October 05, 2011
— Guest Blogger When did we decide that it'd be a great thing for the Republican presidential debates to be a bunch of gotcha questions from liberal Democrats?
Because that's what it's turning out to be.
Drew linked my observations below about the stupid nature of this crappy debate schedule - but there's an added nugget that I've learned just today.
So this next debate, sponsored by WaPo/Bloomberg and hosted on Bloomberg TV, was supposed to be exclusively about the economy. At least that's something, right? We've seen ridiculous sideshow questions for too long - let's get down to brass tacks and talk about economic issues which this whole election is going to end up being about. If you go to the WaPo site, it still says as much (emphasis mine).
The Washington Post and Bloomberg TV, in partnership with WBIN-TV and host Dartmouth College, present the first debate of the 2012 campaign focused exclusively on the issue that matters most to American voters: the economy.
But guess what: that's a lie.
I'm told that the debate organizers have informed the campaigns as of yesterday that only the first half of the debate will be about the economy. The second half will be a free for all.
And anyway, because they're including eight candidates (everybody but poor Gary Johnson), they're limiting things to thirty second answers. Again. Typical.
Oh, and one more bonus:
Charlie Rose will moderate the Bloomberg Washington Post Debate with co-moderators Washington Post political correspondent Karen Tumulty and Bloomberg White House correspondent Julianna Goldman.
Karen Tumulty. Hmm. Would that be the Karen Tumulty who is part of the same WaPo political journalism shop behind the biggest smear campaign yet of the 2012 cycle? Is that Karen Tumulty, Journolist member? The unbiased journalist who thought the 2010 election was Obama being "punished for his effectiveness"?
My only question is: will she personally bring a racist rock to plunk down on the dais?
Posted by: Guest Blogger at
01:21 PM
| Comments (236)
Post contains 335 words, total size 3 kb.
Fantastabulous.
Candidates -- Make your choice: Jersey Shore or Jerseylicious?
Posted by: lu at October 05, 2011 01:25 PM (pLTLS)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, but the levee was dry... at October 05, 2011 01:25 PM (UqKQV)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at October 05, 2011 01:25 PM (SiFbi)
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 01:26 PM (WnIbn)
Posted by: Tami at October 05, 2011 01:26 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: Lance McCormick at October 05, 2011 01:26 PM (zgHLA)
they're limiting things to thirty second answers. Again. Typical
Woo-Hoo, my time to shine again. I just hope I don't get asked another yes or no question again. Those are really difficult to stretch out.
Posted by: Mitt Romney - Master of 30 sec - 1 minute answers at October 05, 2011 01:26 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 01:26 PM (WnIbn)
Posted by: Crashpanic at October 05, 2011 01:26 PM (7eKJh)
Posted by: Bob Saget at October 05, 2011 01:27 PM (F/4zf)
Posted by: jjshaka at October 05, 2011 01:27 PM (xlqLO)
The Repub candidates REALLY need to learn a little bit from Sarah Palin... in that she is now VERY selective of who interviews her.
There is NO reason why the various campaigns could not talk to each other, and CHOOSE who gives those debates.... allowing the LEFT to do so is just plain Stupid.
They are cedeing choice of the battlefield to the enemy.
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 05, 2011 01:27 PM (NtXW4)
My only question is: will she personally bring a racist rock to plunk down on the dais?
Rare rational Obama supporter defends Perry on racist rock.
Wait, no, actually she calls a black GOP candidate an Uncle Tom and the N-word. Sorry about that.
I also heard Mark Thompson on leftist radio call Cain a "Tom" on his
national show last night. Apparently nobody listens to it because I
can't find audio of it today. So, we have another year of that to look forward to.
Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at October 05, 2011 01:27 PM (4136b)
Posted by: The Schwalbe : © at October 05, 2011 01:27 PM (UU0OF)
OT: Which one of you Michigan morons did this????
Posted by: Cheri at October 05, 2011 01:27 PM (G+Wff)
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 01:28 PM (WnIbn)
Posted by: the Charlie Daniels of the torque wrench at October 05, 2011 01:28 PM (le5qc)
Posted by: The Schwalbe : © at October 05, 2011 05:27 PM (UU0OF)
Pictures of painted, turned over rocks kinda destroys the story.
Posted by: Tami at October 05, 2011 01:28 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 05, 2011 01:28 PM (iRmUF)
If you were trying to lose the election, what would you differently than what the R candidates are doing?
Anyone?
Posted by: Sgt. Fury at October 05, 2011 01:28 PM (ONGHB)
Posted by: Captain Hate at October 05, 2011 01:28 PM (AOB4B)
And anyway, because they're including eight candidates (everybody but poor Gary Johnson), they're limiting things to thirty second answers. Again. Typical.
What the hell? I agree why is anyone agreeing to this? What the hell is the point other than to provide gotcha soundbites?
Posted by: alexthechick at October 05, 2011 01:29 PM (VtjlW)
Of course, failure to answer inquiries from our media betters would send Frank Luntz's mouth-breathing and drool cup-wearing thumb masturbaters with their GameBoy "opinionometers" into paroxysms of even deeper muddleheadedness. Mustn't distress the undecideds!
