December 08, 2011
— Ace Geraghty wonders about this.
Say you buy a riding lawn mower. You did some research; you thought you were getting a good one. You paid -- I don't know, what's it cost? -- like $900 for it.
Now it turns out to be kind of crappy, and you keep seeing great reviews for the $850 model you passed over.
It's probably going to take you some time to come around to the idea you bought the wrong mower. It was a significant cost, you used your judgment and brainpower to make the right pick... and you failed at it. Your ego will attempt to mislead you into thinking you bought the right mower for as long a period of time as that remains a semi-plausible position to hold.
Obama was a big purchase, wasn't he?
I wondered about this long ago. My belief was that this natural inclination towards self-defense of the ego would spare Obama for a period.
And then, I thought, the turn would come, and Obama would be hated by many of the people currently still holding out hope.
Because my theory is that the ego will again intervene in a self-preserving manner. First the ego fights off the belief that this was a poor decision. It doesn't want to admit the brain got something so wrong.
But when that position can no longer be maintained, a new self-preserving theory is favored: "Based on the information available to me, I made the right decision. But significant information was concealed from me; ergo, I could not make the correct call based on the information as known. Obama lied to me about his intentions and his qualifications."
This new narrative has the great advantage of confessing an incorrect decision while not confessing any fault in arriving at that incorrect decision.
It also has the virtue of being pretty much true, eh? Add in the media into the pile of scapegoats-who-actually-deserve-blame.
Of course I expected that to happen a while ago.
It's possible that actually is happening, but because most of us sense the national opinion via the media, and the media of course has its own egotistical (and politically-biased) motivation to spin a narrative, we're not aware that a great majority of people actually do kind of hate Obama. (Or, actually kind of hate him, but counterfeit their beliefs when asked by pollsters, because they wrongly believe their position is minority and disfavored.)
Anecdotally, what's your sense? Among people you rate as apolitical and nonpartisan -- the sort of fence-sitters and bandwagon-jumpers you could expect to vote for Obama when that seems to be the "right thing to do," and who would be uncomfortable expressing their dissatisfaction with him unless they began to believe such a statement was socially permissible -- are you detecting any shifts here?
Posted by: Ace at
10:58 AM
| Comments (278)
Post contains 482 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Alex #11 at December 08, 2011 11:01 AM (wwd2y)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at December 08, 2011 11:01 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at December 08, 2011 11:01 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: taylork at December 08, 2011 11:01 AM (5wsU9)
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at December 08, 2011 11:02 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: tasker at December 08, 2011 11:02 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Brad at December 08, 2011 11:02 AM (2GsJg)
Posted by: Mittens! at December 08, 2011 11:03 AM (FcR7P)
--------------------------------------------
If you were a bank teller or a phone operator or a travel agent, you saw many in your profession replaced by ATMs and the Internet.
--------------------------------------------
Obama in his own 2011 State of the Union:
--------------------------------------------
That [government spending] is what planted the seeds for the Internet. That's what helped make possible things like computer chips and GPS. Just think of all the good jobs – from manufacturing to retail – that have come from those breakthroughs.
--------------------------------------------
Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 08, 2011 11:04 AM (YhQHa)
Oh, wait, cognitive dissonance is the expected state for liberals.
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 08, 2011 11:04 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: DeusExMachina at December 08, 2011 11:04 AM (v1tkC)
I try to avoid having these sorts of people in my life. In the cases that I do we don't talk politics.
Posted by: Scott J at December 08, 2011 11:04 AM (KC2BE)
Posted by: tasker at December 08, 2011 11:04 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at December 08, 2011 11:05 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: USA at December 08, 2011 11:05 AM (6Cjut)
Posted by: Dave at December 08, 2011 11:06 AM (Xm1aB)
Yep, Buyer's Remorse is sometimes difficult to come to, but when you do you're kinda pissed. Hopefully, many (10% +) of his supporters have achieved this point and aren't at the "this mower can still work if I pay more to fix it" stage.
Posted by: Jon Corzine at December 08, 2011 11:06 AM (JYheX)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at December 08, 2011 11:06 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: steevy at December 08, 2011 11:07 AM (7WJOC)
Posted by: Dang at December 08, 2011 11:07 AM (BbX1b)
Posted by: maddogg at December 08, 2011 11:07 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at December 08, 2011 11:08 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Dang
Yeah, but you only make history of that kind once. The bloom's off of that rose.
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at December 08, 2011 11:08 AM (h1p5V)
Posted by: Mo Dowd at December 08, 2011 11:09 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Walter Freeman at December 08, 2011 11:09 AM (kqGWM)
Posted by: blaster at December 08, 2011 11:09 AM (7vSU0)
Posted by: taylork at December 08, 2011 11:09 AM (5wsU9)
This new narrative has the great advantage of confessing an incorrect decision while not confessing any fault in arriving at that incorrect decision. [Ace]
It's not exactly a 'new narrative'. ....They've been using that same narrative to excuse people from any responsibility for their decisions....such as in the Subprime Lending mess.
'It's the evil Banksters fault. They were making predatory loans!'
Now, they are going to apply this to people's decision to vote for Obama? ....I hope it bites them in the ass. ....Because, if people are going to start saying "We were fooled!", then who was it that was doing the fooling of them?
Posted by: wheatie.....aka ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at December 08, 2011 11:09 AM (HvKWW)
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God at December 08, 2011 11:09 AM (vahvH)
Posted by: mike at December 08, 2011 11:10 AM (P3YRg)
Posted by: epobirs at December 08, 2011 11:10 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: steevy at December 08, 2011 11:10 AM (7WJOC)
Damn Corzine Sock.
Anecdotally, what's your sense? Among people you rate as apolitical and nonpartisan
Of the few supporters I know, they just don't want to talk about it when previously they were all ga ga.
Of the others, they have no clue, still think F & F is about the movie.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at December 08, 2011 11:10 AM (JYheX)
Barack Obama is an insane SCOAMF.
Posted by: Fritz at December 08, 2011 11:10 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: can't let go of old memes at December 08, 2011 11:10 AM (GTbGH)
The question is, what will it take for the MFM to finally turn on him? Professionally, they've taken a huge amount of abuse from him with only the slightest complaint. I think they'd rather imperil the nation by dragging him over the finish line than admit the dream is dead and give the right any satisfaction.
Posted by: Xander Crews at December 08, 2011 11:11 AM (ht6OV)
I run in a mixed circle and the apolitical people that get their news from the Daily Show seem to be waking up to the scoamfiness. The liberals, not so much. No, they are hanging their hat on Obama got Osama and Healthcare.
All the conservatives I know hate him with the heat of a thousand suns.
Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at December 08, 2011 11:11 AM (4136b)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at December 08, 2011 11:11 AM (tKFT6)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 08, 2011 11:11 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at December 08, 2011 11:11 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Wall-E at December 08, 2011 11:12 AM (48wze)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at December 08, 2011 11:12 AM (i0App)
Posted by: ace at December 08, 2011 11:12 AM (nj1bB)
I can't understand the mindset of friends who would continue to vote their kids into debt. It's mindboggling.
And more importantly, I don't respect them. It's hard to be friends with people you no longer respect.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 08, 2011 11:12 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 08, 2011 11:12 AM (IoUF1)
Posted by: ace at December 08, 2011 11:13 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Ian S. at December 08, 2011 11:13 AM (tqwMN)
It's always "sunk cost", not "sunken cost". Comes from the "sunk cost fallacy".
Great post and analysis.
Posted by: Random at December 08, 2011 11:13 AM (YiE0S)
I don't go out of my way to inquire -- most of the time -- but I do sometimes get "Like" feedback on facebook from unexpected sources when I post or link to material that describes how Barky has screwed us over, even if he's not named explicitly.
My SIL, who lives and works in NYC, underwent the biggest conversion once Barky got on his "if you earn $250,000 and above, you are rich and need to pay your fair share" jeremiads.
Posted by: No Whining at December 08, 2011 11:13 AM (Wqfrr)
Posted by: Idaho Spudboy at December 08, 2011 11:14 AM (1+CnU)
The union goons are the worst.
