June 16, 2011
— rdbrewer At Hot Air:
YesterdayÂ’s vote failed for procedural reasons but they cleaned it up today and nailed down a remarkably bipartisan consensus. Eyeball the roll: 38 Democrats, 33 Republicans, and both independents voted yes, with no votes coming mainly from plains-states senators eager to keep the campaign cash flowing. When youÂ’ve got both senators from California and both senators from Oklahoma on the same side of an issue, youÂ’re working magic, my friends.
While it ends subsidies, it does nothing to end laws mandating minimum ethanol use. But it's a start. Allahpundit has more.
You think Romney will protest this bi-partisan travesty?

BEFORE AFTER
Posted by: rdbrewer at
02:11 PM
| Comments (106)
Post contains 116 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at June 16, 2011 02:13 PM (jx2j9)
On the heels of this news:
After 2 months of quiet, Gaza militants fire rocket into Israel; No injuries or damage - @Jerusalem_Post http://bit.ly/jZmrpP
Beginning of a Third Intifada?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 16, 2011 02:15 PM (c0A3e)
This seems ass backwards.
Posted by: toby928™ at June 16, 2011 02:16 PM (GTbGH)
Beginning of a Third Intifada?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 16, 2011 06:15 PM (c0A3e)
I may have jumped the gun though there have been rockets fired in Israel. The cause of the explosion in the cafe is not known yet.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at June 16, 2011 02:17 PM (jx2j9)
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at June 16, 2011 02:19 PM (pdRb1)
Posted by: JayBee at June 16, 2011 02:24 PM (kX5hh)
Posted by: rdbrewer at June 16, 2011 02:24 PM (jaxDa)
Posted by: t-bird at June 16, 2011 02:24 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: High as an Elephant's Eye at June 16, 2011 02:25 PM (FUozQ)
I'm pleased but I'm not exactly ecstatic.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at June 16, 2011 02:27 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: PaleRider at June 16, 2011 02:29 PM (dkExz)
That'll buy them... oh, 47 seconds of good will from me.
Starting...
...
...
...
NOW!
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 16, 2011 02:30 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: PaleRider at June 16, 2011 02:31 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: rdbrewer at June 16, 2011 02:32 PM (jaxDa)
Posted by: t-bird at June 16, 2011 02:33 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: w at June 16, 2011 02:34 PM (qc5aI)
"jack daniels is not made with corn thank you"
Ummm...really?
Wanna explain what it is made with? (this should be good)
Posted by: gebrauchshund at June 16, 2011 02:34 PM (iYwUw)
Posted by: t-bird at June 16, 2011 02:34 PM (FcR7P)
He sees the ending of a tax credit as a tax increase that needs to be offset with a spending cut.
Posted by: Valiant at June 16, 2011 02:35 PM (9/lhd)
Einstein was right: There is at least one universal constant.
This vote represents a baby step on the way to a coherent energy policy. However, we need to be eternally vigilant about the swithgrass menace as well.
P.S.: I guess I missed all the fireworks over the last couple of days. I am always amazed that some forget that the Head Ewok is the Head Ewok.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at June 16, 2011 02:36 PM (lVC9m)
Posted by: Joe Biden at June 16, 2011 02:37 PM (kUaEF)
That's a nice surprise.
Hopefully laws mandating minimum ethanol use will just fall by the wayside. Without subsidies, how are many of these ethanol companies will be able to stay in business? And when they start falling, if you can't meet the minimum standards, you can't meet the standards.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at June 16, 2011 02:37 PM (GKQDR)
Look at the fuzzy little guy. How cute!
Posted by: Imperial Stormtrooper about to die at June 16, 2011 02:38 PM (SwkdU)
Posted by: Valiant at June 16, 2011 06:35 PM
No, corn production is both subsidized and given tax credits. They're just ending the subsidies, from what I understand.
Posted by: rdbrewer at June 16, 2011 02:38 PM (jaxDa)
I believe what you have there is known as a "conceptual error."
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at June 16, 2011 02:38 PM (lVC9m)
Jack Daniels is food?
Posted by: t-bird at June 16, 2011 06:24 PM
WTF? Why aren't you drinking Valu-Rite?
Posted by: arhooley at June 16, 2011 02:40 PM (ZoJc5)
Establishment Republican Mitt Rockefeller inserts ethanol in mouth.
Establishment Republican Party Leadership to the rescue.
/"I question the timing"...(that was the running line here once.)
Posted by: maverick muse at June 16, 2011 02:41 PM (lpWVn)
Posted by: nickless at June 16, 2011 02:41 PM (MMC8r)
Has the House already passed this? Oh, and the Dems line on this now is that Repubs are FOR tax increases now.