Posted by: No Whining at October 05, 2011 01:29 PM (UzjcV)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 05, 2011 01:29 PM (aYQHH)
Posted by: the Charlie Daniels of the torque wrench at October 05, 2011 05:28 PM (le5qc)
You have MUCH more faith in the intelligence of Politicians, than I do.
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 05, 2011 01:29 PM (NtXW4)
Posted by: Cheri at October 05, 2011 01:29 PM (G+Wff)
Posted by: ontherocks at October 05, 2011 01:30 PM (HBqDo)
MY only question is, does she have big boobs?
Posted by: © Sponge at October 05, 2011 01:30 PM (UK9cE)
Posted by: The Schwalbe : © at October 05, 2011 05:27 PM (UU0OF)
Of course not. That might cause people to go "Wait THAT'S what we're supposed to be outraged about?"
Although I'm only assuming that is the case since I haven't seen any image of it I am led to believe that the claim of what it is is much more damning without showing what it actually is.
Posted by: buzzion at October 05, 2011 01:30 PM (GULKT)
They're morons? What are their nicks?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at October 05, 2011 01:31 PM (xFdca)
Posted by: huerfano at October 05, 2011 01:31 PM (fecOD)
Politicians love showing-off.
Posted by: Miss80s at October 05, 2011 01:31 PM (d6QMz)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 05, 2011 01:32 PM (8c9g6)
Sunday, SUNDAY, SUNDAYYYYYY ... The AoSHQ cage match for the 2012 nominationnnnn!!!
Posted by: Andy at October 05, 2011 01:33 PM (5Rurq)
They should answer every question with a question such as 'Why did Michelle take her own plane to Martha's Vineyard and not wait 4 fuggin hours to ride with her husband on his plane?
or 'Why did the DOE shovel out 4 billion more green loans when we are still investigating Solyndra.'
or 'What was the purpose of arming the Mexican drug cartels?'
Posted by: The Schwalbe : © at October 05, 2011 01:33 PM (UU0OF)
---
I assume it has something to do with money and getting coverage. It's probably super expensive to buy the time and on top of that the networks have to disrupt their (admittedly crappy) schedules.
How this applies to a debate on Bloomberg escapes me.
Posted by: Y-not at October 05, 2011 01:33 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Craig Tucker at October 05, 2011 01:33 PM (ieDPL)
Sorry. Stupid is as stupid does.
Posted by: DarkLord© sez Obama is a stuttering clusterf--- of a miserable failure
Oh, and F--- Nevada! at October 05, 2011 01:34 PM (GBXon)
And of course there won't be any dogs allowed because Romney can't resist torturing them.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at October 05, 2011 01:34 PM (xFdca)
What the hell? I agree why is anyone agreeing to this? What the hell is the point other than to provide gotcha soundbites?
Posted by: alexthechick at October 05, 2011 05:29 PM (VtjlW)
Because Mitt Romney has spent the past 4 years perfecting his 30 second to 1 minute responses so he has no problem agreeing to this. Especially since he knows to answer in a way that while not gaining any more supporters he's not alienating the ones he has, and everyone else can still consider him their fall back because his responses have been what you "expect" from him.
Posted by: buzzion at October 05, 2011 01:34 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Tami at October 05, 2011 05:26 PM (X6akg)
I have a feeling that this is the work of the repub beltway establishment. They know their "guy" is a master of 30 second soundbites.
Remember, folks. We're actually fighting on two fronts during this election.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 05, 2011 01:34 PM (iRmUF)
Posted by: blogforce one at October 05, 2011 01:34 PM (a/yG6)
I heard a rumor that someone wrote "honky" on a rock in the 60s. Obama's mother walked by it on the way to her trysts. He needs to explain to me why she was that insensitive.
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 01:35 PM (WnIbn)
"Trysts." Good word, but it dignifies her too much. She screwed for a place to live, and food, and probably drugs.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at October 05, 2011 01:37 PM (xFdca)
Posted by: That Rock at October 05, 2011 01:37 PM (GvYeG)
Therefore, by the time the candidate finishes answering, the voter will have long forgotten the question.
Posted by: Arms Merchant at October 05, 2011 01:37 PM (kPT11)
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 01:37 PM (WnIbn)
Wapo's Pet Rock will figure into that free-for-all somehow.....count on it. ....This will be a full out 'get Perry' event.
I hate these dumbass debates. .....They're not even debates.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at October 05, 2011 01:37 PM (sYyfh)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 05, 2011 01:38 PM (8c9g6)
I have a feeling that this is the work of the repub beltway establishment. They know their "guy" is a master of 30 second soundbites.
Remember, folks. We're actually fighting on two fronts during this election.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 05, 2011 05:34 PM (iRmUF)
I'll agree that Perry, so far, hasn't knocked it out of the park in the debates but I don't really think Romney has done all that much better. I've come away from most of the debates thinking Newt or Cain won them.
