June 04, 2011
— Dave in Texas Today is the 69th anniversary of the beginning of one of the most important battles in the Pacific in WWII. It was just six months after the catastrophic Japanese attack at Pearl Harbor. But during those six months Japan pushed ahead and consolidated their advantages, inflicting stinging defeats in the Philippines, Singapore and the Dutch East Indies.

Yamamoto's intent was to eliminate the only serious obstacle to Japanese expansion, the American carrier fleet, and he judged the best way to do this was a complex operation that threatened Midway and lured the numerically inferior American forces into a conclusive defeat. The US had a very important advantage, they had broken Japanese naval code JN25 and knew not only what Yamamoto intended, but also his disposition and strength. Adm. Chester Nimitz was able to determine that Yamamoto had spread his anti-aircraft capabilities too thin, and he used that info to outmaneuver and defeat him.
American losses were one carrier, a destroyer, 150 planes, and 300 sailors. But the Japanese lost an astonishing 4 aircraft carriers, a cruiser, almost 250 aircraft, and 3,000 dead.
It's not possible to cover these events or their significance in a blog post, but there are several great resources out there, and actually the movie Tora! Tora! Tora! Midway is a reasonably accurate portrayal of the battle.
ghengis tipped me about the date, June 4. Coincidentally it's also my youngest kid's birthday.
also D'OH. Hey, they shared some footage (thanks commenter kj)
Have a great weekend y'all.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at
12:38 PM
| Comments (76)
Post contains 264 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Smiley at June 04, 2011 12:43 PM (1bLMV)
actually the movie Tora! Tora! Tora! is a reasonably accurate portrayal of the battle.
ah actually thats about pearl harbor midway would be the best movie to watch about midway
Posted by: kj at June 04, 2011 12:44 PM (Q1Okj)
Simple rundown of the battle, the low level dive bombers sacrificed themselves against Japanese air defenses. The japanese lowered their combat air patrol, and some lucky breaks for the americans helped the SBD pilots dive bomb into history. Everyone should know the history of Midway.
Posted by: jules at June 04, 2011 12:46 PM (P7Hj2)
Posted by: Old Man Jenkins from Spongebob at June 04, 2011 12:49 PM (K2wpv)
Posted by: nickless at June 04, 2011 12:52 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Andy at June 04, 2011 12:53 PM (veZ9n)
I can't wait for the Dayton Air Show this year.
The last time I was there a production called Tora! Tora! Tora! was there with restored Zeros and Oscars and a shit ton of pyrotechnics to simulate Pearl Harbor.
It was frickin' bad ass!
Posted by: ErikW at June 04, 2011 12:54 PM (HDdxs)
Posted by: Rod Graves at June 04, 2011 12:55 PM (mKMj1)
Posted by: Lincolntf at June 04, 2011 12:56 PM (Z05lF)
Btw, Admiral John Ford was wounded at Midway while shooting this film.
http://youtu.be/vi4HwxOZDJw
John Wayne wasn't, and John Ford never let him live it down.
Posted by: jules at June 04, 2011 12:57 PM (P7Hj2)
Posted by: Stuff Roosevelt Would Say If He Were Also A Douche at June 04, 2011 01:01 PM (FcR7P)
For a great telling of Midway, try Wouk's Winds of War. You'll have to commit, as it's a 1000 pg book, but it's a fantastic telling of the tale. He combines a great overview of the historical significance of the battle with a gripping fictional personal story. You'll walk away very proud of your countrymen as well as awestruck by the valor of the Navy fliers who beat the Japanese at Midway, and stopped their onslaught cold. I thought the movie Midway was just a tad hacky, although it was a brave attempt to cover such a huge & complex event.
Posted by: rickinstl at June 04, 2011 01:02 PM (3dy9c)
Posted by: jules at June 04, 2011 01:04 PM (P7Hj2)
If either of those events had turned out differently, the world we live in today would be a much darker place.
As it happened, the destruction of the Japanese carrier fleet enabled the USA to divert resources from the Pacific to Africa and Europe, ending the Third Reich before it developed atomic weapons.
