February 08, 2011
— Ace Don't mock him. He's speaking heresy.
[T]he most talked-about speech at this year’s meeting, which ended Jan. 30, involved a new “outgroup.”It was identified by Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist at the University of Virginia who studies the intuitive foundations of morality and ideology. He polled his audience at the San Antonio Convention Center, starting by asking how many considered themselves politically liberal. A sea of hands appeared, and Dr. Haidt estimated that liberals made up 80 percent of the 1,000 psychologists in the ballroom. When he asked for centrists and libertarians, he spotted fewer than three dozen hands. And then, when he asked for conservatives, he counted a grand total of three.
“This is a statistically impossible lack of diversity,” Dr. Haidt concluded, noting polls showing that 40 percent of Americans are conservative and 20 percent are liberal. In his speech and in an interview, Dr. Haidt argued that social psychologists are a “tribal-moral community” united by “sacred values” that hinder research and damage their credibility — and blind them to the hostile climate they’ve created for non-liberals.
“Anywhere in the world that social psychologists see women or minorities underrepresented by a factor of two or three, our minds jump to discrimination as the explanation,” said Dr. Haidt, who called himself a longtime liberal turned centrist. “But when we find out that conservatives are underrepresented among us by a factor of more than 100, suddenly everyone finds it quite easy to generate alternate explanations.”
A little somethin'-somethin' for the New York Times to chew on:
“If a group circles around sacred values, they will evolve into a tribal-moral community,” he said. “They’ll embrace science whenever it supports their sacred values, but they’ll ditch it or distort it as soon as it threatens a sacred value.”
The professor started looking into the matter when several colleagues wrote that they had to falsify their political beliefs in order to avoid discrimination.
Thanks to Charlie Brown's Dildo.
Posted by: Ace at
07:15 AM
| Comments (174)
Post contains 348 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2011 07:19 AM (TMTBg)
Posted by: huerfano at February 08, 2011 07:20 AM (2pEj7)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 08, 2011 07:20 AM (8y9MW)
Who were promptly led away to the killing fields.
Posted by: pep at February 08, 2011 07:20 AM (3ll0O)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 08, 2011 07:20 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: MBM at February 08, 2011 07:21 AM (3ll0O)
Posted by: Fritz at February 08, 2011 07:21 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 08, 2011 07:23 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: typical scientist at February 08, 2011 07:23 AM (xdHzq)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2011 07:23 AM (TMTBg)
Posted by: casiokid at February 08, 2011 07:24 AM (V+ip+)
Unfortunately, conservatives ignoring psychiatry has caused a lot of the problems our society now endures.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 08, 2011 07:26 AM (TpXEI)
Posted by: tadcf at February 08, 2011 07:27 AM (2mull)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2011 07:27 AM (TMTBg)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 08, 2011 07:27 AM (UlUS4)
They're so blind to the possibility that another academic might not agree with them that they simply cannot contain themselves and STFU. My first job interview (faculty job) was littered with partisan political statements and inappropriate questions. I probably could have sued the asshole running the search. And every single faculty meeting I suffered through invariably had some asinine partisan politics injected into it. I cannot fathom how hard it must be in the humanities and social "sciences" -- it was bad enough in a hard science.
Posted by: Y-not at February 08, 2011 07:28 AM (pW2o8)
It's an eye opener.
Posted by: GnuBreed at February 08, 2011 07:28 AM (bvXGR)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2011 11:27 AM (TMTBg)
Yeah, it's even worse.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 08, 2011 07:28 AM (TpXEI)
Posted by: Kensington at February 08, 2011 07:29 AM (mEyVv)
Posted by: cali grump at February 08, 2011 07:29 AM (hL0k8)
I avoided discrimination by not logging onto the NYT web page.
Posted by: Follower of Cthulhu at February 08, 2011 07:30 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: Peppermint Patty at February 08, 2011 07:30 AM (mEyVv)
Have no fear! Olby will straighten it all out on Al Gore TV
NEW YORK — Keith Olbermann, who last month abruptly left his MSNBC talk show, is headed to the Current TV public-affairs channel.
Current announced Tuesday that Olbermann will host a nightly prime-time news and commentary show. His program will begin later this year.
Olbermann will also serve as chief news officer and have an equity stake in Current Media, the network led by former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and businessman Joel Hyatt.
Current is now revamping its little-seen schedule. The addition of Olbermann could raise its profile among viewers.
Yes, with this move they can go from 2 to 4 viewers
Posted by: TheQuietMan at February 08, 2011 07:30 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: toby928™: Free nickless the still-banned (99.174.64.43) at February 08, 2011 07:30 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 08, 2011 07:30 AM (8y9MW)
Sociologists and psychologist are generally uptight progs who look at the world through an exclusively emotional lens.
Conservatives like to get beyond all the psycho-babble, and tackle life with the practical.
This is why so many people on the left are on anti-depressant drugs. They actually think the government should make life perfect and that happiness is something they should feel 100% of the time. They have no mechanism in place to deal with depression and hardship. Take a pill, raise a tax, pass a bill, blame the evil “other”, kill off evil "corporations" and life will be perfect. My psychologist told me so.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at February 08, 2011 07:31 AM (0fzsA)
A little somethin'-somethin' for the New York Times to chew on:
I got somethin' for the NYT to chew on, and it's not a thought....
Posted by: maddogg at February 08, 2011 07:31 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2011 07:32 AM (TMTBg)
Yes, firings can be quite abrupt.
