March 24, 2011
— Gabriel Malor Alternate headline: Grandstanding fool to roll out red carpet for group of non-stop whiners that face less discrimination and "hate crimes" than several other groups, according to FBI data, including Jews, gays, and (shock!) Caucasians. Maybe that's too long?
Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.) announced Tuesday that he will hold Congress' first-ever hearing on the civil rights of American Muslims next week. The hearing comes a little more than two weeks after a Republican in Congress made headlines by holding a controversial hearing on the radicalization of Muslim Americans.The release announcing the hearing said it is in response to the "pike [sic] in anti-Muslim bigotry in the last year including Quran burnings, restrictions on mosque construction, hate crimes, hate speech, and other forms of discrimination."
As has been noted repeatedly, though few Democrats dare to publicly acknowledge it, discrimination and hate crimes against Jews in the United States exceed same directed at Muslims by an order of magnitude. Sen. Durbin goes on in his statement to jaw about religious freedom and intolerance. If he had an ounce of integrity, he would recognize that "anti-Muslim bigotry" is a fraction of what Jews face. Muslims are just more vocal about it because they've got a friendly audience in Washington.
Democrats have made a fetish of holding the Muslim community's hand. Why such attention paid to Muslim sensibilities? Well, you don't see radical Jews blowing up buildings, shooting our troops, threatening beheadings, and funding terrorism abroad, do you?
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
03:29 AM
| Comments (92)
Post contains 265 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Truman North at March 24, 2011 03:31 AM (8ay4x)
Posted by: Truman North at March 24, 2011 03:33 AM (8ay4x)
Posted by: UGAdawg at March 24, 2011 03:34 AM (/VjHB)
http://tinyurl.com/2fpdgq6
Posted by: Marcus at March 24, 2011 03:35 AM (CHrmZ)
Posted by: hobbes the Oathkeeper at March 24, 2011 03:36 AM (vEL1S)
Posted by: momma at March 24, 2011 03:45 AM (penCf)
Posted by: Jeergan Ogoth Noktyn, Quillian Commander, Milky Way Supsector at March 24, 2011 03:48 AM (MPtFW)
Funny thing, back in the day, when Israelis did things like bomb the King David Hotel, the left couldn't get enough of them. The Weavers had a hit with the kibbutz dance Tzena, Tzena. Once they settled down to a dull old parliamentary democracy, the elite switched sides, virtually mid-rant.
There's a masters thesis in there somewhere, if you could get an adviser to sign on. Long list of colleges where that ain't happening.
Posted by: comatus at March 24, 2011 03:49 AM (W5ilH)
Posted by: Jeergan Ogoth Noktyn, Quillian Commander, Milky Way Subsector at March 24, 2011 03:56 AM (MPtFW)
Is there any way of using Durbin's own hearings to call attention to this?
Is he able to screen out all potential inconvenient witnesses?
Can this fact and the supporting statistics get read into the record, at those hearings, in some way?
Is that even worth looking into?
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2011 04:06 AM (LiuJ9)
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 24, 2011 04:10 AM (Jk7tF)
Posted by: Gmac at March 24, 2011 04:10 AM (+lA0p)
If he does, the irony would be so thick that you could cleave it with a knife. CAIR refuses to denounce Hamas or Hezbollah, and they are in fact unindictated co-conspirators in the Holy Land terrorism case.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at March 24, 2011 04:11 AM (9hSKh)
If he does, the irony would be so thick that you could cleave it with a knife. CAIR refuses to denounce Hamas or Hezbollah, and they are in fact unindictated co-conspirators in the Holy Land terrorism case.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at March 24, 2011 08:11 AM (9hSKh)
Any chance Allen West will be there?...cuz I'd pay money to watch that exchange.
Posted by: Tami at March 24, 2011 04:19 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: Truman North at March 24, 2011 04:20 AM (8ay4x)
That's not their hand...
Just sayin'
Posted by: Nighthawk at March 24, 2011 04:21 AM (RSqz2)
Posted by: Frank G at March 24, 2011 04:22 AM (4X0aT)
The majority of Illinois voters richly deserve this turd.
Posted by: boniface ballers at March 24, 2011 04:34 AM (bPbwB)
Since the Republicans would have a chance to question them, I hope they do (assuming they can locate a suitably-spined Republican to sit on the committee).
Posted by: ef at March 24, 2011 04:36 AM (c7Pp2)
O/T
Just When You Think They Get It
"I suspect that what really grinds Hewitt's critics is his observation that "in this age of new media, instant messaging and Twitter, Tea Party activists across the country have already figured out their No. 1 opponents are not Democrats but GOP appropriators."