Posted by: MissTammy at December 08, 2011 11:14 AM (SsG4J)
However, I do not see such loyalty in my friends who are more middle of the road and a little less forgiving. Therefore, I'm stickin' with conventional wisdom. Obama will get his core 40% and some indies, but not enough to offset a more energized GOP and a larger share of the indies.
Posted by: Cornfed at December 08, 2011 11:14 AM (BcYZo)
These people fell for HOPE! because they thought that by virtue of the fact that Obama was one of the major party's nominated candidate, he came with the Media stamp of approval - meaning that they assumed that he was vetted and that all the issues were aired fully.
I don't know how much they're paying attention, unless and until the stagnant economy makes them pay attention.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at December 08, 2011 11:15 AM (mg08E)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at December 08, 2011 11:15 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: nickless at December 08, 2011 11:15 AM (osPiU)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 08, 2011 11:15 AM (YhQHa)
Posted by: steevy at December 08, 2011 11:15 AM (7WJOC)
Posted by: Mullaney at December 08, 2011 11:15 AM (sV0Yw)
Anecdotally, what's your sense? Among people you rate as apolitical and nonpartisan -- the sort of fence-sitters and bandwagon-jumpers you could expect to vote for Obama when that seems to be the "right thing to do," and who would be uncomfortable expressing their dissatisfaction with him unless they began to believe such a statement was socially permissible -- are you detecting any shifts here?
Not really but I don't know that many in the middle types. Maybe my sil but we don't talk politics much at all.
My uncle is an Obamabot and it's gotten to the point that I can't talk to him about anything without him bringing up how great Obama is. I was helping my parents get skype working to talk to him and he started in on Obama almost immediately and I turned and walked out of the room. Even that wasn't enough to get the point across that maybe we shouldn't discuss Obama.
Posted by: alexthechick at December 08, 2011 11:16 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: izoneguy at December 08, 2011 11:16 AM (i6Neb)
For years I never told anyone.
I eventually registered Republican.
There should be many, many in exactly the same circumstance today.
Jack
Posted by: jack simons at December 08, 2011 11:16 AM (dxyzh)
Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at December 08, 2011 03:11 PM (4136b)
I should also mention that I'm in Minnesota, surrounded by mouth-breathing marmosets who elect pro wrestlers & comedians.
Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at December 08, 2011 11:17 AM (4136b)
I'm starting to warm up to the idea of Newt vs Obama, but only slightly.
I find it comforting when the fools at MSNBC spout off with ridiculous criticism for Newt and then act like they're giving helpful advice to the GOP when they say Newt would be a poor choice.
Posted by: soothsayer at December 08, 2011 11:17 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: nerdygirl at December 08, 2011 11:17 AM (2oBun)
I asked them to tell me which candidate went on late night tv and made jokes about the mentally retarded.
That shut them up real quick.
I mean, there's just so much material to embarrass these people about their vote. Take your pick.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 08, 2011 11:18 AM (pLTLS)
Respond by telling him how awesome Bush was and what a great job he did with the War on Terror and watch the veins in his neck start throbbing.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 08, 2011 11:18 AM (YhQHa)
Posted by: Norcross at December 08, 2011 11:18 AM (rUmEc)
All my cop friends hate him like nothing else, most of them are L.A. County sheriffs. Most of my teacher friends are split, half blame the rich, half blame the union for screwing them over because they are all young.
/You know it's bad when most of the successful people you know are in the public sector
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at December 08, 2011 11:19 AM (tKFT6)
Posted by: Cu'Chulainn at December 08, 2011 11:19 AM (oW269)
Posted by: ace at December 08, 2011 11:19 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of
a miserable failure at December 08, 2011 03:15 PM (AZGON)
Agreed.
Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at December 08, 2011 11:19 AM (4136b)
Posted by: chazmartel at December 08, 2011 11:20 AM (wlSqE)
10 .....Perry Passes on Pompous Pompadoured PoseurÂ’s Presidential. . . Debate
December 8, 2011 2:58 P.M.
By Daniel Foster
Really? Perry has declined the Donald? ......Good for him.
People will try to call him 'weak' for not attending. But that one is so tainted, it would've looked sort of unseemly for a sitting Governor to have attended it.
Posted by: wheatie.....aka ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at December 08, 2011 11:20 AM (HvKWW)
Posted by: nerdygirl at December 08, 2011 11:20 AM (2oBun)
Yes Virginia, Barack Obama is a Stuttering Clusterfuck of a Miserable Failure.
Posted by: Entropy at December 08, 2011 11:20 AM (UmXRO)
Among people you rate as apolitical and nonpartisan -- the sort of fence-sitters and bandwagon-jumpers you could expect to vote for Obama when that seems to be the "right thing to do," and who would be uncomfortable expressing their dissatisfaction with him unless they began to believe such a statement was socially permissible -- are you detecting any shifts here?
I live in the San Loonfrisco Bay Area.
Here, no such statement is, was, or ever will be socially permissible.
If you speak even the smallest word of criticism about Obama -- or pretty much for that matter any African-American liberal Democrat -- no matter how neutral and factual your comment, you will be instantly damned and ostracized as a vicious, unregenerate racist of Bull Connor type.
Full stop. End of story.
Posted by: torquewrench at December 08, 2011 11:20 AM (aWrFJ)
Posted by: Dave at December 08, 2011 11:20 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: trainer (Minuteman) at December 08, 2011 11:21 AM (Rojyk)
Posted by: Barb the Evil Genius at December 08, 2011 11:21 AM (MyByM)
Posted by: joncelli, too stressed by half at December 08, 2011 11:21 AM (RD7QR)
The remorse part is where the ego resists the admission of the buyer's bad choice.The state of dissonance and stress continues for some time until the noise/stress becomes so overwhelming that the ego craves to shed the negative stimuli. Now lots of moderates and even some Center Left people were way too invested in the Bush bad, Obama good dialectic that they had a hard time giving into the realization of the SCoaMF paradigm. In consumer behavior there is also a concept of "Catastrophe Theory" which essentially states that a person's view of a product or service can and will change when the dissonance reaches an intense (catastrophic) level at which point the consumer will use any excuse (I had a squishy center right moderate who voted for Obama tell me at Thanksgiving that he got "conned" (deceived) by Obama) to mitigate their "bad" decision or in some cases people will admit to themselves that the decision was wrong and simply take action to aquire the opposite or alternative. I predict a lot
more people will be falling off the "precipice" of the Catastrophe theory point. And many of them will just do it quietly when they get to the voting booth in Nov 2012. Polling won't identify these people. These theories make me pretty confident the we won't have a SCoaMF as president elect this time next year!
Posted by: Robert M at December 08, 2011 11:21 AM (D1Wja)
> are you detecting any shifts here?
NO. In fact, the Obama voters I know are doubling down. You see, it's all George Bush/the banks/Wall Street/the Republicans' fault. The Lightworker from Chicago is doing the best he can with the shitty hand he was dealt, and if you can't see that, you're a racist/warmonger/greedhead.
Posted by: Jones at December 08, 2011 11:22 AM (8sCoq)
All I have is my own, rather unscientific study to go on. Everyone I see on I-80 between exit 30 and exit 12 who is sporting an Obozo '12 sticker gets a full arm, full extension, window all the way down, middle finger. So in blue NJ, it's like once every 2 weeks so far.
I can tell you in Chicago, IL there ain't that many O bumper stickers left. Most of them have disappeared.
Now I have to go back to guessing which drivers I should cut off.
Posted by: Entropy at December 08, 2011 11:22 AM (UmXRO)
Posted by: Jean at December 08, 2011 11:22 AM (WkuV6)
Great question!
I get a mixed bag of answers, really. But many are wavering....answers based on race are as you would expect it to be. Others, those who thought Obama was the man to be a different kind of leader, one of justice and grace, are swaying in the wind.
Posted by: ceraphym at December 08, 2011 11:22 AM (LU88p)
" . . . are you detecting any shifts here?"
No. I couldn't stand anyone who was vocally supportive of that lying junk-sack sucker back in 08. I still can't stand them and when they try to apologize to me I put my fingers in my ears and yell nah nah nah . . .
On the other hand, I have a sister who voted wrong in that election and she has pretty much taken to running and hiding in a closet whenever dumbo's name gets mentioned.
Given that she never used to hide in closets, I'd say that's a shift.
