October 07, 2011

Steve Jobs and the American Dream [Domenech]
— Guest Blogger

The career of Steve Jobs exemplifies the American dream.

While his illness was long a matter of public knowledge, it is still jarring that death strikes Jobs at a point so young - at 56, he barely had half the professional years of Edison, Ford, and Carnegie, who all died in their eighties. It means the world will miss out on the latter days of career, whether he would've stretched out for more incredible goals, or turned to more philanthropic pursuits. In his time, he touched so many areas of cultural life, not just through consumer products, his effect on communication and education, but also the creation of some of the best films of the past decade.

So much work in such a compressed period of time. In the beginning, he seemed so young. And at the end, he seemed old beyond his years. Jobs was and will remain a cult-like figure, the confrontational consumer-focused counterculturalist, the turtlenecked Buddhist who lived in empty mansions. His products bore his imprint in incredible ways - the original iPods had volume and gain problems almost entirely due to Jobs' personal hearing loss - and his ruthless expectation for perfection in design is evident - that things should not just look beautiful, but work beautifully. This came at a premium, of course, but it also planted the flag for others to follow and broaden the impact. Sometimes you need a $500 iPad before you have a $200 Kindle Fire.

The Apple fanbase, in recent years, insulated Jobs from the kind of criticism targeted at other prominent CEOs. The genius was all his, the failures the fault of an insufficient apostle. There was major blowback online, for instance, when the New York Times reported recently that there was no public record of Jobs ever donating to charity. But who knows if that would have changed had Jobs lived. CarnegieÂ’s dictum was that you spend the first third of your life learning, the second earning, the third giving what youÂ’ve earned away. Jobs, of course, only got the first two.

Yet what Jobs gave the world was something far more fascinating and eye-opening than another museum wing. He was the rare inventor who did not lose sight of the ultimate marketplace for invention – remaining profoundly and tangibly consumer-focused. There have been few leaders of industry throughout the Twentieth Century who had comparable impact on this scale. Most didn't have a pedigree that said they could change the world. They were tinkerers, dreamers, and visionaries. The risks they took didn't all pay off. But oh, when they did...

Before the announcement came down about Jobs, IÂ’d planned to write something critical about this Peter Thiel essay, and Neal StephensonÂ’s too, both of whom write about what they view as an untimely end to American technological innovation. They raise some good points. But their pessimism just doesn't ring true to me. And in Jobs' death, I think I understand why.

Here's the thing. The really brilliant ones - the ones who truly advance culture and technology and communication - change the things they touch in such a way that the barriers they break are thoroughly demolished. Afterwards, disenchantment sets in. These barriers are broken, yes, but what next? And time and again, the dust left behind becomes fertile soil for the ingenuity of our children and theirs.

The essence of American optimism is founded in a belief that the world we pass on can exceed the one we inherited. We are not prisoners of an all-encompassing destiny, and neither are our children. This is not a uniquely American inclination, mind you, but a human one – but not all cultures acknowledge or honor it. It was here in America where such an experience was uniquely understood from our inception in our creed. We create, as we were created, and know all who are created have worth. So they have an equal claim to life, to liberty, and to the pursuit. And the fruits of this pursuit are passed on via free enterprise to the new generation, who see in this device or invention not a crowning achievement or barrier buster or an endpoint, but the seed for new ideas, the foundation for new creations, the starting point for a boundless flood of imagination.

We break walls so they can step through. We take them so far, and they take themselves farther. We pass on principles gained, and they apply them. The old begets the new.

So Ray, the milkshake-mixer salesman, the son of Czech immigrants who lied about his age to fight in the First World War, invents fast food. And Bob, third son of a midwestern Congregational reverend, who built an airplane in the garage when he was 12, invents the microchip. And Steve, an Arab-American kid born out of wedlock, adopted son of a machinist and an accountant, drops out of college, starts a company in his garage, and invents something that puts the whole world in the palm of your hand.

It's happened before. It will happen again. Until it does: Go west, old man, and grow young with the country.

Adapted from my daily email, The Transom.

Posted by: Guest Blogger at 04:01 AM | Comments (63)
Post contains 876 words, total size 6 kb.

