October 24, 2011

This Guy Right Here Says America Is About To Rebound Like Crazy
— Ace

I don't believe him. I side with Monty and DOOM.

But it's nice to hear some optimism.

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard offers a lot of it.

He starts off discussing the America's increasing energy production through frakking. Then he turns to manufacture.

Meanwhile, the China-US seesaw is about to swing the other way. Offshoring is out, 're-inshoring' is the new fashion.

"Made in America, Again" - a report this month by Boston Consulting Group - said Chinese wage inflation running at 16pc a year for a decade has closed much of the cost gap. China is no longer the "default location" for cheap plants supplying the US.

A "tipping point" is near in computers, electrical equipment, machinery, autos and motor parts, plastics and rubber, fabricated metals, and even furniture.
"A surprising amount of work that rushed to China over the past decade could soon start to come back," said BCG's Harold Sirkin.

The gap in "productivity-adjusted wages" will narrow from 22pc of US levels in 2005 to 43pc (61pc for the US South) by 2015. Add in shipping costs, reliability woes, technology piracy, and the advantage shifts back to the US.

The list of "repatriates" is growing. Farouk Systems is bringing back assembly of hair dryers to Texas after counterfeiting problems; ET Water Systems has switched its irrigation products to California; Master Lock is returning to Milwaukee, and NCR is bringing back its ATM output to Georgia. NatLabs is coming home to Florida.

Boston Consulting expects up to 800,000 manufacturing jobs to return to the US by mid-decade, with a multiplier effect creating 3.2m in total. This would take some sting out of the Long Slump.

If Chinese labor became too expensive, wouldn't out-sourcers turn to the newest cheap-labor country? It's not like China is the only country capable of producing widgets.

Craziest of all, he notes that America is the only Western economy with a fertility rate above replacement level, and so could, conceivably, grow its way out of debt.

So there you go. Some un-Doom.

Posted by: Ace at 09:49 AM | Comments (152)
Post contains 359 words, total size 2 kb.

1 the president is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure

Posted by: phoenixgirl at work at October 24, 2011 09:51 AM (s+J9D)

2 SCOAMF!

Posted by: Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure! at October 24, 2011 09:51 AM (e8T35)

3 could soon start to come back

Now if we only had a business environment that wasn't openly hostile to making an honest profit. That could might transition to a will.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at October 24, 2011 09:52 AM (0q2P7)

4 Obama is a hero and slayer of tyrants. The Dow is soaring, all is well.

Posted by: kansas at October 24, 2011 09:53 AM (mka2b)

5

If Chinese labor became too expensive, wouldn't out-sourcers turn to the newest cheap-labor country?

This is the "race to the bottom" dilemma. Hopefully, manufacturers would tire of the issues rushing around to save 30 cents an hour and simply return home. And, of course if China does teeter and wages start to slide, manufacturers could overlook a little counterfeiting here and there.

Here is where I diatribe on the minimum wage and how it slows the return of manufacturing. That is because I hate the workers and am a wrecker.

Posted by: spongeworthy at October 24, 2011 09:53 AM (puy4B)

6
bollocks!

There is not one single indicator that points positive.

Posted by: soothsayer at October 24, 2011 09:54 AM (sqkOB)

7 This post violates the Law of the Conservation of DOOM. Five yard penalty, repeat second down.

Posted by: Vote joncelli/Cthulhu 2012 at October 24, 2011 09:55 AM (RD7QR)

8 ...wouldn't out-sourcers turn to the newest cheap-labor country?

Heh, yep.  It's not like that hasn't happened in the past.  If you are like me, once I find a shirt or pants maker for dress clothes that I like, I tend to buy from them over and over through the years.  Go and look at the location of the "Made in X" and see how it follows the rise of the cheap labor markets vs. the year bought.

Posted by: dogfish at October 24, 2011 09:56 AM (NuPNl)

9
How hard is 16-18% unemployment to understand?

No jobs = No money = No expansion in GDP

And this cycle feeds on itself.

Posted by: soothsayer at October 24, 2011 09:56 AM (sqkOB)

10 if only birthrates were the determining factor...

Posted by: shoey at October 24, 2011 09:57 AM (m6OUa)

11 Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.

And this kind of news could explain why everything still looks all doom-y but the stock market keeps going up.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 24, 2011 09:57 AM (8y9MW)

12

"The gap in "productivity-adjusted wages" will narrow from 22pc of US levels in 2005 to 43pc (61pc for the US South) by 2015. Add in shipping costs, reliability woes, technology piracy, and the advantage shifts back to the US."

In other words, the Chinese workers are lazy, incompetent crooks. Now that they are also becoming greedy, they are almost as unpalatable as American union workers.  Hooray!

Posted by: wooga at October 24, 2011 09:58 AM (vjyZP)

13 So instead of "Spending our way out of debt" as Obama has advocated, the new mantra is to "F*** our way out of debt"?


I'm in!

(and I mean that in every way that it can be applied!)

Posted by: Kasper Hauser at October 24, 2011 09:58 AM (HqpV0)

14

Draw a Venn diagram.  Label the first circle "Fertile Americans."  Label the second one "Productive Americans."

The two circles are still touching, but their commonality is quickly shrinking.

Posted by: Noted 7th-c. throwback Keith Ellison at October 24, 2011 09:58 AM (I2LwF)

15

No depression or recession lasts forever; eventually there'll be some combination of events and circumstances that'll produce growth, by accident or design.

It may not pleasant, and it may take a hundred years, but it'll happen. 

Probably.

 

Posted by: Lance McCormick at October 24, 2011 09:58 AM (zgHLA)

16 If Chinese labor became too expensive, wouldn't out-sourcers turn to the newest cheap-labor country?

Well, yes, but (don't look now) all things considered: that's us, after China.  Well, maybe ROK, but only maybe.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 24, 2011 09:59 AM (8y9MW)

17 Assembly of hair-dryers... Ok, better than nothing.

Posted by: t-bird at October 24, 2011 09:59 AM (FcR7P)

18 I want what this dude is smoking.

Posted by: mpfs at October 24, 2011 09:59 AM (iYbLN)

19 Ambrose evens-Pritchard, what a fucktard. Same guy that claims OK city was an FBI plot. Jesus, who can't get a mention here.

Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 24, 2011 09:59 AM (ZDUD4)

20 spongeworthy, I donÂ’t think itÂ’s so much the 30 cents an hour, or even the $8 an hour, but the difference in how much non-core work businesses have to do in order to deal with the regulations involved in hiring domestically. Everything from complicated taxes, the complicated health takeover and all of the other mandates the government puts onto employers; to all of the lawsuits waiting to happen, are all liabilities that make overseas employees more desirable than they would otherwise be.

Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at October 24, 2011 09:59 AM (QF8uk)

21 I don't think we're jumping into a huge recovery, but I do see some companies "re-onshoring". Some will jump to other countries, but I think they're beginning to realize that wages are shooting up faster each time in every country they off-shore too.

Posted by: Darren O'Daly at October 24, 2011 09:59 AM (uI+nn)

22
Remember when the experts predicted a fantastic 3rd, 4th qtrs in 2009?

And then predicted a booming 2010?

Our economy is shell-shocked. Every time it tries to correct itself, the government interferes and meddles and beats the shit out of it. Now it's in a coma.

Posted by: soothsayer at October 24, 2011 10:00 AM (sqkOB)

23 "Rebound" .  Snow White.  Seven Dwarfs.  Hansel und Gretel

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

---What?  What ain't no country I ever heard of.  Do they speak English in What?--

Posted by: SantaRosaStan, keeping it Real at October 24, 2011 10:00 AM (UqKQV)

24
if only birthrates were the determining factor...

Posted by: shoey at October 24, 2011 01:57 PM (m6OUa)





No kidding. If birthrates were the main determining factor then the Islamic world would be rolling in industrial manufacturing money rather than just figuring out the flush toilet.


Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 24, 2011 10:00 AM (G+B5p)

25

If Chinese labor became too expensive, wouldn't out-sourcers turn to the newest cheap-labor country? It's not like China is the only country capable of producing widgets

not really, china backed up it's cheap labor with no regulations and unlimited cheap power. Most cheap labor countries don't have a big check book like China to fund building of new power plants or subsidise the cost. China also attracts a lot of manufacturing by demanding that companies buying rare earth metals manufacture in China. We have two new rare earth mines coming on line now. Shipping is also a problem in manufacturing overseas.

States with right to work laws and reasonable regulations will start attracting manufacturing back here. The feds could help by lowering corporate income tax.

Posted by: robtr at October 24, 2011 10:00 AM (MtwBb)

26 Oh so companies don't like the fact the the Chicoms don't respect intellectual property and copyrights? Gee shock. And yeah lets drill baby drill Oh and I upgraded to Lion on my Mac and been having some problems..anyone else?

Posted by: nevergiveup at October 24, 2011 10:01 AM (i6RpT)

27 increasing energy production through frakking

Oh, I'm all up for frakking our way to energy independence. It'll help with that low birth rate, too.

From DOOM to BOOM.

Posted by: Benson at October 24, 2011 10:01 AM (qzcNU)

28
Nice to think we're not doomed. 

On the other hand, nope.  Too much debt.  Far too much stupidity.

Posted by: Wodeshed at October 24, 2011 10:01 AM (LEcV+)

29
♪ Don't stop thinking about tomorrow

Posted by: soothsayer at October 24, 2011 10:02 AM (sqkOB)

30 could soon start to come back,
The gap... will narrow...  by 2015.
Boston Consulting expects... mid-decade


lots of could soons and maybes in there.

Posted by: The Great Satan's Ghost at October 24, 2011 10:02 AM (l8iDY)

31 The 'news' is getting more and more surreal; hence any commentary about 'news' becomes more and more surreal.  Vicious cycle

It's not just the economy which has fallen, and can't get up;  reality, also

Posted by: SantaRosaStan, keeping it Real at October 24, 2011 10:02 AM (UqKQV)

32 Jesus, who can't get a mention here.

Yea, I meant to talk to Ace about that.

Posted by: Jesus at October 24, 2011 10:02 AM (136wp)

33 32, LOL

Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 24, 2011 10:03 AM (ZDUD4)

34 I can see some high tech coming back, esp. communications devices if industry picks up on the controlled cradel to grave firmware requirements that government is moving towards.  But hair dryers - they will move down the chain to indonesia or africa.

Posted by: Jean at October 24, 2011 10:03 AM (WkuV6)

35 Craziest of all, he notes that America is the only Western economy with a fertility rate above replacement level, and so could, conceivably, grow its way out of debt.

That's if we could conceivably get rid of the deficit. So let me get this straight, we have a deficit driven mostly by entitlements to individuals, and, genius boy here thinks having more individuals solves the problem? Hey I'm not a mathematician but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night. If your problem is giving money to people, doesn't having more people make that worse, not better? Ok I know that growth at a certain rate makes it so there are more youngsters than oldsters who actually get federal entitlements so it does help some. What growth rate would we have to have to make SS/MC break even? Is there any hope of achieving that growth rate short of banning contraceptives, abortion, and making Tuesdays official "Bang a Stranger Day"?

Reasonably accepting that our debt problem can only be solved by restructuring entitlements, what objective, F* I'll even accept subjective, evidence can you provide to suggest some politician might actually be able to accomplish this before our debt destroys our currency?

I WANT TO BELIEVE! Help me out!

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at October 24, 2011 10:03 AM (0q2P7)

Posted by: Chinese Manufacturers at October 24, 2011 10:04 AM (LEcV+)

37 If the Republicans win in 2012, repeal all the regulations the Dems have forced on this country, get spending under control, repeal Obamacare, and a few other things I can't bring to mind at this very moment, then yes, America will take off.

Is that what the guy had in mind? Probably not.

