January 05, 2011
— Gabriel Malor There you go making my heart beat again.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:56 AM
| Comments (191)
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 02:59 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Plymouthmom at January 05, 2011 03:02 AM (O/5X6)
An outstanding new volume explains the sources of its success.
January 5, 2011 - by P. David Hornik @ PajamasMedia
In his new book, The Transforming Fire: The Rise of the Israel-Islamist Conflict, Jonathan Spyer maintains that what was once called the Arab-Israeli conflict has evolved into something with a different coloration, and that the Islamist side — at least declaratively — underestimates Israel’s ongoing resilience. While its old elite has lost much of its spunk, Israel itself has not weakened.
Instead, he maintains, it has changed. In the army, national-religious soldiers, heavily overrepresented among officers and elite combat soldiers, have replaced the scions of Israel’s former secular-socialist elite. The “new Israeliness,” Spyer suggests, “is steeped in a comfortable [though] not particularly rigorous attachment to the symbols of Jewish tradition,” including “the Temple Mount, the Hebrew language,” and “the Jewish festivals[.]” This “immensely powerful complex of images and ideas” forms a “bedrock” of strength, ultimately more solid than the latest wave of humiliated rage, known as Islamism, coming from the other side.
That does not mean Israel has not faltered over this past decade of Iranian-propelled Islamist aggression. It did so, egregiously, in its badly mismanaged 2006 war against Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Since then, though, Israel’s strength, confidence, and power of deterrence have been restored — by successful military actions against the Syrian plutonium reactor in 2007 and against Hamas in Gaza in 2008; by a major revamp of the IDF; and, most important, by a serious reevaluation of the continuing importance of ground combat. Spyer contends that Israel remains the only regional force capable of withstanding and prevailing against the Islamist tide.
Posted by: maverick muse at January 05, 2011 03:12 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: maverick muse at January 05, 2011 03:15 AM (H+LJc)
Some nuts from the other side of the nation wrote a letter to the Editor at my local newspaper. Because I'm a giver I'll reprint it here. I hope Gabe likes it:
Repeal of 'Don't ask, don't tell' makes killers of homosexuals
Editor:
In 1967 Martin Luther King, Jr. gave a speech at Ebenezer Baptist Church called "Beyond Vietnam," where he declared that his conscience would not allow him to remain silent on the question of Vietnam, on the horrors of war, on the threat of violence to our existence. In this speech he pointed out the irony that young men of color were welcomed to join the military in order to burn villages and kill the people of Vietnam in the name of a democracy and of freedoms not yet granted to them in the country for which they fought. They could kill and wreak havoc side by side with white Americans in combat abroad, but they could not sit by one another in the same school or eat together at the same restaurant back home.
I could not help but be reminded of this speech when a colleague suggested that the repeal of the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" legislation showed that, again in King's words, "the arc of the universe bends toward justice." But this colleague left out the most important word in that sentence: "the arc of the moral universe bends toward justice." What is "moral" about war? War is and will always be immoral because it demands of us to violate the first principle of moral conduct: thou shalt not kill. And while it is moral and right to stand firmly for conscience, which the lesbian and gay community achieves by not hiding their sexual identity, preferring to be open about whom they love, it is the moral right of no one to wage war and to kill.
It has often been our observation that we of a progressive persuasion can be easily fooled by our relatively narrow focus on equality for one or another group, forgetting the question of equality for all. Poor people can step up economically by being conditioned to kill for the state; now lesbians and gays can emerge from a social shadow (and we do not minimize the value of this) by undergoing a far deeper kind of dehumanization. These are Pyrrhic victories. Let us not rejoice until we have won the only kind of victory that endures: the victory of everyone over the violence that hurts us all.
Stephanie N. Van Hook and Michael N. Nagler
Portland, Oregon
Posted by: Ed Anger at January 05, 2011 03:22 AM (7+pP9)
Let us not rejoice until we have won the only kind of victory that endures: the victory of everyone over the violence that hurts us all.
Those two should be airdropped into Waziristan.
And congrats, Oregon, you are now little sister to California--with all that entails.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 05, 2011 03:29 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: Mr Pink at January 05, 2011 03:39 AM (py+T/)
Chinese to open candy factory in Sumter, Sc
One wonders how that is going to work out? We used to have two major candy factories over in Darlington County and both shutdown. It wasn't because of high wages either.There were two major reasons for the shutdown; (1) Insane sugar policy of the federal gov and (2) insane regulatory atmosphere of the federal gov.
One wonders if a backdoor deal between the feds and the Chinese has occurred here? I wouldn't put it past them.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 03:52 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Neomom at January 05, 2011 03:52 AM (AovJ3)
Posted by: Oldsailor at January 05, 2011 03:56 AM (AovJ3)
www.fashionspaceonline.com is one of the great resource for brand new fashionable clothing, shoes and accessories.
Here are the main products that we deal with:
Shoes: Nike Air Jordan, Air Force 1, Nike Air Jordan AFJ Fusion, Dunk SB, Nike Air Max, Air Shox Running Shoes, Nike Air Zoom Dunkesto, Air Yeezy, Nike Work Boots, ACG, Nike Foamposite, Gucci, Prada, Puma Ferrari, Supra, Ato Matsumoto, Lacoste, James, Kobe, Converse, Creative Recreation, CR DICOCO, Ed hardy, Evisu, Mauri, Coogi, Dsquared, Ice Cream, New Balance, Greedy Genius, Clae Shoes and Sneakers.
Jeans: Evisu, Gucci, Armani, Bape BBC, Red Monkey, G-Star, Levis, Diesel, Versace, Prada, Louis Vuitton, Ed Hardy, True Religion, Coogi, Christian Audigier, Affliction, Laguna Beach, Iceberg, Crown Holder, Roca wear, Dolce & Gabbana, Artful Dodger, Blac Label, Rock & Republic Jeans Shorts and Pants.