1 I find it ironic that so many are mourning the death of a captain of industry (really, just a good salesman), while they tear down, denigrate, and protest all other captains of industry and always have. Will there be maudlin odes to Bill Gates? I think the answer is no. They hated Carnegie, Rockefeller, and the like, calling them robber barons. So what is the difference here? Ah yes, the religion of Apple. It's a shame someone who was obviously creative died young, that's always a tragedy. And he did provide a wonderful example of the American dream, something in shorty supply anymore thanks to our government. I have a few Apple products and am reasonably satisfied with them, but let's not forget that, in the end, he was a computer salesman.

Posted by: Alex #11 at October 07, 2011 04:11 AM (daLkq)

2 I guess he's still dead, huh?

Posted by: Chris at October 07, 2011 04:14 AM (FMjOm)

3

but let's not forget that, in the end, he was a computer salesman.

He was much more than that.

But you're right, the religion of Apple is the reason he's being lionized the way he is.

Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 07, 2011 04:15 AM (sbV1u)

4 Why does Obama hate Steve Jobs?

Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 07, 2011 04:23 AM (OhYCU)

5 But you're right, the religion of Apple is the reason he's being lionized the way he is.

Thank you for saying that.
Yes, Steve Jobs was a computer salesman who developed a cult-like following.
One more reason that I won't ever buy an Apple product.  Heck I haven't even downloaded anything from the iTunes store.

Posted by: chemjeff at October 07, 2011 04:25 AM (s7mIC)

6 4 Why does Obama hate Steve Jobs? -------------- The success derivative of penis envy?

Posted by: Wonkish Rogue at October 07, 2011 04:27 AM (2xclE)

7 I have a few Apple products and am reasonably satisfied with them, but let's not forget that, in the end, he was a computer salesman. Posted by: Alex #11 at October 07, 2011 08:11 AM (daLkq) I don't think that is accurate. He almost single handedly changed the way the world listens to and pays for music. While he did not invent cell phones, he certainly changed for ever the platforms on which they are delivered. He made the internet ultra-portable with the advent of the iPad, which also is changing the way the world buys and reads books. And while he did not invent the personal computer, oh wait he actually did, his simplistic straight forward designs have set the standard for the market now and in the future. And I am sure I have also left out alot. He was not just a salesman. He "Created" markets that never existed before.

Posted by: nevergiveup at October 07, 2011 04:31 AM (i6RpT)

8 shit can I kill a thread or what

Posted by: nevergiveup at October 07, 2011 04:41 AM (i6RpT)

9 I've had Apple products, I like Apple products, and I appreciate the role Jobs has played in the tech industry, but let's not make him into St. Steve of Cupertino. He was out to make money, he pissed on a lot of people, and he could be a major asshole. All this hagiography makes me uncomfortable.

Posted by: joncelli at October 07, 2011 04:42 AM (YL3wr)

10

Oh please, will we all be this upset when Wozniak dies? I doubt it. There is a mythology about Jobs that is ridiculous. Personally I think he cultivated it and enjoyed it.  He's dead and it's sad for anyone to die. Yes he helped to invent something innovative, but I would never put him in the same league as Edison.

Posted by: Deanna at October 07, 2011 04:44 AM (NEvfT)

11 He was out to make money, he pissed on a lot of people, and he could be a major asshole. All this hagiography makes me uncomfortable. Posted by: joncelli at October 07, 2011 08:42 AM (YL3wr) Good that he was out to make money. This is Capitalism ins't it? And he pissed on people? I am sure he did, after all pee runs down hill doesn't it? And yes he was not Saint and should not be made into one. But all great inventors, like him and Henry Ford ( talk about someone with warts) changed the world.

Posted by: nevergiveup at October 07, 2011 04:45 AM (i6RpT)

12 Well, I heard from at least one leftist that Jobs was a genius, but he was relentlessly anti-union and shipped a whole bunch of jobs to China.....

Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at October 07, 2011 04:45 AM (dIHHd)

13 "turned to more philanthropic pursuits," i.e. provided funding to libtard causes and foundations so even more libtards could avoid getting real jobs, and would be free to intrude in the lives of everyone else.

Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at October 07, 2011 04:47 AM (GhUmv)

14 I have yet to see any biographies noting that Apple was in a tailspin in the mid-nineties with an almost schizophrenic product line (clones, cameras, the newton?) and Steve coming back into the fold was like Doc Frankenstein zapping the monster back to life.

So in effect, he built the company up twice.

Posted by: negentropy at October 07, 2011 04:49 AM (27KAF)

15 I just own an iPod. I don't particularly like Apple products, I definitely don't like the Apple smug, and I think the cult is freaking hilarious.

But that said, we should admire and respect those who recognize market/consumer demand and take risks to meet it. The truth is we need more appreciation of the benefit of those leaders of industry who create thousands of jobs, touch millions of lives, and drive billions in investment income for those who support their efforts.

Free enterprise is a greater force for good than a government handout will ever be.

Posted by: Domenech at October 07, 2011 04:49 AM (PS0gU)

16 He "Created" markets that never existed before.
Posted by: nevergiveup
....................
He innovated.  Take music and iTunes for example.

Ten years ago the digital revolution had given us MP3's and people were trading/downloading music for free over the internet.  Not a very obvious market for starting an entirely new industry on, was it?

But he takes the mp3 player to a new level, shrinks it and provides nearly every piece of music ever made for 99 cent a tune.. and makes billions.

He simply saw things others did not.  That is where his genius lay, I think. 

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 07, 2011 04:49 AM (UTq/I)

17 Good that he was out to make money. This is Capitalism ins't it? And he pissed on people? I am sure he did, after all pee runs down hill doesn't it? And yes he was not Saint and should not be made into one. But all great inventors, like him and Henry Ford ( talk about someone with warts) changed the world.

Posted by: nevergiveup at October 07, 2011 08:45 AM (i6RpT)

I like that he was out to make money but then I'm a money-grubbing right-wing death beast. My problem with him is the cult of personality. It's annoying and dishonest.

Posted by: joncelli at October 07, 2011 04:51 AM (YL3wr)

18 Jesus, how many more of these fucking posts are we going to get?

Posted by: Waterhouse at October 07, 2011 04:51 AM (fNhAr)

19 I like that he was out to make money but then I'm a money-grubbing right-wing death beast. My problem with him is the cult of personality. It's annoying and dishonest. Posted by: joncelli at October 07, 2011 08:51 AM (YL3wr) He was awful good as what he did, what ever he did. Apple was Jobs and Jobs was Apple. Dishonest, I doubt it. Annoying, yeah sure maybe, but the products worked so what the hell.

Posted by: nevergiveup at October 07, 2011 04:55 AM (i6RpT)

20

For fuck's sake, ENOUGH.

Posted by: dagny at October 07, 2011 04:56 AM (WnIbn)

21 Jesus, how many more of these fucking posts are we going to get? Posted by: Waterhouse at October 07, 2011 08:51 AM (fNhAr) Slow news day.

Posted by: nevergiveup at October 07, 2011 04:56 AM (i6RpT)

22 Jesus, how many more of these fucking posts are we going to get?

Posted by: Waterhouse at October 07, 2011 08:51 AM (fNhAr)

Reeducation camp for you

Posted by: Velvet Ambition at October 07, 2011 04:58 AM (mFxQX)

23 I'm pretty sure I agree w Waterhouse. Next

Posted by: dr kill at October 07, 2011 04:58 AM (le5qc)

24 Isn't it great how these Wall Street protestors aren't complaining about Apple?  They love the products (I do too) and that's all that matters.  "If I like it,  it's cool."  Apple is a textbook example of what the far left sees as evil.  They have more cash than any corporation in the world.  Maybe more than any government in the world.  They sell you stuff you really don't need - for a profit.  Their products are made by cheap labor in China.  Steve Jobs made billions.  And they aggressively move to shut down competition over patent rights.  All of this is fine by me.  But to these protestors you would think they'd be burning down Apple stores.  But they aren't because Obama isn't going to run against Apple.  He's going to run against Wall Street and the banks.  So that's the evil du jour.

