March 23, 2011

Speaking of Partisan Games on Matters of War: Gingrich Flip-Flops on Libya
— Ace

I know there are some conservatives who have derided Obama for failing to lead in Libya, when a judicious application of Tomahawk missiles would have permitted the already-advancing rebels to swarm into Tripoli.

I know there are some conservatives who feel Obama is was basically acting properly by not intervening -- they take a "let them sort it out" position. They may criticize Obama for ancillary stuff (like issuing tough-guy bluster like "Qadaffy must go," then going golfing), but they believe that non-intervention is the correct policy, and have been consistent in this from the beginning.

Both of these positions are respectable (I think) and both have a good pedigree in the conservative movement. For every interventionist, there is a noninterventionist.

There is a one-sentence sum-up that everyone agrees on as foreign policy: "We must promote liberty and justice and defend the national interest, but we must not be the world's policeman or be drawn into bloody foreign adventures."

Everyone agrees with that, because it sort of says both everything and nothing at all. The real question in foreign intervention comes down, of course, to which of those two ideas, separated by that mischievously meaningful "but," do you most agree with?

Everyone agrees with that statement, but that's meaningless. The question is which part of it do you nod more vigorously along with.

I know where McCain and Lindsey Graham stand -- they are hawks and eager for foreign intervention. (Too eager, I think.) And I know where Rand Paul stands -- like his father, he is a skeptic of intervention.

I can speak politely with either camp. I may think either is wrong (or too ideological or not "flexible" and nuanced enough or whatever) but I wouldn't say any of those men is insincere.

But what is disrespectable and dishonorable, to me, is simply taking a position opposite whatever Obama is doing at the moment. That is just as much a hypocritical partisan game as what Johnny Come Lately military interventionists Chris Matthews and Joan Walsh are doing.

What is Newt's real position? I do not see any editing in these video clips, so I don't think these clips misrepresent his words. (We'll have to see, though.)

But it is unserious and partisan and cynical to urge muscular interventionism when Obama was sitting back and doing nothing but suddenly urging sitting back and doing nothing when Obama opts for airstrikes.

There was in fact a changed situation here -- 16 days ago the rebels just needed some airstrikes to take out Qadaffy's tanks and artillery and jets and they would have taken the whole country. At this point, the rebels may or may not win, even with Qadaffy's war machinery taken away from him.

But I don't hear Newt making that distinction, or saying that Obama let the situation shift in such a way as to now make intervention futile and therefore foolish. What I hear him saying is now that Obama's ordering airstrikes that he actually wouldn't have intervened before.

Which is the exact opposite of what he said 16 days ago.

This illustrates perfectly my basic problem with Newt Gingrich -- I just don't trust him. He is very clever at being clever, but beneath all that cleverness, what is real? What is genuine?

Is everything a game? Everything positioning for political advantage?

I do not know how Gingrich would respond to this -- I imagine he'll have to within the next few days.

It remains possible that there is deceptive editing here -- this video is offered by ThinkProgress. It is possible there is important context left out.

But, that said: I cannot easily imagine what context might reconcile these statements into something that looks like policy rather than political posturing.


Posted by: Ace at 10:20 AM | Comments (226)
Post contains 649 words, total size 4 kb.

1 Is everything a game? Everything positioning for political advantage?

Bear with me.

Posted by: Knut Gingrich at March 23, 2011 10:23 AM (2pEj7)

2

"when a judicious application of Tomahawk missiles would have permitted the already-advancing rebels to swarm into Tripoli."

Great military analysis.  Where did you get your tactics training again?

Posted by: me at March 23, 2011 10:23 AM (N4deu)

3 He's a clown.  PLEASE, GOP.......find someone WORTH A SHIT to run for President.....PLEASE!!!!!  NO MORE RETREADS!!!!!

Posted by: © Sponge at March 23, 2011 10:24 AM (UK9cE)

4 >>>Great military analysis. Where did you get your tactics training again? It's not so much great as "obvious." If you have some super-smart stuff that disproves the obvious, let me know.

Posted by: ace at March 23, 2011 10:24 AM (nj1bB)

5

Yes, any conservative that flip-flops like that had better offer some context.

Or, we take the approach of some conservatives: The left does it, so we can too.

Fuck that. That's one reason I'm not a liberal.

I've long said I would rather lose an election with Newt than win it with a RINO. But that was based on the premise that Newt was a serious conservative thinker, and not another hack.

Posted by: CJ at March 23, 2011 10:25 AM (9KqcB)

6 American Flip Flops out of Labia!

Posted by: USA at March 23, 2011 10:25 AM (YZISw)

7 Posted by: Knut Gingrich at March 23, 2011 02:23 PM (2pEj7)

I thought it was Gnut?  Much like Gnat.....only with a belly, promiscuity and white hair?

Posted by: © Sponge at March 23, 2011 10:25 AM (UK9cE)

8

OT: just should drop the news Liz Taylor died

Posted by: YRM (Anyone Ever Wonder What Y-R-M Stands For?) at March 23, 2011 10:26 AM (UzBwz)

9 C'mon lets let sleeping newts lie. Shoosh, he sat on a couch with Nazi Peelousi and smiled the "Green" smile, why are you surprised by this? Nee, Nee.

Posted by: Napoleon Boned Apart at March 23, 2011 10:26 AM (Q5+Og)

10 Yes, any conservative that flip-flops like that had better offer some context.

That's not helpful to a certain unnamed Mormon.


Posted by: Which one of you morons put this bag of Snowe on my porch and lit it? at March 23, 2011 10:26 AM (F/4zf)

11 It's because he loves his country so much.

Posted by: USA at March 23, 2011 10:27 AM (YZISw)

12 Look, Ace is reading the comments!

Posted by: Grey Fox at March 23, 2011 10:28 AM (KTAPm)

13 It remains possible that there is deceptive editing here -- this video is offered by ThinkProgress. It is possible there is important context left out.

So, is Think Progress pairing this with Obama/Biden's flip flops?

Posted by: 18-1 at March 23, 2011 10:28 AM (7BU4a)

14

What's obvious is that missiles kill people, often civilians.  Getting involved in warfare is more serious than launching explosive devices from great distances, then letting the rebels mop up.  Sounds to me like it it might be more nuanced than that.

 

Posted by: me at March 23, 2011 10:28 AM (N4deu)

15 I originally was going to do this post because I think you can make a case for intervening to overthrow Qadaffi 3 weeks ago but not be on board for this "protect the civilians, leave Gadaffi" crap.

I thought Newt was making that case and the libs didn't get the "nuance" they love so much but nope, Newt just pulled a Kerry, "for it before I was against it" flip.

I watched the full Today show interview TP took the clip from. Nothing deceptive in their edit.

Fortunately I didn't consider Newt a serious candidate before so I don't have to stop now.

Posted by: DrewM. at March 23, 2011 10:28 AM (HicGG)

16 Yes, any conservative that flip-flops like that had better offer some context.

That's not helpful to a certain unnamed Mormon.

Posted by: Which one of you morons put this bag of Snowe on my porch and lit it? at March 23, 2011 02:26 PM (F/4zf)

Andy Reid on the whole Kevin Kolb/Mike Vick thing? I'm over that.

Posted by: CJ at March 23, 2011 10:28 AM (9KqcB)

17 Hey, I'm named after a fucking amphibian. You fucked up, you trusted me.

Posted by: Newt Gingrich at March 23, 2011 10:30 AM (AZGON)

18 He's a clown.  PLEASE, GOP.......find someone WORTH A SHIT to run for President.....PLEASE!!!!!  NO MORE RETREADS!!!!!

Posted by: © Sponge at March 23, 2011 02:24 PM (UK9cE)

Yep. Newt threw away his chance in the mid 90s - and the only value he really has to offer I think is what not to do, both personally and politically.


Posted by: 18-1 at March 23, 2011 10:30 AM (7BU4a)

19
the politically prudent thing to do is to oppose Obama on everything unless he's doing exactly what you would do.


Posted by: Soothsayer at March 23, 2011 10:30 AM (uFokq)

20

Ace,

I don't think it's edited. I was surprised hearing Newt today after hearing him a couple of weeks ago. I was just waiting for someone to dig up the videos.

Newt is a joke IMO and hurts the party. I don't mind anyone changing their mind if they tell me why they did it but Newt flops around all over the place.

 

Posted by: robtr at March 23, 2011 10:30 AM (MtwBb)

21

Tomahawk is a missile?  Shit, I thought we were just tossing some little meat cleavers at the poor fellows.

Convene my military counsel!

Posted by: King Barry I "Piehole", Skilled In The Art of War at March 23, 2011 10:30 AM (QKKT0)

22 One more thing about things that are "obvious" or make "common sense."   Isn't it funny how they always agree with what *you* think?

Posted by: me at March 23, 2011 10:31 AM (N4deu)

23 I got better.

Posted by: Newt Gingrich at March 23, 2011 10:31 AM (fdG5M)

24 I ask again: who the fuck are the rebels? Why should Col. Daffy be replaced by them? And oh yeah, fuck Newt and the cockroach he humped in on.