Posted by: Tami at October 05, 2011 01:38 PM (X6akg)
I heard a rumor that someone wrote "honky" on a rock in the 60s. Obama's mother walked by it on the way to her trysts. He needs to explain to me why she was that insensitive.
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 05:35 PM (WnIbn)
She was typical white person and that's just how white folks will do you.
Posted by: Barack Solyndra Obama at October 05, 2011 01:39 PM (4136b)
Posted by: Georgette Mosbacher at October 05, 2011 01:39 PM (OcmPS)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 05, 2011 01:39 PM (QcFbt)
"Trysts." Good word, but it dignifies her too much. She screwed for a place to live, and food, and probably drugs.
Really, I got the impression that she was an ideologue who, I'm sure drugged up, wanted to be early on the multicultural fucking front. I think she felt empowered by, at the time, making antisocial choices that would shock the neighbors and please her daddy or the other commies.
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 01:40 PM (WnIbn)
Posted by: Y-not at October 05, 2011 01:40 PM (5H6zj)
Example
Commie Moderator (to Perry): Why do you hunt at camps that are racist?
Perry: Obama hates the U.S. and has bankrupted it with wild spending that has accomplished nothing but increasing the debt.
Commie Moderator (to Romney): How did it feel to be the best Republican governor in MA?
Romney: I am great, would you like to buy one of my fine used cars?
Posted by: Vic at October 05, 2011 01:40 PM (M9Ie6)
OT: Which one of you Michigan morons did this????
Chick," 71, And Man, 54, Busted In Naked Car Romp
She looks pretty pleased. Gettin' busy with a younger man at her age is probably the cause.
Posted by: fluffy at October 05, 2011 01:41 PM (O6q63)
Posted by: Big McLargeHuge (F/K/A Large McBigHuge) at October 05, 2011 01:42 PM (tDuwb)
Dan Rather has a picture of the rock. He's down at Kinkos copying it now.
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 05, 2011 01:43 PM (Hx5uv)
I don't think he brings that vote. He probably brings some of the "white guilt" Indy vote. He would be "historic" and give them a good excuse to dump Obama.
Rubio's main appeal imho is that his personal history and skilled speaking style kind of make him the feel-good candidate. And he's been a politician long enough (albeit not at the national level) to be unlikely to make unforced errors, while at the same time appealing to a good slice of the Tea Party folks.
Posted by: Y-not at October 05, 2011 01:43 PM (5H6zj)
I'll agree that Perry, so far, hasn't knocked it out of the park in the debates but I don't really think Romney has done all that much better. I've come away from most of the debates thinking Newt or Cain won them.
Posted by: Tami at October 05, 2011 05:38 PM (X6akg)
That's because Romney isn't looking to "win." He just answers so opinion doesn't change on him. You know besides when he's acting like a democrat lying out of his ass about Perry wanting to kill grandma. Just look at the "Is Obama a socialist?" question. He used the full minute to answer that. Do you know if he thinks Obama is a socialist or not? Because I sure don't based on his answer. He provides answers to what you already know about his positions and then plays evasive with everything else.
The guy wouldn't be able to answer "Do you love your mother?" without using a minute to answer.
Posted by: buzzion at October 05, 2011 01:43 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: joeindc44 at October 05, 2011 01:44 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: Insomniac at October 05, 2011 01:44 PM (v+QvA)
"What is a SCOAMF?," Alex
Right you are for $100, and that puts you in the lead!
Posted by: Arms Merchant at October 05, 2011 01:44 PM (kPT11)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at October 05, 2011 05:34 PM (xFdca)
Let me fix that for you
And of course there won't be any dogs allowed because Romney can't resist blowing them.
Posted by: Vic at October 05, 2011 01:45 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 05, 2011 01:45 PM (8c9g6)
Posted by: Jordan at October 05, 2011 01:45 PM (XJYf4)
I think it would be a great debate if our top three candidates would respond to these leftists douchebags with only loud belches and farts.
How about they all walk on stage with a six-pack, pop one open immediately after getting introduced, and proceed to drink and joke amongst themselves while asking their own questions of the "moderators." If they drink fast enough, (or start drinking backstage ahead of time), then there's your, um, fuel.
Failing that, I like the suggestion upthread that all of them take a combative attitude with those lefty jerks and start asking them why they didn't ask the stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure that same question. Or, just answer, "I'll reply to that question right after the President does" or "That's a question far better suited for the President."
Properly done, a great deal of fun could be had.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, Tea Party SOB at October 05, 2011 01:45 PM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Retread at October 05, 2011 01:45 PM (G+7cD)
It's a Massachusetts thing.
Posted by: Michael Dukakis at October 05, 2011 01:45 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 05, 2011 05:43 PM (Hx5uv)
He brought the whole damn rock. The f***er's broken three copiers with it already.
Posted by: Guy working at Kinko's at October 05, 2011 01:45 PM (DrWcr)
<will she personally bring a racist rock to plunk down on the dais?>
Of course she will. 'Cause that's how they roll.
