June 01, 2011
— Ace WeinerGate has hit, and I do use this term advisedly, the decadent phase, where people are just trying to outclever each other with outre and novel theories of the case. Even among conservatives, or those who initially doubted Rep. Weiner's bizarre story like Lee Stranahan, we're now seeing baroque theories about jilted ex-girlfriends seeking revenge.
And that possibility was floated by a conservative blogger I like (not Breitbart of Stranahan, Mickey Kaus), as possibility #2 in a list of 3.
The list is that long?
Let me suggest the obvious answer is in fact the answer.
There is no need to get clever here. There is no grand mystery. This is not like Watergate -- scratch that, it sort of is like Watergate. What you think happened here is pretty much what happened here.
A married man, formerly a player (yeah I don't get that either), looking for a little 11:30 am virtual strange while the missus was away, sent a picture of his package, which he's extremely proud of, to a coed. Don't ask me why he's so proud of that. But I just heard him on Maddow getting off on the fact that Jon Stewart talked up his junk on national television.
The guy almost wants us to know it's his penis. That's how proud he is of it.
Anyway, the coed is cute. Has flattered this man, who is a narcissist, by calling him "my boyfriend" and saying she has a "crush" and also that he is, to her, physically attractive.
Yeah I don't get that one, either. But if you look at this cat, you can tell he's not really accustomed to hearing that, so it still strikes a pleasing note inside him.
Do I need to go on any further? This is not complicated.
Weiner asserts that people hack the Twitter accounts of Congressmen in order to send partially-real partially-enhanced pictures of penises "hundreds of thousands of times every day."
Well, no, that doesn't happen hundreds of thousands of times a day. That happens... once, as it turns out.
And, actually, not even that many times.
But what does happen an awful lot is that people get caught up in a sudden attraction and do something dumb.
And yet, despite all this, even conservatives, determined to crack a mystery which was solved within ten minutes of the perpetration of the crime, are on the hunt for hackers, ex-girlfriends, horny staffers and who knows what else.
We are all agreed that someone had an interest in sending a picture of Rep. Weiner's erection to a coed. Even Rep. Weiner agrees on this much -- he's basically told us yeah, that's my junk. And he's proud of that.
So we know someone wanted to send the dicpic to the coed.
Would I sound very boring if I were to suggest that the person with the means, opportunity, and motive to send Rep. Weiner's dicpic to the coed was none other than Rep. Weiner himself?
Oh, I concede that is unimaginative. Lacks punch. A trifling mystery, the one where the murderer is evident from page 10, and the rest is all procedure and filler; but I think that is where the evidence is taking us.
Is taking us? Has taken us. Took us. Is there a more past tense than the past perfect tense? Has hadn taken-tooken us 96 hours ago.
For those who find this a tad too boring, with not enough thrills and chills or surprise twists and unexpected 11th hour entry by exciting new suspects, let me bore you some more and note this isn't even the first time this mystery has ended this way.
One Hayley Williams. Female, caucasian, about 25. Singer for a band called Paramore. Just a small town girl, living in a lonely world. You know the story. You hear it every day.
The victim of a horrible content warning hacking on Twitter, in which a nefarious hacker hacked into her account, and, via hacking, sent a picture of her exposed breasts to the public.
Hayley Williams of Paramore claims her Twitter site was hacked and the nude twitpic that was posted has since gone viral.Of course it was removed, but we have the censored version. Another version can be found here. Hayley did not comment on the embarrassing topless photo directly, and to be honest it seems more like a cruel joke than a hack.
Someone would have to have access to the topless photo of Hayley Williams AND be able to access her twitter account. That is a lot of info to have. For those who donÂ’t pay attention to detail, the photo is also being searched for as, Haley Williams twitter picture.
Can you help Hayley find her hacker? Can you solve this mystery?
Alas, no you cannot.
There is nothing to be solved. The hacker was already discovered.
The hacker, Content Warning For Full Upper Nudity, was Hayley herself, who screwed up in the exact manner that Anthony Weiner did, just a year later.
Paramore’s Hayley Williams attempted to DM this topless picture of herself to her boyfriend, but instead wound up posting it for all to see on the internet. She took it down almost immediately, but we all know “immediately” is about 3 minutes too late in internet time.
Yes, I know it's not as exciting as the Realization Montage in The Usual Suspects, but life usually isn't. That's why we pay clever people a great deal of money to make shit up for us to watch on a movie screen.
Now, if you want to explain to me that some jealous ex-boyfriend of Hayley Williams was "the real perp," or maybe it was a disgruntled staffer, or maybe even it was a conservative who hated her, fine.
But do all that first, explaining why the obvious is to be disregarded as a solution in The Curious Case of Hayley Williams first, before coming to me with some fresh new jazz about Anthony Weiner.
After all-- the Hayley Williams case is a year old. It's a cold case. She deserves our justice, after waiting for her hacker to be exposed for all this time.
Indeed:
This is the most fiendish set-up since Mary Jo Kopechne implicated Ted Kennedy in her suicide.
Posted by: nickless
And As We're Talking About Dic-Fic: There's a simple way to tell if a subject is guilty.
Examine his demeanor. Listen to what he says when first confronted with the crime.
Does his reaction read genuine?
Or does his reaction read false?
Posted by: Ace at
10:14 PM
| Comments (471)
Post contains 1104 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: Portnoy at June 01, 2011 06:46 PM (azgo2)
Posted by: toby928™ at June 01, 2011 06:46 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: nickless at June 01, 2011 06:46 PM (MMC8r)
Hayley Williams doesn't deserve only justice. Hayley Williams deserves HOT STEEL WEINER JUSTICE.
Posted by: Steel Weiner at June 01, 2011 06:48 PM (6HITv)
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 06:49 PM (bAySe)
Posted by: Waterhouse at June 01, 2011 06:49 PM (SfuUm)
Posted by: mpfs at June 01, 2011 06:49 PM (3TjSM)
Posted by: Dave C at June 01, 2011 06:50 PM (QIvCY)
are on the hunt for hackers, ex-girlfriends, horny staffers and who knows what else
Oh deer lord. May I suggest another suspect? Occham and his razor?
No, of course not. I didn't go to an Ivy League school, so my betters inform me that I'm stupid. Fine, but I can do math, so there.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at June 01, 2011 06:50 PM (BDH94)
That's it. One letter. One teenie, weenie fuckup.
There is no goddamned X-Files mystery here.
Posted by: The Man Between The Cans at June 01, 2011 06:51 PM (TCyyS)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at June 01, 2011 06:51 PM (l8yvX)
No need for second account. you don't even need a yfrog account as it's the default for twitpic. The person would have to have known Weiner's yrag email which is randomly generated and we don't even know if he had one because it isn't required to post pics to yfrog.
Posted by: Rocks at June 01, 2011 06:51 PM (th0op)
Posted by: nerdygirl at June 01, 2011 06:51 PM (j/5DA)
But Weiner is a super-genius. He would never, ever get caught by we proles.
Posted by: nickless at June 01, 2011 06:52 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: steevy at June 01, 2011 06:52 PM (2Lnwt)
Posted by: Countrysquire at June 01, 2011 06:52 PM (Mysfb)
Posted by: beedubya at June 01, 2011 06:53 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: snookered at June 01, 2011 06:54 PM (jchJh)
Posted by: The MBM at June 01, 2011 06:54 PM (veZ9n)
I love a good horror movie.
Posted by: mpfs at June 01, 2011 06:54 PM (3TjSM)
Posted by: Walter Freeman at June 01, 2011 06:54 PM (UsjBj)
Posted by: nerdygirl at June 01, 2011 06:54 PM (j/5DA)
THIS!
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at June 01, 2011 06:54 PM (l8yvX)
Posted by: Vanderloon at June 01, 2011 06:54 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: steevy at June 01, 2011 06:55 PM (2Lnwt)
That's another thing. Getting the cops involved w/ subpoenas and whatnot mean that they can get their hands on who-knows-what from yfrog and twitter's servers.
Posted by: nickless at June 01, 2011 06:56 PM (MMC8r)
wow, interesting example Ace, I enjoy Paramore's music btw
Posted by: YRM (Go Heat, Go Canucks) at June 01, 2011 06:56 PM (UzBwz)
I'm not sure why Strahan went off on this odd tangent.
This story seems to follow occam's razor.
A powerful arrogant man with a sense of invincibility sends a picture of his Hanes repressed hard on to a 21 year old girl he may or may not be having an affair with.
He made a typing error on twitter and sent it out publically, then tried to rescind it. He then told several stories, all of which were proven to be lies not only by evidence, but by the fact he moved onto another story/excuse.
And now he's at the point where he's saying, in so many words, that it is in fact his dick..
What more is there to be had? Why are we even debating the hacking issue. It's Wednesday, we got over than hump days ago. Why back track over something that's been disproven by weiner's statements?
Posted by: Ben at June 01, 2011 06:56 PM (DKV43)
Little story I posted on another thread about this business of overthinking the technical AND conspiratorial aspects of this story.
Friend of mine was once conned by one of America's top conmen -- a guy who's been on all the t.v. shows, notorious guy in law enforcement. Funny thing is, she had him credit-checked and even investigated by a very wily detective, and tested CLEAN.
But the thing is, I knew from the moment I met him that he was bad news. How? I took one look at him. Sleaze and lies dripping from every pore.
My friend had essentially picked a dead stinking rat out of the gutter and sent it off to the DNA lab to test whether it was a golden goose. Never mind the maggots, the rot, the stench, the slimy fur, the ringtail -- let's send it out for some high-tech investigation.
Sometimes a dead rat is just a dead rat.
(By the way, yes, my friend was a bit of a gold digger and wanted to believe this guy was her ticket to riches. It's that wanting to believe thing.)
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 06:57 PM (+/eKV)
Cheer up my man, I call 3 months before she poses for Playboy.
Good times, baby. Good. TIMES.
Posted by: The Man Between The Cans at June 01, 2011 06:57 PM (TCyyS)
Posted by: Countrysquire at June 01, 2011 06:57 PM (Mysfb)
Posted by: snookered at June 01, 2011 10:54 PM (jchJh)
One might not have been sent. You need to consider this. Yeah I fully believe this is a "tit-for-tat" situation. However the "tat" may have been sent before the tit.
Posted by: buzzion at June 01, 2011 06:57 PM (oVQFe)
Yeah, i wonder what a girl with breast the size of beach balls could possibly have sent him to ellicit a dick pick
Posted by: Ben at June 01, 2011 06:57 PM (DKV43)
I think she has a creamy right then
Posted by: beedubya at June 01, 2011 06:57 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: occam's delivery service at June 01, 2011 06:57 PM (DUOUR)
Posted by: nickless at June 01, 2011 06:58 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 06:58 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 06:58 PM (bAySe)
Occham just DM'd me to say that Hayley Williams is much hotter than Weiner's weiner. And gave him a raging weiner. I certainly wouldn't kick her out of my bed...
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at June 01, 2011 06:59 PM (BDH94)
It just seems reckless that he would use his official account for these cyber-cheating sessions.
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 10:49 PM
As Weiner very defensively stated to Wolf Blitzer, this was NOT his official account. He's using that as an excuse to not get the FBI involved.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 06:59 PM (+/eKV)
He jilted her. For Huma. She waited, and plotted, for revenge. Until finally, at the perfect moment, when he was watching hockey, she tweeted the dicpic, which she already had, using his account, which password she already had!!
Case closed, bitches!!!11!