T-shirt: BBC, Bape, G-Star, Evisu, Coogi, Armani, LV, 5ive jungle, Akademiks, Smet, A & F, Affliction, Ed Hardy, Christian Audigier, Blac Label, Polo, Lacoste, Crown Holder, Dolce & Gabbana, Versace, Ecko, Gucci, Adidas, Nike, Levis T-shirts and dress shirts.
Other Accessories: Chanel, Chloe, Coach, Dior, Gucci, Fendi, LV, Juicy, Prada, D&G, Ed Hardy, Christian Audigier Leather Handbag, Purse and Wallets.
Rolex, Breitlint, JACOB & CO. Cartier, Gucci, Ed Hardy Watches.
D&G, Okley, Fendi, Coach, Chanel, Gucci, Prada, Armani, Versace, Burberry, Ray.Ban, Ed hardy, Louis Vuitton, Christian Dior, Cartier Sun Glasses
Armani, CK, D&G, LV, Versace, Ed Hardy, Diesel, Gucci, polo, Prada, Puma, Versace, G-star Underwears.
Juicy, Bikini, Ed Hardy, A&F, Polo, Christian Audigier Swimming Wear, Bikini, Bathing suits.
Bape, Ed Hardy, New Era, Coogi, Gucci, New era with light, Louis Vuitton, Monster Energy Caps
DSQ, D&G, LV, Bape, Armani, Gucci, Chanel, Boss, Affliction, Versace, Ed Hardy, Christian Audigier Belts.
Welcome to contact us by MSN: babydress898@hotmail.com .Thanks!
Posted by: China-store at January 05, 2011 03:56 AM (t24Na)
Adjustment to my rank-ordered list of things that concern me:
8,823,902,106. Frozen wasp in Antarctica reanimated. Stings Tina Fey.
8,823,902,107. Glenn Close distraught.
8,823,902,108. James Cameron abducted and eaten by actual blue aliens.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 05, 2011 04:00 AM (B+qrE)
Agreed.
Keeping in line with this, is Glenn Close going to forbid the purchase or sale of anything relating to Fatal Attraction in all military-related stores?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at January 05, 2011 04:01 AM (9hSKh)
Why do I get the feeling Stephanie N. Van Hook and Michael N. Nagler from Portland, Oregon wrote that letter in a co-op coffee shop while wearing stylish all-hemp sweaters and smart glasses while drinking organic cappuccinos.
FIFY
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 05, 2011 04:04 AM (B+qrE)
China's nationalism apparently boils down to racism (even within China, certain tribal ethnic superiority complexes) enhanced by personality cults empowered by complete authoritarianism. And Obama endorsed this as America's model. And given the inflated house of cards global economy, Obama endorses the old "duck and cover" ad campaign for survival.
While our Brass deem nothing of import beyond their profitable careers of power, McChrystal's legacy remains with US troops bound by PC Rules of Engagement. Our troops on the ground are not meant to be empowered to win, "victory" without meaning to the CinC. Meanwhile, the US Military is stripped naked and reissued uniform PC that eschews anything referencing "all American" like moms, apple pie, and the US Constitution. The exercise of faith becomes prohibited with exceptional endorsement for allah. Before you know it, the American flag will be deemed a symbol against US Military policy. And in the social justice globalist framework, our craft and weapons will find their way to be used by Islam against the USA, and the US required to borrow aid/protection--as if we're not there now.
Some nationalist Germans will maintain their innate survival sensibilities, though encumbered by PC playing the "peace" card, unfortunately strengthening the ugly side of survival of the fittest. And the European PC Union set-up will repeat the alienation of cultural ties as the Brits, French and dupes play out their own "tolerant" animosity cards. Yeah, I agree with the American Thinker article the other day that we're set up for something worse than the WWI atrocity against all logic and humanity, likely to be sparked again by another radical-Islamic youth assassin.
Posted by: maverick muse at January 05, 2011 04:05 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: ef at January 05, 2011 04:06 AM (c7Pp2)
Tax system takes S.C. toll
The chamber of commerce is bitching about the sales tax hike that was passed to alleviate school tax hikes. (not; more later).
That law, Act 388, exempts owner-occupied homes -- but not commercial property -- from school operating taxes. An increase in the state sales tax was supposed to offset the loss of home-tax revenue for schools. But as sales tax receipts slumped along with the economy, more of the school-funding burden has fallen on business property.
Yes, when you move ALL your revenue generation into sales taxes and the economy goes to shit you lose a lot of your revenue (note that the SC economy didn't drop that much, it was already low).
Another grip I have with that law is somehow it allows counties to continue their school tax. I got the increased sales tax AND continued school property tax.
And lastly, the law wasn't passed to give you a break on property taxes. It was passed because of federal court's unconstitutional interference with local school systems. In a case a few years ago the courts ruled against the NAACP which had filed suit based on the stupid theory that the school funding system based on property taxes was racial discrimination because of the "outcome" of less funding in heavy black counties.
The court ruled against them, but they included a caveat that the State did need to do something about this "outcome" or perhaps the court may ave to step in at a later date. Of course the lawyers for the school systems all bowed and scraped because school administrators smelled more money and they didn't give a T-damn about how they got it.
Lo and behold the Statewide sales tax funding for schools was born. I also understand that this tactic is being used all over the country.
What we really need is either one of three options:
1. My favorite; eliminate public schools
2. Place ALL schools back to local only funding with no State or Federal government interference or funding. Let the counties decide how they will fund schools.
3. Eliminate ALL State taxes period except a 10% flat tax on all income from all sources regardless of source. Fund everything from that. Decrease all budgets to fit that income.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 04:08 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: maverick muse at January 05, 2011 04:09 AM (H+LJc)
The judges seemed to be saying that the laws governing the IG's independence are so weak as to be without effect, in which case, it hardly makes sense for Congress to have bothered to write them.
Posted by: toby928™ at January 05, 2011 04:15 AM (S5YRY)
Pretty soon, said clown is going to be hosting Iranian Shahab-3 missiles pointed directly at us.
