May 16, 2011
— Monty

Today is the big day, Morons: our national credit-card is officially maxed out. Maybe it was that jet-ski or chrome wheels for the hoopty that put us over....
Over the weekend IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn was arrested for sexual assault on a chambermaid in his New York City hotel. He was apprehended after he boarded a plane back to France. Strauss-Kahn was a leading contender for the presidency of France, so this news is proving to be a bit embarrassing for the French. Who knows what kind of disarray this will throw the IMF into -- and thus the pending bailouts of Greece, Ireland, and Portugal.
In the WSJ, Edward Lazear wonders why the job market feels so dismal.
We added jobs because hires exceeded separations, not because hiring increased. There were 4.7 million separations in February 2009. In March 2011 that number had fallen to 3.8 million. The fall in separations reflects a decline in layoffs, which went from 2.5 million per month in February 2009 to 1.6 million per month in March 2011. One small piece of good news is that the just-released April data showed hires up about 2% over last year's average and 12% above the low reached in January 2010.
Robert Samuelson posts a piece that will no doubt earn him the bitterness of many a retiree, "The Elderly Must Share the Financial Burden". Samuelson speaks with a bit more gravitas than I, since he is himself in his mid-60's. A good bit:
I have been urging higher eligibility ages and more means-testing for Social Security and Medicare for so long that I forget that many Americans still accept the outdated and propagandistic notion that old age automatically impoverishes people. Asks one reader: Who are these "well-off" elderly you keep writing about? The suggestion is that they are figments of my imagination, invented to justify harsh cutbacks in Social Security and Medicare on the needy.Just the opposite. We see every day that many people in their 60s and older live comfortably - and still would if they received a little less in Social Security and paid a little more for Medicare. The trouble is that what's intuitively obvious becomes lost in the political debate; it's overwhelmed by selective and self-serving statistics that cast almost everyone over 65 as being on the edge of insolvency. The result: Government over-subsidizes the affluent elderly. It transfers resources from the struggling young to the secure old.
And more good stuff:
The problems of old age (chronic illness, outliving savings, loneliness) are real, but age by itself is not an indicator of need. The blanket defense of existing Social Security and Medicare isn't "liberal" or "progressive." It's simply a political expedient with ruinous consequences. It enlarges budget deficits and forces an unfair share of adjustment - higher taxes, lower spending - on workers and other government programs. This is the morality of the ballot box.
Our current entitlement programs are basically a financial war on the young. Sooner or later, they're going to fight back. The above article also presents a needed corrective to the myth of the "starving senior". Yes, many seniors live in poverty -- but percentage-wise, those unfortunates are a small fraction of the whole. Most seniors live quite comfortably, and can well afford a reduction in their government welfare checks.
Andrew Ross Sorkin of the NYT examines how an income of $250K apparently is enough to make one "rich".
Who boned California? Among others, the teachers. This is true of almost every state in the union, of course, but especially so in the members of the Loyal Order of the Terminally Boned (LOTB).
[UPDATE 1]: More on hitting the debt-ceiling from the IBD.
[UPDATE 2]: The tortured body will surrender.
[UPDATE 3]: Paul Ryan game-texts Newt on XBox Live: LOL NEWTON U SUQ TEAM RYAN ROXXORZ C U L8R H8R.
How dare you serve me that sub-par store-brand cat food? Take that!

Posted by: Monty at
04:42 AM
| Comments (79)
Post contains 666 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Vic at May 16, 2011 04:46 AM (M9Ie6)
More from Weasel Zipper “Stimulus stole my job”!
LOL, I have been saying for a long time that the failed porkulous program had no impact on the economy because it only boosted welfare rolls and government jobs that would not have been lost anyway.
Posted by: Vic at May 16, 2011 04:49 AM (M9Ie6)
You have until 12/21/2012 to pay off the national credit card. There will be no extensions. Thank you.
yours truly,
Ah Puch
Posted by: mayan collection agency at May 16, 2011 04:51 AM (Y1DZt)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at May 16, 2011 04:52 AM (eOXTH)
Servile class distinction.
I saw Gateway Pundit's silly effort to supposedly give the "housekeeper" more class as a "chambermaid" by placing this 32-year-old woman within the feudal order's lower class as a servant who has no say regarding sexual or any abuse conducted by their elitist "betters".
The only question I had about her is whether she's a legal resident or another illegal alien employed with a union job that American citizens supposedly don't want.