Posted by: FUBAR at June 01, 2011 07:00 PM (1fanL)
I'm not sure why Strahan went off on this odd tangent.
He's been writing at the Bigs complaining about media bias..
Ace will have him running back to HuffPo
Posted by: beedubya at June 01, 2011 07:00 PM (AnTyA)
I suspect Weiner is scared shitless that 2nd account could be discovered and the world would learn what other adventures he's taken his little friend on.
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 10:58 PM (bAySe)
Maybe he has 30 accounts. They aren't needed to explain what happened.
Posted by: Rocks at June 01, 2011 07:00 PM (th0op)
This story seems to follow occam's razor.
...
Posted by: Ben at June 01, 2011 10:56 PM (DKV43)
I don't get Strahan's obsessing either - he seems unable to accept the simplest, most likely scenario and has his tinfoil hat on. His constant repeating of 'just following the facts wherever they lead me' is Sullivan-esque.
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 01, 2011 07:00 PM (pAlYe)
Posted by: palerider at June 01, 2011 07:01 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: nerdygirl at June 01, 2011 07:01 PM (j/5DA)
Posted by: lions at June 01, 2011 07:01 PM (xYZt6)
Posted by: Random Liberal Twit at June 01, 2011 07:02 PM (1fanL)
Well, if it was ME who was messing around... I sure would have set up a second account. If the Comley Coed had not have nuked her account, we could check the theory by looking at who else she was following.
I suspect Weiner is scared shitless that 2nd account could be discovered and the world would learn what other adventures he's taken his little friend on.
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 10:58 PM (bAySe)
Oh I bet he nuked that account already.
Posted by: buzzion at June 01, 2011 07:02 PM (oVQFe)
I'm not sure why Strahan went off on this odd tangent.
He's been writing at the Bigs complaining about media bias..
Ace will have him running back to HuffPo
Maybe he's just trying to be too thorough. Too cute by half, i think is a saying that applies here.
It's solved Lee, accept it and move on. You don't need to keep digging at an angle for something that Weiner's statements have disproved.
Posted by: Ben at June 01, 2011 07:02 PM (DKV43)
I'm not sure why Strahan went off on this odd tangent.
he prob had a talk from some lefty friends, remember the guy is still an avowed lefty, Breitbart supporter or not, and we know how lefties are
Posted by: YRM (Go Heat, Go Canucks) at June 01, 2011 07:03 PM (UzBwz)
Maybe he's just bored with the mundane tawdriness of the weiner.
Posted by: toby928™ at June 01, 2011 07:03 PM (GTbGH)
While you wingnuts are obsessing over underwear, the globe is warming, the economy is tanking, and there are people dying in wars.
It's cool man. Obama has a handle on that shit.
We're going to go back to this if that okay with you.
Posted by: Ben at June 01, 2011 07:03 PM (DKV43)
Posted by: Racefan at June 01, 2011 07:03 PM (FKnHb)
About Ben Shapiros new work, whats the Jewish term for "Uncle Tom?" (other then being a "Soros") That's all the only cards the left has since every pillar of their redistributitive authoritarian statist model has imploded from Stalin-Mao-Soviets-Cuba-S. America-Greece-Euro-Obama (to name only some). Everywhere their ideology has been tried to any real degree bankruptcy and bloodshed soon follow. So you can hardly blame them for playing the
*your a traitor
*your a hater/phobe/idiot/evil/bought off
cards because they really don't have anything else they can say that hasn't been thoroughly proven false-wrong-dangerous over and over and over again.
Posted by: Shiggz at June 01, 2011 07:03 PM (mLAWK)
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 07:03 PM (bAySe)
wow, interesting example Ace, I enjoy Paramore's music btw
Posted by: YRM (Go Heat, Go Canucks) at June 01, 2011 10:56 PM (UzBwz)
Yeah I enjoy their music too. Yep, the music. It definitely has nothing to do with the cute girl with red hair dancing around in tight clothes.
Posted by: buzzion at June 01, 2011 07:04 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: occam's delivery service at June 01, 2011 07:04 PM (DUOUR)
Posted by: The World at June 01, 2011 07:05 PM (AnTyA)
If he was an orgy guy, with the robes and lotions and whatnot. Or a trucker, since a girl I know showed me a p-shot that a trucker guy sent her.
Posted by: toby928™ at June 01, 2011 07:05 PM (GTbGH)
#Hacked! #HomeSexTapesStolen!
@TommyLee&PamelaAnderson, @PamelaAnderson&BretMichaels @ParisHilton, @KimKardashian, @RobLowe, @DustinDiamond, @JohnEdwards, @AmyFisher, @TonyaHarding, @VinceNeil, @CarriePrejean, @KatiePrice, @KidRock, @GeneSimmons, @TomSizemore, @TilaTequila, @VerneTroyer, @Chyna
It's an epidemic I tells ya!
Posted by: Count de Monet at June 01, 2011 07:06 PM (XBM1t)
What I would like to know is if all the watercarriers for Weiner really, truly think that he was the victim of a hack..
Lurking Kos is pretty sickening, but you can get your answer there. Creative self-delusion is their current pastime.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 07:06 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 07:06 PM (bAySe)
Posted by: Occam at June 01, 2011 07:06 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Brian at June 01, 2011 07:07 PM (emHqy)
Posted by: FUBAR at June 01, 2011 07:07 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: ralph kramden at June 01, 2011 07:08 PM (DUOUR)
Well, it was. Well, one anyway... and we all know how crafty they are.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 01, 2011 07:09 PM (1yViP)
Lurking Kos is pretty sickening, but you can get your answer there. Creative self-delusion is their current pastime.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 11:06 PM (+/eKV)
Yeah. Completely delusional true believers plus completely cynical game-players.
Posted by: FUBAR at June 01, 2011 07:09 PM (1fanL)
Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best. Occam's Razor. The simplest explanation is best.
Repeat as necessary. The simplest explanation is typing a "@" instead of a "d" in Twitter and sending the dicpic to the world instead of the 21 year-old Comely Coed that you would like to bone.
This is the simplest explanation possible. Nothing else is close.
Really. That. Simple.
Posted by: J.S. Bryun at June 01, 2011 07:09 PM (rqKB1)
It's a funny thing about men. They assume that, because naughty nudity turns them on, that flashing their hideous genitalia is an equal turn-on to women.
Overall, I've not found women to be that way, but horny men aren't noted for their complex thinking ability.
Posted by: nickless at June 01, 2011 07:09 PM (MMC8r)
Oh I bet he nuked that account already.
Posted by: buzzion at June 01, 2011 11:02 PMUnfortunately for him, it's not like in Aliens. In real life, there's a big mama alien called the yfrog server, and she has a clone of every egg she's ever hatched.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 07:09 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 07:11 PM (Pzf4N)
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 10:59 PM (+/eKV)
Bret Baier asked him if it was his official account and he said no. Then Bret reminded him that it said Rep. Weiner. Of course, little weiner changed the subject as quickly as possible. The fucker lies, and his buddies lie for for him.
Posted by: Steph at June 01, 2011 07:12 PM (AkdC5)
This is the simplest explanation possible. Nothing else is close.
Really. That. Simple.
Posted by: J.S. Bryun at June 01, 2011 11:09 PM (rqKB1)
You left one small fact out of your "explanation," Mr. Genius Razor. The Moon was 2 days past the Last Quarter!!1! Stick that in your theory and smoke it!
Posted by: FUBAR at June 01, 2011 07:13 PM (1fanL)
So, Weiner is okay with people thinking he takes pics of his little thingie and has the pic or pics on his Blackberry. As if this is a common and ordinary thing to do.
So clue me in morons, is this something a guy would do? Use a phone to take pics of his genitalia, and then, presumably, show them to various people?
I wouldn't - I'm actually horrified by the thought*. But I'm not most people. If you want to see some vile photographs, trot on over to "hot chicks with douchebags".
* Unless I lose my job and am forced to revive my pr0n career, in which case it's a job hazard. Ever hear of Wee Willy Winkler? that was me.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at June 01, 2011 07:13 PM (BDH94)
This is why he doesn't want to admit anything. Its the only thing that explains why a man of his intelligence would willingly make such a PR hash of the tweet incident.
Posted by: Fen at June 01, 2011 07:13 PM (Cih47)
This whole situation just reminds me of a South Park episode for years ago.
"I didn't kill anyone, it was just some Puerto Rican Guy, what really!? Some Puerto Rican guy killed MY wife!?!! WE NEED TO FIND HIM!"
But there is no "Puerto Rican Guy." Just like there is no hacker.
Posted by: Cashin at June 01, 2011 07:13 PM (wY3Ne)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 01, 2011 11:11 PM (TMB3S)
Shyeah, right
Posted by: Hillary at June 01, 2011 07:14 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Walter Freeman at June 01, 2011 07:14 PM (UsjBj)
Posted by: Joejm65 at June 01, 2011 07:14 PM (BDB5n)
Posted by: Madame Secretary Emily "Pantsuit" Litellat at June 01, 2011 07:15 PM (Pzf4N)
Posted by: nerdygirl at June 01, 2011 07:15 PM (j/5DA)
Posted by: Hasbro at June 01, 2011 07:15 PM (1yViP)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 01, 2011 07:16 PM (TMB3S)
Ace, the legal standing issue hasn't even been discussed here. There exists a question of fact in so much as the Twitter account in question was likely being supported by a server, phone lines and an electronic computing device i.e. a blackberry... items procured for official use with funds from the U.S. Treasury.
There is a legal nexus to the greater public here that would suggest legal standing to sue not in tort but rather to enjoin Congressman Weiner from missusing public property; property that is at Mr. Weiner's avail to assist him in his official duties as a federal employee.
If we gotz standing, we gotz subpoena.
Posted by: journolist at June 01, 2011 07:18 PM (QM8jX)
Posted by: Occam's Bar of Soap at June 01, 2011 07:18 PM (J/2v7)
Good times.
Posted by: The Cad at June 01, 2011 07:18 PM (agD4m)
KosKids' contrived theories on Weinergate hacking remind me of Rosemary Wood's explanation for the 18-1/2 minute gap on the tape with accompanying contortionist photo.
Posted by: Count de Monet at June 01, 2011 07:18 PM (XBM1t)
While you wingnuts are obsessing over underwear, the globe is warming, the economy is tanking, and there are people dying in wars.
Hey, its not our fault the Diversity Hire can't multi-task.
DHOTUS. Diversity Hire Of The United States
Posted by: Fen at June 01, 2011 07:18 PM (Cih47)
This is why I think it's likely that Obama will be re-elected. We live in a country in which someone as repulsive, corrupt, and obviously guilty as Weiner makes people scratch their beards and go, "Hmmm. Are we entirely sure that...?"
It's something akin to battered-wide syndrome, but applicable to the ruling class. These monstrosities spend their careers screwing us, generating massive personal wealth through insider trading, and partying, and then when they bring destruction down on their own heads, the idiot serfs reflexively give them the benefit of the doubt or even defend them.
Posted by: Llarry at June 01, 2011 07:19 PM (SI/pw)
You. Are. The. Shit.
I love you. I really, really do. Even CBS just had a "the Wiener scandal" promo just now.
Kudos.
We are not worthy.
Posted by: Peaches at June 01, 2011 07:20 PM (afUO8)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 07:20 PM (Pzf4N)
"The guy almost wants us to know it's his penis. That's how proud he is of it."