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at October 05, 2011 01:46 PM (7qKVv)
Only if he thinks he can get votes for it.
Posted by: Arms Merchant at October 05, 2011 01:46 PM (kPT11)
It depends on the sponsors, IIRC. The first debate was sponsored by the South Carolina Republican Party, so the chairman would have decided along with the outlet and the candidates.
Posted by: Miss80s at October 05, 2011 01:47 PM (d6QMz)
69What the candidates should do is the same as the Democommies do on the Fox Fair and Balanced debate. Answer a different question.
Example
Commie Moderator (to Perry): Why do you hunt at camps that are racist?
Perry: Obama hates the U.S. and has bankrupted it with wild spending that has accomplished nothing but increasing the debt.
Commie Moderator (to Romney): How did it feel to be the best Republican governor in MA?
Romney: I am great, would you like to buy one of my fine used cars?
-----
And isn't it about time to start framing world history in terms of the number of years SCoaMF has been in office.
"The past 3.4 years has been the worst economy in the history of mankind"
Posted by: Jimmah at October 05, 2011 01:47 PM (g9KCn)
"What is a SCOAMF?," Alex
Right you are for $100, and that puts you in the lead!
Posted by: Arms Merchant at October 05, 2011 05:44 PM (kPT11)
This program designed to allow the Obama administration to violate the second amendment gave free machine guns to Mexican drug gangs to kill Mexicans and blame their deaths on US gun manufacturers also killed two US federal agents.
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 05, 2011 01:47 PM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 05, 2011 01:48 PM (8c9g6)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 05, 2011 05:38 PM (8c9g6)
Let's look at reality. Perry's dad was probably born in what, 1922 in Texas? Hmmm that's the year my dad was born in Arkansas. Let's see, would the mere mention of that cursed word freak him out since he'd heard it everyday of his life? Perry's dad was a rancher although a county commissioner and member of the school board. He just would not have reacted with a view toward the future becoming obcessed with a rock in the woods in west texas. God is that dumb.
Look, it's very nice that we have eliminated a "word" from all usage writte or oral because it reminded people of an upsetting era. However, we can't pretend that that word was like krptonite to every southerner born after the civil war. It just wasn't. My grandmother said "Colored" which she considered very polite. She was born in 1899.
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 01:48 PM (WnIbn)
I've got a used health care plan I could let you have cheap.
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 05, 2011 01:48 PM (Hx5uv)
Oh, there's no doubt that she was an ideologue. But she was also promiscuous -- how much? we will never know.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sdildo (NJConservative) at October 05, 2011 01:49 PM (xFdca)
Posted by: fluffy at October 05, 2011 01:50 PM (O6q63)
That's because Romney isn't looking to "win." He just answers so opinion doesn't change on him. You know besides when he's acting like a democrat lying out of his ass about Perry wanting to kill grandma. Just look at the "Is Obama a socialist?" question. He used the full minute to answer that. Do you know if he thinks Obama is a socialist or not? Because I sure don't based on his answer. He provides answers to what you already know about his positions and then plays evasive with everything else.
The guy wouldn't be able to answer "Do you love your mother?" without using a minute to answer.
Posted by: buzzion at October 05, 2011 05:43 PM (GULKT)
Probably true buzzion...but he's gonna have to change this if he wants to pick up any steam or change any minds.
Posted by: Tami at October 05, 2011 01:50 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: fluffy at October 05, 2011 05:50 PM (O6q63)
Are his "expressive wrists" in view?
Posted by: No Whining at October 05, 2011 01:51 PM (UzjcV)
<will she personally bring a racist rock to plunk down on the dais?>
Of course she will. 'Cause that's how they roll.
------
$20 bucks to the first candidate who displays an artists rendition of Robert Byrd's grand wizard hat.
Posted by: Jimmah at October 05, 2011 01:51 PM (g9KCn)
Posted by: buzzion at October 05, 2011 01:51 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 05, 2011 01:51 PM (QcFbt)
Hey morons! Let's figure out what words we use now will be banned 35 years from now? I'll start:
1. Socialist
2. Profit
3. Private Property
4. Marriage
5. Hetero or homo sexual
6. Meat
etc.
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 01:52 PM (WnIbn)
Go ahead -- deny it.
RINO!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sdildo (NJConservative) at October 05, 2011 01:52 PM (xFdca)
Posted by: Jewish Janitor at October 05, 2011 01:52 PM (rJVPU)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 05, 2011 01:52 PM (8c9g6)
Are his "expressive wrists" in view?
No longer. He had a dollar bill taped across his mouth, with the word 'occupy' written on it.
Posted by: fluffy at October 05, 2011 01:52 PM (O6q63)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 05, 2011 05:38 PM (8c9g6)
Awww, that's cute lil' polynikes flogging a fake story all because Romney is so much more conservative than Perry--why, Romney is sooo conservative lil' poly even goes so far as to frame the story in the exact same way as the WaPo.