Loved this comment from the story -
And I'm sure Chavez will have plenty of young girls there for Bill to feast on too.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at January 05, 2011 04:23 AM (9hSKh)
If there were a conspiracy afoot among federal judges I'd say it's this: Tear down good laws and build up the senseless ones.
Keep that in mind and none of these decisions will be a surprise.
Posted by: ef at January 05, 2011 04:33 AM (c7Pp2)
I noticed on the replay on C-SPAN yesterday that when Ms. Nancy Pelosi took over the role of Speaker Of The House, gave her acceptance speech and rambled on tediously with all of her other disingenuous comments back on January 4, 2007, all of the Republican Congressmen and members of their families and friends of their families in the chamber that day had the common courtesy of joining Democrats in applauding each and every one of Ms. Pelosi's points and comments.
Let's see if the Democrats have the good manners to reciprocate today when John Boehner takes over the role of Speaker Of The House.
I predict that we will see a lot of sulking, sullen, surly and belligerent Democrats, whose eyes will be glazing over and who will be tuning out Mr. Boehner's speech and who won't be applauding. But we'll see.
Posted by: Brian at January 05, 2011 04:34 AM (sYrWB)
When I was a kid I would read about the gross stupidity of societies in the past and wonder how they could have so oblivious to the obvious. Now we are the oblivious. How does this end well?
Posted by: WalrusRex at January 05, 2011 04:39 AM (xxgag)
Democrats do not have "good sport" written in their playbooks.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 05, 2011 04:40 AM (Fo83G)
those nearest the House Speaker will sue him for "spitting" in their general direction.
Posted by: maverick muse at January 05, 2011 04:41 AM (H+LJc)
Morning, all!
Okay, this has got to be one of the stupidest stories to come out of Britain in recent memory, and that's saying something.
Stowaway shambles: Asylum seeker who keeps trying to return to Morocco sues Britain for STOPPING him
Two things:
1) The guy is an idiot. Instead of stowing away on ships in an attempt to get home to Morocco, why not buy a legitimate ticket? He had a job at SOME point. Or heck, just get on a bus to France. It's more or less the same thing at this point.
and
2) OH MY GOD JUST DEPORT HIM.
I weep for Britain, I really do. They've dug a hole so deep for themselves they're never going to get out of it. I've got family over there somewhere; I just hope they survive the madness.
On a cheerier side note, I CANNOT WAIT for the Wicked Bitch of the West to hand over her gavel today. That will be so sweeeeet.
Posted by: MWR at January 05, 2011 04:51 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2011 04:54 AM (lnUW/)
Because I'm a giver I'll reprint it here. I hope Gabe likes it:
I'm genuinely curious why you think I'd like that op ed.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at January 05, 2011 04:59 AM (IkTb7)
Posted by: SurferDoc at January 05, 2011 05:01 AM (o3bYL)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2011 08:54 AM (lnUW/)
I did
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 05:01 AM (M9Ie6)
Egypt's Christians fear new attack on holiday
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at January 05, 2011 05:02 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at January 05, 2011 05:02 AM (IkTb7)
Posted by: steevy at January 05, 2011 05:03 AM (l/6Ct)
The Benefits Storm
Why New York canÂ’t afford enough sanitation workers to clean up the snow
4 January 2011
On Sunday, BloombergÂ’s Blizzard saved a suicidal HellÂ’s Kitchen man who jumped nine stories, not to his death but into a cushion of trash bags, which hadnÂ’t been picked up because the previous weekÂ’s snowstorm had postponed trash collection. Coming a few weeks before budget season starts, could the storm also save New York from its suicidal spending? Only if state and local politicians identify the true culprit behind the botched post-storm cleanup: the misguided idea that management expertise can overcome the benefits costs that are consuming the city budget.
If money could melt snow, Mayor Bloomberg would be basking in victory over the storm. When he took office in 2002, Gotham spent $1.3 billion annually on the Department of Sanitation. Today, the city spends more than $2.2 billion on “New York’s Strongest.” That increase during Bloomberg’s tenure was almost three and a half times the inflation rate. It follows that we should have a sanitation army well equipped to clean the white stuff up fast. Not quite. Today’s budgeted sanitation force—from supervisors to garbage collectors—is 392 people smaller than it was nine years ago, a 4 percent decline even as population is up. And the department is shrinking further, as Deputy Mayor Stephen Goldsmith knocks 200 people off the rolls to save $21 million by moving supervisors into front-line jobs.
So where has the city’s swelling sanitation budget gone? Not into better services but into workers’ health care and pensions, as well as borrowing to fund infrastructure, which would otherwise be unaffordable because of those sky-high benefits. Taxpayers now spend $144,000 on salary and benefits for each sanitation worker, up from $79,000 nearly a decade ago. Nine years ago, taxpayers contributed about $10.5 million annually to support sanitation pensions; this year, they’ll cost $240 million—a more than twentyfold increase (the final number may be lower, though, as some changes to the pension funds, which push up contribution rates, may not go into effect until next year).
Posted by: Ed Anger at January 05, 2011 05:04 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at January 05, 2011 05:04 AM (IkTb7)
Posted by: Nighthawk at January 05, 2011 05:07 AM (02uN6)
If you are a Religious type, they deny the fallen nature of Man.
Posted by: Zakn at January 05, 2011 05:07 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: steevy at January 05, 2011 05:09 AM (l/6Ct)
Posted by: SurferDoc at January 05, 2011 05:10 AM (o3bYL)
The chart posted earlier guarantees that will happen. It's a matter of when not if.
Posted by: Zakn at January 05, 2011 05:12 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: Zakn at January 05, 2011 05:14 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: steevy at January 05, 2011 05:15 AM (l/6Ct)
Probably the work of that nefarious Jon Huntsman bringing jobs to American communities. The horror!
Posted by: HotAir commenter at January 05, 2011 05:15 AM (IDL9N)
It will take a new act to repeal the parts of the stimulus bill that are CURRENTLY bailing out the States. We have already sent CA something like 19 billion dollars in aid by in the past year buying their worthless bond paper. IL, NY, NJ et al are also getting in on this gravy train.