Posted by: KG at October 24, 2011 10:04 AM (LD21B)

38
So does this means the stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure will take the credit and be re-elected?

Posted by: YIKES! at October 24, 2011 10:05 AM (70TBD)

39
hahahahaha @ your puny hopes for recovery

I am the Juggernaut, bitttttchhhhhhhh!

Posted by: Looming Pension Crisis at October 24, 2011 10:05 AM (sqkOB)

40
Dude with a hyphenated name turns out to be a fuckstick retard.....how surprising.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 24, 2011 10:05 AM (G+B5p)

41 I agree with him. In Obama's attempt to destroy America, he sabotaged the oil and coal industries. If the next president took away the worst regulations crippling our energy sector, jobs and the economy would take off like wildfire.

Posted by: Village Idiot at October 24, 2011 10:05 AM (utXSy)

42

The long term demographic problems and decay in innovation are universal, but its true that the US might come out comparatively pretty good if we play our cards right.

Meaning no SCOAMF.

Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at October 24, 2011 10:06 AM (epBek)

43
Recovery?

hahahahahaha!

Posted by: Your Current Course under the Obama admin at October 24, 2011 10:06 AM (sqkOB)

44

To go to another cheap labor country you have to have stability and security.  China could offer that.  I don't think there are many other places that can do the same.  I can't think of any place in Africa or any Islamic country that would qualify. on that last point.  Cheap labor?  Heck yeah.  Stable and secure? Heck no.

Posted by: Mikey NTH at October 24, 2011 10:06 AM (hLRSq)

45 "Made in America, Again" - a report this month by Boston Consulting Group - said Chinese wage inflation running at 16pc a year for a decade has closed much of the cost gap. China is no longer the "default location" for cheap plants supplying the US.

This is a strawman argument. Business leaders have been saying for decades that "wages" have not been the driving force for pushing industry out of the country. The high cost of regulations is what is killing buisness.

But even at that, if you go back and look at total manufacturing before the great collapse in 2008 the US was beating the crap out of China. It wasn't even close.

Posted by: Vic at October 24, 2011 10:07 AM (YdQQY)

46 Boston Consulting expects up to 800,000 manufacturing jobs to return to the US by mid-decade

that like 6 months worth of jobs in... 5 yrs?

Posted by: The Great Satan's Ghost at October 24, 2011 10:07 AM (l8iDY)

47 If by "about to" he means "starting in January 2013", I'll buy it.

Posted by: Ian S. at October 24, 2011 10:07 AM (tqwMN)

48 Is that what the guy had in mind? Probably not.

Possibly. He was a big critic of Clinton and has written books for Regnery. An opponent of the EU mega-state, too.

Posted by: Benson at October 24, 2011 10:07 AM (qzcNU)

49 In some regards, he is correct -- there is substantial opportunity and resources here in the US. If we shipped our entire political class off to the moon, it's a sure thing that people would apply themselves to improving their lot and the nation would prosper.

Unfortunately, this political class is in the position of a parasite that is killing its host. There's no way to "grow our way out of the problem" so long as it continues to prey.

Posted by: cthulhu at October 24, 2011 10:08 AM (kaalw)

50
I will be fully implemented in 2013.

I will kill 1/6 of your economy, puny humans.


Posted by: Obamacare at October 24, 2011 10:08 AM (sqkOB)

51 come out comparatively pretty good if we play our cards right. Meaning no SCOAMF. Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at October 24, 2011 02:06 PM (epBek) If Europe implodes and the China bubble pops, we only need to compete with India and Brazil.

Posted by: CAC at October 24, 2011 10:08 AM (JEVge)

52 "The Vatican called on Monday for the establishment of a “global public authority” and a “central world bank” to rule over financial institutions that have become outdated and often ineffective in dealing fairly with crises. " Didn't we see this movie? GodFather 3?

Posted by: nevergiveup at October 24, 2011 10:08 AM (i6RpT)

53 Not to belabor the point (while all this theoretical talk of rebound is nice and all), I think it's really just a distraction from the fact that Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.

Posted by: Clutch Cargo at October 24, 2011 10:09 AM (Qxdfp)

54

Craziest of all, he notes that America is the only Western economy with a fertility rate above replacement level, and so could, conceivably, grow its way out of debt.

He must be working off some old figures. ....They were talking about the birth rate here, last week on FoxBusiness....and how the US birth rate has gone down since the downturn in jobs and the suckage of the economy.

 

Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at October 24, 2011 10:09 AM (Jd1fD)

55 But even at that, if you go back and look at total manufacturing before the great collapse in 2008 the US was beating the crap out of China. It wasn't even close.

That was before "Energy Prices Will Necessarily Skyrocket" SCOAMF.
I've put this out many times before. The reason US manufacturing is largely tolerant of US wages is because of US efficiency, e.g. automation. This makes a lot of labor in the US done by machines. Machines want energy. Energy goes up, our cheap labor (robots) prices go up.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at October 24, 2011 10:09 AM (0q2P7)

56 'Hansel' is the kiddie name for Hans, btw.  Like 'Johnny' for John

and yes, until clusterFuck gets out of office, we're doomed.

Posted by: SantaRosaStan, keeping it Real at October 24, 2011 10:09 AM (UqKQV)

57

I sure as hell hope a rebound is in the works.  But it won't take off until the regulatory burden is lifted, and Obama's war on Cheap Energy ended.

America WILL rebound.  When Obama is gone.

 

Posted by: CoolCzech at October 24, 2011 10:10 AM (Iaxlk)

58 High birth rates=progress.
This is why India is the techno-utopia it is.
It's also why Afghanistan and Haiti produce so many more inventions per capita than non-fertile backwards country like Japan.

Oh wait. Never mind.

Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 24, 2011 10:10 AM (QcFbt)

59 40 Dude with a hyphenated name turns out to be a fuckstick retard.....how surprising. Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 24, 2011 02:05 You know I was going to go that route but you never know who has an hyphenated name. But yeah, it's a give-a-way.

Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 24, 2011 10:10 AM (ZDUD4)

60
Of course we are on the precipice of a boom!

Why, all we need to do is raid more companies such as Gibson Guitars.

And punish the job creators.

And make more "good bets" on companies such as Solyndra.

And hire more teachers!

Posted by: Soothsayer at October 24, 2011 10:10 AM (sqkOB)

61 India
China
VietNam

Posted by: James Loughner at October 24, 2011 10:10 AM (e8kgV)

62
He must be working off some old figures. ....They were talking about the birth rate here, last week on FoxBusiness....and how the US birth rate has gone down since the downturn in jobs and the suckage of the economy.


Que?

Posted by: Illegal Immigrants at October 24, 2011 10:11 AM (LEcV+)

63 This is why India is the techno-utopia it is. Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 24, 2011 02:10 PM (QcFbt) Due to low regulation, it is becoming that, rapidly. Ironically its birthrate is shrinking too. We wasted all our time kissing up to the ChiComs. Should've partnered with the Indians if anyone.

Posted by: CAC at October 24, 2011 10:11 AM (JEVge)

64
Seems Mr. Ambrose Evans-Pritchard has something in common with Newsweek.

Posted by: YIKES! at October 24, 2011 10:12 AM (70TBD)

65

If Chinese labor became too expensive, wouldn't out-sourcers turn to the newest cheap-labor country?

The problem is finding a country with a large supply of HIGH-IQ low-wage labor.

In the 1960s & 1970s, that was Japan.

In the 1970s & 1980s, that was South Korea & Taiwan.

In the 1990s & 2000s, that was Mainland China.

About the only remaining country with a known supply of [very] HIGH-IQ  and [extremely] low-wage workers would be North Korea.

Everywhere else has been "discovered".

[BTW, the other thing that's about to be "discovered" is just how precious HIGH-IQ workers really are, especially when they stop making babies and their fertility rates drop to extinction levels...]

 

Posted by: Malia -N- Sasha at October 24, 2011 10:12 AM (M1IO5)

66

"It's not like China is the only country capable of producing widgets."

They make a shit load of computing stuff.

We educate a whole lot of Chinese here in our Universities.

 

Posted by: Rev Dr E Buzz Elitist at October 24, 2011 10:12 AM (iZRbK)

67 Machines want energy. Energy goes up, our cheap labor (robots) prices go up.

Don't you know Skynet is listening? If it knows energy is getting expensive? ROBOT UPRISING?

Posted by: The Robot Devil at October 24, 2011 10:13 AM (136wp)

68 40 Dude with a hyphenated name turns out to be a fuckstick retard.....how surprising. Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 24, 2011 02:05 I STRONGLY resemble that remark and will be sending you a letter of remonstrance FORTHWITH.

Posted by: joncelli Doommonger-Frakstick III at October 24, 2011 10:13 AM (RD7QR)

69 I bet this guy is the same guy that coined Sheriff Joe's phrase for him - Recovery Summer.

Posted by: Roy at October 24, 2011 10:13 AM (VndSC)

70

 Cheap labor? Heck yeah. Stable and secure? Heck no.

Posted by: Mikey NTH at October 24, 2011 02:06 PM (hLRSq)

 

This.  The world has an abudance of cheap labor, but a shortage of clean water, good roads, political stability, law and order, etc.  Plus, the cost of migrating production facilities around is not zero, especially when you consider the bribes involved.  Then there's the damage to your equipment when it is shipped, requalification of the process once it's in the new place, finding people in the West who are willing to go to these hell holes, etc.

The costs of doing business in China have been underestimated for a long time.  Losing the New China is a book by an American business expat who worked in China for quite a while and saw what goes on.  Any round eyed barbarians who have pull with the home office are quickly co-opted into making the Chinese enterprise look good, via access to dope, chicks, and general sleeze and easy living.  (I wish I could get a gig like that!)  You can't trust the numbers coming from the Chinese branch office.

Posted by: Reactionary at October 24, 2011 10:14 AM (xUM1Q)

71

And China has been outsourcing to Vietnam for quite awhile. We may be able to employ some Mexicans yet, and give them a reason to stay at home, if we could just figure out a way to topple their corrupt narco-government without creating a Communist monster to our South. On the other hand, is there really any reason to anticipate that the greatest technological country, us, would not use technology, and I mean principally robotics, to fill vast portions of this manufacturing up-tick. Why would we continue to use inefficient, unionized, call-in-sick workers when we can get a much greater return on investment from smarter, easily trained, healthcare-free machines. Ooops! Guess what China will do to lower it's costs of labor. Yeah, I'm with you .... Doom!

Posted by: Errol at October 24, 2011 10:14 AM (vewos)

72 69 I bet this guy is the same guy that coined Sheriff Joe's phrase for him - Recovery Summer.

Yea, I wanted to go with, "Why Do Ice Cubes Melt in July?"

Posted by: Joe "Plugs" Biden at October 24, 2011 10:15 AM (136wp)

73

what does swearing in the future have to do with energy production?

Posted by: Ben at October 24, 2011 10:15 AM (wuv1c)

74 If not for AIDS, Botswana would be the wealthiest nation PER CAPITA south of Switzerland, east of the US and West of Bahrain. Shit comes up.

Posted by: CAC at October 24, 2011 10:16 AM (JEVge)

75
Guess what China will do to lower it's costs of labor.

Yeah, really. This buffoon talks as if China doesn't have complete control over it's labor force.

Posted by: Soothsayer at October 24, 2011 10:16 AM (sqkOB)

76 73 what does swearing in the future have to do with energy production? Posted by: Ben at October 24, 2011 02:15 PM (wuv1c) It's what happens if you drop a solar panel on your foot.

Posted by: joncelli Doommonger-Frakstick III at October 24, 2011 10:16 AM (RD7QR)

77 "Within 5 years or so", that timeframe makes me leery. Close enough to get your interest but far enough away to avoid blame if it doesn't happen.