But the story itself is ridiculous. The guy who buys any and every bitch, whore or "lady" he wants comes out of his bath butt naked and chases the hotel housekeeper down the $3K/night hotel hallway, dragging her back by her hair while she's kicking and screaming. But no witnesses mentioned in this Sarkozy campaign story.
Posted by: by any other name at May 16, 2011 04:55 AM (H+LJc)
We added jobs because hires exceeded separations, not because hiring increased.
Ding, ding, effing ding.
This statistical artifact is not "job creation" regardless of how many times the MFM tries to claim the recession is over.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at May 16, 2011 04:57 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: melvin at May 16, 2011 04:58 AM (3OCZw)
Chambermaids empty and clean chamberpots. There is nothing upscale about the position.
As for it being a Sarkozy story? Do you really think that Sarkozy has any pull with the NYPD?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 16, 2011 04:58 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 16, 2011 04:59 AM (Jq4xH)
Install Ryan's plan and stop ObamaCare. That's a start. All the rest is just bullshit.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at May 16, 2011 05:00 AM (0fzsA)
Lee Stranahan
Ron Replogle
The few lefties I can stand to read anymore. Pre 2003 I used to watch Daily Show, CNN, and MSNBC. I had some concerns about Iraq, but their eagerness to undermine the Military and Bush repulsed me and I haven't been back. Around that time lefty news went bias to Fraud and the commentators and bloggers go from angry to rabid.
Posted by: Shiggz at May 16, 2011 05:00 AM (mLAWK)
But no witnesses mentioned in this Sarkozy campaign story.
Yes, becasue attempted rapes have to have witnesses and every goddamend thing has to be a conspiracy of some sort.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at May 16, 2011 05:00 AM (B+qrE)
You are being generous. It isn't a statistical artifact; it is bald-faced manipulation of government collected data for political ends.
Government math: (-2) + 2 + (-1) + 1 + (-1) = 3
It's easy; just cancel the negative numbers!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 16, 2011 05:01 AM (LH6ir)
They used government money to prop up existing government jobs, create new union government jobs in schools in "minority" areas, and give subsidies to "green" money losing crap that ultimately went to China.
Now they want to talk about a "double dip" from the debt ceiling. What a pile of unmitigated gall. To have a double dip you have to have a recovery. Anyone who actually believes we have had a recovery is teh stupid. And the debt ceiling has zero to do with a double dip anyway.
Posted by: Vic at May 16, 2011 05:02 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: The Donald at May 16, 2011 05:03 AM (Jq4xH)
Posted by: It's Morning in the Pension Fund of America at May 16, 2011 05:03 AM (mKhMS)
My client did not sexually assault the chambermaid. She became infuriated after he refused to compensate her $100 for oral sex, and I will defend Dominique Strauss-Kahn against these scurrilous charges.
Posted by: Big John Pompadora, Attorney at May 16, 2011 05:03 AM (ndqJC)
Of course! I think it was the Freemasons, in conjunction with the operatives from the French Culinary Academy.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 16, 2011 05:03 AM (LH6ir)
It's an interesting theory -- completely detached from logic and rational analysis -- but still interesting.
The federal government can no longer add to its debts by borrowing more money from foreign bond purchasers, therefore the American economy will be damaged...by the lack of more debt.
Sure. Makes perfect sense.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 16, 2011 05:07 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 16, 2011 05:07 AM (Jq4xH)
Robert Samuelson joined The Washington Post on the business desk in 1969. After four years he left the paper to free-lance, and his articles were published by the Sunday Times of London, the Los Angeles Times, The New Republic and other publications. He became an economic reporter in 1976 for National Journal, where he began a weekly column. The Post started running the column in 1977. In 1984, Samuelson left National Journal and became a columnist for Newsweek.
Google him and you get the feeling that Mr. Samuelson leans left but occasionally writes articles that get the rights attention and applause but he's just chumming the water.
Next up: Paul Krugman says it's time to Kill Old People rein in the MORALLY WRONG spendthrift Seniors spending their poor, hard working children's money on doo-dads and gew-gaws like blood pressure medication and MRI's and all sorts of costly new-fangled unproven technologies that will just keep them alive for only few more years. (why bother, huh? Die now and get out of the way for your children and other people's children, granny!)
Eventually someone'll take the hint and start selling off their portfolio so those promoting doom and gloom can take their profits from selling short. Yeah, stock brokers and bankers win again.
