October 24, 2011
— Ace I don't believe him. I side with Monty and DOOM.
But it's nice to hear some optimism.
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard offers a lot of it.
He starts off discussing the America's increasing energy production through frakking. Then he turns to manufacture.
Meanwhile, the China-US seesaw is about to swing the other way. Offshoring is out, 're-inshoring' is the new fashion."Made in America, Again" - a report this month by Boston Consulting Group - said Chinese wage inflation running at 16pc a year for a decade has closed much of the cost gap. China is no longer the "default location" for cheap plants supplying the US.
A "tipping point" is near in computers, electrical equipment, machinery, autos and motor parts, plastics and rubber, fabricated metals, and even furniture.
"A surprising amount of work that rushed to China over the past decade could soon start to come back," said BCG's Harold Sirkin.The gap in "productivity-adjusted wages" will narrow from 22pc of US levels in 2005 to 43pc (61pc for the US South) by 2015. Add in shipping costs, reliability woes, technology piracy, and the advantage shifts back to the US.
The list of "repatriates" is growing. Farouk Systems is bringing back assembly of hair dryers to Texas after counterfeiting problems; ET Water Systems has switched its irrigation products to California; Master Lock is returning to Milwaukee, and NCR is bringing back its ATM output to Georgia. NatLabs is coming home to Florida.
Boston Consulting expects up to 800,000 manufacturing jobs to return to the US by mid-decade, with a multiplier effect creating 3.2m in total. This would take some sting out of the Long Slump.
If Chinese labor became too expensive, wouldn't out-sourcers turn to the newest cheap-labor country? It's not like China is the only country capable of producing widgets.
Craziest of all, he notes that America is the only Western economy with a fertility rate above replacement level, and so could, conceivably, grow its way out of debt.
So there you go. Some un-Doom.
Posted by: Ace at
09:49 AM
| Comments (152)
Post contains 359 words, total size 2 kb.
Now if we only had a business environment that wasn't openly hostile to making an honest profit. That could might transition to a will.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at October 24, 2011 09:52 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: kansas at October 24, 2011 09:53 AM (mka2b)
If Chinese labor became too expensive, wouldn't out-sourcers turn to the newest cheap-labor country?
This is the "race to the bottom" dilemma. Hopefully, manufacturers would tire of the issues rushing around to save 30 cents an hour and simply return home. And, of course if China does teeter and wages start to slide, manufacturers could overlook a little counterfeiting here and there.
Here is where I diatribe on the minimum wage and how it slows the return of manufacturing. That is because I hate the workers and am a wrecker.
Posted by: spongeworthy at October 24, 2011 09:53 AM (puy4B)
Posted by: Vote joncelli/Cthulhu 2012 at October 24, 2011 09:55 AM (RD7QR)
Heh, yep. It's not like that hasn't happened in the past. If you are like me, once I find a shirt or pants maker for dress clothes that I like, I tend to buy from them over and over through the years. Go and look at the location of the "Made in X" and see how it follows the rise of the cheap labor markets vs. the year bought.
Posted by: dogfish at October 24, 2011 09:56 AM (NuPNl)
How hard is 16-18% unemployment to understand?
No jobs = No money = No expansion in GDP
And this cycle feeds on itself.
Posted by: soothsayer at October 24, 2011 09:56 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: shoey at October 24, 2011 09:57 AM (m6OUa)
And this kind of news could explain why everything still looks all doom-y but the stock market keeps going up.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 24, 2011 09:57 AM (8y9MW)
"The gap in "productivity-adjusted wages" will narrow from 22pc of US levels in 2005 to 43pc (61pc for the US South) by 2015. Add in shipping costs, reliability woes, technology piracy, and the advantage shifts back to the US."
In other words, the Chinese workers are lazy, incompetent crooks. Now that they are also becoming greedy, they are almost as unpalatable as American union workers. Hooray!
Posted by: wooga at October 24, 2011 09:58 AM (vjyZP)
I'm in!
(and I mean that in every way that it can be applied!)
Posted by: Kasper Hauser at October 24, 2011 09:58 AM (HqpV0)
Draw a Venn diagram. Label the first circle "Fertile Americans." Label the second one "Productive Americans."
The two circles are still touching, but their commonality is quickly shrinking.