Posted by: Dang at October 07, 2011 05:03 AM (BbX1b)

25 Did he push the envolope on purpose because he knew his time was short, therefore his cancer helped foster his genious to push forward? Just a thought. Sort of like the guy who gets cut in football camp in his rookie year, then becoming a Hall of Famer (Howie Long).

Posted by: Craig at October 07, 2011 05:08 AM (UHldA)

26

I don't care what motivated Steve Jobs. What I know is that in pursuit of his rational self-interest he directly and indirectly created huge numbers jobs, opportunities, and wealth for countless numbers of people. He was different than almost everyone else because of his innovation and individual impact, but there are tons of Americans out there operating in smaller scales who in aggregate could also create jobs,opportunites, and wealth while pursuing their own rational self-interest if the government would get the hell out of their way.

Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at October 07, 2011 05:08 AM (JxMoP)

27 That's a lot of words, more than enough for me. This might be the longest eulogy ever published on this site. Jobs? I don't own any Apple products, and probably never will. Honestly, I don't see the need for all this fuss.

Posted by: BurtTC at October 07, 2011 05:12 AM (Gc/Qi)

28 What's happening here?

They guy was personally a class-A jerk, who abandoned his own son.

He got rich by convincing suckers (many who blog here) that they had to have his stolen technology in white plastic because "all the cool kids are getting one".

As a bonus, he successfully squashed competitors who had better products which more much more affordable.

His "follow your dreams" pablum used to be mocked here.

Care to trace where his political contributions went?


Posted by: Chuckit at October 07, 2011 05:18 AM (YdtfT)

29 Cult of Apple? What, are they kidnapping kids and feeding them proteinless swill in order to brainwash them? As annoying as apple advocates are, the anti apple dumpling gang go overboard in their bashing.

Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 07, 2011 05:28 AM (3YCP0)

30

For all the fellating of Jobs in the media, what is funny is there are poor people in all parts of the country with no measurable percentage of Jobs personal wealth, who give more time and money to help their fellow man than Jobs ever did.

 

Posted by: Dick Nixon at October 07, 2011 05:30 AM (kaOJx)

31 Juan Cole is bringing the stupid today, claiming that we should thank the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria for Jobs's work.

Jobs was the biological son of Joanne Simpson and Abdulfattah Jandali (a Syrian Muslim then graduate student in political science from Homs, which is now in revolt against the Baathist regime).

That is, like Barack Obama, Jobs was the son of a Muslim.

Then Cole has to admit that Jandali and Simpson abandoned Jobs and so Jobs was raised in a half-Armenian family. But that doesn't stop Cole from bringing up Homs again:

Homs in Syria is the city of his biological paternal forebears. It produced scientists and historians. Hilal al-Himsi, who died in the 9th century, translated from Greek into Arabic the first four books of ApolloniusÂ’s work on the geometry of cones.

Oooh... they had the best scientists translators in the Middle Ages. Colour me impressed.

There's even more funny here:
It seems to me entirely possible that the young Jobs would have joined the OccupyWallStreet.org protests.

An anti-Iraq protest, Jobs might have joined. A pro-Marxist protest, not in his lifetime.

Posted by: Boulder Toilet Hobo at October 07, 2011 05:32 AM (6GvAC)

32

Jobs was the biological son of Joanne Simpson and Abdulfattah Jandali (a Syrian Muslim then graduate student in political science from Homs, which is now in revolt against the Baathist regime).

That is, like Barack Obama, Jobs was the son of a Muslim.



This was a Cole quote. @#$% crappy textbox

Posted by: Boulder Toilet Hobo at October 07, 2011 05:33 AM (6GvAC)

33 Re Apple as a cult: John Siracusa is admitting "When I was a kid, I had a picture of the original Macintosh team on my bedroom wall". Sqweee!

Personally I had Claudia Schiffer on there but, to each his own . . .