Posted by: toby928™: Free nickless the still-banned (99.174.64.43) at February 08, 2011 07:33 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: cali grump at February 08, 2011 07:33 AM (hL0k8)
Posted by: Chakra Khan at February 08, 2011 07:34 AM (GwPRU)
It's not just faculty. Liberals/leftists in general do this in mixed company all the time. They just cannot comprehend that someone else would possibly disagree with them, the enlightened ones. They can't help themselves.
Posted by: grognard at February 08, 2011 07:34 AM (NS2Mo)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at February 08, 2011 07:34 AM (2JVsM)
12 that 7 inches of new snow outside is warming the planet.
Posted by: typical scientist at February 08, 2011 11:23 AM (xdHzq)
Global warming sure works fast......
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 08, 2011 07:35 AM (TAjuH)
Posted by: Iblis at February 08, 2011 07:35 AM (hLGVM)
when he asked for conservatives, he counted a grand total of three.
They were awarded a yellow star emblem to wear.
I'm pretty confident that among social psychologists, liberal Jews if not a majority, were a large minority. I also find it odd that social psychologists have so little introspection into their own psychology. The pattern of thought of their own "tribe" should have been obvious to them.
Posted by: Speller at February 08, 2011 07:37 AM (J74Py)
It might be heresy to say it but blog communities turn into social-moral communities. Look at leftists blogs. They are universally supportive of science that supports their notions of the way that they think. Dissention is not tolerated. Now the hard part, look at the conservative blogs, the same thing but less vicious.
You'll see the same thing with non-political topics. I visit a cruising forum where people have their favorite lines and ships and they are vigorously defended. Critical opinions are attacked and positive comments are fawned over. It's natural, we just try to keep it polite.
Posted by: Max Entropy at February 08, 2011 07:38 AM (lH6z9)
Posted by: Cherry π at February 08, 2011 07:39 AM (+sBB4)
Posted by: Current TV, aMessNBCBSABTV affiliate at February 08, 2011 07:39 AM (93Qr2)
It is not just academia. We ceded the centers of culture to them and we wonder why we have been loosing the culture war for the last 40 years. They own the music business, the movie business, most of TV, and Education. Our only saving grace is talk radio.
Posted by: Holger at February 08, 2011 07:39 AM (YxGud)
And exactly how well can you describe the back of your own hand?
Really, most people are very blind to that with which they are most familiar.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 08, 2011 07:39 AM (8y9MW)
The question Dr. Haidt asked was for a show of hands of who was liberal, libertarian, and conservative.
But what his audience heard was: who is "normal", "fringe", and "ignorant". Most of these learned people have never given their core beliefs any more thought than that, having always lived in an environment that would punish them for coming up with the wrong answer.
It's like how my SIL loves to call me a Nazi when I disagree with her. I finally pointed out to her that, on the contrary, in Nazi Germany she would have certainly been one among the thousands of starry-eyed fraulein lining the streets, throwing rose petals as the Great Leader drove by... and I would be waiting to be hanged.
I could tell from the look that flashed across her face that she too knew it was true, but she recovered her smug composure quickly, and I am sure she has put that brief instant of accidental clarity out of her mind by now.
Posted by: sherlock at February 08, 2011 07:41 AM (TQbuA)
16 Not rocket science. People who are conservative generally tend to think of psychiatry as crap, so very few conservatives go into it.
Unfortunately, conservatives ignoring psychiatry has caused a lot of the problems our society now endures
That's why R. Lee Ermey's "Mamby-Pamby land" commercial for Geico is so hilarious. All good humor is rooted in the truth.
Posted by: Max Entropy at February 08, 2011 07:41 AM (lH6z9)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 08, 2011 07:42 AM (0GFWk)
I asked 'Well what is going to happen to those people that we can't reeducate - that are die hard capitalist?' And the reply was that they'd have to be eliminated. And when I pursued this further they estimated they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these reeducation centers. And when I say eliminate I mean kill . . . 25 million people."
There goes that damned snowbilly with the eliminationist rhetoric again.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 08, 2011 07:42 AM (TAjuH)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2011 07:42 AM (TMTBg)
Posted by: t-bird at February 08, 2011 07:42 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: t-bird at February 08, 2011 07:43 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: cali grump at February 08, 2011 07:44 AM (hL0k8)
Skunk Napolitano is declaring the borders to be secure?
Who ya gonna believe? Me or your lyin' eyes?
Posted by: Big Sis at February 08, 2011 07:44 AM (TAjuH)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2011 07:44 AM (TMTBg)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 08, 2011 07:44 AM (0GFWk)
This is why so many people on the left are on
anti-depressant drugs. They actually think the government should make
life perfect and that happiness is something they should feel 100% of
the time. They have no mechanism in place to deal with depression and
hardship. Take a pill, raise a tax, pass a bill, blame the evil
“other”, kill off evil "corporations" and life will be perfect.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at February 08, 2011 11:31 AM (0fzsA)
Yes, yes, a thousand times, yes!
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at February 08, 2011 07:45 AM (PLvLS)
We Conservatives are so inept when it comes to the culture war. We are just now understanding it.
Posted by: Holger at February 08, 2011 07:45 AM (YxGud)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 08, 2011 07:45 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 08, 2011 07:46 AM (0GFWk)
My comment was in response to a "how come they don't see it in themselves" question. And, despite your own self-awareness, most people are actually very blind to themselves.
