November 18, 2011
— Gabriel Malor FRIDAY! Woooooo!
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:47 AM
| Comments (320)
Post contains 10 words, total size 1 kb.
Romney says SCOTUS will strike down Obamacare
The Romney people keep harping that he says he will repeal Obamacare as his first priority. Anyone who can count past 60 knows that neither he, nor any of the other candidates, will be able to do that. First off the President can’t repeal anything. He can only approve or veto bills sent to him by Congress. Congress will includes a Senate in which the Republicans will have a bare majority, probably in the just above 50 range. In short, unless the Republicans use the “nuclear option” it will never make it out of the Senate. Republicans will not use the nuclear option.
Our only chance to get rid of the POS law is SCOTUS unless we have an earthquake in the election. But facing realism, there will be no taking the Senate by more than 60. Republicans havenÂ’t held a more than 60 majority in the Senate since the 1890s and will not hold one in 2013.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 02:48 AM (YdQQY)
40 Republicans want Holder to resign
(Covered last night). Yeah, I want him to resign, but only as the first step before going to jail. This has been the most lawless DOJ that I have seen in my lifetime.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 02:49 AM (YdQQY)
Note: The link below will take you to a story on the DC which is linked to another site which shows nudity. The DC site itself does not and is SFW.
Get ready for another woman beaten or stoned in the Middle East
This blogger has put up nude photos of herself in open defiance to the mullahs who are taking over Egypt in the name of “Islam”. I suspect that she will not last long.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 02:49 AM (YdQQY)
Attacks on eye of Newt gearing up from the MFM now
A think tank founded by GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich collected at least $37 million over the past eight years from major health-care companies and industry groups, offering special access to the former House speaker and other perks, according to records and interviews.
They will not stomach anyone not Romney at the front of the pack. This is the tip of the iceberg for any Republican AFTER the nomination. However, this just shows Newtie is not the conservative he is touted to be. 30 sec sound bites are not a good showing of a candidate.
But it is not just Newt, he is but an example of the corruption and rotten dealings that go on in Washington, especially for those that rise up to the top like SOTH. The founders went to great lengths to make sure that the United States had no “nobility” in the government. But over the years and decades we have built our own nobility, even to the point in some cases now where political families pass down their legacies to children.
Indeed it appears that this type of wanton corruption can not be stopped. Voters have been bought with bread and circuses (as the old cliché goes). We have entrenched socialists and communists controlling all the large urban areas and entire States. On the rare occasion when a Statewide politician is singled out to be caught by the press the voters yawn and exclaim “everybody does it” and either vote them back in or another one from the same Party just like him.
The founders knew that with massive government came massive corruption and the stifling of liberty for the average person. That is why the Constitution limited the powers of the federal government. But the federalists didnÂ’t like that and immediately set to increase the power. FDR made sure that it was dead in buried in the 30s and his legacy was a Supreme Court that guaranteed it for centuries after he was dead.
People, pray for a Japanese airliner during the next joint session. That appears to be the only way to save the real Republic before the massive collapse.
/rant off.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 02:50 AM (YdQQY)
I distrust new “recollections” after 30 years of silence.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 02:51 AM (YdQQY)
World' scariest ski slopes (per the Telegraph)
I m posting this because once on my way to Reno up highway 80 looking at the country side at some of the famous ski areas I noticed something remarkable. It was Summertime with no snow. There were no slopes to ski on. It was all cliffs. If you fell off of one of those slopes in the Summer it would most likely kill you.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 02:51 AM (YdQQY)
We have to believe he is either a colossal liar who doesnÂ’t care that we know he is lying or that he is colossally stupid. Personally I go with liar. But, it doesnÂ’t matter. He could have stood up on the witness table, dropped his pants, and gave the questioners the moon and the Republicans who blow hard and do nothing.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 02:52 AM (YdQQY)
Funny video being played on F&F this morning with a cute babe from the Daily Caller interviewing those phony “millionaires” who want to raise taxes but then refuse to go ahead and donate to the government.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 02:52 AM (YdQQY)
That’s it for the news this morning. Not much out there today either. I will add we are having what I call pneumonia weather. We have gone from 82° Wed to 27° this morning. Arrggg.
Oh, and I saw the Perry ad about the Obama “lazy” crack this morning. He did not call Obama “pathetic”, he said calling Americans lazy was pathetic. It was a good ad.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 02:53 AM (YdQQY)
40 Republicans want Holder to resign
(Covered last night). Yeah, I want him to resign, but only as the first step before going to jail. This has been the most lawless DOJ that I have seen in my lifetime.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 06:49 AM (YdQQY)
I'm gonna give my freshman Congresswoman's office a ring later today and press her to join the call. It's ridiculous that we haven't brought this prick down yet.
Posted by: mugiwara at November 18, 2011 02:57 AM (KI/Ch)
Posted by: Herb Cain at November 18, 2011 02:57 AM (FabC8)
Posted by: avi at November 18, 2011 02:57 AM (iSFyV)
Here is a novel concept: Jews, don't vote for a F#ckin' Muslim. Then you can shite over the JEF all you want.
Posted by: sTevo at November 18, 2011 02:59 AM (VMcEw)
No it wasn't passed with reconciliation. It was passed with 60 votes before Scott Brown took office. The "fixes", which involved some tax matters were passed with reconciliation.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 03:00 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: ombdz at November 18, 2011 03:03 AM (2DpoY)
Posted by: Zakn at November 18, 2011 03:05 AM (q/891)
Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2011 03:06 AM (LVDiz)
Posted by: Zakn at November 18, 2011 03:06 AM (q/891)
40 Republicans want Holder to resign
Yeah, but the obvious problem would be the 200-some Republicans who don't seem to think that he must he resign - who aren't appalled by his lawlessness.
Posted by: Sasha -N- Malia at November 18, 2011 03:06 AM (Bjf6P)
Imagine that! Stoojents showing up at colleges with few or no studying skills, requiring remedial English classwork, requiring remedial mathematics classwork, and (fill in your favorite expectation of academic competence here).
But they've got self esteem boosted to astronomical heights, a trunk full of participation prizes, a fat wad of cash, courtesy of Uncle Sugar's student loans racket, and a wildly overconfident view of what are their employment prospects when they finish their studies in four five six years.
Big Education, from K through college, is rotten to the core and needs to be taken down, hard.
Posted by: No Whining at November 18, 2011 03:09 AM (4I7lI)
Posted by: Zakn at November 18, 2011 07:05 AM (q/891)
I don't think so. There are 33 seats up for grabs with quite a few Dems retiring. However, a lot of these are in hard core blue States which are unlikely to turn over. I think at best we will pick up between 6 and 8 of the Dem seats (and that is a huge gain). We are likely to lose Scott Brown's seat in MA. That will give a net of between 5 and 7. 7 pick ups would give us 54. And that is the "best" we can do.
Most likely we will wind up with a bare majority of 51 or 52. When you throw in the RINOs and DIABLOS that is not a lot of help.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 03:11 AM (YdQQY)
--------------------------------------
People, pray for a Japanese airliner during the next joint session. That appears to be the only way to save the real Republic before the massive collapse.