Posted by: Doomsayer at May 16, 2011 05:09 AM (KWzOJ)
WTF are you talking about? I was speaking against Tim's call for debt celing increase because to not do it would cause a double dip, his words, not mine.
Posted by: Vic at May 16, 2011 05:11 AM (M9Ie6)
Finally we found out what can actually embarrass the French.
Posted by: TooCon at May 16, 2011 05:11 AM (TOWnk)
Posted by: Shiggz at May 16, 2011 05:12 AM (mLAWK)
Posted by: Sub-tard Goober at May 16, 2011 05:14 AM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: Herman Cain for President at May 16, 2011 05:15 AM (jx2j9)
Uh...yes. I was making fun of the stupid idea that decreasing our borrowing will hurt the economy.
Haven't had your coffee this morning?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 16, 2011 05:16 AM (LH6ir)
Strauss-Kahn would have been the socialist candidate in france, and he's running the IMF. sheesh
When asked for comment he said, "bitch didn't leave me a chocolate during turn downs."
Posted by: Ben at May 16, 2011 05:17 AM (wuv1c)
Omitting the snark, is there any real chance that retirement funds COULD be tapped, or is that just a distraction to disguise something more nefarious?
Posted by: irongrampa at May 16, 2011 05:22 AM (ud5dN)
When we reach the point that Ireland and Greece are in they will be looking for ANY out. But, my feeling is that they will continue to simply print money which is just creating more debt and monetizing it.
That way they can rob from everyone equally because a loaf of bread will cost $100 and that $100 of debt they have can be paid off with a tiny gram of gold.
Posted by: Vic at May 16, 2011 05:25 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Monty at May 16, 2011 05:27 AM (/0a60)
Nope, I was agreeing with you, but added some snark because you were being kind.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 16, 2011 05:28 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Monty at May 16, 2011 09:27 AM (/0a60)
I think that you are deluding yourself if you think that the debt can be retired, or even shrunk to a manageable % of the economy. As soon as the balance sheet shows any improvement the pols will spend again. We need radical restructuring of the political process to survive intact.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 16, 2011 05:31 AM (LH6ir)
So we're looking forward to life as post 1945 England, except we didn't just fight a massive war.
Great, decline there has been great.
Posted by: Ben at May 16, 2011 05:33 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Prof. Irwin Corey, Chair, Detroit School of Nuanced Economics at May 16, 2011 05:38 AM (K/USr)
Sooner or later, they're going to fight back.
How so, by voting for Leftists like Jugears because they're the cool and hip party that cares about the poor and saving the planet and all, and gives them free abortions?
Right
It's mainly the young in Greece and Britain who are rioting, and they're not rioting to cut entitlement programs
Posted by: kbdabear at May 16, 2011 05:38 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: Monty at May 16, 2011 09:27 AM (/0a60)
I think that you are deluding yourself if you think that the debt can be retired, or even shrunk to a manageable % of the economy. As soon as the balance sheet shows any improvement the pols will spend again. We need radical restructuring of the political process to survive intact.
Well we could return to the Constitution and let the States run pensions and insurance but since all problems come to DC to share the pain, I don't think we will see a return to Jeffersonian principles. Think we lost those for configuring ourselves to successfully destroy our enemies (i.e., Germany, Japan and USSR). Funny how we organizationally became what we sought to destroy.
Posted by: Sub-tard Goober at May 16, 2011 05:39 AM (Q5+Og)
Given what you just said, Monty, I gotta think grabbing retirement funds would be the tipping point, where the frustration,etc finally boiled over. Don't see how it could be spun as anything but outright robbery. It likely WOULD see a march on DC.
Posted by: irongrampa at May 16, 2011 05:40 AM (ud5dN)
Posted by: Monty at May 16, 2011 05:48 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: Baby Boomer with is hand in your wallet at May 16, 2011 05:49 AM (EhYdw)
Posted by: Baby Boomer with is hand in your wallet at May 16, 2011 05:55 AM (EhYdw)
Posted by: irongrampa at May 16, 2011 09:40 AM (ud5dN)
Sadly our side is just too law-abiding to ever rebel over issues of property theft. The only ones who would really be harmed are the productive people - and they're always the last to fight the state. They usually just lay down. Short of the government coming in and taking their house or kids, I suspect that those losing the 401k's and pensions and such will just end up bitterly accepting it.
