December 21, 2011
— Gabriel Malor Your must-read of the morning is today's WSJ editorial.
Here's a taste, but click over and read the whole frustrating thing:
GOP Senate leader Mitch McConnell famously said a year ago that his main task in the 112th Congress was to make sure that President Obama would not be re-elected. Given how he and House Speaker John Boehner have handled the payroll tax debate, we wonder if they might end up re-electing the President before the 2012 campaign even begins in earnest.The GOP leaders have somehow managed the remarkable feat of being blamed for opposing a one-year extension of a tax holiday that they are surely going to pass. This is no easy double play.
Republicans have also achieved the small miracle of letting Mr. Obama position himself as an election-year tax cutter, although he's spent most of his Presidency promoting tax increases and he would hit the economy with one of the largest tax increases ever in 2013. This should be impossible.
House Republicans yesterday voted down the Senate's two-month extension of the two-percentage-point payroll tax holiday to 4.2% from 6.2%. They say the short extension makes no economic sense, but then neither does a one-year extension. No employer is going to hire a worker based on such a small and temporary decrease in employment costs, as this year's tax holiday has demonstrated. The entire exercise is political, but Republicans have thoroughly botched the politics.
You will recall that on Friday and Saturday we were doing a victory dance at having forced Democrats to accept an accelerated schedule for Keystone XL in exchange for a two-month extension of the payroll tax holiday and unemployment benefits. Unfortunately, the Tea Party-led rank-and-file in the House immediately revolted.
After opposing the payroll tax holiday for the past year (and thereby handing Obama the bludgeon which he used to beat us for the year), the House GOP had finally, grudgingly agreed to a one-year extension just to get the issue off the table. Democrats, however, sensing an opportunity, took only two months instead. Anybody want to guess what the State of the Union will be about?
Now, of course, the House GOP members are emphasizing the industry reports that say implementing a two-month payroll tax holiday is impractical and disruptive. But let's be clear: House GOP jumped ugly before these reports came out. They're only using it as cover for their real beef, which is that Obama and the Democrats were mean to them and they're tired of it. And nobody, absolutely nobody, expects the payroll tax holiday to last only two more months, anyway. Congress was going to come back after the holidays and negotiate for the rest of the year.
Or, I should say, Congress was going to do that. I can't see why Democrats would sign on to that now, though. Democrats are on top of the world. The House GOP has given Democrats the absolute best Christmas present ever: the opportunity to blame Republicans for a tax increase at Christmas and then a second opportunity to blame us at the State of the Union. Does anybody think the Democrats in the Senate are eager to rush back to D.C. to change that?
House GOP members are protesting that they passed a full one-year extension and nobody's paying attention to that. In fairness, they also say their extension had better features than the Senate version. They're not blocking the tax cut, they screech. Except they did. The deal was struck; it was time to sign on the line. They balked. They could have had their longer extension two months from now---and possibly with more Keystone XL-sized concessions from Democrats. Instead the President is having his best week in months. Merry Christmas, Mr. President.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
03:02 AM
| Comments (241)
Post contains 632 words, total size 4 kb.
Well the first of the primary candidates has gone 3rd party
Gary Johnson to Drop Out of GOP Race to Run as LibertarianPosted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:04 AM (YdQQY)
Hey, I have a better idea. Its less expensive so 3rd world people can afford it. LetÂ’s get rid of the stupid ban on DDT.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:05 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Pat Caddel at December 21, 2011 03:05 AM (q/891)
Old RINO shitbag chimes in on Payroll Tax shit
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said the failure of the House to approve the bipartisan Senate bill to extend the payroll-tax cut is “harming the Republican Party.”
Piss off and go home and resign you asshole. You did more to harm the Republican Party than anyone in 2008.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:06 AM (YdQQY)
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) said Tuesday that President Obama "absolutely" should use his executive power to continue the unemployment benefits and payroll tax cut extension and said she hoped to discuss the option with the White House later in the day.