I wish it weren't true, but it is. I would say it is even true of many Conservatives: people who are Conservative by habit and rearing, but haven't given their beliefs any form of critical review.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 08, 2011 07:46 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2011 07:46 AM (TMTBg)
Posted by: MWR at February 08, 2011 07:47 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 08, 2011 07:47 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2011 07:47 AM (TMTBg)
We Conservatives are so inept when it comes to the culture war. We are just now understanding it.
Yup. It's not all politics and winning elections.
Pragmatists are trying to conform to the culture as it is, in order to get elected.
The real winners are changing the culture itself, out from under them. Doesn't matter who gets elected.
Posted by: Entropy at February 08, 2011 07:48 AM (IsLT6)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2011 07:48 AM (TMTBg)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2011 11:37 AM (TMTBg)
Serves him right for singing with 1,000 shrinks in a bathroom.
Posted by: . at February 08, 2011 07:48 AM (93Qr2)
Psychiatry and social psychology are not the same thing. Psychiatry deals with mental health, social psychology analyses the behaviour of groups.
Social psychology is a useful political/economic tool. By it's nature, social psychology would be more interesting to people who want to control/direct large masses of people in a certain direction.
Posted by: Speller at February 08, 2011 07:49 AM (J74Py)
Actually, I think many of them voted for McCain, or stayed home.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 08, 2011 07:50 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Mr Running Hobo at February 08, 2011 07:50 AM (l1oyw)
the benefits can't just translate into greater profits and bonuses for those at the top. They should be shared by American worker
Does this mean that Arianna will be sharing the $315 million with the thousands of her bloggers that wrote for free?
Posted by: Cherry π at February 08, 2011 07:50 AM (+sBB4)
Yeah, I'd like to chime in. I don't think we accomplish much by making sweeping statements about who is in therapy or on meds or who pursues psychology or psychiatry as careers, for that matter. My dad is as conservative as they come and he spent his career working as a psychiatric social worker, mostly with juveniles and criminals. Now it's certainly true that he faced discrimination in the workplace because of his political beliefs, I'm not contesting that, but I think it's counter-productive to suggest that there is no value in psychology or psychiatry.
Posted by: Y-not at February 08, 2011 07:50 AM (pW2o8)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2011 11:46 AM (TMTBg)
There are also many more people who are medicated and don't really need to be.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 08, 2011 07:50 AM (TpXEI)
Ugh, Academia. Local State U. had a meeting last night to "discuss" all the vote fraud that's been going on at the campus polling station. Commuter kids registering dorm addresses the day of the election, etc.
Of course, the few Republicans in attendance were largely shouted down. This is the same school that "accidentally" sent out 6,000+ e-mails encouraging all recipients to vote Democrat. Anyone imagine the consequences if an NCAA program "accidentally" committed 6,000 violations? They'd be shut down. But that's sports, this is just the Democratic process.
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 08, 2011 07:51 AM (xMT+4)
Posted by: shmoe at February 08, 2011 07:53 AM (xs5wK)
Ahem!
I give you the Hammer.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at February 08, 2011 07:54 AM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2011 07:54 AM (TMTBg)
Posted by: Cherry π at February 08, 2011 07:54 AM (+sBB4)
Posted by: huerfano at February 08, 2011 11:20 AM (2pEj7)
The social scientific method:
Identify a desirable political outcome.
Develop a hypothesis based on that outcome that purports to explain human behavior.
Collect and cull data that would support the hypothesis.
If the data does not support the hypothesis, then there is a flaw in...the data and new data must be collected.
See also Science, Climate.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 08, 2011 07:55 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Cherry π at February 08, 2011 11:54 AM (+sBB4)
We got rid of the asylums back in the 60's or 70's. Remember?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 08, 2011 07:55 AM (8y9MW)
I am not saying that what they do is useless. I am saying that what they do is easy.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 08, 2011 07:56 AM (T0NGe)
Pay no attention to that Journolist thing, or East Anglia, or the MFM instantaneous groupthink...
Posted by: Blackford Oakes at February 08, 2011 07:58 AM (EAtJr)
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 08, 2011 07:58 AM (N49h9)
No value is perhaps an extreme statement, but minimal value is certainly true. I would liken them to medieval Plague Doctors - some things work, most things don't.
What probably works in psychology is for someone with marginal problems to go in and find someone willing to listen and offer impartial advice.
What probably works in psychiatry is for people to prescribe treatments with a history of working to people with mental problems.
Absent from all of this are the silly ideas (subconscious, hierarchy of needs, etc) which psychology is based on, and which influences everything from education to what we consider aberrant behavior.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 08, 2011 07:59 AM (TpXEI)
I'm not an academic but I've noticed this in all sorts of other odd contexts. It must be some kind of insecurity, yes? They've just got to be validated all the time. Which tells you something.
Posted by: jeannie at February 08, 2011 07:59 AM (GdalM)
"I am not saying that what they do is useless. I am saying that what they do is easy."
How does that make you feel?
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 08, 2011 08:01 AM (xMT+4)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 08, 2011 11:51 AM (xMT+4)
Unless, of course, they are playing in the BcS nat'l champ game. In that case, they blame it all on the dad and sweep everything else under the rug.
Posted by: Hedgehog at February 08, 2011 08:01 AM (Rn2kl)
Posted by: toby928™: Free nickless the still-banned (99.174.64.43) at February 08, 2011 08:02 AM (GTbGH)
We got rid of the asylums back in the 60's or 70's. Remember?
Reagan closed them in the '80s. That's when we got the explosion of homeless people. It's probably a coincidence.