Just so you know, Mormans don't technically join the church until age 8 when they are baptized because at that age they are considered old enough to make their own decisions. Which, since Romney was well past the age of 8 by 1978, means Romney made the very, very racist decision all by himself to join a church that didn't consider blacks worthy of full, complete membership. Hmmmm. Now: How would you political consultant advise your client?
On topic: This is why every candidate needs to announce ASAP to the sit-down Erick has proposed over at RedState. Make those types of mass interactions with the voters the standard and leave the gotcha shit for the Dems.
Posted by: Jimmuy at October 05, 2011 01:53 PM (ibeMV)
My issue is I find him about as inspiring as This GUY. Making the Tough Choices.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at October 05, 2011 01:54 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 05, 2011 05:38 PM (8c9g6)
You're not doing your candidate any good with crap like this....but do keep it up.
Posted by: Tami at October 05, 2011 01:54 PM (X6akg)
All the candidates need to walk into the debate wearing SCOAMF halloween masks.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 05, 2011 01:55 PM (iRmUF)
Posted by: Jewish Janitor at October 05, 2011 01:55 PM (rJVPU)
There must be a valid reason, these are not stupid people. But I can't figure out what it is
Practice for press conferences, with the same unbiased journolists.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at October 05, 2011 01:55 PM (D5iHx)
I think he's good-looking in a "what a good-looking young man" way. In other words, his looks (including his grooming) appeal to the middle-aged and older woman set, imho, and are also not at all scary to "white people." The hair doesn't change that. And the VP doesn't need to be tall.
I caught some of his Reagan Library speech (at the beginning) and I thought he got off to a slow start, but more than that to me he's not an emotional speaker like a Giuliani or Fred or even Perry can be. He's more cerebral. Nevertheless, I watched his "maiden" floor speech and my recollection was that it was excellent -- and moving.
Posted by: Y-not at October 05, 2011 01:55 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: ktgreat at October 05, 2011 01:56 PM (hqGID)
Remember they said that it was a waste of money?
Well ......
Posted by: Tim the Enchanter at October 05, 2011 01:56 PM (cA6/i)
ps: And his wife is gorgeous. Again, in a non-threatening way. She'd be an asset at any campaign appearance.
However, DC is reporting that Rubio has again said he won't accept the VP nod.
Posted by: Y-not at October 05, 2011 01:56 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Old Texas Chick at October 05, 2011 01:56 PM (lLXZV)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, Tea Party SOB at October 05, 2011 01:56 PM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 05:56 PM (WnIbn)
Curses, foiled again!
Posted by: Andi Sullivan at October 05, 2011 01:56 PM (v+QvA)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 05, 2011 01:57 PM (8c9g6)
Posted by: kansas at October 05, 2011 01:58 PM (mka2b)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 05, 2011 05:57 PM (8c9g6)
No because there ARE such things as stupid questions.
Posted by: Tami at October 05, 2011 01:58 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: Old Scratch at October 05, 2011 01:59 PM (OlN4e)
Because Mitt Romney has spent the past 4 years perfecting his 30 second to 1 minute responses so he has no problem agreeing to this. Especially since he knows to answer in a way that while not gaining any more supporters he's not alienating the ones he has, and everyone else can still consider him their fall back because his responses have been what you "expect" from him.
1. Ignore what is asked, and answer the question that you think should have been asked. Regardless, answer the question you want.
2. Promise them anything. Just get their vote.
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 01:59 PM (lpWVn)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 05, 2011 02:00 PM (8c9g6)
OT: Which one of you Michigan morons did this????
Chick," 71, And Man, 54, Busted In Naked Car Romp
She looks pretty pleased. Gettin' busy with a younger man at her age is probably the cause.
Can you imagine the hangover that guy had?
Posted by: Cheri at October 05, 2011 02:00 PM (G+Wff)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 05, 2011 02:01 PM (aYQHH)
Posted by: Craig Tucker at October 05, 2011 02:02 PM (ieDPL)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 05, 2011 02:02 PM (8c9g6)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 05, 2011 02:02 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: Jewish Janitor at October 05, 2011 02:02 PM (rJVPU)
134
You don't like Romney or Perry. Do you like Paul?
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 06:01 PM (WnIbn)
Personally I hate the guy. People keep stealing my stuff and giving it to him.
Posted by: Peter at October 05, 2011 02:03 PM (v+QvA)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 05, 2011 06:02 PM (8c9g6)
Right because you are actually uninterested. You think you've found your "gotcha" for Perry and want to beat it to death with a hammer but actually know nothing about it. All so you can talk up your used car salesman that joined a church that didn't allow black people to be full members.
Posted by: buzzion at October 05, 2011 02:04 PM (GULKT)
It is important for Republican elites to know that their eventual candidate has been vetted by all of the 'important people' (read cultural and media elites of every persuasion) before they know a candidate is 'good enough'.
'Good enough' has nothing to do with conservative values and is instead built on image and a general alliance with reinforcing the status quo.
Posted by: Paper at October 05, 2011 02:04 PM (IvlIt)
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 02:05 PM (WnIbn)
I'll answer it.
