November 17, 2011
— Gabriel Malor
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:54 AM
| Comments (247)
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
On to the news this morning. Just not much out there today of interest. We did have a massive storm come through last night. NeighborÂ’s kitteh came to my backdoor screaming because she was scared to death. I let her in and she ran and hid under the furniture. Supposed to be cooler today 61 vs 82 yesterday.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 02:57 AM (YdQQY)
Hey campers, hereÂ’s the plan for our totally organic, spontaneous, non-Soros backed movement.
Adbusters Tactical Briefing No. 19 (includes link to 11/17 schedule and totally cool poster)
“Now begins the second, visceral, canny, militant phase of our nonviolent march to real democracy. We regroup, lick our wounds and begin our counterattack as early as tomorrow.
We will turn this winter into a training ground for precision disruptions – flashmobs, stink bombs, edgy theatrics – against the megacorps and the unrepentant 1%, a festival of resistance in the snow with, or without, an encampment that'll lay the tactical foundation for our Spring Offensive.”
Posted by: Totally organic, spontaneous, non-Soros funded guy at November 17, 2011 02:58 AM (C7ATr)
Lawmakers Confront Executives Over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Bonuses
When Congress learned that 12 executives at Fannie and Freddie were paid some $35 million in salary and bonuses over the last two years, that was the last straw.
Who are they kidding? How about a real damn investigation as to why F&F is damn revolving door for politicians leaving office. How about an investigation has to how all these packages of mixes shitty and good mortgages came about? How about an investigation of Jammie Gorlich who seem to appear in every government meltdown for the past 20 years.
So congress spends $170B to bail out F&F and they are worried about $35M paid in bonuses to executives. It doesnÂ’t need a damn investigation. Just do what they did to the bankers at tax it at 99%. Oh, and instead of bitching about the $170B why not just say no more and let it go under and pass a law that forbid the government from getting involved in mortgages ever again.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 02:58 AM (YdQQY)
And speaking of congress and spending we have this
Fed Now Largest Owner of U.S. Gov’t Debt—Surpassing ChinaAt the close of business on Tuesday, the debt of the federal government exceeded $15 trillion for the first time--with the largest single owner of the publicly held portion of that debt being the Federal Reserve.
Over the past year, as the Federal Reserve massively increased its holdings of U.S. Treasury securities and entities in China marginally decreased theirs, the Fed surpassed the Chinese as the top owner of publicly held U.S. government debt.
Its called monetizing the debt, otherwise know as simply printing money. It is why real inflation is shooting up. Zimbabwe here we come. There is a reason China got rid of its U.S. holdings. We should have already been downgraded again.
I'm sure this will be item 1 on Monty's Doom!
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 02:59 AM (YdQQY)
Republicans "will consider" more tax increases
They say $250B in new “revenue” but not clear if this is on top of the $300B they have already agreed to or not. I doubt if the Dems will accept it anyway. Look assholes, giving the Dems more money will never reduce the deficit. That has not worked once since the republic was formed.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:00 AM (YdQQY)
Nikki Haley orders the Occupy Columbia retards to leave at 6 pm
ThatÂ’s right, even though this Dem rag says 19 of them, thatÂ’s all of them. They were told no more camping out and urinating and shitting in the bushes at the Statehouse. When they didnÂ’t leave they were arrested.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:00 AM (YdQQY)
Now we see why the Washington DC occupy crowd was not evicted
Some of the countryÂ’s most powerful unions are providing the infrastructure and amenities to keep the Occupy D.C. encampment fortified going into the winter.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:00 AM (YdQQY)
Another illegal program pushed by the idiots at the EPA
EPA is using a Clinton era executive order to push “Environmental Justice” which is just another name for extorting shit from regulated industries under the threat of losing permits.
When are one of these places going to take these lawless bastards to court? More and more this lawless administration reminds me of the people in Atlas Shrugged who basically transformed the US into a communist oligarchy. As I read that I keep asking why hasnÂ’t someone just out and out shot one of these lawless assholes. Yet we are seeing the exact same shit today. It is like 1984 and Atlas Shrugged are being used as a road map.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:01 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: dogfish at November 17, 2011 03:01 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: dogfish at November 17, 2011 03:02 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:04 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: dogfish at November 17, 2011 03:05 AM (N2yhW)
Other than the union goons and communists who are the spark plugs for this shit, most of them are there just to "party".
It is the same shit the communist organizers for the anti-war movement did in the 60s and early 70s.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:07 AM (YdQQY)
It is like 1984 and Atlas Shrugged are being used as a road map.
In ten years, both of those books will be documentaries instead of works of fiction.
We are well and truly boned. Oh, and good morning, ya'll.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 17, 2011 03:08 AM (d0Tfm)
Just heard according to the OWS Press Office, only a couple/few hundred were expected this morning. The mob is expected at 5:00 tonight at Foley Square because unions have issued 'mandatory attendence' orders.
Posted by: Nash Rambler at November 17, 2011 03:09 AM (C7ATr)
But now they are actually doing almost everything she used as a foil in the novel and doing it for real. Particularly this shit where they hand of government power to regulatory committees who just make up law as they go.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:11 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: mik at November 17, 2011 03:11 AM (8tLl/)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 17, 2011 03:12 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 03:13 AM (8tLl/)
NO, although I don't use Norton what I have found is that it is actually cheaper to go down to Wal Mart and buy new versions rather than pay for renewals.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:14 AM (YdQQY)
Foley Square - NYC?
