March 08, 2011
— Dave in Texas As suggested (or re-tweeted) by one of my Senators, how about all 50 states?
Link to story here.
PORTLAND, Maine - The federal government Tuesday granted Maine a waiver of a key provision in President Barack Obama's health care overhaul, citing the likelihood that enforcement could destabilize the state's market for individual health insurance.The U.S. Health and Human Services department said in a letter it would waive the requirement that insurers spend 80 cents to 85 cents of every premium dollar on medical care and quality improvement. Instead, the letter said, the state could maintain its 65 percent standard for three years, with the caveat that HHS intends to review the figures after two years.
The Obamacare savings™ calculations don't mean a damned thing and never did. Gabriel noted the other day over a thousand waivers have already been granted. Favored parties (unions) don't have to take the same medicine as the rest of us. But the key provision of the funding mechanism requires every goddang person has to buy into this mess (with cash).
(Actually Cornyn suggested "how bout Texas?" but I'm not selfish. All 50 states deserve a waiver.)
I'm cool with that. Even though I'm old.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at
05:32 PM
| Comments (63)
Post contains 212 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: NC Ref at March 08, 2011 05:34 PM (/izg2)
Posted by: Kasper Hauser at March 08, 2011 05:36 PM (NYW94)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at March 08, 2011 05:37 PM (r1Poc)
Posted by: Y-not at March 08, 2011 09:36 PM (pW2o
It depends. Did you complete our questionnaire on race and income?
Posted by: US Census Bureau at March 08, 2011 05:37 PM (/izg2)
The House should pass a law that says any entity requesting a Waiver should get one as a matter of right, simply by filling out a simple form. Hell, you could even make it income-generating by having them pay a moderate fee for every person covered by the waiver - a company would surely rather pay 50 or 100 bucks per employee per year for a waiver, rahter than having to comply with the law. And it would be sweet making the unions fork over money rather than just getting waivers as thank you gifts.
Posted by: buzz at March 08, 2011 05:38 PM (i27M5)
Posted by: John P. Squibob at March 08, 2011 05:39 PM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: Barry at March 08, 2011 05:41 PM (veZ9n)
One Federal judge said it is unconstitutional.
Posted by: Druid at March 08, 2011 05:42 PM (RnujI)
I've heard mention of equal protection concerns with the Obamacare waivers...doesn't this crank that to 11?
There is nothing stopping Obama apparently from using Obamacare as a cudgel against those he wants to penalize...
Posted by: 18-1 at March 08, 2011 05:42 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: Y-not at March 08, 2011 09:39 PM
Yeah, he's a Tea Party conservative. Obama granted the waiver as a favor to the State of Maine (who 4 electoral college votes he can't afford to risk in 2012) rather than to the Gov.
Posted by: buzz at March 08, 2011 05:42 PM (i27M5)
Posted by: Fellow Traveler in NJ at March 08, 2011 05:43 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Ben Affleck's Bong at March 08, 2011 05:44 PM (toHWP)
Posted by: Ronster at March 08, 2011 05:46 PM (rzuJR)
Alternatively, no way to ban waivers? Guess not.
Posted by: ParisParamus at March 08, 2011 05:46 PM (cdCC7)
The old frog boiling technique...
Posted by: 18-1 at March 08, 2011 05:46 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: Ronster at March 08, 2011 05:48 PM (rzuJR)
If Obama and the Left cared about the rights of those not on board with their agenda, they wouldn't have passed Obamacare.
There was little from stopping the creation of the "Obamacare Health Nonprofit" that would have allowed individuals, regardless of ability to pay, to join if they so choose.
Obama, instead, choose brute force...
Posted by: 18-1 at March 08, 2011 05:48 PM (bgcml)
So with all these waivers, whats the poor smoe that isnt in a favored class gonna pay now? Every grant of waiver means that much less stash to fund the piece of corn thats in my shit called obamacare
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 08, 2011 05:50 PM (FIDMq)
Posted by: steevy at March 08, 2011 05:50 PM (s9+Dh)
Posted by: Citizenslave at March 08, 2011 05:53 PM (8v5B6)
Posted by: Ronster at March 08, 2011 09:48 PM (rzuJR)
He gave them 7 days on the 3rd.