ArenÂ’t these racially gerrymandered districts awesome. Why is it that they always produce the biggest commie idiot possible when they know reelection is a sure thing.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:06 AM (YdQQY)
Iowa evangelical calls for Bachmann to drop out
Is this guy “for real”? What is different about her and Santorum? Both have almost zero support.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:07 AM (YdQQY)
Top 10 wastes of money in the Coburn Report
These are really stupid but one must keep in mind the object of these wastes of money is NOT the targeted project. It is to reward cronies and supporters with federal largess. In other words it is pure corruption.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:07 AM (YdQQY)
National Guard troops on Mexican border to be cut by 75%
Not sure what good they do anyway. We sent them down there unarmed into a damn war zone. But this does reflect Obama attitude towards closing the border.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:07 AM (YdQQY)
Finally an indictment out of fast & Furious! A gun dealer
These crooked idiots can not be serious.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:08 AM (YdQQY)
The stupid, it burns! Perhaps they will pass a law next that makes water run uphill.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:08 AM (YdQQY)
That rabies victim that I posted about a few days ago has died
People, if you get bitten by an animal do get it checked. This is not a laughing matter to be brushed off and it WILL kill you.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:09 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 21, 2011 03:09 AM (FkKjr)
How do these people get away with this shit? Because the feds have taken over the school systems and locals have almost zero say in how their schools are run.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:09 AM (YdQQY)
And thatÂ’s it for news
today. The big story sucking all the O2 out of the news is the fight over the
so-called Pay Roll Tax cut which really is virtually worthless economically
speaking.
And NOBODY mentions all the little gotcha poison pills that the Dems put in the bill in the Senate. Not a single news organization mentions anything but Republicans are going to cause a tax hike.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:10 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 21, 2011 03:10 AM (FkKjr)
Not compromising Republicans signing off on shit sandwich deals.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 21, 2011 03:12 AM (FkKjr)
But it doesn't really matter what the House did. If they had voted it in on the first day the MFM would still be singing Hosannas to Obama.
Its what they do.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:13 AM (YdQQY)
So, basically what we have is a typical Wednesday under the boot of the SCOAMF's oppressive administration. Crime, corruption, lies, coverups, and false accusations of racism.
Is it time to start drinking yet?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, President, Curmudgeon's Union Local 427 at December 21, 2011 03:14 AM (d0Tfm)
This is the same mistake the House GOP made last year. The first and most important issue when it comes to cutting taxes is cutting taxes. It is not some type of economic social engineering. If you or House GOP has another idea for boosting the economy and creating jobs, we should do that in addition to this tax cut, not in lieu of this tax cut.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 21, 2011 03:14 AM (XVaFd)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 21, 2011 03:15 AM (FkKjr)
Bitch McConnell and the crew up there need to be thrown out as well. They appear to be the darlings of the Stoopid Party Establishment and aren't doing one damned thing to get us out of our current crisis.
Hell, they can't even articulate what it is that they're trying to do.
We are well and truly boned.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, President, Curmudgeon's Union Local 427 at December 21, 2011 03:18 AM (d0Tfm)
The House HAS done stuff to boost the economy but it has died in the Senate. What the GOP needs to do is highlight all the bills that Harry Reid is sitting on or has defeated and tell the people what is really needed to fix the economy which is two things:
1) Get the Democrats out of Congress and the WH.
2) Repeal every law passed since the Dems took over congress in 2007.
Of course without owning the MFM it will be hard to get that out.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:18 AM (YdQQY)
No, the first and most important issue is to prevent taxes from being rasised. This isn't a tax cut. It's a tax holiday of two months. In two months, there will be a tax increase back to the old levels.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 21, 2011 03:19 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 21, 2011 03:20 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:21 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: BurtTC at December 21, 2011 03:22 AM (Gc/Qi)
Why is the GOP so profoundly stupid?
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 21, 2011 07:20 AM (niZvt)
They are not that stupid. Why just the other day they traded a cow for some beans and a jar of KY jelly.
Posted by: Killerdog at December 21, 2011 03:22 AM (CZrbJ)
Bullshit. Nobody believes that the payroll tax holiday would not be extended for the full year or longer.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 21, 2011 03:24 AM (XVaFd)
My Senator, Marco Rubio, laid it out in his floor speech the other day in language so simple even a politician can understand it when he said that the SCOAMF got everything he wanted from Congress in his first two years in office.
And things have gotten worse.
But thanks to the MFM, the public has yet to make that connection. And they probably never will, as long as the talking heads are bought and paid for by the anti-Christ George Soros.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, President, Curmudgeon's Union Local 427 at December 21, 2011 03:25 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 21, 2011 07:24 AM (XVaFd)
Just like everybody knew the Super Committee would avert a credit downgrade, and that the Super Committee would awesomely hem in the Democrats?
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 21, 2011 03:27 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:29 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: pitchforksandpowder at December 21, 2011 03:31 AM (oAgzf)
Boner did that and now all he has left is this
Applicable Boner song
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:32 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Potato Bandit at December 21, 2011 03:32 AM (H15Ok)
Why is the GOP so profoundly stupid?
They do not want what's good for the country.
They want power. Unless there's something else going on that we don't know about. They seem to be aiding and giving comfort to our enemies. In this day and age, they can't possibly be that out of touch with the will of the people.