On more time: Social Psychology is the study of group behaviour. It's about manipulating masses of people by studying what they react to and how to trigger a desired reaction from a group. That's why so many Leftists are interested in that particular field.(it has nothing to do with mental health)
Psychiatry is the study of individual mental health.
Posted by: Speller at February 08, 2011 08:02 AM (J74Py)
and Earth is not the center of the universe.
When arrested by the Inquisition, he was heard declaring that he "just didn't expect them."
Posted by: MīcÞeMūß at February 08, 2011 08:03 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Brian at February 08, 2011 08:03 AM (sYrWB)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2011 08:06 AM (TMTBg)
“If a group circles around sacred values, they will evolve into a tribal-moral community,” he said. “They’ll embrace science whenever it supports their sacred values, but they’ll ditch it or distort it as soon as it threatens a sacred value.”
Nah.... would NEVER Happen!
Posted by: East Anglia, NASA, et al at February 08, 2011 08:06 AM (AdK6a)
Posted by: Cherry π at February 08, 2011 08:07 AM (+sBB4)
Reagan closed them in the '80s. That's when we got the explosion of homeless people. It's probably a coincidence.
Wow, the Commiecrat narrative was initially that he did it as Governor in the 1960's. How did he manage to do what are state and local matters on the federal level?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at February 08, 2011 08:08 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Brian at February 08, 2011 08:08 AM (sYrWB)
Posted by: FUBAR at February 08, 2011 08:08 AM (McG46)
You have to listen to people you don't care about whine about there minuscule problems. It's like plumbing, it's not hard, I just don't want to do it. I see myself handing it much the way Lee Ermey does in the Geico commercial.
Posted by: MīcÞeMūß at February 08, 2011 08:09 AM (0q2P7)
How does that make you feel?
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 08, 2011 12:01 PM (xMT+4)
Like sending every social scientist a bill for their unconscionable breathing of oxygen.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 08, 2011 08:09 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: A Scientist of Social Stuff at February 08, 2011 08:10 AM (McG46)
We Conservatives are so inept when it comes to the culture war. We are just now understanding it.
True. And that's one reason why Breitbart's Big Hollywood is such a bugbear to the leftists. They're not used to us conservatives attacking them.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 08, 2011 08:11 AM (TAjuH)
As the only conservative on one side of my family, I've had to sit through this discussion at the dinner table repeatedly. It is usually followed by poking fun at the poor, fat Wal-Mart shoppers, who are too stupid to shop at better, more expensive stores.
Posted by: NC Ref at February 08, 2011 08:13 AM (/izg2)
Their "reporter" admits that a new gubmint report probably won't show any mechanical or electronic flaw in Toyotas that made throttle stick -- of course they won't blame voter driver error -- but they keep hyping the possible Stunning News of Toyota malfeasance and playing clips of owners weepily blaming their cars for crashes.
"Fair and balanced" my ass. FNC is becoming the TMZ of journalism. Soon, they'll be right in there with the NY Slimes and MSLSD as frauds of the highest order.
BTW: I do not like Toyotas, would never own one. But I have experience and knowledge of the subject, and am all too aware that the weakest link in automobile safety is the fucking greedy ("Oh, a crash! Who can I sue?") incompetent drivers.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 08, 2011 08:15 AM (Ulu3i)
What do you mean? I know you guys are all hepcats. It's people like will.i.am who are totally Squaresville.
Posted by: FUBAR at February 08, 2011 08:15 AM (McG46)
Posted by: pitythefool at February 08, 2011 08:15 AM (BjQSh)
You know, I marvel at these "lonely conservative" type stories- my family is mostly fairly conservative, with just a few weirdos thrown in for good measure (my ex-army, assistant HS principal brother, for instance) and they mostly keep their traps shut when politics come up because a) they don't like being that out-numbered and b) they couldn't win the argument anyway.
That said, I don't envy you, and you have my sympathy.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 08, 2011 08:16 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Y-not at February 08, 2011 11:50 AM (pW2o
Ditto. I think if such a discussion must be had it should focus not on the value of the fields themselves, but rather on the people who seek out those services. Face it -- sometimes people face hard times and need to talk to someone. Even conservatives! In those cases, psychiatry and psychology are genuinely beneficial. Making it seem like only "weak" people seek out such services creates a very unfortunate stigma that alienates individuals who would otherwise find great solace and rejuvenation through counseling.
It's when people seek out these services constantly for every little problem they encounter that it becomes ridiculous. Every mental or emotional difficulty does not require anti-depressants or stimulants. But there are people who are going to go to their doctor and say, "I'm depressed, prescribe me some Zoloft," the same way there are parents who go to their pediatrician and say, "Little Jimmy keeps coughing, and I want you to prescribe him an antibiotic RIGHT NOW!" even if it's nothing bacterial. They want the tangible sense of holding a little piece of science in their hand that will Make People Better(tm), and they won't be dissuaded by puny things like COMMON SENSE.
"Instead of taking anti-anxiety medication, how about you try talking to your teenager? Explain the boundaries you've set and outline the punishments she will face for crossing those boundaries. Then make sure you stick to those rules."
"Oh, but doctor, that's so HARD! She'll HATE me!
"Remember, you're the parent. You're not her friend; you're her mother. That means making the tough decisions."
"I can't possibly! My nerves are shot and I'm an emotional wreck! Just give me the pills so I can handle it."
Those are the people who misuse the system, and who usually end up with their shrink on speed dial.