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:15 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: mik
I think Nortion is much improved over years past, but I haven't used is for a couple of years now and have switched over to the using only the MS firewall stuff. It is actually pretty good once they learn it is important to be able to control the outbound stream as well as the inbound.
Posted by: dogfish at November 17, 2011 03:16 AM (N2yhW)
awww you big softie
Posted by: chemjeff at November 17, 2011 03:17 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: dagny at November 17, 2011 03:17 AM (LVDiz)
Posted by: dogfish at November 17, 2011 03:18 AM (N2yhW)
Its funny that Ayn Rand took the stuff FDR was doing and expanded it in a linear exaggeration to make her point.
And yet her warning went largely unheeded, much like most of my friends have no clue what is happening to our country, who is doing it, or why. They are so ignorant it's becoming scary. They are uninformed and don't wish to change that. They have at their fingertips the greatest tool ever devised (teh Interwebs) to become better informed and they refuse to use it.
It's like they have lost their curiousity and scepticism, two qualities that are essential to self-government. And they never, ever, ask "Why?" when confronted with some new governmental proposal to exert more control over their lives.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 17, 2011 03:18 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 17, 2011 03:18 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 03:19 AM (8tLl/)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 03:20 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 03:22 AM (8tLl/)
First, when Rick Perry went polling ballistic then shot himself in the foot,
Herman Cain inexplicably rockets to the top of the polls. I warn Stacy McCain I believe the polls are manipulated and there are machinations to tear him down waiting in the wings. Presto, GroperGate.
Then Newt inexplicably rockets to the top of the polls and presto, he's still a scumbag.
Who's next?
Posted by: Beto Ochoa at November 17, 2011 03:22 AM (j5CHE)
When you get new virus software you must first make sure you absolutely delete ALL the old virus software before loading it.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:23 AM (YdQQY)
Have you noticed that in every Washington scandals, no one ever goes to jail?
That reminds me: did Tigger ever resign?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 17, 2011 03:25 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 03:26 AM (p7SSh)
Have you noticed that in every Washington scandals, no one ever goes to jail?
They're banking on that. Literally.
Posted by: Beto Ochoa at November 17, 2011 03:27 AM (j5CHE)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 17, 2011 03:27 AM (i6RpT)
As I said in that article earlier, the government has really set it up for failure. When that slice of gov cheese costs $100 things are going to get tough.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:28 AM (YdQQY)
What we call a warning, the commies call a blueprint.
It's facinating to me when they see (if they see) the death and destruction under communism that they think they will be in the elite and not the famine victim or the mass grave occupier.
Posted by: dagny at November 17, 2011 03:29 AM (LVDiz)
AntiVirus, Link Scanner, E-mail protection, anti-rootkit, identity protection. There are cost-extra add-ons for PC maintenance, kiddie protection and backup/sync which I've never tried.
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at November 17, 2011 03:29 AM (xqhoO)
Gee, the lack or originality. Well, truth is a two-edged sword that cuts both ways. As if Rand's testament served as template. Larger than life. Never waste a crisis, even if you have to create it to make your point. Greenspan did in Rand's credibility imo, illustrating how the selfish-ideal plays from the top, despite whatever best of intentions.
Balance of powers, limited powers, those make a different story.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 17, 2011 03:29 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 03:30 AM (8tLl/)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 17, 2011 07:27 AM (i6RpT)
The same way the asshole from F&F defended the bonuses to the incompetent executives yesterday. Just blatantly lie in their faces.
They don't have to worry, they now it is all a show. Republicans will do NOTHING.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:30 AM (YdQQY)
Strong defense of Solyndra loan? How the fuck is he gonna do that?
He's already started. FNC had his statement yesterday, with him lamely saying that the loan "underwent rigorous review" or some such bullshit.
I really hope he gets his ass handed to him on a silver platter, right before he does the perp walk, but that's just me.
OK, 'rons 'n 'ettes, time to hit the salt mine for the last time this week. Y'all have fun and try not to trash the place, 'mkay? I'll catch you on the flip-flop.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 17, 2011 03:32 AM (d0Tfm)
When you get new virus software you must first make sure you absolutely delete ALL the old virus software before loading it.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 07:23 AM (YdQQY)
Some of the older laptops don't have enought memory to handle the newer anti-virus software along with the windows updates. I have an old one now that works fine to surf until you load the security and then it's so slow to be useless.
Posted by: dagny at November 17, 2011 03:32 AM (LVDiz)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at November 17, 2011 03:33 AM (3bJHs)
ISP software???? I have NEVER had to use specific software to log on the internet other than what came with Windows.
Even in the old dial-up days you could use a 3rd party browser to log on to AOL.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:34 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Nash Rambler at November 17, 2011 03:34 AM (C7ATr)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 03:35 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 17, 2011 03:36 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 03:37 AM (8tLl/)
Well the Dems sure didn't mind going after Scooter Libey for outing Valerie Plame even when they knew it wasn't him that did it and that it wasn't a crime to begin with.
The Republicans will not go after them even when they are in blatant violation of the law.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:38 AM (YdQQY)
The key to that is "one".
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:39 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 03:39 AM (8tLl/)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 17, 2011 03:40 AM (i6RpT)
The latest version of that malicious worm is written so that you should not "click" on anything. As soon as it pops up turn the computer off.
But to prevent it entirely go to FF and use "no script" add-on. I used to get hit by that BS scam a lot. When I went to FF/No script not another hit at all.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:41 AM (YdQQY)
Pussies.