Posted by: MWTexas at December 08, 2011 11:22 AM (N05oL)
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at December 08, 2011 11:22 AM (ZStML)
Chris Matthews just said Newt has horns growing out of his skull and pitch-forked tail.
How can you nominate this devil???
Posted by: soothsayer at December 08, 2011 11:23 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: ace at December 08, 2011 03:19 PM (nj1bB)
So our agony, ecstasy and orgy of poll dancing is at an end, then? Or at least until CO'D declares she's running for a DE Senate seat next year?
Posted by: Jeremiad was a Bullfrog at December 08, 2011 11:23 AM (Wqfrr)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 08, 2011 11:23 AM (YhQHa)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at December 08, 2011 11:24 AM (AZGON)
I will say there does seem to be a whole lot less OdipO '12 bumper stickers than one would suspect.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at December 08, 2011 11:24 AM (JYheX)
Posted by: Sukie Tawdry at December 08, 2011 11:24 AM (MPtFW)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 08, 2011 11:24 AM (pLTLS)
I can't speak to the state of mind of specific individuals of my acquaintance, but I can speak to the overall aura I've detected in the last year or so here in my little neck of the woods.
I've mentioned previously that where I work in Concord, NH, I have seen a marked uptick in anti-Obama bumper stickers. Concord is the capital of NH, and as such it has a heavy preponderance of leftist political hacks who work in the political bureaucracy. These are the people who have the "I'm SEIU and I Vote!" (like that's something to be proud of?) and "I'm voting for kids!" (as in, the aborting thereof?) and "NHPR" and "Coexist" bumper stickers all over the rear bumpers of their Subaru Outbacks. It used to be that those were the norm around here, but not anymore. I am now just as likely to see a "NObama" or "One. Big. Ass. Mistake. America" bumper sticker as I am to see an "Obama/Biden 2008" on someone's rear fender.
I don't think that this new flurry of local anti-Obama feeling is coming from previously pro-Obama supporters. Rather I think it's anti-Obama people who have always been anti-Obama, but who are just now feeling it's "safe" to actually come out and express their contempt openly without having to worry that some dickhead OWS wannabe will come along and key your car because you're a member of the "fascist elite." That's still a concern, but not as much so as it was immediately after the Chosen One was Anointed.
I view the groundswell anti-Obama sentiment as a precursor to an eventual backlash the likes of which have never been seen in American politics. And I say that without any implied hyperbole. Those who never liked Obama but were worried about speaking up are finally finding their voices. I fully expect that soon they will be followed by those who voted for Obama because they really thought he could bring something fresh to the public discourse, and they've seen how dreadfully he's performed in office. Then you'll get the converts who voted for him because he was "historic," only to find out the only thing historic about him is his ability for historic failure. Last will be the diehards who believed every golden falsehood that fell from his purple lips, and who have been kicked repeatedly in the solar plexus by every broken promise.
The expectations for Obama were so high -- stupidly so, and disbelieved by anyone with an ounce of basic intelligence -- that the fall from his ivory tower is going to lead to a very, VERY hard landing when he comes down to earth.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at December 08, 2011 11:25 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: MacAoidh at December 08, 2011 11:25 AM (MWNY/)
I see you know my family personally.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 08, 2011 03:23 PM (YhQHa)
'sup, Cuz.
Posted by: Jones at December 08, 2011 11:25 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: DeusExMachina at December 08, 2011 03:04 PM (v1tkC)
Well, it's not like they're wrong. He sold himself as an all knowing, socialist dictator, and that's exactly what we're seeing.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 08, 2011 11:25 AM (UK9cE)
The next Dem to primary Obama. Maybe Hillary! will get the balls to do it, and then you'll see everyone start jumping on the SCOAMF bandwagon saying how fucking awesome it is to have a real accomplished woman like Hillary! get in the race and fix all the problems and deficiencies that Obama had.
Posted by: EC at December 08, 2011 11:26 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: wheatie.....aka ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at December 08, 2011 11:26 AM (HvKWW)
Posted by: nerdygirl at December 08, 2011 11:26 AM (2oBun)
I have a couple of liberal sisters who I do not discuss politics with at all because they are very important to me so I don't have any anecdotal evidence from the really left.
Posted by: traye at December 08, 2011 11:27 AM (zRegt)
Posted by: Gaia Rapist at December 08, 2011 11:28 AM (2oBun)
You could then further assume that those blindly still supporting King Putt despite being disappointed by his performance have had their ego's ass kicked by their id's.
Moral of the story.
Leftism... putting the id in idiot.
Posted by: fixerupper at December 08, 2011 11:28 AM (C8hzL)
I can't take credit for a version of this statement that I saw on another blog (or maybe it was this one): "If you voted for Obama to prove you weren't a racist, you are now obligated to vote against him in 2012 to prove you're not an abject idiot."
My brother in law, who voted for Obama because of his hatred for Bush now admits that Obama is a SCOAMF and says he would sooner vote for a cast iron skillet than Obama. Also, I don't know a soul who didn't vote for him in 2008 who intends to vote for him now (pardon the double negative).
Posted by: Natasha at December 08, 2011 11:28 AM (jU5uf)
Yes, they really think that. He didn't immediately end the war in Iraq, didn't close Gitmo, renewed the Bush tax cuts, sent more troops to Afghanistan, didn't hold out for socialized health care, and didn't fund every one of their pet projects.
So yeah- a lot of them are disillusioned, but when it the Evil Greedy Republican starts taking shots at Obama, they'll rally around the flag and end up voting for him anyways. Just somewhat less enthusiastically than last time.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 08, 2011 11:29 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Jeremiad was a Bullfrog at December 08, 2011 11:29 AM (Wqfrr)
They've got bigger fish to fry....
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 08, 2011 11:30 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Jed at December 08, 2011 11:30 AM (vozo7)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at December 08, 2011 11:30 AM (kzxe7)
#49, Adam, hail from St. Louis here. You are ever so right......... Actually we all think he's a prick.
I have relatives from the area, I awoke this morning to find text messages letting me know I was kicked out of the family. I had no clue what the hell was going on until I turned on ESPN.
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at December 08, 2011 11:31 AM (tKFT6)
He popped a circuit after Libya. He reallly realllly thought the JEF was not a warmonger like Booooooooooooosh. He felt he'd been had.
The rest? still stupid after all these years.
Posted by: Derak at December 08, 2011 11:31 AM (8tAhu)
Someone should do a post of things that used to be the fault of the sitting president but which no longer are-
1-Gas prices
2-Affronts to the dignity of our military (body parts cremated and then sent to landfill)
3- Homelessness
Posted by: kdny at December 08, 2011 11:31 AM (SrCor)
>"If you were a bank teller or a phone operator or a travel agent, you saw many in your profession replaced by ATMs and the Internet."
Sure- 10-20 fucking years ago. In 2011, this statement is no longer operative.
By the way, Mr President, you stupid fuck- when I go inside my bank to get a cashier's check or take money out of savings, I am waited on BY A FUCKING BANK TELLER, you sorry-ass bucket of codswallop.
Posted by: Jones at December 08, 2011 11:31 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: jmp at December 08, 2011 11:32 AM (r/SPj)
Posted by: Beckster at December 08, 2011 11:32 AM (VjJAc)
I like mine; it does what I expected of it. For $200, I can't complain.
Being restricted to WiFi is sometimes a pain, but I wasn't ready to shell out even more money to Verizon for another data plan.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 08, 2011 11:32 AM (SY2Kh)
----
The best examples I have are people who are apolitical and would probably only vote if their family members dragged them to the polls. Unfortunately, since those folks are related to union members (UAW and teachers' union), they will probably vote for Obama.
Also, I actually don't react the way you describe in your major purchase example. Maybe most people do, but I don't.
What I do do is steadfastly avoid doing additional research into other models after I've bought whatever it is I've bought. I figure ignorance is bliss at that stage of the game.
Posted by: Y-not at December 08, 2011 11:33 AM (5H6zj)
In my circle of lefty friends and associates, there are currently two positions...
1. He's just being held back by the evil rethuglikkkans and it's not his fault, he's doing the best he can!!!!
2. Anger that he's giving in to the evil rethuglikkkans and he's practically an R himself.
The 'moderates' I know just don't talk politics and act like you're torturing them if it comes up. Therefore I think we're fucked.
