October 20, 2011
— Gabriel Malor Never rub another man's rhubarb.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:57 AM
| Comments (150)
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
Finally a few Republicans question the phony science coming out of Washington
Note this also from the article concerning the Yucca Mountain issue which was closed for purely political reasons:
Not all Republicans are united in backing the Yucca site, however.
It's a sensitive issue in Nevada, and at the Republican presidential debate in Las Vegas Tuesday night top GOP candidates said the federal government should not be sticking Nevada with the waste.
So who are the “top GOP candidates”?
"The idea that 49 states can tell Nevada, 'We want to give you our nuclear waste,' doesn't make a lot of sense," former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said.
That is the classic Mitt response, he objects without objecting. The fact is the Yucca Mountain project was approved decades ago. Billions upon billions have been collected from nuclear utilities to build it, it has been built, and it has been delayed year after year by phony court challenges, junk science, and Harry Reid. So yes you asshole Mitt, it does make a lot of sense. If the federal government can decide to build a damn ICBM base on federal property in Kansas they can certainly decide to build a damn waste storage site on their property in NV.
Anytime you here ANYONE complaining about the safety of Yucca Mountain you can automatically assume they are either a liar or they are a brainless idiot who is a waste of Oxygen and space on this earth.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 02:58 AM (YdQQY)
Despite warning signs, Romney declines to reach out to major tea party groups
Two of AmericaÂ’s most active national tea party organizations say former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney has made no effort to win them over, despite his apparent need to attract more grassroots support.
LOL, how about ANY grassroots support. But, combine that with this from NH earlier this year.
As Democratic and Republican leaders in Washington
struggled to find agreement on spending cuts and extending the debt limit, Mitt
Romney struck a conciliatory note in New Hampshire on Monday by lamenting
partisan feuding while touting his record of working with Democrats -- even the
Senate's onetime liberal lion Edward M. Kennedy.
I bring this up not only because it is news on the primary front, but also because of the post from tmi3rd on “compromise”. This is the exact kind of shit that has allowed the country to move so far to the left since 1900. It is time to end the “compromise”. To a Dem compromise means Republicans do what they want when Republicans are in charge and when Dems are in charge, like the previous congress, it means sit down and STFU because we are locking you out of the committee room.
The USA is sitting on the edge of economic and political doom because of this continued shift into socialism and communism. Democrats think we are immune from becoming Greece because we are somehow exempt from the laws of economics and nature. Some Republicans think the same damn way and I number Romney in that group. Normally during the primary a candidate runs toward the base and then during the general turns back toward the liberals. The fact that Romney is not doing that is really scary.
But what really gets to me is the continued call by Morons on here who think that we MUST have Romney for “electability” and how incensed they get when people say they will NEVER vote for the SOB. It should be pure common sense that when you nominate a candidate that 70-75 percent of the polled electorate do not like and 90-95% of the conservative base can not stand, that 4 or 5 percent of them will sit out the election rather than go down and vote for them, particularly if they have no other Statewide elections going on that year. (that 90-95% based on polls here and at HA for September)
You can rant and rave all you want about Obama, but that is not going to change the outcome. The fact of the matter is that Romney is no more electable than any of the other top tier candidates, possibly even less electable based on the GOTV factor that polls do not measure. There was a recent poll discussed on Fox that said all three of the top candidates, Romney, Perry, and Cain would beat Obama, with Perry actually beating him by the widest margin.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 03:00 AM (YdQQY)
NV GOP having an internal war over moving caucus dates
Personally from the elections in 2010, I think the NV, MD, and NY GOP leadership is dysfunctional. I will freely admit that in 2008 the SC GOP leadership was no great shakes either as it was being run by the Graham faction. That is no longer the case and 2012 should be very interesting.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 03:00 AM (YdQQY)
He even raised more cash than Romney among Bain Capital employees, despite the fact that Mitt made his fortune working for them.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 03:01 AM (YdQQY)
A new poll for SC was released yesterday afternoon