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at November 17, 2011 03:43 AM (xqhoO)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 17, 2011 07:40 AM (i6RpT)
Congress has NEVER given me any reason to have "faith".
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:43 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 03:44 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 17, 2011 03:46 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 03:46 AM (8tLl/)
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at November 17, 2011 03:46 AM (xqhoO)
Nice and cleear in Tenn. The dam IRS can do anythin to us these days. They can break a man. Heard dat an occypier called the IRS on some businessmen and they are bein investigated. Dam liberal northeners!
Posted by: HillbillyJimmy at November 17, 2011 03:47 AM (t4YF+)
Some of us have been screaming about that for a long time. Its not just SSI either. They simply moved all of it over to "kid programs" and called it something different.
When people talk about "the end of welfare as we know it" I laugh at them because obviously they are right. They just don't "know it".
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:47 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 03:47 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 17, 2011 07:46 AM (i6RpT)
Isn't that grounds for a "blanket party"?
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:48 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 03:48 AM (p7SSh)
Microsoft Security Essentials worked well as well, and was free. And Spybot, and Malware Malbytes.
Or, best yet, Linux.
Posted by: nickless, back with the banned (99.174.64.43) at November 17, 2011 03:49 AM (cBVAS)
Posted by: HillbillyJimmy at November 17, 2011 03:50 AM (t4YF+)
Posted by: HillbillyJimmy at November 17, 2011 03:50 AM (t4YF+)
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 03:51 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 17, 2011 03:51 AM (i6RpT)
Get Avast, it's free and it is currently ranked #3 in anti-virus. As always, install Malwarebytes along with avast. Both are free.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at November 17, 2011 03:53 AM (4xpaZ)
Many in the news are saying that the man who shot at the white house was a tea partier. Like all of the tea party can be violent and living on the criminal edge. Unbelieveable. Where are we as a country right now?
Posted by: RationalMan at November 17, 2011 03:54 AM (t4YF+)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 03:54 AM (8tLl/)
Posted by: Steve at November 17, 2011 03:55 AM (t4YF+)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 03:55 AM (8tLl/)
Posted by: Steve at November 17, 2011 07:55 AM (t4YF+)
There are nasty people everywhere. I was a cop, I met a whole lot of nasty poor folk. Rich guys never shot at me, poor guys have.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at November 17, 2011 03:56 AM (4xpaZ)
they think they will be in the elite and not the famine victim or the mass grave occupier.
Absolutely correct. Sucker pawns, dead weight has its use dragging life down.
Self delusion has its own power over the psyche and self defense mechanisms. Stroke the lamebrain with a sense of "belonging" and the fool eats from the owner's hand. Anything to fit in. Sad to say, that critique applies across the board of human behavior and ideologies.
The quick fix amounts to haste makes waste, "efficiency" terminating the "out-moded" US Constitution from American governance whether in part or whole, authoritarian UN and DHS modernity that denies humanity's natural rights for the socialist national defense sake of the "many v. individual", kinetic perpetual wars to protect global corporatism at direct odds against the valued interests of the US Constitution, US Dollar, US citizens and local domestic US business...
Speaking of which, the US Government owes the Saudis exactly what for all the horror support we've given the House of Saud and its Jihadi Brotherhood specifically since FDR's treaty?
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 17, 2011 03:56 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at November 17, 2011 03:58 AM (xqhoO)
Rich guys with "clean hands" hired the poor guys to do the shooting dirty work.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 17, 2011 03:59 AM (lpWVn)
Yeesh. All this good news.
To think, I was just going to reiterate how awesome the business card is from the ONT.
Posted by: Truman North at November 17, 2011 04:03 AM (I2LwF)
The latest version of the "free" Malwarebytes is now a limited time trial. I installed it on my MIL's machine and it now wants a pay version.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 04:03 AM (YdQQY)
Agreed. Actually, I can get new McAfee for as low as 35 bucks.
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at November 17, 2011 07:56 AM (OWjjx)
I am using the 3-machine version of McAfee and I buy it every year from Wall Mart.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 04:04 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: GMan at November 17, 2011 04:05 AM (sxq57)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 04:08 AM (8tLl/)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 04:10 AM (8tLl/)
Posted by: BryanCaskey at November 17, 2011 04:11 AM (qZkSQ)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 04:13 AM (8tLl/)
As if Americans feel better having been terminated by a smiley face.
So long as it's GOP or in my circle, it couldn't be that bad...self delusion and defense mechanisms.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 17, 2011 04:15 AM (lpWVn)
The canyon walls make the noise reverberate. Pool supports OWS. Still think he's a good guy but doesn't know shit about the law. He's from Chicago so that may explain a lot.
Posted by: Nash Rambler at November 17, 2011 04:15 AM (C7ATr)
1. Romneycare
2. Gun grabber
3. Tax and spend
4. Favored McCain Kennedy amnesty bill
5. Pro-abortion (for those who have that as an issue)
6. Will lose close Southern States like NC and VA and deliver Obama to a second term.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 04:17 AM (YdQQY)
“Taking political advice from Ann Coulter is like taking weight control advice from me and Chris Christie,” Beckel said. “That woman knows as much about politics as my retired senile aunt.”
