March 23, 2011
— Dave in Texas Photographs from the tsunami stricken Fukishima Nuclear Power Plant.

These men are risking their lives to save others. I don't think I can add anything to that. It is just that.
via DrewM.
more


Greater love hath no man, than he lay down his life for his brother. I don't mean that to say it's a suicide mission, like Chernobyl.. we can't know that. We can know it's dangerous, and difficult, and they are there, doing what they can to cool these reactors down knowing it has to be done.
* thanks commenters, I was being sloppy there.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at
03:42 PM
| Comments (100)
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Flounder at March 23, 2011 03:44 PM (Kkt/i)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 23, 2011 03:46 PM (kq1lG)
The wormme.com has more.
This is a comment I made there earlier.
Dave,
The suits you see people wearing are to prevent radioactive
contamination from getting on people and thereby exposing them to
radiation.
That helps. Right? No?
These suits are called anti-contamination clothing or anti-cÂ’s or PPE for short.
Contamination is composed of atoms (or isotopes) that are radioactive, which is to say that they naturally give off high energy particles and waves that are damaging to living tissues, when the particles decay to lower energy states (a disintegration). Think X-rays and stuff.
The problem with radioactivity is that it can be 1) highly localized, contained (preferably), and controlled, such as in a reactor, or it can be 2) dispersed as radioactive particles. In 1), there would be radiation (particles and waves) that, because they are contained, exposure can be minimized by minimizing exposure time, increasing distance from the source, and increasing shielding between you and the source.
For 2), you need to keep any radioactive particles from getting on you. Thus, for 2) you are doing the same (exposure minimization by minimizing time, increasing distance, and increasing shielding) but by keeping the particles off of your skin and minimizing the possibility of ingesting any. So by wearing these anti-cÂ’s you are basically providing yourself a second skin to shed and dispose of in the event that any contamination gets on you.
Note that if you were to get radioactive contamination on your skin, or if you were to ingest it, then you would continue to get irradiated by the contamination, wherever the contamination is located (skin, eyes, lungs, thyroid, etc.). Also note that there are different energy levels of particles and waves, different radioactive decay mechanisms for different radioactive isotopes, and different propensities to decay (expressed as half-lives).
Some decay by emitting waves or gamma radiation (the Hulk), and others emit high energy particles such as by neutron emission, alpha particles (helium without its electrons), or beta particles or electrons. The point is that each of the more prevalent contamination sources have different ways that they do damage to human tissue.
The one most commonly spoke about is Iodine-131, because it is a major uranium fission product (along with Cesium-137) (JP reactors were in part uranium fission, to my knowledge), notable for causing mutation and death in cells which it penetrates, and its has a propensity to concentrate in the thyroid due to the thyroids natural uptake of iodine. Thus, the rush of people in the U.S.A. trying to get iodide or iodate tablets, because they have this great fear of the unknown.
That said, the suits also provide some protection from radiation
sources that do not have enough energy to penetrate the suits or those
have a high propensity of being absorbed by the suits. So they do
provide some level of radiation protection, almost as an aside.
But to call them radiation suits, you are placing yourself amongst the likes of Sheppard Smith.
Don't be that guy/gal.
Posted by: Flounder at March 23, 2011 03:53 PM (Kkt/i)
Posted by: CDR M at March 23, 2011 03:54 PM (cqZXM)
The japanese culture is very interesting. Different from ours in that they are way more socialist in nature, way more "for the good of all" that "for the individual". Sometimes this is good, like now. But, other times it isn't good like the fact that it appears they worried about the reactors and not finding the Japanese who were hit by the tsunami to see if there were any people left alive and injured.
when the book comes out I hope to read that these men volunteered, willingly, no coercion. It would be horrible to think they were chosen and forced. Here if they were chosen or forced it would be the oldest ones who would be forced. Since they revere their elders then perhaps the young ones were the ones in their culture to "volunteer" or if they were coerced then it would be the young ones still. Wonder if the truth of this will ever come out? Wonder what we will learn that will ultimately shock us to our shoes?
