October 05, 2011
— Guest Blogger So Rick PerryÂ’s been in the race eight weeks. HeÂ’s skyrocketed up and then come back to earth. Thanks to the compressed schedule for the Republican Primary, and following in the wake of the Washington Post smear, the next month or so constitutes the window that will determine PerryÂ’s role in this election – as nominee or as Fred Thompson redux.
One of the reasons is that in those eight weeks, he has largely allowed himself to be categorized and boxed in by his opponents; he has not articulated a clear vision to lead the country back to prosperity; and he has seemed unprepared for attacks he shouldÂ’ve expected from an audience unfamiliar with his Texas record. (For his staff: yes, the national media are idiots for not paying attention to literally anything youÂ’ve done or said on policy for ten-plus years. No, you canÂ’t correct that.) The combo of a lack of a coherent offensive strategy and getting stuck on defense in the debates brings us to the ABC/WaPo 16% tie for second with Herman Cain, which I think is an accurate depiction of where things stand.
HeÂ’s got roughly three months before voting starts. He's got several more debates, but they're spaced out a bit. The WaPo smear has pretty clearly backfired, and increasingly looks like a benefit to Perry in the primary, though IÂ’m sure itÂ’ll be blown up again in any general (though it's unlikely to bend anyone who didn't already hate his guts or view him as W. II). The early whispers are that he met his Q3 fundraising goals ($17 Million in seven weeks - Drudge is reporting this, thanks, comments - is pretty nice coin, frankly).
So there are as I see it three key questions about where he goes from here. 1. Does Perry have the heft to be president?
This is a different question than you may think it is. ItÂ’s not about impressing the self-styled gatekeepers (leave them to their Santorum worship) in Washington and New York, who still think Rudy Giuliani has national appeal, have never shot a gun, and have no idea about the difference between a lease and a hunting lease (they also havenÂ’t determined the outcome of a Republican primary since 1976). ItÂ’s about the donor community and the national conservative base, which overlaps.
This requires different attributes, and more meaningful ones, than the often vacuous checkboxes of the national scene. CainÂ’s 9-9-9 plan appeals to the base not for its specifics but because it is a plan. ItÂ’s an improvement; itÂ’s a sign of seriousness that goes a step further than rhetoric; and it puts a marker in the sand about what he believes economic policy should look like.
Perry’s Texas handlers need to understand that no one has paid attention to Perry’s superb acumen in handling environmental regulatory issues over the past decade, for instance – it’s all new to them. Tim Pawlenty gave a series of pretty good policy speeches that went nowhere because he has the personality of reduced-fat cream cheese. Perry has the opposite problem – he has personality out the ears, but the only policy markers that national Republicans have heard thus far are that he loves Texas, Israel, immigrants, and getting some goats for our computer industry. He doesn’t need to be Paul Ryan, nor should he pretend to be. But he needs a plan, and he needs it soon, and it needs to be damn good. There’s an economic policy-only debate coming up on October 11 where Gardasil and immigration will be in the background; Perry should at least tease his economic plan there, and lay it out soon after.
2. Does Perry have the message to be president?
Keying off the last point: heÂ’s told us what heÂ’s done in Texas many times over, yes yes, we get it. But this is an outline of a message which still sounds like heÂ’s running for governor. Beyond the soundbites now: what does that look like for the country? Nationalize the message. What does PerryÂ’s view of America look like?
It doesn’t matter that Mitt Romney’s vision has changed about thirteen times over the course of his career (don’t like what he’s saying? Just wait), he's still got a "vision" which is vaguely defined in people's minds. You’re competing with a national conservative base that is still getting introduced to you. This is about more than red meat, it’s about framing an understanding of the world and the role you want to chart within it. Christie, Ryan, and Rubio have all given big, prominent speeches about American Exceptionalism over the past month or so that stir up calls for them to run. Romney’s going to do his take on Friday in South Carolina. Perry can't run a campaign just based on how much he loves Texas jobs. He has to nationalize the message. He can do this – I’ve seen him do it before – but he hasn’t done it on the trail yet for some reason.
Perry needs better defenders around him to peel off the task of defending the non-stop drumbeat against Texas – which is real, but is also an attempt to get him off his game (according to a TPPF analysis roughly 90% of the national media stories about Texas since Perry entered the race which are not about Perry have been negative) – so he can focus on offense. Instead of flailing at Romney, he needs to decide his one path of attack and take it when the opportunity comes, with as compact a swing as possible.
Nationalizing the message means emphasizing Perry’s contrast with Romney's record and Obama's approach in stark colors and leading with his vision of America – referencing Texas half as much, and then only as the proof mechanism that he means what he says, and that his methods reap results.
3. Does Perry have the ground game to be president?
Both of the other critiques are about failures of communication, but this one is about the campaign itself. PerryÂ’s best political asset over the past two cycles in Texas was his superb retail operation and his impressive ground game, which allowed him to overperform the expectations of experts and come back from twenty point deficits and the like. They need to understand that he entered this race in comeback mode, not some coronation (I donÂ’t think they did, but I wouldnÂ’t know).
Mitt has been running for this job effectively for his entire adult life, and non-stop for the past six years. He’s done all the due diligence. But only about a quarter of the party likes him at all, and they want to like someone else. But that means connecting with as many people as possible and building a campaign infrastructure very quickly – Perry’s success has come when his political team has been preparing years ahead of time. I’m not sure why he’s spending so much time in New Hampshire – Iowa, where he has a clearer shot, is feeling neglected. South Carolina is the key part of this, but Florida too – and in that state, he’s currently fourth. The ability of Perry’s state level people to collaborate with Nikki Haley and Rick Scott – both of whom like him personally and have yet to endorse – and the gatekeepers on the ground will make a huge difference in the outcome.
A ground game does not come out of thin air, and the ability to construct one in essentially three months is not a task to be considered lightly.
If Perry wants this, and I think he does, weÂ’ll find out the answers to 1 and 2 within the next month or so. We wonÂ’t be able to know the answer to the third question until January. And then weÂ’ll know whoÂ’ll be the nominee.