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at March 24, 2011 04:43 AM (ZHsNw)
Posted by: andycanuck at March 24, 2011 04:49 AM (/wCSE)
including Jews, gays, and (shock!) Caucasians
Okay, I know it's early in the morning, but the first time I read through that phrase, I swear I thought it said "Jews, gays, and (shock!) Canadians." And I was like, "Really? Canadians? Does this have something to do with their infernal healthcare system?"
I need more sleep.
Senate Subcommittee on The Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights
Democratic Members
Dick Durbin, Illinois (Chairman)
Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont
Sheldon Whitehouse, Rhode Island
Al Franken, Minnesota
Christopher A. Coons, Delaware
Richard Blumenthal, Connecticut
Wow. What a list of shining stars. *rolls eyes* And I call foul on allowing Dick Blumenthal on a committee for Human Rights. A reanimated skeleton wearing a badly stretched skinsuit is not a human.
Posted by: MWR at March 24, 2011 04:49 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Ed at March 24, 2011 04:50 AM (YJH2X)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 24, 2011 04:53 AM (+61wI)
I'd love for these hearings, or any hearings really, to publicly call out the pedophile Prophet. It really doesn't get enough play that 54 year old Mohammad married a 6 year old girl and banged her when she was 9 (gentleman that he was.)
uncomfortable silence...
crickets....
Posted by: Canadian Infidel at March 24, 2011 04:54 AM (GKQDR)
Wow. What a list of shining stars. *rolls eyes* And I call foul on allowing Dick Blumenthal on a committee for Human Rights. A reanimated skeleton wearing a badly stretched skinsuit is not a human.
Posted by: MWR at March 24, 2011 08:49 AM (4df7R)
Hey buddy, you try going through hell in the Vietnamese jungles killing the VC with your bare hands and see how you look...
Posted by: Dick "Rambo" Blumenthal at March 24, 2011 04:59 AM (Rn2kl)
Well, history has shown that the jews will vote for the Dems anyway, so why not pander to the Muslims.
Posted by: Ed at March 24, 2011 04:59 AM (YJH2X)
That's the kicker right there. Durbin is a shameless hack, a headline-grabbing pinhead who would run over his own grandmother twice to get into the news. Easily one of the most despicable people in Congress.
Posted by: Slublog at March 24, 2011 05:00 AM (0nqdj)
The world would be a better place without the likes of the butt dumpling Durbin.
Posted by: maddogg at March 24, 2011 05:07 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 24, 2011 05:08 AM (OW0nw)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 24, 2011 05:11 AM (OW0nw)
Posted by: maddogg at March 24, 2011 05:12 AM (OlN4e)
"Mr. Witness, here is a brief summary from the Justice Department, showing that discrimination and hate crimes against Jews in the United States exceed same directed at Muslims by a factor of [how-ever much]. Is it your position that American Jews and American Muslims share a common cause in the suppression of discrimination and hate crimes, against all Americans? If not, why the fuck not?"
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2011 05:12 AM (LiuJ9)
Anti-Jewish: 931 reported crimes.
Anti-Islamic: 107 reported crimes
Huh. Durbin's full of crap Democrat politician. Go figure.
Posted by: Slublog at March 24, 2011 05:13 AM (0nqdj)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 24, 2011 05:14 AM (TATbF)
"Mr. Witness, here is a list of Muslim-affiliated organizations in the USA detailing their political contributions. Ahem. We can't help but notice that our esteemed colleagues on the Dhemmi side of the aisle are receiving the vast preponderance of these contributions. Does this reflect a prevailing sentiment amongst your religious community that Democrites are, in general, more sympathetic to your very numerous grievances, and more likely to do your bidding in the Congress of these United States? If not, what is all that money supposed to be buying for you?"
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2011 05:17 AM (LiuJ9)
"Mr. Witness from CAIR, on behalf of your organization, would you please spend the next ten minutes, with the cameras rolling, refusing to denounce Hamas and Hezbollah? Please make sure to lay out in detail the grounds on which you refuse to do so."
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2011 05:21 AM (LiuJ9)
This is classic Arab/Muslim use of disinformation to further their goal of global hegemony and imposition of sharia law.
Rep. King had it 100% correct when he held hearings on home-grown Islamic terror. Maybe one of these days, before it is too late, the rest of the country will understand.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 24, 2011 05:24 AM (LH6ir)
You already know what happens, if they do.