Posted by: curious at March 23, 2011 03:55 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: jcjimi at March 23, 2011 07:53 PM (ay6+/)
- - -
Seriously people. If you have not been visiting wormme.com for your daily dose of Fukushima, go there and he will put you some knowledge.
Between that and a few others, you'll have everything you need to know about Fukushima.
And yeah, those guys/gals deserve some hefty praise, if not a national monument and award to their families for sacrificing so much.
Posted by: Flounder at March 23, 2011 03:59 PM (Kkt/i)
Posted by: Tami at March 23, 2011 03:59 PM (VuLos)
Posted by: The One at March 23, 2011 04:04 PM (yCH89)
Posted by: Fukushima Tech at March 23, 2011 04:06 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Max Entropy at March 23, 2011 04:07 PM (lH6z9)
Posted by: Retread at March 23, 2011 04:07 PM (okCHU)
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at March 23, 2011 04:08 PM (6IReR)
Posted by: Max Entropy at March 23, 2011 08:07 PM (lH6z9)
used to be like that for our servicemen. now, instead of a drink, our county has given them sex in the ass.
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at March 23, 2011 04:09 PM (6IReR)
Posted by: Shoey at March 23, 2011 04:09 PM (yCH89)
Big fucking brass balls, the lot of them.
May God Bless them or Buddha smile upon them or whomever they worship.
Fucking A right!
Posted by: ErikW at March 23, 2011 04:11 PM (TYp0F)
the boats are ok and Spicolli's styrofoam cup would melt.....
add in his hero Chavez revealing that capitalism killed the martians and Sean's already had a rough week,
Posted by: sven10077 at March 23, 2011 04:12 PM (kq1lG)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2011 04:12 PM (kUbaX)
If we bombed Iran instead of Libya, we would be avoiding nuclear DOOM...
/Seriously, these are true men and should be given the highest honors.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at March 23, 2011 04:15 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 23, 2011 04:16 PM (UO6+e)
Posted by: Evil libertarian at March 23, 2011 04:17 PM (n3Hg2)
I wonder if Sean Penn will go and help?
Nah, all the cameramen have left due to radiation concerns.
Posted by: runningrn at March 23, 2011 04:24 PM (ihSHD)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 23, 2011 04:25 PM (kq1lG)
I guess since she's been out of town, Moochelle hasn't had a chance to record a PSA for Japan, soliciting donations like she did for Haiti. Oh wait, there are hardly any black people in Japan. Never mind.
Posted by: runningrn at March 23, 2011 04:26 PM (ihSHD)
Posted by: sven10077 at March 23, 2011 04:28 PM (kq1lG)
Yeah, I don't know the proper form of calling blessings upon people in the Shinto faith, so I'll go with what I know and I'm sure it's OK.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 23, 2011 04:29 PM (0vDuM)
Posted by: huerfano at March 23, 2011 04:32 PM (2pEj7)
Posted by: dave at March 23, 2011 04:38 PM (fzU/7)
As a mom, I wish I could keep my only child here. But Japan beats the hell out of stinkies (Tolleebon) blowing up our men and women.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 23, 2011 04:43 PM (UOM48)
I would hope that if I ever faced something that catastrophic, I'd be brave enough to say, "What the hell. I'm going to die. Might as well go out trying to save my fellow man."
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 23, 2011 04:45 PM (UOM48)
I guess since she's been out of town, Moochelle hasn't had a chance
to record a PSA for Japan, soliciting donations like she did for Haiti.
Oh wait, there are hardly any black people in Japan. Never mind.
runningrn, you RAACISST!!!!!
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 23, 2011 04:47 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: steevy at March 23, 2011 04:51 PM (kUbaX)
Well, I'm going to die of old age or whatever. I think I'll go full in.
You have to admire someone who could have just retired and spent time with his wife and grandchildren.