He walked past, probably thought and said that it was a tacky sign, and didn't think much else of it. Eventually he had it painted over.
Not everything has to be viewed through the prism of racial bigotry and anger.
Is my father, who calls Blacks "Negroes" because that's what he grew up hearing, a racist?
Am I a racist for laughing at Black jokes?
Oh, and I don't give a rat's ass about Romney's Mormanism, but it will be a big issue if he is the nominee.
"Governor Romney, will you try to change the laws in this country to allow bigamy"
"Governor Romney, will you state that you categorically reject the teachings of your church on matters of race?"
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sdildo (NJConservative) at October 05, 2011 02:05 PM (xFdca)
Posted by: Jewish Janitor at October 05, 2011 02:06 PM (rJVPU)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 05, 2011 02:06 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 05, 2011 06:02 PM (QcFbt)
--
OK, whatever. I'm not sure why you're hung up on this.
Rubio is "ethnic." He has a very clear ethnic background - both parents being Cuban exiles. I assume he was raised speaking Spanish. In that sense he is less "white" (or more ethnic) than many of us who are mongrels from European stock a few generations back.
I don't care what color he is.
Posted by: Y-not at October 05, 2011 02:06 PM (5H6zj)
It's just odd. Why do we have to pretend Rubio is not a white guy?
IDK but I'd like to know why my darker than Obama Sicilian husband has to pretend he is a white guy and forego any "special" status.
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 02:07 PM (WnIbn)
Just don't even let the muthafuckers get started. Walk. Out.
Give a joint press conference explaining that the GOP will no longer be subject to this kind of ambush bullshit.
Worked for Reagan against Gorbachev.
Posted by: sifty at October 05, 2011 02:07 PM (4CSeG)
You KNOW Obama wears briefs which should have everyone retching
Why do you torment yourself by entertaining such thoughts?
Posted by: fluffy at October 05, 2011 02:07 PM (O6q63)
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at October 05, 2011 02:07 PM (xy9wk)
Let me see if I have this straight.
This "debate" is being run by the WaPo and Bloomberg, and moderated by someone who was a member of freaking JournoList?
And our party's candidates agreed to show up to this? To what is absolutely guaranteed to be another event deliberately designed to make them look bad, spur unproductive infighting, and ask them "when did you stop beating your wife" type questions?
Maybe none of these candidates are actually smart enough to be President after all. Seriously. We may really need some new blood in the GOP primary race.
It's like Jews in Nazi Germany being invited to air and defend their views at a debate jointly sponsored and moderated by Der Sturmer and the Volkischer Beobachter.
And showing up for it!
Posted by: torquewrench at October 05, 2011 02:08 PM (aWrFJ)
Posted by: Y-not at October 05, 2011 02:08 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: alexthedude at October 05, 2011 02:09 PM (3L0Bq)
Posted by: Julie at October 05, 2011 02:10 PM (O/fK8)
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 02:10 PM (WnIbn)
Posted by: joeindc44 at October 05, 2011 02:11 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: sifty at October 05, 2011 02:11 PM (4CSeG)
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 02:11 PM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Julie at October 05, 2011 02:12 PM (O/fK8)
Posted by: alexthedude at October 05, 2011 02:12 PM (3L0Bq)
Yes....parody's....you know, the plural form.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at October 05, 2011 02:12 PM (7utQ2)
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at October 05, 2011 05:46 PM (MKxSB)
Classic!
Posted by: Barack Solyndra Obama at October 05, 2011 02:12 PM (4136b)
Posted by: Oldcat at October 05, 2011 02:13 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Julie at October 05, 2011 02:13 PM (O/fK8)
I agree with the things said about Rubio. He will be a very good politician long-term, but he is not a great speaker, and he can be more than a bit awkward to watch. Someone above said 'nerdy' and that sounds about right to me.
Republicans always end up trying to be too clever playing the identity politics game. Nominate experienced, conservative candidates who bring together the largest parts of the base with some independents, and things usually work out.
Posted by: Paper at October 05, 2011 02:13 PM (IvlIt)
Posted by: Chris R, red in NY-9 at October 05, 2011 02:13 PM (hGTfi)
Yep. The general rule is "cock-up before conspiracy," but at some point, the difference between the two becomes entirely irrelevant. Either the GOP elites actively collaborate in their own party's gelding, or they're too stupid to realize that they get owned on a continuing basis. Not exactly confidence inspiring, is it?
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at October 05, 2011 02:14 PM (xy9wk)
We do that pretty well without the trolls.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at October 05, 2011 02:14 PM (7utQ2)
Posted by: Chris at October 05, 2011 02:14 PM (iTTDT)
Posted by: Julie at October 05, 2011 06:10 PM (O/fK
Even though she may not be running, she'll still be a part of the political debate. After all, she's one of the sparks that got the conservative ascendency going.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 05, 2011 02:14 PM (iRmUF)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 05, 2011 02:15 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: alexthedude at October 05, 2011 02:15 PM (3L0Bq)
Posted by: pko Strany at October 05, 2011 02:15 PM (RJOgX)
Posted by: dogfish at October 05, 2011 02:15 PM (N2yhW)
Posted by: Tami at October 05, 2011 05:26 PM (X6akg)
Which is kind of ironic given that today's technology affords you so many ways to get your message out that you needn't even show up for the sound bite-fests these non-debates are.