Is there, then, an expectation, soon, of a picture of Tony and His Trident?
Posted by: Arbalest at June 01, 2011 07:21 PM (7E2Tr)
Posted by: The Cad at June 01, 2011 07:21 PM (agD4m)
Posted by: nickless at June 01, 2011 07:23 PM (MMC8r)
Attention troops;
Lee Strahan is not a conservative. He's a liberal who works for Breitbart--but a liberal all the same. Just so we are clear.
Posted by: R.D. at June 01, 2011 07:25 PM (BYzwk)
Posted by: Joejm65 at June 01, 2011 07:25 PM (BDB5n)
For all of those who really know just how nefarious and truly disgusting Congressman Weiner has been in the media, you will hit Ace's tip jar big time.
Congressman Weiner is the Rook on the DNC's chess board and he's being taken out by the ACE of SPADES.
Hit the tip jar folks. Our ACE is peforming the most intricate and exacting political punditry Kung fu that has taken place on a political blog.
Hit the tip jar folks.
Thanks,
Ace's official Tip Jar Scowler
Posted by: journolist at June 01, 2011 07:25 PM (QM8jX)
Posted by: thirtyandseven at June 01, 2011 07:26 PM (xtVAI)
Posted by: JonathanEllis at June 01, 2011 07:27 PM (BdzEV)
Posted by: Hayley Williams at June 01, 2011 07:27 PM (4uWkx)
Posted by: thirtyandseven at June 01, 2011 11:26 PM (xtVAI)
Speak for yourself, Francis.
Okay, I might be a little drunk.
Posted by: Peaches at June 01, 2011 07:28 PM (afUO8)
Weiner is using an interesting and gutsy strategy here. Under the surface he's admitting he did the deed. At the surface he's performing a stonewall as best he can. Delay is victory for him as other events will soon knock him off the radar screen.
I think he could pull this off except...what are the odds of more suggestive pics and dark-haired babe-ettes showing up?
Posted by: Meremortal at June 01, 2011 07:29 PM (Usk3+)
Posted by: Occam's Bar of Soap at June 01, 2011 07:29 PM (J/2v7)
Okay, I might be a little drunk.
Posted by: Peaches at June 01, 2011 11:28 PM (afUO
If you're saying you might have wanted to see teh weiner, you're shit-faced.
Posted by: Steph at June 01, 2011 07:29 PM (AkdC5)
This whole situation just reminds me of a South Park episode for years ago.
"I didn't kill anyone, it was just some Puerto Rican Guy, what really!? Some Puerto Rican guy killed MY wife!?!! WE NEED TO FIND HIM!"
But there is no "Puerto Rican Guy." Just like there is no hacker.
Posted by: Cashin at June 01, 2011 11:13 PM (wY3Ne)
The better comparison is O.J. searching for the "real killer."
Posted by: J.S. Bryun at June 01, 2011 07:30 PM (rqKB1)
Posted by: Jethro Bean at June 01, 2011 07:33 PM (PTigi)
Goddamit. I swear I did not read one single comment before posting as Sir Wm. of Ockham above (note teh spelling <> Occam). I mean, WTF, am I just slow, or am I just unimaginat... um, okay wait.
Big Tony, I need some help here...
Posted by: sherlock at June 01, 2011 07:33 PM (thr9V)
Posted by: nickless at June 01, 2011 07:35 PM (MMC8r)
no, if anyone wants to see it, they see it in person.
Posted by: The Great Satan's Ghost at June 01, 2011 07:35 PM (UrPTC)
Really. That. Simple.
Posted by: J.S. Bryun at June 01, 2011 11:09 PM (rqKB1)
You
left one small fact out of your "explanation," Mr. Genius Razor. The
Moon was 2 days past the Last Quarter!!1! Stick that in your theory and
smoke it!
Furthermore, the correct expression of Occam's Razor is in Latin! "Quando podeces te regi eorum fecerunt!"
Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 01, 2011 07:36 PM (qaU+h)
Posted by: Count de Monet at June 01, 2011 07:37 PM (XBM1t)
Posted by: BSR at June 01, 2011 07:38 PM (+Uet8)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 01, 2011 07:38 PM (TMB3S)
So he gets replaced by another Lib. At least this dishonest, smart-mouthed, acid-tongued Progressive doesn't enjoy the fruits of his assholery.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 01, 2011 07:40 PM (1yViP)
Posted by: William of Occam at June 01, 2011 07:40 PM (t0QqV)
Posted by: BSR at June 01, 2011 07:41 PM (+Uet8)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 07:42 PM (Pzf4N)
Posted by: Slick Willie
After the press conference with his boyfriend?
Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 01, 2011 07:42 PM (qaU+h)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 01, 2011 11:38 PM (TMB3S)
Its natural to react less to things that happen again and again. Even a stupid horse eventually ignores a gun going off near its head.
Posted by: Meremortal at June 01, 2011 07:44 PM (Usk3+)
This whole situation just reminds me of a South Park episode for years ago.
"I didn't kill anyone, it was just some Puerto Rican Guy, what really!? Some Puerto Rican guy killed MY wife!?!! WE NEED TO FIND HIM!"
But there is no "Puerto Rican Guy." Just like there is no hacker.
Posted by: Cashin at June 01, 2011 11:13 PM (wY3Ne)
The better comparison is O.J. searching for the "real killer."
Posted by: J.S. Bryun at June 01, 2011 11:30 PM (rqKB1)
Posted by: buzzion at June 01, 2011 07:44 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Count de Monet at June 01, 2011 07:44 PM (XBM1t)
Posted by: SGT Dan at June 01, 2011 07:44 PM (h1vJ/)
I hope and pray that in the next democrat primary, for his house seat or mayor, somebody uses clips from the Weiner's press appearances in a commercial, and the photo in direct mail.
Could be a really fun campaign to watch.
Posted by: AlanR at June 01, 2011 07:45 PM (+CKqs)
Posted by: nickless at June 01, 2011 11:23 PM (MMC8r)
I am so stealing that.
Posted by: lowandslow at June 01, 2011 07:45 PM (GZitp)
Posted by: unclefacts, mobile edition at June 01, 2011 07:45 PM (6IReR)
Not enough people seem to be pointing out the hilarious contradiction between Weiner not pursuing justice and his crying over the innocent girls he followed on twitter being named in newspapers.
We get it, Anthony, it was just a silly prank because your name is a slang term for a penis. And as we all know, a prankster would obviously post a tame, clothed image, not a graphic nude shot of a hard, throbbing member.
But guess what? Innocent people who have done nothing wrong are being dragged into this. Where's your sense of justice on their behalf?
You aren't worried about it personally, OK, fine. But you're just going to sit there and let these poor girls -- these poor, hot, young, big-breasted girls -- be treated this way?
I can't understand it.
Posted by: OscarMeyer at June 01, 2011 07:46 PM (nwrWy)
Posted by: Seixon at June 01, 2011 07:47 PM (h8WtQ)
Posted by: Peaches at June 01, 2011 07:48 PM (afUO8)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 07:50 PM (Pzf4N)
Posted by: M. Night Shyamalan at June 01, 2011 07:50 PM (2jQGY)
Since we can safely assume that Weiner's inappropriate relations with female twitters did not begin yesterday, that means that he never stopped the skirt chasing that he was know for. Which has me asking: Why, if he seems to enjoy that kind of freedom, did he marry Abedin in the first place?
Which brings us back to the rumours that were swirling since the announcement of their relationship. Was this a sham marriage, arranged merely for the purpose of quieting the rumours about the nature of Abedin's relationship with Hillary? If so, what happens now that Weiner's escapades are having the opposite effect than the marriage was supposed to, in that he's now going to bring more scrutiny on Huma and Hill?
Posted by: sartana at June 01, 2011 07:51 PM (/IW23)
I'm sure it'll be no problem for me to preside over their divorce also.
Posted by: Slick Willie at June 01, 2011 07:52 PM (cBndz)
So, is the wife's name pronounced
Humma Weiner
or
Hooma Weiner?
Either way, I giggle like a 12-year-old girl when I think of it. Did she keep her maiden name?
Posted by: Palandine at June 01, 2011 07:52 PM (g7D8V)
Posted by: Wolf Blitzer, Digging to the Bottom of the Story So You Won't Have To at June 01, 2011 07:53 PM (Txl/u)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 07:54 PM (Pzf4N)
Posted by: John Kerry at June 01, 2011 07:54 PM (wTjXd)
Not dissimilar to the whole Jeopardy experience, eh, Wolf?
Posted by: Peaches at June 01, 2011 07:55 PM (afUO8)
Posted by: The Cad at June 01, 2011 07:55 PM (agD4m)
Posted by: Andrew at June 01, 2011 07:56 PM (oojTq)
These are all good questions I could have asked if I wasn't so struck by Weiner's courage and forthrightness. And if I wasn't mildly retarted.
Next time.
Posted by: Wolf Blitzer at June 01, 2011 07:56 PM (GZitp)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 11:54 PM (Pzf4N)
Hope they learned from VF and will ensure AW's car keys are in his pocket. For the car that will be placed in the parking lot. After witnesses begin to show.
Posted by: Count de Monet at June 01, 2011 07:57 PM (XBM1t)
BTW, I'm sure there has been a jump in hits to the site, but hopefully more. I made sure to mention on FB to all my con friends, who just *TODAY* are linking to Glenn Beck and others, that Ace of Spades HQ had the scoop long before any other media types did.
Great work and keep it up.
Posted by: GW McLintock at June 01, 2011 07:57 PM (xj4/B)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 07:57 PM (Pzf4N)
Posted by: The Cad at June 01, 2011 07:57 PM (agD4m)
Posted by: The Cad
The heck you say ....
Posted by: Andrew Codevilla at June 01, 2011 07:58 PM (qaU+h)
Fuck you.
Posted by: M. Night Shamalayan at June 01, 2011 07:59 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 08:00 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: David Letterman at June 01, 2011 08:01 PM (agD4m)
Posted by: Scranton Joe at June 01, 2011 08:02 PM (1yViP)
Posted by: shivas Irons at June 01, 2011 08:02 PM (qu2SW)
Yes, I know it's not as exciting as the Realization Montage in The Usual Suspects, but life usually isn't. That's why we pay clever people a great deal of money to make shit up for us to watch on a movie screen.
Now, if you want to explain to me that some jealous ex-boyfriend of
Hayley Williams was "the real perp," or maybe it was a disgruntled
staffer, or maybe even it was a conservative who hated her, fine.
No one wants to listen to a boring monk, even when he's right.
Posted by: Occam at June 01, 2011 08:03 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: SKYNET at June 01, 2011 08:03 PM (D6Uk6)
There's a simple way to tell if a subject is guilty.
Examine his demeanor. Listen to what he says when first confronted with the crime.
Does his reaction read genuine?
You know ace, if this sort of stuff does interest you, then you might really want to check out L.A. Noire, the game you talked about a while ago. Because you are right, you do actively participate in interrogations and have to be watching the people you're talking to in order to determine if they're lying or not. And the story will progress even if you are wrong but with some alterations.
Posted by: buzzion at June 01, 2011 08:04 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 08:04 PM (bAySe)
When will be the best time to inform Huma that she and Weiner were never
legally married?
Posted by: Slick Willie at June 01, 2011 11:38 PM
The way things are going, I think she would love it as a first anniversary gift.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 08:04 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 08:05 PM (hIWe1)
"Thats a good point, under what fucked up religion is BJ Clinton an ordained minister?"