Adapted from my daily email, The Transom.
Posted by: Guest Blogger at
03:27 AM
| Comments (202)
Post contains 1328 words, total size 8 kb.
No he hasn't. Week-kneed squishes who purport to be Republicans have allowed the MFM and his opponents to categorize him. But mostly this is due to a very few but very vocal "bots" of dubious quality and dubious candidate support.
Posted by: Vic at October 05, 2011 03:39 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Lawrence of the Labia at October 05, 2011 03:39 AM (INFu3)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at October 05, 2011 03:44 AM (ijjAe)
Adding a national sales tax doesn't get my part of the base rolling.
But, Cain has a plan and is pushing it. Perry is not pushing a plan of any type, which explains his supporters like me getting agitated.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at October 05, 2011 03:45 AM (wCfF8)
I've seen Perry get those budget cuts, even hard ones. I've seen him run his government like an honorable man for the most part, which is saying a lot given how long he's done it. Not a racist bone in his body. He's a squish on 10% of issues. That's actually pretty good, if you think about the long record he's got. Some of these other candidates are simply unrevealed squishes.
Perry needs to lay out his plan, and he needs to hit Romney with everything he's got. He can hit Obama too, but let's face it: in today's GOP, bashing Obama is extremely easy to do. It's important to do, but it's not as helpful as bashing Romney.
Posted by: Dustin at October 05, 2011 03:48 AM (fF625)
Money talks. Since Sunday, did N-head slow or stimulate Perry's GOP fundraising?
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 03:49 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: i'm sending a $5 contribution to dicky durbin, cockholster at October 05, 2011 03:50 AM (V39XA)
It's not just Perry, but any thread about him or Cain (especially at Tepid Air, where the Palinoids and their responses are predictable and easily identifiable) is filled with snark, supposition, innuendo and outright lies, all meant to make the posters' particular savior look good by comparison.
So an slip-up or misinterpretation of Perry's beliefs and history brings out the "OMG, forget him! He's dead to me...." comments. Trolls feeding trolls.
I'd like to hear what the man has to say without all the background noise, thank you. We're all going to have to vote for someone, and that someone isn't likely to be 100% acceptable. So the next-best-thing choice needs to be clearly understood for what he is, has done and will do.
Right now, my preference is Cain, followed by Perry. Mutt Romney and The Newt are out of it, though I will support them if they are chosen to run against the stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure. Ron Paul (RON PAUL!!11!!!) would make me consider moving to, say, Tahiti.
I'm severely pissed off by the uber-partisans who tear down all candidates not named Palin, Romney or Paul....
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 05, 2011 03:51 AM (YjjrR)
I completely agree with you. Cain's plan is flawed. But it's a plan! I'd have expected Perry to roll out a national economic/tax reform plan within a month of jumping in, it's obviously his best asset and the area where he has the strongest record... but no signs that's coming our way even now, when he's in need of a boost.
Posted by: Domenech at October 05, 2011 03:51 AM (PS0gU)
Bush made a personal connection with a lot of GOP voters and got lots of volunteers. Loyal ones. These eventually ended up being the people who stopped the attempted cheating in the counting in Florida and stood outside the VP residence in DC.
I always said that unnerved the democrats because they weren't used to seeing lady demonstrators in matching shoes and handbags.
Can Perry get that level of volunteerism and lyalty? He will shortly be competing for grassroots volunteers with Palin, I think. This will be a good test of his skills.
Thanks for the analysis, Guest Blogger!
Posted by: Miss Marple at October 05, 2011 03:51 AM (GoIUi)
That pretty well knocks out Perry's propaganda effort to convince Texas tax payers that our funding his potus campaign travels and his book tour is spending public funds to successfully promote Texas.
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 03:54 AM (lpWVn)
[Domenech]
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 03:55 AM (lpWVn)
However, there were some vague statements that left me feeling he was dodging.
And he just doesn't seem to have fire.
I wil vote for whoever wins the nomination, since any one of these people would be better. I am hoping Perry does the same type of interview, because I think he would benefit from a long discussion of policy rather than the sound bites we get in these debates.
Posted by: Miss Marple at October 05, 2011 03:56 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Ralphies Dad. at October 05, 2011 03:57 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: TWoPolitics at October 05, 2011 04:02 AM (+QfDC)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 04:09 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Vic at October 05, 2011 04:09 AM (M9Ie6)
America is just concerned Perry doesn't have the mental acumen for the job.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at October 05, 2011 04:10 AM (uVlA4)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 05, 2011 04:10 AM (eOXTH)
In '08 Romnibots cried "bigot" at every criticism lodged against his record.
It's not any more amusing listening to Perrynots whine when his record infringing on constitutional rights is the matter.
Vic, take it easy this morning and stay on the mend.
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 04:11 AM (lpWVn)
I think we should refer to Romney supporters as 25%rs. At the end of the day, that's all the GOP vote he's gonna get
Even if he's the nominee?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 04:11 AM (sbV1u)
Anyone pushing that rock as an issue is either a brainless idiot, part of the MFM, a Democrat concern troll, or a rabid supporter of a non-candidate who uses Democrat troll tactics.
Well I guess Herman Cain is all of the above because he's the only one that bit on it.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 04:12 AM (sbV1u)
Just trust me one more time.
Posted by: MFM at October 05, 2011 04:13 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Lifeisdeath at October 05, 2011 04:15 AM (mLbhb)
Posted by: Blaster at October 05, 2011 04:15 AM (dJWs0)
Not true. Cain has since walked it back. Meanwhile Romney jumped on it and we have some "bots" on here pushing it has well.
Posted by: Vic at October 05, 2011 04:15 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Case at October 05, 2011 04:16 AM (FD6YW)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 04:16 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at October 05, 2011 04:17 AM (ijjAe)
Not true. Cain has since walked it back. Meanwhile Romney jumped on it and we have some "bots" on here pushing it has well.
Vic, Cain should have known better than to bite in the first place, and bite he did.
I love what Cain says about policy.