Posted by: stuiec at June 04, 2011 01:04 PM (HMdeP)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 04, 2011 01:05 PM (UlUS4)
Japanese Attacks on USS Yorktown, 4 June 1942
Overview and Special Image Selection
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 04, 2011 01:06 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 04, 2011 01:07 PM (BZbqK)
There's a movie that was made in Japan in the 1950's called (English dubbed version) "I Bombed Pearl Harbor".
It tells the story of the Japanese Navy from Pearl Harbor to Midway, from the Japanese point of view. It was actually pretty good, but it's been at least 40 years since I've seen it.
Torpedo Squadron 8 of the Yorktown, died to all but the last man on that day. They got separated from the F4 Wildcats and SBD Dauntless dive bombers and came in alone to attack the Japanese. Ensign George Gay was the only survivor.
Before Gay died some years ago, he asked that his ashes be scattered over the ocean where his friends all died that day in 1942.
A whole squadron, died to all but the last man. Something to remember.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes... at June 04, 2011 01:09 PM (sJTmU)
I was mistaken, it's Wouk's War & Remembrance, the sequel to Winds of War, which covers Midway.
Particularly impressive is his stopping of the narrative to list for posterity the members of Torpedo Squadron 8, who died together (only 1 survivor) in the initial attack.
Posted by: rickinstl at June 04, 2011 01:10 PM (3dy9c)
Ya beat me to it.
But I would go with most important land battle of WW 2.
Battle of the North Atlantic most important sea battle.
Just my opinion.
Posted by: YIKES! at June 04, 2011 01:15 PM (sdRJs)
Posted by: jules at June 04, 2011 04:57 PM (P7Hj2)
Dogfights on the History Channel is cool but I get what you mean. There has to be talented filmmakers out there who are conservative and would love to make a factual, patriotic movie.
God knows there's a market for it!
Posted by: ErikW at June 04, 2011 01:15 PM (HDdxs)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 04, 2011 01:15 PM (BZbqK)
Posted by: nevergiveup
The scale of the battle was different, of course, and so was the length of time. The Battle of Stalingrad took place over months, from the summer investing of the city by the Germans, to the encirclement and defeat by the Russians in January of 1943. It is estimated that the Russians lost nearly 1 million men in that battle alone. The Russians have hidden that fact, but there are tens of thousands that were buried in unmarked graves, and even now remains from the battle are still being dug up. There were also a whole series of encirclement operations that the Russians tried along the front at the same time that failed and have never gotten much notice - more bad generaling by the Soviet Generals.
The Battle of Kursk in July of 1943 (Operation Zitadelle- called by the Germans) was also a turning point, as that nearly destroyed the German armored formations in a huge battle of attrition.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes... at June 04, 2011 01:16 PM (sJTmU)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 04, 2011 01:17 PM (BZbqK)
If "The Pacific Theater" had lasted longer and America not entered the war, Russia still would have won. It's just that the Red Army would have taken over the whole European continent (and north Africa) instead of having to settle for the Iron Curtain.
America's main contribution to Germany's defeat was to supply Stalin with equipment.
(BTW, this is not to denigrate the Allies' courage; I had grandparents fighting for the UK in WW2. And yeah, I have to admit - sideshow. Germany and Russia were much, MUCH bigger than the UK.)
Posted by: Zimriel at June 04, 2011 01:19 PM (Vh7aI)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 04, 2011 01:19 PM (BZbqK)
Posted by: rickinstl at June 04, 2011 01:19 PM (3dy9c)
Posted by: Zimriel at June 04, 2011 01:23 PM (Vh7aI)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 04, 2011 01:23 PM (BZbqK)
Posted by: Barry The Total 0 at June 04, 2011 01:25 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 04, 2011 01:26 PM (BZbqK)
Japan:
Naval: Midway
Land: Guadalcanal
Air: Mariana Turkey Shoot
Germany:
Naval: North Atlantic
Land: Stalingrad
Air: Battle of Briton
Posted by: YIKES! at June 04, 2011 01:26 PM (sdRJs)
Posted by: nickless at June 04, 2011 01:26 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 04, 2011 01:28 PM (BZbqK)
Midway exposed a serious weakness in the ability of the IJN to replace pilot losses with qualified and well trained pilots.