/rant off.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 06:50 AM (YdQQY)My wife tends to wince when she hears me say this, but the smartest thing Al Qaeda did on 9/11 was to leave the U.S. Congress intact, whether they planned it that way or not. Not a very nice thing to say, I know.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 18, 2011 03:15 AM (haFNK)
Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2011 03:17 AM (LVDiz)
Posted by: Doctor Fish at November 18, 2011 07:02 AM (Lt/Za)
Rubin: The Phony Opinion "Journalist"/Full Time Romney Butt Kisser
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 18, 2011 03:18 AM (haFNK)
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 07:00 AM
Fixed it for ya, Vic.
As long as we have squishy, accommodating, reach-across-the-aisle Repubs there, the Senate might as well be 100% Democrat.
Anyone who puts getting home for his meal of Christmas pork ahead of the country does not deserve to be in public office.
Posted by: MrScribbler at November 18, 2011 03:24 AM (HkOAc)
Hey but we were promised a vote on the balanced budget amendment!
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 03:26 AM (YdQQY)
Here is how it would have to go: We would have to take:
HI (with Lingle-Rino)
NM (with NM gov-babe?)
OH (no top tier candidate has stepped up yet, so looks unlikely)
PA (ditto)
ND (looks good)
NE (looks good)
NY (with Giuliani/Pataki - Rino)
WI (50/50 chances)
WV (looks doubtful)
MO (looks good)
FL (50/50 chances)
MT (looks good)
And, hold MA.
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 03:30 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Case at November 18, 2011 03:31 AM (FD6YW)
Posted by: Winning at November 18, 2011 03:32 AM (80nuu)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 03:36 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Winning at November 18, 2011 03:36 AM (80nuu)
Brown will be gone. The Dems in MA were caught by surprise, they wont be again.
But lets not forget MooKow in AK. She is just as bad as any of the rest on that list.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 03:38 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Winning at November 18, 2011 03:38 AM (80nuu)
Posted by: Winning at November 18, 2011 03:40 AM (80nuu)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 03:45 AM (s7mIC)
That is reasonable, but when you throw in MA look what would wind up with. About what I said, a net gain of 5 or 6. That gives the final Senate count at 52 or 53.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 03:46 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 03:46 AM (s7mIC)
It will be a squeaker but Brown is not the underdog (yet).
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 03:47 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: That Anchorguy That KFTC at November 18, 2011 03:47 AM (niZvt)
'This man doesn't represent our community': Warren Beatty's transgender son brands Chaz Bono a misogynist
Posted by: No Whining at November 18, 2011 03:48 AM (4I7lI)
Wait a minute. We talking about the real MA or an alternate-universe MA?
This is the land of Zombie Ted Kennedy (who could win reelection next year in his current condition), Bawney Fwank and Deval Patrick. This is not a place where sense has anything to do with politics.
Ads are already running here blasting Brown as a Tool of Big Oil. Warren's own early ad shows her looking (and sounding) downright sensible. In fact, she almost doesn't come across as liberal enough for the loons who make up the majority here.
Hate to say it, but it looks like Brown may be toast in '12.
Posted by: MrScribbler at November 18, 2011 03:49 AM (HkOAc)
Or even worse, votes in a huge tax increase during the election year and everybody sits at home or votes third party.
In that event we could lose a lot of those red states we assume are sure things. The Dems holding out for a $1T tax increase are not stupid.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 03:51 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 03:51 AM (i6RpT)
Don't forget me!
Posted by: Mittens! at November 18, 2011 03:52 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 07:51 AM (i6RpT)
They see out "great white fleet" of 1913 on the horizon.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 03:53 AM (YdQQY)
In short, unless the Republicans use the “nuclear option” it will never make it out of the Senate. Republicans will not use the nuclear option.
The Democracts have already "shown" that this is a budget bill; certainly reversing it will also be a budget bill. Nuclear retaliation.
Posted by: Truman North at November 18, 2011 03:55 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 07:51 AM
Calm down, Vic. Mutt Romney will save us, as Ann Coulter so sagely opines. After all, it has been decided that he's the Electable One...never mind about that trivial Romneycare thing, the flip-flops, the fact that in spite of all his big talk he really hasn't done much (anything?) to prove his ability and conservative bona fides.
He'd be Stuttering Clusterfuck of a Miserable Failure v2.0, without the America-hatred, but with all the big-government horseshit we currently have in place.
Posted by: MrScribbler at November 18, 2011 03:56 AM (HkOAc)
Obamacare scam will not be voted out by Congress. The Suprmees are our only chance and that depends on whether Kennedy is pissed at Scalia that day or not.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 03:57 AM (YdQQY)
And how we would be able to discern any difference? The razing of abandoned and derelict houses would stop?
Posted by: No Whining at November 18, 2011 03:57 AM (4I7lI)
The "fixes" were, and besides, how often do the spineless Republicans actually retaliate?
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 03:58 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Winning at November 18, 2011 03:58 AM (80nuu)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 03:59 AM (i6RpT)
He'd be Stuttering Clusterfuck of a Miserable Failure v2.0,
Acting as President is hard.
More waffles please
Posted by: Michelle's Husband at November 18, 2011 04:00 AM (j5CHE)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 04:00 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 04:01 AM (s7mIC)
Who decided that? Was it the Dems because they saw losing the State? Caucuses are the most corrupt form of primary, may as well go back to smoke filled rooms.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 04:02 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 07:58 AM
Be fair, Vic!
Remember when the Republicans paid back the stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure for his hideous choice for Attorney General? His worthless Supreme Court nominees? Remember when they stood together to show him that we wanted smaller, less expensive government after he promoted OsamaObamaCare?
Neither do I.
Fuggedaboutit.
Posted by: MrScribbler at November 18, 2011 04:02 AM (HkOAc)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 04:04 AM (niZvt)
Remember, you are banking on Bitch McConnell. It will not happen.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 04:04 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 04:04 AM (i6RpT)
Our only chance to get rid of the POS law is SCOTUS unless we have an earthquake in the election. But facing realism, there will be no taking the Senate by more than 60. Republicans havenÂ’t held a more than 60 majority in the Senate since the 1890s and will not hold one in 2013.
Posted by: Vic..............
Remember what is going to happen January 1st, 2013. The Bush tax cuts will expire. By the time a GOP prez is sworn in on Jan 20, the new tax code will have to start being implemented.
There could be a fight like you haven't seen before getting those tax cuts put back. I think repeal of Obamacare will be tied to new tax cuts and Dems will be under a lot of pressure not to block it.
Vic - you criticized Romney for saying he would grant waivers for all states immediately while they try to repeal it. Maybe not such a bad idea after all, huh?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at November 18, 2011 04:05 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 08:00 AM
I agree.
After all, when the choice is between the immediate collapse of the United States and a more gradual collapse, I'll take the latter.
Posted by: MrScribbler at November 18, 2011 04:05 AM (HkOAc)
I don't remember that but it doesn't matter any damn way. It will NOT be repealed. This will be over before the election. Either the Supremes will strike it down this year or not.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 04:07 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 04:08 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: nickless, back with the banned (99.174.64.43) at November 18, 2011 04:08 AM (cBVAS)
Posted by: Winning at November 18, 2011 04:09 AM (80nuu)
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 08:02 AM (YdQQY)
Well, it was due to the stuttering clusterfuckery that we have here in Missouri.
Originally, Missouri had a primary, and they moved theirs up to early February so that it could be, you know, actually relevant.
But, national GOP slapped them, saying that they had to move the primary back to March or else lose half its delegates.
So, there was a bill introduced in our recent special session to move the primary to March.