Posted by: Ms Choksondik, hoping for a Rick Perry miracle at December 08, 2011 11:33 AM (fYOZx)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at December 08, 2011 11:33 AM (kzxe7)
Now I have to go back to guessing which drivers I should cut off.
Glad I don't have that problem, NY plates doing 64 in the left lane and anyone spoting any combination of Odumbass, Slow Joe, '08 and '12.
Posted by: Cu'Chulainn at December 08, 2011 11:33 AM (oW269)
Dems are losing support in battleground states.
Thank God for small wonders.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 08, 2011 11:33 AM (pLTLS)
I don't think it is a sense of hate as much as apathy. I know people who hate him, but more for a sense of what he represents. He doesn't have a personality strong enough to hate. He barely fights for his own causes. He just lobs out his opinion and asks others to fight the battle for him. To me he seems passionless. Bush made it easy for the left, like him or hate him he had personality. Obama is just a collection of superlatives.
Posted by: Crom at December 08, 2011 11:33 AM (1WKq7)
It's depressing as hell but the GOP needs to come to grips with the fact that no matter who we nominate and no matter how bad things get or what the JEF does--he will get a bare minimum of 45% to 47% of the vote.
I still don't think we've come to grips with just how badly Bush not fighting back damaged the GOP brand; to the point that 3+ years into the worst economy in 50 years and there are still a near majority of people who will not consider voting GOP.
Posted by: Jimmuy at December 08, 2011 11:33 AM (KLVyl)
Never been much of a fan, but I am now!
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at December 08, 2011 03:20 PM (Qxdfp)
Yeah, the band that lost a member nicknamed Head to being "born again," where someone came up with the uncomfortable T-Shirt slogan: "Korn gave Head to God"
Posted by: © Sponge at December 08, 2011 11:34 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Honey Badger at December 08, 2011 11:34 AM (GvYeG)
I believe cast iron skillet is the next not-Romney candidate.
Posted by: taylork at December 08, 2011 11:34 AM (5wsU9)
In the end, what we will get in this election will either be Obama for another four years, or a big government republican, and that will be because big Washington operates by the consent of those best served by big Washington. And that, like it or not, is a large enough and powerful enough block to keep the spigots on the propaganda faucets opened enough to make certain that big Washington will stay big until the lights go out.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at December 08, 2011 11:34 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: Libby at December 08, 2011 11:35 AM (Oa6zQ)
Posted by: Berserker at December 08, 2011 11:35 AM (FMbng)
Posted by: Preznit Training Pants at December 08, 2011 11:35 AM (jucos)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 08, 2011 11:35 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 08, 2011 11:35 AM (0yt4x)
Posted by: Bob Saget at December 08, 2011 11:36 AM (SDkq3)
As opposed to the rest of us?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 08, 2011 11:36 AM (SY2Kh)
There are a few at my workplace that I'm sure will vote to re-elect him but my sense is that a lot of the a-political or moderate independent types are going to vote third party or not at all.
In 2008 there were political discussions all the time at the office, usually started by the pro-obama people. Those were long gone by mid 2010 and you don't hear a word about him now. The reality is setting in that his policies don't work, and the evidence is so out in the open you look like an idiot defending him.
Posted by: jimstl at December 08, 2011 11:37 AM (Er/xb)
Posted by: nerdygirl at December 08, 2011 11:37 AM (2oBun)
Don't worry. We'll see that she still casts a vote for Obama next year.
Posted by: ACORN at December 08, 2011 11:37 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: steevy at December 08, 2011 11:37 AM (7WJOC)
We all know he has the lefties in the bag, but the indies sure seem to be moving away from him. slowly.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at December 08, 2011 11:38 AM (JYheX)
Posted by: Cue Card Guy at December 08, 2011 11:38 AM (GULKT)
Guy: "Damn, that's expensive. For that price, I should get a blow job. The damn thing should GIVE me a blow job."
Blonde, big-titted sales woman: "SIR!!! That thing is NOT going to give you a blow job.........but I will....."
You can imagine where it goes from there.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 08, 2011 11:38 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at December 08, 2011 11:38 AM (BOx9A)
That would require them to have a mind to begin with.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 08, 2011 11:39 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Libtard at December 08, 2011 11:39 AM (136wp)
Posted by: steevy at December 08, 2011 11:39 AM (7WJOC)
My liberal friends ( I have a couple ) have quit inviting me over for parties. We make it a point no to talk politics so that's not the problem.
I truly think it is because of their embarrasment over the SCOAMF. They adamantly supported him during the election.
Posted by: The Jackhole at December 08, 2011 11:39 AM (nTgAI)
My apolitical/middle'ish friends have posted, here or there, snark about Obama. One example in particular was posting snark about the Tea Party about a year ago. Out of my 300 or so facebook "friends" only about three or four had anything positive to say about OWS.
The hardcore I know are doubling down, but they aren't the target anyway.
So yeah, I think the tide is turning. Especially once the GOP settles on a nominee, stop the circular firing squad, and gets their collective eyes on the prize.
Posted by: Lee (in KY) at December 08, 2011 11:39 AM (mxMC0)
Posted by: A Liberal AoSHQ Reader, Really! at December 08, 2011 11:39 AM (KfeDD)
He also said Obama is a nice, intelligent guy who was dealt an impossible hand, so it's unfair to say he's been ineffective. No president could have fixed the mess Bush created.
John Kobylt is no liberal. He's an anti-tax crusader who supported McCain until he chose Sarah Palin. He hates Sarah Palin with a pathological fervor, and he's always been soft on Obama. He'll talk about the various current scandals, but he always soft-pedals Obama's role in them.
The John and Ken Show highlighted Fast and Furious and Solyndra, but John says he's still going to vote for Obama again over Gingrich. Go figure.
Obama's race is his impenetrable shield. Too many whites have internalized the notion of blacks as perpetual victims, people to whom we must be very kind. Also, John Kobylt is so rich that he doesn't actually care who's president. He'll be okay no matter what. The rich and the lower-middle class on down want Obama reelected, the former because they want to be kind to blacks, and the latter because they not only want to be kind to blacks but they also want more government goodies.
Posted by: Llarry at December 08, 2011 11:39 AM (7tfWs)
Ace,
6 friends voted for BO, 5 now despise him. Sixth continues the kool-aid binge and is a union member.
Posted by: booter at December 08, 2011 11:40 AM (deujC)
1. OMG BUSH REPUBLICAN BAD ANTI-GAY CHRISTIANIST CRAZY TOWN EVIL
and
2. I'd vote for that Ron Paul guy.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 08, 2011 11:40 AM (YhQHa)
Unfortunately, I'm not sure the "right candidate" is even running, much less will win the nomination. I have doubts that they'd be thrilled over the prospect of seeing Newt Gingrich on TV for the next four years.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 08, 2011 11:40 AM (SY2Kh)
Can someone explain to me the insight here? This sounds like exactly what happened during Iraq to Bush. Everybody bought into Bush, including dems, then it fell apart, and everyone turned on Bush.
Old proverb: success has many fathers, but failure is a SCOAMF.
Posted by: Joey at December 08, 2011 11:40 AM (JpC1K)
Posted by: Honey Badger at December 08, 2011 03:34 PM (GvYeG)
We could tell you but then we'd have to kill you.
Posted by: joncelli, too stressed by half at December 08, 2011 11:41 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: JEM at December 08, 2011 11:42 AM (o+SC1)
So there's that.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 08, 2011 11:43 AM (pLTLS)
When tech companies look to technology conpanies for large complicated systems, they often enlist the aid of othe technology vendors who supply subsystems or smaller parts for the final system.
In order to have the most "cutting edge" technology (sometimes referred to as the "foreskin of technology"), these systems houses have to look at all the possibilities and pick the vendor that is the most advanced that performs the required specifications for any given subsystem. The vendor companies know this, so they will often stretch the truth a bit and offer what they hope to have next year (as opposed to what they have now or in the near term pipeline).
This stretching of the truth is called "leaning forward" or sometimes simply "lying."