This is an NBC/Marist poll and going to the Marist site they have the internals but not a lot of data about the “likely voters”. I am not sure how much I would trust this poll based on the last NBC poll which was virtually worthless. Keep in mind that the SC primaries are open and there are no major statewide offices up for grabs so Democrat primaries will be about NIL (lots of crossover voting which is where the so-called moderates are coming from in the poll internals). In any case:
30% for Herman Cain26% for Mitt Romney9% for Rick Perry6% for Newt Gingrich5% for Ron Paul5% for Michele Bachmann2% for Rick Santorum1% for Jon HuntsmanLess than 1% for Gary Johnson15% are undecidedSo if the primary were held today with 25 delegates up for grabs (50/2 due to moving primary) Cain would get 8, Romney would get 6, Perry would get 2 and the rest would get 1 or less. This under the new rules for proportional delegates for the first 3 primaries. FL is next with winner take all rules. However, now that they have moved their primary to Jan 31 that is unknown how the RNC will treat it. But, as far as SC (and Iowa and NH) the races are virtually worthless for delegate totals now and are good for nothing but PR. The RNC took a shitty set of rules and made them worse this year.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 03:02 AM (YdQQY)
Talk about a slap on the damn wrist!
Judge sentences ex-Mullins schools leader to six years in prisonThe SOB stole $500,000 from the tax payers and he is getting 6 years in jail??? If I went down and held up a liquor store for a bottle of Woodford Reserve I would get a lot more than that.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 03:02 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at October 20, 2011 03:02 AM (XVaFd)
Here's a subject that we talked a lot about last week, abuse by local cops
Is it possible to get hit for DUI when sitting in your car in your own driveway listening to music? The idea that this guy was hit to begin with is ludicrous. The idea that he had to go all the way to the State Supreme Court is even more ludicrous. Think about what this BS cost this guy.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 03:03 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at October 20, 2011 07:02 AM (XVaFd)
Well Gabe, when I did the research on him for the evals the evidence I saw was that he was solid right to life.
I don't know that I would trust the WP twising his response trying to keep from looking like he is too hard core on the issue.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 03:06 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 06:58 AM (YdQQY)
As someone who lives a few miles from Indian Point and is on the emergency response team, can we please unload this shit from the most densely populated area in the country and relocate it to the storage facility in an uninhabited wasteland that has taken tens of billions of dollars and decades to build? And Nevadans, please, go fuck yourselves.
Posted by: mugiwara at October 20, 2011 03:06 AM (KI/Ch)
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 03:07 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Zakn at October 20, 2011 03:08 AM (q/891)
No worries, Mittens will make it up by carrying MA, NY, NJ and other more enlightened states. AH, HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Posted by: Unka Two Pillow at October 20, 2011 03:09 AM (+kznc)
I suspect that he would have a good case since highway laws are based on "implied consent" to drive on public roads.
In the past people have not fought this kind of abuse because it cost more to fight it than to suffer the "punishment". The problem is now the damn MADD scrunts have succeeded in making the punishments so bad it MUST be fought.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 03:13 AM (YdQQY)
Okay, no problem. But then he went and described the circumstances under which abortion might be okay, like rape, etc. That's a very common, generally pro-life position. Less sure to win all social conservatives, but still very much within the mainstream.
And finally he said that the government shouldn't be making that decision for us and he wouldn't try and change abortion law. That's a very weak position in favor of the status quo. Sure to win no social conservatives.
He can have whichever position he wants, but he can't have all three he listed. They're contradictory. This is a classic Cain answer in need of a classic Cain clarification.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at October 20, 2011 03:14 AM (XVaFd)
Yeah, it appears he was trying to not appear "hard core", but one wonders if the WP was providing an accurate quote as well.
The WP has got so bad recently I have just about quit using them for a source anymore and link to them only when I want to illustrate how bad they are.
But yeah, it looks bad, but "looks".
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 03:17 AM (YdQQY)
In the past people have not fought this kind of abuse because it cost more to fight it than to suffer the "punishment". The problem is now the damn MADD scrunts have succeeded in making the punishments so bad it MUST be fought.