Posted by: giftogab at October 05, 2011 02:15 PM (SPVfc)
Posted by: sifty at October 05, 2011 02:16 PM (4CSeG)
Posted by: lu at October 05, 2011 02:17 PM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 05, 2011 02:18 PM (qpKJT)
At some point tonight, Rick "Painful Rectal Itch" Santorum will claim that it benefits him. I guarantee this.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at October 05, 2011 02:19 PM (7utQ2)
Ask why Romney was a self professed salesman for a church while it denied blacks the priesthood.
Posted by: didn't take long
"Governor Romney, any response to Mr. Cain's comment?"
"I'm afraid my dear Lamanite friend and I will have to agree to disagree on this one..."
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at October 05, 2011 02:19 PM (/qkBU)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 05, 2011 06:02 PM (QcFbt)
Same reason we're supposed to pretend Odumdum's not a Defermative Action, America hating communist - MFM.
I stopped pretending when I gave up trick or treating a few decades ago.
Posted by: ontherocks at October 05, 2011 02:19 PM (HBqDo)
Now get your ass to work beating on the SCoaMF or SDASTFU.
Somebody hide the straight razors before the C4P people get ahold of them.
Posted by: sifty at October 05, 2011 02:19 PM (4CSeG)
You've hit the nail on the head, here. Rubio is a minority because the government says he is. I'd be a minority, too, if the government cared to make Swiss-Cherokee-Slovenian-Irish-God-knows-what-else into a protected class.
The thought is that the folks who believe in identity politics would identify with a candidate who occupies the same government-defined ethnicity. It worked for Obama, right?
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at October 05, 2011 02:20 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at October 05, 2011 02:20 PM (8c9g6)
The media sets the rules, decides who is in and out, picks the far-left panelists who then become a part of the story and the show and vie with each other to be the one who sinks a campaign with a killer question.
It's insane.
First of all, no "panelists" should be needed. People running for the highest office shouldn't need anyone to lead them to the issues, they know what the issues are. All we need is a neutral timekeeper to keep the time even. And if Romney wants to spend ten minutes talking about his business record or Perry spends half an hour on Texas, let 'em talk - BUT when their total time for the debate is over, they get no more. If they use up the time for a closing statement, tough.
Candidates can talk about their philosophy, any issue they want, ask others questions or answer questions - or not, let the people decide if they were justified or not. Just keep the dang "Keepers of the News" the heck off the stage.
Posted by: Adjoran at October 05, 2011 02:21 PM (VfmLu)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at October 05, 2011 02:21 PM (7utQ2)
1) Was a supporter of abortion rights, now is pro-life (change occurred when he decided the presidency was his highest calling)
2) Supported a federal health insurance mandate and instituted government run health care, now a Federalist
3) Believes humans are causing global warming, or climate change, or whatever they're calling it this week.
4) Once supported "taxing private political contributions in order to finance publicly funded campaigns" and "advocated spending limits on congressional campaigns and suggested abolishing political action committees", now who the hell knows what his stance is.
5) Hates Mexicans, unless they're doing his yard work.
You get the picture.
Posted by: Dr Spank at October 05, 2011 02:22 PM (OGQrv)
Posted by: sifty is gettin his Depression on at October 05, 2011 02:22 PM (4CSeG)
Cain or Perry. I'd be happy with either one.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 05, 2011 02:23 PM (iRmUF)
If the LOSERship could, for a moment, think out of the box, they'd take more control of this debate process by organizing them so the questions were selected by conservatives, tea party and talk show types. But no, these sorts of folks the LOSERship fears, as they are a threat to the LOSERship's power.
Hence, the LOSERship goes along with all GOP debates being chaired by liberals... Just like Democrats make sure their debates are chaired by conservatives? Not... What's wrong with this picture...?
Posted by: drfredc at October 05, 2011 02:23 PM (iNKlO)
The Rubio Maneuver is "clever" like Biden is clever. The dude lost the Latino vote in Florida by ten. Non-Cuban Hispanics hate him.
Because—get this—he's not a Democrat. And that's all that matters. Their political-proxy identity is D, not "guys whose names end in -io, -es, and -sa."
Nothing can change this. Nothing.
Posted by: oblig. at October 05, 2011 02:23 PM (xvZW9)
Posted by: sifty is gettin his Depression on at October 05, 2011 02:25 PM (4CSeG)
Posted by: tsj017 at October 05, 2011 02:27 PM (vOH26)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at October 05, 2011 02:27 PM (7utQ2)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at October 05, 2011 02:29 PM (afrI6)
Posted by: sifty is gettin his Depression on at October 05, 2011 06:25 PM (4CSeG)
Yeah. I'm all for putting everyone in the same racial catagory as "American". Can't go wrong with that.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 05, 2011 02:30 PM (iRmUF)
To me the definition of ethnic has to do with how long ago your ancestors came here and how strongly you identify with that "home" country, which includes whether or not you grew up speaking that language. Ethnicity has nothing to do with color except insofar as color is a readily identifiable trait.