Posted by: maddogg at March 23, 2011 10:32 AM (OlN4e)

25 I was never a big Newt fan, but seeing him on the couch with San Fran Nan finished it for me.

Posted by: huerfano at March 23, 2011 10:32 AM (2pEj7)

26 Ah "nuanced" the last bastion of the blowhard retard.

Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at March 23, 2011 10:33 AM (6IReR)

27

OT.

Does Gabe post anymore?

Posted by: maddogg at March 23, 2011 10:33 AM (OlN4e)

28 25 I was never a big Newt fan, but seeing him on the couch with San Fran Nan finished it for me.

Posted by: huerfano at March 23, 2011 02:32 PM (2pEj7)


also, this. Who the hell is taking Gingrich seriously after that?

Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at March 23, 2011 10:33 AM (6IReR)

29 Enough about this careerist toady. What seems more important is that people with a high media profile like Hannity (meh) and talkers like Hugh Hewitt cease consulting Newty. It makes them look like idiots. There is no reason to listen to anything Gingrinch has to say any longer. When he says anything useful someone else has already said it. The rest of the time he's canoodling with libtards on cushy furniture or pimping a book.

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 10:34 AM (AZGON)

30 Newt was a weiner on Bosnia - he wouldn't oppose Clinton on it then because he wasn't going to vote against a President while we had troops in harm's way. Now he is not worried about voting. Newt ceased being serious the second he sat on the couch with Nancy.

Posted by: blaster at March 23, 2011 10:35 AM (Fw2Gg)

31 OT: Wisconsin's AG J.B. Van Hollen has appealed Judge Sumi's order to the 4th circuit.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 23, 2011 10:35 AM (UO6+e)

32 >>>I ask again: who the fuck are the rebels? I don't know. It's a wait and see thing. Could be bad. Could be not so bad. honestly, I don't know. >>>Why should Col. Daffy be replaced by them? Because he killed Americans in brazen terrorist actions. Not just Lockerbie, but his agents shot up a disco in Rome where American servicemen where known to dance. He's been supporting terrorism for years. Call it justice or call it vengeance, but he deserves to die. Are the rebels any better? I don't want to say "they can't be worse," because, when it comes to these epople, yes, it always could be worse, but at least they have not been proven to have killed 300 innocent Americans already.

Posted by: ace at March 23, 2011 10:36 AM (nj1bB)

33 18 He's a clown.  PLEASE, GOP.......find someone WORTH A SHIT to run for President.....PLEASE!!!!!  NO MORE RETREADS!!!!!

Posted by: © Sponge at March 23, 2011 02:24 PM (UK9cE)

Yep. Newt threw away his chance in the mid 90s - and the only value he really has to offer I think is what not to do, both personally and politically.

Newt = douchebag.  Everyone knows it but Hannity.  And he may actually know, but still invites Ginko on all the time because he runs his mouth incessantly, says nothing worth remembering, and is an easy way to fill a segment.

Posted by: HoundOfDoom at March 23, 2011 10:36 AM (KhioZ)

34 I'll admit to a flip-flop of my own on Libya but I'll give some context to why I've done so...


I wanted a no-fly zone and to stall out the Libyan drive to Benghazi, at least temporarily, to give the rebels time to regroup and prevent genocide by Daffy.

I didn't initially start off bashing Obama on this until the fly-by-night nature of the operation got exposed.


The manner in which Obama has addressed this whole operation, including his spur-of-the-moment decision to initiate the attack, a lack of consultation with Congress, the waffling of the Arab League, the French decision to put a "steering committee" in charge of running the war, and confusion over whether targeting Daffy directly was a valid objective have convinced me that he doesn't have a goddamn idea what he's doing and that a lot of our guys are going to be in danger for nothing.

In short, it falls into my stance on Afghanistan, which is "Go hard or go home."  Decide on the goals, make a strategy to reach those goals, and put everything in place to follow that strategy to a T.  If you can't do that, then don't put our troops in danger.

/soapbox

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 23, 2011 10:36 AM (UvFnc)

35
Orwell is right. Gingrich is irrelevant.

And Obama is wrong about everything.

Posted by: Soothsayer at March 23, 2011 10:36 AM (uFokq)

36 People think Zero is tone deaf. Hell, Newt could give him lessons. Go away Newt. Your done, finished, kaput. Can't you smell the rotting flesh of your political career? Don't you feel the grave worms munching it's carcass? Go into the light, Newt. Into the light...

Posted by: maddogg at March 23, 2011 10:37 AM (OlN4e)

37 My problem is with the whole "humanitarian war" thing coming from this administration.  If you want Qducky removed, say so and do it, not this leave, stay, leave stay crap.  Otherwise, the humanitarian angle is a never ending commitment and puts you at odds if the rebels start to win and start to slaughter the other side.

And if the Libyan rebels were worth supporting, why not the Iranian students?

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 23, 2011 10:37 AM (Z1jiu)

38

For the record, I am really opposed to this intervention crap. How many times do we have to do it to prove we can't afford it and that it doesn't work.

Arab's killing Arab's reason doesn't persuede me, in fact it gives me some joy.

Taking out Gadaffy doesn't perseude me, what do you get after you take him out? Either the rebels who we believe are terrorists or his son. Why bother, revenge? Fine send in or hire some assasins.

Posted by: robtr at March 23, 2011 10:37 AM (MtwBb)

39 Knee-jerk opposition to that windsock Obama makes you look like a fool when the weather shifts. Take a stance, and stand.

Posted by: t-bird at March 23, 2011 10:37 AM (FcR7P)

40

"This illustrates perfectly my basic problem with Newt Gingrich -- I just don't trust him. He is very clever at being clever, but beneath all that cleverness, what is real? What is genuine?

Is everything a game? Everything positioning for political advantage?"

- - -

Notably, I had the same reservations about Obama. I wouldn't support Newt for a national office for this reason.


Posted by: Flounder at March 23, 2011 10:37 AM (Kkt/i)

41 I ask again: who the fuck are the rebels? We have to support them to find out who they are.

Posted by: General Barry, via Twitter at March 23, 2011 10:38 AM (FcR7P)

42 You know who Gingrich is? He's Kitty Carlisle. Or Paul Lynde. He's the political equivalent of one of those celebrities who appeared regularly on game shows or on Carson, but finally no one could remember why or what made them celebrities in the first place. At least Paul Lynde was funny.

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 10:39 AM (AZGON)

43 24 I ask again: who the fuck are the rebels? Why should Col. Daffy be replaced by them? And oh yeah, fuck Newt and the cockroach he humped in on. --------------------------------------------- Protesters with guns. 

Posted by: Shoppy at March 23, 2011 10:40 AM (u2rWt)

44 I was never a big Newt fan, but seeing him on the couch with San Fran Nan finished it for me.

Posted by: huerfano at March 23, 2011 02:32 PM (2pEj7)

Fine. Let's all bury Newt. So, who is the potential Republican candidate who can walk and chew gum at the same time, with sufficient conservative values?

Posted by: CJ at March 23, 2011 10:40 AM (9KqcB)

45 I'm confused, what Conservative said we need to intervene in Libya and NOT take out Qadhafi? There never was a point to doing anything in Libya without getting rid of Qadhafi. He is the problem, not Libya.

Posted by: dscott at March 23, 2011 10:40 AM (gaD9p)

46 what is going on in egypt...or have we been there done that?

Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 23, 2011 10:41 AM (eOXTH)

47 This Gingrich dude can't be trusted.

Posted by: Mitt Romney at March 23, 2011 10:41 AM (4ZxEW)

48 Okay, Newt's an idiot.  Stop the freakin' presses.

But Ron Paul - and Rand - is a "skeptic on intervention" now?  Horse manure!  Daddy Paul, at least, is a dyed-in-the-wool isolationist who opposes any foreign military activity - including even bases on foreign soil - unless we are directly attacked and a congressional Declaration of War passed.  Sonny seems pretty close, we'll flesh out his beliefs over time because, like Obama, he was just too cool to vet before electing.

If Ron Paul's foreign policy had been in place after WWII, we would be living in Soviet America today, without any doubt at all.  We would not have opposed Soviet expansion directly, through proxies, or used the CIA to stop them.

It is necessary at every moment Ron Paul's name comes up in relation to foreign affairs to recall these FACTS, because there are people who are attracted to some of his small-government rhetoric (NOT actions) who are unaware of what they are signing onto.

Posted by: Adjoran at March 23, 2011 10:41 AM (VfmLu)

49

Because he killed Americans in brazen terrorist actions. Not just Lockerbie, but his agents shot up a disco in Rome where American servicemen where known to dance. He's been supporting terrorism for years.

Yeah, I remember and yes he deserves to die. I just hate fighting a war to deny al-Qaeda a base country and then fight another to give them a base country back. This time with oil.

Posted by: maddogg at March 23, 2011 10:41 AM (OlN4e)

50 1 Is everything a game? Everything positioning for political advantage?

Bear with me.

