January 17, 2011
— Open Blogger The ridiculous attempts by the MFM and the left (BIRM) to link the tea party movement to the paranoid schizophrenic Tucson shooter, in retrospect, shouldn't come as any surprise. From the second it appeared that Rick Santelli's "shot heard 'round the world" (can I still say that?) might just have awakened a sleeping giant that would wrest power away from the statists in D.C., the effort to smother this grassroots movement in the crib (too violent?) has been increasingly strident.
When people were shouting "STOP!" to their representatives regarding Obamacare at town hall meetings across the country, the Speaker of the House engaged in this classic piece of slander with a healthy dose of projection thrown in:
I think there are AstroTurf — you be the judge, carrying swastikas and symbols like that to a town meeting on health care.This initiative is funded by the high end. We call it "Astroturf," it's not really a grass roots movement. It's AstroTurf by some of the wealthiest people of America.
And it wasn't just Pelosi. The president's own press secretary made the same "astroturf" accusation and the usual suspects on the left talked about how awful it was that the unwashed masses actually had the gall to show up at town hall meetings and express their opinions. Their preferred option where the citizenry just lies back and thinks of England wasn't working this time.
Then Massachausetts elected Scott Brown. The left pulled out all manner of parliamentary tricks to ram Obamacare down our throats despite the fact that Brown's election was a loud "NO!" vote on it from a state that had already implemented version 1.0.
Time to play the race card.
Civil rights hero Rep. John Lewis was taunted by tea partiers who chanted n***** at least 15 times, according to the Associated Press ... confirmed by Lewis spokeswoman Brenda Jones and Democratic Rep. Andre Carson, who was walking with Lewis. "It was like going into the time machine with John Lewis," said Carson, a former police officer. "He said it reminded him of another time."
Many cameras were present when San Fran Nan and the Congressional Black Caucus trolled through the crowd on the way to casting their "historic" vote. However, no one (including the CBC members who were filming) apparently managed to capture any of these slurs, not a single one, and Andrew Breitbart's offer of a $100,000 reward for footage went unclaimed.
Despite the fact that we passed the bill so now we could find out what was in it, the noise didn't subside. Worse, the left's time-honored tradition of shouting "RACIST!" to shut its opponents up was ineffective. Time for them to move on to mockery. And who better to pull this one off than the Condescender-in-Chief:
I've been a little amused over the past couple of days where people have been having these rallies about taxes ...you would think they would be saying "thank you."
Yeah, right. I can't imagine why people whose main concern is about the crushing debt burden facing their children and grandchildren weren't falling at Obama's feet thanking him for a couple of tanks of gas worth of a tax cut.
You know the rest of the story ... an historic refudiation of the left in the November elections that was orchestrated entirely from Sarah Palin's fully armed and operational battle station Facebook page (to hear them tell it).
The left's calls for "civility" in the wake of the Tucson shootings are just their latest attempt to tell people opposed to their policies to shut up. Nothing more, nothing less.
I favor Don Surber's response. Bite me!
Posted by: Open Blogger at
07:12 AM
| Comments (65)
Post contains 614 words, total size 4 kb.
How can we live in such a world? Seriously, between all the non-namecalling and not being able to explain how magnets work, this whole thing should just collapse into the quantum dust from whence it came.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 17, 2011 07:17 AM (GZITd)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at January 17, 2011 07:20 AM (SJ6/3)
And please try to cut down on the violent rhetoric (refudiation!) presented here.. it makes me feel all ooky inside.. Hey! Where's my Colt?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 17, 2011 07:20 AM (f9c2L)
The really bad part, Flavius? That is not, unfortunately, a euphemism.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 17, 2011 07:23 AM (GZITd)
I'm feeling incited by those words.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 17, 2011 07:23 AM (4ucxv)
And "boy." Don't forget -- you can always hear "boy."
Posted by: Big Lefty Media at January 17, 2011 07:23 AM (cHqVb)
What a good reminder on MLK Day - John Lewis is now seen as the face of today's 'Civil Rights' movement.
Good job, progs.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 17, 2011 07:24 AM (Ktk1n)
Seriously, have these establishment RINO suckers of cock been living under a rock for the last decade? How did that whole "don't fight back thing" work out for BOOOOSHITLER?