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 17, 2011 04:18 AM (lpWVn)
“Republicans cannot make the same mistake as the Democrats in 2012. What this means in practice is not that the party must forsake its conservative values, but rather it must find a nominee who can relate them to the practical worries of these non-partisan, non-ideological voters in the center, and make those voters believe that he will be the best choice for the future. Put another way, ne must be a great salesman of conservatism to non-conservatives. And then in office, he must govern always with an eye to holding them in his voting coalition.
“An ideological firebrand or a polarizer who alienates the political center will not do. Because, after all, the GOP’s opportunity next year is not thanks to an emerging Republican majority, but because the emerging Democratic majority the liberals were awaiting never happened. That means all those swing voters who backed Obama in 2008 are up for grabs, and the top priority of the GOP is now to find a candidate who can win them over.”
Rush thinks swing voters do not exsist. Rush is wrong. Rush must want 4 more years of Obozo for his ratings.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 04:21 AM (O7ksG)
And there are swing voting "undecideds". They amount to < 1 or 2% of the actual voters.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 04:23 AM (YdQQY)
Rick Perry will deliver Obama a 2nd term.
Gingrich will deliver Obama a 2nd Term
Cain, thanks the the racist left, is out.
I'm not sure why so many on the right are blind to purity and allergic to strategy. But - whatever.
Romney's faults are the devil we know.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 04:24 AM (O7ksG)
7. Ethanol subsidies.
8.Anthropomorphic Global Warming
Posted by: Cicerokid at November 17, 2011 08:22 AM (Xl2G5)
Thanks, forgot about those
But what that all boils down to is he is a Democrat with an R after his name. That is the real way he "fooled" the people in MA.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 04:25 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 04:26 AM (YdQQY)
.........
Norton is a piece of shit... it bogs down your computer until it becomes unusable.. same with McAfee and others..
Get the free version of Avast.. it just works and stays out of your way.
http://tinyurl.com/4xt3rck
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at November 17, 2011 04:30 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: Cicerokid at November 17, 2011 04:31 AM (Xl2G5)
Not only are they financing them but I'll bet that if you zero's in on the real agitators in the crowds who are leading the shouting you would find that they are a member of a communist front group or the union leadership.
This is not a "grassroots" organization.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 04:31 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Jean at November 17, 2011 04:32 AM (/FT0A)
Posted by: Vic
..........
Ahh.. then as long as you say so.. that's it then. Proven. Who knew?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at November 17, 2011 04:32 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: Rick Rombachcaingrichsman at November 17, 2011 04:33 AM (8/DeP)
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 04:34 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 04:37 AM (8tLl/)
Posted by: Jean at November 17, 2011 04:39 AM (/FT0A)
A couple days ago when they were trying to get back into Zucotti, the chant souded like
Who's park?
Aardvark!
Posted by: Nash Rambler at November 17, 2011 04:39 AM (C7ATr)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 04:40 AM (8tLl/)
Swing voters, independent voters, and even some republicans voted for Obama in 2008. Obama crafted a centrist message and campaigned to the center. He lied about how leftwing he is/was. Obama fooled everyone into believing he was a government transparency reformer! Obama promised to cut wasteful spending! What a joke.
Folks on the right forget that we really don't live in a "conservative" naiton. If it were, Obama would have been laughed off the stage. All the smart independents and republicans would have seen through the fraud and the false facade that is Obama. Obama ins't a centrist, he a leftiwng loon. Instead, we eleceted him.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 04:41 AM (O7ksG)
If Romney is elected, and Democrats either keep control of the Senate or win control of the House, Romney will head for Capitol Hill, sit down with Reid and Pelosi, and deal. In fact, even if Democrats lose the Senate but threaten filibusters, which they would, the Romney you will see then will look nothing like the conservative Mitt Romney you see today, and will look more like the moderate to liberal Mitt Romney who was governor.
The bolded stuff is the most likely scenario. And he has already said he will do that and recently.
As Democratic and Republican leaders in Washington struggled to find agreement on spending cuts and extending the debt limit, Mitt Romney struck a conciliatory note in New Hampshire on Monday by lamenting partisan feuding while touting his record of working with Democrats -- even the Senate's onetime liberal lion Edward M. Kennedy.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 04:42 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 04:43 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: Cicerokid at November 17, 2011 08:22 AM (Xl2G5)
Um...Anthropogenic Global Warming?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at November 17, 2011 04:44 AM (ES+yV)
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 08:26 AM (YdQQY)
Even the crazies aren't pure...
http://1.usa.gov/uPrYXb
note Ron Paul signed on to this letter.
Posted by: StrategicCPLUSMC at November 17, 2011 04:44 AM (zgwWv)
Posted by: Nash Rambler at November 17, 2011 04:44 AM (C7ATr)
Re: Fannie and Freddie bonuses
Seems to me that Rahm Emmanuel was on the board at Freddie and that the other clinton appointee Jamie Gorelick was on the board at either Fannie or Freddie...
When are the media going to stick a mike in front of them as I saw Gingrich getting the prison rape interview this morning???
Sickening that these bloodsuckers are feeding at the trough of the bankrupt housing giants being supported by the taxpayers...Can't these fucking people make their own money???
Posted by: Survey sez at November 17, 2011 04:44 AM (pg8PV)
Vic - It has everything to do with purity. Look at your anti-Romney lists. He doesnÂ’t pass your purity test.
Rick Perry is an idiot. But hey - lets vote for him because he's a pure conservative. Lets ignore the independent voters, who are growing in numbers, and who are turned off by Perry and will never vote for him in the general. Then we can gleefully watch as Obama wins a 2nd term. Purity.
