October 07, 2011
— Guest Blogger The career of Steve Jobs exemplifies the American dream.
While his illness was long a matter of public knowledge, it is still jarring that death strikes Jobs at a point so young - at 56, he barely had half the professional years of Edison, Ford, and Carnegie, who all died in their eighties. It means the world will miss out on the latter days of career, whether he would've stretched out for more incredible goals, or turned to more philanthropic pursuits. In his time, he touched so many areas of cultural life, not just through consumer products, his effect on communication and education, but also the creation of some of the best films of the past decade.
So much work in such a compressed period of time. In the beginning, he seemed so young. And at the end, he seemed old beyond his years. Jobs was and will remain a cult-like figure, the confrontational consumer-focused counterculturalist, the turtlenecked Buddhist who lived in empty mansions. His products bore his imprint in incredible ways - the original iPods had volume and gain problems almost entirely due to Jobs' personal hearing loss - and his ruthless expectation for perfection in design is evident - that things should not just look beautiful, but work beautifully. This came at a premium, of course, but it also planted the flag for others to follow and broaden the impact. Sometimes you need a $500 iPad before you have a $200 Kindle Fire.
The Apple fanbase, in recent years, insulated Jobs from the kind of criticism targeted at other prominent CEOs. The genius was all his, the failures the fault of an insufficient apostle. There was major blowback online, for instance, when the New York Times reported recently that there was no public record of Jobs ever donating to charity. But who knows if that would have changed had Jobs lived. CarnegieÂ’s dictum was that you spend the first third of your life learning, the second earning, the third giving what youÂ’ve earned away. Jobs, of course, only got the first two.
Yet what Jobs gave the world was something far more fascinating and eye-opening than another museum wing. He was the rare inventor who did not lose sight of the ultimate marketplace for invention – remaining profoundly and tangibly consumer-focused. There have been few leaders of industry throughout the Twentieth Century who had comparable impact on this scale. Most didn't have a pedigree that said they could change the world. They were tinkerers, dreamers, and visionaries. The risks they took didn't all pay off. But oh, when they did...
Before the announcement came down about Jobs, IÂ’d planned to write something critical about this Peter Thiel essay, and Neal StephensonÂ’s too, both of whom write about what they view as an untimely end to American technological innovation. They raise some good points. But their pessimism just doesn't ring true to me. And in Jobs' death, I think I understand why.
Here's the thing. The really brilliant ones - the ones who truly advance culture and technology and communication - change the things they touch in such a way that the barriers they break are thoroughly demolished. Afterwards, disenchantment sets in. These barriers are broken, yes, but what next? And time and again, the dust left behind becomes fertile soil for the ingenuity of our children and theirs.
The essence of American optimism is founded in a belief that the world we pass on can exceed the one we inherited. We are not prisoners of an all-encompassing destiny, and neither are our children. This is not a uniquely American inclination, mind you, but a human one – but not all cultures acknowledge or honor it. It was here in America where such an experience was uniquely understood from our inception in our creed. We create, as we were created, and know all who are created have worth. So they have an equal claim to life, to liberty, and to the pursuit. And the fruits of this pursuit are passed on via free enterprise to the new generation, who see in this device or invention not a crowning achievement or barrier buster or an endpoint, but the seed for new ideas, the foundation for new creations, the starting point for a boundless flood of imagination.
We break walls so they can step through. We take them so far, and they take themselves farther. We pass on principles gained, and they apply them. The old begets the new.
So Ray, the milkshake-mixer salesman, the son of Czech immigrants who lied about his age to fight in the First World War, invents fast food. And Bob, third son of a midwestern Congregational reverend, who built an airplane in the garage when he was 12, invents the microchip. And Steve, an Arab-American kid born out of wedlock, adopted son of a machinist and an accountant, drops out of college, starts a company in his garage, and invents something that puts the whole world in the palm of your hand.
It's happened before. It will happen again. Until it does: Go west, old man, and grow young with the country.
Adapted from my daily email, The Transom.
Posted by: Guest Blogger at
04:01 AM
| Comments (63)
Post contains 876 words, total size 6 kb.
but let's not forget that, in the end, he was a computer salesman.