Anyway, as was mentioned in an earlier comment, "social psychology" studies groups, not individuals. It's a very different discipline.
I honestly think all the social sciences could do with a healthy infusion of conservatives. We'd bring in a lot of fresh viewpoints and common sense. You can only understand so much about human behavior at a mass or individual level when you're observing it through a narrow ideological lens. If there'd been some more conservatives (or even centrists) on the review board for the DSM 5, I don't think you'd have seen so many frou-frou disorders getting the stamp of approval!
Posted by: MWR at February 08, 2011 08:18 AM (4df7R)
Wow, the Commiecrat narrative was initially that he did it as Governor in the 1960's. How did he manage to do what are state and local matters on the federal level?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at February 08, 2011 12:08 PM (ujg0T)
He didn't, the ACLU did, when Reagan wasn't even in office. This was covered in detail on this morning's Mitchell thread.
But the lefty narrative says he had to have done it because he was a dirty grubby Republican, so that's what gets reported by the newsliars and corrupt and stupid teachers, so that's what you heard.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 08, 2011 08:18 AM (bxiXv)
Here's my competing hypothesis: There will always be liberals because Men fear the idea of a Just God who will judge us for our sins and iniquities; therefore they will invent stories to make themselves feel better.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 08, 2011 08:18 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Stirner at February 08, 2011 08:19 AM (nTjSs)
Yeah, I'd like to chime in. I don't think we accomplish much by making sweeping statements about who is in therapy or on meds or who pursues psychology or psychiatry as careers, for that matter. My dad is as conservative as they come and he spent his career working as a psychiatric social worker, mostly with juveniles and criminals. Now it's certainly true that he faced discrimination in the workplace because of his political beliefs, I'm not contesting that, but I think it's counter-productive to suggest that there is no value in psychology or psychiatry.
Posted by: Y-not at February 08, 2011 11:50 AM (pW2o
A million thanks for saying this.... We harangue our own out of the soft sciences, history, psychology, law, journalism, the arts, music, and the entertainment fields and then wonder why we're losing the culture war. Whining about it doesn't discourage liberals from entering the fray, it merely ensures we have no input. Those conservatives who are left are isolated in the professions, and have little to no support on the outside.
We're like rural Chinese villagers who've been encouraging female infanticide for decades, and then can't figure out why there are no women in the village for our son to marry.
Posted by: La Mauvaise New Yorkaise at February 08, 2011 08:19 AM (8uZ8A)
94 "And every single faculty meeting I suffered through invariably had some asinine partisan politics injected into it"
Try working in government. Not elected office, but just the bureaucratic every day workings of government. I can't get through a staff meeting without someone making a comment about Sarah Palin being stupid, John Boehner being a stooge, or George W. Bush being a war criminal. I once piped up and said that I couldn't stand Nancy Pelosi because I thought she was an insane, narcisstic clown, and the looks I got were PRICELESS.
Posted by: MWR at February 08, 2011 08:20 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Brian at February 08, 2011 12:08 PM (sYrWB)
I have to disagree. Social scientists have come up with such stupid, worthless, and obviously incorrect, ideas that no one on Earth would have thought to have publicly aired them before.
A mathematician named Sokal decided to show how stupid sociologists were (and how pathetic their journals were) so he submitted a joke paper to 'Social Text' that was couched in neat-sounding mathematical language, ""Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity", but was nothing but total crap. It was published, as sociologists (and most social scientologists) love to publish scientificky-sounding papers to show how scientificky they really are.
This should remind people of the "paper" that the Indonesian Imbecile co-authored (whatever that means in this context) that pathetic paper with Tribe: "The Curvature of Constitutional Space". LOL. This from the guy who speaks of "profit and earnings ratios" and thinks that he can convince people that his health scare would "reduce your premiums by 3000%" - which proved that he probably scored around 420 on the math section of his SATs and likely can't do simple arithmetic with fractions. But, to the left, he's a genius. 'Nuff said.
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 08, 2011 08:20 AM (N49h9)
I've found that most Conservatives (that is, most that I know- take it for what its worth) use "counselors" instead of psychologists or psychiatrists- at least until the counselor says "you may have a real chemical issue, and I can't help with those. Go see Dr. X."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 08, 2011 08:21 AM (8y9MW)
On the other hand, I have been happy with every Toyota I've owned, although the '85 LB Pickup was the worst handling vehicle in a turn at speed I've every owned. I had to learn not to go my normal twice the yellow speed on the ramps.
Posted by: toby928™: Free nickless the still-banned (99.174.64.43) at February 08, 2011 08:21 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: MrScribbler© at February 08, 2011 12:15 PM (Ulu3i)
Yep, exact same thing that happened to Audi, with the added bonus that after GM became Government Motors, anti-Union Toyota became an Enemy of The State, which made them all the more juicy a target.
I tend to dislike Toyotas as well, but not because they're mechanically unsound or the company is careless (the opposite is true), but because of their ergonomic choices, general boringness and the fact that they always seem to be in my damned way wherever I go, clogging the fast lane, making weird lane changes, not knowing where they're going, etc.
Obviously that's the drivers, not the cars, which adds a little anecdotal evidence to the "it was the drivers" hypothesis.
In the end, after the damage had been done, that was the conclusion about Audis as well.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 08, 2011 08:24 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Dennis at February 08, 2011 08:25 AM (cY2vO)
Toby, I've driven literally hundreds of Toyotas over the last 25 years, and have recommended them to plenty of people.