His potential for Bidenesque gaffes makes me wonder what he really thinks.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 04:18 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Blaster at October 05, 2011 04:18 AM (dJWs0)
Posted by: Lifeisdeath at October 05, 2011 04:18 AM (mLbhb)
He does like to step on his dick when talking to that asshole Wallace.
Posted by: Vic at October 05, 2011 04:19 AM (M9Ie6)
Well I guess Herman Cain is all of the above because he's the only one that bit on it.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 08:12 AM
Gotta disagree slightly. Cain didn't "bite on it." He was asked about it, gave an honest and not particularly contentious answer, and was subsequently pilloried for it.
If no one asked the other candidates, is that The Hermanator's fault? I think not. No one seems to want to ask them anything...Cain is more forthright and therefore a better sound-bite.
Hell, Palin didn't even post anything about "the rock" on Facebook.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 05, 2011 04:19 AM (YjjrR)
My point is, he won't be the Nominee with 25%. I vote ABO even if it's (insert your personal worst case senario here).
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 08:16 AM (ZDUD4)
I'm with you there.
I'd vote Dennis Kucinich before I'd vote Obama.
Besides, his wife is smokin' hot.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 04:19 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Lifeisdeath at October 05, 2011 08:18 AM (mLbhb)
Go back and review yesterday's flame war on this subject. It showed up several times.
Posted by: Vic at October 05, 2011 04:19 AM (M9Ie6)
He was asked about it, gave an honest and not particularly contentious answer, and was subsequently pilloried for it.
To me, that's a bite.
The better answer was, "I'm not here to talk about what Governor Perry's family may or may not have done 20 years ago. I'm here to talk about the economy. Got a question on the economy?"
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 04:21 AM (sbV1u)
Plan? ....A good philosophy is more important than a rigid plan.
"I would like to see Washington DC be as inconsequential in our lives as possible."
I've heard Perry say this on business channels for a long time. ....Since he started running, he has changed it to "I would like to make Washington DC as inconsequential...".
Cain's 999 plan is typical of the sort of 'plan' that comes out a corporate meeting held to 'come up with a plan'.....whereupon said corporation spends a year and millions of dollars trying to make said plan work, then finally concludes that said plan didn't account for all determining factors and must be revised into a 'new plan'.
Making Washington inconsequential in our lives is a pretty damn good goal if you ask me. ....Getting Fedzilla off our backs and out of our face would get the economy rolling again, instead of spinning its wheels in 1st gear.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at October 05, 2011 04:22 AM (sYyfh)
Posted by: Blaster at October 05, 2011 04:22 AM (dJWs0)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 04:22 AM (ZDUD4)
6 The base isn't excited about Cain's 999 plan as much as you think, since it calls for a whole new added tax on consumption (national sales tax).
Yeah, 9-/9/-9 is a wonderful idea, if you want to pay 35 Percent Income Taxes AND a 15 percent National Sales Tax twenty years from now.
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 05, 2011 04:23 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 04:25 AM (ZDUD4)
And speaking of her, given that her support has dropped below the rent's too guy and she is collecting zero money I expect her to drop out soon.
But, as one of the talking heads at NRO said, she can always survive off of the "debates" because they are free.
Posted by: Vic at October 05, 2011 04:25 AM (M9Ie6)
And speaking of her, given that her support has dropped below the rent's too guy and she is collecting zero money I expect her to drop out soon.
Roger that. Which is a shame, because I really wanted to like her. But she gave her opponents too much ammo. She could have taken this run, even if it failed, to set herself up for a serious future in the party. Now I think she has given off so much of "teh crazee" vibe that she's going nowhere in the future.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 04:28 AM (sbV1u)
The better answer was, "I'm not here to talk about what Governor Perry's family may or may not have done 20 years ago. I'm here to talk about the economy. Got a question on the economy?" Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 08:21 AM
Agreed. But....
Too many of the comments -- both pro- and anti- any given candidate -- smell of Monday-morning quarterbacking. Yeah, we all know what Cain should have done. Ditto Perry, Christie, and even the stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure his own ugly self. You can pick the exact ideal response, and so can I, simply because we're not in the trenches.
I've met a few successful types like Cain, and those that are genuine leaders do tend to pop out with a quick response to almost anything. The mediocre ones look at their PR handlers before answering. Sometimes the results aren't as intended, but there are results.
So yeah, Cain should have done that. He didn't. I can give him a pass, because he said something, and it was couched in declarative sentences, not evasions, half-truths and poll-tested "thoughts."
YMMV.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 05, 2011 04:30 AM (YjjrR)
Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 08:12 AM
Then include this website and everyone who commented, particularly those since Sunday bringing up the issue over and over as if it's an issue.
If it's not an issue, quit bringing it up.
If it shouldn't affect Perry, where's the justification for smearing Cain?
If Perry supporters grant themselves the right to express righteous indignation about "it", then all the more right to express be given Cain.
Drop it.
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 04:30 AM (lpWVn)
Plans are for homos.
Repeal Obamacare. Choke the EPA like a bitch. Get the federal government off our backs.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at October 05, 2011 04:30 AM (WvXvd)
In answer to the questions, I believe:
1. No, he doesn't. Let's set aside his constant digging with illegal immigration. (And really, he's getting beat up on his most defensible point. His other statements and actions would just get him hammered more.) His Social Security statement was red meat that represented what he will look like if he continues making statments like that. Of course SS is fatally flawed and therer need to be changes. But, just calling it a Ponzi scheme and announcing it has to go is politically stupid. One has to make very clear that you aren't going to toss granny to the curb, and you want a viable retirement system for younger workers.
Without getting into the Gardasil and immigration details, his actions in both cases show a Bush trait that most conservatives are very uncomfortable with.
2. Texas is really a liability now. We've had two recent presidents from the state and a lot of conservatives who really wish Texans would just shut up. There's a "Texas is different" attitude that leads to the rejoinder, "Okay, Texas is different and you don't understand the rest of the country." I doubt Perry can distance himself enough to get rid of that taint. He's been governor too long and came out of the gate with the ridiculous Texas swagger.