Having always thought that DUI checkpoints were unconstitutional as all get-out, we need some serious reform of driving laws when you can get busted for DUI while not driving and not being on the road.
The idiocy is staggering, but to be expected when you have, literally, a legal racket being perpetrated. Drunk driving laws have devolved into an industry.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 20, 2011 03:17 AM (d0Tfm)
Hell, it makes me worry about drinking a beer while mowing my grass.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 03:20 AM (YdQQY)
That's the standard Democratic answer on abortion.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at October 20, 2011 03:21 AM (XVaFd)
It is worse than idiocy, it is a jobs program for lawyers perpetrated in the name of the chirren.
Nothing like left-wing social engineering to remove your right to expect common sense to prevail amongst your public "servants"!
Posted by: Hrothgar at October 20, 2011 03:21 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: Awful McNasty at October 20, 2011 03:21 AM (0f+SI)
Posted by: SCRednek at October 20, 2011 03:29 AM (AR+tO)
Posted by: Hrothgar at October 20, 2011 03:30 AM (i3+c5)
You ain't got no legs, Lt. Dan!
Posted by: As If! at October 20, 2011 03:31 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at October 20, 2011 03:33 AM (Emzmw)
So, four more years of Barry might be necessary. More suffering, more pain that touches more folk, so the lesson of the evil of progressiveness is seared on the memory. Perhaps we need to drive right off the cliff and then retool. Quickest way to get that done is with Barry at the wheel.
Our family won't vote Romney. No way, no how.
Barry-lite and the continued entrenchment of the Georgette Mosebacher contingent at the head of the GOP means more of the same, just at a slightly less frenetic pace. Time to lance the boil, folks. Putting a band-aid on it won't help. Romney is a band-aid, and a small one, at that.
Posted by: Lizabth at October 20, 2011 03:34 AM (JZBti)
I always thought the standard Dem position was all abortion all the time.
But regardless of the WP and the quote, he is a Baptist minister. You just will not find too many Baptist ministers who support unlimited abortion.
And for all the folks here, yes I still support Perry.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 03:34 AM (YdQQY)
I expect this means we'll be treated to another chest-beating press conference from SCOAMF telling us how he's made the world safe for democracy, as long as that democracy isn't in the US.
Posted by: Retread at October 20, 2011 03:35 AM (UvV0d)
Posted by: Hrothgar at October 20, 2011 03:35 AM (i3+c5)
It utterly escapes me how folks cannot be calling for heads at the RNC. I've commented on it repeatedly and folks just don't see to give a shit.
But, no. This nation cannot afford four more years of Obama to simply prove a point.
Posted by: As If! at October 20, 2011 03:37 AM (piMMO)
Now we know where Ace went on his recent vacation.
Is it possible to get hit for DUI when sitting in your car in your own driveway listening to music?
Back in the early 80's before MADD was so prominent, Oklahoma had a law (may still have) that referred to "actual physical control" of a vehicle. If you had the keys available and were in the car, even if you were in the back seat asleep, it was considered the lowest form of DUI. I knew several people who got popped on that one.
Posted by: Iron Balls McGinty at October 20, 2011 03:38 AM (Gkhxf)
Posted by: Hrothgar at October 20, 2011 07:35 AM (i3+c5)
The easiest way is to post them in a word processing document first using the "insert link" feature and edit the link there. Then copy it and paste it in pixy here.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 03:41 AM (YdQQY)
And we should listen to you peons just because you are our base?
Our RNC staffers are true Republican Establishment believers in an elite governing class and they know what's best for the country. Just look at their track record.
Shut up and vote straight R--that's all you really need to know!
Posted by: Karl Rover at October 20, 2011 03:41 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: flyoverstate at October 20, 2011 03:45 AM (ajtpR)
Posted by: HH at October 20, 2011 03:47 AM (HFnqj)
I do have to point out that she is one of the go-to interviewees whenever the press wants to get us upset at the RNC. (Not that they don't deserve it, but it is sort of like going to Ron Paul for the GOP take on the Iraq War).