But, it was a part of the same bill that had this bullshit "economic development" stuff in it (i.e., handouts to biz to turn part of St. Louis' airport into an economic development zone, or something). That bill was not approved. So neither did the bill to move the primary.
So the state GOP just decided on its own that there would be caucuses in March. But the law as it is currently written says we will have a primary in February. But apparently that vote, if it even takes place, won't mean anything.
So yeah it's all fucked up.
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 04:10 AM (s7mIC)
Good Lord. Another dysfunctional State level GOP. But hey, we have several counties here in SC now suing the State over the GOP Primary and having to support it. (It is only a "coincidence" that the Dems are not running a primary at all)
They are going to lose of course because there is already too many court cases on this.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 04:13 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 04:17 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 08:17 AM (i6RpT)
That's a typo right, you meant 2 a.m.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 04:17 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 04:19 AM (i6RpT)
the bad news gets even worse: the likely Republican challenger to McCaskill is Sarah Steelman, who, in my impression, is like a hybrid between Sarah Palin and Rick Santorum. And she is not a part of the "buddy system" so that might actually hurt her here.
The good news is that she's hot.
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 04:21 AM (s7mIC)
Our moron governor constantly brags about how we send 2/3 of high schools graduates to some form of higher ed. He somehow fails to mention that over 50% of them need remediation in one or more subjects when they get there and that our graduation rate is abysmally low. In his mind, the only problem is that there is just not enough money for higher ed even though we have a scholarship that any student can qualify for with an ACT score that's less than the state average.
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at November 18, 2011 04:22 AM (Gkhxf)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 08:21 AM (s7mIC)
Damn, and she's more conservative than Palin! How could you not vote for that?
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 04:23 AM (YdQQY)
No kidding? I never saw that coming.
*snark
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at November 18, 2011 04:28 AM (piMMO)
LOL Huckabee and Romney twinsies.
"Moderate" meaning only half-corrupt.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 04:29 AM (lpWVn)
welll.....
1. hubby is a trial lawyer, she voted against tort reform in the MO state senate
2. she is associated, whether for good or for ill, with the SoCons - she was the one who sponsored the traditional marriage ballot question in 2004 (I think)
3. she endorsed McCain in 2000
No doubt I will vote for her, just due to her MILFiness alone, but there are some reasons why some Republicans might sit at home as well
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 04:29 AM (s7mIC)
hah, that is the best thing that could happen, therefore it wont.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 04:29 AM (YdQQY)
Laura Ingraham said her sources are NOT optimistic.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 04:30 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 04:30 AM (niZvt)
That is a major hit for a Republican unless the "tort reform" bill was a fraud. I have seen a lot of that lately .
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 04:30 AM (YdQQY)
Next, the Super-Super Committee of 6.
Thereafter, the Super-Super-Super Committee of 3.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 04:31 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 04:31 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Lace Wigs at November 18, 2011 07:32 AM (IhHdM)
Probably so, given their hard-on for big symbolic targets...or the White House, but the Capital building would have been a much easier target. I don't think the terrorists understand America nearly well enough to have left the idiots in Congress alive on purpose, but it's surely worked to their advantage over the years that it turned out that way, as far as bringing down America - one way or another - is concerned.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 18, 2011 04:32 AM (haFNK)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 08:00 AM
I agree.
After all, when the choice is between the immediate collapse of the United States and a more gradual collapse, I'll take the latter.
Posted by: MrScribbler at November 18, 2011 08:05 AM (HkOAc)
Well of course, when your option is voting for the socialist or voting for the democrat. You go with the democrat.
Posted by: buzzion at November 18, 2011 04:33 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: Elize Nayden at November 18, 2011 04:34 AM (/TSnh)
"08:30 AM (niZvt) So it will hang over the economy like a Sword of Damocles, about to drop every bi-annual election?
Once you hire all those bureaucrats needed to administer it, good luck trying to defund it the next time the GOP wins the House again.
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011"
--
So just quit then and let it become law because a 60 GOP senate is a fucking pipe dream.
By the way, if you have to hire all those bureaucrats then its a fiscal matter affecting the budget and the GOP can use simple 50 majority rules of reconciliation to repeal those provisions.
Posted by: Winning at November 18, 2011 04:35 AM (80nuu)
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 06:51 AM (YdQQY)
Heh! If I would ski down one of those slopes in the winter, Vic, it would most likely kill me! Gonna keep the winter activities limited to a tobogan run or snow saucer with my daughter.
Posted by: Cicerokid at November 18, 2011 04:37 AM (m0MfE)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 04:39 AM (niZvt)
LOL, skiing on slopes like that is for young people who are stupid and have a "pocket full of life". Once you get old you have had mortality rubbed in your face so many times you know how to avoid hazardous stuff as a means of "recreation".
My most hazardous recreation is sitting in the rocking chair on the front porch waiting for vile teenagers to come by so I can run them off my lawn with the shotgun.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 04:41 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 04:41 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Mandy P. refuses to watch the SCOAMF at November 18, 2011 04:41 AM (qFpRI)
Posted by: naturalfake at November 18, 2011 04:43 AM (I49Jm)
Posted by: Lincolntf at November 18, 2011 04:43 AM (Qjh0I)
As far as the Senate is concerned, Reid already dropped "the nuclear option" regarding supermajority votes once. We don't need to be saps by abstaining from the same technique.
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 08:39 AM (niZvt)
Yeah, but with McCain and Graham there we always will be. They'll also be the ones a President Romney will cite as providing the assistance to getting a bipartisan "solution" to Obamacare so they can just modify it without going through the long process of Repeal and Replace.
Posted by: buzzion at November 18, 2011 04:44 AM (GULKT)
Also waivers are effectively permanent.
Its takes years to implement such a bill. If a Dem president ever recinds the waiver, all a state has to do is wait it out. If the Dem gets tough about it, it becomes an albatross in the next POTUS election. It will forever destroy Dems in independent minded states like New Hampshire.
Posted by: Winning at November 18, 2011 04:45 AM (80nuu)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 04:47 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at November 18, 2011 04:48 AM (6IV8T)
Used up the clenched fist hoisted with "Bah, humbug!"
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 04:48 AM (lpWVn)
Uh....no. Probably going to be Todd Akins, a conservative Congressman.
Well, RCP has Steelman up by 11 in the primary.
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 04:49 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2011 04:50 AM (LVDiz)
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 04:51 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 04:51 AM (i6RpT)
During that era TV cameras were huge, heavy, and great power hogs. It took a lot of effort to do local shoots and TV stations didn't have a lot of them either. So they set up at the airport and nowhere else.
To my knowledge, there has never been any video of that parade from other than amateur 8mm cameras which were common at the time.
And there are no off topic things in an open thread.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 04:51 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 04:51 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 04:53 AM (lpWVn)
I can dream, can't I?
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 04:54 AM (s7mIC)
So who is going to be the candidate against her? Dino Rossi again?
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 04:54 AM (s7mIC)
From an outsider's perspective, Steelman does not strike me as a natural politician. I hate giving credit to any Democrats, but McCaskill has some decent skills and knows how to pull those centrist populist cards.
I dont think Steelman McCaskill would be a likely pick up for the GOP.