Posted by: Heorot at October 24, 2011 10:17 AM (Nq/UF)

78 He's just an Obama voter that's looking to turn the tables back to the positive to mien fuhrer..

Posted by: © Sponge at October 24, 2011 10:17 AM (UK9cE)

79

>>If Europe implodes and the China bubble pops, we only need to compete with India and Brazil.

 

How does one compete with Brazil? They DQ themselves every couple of years.

 

Posted by: Ben at October 24, 2011 10:17 AM (wuv1c)

80

They were talking about the birth rate here, last week on FoxBusiness....and how the US birth rate has gone down since the downturn in jobs and the suckage of the economy.

You have to include Black & Mexican Indian fertility rates to account for the [sub-replacement-level] White fertility rate.

Without Blacks & Mexican Indians, you have Blue State White DEMs with European-style fertility rates [sub-1.50] and Red State White GOPers just struggling to stay near replacement level [> 2.00].

 

 

 

 

Posted by: Malia -N- Sasha at October 24, 2011 10:17 AM (M1IO5)

81 What pray tell does the phrase "manufacturing jobs" mean?

Posted by: Barack Hussein ("Rambo") Obama, J.D. at October 24, 2011 10:18 AM (f8XyF)

82

Lest we forget.  Companies in the USA have been hoarding a shit-load of cash and capital since the SCOAMF and the dems came to power.  There's a lot of money just waiting to be re-invested into businesses.

Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 24, 2011 10:18 AM (UNB7o)

83 Don't you know Skynet is listening? If it knows energy is getting expensive? ROBOT UPRISING?

Posted by: The Robot Devil at October 24, 2011 02:13 PM (136wp)


No machine oil, no peace!

Posted by: @OccupyDeathStar at October 24, 2011 10:18 AM (lLKjJ)

84 Fortunately, This will help Romney the most.

Posted by: The Committee to Elect Jeb Bush in 2016, K. Rove, Chairman at October 24, 2011 10:19 AM (SSm72)

85
Skynet is my bitch.

Posted by: Obamacare at October 24, 2011 10:19 AM (Qxdfp)

86

>>>Lest we forget. Companies in the USA have been hoarding a shit-load of cash and capital since the SCOAMF and the dems came to power. There's a lot of money just waiting to be re-invested into businesses.

A lot of that money is overseas and would like to come how if not for the repatriation taxes.

Posted by: Ben at October 24, 2011 10:19 AM (wuv1c)

87 i do a lot of business with China and it is getting increasingly more difficult to deal with them.  prices are higher, and their need to increase wages to reduce conflict with the people and their desire for more environmentally friendly manufacturing will lead to more business moving back here.  Just a question of how much.

Posted by: dave clark at October 24, 2011 10:19 AM (nhEck)

88 How does one compete with Brazil?

By not looking at their cheerleaders.

LOOK AWAY!!!!!

Posted by: EC at October 24, 2011 10:21 AM (GQ8sn)

89 "So let me get this straight, we have a deficit driven mostly by entitlements to individuals, and, genius boy here thinks having more individuals solves the problem?" It does if you're planning on fucking the next generation.

Posted by: Warden at October 24, 2011 10:22 AM (KulgD)

90
I almost forgot!

Obama decreed the job-market to improve. So, yeah, good times are ahead.

This right here is sound economic policy:

"It is time for companies to step up [and hire]."

-President Nifty Slogan
May 2011

Posted by: Soothsayer at October 24, 2011 10:22 AM (sqkOB)

91 We are going to need three-a-day Doom!s to offset this.

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at October 24, 2011 10:23 AM (D5iHx)

92 I don't believe him. I side with Monty and DOOM.

I'm a bit in the middle.  I  think there is a very slim possibility of recovery - the absolutely critical first step is getting rid of Darth Zero - but that will not be enough, and I fear Romney will fall short. 

Nothing less than full embracing of conservatism (economic and social) will save the Republic (what is left of it).  With that kind of freedom, we can find a way out.  But the least little bit of "social engineering" will lead to the inevitable ascendency of the Dark Side.  Re-election of Obama will hasten the end, but only a return to full economic and social freedom will prevent it.

Posted by: Roger at October 24, 2011 10:23 AM (tAwhy)

93 By not looking at their cheerleaders.

LOOK AWAY!!!!!

Posted by: EC at October 24, 2011 02:21 PM (GQ8sn)

Too late!

Posted by: The Robot Devil at October 24, 2011 10:23 AM (136wp)

Posted by: laceyunderalls at October 24, 2011 10:24 AM (pLTLS)

95 One of the Ten Million Great Ironies of the modern world is that the left bitches *endlessly* about how Western Imperial Powers are raising the standard of living in third world countries, like the dastardly dastards we are. Wait, what? Seriously, are they saying people's lives, in the aggregate, are worse in India and China now that we've invested hundreds of billions or more and their wages and standards of living have risen? What are we supposed to do to satisfy the rabid left, other than cease existing?

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of The 1% at October 24, 2011 10:24 AM (bxiXv)

96 Ben,

They have DQ in Brazil?  I did not know Dairy Queen was popular there.  Ya learn something new everyday.

Posted by: mpfs at October 24, 2011 10:25 AM (iYbLN)

97 What are we supposed to do to satisfy the rabid left, other than cease existing? Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of The 1% at October 24, 2011 02:24 PM (bxiXv) That is the whole point for them, I thought.

Posted by: CAC at October 24, 2011 10:25 AM (JEVge)

98 dude's name is Ambrose and he uses a hyphen.  Thats all I needed to see.

Posted by: California Red at October 24, 2011 10:26 AM (7uWb8)

99 But the least little bit of "social engineering" will lead to the inevitable ascendency of the Dark Side. Posted by: Roger at October 24, 2011 02:23 PM (tAwhy) Hey.

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at October 24, 2011 10:26 AM (bxiXv)

100 The stock market will really soar the more Obama looks like a one-term-wonder, and the more peope get a belly-full of his OWS "base".