Mosbacher has a lot of money and since she has already spent way too much on plastic surgery, she is looking to buy some entertainment by yanking the strings of the RNC. Last call I got from them I smoked their ears about her and told them if they wanted to hang onto the grass roots they'd better get her to keep her mouth shut.
Posted by: Miss Marple at October 20, 2011 03:48 AM (GoIUi)
What I am afraid of is if the RNC continues to ignore the wishes of the conservative/libertarian wing of the Party there will be a split off of that wing into a new Party.
That will assure complete Democrat control for at least a decade and probably longer. The US will not survive 4 more years of Obama, much less a decade of communists running the country.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 03:48 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: HH at October 20, 2011 07:47 AM (HFnqj)
Driving Under the Influence?
Posted by: Hrothgar at October 20, 2011 03:49 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 07:48 AM (YdQQY)
Worse than that is the DECADES of a solid liberal (6 to 3) Supreme Court (the de facto legislative branch) that are an inevitable result of four more years of Øbama!
.
Posted by: Hrothgar at October 20, 2011 03:52 AM (i3+c5)
So if you're not driving...
Posted by: HH at October 20, 2011 07:51 AM (HFnqj)
But if you are in a car, you might be thinking about driving! Sort of like how a hate crime is worse than a regular crime.
Think of it as pre-emptive policing, and expect more of it!
Posted by: Hrothgar at October 20, 2011 03:54 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: No Whining at October 20, 2011 03:56 AM (Y9JPs)
It's amazing that we haven't been able to deal with the straightforward (at least technically) issue of waste storage. We are not a serious country when we allow idiots who are afraid of technology to stop the progress of an entire country.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at October 20, 2011 03:58 AM (K6bNI)
That is the inevitable result of a third party challenge from the Right, and anyone who claims differently is delusional or has a bridge to sell you.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at October 20, 2011 04:01 AM (K6bNI)
Posted by: dogfish at October 20, 2011 04:02 AM (N2yhW)
Think of it as pre-emptive policing, and expect more of it!
(Sighs). Yeah, yer probably right, but dammit, if the law says 'Driving', then you need to be driving. I just don't see how anyone can get around that.
Posted by: HH at October 20, 2011 04:03 AM (HFnqj)
Posted by: Retread at October 20, 2011 04:04 AM (UvV0d)
It is unlawful for a person to drive a motor vehicle within this State while under the influence of alcohol to the extent that the person's faculties to drive a motor vehicle are materially and appreciably impaired, under the influence of any other drug or a combination of other drugs or substances which cause impairment to the extent that the person's faculties to drive a motor vehicle are materially and appreciably impaired, or under the combined influence of alcohol and any other drug or drugs or substances which cause impairment to the extent that the person's faculties to drive a motor vehicle are materially and appreciably impaired. A person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of the offense of driving under the influence and, upon conviction, entry of a plea of guilty or of nolo contendere, or forfeiture of bail must be punished as follows: .....
The key word there is "drive", so it is evident that you must be driving the vehicle, not just sitting in it. And by the court interpretation you must be on a public road.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 04:04 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at October 20, 2011 04:04 AM (F12pH)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at October 20, 2011 04:05 AM (F12pH)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at October 20, 2011 07:58 AM (K6bNI)
We haven't been a serious country for a long time, but I don't think this is news to any of us. We (the collective hive mind "we") have been voting to return crooks and idiots to public office in spite of clear evidence that we are being screwed.
Posted by: Hrothgar at October 20, 2011 04:06 AM (i3+c5)
If OWS had any class, humor or style, they'd adopt this as one of their anthems. It says what they think they want to say, only it's interesting and coherent.
Granted, the actual music video sucks, but the song is perfect for them.
Posted by: Truman North at October 20, 2011 04:06 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: dogfish at October 20, 2011 08:02 AM (N2yhW)
France insisted it was a good idea.