Posted by: Aaron at December 08, 2011 11:43 AM (e8kgV)
I think they see the writing on the wall. And also f*ck them with pineapples.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 08, 2011 11:44 AM (YhQHa)
I know a much older couple, in their eighties, who are life long Dems. He's never going to change but she hates the POS.
Hope springs eternal.
Posted by: BIG ROB at December 08, 2011 11:45 AM (hr33h)
What? That will not happen until three weeks after his defeat in the election.
Posted by: ace at December 08, 2011 03:13 PM (nj1bB)
--------
I am hoping that the election will be over, three weeks after his defeat. ....We could very well be looking at a long contested post-election period, with the media holding daily vote-a-thons for Obama in the recounting of it.
Posted by: wheatie.....aka ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at December 08, 2011 11:45 AM (HvKWW)
Posted by: BuddyPC at December 08, 2011 11:45 AM (dZTHc)
1) "...BUT, rethuglicans are all even more super-duper evil than they were a few years ago."
2) "...BUT, I'm still a liberal at heart and will still reflexively, if unenthusiastically, pull the D-lever in the election."
I have no ancedotal evidence from 'independents'.
Until media relents from its propaganda and gives people cover (via polls, whatever) to be 'on the winning side', they will not participate in the coming preference casacade revolution. IMO. :-/
Posted by: Tonic Dog at December 08, 2011 11:45 AM (X/+QT)
Now my friend who never paid attention.. pays attention and sends me emails that are anti Obama.
Its personal now to her.. her business is in the ditch.
Obama is one and done.
Posted by: Jumbo Jogging Shrimp at December 08, 2011 03:40 PM (qjUnn)
I would personally go down to that school and tell that teacher that if she ever did that again I would sue her and the school district for everything they were worth. Then, I'd punch her in the face.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 08, 2011 11:46 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Darth Vader at December 08, 2011 11:46 AM (zHl9z)
Posted by: nerdygirl at December 08, 2011 11:46 AM (2oBun)
Not only have most of those been taken off, I see very very few Obama 2012 bumper stickers.
So, if that is any indication, there is definitely some buyer's remorse going on. That's not to say he will win Illinoi! That's a real tough one.. but I'm keeping my fingers crossed that the disappointment with the SCOAMF is nationwide.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at December 08, 2011 11:47 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Mullaney at December 08, 2011 11:47 AM (sV0Yw)
- ACORN
Wouldn't surprise me, actually. My aunt's friends in FL, who all own multiple homes, used to laugh about how they cast votes in each state in which they owned homes in order to oust Bush from office. Voter fraud: not just for the radical poor!!
Posted by: Libby at December 08, 2011 11:47 AM (Oa6zQ)
yeah not this one. I don't give rat's ass what color he is. I'm italian, and I hate just as many white italian dems as I do black dems. I'm an equal opportunity dude, I think all dems suck equally hard no matter what their color is. A socialist is a socialist.
Posted by: Berserker at December 08, 2011 11:48 AM (FMbng)
I learned a long time ago that John Kobylt is utterly hopeless on anything beyond the local level. State level issues are his upper limit. A few years ago The John & Ken Show got a national syndication deal and it was a disaster. They were completely out of their depth.
John is a person who isn't stupid but hates to study. I've never heard him make reference to reading anything more than a dozen ages in length. Ken is somewhat better but cannot carry a show by himself. On those days when John is away for some reason, you can tell Ken is really struggling. He has opinions but isn't the sort of rambunctious personality John brings to the microphone.
Posted by: epobirs at December 08, 2011 11:49 AM (kcfmt)
My husband's best friend is a hardcore Obama supporting union goon. I love him like a brother, but we cannot discuss politics. The man is a text-book family loving, devoutly Catholic, warm-hearted, do-anything-in-the-world-for-a-friend Italian, too; I just do not get it.
Posted by: MissTammy at December 08, 2011 11:49 AM (SsG4J)
Posted by: JEM at December 08, 2011 11:51 AM (o+SC1)
Posted by: Obama loves him some solyndra at December 08, 2011 11:51 AM (2oBun)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 08, 2011 11:51 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Ducatisti at December 08, 2011 11:53 AM (KYE7u)
When tech companies look to technology conpanies for large complicated systems, they often enlist the aid of othe technology vendors who supply subsystems or smaller parts for the final system.
In order to have the most "cutting edge" technology (sometimes referred to as the "foreskin of technology"), these systems houses have to look at all the possibilities and pick the vendor that is the most advanced that performs the required specifications for any given subsystem. The vendor companies know this, so they will often stretch the truth a bit and offer what they hope to have next year (as opposed to what they have now or in the near term pipeline).
This stretching of the truth is called "leaning forward" or sometimes simply "lying."
You ask .. "how can any company survive if the are constantly lying "leaning forward" with their customers ?"
I works like this ... once the systems company picks a vendor company for a given subsystems, the management that made the selection now have a vested interest for their selection to work out. If the vendor is late or whatever, they must convince their upper management that it wasn't a big deal, since their next review/ raise is dependent on it working. In other words, the selecting management and the vendor company become co-conspriators .. synchronizing their stories if thing go bad in the hopes that eventually it will work out .. or else.
Posted by: Aaron at December 08, 2011 11:53 AM (e8kgV)
I've spoken to a few who voted for him who are now expressing buyer's remorse and say they won't do it again down here in MouseHouse Territory.
Still, I've stayed off Facebook for quite a while because many of my music buddies still sing his praises (pun intended). I'm outnumbered, but I correct the few I still think I can persuade in the nicest way possible. It's an ongoing battle of wits, moxie, and snark, with a foundation of truth.
Ace, your psychological skills are pretty good, but never underestimate the power of the human ego's self-defense mechanisms. They have led to every major conflict in history by preventing the soul from seeing the truth of its failures. They're also the reason we're in the national crisis we're in. The OWS'ers are the perfect example of young skulls full of mush being told that they're precious little snowflakes and can never, ever do anything wrong (ala Mr. Rogers, Dr. Spock and Dr. Rudoph Rewriter, among others). Lesson? Encourage the ego at your peril.
They, and the rest of the nation needs a good dose of the Truth. If the results of El SCOAMF's Reign of Error doesn't do it, I don't know what will.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, working towards full Curmudgeonhood at December 08, 2011 11:53 AM (d0Tfm)
An end, or a significant reduction in entitlements.
The reintroduction of personal accountability and responsibility.
The austere life style imposed by living debt free.
The actual end to American exceptionalism and all of the consequences globally that that will carry with it.
Nobody is going to go along with accepting that these are even remote possibilities.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at December 08, 2011 11:54 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 08, 2011 11:54 AM (vzFJV)
you can be all that and still be a shallow thinking imbecile.
Posted by: Berserker at December 08, 2011 11:54 AM (FMbng)
I never thought I would say this 6 months ago, but take a look @ Huntsman. He's not Romney and seems to disarm independents. He might be the BO of the right. Convinces everyone he is a moderate but is really more conservative than people know. A reverse-obama if you will.
Perry, his campaign looks as unprepared as Cain's. And how would he hold up against a hostile media and in a debate against BO? He likely would walk right into the media narrative that he is as dumb and stupid as Bush. Romney is flip flopping Romney. Gingrich, man what a wild card. He could leave orbit at any moment. Probably the personally equipped mentally to combat Obama, but some of this stuff coming out from right leaning media really gives me pause. Bachman, overshoots rhetorically, and a majority of women aren't prepared for a female president other than Hillary. Santorum was part of the problem that led to massive losses in 2006, a Bush voting Republican, sorry, not interested.
Posted by: jimstl at December 08, 2011 11:54 AM (Er/xb)
I'd rather his former voters didn't care about him rather than hate him. Hate can be dismissed as irrational and they can defend against it but apathy is infectious and will decimate his ranks.
Posted by: Jimmuy at December 08, 2011 11:55 AM (KLVyl)
I hate those guys. (The Facebook clueless, that is.) If I didn't need to use the damn thing to schedule meat-verse events, I'd have bailed on Facebook months ago.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at December 08, 2011 11:56 AM (bjRNS)
yeah, well "future" better be the nickname of a long legged big tit blonde chick that can suck the moon out of its orbit, or it don't go anywhere near the dick. lol
Posted by: Berserker at December 08, 2011 11:56 AM (FMbng)
Wouldn't it have been just as historic if Obama had lost? It would still have been the first time there was a somewhat black man as a major contender.