Posted by: Noted 7th-c. throwback Keith Ellison at October 24, 2011 09:58 AM (I2LwF)
No depression or recession lasts forever; eventually there'll be some combination of events and circumstances that'll produce growth, by accident or design.
It may not pleasant, and it may take a hundred years, but it'll happen.
Probably.
Posted by: Lance McCormick at October 24, 2011 09:58 AM (zgHLA)
Well, yes, but (don't look now) all things considered: that's us, after China. Well, maybe ROK, but only maybe.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at October 24, 2011 09:59 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: t-bird at October 24, 2011 09:59 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 24, 2011 09:59 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at October 24, 2011 09:59 AM (QF8uk)
Posted by: Darren O'Daly at October 24, 2011 09:59 AM (uI+nn)
Remember when the experts predicted a fantastic 3rd, 4th qtrs in 2009?
And then predicted a booming 2010?
Our economy is shell-shocked. Every time it tries to correct itself, the government interferes and meddles and beats the shit out of it. Now it's in a coma.
Posted by: soothsayer at October 24, 2011 10:00 AM (sqkOB)
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
---What? What ain't no country I ever heard of. Do they speak English in What?--
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, keeping it Real at October 24, 2011 10:00 AM (UqKQV)
if only birthrates were the determining factor...
Posted by: shoey at October 24, 2011 01:57 PM (m6OUa)
No kidding. If birthrates were the main determining factor then the Islamic world would be rolling in industrial manufacturing money rather than just figuring out the flush toilet.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 24, 2011 10:00 AM (G+B5p)
If Chinese labor became too expensive, wouldn't out-sourcers turn to the newest cheap-labor country? It's not like China is the only country capable of producing widgets
not really, china backed up it's cheap labor with no regulations and unlimited cheap power. Most cheap labor countries don't have a big check book like China to fund building of new power plants or subsidise the cost. China also attracts a lot of manufacturing by demanding that companies buying rare earth metals manufacture in China. We have two new rare earth mines coming on line now. Shipping is also a problem in manufacturing overseas.
States with right to work laws and reasonable regulations will start attracting manufacturing back here. The feds could help by lowering corporate income tax.
Posted by: robtr at October 24, 2011 10:00 AM (MtwBb)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 24, 2011 10:01 AM (i6RpT)
Oh, I'm all up for frakking our way to energy independence. It'll help with that low birth rate, too.
From DOOM to BOOM.
Posted by: Benson at October 24, 2011 10:01 AM (qzcNU)
The gap... will narrow... by 2015.
Boston Consulting expects... mid-decade
lots of could soons and maybes in there.
Posted by: The Great Satan's Ghost at October 24, 2011 10:02 AM (l8iDY)
It's not just the economy which has fallen, and can't get up; reality, also
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, keeping it Real at October 24, 2011 10:02 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: Jean at October 24, 2011 10:03 AM (WkuV6)
That's if we could conceivably get rid of the deficit. So let me get this straight, we have a deficit driven mostly by entitlements to individuals, and, genius boy here thinks having more individuals solves the problem? Hey I'm not a mathematician but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night. If your problem is giving money to people, doesn't having more people make that worse, not better? Ok I know that growth at a certain rate makes it so there are more youngsters than oldsters who actually get federal entitlements so it does help some. What growth rate would we have to have to make SS/MC break even? Is there any hope of achieving that growth rate short of banning contraceptives, abortion, and making Tuesdays official "Bang a Stranger Day"?
Reasonably accepting that our debt problem can only be solved by restructuring entitlements, what objective, F* I'll even accept subjective, evidence can you provide to suggest some politician might actually be able to accomplish this before our debt destroys our currency?
I WANT TO BELIEVE! Help me out!
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at October 24, 2011 10:03 AM (0q2P7)
Is that what the guy had in mind? Probably not.
Posted by: KG at October 24, 2011 10:04 AM (LD21B)
So does this means the stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure will take the credit and be re-elected?
Posted by: YIKES! at October 24, 2011 10:05 AM (70TBD)
Posted by: Village Idiot at October 24, 2011 10:05 AM (utXSy)
The long term demographic problems and decay in innovation are universal, but its true that the US might come out comparatively pretty good if we play our cards right.
