June 12, 2011
— Ace Before the covers (which you've probably guessed at), Businessinsider discusses a new term, "Screwflation," which the author defines as inflation plus getting hit by other rising costs.
The actual coining of this term is by Doug Kass at Barron's, but it's behind a subscription wall.
April 19, 2010 cover date. Newsweek, the magazine sold for one rectangular U.S. dollar, with many questioning if it was worth so much:

Note the second headline at the top of the cover: "Hate on the Right." Pretty much a story they can, and do, write every other month. And this was nearly a year before Gabrielle Giffords was shot by a left-wing lunatic and 9/11 Truther. This was back, if I'm recalling right and I'm probably not, when the media became outraged over an attempt by citizens to express their opposition to ObamaCare to the politicians who allegedly represent them.
June 20, 2011 cover date. Time, which I'm sure not saying isn't biased or Obama-loving, but which at least recognizes the outer limits of plausible spin:

The Baltimore Sun (from whom that first cover is linked) expressed a little skepticism about Newsweek's Whoo-Hoo cover.
Time Magazine doesn't seem proud of its cover story. I searched for it online, paging through Time's online splash page, its US splash, its politics splash, its business splash. Couldn't find it. I suppose it might be linked down the page.
I eventually found it by a google search, going through someone else's website to get it.
I know it's a few days old now but sort of think this should still be prominent.
Posted by: Ace at
06:26 AM
| Comments (46)
Post contains 274 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Hrothgar at June 12, 2011 06:30 AM (yrGif)
Posted by: lowandslow at June 12, 2011 06:33 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 12, 2011 06:34 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: runningrn at June 12, 2011 06:34 AM (9tFhE)
Posted by: Andy at June 12, 2011 06:35 AM (veZ9n)
Posted by: Tami at June 12, 2011 06:35 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: t-bird at June 12, 2011 06:36 AM (FcR7P)
You'd never read a story written in this tone if it were about black men or single moms.
But upper middle class white males? Oh, yeah. It's about time those guys got what was coming to them.
Posted by: Warden at June 12, 2011 06:37 AM (fVIlG)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 12, 2011 06:38 AM (AZGON)
June 20, 2010 2011 cover date.
Heh! I went to my hubby's nephew's graduation last night. The speaker who was presenting the citizenship award, was himself an alumnus of the same high school (class of 80). He was going through a list of what was going on then juxtaposed with what is going on now. One of the lines that made me lol: "Back then, we had Ronald Reagan. Today we have Barack Obama (just a few scattered cheers). Back then we had Libya and Moamar Ghadaffi. Today, we have Libya and Moamar Ghadaffi." I loved that he said that because no one ever points out the fact that there is a third (and completely unnecessary war going on now, compliments of B.O.)
Posted by: runningrn at June 12, 2011 06:39 AM (9tFhE)
I like that most of Newsweeks' comments sections are filled with either-
raving lefty moonbats
or
apparently...a hangout for the Stormfront crowd.
It is like the worst of both worlds decided to make a home in the carcass of Newsweek.
Posted by: CAC at June 12, 2011 06:39 AM (JEVge)
Posted by: Rep Anthony Weiner, the loin of the H O R at June 12, 2011 06:40 AM (le5qc)
Posted by: fluffy ponies up at June 12, 2011 06:41 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 12, 2011 06:41 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Rep Anthony Weiner, the loin of the H O R at June 12, 2011 06:43 AM (le5qc)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 12, 2011 06:43 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: blaster at June 12, 2011 06:50 AM (Fw2Gg)
I hunted for one that was at least "neutral". There aren't any. They are all in the Democrats pockets and liberal as hell.
Posted by: Vic at June 12, 2011 06:59 AM (M9Ie6)
You know it's true because they said "let's be clear."
Such an authoritative declaration! And just like Obama does it!
And you know, they make a compelling case assertion.
Because the combination of Obama's off shore drilling ban, business hostile EPA, and Bernanke's dollar devaluation have nothing to do with skyrocketing energy costs, right?
And increased energy costs never kill economies, do they?
Businesses just thrive in environments where the cost of doing business is sky-high.
You know what else businesses love? New burdensome health care regulations. They also love increased paperwork brought about by byzantine federal rules and regulations
Also, business love when an administration takes a big shit on hundreds of years of established contract law in order to steal from companies and pay off union supporters.
Makes 'em really want to stick their necks out.
But none of this is Obama's fault. Right?
Right?
Posted by: Warden at June 12, 2011 07:05 AM (fVIlG)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 12, 2011 07:05 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 12, 2011 07:07 AM (AZGON)
thanks for having nice time
Posted by: urdu tutorial at June 12, 2011 07:08 AM (e4WFu)
Posted by: demoncrat at June 12, 2011 07:17 AM (GkYyh)
Yes, with all the new neighbors moving in I'm sure there is some who only speak urdu and need help.
Posted by: Vic at June 12, 2011 07:18 AM (M9Ie6)
The Myth that government stimulus is the only answer
They still believe with all their souls that a bureaucracy run by academics is far more efficient and innovative than private entrepreneurs
Posted by: kbdabear at June 12, 2011 07:25 AM (so1xa)
Posted by: Vic at June 12, 2011 10:59 AM (M9Ie6)
I did the same thing, and I had the same result.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 12, 2011 07:34 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: TexasJew at June 12, 2011 07:34 AM (jOwjy)
Fucking idiots.
Posted by: TexasJew at June 12, 2011 07:38 AM (jOwjy)
OK, let's impeach Obama, arrest half of Congress, put Bernanke and Greenspan in leg irons and cut spending by 50% and business taxes by 70%.
How about that, dickhead?
Posted by: TexasJew at June 12, 2011 07:40 AM (jOwjy)
Posted by: Daniel Gross, Offering A Full Dollar of Journalistic Value at June 12, 2011 08:14 AM (Txl/u)
If only. There may be $2 trillion sitting on the balance sheets of American corporations globally, but firms show no signs of wanting to spend it in order to hire workers at home, however much Washington might hope they will. Meanwhile, the average American is feeling poorer by the week.
How the hell can they be taken seriously? This is grotesque. Why not just make a Disnefied cartoon about the evil rich cats oppressing the helpless little poor mice?
Oh, because that would be more readily recognized as propaganda.
Bastards. (that's from the Time article, BTW)
Posted by: original signed at June 12, 2011 08:17 AM (YCuex)
Posted by: The Mega Indepedent at June 12, 2011 08:49 AM (5I0Yr)
I can't believe they went with a half-white/half-black presidential image. The slam against Barry is obvious, unless it was a slam on Frank Gorshin.
Racists!
Posted by: toby928™ at June 12, 2011 09:19 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Wonkish Rogue at June 12, 2011 10:11 AM (QMHEx)
Posted by: Wonkish Rogue at June 12, 2011 10:15 AM (QMHEx)
Posted by: dick at June 14, 2011 10:12 PM (1C5Qu)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2025 seconds, 174 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Hrothgar at June 12, 2011 06:28 AM (yrGif)