I think the only way to prevent the state from taking all it can is to convince it that the effort is more trouble than it's worth. Like the illegals, for example. They have nothing. There is nothing but cost involved in policing them up. So the government ignores the problem. But you and I have stuff to take, and we have enough wealth that we can be threatened. If we on the Right want to have any hope of keeping our rights long-term, we will have to start forming street armies. Local, non-government militias of like-minded folk who stand ready to beat down the opposition - ala 1930's Europe. If you're organized and armed, the government will think twice. Otherwise, you're meat.
Posted by: Reactionary at May 16, 2011 05:57 AM (xUM1Q)
I don't see the problems as being lack of revenue, but out of control spending. Look at the sheer size of the economy--to imperil a country that produces in the trillions, by spending to this extent, is hard to comprehend. Never paid too much attention to the economy, being busy living, raising family and prepping for retirement, and to now see what faces us was a helluva jolt.
I'll do what I can to help fix it, but I WON'T allow that which we've attained legally, morally and ethically to be appropriated like that.
Posted by: irongrampa at May 16, 2011 05:58 AM (ud5dN)
So, is this the reason why their salaries were tripled and quadrupled?
Posted by: curious at May 16, 2011 06:00 AM (k1rwm)
And no taxing me on my job at all.
Posted by: Generation X-Y who wants his government handout with no taxes at May 16, 2011 06:03 AM (M9Ie6)
That's the thing that bugs me about any solution you hear, no matter how good. The fiscal shennanigans are a direct result of the political landscape, which is itself a product of what our society has become, which has its roots...?
By the time you get to anything resembling a foundation for the whole sad scenario, you find yourself wondering how we do anything other than chuck the whole thing and start fresh. And I'm not entirely clear how that could be done. And thus, the inevitability of boneage...
Posted by: DarkLord©, wondering where this raging migraine comes from at May 16, 2011 06:03 AM (GBXon)
Exactly! Cause we all know that rich famous guys who could get all the tail they want never rape anyone.
Posted by: kobe/Tyson/Roethlessburger at May 16, 2011 06:14 AM (ECt2r)
By the time you get to anything resembling a foundation for the whole sad scenario, you find yourself wondering how we do anything other than chuck the whole thing and start fresh. And I'm not entirely clear how that could be done.
Well, the Khmer Rouge had some interesting ideas about "Year Zero". Oops, I better not give our socialist friends any ideas (as if half of them aren't already wishing it).
Posted by: somebody else, not me at May 16, 2011 06:15 AM (7EV/g)
38 is there any real chance that retirement funds COULD be tapped
If by "retirement funds" you mean things like Roth IRAs, 401(k)'s, and so forth, then: maybe. They might try.
Posted by: Monty at May 16, 2011 09:27 AM (/0a60)
Honestly, that answer chilled me. But truthfully, we have been seeing stories in the news popping up occasionally about countries strapped for cash talking about nationalizing pensions. But hearing someone say the US government might go after Roth's, 401 Ks just struck that paranoid nerve with me because obviously the US government is the most powerful state on the planet. As someone else pointed out, the productive have other things to do than revolt.
In terms of the debt ceiling, if it's not raised, in what order are payments to people affected?
Bondholders always get paid, even if late. Do government agencies get hit first and have to shut down? Do Social Security checks not go out? Or is this a roller coaster ride where we'll just have to be surprised.
Posted by: Stateless Canadian Infidel at May 16, 2011 06:28 AM (Cm/jf)
Yes, it is a very murky and messy business with many tentacles. Progressivism, the mass schooling movement, the Woodrow Wilson Admin which resulted in a couple of bad amendments, Congress fixing its size sometime around WWII, a lot of Supreme Court rulings, the monopoly of liberals in culture, Democrat eleectoral shenanigans, and there are probably a whole bunch more that I have left out.
In short, our system was subverted, and our enemies have been working on subverting it since the beginning, but their efforts really took off with the Progressive movement.
Posted by: KG at May 16, 2011 06:45 AM (4L0zr)
It's not just a war on the young, it's a war on the thrifty and the hardworking.
Samuelson is specifically targeting THOSE people. Means-testing is a tax by another name.
"So, you put 100% of your money in? You paid your tax? In fact, you paid MORE tax than the other guys, since you worked harder and earned more?
Cool... now, since you are hard working and thrifty, you get less since you 'need' less."
Why not come out and say the famous "from everyone/to everyone..."