Posted by: Winning at November 18, 2011 04:55 AM (80nuu)
Posted by: Alice's Clone Army at November 18, 2011 04:55 AM (7xYAU)
Posted by: mike at November 18, 2011 04:55 AM (8tLl/)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 04:56 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 04:56 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 04:56 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at November 18, 2011 04:57 AM (6IV8T)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 08:54 AM (s7mIC)
Ya know, I'm not sure. I think it's some previous local news talking head that was living in S. Korea of all places. I'll see if I can get some more info.
Posted by: Barbarian at November 18, 2011 04:57 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 04:58 AM (YdQQY)
Nice Jack Ryan reference.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 04:58 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: nickless, back with the banned (99.174.64.43) at November 18, 2011 04:59 AM (cBVAS)
Posted by: Bob Saget at November 18, 2011 05:00 AM (SDkq3)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 05:00 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Mandy P. refuses to watch the SCOAMF at November 18, 2011 05:02 AM (qFpRI)
This reminds me I saw an ad yesterday for show that has run the Zapruder footage through the latest enhancement techniques and promises New Insights. Sorry I can't remember which channel but I'm sure the ad will run many more times before the November 22nd anniversary.
Posted by: Retread at November 18, 2011 05:05 AM (XOMQv)
Posted by: ParisParamus at November 18, 2011 05:05 AM (m4nvO)
He's a 35yo State Senator apparently.
I had to dig to get the info and I live here- well for a little longer at a least. Fucking unbelievable.
Posted by: Barbarian at November 18, 2011 05:06 AM (EL+OC)
This reminds me I saw an ad yesterday for show that has run the Zapruder footage through the latest enhancement techniques and promises New Insights. Sorry I can't remember which channel but I'm sure the ad will run many more times before the November 22nd anniversary.
Posted by: Retread at November 18, 2011 09:05 AM (XOMQv)
New insights aren't necessary. Lee Harvey Oswald, a communist dipshit shot the president.
Posted by: buzzion at November 18, 2011 05:08 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: nevergiveup
Yeah, I just read a couple more stories about Fine. He could be innocent, but the story has the same "feel" as so many others. The accuser has had his claims investigated before but they were not substantiated (sounds kinda like Penn State there). Supposedly the kid traveled all over with Fine, which I assume has been confirmed or Syracuse would never have suspended the guy. Accuser also claims the abuse went on into adulthood, which strikes me as odd.
One lesson from all this is that if you're a Coach who currently travels with children (ball boys, players, charity beneficiaries, whatever) then DON'T. False accusations have doomed many a man.
Posted by: Lincolntf at November 18, 2011 05:11 AM (Qjh0I)
And I thought: Well, yes, douche, but the problem there is that Clinton wasn't nearly the ideologue that Obama is, and we had a fully Republican Congress- not just a Republican House. Also, how many times since then was the budget balanced? Heck, how many times since then was a budget passed?
I really hate that kind of misleading crap. Implied falsehood count: minimum 2, off the top of my head.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 05:11 AM (8y9MW)
In Catholic schools for the past six or seven years they have a program that starts in Kindergarten classes and runs through every grade once a year. I used to despise that entire day. For instance, part of the program was teaching the difference between 'trusted' men and women (nurses and doctors for instance) and those not to be trusted.
You might be able to find some age-appropriate lesson plans on the internet for assistance. Google 'protecting God's children lesson plan'.
Posted by: Lace Wigs at November 18, 2011 09:10 AM (IhHdM)
Well at least you don't have Mr. Belvedere teaching kids about molestation anymore.
Posted by: buzzion at November 18, 2011 05:12 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 05:13 AM (i6RpT)
Did they actually "balance" it or was that one of those "projected" things out a few years that never came about?
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 05:14 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: mike at November 18, 2011 05:15 AM (8tLl/)
Did they actually "balance" it or was that one of those "projected" things out a few years that never came about?
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 09:14 AM (YdQQY)
Wasn't it balanced by counting the money they were stealing from Social Security as revenue, but weren't counting the money they needed to pay it back as expenditures. So basically saying that your credit card limit is part of your income.
Posted by: buzzion at November 18, 2011 05:15 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at November 18, 2011 05:15 AM (3bJHs)
Posted by: Conan the kilt wearing Honey Badger at November 18, 2011 05:16 AM (GvYeG)
I don't remember. I was a teenager at the time, and not really paying much attention. I do remember, even then, thinking that Clinton was a douche-bag. But that's about as deep as my political insight went.
Oh, and that the ACLU were evil.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 05:17 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: SGT Dan at November 18, 2011 05:17 AM (1RIcI)
It was never actually balanced. It was a mythical fake balancing if you count SS revenues as if they were a part of the general budget.
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 05:17 AM (s7mIC)
Actually, that puts to question "agenda".
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 05:18 AM (lpWVn)
Well, since they are, I don't see a problem there. Remember: that's the problem with SS- there never was a "lockbox" that money always went into the general fund.
Unless you're saying they "double counted" FICA taxes.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 05:18 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2011 05:18 AM (Xm1aB)
He'd be Stuttering Clusterfuck of a Miserable Failure v2.0,
I'm bracing to have that on a bumpersticker.
New! Improved!
Posted by: Mama AJ at November 18, 2011 05:19 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 05:19 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 05:19 AM (s7mIC)
But that did include SS income.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 05:20 AM (YdQQY)
It wasn't really a "lockbox", but it wasn't until LBJ that they started counting SS as general funds for revenue purposes. Until then it WAS off-budget.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 05:21 AM (YdQQY)
She won in 2006, a D wave year, and just barely. But she plays the Blue Dog game pretty well, saying that she represents Missouri values when campaigning in Missouri, yet voting for San Francisco liberalism while in DC.
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 05:22 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 05:25 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 05:26 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Mama AJ at November 18, 2011 05:26 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 09:14 AM (YdQQY)
It was fake accounting and gimmickry. If you look on the treasureys website for the table of our accumulating debt, the debt went up every year under Clinton. If I remember correctly his last year the debt only went up around $20 Billion but it did in fact go up.
Again if I remember they were able to say it balanced because the debt we took on was intra governmental. In other words they took the money from Social Security.
Posted by: robtr at November 18, 2011 05:26 AM (MtwBb)
Posted by: SGT Dan at November 18, 2011 09:17 AM (1RIcI)
It's always scared me - frightened me for the future of the Republic - to contemplate what sort of ego you'd have to have to pretend you're trying to seriously persuade people on some issue or other when there are no people in the room with you like they do in Congress.
Yeah, a hooker's apartment...or a lobbyist function of some sort...would be a much more target rich environment for Congress critters.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at November 18, 2011 05:26 AM (haFNK)
Posted by: Algore at November 18, 2011 05:27 AM (niZvt)
The REAL lockbox was on Tipper. IYKWIM.
Posted by: Algore at November 18, 2011 09:27 AM (niZvt)
well that much is clear, she obviously didn't release enough of your chakra
Posted by: chemjeff at November 18, 2011 05:29 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: SGT Dan at November 18, 2011 05:30 AM (1RIcI)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 05:30 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 05:33 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: McLovin at November 18, 2011 05:33 AM (j0IcY)
Posted by: Wall-E at November 18, 2011 05:33 AM (48wze)
Posted by: dogfish at November 18, 2011 05:33 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: Marie at November 18, 2011 05:34 AM (P9OJs)
These days, hard-nosed disciplinarians are already the victims of maliciously fabricated rumors. They get taken down first by the "moderate" liberals endorsing non-performance "all winners no losers feel good participation award" before then "unintentionally" getting destroyed along with the public outrage v. sexual abuse. Institutionally, same application to the Christian Church and Boy Scouts of America, etc. Perverts are drawn where opportunity knocks. Hence, all volunteers or instructors are smeared when the perverted shit hits the fan.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 05:35 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: dogfish at November 18, 2011 09:33 AM (N2yhW)
It also allows time for many of the parties responsible for the investigation to die.
Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2011 05:36 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 05:36 AM (niZvt)
Fox is out there touting this old "news" shit again about Einstein being wrong
A new experiment appears to provide further evidence that Einstein may have been wrong when he laid down that nothing could go faster than the speed of light, a theory that underpins modern thinking on how the universe works.
You dumb shit reporters are leaving out one important thing that is part of that theory. It is the “speed of light in a vacuum”. Everyone has always known that subatomic particles can exceed the speed of light in other mediums.
That is what causes the blue glow around nuclear fuel underwater. That is sub-atomic particle exceeding the speed of light in water. I have seen it myself. No need for damn complicated experiments.
They should never let reporters write about science.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 05:37 AM (YdQQY)
The above link is to an interesting article on the OWS in the WSJ. Written by Tarranto, so it may have already been posted/
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at November 18, 2011 05:38 AM (6IV8T)
Posted by: Marie at November 18, 2011 05:38 AM (P9OJs)
delousing, definitely.
But these tent slums aren't simply hosting external infectious diseases, as the internal deadly ones spawn into the WHO propagandized epidemics.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 05:39 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Marie at November 18, 2011 09:38 AM (P9OJs)
No doom (other than normal news) on Fridays.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 05:39 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 05:40 AM (niZvt)
Silly Vic, you must know the MFM is smarter than Einstein. Just ask them, they'll tell you so.
Posted by: dogfish at November 18, 2011 05:40 AM (N2yhW)
The approved Border Fence w/o appropriations...
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 05:41 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 05:42 AM (niZvt)
Yeah, they like to spew crap about "the speed of light" because it sounds neat, but they have no clue as to what the overall theory of relativity is and what it means.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 05:42 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 18, 2011 05:44 AM (i6RpT)
I think there was also some stuff about the Russians and they were trying to prevent a public outcry there.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 05:45 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Conan the kilt wearing Honey Badger at November 18, 2011 05:45 AM (GvYeG)
Is ows a 'cult'?
Posted by: sickinmass at November 18, 2011 09:45 AM (1rflU)
Probably, in a sense, but I doubt that we're so lucky that they'll go the Jim Jones route. Such a shame.
Posted by: Reactionary at November 18, 2011 05:49 AM (xUM1Q)
Initial written reason to not open the 9/11/01 Commission Report investigation findings (not "released" as due to be opened Jan. 2009) is that the evidence will affect upcoming elections.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 05:49 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 09:40 AM (niZvt)
Funny, I had that same thought this A.M. Maybe we are spending too much time with each other!
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at November 18, 2011 05:52 AM (6IV8T)
The whole Romney computer files is a non-story. He left behind all paper documents- 700 square yards worth: link goes to networked blogs
Reporters are po'ed- they have to hunt information the old-fashioned way, with no search engine/utility.
Posted by: museisluse at November 18, 2011 05:52 AM (4Lj43)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 05:52 AM (niZvt)
Here's what the National Archives says
It says all have been
released already except a few that are specifically mentioned in the Kennedy
Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. If you look at the act it appears
that these are all matter that pertain to intelligence gathering.
They are due for declassification and release in 2017.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 05:54 AM (YdQQY)
(Covered last night). Yeah, I want him to resign, but only as the first step before going to jail. This has been the most lawless DOJ that I have seen in my lifetime.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 06:49 AM (YdQQY)
He's just one crook in a den of thieves. I don't think there's an honest person in Barry's entire administration
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 18, 2011 05:56 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Mama AJ at November 18, 2011 05:56 AM (XdlcF)
I think otherwise. Elizabeth "Occupado" Warren is the likely Dem contender. The base might like this screeching harpy, but I doubt she will go over big in the general.
Scott Brown isn't much of a senator, but he is a very likeable person. That is a big plus. If it isn't enough, the occutards will give him the push over the top.
Posted by: fluffy, Masshole at November 18, 2011 05:57 AM (4Kl5M)
... I don't think there's an honest person in Barry's entire administration
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 18, 2011 09:56 AM (1Jaio)
Just the two kids and the dog- and I'm not so sure about the dog...
Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2011 05:58 AM (OtQXp)
"How Congress Occupied Wall Street" LINK
Excerpt:
This call for real reform must transcend political parties. The grass-roots movements of the right and the left should embrace this. The tea party's mission has always been opposition to waste and crony capitalism, and the Occupy protesters must realize that Washington politicians have been "Occupying Wall Street" long before anyone pitched a tent in Zuccotti Park.
Posted by: mrp at November 18, 2011 05:58 AM (HjPtV)
He's just one crook in a den of thieves. I don't think there's an honest person in Barry's entire administration
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 18, 2011 09:56 AM (1Jaio)
When he was looking for staff I like to think of it like the scene from Blazing Saddles where they were recruiting thugs for terrorizing Rockridge.
They just used different questions. Since Clinton left office rape is not high up on the list for desired criminal behavior anymore.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 05:58 AM (YdQQY)
So we were told and respected.
Her daughter decided to release Jackie's private thoughts, etc. But I don't recall "everything" being released from the federal commission without evidence redacted still from the documentation provided for the public review.
That eye witnesses with accounts contrary to the official report all ended up dead within a few years of JFK's assassination is just as grotesque. Their deaths and the official silence from Washington hardly protected Jackie, though likely Teddy's career as it went down.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 06:00 AM (lpWVn)
In the link to Taranto:
Because so many intellectuals are on the left, the intellectual dissolution of the left over the past few decades has been easy to overlook. But really, with the exception of same-sex marriage, can you think of a single new idea that has come out of the left since Lyndon Johnson was president? The ObamaCare case illustrates the point beautifully: The so-called individual mandate was originally a conservative idea--though, to be sure, one of the worst conservative ideas ever. But whereas a progressive of Obama's age is at least capable of borrowing bad ideas from the right, the next generation screams at banks.
Posted by: Mama AJ at November 18, 2011 06:01 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Barbarian at November 18, 2011 06:02 AM (EL+OC)
Great final paragraph. Bing!
So will Palin, the non-candidate, become the truly investigative journalist that "conservatism" needs to advance anti-corruption?
I'd certainly encourage her to do that.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 06:03 AM (lpWVn)
The fact that "Timmy Teabagger" is winning for the crunchy-munchy Coloradans, and that the MSM yappers have to talk about it, makes me all warm inside. They want to hate him so bad, but he'as making it impossible.
Posted by: Lincolntf at November 18, 2011 06:04 AM (Qjh0I)
From that write-up from the National Archives it appears that everything except the intelligence material was released in 1992.