Posted by: sherlock at October 24, 2011 10:26 AM (JYBAr)

101 96 Ben, They have DQ in Brazil? I did not know Dairy Queen was popular there. Ya learn something new everyday. Posted by: mpfs at October 24, 2011 02:25 PM (iYbLN) There's probably a joke about big butts to be made here but I'm too tired to think of it.

Posted by: joncelli Doommonger-Frakstick III at October 24, 2011 10:27 AM (RD7QR)

102 But, but, there will be a United States of Europe!  Don't let your hearts be troubled, all is well!  *sarc*

New euro 'empire' plot by Brussels

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 24, 2011 10:27 AM (9hSKh)

103 I've read in the tech media that many smaller companies are moving back to the US because the costs are rising, and if you're not a mega company like Intel or Apple that can guarantee volume and dictate terms, they'll shunt you to their second rate manufacturers who can't handle the volume, screw with the quality control, and steal the intellectual property (like via the "gray shifts"). So when the "hassel" factor is weighed in, China becomes too expensive. 
I'd like to know where this guy thinks we'll get energy independence given our current administration. I guess he figures Barry's 1 termer and the next Prez won't be so drill phobic.

Posted by: Iblis at October 24, 2011 10:31 AM (9221z)

104 Good points about IQ.

China isn't a manufacturing power-house because it has cheap peasant labor. It's because the cheap peasant labor has universal literacy and an average IQ north of 100.

And yeah, North Korea has the most underachieving population on the planet. Getting rid of the Kim family would do more to help the planet than getting rid of, say, Mugabe.

India, on the other hand, has an average IQ lower than Mexico. Widespread malnutrition accounts for some of that. But that can't be fixed overnight. Once you malnourish a child the lower IQ is permanent. Eating well as a teen-ager or adult can't make up those lost IQ points.

Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 24, 2011 10:31 AM (QcFbt)

105 dude's name is Ambrose and he uses a hyphen.  Thats all I needed to see.

Posted by: California Red at October 24, 2011 02:26 PM (7uWb



What's that supposed to mean?!?


Posted by: Marcos Ambrose - Driver #9 DeWalt Ford at October 24, 2011 10:31 AM (UK9cE)

106 I read this and think of the penguin in Rudolph the Red Nose Reindeer. Remember the sound it made? It sounded like: "SCOAMF! SCOAMF! SCOAMF!"

Posted by: PugBoo TeaPug Jihadist Mastermind at October 24, 2011 10:33 AM (PmMQb)

107 There's probably a joke about big butts to be made here but I'm too tired to think of it.

Posted by: joncelli Doommonger-Frakstick III at October 24, 2011 02:27 PM (RD7QR)



I'm a fan of the ass.  I'm an ass man.......go on.

Posted by: Arnold Schwarzenegger at October 24, 2011 10:33 AM (UK9cE)

108 quality control... china haz not...  especially in terms of metalurgy...

Posted by: phreshone at October 24, 2011 10:35 AM (T3vCe)

109 About the only remaining country with a known supply of [very] HIGH-IQ and [extremely] low-wage workers would be North Korea.
And they'll work for grass clippings. Hmm. We can start a product called Soylent Green® to pay them.

Posted by: andycanuck at October 24, 2011 10:36 AM (OKhgI)

110

Sure is a glass half full kinda guy.

 

Posted by: dananjcon at October 24, 2011 10:37 AM (8ieXv)

111 "If the Republicans win in 2012, repeal all the regulations the Dems have forced on this country, get spending under control, repeal Obamacare, and a few other things..."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!1!

Listen, I'm not going to do anything crazy like that when I become President. For one thing, we have a serious healthcare problem in this country. I started to fix it with RomneyCare, and I intend to do everything in my power to give ObamaCare the necessary tweaks to make it the best provider of healthcare in the universe!

Posted by: Mitt Romney, Your Inevitable Nominee at October 24, 2011 10:37 AM (/AHDz)

112 Tell 'em, Mitt!

*swallow*

Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at October 24, 2011 10:38 AM (/AHDz)

113

I work for a large corporation in supply chain logistics and we have been bringing back our "china" business for the last couple of years. Poor quality and ever increasing costs are slowly forcing business back home.

Posted by: Hey You! at October 24, 2011 10:41 AM (XGLac)

114 I like this guy's thinking.  But the time frame, 2015(?), may be just a bit optimistic. I'd say give it a 4 year term.

Posted by: Fritz at October 24, 2011 10:42 AM (FabC8)

115
re: the topless tarts

OWSAttentionWhore

Posted by: Soothsayer at October 24, 2011 10:44 AM (sqkOB)

116
OccupyMyAbsenteeFather'sConscience

Posted by: Soothsayer at October 24, 2011 10:45 AM (sqkOB)

117
OccupyDaddyDoesn'tLoveMe

Posted by: Soothsayer at October 24, 2011 10:45 AM (sqkOB)

118
OccupyLookAtMe!LookAtMe!

Posted by: Soothsayer at October 24, 2011 10:45 AM (sqkOB)

119
I have boobies!

I am raising awareness for important causes that I cannot explain!

Posted by: Soothsayer at October 24, 2011 10:46 AM (sqkOB)

120

I work for a large corporation in supply chain logistics and we have been bringing back our "china" business for the last couple of years. Poor quality and ever increasing costs are slowly forcing business back home.

Posted by: Hey You! at October 24, 2011 02:41 PM (XGLac)

 

I believe it.  You should see the Chinese-built molding tooling that our customers transfer into our shop.  It's a disgrace.  They can't even drill and tap bolt holes that are perpendicular to the surface.  The steel is crap, the functionality is primitive, and the craftmanship is something you'd expect from an American 1st-year shop student.

Posted by: Reactionary at October 24, 2011 10:46 AM (xUM1Q)

121

Manufacturing could well come back; the thought we could grow our way out of our debt is laughable, especially after all the budget debates and debt ceiligng debates this year leave us with a higher deficit than before.

We need real pain before we'll change.