One example is O'Care. It was never popular with the people and that sentiment has only grown now that we're finding out what's in it. Yet, strangely, the GOP isn't united in opposition, for if they were, we'd hear it more.
Ditto for all the other low-hanging fruit of actual, real, live talking points concerning SCOAMF's various failures. We don't hear a word about them when they should be on the lips of each and every member of that party all day every day.
I'm starting to wonder about a great many things concerning the GOP "leadership," and none of them are good. Why are they not imitating what the left did to GWB for eight years, namely criticizing his every move, even his bathroom trips? Hell, it worked for them, didn't it? We got the SCOAMF, didn't we?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, President, Curmudgeon's Union Local 427 at December 21, 2011 03:37 AM (d0Tfm)
Thats an interesting take on it, Gabe. I can see where you're coming from. I immediatel had a very different opinion of where they all screwed up there though. Mitch McConnell negotiated a two-month tax holiday in exchange for a permanent increase in mortgage fees. And the tea party in the House said "not so fast."
Anyway, Potato Bandit (!) is right. This only matters to the wonks in the room-- namely, us.
Posted by: Truman North at December 21, 2011 03:39 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, President, Curmudgeon's Union Local 427 at December 21, 2011 03:39 AM (d0Tfm)
Well the House did pass a bill last February to repeal it and all 47 Republican Senators voted yes to repeal it in the Senate. All the Democrats voted to keep it.
Remember that "deal" from The Repubs, they traded a raise in the debt limit for an up or down vote on Obamacare.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:39 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 21, 2011 03:41 AM (+Vp06)
Posted by: Edward Cropper at December 21, 2011 03:42 AM (Oilt3)
The House GOP did the right thing. A two month agreement is useless. Everybody knows that including the public that bloggers tend to underestimate. Why doesn't the Senate Democrats just agree to a one year deal? If a two month agreement is good for them, why not a one year? The GOP can easily make that case and also emphasize that the two month agreement is unworkable.
Does President Idiot have the nerve to go to Hawaii with this yet to be resolved? Of course he does but he will pay for it as will the Democrats. People are not stupid. The GOP just has to continue to make the case.
Posted by: Pete_Bondurant at December 21, 2011 03:43 AM (Q4jrq)
Posted by: Andy at December 21, 2011 03:43 AM (XG+Mn)
Posted by: Andy at December 21, 2011 03:48 AM (XG+Mn)
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:48 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 21, 2011 03:50 AM (vzFJV)
Posted by: soothie at December 21, 2011 03:52 AM (Ba6aP)
That will teach those "racist" Arizonans who has the right to abuse power and neglect responsibilities.
Secretary Janet Napolitano said Thursday the Department of Homeland Security is ending an agreement with the Maricopa County sheriff's office of trained deputies access to the Secure Communities program that uses fingerprints collected in local jails for identification of suspects. (Dec.15, AP)
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mother Fears at December 21, 2011 03:53 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 21, 2011 03:53 AM (l9zgN)
Just ponder Obama as prez for 4 more years. + A democrat controlled house and senate and a democrat controlled Supreme Court.
Say hello to "Employee Free Choice" aka "Card Check" aka "The end of the private ballot" aka "A leftwing union goon stands over you while you *wink* vote for the democrat unionista machine to take over industry in America and turn said industry a baby-sitting factory/democrat unnion money laundering machines as far as the eye can see."
Say hello to extremely unfair and punitive taxes.
Say hello to Greece.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at December 21, 2011 03:55 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: moki at December 21, 2011 03:55 AM (dZmFh)
Posted by: countrydoc at December 21, 2011 03:56 AM (OMMin)
Posted by: lowandslow at December 21, 2011 03:56 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: Andy at December 21, 2011 03:57 AM (XG+Mn)
Well if you are in PA the schools are teaching the joys of communism and OWS gatherings. .....as a Christmas play.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:57 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 21, 2011 07:20 AM (niZvt)
Gotta be hardwired in the DNA.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at December 21, 2011 03:59 AM (hcJkV)
another Mittgrich endorsement?
We only thought we earned our wages by working.
Please sir, I want some more.
Posted by: taxation with parasitic representation at December 21, 2011 04:00 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: packsoldier at December 21, 2011 04:01 AM (S7roo)
Posted by: taxation with parasitic representation at December 21, 2011 04:01 AM (lpWVn)
And people think it's SOOOOO important that we elect Mitt Romney so we can get more of this.
My enthusiasm for the november elections has gone from a 10 two years ago to a 2.
I hate the f--king GOP.