So I am not sure how we can stop it, short of a special funding bill that includes zero dollars for funding that bond buying racket.
We are already seeing how that will work with the zero funding for moving GITMO prisoners for trial. Obama in a signing statement said he would ignore it.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 05:17 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Zakn at January 05, 2011 05:17 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 05, 2011 05:18 AM (mHQ7T)
----
fify
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 05:18 AM (IDL9N)
Is there nothing that BushCheney can't do?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at January 05, 2011 05:18 AM (LH6ir)
Even the rich aren't paying their bills and/or cancelling the perks of being rich.
My husband works for a window washer/large equipement operator business. He is always busy and usually bitches because my hubby has a day job and can't help him that often.
Now, he barely has enough jobs to keep him busy. There are several rich (by rich I'm talking they can afford sports cars and dog walkers - not millions in the bank) customers that have just stopped paying him. Even truck stops, banks, stores, etc have told him that instead of washing their windows once a month, he only has to do it every three/four months.
Some of his clients haven't even paid him in months.
One of his financial clients was talking to him and told him to make sure he gets paid ASAP after he does a job because the next big bubble to burst is going to be the upper, upper middle class (and small service businesses). He said that even four years ago people making $500,000 could afford a nice house, 2 fancy cars, a nanny, etc. Now, their cars are being foreclosed on, they are downsizing their houses, dropping all extra expenditures, etc. That in turn will cause A LOT of small businesses to go belly up.
He warned that by the end of this year, most small businesses like my friend's (service) will be destroyed.
Posted by: momma at January 05, 2011 05:19 AM (penCf)
Caught the tail end of a news flash about Cheney needing a heart transplant this morning but nothing else since. In that last go-round I said things didn't look good for him. It looks like it is starting to get worse.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 05:20 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 05, 2011 05:21 AM (mHQ7T)
That's cappuccini! You probably eat farmed arugula too.
Savage.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at January 05, 2011 05:21 AM (LH6ir)
Too bad the Razorbacks' receivers couldn't catch a ball if it was hand-delivered to them wrapped up in a bow.
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 05:23 AM (IDL9N)
A small network of hedge fund executives pumped at least $10 million into Republican campaign committees and allied groups before NovemberÂ’s elections, helping bankroll GOP victories that this week will change the balance of power in Washington, according to a review of campaign records and interviews with industry insiders by the Center for Public Integrity and NBC News.
Bitterly opposed to President Barack Obama’s economic and regulatory policies — including proposals to increase taxes on some of their profits — top Wall Street hedge fund moguls were unusually energized during last year’s election. They held multiple fundraisers and coordinated strategy to direct what appear to be unprecedented sums into the coffers of GOP and allied political committees, according to industry and GOP fundraising sources.
The MFM is in full propaganda mode. Those EVIL Wall Street types spent $10 million to put those EVIL Republicans in office. I'm sure that $10 million really tipped the balance. How many stories will there be about how much the unions spent?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 05, 2011 05:24 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 05, 2011 05:25 AM (rGcPc)
That phrase has always irritated me. "Free Trade," when used by the typical lefty coffee-house fool, means state-supported agrarian redistribution.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at January 05, 2011 05:30 AM (LH6ir)
'Tea party' freshmen embrace status quo After campaigning against D.C.'s ways, new Republican lawmakers quickly turn to lobbyists and fundraisers The new class of Republican lawmakers who charged into office promising to shun the ways of Washington officially arrives on Capitol Hill on Wednesday. But even as they publicly bash the capital's culture, many have quietly begun to embrace it.
Several freshmen have hired lobbyists — the ultimate Washington insiders — to lead their congressional staffs. In the weeks leading up to Wednesday's swearing-in, dozens of the newcomers joined other lawmakers in turning to lobbyists for campaign cash. And on Wednesday, congressional offices will be packed with lawmakers' relatives, friends, constituents and lobbyists, all invited to celebrate the new Congress.
So it raised eyebrows Tuesday when several House freshmen held a fundraiser in a swanky Washington hotel. The event, organized in part by California Rep.-elect Jeff Denham (R-Atwater), stood out as the flashiest celebration of the new Congress.
Posted by: momma at January 05, 2011 05:31 AM (penCf)
What's with Charles Krauthammer in recent days? He seems to be reversing his positions on issues, and he seems to have become an Obama supporter suddenly, and what's worse is that he seems to be well on his way to becoming another David Gergen. Maybe there is a link between those spooky recent developments and the birds falling out of the sky, ya think?.
BTW, did you ever notice that Mr. Krauthammer has an uncanny resemblance to the Grinch who stole Christmas, and that when Senator Dick Lugar is talking, he has an uncanny resemblance to Howdy Doody? Seriously.
Posted by: Brian at January 05, 2011 05:31 AM (sYrWB)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2011 05:33 AM (xkJak)
means state-supported agrarian redistribution
Which has such an amazing track record.
Ooops, I forgot, lessons from the last century do not apply in the Age of Stupidtm.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 05, 2011 05:33 AM (B+qrE)
I never heard TEA partiers say they were going to eschew lobbyists or fundraisers. What they did say was that they were going to lower the deficit and shrink the government.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 05, 2011 05:33 AM (TpXEI)
I'm an idiot. I meant "fair trade". Probably that evil oppressive cup o' joe I had this morning.
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 05:39 AM (IDL9N)
China military eyes preemptive nuclear attack in event of crisis
The Chinese military will consider launching a preemptive nuclear strike if the country finds itself faced with a critical situation in a war with another nuclear state, internal documents showed Wednesday.
The newly revealed policy, called ''Lowering the threshold of nuclear threats,'' may contradict China's strategy of no first use of nuclear weapons under any circumstances, and is likely to fan concern in the United States, Japan and other regional powers about Beijing's nuclear capability.
/Which will be with us, more than likely.In the end, there will be only chaos.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at January 05, 2011 05:41 AM (9hSKh)
Please explain to me why lobbyists are evil? We shouldn't lobby congress because of what?