Meaning no SCOAMF.
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at October 24, 2011 10:06 AM (epBek)
To go to another cheap labor country you have to have stability and security. China could offer that. I don't think there are many other places that can do the same. I can't think of any place in Africa or any Islamic country that would qualify. on that last point. Cheap labor? Heck yeah. Stable and secure? Heck no.
Posted by: Mikey NTH at October 24, 2011 10:06 AM (hLRSq)
This is a strawman argument. Business leaders have been saying for decades that "wages" have not been the driving force for pushing industry out of the country. The high cost of regulations is what is killing buisness.
But even at that, if you go back and look at total manufacturing before the great collapse in 2008 the US was beating the crap out of China. It wasn't even close.
Posted by: Vic at October 24, 2011 10:07 AM (YdQQY)
that like 6 months worth of jobs in... 5 yrs?
Posted by: The Great Satan's Ghost at October 24, 2011 10:07 AM (l8iDY)
Posted by: Ian S. at October 24, 2011 10:07 AM (tqwMN)
Possibly. He was a big critic of Clinton and has written books for Regnery. An opponent of the EU mega-state, too.
Posted by: Benson at October 24, 2011 10:07 AM (qzcNU)
Unfortunately, this political class is in the position of a parasite that is killing its host. There's no way to "grow our way out of the problem" so long as it continues to prey.
Posted by: cthulhu at October 24, 2011 10:08 AM (kaalw)
Posted by: CAC at October 24, 2011 10:08 AM (JEVge)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 24, 2011 10:08 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at October 24, 2011 10:09 AM (Qxdfp)
Craziest of all, he notes that America is the only Western economy with a fertility rate above replacement level, and so could, conceivably, grow its way out of debt.
He must be working off some old figures. ....They were talking about the birth rate here, last week on FoxBusiness....and how the US birth rate has gone down since the downturn in jobs and the suckage of the economy.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at October 24, 2011 10:09 AM (Jd1fD)
That was before "Energy Prices Will Necessarily Skyrocket" SCOAMF.
I've put this out many times before. The reason US manufacturing is largely tolerant of US wages is because of US efficiency, e.g. automation. This makes a lot of labor in the US done by machines. Machines want energy. Energy goes up, our cheap labor (robots) prices go up.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at October 24, 2011 10:09 AM (0q2P7)
and yes, until clusterFuck gets out of office, we're doomed.
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, keeping it Real at October 24, 2011 10:09 AM (UqKQV)
I sure as hell hope a rebound is in the works. But it won't take off until the regulatory burden is lifted, and Obama's war on Cheap Energy ended.
America WILL rebound. When Obama is gone.
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 24, 2011 10:10 AM (Iaxlk)
This is why India is the techno-utopia it is.
It's also why Afghanistan and Haiti produce so many more inventions per capita than non-fertile backwards country like Japan.
Oh wait. Never mind.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 24, 2011 10:10 AM (QcFbt)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 24, 2011 10:10 AM (ZDUD4)
Of course we are on the precipice of a boom!
Why, all we need to do is raid more companies such as Gibson Guitars.
And punish the job creators.
And make more "good bets" on companies such as Solyndra.
And hire more teachers!
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 24, 2011 10:10 AM (sqkOB)
He must be working off some old figures. ....They were talking about the birth rate here, last week on FoxBusiness....and how the US birth rate has gone down since the downturn in jobs and the suckage of the economy.
Que?
Posted by: Illegal Immigrants at October 24, 2011 10:11 AM (LEcV+)
Posted by: CAC at October 24, 2011 10:11 AM (JEVge)
If Chinese labor became too expensive, wouldn't out-sourcers turn to the newest cheap-labor country?
The problem is finding a country with a large supply of HIGH-IQ low-wage labor.
In the 1960s & 1970s, that was Japan.
In the 1970s & 1980s, that was South Korea & Taiwan.
In the 1990s & 2000s, that was Mainland China.
About the only remaining country with a known supply of [very] HIGH-IQ and [extremely] low-wage workers would be North Korea.
Everywhere else has been "discovered".
[BTW, the other thing that's about to be "discovered" is just how precious HIGH-IQ workers really are, especially when they stop making babies and their fertility rates drop to extinction levels...]