Posted by: SamInVA at December 21, 2011 04:02 AM (rFiOs)
Posted by: lowandslow at December 21, 2011 04:03 AM (GZitp)
Say hello to Greece.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at December 21, 2011 07:55 AM (O7ksG)
And I'll say hello to Belize. It's looking better and better every day, especially on days when President Petulant's approval rating gets near 50%. We are becoming - and are nearly there - a nation of retards and delusionals.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at December 21, 2011 04:04 AM (hcJkV)
Posted by: Lord Monochromicorn at December 21, 2011 04:04 AM (wW2z9)
Posted by: moki at December 21, 2011 04:05 AM (dZmFh)
The same sorts of lies and stupidity as the last one?
Why are you scared of what Barky is going to say? The guy is a retard who NO ONE takes seriously - not even his own supporters.
The Senate bill was shit. End of story. Grow a pair.
Posted by: really ... at December 21, 2011 04:06 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: packsoldier at December 21, 2011 08:01 AM (S7roo)
And here is the main problem with so-called 'realist' Republicans. They think they can see the future.
No bill is analyzed based upon what it does, but only what it will do politically. If you disagree, the 'realist' will use his superior understanding of human nature to educate you. Usually with invective at how silly you are for not agreeing with his unsubstantiated hunches.
And when they don't get it right (which is always), that just goes down the memory hole because it isn't important. All that is important is the here and now, and the future. And they always know what we must do.
Of course, the Republican party has been run by these people, and look what our political gamesmanship has gotten us - a country on the brink of insolvency.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 21, 2011 04:06 AM (FkKjr)
Except that would be racist!
Posted by: real joe at December 21, 2011 04:10 AM (w7Lv+)
A payroll tax holiday doesn't do much to offset the Illinois *spit* toll road increase I have to deal with or the higher energy costs that everyone has to deal with thanks to this jackass President.
Not the the MFM will help people think about that even if the GOP were to scream it from every mountaintop.
Posted by: Mark at December 21, 2011 04:11 AM (yPDyB)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 21, 2011 04:12 AM (Ho2rs)
They should never be referring to this as the payroll tax anyway. It's "funding for Social Security that Democrats want to cut".
This time of year nobody's interested in dissecting the issue and a decent soundbite like that would toss the issue into the Political Squabble/Ignore pile for all but the wonkiest.
Posted by: spongeworthy at December 21, 2011 04:13 AM (puy4B)
I'm glad someone in the House is finally showing some balls.
Could the timing be better? Sure. But the perfect is the enemy of the good.
This is the underpants gnome theory of politics, Andy.
(1) Kill a wildly popular bill.
(2) ???
(3) Profit!
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 21, 2011 04:13 AM (IkTb7)
Why are you scared of what Barky is going to say? The guy is a retard who NO ONE takes seriously - not even his own supporters.
Here's the thing. I really, really want us to win the next elections. Big win. Like, take over two branches of government big. And giving the President ammunition isn't the best way to get there.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 21, 2011 04:14 AM (IkTb7)
The bill says military travelers must be in uniform and present their orders to get the expedited screening. "An expedited, risk-based TSA screening process is the least we can do for our men and women in uniform and their families who sacrifice so much," said chief sponsor Rep. Chip Cravaack, R-Minn. He said the bill also would be an important piece of the government's move toward a screening system based on risk and intelligence information.
Next year, maybe.
Posted by: taxation with parasitic representation at December 21, 2011 04:14 AM (lpWVn)
This is the underpants gnome theory of politics, Andy.
(1) Kill a wildly popular bill.
Really? Wildly popular? With who? On what do you base that assessment?Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 21, 2011 04:16 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: Blaster at December 21, 2011 04:16 AM (Fw2Gg)
Posted by: soothie at December 21, 2011 04:17 AM (vanqS)
Posted by: soothie at December 21, 2011 04:17 AM (YO+5B)
Here is what the Republican Message should be right now in an unrelenting full chorus!
The Democrats only want you to pay taxes. The Democratic Senate and the President only want you to have the payroll tax cuts for 2 MONTHS!
Republicans are holding out against this two month plan from the Democratic Senate in order to get you that payroll Tax Break for the FULL YEAR!
And Republicans will not give in to the President who only wants you to have this tax break for two months! The American public deserves more than a sixty day payroll tax break, the American public deserves the Payroll tax break for three hundred and sixty days!
Maybe a few less exclamation points. And an Oxford comma somewhere.