Posted by: dagny at January 05, 2011 05:41 AM (d2Pb5)
Posted by: GnuBreed at January 05, 2011 09:36 AM (h0RtZ)
That just went up as my profile pic on Facebook. Ha.
Posted by: Tami at January 05, 2011 05:43 AM (VuLos)
I saw him too. I was shocked by his appearance. He has dropped a great deal of weight and looks bad, imo. As for the transplant, it appears there's only a small window of opportunity for him due to his age.
Posted by: Lady in Black at January 05, 2011 05:43 AM (x9xik)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 05, 2011 05:44 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 05, 2011 05:45 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Zakn at January 05, 2011 05:45 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 05, 2011 09:44 AM (UOM4
I'm hoping after she hands it to him, he biffs her with it...hard.
Posted by: Tami at January 05, 2011 05:46 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: someone out there at January 05, 2011 05:48 AM (tigOM)
Posted by: Zakn at January 05, 2011 05:49 AM (zyaZ1)
There are a couple of potential problems that spring to mind. One is that the lobbyists representing industries or organizations that make campaign contributions have profit motives that can run counter to the best interests of - or simply the will of - the people. Industries (or unions) have deeper pockets than individuals (or even than groups of individuals if we're talking about many grassroots organizations), so they get a seat at the table that we don't get as "just" voters. Another is that lobbying groups employ politicians and their staff members after they leave government. So there's a fiduciary interest that the politicians hold in the happiness of lobbying groups.
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 05:50 AM (IDL9N)
*saves Drudge pic!* That one's going in my save folder!
Question, though: how the hell much money did that sign cost? Do all Speakers of the House get a solid wood sign with their name and position on it in engraved gold letters? What about other ranking members of the House and Senate? Can't we just have one sign that reads, "Speaker of the House" with a smaller, cheaper plastic sign beneath it with the current Speaker's name? You know, the kind of thing an office worker or cubicle flunkie might get if they're lucky? (Most of the time I just settle for making my own with a magic marker and some card stock.) Seriously, if we're trying to cut spending, can we make PART of that cut the elimination of vanity placards like this?
Posted by: MWR at January 05, 2011 05:50 AM (4df7R)
I was about to say "Source LA Times" = output 90% lie", but someone beat me to it.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 05:53 AM (M9Ie6)
I'm hoping after she hands it to him, he biffs her with it...hard.
Posted by: Tami at January 05, 2011 09:46 AM (VuLos)
Oh, that would be priceless. We can dream, right?
Hey, maybe we can get those Taiwanese animators to put us together a cartoon where he really DOES do that.
Posted by: MWR at January 05, 2011 05:53 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 05, 2011 09:50 AM (UOM4
*Waves back!*
He's good....was home for Christmas and it was great having him here. We hadn't seen him since last Christmas. He leaves for Afghanistan in a couple of weeks, so it was all I could do not to sob uncontrollably at the airport when we said goodbye to him.
And how is your son?
Posted by: Tami at January 05, 2011 05:55 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: Brian at January 05, 2011 05:56 AM (sYrWB)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 05, 2011 05:57 AM (rGcPc)
The group of scholars and clerics known as Jamat Ahle Sunnat is affiliated with a moderate school of Islam and represents the mainstream Barelvi sect.
The group said in a statement Wednesday that no one should pray for Punjab province Gov. Salman Taseer or express regret for his murder. One of his security guards is the suspected killer.
The statement also made a veiled threat against Taseer's supporters: "The supporter is as equally guilty as one who committed blasphemy."
Their comments came as thousands gathered under tight security Wednesday to pay silent homage at Taseer's funeral.
Taseer, 66, was a senior member of the ruling party regarded as an outspoken moderate in a country increasingly beset by zealotry.
His assassination on Tuesday added to the turmoil in nuclear-armed Pakistan, where the government is on the verge of collapse and
Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani and other senior ruling party officials joined up to 6,000 mourners at a ceremony at the governor's official residence in the city of Lahore in eastern Pakistan, before Taseer was buried at a nearby cemetery.
The governor's residence has been the scene of angry street protests in recent weeks against Taseer's call to repeal blasphemy laws that order death for anyone convicted of insulting Islam and his support for a Christian woman sentenced to die for allegedly insulting Islam's Prophet Muhammad.
Taseer was shot in the back in the capital Islamabad as he left a restaurant to walk to his car.
AP
Moderate and mainstream Islam strikes again....
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at January 05, 2011 05:57 AM (Bwxkn)
Outside of DC- They don't cost that much. I learned it when I was a commish of a fantasy football league and worked with a local trophy shop. It generally cost 1/2-1/4 what I thought it would. So I'm guessing $200ish based on my experience.
Posted by: Zakn at January 05, 2011 05:57 AM (zyaZ1)
Oh, that would be priceless. We can dream, right?
Hey, maybe we can get those Taiwanese animators to put us together a cartoon where he really DOES do that.
Posted by: MWR at January 05, 2011 09:53 AM (4df7R)
If they need funds to do it, I'm in.
Posted by: Tami at January 05, 2011 05:59 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 05, 2011 05:59 AM (0GFWk)
Lobbyists aren't bad, but those representing special interests instead of businesses seem to be.
Posted by: momma at January 05, 2011 06:00 AM (penCf)
D'oh Boy is fine. Bored to death with Okinawa and......wants to go to Afghanistan.
Don't know when he'll go. Shoot me now and be done with it.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 05, 2011 06:00 AM (UOM48)
Sigh. I had such plans.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 05, 2011 06:02 AM (UOM48)
I dunno if I'd give business lobbyists much of a pass either. Ethanol lobby springs to mind, but there are others.
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 06:02 AM (IDL9N)
Zakn: Thanks! Of course, to my cheap Yankee blood, $200 is enough to make me choke. Rather like my reaction when I see how much it costs to frame something. Holy Christmas, you want to talk about gobsmacking!
Unrelated note, how long until we see birds falling out of the sky in British Columbia?