It is a common misconception that the records relating to the assassination of President Kennedy are in some way sealed. In fact, the records are largely open and available to the research community here at the National Archives at College Park in the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Record Collection.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 06:04 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Conan the kilt wearing Honey Badger at November 18, 2011 06:08 AM (GvYeG)
Posted by: Truman North at November 18, 2011 06:10 AM (G5JPI)
It's available on the Netflix instant streaming service. Superb. LINK
Posted by: mrp at November 18, 2011 06:12 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at November 18, 2011 08:05 AM (UTq/I)
I keep thinking about this silly waiver thing, and something bugs me: So, your state gets a waiver from the requirement that you purchase health care. BFD. Because all the taxes they passed to fund it are still in place, all the regulations, all the agencies and all the other provisions are still in place--in short, it is a horrible law even without the mandate and Mitt "I can fix this big government to run better" Romney just plans to tinker around the edges and take away the biggest weapon we have for full repeal. Because every other part of the law is most certainly Constitutional.
So: Yes, the waiver is stupid as shit and so is anyone who thinks its a good idea. And I don't give a shit if you get your feelings hurt because I told the truth.
If we remove the individual mandate, all that's been done is someone (Mitt Romney) cut the crust off of the shit sandwich. And Mitt wants you to eat that shit sandwich. He needs you to eat that shit sandwich. Because if you don't eat that shit sandwich, he has to admit the only legislation he worked on in his life was a mistake. So: You ARE going to eat that shit sandwich so Mitt can feel good about himself.
Posted by: Jimmuy at November 18, 2011 06:12 AM (sMd/h)
Posted by: Conan the kilt wearing Honey Badger at November 18, 2011 06:14 AM (GvYeG)
It is really good. I watched parts of it over the weekend. They were brutally honest in their portrayal of JFK as a total inept fuck-up.
No wonder Caroline fought hard to have this miniseries die off.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 18, 2011 06:14 AM (pLTLS)
Whenever I watch media coverage of another Occupy Wall Street event I am reminded of an exchange between Jewish protesters in the 1979 Monte Python movie Life of Brian. One of the protesters asks another what the Romans have brought to the area and the conversation goes like this:
Question: All right, but apart from the sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?
Answer: Brought peace?
Response: Oh, peace - shut up!
Every so often I ask my friends at the local pub: "What would you rather be? King of England in 1263 or you?" Turns out, people would rather be themselves. They enjoy using their iPhone, indoor plumbing, central heating, refrigerators and electric lighting. All of these things are available to the average person in America today and none of them were available to the aristocracy when the West operated under the feudal system.
How is it that for thousands of years mankind made very little progress in increasing the standard of living and yet today half of the goods and services you use in the next week did not exist when I was born? It wasn't that there was some change in the DNA such that we got smarter. The Greeks knew how to make a steam engine 3,000 years ago and never made one. The difference is in how we organize our economic system. The advent of market capitalism in the mid 18th century made all of the difference.
We need not just rely on historical data. Look at cross-section evidence. I try another experiment with my students. I tell them they are about to be born and they can choose whatever country in the world they would like to be born in. The only caveat is they will be the poorest person in that country. Every student picks a country that is primarily organized in a market capitalist system. No one picks a centrally planned state. No one says, "I want to be the poorest person in North Korea, Cuba, or Zimbabwe," countries which are at the bottom of the Heritage Foundation's Index of Economic Freedom.
What does it mean to be poor in our capitalist society that the Occupy Wall Street crowd so hates? Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation has several studies of those classified as poor by the U.S. Census Bureau. He found that 80 percent of poor persons in the United States in 2010 had air conditioning, nearly three quarters of them had a car or truck, nearly two-thirds had satellite or cable television, half had a personal computer and more than two-thirds had at least two rooms per person.
Contrast this with what it means to be poor in Mumbai, India, a country that is moving rapidly towards market capitalism but was burdened for decades with a socialist system. A recent story in The Economist described Dharavi, a slum in Mumbai, where for many families half of the family members must sleep on their sides in order for the entire family to squeeze into its living space.
The Occupy Wall Street movement has shown a lack of understanding of how the market capitalist system works. They appear to think that the cell phones they use, food they eat, hotels they stay in, cars they drive, gasoline that powers the cars they drive and all the myriad goods and services they consume every day would be there under a different system, perhaps in more abundance.
But there is no evidence this could be or ever has been the case. The reason is that only market capitalism solves the two major problems that face any economy-how to provide an incentive to innovate and how to solve the problem of decentralized information. The reason there is so much innovation in a market system compared to socialism or other forms of central planning is that profit provides the incentive for innovators to take the risk needed to come up with new products.
My mother never once complained that we did not have access to the latest Soviet washing machine. We never desired a new Soviet car. The socialist system relies on what Adam Smith referred to as the benevolent butcher and while there will undoubtedly be benevolent butchers out there, clearly a system that provides monetary rewards for innovators is much more dynamic and successful. The profit that the Occupy Wall Street protesters decry is the reason the world has access to clean water and anti-viral drugs.
The other major problem that must be solved by any economic system is how to deal with the fact that information is so decentralized. There is no way for a central planner to know how many hot dogs 300 million Americans are going to want at every moment in time. A central planner cannot know the relative value of resources in the production of various goods and services. Market capitalism solves that problem through the price system. If there are too few hot dogs, the price of hot dogs will rise and more hot dogs will be produced. If too many hot dogs are produced, the price of hot dogs will fall and fewer will be produced.
Market capitalism is the key to the wealth of the masses. As Ludwig von Mises wrote in his 1920 book, Socialism, only market capitalism can make the poor wealthy. Nobel Laureate Friedrich Hayek in his famous 1945 paper, The Use of Knowledge in Society, showed that only the price system in capitalism can create the spontaneous order that ensures that goods will be allocated in a way that ensures consumers determine the use of resources. The Occupy Wall Street movement would make best use of its time and energy in protesting the encroachment of the centrally planned state that led to the disaster of the Soviet Union, fascist Germany, and dictatorial North Korea and now the US Democrat Party and Barack Hussein Obama
Posted by: Wall-E at November 18, 2011 06:15 AM (48wze)
Posted by: Truman North at November 18, 2011 06:15 AM (G5JPI)
Posted by: The Greys at November 18, 2011 06:15 AM (NRygI)
Posted by: Lincolntf at November 18, 2011 10:04 AM (Qjh0I)
They still hate him (probably even more that he's winning) and the articles today talk about his awful game and how he's going to crash and burn. I'm not a Tebow fan but I know that the media hate of him is purely personal because of his religion.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 18, 2011 06:19 AM (1Jaio)
I watched part of that game last night (I was at Chili's waiting for a to-go order) and saw him make one his pass attempts. If he always throws like that, God must really be on his side, because there's no way- short of divine intervention- that a QB who is that bad at passing keeps winning games.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 06:21 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Wall-E at November 18, 2011 10:15 AM (48wze)
These whiny spoiled twits hate capitalism and love socialism so much I'd love to send them back to the USSR and watch them stand in line for days to get a roll of toilet paper. Or North Korea where they can chow down on a nice plate full of grass.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 18, 2011 06:22 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 18, 2011 06:22 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: A text message at November 18, 2011 06:22 AM (G5JPI)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 06:23 AM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: Bob Saget at November 18, 2011 06:24 AM (SDkq3)
Fox is out there touting this old "news" shit again about Einstein being wrong
CERN checked neutrino time-of-flight measurements and says they "do not change the initial conclusion", i.e. of faster-than-light neutrinos.
Seminar/webcast on updated measurements going on now (10:20am EST). Link in today's press release from CERN: http://tiny.cc/dba7g
Posted by: crisis du jour at November 18, 2011 06:24 AM (J1eJz)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 06:25 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Conan the kilt wearing Honey Badger at November 18, 2011 06:25 AM (GvYeG)
Morning, all! Thank God it's Friday, that's all I have to say.*
Anybody else waiting in breathless anticipation to see what explosive bit of negative news the regime drops on us today? It IS Friday, after all; the day where stories that could be harmful to Obama go to die.