Posted by: Malia -N- Sasha at October 24, 2011 10:12 AM (M1IO5)
"It's not like China is the only country capable of producing widgets."
They make a shit load of computing stuff.
We educate a whole lot of Chinese here in our Universities.
Posted by: Rev Dr E Buzz Elitist at October 24, 2011 10:12 AM (iZRbK)
Don't you know Skynet is listening? If it knows energy is getting expensive? ROBOT UPRISING?
Posted by: The Robot Devil at October 24, 2011 10:13 AM (136wp)
Posted by: joncelli Doommonger-Frakstick III at October 24, 2011 10:13 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Roy at October 24, 2011 10:13 AM (VndSC)
Cheap labor? Heck yeah. Stable and secure? Heck no.
Posted by: Mikey NTH at October 24, 2011 02:06 PM (hLRSq)
This. The world has an abudance of cheap labor, but a shortage of clean water, good roads, political stability, law and order, etc. Plus, the cost of migrating production facilities around is not zero, especially when you consider the bribes involved. Then there's the damage to your equipment when it is shipped, requalification of the process once it's in the new place, finding people in the West who are willing to go to these hell holes, etc.
The costs of doing business in China have been underestimated for a long time. Losing the New China is a book by an American business expat who worked in China for quite a while and saw what goes on. Any round eyed barbarians who have pull with the home office are quickly co-opted into making the Chinese enterprise look good, via access to dope, chicks, and general sleeze and easy living. (I wish I could get a gig like that!) You can't trust the numbers coming from the Chinese branch office.
Posted by: Reactionary at October 24, 2011 10:14 AM (xUM1Q)
And China has been outsourcing to Vietnam for quite awhile. We may be able to employ some Mexicans yet, and give them a reason to stay at home, if we could just figure out a way to topple their corrupt narco-government without creating a Communist monster to our South. On the other hand, is there really any reason to anticipate that the greatest technological country, us, would not use technology, and I mean principally robotics, to fill vast portions of this manufacturing up-tick. Why would we continue to use inefficient, unionized, call-in-sick workers when we can get a much greater return on investment from smarter, easily trained, healthcare-free machines. Ooops! Guess what China will do to lower it's costs of labor. Yeah, I'm with you .... Doom!
Posted by: Errol at October 24, 2011 10:14 AM (vewos)
Yea, I wanted to go with, "Why Do Ice Cubes Melt in July?"
Posted by: Joe "Plugs" Biden at October 24, 2011 10:15 AM (136wp)
what does swearing in the future have to do with energy production?
Posted by: Ben at October 24, 2011 10:15 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: CAC at October 24, 2011 10:16 AM (JEVge)
Guess what China will do to lower it's costs of labor.
Yeah, really. This buffoon talks as if China doesn't have complete control over it's labor force.
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 24, 2011 10:16 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: joncelli Doommonger-Frakstick III at October 24, 2011 10:16 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Heorot at October 24, 2011 10:17 AM (Nq/UF)
Posted by: © Sponge at October 24, 2011 10:17 AM (UK9cE)
>>If Europe implodes and the China bubble pops, we only need to compete with India and Brazil.
How does one compete with Brazil? They DQ themselves every couple of years.
Posted by: Ben at October 24, 2011 10:17 AM (wuv1c)
They were talking about the birth rate here, last week on FoxBusiness....and how the US birth rate has gone down since the downturn in jobs and the suckage of the economy.
You have to include Black & Mexican Indian fertility rates to account for the [sub-replacement-level] White fertility rate.
Without Blacks & Mexican Indians, you have Blue State White DEMs with European-style fertility rates [sub-1.50] and Red State White GOPers just struggling to stay near replacement level [> 2.00].
Posted by: Malia -N- Sasha at October 24, 2011 10:17 AM (M1IO5)
Posted by: Barack Hussein ("Rambo") Obama, J.D. at October 24, 2011 10:18 AM (f8XyF)
Lest we forget. Companies in the USA have been hoarding a shit-load of cash and capital since the SCOAMF and the dems came to power. There's a lot of money just waiting to be re-invested into businesses.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at October 24, 2011 10:18 AM (UNB7o)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at October 24, 2011 02:13 PM (136wp)
No machine oil, no peace!