3. No sure about this one.
Posted by: Chris at October 05, 2011 04:31 AM (zKcvb)
So yeah, Cain should have done that. He didn't. I can give him a pass, because he said something, and it was couched in declarative sentences, not evasions, half-truths and poll-tested "thoughts."
Well, like Bachmann, how long are we going to go watching the gaffes pile up? I guess that's my real issue with him right now. I'm not anti-Cain, I'm just cautious.
Besides, yesterday he flip-flopped on the al-Awlaki killing.
Frankly most of America doesn't care when a terrorist, American or not, buys the farm. In May Cain was against targeting him. Today after a successful strike he's all for it.
Please Herman, don't turn into Mittens.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 04:33 AM (sbV1u)
We can argue about it until the cows come home, but the bottom line is: it'll pretty much be all over for Perry if he has another debate performance like last time around. I say that out of Love... I'd love to see him be the nominee, or at least the "him" I thought he was.
WTF happened to the Brilliant Debater we heard so much about?? I don't get it.
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 05, 2011 04:33 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 04:37 AM (ZDUD4)
Please Herman, don't turn into Mittens.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 08:33 AMDon't think I'm picking on you, K? It's simply that I disagree while accepting that your points are rational.
You/I/we are looking at the candidates under a microscope. Unless you are serious about parsing his every word and drawing distinctions for the sake of drawing distinctions, things like the al-Awlaki quotes aren't really that different. You have to think in context, and Cain's previous statement was made while the dude was still alive. He would be pilloried for having said "yeah, we oughtta bust a missile in his ass."
I can't imagine Cain turning into a dark-hued Mutt Romney. More likely, he'll go right on pissing off the concern trolls and other candidates' supporters while being forthright. I like that about him.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 05, 2011 04:39 AM (YjjrR)
He also dropped a bombshell on folks about SS without ANY counter proposal (even in rough draft) to ease folks mind on what he would do about SS. He still hasn't articulated any plans on jobs, entitlement reform and has refused to retract his heartless comments.
He's weak as a national candidate and his ego won't let him back off.
I'm not interested in a Bush 2.0 or Democrat Lite.
If he's the candidate when the dust clears then I'll vote for him but I want someone who's going to actually back off from the direction we're headed.
No amnesty, build the fence. Change SS and plan for phase out to something else; either privatize or investment leaving those on retirement as they are.
And stop getting upset when conservatives criticize and ignore the liberal Media.
Oh and quit participating in liberal media debates.
Posted by: Tim the Enchanter at October 05, 2011 04:40 AM (cA6/i)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 05, 2011 04:40 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: noislamocommie at October 05, 2011 04:40 AM (Uuurq)
I like suing the EPA to force them to back down. Liberals hate that.
I like Voter ID. Democrats hate it.
I like Loser Pays. Trial lawyers hate it.
Those aren't "plans", they're actions that come from vision, which is choke down the size and scope of government.
Plans are nice words about things that don't happen.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at October 05, 2011 04:41 AM (WvXvd)
More likely, he'll go right on pissing off the concern trolls and other candidates' supporters while being forthright. I like that about him.
Prolly right.
I know there's something good about Cain when my wife - a former California hippie chick - loves everything he says.
Me? I'm more like Eeyore.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 04:41 AM (sbV1u)
I'm surprised that Cain's handling of the rock pissed me off as much as it did. He HAS got to know that every libtard in the nation is fomenting questions for him that are intended to make him either douche on the republicans or white people or make himself look like an oreo.
He should have laughed at the tale and said, "You're kidding me that anyone is even talking about this right? Stupid people are destroying america and you guys want to talk about a rock in the woods in 1983? No wonder we are in danger."
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 04:41 AM (9mW6H)
This! And he shouldn't need to be told so. He should recognize 'gotcha' questions when they come at him.
Posted by: Retread at October 05, 2011 04:44 AM (gWFUh)
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 04:45 AM (9mW6H)
54.....the ridiculous Texas swagger.
Compared to what? ....Northeastern elitist superiority? Or Chicago thuggery? Or West Coast snootery? .....Or insufferable ivy league foppery?
Texas has earned the right to deploy some swagger. ...I am not from Texas, but I think that state has paid it's dues.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at October 05, 2011 04:46 AM (sYyfh)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 04:46 AM (lNGfM)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 04:46 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 08:45 AM (9mW6H)
Concur. If Cain had Newt's sensibility about that kind of stuff, he'd go far.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 04:47 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 04:47 AM (lNGfM)
Shoulda Woulda Coulda, pfft.
I can give him a pass, because he said something, and it was couched in declarative sentences, not evasions, half-truths and poll-tested "thoughts."
Furthermore, if "deserve" ever had merit, this particular offense wasn't something Cain should have evaded. History happened, and everyone's getting over it. That's not to say a black politician should be required by Republican PC to blink, turn the other cheek and stfu regarding the posting of N-head. Had the n-word been instead an antisemitic slur during the 1980s, "No Jews Allowed" for instance, would a Jewish candidate be given a quicker pass for responding with an immediate rebuke? Would Republicans bear down on such a Jewish candidate for calling that insensitive?
If Perry supporters are going to accept Perry's follow-up after an unpleasantry was exposed from his family's past, then all the more, accept Cain's follow-up as well.
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 04:47 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 04:49 AM (lNGfM)
She's waited too long and frankly I don't think she'll run. It's all been a gotcha game to get back at the MFM while trolling for dollars. That's why FOX didn't make her quit as she has already informed them she's not running. (she told only top people which is why the secret's been kept.)
Sure she's helped some candidates and thrown some firebombs at barry but in the long run has she been a game changer? I don't think so.
When we needed her about 1-2 months ago she was still playing the coquette. She's worn out the welcome and think about it, she hasn't written anything to inspire anybody and taken no shots at the Administration though there's plenty of topics to choose from.
Posted by: Tim the Enchanter at October 05, 2011 04:50 AM (cA6/i)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at October 05, 2011 04:50 AM (JNqU9)
The only followup Perry should havehad for the WP post was "take that stupid rock and shove it up your lying ass".