Islam.
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 11:42 PM
Don't forget the hyphen. I-slam.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 08:05 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: shivas Irons at June 01, 2011 08:06 PM (qu2SW)
Posted by: nerdygirl at June 01, 2011 08:06 PM (j/5DA)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 08:06 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Slick Willie at June 01, 2011 08:06 PM (cBndz)
Posted by: ace at June 02, 2011 12:00 AM (nj1bB)
What? This wasn't a good job? This was the job, all of it. Far more important then another Trump, Huckleberry will they or won't they thread.
Posted by: Wolf Blitzer at June 01, 2011 08:06 PM (GZitp)
Why no mention anywhere about the discussions in Patriots timeline regarding a forthcoming NY congressional sex scandal being tweeted and re-tweeted between patriot and those who were following him. He taunted both Rangel and Weiner, asking, "Is it you?" But, to hack the account? Am struggling with that concept a bit.
My opinion is that Patriot was just the messenger. BUT, there is something very big going on and the NY sex scandal and Anthony's pic may just be connected.
Posted by: lovedinthekeys at June 01, 2011 08:07 PM (Tz/Wa)
Posted by: The Great Satan's Ghost at June 01, 2011 08:09 PM (UrPTC)
You know ace, if this sort of stuff does interest you, then you might really want to check out L.A. Noire, the game you talked about a while ago. Because you are right, you do actively participate in interrogations and have to be watching the people you're talking to in order to determine if they're lying or not. And the story will progress even if you are wrong but with some alterations.
Posted by: buzzion---
It would be pretty funny if someone did a spoof where they spliced in Anthony's nutty responses into the game's interrogation scenes.
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 08:09 PM (bAySe)
Posted by: Slick Willie at June 01, 2011 08:09 PM (cBndz)
Posted by: Howard Kurtz at June 01, 2011 08:09 PM (KIFT6)
ItÂ’s a good thing he hired that private security firm to rubber-stamp his allegation that he was hacked, or else that could have been quite the sticky wicket.
Weiner's had a problem with a sticky Wicket from the beginning. Thanks the efforts of a certain honey badger-esque Ewok, Weiner is being exposed for the prick most of us new he was.
Posted by: proud Moron at June 01, 2011 08:09 PM (wTjXd)
Posted by: nerdygirl at June 01, 2011 08:10 PM (j/5DA)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 01, 2011 08:10 PM (TMB3S)
It would be pretty funny if someone did a spoof where they spliced in Anthony's nutty responses into the game's interrogation scenes.
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 02, 2011 12:09 AM (bAySe)
That would be pretty good.
Posted by: buzzion at June 01, 2011 08:11 PM (oVQFe)
Weiner sent the pic. End of story.
Now if we just had some repubs that would ask for his resignation and/or start code of conduct hearings, it sure would be nice.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at June 01, 2011 08:11 PM (ldUCK)
Posted by: Anderson Cooper at June 01, 2011 08:12 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 01, 2011 08:12 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: ParisParamus-Hewitt at June 01, 2011 08:13 PM (tUIG0)
Weiner told Maddow that the photo 'maybe started out being a photo of his' but was manipulated.
Yes, he was taking pix of the pattern in his bathroom floor tile so he could make an exact match at Home Depot. And it all went downhill from there.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 08:13 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: The Cad at June 01, 2011 08:13 PM (agD4m)
At what point in a relationship with a guy would it be okay for him to text you a picture of his wang? (Or at least a close up him in his speedo.. and not a head shot either)
And what if the guy was Hugh Jackman or whoever is your flavor of beefcake?
Just for a point of reference as to why Weiner felt it was okay to send the comely coed a picture of his wang..
Posted by: Dave C at June 01, 2011 08:13 PM (QIvCY)
Not being a twitterer, I have no experience to do so myself but it sounds plausible except for the assumed behaviour of yfrog.
Posted by: 8==> at June 01, 2011 08:14 PM (9YuJS)
Waitasec, is Average Joe trolling us again? The real Howard Kurtz picked a bad time to suddenly post this reasonable-sounding missive if so.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 08:14 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 08:15 PM (+/eKV)
DO NOT STOP! TAKE THIS WIENER DOWN! HARD!
Posted by: Some Confused Moron at June 01, 2011 08:15 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: shivas Irons at June 01, 2011 08:16 PM (qu2SW)
The hole in that theory is that the email you need to make that happen itself is sorta like a password, random characters, and is not publicly available.
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 08:16 PM (bAySe)
Posted by: ace at June 02, 2011 12:00 AM (nj1bB)
Ace, on your worst day, you are head and shoulders above the rest. Where the fuck would we all be without you? Too hideous to even contemplate . . .
Posted by: Peaches at June 01, 2011 08:17 PM (afUO8)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 08:17 PM (Pzf4N)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 08:18 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 08:18 PM (bAySe)
Posted by: looking closely at June 01, 2011 08:18 PM (KNy97)
Can someone explain/deconstruct this from Cannonfire? Re: Weiner was not hacked but spoofed with a picture that wasn't his.
Not being a twitterer, I have no experience to do so myself but it sounds plausible except for the assumed behaviour of yfrog.
Posted by: 8==> at June 02, 2011 12:14 AM
It's all explained in a front page thread here. Go to the main page and scroll down.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 08:20 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: LJ Gibbs at June 01, 2011 08:21 PM (VxqUc)
Posted by: Howard Kurtz at June 01, 2011 08:21 PM (liBQN)
Posted by: supercore at June 01, 2011 08:21 PM (ZUFNn)
Posted by: Peaches at June 02, 2011 12:17 AM (afUO
--My work productivity would increase ~30%, for sure.
Posted by: logprof at June 01, 2011 08:21 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 08:22 PM (nj1bB)
Ace, I'll add my voice to the throng: you da man. I can't tell you how often I mention "this conservative forum where I participate" and I have more facts than anyone else in the room.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 08:23 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: davidr at June 01, 2011 08:23 PM (ONqbz)
He seems pretty adamant that he did not send the tweet to her. He may actually be ignorant how it got to her.
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 08:24 PM (bAySe)
who saw a picture and went all a-Twitter
He meant to privately post his crotch
but one letter did he botch
and wishes he'd never seen her...
Posted by: Evil Limerick at June 01, 2011 08:25 PM (Gn3KK)
And it would appear that many (most?) on his blog agree with him. I don't know, Mr. Johnson's blog just seems to have a certain je ne sais quoi about it....
Posted by: jeannebodine at June 01, 2011 08:26 PM (nvlAW)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 08:26 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: nerdygirl at June 01, 2011 08:26 PM (j/5DA)
I fucking love "Uncomplicated." The entire Blood & Chocolate album, really. You're playing to the cheap seats with that one, Ace, but I'm sitting in the cheap seats so hell yeah.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 08:26 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 08:26 PM (Pzf4N)
Do you notice Weiner appears cockier than you'd be? That's because he knows the fix is in. He only needs to throw up a little doubt and the media will run with it.
Posted by: ace at June 02, 2011 12:22 AM (nj1bB)
Yeah, all he needs to do is to get the people on the left to stop with their cries for the blood of the "hacker" and then they can drop it. They really don't give a shit about what we're saying, as you've put it so well in a previous post. Even when given the opportunity to hear our views they aren't interested.
Posted by: buzzion at June 01, 2011 08:26 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 08:27 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 08:28 PM (nj1bB)
Agreed..
Posted by: Dave C at June 01, 2011 08:28 PM (QIvCY)
Posted by: Mister Christopher at June 01, 2011 08:29 PM (/BUPU)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 08:29 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 01, 2011 08:30 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: vanderleun, who may be a nice guy but was hilariously wrong on this one at June 01, 2011 08:30 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 08:31 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: The Cad at June 01, 2011 08:32 PM (agD4m)
Posted by: Dumb_Blonde at June 01, 2011 08:32 PM (q1/Wn)
Posted by: ace
---
But then why the heck would he be truthful about the underwear shot? Its a lot harder to prove that is him than to find out the tweet came from his IP address.
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 08:32 PM (bAySe)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 08:33 PM (nj1bB)
Anthony Weiner is playing for a draw, and that's all he needs.
Exactly. If Weiner doesn't report this to LE, how much further can it go? It would take some of those Comely Followers to produce more dicpix or something, and that hasn't happened yet, so I don't see it happening at all.
I can only hope Breitbart is right: Dana Bash is a bitter PUMA woman who will take down Weiner for disgracing Huma.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 08:34 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 08:34 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: supercore at June 01, 2011 08:36 PM (ZUFNn)
P.S. Valu-Rite makes a beer? Who knew!! How does it compare to Natty Lite, pricewise?
Posted by: Peaches at June 01, 2011 08:36 PM (afUO8)
Posted by: tangonine at June 01, 2011 08:37 PM (x3YFz)
So when does Weiner go to the notarized affadavit and polygraph test to "prove" his ridiculous statements?
On MadCow he just repeated that he did not know the ComelyCoedTM
Posted by: Count de Monet at June 01, 2011 08:37 PM (XBM1t)
That people are, by and large, willing to lie in order to weasel out of culpability for bad or foolish behavior? Nah. I think that's pretty universally accepted. Maybe I'm just cynical.
Posted by: Dumb_Blonde at June 02, 2011 12:32 AM (q1/Wn)
Yes people are very naive. And also incredibly ignorant about technology. Even those that claim to be tech savvy, solely because they post online or use twitter. I think a lot of those you start talking about IPs and whether they are static or dynamic and they'll get a glazed look across their eyes and go "Huh?" They probably have no clue how incredibly simple it would be to determine whether the dicpic originated from a computer or smartphone used bye weiner.
Posted by: buzzion at June 01, 2011 08:37 PM (oVQFe)
Why are Americans playing this game? This guy is a fucking dirtbag.
Where's O'Reilly? With all due respect, get his ass on the phone!
Posted by: Fritz at June 01, 2011 08:38 PM (p2IBw)
And I think that damage is now done. Weiner can "wait this out" or "play for the tie," as Ace puts it, but I haven't spoken to a SINGLE LIBERAL -- that is, out in the real world (where I know tons) or even on the internet (where I visit other forums populated by typical lefties) -- that thinks Weiner isn't transparently guilty. The interviews he gave yesterday and today sealed it. Now some of them say things like "oh big deal," but I'm not even hearing much of that. Just a lot of embarrassment and face-pulling, and "gee Congressmen are scumbags, aren't they?"
Pretty much only the Kos Kiddies still believe that this is all a huge misunderstanding, and that Weiner is somehow innocent. But then they were going to no matter what. So I don't really see how the ball is going to be moved much forward from here (though I look forward to more awkward interviews), but I consider this a big "win" for us as it is, and much more than I expected at the outset: he's really torched himself something fierce, and even though this will eventually die down it's never going away for him.
The big wild card: Huma. She hasn't said a word since the jump. Now she's very media-shy as it is, so that isn't a huge shock, but I'm a bit surprised Weiner hasn't talked her into a "stand by your man" appearance yet. If that doesn't happen, or if shit breaks bad (look for a whisper campaign!) it may get worse. Other than that, I think we can be satisfied with what we've accomplished.