Marianas demonstrated that.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at June 04, 2011 01:30 PM (Wh0W+)
True dat.
But the Turkey shoot was the coup de grace for the naval air wing for the IJN.
The IJN still had carriers but hardly any pilots after that battle.
Posted by: YIKES! at June 04, 2011 01:35 PM (sdRJs)
My knowledge of the eastern front is an outline, with highpoints in Stalingrad. So the impression this gave me is that Stalin was willing to expend pretty much every Russian in order to beat Hitler. I read a lot more about Stalin's early mistakes than about him wising up later.
Another impression I got - some of which has been floated in this thread - is that the Russians were gaining ground up to spring 1944 and that, post Stalingrad and Kursk, the Nazis didn't have the men to keep the Russians at bay.
Posted by: Zimriel at June 04, 2011 01:37 PM (Vh7aI)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 04, 2011 01:39 PM (BZbqK)
Posted by: nevergiveup at June 04, 2011 01:42 PM (BZbqK)
Once the Russians started Operation Bargration, they weren't stopping till they got to the Reichstag.
Posted by: YIKES! at June 04, 2011 01:44 PM (sdRJs)
As Hitler hadn't executed Stalin by then (or encircled 40-60 million Russians in Moscow and Leningrad by then), only the stupidity of his enemies could have postponed the inevitable decision. The broken timetable resulted in the aftermath, the battles around Moscow, Stalingrad, and Kursk.
The Japanese timetable indeed did not outlast the Battle of Midway. But there was always a chance, peculiar to sea power, of a spectacular naval victory over a superior fleet, even after Midway, as at the Solomons, Leyte, (where is Task Force 34 the world wonders).
The IJN survived to restrict the movement of the USN. The decisive battle of the Pacific War is the capture of the Marianas Islands, the Japanese knew this, allowing LeMay to inaugurate low-level bombing using incendiary, later atomic weapons.
Posted by: hyuman at June 04, 2011 02:22 PM (5Nf0H)
Resplendent with the Silver Star awarded for bombing and sinking a Japanese aircraft carrier during the battle of Midway. Almost 70 years have passed and generations of tarholes have walked past this picture and taken it for gospel.
Everlasting shame on the the Inn.
Posted by: geezer at June 04, 2011 02:27 PM (3GcK2)
The entire squadron of 15 Devastators was shot down on June 4, 1942, when making a torpedo run on Japanese carriers. VT-8 attacked even though the squadron had no fighter cover. The men knew they wouldn't live through the mission but carried it out anyway.
Of the 30 men in VT-8, only one--Ensign George H. Gay, Jr.--survived. He carried out his torpedo run wounded and was shot down by five Japanese Zeros. After splashing down he held a seat cushion on his head to disguise himself as floating debris, since the Japanese relentlessly strafed the area trying to kill him.
Gay spent 30 hours in the water and witnessed the sinking of three Japanese carriers by American dive bombers. He was rescued by a PBY, survived the war, and flew airliners for 30 years. After his death in 1994, he was cremated and his ashes scattered in the Pacific at the site where VT-8 was destroyed.
Posted by: Llarry at June 04, 2011 02:33 PM (SI/pw)
Posted by: rickinstl at June 04, 2011 02:38 PM (3dy9c)
Let's not forget:
- El Alamein, leading up to the surrender in Tunisia; about 250,000 mostly German troops that could have been extremely useful anywhere else, .. like in Russia.
- the UK/US bombing of the Reich, which eventully tied up perhaps 1,000,000 German troops and many aircraft, and hurt German industrial production badly. Recalculate German tank and aircraft production without the losses to bombing ... things look real grim for the Soviets.
Kursk is the end of the German ownership of the strategic initiative. depending on which source you read, the Wehrmacht lost too many men and tanks / was able to recover most of the tank losses / etc., etc., but the fact is that starting August 1943, the Soviets held the strategic initiative. It was then simply a question of when and how the Nazi regieme would end.