It's just "being fair" right?
"Fair" has become another term for "screw you."
Posted by: RobM1981 at May 16, 2011 06:59 AM (dFemX)
If by "retirement funds" you mean things like Roth IRAs, 401(k)'s, and so forth, then: maybe. They might try. The outcry would be enormous, but the debt is also enormous and something has got to give. There isn't enough money in the entire economy to fix the Big Three entitlement programs, though -- the best we can do is to delay the reckoning for some years.
I personally think we're going to see a horrendous combination of higher taxes (maybe a VAT) combined with benefit cuts (through means-testing and age-eligibility hikes). This all means that the Great Downturn will continue for many more years yet, until the debt-bolus has been passed.
Posted by: Monty at May 16, 2011 09:27 AM (/0a60)
The thing is, either full-on seizure of the retirement funds or a tax on them has been a popular option among members of the LOTB. Fausta caught Ireland putting a fresh 0.6% tax on private pensions after Britain did the same in 2008, while Argentina did the full seizure of pensions. Hell, it's been pushed by the Rats since at least 1993, when S(l)ick Willie wanted to seize 15% of every pension, 401(k) and IRA in a "one-time" tax.
Posted by: steveegg at May 16, 2011 07:00 AM (o44nj)
But no witnesses mentioned in this Sarkozy campaign story.
Yes, becasue attempted rapes have to have witnesses and every goddamend thing has to be a conspiracy of some sort.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at May 16, 2011 09:00 AM (B+qrE)
Yes, and there must be at least TWO other female witnesses...
Posted by: Obuma Bin DooDoo, Judge, Sharia Court at May 16, 2011 07:04 AM (NtXW4)
Bondholders always get paid, even if late. .
Posted by: Stateless Canadian Infidel at May 16, 2011 10:28 AM (Cm/jf)
REALLY?????
Posted by: GM Bondholder at May 16, 2011 07:05 AM (NtXW4)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at May 16, 2011 07:06 AM (npr0X)
Bondholders always get paid, even if late. .
Posted by: Stateless Canadian Infidel at May 16, 2011 10:28 AM (Cm/jf)
REALLY?????
Posted by: GM Bondholder at May 16, 2011 11:05 AM (NtXW4)
Hey, at least you got stock in Government Motors. We got well and truly boned by UAW Motors.
Posted by: Chrysler bondholder at May 16, 2011 07:14 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at May 16, 2011 07:15 AM (fjoLg)
Posted by: dvdivx at May 16, 2011 07:18 AM (rBW4C)
Posted by: steveegg at May 16, 2011 07:50 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Eater of cheese in a can. at May 16, 2011 07:55 AM (wzECP)
Posted by: ya2daup at May 16, 2011 07:59 AM (HrAUl)
Our Newest Exhibition: Hot Pink Flamingos
Should read: Hot, Pink Flamingos. Or Getting Hot, Pink Flamingos. Or Hotter, Pink Alamingos, or...
Posted by: Glacier Hugger at May 16, 2011 08:03 AM (wzECP)
Posted by: ya2daup at May 16, 2011 08:04 AM (HrAUl)
Posted by: Dominique Strauss-Kahn at May 16, 2011 08:12 AM (mQMnK)
Over the weekend, Strauss-Kahn was yanked from an Air France plane after the maid at the $3,000-per-night luxury Sofitel hotel identified him from a lineup.
Posted by: Miss Ballbreker at May 16, 2011 08:14 AM (wzECP)
Posted by: RobM1981 at May 16, 2011 10:59 AM (dFemX)
Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding!
We have a winner, folks!
Posted by: ya2daup at May 16, 2011 12:04 PM (HrAUl)
It is like robbing banks--you go where the money is.
I do wish they would just admit that it is "to each/from each" writ large and make it clear they have always intended to screw us over.
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 16, 2011 08:20 AM (yrGif)
Posted by: GM Bondholder at May 16, 2011 11:05 AM (NtXW4)
Sorry. You're right. Damn are you right.
Posted by: Stateless Canadian Infidel at May 16, 2011 08:39 AM (Cm/jf)
Posted by: CanaDave at May 16, 2011 10:28 AM (gVIyX)
Posted by: Jeannie at May 16, 2011 11:44 AM (GdalM)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1679 seconds, 207 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








That'll larn 'em good!
Posted by: rdbrewer at May 16, 2011 04:44 AM (h614z)