June 04, 2011
— Ace Subtitle:
Top Al Qaeda Leader Killed By Twitter Hack3rz and High Explosives But Mostly High Explosives
I will give Obama a rare shout-out: China claimed that it would treat an attack on Pakistan as an attack on China. What "attack" means wasn't clearly defined; did they mean the state apparatus? Perhaps this was clarified through normal diplomatic channels.
In which case, if China expressly stated "we just mean attacks on the actual nation of Pakistan," not much of a kudo to Obama, but still not bad. He is doing a good job of killing Al Qaeda.
The US has killed Ilyas Kashmiri, one of al Qaeda's most dangerous military commanders and strategists, in a Predator airstrike yesterday in South Waziristan.Kashmiri is said to be one of nine members of the al Qaeda-linked Harkat-ul Jihad Islami, or HUJI, who were killed in yesterday's Predator airstrike that leveled a compound in the Wana area of South Waziristan. A Harkat-ul Jihad Islami spokesman told Dawn that Kashmiri was killed in the attack.
...
"HUJI's statement is a sure sign we got him, we are pretty confident he is dead but we cannot confirm 100 percent," one official told The Long War Journal.
The attack took place in an area of South Waziristan controlled by Mullah Nazir, a Taliban commander who has proudly admitted he is also an al Qaeda leader. The Pakistani military refuses to move against Nazir as he is considered a "good Taliban" leader because he does not attack the state. Nazir does shelter al Qaeda and other terror groups, and carries out attacks in Afghanistan.
The only good Taliban is a #Hacked! Taliban.
Thanks to Marilyn.
More: Hot Air already has this well-covered, and it turns out this seems a Big F'n' Deal, as Joe Biden might say, perhaps about Amtrak adding a new Scranton-to-Albany line.
Lots of important details plucked out there, but this quote gives a flavor:
“We will never recover from his loss,” a young Afghan who fought with al Qaeda in the tribal area in 2009 and who had seen Kashmiri there tells The Daily Beast. “He was the bridge between al Qaeda and the Afghan and Pakistani Taliban…But his spirit will rest calmly because he did his job, and his revenge will be bigger than bin Laden’s revenge.”
Posted by: Ace at
08:59 AM
| Comments (37)
Post contains 408 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Tami at June 04, 2011 09:04 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: dagny at June 04, 2011 09:05 AM (Tf2JU)
Posted by: mugiwara at June 04, 2011 09:06 AM (KI/Ch)
3
I think India is a big factor. As usual, China has claims to (fill in the blank: here India's) territory.
Posted by: Beagle at June 04, 2011 09:07 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: General Won Hung Lo at June 04, 2011 09:08 AM (VXBR1)
Posted by: David Gillies at June 04, 2011 09:12 AM (FdBA0)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at June 04, 2011 09:13 AM (UciSl)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at June 04, 2011 09:15 AM (qvify)
There. I said it.
Posted by: S. Weasel at June 04, 2011 09:19 AM (SJTLr)
Posted by: Donna at June 04, 2011 09:19 AM (bdE9c)
Posted by: dagny at June 04, 2011 01:05 PM (Tf2JU)
They are both longtime enemies of India, (the old enemy's/enemy/friend).
Posted by: ontherocks at June 04, 2011 09:21 AM (HBqDo)
Well, have at it, you goatfuckers. And keep one eye on the sky. Captain Awesome is on the watch!
Posted by: I'm in a New York state of mind at June 04, 2011 09:28 AM (4sQwu)
If you search the India-China cold war it really only goes back to the 1962 War. You'd think given the age of the civilizations it would be more, but that's it. One author in 2010 called another China-India war inevitable, Time article.
Too bad IE 9 makes it impossible to use most websites or use any of the handy features at AoSHQ. Upgrade fever, catch it! Yeah, I know, download Firefox and start over. Been there, done that.
Posted by: Beagle at June 04, 2011 09:29 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Errol at June 04, 2011 09:48 AM (uAzAD)
Posted by: Kasper Hauser at June 04, 2011 09:50 AM (v0pFT)
Perchance the former is feeding us information on the latter, in hopes that we'll do the heavy lifting/housecleaning?
Posted by: John P. Squibob at June 04, 2011 09:58 AM (/U/Mr)
i guess that means that any actionable intel to be gathered was blown to shit also.
Posted by: stormin1961 at June 04, 2011 10:15 AM (Foooh)
". . . and his revenge will be bigger than bin LadenÂ’s revenge."
The 'revenge' attack they talk about was against the Pakistan military. The same military that most likely protected Bin Laden there for years. Yeah, ok. We blow up one of you, they kill each other in revenge.....sounds like a plan.
Posted by: landofskybluewater at June 04, 2011 10:35 AM (XthHy)
Eventually, there will be blowback from this. It won't be pretty. Endless war is....endless.
That said understand there isn't any tears shed on my end for dead jihadis.
Posted by: torabora at June 04, 2011 10:37 AM (XL2DT)
Why do they keep becoming outraged and having enragement with rage and furious fury?
O'Bama has The Peace Prize! From a Committee! That should count for something. They should listen to His Words as we do.
Posted by: DougS at June 04, 2011 10:55 AM (Xet17)
The only reason the targeted Al Qaida killings are continuing under Obie's watch is because he has no choice.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at June 04, 2011 11:27 AM (TG5lG)
Posted by: t-bird at June 04, 2011 11:32 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: t-bird at June 04, 2011 11:34 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at June 04, 2011 11:38 AM (bxiXv)
Too bad IE 9 makes it impossible to use most websites or use any of the handy features at AoSHQ. Upgrade fever, catch it! Yeah, I know, download Firefox and start over. Been there, done that.
Posted by: Beagle at June 04, 2011 01:29 PM (sOtz/)
The best thing about standards is that there are so many of them!
Seriously, about IE 14 people will finally get sick of MS dicking with internet standards. You can't just re-write standards everybody has to use without pissing people off.
Not that FF4 isn't Full of Lose, man, it's like there's some universal principle that things get better for a while, and then by the immutable laws of physics they must get worse.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at June 04, 2011 11:40 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: stuiec at June 04, 2011 11:40 AM (HMdeP)
The Neocon catchphrase used to argue for extended military involvement in the Middle East and and far-off Bactria- " We're fighting them over there, so we don't have to fight them over here", has proven complete folly. With the attack at Fort Hood by Nidal Hasan, anyone can see the failure. Yet we've learned nothing.
We weren't struck on 9/11 because muslims were in Afghanistan, we were struck because muslims were in the US.
Posted by: sartana at June 04, 2011 01:20 PM (/IW23)
The only reason the targeted Al Qaida killings are continuing under Obie's watch is because he has no choice.
My thoughts exactly. If the indonesian idiot had a choice he wouldn't be doing jack shit. All credit goes to our Warriors who continue to do an amazing job killing our enemies and defending America, despite the lack of leadership in the White House and the Pentagon (talking to you Mullen's, you buddy fucking prick).
Posted by: Theresa, MSgt (ret), USAF at June 04, 2011 01:32 PM (6t/p5)
Posted by: Cortillaen at June 04, 2011 01:54 PM (VE37E)
Holy Shit! I don't know if you've looked at this guys pic in the link or not, but I think they accidentally killed Ben stiller.
Posted by: FireSarge at June 04, 2011 02:41 PM (cGybZ)
Posted by: Comanche Voter at June 05, 2011 06:49 AM (3ESDJ)
Posted by: Sexy corsets at June 05, 2011 07:58 AM (1G42x)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2228 seconds, 165 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: ...And noodles at June 04, 2011 09:01 AM (bMlVI)