We could have held out for a GOOD black man for actually winning the election. Of course, that is what so many libs cannot understand. It wasn't about race, it was about character and I judged Obama on his. Just as MLK hoped I would do.
Put Thomas Sowell on the ballot and I'd vote for him with an intensity I've never felt in the booth in 29 years since coming of age. Sowell is pretty old now but another, younger black man who believably called Sowell his mentor would do.
Posted by: epobirs at December 08, 2011 11:57 AM (kcfmt)
Posted by: Benjamin Franklin at December 08, 2011 11:57 AM (ULADD)
(this thread is slowwwww, anyone else?)
Um, yeah. About that. It appears that I broke the blog at some point yesterday afternoon with a particularly pithy comment. Evidently, Pixy hasn't yet replaced all the computer hamsters who were damaged in the incident.
There are still three who are unaccounted for.
I think hamsters are distantly related to Ewoks somehow. I am truly sorry.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, working towards full Curmudgeonhood at December 08, 2011 12:00 PM (d0Tfm)
I find that most libs I know are able to mentally excuse any failure in actual performance by a liberal politician, no matter how total and obvious it is, as long as said politician continues to say things they like to hear. As long as the message continues to resonate, reality doesn't intrude.
Posted by: JPS at December 08, 2011 12:01 PM (4vxZU)
This post reminds me that
OMIGOD ACE THINKS A RIDING MOWER COSTS $900.
It's like grocery shopping with GHW Bush.
Posted by: comatus at December 08, 2011 12:01 PM (N0OTq)
He's an awesome man in every other way. He has told my husband he will take care of me if anything happens to him, he has stood by us through horrible times.
Berserker, can't really argue the imbecile part, though. Sigh.
Posted by: MissTammy at December 08, 2011 12:02 PM (SsG4J)
Why yes he was. Apparently we (and by "we," I mean idiots and not the moron/ettes) bought a fake American with counterfeit money. (And fake has nothing to do with birth certificacy.)
As to the sensing of peers WRT Obama? Everyone despises him. The sample size isn't that large but then no single individual's will be. I think they probably hate him enough to reflect the opinions of two samples.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 08, 2011 12:02 PM (eHIJJ)
>We could very well be looking at a long contested post-election period, with the media holding daily vote-a-thons for Obama in the recounting of it.
this is my great fear- that if the Republican wins a close election, say 2 or 3 points, Obama and his media allies will contest the outcome nationwide.
Imagine Florida 2000 x 50: chaos.
Posted by: Jones at December 08, 2011 12:02 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Sgt. York at December 08, 2011 12:03 PM (H3Kr3)
Posted by: t-bird at December 08, 2011 12:05 PM (FcR7P)
I know at least a dozen people with buyer's remorse over Barry's election. Some are most vocal. Some a very pissed. Most claim they will not vote for him next time around under any circumstances.
These are real people with whom I interact quite frequently. Strange too how they reinforce and spread their wrath, one states a reason, the next tops this story with another more convincing reason. And on and on.
I think this is a good thing.
Posted by: lazy american 99%er fool/clown clinging bitterly to my guns at December 08, 2011 12:05 PM (wN82N)
Posted by: AtlasMugged at December 08, 2011 12:06 PM (r9vQr)
Posted by: Ducatisti at December 08, 2011 12:06 PM (KYE7u)
He's black. Is that the reason? Because I never remembered him as a Bush hater. He's not really partisan and isn't snarky about conservatives, so we still get along. He's a good man. But politically? I don't get it.
Other than that, most people either hate him or think he's bad but hate republicans more.
Posted by: Crazee at December 08, 2011 12:08 PM (sbtxl)
They can take their buyer's remorse, and fuck themselves silly with it.
Posted by: Unclefacts Out Of Commenting Retirement Just For This One Thing at December 08, 2011 12:09 PM (6IReR)
No. you can't. How many serial killers were "the nice man down the street"? Dem voters are fully functional retards with absolutely no eye on history and no sense of logic.
Posted by: Berserker at December 08, 2011 12:09 PM (FMbng)
Milton Friedman wrote about this same kind of logic when he published his "Permanent Income Hypothesis." Friedman posited:
If/when you get a significant raise - such as when you change jobs, etc. - you will initially not realize that you are making a lot more money. You will spend less than you make until your psyche realizes "hey, I can afford more."
This normally doesn't take too long.
The inverse is true and worse: if you lose your job, and you go from $X/year to zero, you also refuse to believe that you're busted. You'll keep spending. First it will be your savings, then it will be your lines of credit. At some point, like it takes a while to realize that you voted for a failure, you will realize that you are broke and you have to stop spending.
This normally takes a long time, unfortunately.
As with most things, Friedman was prescient. And he extended his theory into how unemployment and other such socialist things can really skew this already bad logic even worse.
In this case I think a lot of people have actually come around to blaming Obama. I think that they realize they voted for a bad candidate.
They do this for a good reason: if they can't blame Obama, then they have to face the even grimmer truth that it's not just Obama that's wrong, but Socialism, in general, that is a complete failure.
Consider Europe: they are throwing PM's out by the bundle. Scapegoats R'Us. Because if it's not the PM's fault, then it's a failure in the whole "welfare state" logic.
And that's simply too much for them to accept. Same thing here.
Posted by: RobM1981 at December 08, 2011 12:12 PM (qlIZh)
I'm going to blame it on years of union brainwashing.
I also have trouble reconciling his devotion to his Church with a Dem vote, given the party is so rabidly pro-abortion.
We just do not bring up politics, ever, which is hard for me, because as you may have noticed, I am somewhat opinionated....
Posted by: MissTammy at December 08, 2011 12:15 PM (SsG4J)
===
Only for those who actually looked.
If you don't delve into blogs (and most don't) and uncritically believed the popular media (and most do), Obama was a demi-god.
As to Ace's question, I get the sense that at least some of the people whom I know that liked Obama see he's a screwup, at the very least with respect to the economy. Most people simply aren't knowledgeable about foreign policy, or certainly not knowledgeable enough to understand the many ways Obama has been screwing over the USA's role as global leader.
Posted by: looking closely at December 08, 2011 12:18 PM (PwGfd)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at December 08, 2011 12:19 PM (deaac)
They've got bigger fish to fry....
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 08, 2011 03:30 PM (pLTLS)
So, what is their argument exactly, "Rick Perry hates the gays so we're gonna call him a fag?"
Posted by: Jimmuy at December 08, 2011 12:21 PM (KLVyl)
Most sentient beings concluded this a long time ago. The rest are still lying to themselves. It would be painful to watch if it weren't happening to Democrats.
Posted by: SamInVA at December 08, 2011 12:23 PM (rFiOs)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at December 08, 2011 03:54 PM (jx2j9)
...An end, or a significant reduction in entitlements.
SS has to stay, the rest of the entitlements are now necessary because of SCOAMF's policies of economic destruction. An economic recovery will greatly diminish the need for them.
The reintroduction of personal accountability and responsibility.
The austere life style imposed by living debt free.
These are probably only two of the Unwritten Rules of the Moron Horde. I've been living that way for a looooong time, as, I would guess, do many of us.
The actual end to American exceptionalism and all of the consequences globally that that will carry with it.
America will always be exceptional. Our form of government is proof, as is our national psyche. We're just different from the rest of the world. We will prove that to the world once more if we can mangage to overcome the Great Mistake of '08. That will take some time.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, working towards full Curmudgeonhood at December 08, 2011 12:24 PM (d0Tfm)
My mom is pretty much a moderate/independent--liberal on some issues, conservative on others, so it all cancels out--and while I believe she voted for McCain, she was pretty supportive of Obama after his election. Or at least, she thought he should be given a fair chance.
A few months ago we spoke about political stuff and she said something to the effect of "I think he's had enough time to fix things, and he hasn't really been able to do it." That's not the same as being sold on the Republican ticket, and I wouldn't say she hates him, but I do see it as indicative of a larger shift (with all the caveats about anecdotal info, of course).