Posted by: Vic at June 16, 2011 02:44 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: PaleRider at June 16, 2011 02:45 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: Snuffy Smith at June 16, 2011 02:47 PM (Ng9kQ)
It'll probably do both. It's a step in the right direction, but without completing the next step (ditching the mandate), it'll be bad in the long run.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 16, 2011 02:50 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: arhooley at June 16, 2011 06:40 PM (ZoJc5)
Indeed! Valu-Rite is a rare example of vodka distilled from fermented hobo sweat, aged in particle-board casks and infused with anti-freeze for flavor and a subtle hint of sweetness.
It's known to provide a quick and enjoyable buzz but the aficionado should be warned: Overconsumption usually leads to embarrassing displays of lewd conduct and/or gutter sleeping.
Posted by: ErikW at June 16, 2011 02:51 PM (T9cS4)
Something's afoot.
In the same day the Party of Immorality casts off one of their own for immoral behavior AND gives up one of the legs of their precious Cap'n Trade Energy Hoax that is meant to enslave us all. What's next, they going to annouce they made a mistake with Obamacare?
These people do nothing that is not calculated. My first thought is that their internal polling numbers shows them that they are going to get their arses handed to them so bad next year at the polls that it will make Sherman's march to the sea look like an Adopt a Highway clean-up brigade.
Posted by: 57 states at June 16, 2011 02:53 PM (sMgrb)
Instead of the taxpayer paying for it in taxes (or, more accurately, borrowing from the Chinese), the taxpayer pays for it at the pump. The problem remains - consumers are forced to buy shit no sane person wants or needs.
Posted by: Waterhouse at June 16, 2011 02:55 PM (N7UT7)
Seriously, though, ethanol is a major problem in boats, and there is no change in the NC regulation that specifies that no service station need notify customers of ethanol content unless it exceeds 10% by volume.
The issue is that ethanol content is difficult to control, and it breaks down in a matter of a few months into water. That's an issue in cars, but a far bigger problem in a boat engine. Mechanics here on the NC coast are flooded, if you will, with broken down motors due to ethanol. My own mechanic told me recently of a guy who filled his tank with what was ultimately determined to be 25% water, at 4 bucks a gallon.
Posted by: Wodeshed at June 16, 2011 02:56 PM (LEcV+)
"Speaking on the House floor, Cantor outlined next week's House schedule, which he said could include 'potential legislation related to the ongoing military conflict in Libya.'"
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 16, 2011 02:57 PM (ITYRW)
Even more shocking is that Babs supported her.
Blind squirrels, nuts, yada, yada, yada.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at June 16, 2011 03:00 PM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: PaleRider at June 16, 2011 03:00 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: w at June 16, 2011 03:00 PM (qc5aI)
Thanks for the tip. I've got a line on a marina here; one out of five locally being the only one with pure gas.
Posted by: Wodeshed at June 16, 2011 03:02 PM (LEcV+)
Posted by: PaleRider at June 16, 2011 03:03 PM (dkExz)
I agree with Coburn, end the payout to ME interests and develop our own energy resources and economy.
I was gonna say kick them off the teat.
Posted by: SomeWhereSouthWest at June 16, 2011 03:03 PM (CyPWX)
Now for them to get the ball rolling on a bunch of other things that would actually be helpful.
Posted by: ArcadeHero at June 16, 2011 03:11 PM (mmHDH)
He chuckled. The eight people gathered around him, who had just finished talking about strategies of finding employment in a slow-to-recover economy, joined him in laughter.
"Are you on LinkedIn?" one of the men asked.
"I'm networking," Mr. Romney replied. "I have my sight on a particular job."
Sorry...but I'm sitting this one out if this fucking idiot gets the nom
Posted by: beedubya at June 16, 2011 03:11 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: MikeinSC at June 16, 2011 03:12 PM (s6GzQ)
Jack Daniel's isn't just whiskey, it's Tennessee Whiskey. Not quite bourbon whiskey but damn fine tasting.
Posted by: lowandslow at June 16, 2011 03:13 PM (GZitp)
Naming states square or squiggly is surely a step up from the name for Florida, the flaccid penis state with one ball!
It's because of all the dicks that moved here from New York and New Jersey.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at June 16, 2011 03:15 PM (cwFVA)
Posted by: Cornholio at June 16, 2011 03:15 PM (CYoZS)
We have two weed eaters that simultaneously bit the dust, wouldn't feed the gas. The power tool guys said that it is likely caused by ethonol 10 in the gas.