Posted by: Knut Gingrich at March 23, 2011 02:23 PM (2pEj7) 


snerk

Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 23, 2011 10:41 AM (UOM48)

51

At least Paul Lynde was funny.

Not really. He was gay, which back then was amusing.

Posted by: CJ at March 23, 2011 10:41 AM (9KqcB)

52

who is the potential Republican candidate who can walk and chew gum at the same time, with sufficient conservative values?

Dunno, but it sure as fuck ain't Gingrich.

Posted by: meekrob at March 23, 2011 10:42 AM (pSv+9)

53 This Gingrich dude can't be trusted. Posted by: Mitt Romney I regret ever giving you the name of my hairdresser.

Posted by: Newt Gingrich at March 23, 2011 10:42 AM (AZGON)

54 what is going on in egypt...or have we been there done that?

Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 23, 2011 02:41 PM (eOXTH)

They just passed a law that will pave the way for the MO Bros. to be elected in June.

Posted by: robtr at March 23, 2011 10:42 AM (MtwBb)

55 Fine. Let's all bury Newt. So, who is the potential Republican candidate who can walk and chew gum at the same time, with sufficient conservative values? Posted by: CJ at March 23, 2011 02:40 PM (9KqcB) I could tell you, but then this thread becomes a flame war.

Posted by: blaster at March 23, 2011 10:42 AM (Fw2Gg)

56 Who are the rebels? Most likely terrorist types who hate America.

Posted by: Dr Spank at March 23, 2011 10:43 AM (4ZxEW)

57 I love my job. I'm always right. (Politico)- President Obama defended his Nobel Peace Prize on Tuesday, saying that Americans “don’t see any contradiction” in him ordering an attack on Libya to make sure “people aren’t butchered because of a dictator who wants to cling to power.” “When I received that award, I specifically said there was an irony because I was already dealing with two wars,” Obama said in an interview with CNN from El Salvador. “So I am accustomed to this contradiction of being both a commander-in-chief but also someone who aspires to peace.”

Posted by: Chickenhawk Obama at March 23, 2011 10:43 AM (AZGON)

58

At least Paul Lynde was funny.

Not really. He was gay, which back then was amusing.

It's still funny to me!  I'm gay, you know.

Posted by: Ant at March 23, 2011 10:43 AM (pSv+9)

59 robtr......so beck....you know the guy everyone hates and won't listen to because he's a whacked out conspiracy theorist.....WAS RIGHT!!!!!

Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 23, 2011 10:44 AM (eOXTH)

60 At least Paul Lynde was funny. Not really. He was gay, which back then was amusing. Still is, if you ask me. Few things generated so many hilarious jokes and youtube parodies like "Brokeback Mountain."

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 10:44 AM (AZGON)

61

what is going on in egypt...or have we been there done that?

Egypt is now a vibrant, peace-loving liberal democracy, famous for its fine chocolates, like Belgium. 

Now shut up.

Posted by: King Barry I "Piehole" at March 23, 2011 10:45 AM (QKKT0)

62 Is it just me or is the blog off center?? It's driving me crazy

Posted by: Karenm at March 23, 2011 10:45 AM (inzhm)

63

>>> I could tell you, but then this thread becomes a flame war.

Lets have it then.

The name I mean.

Posted by: Roadking at March 23, 2011 10:45 AM (gdzvN)

64 The liberal trolls and concern trolls are all over this poll showing Ogabe winning against a generic Republican by thirteen points over at TepidAir. I have one word for it: Bullshit. The difference between McCain and Bummbles voters is a gap of like 14 or thirteen. AP is such a clickwhore

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at March 23, 2011 10:45 AM (c5RQr)

65 Great military analysis. Where did you get your tactics training again? I learned my trade on the killing fields of Walsh Street Elementary School, son. The horrors I saw on the playground that day haunt my dreams. Had we stopped the advancing column of fifth-graders at the monkey-bars, our precious sandbox would have avoided the looting and pillaging that was to follow. I lost many good soldiers to head-noogies, purple-nurples, and Atomic Wedgies on that day.

Posted by: Monty at March 23, 2011 10:45 AM (4Pleu)

66 Hey, where's that coach where Newt and Pelosi were holding hands over man-made global warming?

Posted by: Scoob at March 23, 2011 10:45 AM (T7+JL)

67

Whoops, sorry, it's supposed to be in caps. 

I'm gay.

Posted by: ANT at March 23, 2011 10:45 AM (pSv+9)

68  robtr......so beck....you know the guy everyone hates and won't listen to because he's a whacked out conspiracy theorist.....WAS RIGHT!!!!!

Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 23, 2011 02:44 PM (eOXTH)

Yeah I know, I always say he's nuts and I believe that. He usually turns out to be right though.

Posted by: robtr at March 23, 2011 10:46 AM (MtwBb)

69 Newt needs to go away. That is all.

Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 23, 2011 10:46 AM (/G5LI)

70 Hey, where's that coach couch where Newt and Pelosi were holding hands over man-made global warming?

Posted by: Scoob at March 23, 2011 10:46 AM (T7+JL)

71 63 Is it just me or is the blog off center?? It's driving me crazy

Posted by: Karenm at March 23, 2011 02:45 PM (inzhm)

Dead nuts on my screen.

/pardon the engineering term.

Posted by: maddogg at March 23, 2011 10:46 AM (OlN4e)

72 Or, we take the approach of some conservatives: The left does it, so we can too. I don't *hold* that position. Except when liberals are around, because the opportunity to hatefuck their skulls and spew their own venom back into them is too good to pass up. BECAUSE FUCK THEM, THAT'S WHY. They've earned every bit of having their slapdick illogic thrown in their faces, with added moonbat interest-sauce. But no, I am against intervening militarily in the internal affairs of any nation, unless it's training, monetary support, intel, etc. Does Qadaffy need killing? Yes. Should have been bombed again as soon as we found out we missed him in 1986.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 23, 2011 10:46 AM (g6nyw)

73 He is very clever at being clever,

He's too clever by half as my British granny used to say..

Posted by: Buzzsaw at March 23, 2011 10:47 AM (tf9Ne)

74 robtr we always said that about my mom too.....and she is nuts...and she's always right........

Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 23, 2011 10:47 AM (eOXTH)

75 Is everything a game? Everything positioning for political advantage? YUP!

Posted by: Dan at March 23, 2011 10:48 AM (mXBxH)

76

who is the potential Republican candidate who can walk and chew gum at the same time, with sufficient conservative values?

Dunno, but it sure as fuck ain't Gingrich.

Posted by: meekrob at March 23, 2011 02:42 PM (pSv+9)

True. (Sadly. Not too long ago I would have personally drafted the dude myself.)

But, I'm not going into another election with a GOP candidate who has to use flash cards to get up to speed on what conservatives think.

Posted by: CJ at March 23, 2011 10:48 AM (9KqcB)

77 Newt and his Stepford wife need to go away.

And speaking of newts, I saw one on the front porch today.  It ran away and hid under a planter.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 23, 2011 10:48 AM (UOM48)

78 They've earned every bit of having their slapdick illogic thrown in their faces, with added moonbat interest-sauce. This is actually useful to an extent. Refer back to the Deepwater Horizon spill and Ace's post where he says it's time to play turnabout. If the rules say Katrina is a millstone for Bush, then BP is a millstone for Barry.

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 10:49 AM (AZGON)

79

Anything interesting happen while I was Central America?

 

 

 

Posted by: Field Marshal Snaphook McMulligan at March 23, 2011 10:49 AM (u2rWt)

80 moonbat interest-sauce Is this good on kung pao chicken?

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 10:49 AM (AZGON)

81 Gingrich is a doof.

Posted by: dick cheese at March 23, 2011 10:50 AM (GTbGH)

82 Eye of Newt is as much of a flip-flopping whore as Romney. His goose was cooked when he got on the couch with Pelosi and signed on to the fraudulent crap and tax bill.

He may as well not even come to SC because he get zero here.

Posted by: Vic at March 23, 2011 10:51 AM (M9Ie6)

83 i dislike newt more than i did mccain

Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 23, 2011 10:51 AM (eOXTH)

84 Yes Newt is a jerk but he ain't the President

Gingrich is powerless; Obama can ruin everything  ( and is in the process of doing just that )


Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 23, 2011 10:51 AM (UqKQV)

85 The horrors I saw on the playground that day haunt my dreams. Had we stopped the advancing column of fifth-graders at the monkey-bars, our precious sandbox would have avoided the looting and pillaging that was to follow. I lost many good soldiers to head-noogies, purple-nurples, and Atomic Wedgies on that day.

5th grade was like your personal 9/11? 

This illustrates perfectly my basic problem with Newt Gingrich -- I just don't trust him. He is very clever at being clever, but beneath all that cleverness, what is real? What is genuine?

Nothing.  He is just dust and air, at least he is to me after his pow-wow with Pelousi on the couch. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at March 23, 2011 10:51 AM (9hSKh)

86 Newt is so irrelevant, the leftards don't even bother with him anymore. That should be a clue to him.

Posted by: maddogg at March 23, 2011 10:52 AM (OlN4e)

87 And BTW, I am still against us going into Libya. We have NOTHING to be gained there which is usual for the wars that the Dems start.