He was much more than that.
But you're right, the religion of Apple is the reason he's being lionized the way he is.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 07, 2011 04:15 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 07, 2011 04:23 AM (OhYCU)
Thank you for saying that.
Yes, Steve Jobs was a computer salesman who developed a cult-like following.
One more reason that I won't ever buy an Apple product. Heck I haven't even downloaded anything from the iTunes store.
Posted by: chemjeff at October 07, 2011 04:25 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Wonkish Rogue at October 07, 2011 04:27 AM (2xclE)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 07, 2011 04:31 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: joncelli at October 07, 2011 04:42 AM (YL3wr)
Oh please, will we all be this upset when Wozniak dies? I doubt it. There is a mythology about Jobs that is ridiculous. Personally I think he cultivated it and enjoyed it. He's dead and it's sad for anyone to die. Yes he helped to invent something innovative, but I would never put him in the same league as Edison.
Posted by: Deanna at October 07, 2011 04:44 AM (NEvfT)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 07, 2011 04:45 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at October 07, 2011 04:45 AM (dIHHd)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at October 07, 2011 04:47 AM (GhUmv)
So in effect, he built the company up twice.
Posted by: negentropy at October 07, 2011 04:49 AM (27KAF)
But that said, we should admire and respect those who recognize market/consumer demand and take risks to meet it. The truth is we need more appreciation of the benefit of those leaders of industry who create thousands of jobs, touch millions of lives, and drive billions in investment income for those who support their efforts.
Free enterprise is a greater force for good than a government handout will ever be.
Posted by: Domenech at October 07, 2011 04:49 AM (PS0gU)
Posted by: nevergiveup
....................
He innovated. Take music and iTunes for example.
Ten years ago the digital revolution had given us MP3's and people were trading/downloading music for free over the internet. Not a very obvious market for starting an entirely new industry on, was it?
But he takes the mp3 player to a new level, shrinks it and provides nearly every piece of music ever made for 99 cent a tune.. and makes billions.
He simply saw things others did not. That is where his genius lay, I think.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 07, 2011 04:49 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 07, 2011 08:45 AM (i6RpT)
I like that he was out to make money but then I'm a money-grubbing right-wing death beast. My problem with him is the cult of personality. It's annoying and dishonest.
Posted by: joncelli at October 07, 2011 04:51 AM (YL3wr)
Posted by: Waterhouse at October 07, 2011 04:51 AM (fNhAr)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 07, 2011 04:55 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 07, 2011 04:56 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Waterhouse at October 07, 2011 08:51 AM (fNhAr)
Reeducation camp for you
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at October 07, 2011 04:58 AM (mFxQX)
Posted by: dr kill at October 07, 2011 04:58 AM (le5qc)
Posted by: Dang at October 07, 2011 05:03 AM (BbX1b)
Posted by: Craig at October 07, 2011 05:08 AM (UHldA)
I don't care what motivated Steve Jobs. What I know is that in pursuit of his rational self-interest he directly and indirectly created huge numbers jobs, opportunities, and wealth for countless numbers of people. He was different than almost everyone else because of his innovation and individual impact, but there are tons of Americans out there operating in smaller scales who in aggregate could also create jobs,opportunites, and wealth while pursuing their own rational self-interest if the government would get the hell out of their way.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at October 07, 2011 05:08 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: BurtTC at October 07, 2011 05:12 AM (Gc/Qi)
They guy was personally a class-A jerk, who abandoned his own son.
He got rich by convincing suckers (many who blog here) that they had to have his stolen technology in white plastic because "all the cool kids are getting one".
As a bonus, he successfully squashed competitors who had better products which more much more affordable.
His "follow your dreams" pablum used to be mocked here.
Care to trace where his political contributions went?