Posted by: Boulder Toilet Hobo at October 07, 2011 05:37 AM (6GvAC)

34 steve jobs, a computer salesman?  seriously?  at worst, i suppose.  but isn't it important to remember that he's not michael dell who made his fortune being a logistics and manufacturing perfectionist, this man helped invent the personal computer, then made it relatively affordable, necessary, and usable for individuals, and then later singlehandedly reminded everyone that design is sometimes as important as the product itself?  then there's the side effect by making the ipod the most desirable electronic toy ever produced of being able to sell music, movies, and books electronically when everyone else said it couldn't be done.  jobs runs the gamut with respect to accomplishments necessary to be designated american business icon, capitalist, obsessive perfectionist, workaholic, a technological innovator, inventor, marketer, designer, self-promoter and deserves to be remembered in the same sentences as the greatest american business titans.

yeah, the cult of apple is cloying and pervasive, but steve jobs embodied the american dream and should be celebrated for that.

Posted by: matt at October 07, 2011 05:37 AM (X69df)

35 He was the messiah.

Posted by: jeannebodine at October 07, 2011 05:47 AM (nvlAW)

36 Like Barak Obama he would have been aborted post roe v wade.

Posted by: dagny at October 07, 2011 05:51 AM (WnIbn)

37 Day 2: The Ball-Lickening Holy shit, get over yourself, dude. You're confusing "trendsetting" with innovating. This is exactly what Lady Gaga does: puts new lyrics to a Madonna song, slaps on a meat dress and sparkly lobster helmet and "Ooooooo! That's so exciting!" I had a Palm Treo that did all the things the first iPhone did, with the capabilities that existed at the time three years before the iPhone launched. Internet browsing, mail push, contact management, porn on demand. And yes, a fucking touchscreen, which Jobs did NOT invent. Steve Jobs made premium versions of existing products. He then stood in a darkened theater wearing his super-innovative bjeans and black turtleneck while a single spotlight shined on his latest product perched on his steepled fingers like it had just been beamed down from fucking Zeta Reticulon. Yes, I admire successful businessmen. He was that. But holy shit, quit sniffing his dead ass. He didn't ADD new technology so much as create a high-end consumer space. The only Apple products in reach of the common consumer are iPods. The phones and computers are still well out of reach for the average earner. Apple will never dominate market share unless they make cheaper products or produce NEW technology. Fucking ENOUGH already. Not a goddamn word about Jobs as a husband or father. Does anybody know about his family? Who cares, right? Because nobody ever gave a shit about Jobs the MAN, just Jobs the turtlenecked douchebag Apple homo. I've had enough.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 07, 2011 05:53 AM (l9zgN)

38 Irony: Jobs became that guy on the viewscreen in the 1984 commercial. Take a look at any of his onstage, multimedia presentations to an adoring audience of followers. There's no real difference.

Posted by: tsj017 at October 07, 2011 05:54 AM (4YUWF)

39 As Frank J. of IMAO put it: "The iPad is the only thing that's met my childhood expectations of what 2011 would be like."

Posted by: The Chap in the Deerstalker Cap at October 07, 2011 05:54 AM (qndXR)

40

I just read a little article in the NYT linked by HotAir...all they wrote about is what he's going to do with his money. "What's he gonna do with his money? what's he gonna do with his money? give it to Obama! Give it! NOW!"

I maintain that there is no one as disgustingly greedy as a leftist.

Sick bastards.

http://tinyurl.com/3qfwn3h


Posted by: Rev Dr E Buzz at October 07, 2011 05:57 AM (AMi60)

41 Since Ace has been gone, we've had __ posts propping up Perry. Don't get me wrong, I like Perry, I just think he should stand on his own. We've had __ posts memorializing Jobs.

Come back, Shane.

Posted by: jeannebodine at October 07, 2011 05:59 AM (nvlAW)

42

For fuck's sake, ENOUGH.

Posted by: dagny at October 07,

Thank you! I don't get the Apple cult. Yes I have a product or two and they are nice. But the most puzzling part of the cult is that it's mostly lefties who worship a guy who basically: Took many ideas and improved on them (nothing wrong with that) He also was a billionaire who didn't give away squat and who got rich by making all his shit in sweat shops in China. Not to mention they were ranked as the worst polluters in China. Funny considering all the people who worship at the Apple Alter. They'd love to burn down every Wal-Mart for doing the same thing, but are now blowing Jobs. Sorry Apple cultists are freaking wierd.