Ambassador *Not Condi* Rice agreed.
Obumble said, suuuuurrreee, why not?
Posted by: Robert at October 20, 2011 04:08 AM (4ixH5)
LOL, my wifey was just out there in your fair city last summer. She was visiting relatives for a reunion and they went down to San Antonio for touristy stuff. (she is from TX originally)
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 04:08 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Hrothgar at October 20, 2011 07:30 AM (i3+c5)
We're $15T below having nothing in the public treasury.
Posted by: Truman North at October 20, 2011 04:10 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: dogfish at October 20, 2011 04:11 AM (N2yhW)
Yep. Reports are that QwackDaffy is dead.......they're celebrating in the streets.
Crap. Now we'll have to suffer another 'victory speech' from the SCoaMF.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at October 20, 2011 04:11 AM (3b0c5)
Posted by: Retread at October 20, 2011 08:04 AM (UvV0d)
Now dump him in the Med, quickly!
Posted by: Robert at October 20, 2011 04:11 AM (4ixH5)
Well, see, I was prepared to yell THIS! but then this comment popped up:
Worse than that is the DECADES of a solid liberal (6 to 3) Supreme Court (the de facto legislative branch) that are an inevitable result of four more years of Øbama!
So, now I have to yell THIS! and THIS!
Posted by: As If! at October 20, 2011 04:12 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet , still waiting for Godot at October 20, 2011 04:14 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at October 20, 2011 07:02 AM (XVaFd)
You might as well wait, Gabe. His position(s) will change the next time an MSM reporter asks him a question about it anyway.
Funny how much more concerned the hate-Romney part of Cain's support (and I can't stand Romney either, btw) are about all his flip-flops over the years than they are about Cain's daily flopping and flipping about.
Herman Cain: Not Even Ready To Be A Minor Gov't Functionary 2012!!!
Posted by: davidinvirginia at October 20, 2011 04:14 AM (haFNK)
We're $15T below having nothing in the public treasury.
Posted by: Truman North at October 20, 2011 08:10 AM (I2LwF)
Not as long as I have paper and ink!
Posted by: Ben "Printer" Bernanke at October 20, 2011 04:15 AM (i3+c5)
Of course, it is no longer a Constitutional Republic now. It is more like a socialist oligarchy.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 04:15 AM (YdQQY)
remove the spaces.
Posted by: Zakn at October 20, 2011 04:15 AM (zyaZ1)
Hell, if having folks killed were the ultimate qualification for president, Hillary would have won in '08.
Posted by: Doh! at October 20, 2011 04:16 AM (piMMO)
Nah, they'll parade his body through the streets. Only SCOAMF quickly buries the evidence and then takes credit.
Posted by: Retread at October 20, 2011 04:17 AM (UvV0d)
I don't think Cain is flip-flopping on the issue. I think what is happening is he makes a lot of "gaffes", particularly in hostile interviews and he winds up having to walk back the "gaffe".
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 04:17 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Truman North at October 20, 2011 04:18 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Hrothgar at October 20, 2011 04:18 AM (i3+c5)
And, despite claims to the contrary, Cain is not really at threat of winning the nomination, so it becomes less of an issue.
Sorry.
Posted by: Doh! at October 20, 2011 04:18 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: "Clayface" Kaddafy at October 20, 2011 04:19 AM (27KAF)
Posted by: Retread at October 20, 2011 08:04 AM
Silly Question, who is running that show now?
By 8:30 am it's all Jim Cramer all the time. I wish the ghost of Mark Haines would slap some sense into them.
Posted by: Retread at October 20, 2011 04:20 AM (UvV0d)
Posted by: ian cormac at October 20, 2011 04:20 AM (JU0xh)
Posted by: Ed Anger at October 20, 2011 04:20 AM (7+pP9)
I agree, I don't think he will. In the end it will come down to Romney the anointed or the MFM's whipping boy Perry.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 04:21 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Truman North at October 20, 2011 04:21 AM (I2LwF)
They are on a bookshelf in the private quarters. I'm sure of it!