Posted by: MWR at January 05, 2011 06:03 AM (4df7R)
There are a couple of potential problems that spring to mind. One is that the lobbyists representing industries or organizations that make campaign contributions have profit motives that can run counter to the best interests of - or simply the will of - the people. Industries (or unions) have deeper pockets than individuals (or even than groups of individuals if we're talking about many grassroots organizations), so they get a seat at the table that we don't get as "just" voters. Another is that lobbying groups employ politicians and their staff members after they leave government. So there's a fiduciary interest that the politicians hold in the happiness of lobbying groups.
And industries and organizations are not people? I find this argument fallacious even though it is the standard accepted anti-corporate argument. It supposes that (even though you didn't say it) that unions of "workers" are composed of people but industry is not. You also have to juxtapose non-profits with industry. Should Soros' many non-profits have access to congress but not say, Wal-mart or Ford? If industry doesn't lobby then the only groups, obviously more organized than grandma calling her congressman, are non-profits and unions. I would actually rather see the market lobby than the Center for American Progress. I would also rather see industry lobby than unions whose members were forced to provide campaign funds and who don't represent the worker as much as the union bosses and the politicians for whom they paid.
Look at the left trying to create the idea that republicans shouldn't raise money or see lobbyists. It's not because they think it's bad, it's because they want that money for themselves. They are trying to create the idea that money raising is evil while they rake it in with both hands.
Posted by: dagny at January 05, 2011 06:03 AM (d2Pb5)
The governor on Monday vowed to get to the bottom of the decision to free career criminal Dominic Cinelli, who was paroled in 2008 despite being sentenced to three concurrent life terms for a spate of armed robberies.
Woburn, Mass., officer John B. Maguire was killed in the Dec. 26 face-off at a Kohl's department store.
According to The Boston Globe, Patrick, who is facing widespread anger from police chiefs and victims' advocates, said he is "obviously upset" about the case, but was waiting for an administrative review of the decision to release Cinelli before taking any action.
Posted by: momma at January 05, 2011 06:03 AM (penCf)
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 10:02 AM (IDL9N)
Ditto. Lobbyists are the same as any other special interest group. They serve a purpose, but the power they wield has really gotten out of control, IMO.
Posted by: MWR at January 05, 2011 06:06 AM (4df7R)
Actually, I specifically inserted unions into my comment. Feel free to insert other groups as you wish (scientific societies, groups of universities such as land grants, etc).
I was trying to distinguish between deep pocketed organizations and grass-roots lobbying efforts.
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 06:06 AM (IDL9N)
Posted by: willow at January 05, 2011 06:06 AM (h+qn8)
If you are willing to trim a Mustache, then why not tend the beard?
Posted by: Zakn at January 05, 2011 06:06 AM (zyaZ1)
Damn. It drives me crazy.
Posted by: momma at January 05, 2011 06:09 AM (penCf)
Thank you Jane...and your son is in my prayers as well.
These guys don't like sittin' around, do they? Their mothers like them sittin' around....but they don't.
Posted by: Tami at January 05, 2011 06:10 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: momma at January 05, 2011 10:03 AM (penCf)
It makes your blood boil, doesn't it? Friggin' Deval. He wants to find out if the guy was wrongly granted parole? HELL YES he was wrongly granted parole! You don't receive three concurrent life sentences for being a nice guy who made a mistake. You get them for being a violent bastard!
*breathes deeply and shakily*
HATE.
Posted by: MWR at January 05, 2011 06:10 AM (4df7R)
Often beards will really make a guy look a lot older than just the mustache, imho. I don't know if it's just that beards have so may hairs that there are bound to be some grey ones in them or what.
And some guys have really nice jaws/chins but kind of funny upper lip areas (there was a picture of some dude posted here last week that was the classic example of a guy who should grow a mustache but not a beard; his upper lip was too "high" and he had a really deep indentation in the middle).
But, beware the porn star mustache!
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 06:11 AM (IDL9N)
What other clown is Obama going to find to replace him?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at January 05, 2011 06:11 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: willow at January 05, 2011 10:06 AM (h+qn
Oh, absolutely! And she'd have a big gold star added every time "her Congress" passed another piece of "landmark" (aka, "landmine") legislation.
The hubris. It burns.
Posted by: MWR at January 05, 2011 06:13 AM (4df7R)
DC will try Yoga for deliguent youths. @ Drudge;
." In the e-mail obtained by The Washington Examiner, Holman said his primary interest was in finding among the staff an instructor certified in yoga, tai-chi, or another "mind-body connection discipline."The agency is coming off a controversial year during which more than a dozen of its wards were charged with murder and at least a half-dozen were killed
Posted by: willow at January 05, 2011 06:14 AM (h+qn8)
Posted by: Zakn at January 05, 2011 06:14 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 05, 2011 06:15 AM (rGcPc)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at January 05, 2011 10:11 AM (9hSKh)
My money's on Julian Assange.
Posted by: MWR at January 05, 2011 06:15 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Trish at January 05, 2011 06:16 AM (yqhkv)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 05, 2011 06:17 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 05, 2011 06:17 AM (0GFWk)
DC will try Yoga for deliguent youths. @ Drudge;
willow: I saw that, too. Yes, because teaching thugs the lotus position is going to turn them from a life of crime.
I foresee very flexible thieves and murderers in DC's future.
Posted by: MWR at January 05, 2011 06:18 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Nighthawk at January 05, 2011 06:18 AM (02uN6)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 05, 2011 06:18 AM (UOM48)
Flip flops. F*cking, flip flops.
Posted by: momma at January 05, 2011 06:19 AM (penCf)
BTW, did you ever notice that Mr. Krauthammer has an uncanny resemblance to the Grinch who stole Christmas,
I've been seeing a turtle, although his recent bizarro pronouncements suggest he should start resembling a jackass soon.
Posted by: RushBabe at January 05, 2011 06:20 AM (urYpw)
Lobbyists are one of the most corrupting forces in the government. This is one of the most hypocritical things that the commies in power do. They constantly harp about the Republicans being owned by "big evil business" while they have the lobbyists actually write the damn bills for them.