Posted by: Vic at March 23, 2011 10:52 AM (M9Ie6)

88 moonbat interest-sauce

Is this good on kung pao chicken?

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 02:49 PM (AZGON)

 

Quick cure for priapism - so I hear.

Posted by: Roadking at March 23, 2011 10:52 AM (gdzvN)

89 Fine. Let's all bury Newt. So, who is the potential Republican candidate who can walk and chew gum at the same time, with sufficient conservative values? We don't need values. We need a robber baron with great hair and a Ukrainian sexbot with tits like five gallons of handcrafted vanilla ice cream. We need The Donald.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 23, 2011 10:52 AM (TATbF)

90

A.  Newt, you will never, ever, EVER be President.  Give.  It.  Up.

B.  Remember the whole chickenhawk train of ....ummm...."logic" from the libtards?  Is this train of ....ummm...."logic" still applicable?  Or are we supposed to have forgotten about that, too?

C.  The person who can tell me what our actual policy is regarding Libya gets a shiny red apple since "Qadaffi must go" does not mean "regime change." 

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 23, 2011 10:53 AM (B+qrE)

91 It's a Wiegel post, cribbing from Think Progress that probably edited  Greta further,

Posted by: justin cord at March 23, 2011 10:53 AM (6UTk5)

92

Totally am in synch with this post, but it's interesting. What Newt is doing is the same stuff liberals do over and over and over again. They demagogue, second guess, flip-flop depending on what works at the time to score political points, all that good stuff. They do so because they have learned that the MSM will not point out the inconsistencies, and will in fact, provide cover fire for them as liberals.

My guess is that Newt is taking this same kind of cheap shot, banking on not really getting called to task for it.

Posted by: RM at March 23, 2011 10:54 AM (TRsME)

93 We don't need values. We need a robber baron with great hair and a Ukrainian sexbot with tits like five gallons of handcrafted vanilla ice cream.

We need The Donald.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 23, 2011 02:52 PM (TATbF)

Bu God, I think you've sold me. Pics?

Posted by: maddogg at March 23, 2011 10:54 AM (OlN4e)

94

A senior member of al Qaida urged Libyan rebels to continue their fight against Muammar Gaddafi and warned of the consequences of defeat, in a videotaped message posted on Jihadi websites, the Qatar-based Gulf News reported on Sunday.  http://tinyurl.com/4kcav69

 

We're now allies with Al Qaeda.  Well played, Barry.  Well played.

Posted by: Cicero at March 23, 2011 10:54 AM (QKKT0)

95 Newt's opinion is about as relevant as Tip O'Neal's. And Tip O'Neal is dead.

Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 23, 2011 10:54 AM (/G5LI)

96

We need a robber baron with great hair and a Ukrainian sexbot with tits like five gallons of handcrafted vanilla ice cream.

 Wow.  You think Trump's hair is great?  Really?

Posted by: meekrob at March 23, 2011 10:55 AM (pSv+9)

97 5th grade was like your personal 9/11? The insensitivity of your remark bears reproach. Everyone knows puberty is our shared, personal 9/11. We long to erect a new tower in its aftermath.

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 10:55 AM (AZGON)

98 Posted by: ace at March 23, 2011 02:24 PM (nj1bB)

I don't think that it is obvious that a few Tomahawks would have ensured a rebel victory. Tomahawks are not anti-tank weapons; they are not usually used against artillery. So what would they have been used against? C&C certainly. But a few A-10s would have helped the rebels far more than the destruction of the ministry of defense building and some communications infrastructure.

If we were serious about this endeavor we should have gone in three weeks ago and destroyed Qaddafi's armor and artillery. Then it would have been a fair fight.

And just to be clear, I supported this -- but for very different reasons. I am under no illusions as to the make-up of the rebels. We should have done this to make sure that Qaddafi paid for the murders of 250+ Americans over Lockerbie -- preferably by hanging from the tallest lamp post in Tripoli.


Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2011 10:56 AM (LH6ir)

99

For all that I'm not particularly bestirred by this latest schtick, Newt's a politician to the core and I'm with Ace re: never feeling "right" about him.  His recent claim that his serial divorces stemmed from working so hard for America did nothing to further endear him to me.  Count me as another vote for Newt Go Away 2012. 

Posted by: societyis2blame at March 23, 2011 10:56 AM (srV3y)

100 We need a robber baron with great hair and a Ukrainian sexbot with tits like five gallons of handcrafted vanilla ice cream. You had me at "Ukrainian sexbot."

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 10:57 AM (AZGON)

101 O/T and Moron Alert:

Megyn Kelly's coming up with pics of Berlusconi's bunga bunga parties.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 23, 2011 10:57 AM (UOM48)

102 I could tell you, but then this thread becomes a flame war.

Posted by: blaster at March 23, 2011 02:42 PM (Fw2Gg)


OH HERE WE GO

Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at March 23, 2011 10:57 AM (6IReR)

103 Problem is, he is one of the few with enough knowledge and moxie to cream Obama in a debate. But he blows like the wind through Andrea Mitchell's crotchless panties- in every direction.

I mean, really. The only thing Romney wins on is a debate about hairspray.

And Pawlenty? He sounds like Mr. Rodger's brother. Frankly it would be unfair. Like beat-up-the-mentally-disabled unfair.

Posted by: Marcus at March 23, 2011 10:58 AM (CHrmZ)

104 Posted by: ace at March 23, 2011 02:36 PM (nj1bB)

The problem with an anti-American in the WH is that it pretty much guarantees that the Anti-American sect in Libya will have the power when all is said and done.

Just look at Egypt.

I really believe that is why Obomba never spoke out for the people of Iran.  Iran's 'leaders' hate America and he is fine with that.

If Bush had done this (yeah, he would have acted weeks earlier, if he even needed too, because he was strong and our enemies knew this) you could be sure that they were working behind the scenes for a pro-American (as much as there can be given it is Libya) sect in power when all was said and done.

Obomba will always/has always come done on the side of our enemies.

I really wish Hillary would start letting her people leak documents etc that shows why she hates her job.  I know Clinton's love power and money, but part of them is still (maybe a small part) still loves America.  Maybe she is waiting for 2012.

Posted by: momma at March 23, 2011 10:58 AM (penCf)

105 We're now allies with Al Qaeda. Well played, Barry. Well played. Well, I never had a problem with them anyway.

Posted by: Chickenhawk Obama at March 23, 2011 10:58 AM (AZGON)

106 Lets not turn a perfectly good Bash Newt thread into a flame war.

Posted by: maddogg at March 23, 2011 10:59 AM (OlN4e)

107 Newt is constantly changing his mind . From women he marries to wars he likes. His over sized ego thinks he can explain it away to those he thinks are below his intellect which means everyone. He acts like you would expect 90% of other college professors would normally act.

Posted by: polynikes at March 23, 2011 11:00 AM (yKP4s)

108 Fine. Let's all bury Newt. So, who is the potential Republican candidate who can walk and chew gum at the same time, with sufficient conservative values?

We don't need values. We need a robber baron with great hair and a Ukrainian sexbot with tits like five gallons of handcrafted vanilla ice cream.

We need The Donald.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 23, 2011 02:52 PM (TATbF)

Fuck that Jeff - I'll write you in before I would vote for that clown.

Vote Jeff and Walk Away.

Posted by: Roadking at March 23, 2011 11:00 AM (gdzvN)

109 103 O/T and Moron Alert:

Megyn Kelly's coming up with pics of Berlusconi's bunga bunga parties.

Hope she realizes they didn't Photoshop her out before showing them..

Posted by: Marcus at March 23, 2011 11:00 AM (CHrmZ)

110 81

Anything interesting happen while I was Central America?

 

 

 

Posted by: Field Marshal Snaphook McMulligan at March 23, 2011 02:49 PM (u2rWt)


I don't know whether to laugh or cry over this.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 23, 2011 11:00 AM (UOM48)

111 Ace,  I do not know why this surprises you about Gingrich.  I wrote him off 1 year after Katrina as an opportunist who will go with whatever the prevailing mood in the GOP is.

Right after Katrina,  he was on Fox pushing for Bush to do a Marshall Plan for the Gulf Coast (massive injection of federal money).  He went on and on about how this could re-do their infrastructure and help their economy,  like we did with Europe after WWII.

The following summer,  he was back on Fox talking about the corruption,  theft,  and waste with the Katrina money.  And then he said "This is what you get when the federal government undertakes such massive programs. It should have been done by private charities."


So,  I wrote him off as a poseur who says what will get him a spot on TV.  It's also how he wound up on that sofa with Pelosi.  He's an opportunist and has no firm convictions.

Posted by: Miss Marple at March 23, 2011 11:01 AM (Fo83G)

112

Well Ace on this we can agree.  Newt is not presidential material. 

 

(Would you expect anything else from a man that could lie to two wives,  daily?) 

Posted by: unseen at March 23, 2011 11:01 AM (aVGmX)

113

We have to be careful- the public will almost always "rally around the flag" once the military is engaged.  No matter how badly Obama has bungled the execution, it's probably going to be a losing argument to suggest that we shouldn't have intervened against a Bad Guy doing very bad things.