Posted by: Arbalest at June 04, 2011 02:44 PM (YpwiT)
Posted by: Tmitsss at June 04, 2011 02:48 PM (joOtR)
Posted by: yakima canutt at June 04, 2011 02:50 PM (YDhmi)
... not, of course to minimize the importance of Midway, Guadalcanal, Stalingrad, ... and every other battle or action in WW2.
Midway, Guadalcanal. Stalingrad and El Alamein mark the turning points in WW2.
Posted by: Arbalest at June 04, 2011 02:53 PM (YpwiT)
"What if the Russians would have had crossbows, and the Germans had longbows?"
I damned near got banned a few years back for a similar comment. The circumstances were unique, though.
Posted by: Crimso at June 04, 2011 02:55 PM (CCVcO)
DinT:
Nice post. My middle child has this date as a birthday. And a nice shout out for George Gay upthread. He had a most interesting (and unenviable) location from which to witness history.
Posted by: Crimso at June 04, 2011 03:00 PM (CCVcO)
CDR John Thach, piloting an escorting fighter:
"I was utterly convinced that we weren't any of us coming back because there were still so many Zeros.... And then I saw a glint in the sun that looked like a beautiful silver waterfall. It was the dive-bombers coming in."
Posted by: Crimso at June 04, 2011 03:02 PM (CCVcO)
Great post and great comments.
I actually make a point each time this year of visiting some monument (many of them to WWII in San Diego area) and usually bring up Midway in conversation with people.
I highly recommend Shattered Sword - The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway, by Parshall and Tully. I actually am going to re-read it starting tonight - read it when it first came out a few years ago. From memory, the key points mostly concerned a new understanding of the Japanese side, which had long been based mainly on Japanese officer Mitsuo Fuchida's account. The book goes back to basics, developing an understanding of Japanese carrier operations, and I believe using such info as flight ops logs from the Akagi, to come to some significant conclusions at variance with Fuchida's version (Midway: The Battle That Doomed Japan). For example, it is very unlikely that the Japanese carrier decks were crowded with armed strike planes at the time of the attack - the surviving records and the operational rhythm of these ships in air operations indicate that all the Japanese carriers were in waiting mode, having been prevented from spotting an attack force on the flight deck for hours by the various heroic US torpedo attacks.
I believe the authors also got more detail that merely added to the "miracle" aspect of the US success. I recall that one SBD squadron leader and two planes of his unit just hesitating before pushing over to dive on Kaga, as another entire squadron was attacking her. They moved on to Akagi, where only one bomb found its mark - enough to set the carrier afire and doom her.
Another Pacific theater book I highly recommend is Last Stand of the Tin Can Sailors by Hornfischer. Compelling account of the - truly - most amazing US stories in WWII, the heroics of Taffy 3 at the Battle of Leyte Gulf.
To join in the whining regarding movies - why the Leyte story has not been made into a quality film is beyond comprehension. A stone-cold literal telling of the tale would be better than the best fiction. Same goes for Midway - and I think that story hugely deserves a modern re-make, taking advantage both the huge advances in special effects and the better understanding of the battle as noted in the book above.
I dunno, is Latrell's Lone Survivor being made into a movie? Another better-than-fiction tale, this time from today's wars.
Ditto to the commenter above who slammed Eastwood's film versions of Flags of Our Fathers/Letters from Iwo Jima. Considering the yawning gulf that separates the power and insight of the books from the movies, and what an inexcusable wasted opportunity this represents, I like to call these films the last two atrocities of the Pacific War. Of course who knows what happened with the Flags author - his next book started with a bizarre and absurd lecture in moral equivalence apparently aimed at softening the impact of the Japanese brutality documented later in the book. My theory is that Bradley's personal social environment exacted a price on him for Flags, which was an extremely powerful and unassailable positive recounting of America in WWII, and the first ridiculous 70 pages of Flyboys was his penance .....
Posted by: non-purist at June 04, 2011 04:00 PM (pLV4e)
As noted above, the Shattered Sword nearly completely revises the conventional thinking about Midway. Almost everything we thought was true about it turned out to be false.