Romney didn't win the 2008 nom for all sorts of reasons. We got McCain because that's who the media wanted.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 04:45 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: Jean at November 17, 2011 04:45 AM (/FT0A)
I think Romney is a Democrat asshole who worships big government and is also a dumb-ass. People say he is good in the "debates" but the one time he actually got challenged he fell apart. So where does that leave you? Ron Paul?
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 04:45 AM (YdQQY)
So ... they either can't or won't get jobs, don't have any significant money of their own, many appear to have abused their parents' educational generosity, and they are causing the same government they want more money from to waste the precious resources they have, all so they can stand around in the street and chant stupid, repetitive slogans.
Yet according to them, the source of all their problems is the banking and financial sectors.
Again, I utterly fail to see the point of the protest. What exactly are they hoping to accomplish, heightened awareness of the situations? This is all very poorly thought out.
Posted by: Rick Rombachcaingrichsman at November 17, 2011 04:45 AM (8/DeP)
All sorts of idiots worked with Teddy Kennedy. After killing a woman, Teddy was in there for life. GWB worked with Teddy on "no child left behind" oh no!
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 04:46 AM (O7ksG)
The only "purity" that is involved is that Romney's actual record is pure GD Democrat. I can live with a few moderate leanings, Perry has those himself. What I can't live with is every damn category being moderate and liberal.
When you are zero for 6 it is pure liberal.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 04:47 AM (YdQQY)
Texas, Montgomery County Sheriff Department is using the unmanned ShadowHawk helicopter drone (six-feet long, weighs fifty pounds and fits in the back of an SUV).
Chief Deputy Randy McDaniel told FOX News:
“We can put it over a fire, put it over ahazmat (sic) spill, put it over a house with a suspect barricaded inside and literally give the incident commander the ability to look at the entire scene with a bird’s eye view. This sheriff’s office has better things to do with its time then (sic) spy on people, ” McDaniel argued. "That’s not our mission. The only way that it’s going to be an invasion of their privacy is if they are committing some type of a criminal act where we might utilize this to catch them.”
Montgomery County is one of the most heavily Republican counties in Texas, represented by the conservative Congressman Kevin Brady who resides in The Woodlands.Is the ShadowHawk drone going to be kept under wraps except when in pursuit of a criminal fugitive, or over a fire or hazmat spill? Blue Thunder update ohne pilot.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 17, 2011 04:47 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Jean at November 17, 2011 04:48 AM (/FT0A)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 04:49 AM (8tLl/)
Posted by: Lizabth at November 17, 2011 04:49 AM (JZBti)
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 04:49 AM (YdQQY)
138 Anthropomorphic Global Warming
Worshipped as a god, Global Warming has taken on a human form.
Posted by: Cicerokid at November 17, 2011 04:50 AM (Xl2G5)
Jean - I disagree. Perry's negatives are of his own doing.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 04:51 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: Rick Rombachcaingrichsman at November 17, 2011 04:51 AM (8/DeP)
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 04:52 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Granny McBotox at November 17, 2011 04:53 AM (P9OJs)
Last night, I watched Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. God bless her, my bride had never seen it before. I was pleased to explain to her as we went along what each of the finer plot points meant (it's always ego-stroking to feel like a know-it-all).
It really was rife with a nascent leftist ideology. Which is understandable; that's Gene Roddenberry- a still-born Commie. The one thing that struck me was the theme of, "the good of the many outweighs the good of the few or the one." Perfect collectivist slogan in theory. But in practice, Spock makes an individual sacrifice to save the rest of ship of his own volition. Nobody forced him to do it. It wasn't an institutional, top-down decision. He did it. As an individual.
Only an individual can make a sacrifice. If some group forces that 'sacrifice,' it's not a sacrifice at all, but rather a theft of liberty. This is what turns my stonach when I hear the president or other statists talk about the concept of 'shared sacrifice'. There is no such thing.
Posted by: Truman North at November 17, 2011 04:54 AM (I2LwF)
The only thing keeping him in the race is the fact that the anti-Romney keeps getting split. It is 2008 all over again.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 04:54 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Jean at November 17, 2011 04:54 AM (/FT0A)
Posted by: naturalfake at November 17, 2011 04:55 AM (I49Jm)
The police are unionized. The urban politicians in control fundamentally agree with and need the OWSers.
Posted by: Truman North at November 17, 2011 04:55 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Jean at November 17, 2011 04:57 AM (/FT0A)
StrategicCPLUSMC at November 17, 2011 08:44 AM (zgwWv)
#139 Stipulate how that's "impure"
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 17, 2011 04:57 AM (lpWVn)
Morning, all!
Remember the non-troversy a couple years ago about the Hallmark card that the NAACP was all up in arms about because they imagined the characters were saying "black ho's" instead of "black holes?" Because they're stupid?
Yeah, time to lay another stupid non-troversy at the feet of "racism." I'm sorry for the lengthy excerpt, but this story has me hopping mad.
North Texas Dad Says Unnoticed Racial Slur Slipped In 'Fraggle Rock' Cartoon
BEDFORD, TEXAS— A North Texas father is fuming mad. He says a cartoon slipped a racial slur into an episode and it's gone decades without notice.
His daughter, two-year-old Zariyah, loves to watch Fraggle Rock reruns.
"It is her favorite show, period," said father Keith White. But, White says he recently heard a disturbing racial slur on the show.
"My reaction was to keep replaying to see if that`s what I really heard, and that`s what I heard, and that`s what I hear," he said.