Posted by: Minnfidel at October 07, 2011 06:03 AM (1XX+p)

43 The second half of this post is one of the most beautiful tributes to America I've ever read. 

If Steve Jobs' passing makes people remember this country in particular should foster a free market that rewards innovation and creativity, then bring on a thousand more eulogies.

Posted by: VKI at October 07, 2011 06:06 AM (TKoA3)

44 I am getting the same tone here as the one that has went on for two years with/between the pro and anti Palin dust-up. Some like icons and some don't. Facts are marshalled on both side to support emotion driven stances. This shit gets old after a while. But, I guess it's pretty harmless because our opinions and stances don't fucking matter much anyway, whether we are talking about Palin or Jobs. American Idol mentality.

Posted by: tubal at October 07, 2011 06:13 AM (BoE3Z)

45 Geezus. Steve Jobs may be dead but the cult of apple lives.

Posted by: ccee at October 07, 2011 06:17 AM (bNx79)

46

He was much more than that.

But you're right, the religion of Apple is the reason he's being lionized the way he is.

Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 07, 2011 08:15 AM (sbV1u)

Not sure of that. I think DESPITE the religion of Apple, he deserves some lionizing. Face it, he was a changer and we all benefit from it. It wasn't just a sales pitch that made the iPhone take down kings like Palm and Motorola. It wasn't religion that made the iPod trounce Sony's walkman. And it wasn't luck that caused his early losses to Bill Gates vis a vis the WYSIWYG to turn around and make MAC fast, clean and virtually virus free. And is it religion to want products that look good and function well? In all categories of success that Apple enjoys, they have refined and honed them to ultimate performance. That isn't religion, that is good, old fashioned quality.

Posted by: giftogab at October 07, 2011 06:27 AM (SPVfc)

47 I wonder how Thomas Edison would have been eulogized had he died today?  Electricity truly changed the world; iPods locked into a clunky, closed (i.e. more expensive) platform.

Posted by: Phil in Houston at October 07, 2011 07:04 AM (hpj7U)

48 I didn't read this as another eulogy so much as a "look what can happen.. the American dream still lives". Jobs just happens to be a fantastic example of it.

Posted by: AngelEm at October 07, 2011 07:05 AM (94jbd)

49

Yep and all his shit is made in sweatshops in China. The guy is just like Ford I tells ya!

Posted by: Minnfidel at October 07, 2011 07:12 AM (1XX+p)

50 This post is false!!

There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own — nobody!!11111

Posted by: Elizabeth Warren at October 07, 2011 07:13 AM (vZ8SK)

51 He was out to make money, he pissed on a lot of people, and he could be a major asshole. All this hagiography makes me uncomfortable.
Posted by: joncelli

Most great capitalists and visionaries are out to make money, that is their goal.  Most are major assholes that's why they made it to the top.  You aren't going make it if you sit around holding hands and singing Michael, Row Your Boat Ashore. I'd rather work for a hard ass who has the drive to push you to your limits, to make you better than you ever thought you could be and achieve more than you ever dreamed.

Posted by: mpfs, TPT at October 07, 2011 07:24 AM (iYbLN)

52

I just kind of always preferred the Woz' (didn't ever bother with any of the Apple insider personal stuff, not trying to dis' Jobs, and loved parts of what Dom' wrote ...but Woz' invented the bloody thing, and in a very real sense, is the father of the personal computer; could be wrong I s'pose, but there you go).

Not a cult-ist.

Oh: and I still have a treasured SE30 (though I haven't turned it on in years, and no doubt the cap's are all screwed up by now); but between that and an iPhone, I haven't really paid Apple much much attention.

Posted by: davisbr at October 07, 2011 07:26 AM (uCShA)

53 They told me if Obamacare passed, the first thing it would do is kill Jobs. And they were right.

Posted by: Original Roy at October 07, 2011 07:30 AM (jV0wG)

54

53^ Thread winnah!