There have been several efforts to eliminate lobbyists but the courts have repeatedly struck them down based on free speech. This is most likely due to congress not really wanting to get rid of them and writing the laws specifically so that they would be struck down.
What I would like to see is "lobbying regulation" in a manner that is meaningful. Ban "paid lobbying". If a company or other special interest group wants to speak to their congress critter then by all means, go down and schedule an appointment. If they want to contribute money, by all means contribute money as long as those contributions are documented.
However, I would make it illegal to advocate for people are groups other than yourself individually.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 06:21 AM (M9Ie6)
Well said. I agree completely. Part of capitalism is the unrestricted drive for profit, and if lobbying by industry of our lawmakers is part of that, well, it may be distasteful, but it should be allowed. And of course that is the problem with the unions. Their profit runs contrary to the success of the country, and is uncontrolled by the markets.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at January 05, 2011 06:23 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Zakn at January 05, 2011 06:24 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 05, 2011 06:25 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 10:21 AM (M9Ie6)
Oh, so I won't be able to politic for my congressman? Or advocate for any politician?
Sounds rather anti-freedom.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at January 05, 2011 06:27 AM (LH6ir)
I was thinking more about the earlier news clips in the comments where the libs are going after the republicans for having lobbyists on their staffs and fundraisers. I guess I got muddled because I would never connote industry and unions. They appear to be diametrically opposed in their goals. I see that they both have deep pockets although the union pockets are filled by coersion. I think that we have to have industry lobbyists to try to counteract the lobbying from entities that pretend to be grass-roots but are really the product of high level socialist organizing (community organizing) leftists. The communists have a lot longer history of infiltrating and organizing than the newly awakened right.
Posted by: dagny at January 05, 2011 06:27 AM (d2Pb5)
Posted by: RushBabe at January 05, 2011 06:27 AM (urYpw)
Posted by: RushBabe at January 05, 2011 06:30 AM (urYpw)
Discuss
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 06:31 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 05, 2011 06:31 AM (UOM48)
Oh, so I won't be able to politic for my congressman? Or advocate for any politician?
Sounds rather anti-freedom.
No, sounds like you don't know the difference between lobbying and campaigning. .
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 06:32 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: RushBabe at January 05, 2011 10:30 AM (urYpw)
That's it....we're now officially hosed.
Posted by: Tami at January 05, 2011 06:32 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 10:11 AM (IDL9N)
Sooo, you've fating a Frenchmen, huh? Only Frenchmen have to make love with their faces.
Posted by: Brian at January 05, 2011 06:33 AM (sYrWB)
Posted by: cali grump at January 05, 2011 06:33 AM (hL0k8)
Posted by: RushBabe at January 05, 2011 10:30 AM (urYpw)
He probably has been pressured by that libtard group who does his shows, Pukovery Channel.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 06:34 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 10:21 AM (M9Ie6)
---
---
I don't know what the solution is, but I tend to agree that eliminating the professional lobbyist (someone who is hired to make a group's case to Congress) is probably not it. One could argue that a professional lobbyist, like a professional fundraiser or marketing person or medial relations person, results in cost savings because they, in theory, might be more efficient in the use of everyone's time.
I think trying to eliminate the financial interests of congresscritters and their staffers is the right idea, but it seems as if the moratorium on working as a lobbyist within a window of time of leaving office (or going into office) doesn't seem to be working. Part of it is enforcement. My recollection is that this particular administration has been granting (granted?) lots of waivers for the folks they've hired.
It's very frustrating.
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 06:36 AM (IDL9N)
As a matter of fact... Mr Y-not is half French. The other half is Italian. I did rather well for myself.
When we started dating he had a full beard, not particularly trimmed so between that and his coloring and the plaid shirts he looked like Blacque Jacques Shellaque. Then he trimmed it really nicely which really gave him a nice angular shape to his face. But he shaved it off after we'd been married 7 years because we had moved to Houston and we noticed few men had beards there, especially in white-collar jobs.
Now he'd have to dye his beard hair if he grew it back.
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 06:39 AM (IDL9N)
Posted by: dagny at January 05, 2011 06:41 AM (d2Pb5)
We have to do something. The system is broken. The biggest problem is giving them the power to do all this shit to begin with. Of course "we" didn't do that, the courts did after being packed for 12 years by FDR.
Now that they have the power they are not going to give it up. The system is as corrupt as it can be. It doesn't help to replace a few of them at a time because it is like throwing a nice apple into a barrel of rotten ones.
Sometimes I think the Japanese aircraft solution is really the only way. Sure, a few good ones will get the "ax" but as they say, omelets require eggs.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 06:41 AM (M9Ie6)
Sooooo many surrender jokes....must control myself.....
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 05, 2011 06:41 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2011 06:43 AM (lnUW/)
Yes, that's frustrating. It's ludicrous to pretend both sides aren't doing it.
And I agree with you about the fundraising story. I don't feel any outrage over the dinner the newbies are having. People can tell themselves that $5 donations are what won these elections, but they're kidding themselves. We need the people who can plonk down $2,500 for a fundraising gala just as much as we need regular folks.
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 06:44 AM (IDL9N)
I know! We make them all the time.
Also, he will not sit with his back facing a window.
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 06:45 AM (IDL9N)
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 06:45 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: cali grump at January 05, 2011 06:45 AM (hL0k8)
Posted by: eman at January 05, 2011 06:47 AM (+iY8m)
Posted by: SurferDoc at January 05, 2011 06:47 AM (o3bYL)
This is the Eric Holder Justice Dept, so I'm sure the investigation will reveal that Wall Street, Bush, and Global Warming were to blame.
Posted by: kbdabear at January 05, 2011 06:48 AM (vdfwz)
I don't mind the $2500 a plate dinners, or the campaign contributions, as long as the donors are published.
When I speak of professional lobbying I am talking about paying some guy $500,000 a year to write letters to, and camp out in a critter's office AFTER making those contributions so that they can pressure for laws to be written that benefit their clients.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 06:48 AM (M9Ie6)
When I speak of professional lobbying I am talking about
Yeah, sorry, I didn't mean to imply that you did.