My dislike is personal. Nothing at all to do with quality, engineering, safety or reliability. They just don't interest me as many other cars do.
That I wouldn't own one doesn't change the fact that millions do, and generally made the right choices for themselves.
Posted by: MrScribbler© says: no bailout for Nickless and Logprof at February 08, 2011 08:25 AM (Ulu3i)
We're like rural Chinese villagers who've been encouraging female infanticide for decades, and then can't figure out why there are no women in the village for our son to marry.
Posted by: La Mauvaise New Yorkaise at February 08, 2011 12:19 PM (8uZ8A)
This times a thousand!
Posted by: MWR at February 08, 2011 08:27 AM (4df7R)
So what is Sociology, then? That's a real hotbed of leftie postmodernism...invented by la France!
Posted by: jeannie at February 08, 2011 08:28 AM (GdalM)
Posted by: steevy at February 08, 2011 08:31 AM (TMTBg)
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 08, 2011 12:24 PM
Yup. The "unintended acceleration" thing was about as true as reports of Osama Obama's love for America. Which is to say not at all.
Audis are, in fact, among my favorites. I have driven them -- including the Evil Death Audis -- at speeds and under conditions they seldom face in the real world. No problems, ever, but lots of fun.
As cars for someone who likes cars -- as opposed to those seeking transportation devices -- I'd take Audis over Toyotas any day. Judged by consumerist standards, they are at a minimum equal.
Okay, if I could find a clean Toyopet Crown Deluxe you can bet I'd buy it....
Posted by: MrScribbler© says: no bailout for Nickless and Logprof at February 08, 2011 08:31 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 08, 2011 12:21 PM (8y9MW)
Exactly! That's been my experience. Though psychologists can't prescribe medicine; psychiatrists can. I'd say most of the psychological, rather than psychiatric, fields fall into the realm of "counselors."
Posted by: MWR at February 08, 2011 08:40 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: cali grump at February 08, 2011 08:42 AM (hL0k8)
Or their mothers could have dropped them on their heads when they were babies.
Posted by: Brian at February 08, 2011 12:37 PM (sYrWB)
Nah. My mother dropped my sister on her head into the diaper pail when she was a baby, and she's as conservative as they come.
Though she also pulled a (not in use) Fry Daddy off the kitchen counter onto her head when she was three or four, so perhaps the concussive force from that counteracted any crazy liberalness from the earlier fall?
Posted by: MWR at February 08, 2011 08:43 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: republicanmother at February 08, 2011 08:44 AM (4JT7Z)
Most of us have experienced it at one point or another, I have in academia and some work in a few different levels of government bureaucracy.
Part of the reason is a deliberate choice by the political left to concentrate on certain professions they thought would gain influence in the long-term - that's well-documented, too. Once they were in the majority, peer pressure took effect, especially in the case of younger people trying to get in.
Most young people don't have the confidence to stand up to ideas that surround them, look at the inane fashion trends that swamp teen years and always have (at least in modern times). Conservative youngsters are encouraged to leave these fields, subtly or angrily, and most do. People with no particular preference just get used to being surrounded by these ideas and parroting them, as that's rewarded.
The left has taken advantage of social phenomena like this for decades because they are *interested* in excluding other ideas and squeezing other people out of power until they're the only ones left. It's an alien concept to most on the right (at least the American right), which is why we suck at it. Most of us just don't care that much about what other people want to think, live and let live.
Except the left has no real concept of the "let live" part. Oh, they can say the words, but they can't allow it to happen.
And so we end up in a position of only fighting back when we notice that they're trying to do something to us (which is why the right got tacked with the label of "reactionary" despite the fact that the left's thought process fits that tag better). Which, practically by definition, means we lose.
So we have a 14 trillion dollar debt, thousands of government offices eating away at us, our schools have become moderately successful indoctrination centers, and our press corps upwards of 90% dedicated to managing leftist campaigns (from inventing stories about Palin and hiding Obama's past, to hit jobs on enemies of the left (Toyota, land developers, Republicans in general, Honduras).
We're kind of boned, now that I think about it. We probably need to be more aggressive about countering the bullcrap, but most of us have lives in addition to (or instead of) politics, for an awful lot of the left (especially in academia, bureaucracy and the MBM) it IS their life.
Somehow we have to counter all that part-time. Sucks.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 08, 2011 08:46 AM (bxiXv)
BULLSHIT, read the Reagan thread.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2011 08:46 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Brian at February 08, 2011 08:48 AM (sYrWB)
You're one of those Carnival Cruise Lines freaks, aren't you, Max?
Posted by: andycanuck hey-ho hey-ho free the nickless and logprof two at February 08, 2011 08:48 AM (2rOwc)
Somehow we have to counter all that part-time. Sucks.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 08, 2011 12:46 PM (bxiXv)
THIS. Sadly, this. The way I figure, conservatives are the "doers" in society. We actually get things done. Liberals are the "thinkers" who spend all their time daydreaming about happy things and talking, talking, talking, to the point that no one else can get a word in edgewise. Conservatives tend to ignore the talking and daydreaming because we're busy living our lives and generally making things happen. But anyone who hasn't yet decided on an ideology (*cough*stupid kids and college students*cough*) or who have already had basic indoctrination into leftist ideologies through their parents and pop culture get sucked into the endless void of lefty chatter until all original thought is repressed in service of leftist talking points.
Sucks is right.
Posted by: MWR at February 08, 2011 08:53 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: MrScribbler© says: no bailout for Nickless and Logprof at February 08, 2011 12:31 PM (Ulu3i)
I simply find Toyotas boring.