We should be focusing on asking the questions that the Obama administration hasn't yet answered.  Are we going to stay until Qaddafi is deposed or not?  Exactly who the fuck is even in charge?  Who are the rebels?  What specifically is our goal?  Was it too much to ask that Obama interrupt his perpetual vacation to come home beforehand?

Publicly the GOP should be supporting the decision to attack Qaddafi, but criticizing his handling of it- and there's plenty there to criticize.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 23, 2011 11:01 AM (SY2Kh)

114 The problem with the "world's policeman" question is that being the "world's policeman" explicitly rules out the first part of the question. "Policemen", for all their good efforts, are only there to clean up the messes. The problems that cause the messes are there before their arrival or they would never be called... but they're also still there after the cops leave again.

Posted by: richard mcenroe at March 23, 2011 11:01 AM (2n5kn)

115 Sheppy's going to be showing the bunga bunga pics (just showed one).  He'll probably break out in hives over the nasty.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 23, 2011 11:01 AM (UOM48)

116 I gree that Hillary at least loves her country. At least compared with Zero and the rest of his crab lice. But one should not forget that Hildebeast willingly went into his brotheral, and she went cheap.

Posted by: maddogg at March 23, 2011 11:02 AM (OlN4e)

117 I can't resist. It's too tempting. Palin is unelectable. Good for another 400 comments.

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 11:02 AM (AZGON)

118

Nothing sadder than a politician past his career expiration date.  Seriously, he thinks this kind of swing-in-the-wind stuff on a Big-3 show is good and  helpful, how exactly?

That alone brings his judgement into question, forget the positions in question...

Posted by: DarkLord's patience is exhausted! at March 23, 2011 11:02 AM (GBXon)

119
You guys don't understand Newt's genius.

All his ideas work...

in theory.


Posted by: Soothsayer at March 23, 2011 11:03 AM (uFokq)

120 Completely O/T

Just installed Foxfire 4.0.   It is Hot and Fast.

AoSHQ comes up immediately, instead of the usual pause.

If you are running Foxfire, upgrade to 4.0

Posted by: Kemp at March 23, 2011 11:04 AM (JpFM9)

121

>>> Good for another 400 comments.

Great, now Ace can take the rest of the day off if he wants.

Did he put you up to this?

Posted by: Roadking at March 23, 2011 11:04 AM (gdzvN)

122

Palin is unelectable.


You heard it here first, gentlemen.

Posted by: Mitt Romney, Mad Scientist in the Laboratory of Democracy at March 23, 2011 11:04 AM (QKKT0)

123 All his ideas work...

in theory.

Posted by: Soothsayer at March 23, 2011 03:03 PM (uFokq)

Ah, so Gingrich is French?

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 23, 2011 11:04 AM (LH6ir)

124 "24 I ask again: who the fuck are the rebels?" The rebels are the, uh, the plucky humanities majors from Benghazi University and, uh, their brave allies in the Libyan Public Employee Unions. Isn't it inspiring how quickly, uh, they learned to use those, uh, AK47's and RPG's?

Posted by: Barrackin' Hissy O'bama at March 23, 2011 11:05 AM (2n5kn)

125 I'm running IE, so I suppose I'm a masochist, and it's not even wearing a leather skirt and 6 inch stillettos.....

Posted by: maddogg at March 23, 2011 11:05 AM (OlN4e)

126 Palin is unelectable.



Good for another 400 comments.

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 03:02 PM (AZGON)

She might be, she wanted the no fly 3 weeks ago. Each day it looks more and more like the rebels are actually terrorists.

If we are being attacked or our people are threatened I am all in for doing something about it.

If it's Arab on Arab violence I am for sitting back and enjoying it for awhile.

Posted by: robtr at March 23, 2011 11:05 AM (MtwBb)

127 119 I can't resist. It's too tempting.

Palin is unelectable.

Who?

Posted by: Marcus at March 23, 2011 11:06 AM (CHrmZ)

128 His recent claim that his serial divorces stemmed from working so hard for America did nothing to further endear him to me.  Count me as another vote for Newt Go Away 2012.  Then vote for a divorcee you can believe in. "New Pussy" might not be the most pleasant reason for divorce, but it's honest. President Donald Trump. SAY IT.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 23, 2011 11:06 AM (OW0nw)

129 I don't know who does Trunps hair, but whoever it is, needs to hang themselves. And Trump must not own any mirrors, or he would know he is wearing a badger on his head.

Posted by: maddogg at March 23, 2011 11:08 AM (OlN4e)

130

All his ideas work...

in theory.

Posted by: Soothsayer at March 23, 2011 03:03 PM (uFokq)

Ah, so Gingrich is French?

 

No, Soothsayer's formulation is Russian.

For them to be French, all the ideas have to work in theory...

and sneer.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 23, 2011 11:08 AM (B+qrE)

131 President Donald Trump. SAY IT. I would prefer Ming the Merciless. Max von Sydow version. Can you imagine the inauguration? It would be like a gay Broadway musical crossed with a Gaddafi military parade.

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 11:08 AM (AZGON)

132 The problem with being the world's policeman is you don't get to retire at age 50 with indexed pensions and gold-plated benefits.

Posted by: Waterhouse at March 23, 2011 11:08 AM (oSMOM)

133 Here's my thing: I tend to be more isolationist when the President is a Dem, because I know they will royally screw up any military action.  Is that changing my stance just to be contrary?  I don't think so.  I'm not saying it's bad when Dems go to war just because, but because they'll make a fine mess of things, and tend to do so more than Repubs, such that it shifts the balance on a cost/benefit analysis.  There's more costs from more cock-ups. 

Posted by: shillelagh at March 23, 2011 11:09 AM (Oz4Bj)

134 ace: "Are the rebels any better? I don't want to say 'they can't be worse,' because, when it comes to these epople, yes, it always could be worse, but at least they have not been proven to have killed 300 innocent Americans already."

That's where I am. There was a window of opportunity just after the Egypt Affair where we could have provided flyover-cover for the "rebels" and could have nudged the tyrant out of power or helped in his assassination (or skipped it altogether and done a decapitation strike ourselves) and been out of there. If the new guy gets in and bothers us, we take him out. And so on. No need for break-it-own-it policy.

Now, the Obama Dither™ has ensured that we get sucked in with no easy way out. His inexperience (or some protective reflex of his of that particular leader due to friends of Qaddafi) will cost us money, prestige, control, lives, etc.

But we'll get nice, archival footage of Rio, so we still have that going for us.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 23, 2011 11:09 AM (swuwV)

135 Great Hair. New Pussy. Trump 2012.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 23, 2011 11:09 AM (OW0nw)

136 The problem with being the world's policeman is you don't get to retire at age 50 with indexed pensions and gold-plated benefits. See? SEE??? This world turmoil is all the fault of Scott Walker!!!

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 11:09 AM (AZGON)

137

C.  The person who can tell me what our actual policy is regarding Libya gets a shiny red apple since "Qadaffi must go" does not mean "regime change." 

-------------------------------------------------------------

It is my firm belief that deep inside every burqa is a Jane Fonda waiting to get out, and that benefits America. 

Now watch this shank. 

 

 

Posted by: Snaphook McMulligan at March 23, 2011 11:10 AM (u2rWt)

138

Am I the only one who thinks that the only reason Newt is flirting with a run (again) is to bolster his visibility and speaking fees?

Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 23, 2011 11:10 AM (SY2Kh)

139 Let me say this - Newt is a valuable thinker on the Conservative side of the aisle. He really is smart, if not quite as smart as he thinks he is, "quite frankly." So, you know, go ahead and be anti on the Dems Mr. Newt. But don't bother running for President. It isn't your gig.

Posted by: blaster at March 23, 2011 11:10 AM (Fw2Gg)

140 Hey, you can even mix it up. Modular bumper stickers. Great Pussy. New Hair. TRUMP/EMPIRE OF JEFF 2012

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 11:11 AM (AZGON)

Posted by: by any other name at March 23, 2011 11:11 AM (H+LJc)

142

Completely O/T

Just installed Foxfire 4.0.   It is Hot and Fast.

AoSHQ comes up immediately, instead of the usual pause.

If you are running Foxfire, upgrade to 4.0

Posted by: Kemp at March 23, 2011 03:04 PM (JpFM9)

Unfortunately, the newest version usually shits the bed with my add-ons. That's why I normally wait awhile to upgrade.

Posted by: Ed Anger at March 23, 2011 11:11 AM (7+pP9)

143

Ace wrote:

"It remains possible that there is deceptive editing here -- this video is offered by ThinkProgress. It is possible there is important context left out."

Uh, gee, ya think?  What?  Didn't have a Dave Weigel article to link to? You're now willing to give Think Progess the benefit of the doubt?  Maybe they might have manipulated the video?  Christ.  We really are doomed.

Posted by: Jaynie59 at March 23, 2011 11:11 AM (/f9MS)

144

And Trump must not own any mirrors, or he would know he is wearing a badger on his head.