Posted by: Tami at March 08, 2011 05:56 PM (VuLos)
Barky has to respond to the judge that ruled the mess unconstitutional pretty damn soon. Anyone know the actual date?
Tomorrow or Thursday. I believe the judge imposed the 7 day deadline last Thursday.
Posted by: Mayday at March 08, 2011 05:56 PM (TRgli)
Posted by: lorenU at March 08, 2011 05:57 PM (ZMeaC)
Posted by: NR Pax at March 08, 2011 05:57 PM (1EOfA)
Posted by: Ronster at March 08, 2011 05:59 PM (rzuJR)
I really want the courts to strike down this law but I somehow feel that the government has the game rigged, I didn't feel that way until I saw Michelle Bachman talk about the 105 billion that is cast in stone. I wish we could go back to our old health care system and make free market capitalism work the way it is supposed to work.
Posted by: curious at March 08, 2011 06:01 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Joe McCarthy was right at March 08, 2011 06:01 PM (hJUo3)
Don't you just know that on Thurs, O will ask the judge for a "clarification" on whether he meant 7 consecutive days, or 7 business days? Would be just like him.
Also, I'm itching for someone to sue over the inequality of some states/businesses/people being subject to Obamacare while others aren't. Clearly unfair. C'mon lawyers, get to work.
Posted by: Mayday at March 08, 2011 06:03 PM (TRgli)
"after one of three insurers offering individual plans in Maine threatened to withdraw from the state."
Not coincidentally, that insurer is MEGA, famous (or infamous) for its "mini-med" plans.
Factoid: "Carriers in Maine are required to issue a policy to anyone, regardless of their health, and cover their pre-existing conditions. That alone causes health insurance premiums to be among the highest in the nation . . . at least for now."
Posted by: speedster1 at March 08, 2011 06:04 PM (yeM7r)
Posted by: Citizenslave at March 08, 2011 06:10 PM (8v5B6)
Posted by: Citizenslave at March 08, 2011 06:16 PM (8v5B6)
Posted by: jbarntt at March 08, 2011 06:17 PM (UNFot)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 08, 2011 06:28 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Cass R. Sunstein, Nudge Czar at March 08, 2011 06:30 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 08, 2011 06:32 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: curious at March 08, 2011 06:34 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 08, 2011 06:53 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: curious at March 08, 2011 07:03 PM (k1rwm)
I think they are burying us.
Posted by: StrangernFiction at March 08, 2011 10:38 PM (dKCBV)
I was watching Nikita at the UN just yesterday and had the same thought.
Posted by: jcjimi at March 08, 2011 07:32 PM (EUW8K)
Because you wouldn't buy what they are selling otherwise. Clearly you know this. It's less a battle of Left versus Right as much as it's D.C. versus the taxpayer. The Left is just headed by Marxists right now.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 08, 2011 07:35 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: Rob in Katy at March 08, 2011 07:39 PM (PiTBB)
Posted by: FAB at March 08, 2011 07:45 PM (v85We)
These waivers cannot be constitutional.
Posted by: Derak at March 08, 2011 08:38 PM (CjpKH)
Posted by: Citizenslave at March 08, 2011 09:53 PM (8v5B6)
Take two cyanide capsules and report to your local FEMA camp for further processing.
Posted by: Dr. Kevorkian, Surgeon General of the United States at March 08, 2011 09:19 PM (6CtUc)
Posted by: jbarntt at March 08, 2011 10:17 PM (UNFot)
bingo
Posted by: torabora at March 08, 2011 09:21 PM (6CtUc)
Posted by: NHL Jersey at March 11, 2011 03:34 AM (+rqgT)
Posted by: yalitongstone at March 15, 2011 10:07 PM (66PHb)
Posted by: yalitongstone at March 15, 2011 10:08 PM (66PHb)
Posted by: David at May 03, 2011 01:35 PM (u7Tq0)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.182 seconds, 191 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Rum, Goddess of Doom at March 08, 2011 05:33 PM (YxBuk)