But then what do I know? I've been playing the wet blanket about this affair from the get-go. I just love being proven so wrong. Never would've thought Weiner would self-destruct so spectacularly on that CNN interview or today. His media rounds are NOT GOING OVER WELL in Washington today, despite what Ace says about softballs from Wolf Blitzer. Special Report's panel savaged him today, Politico's all over his shit (you give Ben Smith crap, but he's reporting all sorts of great stuff, like how Pelosi's shop basically has hated him for years and now they're comparing his newsers on background to Charlie Sheen's meltdown), and even Salon's tossed him to the wolves. Toasty.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 08:39 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Dumb_Blonde at June 01, 2011 08:39 PM (q1/Wn)
Posted by: Shiggz at June 01, 2011 08:39 PM (mLAWK)
Part true. Naive and stupid. And disingenuous. Hacks are clearly the latter. And politicians, especially a-holes like Weiner, conflate the topic to exploit the former. Bide for time, throw in wiggle words, selectively parse terminology and events, deflect, and accuse others. Pretty much boilerplate politics with the Bell Curve of Voter IQ's determining the outcome of events.
Your task was to move the curve Right. You succeeded. How far yet to be determined.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 01, 2011 08:39 PM (1yViP)
LOL!! Puts me right in mind of Citibank's "Economic Surprise Index" that was all over the news today. Yup, it's all so surprising.
Posted by: Peaches at June 01, 2011 08:39 PM (afUO8)
It was sent from his account to her - so the logical presumption ought to be that he was the sender until proven otherwise. And so far no one has been able to. And the one guy who could - Weiner - refuses to.
So why go looking for complicated sting conspiracies when the simplest, most likely explanation hasn't been disproved?
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 01, 2011 08:40 PM (TU3mr)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 01, 2011 08:40 PM (AZGON)
On trying to cyber a 21 year old, he skates. It's the provable lies he dies on.
So he attempts to commit himself to as little as possible.
Dude has no poker face. He comes accross as anything but a 'victim' in this, making his claims all the more ludicrous.
I do find it funny how he immediately appealed to victimhood, though. Tellingly funny.
Posted by: garrett at June 01, 2011 08:40 PM (sH0LP)
Weiner's office today:
http://twitpic.com/55irkk
Maybe it comes down to who will win the chicken fight.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 08:40 PM (+/eKV)
whoa, whoa, whoa. I'm a-gonna stop you right there.
Rewind and reexamine this conclusion.
Weiner is being advised by lawyers on how to lie in the best manner possible and without wanting to bring in the Comely Coed, let's just say I suspect she might have been given some advice as well.
Posted by: ace at June 02, 2011 12:33 AM (nj1bB)
< Damn straight Ace. Follow your instict on this. This shit is the thing and will not dampen down. This fool is steeped in foolishness and cannot play the volley. Ace don't let this down. Keep advancing this and keep reinventing it in genre because this feller will resign once big uncontrollable mo gets cookin. The DNC ain't gonna want their rook grilled up on the cusp of the next cycle.
Ace, keep moving this forward through your genius.
Posted by: journolist at June 01, 2011 08:41 PM (QM8jX)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 08:41 PM (Pzf4N)
2) Hayley Williams - it's sad that had to get dredged up again, poor lady. Also, I would *so* hit that like the K-T Extinction Event.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at June 01, 2011 08:41 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: KevinF at June 01, 2011 08:41 PM (8qobt)
Posted by: Anthony Weiner at June 01, 2011 08:41 PM (wTjXd)
Posted by: Dumb_Blonde at June 02, 2011 12:39 AM (q1/Wn)
Yes, but less cynical than me
Posted by: buzzion at June 01, 2011 08:41 PM (oVQFe)
"1. Show your friends and laugh, say things like, ick, ew, gross, yuch.
2. Make a lot of jokes about how small it is, about 30 minutes worth.
3. throw out some Lorena Bobbitt references."
Or variations thereof. Like not showing the picture, but describing it, and getting the same reaction as #1.
Laughing at the fact that he felt that it was okay to send a dick pic and 20 minutes on 'you can't be serious about going out with him again' which directly follows 'omg, you won't believe this..."
Any self respecting woman would receive something like that and either be pissed off/offended, or left incapacitated by peals of laughter, neither of which is the reaction that a guy is looking for.
For the more savvy, then there is the gross speculation as to how many OTHER women to whom he's also sent pictures of his wang to. Suddenly, he becomes globally UNAPPEALING.
No wang pics, ever.
Posted by: LMAO at Weiner at June 01, 2011 08:42 PM (+XMtr)
Btw, is it now kosher to use her real name. Fox News was reporting both her name and photo tonight.
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 08:42 PM (bAySe)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 01, 2011 08:43 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 01, 2011 08:43 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 08:43 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at June 02, 2011 12:22 AM (nj1bB)
That's undoubtedly true but it's also getting out of control. The whole "context" thing with Maddow? That just creates more questions.
Posted by: Rocks at June 01, 2011 08:44 PM (th0op)
You know Dave Chappelle's bit about his super-high white friend getting pulled over by the cops and scaring him by acting like it's no big deal? My partner-in-teenage-misdemeanors was like that, because he knew that saying his father's name had the power to make crimes disappear. A rearview full of blue and red lights made him smile. Weiner's got the same thing going.
I've always had to make do with sociopathic cool (which works, but not in the same way, and can backfire freakishly). I thought Weiner would resort to that, and use the lie that fits all known knowns here (while allowing all his fans and enemies to know he was lying and get off on or be shamed and infuriated by his getting off), but he knows he doesn't have to.
I've only once been in a situation where the world was against me, and rightly so, but I outranked the world, so I could just "...And?" it. Fine fucking day that was. And if all my days were like it, you'd all know exactly what my dick looks like.
Posted by: oblig. at June 01, 2011 08:44 PM (xvZW9)
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 08:45 PM (bAySe)
This story is beyond ridiculous. He's an idiot and so is anyone that believes his cockamamy story.
Posted by: JR at June 01, 2011 08:45 PM (+XMtr)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 08:46 PM (nj1bB)
There is nothing implausible about how Patriot saw it in the 1-5 seconds.
Timeline:
1. Patriot, obsessed for some reason, has 2 tabs open. One to his feed and one to WeinerÂ’s. But I think Patriot saw Weiner tweet in his own feed as he follows Weiner.
2. Twitter says “new tweet” and Patriot clinks on “new tweet” which shows Pic tweet to coed.
3. Patriot right clicks on link to Yfrog pic and selects “Open in new tab”
4. Patriot see pic in new tab.
5. Clicks on tab for Patriot feed & retweets WeinerÂ’s tweet.
6. Retweet updates page which shows Weiner tweet gone.
7. Total time so far? Under 5 seconds for someone who uses a computer regularly.
8. Patriot goes back to tab with pic and tries to save or download but canÂ’t since it has been deleted.
9. Grabs screen grab of window with Weiner pic in it.
Leaving a tab open for 3 hours to WeinerÂ’s feed is nothing for someone obsessed with him for some reason. I think even Patriot would admit he was obsessed about following Weiner.
The odd thing is that Patriot states twice what a coincidence it is Weiner is there to delete tweet in under 5 seconds. This would be no coincidence if Weiner had just sent it, seen it was public, and immediately deleted it.
Posted by: Rocks at June 01, 2011 08:46 PM (th0op)
This country is toast when crap like this can get elected.
God help us all.
Posted by: Killerdog at June 01, 2011 08:46 PM (CZrbJ)
This actually might work for him.
Posted by: creeper at June 01, 2011 08:47 PM (gre5a)
Where's O'Reilly? With all due respect, get his ass on the phone!
Posted by: Fritz at June 02, 2011 12:38 AM
I don't have t.v. where I am. Wasn't Bill-o supposed to have some "answer" for us tonight as to why the FBI isn't involved?
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 08:47 PM (+/eKV)
That's just crazy talk, that's what that is. Haven't you been listening to @Stranahan et al.?!
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 01, 2011 08:47 PM (1yViP)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 01, 2011 08:48 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 01, 2011 08:48 PM (AZGON)
Now this was some well-written shit.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 08:48 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: buzzion at June 01, 2011 08:49 PM (oVQFe)
I tweeted to him on Saturday and Sunday that he was huddled up in a boardroom in an office of a crisis communications (Spin SWAT) firm. I am confident that when I addressed him that's exactly where he was.
Then tell him he won't get away with it. Tell him no one is going to let it die. Get Edgar Allen Poe on his ass. "It was the beating of his hideous heart!"
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 08:50 PM (+/eKV)
Anthony Weiner is playing for a draw, and that's all he needs.
Exactly. If Weiner doesn't report this to LE, how much further can it go? It would take some of those Comely Followers to produce more dicpix or something, and that hasn't happened yet, so I don't see it happening at all.
I can only hope Breitbart is right: Dana Bash is a bitter PUMA woman who will take down Weiner for disgracing Huma.
Posted by: arhooley at June 02, 2011 12:34 AM (+/eKV)
< Simply put... Bull Shit. This thing is now uncontainable. Weiner is a verbose spiteful hypocrite and the beclownment factor is a mighty toxin.
Posted by: journolist at June 01, 2011 08:50 PM (QM8jX)
Posted by: Rocks at June 01, 2011 08:51 PM (th0op)
So clue me in morons, is this something a guy would do? Use a phone to take pics of his genitalia, and then, presumably, show them to various people?
nerdygirl
Totally normal, but only shown to coeds. I do it all the time.
Posted by: Alvin Greene at June 01, 2011 08:52 PM (J74Py)
Posted by: Count de Monet at June 01, 2011 08:52 PM (XBM1t)
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 02, 2011 12:42 AM (bAySe)
Clearly, the word "kosher" does not mean what I think it means.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at June 01, 2011 08:52 PM (bxiXv)
Simply put... Bull Shit. This thing is now uncontainable. Weiner is a verbose spiteful hypocrite and the beclownment factor is a mighty toxin.
Okay, thanks for talking me out of my trough. I've been up and down on this with lightning speed.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 08:52 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 08:53 PM (Pzf4N)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 01, 2011 08:53 PM (AZGON)
That's just crazy talk, that's what that is. Haven't you been listening to @Stranahan et al.?!
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 02, 2011 12:47 AM (1yViP)
Well see that's the problem - I have been listening @Stranahan and now I'm beginning to doubt non-leftards' ability to use basic logic.
I think there's a certain percentage of people who deliberately look for the convoluted and complex in things because that's how the world makes sense to them - simplicity is just unsatisfying. So the obvious explanation - meth found in the car of the thin, nervous guy with bad teeth actually belongs to him - must in fact be a puzzle that they must unwrap, dig into and solve.
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 01, 2011 08:54 PM (TU3mr)
Oh, hell, no. Where would you even get such a ridiculous idea?
Posted by: Bret F. at June 01, 2011 08:54 PM (afUO8)
>>>This actually might work for him
No. No it won't. I don't think you realize how poorly his "joking" about this today was received by the DC press corps. Awkward laughs? Sure. But the reaction was generally one of "gee, this is creepy." Normally they'd be all okey-dokey laugh-in with Weiner, but now? Now they smell blood and they ARE journalists after all, with bullshit-detectors, and those are attuned to this sort of stuff pretty well.
Again: look at the coverage of this on every major news site (absent the NY Times, of course). Politico? Say what you will about them, all you need to do is look at their front-page coverage (as well as Ben Smith's blogging) and not even read between the lines very hard to know that they think he's a lying bastard. Salon put him out to pasture by mid-afternoon. Fox, after being initially ginger, is all-in on him (even Juan Williams was skewering him tonight). CNN has done its damage already, Wolf Blitzer softballs or no.