Meh.  It's a living.

Posted by: The honey badger on the Donald's head at March 23, 2011 11:11 AM (GBXon)

145
I know there are some conservatives who have derided Obama for failing to lead in Libya, when a judicious application of Tomahawk missiles would have permitted the already-advancing rebels to swarm into Tripoli.

The problem with that is that it would be an act of war without any sort of Authorization of the Use of Force. Libya isn't currently, and so far as I know, not a immediate or even medium or long range terrorist threat, and was not involved in the 9/11 attacks where there may be such authorization - and I read that authorization as being aimed at the Taliban and al Queda and not the Government of Libya.

The Won is the President, and while he has wide latitude with regard to foreign military policy, he doesn't have the authority to get us in a hot shooting war with a sovereign nation just because. Only Congress can do that.

And the next time a lefty tells you that Booosh got us into war! say no, Congress told him to go to war.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at March 23, 2011 11:12 AM (1hM1d)

146 It got better.

Posted by: Guy who got turned into a Newt at March 23, 2011 11:12 AM (McG46)

147 And Trump must not own any mirrors, I thought you were going to tell me he has no reflection.

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 11:13 AM (AZGON)

148 Firefox? Just use Chrome its always nice and speedy on AOSHQ. I was using IE on the site yesterday on a loaner laptop and it blew it up.

Posted by: blaster at March 23, 2011 11:13 AM (Fw2Gg)

149 144 U.K. ministers have admitted the intervention in Libya could last for up to '30 years'.
memo to Libyan al Qaeda revolutionaries...

Posted by: by any other name at March 23, 2011 03:11 PM (H+LJc)

Chelrin, kin ewe say Quagmire?

Posted by: maddogg at March 23, 2011 11:13 AM (OlN4e)

150 Newt's true position is obvious. Whatever will get him the most blow jobs.

Posted by: William at March 23, 2011 11:13 AM (77TeU)

151
"Bombing for Peace is Like
Fucking for Virginity!"

remember that sign?

Posted by: Soothsayer at March 23, 2011 11:13 AM (uFokq)

152 I would prefer Ming the Merciless. Max von Sydow version.

Only if we promise not to blast him into space until such time as we go weary of him.

Posted by: Vic at March 23, 2011 11:14 AM (M9Ie6)

153

And Trump must not own any mirrors, or he would know he is wearing a badger on his head.

Meh.  It's a living.

The ultimate honey badger I don't give a shit job.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at March 23, 2011 11:14 AM (1hM1d)

154 Newt's true position is obvious. Whatever will get him the most blow jobs. I'm gonna have to say that's not a bad way to go.

Posted by: blaster at March 23, 2011 11:14 AM (Fw2Gg)

155 Palin is unelectable.
She might be, she wanted the no fly 3 weeks ago. Each day it looks more and more like the rebels are actually terrorists.

I don't know about unelectable (anyone who's name doesn't include "Obama" is looking pretty good) but this uninformed call really doesn't help. I don't think everything I disagree with is a complete disqualifier (aside from Romneycare), but I'm not encouraged by anyone who's getting swept up in Arab Spring Fever.

Okay, it's not a disqualifier because it would seem to leave me with friggin' Ron Paul, so no.

Posted by: Methos at March 23, 2011 11:14 AM (uqJo6)

156

You're now willing to give Think Progess the benefit of the doubt? 

Think Progress vs. Newt

Kinda dead even on the credibility front, I would say.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 23, 2011 11:14 AM (B+qrE)

157 From his sponsor of a Tea Party group to his constant talking points, it seems Newt's real reason for running is to change what will be written in the history books about him. In other words, he wants to change his place in history by being that man who say the error of his ways and reformed. That's a selfish reason for running, for one thing; for another, I can't respect a man who reinvents himself just so he appears better than he was in the 1990s. It's a sad fact of life that sometimes we don't get do-overs, as much as we would like the opposite to be true.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 23, 2011 11:14 AM (UO6+e)

158 You guys don't understand Newt's genius.

All his ideas work...

in theory.


Posted by: Soothsayer at March 23, 2011 03:03 PM (uFokq)

The funniest Newt story I've heard was by Medved, who heard it from one of Newt's assistants back when he had to move from one office to another (either when he became the Speaker or afterward).  There were two large transfile boxes to be moved:  One had "Ideas" marked on it and the other had "Really Big Ideas" written.

I think Newt savors the flavor of cock, but only his own.

Posted by: Captain Hate at March 23, 2011 11:15 AM (VInlz)

159 I'd bet the f*cking farm that any hot female, if she so desired, could get Newt to say any f*cking thing she wanted him to, 'cause he's playa to-the-bone, Chum.

It's fundamental to his political nature, or in other words, he's a prick.

Posted by: Fritz at March 23, 2011 11:15 AM (/8mBu)

160 144 U.K. ministers have admitted the intervention in Libya could last for up to '30 years'.
memo to Libyan al Qaeda revolutionaries...


Well, at least its a time line....What say you Prez Brackets O'candyass?

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 23, 2011 11:15 AM (Z1jiu)

161

Am I the only one who thinks that the only reason Newt is flirting with a run (again) is to bolster his visibility and speaking fees?

Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 23, 2011 03:10 PM (SY2Kh)

Pretty much. Or, maybe with an outside belief that maybe he'll catch lightening in a bottle. Anyone who says they can predict modern politics is lying. But, probably the speaking fees.

And I say he's earned it. Web-savvy political junkies like to be the first to throw a previously loyal soldier over the side at the first wiff of disloyalty. This guy was doing the heavy lifting for the Right back when Republicans were happy to be the mild-mannered opposition party forever.

Posted by: CJ at March 23, 2011 11:15 AM (9KqcB)

162 Trump curses like a sailor regardless of who is listening if you want to and that to your hair and pussy campaign.

Posted by: polynikes at March 23, 2011 11:15 AM (yKP4s)

163
Newt's true position is obvious. Whatever will get him the most blow jobs.

You say that like it is a bad thing.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at March 23, 2011 11:15 AM (1hM1d)

164
Let's all chip in for an ad in the NYT:

Not In My Name

Posted by: Soothsayer at March 23, 2011 11:15 AM (uFokq)

165 This works too: New Great Pussy Hair TRUMP 2012

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 11:16 AM (AZGON)

166 Let's all chip in for an ad in the NYT:

Not In My Name

Heh, where's the new "I'm Sorry, World" site?

Posted by: Waterhouse at March 23, 2011 11:17 AM (oSMOM)

167
One had "Ideas" marked on it and the other had "Really Big Ideas" written.

hahaha, I believe it.

Posted by: Soothsayer at March 23, 2011 11:17 AM (uFokq)

168 One had "Ideas" marked on it and the other had "Really Big Ideas" written. One box weighed six ounces, the other weighed one.

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 11:19 AM (AZGON)

169 Needs to be said:

Newt vs. Odipstick,  yeah, no contest, I will go with boil, boil, trouble, hair of dog and eye of newt.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 23, 2011 11:19 AM (Z1jiu)

170 It isn’t just the direct military value of a no-fly zone that would have “taken Gaddafi out”. It sure looked like Gaddafi was on the edge of taking himself out and just retiring on his nurse. If Obama had asked for congressional approval three weeks ago when all he held was Tripoli—and not much of that—that little resolve on our part could easily have convinced him it was time for a chalet in Venezuela.

Posted by: Jerry at March 23, 2011 11:21 AM (QF8uk)

171 U.K. ministers have admitted the intervention in Libya could last for up to '30 years'.
memo to Libyan al Qaeda revolutionaries...

That would make me like 100. I'm not that optimistic.

Posted by: Molemar Kadphi at March 23, 2011 11:21 AM (uqJo6)

172 Completely O/T

Just installed Foxfire 4.0.   It is Hot and Fast.

AoSHQ comes up immediately, instead of the usual pause.

If you are running Foxfire, upgrade to 4.0

Posted by: Kemp at March 23, 2011 03:04 PM (JpFM9)

Unfortunately, the newest version usually shits the bed with my add-ons. That's why I normally wait awhile to upgrade.

Posted by: Ed Anger at March 23, 2011 03:11 PM (7+pP9)


Yeah, I still can't download my 'Better Privacy' add-on that makes you able to delete those 'permanent cookies' that sites put on your computer.  Most people think that by deleting their cookies they delete those (LSOs) but they don't. Plus, every site seems to add them now.  Hell, every time I hit this place 2 or 3 usually pop up on the list to delete.

Posted by: momma at March 23, 2011 11:23 AM (penCf)

173 136 Newt is like a dose of the clap.

Posted by: George Bernard Shaw at March 23, 2011 03:09 PM (MvISE)

Before he arrived it was pleasure, afterward it was a pain in the dong!