Or, did I pack them away with the knick-knacks?
Posted by: Carolyn Huber at October 20, 2011 04:21 AM (piMMO)
I agree. Perry cannot be counted out.
Posted by: Carolyn Huber at October 20, 2011 04:22 AM (piMMO)
I can't imagine a jury convicting on that.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 04:22 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at October 20, 2011 04:24 AM (0M3AQ)
What's the problem? It worked out fine in Iran.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at October 20, 2011 04:24 AM (K6bNI)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet , still waiting for Godot at October 20, 2011 04:25 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 04:25 AM (SH3gZ)
The real answer? France and Italy didn't want Libyan refugees.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 20, 2011 04:26 AM (73tyQ)
Right. And the moment someone says the word "revolution" the story becomes Republicans threaten to storm the White House!.
Unless, of course, it's a bunchy of greasy hippies saying it, then, well, that's a different story,
Posted by: As If! at October 20, 2011 04:26 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Jean at October 20, 2011 04:26 AM (6ziMD)
Posted by: macintx at October 20, 2011 04:27 AM (ucs8Y)
Newt was finished the day he got on the couch with Nancy. To my knowledge he has never even tried to walk that back. When you add in the attack on the budget cuts as "social engineering" and his despicable and untrustworthy personal behavior it explains why he is polling so low right now.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 04:27 AM (YdQQY)
Yeah.
It's supposed to help the housing market. Sell our national security. Sell our borders.
Something is very, very off about this line of thinking.
Posted by: As If! at October 20, 2011 04:29 AM (piMMO)
I don't think Cain is flip-flopping on the issue. I think what is happening is he makes a lot of "gaffes", particularly in hostile interviews and he winds up having to walk back the "gaffe".
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 08:17 AM (YdQQY)
I'm starting to think he gives the answer that he thinks whatever audience happens to be listening or reading (the one he assumes is anyway) will like hearing the most (or maybe just that particular interviewer...who knows). Sort of the definition of pandering, yes? I either have to think that or think that he's so ignorant about most stuff as to be functionally retarded (or maybe senile at his age). (shrug) Either way, he's got no business with the GOP nomination or setting up residency in the White House. Some of his nonsense probably are just gaffes, but either way, no sale.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at October 20, 2011 04:29 AM (haFNK)
The Oakland I knew is obviously gone forever.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 04:31 AM (YdQQY)
So, four more years of Barry might be necessary. More suffering, more pain that touches more folk, so the lesson of the evil of progressiveness is seared on the memory. Perhaps we need to drive right off the cliff and then retool. Quickest way to get that done is with Barry at the wheel.
"Four more years of Barry" doesn't necessarily mean four more years of Barry.
If Republicans decide they'll stay home or even vote for Obama because they didn't get a nominee they liked then we'll all have to live with two to three atrocious SCOTUS picks for likely the next twenty years and beyond. Think how hard it will be to retool with those clowns stuck on the bench?
Posted by: Reggie1971 at October 20, 2011 04:32 AM (0DGtF)
Posted by: ian cormac at October 20, 2011 04:33 AM (JU0xh)
I posted this comment about Cain a few days ago:Herman Cain is fun. About that there is no doubt. He's the kind of guy it would be fun to hang with.
But President? No.
That's not to say I won't vote for him if he's the nominee, because I will, but then again I'd vote for a root vegetable before I'd let Obama off the hook without an opposing vote.
Cain behaves the same as nearly every CEO I've ever worked for, which is to say that it doesn't matter two shits if the underlings like his ideas: BACK INTO THEM! They don't have to be logical. They don't even have to be doable. All they have to be is "catchy". Of course, six months later and you're trying to craft a presentation for the board to explain the fiasco in such a way that the CEO is left unscathed.
THAT, I feel certain, is how Cain will operate.