"I heard him say Jigaboo," said White. "That`s what I heard him say," he said.
We showed the clip to the Dallas-Fort Worth chapter of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.
"I agree with him. It does say Jigaboo, there`s no if ands or butts about it," said D-FW SCLC Chapter President Rev. Kyev Tatum.
But The Hub Network, which airs the show, says there is no slur. The Hub sent us the episode's script written in 1984.
They say the character's name is Gobo and his friend is saying "Gee, Gobo. We're sorry".
"I think it`s a little misleading for them to say what`s in the script is what`s being heard," said Tatum.
Rev Tatum and Zariyah's father say what's on paper and what the ear hears are two different things.
"Whether that was Freudian slip, whether it was a mishap, or whatever, it doesn't add up," said Tatum...
So in other words, it doesn't matter what the truth is, only what your perception of the truth is. Facts are irrelevant; feelings and assumptions are the true arbiters of what is real and what is right.
What absolute and utter bullshit.
I love this part at the end of the story. It's the icing on the bullshit cake.
The Hub says they do plan to edit Gobo's name out of the sentence to prevent viewers from making the mistake again. The Jim Henson Company, the show's original creator, said they agree with The Hub`s interpretation of the scene and their actions in this matter.
But Zariyah's family says they're standing by what they hear.
"Why would you edit, if it`s a mistake? Why are you going to edit it out? Are you hearing the same thing?" said White
No, they're editing it out because dumbasses like YOU will give them nothing but shit for it if they don't. You are everything that is wrong with this country, Mr. White. I pity your daughter having you as a father, you unmitigated asshole.
(h/t Five Feet of Fury)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at November 17, 2011 04:58 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 17, 2011 04:58 AM (UlUS4)
91%. I lurk here a lot.
Posted by: jwb7605 at November 17, 2011 04:58 AM (Qxe/p)
You won't get any argument from me about RomneyCare. That issue alone is of singular importance. [Then, the other candidates emerged, and I cringed.] oh shit. Romney has promised repeatedly that he would repeal ObamaCare.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 04:59 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: Jean at November 17, 2011 04:59 AM (/FT0A)
Meh...for what its worth, Perry did a good job on Hannity last night. Cut-Jib and all that. Like Palin, substatively-I like what he has to say but I have a hard time getting past the the folksy/country-bumkin persona and he really does reminds me of W. Not the worse things in the world and I guess I'm just being shallow...sooooo, I have to say, I'm still drinking the Perry-Ade.
Morn, ya'll
Posted by: dananjcon at November 17, 2011 04:59 AM (8ieXv)
Posted by: Jean at November 17, 2011 05:01 AM (/FT0A)
Nothing new there since allahp/HotAir promoted Romney '08, not to mention that allahp never let a reader's eye pass without poking it with a stick.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 17, 2011 05:01 AM (lpWVn)
I'm not to sure of that. I think Newt is just enough of a backstabbing asshole to stay in and screw with Perry.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 05:01 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: phoenixgirl ready to drink the perry flavor-aid..can i get a different flavor? at November 17, 2011 05:01 AM (SH3gZ)
Debates matter because we get a glimpse of how these candidates will debate in the not so obscure GENERAL election.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 05:01 AM (O7ksG)
"HUH? Rick Perry Challenges Nancy Pelosi to a Debate"
(seems like hiring George Will's wife was the best move Perry ever made)
Posted by: sky at November 17, 2011 05:02 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: phoenixgirl ready to drink the perry flavor-aid..can i get a different flavor? at November 17, 2011 05:03 AM (SH3gZ)
I am literally embarrassed for these people. What filth.
Posted by: Rick Rombachcaingrichsman at November 17, 2011 05:05 AM (8/DeP)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 17, 2011 05:05 AM (8y9MW)
Hahahahahahahah
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 05:06 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: phoenixgirl ready to drink the perry flavor-aid..can i get a different flavor? at November 17, 2011 05:07 AM (SH3gZ)
From Allah's link: Sorry - I agree with it.
“In fact, as they struggle to settle on a leader by indulging in serial infatuation with a variety of unelectable alternatives to the front-runner, the Republicans are revealing a fundamental fact about a large and controlling segment of the party: they can only tolerate leaders who are simpler than Mitt Romney seems to be. The ‘anybody-but-Mitt’ attraction to simpler alternatives is just the latest expression of a concept known as the attraction to non-thought, an unconscious defense first identified by British psychoanalyst Gianna Williams. The appeal of the phenomenon is simple: why make the effort to entertain notions of complexity when to do so invites the risk of psychic chaos that uncertainty can produce?…
“The Republican resistance to Romney is rooted in this same mindset, expressed as a desperate need to find a leader who is simple, certain, and who will never change his mind. Like Obama, Romney is perceived as Other — wealthy, northern and Mormon, which arouses deep distrust bordering on hatred among Tea Party voters. Compared to his Republican rivals, whose rhetoric can rarely be confused with sophisticated thought based on a command of history or the facts, he comes off as a thinker and as different as the exotic Obama.”
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 05:07 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 17, 2011 05:08 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Nash Rambler at November 17, 2011 05:08 AM (C7ATr)
yeah, I was waiting on her and DeMint. DeMint has now said he will not endorse anyone in the Primaries. I am wondering if Haley is going to do the same thing because the primaries are approaching fast.