If you put Stabil in the gas, as we do for overwintering the gas in such equipment, the ethanol 10 reacts with the Stabil to produce a paste, which then clogs the carborater. Stabil has a new product that solves the problem caused by gas w/ higher ethanol percentages.
Don't be a victim.
Posted by: Derak at June 16, 2011 03:19 PM (CjpKH)
Alvin Greene with a extra E looks more promising every day after witnessing some of our starters leaving the gate. A couple of gimps, a wussie, a two-timer, a serial adulterer, and a chick that sends shivers down the dicks of most liberal women.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at June 16, 2011 03:20 PM (cwFVA)
Were the minimums just nonsense arguments. Lower Oil use & less CO2?
Or was part of it actual pollutants CO, Nwhatever. Any car/chemistry folks to put us some octane knowledge.
Posted by: Dave at June 16, 2011 03:29 PM (BUfoO)
Posted by: Crispian at June 16, 2011 03:38 PM (ULTcD)
Posted by: Da Prog! at June 16, 2011 03:45 PM (ijjAe)
I think this is just a lot of Congressional Kabuki. I expect Barry to veto it for some idiot reason. Then Congress will say that they can't get an override as it stands so they "have to compromise". Which, in the end, will mean that functionally the subsidy/tax break will remain, cheap cane alcohol from Brazil will still be tariffed to a value ADM and Cenex like, and the mandates will remain.
I guess I've just gone completely over to the cynical (dark) side.
Posted by: chuck in st paul at June 16, 2011 03:49 PM (EhYdw)
Posted by: the dandy at June 16, 2011 03:53 PM (1h53u)
Posted by: Crispian at June 16, 2011 03:56 PM (ULTcD)
Yeah, everyone around here uses the blue Stabil, for ethanol treatment. Doesn't do shit if it has already gone to water in the station's tank.
Posted by: Wodeshed at June 16, 2011 04:09 PM (LEcV+)
Posted by: Rob in Katy at June 16, 2011 04:12 PM (PiTBB)
Posted by: rdbrewer at June 16, 2011 06:32 PM (jaxDa)
RINO establishment Rove clone paying back his buds.
It is obvious that all alternative energy subsidies need to end!
Posted by: Hrothgar at June 16, 2011 04:12 PM (yrGif)
Posted by: Damiano at June 16, 2011 04:15 PM (3nrx7)
Posted by: SFGoth at June 16, 2011 04:23 PM (dZ756)
Lots of callers with examples of EPA and putting the blame on Obama, with the host finally saying that he wonders why Obama is cutting the legs out from under the miners who supported him.
I chimed in with my standard examples of Gulf oil being shut down while Brazil got help to drill, and coal mines here shutting while they mine like gangbusters in southeast Asia.
Also put in the "Obama sees himself as the avenger for the Third World" theory.
Posted by: Miss Marple at June 16, 2011 05:25 PM (Fo83G)
Posted by: Miss Marple at June 16, 2011 05:26 PM (Fo83G)
Posted by: Peaches at June 16, 2011 05:29 PM (afUO8)
While it ends subsidies, it does nothing to end laws mandating minimum ethanol use.
So that will make gas prices go down, huh? No?
Posted by: kansas at June 16, 2011 05:38 PM (nNgbi)
You guys are so far behind the political curve on this. All of the major ethanol lobbies, and the farm state Senators support the Thune/Klobuchar Bill that . . . . ends the VEETC ($0.45/gal subsidy for ethanol.) This amendment (to a bill that's unlikely to pass) is just a "place-holder" for that bill.
This subsidy is for the Blenders (re: oil companies.) The farmers, and biorefineries have never benefitted from the VEETC, and they are, quite frankly, tired of taking heat for something from which they derive virtually no benefit.
<a href="http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/synopsis.aspx?id=1160">This Academic Study</a> found that the presence of the 900,000 bbl/day of ethanol in the market reduced the price of a gallon of gasoline last year by $0.89. We use about 135 Billion Gallons/Yr. You do the math.
Posted by: Rufus at June 16, 2011 07:00 PM (J+D+J)
1) None of you have ever eaten an ear of field corn in your life
2) The Tariffs on Foreign ethanol are lifted.
3) Jim Cramer, notwithstanding, it doesn't matter; Corn ethanol costs less than Brazilian Cane ethanol (we've been Exporting Corn ethanol to Brazil for over a year.)
Posted by: Rufus at June 16, 2011 07:58 PM (J+D+J)
If food prices are so high due to a shortage of these grain commodities, such that the 3rd world can't afford imports of this stuff, can't our farmers make a decent return now growing... food?
Posted by: Bruce at June 16, 2011 09:41 PM (git57)
Rufus, we don't eat feild corn but cattle do. And we eat cattle.