Posted by: Y-not at October 05, 2011 02:32 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: tsj017 at October 05, 2011 06:27 PM (vOH26)
Not to worry. He'll find something, anything to bitch about Palin (or any woman who claims to be conservative).
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 05, 2011 02:33 PM (iRmUF)
^This.
But it's moot. He said he won't take the VP slot.
Posted by: Y-not at October 05, 2011 02:34 PM (5H6zj)
The thought is that the folks who believe in identity politics would identify with a candidate who occupies the same government-defined ethnicity. It worked for Obama, right?
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at October 05, 2011 06:20 PM (bjRNS)
Yeah, for some reason teh Government does not put my self chosen Category... MUTT, on their forms...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 05, 2011 02:34 PM (NtXW4)
Yeah, completely destroying part of language because it is sometimes offensive depending on who is saying it and how it is being said (i.e., fine to use in a multi-platinum rap album or Showtime at the Apollo comedy gig) is indeed "very nice." Depending on usage, the word in question can range from a positive term of endearment ("my [taboo]!") to an insult. Restricting language restricts thought, and that's rarely, if ever, a good idea.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at October 05, 2011 02:34 PM (xy9wk)
FIFY
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at October 05, 2011 02:35 PM (MKxSB)
Posted by: steevy at October 05, 2011 02:35 PM (fyOgS)
<Levin asked her if she would consider 3rd party run. She said no as doing so would guarantee Obama's re-election.>
Finally, somebody gets it!
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at October 05, 2011 02:39 PM (7qKVv)
Posted by: Shiggz at October 05, 2011 02:42 PM (I9fXA)
Posted by: buzzion at October 05, 2011 02:44 PM (GULKT)
Because race is the ultimate trump card in modern America, and, as everyone knows, "white ain't right".
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at October 05, 2011 02:52 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: TomJW at October 05, 2011 02:53 PM (nC3O5)
Posted by: Craig Tucker at October 05, 2011 05:33 PM (ieDPL)
Indeed. There's probably at least one in every state in the union. I personally know of two such named landmarks, in two separate states. And because, as we passed by it, someone pointed out the peculiarly-shaped formation and informed me of the moniker assigned to it by the locals, I must be a racist!
Posted by: EyeTest at October 05, 2011 02:57 PM (ReC4P)
They should just spout whatever talking points they have.
Maybe they should have a stump speech prepared, and run right into it, from wherever they left off last, when "questioned."
Posted by: I'm in a New York state of mind at October 05, 2011 03:01 PM (4sQwu)
Posted by: yankeefifth at October 05, 2011 03:44 PM (loM0R)
He slaps their biased asses down every time.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 05, 2011 03:45 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: naturalfake at October 05, 2011 04:03 PM (I49Jm)
Win or lose in 2012, I think this is the last cycle that GOP candidates will dance to the MSM tune vis-a-vis debates.
By 2016, there will either be a Republican running for re-election or it will be a free for all of information age/media savvy GOP candidates in their 40's who grew up instinctively avoiding or challening the liberal mdeia, & who will not countenance such a limited (and hostile liberal) bunch of debate options.
Either that or we'll be in Year 2 of Soylent Green meets Omega Man and the silky soft sensibilities of Manhattan-Beltway millionaire TV and print personalities wont matter as much as where do people get clean water and untainted bags of cheesy-poofs?
So the MSM I say, "laugh while you can, Monkey-boys."
Posted by: Mike D. at October 05, 2011 04:35 PM (YUrBn)
Donald Graham Washington Post Publisher, Harvard. Katherine Weymouth Editor in Chief Harvard. Karen Tumulty Harvard MBA Bloomberg News founder Michael Bloomberg Harvard. Token non-Harvard this Juliana Goldman Barnard/Columbia ex-wife of David Schuster. This will be a Romney love-in 100% guaranteed.
It is way past time for people to get it through their thick skulls that these made members of the Ivy League Mafia are self-dealing group-thinkers who don't give a Rat's ass beyond the corridor or the SF-LA-Chi triangle.
EVERY big Financial house is run by these people. Every stinkin' scandal, from Solyndra to Lightsquared to Fannie Mae to Iraq to Enron involves them. They screw up and the pals in govt bail them out.
Posted by: cow college reject at October 05, 2011 05:08 PM (7ZXjs)
Posted by: Molon Labe at October 05, 2011 05:38 PM (S7K8x)
Posted by: Genetic Tunder at October 05, 2011 05:50 PM (vQfJ3)
You need to talk to the idiots that comprise the Republican Party "leadership".
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at October 05, 2011 10:42 PM (dr4y0)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4237 seconds, 364 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Captain Hate at October 05, 2011 01:23 PM (AOB4B)