That would have been the Texas thing to do.
Posted by: Vic at October 05, 2011 04:50 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Pecos Bill at October 05, 2011 04:51 AM (j84s0)
But she could easily FK up in my eyes too.
OSP, to me, she already did. That's why.
The rap on her was that she wasn't serious.
She hasn't done anything in 3 years to dispel that notion with the bulk of the electorate. Reality TV de facto proves that you are not serious.
I'm not talking politics junkies like us, we know what she'd be like in office with a relatively high degree of certainty.
I'm talking about the people who tune in to an election 60 days out. They don't know her. They still think she's a dim bulb and they're not going to vote for her. National elections are won in the middle of the ideology scale. They're not won in party primaries.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 04:51 AM (sbV1u)
69 +100 God, I'm sick of the antisouth bigots
If Perry supporters grant themselves the right to express righteous indignation about "it", then all the more right to express be given Cain.
Drop it.
Excuse me?
There's a big fucking difference between being annoyed at a stupid question and being annoyed at someone for falling for a stupid question. In the first case the questioner is stupid in the second case the questionee is stupid. This controversy doesn't reflect badly on Perry but it does on Cain.
I love Cain. I would love to see him beat Obama. I don't like the race card and I want him to be above it.
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 04:51 AM (9mW6H)
I scoffed at my gay brother ridiculing Perry's swagger.
/Gays never pride themselves on swagger./
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 04:53 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Tim the Enchanter at October 05, 2011 04:53 AM (cA6/i)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 04:53 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 04:56 AM (lNGfM)
Posted by: Paladin at October 05, 2011 04:56 AM (lP8dE)
If Perry supporters are going to accept Perry's follow-up after an unpleasantry was exposed from his family's past, then all the more, accept Cain's follow-up as well.
WTF.
Perry's "family" didn't do anything wrong. Driving past a rock does not incur sin. Hunting in an area that has a rock near the road with a *word* on it does not incur sin. Nobody seems to grasp this anymore but it's a WORD it's not a violent crime, it's not a magic spell, it's not an evil curse, it's not a deadly disease, it's a word. I'm so sick of people fainting dead away at the mere hint of a word I cold puke. We can say and write fuck fuck fuck all over the place but one mention of a word we can't even write down and people are fainting dead away? Give me a break. Who the fuck did this?
Yeah, and Cain should not have taken the bait and even when correcting he's still not seeing the ridiculousness.
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 04:58 AM (9mW6H)
A good way to correct this error would be to start talking about probable Texas Senator and king of the RINOs David Dewhurst now.
Posted by: Bob Saget at October 05, 2011 04:58 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: chemjeff at October 05, 2011 04:58 AM (czcue)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 04:58 AM (lNGfM)
BTW, I sincerely believe that Perry will pleasantly surprise us all in the next debate. He may have been over confident in the first, and unprepared in the second, but I know that I perform best when I really need to, and I think he will, too. He would not have gotten where he is otherwise. Romney, on the other hand, will continue to expose himself as Romney.
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at October 05, 2011 04:59 AM (6IV8T)
But then you would think he would understand why the 1964 Civil Rights Act and Voting Act meant such a big deal to black Americans.
Huh? If they were/are grateful why are they voting democrat? The republicans passed those bills and the democrats fought them?
How bizarre.
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 05:00 AM (9mW6H)
There it is. "Annoyed." No, N-head isn't simply an annoying confrontation to any black American.
This controversy doesn't reflect badly on Perry but it does on Cain.
You have no "fucking" "stupid" excuse for that.
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 05:00 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 05:00 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 05, 2011 05:01 AM (l9zgN)
Even Obama had more experience before 2008, and we all called him unprepared and unfit.
Posted by: chemjeff at October 05, 2011 08:58 AM (czcue)
Sorry, don't agree there.
Obama had no executive experience. None. That means he has never been in a position where he was accountable for his actions. Cain has been
You're right about one thing, Cain is a political rookie. To me, that's actually a selling point. Obama was a political veteran. We got a politician when Obama was elected. How's that working out?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 05:01 AM (sbV1u)
Oldsailor; I've though of a thousand reasons why she stayed out.
I was one who thought her resignation as Governor was clever move when so many thought otherwise.
She lambasted Barry with Facebook comments.
Then this year we get this "maybe I will maybe I won't" and then deadlines that aren't. It's moved twice that I know of and no reasons given.
What she HAS done is promoted the hell out of her show, her books, her tour and then a DVD.
Plus I think the giveaway is that Fox hasn't fired her as being a candidate. If they thought she was going to be a candidate they'd drop her like bowling ball. Hasn't happened. They know she's not going to run and probably never was going to run.
I think the quality of her endorsement has even been damaged. I think she's going to put it off to November. If she does then she's not going to run.
Posted by: Tim the Enchanter at October 05, 2011 05:01 AM (cA6/i)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 05:01 AM (lNGfM)
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at October 05, 2011 05:02 AM (6IV8T)
All it takes is one "I PAID FOR THIS MICROPHONE" moment and things change.
When I actually see one then I might become a fanboy.
For now, not so much. Her ship has sailed.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 05:02 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 05:05 AM (lNGfM)
Cain speaks well, but there's something about him that I just don't fully trust. He seems to want to play to who he's talking to. He should have NEVER bit on the racist rock story. That was pure stupid and reflected an inner readiness to throw down a race card if need be. We don't need any more of that. He could have been smart and used the question as a platform to say he would be a race united, not divider. We're long past tired of the racist card being thown at us just to try to score political points. Much like the movie War Games - the only way to win is not to play. Bad, bad move Herman. Also, there's just something about him that leads me to believe he would be taken to the cleaners by the Putins of the world. I may be wrong, but I see him as someone who needs to be liked and admired. That is not a good quality for President.