Posted by: @OccupyDeathStar at October 24, 2011 10:18 AM (lLKjJ)
Posted by: The Committee to Elect Jeb Bush in 2016, K. Rove, Chairman at October 24, 2011 10:19 AM (SSm72)
>>>Lest we forget. Companies in the USA have been hoarding a shit-load of cash and capital since the SCOAMF and the dems came to power. There's a lot of money just waiting to be re-invested into businesses.
A lot of that money is overseas and would like to come how if not for the repatriation taxes.
Posted by: Ben at October 24, 2011 10:19 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: dave clark at October 24, 2011 10:19 AM (nhEck)
Posted by: Warden at October 24, 2011 10:22 AM (KulgD)
I almost forgot!
Obama decreed the job-market to improve. So, yeah, good times are ahead.
This right here is sound economic policy:
"It is time for companies to step up [and hire]."
-President Nifty Slogan
May 2011
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 24, 2011 10:22 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at October 24, 2011 10:23 AM (D5iHx)
I'm a bit in the middle. I think there is a very slim possibility of recovery - the absolutely critical first step is getting rid of Darth Zero - but that will not be enough, and I fear Romney will fall short.
Nothing less than full embracing of conservatism (economic and social) will save the Republic (what is left of it). With that kind of freedom, we can find a way out. But the least little bit of "social engineering" will lead to the inevitable ascendency of the Dark Side. Re-election of Obama will hasten the end, but only a return to full economic and social freedom will prevent it.
Posted by: Roger at October 24, 2011 10:23 AM (tAwhy)
LOOK AWAY!!!!!
Posted by: EC at October 24, 2011 02:21 PM (GQ8sn)
Too late!
Posted by: The Robot Devil at October 24, 2011 10:23 AM (136wp)
69% of Americans says the US is in a permanent state of decline
*serious down twinkles*
Posted by: laceyunderalls at October 24, 2011 10:24 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of The 1% at October 24, 2011 10:24 AM (bxiXv)
They have DQ in Brazil? I did not know Dairy Queen was popular there. Ya learn something new everyday.
Posted by: mpfs at October 24, 2011 10:25 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: CAC at October 24, 2011 10:25 AM (JEVge)
Posted by: California Red at October 24, 2011 10:26 AM (7uWb8)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at October 24, 2011 10:26 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: sherlock at October 24, 2011 10:26 AM (JYBAr)
Posted by: joncelli Doommonger-Frakstick III at October 24, 2011 10:27 AM (RD7QR)
New euro 'empire' plot by Brussels
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 24, 2011 10:27 AM (9hSKh)
I'd like to know where this guy thinks we'll get energy independence given our current administration. I guess he figures Barry's 1 termer and the next Prez won't be so drill phobic.
Posted by: Iblis at October 24, 2011 10:31 AM (9221z)
China isn't a manufacturing power-house because it has cheap peasant labor. It's because the cheap peasant labor has universal literacy and an average IQ north of 100.
And yeah, North Korea has the most underachieving population on the planet. Getting rid of the Kim family would do more to help the planet than getting rid of, say, Mugabe.
India, on the other hand, has an average IQ lower than Mexico. Widespread malnutrition accounts for some of that. But that can't be fixed overnight. Once you malnourish a child the lower IQ is permanent. Eating well as a teen-ager or adult can't make up those lost IQ points.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 24, 2011 10:31 AM (QcFbt)
Posted by: California Red at October 24, 2011 02:26 PM (7uWb
What's that supposed to mean?!?
Posted by: Marcos Ambrose - Driver #9 DeWalt Ford at October 24, 2011 10:31 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: PugBoo TeaPug Jihadist Mastermind at October 24, 2011 10:33 AM (PmMQb)
Posted by: joncelli Doommonger-Frakstick III at October 24, 2011 02:27 PM (RD7QR)
I'm a fan of the ass. I'm an ass man.......go on.
Posted by: Arnold Schwarzenegger at October 24, 2011 10:33 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: phreshone at October 24, 2011 10:35 AM (T3vCe)
And they'll work for grass clippings. Hmm. We can start a product called Soylent Green® to pay them.
Posted by: andycanuck at October 24, 2011 10:36 AM (OKhgI)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!1!