I'll reemphasize: I don't see how the ball moves forward from here. Weiner will stonewall, there won't be an official investigation that could prove the matter, and nobody will confess, so it's over except for the exceedingly awkward questioning (and even that will die away necessarily in a week or so). But Weiner has permanently damaged himself here. Except for the happy haunts of MSNBC, he's a back-bencher again while he remains in Congress, and is suddenly very vulnerable in a Dem primary for mayor.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 08:54 PM (hIWe1)
I did a victory lap on twitter about predicting the "private security firm" gambit. I baited the MSM by asking them if they thought I was simply psychic, or maybe there was some other reason I was living in Weiner's head.
I tweeted to him on Saturday and Sunday that he was huddled up in a boardroom in an office of a crisis communications (Spin SWAT) firm. I am confident that when I addressed him that's exactly where he was.
I doubt I've gotten anything wrong, including the baiting speculation.
Posted by: ace at June 02, 2011 12:46 AM (nj1bB)
< You are spot on brother... I will personally fund your enterprise (although the wife is sick of my funding enterprises) but I am living a life right now of going for it. Ace, it's liberating. Don't back down ever on this. You have a multitude of support beyond your wildest imagination with some well dialed in salty bastards who know we are operating in unchartered waters who are all in at this point.
Posted by: journolist at June 01, 2011 08:55 PM (QM8jX)
Yes, I'm a putz, but you gotta hand it to me for pounding my well-watched fist on the importance of this.
Word of the day: putz.
Posted by: Bill O'Really at June 01, 2011 08:55 PM (wOaLi)
And that's how it happened.
Posted by: Count de Monet at June 02, 2011 12:52 AM
Any clue as to how he had Delete privileges at a yfrog account he didn't know existed?
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 08:55 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: Steve Perry at June 01, 2011 08:56 PM (fpgkJ)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 02, 2011 12:53 AM (Pzf4N)
Well I sure hope Breitbart or somebody out there is logging every Democrat politician's tweets and FB update 24/7. It wouldn't be hard to do.
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 01, 2011 08:58 PM (TU3mr)
Posted by: arhooley at June 02, 2011 12:55 AM (+/eKV)
Magic. He's a magician.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at June 01, 2011 08:59 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 08:59 PM (Pzf4N)
Posted by: Steve Perry at June 02, 2011 12:56 AM (fpgkJ)
Get off my lawn.
Ain't nothin' worse than a punk-ass white boy.
Posted by: Gladys Knight at June 01, 2011 08:59 PM (afUO8)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 02, 2011 12:53 AM
Maybe we ought to have an Adopt-a-Congresscreep program. Everybody pick one and get some Firehose app or something that downloads everything from the Twitter account including the associated content at any tweeted URLs.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 09:00 PM (+/eKV)
That's the left side of the Bell Curve I mentioned earlier. Plus, they desperately want an out for Weiner. The implausible becomes plausible - especially if you can't disentangle the spaghetti getting tossed out by Team Weiner and the hacks.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 01, 2011 09:00 PM (1yViP)
Because that's what Dave Weigel, Conservative Media Reporter, does.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 09:01 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: The Cad at June 01, 2011 09:02 PM (agD4m)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 09:03 PM (Pzf4N)
...and the undoing is complete.
Hardest hit.
Charles Johnson by Weinergate and going all in on insanity of desperation.
BWAHAHAHA!
Posted by: Jethro Bean at June 01, 2011 09:04 PM (PTigi)
>>>Yes, I'm a putz, but you gotta hand it to me for pounding my well-watched fist on the importance of this.
Mock Bill O'Reilly all you want, he's played the Weiner scandal brilliantly. I fucking love his deadpan "this is a national security issue" angle. It's perfect.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 09:04 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: The Cad at June 01, 2011 09:05 PM (agD4m)
Posted by: Ginger Lee, Star of Teenage Whores and Backdoor Sluts 9 at June 01, 2011 09:05 PM (Q3nWV)
Never understimate the currency of beclownment... it don't depreciate.
Posted by: journolist at June 01, 2011 09:05 PM (QM8jX)
Why is it that there are two versions of the dic pic? One cropped and another larger version where you can see a table leg in the background?
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 09:06 PM (bAySe)
Apparently he's on vacation. I thought it was only for the holiday weekend, but he seems to have "conveniently" extended his stay or something.
I've known Weigel for years, and he's gotten progressively more turdish with each passing one.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 09:07 PM (hIWe1)
I've called your office three times and can't seem to get a response. Who are you talking to all day?
Posted by: Normal Constituent of Anthony Weiner's District who isn't a very young and attractive girl at June 01, 2011 09:07 PM (Q3nWV)
Remember the endgame here is not Weiner resigning, but making him an impotent laughingstock. Halfway there. Posted by: George Orwell at June 02, 2011 12:53 AM
he's a back-bencher again while he remains in Congress, and is suddenly very vulnerable in a Dem primary for mayor.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 02, 2011 12:54 AM
Well gentlemen, I'd like to pose a concrete objective: he never gets further than where he is now. Jeff B, "very vulnerable" isn't enough for me. I'm counting on some cannibalistic New York Dems to see his implosion as their entree to mayoral victory. Hell, I'll donate to their campaigns. I'll donate if there's some dog-eat-dog bastard who ventures to primary his ass in 2012.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 09:07 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 09:07 PM (Pzf4N)
Posted by: Walter Freeman at June 01, 2011 09:07 PM (UsjBj)
He keeps sending my pictures of a teddy bear called pedro. Pedrobear!
I hope you take me to the prom.
Nice jockeys, btw!
Posted by: Some High School girl in Wisconsin with no Political Views at June 01, 2011 09:08 PM (Q3nWV)
Posted by: The Cad at June 01, 2011 09:10 PM (agD4m)
Prove me wrong!
Clearly he's been framed because it's not possible to prove me wrong!!!
Posted by: Idiot at June 01, 2011 09:10 PM (Q3nWV)
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 02, 2011 12:54 AM (TU3mr)
Spot on! FIFM
What? I just need to ask Jesus to come into my heart and be my Lord and Savior? But I don't have any Faith in Him. What? He'll give me Faith, and Forgiveness, and Acceptance, and Eternal Salvation just for the asking? That's completly idiotic! The Scientology Church has a much cooler spiritual path as do the Buddhists with reincarnation.
Posted by: Count de Monet at June 01, 2011 09:12 PM (XBM1t)
I tweeted to him on Saturday and Sunday that he was huddled up in a boardroom in an office of a crisis communications (Spin SWAT) firm. I am confident that when I addressed him that's exactly where he was.
Quoted again. For goldenness.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 09:13 PM (+/eKV)
Reasonable people will get drawn in to the story in an official manner with a ratcheting of events.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 01, 2011 09:14 PM (1yViP)
What? I just need to ask Jesus to come into my heart and be my Lord and Savior? But I don't have any Faith in Him. What? He'll give me Faith, and Forgiveness, and Acceptance, and Eternal Salvation just for the asking? That's completly idiotic! The Scientology Church has a much cooler spiritual path as do the Buddhists with reincarnation.
Posted by: Count de Monet at June 02, 2011 01:12 AM (XBM1t)
It also explains the long running appeal of Gnosticism.
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 01, 2011 09:15 PM (TU3mr)
Posted by: Walter Freeman at June 01, 2011 09:15 PM (UsjBj)
It wasn't my junk they I was tweetin,
computer hacks,
stole my package oooo-aaaaaaah....
Posted by: Steve Perry at June 01, 2011 09:16 PM (nm/Ej)
Posted by: arhooley at June 02, 2011 12:55 AM (+/eKV)
Old woman! I order you to be quiet! No follow up questions to implausible answers!
Posted by: Arthur Pendragon, King of the Britons at June 01, 2011 09:16 PM (XBM1t)
"Dick" Cheney
Posted by: KZnextzone at June 02, 2011 01:14 AMIn which case, Weiner brought a toothpick to a swordfight.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 09:17 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: Huma Abedin at June 01, 2011 09:20 PM (agD4m)
Well here's the big secret about Anthony Weiner: nobody really likes him at all in NYC (or NY state) politics. He's seen as a fake, an opportunistic. Within the world of NYC Democrats, he was viewed for years as sort of a center-right guy (you have to understand...this is NYC we're talking about, but do note that Weiner's district is the most GOP-leaning of the Five Borough's outside of Mike Grimm's actually Republican one on Staten Island), in the mold of his predecessor in the Congressional seat he holds, Chuck Schumer. (Again, yes: there was a time when Schumer was seen as a moderate of sorts, and not just a dependably liberal sleazebag.)
And NYC politicos dislike him for the same reason they disliked Schumer: they saw them as outsiders, not "real" liberals, but canny opportunists who leveraged their centrist crossover appeal and media-whoring antics (Weiner was Schumer's aide when Schumer was Congressman -- he learned from the best) into a national profile that vaulted them ahead of fellow Dems who had actually "paid their dues."
You have to remember -- again in the world of NYC politics, which is significantly to the left of the country as a whole, so adjust your visor accordingly -- prior to 2009 and push for Obamacare, Weiner had actually spent his career carefully acquiring credentials as being a moderate in the NY Dem caucus: voted for the Iraq War, very VERY pro-Israel, muscular foreign-policy guy, pro-Wall Street and business, etc. Sure he's 100% pro-choice and anti-gun, but that's New York for you.
It was only after Obamacare got rolling that he made the (brilliant) tactical decision to fight a battle that he knew was lost from the get-go: for the Public Option in the healthcare package. He demagogued the issue up and down the halls of every single cable TV station on the planet, if you recall...and prior to that he wasn't very well known. Now Weiner KNEW that there was never any chance of actually getting a public option into the bill, which is exactly why he chose that issue: he wanted to raise his national profile and become a hero to the left (specifically the Kos/online Left, which drives media buzz), so suddenly he pivots from being a "centrist Dem" to being a "hard left crusader." Don't think for a moment that this didn't piss off a bunch of NYC politicos who understood exactly what Weiner was doing, and what his reasons were. He lost the battle, but then he never intended to win. He was playing for a different victory, and he won that one.
Finally, Weiner's a notoriously mean person. I mean, this isn't even much of a secret anymore -- you keep seeing hints of it bubbling up in press accounts over the last few days -- but I'll just lay it out straight: he's easily one of the nastiest, rudest, most prickish cockholsters on Capitol Hill. He's arrogant, shouts all the time, berates EVERYONE from staffers (an even higher turnover than Michele Bachmann, and that's saying something!) to fellow congressmen (ask Pete King!) to reporters. Nobody really likes him, except of course the nutroots and the future voters of NYC whose opinion of him is formed by his newfound media celebrity.
That's why there is a lot of schadenfreude (as reported by Politico) right now in Dem circles, watching Weiner implode professionally. He had no real allies, no real friends. He's angered a lot of people, and his only real friends are in the MSM.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 09:21 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Huma Abedin at June 02, 2011 01:20 AM
You sure are hon.
I'll be over with some lighter fluid and Haagen Das
Rocky Road?
Posted by: Hillary at June 01, 2011 09:21 PM (ZUWaD)
Walter Peck: They caused an explosion!
Mayor: Is this true?
Dr. Peter Venkman: Yes it's true. - This man has no dick.
Posted by: mojo at June 01, 2011 09:21 PM (D6Uk6)
I still think he's toast next Monday. Something's gonna blow up this weekend. I just feel it in my bones, or gut, or wherever. Yeah.