*Well, that and also that Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at November 18, 2011 06:26 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Tami at November 18, 2011 06:26 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: sickinmass at November 18, 2011 09:45 AM (1rflU)
Absolutely. They must subsume into the collective consciousness. If they don't they're shouted down or evicted. CULT CULT CULT.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at November 18, 2011 06:27 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 06:27 AM (niZvt)
Tebow, what is best in life?
Tebow: To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women
Posted by: Conan the kilt wearing Honey Badger at November 18, 2011 06:28 AM (GvYeG)
I'm pretty sure revelry rules require the Hooo! suffix until after lunch or the 1st drink, whichever comes 1st.
Posted by: DaveA at November 18, 2011 06:28 AM (u70JJ)
Furthermore, the Jets two best defenders are cornerbacks. If they had Detroit's front four, it would be different.
Posted by: Truman North at November 18, 2011 06:28 AM (G5JPI)
Posted by: joncelli, reluctant Perry supporter at November 18, 2011 06:29 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Ted Kennedy at November 18, 2011 06:29 AM (niZvt)
Hey, celebrate! I just noticed that the world was betting on Tebow's success on a Thursday when he pulled through. He wasn't fighting overwhelming negativity that game.
...The Cowboys had a recent big victory, as if they couldn't have them more often than naught. Since winning is everything, savor the moment. I used to cheer UT Longhorns and Dallas Cowboys. Go Oilers Texans! Caught the TX A&M v. Kansas State game from the 1st through the 4th OT. That was exciting. Since the Aggies lost to Missouri in OT, endurance...by a hair.
Good games can have disappointing ends. Just like political campaigns.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 18, 2011 06:30 AM (lpWVn)
Texts are cheaper.
Posted by: Waterhouse at November 18, 2011 06:31 AM (SPC42)
I would kind of like to see how they'd fare against the Dallas D. We're pretty solid on the run (#3 in run D?) and not shabby at all on the pass.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 06:31 AM (8y9MW)
Well, since our capitalist system is the best economic model yet devised, it appears logical to keep it, flaws and all. Socialism is an illogical premise, thus any conclusions or implementation is also flawed.
AFAIC, proponents of socialism and all the other left-leaning isms can go die. Got no use for them.
Meanwhile, get off my lawn.
Posted by: irongrampa at November 18, 2011 06:31 AM (SAMxH)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 06:31 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Waterhouse at November 18, 2011 06:32 AM (SPC42)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 18, 2011 06:32 AM (p7SSh)
Texts are cheaper.
Also asynchronous. I can send a text for something not too important before I forget, and whoever I'm texting (mostly the wife), can respond whenever they have a chance. An actual phone-call, I have to hope they're not busy.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 06:33 AM (8y9MW)
...former college students will Occupy a Spring Break site. Maybe Palm Springs?
and demand a Delta charter flight.
(and if it hasn't been said enough, TEEBOOOW!!)
Posted by: Flea Party Collective Conscienceless at November 18, 2011 06:34 AM (KOQBP)
Better, you can always just say you didn't see the text.
"Oh, I'm sorry honey. I just got so busy."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 18, 2011 06:34 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Miss'80s at November 18, 2011 06:34 AM (d6QMz)
They will never give up.
http://www.unitedwisconsin.com/
Posted by: Deathknyte at November 18, 2011 06:34 AM (GPq65)
Posted by: Conan the kilt wearing Honey Badger at November 18, 2011 06:35 AM (GvYeG)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at November 18, 2011 06:36 AM (ee1NQ)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2011 06:36 AM (Xm1aB)
Our esteemed Establishment Republican ideology isn't significantly different from the establishment Democrats to move us to smaller government. Pipe dream, I am afraid.
Posted by: Russell Banks at November 18, 2011 06:36 AM (rZZA3)
Posted by: joncelli, reluctant Perry supporter at November 18, 2011 06:38 AM (RD7QR)
Busted: Democrats are heading out to the cemeteries to collect names for their petition drive to oust Governor Scott WalkerÂ…
Posted by: Truman North at November 18, 2011 06:38 AM (G5JPI)
Posted by: Conan the kilt wearing Honey Badger at November 18, 2011 06:38 AM (GvYeG)
Kept waking every hour "Should I drive to the C-Store and get some Tums? Nah, it'll go away." Never did.
Tired as hell.
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2011 10:36 AM (Xm1aB)
If you have a box of baking soda in the kitchen cabinet try dissolving a tablespoon of it in a tall glass of water and drink it. Works for me.
Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2011 06:42 AM (OtQXp)
So what would be wrong with saying to the welfare pros (you know who I refer to here)--here is a job. Your benefits have now ceased--you may learn to live within the means your job provides, and strive for upward motion.
If you choose not to do so, then you may go die. There are no options provided.
Posted by: irongrampa at November 18, 2011 06:42 AM (SAMxH)
Posted by: Miss'80s at November 18, 2011 06:45 AM (d6QMz)
Why are these people not charged and convicted for fraud? I'm sick of these fuckers.
Posted by: dogfish at November 18, 2011 06:46 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: dogfish at November 18, 2011 06:47 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 18, 2011 06:48 AM (p7SSh)
Whatever happens with his career over the long haul, he's made the very most of his opportunities so far and I'm sure he'll come out on top. And the anti-Teboids can suck his ass.
Posted by: Lincolntf at November 18, 2011 06:48 AM (Qjh0I)
Any of you ever have a bad case of heartburn that keeps you up all night, and no Tums in the house?
Kept waking every hour "Should I drive to the C-Store and get some Tums? Nah, it'll go away." Never did.
Tired as hell. Eat some celery. It aids digestion. Things will pass. Don't use a histamine H2-receptor antagonist that inhibits stomach acid like Zantac, it will only prolong the situation. Celery and maybe some yogurt should fix you soon. Just sayin. What did you eat yesterday?
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 06:49 AM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 06:51 AM (0M3AQ)
Are we talking Obama or Romney?
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 18, 2011 10:31 AM (niZvt)
Both.
And how sad is that, that the front-runner for both parties have essentially the same position on the most monumental legislation of the last 30 years.
And don't talk to me about the Courts. Because if the Supreme Court upholds Obamacare, we have no Constitution left. Nominate conservative judges for what? The precedent has been set and the rules require they follow. The ultimate futile locking the barn door after the horse escapes.
No, we need a candidate who sees government as the problem not one who sees the problem as not having the right mix of conservatives and liberals.
As others here have mentioned: With an Obama vs. Romney we get the choice between full socialism and full socialism just not as fast.
At this moment in our history, when we most need a candidate who will dismantle the machinery of government, right now our front-runners--Romney, Cain and Gingrich--are all of the same mold: Government is not the problem; the problems can be fixed if I can run it more efficiently; like my business; or how I've got it down here on paper.
Posted by: Jimmuy at November 18, 2011 06:53 AM (sMd/h)
I'll see to posting a story about those Democrat grave-robbers. Probly sidebar. I still have my blog training wheels on, and I have an article in queue about Ann Barnhardt going Galt.
See you retards at some point...