Romney is the epitomy of a slimy, say anything to get votes politician. I do not trust him. He has demonstrated his ability to flip-flop on major issues, then lie about it. He is worse than McCain in my opinion. Also, I believe Romney would destroy the Tea Party by totally demoralizing the movement. There's been a lot of hard work and heavy lifting done over the past couple of years by the grass roots Tea Party. It seems that we are effecting a change as evidenced by the 2010 elections. It really takes the wind out of the sails to have the establishment right and the MFM once again choose our candidate for us.
That leaves Perry. Yes, he has faults, but to me he seems real. It's ironic that we ridicule the left for electing a smooth talker with no substance, while bashing Perry, a man of demostrated ability, for not being smooth and polished. Think about it.
Posted by: Havedash at October 05, 2011 05:06 AM (JfvbF)
Posted by: dogfish at October 05, 2011 05:06 AM (NuPNl)
Sorry, but that's a little crazy, especially when the stakes are so high. It is like a sporting event, like football. You have to know the formal rules of the game (i.e., how to get a first down), but then you also have to know the *real* rules of the game (i.e., how to read the defense to know when a blitz is coming). Putting up Cain vs. Obama is like putting up the Springfield District 5 Highschool Football Team vs. the Packers. We don't want any rookie team to go up against Obama's billion dollar professional squad.
Posted by: chemjeff at October 05, 2011 05:07 AM (czcue)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 05:08 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 09:00 AM (lpWVn)
Oh please black americans use the word constantly. The black teenage boys in my house every weekend use it to each other non-stop when they play video games, the white ones are allowed to do it too if they are all close enough friends. It's a lib meme that the mere mention of a "word" makes them writhe in agony. The little black kids my son plays football with (he's the only white on the team) all use it to each other.
See, we live in the south and we actually have relationships, friendships, and associations with black people and don't just pretend to know everything there is to know about how they feel because some lib elite told us how it is.
This controversy doesn't reflect badly on Perry but it does on Cain.
You have no "fucking" "stupid" excuse for that.
What?
You make no sense.
Besides no one would know there used to be a rock in the woods in the early 80s with a magic evil word on it unless it were trying to be used to magically macaca Perry.
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 05:08 AM (9mW6H)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 05:08 AM (lNGfM)
Posted by: Do NOT buy it at October 05, 2011 05:10 AM (rZZA3)
We don't want any rookie team to go up against Obama's billion dollar professional squad.
Posted by: chemjeff at October 05, 2011 09:07 AM (czcue)
What makes the team is exactly what you just said, "the professional squad."
It's the staffers that make the campaign. Sure, the candidate ultimately bears responsibility for its conduct, but the staffers - to extend your analogy - do the scouting, the conditioning, the film analysis, etc.
Obama has some good campaign staffers. I think if Cain were the nominee you'd see our bare-knuckles politico types come out of the woodwork to pitch in.
Cain's personality at a gut level is also far, far, far more appealing than Obama's. Obama is a thin-skinned, narcicisstic whiner. Cain is a friendly, well-spoken "git er done" type. I think voters respond better to the latter once they get to know him.
I can't believe I am defending Herman Cain. LOL
Posted by: Sean Bannion at October 05, 2011 05:11 AM (sbV1u)
83....There is another way to look at it. Maybe she was too smart to join the circular firing squad.
Oh please. ....The tease went on for too long. She obviously doesn't want the scrutiny of her own 'true conservative values' that she advocates for others.
She betrayed her true motives by crowing to Greta about how she was loving "shaping the debate" from the sidelines. ....."Thinking about it" afforded her a relevance that merely being a member of the media does not give her.
My biggest lament is the damage she has done.
Her Bus Tour which was not-a-campaign-tour opened the door for Obama to do the same thing....at our expense.
She was pleased with herself for attacking candidates [Perry] for their "Crony Capitalism".....a phrase that was coined by Soros-backed groups to demonize capitalism. .....This phrase, crony capitalism, is being used by those little anarchists that are sqwatting on Wall Street, and planning to spread their ilk to other cities. .....Is she proud of using that phrase now?
She cannot claim 'no harm no foul' from her long tease.....because there has been harm, and it is foul.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at October 05, 2011 05:12 AM (sYyfh)
Posted by: ian cormac at October 05, 2011 05:12 AM (eMSXN)
>> He who would cross the Bridge of Death Must answer me These questions three Ere the other side he see.
HAH. African or European?
Here's another interesting Perry fact, $17MM in seven weeks, not even a full 1st quarter. And outta that he's got $15MM cash on hand.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at October 05, 2011 05:12 AM (WvXvd)
EXCLUSIVE: Republican White House hopeful Rick Perry raised over $17 million in 49 days, DRUDGE has learned. $347,000 per day; 20,000 unique donors from all 50 states, DC, Puerto Rico, and Guam. With more than half of donors living outside of Texas... Developing...
Obama's :
Sept Layoffs Highest in 2 Years...
115,730 job cuts last month, more than double August's 51,114..."
Posted by: Jean at October 05, 2011 05:12 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Jean at October 05, 2011 05:13 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at October 05, 2011 05:14 AM (6IV8T)
Posted by: Jean at October 05, 2011 09:13 AM (WkuV6)
He raised eleventy billion dollars now SHUT UP racist!!!!
Posted by: Obamabot at October 05, 2011 05:14 AM (czcue)
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 05:15 AM (9mW6H)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 05:17 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at October 05, 2011 05:18 AM (6IV8T)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 05:18 AM (lNGfM)
I hate that they attack each other and much prefer Newt's approach...turn every question into a slam on Obama. I wish more of them would do this.
I do like Cain....gaffs and all. He's got a great personal story. Perfect VP material at this point.
Posted by: Tami at October 05, 2011 05:19 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 05:21 AM (ZDUD4)
But not a candidate for potus.
Juveniles, black on black. Do your kids say it as well?
That you'd promote/accept its usage in your home is your business.
During the 1980s, it hadn't been ok to post/say the n-word for decades already. So eventually, the Perrys removed the offense at the gate BECAUSE it was insensitive and not PC. So that's that. No more, no less.
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 05:22 AM (lpWVn)
112.....who do you support?