Listen, I'm not going to do anything crazy like that when I become President. For one thing, we have a serious healthcare problem in this country. I started to fix it with RomneyCare, and I intend to do everything in my power to give ObamaCare the necessary tweaks to make it the best provider of healthcare in the universe!
Posted by: Mitt Romney, Your Inevitable Nominee at October 24, 2011 10:37 AM (/AHDz)
I work for a large corporation in supply chain logistics and we have been bringing back our "china" business for the last couple of years. Poor quality and ever increasing costs are slowly forcing business back home.
Posted by: Hey You! at October 24, 2011 10:41 AM (XGLac)
Posted by: Fritz at October 24, 2011 10:42 AM (FabC8)
I work for a large corporation in supply chain logistics and we have been bringing back our "china" business for the last couple of years. Poor quality and ever increasing costs are slowly forcing business back home.
Posted by: Hey You! at October 24, 2011 02:41 PM (XGLac)
I believe it. You should see the Chinese-built molding tooling that our customers transfer into our shop. It's a disgrace. They can't even drill and tap bolt holes that are perpendicular to the surface. The steel is crap, the functionality is primitive, and the craftmanship is something you'd expect from an American 1st-year shop student.
Posted by: Reactionary at October 24, 2011 10:46 AM (xUM1Q)
Manufacturing could well come back; the thought we could grow our way out of our debt is laughable, especially after all the budget debates and debt ceiligng debates this year leave us with a higher deficit than before.
We need real pain before we'll change.
Posted by: Randy M at October 24, 2011 10:46 AM (vI8R6)
Posted by: Surellin at October 24, 2011 10:47 AM (DWuhs)
My wife works logistics for a major corporation. She told me a few years back that the whole outsourcing thing was a fad and will eventually reverse itself because of the reasons you listed. She also mentioned china are bootlegging cocksuckers, and you have to expect that for every one they make for you they'll make one for the black market.
Posted by: Berserker at October 24, 2011 10:47 AM (FMbng)
She also mentioned china are bootlegging cocksuckers......
Once during a plant visit we caught the cocksuckers stealing parts off the assembly lines and stuffing them into thier pockets. Their answer when confronted " We need them so we can give you quotes at a lower price". We won't let the assholes out of the conference room when they visit now.
Posted by: Hey You! at October 24, 2011 10:56 AM (XGLac)
Maybe. I think in the future we are going to have a lower-IQ, less productive population. Which means we will be poorer.
Wealth comes from productivity. Productivity comes from IQ.
Occasionally you get a natural resource windfall. But many African nations have shown that if your population IQ is low, that windfall won't help all that much. It's really hard to operate a modern society if the average IQ is 80.
High IQ countries can impoverish themselves with bad governments -- ie North Korea. But low IQ countries have few options for generating wealth and prosperity.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 24, 2011 10:57 AM (QcFbt)
Posted by: DangerGirl at October 24, 2011 10:58 AM (Td6In)
Mexico has been exporting their racial problem to America.
On the plus side our India immigrants are pulled from the high IQ strata of India. But that will revert to the mean as they use chain migration to help their idiot cousins to come here. Chinese migrants seem to be pretty avg Chinese, maybe slightly above. We get Chinese engineering students, but we also get the cousins of the Chinese waiter and laundromat lady. Still, average Chinese is better than most.
And immigration from Africa is up sharply. And the pickings there are just grim.
We need to move to a skills based immigrations system like Australia uses. The problem is the Left will attack this as racist since it will disproportionately exclude black Africans. Meanwhile we'll keep importing more semi-retarded, illiterate, gang-raping Somalis.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at October 24, 2011 11:06 AM (QcFbt)
I sell DC rotating automotive parts (starters and alternators) Were a pretty big operation...I return up to 2skids a month of Chinese automtive product. We NEVER sell Chinese made units for Heavy Duty applications; only new OEM mfg(which is still done overseas and in Mexico with tight mfg controls or our own rebuilt product in which we can closely QC.
Posted by: dananjcon at October 24, 2011 11:15 AM (8ieXv)
Posted by: Vic at October 24, 2011 11:24 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Greg at October 24, 2011 11:33 AM (ohd8M)
Hmm. I look at my kids and think we'll be lucky if we get one grandchild out of either of them.