It was one of Wilde's

Posted by: George Bernard Shaw II at March 23, 2011 11:24 AM (LdYLm)

174 Trump curses like a sailor regardless of who is listening if you want to and that to your hair and pussy campaign Who is this person who speaks to me as though I needed his advice? ***tosses polynikes through window***

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 23, 2011 11:25 AM (+61wI)

175 #176 "Yeah, I still can't download my 'Better Privacy' add-on that makes you able to delete those 'permanent cookies' that sites put on your computer.  Most people think that by deleting their cookies they delete those (LSOs) but they don't. Plus, every site seems to add them now.  Hell, every time I hit this place 2 or 3 usually pop up on the list to delete."

TinyURL went away, too, as did "clear cache" and the restart extension.

Posted by: jwb7605 at March 23, 2011 11:28 AM (Qxe/p)

176

@96: "We're now allies with Al Qaeda.  Well played, Barry.  Well played."

We were allies with Stalin, Mao, and a bunch of other nasties in WWII.  Sometimes, shit just happens.

Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at March 23, 2011 11:28 AM (xy9wk)

177

Who is this person who speaks to me as though I needed his advice?

***tosses polynikes through window***

But he was skilled in the Arts of War!  Didn't you hear??

Posted by: Eddie Jr. at March 23, 2011 11:29 AM (QKKT0)

178 The time to take out Khadaffi was in December 1988, if you're gonna cite the Lockerbie Bombing as a casus belli. Re-reading an account of the bombing, no, I couldn't care less if Khadaffi gets blown up now...and somehow, find the guy who was supposed to have 3 months to live a year ago and kill him, too... but are we now supposed to give Zero credit for this when he can't figure out what the hell we are doing there?

Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at March 23, 2011 11:30 AM (YmPwQ)

179 #180 "We were allies with Stalin, Mao, and a bunch of other nasties in WWII.  Sometimes, shit just happens."

I'm having trouble convincing myself QDaffy is as much of a menace as Hitler and Tojo were.

Posted by: jwb7605 at March 23, 2011 11:30 AM (Qxe/p)

180 Newt sits on couches with Pelosi and worries about global warming.
Deal breaker.

Posted by: real joe at March 23, 2011 11:31 AM (w7Lv+)

181 Newt lost me years ago when he sat on that bench with Pelosi and promised to work with her to fight that #1 threat to mankind -- global warming.

Posted by: Clubber Lang at March 23, 2011 11:33 AM (QcFbt)

182 Stalin and Mao weren't actively at war with us yet. Enemy of my enemy., and all that.

Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at March 23, 2011 11:33 AM (YmPwQ)

183 Newt lost me when he didn't even give me a reach around.

Posted by: Barack Obama at March 23, 2011 11:34 AM (LdYLm)

184 Newt lost me when he gave me the Herpes.

Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at March 23, 2011 11:34 AM (LdYLm)

185 Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at March 23, 2011 03:28 PM (xy9wk)

Yeah, but they were the lesser evil.

Joining with AQ to take down Kadhafi is like allying with Hitler to stop Mussolini.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 23, 2011 11:35 AM (8y9MW)

186 Newt lost me when he put Ben Gay in my hair gel.

Posted by: Mitt Romney at March 23, 2011 11:35 AM (LdYLm)

187 Hmm. How about this: Trump/Sheen 2012... WINNING! AND YOU'RE FIRED!

Posted by: George Orwell at March 23, 2011 11:37 AM (AZGON)

188 It would have helped if Obama had kept his damn mouth shut about Egypt.  Once he pressured Mubarak out,  the Libyans thought he would help them get rid of their dictator.  

The whole mess was caused by him not keeping his mouth shut and trying to act like he's king of the world.

And a quick no-fly zone with an aircraft carrier in the Med,  along with some Egyptian army people on the border would have put a crimp in Ghadaffi's plans. 

Now it's a big mess,  and it is because he CAUSED the thing by shooting his mouth off and then DITHERED so that Ghadaffi could regroup.


Posted by: Miss Marple at March 23, 2011 11:38 AM (Fo83G)

189 Newt gave us a great ethanoly BJ when he was last in Iowa. Therefore, he hasn't lost US!

Posted by: Ioway corn farmers at March 23, 2011 11:40 AM (JZBti)

190

@140: "It is my firm belief that deep inside every burqa is a Jane Fonda Kathleen Soliah/Bernadine Dorhn/Squeaky Fromme/Sara Jane Moore waiting to get out, and that benefits America."

FTFY 

Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at March 23, 2011 11:40 AM (xy9wk)

191 Newt lost me when he didn't put Ben Gay in the lube

Posted by: Bwarny Fwank at March 23, 2011 11:40 AM (LdYLm)

192 131 I don't know who does Trunps hair, but whoever it is, needs to hang themselves. And Trump must not own any mirrors, or he would know he is wearing a badger on his head.   It's a honey badger ....and HoneyBadger don't give a sh1t !!!1!1!

Posted by: MrObvious at March 23, 2011 11:42 AM (v4UYp)

193  Newt lost me years ago when he sat on that bench with Pelosi and promised to work with her to fight that #1 threat to mankind -- global warming.

Posted by: Clubber Lang at March 23, 2011 03:33 PM (QcFbt)

 

Newt lost me when he ripped the last box of ribbed Trojans out of my hands at the drugstore. 

Posted by: Soona at March 23, 2011 11:43 AM (7X1Ce)

194

@175: "They've arrested the animal who raped her, and I genuinely hope he suffers a violent, vicious, brutal end.  Him and his entire accursed family."

Hey, we already got one of his family!

Posted by: Bangladeshi Justice System at March 23, 2011 11:48 AM (xy9wk)

195
Yep, this is exactly why I can't respect Newt either.

He's always got to be the smartest back-seat driving Monday morning quarterback in the room.

It doesn't matter whether it's a Republican President or a Democratic one he happens to be critiquing because, in Newtie's mind, none of them have been blessed with the extraordinary 20/20 hindsight which allows him to share his ex post facto omniscience with the world.


Posted by: leilani at March 23, 2011 11:48 AM (MI7Jw)

196 Adjoran,

"dyed-in-the-wool isolationist who opposes any foreign military activity", learn the distinction between NON-INTERVENTIONIST and isolationist.

Your biased opinion is ill founded, to say the least.

Non-interventionists abide by the Constitution, and require the US Military to defend the borders and interior of our nation. Non-interventionists like Ron Paul promote laissez-faire free trade between nations. The policy of non-intervention is based upon the farewell speech by the Father of our Country leaving the presidency, George Washington. 

Isolationists not only refuse military interventionism, but are also protectionists promoting punitive tariffs on imports to drive up inflation and stagnate trade through commerce interventionism.

Posted by: by any other name at March 23, 2011 11:54 AM (H+LJc)

197

Like beat-up-the-mentally-disabled unfair.

Posted by: Marcus at March 23, 2011 02:58 PM (CHrmZ)

That's unfair? Oops!

I like how Obama has done things in Libya. I doubt he is using my reasoning though: Why help out the rebels/al Queda early and just get screwed by the world doing it? Let them bleed each other all over the place. Whatever ends up dead is that many less ragheads who might come over here and suicide bomb us. Also, he wants someone else to lead. Great! Then, whenever we want, we  can take our marbles and go home, like the Dumb Krautheads just did. (O noes! 2 less frigates & 1 less AWAC!)

I doubt the Commie-in-Chief is thinking like that, but I wish I wish he was. Still, maybe for the first time he didn't lie and it will be days, not weeks.

It could all become academic since the Frogs want to command by committee (and keep their vote strong in decision making) while the Italians say put command under NATO (Needs America To Operate) or they yank the bases.

I'm probably wrong and it will end up sucking some how.

Posted by: TomJW at March 23, 2011 11:57 AM (Li2G9)

198 Newt proved that there's no depth too low for him to stoop to scam America when he jumped onto Gore's Global Warming Wagon against the facts that had already been made evident. Lord Monckton's Open Letter to John McCain made news in Newt's circle, despite the media monopolized flat earth messaging, that "If you deny Global Warming, you're a holocaust denier,"  to be burnt along with the truth of empirical proof at the sacrificial stake of fraud for profit's altar.

Posted by: by any other name at March 23, 2011 12:02 PM (H+LJc)

199 And Trump must not own any mirrors,

With that wife? You're kidding.

Posted by: TomJW at March 23, 2011 12:05 PM (Li2G9)

200 33 HNewt = douchebag.  Everyone knows it but Hannity.  And he may actually know, but still invites Ginko on all the time because he runs his mouth incessantly, says nothing worth remembering, and is an easy way to fill a segment.

 Hannity went on the  most paternalistic rant today, saying America was the world's daddy and the other countries know when they really need discipline & tough love.  That was too much neocon even for me.

Posted by: jeannie at March 23, 2011 12:11 PM (GdalM)

201 Not sure why all the problems with Firefox 4. My add-on's all work. Better Privacy says it works with 4.0.

What is the issue?  If you go to the tools menu they should all show... Curious.

Posted by: Marcus at March 23, 2011 12:13 PM (CHrmZ)

202

The man leaves both his ex wives while they are fighting serious illness, although he was already screwing around on them for years.   His excuse is that he was working so hard for his country.   That excuse alone should disqualify the bastard from ever setting foot in the WH, again.    I mean, who the fuck comes up with that to justify his complete assholery?