Posted by: Walter Freeman at June 02, 2011 01:15 AM
Huma.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 09:22 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: Walter Freeman at June 02, 2011 01:15 AM (UsjBj)
Maybe. I just hope the story doesn't step on the toes of AoSHQ's E3 Coverage. :/
Posted by: Serious Cat at June 01, 2011 09:22 PM (bAySe)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 01, 2011 09:24 PM (agD4m)
Finally, Weiner's a notoriously mean person.
I had the feeling this was so -- in the vein of Olbermann and Spitzer. May his mastication and digestion by fellow Dems be glorious.
Everything else I had no idea, except the part about his destined-for-defeat campaign for the Public Option. Thanks for the long post. You're on a roll tonight, Jeff B.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 09:29 PM (+/eKV)
I think ace ought to seriously consider letting you do a post pretty much re-capping what you've been saying re:Weiner.
I sort of knew who Weiner was and what he was thanks to an opportunity to briefly observe him in person several years ago. A lot of people know or think they know what a nasty P.O.S. he is, but you laid it all out...at 1:30 AM on a Thursday morning, when not many will see it
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth (Jeff B.'s New Fanboi) at June 01, 2011 09:31 PM (agD4m)
Howard Kurtz is now a girther:
"At the outset, I argued that Weiner was entitled to the presumption of innocence. ... But after listening to Weiner bob and weave and talk about how photographs can be manipulated, and how heÂ’s called in experts to determine whether that is or isnÂ’t his junk, I have to say: heÂ’s not acting very smart. The explanations seem increasingly bizarre. In the court of public opinion, at least, Weiner has forfeited the presumption of innocence."
"Sending a young woman a lewd photo is not an impeachable offense, but it is monumentally bad judgment. Saying youÂ’re not sure if thatÂ’s you in the gray underwear is unimpeachably stupid."
Posted by: Count de Monet at June 01, 2011 09:31 PM (XBM1t)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at June 01, 2011 09:33 PM (Pzf4N)
I think ace ought to seriously consider letting you do a post pretty much re-capping what you've been saying re:Weiner.
I sort of knew who Weiner was and what he was thanks to an opportunity to briefly observe him in person several years ago. A lot of people know or think they know what a nasty P.O.S. he is, but you laid it all out...at 1:30 AM on a Thursday morning, when not many will see it
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth (Jeff B.'s New Fanboi) at June 02, 2011 01:31 AM (agD4m)
Agreed. Jeff's comment is post-worthy - especially in explaining the background for why pursuing weinergate is worthwhile even if Weiner doesn't resign.
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 01, 2011 09:38 PM (TU3mr)
Posted by: Pirate of the Perineum at June 01, 2011 09:40 PM (ZRN7N)
But I'm not the only one
Here's a picture of my hot dog
Send me one of your bun.
Posted by: Anthony Sings the Oldies at June 01, 2011 09:48 PM (agD4m)
Thanks, Balrog (and coming from you I know it's a real compliment). Care to share your personal anecdote? Was he bigfooting people at a bar/club/restaurant? Shouting at subordinates? Just giving off general douchechills?
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 09:49 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Ryan 2012 at June 01, 2011 09:49 PM (C42qb)
Posted by: journolist at June 02, 2011 01:43 AM (QM8jX)
Sure...unless Jeff B has an objection.
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 01, 2011 09:52 PM (TU3mr)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 09:52 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 09:53 PM (hIWe1)
I completely understand your reluctance to post anything potentially defamatory, of course, but I will point out that nothing in that post I wrote is defamatory. It refers to his political record and his reputation among fellow NY politicos. And THAT can be easily confirmed, in fact it's on my mind because I noticed that Politico was finally reporting about it tonight.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 09:56 PM (hIWe1)
Here's a guilt-free link to Politico (Ben Smith) basically confirming everything I've written: http://tinyurl.com/4yn2xlr
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 09:57 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: KZnextzone at June 01, 2011 09:58 PM (ZUWaD)
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 01, 2011 09:59 PM (TU3mr)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 10:00 PM (nj1bB)
"Never shy about belting out R-rated language, he enjoys challenging staff members on issues, even at parties. And, in a city saturated with transient career hoppers, Mr. Weiner has presided over more staff turnover than any other member of the New York House delegation in recent years, according to an analysis of congressional data."
Another link on the same subject, to HuffPo: http://tinyurl.com/5hyvaa
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 10:00 PM (hIWe1)
While I like Jeff B's analysis, this is Ace's house and deference should be maintained to house trump. If it's OK with Ace and Jeff B. I can have it cross posted at Clarion Advisory and if the punk Weiner want's to sue me I'll be more than happy to submit a few interragatories in re. Weinergate.
If I have Jeff B's clearance, I'll have this posted on Clarion and perhaps a side bar post on AOSHQ if Ace is OK with it.
Posted by: journolist at June 01, 2011 10:01 PM (QM8jX)
Posted by: David at June 01, 2011 10:01 PM (4t9J5)
"It started as a routine conference call. But at some point during the call, Representative Anthony D. Weiner became furious, convinced that his scheduler had not given him a crucial piece of information.
His scheduler, John J. Graff, who was in the next room, suddenly heard the congressman yelling at him through the wall.
Then, Mr. Graff recalled, Mr. Weiner started pounding his fists on his desk, kicked a chair and unleashed a string of expletives.
Two weeks later, Mr. Graff, a Navy veteran, became the latest of a sizable number of staff members who have resigned after an abbreviated stint with Mr. Weiner, a Democrat who represents parts of Brooklyn and Queens."
Yeah, this guy's a fucking prick and a half.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 10:02 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 10:04 PM (hIWe1)
No, nothing as profound as all that, and I do not recall the details as well as I would like. He was the featured VIP at the graduation/commissioning ceremony of the NROTC unit where I was then an instructor. Dude shows up about halfway through, says a few words (that left me with the impression he had his eye on Gracie Mansion), then just leaves, trailed by his assistants. Total driveby.
Maybe that's typical for him, but I've never seen anyone make a cameo appearance at a commissioning ceremony. It's just not done.
To revisit a point you made earlier, i.e. he's a recent convert to moonbattery since he is looking to win a citywide race rather than just his district: Amen. The Progtards in Astoria and Long Island City would have backed some Working Families Whackjob before they would have supported the old Anthony Weiner.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 01, 2011 10:05 PM (agD4m)
Jeff B. I will cross-link your AOSHQ redacted analysis to Clarion on Friday when it's posted here.
Posted by: journolist at June 01, 2011 10:05 PM (QM8jX)
Posted by: freedomplow at June 01, 2011 10:05 PM (GLP9X)
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 10:05 PM (hIWe1)
Pajamas also has a story up about what a nasty prick and target for ambitious NY Dems Weiner is: http://tinyurl.com/3c594fu
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 10:05 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 01, 2011 10:06 PM (AZGON)
2 questions (or maybe 1):
1) What is up with the patriot76 May 11 assertion that there would be some damaging pic or something coming out?
2) Same with Breitbart saying (early on) that more was on the way?
Is Weiner going to get hit with dic pic number 2 to another honey that Breitbart will disclose in Acorn-story-like fashion?
I wonder if coeds will start coming out of the woodwork... kind of like Tiger's ladies - in which most people lost count after about 431 or so.
Posted by: pud at June 01, 2011 10:06 PM (u6K6A)
I'll clean it up for Friday. Send it to you tomorrow, I guess.
Funny, after posting on AoSHQ for like, eight years, this would be my first front-page post. I guess I just always felt like I was born to haunt the comments.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 10:07 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 01, 2011 10:08 PM (agD4m)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 01, 2011 10:08 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 02, 2011 02:06 AM (AZGON)
Say...mind if we borrow your brother's car for the weekend? Don't worry - we'll gas it up before we bring it back.
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 01, 2011 10:10 PM (TU3mr)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 01, 2011 10:11 PM (agD4m)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 01, 2011 10:13 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: journolist at June 01, 2011 10:13 PM (QM8jX)
Posted by: ace at June 01, 2011 10:19 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 01, 2011 10:21 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Case at June 01, 2011 10:24 PM (0K+Kw)
As in "diamond hard and photographed on Blackberry-cam through my boxer-briefs."
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 10:26 PM (hIWe1)
What occasion?
Posted by: ace at June 02, 2011 02:19 AM (nj1bB)
< Book signing and happy hour in Newport Beach.
Posted by: journolist at June 01, 2011 10:27 PM (QM8jX)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 01, 2011 10:29 PM (AZGON)
Oh I have absolutely no doubt that he's smart. Stupid people don't survive and thrive in the meat-grinder of NYC Democratic politics, and furthermore his public appearances prove well enough to me that he's got a brain.
But there's a difference (and I would know from experience!) between being smart and having good judgment. Or being smart and being an irredeemable, arrogant asshole. (In fact, those two often tend to go hand-in-hand, especially in politics.)
I don't think a psych-profile of Weiner is particularly hard to figure out. He fits the pattern of a lot of chip-on-the-shoulder politicians who suddenly find themselves "sexy" and "in demand" after years of being passed over by the opposite sex.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 10:30 PM (hIWe1)
Sheeesh....
Posted by: pud at June 01, 2011 10:33 PM (u6K6A)
The change of circumstances must have been particularly jarring in his case since, were he to pull the back of his shirt collar up over his head, he's pretty much "Cornholio."
Look at a profile of Anthony and tell me he's not separated at birth from Beavis.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 01, 2011 10:36 PM (agD4m)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 02, 2011 02:29 AM (AZGON)
Yes that was excellent. I was going to stick it on the ONT but totally forgot. You can listen to it here.
Posted by: Mætenloch at June 01, 2011 10:36 PM (TU3mr)
already heard it.. laugh out loud funny..
Posted by: The Great Satan's Ghost at June 01, 2011 10:37 PM (UrPTC)
Also, felt sorry (almost) for Huma. Obviously, it is a poor-quality marriage when Weiner is looking for e-jollies with 20 year olds. Just when her glow is fading fast, too...
Posted by: pud at June 01, 2011 10:40 PM (u6K6A)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 01, 2011 10:41 PM (AZGON)
Really? Is it truly Weiner? With certitude?
Posted by: George Orwell at June 02, 2011 02:41 AM (AZGON)
< A dick for sure.
Posted by: journolist at June 01, 2011 10:42 PM (QM8jX)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 01, 2011 10:45 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: buzzion at June 01, 2011 11:01 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Oprah-Huma-Huma-Oprah at June 01, 2011 11:05 PM (pmzey)
Posted by: Oprah-Huma-Huma-Oprah at June 01, 2011 11:06 PM (pmzey)
But back on topic with the likely similarity between Hayley Williams and Antony Weiner, from the very start it seemed open and shut to me (going completely by what Ace was reporting). It was never really a question of did he do it, but rather will this find traction over the long weekend. Then, of course, the interviews totally confirmed it. And, the "journalists" just couldn't keep from delving into it a little... I mean, when a US Rep is so obviously lying about sexting a young journalism major. It's like he left them no choice, and now we'll see where it goes!
I think he'll weather it somewhat, but it will be a significant black-eye, and for the rest of his life people will smile to his face and laugh at his jokes... you know nice political laughter... and then as they walk away they will laugh at him. And, when he hears the whispers, he should know that they are commenting under their breath, "sick uncle pervy weiner... actually thinks he's funny when he's actually equal parts of geek, desperate, power-hungry, and liar."
His sway is forever seriously damaged.