Big difference this time though is they are ALL proportional until Mar 1.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 05:10 AM (YdQQY)
Thank you Mallamutt for the reminder. I forgot about the orange creep and Gov. S. At least the orange creep is gone and we have Rubio. Occasionally - we get it right.
Well, McCain was certainly a gift from TO the media.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 05:11 AM (O7ksG)
Then you're deluded. We have no problem with someone "chang[ing] his mind." We have a problem with someone who has changed their mind about so much with such frequency.
Romney 2012 - Stop Me When You've Heard Something You Like.
Worse than that, his record (something he can't change) shows that he's a liberal, or at least so 'moderate' that you can't tell the difference.
Newt, for all his baggage, at least tried to get conservative things done, and succeeded to some extent. I see no proof (based on his record) that RINO Romney (yes, I believe he's a true RINO, not just saying that because he's a squish) even tried to govern as a conservative.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 17, 2011 05:11 AM (8y9MW)
Mic check my ass.
Posted by: sickinmass at November 17, 2011 09:09 AM (1rflU)
But isn't OWS supposed to be nonviolent? *innocent wide eyed stare*
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at November 17, 2011 05:11 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 05:11 AM (8tLl/)
Posted by: naturalfake at November 17, 2011 05:12 AM (I49Jm)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 05:12 AM (p7SSh)
Saying Mitt will never change his mind doesn't make it so.
That you believe what you want despite recorded history defines who you are.
Hell, revisionist doctrines change faster than previous editions can be destroyed. Try scholarly research v. limited blogger posts if you want to know. You don't.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 17, 2011 05:13 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 05:13 AM (8tLl/)
first time jobless claims drop to 388K.
In which state?
Posted by: Cicerokid at November 17, 2011 09:09 AM (Xl2G5)
I'd be more inclined to ask, "In which universe?"
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at November 17, 2011 05:13 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Jimbo at November 17, 2011 05:14 AM (O3R/2)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 05:16 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: Nash Rambler at November 17, 2011 05:16 AM (C7ATr)
http://tinyurl.com/6txmcn4
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry at November 17, 2011 05:18 AM (bvfSj)
"Die in a fucking fire"? Is that conservatism, Vic?
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 05:22 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 05:22 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: Steve at November 17, 2011 05:24 AM (t4YF+)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 09:22 AM (O7ksG)
Perhaps you need some "re-reading".
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 05:24 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 05:25 AM (p7SSh)
Front toward left: You should get back to your OWS meeting? I heard the weather underground is re-grouping. Lots of room for mindless hate there.
Certainly we cannot agree to disagree- but instead, issue death threats.
"DIE IN A FUCKING FIRE" is kind of a death threat.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 05:30 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 05:30 AM (8tLl/)
Hahahahahahahah
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 09:06 AM (YdQQY)
Unemployment goes down a bit at this time of year? Why that's never happened before. It must be because of all of Barry's wonderful plans
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 17, 2011 05:31 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 09:31 AM (8tLl/)
Hehehehe...to think the occupiers were gonna hinder a thoudands of motivated capitalist from making money.
Posted by: dananjcon at November 17, 2011 05:35 AM (8ieXv)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 05:35 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 05:40 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 05:40 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 05:41 AM (8tLl/)
IN RE Kathy Griffin:
I don't want to hear none of you guys (LIARS) saying you wouldn't hit that.
IF you could figure out how to keep her from talking, cause I'm pretty sure she's a talker in bed.
"Men will try to stick their dick in anything with a hole large enough (and sometimes too small)"
Me.
Posted by: Fight the nattering nabobs of negativism at November 17, 2011 05:43 AM (xqpQL)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 05:46 AM (p7SSh)
Awww, you're a good man, Vic.
Posted by: Lady in Black: still voting for Perry ... for now at November 17, 2011 05:46 AM (ycuSb)
LOL, sometimes.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 05:47 AM (YdQQY)
Waaa call your mother. I'm a tea party person and I'm not offended.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 05:50 AM (O7ksG)
I thought the government check ad was at first a clever existential juxtaposition of Gabe's conservativeish libertarian thought was the bloated government beaucracy in which we find ourselves on this blog.
That and I need more coffee.
p.s. Obama is a Stuttering Clusterfuck Of A Miserable Failure
Posted by: Heartless Nora on the Perry,Gingrich,Santorum,ABOCain Train at November 17, 2011 05:52 AM (VxqUc)
previous comment should read as follows:
....libertarian thought versus the bloated
-like I said, I need more coffee
Posted by: Heartless Nora on the Perry,Gingrich,Santorum,ABOCain Train at November 17, 2011 05:53 AM (VxqUc)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 05:56 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: Heartless Nora on the Perry,Gingrich,Santorum,ABOCain Train oh and eff off Mittens at November 17, 2011 05:58 AM (VxqUc)
mittens a thinker?
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahha stop, breathe, hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Posted by: Heartless Nora on the Perry,Gingrich,Santorum,ABOCain Train oh and eff off Mittens at November 17, 2011 06:00 AM (VxqUc)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 06:04 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 06:11 AM (YdQQY)
The only difference is he didn't serve in Vietnam.
In fact he was against the war. (shocker)
You know who he is; a better looking John F'n Kerry.
Mitt at least got his money the old fashioned way; he got it from his Daddy and his Daddy's friends help.
If Romney wins the Republican Nom. then we're in for 4 more years of socialism and I don't think America can make it unchanged.
This is similar to the time period when Rome went from a Republic to an Empire.