Rick Perry. .....I thought I have made that clear. I used to be a big supporter of Sarah Palin, but her actions in recent months have caused me to see her a lot more clearly.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at October 05, 2011 05:26 AM (sYyfh)
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God at October 05, 2011 05:28 AM (vahvH)
Posted by: Honey Badger at October 05, 2011 05:29 AM (GvYeG)
Back to the questions
1 - We thought so when he got in but 3 poor debate performances and shoot from the hip gaffes have made this questionable. A good debate or 2 and more disciplined message should fix this
2 - Not yet. As noted above saying "Look at Texas" doesn't work nationally. also saying "Make DC inconsequential to your life" sounds great but falls flat when someone asks how and he can't answer the question.
3 - Florida straw poll would say no. Fundraising numbers are a positive sign but if he keeps stumbling the fundraising and ability to draft supporters will dry up.
Bottom line - Perry is a like a highly touted rookie who has performred poorly in the first few games. We will need a few more games to see if he recovers or goes into the bust category
Posted by: nobama12 at October 05, 2011 05:31 AM (ykY2u)
Posted by: macintx at October 05, 2011 05:32 AM (ucs8Y)
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God at October 05, 2011 05:32 AM (vahvH)
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 19% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-three percent (43%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -24
Posted by: Tami at October 05, 2011 05:33 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 05:33 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: some asshole at October 05, 2011 05:35 AM (Oxepi)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 05:36 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: nobama12 at October 05, 2011 05:38 AM (ykY2u)
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 05:39 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 05:40 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God at October 05, 2011 05:41 AM (vahvH)
On that, yesterday's twitter highlighted that Romney's religion took until 1979 to permit blacks to hold their priesthood.
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 05:44 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at October 05, 2011 05:46 AM (ZDUD4)
143.... So evidently Cain is an ordained Baptist Minister (2002) years before considering entry to politics.
Cain ran for president in 2000. ....And I think, not sure, but I think he ran for a senate seat somewhere back there.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at October 05, 2011 05:46 AM (sYyfh)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 05:47 AM (lNGfM)
A contrast between the yin/yang Obama and Palin perpetual campaign mode?
Unless he pulls out, he's a candidate. Unless she jumps in, she's not.
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 05:47 AM (lpWVn)
tell it to free republic
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 05:49 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 05:50 AM (lNGfM)
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 05:52 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 05:55 AM (lNGfM)
Posted by: nobama12 at October 05, 2011 05:57 AM (ykY2u)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 06:00 AM (lNGfM)
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at October 05, 2011 06:00 AM (6IV8T)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 05, 2011 06:01 AM (eOXTH)
Juveniles, black on black. Do your kids say it as well?
That you'd promote/accept its usage in your home is your business.
During the 1980s, it hadn't been ok to post/say the n-word for decades already. So eventually, the Perrys removed the offense at the gate BECAUSE it was insensitive and not PC. So that's that. No more, no less.
Posted by: didn't take long at October 05, 2011 09:22 AM (lpWVn)
What an ass you are. Yeah, I "promote" it in my home. How old are you? Do you have children over the age of 11? Do you know any black people? If you have children over 11 are they male or female? Heterosexual?
Perry did not say/use/defend it.
You are so off on a tangent about some word that had nothing to do with him and everything to do with the race baiting anti-south anti-republican media, it isn't even funny.
Examine your assumptions. Perry didn't DO anything wrong. Cain reacted poorly. Hopefully he will do better next time because he appears to have a very very short learning curve.
Posted by: dagny at October 05, 2011 06:03 AM (9mW6H)
Posted by: jeannebodine at October 05, 2011 06:04 AM (nvlAW)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 06:10 AM (lNGfM)
Look. all the cheerleaders er, um candidates have pointy elbows. Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who in the pre-season debates. This is supposed to be a happy occasion - namely getting the SCOAMF-in-Chief and his evil minions out of the White House, Executive Branch, Senate, and House.
And any more cracks about Texas and I'll become your worst Too Proud of Texas Guy Real Men of Genius sock spammer nightmare.
Posted by: Count de Monet at October 05, 2011 06:11 AM (4q5tP)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 06:11 AM (lNGfM)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 05, 2011 06:13 AM (lNGfM)
Posted by: McLovin at October 05, 2011 07:32 AM (j0IcY)
A vote for Cain is a vote for Romney. Cain is this cycle's Huckabee, the flash in the pan who sucks just enough oxygen to allow the establishment candidate to win a plurality. Cain cannot fundraise, is not interested in winning, has shown an instinct to join media attacks, has made stupid gaffes and is not willing to endorse whoever wins--that is a time-bomb waiting to go off.
Posted by: Jimmuy at October 05, 2011 06:26 AM (ibeMV)
Posted by: SurferDoc at October 05, 2011 06:32 AM (STdkO)
Perry still has legs. The election is 13 months away. Unbunch your panties.
#173 On to the next whom, exactly?
Posted by: Count de Monet at October 05, 2011 06:36 AM (4q5tP)
I hope I did the tiny url right. It should be a link to Gateway Pundit, who is reporting a GOP top fund raiser who says the GOP has "chosen" its candidate. Romney. I am disgusted with the GOP if this is true.
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at October 05, 2011 06:38 AM (6IV8T)
What does Perry stand for?
I don't know the answer to either one. I don't like green eggs or ham.
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 05, 2011 06:40 AM (OhYCU)
^This
Excellent analysis, Domenech, whoever you are.
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry, bitch at October 05, 2011 06:40 AM (pY3GI)
Dude, if you can't stand the heat now, wait til the Marxists get a hold of you in the general.
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 05, 2011 06:42 AM (OhYCU)
Fuck the establishment GOP.
It's time to teach them that they don't get to choose the candidate, we do.
Donate money directly to your candidate, not the RNC, for starters.
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry, bitch at October 05, 2011 06:43 AM (pY3GI)
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry, bitch at October 05, 2011 10:43 AM (pY3GI)
Yes, I'm shocked to hear that the GOP establishment has chosen (gasp) an establishment NE RINO liberal for their candidate. The same guys that gave us the McCain win (oh wait...).