For example: the Japanese carriers were not filled with planes and bombs on their decks. Nearly all of their aircraft - with the exception of a few CAP fighers - were still below deck.
Second, nearly all of the best Japanese aviators escaped the battle. Very few were killed. However, the Japanese lost a large number of their best engineers and mechanics who went down with the carriers.
The authors also discovered that the Japanese fighter aircraft -while superior to the US only had 50 rounds of ammunition to use, or 2 quick 3-second bursts. After using that up, they had to land and be re-supplied. This forced the Japanese to continually land and re-supply their CAP aircraft.
Most important of all, the authors show that the US victory at Midway wasn't luck.
Posted by: AreopagiticaCelebrates at June 04, 2011 04:19 PM (n3TlB)
Posted by: Richard Aubrey at June 04, 2011 04:26 PM (wxHHM)
One other interesting point revealed in Shattered Sword was that all Japanese carriers had enclosed hangars. Since most of them were converted battleships, they weren't able to open up the hangars.
But US carriers had the capability of opening up the hangars.
Since it took about 20-25 minutes to warm up the engines of the planes, American carriers were able to get their planes ready while still stored below since they could open up the hangars. They didn't need to bring them to the deck and then start the engines up.
The Japanese, however, had to laboriously bring up each plane to the deck, start them up and run them for the 20 or so minutes to get ready to take off.
This was just one more advantage that US carriers had over the Japanese.
Of course it didn't matter anyway since the Japanese never were able to get their attack aircraft on the decks. They were too busy fighting off attacks from the bombers stationed at Midway and the carrier-based aircraft.
As the authors of the book argue, it wasn't luck that led to the US victory. It was tactics and technology and planning.
Posted by: AreopagiticaCelebrates at June 04, 2011 04:32 PM (n3TlB)
AreopagiticaCelebrates, thanks for adding those key points from Shattered Sword. I had meant to respond to the several comments earlier that Midway had cost Japan most of its best pilots - in fact, however paradoxical, this was not one of the results.
On a related point, another commenter earlier had noted that Japan still had carriers towards the end of the war, but few (well trained) pilots. One chief reason for this was Japan's system of not returning its better pilots home to train others - the opposite of the US system, which succeeded in producing ever greater numbers of pilots operating with an expanding base of lessons learned from others. Part of this was neccessity - they simply didn't have the numbers to take their best people off the line, esp. once the US pressure became unrelenting. Part probably was bushido code - warriors served at the tip of the spear, not training others.
Another Japanese carrier aviation quirk that brings us back to Midway - Japanese carriers and air wings trained and operated always as a unit, helping them make among the best carrier force in history, but imposing a key limitation. At the Battle of the Coral Sea, Shokaku received bomb damage and required repair, whereas Zuikaku was unscathed, but its air wing suffered heavy losses. The US would have swapped air wing and carrier and had one more carrier available, but Japan didn't do this sort of thing. Result: both carriers were dropped from Yamamoto's order of battle for Midway - what might one more fleet carrier (nearly the full Dai Ichi Kido Butai, or First Strike Force) have meant for Japan at Midway?
Posted by: non-purist at June 04, 2011 05:02 PM (pLV4e)
My neighbor growing up was the widow of a torpedo plane pilot lost at Midway. She was a remarkable lady, and had remarried to another man, who was also a hero in his own right. When I was old enough to appreciate history and the sacrifices made for me before I was born, it really gave me a remarkable insight into how extraordinary ordinary people can be.
Posted by: Brian at June 04, 2011 05:07 PM (9fLc0)
Non-purist: Thanks and thanks for that additional information.
I read Shattered about 2 years ago and was stunned at what they uncovered. It really does turn much of Midway on its head.
What is fascinating though, as they pointed out in the book, a number of our dive bombers had cameras on them that took pictures of the Japanese carriers being bombed. If you look closely at some of the available photos you can see that the decks were empty. No attack aircraft at all. No bombs. No fuel lines.
Mitsuo Fuchida's book - he was as you know the lead pilot at Pearl Harbor - really did give out a lot of misinformation. Ironic that he later became a US citizen and converted to Christianity.