Posted by: Randy M at October 24, 2011 10:46 AM (vI8R6)

122 If you are looking for a fix of demographic pessimism, Spengler has some for you - he has a new book out called "How Civilizations Die".  But even he says that the USA fertility rate of +2/woman is a Good Thing and puts us in a Good Place compared to, say, Europe and the Muslim countries.

Posted by: Surellin at October 24, 2011 10:47 AM (DWuhs)

123 ""I work for a large corporation in supply chain logistics and we have been bringing back our "china" business for the last couple of years. Poor quality and ever increasing costs are slowly forcing business back home.""


My wife works logistics for a major corporation. She told me a few years back that the whole outsourcing thing was a fad and will eventually reverse itself because of the reasons you listed. She also mentioned china are bootlegging cocksuckers, and you have to expect that for every one they make for you they'll make one for the black market.

Posted by: Berserker at October 24, 2011 10:47 AM (FMbng)

124

She also mentioned china are bootlegging cocksuckers......

Once during a plant visit we caught the cocksuckers stealing parts off the assembly lines and stuffing them into thier pockets. Their answer when confronted " We need them so we can give you quotes at a lower price". We won't let the assholes out of the conference room when they visit now.

Posted by: Hey You! at October 24, 2011 10:56 AM (XGLac)

125 The US white fertility rate is barely above European levels. We seem to be resting our hopes on the idea that the high-school dropout 2nd-generation Mexicans are gonna save our bacon.

Maybe. I think in the future we are going to have a lower-IQ, less productive population. Which means we will be poorer.

Wealth comes from productivity. Productivity comes from IQ.

Occasionally you get a natural resource windfall. But many African nations have shown that if your population IQ is low, that windfall won't help all that much. It's really hard to operate a modern society if the average IQ is 80.

High IQ countries can impoverish themselves with bad governments -- ie North Korea. But low IQ countries have few options for generating wealth and prosperity.

Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 24, 2011 10:57 AM (QcFbt)

126 Sure, birthrates may be up, but when they're all offspring of Clevon and Clevon Jr, it doesn't help much economy-wise.

Posted by: DangerGirl at October 24, 2011 10:58 AM (Td6In)

127 The new hotness! Un-Doom!!!

Posted by: Sean at October 24, 2011 11:00 AM (5J881)

128 US avg IQ is heading from the high 90s to the mid to low 90s. Remember, our Mexican immigrants tend to come from the lower IQ segments of Mexican society. The Spaniards who run things in Mexico City aren't sneaking in to pick apples.

Mexico has been exporting their racial problem to America.

On the plus side our India immigrants are pulled from the high IQ strata of India. But that will revert to the mean as they use chain migration to help their idiot cousins to come here. Chinese migrants seem to be pretty avg Chinese, maybe slightly above. We get Chinese engineering students, but we also get the cousins of the Chinese waiter and laundromat lady. Still, average Chinese is better than most.

And immigration from Africa is up sharply. And the pickings there are just grim.

We need to move to a skills based immigrations system like Australia uses. The problem is the Left will attack this as racist since it will disproportionately exclude black Africans. Meanwhile we'll keep importing more semi-retarded, illiterate, gang-raping Somalis.







Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 24, 2011 11:06 AM (QcFbt)

129

I sell DC rotating automotive parts (starters and alternators) Were a pretty big operation...I return up to 2skids a month of Chinese automtive product. We NEVER sell Chinese made units for Heavy Duty applications; only new OEM mfg(which is still done overseas and in Mexico with tight mfg controls or our own rebuilt product in which we can closely QC. 

 

Posted by: dananjcon at October 24, 2011 11:15 AM (8ieXv)

130 One more thing about their "manufacturing" to the Morons - NEVER buy cheap Chinese rotors for your brakes. Never.

Posted by: Vic at October 24, 2011 11:24 AM (YdQQY)

131 What about the plethora of other third-world hellholes where semislave labor is willing to work for next to nothing?

Posted by: Greg at October 24, 2011 11:33 AM (ohd8M)

132 Like your mom, Greg?

Posted by: andycanuck at October 24, 2011 11:40 AM (OKhgI)

133 "Craziest of all, he notes that America is the only Western economy with a fertility rate above replacement level, and so could, conceivably, grow its way out of debt."

Hmm. I look at my kids and think we'll be lucky if we get one grandchild out of either of them.

Posted by: Arms Merchant at October 24, 2011 11:52 AM (VKRmb)

134

#132.

Are those places stable and secure, such that a multi million dollar facility can be opened and won't be looted and burned to the ground by the natives?  If that can't be provided business is not going to go very far in those places.

Posted by: Mikey NTH at October 24, 2011 11:57 AM (hLRSq)

135

I want to believe this, I really, really do. I even linked it over at my little slice of Intewebs Heaven this morning.

Our recovery begins when the stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure and his band of Merry Marxists are removed from office, hopefully in November of 2012, if not before.

Hope springs eternal...

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 24, 2011 11:58 AM (d0Tfm)

136   Of course the country will take off again if we elect a conservative who will de-regulate as appropriate, plus all the other items talked about.

 Question being, do we have such a qualified individual in the current crop of nominees?

Posted by: irongrampa at October 24, 2011 12:03 PM (SAMxH)

137 We can talk about "deregulation" but no President has ever succeeded in that. Not even Saint Reagan was able to accomplish the promised killing of Carter's Dept of Education.

Even Perry will have a tough row to hoe with all the damn RINOs we have in the Senate and the fact that we will not have a 65 vote margin.

Posted by: Vic at October 24, 2011 12:13 PM (YdQQY)

138 Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.

Posted by: steevy at October 24, 2011 12:38 PM (fyOgS)

139 @14

I don't think there's any overlap at all.  My wife's sammich productivity was way down when she was pregnant. 

Posted by: sum(random) at October 24, 2011 12:40 PM (mkBiv)

140 The hispanic immigrant birthrate boosts America's birthrate level to positive growth. Among whites, the numbers are not so rosey, and the birth rate among blacks has fallen over the last decade. Speaking of Doom, Derb's book "We are Doomed" is really worth reading.