Posted by: Arms Merchant at October 24, 2011 11:52 AM (VKRmb)
#132.
Are those places stable and secure, such that a multi million dollar facility can be opened and won't be looted and burned to the ground by the natives? If that can't be provided business is not going to go very far in those places.
Posted by: Mikey NTH at October 24, 2011 11:57 AM (hLRSq)
I want to believe this, I really, really do. I even linked it over at my little slice of Intewebs Heaven this morning.
Our recovery begins when the stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure and his band of Merry Marxists are removed from office, hopefully in November of 2012, if not before.
Hope springs eternal...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 24, 2011 11:58 AM (d0Tfm)
Question being, do we have such a qualified individual in the current crop of nominees?
Posted by: irongrampa at October 24, 2011 12:03 PM (SAMxH)
Even Perry will have a tough row to hoe with all the damn RINOs we have in the Senate and the fact that we will not have a 65 vote margin.
Posted by: Vic at October 24, 2011 12:13 PM (YdQQY)
Posted by: steevy at October 24, 2011 12:38 PM (fyOgS)
I don't think there's any overlap at all. My wife's sammich productivity was way down when she was pregnant.
Posted by: sum(random) at October 24, 2011 12:40 PM (mkBiv)
Posted by: Demographics of Doom at October 24, 2011 12:41 PM (HXI5v)
Behold, the Affordable Refinance Program
I've been on the Planet long enough to know, when a plan is prefaced with the word "Affordable" hang on to your wallet.
Posted by: franksalterego at October 24, 2011 12:49 PM (9XykO)
This Guy Right Here Says, "Romney still sux."
Posted by: Live Free Or Die at October 24, 2011 02:13 PM (nK9TN)
The US has manufactured around 20% of the worlds goods for the past 50 or more years. We still do.
We do it with a lot less labor. We use machines, not unskilled labor.
And that is a good thing. I wonder how many of the commenters here have spent much time in a manufacturing plant? Some, I am sure but probably a minority.
If you had spent time in a manufacturing plant you would realize that most of the jobs going offshore are low or unskilled jobs. Most of them don't pay a whole lot more than minimum wage.
A lot of them are not as good a job as working in a McDonalds or a GAP.
John Henry
Posted by: John Henry at October 24, 2011 03:30 PM (h8Pf4)
Posted by: The Magical Christmas Horse ePub at October 24, 2011 05:26 PM (kplp3)
Posted by: sexypig at October 24, 2011 06:11 PM (4zNJJ)
Posted by: 1Q84 iBooks at October 24, 2011 06:15 PM (1mVin)
Posted by: sexypig at October 24, 2011 06:15 PM (4zNJJ)
Posted by: Half-Blood AudioBook at October 24, 2011 06:33 PM (Z93nW)
Posted by: Destined House of Night ePub at October 24, 2011 08:00 PM (MFNBL)
Posted by: Major Kong at October 24, 2011 09:11 PM (B+qrE)
This was a Burroughs plant, back when there was such things, installing wiring harnesses on refrigerator sized hard drive cabinets. (I have more storage capacity on my keychain these days.) I have no lack of respect for the people who were getting this work done but I could never be one of them, even if it was the best paying gig in town.
Yet I am by some measures a high IQ type. (Usually around 145.) With some serious self-sabotage defects but I'm not completely useless. But the idea that a strong manufacturing sector requires a high average IQ population is silly. Only a small subset of factory personnel need the cognitive wattage associated with creating new products. Part of what the manufacturing engineers do is create processes that minimize the number of high IQ personnel on the production line. You need the line workers to be competent but not bored out of their minds.
The high IQ aspect of China isn't about the manufacturing side. It's about shifting the engineering department over there, too. Like at the box for the Apple iPad. It proudly announces that this widget was 'Designed in California.' Not engineered. Not made. Just designed. Which calls for a very small number of exceedingly smart people in Cupertino and a legion of lesser minds over in a Foxconn plant in China.
Posted by: epobirs at October 24, 2011 09:55 PM (kcfmt)
Posted by: deepelemblues at October 24, 2011 11:57 PM (Jov5i)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1931 seconds, 280 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: phoenixgirl at work at October 24, 2011 09:51 AM (s+J9D)