Posted by: AreopagiticaCelebrates at June 04, 2011 05:09 PM (n3TlB)
Yes - in fact, I believe Fuchida was the one tasked with giving the "tora tora tora" signal, signifying the first wave had achieved complete surprise at Pearl. I knew about the conversion to Christianity - didn't know about the citizenship change. Wow.
You referred to Japanese carrier design features in your first comment - one other huge difference in the two navies, which grew as the war went on, was in damage control. US Navy damage control became nearly unbelievable as the years passed - by Okinawa (by far the greatest losses and damage the USN has ever seen), the US was working miracles several times a day saving ships ravaged by kamikaze attacks. At Midway, as evidenced by Lt. Dick Best's single killer shot to the Akagi, the Japanese carriers proved very "soft".
Thanks for your comments - and again thanks to Dave in Texas for the post. And all ye morons with an interest in Midway - get thee to a bookstore/website and get Shattered Sword.
Posted by: non-purist at June 04, 2011 05:26 PM (pLV4e)
And all ye morons with an interest in Midway - get thee to a bookstore/website and get Shattered Sword.
Yes, even though we gave away the best parts of it <g>. Another hint: the good guys win at the end.
Here's a link for the book online: Shattered Sword.
Posted by: AreopagiticaCelebrates at June 04, 2011 06:11 PM (n3TlB)
A salute as well to those Doolittle Raiders- don't recall if it was remembered here back around the 18th of April, who put Japan on the rush to "AF".
Also the supposed "Midway diversion" into the Aleutians.
June 4th, 1942- also the date Koga crash landed on Akutan and his Zero would be recovered about a month later and it's strengths and weaknesses would be further discovered esp aileron effectiveness in turning to the right in a dive above 200 knots.
Posted by: Mick at June 04, 2011 06:42 PM (rrkE9)
I'm just a lowly internet commentator, but I think the best way to reconnect the american public and especially men (who play a lot of video games rather than watch weepy soldier dramas) with the military and patriotism is through video games, comic books and CG movies that are pro-USA.
Posted by: jules at June 04, 2011 07:04 PM (P7Hj2)
HELL-DIVERS!--Surprised Jap at Midway.
Apparently Wouk got some things wrong, as made clear in the thread. but you can't beat his pure America-love in his account of Midway: "It was a perfect coordinated attack.It was timed almost to the second. It was a freak accident. . .
"What was not luck, but the soul of the United States of America in action, was this willingness of the torpedo plane squadrons to go in against hopeless odds. This was the extra ounce of martial weight that in a few decisive minutes turned the balance of history. . ."
I blubber every time I read that, and I've read it roughly 5000 times.
Posted by: jgm at June 04, 2011 10:30 PM (L6mI7)
Also the supposed "Midway diversion" into the Aleutians.
Shattered Sword (I get 10% of every sale <g>, just kidding) also goes into this as well. According to their findings - although other historians have also discovered this - this "diversion" really wasn't designed to be one; it was intended to be a separate operation and a deliberate or serious attack on the Aleutians.
Which, of course, made no sense since it meant Yamamoto was splitting up his forces, something that made no military sense - e.g., What was the objective? Midway? The Aleutians? Why both?
Posted by: AreopagiticaCelebrates at June 05, 2011 06:04 AM (raMBG)
Posted by: Sexy corsets at June 05, 2011 07:56 AM (1G42x)
Is this officially a "dead thread" by now? Have never known exactly how that's determined.
Oh well - mick, thanks for bringing up the Aleutians/captured Zero. Continuing the stream-of-consciousness style commenting, you are exactly right. The Zero picked up off the mud of that Aleutian island - with limited damage - was carted off to San Diego's North Island Naval Air Station, where the USN flew it and explored its limitations - among which the one you noted, the reduced responsiveness to a right turn in a dive (result of engine-induced torque, no?).