Posted by: As If! at October 20, 2011 04:34 AM (piMMO)
The obvious solution then is don't vote for Romney in the primary. People are not looking for a "perfect" candidate". They are looking for ABR.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 04:34 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: billygoat at October 20, 2011 04:35 AM (R3k3C)
I will not vote for Romney in the primary, but if he gets the nomination, I'll damn sure poke the chad for him in the general.
Posted by: As If! at October 20, 2011 04:36 AM (piMMO)
"So, four more years of Barry might be necessary. More suffering, more pain that touches more folk, so the lesson of the evil of progressiveness is seared on the memory. Perhaps we need to drive right off the cliff and then retool. Quickest way to get that done is with Barry at the wheel."
Yes, yes, yes, my children and grand children need to be taught a painful lesson! Why, they are busy being young and stupid, those little bastards! Let's destroy their futures so we can say we stood on principal.
You assholes are worse than the Obots.
Posted by: Sgt. Fury at October 20, 2011 04:37 AM (yc3WX)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 20, 2011 04:38 AM (i6RpT)
I know we had a whole front-page post on this yesterday and everything, but this is so cringe-worthy as to induce traffic jams as people crane their nexks to see the stupid:
“It’s very clear that private-sector jobs have been doing just fine; it’s the public-sector jobs where we’ve lost huge numbers, and that’s what this legislation is all about,” Reid said on the Senate floor.
Posted by: Truman North at October 20, 2011 04:38 AM (I2LwF)
I know that in Kentucky you can get a DUI for sliding down a hill while sitting on a piece of cardboard if you're drunk.
I can't imagine a jury convicting on that.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 08:22 AM (YdQQY)
In a dry county with a bunch of bible-thumpers on the jury?In a heartbeat.
While I lived there I read about a few cases of people getting a DUI for riding horseback while drunk.
Posted by: Ed Anger at October 20, 2011 04:39 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet , still waiting for Godot at October 20, 2011 04:40 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at October 20, 2011 04:41 AM (mFxQX)
...You're already on board Obama's bandwagon going your chosen course into the bottomless pit where there is no retooling. Abandon all hope ye who enter.
Posted by: didn't take long at October 20, 2011 04:42 AM (lpWVn)
I have seen cases of that in TX. Like I said earlier though, it depends on the wording of the law and where you are "operating the conveyance". You could not be convicted of riding a horse drunk here because the law does specify a "motor vehicle" and the law also defines a motor vehicle. A horse or a cardboard slat doesn't meet that definition. (A riding lawnmower does)
However, even in a real restrictive State, the law still depends on the "implied consent rule" which requires you to be on a public road.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 04:43 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 20, 2011 04:44 AM (XE2Oo)
“I can have an opinion on an issue without it being a directive on the nation,” ...
Somebody explain to me why that philosophy is flip flopping.
Apparently I flip flop a lot, myself.
Posted by: jwb7605 at October 20, 2011 04:46 AM (Qxe/p)
Does this mean we will now be in Greece as well?
Posted by: Miss Marple at October 20, 2011 04:49 AM (GoIUi)
Bill Clinton thanks you for your vote.
Posted by: As If! at October 20, 2011 04:49 AM (piMMO)
Glad it worked out for you, but it's a very bad idea to consent to a search.
Did you invite her in?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at October 20, 2011 04:50 AM (K6bNI)
Now, if only he can convince Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorhn to teach a few bomb-making classes.
Posted by: As If! at October 20, 2011 04:51 AM (piMMO)
The problems are several fold. First it wasn't just "getting on the green bandwagon". I can understand that to some extent even though I don't agree with it. He got on the couch with the most hated liberal in the Dem party to help push that crap of a bill for AGW through. That bill was so bad it was insane. Any Republican who supported that bill should be run out of the Party.
The social engineering comment referred to the Ryan call for cutting back on medicare and medicaid from what I understood. He helped the Dems attack the plan.
As for his personal life, yes it is his own life and he will have to answer for it. But to me it reflects a personal trait that indicates that he simply can not be trusted. When the chips are down he will shit on you if he sees a benefit for himself in it somewhere.