Posted by: franksalterego at March 24, 2011 05:25 AM (7/sDI)
"Mr. Witness, would you like to take this opportunity to share with us any briefings or preparatory material that was shared with you, in advance of these hearings, by our esteemed colleague Mr. Durbin and/or his staff? To what extent, that is, has your testimony been collaboratively pre-aligned with these same four tired-ass talking points that he keeps repeating?"
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2011 05:25 AM (LiuJ9)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 24, 2011 05:26 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: alppuccino at March 24, 2011 05:27 AM (LNVqc)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 24, 2011 05:29 AM (g6nyw)
"Mr. Witness from the U.S.Army, you've heard the previous witness, Mr. Andycanuck, state that 'The Republicans should subpoena everyone who promoted Major Nidal Hasan and grill them over it.' According to these records, you personally recommended [...details...]. In your opinion, how many buck-passing imbeciles remain in our armed forces, behaving exactly the way you did? And what do you think should be done about that?"
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2011 05:31 AM (LiuJ9)
"Mr. Witness, please share with us, Al Franken? spitter or swallower?"
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2011 05:33 AM (LiuJ9)
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2011 09:31 AM (LiuJ9)
The problem I have with that is that if anyone HAD raised red flags over Nadal, they would have been roundly criticized or written up for 'lack of diversity understanding' or some such BS.
Posted by: Tami at March 24, 2011 05:35 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: polynikes at March 24, 2011 05:36 AM (yKP4s)
"Mr. Witness, here's a big fat folder full of evidence that the planning and funding for the Mumbai attacks were funneled through Illinois. Here are the points at which your organization were involved in that. Would you explain for the gallery exactly why you personally should leave this room without being under arrest?"
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2011 05:36 AM (LiuJ9)
Posted by: Angry White Male at March 24, 2011 05:36 AM (7cXE7)
"Reverend Farrakhan, please take the next ten minutes, with the cameras rolling, to say whatever the hell comes into your head. Really, the floor's all yours, baby."
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2011 05:38 AM (LiuJ9)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 24, 2011 05:38 AM (g6nyw)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 24, 2011 09:38 AM (g6nyw)
He might have real trouble if he uses an Egypt Air map. Love those "freedom fighters".
Posted by: maddogg at March 24, 2011 05:42 AM (OlN4e)
The Republicrats on that list are not much better. Don't look for any tough questions here folks. But, one must always remember about congrssional committees and "investigations". They are all about grandstanding for the press and since they brought in cameras it has grown worse.
If it were within my power I would eliminate congressional "investigation" committees altogether. And the idea of giving them subpoena power is ludicrous.
Posted by: Vic at March 24, 2011 05:44 AM (M9Ie6)
"Mr. Witness, you've seen prior witness Tami object that 'The problem I have with that is that if anyone HAD raised red flags over Nadal, they would have been roundly criticized or written up for 'lack of diversity understanding' or some such BS. ' Does this state of affairs meet with your approval, and that of your organization? Do you, that is, take pride in the ability of your grievance-mongering pressure group to suppress U.S. military capability and readiness? If not, then why does your organization even exist?"
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2011 05:47 AM (LiuJ9)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 24, 2011 09:38 AM (g6nyw)
He made big booming noises and said, "Point out? I thought you said wipe out." Senator Dickless Dirtbag chuckled in delight
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 24, 2011 05:51 AM (1Jaio)
Is there any group in America that assimilates LESS than muslims do?
It's like granting civil rights to space aliens. We don't understand them, we don't know their intentions, and there is always that feeling that they might be dangerous.
Posted by: Snaphook McMulligan at March 24, 2011 05:57 AM (u2rWt)
Since when is it a concern in America for someone to do what they want with a book? Isn't this a core part of the 1st Amendment?!?
Oh, and you can have hate speech towards an ideology? Really? Good to know that most liberals are intolerant haters towards the tea party...
Posted by: 18-1 at March 24, 2011 06:09 AM (bgcml)
"Mr. Witness, you've seen prior witness Tami object that 'The problem I have with that is that if anyone HAD raised red flags over Nadal, they would have been roundly criticized or written up for 'lack of diversity understanding' or some such BS. ' Does this state of affairs meet with your approval, and that of your organization? Do you, that is, take pride in the ability of your grievance-mongering pressure group to suppress U.S. military capability and readiness? If not, then why does your organization even exist?"