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at January 17, 2011 07:25 AM (IoUF1)
Posted by: Peggy Joseph at January 17, 2011 07:25 AM (mHQ7T)
Yeah, that'd be nice, but it won't. Its why we have to fight them every step of the way until even the 52% even realize that a large portion of the blame for the current state of civilization should be laid at the feet of the MFM.
We have to start fighting the propaganda war, because we're leaving that front unguarded (mostly) while trying to take "the high road."
You know what Audie Murphy called Germans who took the high road? Good targets. You know what I'd call Republicans who "take the high (rhetorical) road," (If I were the MFM)? Stupid.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at January 17, 2011 07:25 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Full Loughner at January 17, 2011 07:28 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at January 17, 2011 07:28 AM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Joe Biden at January 17, 2011 07:30 AM (zgZzy)
Posted by: AmishDude at January 17, 2011 07:31 AM (/CvyH)
Posted by: Clyde Shelton at January 17, 2011 07:31 AM (NITzp)
Posted by: can't let go of old memes at January 17, 2011 07:32 AM (S5YRY)
Why do I ever click over to the NYT? Why do I do it?
Every time I think: well, maybe it'll at least be humorously bad... but it's not. It's just bad. Or, as Whoopi might say: "bad-bad."
And RD has been an idiot for a long time, so that really didn't surprise me.
The Editorial about how awesome it was for Illinois to raise it's taxes? That one was pathetic. I get it that the CBO uses static analysis. I even sort of get it that Congress does (it's stupid, but when you're doing paper-napkin calculations, it's easier: and heaven forbid a CongressCretin's job be anything but easy). The NYT with Nobel Prize winning Paul Krugmann? Really? How about exercising some of that research ability you're supposed to be good at and see what raising taxes really does to treasury income. How about that?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at January 17, 2011 07:34 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Mb at January 17, 2011 07:34 AM (Fr8N6)
Posted by: Harry Reid at January 17, 2011 07:35 AM (zgZzy)
the Speaker of the House engaged in this classic piece of slander with a healthy dose of projection thrown in:
I don't think there is such a thing as a healthy dose of projection.
Projection ain't healthy at any dosage.
Posted by: Speller at January 17, 2011 07:35 AM (J74Py)
“Honestly, this pick reeks of desperation,” wrote Michael Cohen of the New America Foundation in the minutes after the news became public. “How can anyone logically argue that Sarah Pallin [sic], a one-term governor of Alaska, is qualified to be President of the United States?”
“Q: Sen. McCain, given Gov. Palin’s paltry experience, how is she qualified to be commander in chief?,” Stein asked hypothetically. “A: Well, she has much experience as the Democratic nominee.”
“What a joke,” added Jeffrey Toobin of the New Yorker. “I always thought that some part of McCain doesn’t want to be president, and this choice proves my point. Welcome back, Admiral Stockdale.”
“This seems to me like an occasion when the non-official campaign has a big role to play in defining Palin, shaping the terms of the conversation and saying things that the official [Obama] campaign shouldn’t say – very hard-hitting stuff, including some of the things that people have been noting here – scare people about having this woefully inexperienced, no foreign policy/national security/right-wing christia wing-nut a heartbeat away …… bang away at McCain’s age making this unusually significant …. I think people should be replicating some of the not-so-pleasant viral email campaigns that were used against [Obama],” noted Daniel Levy of the Century Foundation.“Her decision to keep the Down’s baby is going to be a hugely emotional story that appeals to a vast swath of America, I think,” Donmoyer wrote.
Politico reporter Ben Adler, now an editor at Newsweek, replied, “but doesn’t leaving sad baby without its mother while she campaigns weaken that argument? Or will everyone be too afraid to make that point?”
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 17, 2011 07:37 AM (mHQ7T)
10 In related news, Ross Douchehat is a fucking scumbag.
She was libeled in connection with a murder!!! But hey, let's have Sarah turn the cheek.
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at January 17, 2011 07:37 AM (zgZzy)
Projection ain't healthy at any dosage.
I used to watch projections at the drive-in after my friends let me out of the trunk.
Posted by: bijou at January 17, 2011 07:37 AM (jFpNn)
Posted by: B. H. O. at January 17, 2011 07:38 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: Barack Obasketball at January 17, 2011 07:39 AM (zgZzy)
RCP was more truthful in advertising his headline than TepidAir. I clicked on it knowing full well what I was getting into but still came away shocked at the lengths Douchehat went to blame the victim.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 17, 2011 07:41 AM (mHQ7T)
--I favor Don Surber's response. Bite me!