I think that cute little Corny Mitt will help him win the Iowa Caucus... you should put it on a billboard.
Posted by: petunia at June 16, 2011 10:35 PM (9OZkG)
Field Corn is cattle feed. We've never exported field corn, in much quantity, to the 3rd world. We mostly export corn to Japan, Korea, etc. to feed their cattle, which are in turn eaten by their Rich.
In fact, the largest percentage, by far, of the world's malnourished are subsistence farmers. They can raise corn, but, due to the fact that our Subsidized corn was always so cheap, they couldn't afford to raise it to sell (and, human beings can only eat so much of the danged stuff.)
Anyway, no cash crop, no money to buy vegetables, fruits, edible grains, etc. Only with the higher prices of the last couple of years (about $0.08/lb on average,) have the poor Africans been able to make a few bucks raising the stuff.
All isn't as it seems when you get into the International "save the world" bizness.
Posted by: Rufus at June 17, 2011 03:45 AM (J+D+J)
It's time for real ethanol subsidies. I want a government check to buy me some more Valu-rite.
Posted by: Roy at June 17, 2011 05:55 AM (VndSC)
2) I work nights and live close to work so I drive exactly the same route every day and there is not much to do after work so not much driving around
3) ALL of my shopping is between work and home
4) when I was using ethanol blend I filled my 20 gal gas tank up every 4 weeks
5) since I switched to straight gas I fill that same tank up every 5 to 6 weeks
Exactly WHY are we subsidizing ethanol????
Posted by: Dan Kauffman at June 17, 2011 06:10 AM (9cQgS)
Posted by: Dan Kauffman at June 17, 2011 06:11 AM (9cQgS)
You pick it while immature cut it off the cob and fry it.
never much like the taste though
Posted by: Dan Kauffman at June 17, 2011 06:14 AM (9cQgS)
Dan, they've done some Serious Scientific Studies on this. You should give up about 1.5% mpg with E10. So, a difference of $0.06/gal between E10, and straight gas should cover that. However, having said that, there are so many things that can greatly influence gas mileage that it gets very difficult in the real world to distinguish differences that small. Weather (winter vs summer - dry vs wet) is the first thing that comes to mind. Also, a lot of times a certain amount of self-fulfilling prophesizing starts to affect driving habits.
Anyway, we saw the difference when 1.2 million bbl/day of Libyan crude came off the market. What would be the effect of 1.8 million bbl/day of ethanol coming off the global market? Also to consider: As more higher compression/efficient engines hit the market the differences between alcohol, and gasoline mpg will shrink. Ex. The Buick Regal 2.0 comes in somewhere between 5 and 10% difference in mileage between E85 and gasoline (with considerably more power running the ethanol blend.)
Posted by: Rufus at June 17, 2011 07:00 AM (J+D+J)
@Rufus I think there are a lot of variables, I am lucky I live about 2 miles from work and like I said I work nights and don't drink so I drive to and from during the week. I sometimes drive 4 blocks from my house to a very large grocery store that has every thing I need including the odd and ends of hardware, on Saturday Night I do meet with some political friends a few blocks from where I work again 2 miles Sunday I go to a meeting visit friends total round trip 10 miles? My habits and life may seem boring to some but they are VERY regular and my 21 year old 1990 Dodge Caravan now uses about 20 gals every 5 to 6 weeks before every 4 weeks so for ME the savings were a lot more than 1.5%
Actually right now times are tight and I don't fill the tank up any more I put some weeks $10 about 3 gals worth and some weeks $15 about 4 gals worth usually on Fiday like I did today,
You do the math.
As for the newer more effficient cars? They cost a lot LOL I will stick with my clunker. Why would I want to shell out all that money, raise my taxes and insurance just to lose the 25% greater mpg I get now with regular gas???
Posted by: Dan Kauffman at June 17, 2011 04:08 PM (K6mgj)
Posted by: soccer cleats at June 26, 2011 09:53 PM (ESwwK)
Posted by: Philadelphia Phillies Jersey at July 09, 2011 09:55 PM (dwhLX)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3441 seconds, 234 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.






YesterdayÂ’s vote failed for procedural reasons but they cleaned it up today and nailed down a remarkably bipartisan consensus. Eyeball the roll: 38 Democrats, 33 Republicans, and both independents voted yes, with no votes coming mainly from plains-states senators eager to keep the campaign cash flowing. When youÂ’ve got both senators from California and both senators from Oklahoma on the same side of an issue, youÂ’re working magic, my friends.

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at June 16, 2011 02:12 PM (jx2j9)