And thanks for one more thing - one of my favorite least known aspects of the Pacific War - that Midway itself was a direct consequence of the Doolittle raid. The chain is fascinating, and (it seems) not often appreciated - Coral Sea reduced Dai Ichi Kido Butai by one carrier; the Doolittle raid forced the high command's hand, allowing Yamamoto his last chance to draw out and destroy the US carrier force; he took his reduced force to ultimate destruction, while the Aleutian operation resulted in the capture of the Zero and a big assist to the remarkably successful efforts by USN pilots to compete in their Wildcats against the generally superior Zero.
With that, on a perfect sunny day, I'm heading down to Pt Loma/Ft. Rosecrans cemetery to enjoy the view, which includes a commanding one of NAS North Island - from where the Lexington rushed off to its destruction at Coral Sea, and where Thach and others studied the captured zero and invented their ingenious tactics for battling the tremendously effective pilots of the IJN.
Posted by: non-purist at June 05, 2011 09:39 AM (pLV4e)
I'll never understand why Yamamoto after Pearl - where he combined all of his forces in a spectacular victory - decided at Midway to split them up.
The Aleutian campaign makes no sense at all. If he failed at Midway, the Aleutian campaign meant nothing. It was Midway or nothing else.
Wouldn't have mattered, I think. Once Spruance found the Japanese carriers and was able to launch first, the die was cast.
Posted by: AreopagiticaCelebrates at June 05, 2011 10:03 AM (evMYy)
Posted by: jules at June 04, 2011 04:46 PM (P7Hj2)
This is correct-but it was Jimmy Thatch(inventor of the "Thatch Weave")'s squadron of Wildcats off Yorktown that kept the zeros on the deck after they came down to slaughter the Devastators. Yorktown was the only carrier to get it's strike over the Japanese fleet intact, and without those Wildcats tying down the Zeros, they very possibly might have had time to climb and disrupt Leslie and McClusky's attacks (and contrary to what you usually read, it was Leslie and VB-3 that got Kaga, not McClusky and VB-6. Fascinating stuff, history)
Torpedo Squadron 8 of the Yorktown, died to all but the last man on that day. They got separated from the F4 Wildcats and SBD Dauntless dive bombers and came in alone to attack the Japanese. Ensign George Gay was the only survivor
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes... at June 04, 2011 05:09 PM (sJTmU)
VT-8 flew off of Hornet, not Yorktown.
Posted by: Dave at June 05, 2011 08:32 PM (7MUaH)
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at June 05, 2011 09:08 PM (vA9ld)
Non-purist, it was either the torque of the engine or the prop itself and heavy ailerons at higher speed. I am a little over halfway through "Whistling Death" by the F4U Corsair test pilot Boone Guyton. He goes into detail how Vought had him test a bunch of combination of aileron set ups until just the right balance was achieved to give it a fast roll rate at extremely high speeds without too much difficulty for the pilot. Those Zeros were lightweight fighters though so the torque of the radial has to come more into play.
And just to show how "prepared" we were for ww2, Koga's Zero had a licensed copy of our own Hamilton Standard propeller on it. When his got all bent up in the crash landing, (his plane flipped and he broke his neck in the landing) Hamilton Standard had replacement ones that allowed it to fly for those performance tests and mock fighting.
And Doolittle went on to unleash Mustangs from pure escort to attacking Luftwaffe fighters when he joined the 8th AF, making them truly offensive fighters.
AreopagiticaCelebrates, I am not sure why they would do that. It might go back to Doolittle as well- if it is true that they suspected he might have launched from there and were worried about future attempts.
As for major battles, I came across a USAAF Historian's paper about how it was important here in the States that Britain's defeat of the Luftwaffe in the skies over and beyond those White Cliffs helped America get over it's isolationist feelings (America loves a winner) and support their effort more. So the Battle of Britain is very important.
Would have posted something about 6 hours ago but got too busy.
Posted by: Mick at June 05, 2011 11:12 PM (rrkE9)
Free online insurance quotes
Best online insurance quotes
Free online insurance quotes
Best online insurance quotes
Posted by: Free online insurance quotes at June 06, 2011 01:36 AM (Np1mF)
Posted by: adc at June 06, 2011 07:13 AM (VCCe8)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2911 seconds, 204 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: caring San Francisco progressives at June 04, 2011 12:42 PM (Vh7aI)