Imagine that kind of bravery out of our SEIU and other union thugs.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 23, 2011 04:53 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: RushBabe at March 23, 2011 04:56 PM (urYpw)
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at March 23, 2011 04:58 PM (py9B+)
Posted by: RushBabe at March 23, 2011 08:56 PM (urYpw)
Just have to avoid posting material tied to them. Pretty easy when you have the RightHaven blocker intalled on your browser.
Posted by: CDR M at March 23, 2011 05:04 PM (cqZXM)
Compare/Contrast.
Posted by: Flounder at March 23, 2011 05:05 PM (Kkt/i)
Posted by: RushBabe at March 23, 2011 08:56 PM (urYpw)
FIFM
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at March 23, 2011 05:05 PM (6IReR)
12 days? Me thinks our unions would have objected to the efficiency.
And whaaa? No donuts?
Posted by: Derak at March 23, 2011 05:09 PM (CjpKH)
Posted by: TexasJew at March 23, 2011 05:09 PM (We6Z4)
Just have to avoid posting material tied to them. Pretty easy when you have the RightHaven blocker intalled on your browser.
Posted by: CDR M at March 23, 2011 09:04 PM (cqZXM)
Sigh...What will they think of next?
Posted by: RushBabe at March 23, 2011 05:13 PM (urYpw)
Posted by: Ben at March 23, 2011 05:25 PM (DKV43)
Posted by: TexasJew at March 23, 2011 05:25 PM (We6Z4)
Posted by: Evil libertarian at March 23, 2011 05:26 PM (n3Hg2)
These guys deserve a proper hero's reward. And sammiches afterwards.
Posted by: Count de Monet at March 23, 2011 05:28 PM (XBM1t)
Posted by: dagny at March 23, 2011 05:28 PM (ol1En)
Posted by: Catlady at March 23, 2011 05:28 PM (CyPWX)
Posted by: RushBabe at March 23, 2011 05:30 PM (urYpw)
Posted by: dagny at March 23, 2011 09:28 PM (ol1En)
After the whole Campaign for Human Develoopment fiasco (w/donations going to ACORN!), I give the bare minimum to the church. I kick in for the physical costs associated with the bldg, but that's it. I'm not wild about the Red Cross either. But lo and behold, the Salvation Army is in Japan and has a special link on its homepage for donations to Japan. We combat natural disasters with Acts of God.
Posted by: RushBabe at March 23, 2011 05:33 PM (urYpw)
Posted by: Evil libertarian at March 23, 2011 09:26 PM (n3Hg2)
Wouldn't it be more appropriate for her to be behind bars?
Posted by: RushBabe at March 23, 2011 05:35 PM (urYpw)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at March 23, 2011 05:42 PM (EiH7n)
Posted by: chris edwards at March 23, 2011 05:43 PM (evfql)
Posted by: Catlady at March 23, 2011 05:43 PM (CyPWX)
Posted by: Barb the Evil Genius at March 23, 2011 05:45 PM (MyByM)
Posted by: Barb the Evil Genius at March 23, 2011 05:46 PM (MyByM)
Posted by: Catlady at March 23, 2011 09:43 PM (CyPWX)
I soured on the Red Cross a loooong time ago, when they charged American GIs in Europe for a cup of coffee. The S.A. gave our boys (one of which was my father) coffee. The "Army" gets all my donations.
Posted by: RushBabe at March 23, 2011 05:47 PM (urYpw)
Posted by: Barb the Evil Genius at March 23, 2011 09:45 PM (MyByM)
Save your sanity. This guy sounds too far gone to even bother with.
However, if you feel strongly about it, show him some of the protest signs those wonderful "purveyors of edumakashun" were toting. Will he say FOX P-shopped all the pix too?
Posted by: RushBabe at March 23, 2011 05:50 PM (urYpw)
I came across an explanation for this months ago and, naturally, can't find it now. IIRC, it had something to do with being ordered to make a small charge by Eisenhower's command. Maybe your google-fu (or bing-fu) is stronger than mine.