Posted by: T at December 08, 2011 12:24 PM (moUeW)
Posted by: AtlasMugged at December 08, 2011 12:24 PM (r9vQr)
Posted by: Socratease at December 08, 2011 12:26 PM (vaIln)
Yes! Of course they were blaming it all on that vast right-wing conspiracy, but some of my Lib friends have changed their tune on that a bit, too. I mean, when the conspiracies proving to be true, you have no choice.
Posted by: MissTammy at December 08, 2011 12:27 PM (SsG4J)
With all of the insider trading and corruption brought to light from Peter Schweizer's book, has anyone investigated whether the sycophantic supporters of the media/punditry class have had similar "success" with their portfolios?
Obviously they wouldn't be protected from insider trading laws (as congress transparently is) It certainly would go a long way in explaining why they're so malleable in promoting provable lies.
Ideology is nice and all, but money talks.
Posted by: AtlasMugged at December 08, 2011 04:24 PM (r9vQr)
I have to agree here... money talks... barring any drastic changes it will be
" the economy stupid "
Posted by: The Jackhole at December 08, 2011 12:28 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream, Cultist for Jesus at December 08, 2011 12:29 PM (epBek)
My husband, normally passive at this type of crap (as it does no good to argue with idiots of another political party, and I am usually the one opening her mouth) defended his own personal success and capitalism and general working his ass off his whole life to support me and boys,etc.
The boyfriend dude had some stats memorized, so (to some) he sounded smart. He gave himself away when he said that our country was successful after WWII due to welfare (or some BS related to all of FDR's programs, including the GI Bill). Obama has completely let him down, bummer. These peeps honestly thought Utopia was going to occur after January 20, 2009. Some more ignorance: he thought Anthony Weiner was "brilliant" and also his great hope before resignation (I calmly said, "Well, he did that to himself."). He thinks Obama was vetted (I now think he did not know what vetted meant when I said that the media did not vet him). He also looked confused, dude, when I asked, if Obama is not his guy, who did he want to "primary" The Won? Our niece had to explain what "primary" meant. I then knew he was seriously ignorant on a lower level than I thought. I told him to watch Senator Marco Rubio on YouTube (who he had never heard of). No doubt his head exploded.
Seriously, this is what the GOP is dealing with in the next election: ignorant,stoned hippies who like to hate Wall Street and the Tea Party as that is their echo chamber. If asked, they could not tell you why they hate them or even explain the difference between socialism (which sounds cool) or capitalism.
My brother-in-law, a wise-guy who I do love as a brother, is anti-GOP due to living in Utah and the Mormon thing (they are all Catholic). Keeping in mind that their father was a Reagan Republican conservative who made lots of money, thanks to capitalism and education. Brother-in-law "hates" Wall Street and made sarcastic remarks over his gin. I wanted to say, well, you know that money we will all divide when your mother is gone from their investments? Where do you think that came from? But I was a good girl and did not want to make these people feel stoopid. But they are.
It is the Republican's election to lose, y'all, and I give them full credit for possibly doing this. God help us.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at December 08, 2011 12:31 PM (baL2B)
Funny how that works.
Posted by: Brown Line at December 08, 2011 12:44 PM (VrNoa)
My lib friends here in the Triangle of NC (ie 99% of my friends) who loved Obama in 2008 might not love him as much anymore but they'd sooner pluck out their eyebrows rather than vote Republican.
I think the best we might get out of them is that they are really really busy on in November 2012 and "don't have time" to vote come election day.
Posted by: Average Jen at December 08, 2011 12:48 PM (LnCi3)
They've got bigger fish to fry....
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 08, 2011 03:30 PM (pLTLS)
Lacey
Where I live every man wears that same jacket! And I can guarantee you that they are not gay!! It is so silly that they would make an issue of something like that. In fact, I could not even join in this discussion (about people having cooled on Obama) because the only stickers on cars up here are "Obama, One Big Mistake America" and the NRA stickers! I hope that if they are making fun about Perry and the jacket it is because they feel he will be the next "flavor of the month", as I think he can take it.
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at December 08, 2011 12:50 PM (6IV8T)
Then, no one I talked to would listen. Now, no one wants to talk. I think a large part of the reason is fear of the Race Card, more than being called stupid due to Sunk Cost realization.
Posted by: Arbalest at December 08, 2011 12:51 PM (zOyi0)
Posted by: Jaynie59 at December 08, 2011 12:51 PM (4zKCA)
-- are you detecting any shifts here?
Yes, kinda sorta like Japan had a few shifts earlier this year.
Seriously. Even the liberals around here start their narratives with "Admittedly Obama's been kind of a dissappointment but....." and then go on with their own left wing rationalization of whatever they percieve as being wrong.
The shocker though is when they forget to blame everything on Bush. Or even more shocking is when you confront them with the fact that Obama hasn't changed ANYTHING in terms of Policy that Bush set up....and they don't argue.
Posted by: Mr. Obvious at December 08, 2011 12:57 PM (2uovW)
Posted by: Guvnah at December 08, 2011 12:59 PM (Rg8DN)
Love this!
Posted by: MissTammy at December 08, 2011 01:09 PM (SsG4J)
Posted by: ParisParamus at December 08, 2011 01:12 PM (dij/b)
Christie is on this bandwagon. In Iowa today he sympathized with hecklers (in a Christie sort of way), saying they got taken to the cleaners with all the Hopeandchange shit and now they were having trouble coming to grips with it. "Maturity" would help them, a bit, he thought. As in "when they learn a little maturity".
Maybe a great ad for whomever turns out to be the GOP nominee would be to replay some of the really inspiring Obama ads from 2008, with a new tagline, like "How'd that work out for you?"
Posted by: MTF at December 08, 2011 01:20 PM (B5y+v)
Posted by: Tim203 at December 08, 2011 01:41 PM (d1JmE)
Posted by: Von Bismarck at December 08, 2011 01:45 PM (KIAKs)
Posted by: Radar at December 08, 2011 01:47 PM (8xYyJ)
Ace,
I really like your theory. And I have not encountered anything similar to it before.
The vast majority of my friends (like, 90+%) are deep, blue lefties with intense sympathies for the OWS crowd. They all voted for Obama in the last election, and they won't hesitate to vote for him coming up. The minority-remainder of my friends did not vote for Obama, and certainly will not be voting for him coming up.
So I'm afraid I've no relevant sample to offer for the testing of your theory.
I will say that there is no question that a sizable percentage of my Obama voting friends have softened in their support of him. Some are quite disappointed in him - but not enough not to vote for him. Several are even anticipating he'll likely be replaced by a Republican.
Posted by: Dave at December 08, 2011 02:05 PM (SV650)
Posted by: I. Buttocks at December 08, 2011 02:08 PM (d43J9)
On facebook, there is a group entitled something like "We survived 8 years of Bush, you will survive Obama" or something like that that several of my left-wing "friends" have been "liking" recently. Presumably this is supposed to be pro-Obama, but when I saw it I thought, isn't that kind of admitting that Obama sucks? Aren't you essentially saying, yes, Obama sucks, we can't deny it any longer, but Bush sucked, too!
Also, I find it humorous that so many lefties think us on the right are so invested in defending Bush. I like Bush as a person, but I disagreed with many of his policies, especially the spending. I hardly feel the need to defend him, even though I generally don't think he was anything near as bad as the left wants to believe.
Posted by: Mullaney at December 08, 2011 02:12 PM (21rff)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at December 08, 2011 02:14 PM (r4wIV)
Ace...dont forget there is a new crop of people that never even voted for Obama that are now of voting age (and they dont have to reckon with buyer's remorse or some sunk cost mentality).
My daughter is already fantasizing about pulling that lever to vote that SOB out of office. She turns 18 this December and graduates high school in May. While there are still plenty of liberal indoctrinated kids that wont vote for a Republican, they probably also wont even go to the effort of registering when they are at college and won't vote on election day. But those from conservative households understand that the country and their future hangs in the balance and will register and vote.
For my daughter, registering will be the first god-damn thing she does when she gets to college (from her mouth...not mine).
I have a 16 year old right behind her and a then a 13 year old, too. I also know plenty of conservative families who have 3-4 children. If the liberals expect to win they better start breeding, because the conservatives are.