What does the crazy VP have to do with this? He's more stupid than nasty.
Posted by: Charles Krauthammer's 3rd, And Last, Brain Cell at January 17, 2011 07:41 AM (xDePn)
Posted by: Clyde Shelton at January 17, 2011 07:43 AM (NITzp)
Posted by: Big Lefty Media at January 17, 2011 11:23 AM (cHqVb)
Did someone call "Joy"?
Posted by: The Queen of the View at January 17, 2011 07:48 AM (kb0wl)
Posted by: A.G. at January 17, 2011 07:49 AM (oAVyq)
Posted by: Trish at January 17, 2011 07:51 AM (yqhkv)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 17, 2011 07:53 AM (mHQ7T)
Exactly. Bite me, you immoral hypocrites. You will not rule my country.
Posted by: Derak at January 17, 2011 07:57 AM (CjpKH)
This is a two-front war . . . .
Posted by: Jimmuy at January 17, 2011 07:58 AM (0yTk1)
Posted by: Clyde Shelton at January 17, 2011 08:02 AM (NITzp)
The question left unanswered: which journalists and pundits?
While there was plenty of debate in newspapers, and on radio and
television about the effects of a toxic politic environment, most of the
direct accusations against conservative talk radio and pundits were
leveled by people online, not members of the mainstream media.
Mr. O’Reilly went on to cite a column by the Times Op-Ed columnist Paul Krugman and a Times editorial as evidence that The Times and others were blaming Sarah Palin for the killings and portraying those on the right as “accessories to murder.”
The Times editorial did not actually blame the right for Mr. Loughner’s actions, saying, “It is facile and mistaken to attribute this particular madman’s act directly to Republicans or Tea Party members.” Mr. O’Reilly, who did not read that sentence on the air, did read the section of the editorial that said “But it is legitimate to hold Republicans and particularly their most virulent supporters in the media responsible for the gale of anger” that has produced an increase in the number of threats toward members of Congress and the judiciary.
Posted by: kbdabear at January 17, 2011 08:06 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: Trish at January 17, 2011 08:09 AM (yqhkv)
[link goes to blogprof]
Posted by: Museisluse at January 17, 2011 08:11 AM (kb7mQ)
But Republicans have always been more polite, so this will probably just make the angry and violent left stand out. Not that the MFM will ever notice, but many will.
What the hell is BIRM?
Posted by: bill at January 17, 2011 08:11 AM (GS6+S)
The sickest part of this last week were libtards complaining that Palin was trying to inject herself into the story with her video. I'm pretty sure she would have LOVED not to have been called a murderer from every fucking TV anchor because she had a map with campaign targets on it for 5 days. And that idiot McVain sat back quiet, and now even wants to sit with Dems during the SOTU speach, effectively saying 'Yes, we need to be more civil so more murders dont happen.' F.U. McVain
And then the Fuckwit Krauthammer saying she should have kept quiet, that Big Bill Oreilley already ended the argument for her. Well Chuckles, the argument is STILL going with death threats during an ABC show (which they failed to note on their own program) so shove it up your ass. All of Fox is now sucking Barry's dick because Bill OReilley has a Super Bowl interview/fellating show to do, and we don't want to make Ø mad before that.
Posted by: Schwalbe : © at January 17, 2011 08:12 AM (UU0OF)
Posted by: Andy at January 17, 2011 08:25 AM (veZ9n)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 17, 2011 08:32 AM (1Jaio)
tinyurl.com/2ga26pl
Breitbart tried to get the MFM to show those videos, but none of them would.
Posted by: Blackford Oakes at January 17, 2011 08:35 AM (MadRw)
Republican senators are a bunch of goobers, especially if they fall for this civility charade. Maybe we need to lock them in a room and run a never ending spool of the campaign ads their "friends" broadcast. "Sen. DumbAss voted to ship all of our jobs to China!!!!!" Then some voter fraud statistics and then some more lies during restroom breaks.
These doofuses don't understand that they have political enemies. They must understand that the MFM is an enemy.
In short, what Clyde said about Guadacanal. That is all.