What did in the Red Cross for me was when they wanted to put money donated for 9/11 victims in their general fund, without publicizing it.
Posted by: Retread at March 23, 2011 05:55 PM (okCHU)
I soured on the Red Cross a loooong time ago, when they charged American GIs in Europe for a cup of coffee. The S.A. gave our boys (one of which was my father) coffee. The "Army" gets all my donations.
I'm not aware of this incident, when was this?
Posted by: Catlady at March 23, 2011 05:58 PM (CyPWX)
After the whole Campaign for Human Develoopment fiasco (w/donations going to ACORN!), I give the bare minimum to the church. I kick in for the physical costs associated with the bldg, but that's it. I'm not wild about the Red Cross either. But lo and behold, the Salvation Army is in Japan and has a special link on its homepage for donations to Japan. We combat natural disasters with Acts of God.
I don't give any money to the Church itself anymore except for the building fund and of course 20 grand in tuition (which is well worth it). Catholic Relief doesn't support acorn and is really much more like the red cross. I do love the salvation army though and give all my material donations to them.
Posted by: dagny at March 23, 2011 05:58 PM (66JDx)
After the whole Campaign for Human Develoopment fiasco (w/donations going to ACORN!), I give the bare minimum to the church. I kick in for the physical costs associated with the bldg, but that's it. I'm not wild about the Red Cross either. But lo and behold, the Salvation Army is in Japan and has a special link on its homepage for donations to Japan. We combat natural disasters with Acts of God.
Posted by: RushBabe at March 23, 2011 09:33 PM (urYpw)
same here and in my friends diocese the bishop came and was transferred from one of the hotbeds of priests who were accused of molestation and then moved around by the bishop and not telling anyone in the new parish. So, he came to the new area and immediately built himself a state of the art kitchen with the diocese's money and this was like the final straw for a lot of folks in the diocese. So contributions have been down since the guy came but he's ballsy and doesn't seem to care, guess he figures he got away with something but God sees. Most people have stopped giving to the development campaigns, and they keep changing the name but everyone knows what it is and doesn't give. If they had faced it, and not angered the parishioners, then maybe people would be forgiving, understanding and generous but they keep running from it.
Posted by: curious at March 23, 2011 06:22 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: sexypig at March 23, 2011 06:23 PM (2heUi)
Posted by: Evil libertarian at March 23, 2011 09:26 PM (n3Hg2)
Wouldn't it be more appropriate for her to be behind bars?
Posted by: RushBabe at March 23, 2011 09:35 PM (urYpw)
how and when did that happen? she must know all the dirt cause they treat her like she is about to explode.
no wonder Beck was trying to decide who to send his tape to, and realized he had lost before he began, now I understand.
Posted by: curious at March 23, 2011 06:25 PM (k1rwm)
It doesn't matter none of them should have been charged. It's a disgrace.
Posted by: curious at March 23, 2011 06:27 PM (k1rwm)
So, During World War II, the Red Cross charged American Gis for off-base food and lodging: TRUE
Why? Sixty + years ago.
Posted by: Catlady at March 23, 2011 06:47 PM (CyPWX)
Posted by: chuckR at March 23, 2011 07:02 PM (UGxsK)
Instead, there's a lot of nameless, faceless dudes busting their butts working a lot of non-nuclear disaster sites in Japan right now. They deserve no less honor.
Posted by: Steve Poling at March 23, 2011 08:09 PM (db5YN)
Posted by: sexypig at March 23, 2011 09:49 PM (2heUi)
Posted by: Flounder at March 23, 2011 07:53 PM (Kkt/i)
And yet, the contamination those anti-C's are protecting you from is, wait for it, wait for it... *radioactive* contamination.
Long story short, calling them anti-C's vs. a radiation suit is frankly a difference without any real distinction.
Calling Dave Sheppard Smith was entirely uncalled for.
Posted by: Additional Blond Agent at March 23, 2011 10:11 PM (uehxp)
Long story short, calling them anti-C's vs. a radiation suit is frankly a difference without any real distinction.