I am generally against abortion, but frankly if all the liberals want to pre-emptively kill off their offspring and the survival of their crappy, liberal ideas, I am happy to let them do so. I'll even pitch in with taxpayer money. I know that is harsh, but to me the survival of the USA comes before everything else. I will lay down my life to preserve it for my children. I have no compunction about them laying down the lives of their unborn children to also help ensure the survival of The USA as I have known it.
Posted by: Fustigator at December 08, 2011 02:41 PM (e6R9Q)
1. they don't think it's doing so bad. As it's the PREVIOUS MOWER'S FAULT THAT'S THE PROBLEM.
2. Even when you know you've made a bad purchase, you'll still ride that thing into the ground. (I did with my Ford Ranger. 115,000 miles and 7 years and I hated driving it every minute but it was all I had and I couldn't afford to sell it and buy another)
3. There's always hope that it will get better. (or as you would put it; magical thinking.)
And apparently there's 42% out there that feel this way.
I've been keeping almost daily track of Obama's poll with Gallup he's been up to 44% approval and as low as 47% disapproval for about 3-4 months.
42% seems to be the median.
That means (if this means ANYTHING) that we've got 8% that can f*ck things up big time if they don't show or vote for the one the Media says to.
Not good. Not good at all.
Posted by: Vote for me and I'll set you free! at December 08, 2011 03:13 PM (xqpQL)
Took awhile to admit it and make the change.
Posted by: unclezeb at December 08, 2011 03:26 PM (JCX8H)
Anyway by this point last year, he several times brought up and directly apologized to me for having voted for Obama. He was visibly upset, he did feel a bit tricked into supporting him. Not sure if he meant tricked by Obama or the media presenting him as something he wasn't. Never saw him watch foxnews I assume his kids were the ones telling him of Obamas misdeeds. I assumed he watched CNN.
Posted by: Shiggz - Newt (Maximum Warp!) at December 08, 2011 03:30 PM (RfvTE)
Buy a fuze
"Rockbox" it
a cheap=worry free, flexible, solid player with expandable memory that does not require indoctrination into any creepy pseudo-religious cults.
side note - fuze+ rockbox project is almost done
Posted by: Shiggz - Newt (Maximum Warp!) at December 08, 2011 03:33 PM (RfvTE)
We all know that directly confronting people on their beliefs results in their digging in their heels, so that strategy, while gratifying to us who have all the facts with which to bury Obama fans, does not really work in garnering support for whoever will be his Republican opponent. And I am sure we can agree that anyone is preferable to Zero.
Indirect suggestion is far preferable. As in, "Obama is working hard and doubtless his heart is in the right place, but he did have two years of unfettered opportunity - without any Republican opposition - to do what he wanted, and we got Obamacare. That seems pretty unpopular. Maybe a change in approach would be good the next time around." Now that I read that, it sounds pretty lame, but I'm sure you can come up with a better formula. But I still think the approach is right. Run that sort of thing by three friends and report back in two days.
Posted by: Charles at December 08, 2011 04:05 PM (y85Ph)
Posted by: Schwalbe at December 08, 2011 04:28 PM (IxGUR)
Not much of a shift. Almost everyone in my neck of the woods is liberal or moderate (read: leans left).
Nobody is happy with the status quo but there is still the attitude of Bush and GOP had 8 years, screwed things over royally and ran the car in the ditch. If Obama gets any blame, it's along the lines of "I thought he would be better at cleaning up the huge mess the Republicans and Bush made" Heard one person comment that Bush looked pretty good in some appearance. Someone else said, "Yeah, he should look good, he's relaxing and playing golf while Obama's busy trying to fix his mess."
Posted by: RM at December 08, 2011 05:06 PM (amZQJ)
Yabbut it's one thing to be dissatisfied with Obama, still another to believe that the Republican nominee will be a better choice.
The vote for Obama in 2008 was in large part "we don't like the other guys." There was fatigue with Bush-era Republicanism and associated sludge or perceived sludge: Heckuva job, Brownie; wide stance Craig; Duke-stir Cunningham, Foley, DeLay, Abramoff, Scooter, Meiers, Gannon, Goodling...
Anyway. Many Democrats made the mistake of confusing this "we don't like the other guys" sentiment with "that must mean you REALLY want our agenda."
Cut to: Rampant socialism, open borders, enterpreneurial success being made illegal, guns outlawed, mandatory reeducation classes requiring eighth-graders to embrace both Islam and homosexuality (simultaneously!), single-payer health care, the replacement of the Star-Spangled Banner with the French national anthem, AGW as state dogma, and mandatory latte-sipping for everyone. Or whatever. But I digress. They proceeded to implement something very like this agenda. Or as much as they felt they could get away with.
And, surprise surpise, voters were like, "Um, hey, that's not quite what we meant," and the 2010 midterms happened.
News Flash: Republicans are just as capable of making exactly the same mistake. Assume (for the sake of argument) that the message of 2010 was "no, just because we don't like the other guys doesn't mean suddenly want your whole radical agenda." It doesn't mean that most voters are ready for a full conservative utopian Teagasm.
Posted by: palancik at December 08, 2011 05:35 PM (iu0/e)
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at December 08, 2011 06:11 PM (xbrnB)
Posted by: Tiny Buddha ePub at December 08, 2011 06:28 PM (NnwTo)
It's like a ballroom dance in which the partners feign interest in the Foxtrot until the next Swing number comes around.
Posted by: Vercingetorix at December 08, 2011 07:54 PM (hfWKa)
My neighbors' parents are pretty typical of the senior vote that went Obama's way. At Thanksgiving Dinner they told a similar story. They are independents who lean right but in 2008 they thought McCain was too old and that this smart, upbeat black guy should get his chance. They assumed the press had vetted him and that he was a man of the political center. They now know that he wasn't vetted at all and won't vote for him again.
Posted by: NC Mountain Girl at December 08, 2011 08:49 PM (dUrQK)
Posted by: VM at December 08, 2011 09:01 PM (AyryN)
The foul bitch who reads the intro really insinuated all the sinister overtones into her voice that she could muster. Allegedly, the piece was about subliminally negative campaigning, but it focussed solely on Republicans, and tried to make Perry's utterly American Protestantism sound like the Spanish Inquisition.
Of course, the "Reverend" God-Damn-America Wright and his viciously racist "church" weren't mentioned At All.
They will pull out all the stops, AGAIN, for the Bastard. Goebbels would be lost in admiration at their tactics.
Posted by: Beverly at December 09, 2011 12:23 AM (AfeZm)
Print out 8.5" x 11" copies of Hussein with his snoot in the air and backed by his fucking "Obama Logo" in halo-fashion. Put it on every fence and lamppost and every grocery store/laundromat/ bulletin board you can find.
That image says it all. That he thinks he's a Messiah; that his shit doesn't stink. Americans hate that sort of jackass.
Here in Manhattan, I don't interpret the silence of the Stalinist imbeciles as anything other than complacency. Like anacondas that have eaten their monthly goat, they lie in the shade, pleased with the slaughter, digesting the remains of our nation's greatness. What's to talk about?
All the problems of the nation they easily and mindlessly lay at the Republicans' door. An example of this imbecility: a Leftard I was talking with, who's not unintelligent in other spheres, was whining about the "Republican saboteurs" on the New York City Council. I was gobsmacked: "There ARE no Republicans on the City Council! well, the two guys from Queens! but there are some THIRTY Democrats! Anything that's going wrong is on them."
She just pouted and said, "Well, they must be doing something to fuck things up." I said, "Do you really think that?" but she just blew me off. Petulantly, impatiently, childishly.
Humans. A mostly irrational species, with occasional flashes of light.
Posted by: Beverly at December 09, 2011 12:32 AM (AfeZm)
Buyer's remorse is a good model to organize thinking on reactions to Obama. But while reading your post, I started getting a strong "abused spouse" vibe also, where Democrats would be denying, making excuses, etc. Perhaps "abused spouse" is a subset of "buyer's remorse."
Also, perhaps after his poor performance, Obama himself might be having a few "abused spouse / buyer's remorse" reactions to Leftism. Along with many leftists.
We can but hope.
Posted by: Chizbro at December 09, 2011 06:22 AM (500Qy)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1797 seconds, 406 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: taylork at December 08, 2011 11:00 AM (5wsU9)