That BS excuse, alone, refutes the belief that the man has a fucking brain in his head let alone is smart enough to run the damn country.

Posted by: Steph at March 23, 2011 12:15 PM (AkdC5)

203 Watch any episode of Trump's "Apprentice" to witness how dysfunctional Trump's Cabinet would be. No sane person wants the loudest shouter and most obnoxious tantrum in the boardroom to always be the "winner" of the debate, as if records are irrelevant.

Every presidential decision would be based on advancing Trump's personal business interests, no holds barred. It isn't as if Trump is interested in abiding by the Constitution or Rule of Law, that somehow he'd be a better leader than Obama. Trump is for Obama's social justice, Bush's compassionate neoconservatism, and federal intervention in commerce not for national security but to "level the playing field".

Posted by: by any other name at March 23, 2011 12:21 PM (H+LJc)

204 Ace, I agree with you except for one 'minor' point. Qdaffy is not on the target list to satisfy your and my thirst to avenge the Lockerbie bombing. Since he's not the target, I have no problem with them just killing each other especially since the administration didn't even bother to identify who we are siding with. Are they Al Queada or Boy Scouts yearning for freedom is an important piece of information that SHOULD go into any war-making decision.

Posted by: Schwalbe : The © at March 23, 2011 12:22 PM (UU0OF)

205 I really would like us to earn our moniker of The Great Satan.  Look out for our own interest, cause trouble for our enemies, sell out allies when necessary and buy new ones.

Britain had this down to an art form from the Napoleonic era up until after WWI.

Posted by: toby928™ at March 23, 2011 12:27 PM (GTbGH)

206 Perhaps old Newt will just whither on the vine..........

Posted by: Awnree at March 23, 2011 12:29 PM (sR3hB)

207 Super Atomic Wedgies on that day.

Posted by: Monty

I can see my tree from here.
ps: I've been waiting to use that joke on my nephew.
Pps: answers the other ? sideways also.

Posted by: The Fruit of the Loom Apple at March 23, 2011 12:29 PM (gzJsG)

208 In other words, it seems to me that there are two different, but successful models, for Great Power diplomacy.  Perfidious Albion, the fickle Allie whose gold and military you think you can use to your own ends and who you don't trust but can't stay away from, and the Roman model.  Not the ruthless and enslaving part but the part where, once they start to fight you, they will never stop until they win.  Scipio Africanus style.  We used to have street cred for having that kind of will.  Slow to move but inexorable once in motion.

Posted by: toby928™ at March 23, 2011 12:34 PM (GTbGH)

209 This talk of Trump as President... you think Obama has an ego? Trump would be Obama2. Plus, he'd use the office to impose eminent domain for his next casino-hotel. Arizona would hold the slots and tables while New Mexico would hold the floor shows and parking.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 23, 2011 12:34 PM (swuwV)

210

The man leaves both his ex wives while they are fighting serious illness, although he was already screwing around on them for years.   His excuse is that he was working so hard for his country.   That excuse alone should disqualify the bastard from ever setting foot in the WH, again.    I mean, who the fuck comes up with that to justify his complete assholery?

It was a dumb excuse, but I doubt that the truth- "Hey, I was horny"- would've gone over much better.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 23, 2011 12:42 PM (SY2Kh)

211 I just do eyes, ju-, ju-, just eyes... just genetic design, just eyes

Posted by: Hannibal Chew at March 23, 2011 12:42 PM (GTbGH)

212 crap wrong thread

Posted by: Hannibal Chew at March 23, 2011 12:42 PM (GTbGH)

213

We don't know who any of the rebels are!  Look how well Egypt is turning out, Obama threw an ally under the bus and now the people voted Saturday and the winner is the Muslim Brotherhood and the biggest losers are the women and Coptic Christians.  I heard yesterday that the lowly police set one building on fire, I use the word "lowly" as I heard in, in "lowly paid". 

The Muslims have been killng each other for thousands of years, we should not pick sides and stay out of it.

I'm still PO'd at Newt for the ad with Pelosi a few years ago, I remember them on a bench together!  I would stay home rather than cast a vote for him too, unless I thought he'd beat O but I don't think he can.  How bad is that?

Posted by: Carol at March 23, 2011 12:46 PM (bdB1C)

214

It was a dumb excuse, but I doubt that the truth- "Hey, I was horny"- would've gone over much better.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 23, 2011 04:42 PM (SY2Kh)

Fuck an excuse.   There was none.    Apologize for being an asshole, and at least try to convince people you've changed into somewhat of a decent person.

He can't do that, though, because he isn't.   He's still a self-absorbed prick.

Posted by: Steph at March 23, 2011 12:48 PM (AkdC5)

215

Ace doesn't miss much, but what he doesn't discuss is the Obama factor. 

Little Lenin is the 3rd factor, and he is the reason a respectable person can oppose something that under most other circumstances one would support.

Posted by: proreason at March 23, 2011 12:49 PM (+8dSJ)

216 "But it is unserious and partisan and cynical to urge muscular interventionism when Obama was sitting back and doing nothing but suddenly urging sitting back and doing nothing when Obama opts for airstrikes."

Hmm.  You have a good point, but I've always lived my life doing the exact opposite of what Jimmy Carter would do, and it makes me rarely wrong.  Maybe it works doing the opposite of Obama too.

Posted by: Kevin at March 23, 2011 12:52 PM (ENL+r)

217 In my experience Think Progress doesn't really manufacture things like this. They are proud of their insanity and as far as bashing goes, just imply the usual crap with buzzword talking points. If you haven't read their site you should; they are the worst of Nazi-Communist thought.

Posted by: "My eyes! My eyes!" at March 23, 2011 12:53 PM (+aMaK)

218 Here's something funny.  If you cut and paste this paragraph from Ace's article with the link intact, it says it won't let you post because you are annoying.  I think the parser just called Ace annoying!

But it is unserious and partisan and cynical to urge muscular interventionism when Obama was sitting back and doing nothing but suddenly urging sitting back and doing nothing when Obama opts for airstrikes.

Posted by: Kevin at March 23, 2011 12:54 PM (ENL+r)

219 Here's something funny. If you cut and paste this paragraph from Ace's article with the link intact, it says it won't let you post because you are annoying. I think the parser just called Ace annoying! ---------------------------------------------------------------- If you read his posts backwards the dialogue lines up perfectly with "Five Easy Pieces"

Posted by: pink floyd at March 23, 2011 12:58 PM (+aMaK)

220 American Flip Flops out of Labia!

Posted by: USA at March 23, 2011 02:25 PM (YZISw)

That's always SO aggravating when that happens.

Posted by: Frustrated Moronettes Everywhere at March 23, 2011 12:59 PM (urYpw)

221 Publicly the GOP should be supporting the decision to attack Qaddafi, but criticizing his handling of it- and there's plenty there to criticize.

No it shouldn't. The mission's a dumb one that doesn't do anything for American security and in fact harms it.

Posted by: MlR at March 23, 2011 01:00 PM (uxyPr)

222

We need to get rid of the CIA ban on assassinations from the mid 70s.  Millions of innocent lives could be saved with some well-planned, well-targeted and (most of all) SECRET killings of America's enemies.  I want to see the CIA become a feared service again, like the Mossad.

The risks to Western society associated with having a Star Chamber for dictator assasins have become lower than the risk of NOT having one.  Here are my votes for guys that shoulda been green lighted years ago:

Castro, Kim Jong Mentally Il, the Ayatollah Khomeini, Qaddafi, Saddam, Mugabe, Assad, Chavez and of course # 1 - Osama Bin Laden.  Could we have gotten all of them?  Probably not, but wouldn't the US and the west in general be better off if several of these assholes had taken their dirtnaps a couple decades ago?

Posted by: Kortezzi at March 23, 2011 01:15 PM (piR98)

223

Let's say that Qaddafi gets overthrown by an Al Qaida led rebel force, which then leads to an Al Qaida gov't. 

Would you morons be upset about finally having a nation that we can formally declare war on for 9/11?!? 

If the Libyan people are stupid enough to setup an Al Qaida gov't, then they'll reap what they sow.

Posted by: scrood at March 23, 2011 01:20 PM (4cRlt)

224 Who the hell even cares what Newt has to say anymore.

Didn't his Elvis leave the building when he plopped his fat ass on a park bench with Nancy Pelosi to spout off the "green" bullshit?

Posted by: jmflynny at March 23, 2011 02:18 PM (piMMO)

225 I don't think there is an obvious right or wrong answer to Libya. I could go either way, though Obama did leave it close to the end to make his decision. Obama also has it set up very weakly. We will hand over in a matter of days, etc. He could get major blow back if it doesn't work out. If you're going to intervene do it right.

Posted by: sexypig at March 23, 2011 06:59 PM (2heUi)

226 Let's all chip in for an ad in the NYT Free classifieds Free classified Advertising

Posted by: funkboy at March 26, 2011 07:02 AM (iWRab)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
209kb generated in CPU 0.2235, elapsed 0.3551 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2878 seconds, 354 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.