- - -
Thanks Shep. I see you don't get it either. The suits prevent you from ingesting it, getting it in your eyes, ears and nose, or having it embedded in your skin - the "it" being radioactive contamination. The small dose of radiation that you get while it is on your suit is small compared to a lifetime (it or yours) of dose rate by having it on you or in you. But, heh. Go ahead and sound ignorant if the distinction isn't that important to you.
Calling Dave Sheppard Smith was entirely uncalled for.
- - -
Yeah, I agree. That was an unfortunate coincidence and oversight on my part. The opening address to Dave was not meant to specifically address Dave in Texas, it was actually addressed to another Dave at wormme.com. Point taken.
Now go suck a bag of dicks, Shep.
Posted by: Flounder at March 24, 2011 01:32 AM (Kkt/i)
Snerk.
Sticks and stones, etc. You go ahead and send out a few more notes to various websites like the last one, and don't forget to capitalize a few random words for emphasis while you're at it.
In the meantime, if you want to rassle over the difference between coveralls, tyveks, full-face respirators, etc., by all means, do carry on. But to the average person, it really doesn't matter.
Posted by: Additional Blond Agent at March 24, 2011 06:15 AM (uehxp)
- - -
That's what makes them average. I'm OK with this, but let's be clear that this is a choice to have other priorities.
It seems you continue to miss the point. I am not "rassl[ing] over the difference between coveralls, tyveks, full-face respirators, etc." The incidental radiation protection afforded by these for beta and alpha particulate radiation sources is arguably no more effective than dead skin layer, long sleeves, safety glasses, etc. And neither do anything to avoid biological damage caused by whole body radiation sources such as high energy gamma sources.
The point of the PPE is to keep all of these radioactive contamination sources off your skin and out of your cake hole. You can throw on all the pretty pink polka dot PPE you want on and go work next to a 1000 Rem/hr. gamma source for an hour, and you will still have likely received a fatal dose. Differences? Distinctions? Yes - very important ones. Sorry, but it does take a little knowledge to be safe around radiation.
But then so do I miss the point (that it doesn't matter). I realize that people don't want to be distracted from their shiny things so that they remain blithely unaware of things that could have important impacts on their health. Do you not care about these people?
How many days did Chicken Little Shep spread FUD about radiation leaks (also improper), meltdowns (also misleading), and the possibility of bad effects on the west coast (expected by informed people from day 1 to be remote)? Then, only days later, and after having contributed to whipping up the populace into a frenzy over fears of "radiation leakage" reaching the west coast, Shep had the unmitigated gall to call the purchasers of iodide and iodate tablets in the subsequent run on them idiots and suggested they were overreacting. WTF? Really, Shep? You think they were overreacting?
I will not begrudge you your desire to pretend that there are not meaningful differences, because you feel people just do not care. But I'll disagree and remain firm that it is important to thwart the misunderstandings that are out there and the misinformation that is being spread about nuclear power and its hazards. And we can part, respectfully.
Belittle that if you must, but read the latest story on Wormme.com today ("'Radiation burns' implied on the radio"). He illustrates my points perfectly without any of our differences clouding the message.
Posted by: Flounder at March 24, 2011 09:09 AM (Kkt/i)
Yep, those people pulling on the gear and walking into that uncertainty are
demonstrating high courage. Their dread must hang like a fifty pound weight on each ankle. I hope that they are spending just a little time looking at the
reflections that they see in the glass of the gauges and know that they have sincere admirers out here.
Posted by: Errol at March 24, 2011 09:52 AM (7f/h+)
All of the control wiring and logic will probably have to be rebuilt, repaired and tested. What a godawful mess.
Posted by: Jerry at March 24, 2011 05:07 PM (io2/N)
Posted by: office 2010 at March 29, 2011 03:06 AM (fNQDk)
Posted by: ipod transfer at April 14, 2011 10:20 PM (2JYnr)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2122 seconds, 228 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Flounder at March 23, 2011 03:43 PM (Kkt/i)