C&D or Automobile magazine, many years ago, compared the Supra (last gen) to a Porsche and a Ferrari - and they said, by the numbers, the Supra is almost as good as the others, close enough that most drivers couldn't tell. But the drivers could tell, the Supra was deader, less interesting, less reactive, less fun to drive. And it looked like a melted bar of soap.
They came to the conclusion was that the problem was compromise - the design model at Toyota was consensus, and it produced something without any truly exceptional qualities.
Even Volvos are more interesting than Toyotas, but definitely less reliable.
Of course, I've bought an RX-7 (still have it) and Dodge Stealth Twin Turbo (3000GT clone) (wish I still had it despite its flaws), so there you go. Oddball me.
Also, as a side note, for a similar reason, factory wheels suck. Because they compromise, pretty much everybody but the exotics sell cars with wheels that are ugly, heavy, and entirely uninspired. It's like a tax on people who have taste.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 08, 2011 08:54 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: andycanuck hey-ho hey-ho free the nickless and logprof two at February 08, 2011 08:56 AM (2rOwc)
Posted by: Brian at February 08, 2011 08:58 AM (sYrWB)
I always thought Volvos were ugly and unreliable Soccer-mom cars. I would much rather have a Toyota than a Volvo.
But my last 3 vehicles have been Ford trucks. Those were preceded by Fords as well, just not trucks.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2011 09:03 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2011 09:05 AM (M9Ie6)
He pretty much nailed the Zealots of the Church of AGW with this statement, except for ascribing to them any moral component in their groupthink processes.
Posted by: ya2daup at February 08, 2011 09:05 AM (UzjcV)
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2011 01:03 PM (M9Ie6)
To some extent it depends on the model. I have an AWD turbo wagon that was a purchase of convenience, but damn, you could fit a house in that car. Handles surprisingly well (not a sports car, just way better than you'd expect) and goes like a stabbed rat.
And, of course, it's invisible.
The more I work on it, however, the less I respect the engineers. Kind of like having the needless complexity of a BMW without all that German quality control. Also, they seem to have defied the laws of physics as there is nothing on the car that can be removed without having to remove something else first.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 08, 2011 09:14 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2011 01:05 PM (M9Ie6)
Miatas are too small for me. I'm all elbows and knees in one. My older RX-7 is just right except for headroom, I plan to install new seats.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 08, 2011 09:16 AM (bxiXv)
It's like a bunch of fish saying "Water? What water?"
Posted by: Trimegistus at February 08, 2011 09:16 AM (/y1t0)
Posted by: Trimegistus at February 08, 2011 01:16 PM (/y1t0)
Ironically, the cause of the problem (aggressively reinforced groupthink) is also the reaction to the problem.
Which is why we have the problem, of course.
Thena gain, this is the comment section at the NYT, we're not talking about the general public here, these people are more like Andrea "Memory Hole" Mitchell.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 08, 2011 09:24 AM (bxiXv)
Newer cars with their manifold engineering advances would be profoundly MORE interesting, if during the "improvement " process the personality factor hadn't been edited out. New vehicles are merely efficient transportation modules, with the visceral appeal of a dead tree stump. They serve the purpose of getting from A to B--and nothing else.
Driving is supposed to be FUN--something the older ( read 40's to 70's) cars supplied in spades. Not only that, but they were distinguishable from one another, not a trait shared by anything currently produced. I much prefer the honest and simple charm of, say, a '49 Ford. or Olds, or ANY other make than the newest example of engineering excellence.
Gonna cut this short, there's a lengthy rant that y'all probably don't want or need to hear.
But that's my view, not likely to change, so laugh or sneer away..
Posted by: irongrampa at February 08, 2011 09:36 AM (ud5dN)
I agree with most of what you said except that I would add made so you could work on them without $50,000 worth of special tools, computers, and diagnostic devices.
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2011 09:41 AM (M9Ie6)
So true. I can't count the times a faculty colleague has slipped in some off-the-cuff remark bashing Booosh or conservatives without even considering the fact that I'm an infiltrator in their leftist stronghold.
Posted by: Reiver at February 08, 2011 09:49 AM (64S5N)
"Making it seem like only "weak" people seek out such services creates a very unfortunate stigma that alienates individuals who would otherwise find great solace and rejuvenation through counseling."
Agreed. I also find it unhelpful when those fields are disparaged or marginalized as "soft" sciences, and it is insinuated that anyone who might be interested in pursuing these fields is more akin to a weak spined liberal and really doesn't belong with the rest of us tough conservatives.
I'm not denying that the proportions of liberal v. conservative in these fields are outrageous. That's part of why this study is helpful.
But when we take this tack of pissing outside our tent, all we do is alienate some like minded conservatives who just might have been helped, or had someone close helped by these practitioners.
Posted by: RM at February 08, 2011 10:24 AM (1kwr2)
Posted by: Vic at February 08, 2011 01:41 PM (M9Ie6)
Most modern cars can be worked on with a standard tool set, maybe 1 or 2 specialty tools, and a laptop and a $50-200 adapter.
It ain't as easy as it should be, but it's easier than all that. I do it all the time. I grump about it, but it can certainly be done.
But when we take this tack of pissing outside our tent, all we do is alienate some like minded conservatives who just might have been helped, or had someone close helped by these practitioners.