Posted by: Truman North at November 18, 2011 06:53 AM (G5JPI)
Everything changed just a few short weeks ago. A firm, led by a crony of the Obama regime, stole all of the non-margined cash held by customers of his firm. Let’s not sugar-coat this or make this crime seem “complex” and “abstract” by drowning ourselves in six-dollar words and uber-technical jargon. Jon Corzine STOLE the customer cash at MF Global. Knowing Jon Corzine, and knowing the abject lawlessness and contempt for humanity of the Marxist Obama regime and its cronies, this is not really a surprise. What was a surprise was the reaction of the exchanges and regulators. Their reaction has been to take a bad situation and make it orders of magnitude worse. Specifically, they froze customers out of their accounts WHILE THE MARKETS CONTINUED TO TRADE, refusing to even allow them to liquidate
Posted by: willow at November 18, 2011 06:54 AM (h+qn8)
I beg to differ.. Steven Chu was able to grease the palms of campaign financiers with $535 Million taxpayer Dollars, and get away with it.. He sat in front of a bunch congressmen/women yesterday, and didn't even break a sweat.. That's not incompetence.. That's Competence with a capital "C"
These G'Damn crooks can sit on National TV, and tell the American People to go F__k Themselves, and there's not a G'Damned thing you can do about it.
Posted by: franksalterego at November 18, 2011 06:54 AM (9XykO)
That story belongs in the mainline.
Posted by: dogfish at November 18, 2011 06:56 AM (N2yhW)
Every time I read about ones like Tebow, with the usual detractors spouting, I see barely concealed envy. Says much about them--none of it good.
I guess one can take satisfaction in knowing his detractors have to live with the fact that they simply aren't as good, and there is nothing they can do about it.
Posted by: irongrampa at November 18, 2011 06:57 AM (SAMxH)
Posted by: Evan at November 18, 2011 06:57 AM (O3OlP)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2011 06:57 AM (Xm1aB)
"Absolutely. They must subsume into the collective consciousness. If they don't they're shouted down or evicted. CULT CULT CULT"
I was watching some kind of blog / gomment feed on "The Other 99%" site last night ane every few minutes someone would warn us that trolling is not a good idea because "anonymous" is tracking us down.
Posted by: bernverdnardo at November 18, 2011 06:58 AM (xXhWA)
Vic, there's a big difference between a think tank taking money from industry to build policy positions and the government itself rewarding campaign contributors bogus contracts for bullshit work with money extracted from taxpayers by force of law.
There will be attempts to buy influence so long as there is money to be dolled out by Washington. But the people can see the difference between legitimate business and the incredible, blatant corruption that is the SCOAMF administration.
Posted by: Arms Merchant at November 18, 2011 06:59 AM (vA8Rg)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at November 18, 2011 07:00 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: mpfs, I'll Save a Horse & Ride Rick Perry at November 18, 2011 07:01 AM (iYbLN)
I watched that feed too. I loved giving them shit.
Posted by: mpfs, I'll Save a Horse & Ride Rick Perry at November 18, 2011 07:02 AM (iYbLN)
Thanks for the heartburn remedies guys.
All fine now.
Of course it all cleared up about 5 am when I had to get up anyway.
As far as celery, I'll remember that. As much as I hate it, I definitely would have chowed on it last night if I thought it might help. GERD ain't for sissies. Eat light for dinner (avoid heavy fats like PIZZA and acids like tomato sauce - dittos Mexican food) and don't lie down for at least 2 hours.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at November 18, 2011 07:02 AM (0M3AQ)
For all you young kids who haven't been paying attention all that long let me tell you a story about Newt that tells you all you need to know about him.
Back just after Newt won the Speakership, the GOP was riding high, Clinton was humbled and weakened. The issue of renewing Most Favored Nation Status with Mexico came up. The freshmen led a revolt against the rubber-stamp, business as usual and pushed the crazy idea that maybe we shouldn't be giving tariff breaks to countries that actively work to undermine our drug laws and do nothing inside their borders to stem the flow of drugs north.
Clinton came out in favor of the MFN renewal. Newt started to make some noise against. And I'm in my truck, listening to Rush, and I said to myself, "This is not a big deal, beat up on Mexico, extract a few concessions, get them to promise to improve their enforcement, which they will--because they need MFN more than we do--and as a bonus, you get to beat Clinton again; setting the stage for beating him again and again. IF you don't, Clinton will know you aren't serious about anything and will realize that he can go to the press and beat you up on anything and you will cave."
Well, what happened?
Newt caved. Couldn't handle the Clinton media pressure. Got nothing out of Mexico and gave them MFN renewal with a whimper.
And the government shut-down came. Clinton ran the same play, went to the media. And Newt caved.
And then impeachment. Same play, same players, same guy caved again.
THAT'S what we get with Newt: All talk, no action, utter capitulation in the end.
Posted by: Jimmuy at November 18, 2011 07:13 AM (sMd/h)
The bizarre diktat from Brussels has far-reaching implications for member states, including Britain, as no water sold in the EU can now claim to protect against dehydration.
Any producer breaching the order, signed by European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, faces being jailed for up to two years. It took the 21 scientists on the panel three years of analysis into the link between water and dehydration to come to their extraordinary conclusion.
Posted by: Matt Damon at November 18, 2011 07:38 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: befuddled at November 18, 2011 07:54 AM (xJU23)
In the hyperlink button, what do need to put in for "Target" and do I identify the target as "self, blank, or parent".
Posted by: Evan at November 18, 2011 08:23 AM (O3OlP)
In the hyperlink button, what do need to put in for "Target" and do I identify the target as "self, blank, or parent".
Posted by: Evan at November 18, 2011 12:23 PM (O3OlP)
Don't bother. Write the text you want the link in. Highlight it then click the hyperlink button and just enter the source. The rest you can leave blank
Posted by: buzzion at November 18, 2011 08:28 AM (GULKT)
It's still a pretty awesome fortification though.
Posted by: fiatboomer at November 18, 2011 10:31 AM (6tFTH)
Posted by: t-bird at November 18, 2011 11:08 AM (FcR7P)
http://tinyurl.com/7f5cbfv
OMG, according to the commerce clause, you better get used to a European scooter instead.
Posted by: befuddled at November 18, 2011 12:30 PM (xJU23)
Posted by: steevy at November 18, 2011 01:00 PM (7WJOC)
amv converter for mac
Posted by: nanonu at November 18, 2011 06:04 PM (qW+9F)
Posted by: Michael Crichton Micro ePub at November 19, 2011 03:25 AM (7+Xxi)
Posted by: Longing Bailey Flanigan iBooks at November 19, 2011 04:29 AM (XbzaH)
Posted by: Eat, Pray, Love AudioBook at November 19, 2011 03:29 PM (fzSH3)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2844 seconds, 448 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








DNC files under FOIA to see Mitt E-mails that were deleted
The Democratic National Committee has filed a freedom of information (FOIA) request with the office of the governor of Massachusetts in an effort to uncover whether staff destroyed information before Mitt Romney left office.
I donÂ’t think the FOIA was designed to give out information on a possible criminal act. Of course if you donÂ’t intend to call it a criminal act you can give out the deleted e-mails. Hahahahaha. HereÂ’s nuttinÂ’ you bums, theyÂ’re deleted. But, anyone who knows about corporate IT knows that e-mails and other such stuff stored on corporate networks are never permanently deleted.
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2011 02:48 AM (YdQQY)