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2011 09:47 AM (LiuJ9)
LOL! You really should get yourself to DC fast and storm that hearing.
Posted by: Tami at March 24, 2011 06:14 AM (VuLos)
A: Statistical outlier.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 24, 2011 09:29 AM (g6nyw)
That was funny! Thanks.
Posted by: Canadian Infidel at March 24, 2011 06:19 AM (GKQDR)
Posted by: huerfano at March 24, 2011 06:28 AM (2pEj7)
Posted by: senator imightfind someballs (R) at March 24, 2011 06:34 AM (/wCSE)
A: A whore!!!111!! Stone her!!!11!!!
Posted by: witness imam fundraising for the ground zero victory mosque at March 24, 2011 06:36 AM (/wCSE)
This was probably a stupid move by Dick.
I don't think the country is going to buy it (at least the ones who would already have), and it keeps the delightful RORIP in the news (not that it doesn't manage to keep itself there all on its own). The more people try to defend these jackwagons while they go around chopping off heads and blowing shit up, the more people are getting po'd. I think this will backfire on Dick...couldn't happen to a better guy.
Dick thinks he can cultivate a new voting bloc for himself, and he's getting sweet money love from certain Islamic groups...so of course he's going to give them tongue baths and just about anything else they want.
It also keeps his not so great economic recovery ideas out of the hometown papers.
Too bad the prick isn't up for re-election sooner.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 24, 2011 06:37 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 24, 2011 06:40 AM (Jk7tF)
Well, the Muslims in this country made such a big freaking stink, protesting and all during the radical muzz hearings -- why not do the same in the opposite direction for Dick's carnival sideshow?
The theme could be "it's not a phobia when they're really trying to kill us"...the msm wouldn't run with it, but nothing says the bloggers couldn't.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 24, 2011 06:44 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Rocks at March 24, 2011 06:46 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Jeff Carter at March 24, 2011 06:48 AM (C2sFS)
Posted by: Jeff Carter at Marh 24, 2011 10:48 AM (C2sFS)
By here you mean in the US? Some surveys say as many as 3 times as many Jews as Muslims but others say closer but they are old. At this point I would say they are about the same or slightly more Muslims.
Posted by: Rocks at March 24, 2011 06:56 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 24, 2011 06:57 AM (U9jjw)
Posted by: Schwalbe : The © at March 24, 2011 07:01 AM (UU0OF)
Hey Dick, who wants to chop off our heads and rule us under Sharia law?
Dickhead : I think we may need to look at the Cub Scouts.
Posted by: Sparky at March 24, 2011 07:03 AM (NjXSJ)
"Mr. Witness, you'll notice from the fistfight breaking out in the corner of the room that prior witnesses Jeff Carter, Rocks, and Empire of Jeff have some issues with the earlier statistical analysis regarding the ratio of hate crimes per population size. Can you take this opportunity to clarify your estimates of the relative sizes of the U.S Jewish and U.S.Muslim populations, and on the numerical levels of the hate crimes being directed at each? At this point, additional anecdotal evidence would also be welcome, at least until we wait for the U.S.Marshals to pry those three apart."
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at March 24, 2011 07:11 AM (LiuJ9)
Saw a CNN commercial making this an issue of Freedom of religion v. fear of terror.
Islam kills apostates, blasphemers, dishonorable women, and so on. This is accepted sharia law.
So it's more accurately termed freedom of religion v. a religion which opposes freedom of religion and all our basic post-Enlightenment freedoms. Hell, many Muslims reject the Treaty of Westphalia.
Durbin is a contemptible piece of treasonous excrement.
Posted by: Beagle at March 24, 2011 11:33 AM (sOtz/)
Well that's just what it is, man, because if you don't have the freedom to impose your religion on the unwilling, then, like, in what sense are you truly free?
Posted by: Hippie at the bus stop at March 24, 2011 12:03 PM (LiuJ9)
Your ability to exercise your rights will come to an end when your actions, methods, or pattern of behavior appears TO ME to be on a collision course with my life, liberty, or pursuit of happiness. I PERSONALLY will bring to an end any and all efforts on your part to continue on this course.
More concisely:
Your rights stop where they encounter mine.
OR
as we say in Tejas:
Come and take it.
Posted by: Blacksmith8 at March 24, 2011 01:54 PM (Q1qy3)
Posted by: DaveO at March 24, 2011 04:19 PM (AkfCX)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2049 seconds, 220 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Marcus at March 24, 2011 03:30 AM (CHrmZ)