Posted by: Chuckit at October 07, 2011 05:18 AM (YdtfT)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 07, 2011 05:28 AM (3YCP0)
For all the fellating of Jobs in the media, what is funny is there are poor people in all parts of the country with no measurable percentage of Jobs personal wealth, who give more time and money to help their fellow man than Jobs ever did.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at October 07, 2011 05:30 AM (kaOJx)
Jobs was the biological son of Joanne Simpson and Abdulfattah Jandali (a Syrian Muslim then graduate student in political science from Homs, which is now in revolt against the Baathist regime).
That is, like Barack Obama, Jobs was the son of a Muslim.
Then Cole has to admit that Jandali and Simpson abandoned Jobs and so Jobs was raised in a half-Armenian family. But that doesn't stop Cole from bringing up Homs again:Homs in Syria is the city of his biological paternal forebears. It produced scientists and historians. Hilal al-Himsi, who died in the 9th century, translated from Greek into Arabic the first four books of ApolloniusÂ’s work on the geometry of cones.
Oooh... they had the best scientists translators in the Middle Ages. Colour me impressed.
There's even more funny here:
It seems to me entirely possible that the young Jobs would have joined the OccupyWallStreet.org protests.
An anti-Iraq protest, Jobs might have joined. A pro-Marxist protest, not in his lifetime.
Posted by: Boulder Toilet Hobo at October 07, 2011 05:32 AM (6GvAC)
Jobs was the biological son of Joanne Simpson and Abdulfattah Jandali (a Syrian Muslim then graduate student in political science from Homs, which is now in revolt against the Baathist regime).
That is, like Barack Obama, Jobs was the son of a Muslim.
This was a Cole quote. @#$% crappy textbox
Posted by: Boulder Toilet Hobo at October 07, 2011 05:33 AM (6GvAC)
Personally I had Claudia Schiffer on there but, to each his own . . .
Posted by: Boulder Toilet Hobo at October 07, 2011 05:37 AM (6GvAC)
yeah, the cult of apple is cloying and pervasive, but steve jobs embodied the american dream and should be celebrated for that.
Posted by: matt at October 07, 2011 05:37 AM (X69df)
Posted by: dagny at October 07, 2011 05:51 AM (WnIbn)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 07, 2011 05:53 AM (l9zgN)
Posted by: tsj017 at October 07, 2011 05:54 AM (4YUWF)
Posted by: The Chap in the Deerstalker Cap at October 07, 2011 05:54 AM (qndXR)
I just read a little article in the NYT linked by HotAir...all they wrote about is what he's going to do with his money. "What's he gonna do with his money? what's he gonna do with his money? give it to Obama! Give it! NOW!"
I maintain that there is no one as disgustingly greedy as a leftist.
Sick bastards.
http://tinyurl.com/3qfwn3h
Posted by: Rev Dr E Buzz at October 07, 2011 05:57 AM (AMi60)
Come back, Shane.
Posted by: jeannebodine at October 07, 2011 05:59 AM (nvlAW)
For fuck's sake, ENOUGH.
Posted by: dagny at October 07,
Thank you! I don't get the Apple cult. Yes I have a product or two and they are nice. But the most puzzling part of the cult is that it's mostly lefties who worship a guy who basically: Took many ideas and improved on them (nothing wrong with that) He also was a billionaire who didn't give away squat and who got rich by making all his shit in sweat shops in China. Not to mention they were ranked as the worst polluters in China. Funny considering all the people who worship at the Apple Alter. They'd love to burn down every Wal-Mart for doing the same thing, but are now blowing Jobs. Sorry Apple cultists are freaking wierd.
Posted by: Minnfidel at October 07, 2011 06:03 AM (1XX+p)
If Steve Jobs' passing makes people remember this country in particular should foster a free market that rewards innovation and creativity, then bring on a thousand more eulogies.
Posted by: VKI at October 07, 2011 06:06 AM (TKoA3)
Posted by: tubal at October 07, 2011 06:13 AM (BoE3Z)
Posted by: ccee at October 07, 2011 06:17 AM (bNx79)
He was much more than that.