Posted by: Mr. Barky at January 17, 2011 09:00 AM (qwK3S)
Posted by: bill at January 17, 2011 09:10 AM (GS6+S)
Posted by: Jagiello at January 17, 2011 09:15 AM (Du09Y)
Posted by: ManeiNeko at January 17, 2011 09:16 AM (TiE76)
Loughner's school accepted grant money to participate in a small schools workshop program that was part of the Ayers-Obama Annenberg Challenge. The maniac was in their program from grade 9 until he dropped out during his senior year. Did anyone think it was coincidence that a favorite YouTube video was a flag-burning? That the Communist Manifesto was a favorite book? In the video that got him expelled from community college, he ranted about "genocide" and "torture." All this violent rhetoric came from the left.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 17, 2011 09:44 AM (mHQ7T)
Joynny Utah: Okay. I get it. This is where you tell me that "locals rule", and that Yuppie insects like me shouldn't be surfing the break, right?
Bunker: [smiling] Nope. That would be a waste of time... We're just gonna fuck you up!
Posted by: fixerupper at January 17, 2011 09:52 AM (J5Hcw)
This was their strategy from the get go. Obama declines to comment aka "stays above the fray" and "lets cooler heads prevail" while his surrogates saturate the media with his lies. Meanwhile, he conducts polling as to whether the public is buying his spin or not. From there, he decides what his response will be. By that time, the dirty work is done and his hands are clean. But his aim has not changed since he waged war on FOX and Limbaugh (never Palin directly, because that raises her profile and engenders sympathy for her), that is to silence his critics. He has accomplished this with his memorial pep rally. He doesn't want civility; little dead Christina splashing in heavenly puddles does. Giffords opened her eyes (chorus 3X), so do it for her. Just disgusting.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 17, 2011 09:54 AM (mHQ7T)
Stage 2 - Claim the middle ground, demand civility (especially from the people you lied about)
Stage 3 - Carry on with the assumption that your lies are the truth, refuse to discuss it, claim that anyone who wants to discuss it is prolonging the conflict.
They do this over and over and over - it's become a habit, that's how they all jumped into it immediately this time, they don't even have to coordinate.
Stage 1 is pulling on the ratchet handle, stage 2 and 3 are resetting for another pull.
We have to stop going along with it, we need to document it, describe it, and throw it back in their faces, because we're running out of time. We're broke.
We *can't* reconcile with them, they won't let us. We have to go past them, around them, because the "progressives" aren't going anywhere.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at January 17, 2011 11:02 AM (bxiXv)
The comparison to Hitler's Germany doesn't seem as apt as comparisons to Communist China.
Mid oughts US - dissent is the highest form of patriotism
late 1950s China - 100 Flowers Movemeent - Mao encouraged his countrymen to criticize, in order to make stronger, the Communist Party
2011 US - dissent is racism, dissent is violence, dissent is Islamaphobic, you wingnuts almost got a Congresswoman killed!
early 1960s China - Anti-Righist Campaign launched, all that criticism we solicited previously? Just kidding! Now your name is on a list.
Obviously we're nowhere near the Chinese Anti-Rightist campaign. Palin walks free, but there's a significant percentage of the country that wishes this were not so. Once that fraction hits 50+1, it's done. Imgaine if crazy killer said he was doing it for Palin? I don't think that would get them to 50+1 but who knows? Once they arrest one for encitement to violence all that operate in the same 'space' face the same 'music'. If Obama's popularity returns I can see it.
Posted by: East Bay Jay at January 17, 2011 11:26 AM (ocHBO)
1. Doesn't anyone else get a little tired of the conservative pundits lauding about Obama when he makes a speech of unity after the left creates the problem.
2. The t-shirts at the memorial service may have been given out by the university but the slogan was one Obama used in 2008.
3. If the applause at the memorial service was the result of the spontaneous outpouring of sympathy for the victims, why was the Jumbotron does flashing applause.
(I have links but can never get the link to take on this site)
4. With all the kumbaya, and lets show a united front for our President at the State of the Union, we might as well change the name of Congress to Politburo.
Posted by: davod at January 17, 2011 12:31 PM (GUZAT)
Ignore those trillion dollar deficits, fools. Your betters know how to spend your money for you.
It's still Tea Party time.
Posted by: MarkD at January 17, 2011 02:26 PM (0Jy1K)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3081 seconds, 193 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








http://www.kronosphere.com/kronology/?p=8
Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at January 17, 2011 07:17 AM (KktlX)