Posted by: RM at February 08, 2011 02:24 PM (1kwr2)
I'm not sure it's tactically unsound, see what the left does 24/7, but it certainly isn't nice.
Except when I say "soft science" I'm not referring to leftism but to lack of standards and poor policing of statistical and scientific integrity, regardless of politics - it just seems that, whether it's because of the ideology or because teh fields are so dominated, the left gets the brunt of that one (social sciences, climastrology, etc). Medicine / pharmaceuticals is less obviously left (though I have my suspicions) but rife with poor methodology and practices.
And thanks for the comment about post 139...
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 08, 2011 10:59 AM (bxiXv)
Are they kidding? If I were to have a full frontal lobotomy, the piece of my brain that they take out could get a Ph.D. in Social Psychology.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 08, 2011 11:00 AM (T0NGe)
A friend of mine, 25-year army vet, is going 'back to school'...Social Science major. Says he's got to bite his tongue ("chew it to a bloody pulp"), as any conservative opinions are...not welcome to discussions.
I couldn't do it.
Posted by: Stillwater at February 08, 2011 11:20 AM (0GpN4)
Since this is becoming a car thread, anyone heard any decent rumors if GM is going to stay in the compact (Colorado/Canyon) truck business or get out of it like Ford did when the Ranger was cancelled?
Reason I ask is I've got an '02 GMC Sonoma (same thing as an S-10) with 177,000 miles on it. Runs fine, the 4.3 V6 is siad to be good for 300,000 miles or so, but I just need to know if there will be a GM product to replace it with when it comes time.
I don't WANT to have to go Japanese, but the Toyota Tacoma is US made anyway.
Posted by: SGT Dan at February 08, 2011 12:18 PM (GgXZc)
For the left Reagan will always be Melkor. Bush is Sauron and Palin is Thuringwethil. But I probably need to get out more and meet actual people.
Posted by: joh at February 08, 2011 02:44 PM (JEvSn)
Posted by: oxpdf at February 24, 2011 05:41 PM (ko8AC)
Posted by: instyler at February 27, 2011 06:29 PM (0FZEu)
Posted by: instyler at February 28, 2011 01:10 AM (0FZEu)
solar panelThe main products we manufacture and export as below:
Monocrystalline silicon solar panel, polycrystalline silicon solar panel, solar power system.
solar street light, wind solar hybrid street light, solar garden light, solar sensor light, solar lawn light.
LED lamp for solar garden light, solar brick light, solar street lightsolar post cap, solar road stud, other solar lights and accessories
Posted by: vh4rb at March 06, 2011 05:24 PM (+e92r)
Posted by: chen20081 at March 13, 2011 11:17 PM (61+D/)
Posted by: iPad Video Converter at March 22, 2011 06:03 PM (TbE7f)
Posted by: ipod transfer at April 11, 2011 10:26 PM (Aya9b)
Posted by: north face at June 20, 2011 09:13 AM (LGHKZ)
Online Radii Shoes• Buy Radii Shoes on www.radiishoe.com. Fashion and free shipping in radii footwear, radii straight jacket, radii 420 top.
Posted by: radii shoes at June 27, 2011 05:32 PM (We9m7)
Radii Straight Jackets -- Radii Footwear is definitely at the top of their game right now, as they are putting out tons of hot releases. To join the inaugural color way of the Radii Straight Jackets Shoes, Radii quietly rolled out this special color way of the infamous game changing high-top. The radii footwear includes a metallic leather upper, patent high-lights in black and a big tongue marked by cutouts. Men's Radii Footwear is definitely raising the bar on lifestyle trainers designs. Not only in professional sports fields Radii Straight Jackets Footwear is indispensable to tide bound strength. Radii each footwear have no personality, only has the remarkable in appearance, also attach great importance to the performance, the specialized trainers shockproof system can better protect your feet.
Posted by: radii shoes at June 30, 2011 11:28 PM (qPjp3)
Radii Straight Jackets -- Radii Footwear is definitely at the top of their game right now, as they are putting out tons of hot releases. To join the inaugural color way of the Radii Straight Jackets Shoes, Radii quietly rolled out this special color way of the infamous game changing high-top. The radii footwear includes a metallic leather upper, patent high-lights in black and a big tongue marked by cutouts. Men's Radii Footwear is definitely raising the bar on lifestyle trainers designs. Not only in professional sports fields Radii Straight Jackets Footwear is indispensable to tide bound strength. Radii each footwear have no personality, only has the remarkable in appearance, also attach great importance to the performance, the specialized trainers shockproof system can better protect your feet.
Posted by: radii shoes at June 30, 2011 11:32 PM (qPjp3)
The mission ofRadii footwear is to create unique designs that reflect each individualÂ’s personality, and the Radii 420 Top definitely achieves that. This interesting high top design contains three straps around the forefoot, a large strap around the ankle and perforated accents on the toe box, tongue, and heel. They are available in an array of striking colorways and will demand attention as soon as you put them on.
Posted by: radii shoes at June 30, 2011 11:39 PM (qPjp3)
Our online store supply asics running shoes with big discount and fast free shipping to worldwide!
Posted by: onitsuka tiger sale at July 01, 2011 06:05 PM (Ikj/O)
Posted by: franklinew at July 04, 2011 12:01 AM (FmDqk)
Posted by: swarovski wholesale at July 07, 2011 05:41 PM (rFkvp)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2659 seconds, 302 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








They were awarded a yellow star emblem to wear.
Posted by: Cherry π at February 08, 2011 07:19 AM (+sBB4)