Posted by: pud at June 01, 2011 11:12 PM (u6K6A)
Posted by: pud at June 02, 2011 03:12 AM (u6K6A)
< He will resign.
Posted by: journolist at June 01, 2011 11:14 PM (QM8jX)
OK, 'IF' this was sent from his Gov owned Blackbury, using Gov paid for airtime, even on a Private Twitter Account... it gets interesting.
There is NO Expectation of Privacy on Twitter, and the Rest is all Gov owned and thus open to Freedom of Information Act requests...
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 01, 2011 11:19 PM (NtXW4)
Posted by: Oprah-Huma-Huma-Oprah at June 01, 2011 11:20 PM (pmzey)
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 11:23 PM (hIWe1)
OK, 'IF' this was sent from his Gov owned Blackbury, using Gov paid for airtime, even on a Private Twitter Account... it gets interesting.
There is NO Expectation of Privacy on Twitter, and the Rest is all Gov owned and thus open to Freedom of Information Act requests...
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 02, 2011 03:19 AM (NtXW4)
<Good call.
Posted by: journolist at June 01, 2011 11:23 PM (QM8jX)
Posted by: davidr at June 01, 2011 11:24 PM (ONqbz)
Something to chew on.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 01, 2011 11:26 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: buzzion at June 01, 2011 11:27 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: davidr at June 01, 2011 11:28 PM (ONqbz)
Also, felt sorry (almost) for Huma. Obviously, it is a poor-quality marriage when Weiner is looking for e-jollies with 20 year olds. Just when her glow is fading fast, too...
Posted by: pud at June 02, 2011 02:40 AM
I just thought of something. What if that poor thing is pregnant? I realize I invite many jokes by posing this question, but I'd feel very sorry for her if this was the case.
Posted by: arhooley at June 01, 2011 11:28 PM (+/eKV)
Posted by: journolist at June 01, 2011 11:33 PM (QM8jX)
The more I think about it the uncropped photo is probably the reason Weiner is taking the "could be manipulation" route because people (namely Huma) have seen that flooring before.
Posted by: Oprah-Huma-Huma-Oprah at June 01, 2011 11:36 PM (pmzey)
Posted by: Pirate of the Perineum at June 01, 2011 11:46 PM (ZRN7N)
Posted by: Supervisor 194 at June 01, 2011 11:48 PM (qpstS)
Staff turnover. Is that like a wiener knish?
Posted by: sartana at June 01, 2011 11:55 PM (/IW23)
OK, just read Breitbart's Twitter Feed the Mickey Kaus wrote about over at the Daily Caller. Question why is Breitbart seemingly now inquiring about this Wolfe guy's credibility.
Someone explain this to me.
Posted by: journolist at June 02, 2011 12:00 AM (QM8jX)
Posted by: Oprah-Huma-Huma-Oprah at June 02, 2011 12:14 AM (pmzey)
Posted by: alppuccino at June 02, 2011 02:26 AM (laPL6)
Posted by: alppuccino at June 02, 2011 02:30 AM (laPL6)
see this is the thing - just assuming for one moment that his account WAS hacked, Weiner's reaction only guarantees that there will be more hackers, because he's demonstrated that he won't go after them.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 02, 2011 02:45 AM (7mSYS)
Posted by: FUBAR at June 02, 2011 03:05 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: chemjeff at June 02, 2011 06:45 AM (7mSYS)
Dems don't understand incentives in government policies and laws. Why do you think they'd understand them in their "personal" lives?
Posted by: FUBAR at June 02, 2011 03:06 AM (1fanL)
Are you being trolled by any of Wiener's "media advisors " yet ace?
Surely you must be.
I submit that many of the se theories are originating with these advisors and then being propagated amoung the tubes by trolls.
Posted by: Cluebat from Exodar at June 02, 2011 03:28 AM (Mv/2X)
Is that a Tony in your pocket, or are you just glad to see me?
Nine inches of steaming Tony......
There's a Tony in my pants and your invited.
Tony Trout, it's what's for dinner.
And then she grabbed my One Eyed Tony....
AW Root Beer has just taken on a new meaning. But it works my friends! It works!
We should cast Anthony Weiner as Young Frankenstein
Posted by: Jack at June 02, 2011 03:43 AM (kCT7A)
It may violate Fair Use laws
Posted by: beedubya at June 02, 2011 03:46 AM (AnTyA)
Here's a guilt-free link to Politico (Ben Smith) basically confirming everything I've written: http://tinyurl.com/4yn2xlr
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 02, 2011 01:57 AM (hIWe1)
Funny how he "confirmed" what you wrote about 8 hours before your comment...and in remarkably similar language
Posted by: beedubya at June 02, 2011 04:02 AM (AnTyA)
One can only hope. If Weiner's accounts are actually hacked, wouldn't that put him between a rock and a hard place? I mean, he'd almost have to report a real hack but that leaves him open to "exposure" on the fake one.
Posted by: Ansel Adams at June 02, 2011 04:43 AM (gre5a)
Posted by: trainer at June 02, 2011 04:48 AM (Rojyk)
But Cheeze Jonsin obsessively HATES Andrew Breitbart - so that means none of what you say, Ace, can be true. Cheeze Jonsin's hatred creates its own reality!
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at June 02, 2011 04:56 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Chuckit at June 02, 2011 05:06 AM (kF79y)
Posted by: Sexy corsets at June 02, 2011 05:10 AM (zRM7G)
Posted by: Comanche Voter at June 02, 2011 05:28 AM (3ESDJ)
Posted by: cheeze f. Tard J at June 02, 2011 05:30 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Roy at June 02, 2011 05:48 AM (VndSC)
If you are a Republican - this would sink you.
If you are a precious and corrupt welfare state democrat? Praise Jesus on the Maddow show!
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at June 02, 2011 05:58 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: palooka at June 02, 2011 06:02 AM (66OqG)
You are such an irredeemable scumbag prick. Thank you for accusing me of what, plagiarizing my insights or something. But of course if you'd bothered to read my earlier post, I wrote just this:
"And THAT can be easily confirmed, in fact it's on my mind because I noticed that Politico was finally reporting about it tonight."
I mentioned the Politico article several times in this thread. But of course all you want to do is deny me credit for something, I guess. You're a worthless person. You're so full of hatred that you can't even think.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 02, 2011 06:10 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Chuckit at June 02, 2011 06:10 AM (kF79y)
In fact, what the fuck did I plagiarize at all? You schmuckishly cited "Fair Use" in an effort to impugn my integrity -- because you're an aspersion-casting sack of crap -- but that would suggest I've just stolen someone's article word-for-word. Guess what? We covered similar subjects, OBVIOUSLY, so we said similar things about the matter. But everything I wrote is my own language, for fuck's sake. For you to accuse me of stealing someone else's words is lower that whaleshit, which coincidentally is exactly what you are.
Seriously: between the attacks on my friends and family and now this (which in a way is worse), you're dirt.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 02, 2011 06:22 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 02, 2011 10:10 AM (hIWe1)
Go easy there , Skippy
Gee, the rest about weenie and the public option verbiage...and the Schmucky Schumer stuff look awfully damned familiar too.
Are you going to include in your post your reaking news aout the Joo parties and the Joo banks that all the political class Joos go too also
Posted by: beedubya at June 02, 2011 06:24 AM (AnTyA)
Hmmmm........
Anthony Weiner, who spent most of his career as a media-friendly center-right (by local standards) outer borough Democrat in the Chuck Schumer model,
Posted by: beedubya at June 02, 2011 06:28 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Bill Clinton, on behalf of any non Republicans at June 02, 2011 06:28 AM (nBE5A)
Your integrity?? Huh?
No...Smith happens to read this blog and I'm sure he would have mentioned the fact to Ace that something from a post here is really, really, really close to something he has the rights to.
Posted by: beedubya at June 02, 2011 06:31 AM (AnTyA)
And yet mentioning these things in a paragraph is like, plagiarizing from anyone else who makes the same well-known points?
You are beneath contempt.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 02, 2011 06:47 AM (hIWe1)
And yes, it's about fucking integrity. I write what I write because it comes out of my head and onto the page. Suddenly popping up in the comment thread here -- after a long history of attacking me in every savage and inappropriate way possible on this blog -- with the accusation that I simply stole (or cynically recycled) everything from Ben Smith...what, that's not an attack on my integrity? Fuck you, buddy. Seriously. That gets people fired at the jobs I've worked in.
You haven't proven your point, and you've hugely insulted me. I know you don't care, because you almost certainly didn't even care about this "accusation" anyway (just another opportunity to give me shit, of course). But you should know you're a worm.
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 02, 2011 06:53 AM (hIWe1)
Hey Beedubya, why do you hang out on this blog anyway? Is it just to stoke your rage against RINOs or something?
Posted by: Jeff B. at June 02, 2011 06:57 AM (hIWe1)
No, I didn't call you anti-Semitic..or even imply it, you nitwit.
I ridiculed your ridiculous statement that Podhoretz and Weiner have to know each other socially because they are both Jews from NY
Posted by: beedubya at June 02, 2011 07:12 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Editor at June 02, 2011 07:40 AM (e/rhk)
Okay, then why did he (& why do they) lie about it? If it's all good and life is an orgy, why lie about it? Just having fun anyway, right? Because of lying, y guess is that there is a moral compass in there somewhere, cuz he is protecting someone. no. I take that back. It is much more likely the thought process was , "man, this might hurt my reputation" rather than "dammit, this might hurt MY WIFE".
Posted by: He is NOT a Family Values campaigner, therefore he is not as scummy as a scummy hypocrite lying liar at June 02, 2011 07:54 AM (nBE5A)
The most compelling evidence that it was Weiner himself that sent the tweet is his lack of any call for a real investigation. If, as Weiner claims, it was his political enemies that hacked the offending tweet, then why isn't he loudly calling for an FBI investigation. The security implications of hacking a congressmens account, even for a trivial thing like this, would definitely justify an investigation. Most repubs not only agree, but are calling for one themselves.
If an enemy hacker did this, wouldn't Weiner be eager for the FBI to find this enemy, and jail them for criminal hacking. Launching his own investigation, outside of the FBI, and solely under his control, only makes sense if he, or someone close to him, was the one that did it, since he knows his own investigation would never charge him, and it provides a cover excuse for not calling in the real investigators, the FBI hackers unit.
The many leftists that still beleive that Briebart did the hack are almost as stupid as the farm animals in Animal Farm that continued to beleive Squealers ever more outlandish stories. If Briebart actually did it, Weiner would be demanding the FBI investigate, since he would be delighted if Briebart was convicted of criminal hacking. Weiners silence, in not calling on the FBI, can only be explained because he knows any FBI investigation would either implicate him, or somebody close to him. I know some leftists are willing to swallow almost any lie from their fellow leftists, but in this case it is not only a lie, but an incredibly stupid lie.
As for those who say this is not worth worrying about, we have a case where a US congressmen is publically claiming he was criminally hacked. Dont we need to find out the identity of this criminal hacker, so we can deter future hacks, or if their is none, find out whether this congressmen is lying to us? When O'Reilly was hacked, he called in the FBI, and they promptly caught the hacker. Is O'Reilly more deserving of protection than a US congressmen? (Well maybe he IS more deserving than this lying weasel, but in normal cases my answer would be no.)
Posted by: richard40 at June 02, 2011 02:20 PM (cQhQZ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4093 seconds, 599 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Rocks at June 01, 2011 06:44 PM (th0op)