I will never give a cent to the RNC "party" hacks, but I do intend to give directly to the conservative candidates of MY choice!
Posted by: Hrothgar at October 05, 2011 06:47 AM (i3+c5)
Exactly. He studied the McCain campaign from top to bottom and has produced a near copy: Say what needs to be said, just get enough of the votes; suck up several big donors, present a facade of support; keep third-tier candidates in long enough to win enough of the first big states, make it a one-man race between you and all the other guys fighting over the same loaf.
Somewhere, somehow, McCain got his big donors to fund Huckabee and right now Romney is doing the same for Bachmann and Cain.
I still can't believe we are going down this road.
Are we really going to nominate the guy who lost to McCain, who was to the left of McCain and is only flanked on the left in the current field by Huntsman?
Not a one Romney supporter can come up with any of his policy positions that are to the right of Perry.
Give me a reason to vote for Romney over Perry and it all boils down to this: He a good speaker. That's it. Not policy, not action, not results. Words. Just words.
Posted by: Jimmuy at October 05, 2011 06:57 AM (ibeMV)
His delivery is "milder" than the stump speech Perry - again, understandable. I think this is a radio interview (even though there is video on YouTube).
I will vote for Newt Gingrich before I'd vote for Cain.
Posted by: Y-not at October 05, 2011 06:57 AM (5H6zj)
158 Romney has flaws but going after him on his religiion is last ditch desperation moves
Ha! If he wins the nomination, just watch the MSM do that very thing.
Posted by: Old Texas Chick at October 05, 2011 06:59 AM (lLXZV)
Bingo.
The "Romney is the most electable candidate" argument is fallacious. Even when I was supporting him (earlier this year) I had my doubts about his electability.
Posted by: Y-not at October 05, 2011 07:02 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Y-not at October 05, 2011 07:03 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: George Orwell at October 05, 2011 07:05 AM (AZGON)
And IÂ’ll promise you this: IÂ’ll work every day to make Washington, D.C. as inconsequential in your life as I can.
That's what he stands for.
In my opinion, Mitt Romney stands for the status quo when it comes to the size of government.
Posted by: Y-not at October 05, 2011 07:05 AM (5H6zj)
I like that, but...
Has he done that in Texas? Will he just maintain the bloated government? Or will he cut it?
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 05, 2011 07:26 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: danny at October 05, 2011 07:43 AM (2OCgP)
" It should be a link to Gateway Pundit, who is reporting a GOP top fund raiser who says the GOP has "chosen" its candidate. Romney. I am disgusted with the GOP if this is true."
Well, some voters might disagree. Romney tops out at 25-30% of GOP voters. 50-60% can be called anti-Romney.
With the change of rules, unlike McCain, Romney might not be able to put the nomination away by winning 30-35% each primary.
The question is if how much of the 50-60% anti-Romney vote will soften over time to let him win.
Posted by: Bob from Ohio at October 05, 2011 07:49 AM (ROFkf)
Posted by: Tommy V at October 05, 2011 08:25 AM (J2Str)
Yes, we hate Obama. And a large chunk of America is very disappointed in him. Now, what you need to do is tell us why we should like you, and tell that vast pool of Americans why they should vote for you.
Forget about the Obama bashing. Reality is bashing Obama far better than you can. Tell us why you are the one we should send to replace Obama.
Less than 50% of voters approve of President Obama, and the job he's done. The first half of the sale has been made. Now make the second half. Introduce yourself to us. Get some out of state advisers who don't know anything about you. Then have your texas people sit down with them, and talk about what you've done. Everything that's a surprise? Assume the rest of America needs to be told it, too.
Posted by: Greg Q at October 05, 2011 08:29 AM (/0a60)
Since whoever takes office in January 2013 will be presiding over a nation in many kinds of collapse/disaster, it's going to have to be someone with brains abundant and balls of steel. We need a fricking Churchill, folks. And frankly, I'm not seeing Churchill in any of the people on that stage. If and when our version of Churchill comes along, hopefully he or she will refuse to even participate in these stupid dueling-soundbites charades.
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at October 05, 2011 08:34 AM (2AfqM)
Jimmuy @171:
A vote for Cain is a vote for Romney. Cain is this cycle's Huckabee, the flash in the pan who sucks just enough oxygen to allow the establishment candidate to win a plurality.
Amen, brother.
Am I really the only person around who has noticed Cain and Romney's little mutual admiration society? Romney never says anything bad about Cain, and Cain sucks up to Romney. I think Cain is angling to be Romney's VP.
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at October 05, 2011 08:41 AM (2AfqM)
Bob from Ohio @192:
WHAT change of rules? I haven't heard about this, but I'm intrigued. Has the GOP finally decided to quit being the Party of Stupid? Last I heard, NH was still gonna be a fucking open primary.
Links, please?
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at October 05, 2011 08:44 AM (2AfqM)
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at October 05, 2011 08:56 AM (2AfqM)
Posted by: Elize Nayden at October 05, 2011 10:22 AM (v49dF)
Texans like him because he does a good job of being CEO and not laying down and letting the Feds roll over us. He has never been a great debater, don't know who ever said he was. We don't care. Rick just does the right thing for Texas, and I know he will carry that blueprint to Washington. Don't judge a man by 2 debate performances. Look at his record. Texas is the world's 8th largest economy and he has been running it for 11 years. When S&P downgraded the U.S. in August, they upgraded Texas. Look at his record.
Posted by: William Barrett Travis at October 05, 2011 11:48 AM (g86v0)
Posted by: steevy at October 05, 2011 02:29 PM (fyOgS)
I look for integrity, good judgement and common sense, and the ability to get the job done within the constraints of our politicial system and its traditions. Past accomplishments and a consistent record are also vital.
Perry fails on these points. His disdain for the voters is beyond belief. If you liked Bush you'll love Perry. I can not stomach more "compassionate conservatives" or as they used to be called limosine liberals.
Posted by: Molon Labe at October 05, 2011 05:54 PM (S7K8x)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3281 seconds, 330 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: McLovin at October 05, 2011 03:32 AM (j0IcY)