Posted by: davisbr at October 07, 2011 07:54 AM (uCShA)

55 Someone once compared the PC to a Mac this way: "On a PC you can do pretty much anything if you have enough time and patience.  On a Mac, things are either insanely easy or impossible."  My first computer was an Apple IIe, product of Jobs and Woz that was WAY cheaper (and cooler-looking) than the  original IBM PC's, and my first programs were written in Apple (Microsoft) Basic.  The following year I went back to school (after being a dropout for 10 years), got my Systems degree and started a whole new career.

Thanks to Jobs, Woz and Gates millions of people like me found meaningful work at good pay and helped change the world.  How do you measure that kind of impact?

What I find really interesting is that Apple was born during the Jimmy Carter era, when a lot of people (including Pres. Carter) were dishing out the same crap we hear today:  "best days behind us", "innovation is dead", "American malaise" -- BS then, same BS now.  Those libturds that are "protesting" because we want to eradicate their "Great Society"?  This is their last stand, they know they're toast.

Whatever you do, do it well with all your heart.  And don't tread on me - EVER.  I will always come back.  That's a legacy worth honoring.


Posted by: WildWillyC at October 07, 2011 08:12 AM (TjOL+)

56

I bought one of those things. In 1985. For about $2500, as I recall, of my client's money. And it turned out that the useless god-damned box of chips could not add two numbers. It literally had some screwed-up data base software that would enable you to enter and store loads of numbers (as my client paid someone to do for him), but could not add them up and tell you the total. It had the function, but it didn't work. It was a lovely, stylish, well-designed, impressive, useless piece of junk.

 

Sound familiar? 

Posted by: JinEugene at October 07, 2011 08:56 AM (eQa5p)

57 Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.

Posted by: steevy at October 07, 2011 12:08 PM (fyOgS)

58 The anti-Jobs crowd always shows their envy, cluelessness, and classlessness. His considerable accomplishments are undeniable. His historical positive influences are undeniable. And anyone who nevertheless denies this really ought to stop using modern technology. He revolutionized several major industries, for cryin' out loud. Apple products As far as him "helping other people", he created wealth and employment for a hell of a lot of people, and brought products to market that, like it or not, actually DID benefit us all, even if you stubbornly refuse to use any Apple products because of some silly, neurotic hangup you have about it. And those products were routinely best in class. Rolls Royce products in a Yugo world of PC crap - a fact which is silly to deny. And those who now, in all their cowardice and willful ignorance, attempt to diminish him only diminish themselves. How much have YOU created? How many industries have YOU revolutionized? How much employment have YOU made possible? How much wealth have YOU created? Have fun answering those questions!

Posted by: Mr. Grady at October 07, 2011 03:30 PM (BW8yZ)

59 I have been absent for some time, but now I remember why I used to love this website. Thanks , I will try and check back more frequently. How frequently you update your web site?

Posted by: The Education of Millionaires ePub at October 07, 2011 04:46 PM (zQhC2)

60 You really make it seem so uderstandable with your presentation but I find this topic before really hard to understand. It seems too complicated and very broad for me.

Posted by: The Best of Me iBooks at October 07, 2011 05:05 PM (xZ4xi)

61 Yep! I was agreed, I'll keep in touch to your blog.

Posted by: The Innovation Secrets of Steve Jobs AudioBook at October 07, 2011 05:21 PM (EyHll)

62 Love the video. I'm a year younger than Steve, and I well remember that we only knew "green screen" computers (q.v.) before he exploded onto the scene. My first office job involved editing on an IBM Mainframe at a VDT (Video Display Terminal). I wrote an article for Publishers' Weekly about the future of OCR, Optical Character Recognition: back then, a computer's primitive 'scanner' would only "read" type in 12-pitch Courier font spaced JUST so, and the damn thing cost fifty thousand dollars. Yes, $50,000.

Now my little Epson Small-in-One printer reads all sorts of stuff and digitizes it. For $99.00.

Posted by: Beverly at October 07, 2011 09:12 PM (jk8YX)

63 jesus, I will be glad when people stop whinging about steve fucking jobs. I've never been so happy to see someone dead because of the angst it gave their douchebag fans since princess die.

Posted by: docweasel at October 08, 2011 06:44 AM (G92eR)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
111kb generated in CPU 0.0369, elapsed 0.2379 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2155 seconds, 191 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.