Posted by: Fight the nattering nabobs of negativism at November 17, 2011 06:13 AM (xqpQL)
The Golden Globes hiring Gervais again might be the only smart decision made in Hollywood in recent times. I clicked over last year thinking he'd be a little edgy but he went for it more than anticipated. They were, IIRC, pissed. Hiring him again this year means that folks will tune in just to see him make fun of the self-righteous shits.
It doesn't matter that nobody gives a damn about the awards, just so long as they get ratings.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at November 17, 2011 06:16 AM (piMMO)
You're also an idiot, but that's not important right now ..
Posted by: toby928© Perrykrishna with tattooed knuckles at November 17, 2011 06:25 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: mike at November 17, 2011 06:28 AM (8tLl/)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 06:31 AM (p7SSh)
IÂ’m a tea party minded person. I want a small efficient government that works for me, not against me. I want fair and low taxes, I want private sector job growth, I want limited transparent constitutional government.
That doesnÂ’t mean I cannot criticize the precious tea party. Lets look at some self-defeating tea party purity, shall we?
In MA – The tea party helped get Scott Brown elected to Teddy Kennedy’s seat. An amazing wonderful achievement! We all ate pudding cups until we passed out. Now we all know Scott Brown is a moderate or left leaning “republican” or “rino” or whatever we want to call him. To keep his job representing the lefty folks who reside in MA – he has to be. Of course this makes us cringe. When he votes with the Dems – we want to scream. And now the tea party is saying “enough” and that they are withdrawing their support of him. OK. Well guess what? Elizabeth Warren is what. And Elizabeth Warren is a repugnant hard core leftist. Politics is always about the lesser of two evils. Now, we call all agree or disagree on who will be able to take out Obama. I happen to think that it’s Romney. I am in the minority here. Fine.
Btw- Vic Sorry I did not mean to accuse you of being the other poster.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 06:37 AM (O7ksG)
“In fact, as they struggle to settle on a leader by indulging in serial infatuation with a variety of unelectable alternatives to the front-runner, the Republicans are revealing a fundamental fact about a large and controlling segment of the party: they can only tolerate leaders who are simpler than Mitt Romney seems to be. The ‘anybody-but-Mitt’ attraction to simpler alternatives is just the latest expression of a concept known as the attraction to non-thought, an unconscious defense first identified by British psychoanalyst Gianna Williams. The appeal of the phenomenon is simple: why make the effort to entertain notions of complexity when to do so invites the risk of psychic chaos that uncertainty can produce?…
And since that psychobabble attack on conservatives wasn't enough for you, you just had to pile it on:
“The Republican resistance to Romney is rooted in this same mindset, expressed as a desperate need to find a leader who is simple, certain, and who will never change his mind. Like Obama, Romney is perceived as Other — wealthy, northern and Mormon, which arouses deep distrust bordering on hatred among Tea Party voters. Compared to his Republican rivals, whose rhetoric can rarely be confused with sophisticated thought based on a command of history or the facts, he comes off as a thinker and as different as the exotic Obama.”
I kind of agree with that.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 17, 2011 06:37 AM (O7ksG)
I kind of agree with that.
Then maybe you should GTFO and go hang out at kos where you belong.
Posted by: GMan at November 17, 2011 06:41 AM (sxq57)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 06:45 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 06:47 AM (p7SSh)
A friend posted a link to this on Facebook (link does not go to Facebook) and thought it might be of interest. It's a candidate matching tool from a place called ProCon.
I got Bachmann, Cain, and Perry in that order, so I think there's something wrong with some of their scoring, but it was still worth a couple of minutes for jollies.
Posted by: Y-not at November 17, 2011 07:22 AM (5H6zj)
I got the same and then Romney. It becomes evident what kind of org they are when you read the questions. "torture such as water boarding" is a prime example. Only liberals think water boarding is torture.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2011 07:27 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 07:29 AM (p7SSh)
This makes me think he might actually be competent.
Posted by: Greg Q at November 17, 2011 07:48 AM (/0a60)
We used to joke that if a B-2 pilot was FEB'd after a crash there would be something breathtaking about being responsible for the loss of a half-trillion-dollar jet.
Posted by: Arms Merchant at November 17, 2011 08:36 AM (vA8Rg)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 08:40 AM (p7SSh)
---
I haven't had a chance to investigate them, but I think they may be libertarian. A bunch of my (progressive Democrat but not virulently so, more like socially progressive Dems) friends got Johnson as their #1 or #2.
Several questions about marijuana seems to be the hallmark of the Libertarians.
Posted by: Y-not at November 17, 2011 08:58 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 17, 2011 09:02 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: steevy at November 17, 2011 12:25 PM (7WJOC)
Posted by: Vultures’ Picnic ePub at November 17, 2011 04:10 PM (AlLsi)
Posted by: Saving June iBooks at November 17, 2011 04:37 PM (UzfXG)
Posted by: Star Wars: The Old Republic: Revan AudioBook at November 17, 2011 04:56 PM (BVrHC)
Posted by: Who’s in Charge ePub at November 17, 2011 05:54 PM (gqAct)
I always smelled a rat about her death.
Most likely was a misadventure and not murder 1 but they covered it up and that's a shame and a crime.
Posted by: Fight the nattering nabobs of negativism at November 17, 2011 09:24 PM (xqpQL)
amv converter for mac
Posted by: nanonu at November 17, 2011 10:00 PM (bVQN/)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3171 seconds, 375 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: gunslingeraz at November 17, 2011 02:57 AM (Ij1fE)