I do not want someone like that running the country. We had it with Nixon and we had it with Clinton.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 04:51 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: jeannebodine at October 20, 2011 04:53 AM (nvlAW)
Think of it as pre-emptive policing, and expect more of it!
(Sighs). Yeah, yer probably right, but dammit, if the law says 'Driving', then you need to be driving. I just don't see how anyone can get around that.
Posted by: HH at October 20, 2011 08:03 AM (HFnqj)
Here in Ohio, it's called OVI (Operation of a Vehcle while under the Influence). It was called OWI for a while, and a few others before that. I've had a few friends ganked under it for sleeping it off in the back of a friends' car. It was considered OVI because they were in a vehicle and they had a set of keys; in both instances not to the vehicle they were sitting in. One didn't even have vehicle keys, just his apartment and work keys, because he didn't own a vehicle at the time.
Posted by: Ranba Ral at October 20, 2011 05:11 AM (G99e4)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 20, 2011 05:14 AM (vzFJV)
He even raised more cash than Romney among Bain Capital employees, despite the fact that Mitt made his fortune working for them.
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2011 07:01 AM (YdQQY)
Just a couple of days ago the left wing rag the Financial Times ran a story that the big EVIL Wall Street money had abandoned Barry and was flooding to Republicans because they're EVIL too. Reality is an enemy to liberalism
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 20, 2011 05:15 AM (1Jaio)
Stem Cells, cough.
Yes I know they're not the same. I'm doing contradictory Thursday.
This goes for the DUI over the top industry also. Despite the over enforcements noted here Drunks still kill all over the roads every day.
And for a laugh.
Steve knows his rights!
http://tinyurl.com/3mxbayd
Posted by: DaveA at October 20, 2011 05:16 AM (AhU8T)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 20, 2011 05:18 AM (l9zgN)
Posted by: Chilling the most for perry at October 20, 2011 05:18 AM (6IV8T)
Nah, they were too busy tripling minimum payments, and changing loan types so you get drafted into Peace Corps if you default.
Posted by: Ranba Ral at October 20, 2011 05:38 AM (G99e4)
Posted by: Chilling the most for perry at October 20, 2011 05:48 AM (6IV8T)
Posted by: Ranba Ral at October 20, 2011 05:53 AM (G99e4)
we have a light rail here in phoenix!!!!! it's awesome!!! you can travel nowhere on it slower than if you were walking in 130 degree heat! and the best part! while they were building it.....businesses lost business because people couldn't access there store due to construction of the line! and the fare? well it was on the honor system! so if you dishonorably hopped the gate......you got a free ride! and if you were a student? you got a free ride! and if you were a senior? you got a free ride! and if you were neither? you got to pay a lot of money for your ticket to ride! and now.....they are expanding it to the airport! which is great for about .000000001% of the population that will make use of it! yeah for light rail! it sucks!
Posted by: phoenixgirl occupying my kitchen at October 20, 2011 08:25 AM (SH3gZ)
Ditto for the Bayou City (Houston). Whom copied off of whom, I wonder?? Plus it turns out Houston drivers are far worse than anticipated at crashing into the trains.
Houston City Council and Metro's position echo's Judge Smails': You get light rail and you'll like it!!
Posted by: Count de Monet at October 20, 2011 06:16 AM (4q5tP)
Posted by: DAveinNC at October 20, 2011 06:58 AM (boNGU)
Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2011 02:02 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: When Elves Attack ePub at October 20, 2011 04:42 PM (OMloq)
Posted by: When Elves Attack ePub at October 20, 2011 04:43 PM (OMloq)
Posted by: Steve Jobs iBooks at October 20, 2011 05:12 PM (OMloq)
Posted by: Bright Lights, Dark Shadows AudioBook at October 20, 2011 05:43 PM (2CDMi)
Posted by: Tamora Pierce Mastiff ePub at October 20, 2011 07:08 PM (wkzne)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2132 seconds, 278 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: weew at October 20, 2011 02:57 AM (7RbIF)