Posted by: Demographics of Doom at October 24, 2011 12:41 PM (HXI5v)

141 Wait.. There's more..

Behold, the Affordable Refinance Program

I've been on the Planet long enough to know, when a plan is prefaced with the word "Affordable" hang on to your wallet.

Posted by: franksalterego at October 24, 2011 12:49 PM (9XykO)

142

This Guy Right Here Says, "Romney still sux."

Posted by: Live Free Or Die at October 24, 2011 02:13 PM (nK9TN)

143 Don't get confused by the difference in manufacturing activity and manufacturing jobs.

The US has manufactured around 20% of the worlds goods for the past 50 or more years. We still do.

We do it with a lot less labor. We use machines, not unskilled labor.

And that is a good thing. I wonder how many of the commenters here have spent much time in a manufacturing plant? Some, I am sure but probably a minority.

If you had spent time in a manufacturing plant you would realize that most of the jobs going offshore are low or unskilled jobs. Most of them don't pay a whole lot more than minimum wage.

A lot of them are not as good a job as working in a McDonalds or a GAP.

John Henry

Posted by: John Henry at October 24, 2011 03:30 PM (h8Pf4)

144 Thanks for sharing, please keep an update about this info. love to read it more. i like this site too much.

Posted by: The Magical Christmas Horse ePub at October 24, 2011 05:26 PM (kplp3)

145 "If Chinese labor became too expensive, wouldn't out-sourcers turn to the newest cheap-labor country? It's not like China is the only country capable of producing widgets." Here's the thing about China...it had access to Hong Kong and Taiwan's industrial experience along with its own industrial base. This means that in China there were tons of factories waiting for your OEM orders that knew what they were doing. Most Chinese exports come from these kinds of factories and not those set up by foreign companies (those usually serve the domestic market.) You just don't get the breadth of suppliers in Vietnam - they have a much smaller population, many Chinese don't speak the language so are less willing to invest there, they don't have access to all manner of parts, and their infrastructure really sucks. Hell, almost all of the furniture factories there just do bedroom furniture because China had anti-dumping duties on theirs. Now consider Bangladesh. Sure some Chinese or Taiwanese might invest there, but not very many, and even less Westerners. India is an insane place to run a business, but it does have the population, so maybe it could take over the export model, but I am doubtful somehow.

Posted by: sexypig at October 24, 2011 06:11 PM (4zNJJ)

146 I have been quite impressive with your posts, keep up the great work.

Posted by: 1Q84 iBooks at October 24, 2011 06:15 PM (1mVin)

147 "how much non-core work businesses have to do in order to deal with the regulations involved in hiring domestically" Bingo. I will note that if you invested yourself in a Chinese factory, you would have some of those headaches as well. In fact, all of their super strict laws are applied enthusiastically to foreign invested firms, while local firms are often allowed to slide or just shut down when caught. This is why Apple does not open factories in China but out sources instead. It also points to some ways to create growth for free - deregulation or maybe a better term would be regulation reform and simplification. Unfortunately the Libs mantra is that if you touch a single line of regulatory code or don't pass 2,000 page bills, you are planning to chain kids to the looms.

Posted by: sexypig at October 24, 2011 06:15 PM (4zNJJ)

148 Took me time to read all the comments, but I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commenters here! ItÂ’s always nice when you can not only be informed, but also entertained!

Posted by: Half-Blood AudioBook at October 24, 2011 06:33 PM (Z93nW)

149 I was very happy to search out this web-site.I needed to thanks to your time for this excellent read!! I definitely enjoying each little little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.

Posted by: Destined House of Night ePub at October 24, 2011 08:00 PM (MFNBL)

150 Right now, the Obama regime--with its socialistic, tax-and-spend, anti-growth, class warfare agenda--is sitting on the shoulders of this economy like a rucksack full of Olympic barbell plates.  On the day after Obama is defeated, and a Republican majority elected in the Senate, that weight will be lifted, and the economy will take off like a rocket.  Just you watch.

Posted by: Major Kong at October 24, 2011 09:11 PM (B+qrE)

151 I worked in a factory in my late teens just long enough to find out I was extremely ill-suited to such work. ADD runs very strong down my mother's side and I got it in spades. Doing the same operations over and over all day is trouble waiting to happen with me.

This was a Burroughs plant, back when there was such things, installing wiring harnesses on refrigerator sized hard drive cabinets. (I have more storage capacity on my keychain these days.) I have no lack of respect for the people who were getting this work done but I could never be one of them, even if it was the best paying gig in town.

Yet I am by some measures a high IQ type. (Usually around 145.) With some serious self-sabotage defects but I'm not completely useless. But the idea that a strong manufacturing sector requires a high average IQ population is silly. Only a small subset of factory personnel need the cognitive wattage associated with creating new products. Part of what the manufacturing engineers do is create processes that minimize the number of high IQ personnel on the production line. You need the line workers to be competent but not bored out of their minds.

The high IQ aspect of China isn't about the manufacturing side. It's about shifting the engineering department over there, too. Like at the box for the Apple iPad. It proudly announces that this widget was 'Designed in California.' Not engineered. Not made. Just designed. Which calls for a very small number of exceedingly smart people in Cupertino and a legion of lesser minds over in a Foxconn plant in China.

Posted by: epobirs at October 24, 2011 09:55 PM (kcfmt)

152 When this guy talks about the fertility rate, he means that in a generation, China is going to have a big, big problem with the amount of workers to retirees, much bigger than ours just because of the larger number of people involved. Whereas by then we will have presumedly (the weakest part of his blog post) gotten our house in order and repeated the Reagan boom, or something. And also Europe will be weak (duh) so the only big game in town will still be America thanks to the weaknesses of everyone else catching up to them at the same time general time the advantages we do have should be kicking in.

Posted by: deepelemblues at October 24, 2011 11:57 PM (Jov5i)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
157kb generated in CPU 0.0606, elapsed 0.2319 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.1931 seconds, 280 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.