But you're right, the religion of Apple is the reason he's being lionized the way he is.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 07, 2011 08:15 AM (sbV1u)
Not sure of that. I think DESPITE the religion of Apple, he deserves some lionizing. Face it, he was a changer and we all benefit from it. It wasn't just a sales pitch that made the iPhone take down kings like Palm and Motorola. It wasn't religion that made the iPod trounce Sony's walkman. And it wasn't luck that caused his early losses to Bill Gates vis a vis the WYSIWYG to turn around and make MAC fast, clean and virtually virus free. And is it religion to want products that look good and function well? In all categories of success that Apple enjoys, they have refined and honed them to ultimate performance. That isn't religion, that is good, old fashioned quality.
Posted by: giftogab at October 07, 2011 06:27 AM (SPVfc)
Posted by: Phil in Houston at October 07, 2011 07:04 AM (hpj7U)
Posted by: AngelEm at October 07, 2011 07:05 AM (94jbd)
Yep and all his shit is made in sweatshops in China. The guy is just like Ford I tells ya!
Posted by: Minnfidel at October 07, 2011 07:12 AM (1XX+p)
There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own — nobody!!11111
Posted by: Elizabeth Warren at October 07, 2011 07:13 AM (vZ8SK)
Posted by: joncelli
Most great capitalists and visionaries are out to make money, that is their goal. Most are major assholes that's why they made it to the top. You aren't going make it if you sit around holding hands and singing Michael, Row Your Boat Ashore. I'd rather work for a hard ass who has the drive to push you to your limits, to make you better than you ever thought you could be and achieve more than you ever dreamed.
Posted by: mpfs, TPT at October 07, 2011 07:24 AM (iYbLN)
I just kind of always preferred the Woz' (didn't ever bother with any of the Apple insider personal stuff, not trying to dis' Jobs, and loved parts of what Dom' wrote ...but Woz' invented the bloody thing, and in a very real sense, is the father of the personal computer; could be wrong I s'pose, but there you go).
Not a cult-ist.
Oh: and I still have a treasured SE30 (though I haven't turned it on in years, and no doubt the cap's are all screwed up by now); but between that and an iPhone, I haven't really paid Apple much much attention.
Posted by: davisbr at October 07, 2011 07:26 AM (uCShA)
Posted by: Original Roy at October 07, 2011 07:30 AM (jV0wG)
Thanks to Jobs, Woz and Gates millions of people like me found meaningful work at good pay and helped change the world. How do you measure that kind of impact?
What I find really interesting is that Apple was born during the Jimmy Carter era, when a lot of people (including Pres. Carter) were dishing out the same crap we hear today: "best days behind us", "innovation is dead", "American malaise" -- BS then, same BS now. Those libturds that are "protesting" because we want to eradicate their "Great Society"? This is their last stand, they know they're toast.
Whatever you do, do it well with all your heart. And don't tread on me - EVER. I will always come back. That's a legacy worth honoring.
Posted by: WildWillyC at October 07, 2011 08:12 AM (TjOL+)
I bought one of those things. In 1985. For about $2500, as I recall, of my client's money. And it turned out that the useless god-damned box of chips could not add two numbers. It literally had some screwed-up data base software that would enable you to enter and store loads of numbers (as my client paid someone to do for him), but could not add them up and tell you the total. It had the function, but it didn't work. It was a lovely, stylish, well-designed, impressive, useless piece of junk.
Sound familiar?
Posted by: JinEugene at October 07, 2011 08:56 AM (eQa5p)
Posted by: steevy at October 07, 2011 12:08 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: Mr. Grady at October 07, 2011 03:30 PM (BW8yZ)
Posted by: The Education of Millionaires ePub at October 07, 2011 04:46 PM (zQhC2)
Posted by: The Best of Me iBooks at October 07, 2011 05:05 PM (xZ4xi)
Posted by: The Innovation Secrets of Steve Jobs AudioBook at October 07, 2011 05:21 PM (EyHll)
Now my little Epson Small-in-One printer reads all sorts of stuff and digitizes it. For $99.00.
Posted by: Beverly at October 07, 2011 09:12 PM (jk8YX)
Posted by: docweasel at October 08, 2011 06:44 AM (G92eR)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2155 seconds, 191 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Alex #11 at October 07, 2011 04:11 AM (daLkq)