We're reacting to this HotAir (I think) story that was about the outrage we should feel because the GOP freshmen are having a gala dinner this week (I think) and it's also a fundraiser.
If the RNC weren't so damaged, these newbies wouldn't have to fundraise the first week in office, but they only have two years to get ready for re-election.
There's a strong populist streak over at HotAir now... it seems to be coming from... well, I'd rather not say.
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 06:52 AM (IDL9N)
Posted by: eman at January 05, 2011 06:52 AM (+iY8m)
If the Congress critters didn't have gazillions to spend, lobbyists wouldn't be a problem.
It's where the money is. Take the money away from them and I'll have no reason to rob--er, lobby them.
Posted by: Willy Sutton, Bank Lobbyist at January 05, 2011 06:57 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: dagny at January 05, 2011 07:02 AM (d2Pb5)
This.
We used to payoff the health inspectors routinely in our family restaurant. Not to pass us, but rather to forewarn us of surprise inspections so we could make sure ever little i was dotted.
I have never blamed business for resorting to bribery when some retard has the power to enrich, or impoverish you, with the stroke of a pen.
It's self defense.
Posted by: toby928™ at January 05, 2011 07:08 AM (S5YRY)
Milton Friedman on how to fix the system.
People have a great misconception in this way, they think way they solve things by electing the right people. Its nice to elect the right people, but that isnÂ’t the way you solve them. The way you solve things is by making it politically profitable for the wrong people to do the right things!
Posted by: Buzzsaw at January 05, 2011 07:12 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 10:39 AM (IDL9N)
Cioè signora, avete sposato il meglio di entrambi i mondi.Posted by: Brian at January 05, 2011 07:15 AM (sYrWB)
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at January 05, 2011 08:07 AM (tvs2p)
For two years, the Republicans complained about unrelenting Democratic partisanship. Now they’re planning no fewer than 10 investigations of the Obama administration, and the man leading most of those has already branded Obama’s “one of the most corrupt administrations” in history.
How nice of Dana Milbank to point out that “unrelenting Democratic partisanship”. It’s so white of him.
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at January 05, 2011 08:09 AM (tvs2p)
Posted by: Y-not at January 05, 2011 11:57 AM (IDL9N)
197 Y-not at January 05, 2011 03:57 PM
That was my first thought as well. I think she's quoted as saying it looked like he'd had a stroke or some such. In that case, the obvious thing to do seems to be to ask if the person needs help and probably call 911 even if they say no. I just can't imagine talking to someone and then leaving them in that condition.
Posted by: Polliwog at January 05, 2011 12:13 PM (L9VtR)
Posted by: Max Entropy at January 05, 2011 01:05 PM (lH6z9)
Posted by: Running Hobo at January 05, 2011 09:12 PM (l1oyw)
www.fashionspaceonline.com is one of the great resource for brand new fashionable clothing, shoes and accessories.
Here are the main products that we deal with:
Shoes: Nike Air Jordan, Air Force 1, Nike Air Jordan AFJ Fusion, Dunk SB, Nike Air Max, Air Shox Running Shoes, Nike Air Zoom Dunkesto, Air Yeezy, Nike Work Boots, ACG, Nike Foamposite, Gucci, Prada, Puma Ferrari, Supra, Ato Matsumoto, Lacoste, James, Kobe, Converse, Creative Recreation, CR DICOCO, Ed hardy, Evisu, Mauri, Coogi, Dsquared, Ice Cream, New Balance, Greedy Genius, Clae Shoes and Sneakers.
Jeans: Evisu, Gucci, Armani, Bape BBC, Red Monkey, G-Star, Levis, Diesel, Versace, Prada, Louis Vuitton, Ed Hardy, True Religion, Coogi, Christian Audigier, Affliction, Laguna Beach, Iceberg, Crown Holder, Roca wear, Dolce & Gabbana, Artful Dodger, Blac Label, Rock & Republic Jeans Shorts and Pants.
T-shirt: BBC, Bape, G-Star, Evisu, Coogi, Armani, LV, 5ive jungle, Akademiks, Smet, A & F, Affliction, Ed Hardy, Christian Audigier, Blac Label, Polo, Lacoste, Crown Holder, Dolce & Gabbana, Versace, Ecko, Gucci, Adidas, Nike, Levis T-shirts and dress shirts.
Other Accessories: Chanel, Chloe, Coach, Dior, Gucci, Fendi, LV, Juicy, Prada, D&G, Ed Hardy, Christian Audigier Leather Handbag, Purse and Wallets.
Rolex, Breitlint, JACOB & CO. Cartier, Gucci, Ed Hardy Watches.
D&G, Okley, Fendi, Coach, Chanel, Gucci, Prada, Armani, Versace, Burberry, Ray.Ban, Ed hardy, Louis Vuitton, Christian Dior, Cartier Sun Glasses
Armani, CK, D&G, LV, Versace, Ed Hardy, Diesel, Gucci, polo, Prada, Puma, Versace, G-star Underwears.
Juicy, Bikini, Ed Hardy, A&F, Polo, Christian Audigier Swimming Wear, Bikini, Bathing suits.
Bape, Ed Hardy, New Era, Coogi, Gucci, New era with light, Louis Vuitton, Monster Energy Caps
DSQ, D&G, LV, Bape, Armani, Gucci, Chanel, Boss, Affliction, Versace, Ed Hardy, Christian Audigier Belts.
Welcome to contact us by MSN: babydress898@hotmail.com .Thanks!
Posted by: China-store at January 07, 2011 04:45 AM (t24Na)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2016 seconds, 319 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








The portion of the spending bill that prohibited spending money on moving prisoners from GITMO to the US for trial. Obama signed the bill with one of those "signing statements" that they excoriated Bush for, that said he would ignore the GITMO prohibition!
This is NOT an "interpretation" folks. He says he will totally ignore and outright prohibition from Congress.
Another one for the whatif book.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2011 02:58 AM (M9Ie6)