Posted by: Mister Money at December 21, 2011 04:18 AM (wN82N)
Posted by: soothie at December 21, 2011 08:17 AM (YO+5B)
I'm going to guess it involves hills and not dying on them. It is now insane rightwing behavior for the House to go to conference.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 21, 2011 04:19 AM (FkKjr)
This time of year nobody's interested in dissecting the issue and a decent soundbite like that would toss the issue into the Political Squabble/Ignore pile for all but the wonkiest.
Posted by: spongeworthy at December 21, 2011 08:13 AM (puy4B)
Holy shit, this is true. The Democrats are demanding we defund social security! We're not going to go along with their risky schemes that destroy SS!
Posted by: Truman North at December 21, 2011 04:19 AM (I2LwF)
RINO.
Posted by: pep at December 21, 2011 04:19 AM (YXmuI)
The same characteristics that make you want to be a political leader should probably exclude you from ever actually serving as one.
Posted by: Bien Pensant at December 21, 2011 04:22 AM (8/DeP)
Posted by: soothie at December 21, 2011 04:23 AM (LVtr+)
Oh. Yay. Extra doooooooooooom.
I'm in a bit of a set it on fire and watch it all burn mood today and shit like this is why. We're facing an actual existential crisis about the future of our country and the GOP is being actively stupid. Head, meet Desk. Desk, Head. Lather rinse repeat.
Posted by: alexthechick at December 21, 2011 04:24 AM (VtjlW)
(1) Kill a wildly popular bill.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 21, 2011 08:13 AM (IkTb7)
What percentage of the population do you think even knows of the existence of this bill, Senate or House version? 7%? That's wild, but not what I would call "popular" even giving you the assumption that 3000% of people who have heard of the bill support it.
Posted by: really ... at December 21, 2011 04:24 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 21, 2011 04:25 AM (l9zgN)
Posted by: stuiec at December 21, 2011 04:25 AM (aSN7Z)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at December 21, 2011 04:25 AM (h6mPj)
This time of year nobody's interested in dissecting the issue and a decent soundbite like that would toss the issue into the Political Squabble/Ignore pile for all but the wonkiest.
Posted by: spongeworthy at December 21, 2011 08:13 AM (puy4B)
Excellent!
Posted by: Mister Money at December 21, 2011 04:27 AM (wN82N)
Posted by: Potato Bandit at December 21, 2011 04:29 AM (H15Ok)
Yeah, that makes sense.
How about pointing out what is happening in Europe, with their cradle to grave so called safety net and near 0% of GDP military spending -- and they are still all going broke? Is that not relevant?
I think the choices we face must be made clear and stark -- change NOW or face a crash. There will be pain. That is unavoidable. Make it known. Say it every day. Say we don't have to crash and burn, but only if we change away from Euro habits.
If we get tossed from office, then so be it. Watch it all crumble in fast motion, with CA and IL and the other blue states leading the way.
I'm ready for it. It sure beats watching us aid and abet the collapse by appeasement over and over.
Posted by: GnuBreed at December 21, 2011 04:30 AM (ENKCw)
The Republicans need to find a way to get their message out. I have been saying that for years now and they still haven't found a way to bypass the MFM.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 04:30 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at December 21, 2011 04:31 AM (h6mPj)
Political preferences arealways based on personal self-interest.
Huh. And here I thought my political preferences were based on careful thought and in-depth consideration of the role of the individual vs. the state, the definition of freedom and liberty, analysis of the role of society in regards to maintaining order and the balance of freedom vs. security. Sheesh, if I'd known that I could just pick shit based on self-interest, it would have saved a ton of time that could have been better spent getting drunk.
Posted by: alexthechick at December 21, 2011 04:31 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at December 21, 2011 04:32 AM (h6mPj)
How much more incompetent do you think the Republican leadership can be next year? I'm sure Dems are anxiously waiting for more and better screw-ups from the disaster that is the GOP.
Happy holidays...
Posted by: JEA at December 21, 2011 04:32 AM (4kpbt)
@95 Haster and Frist were a disaster during the Bush years
You are too kind to them. Especially Frist.
Posted by: Mister Money at December 21, 2011 04:33 AM (wN82N)
Euro court rules that they can tax the shit out of American airlines for CO2 rules
How about this. We tax the shit out of euro airlines using American airports and reimburse the airlines. Tit for tat. But I guess as long as we have the watermelon commies in power that will never happen.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 04:35 AM (YdQQY)
How much more incompetent do you think the Republican leadership can be next year?
Dear God, don't challenge them!
Posted by: alexthechick at December 21, 2011 04:35 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik, hoping for a Perry miracle at December 21, 2011 04:35 AM (fYOZx)
The "adults" already gave away the china shop, in addition to getting Obama elected.
Posted by: MlR at December 21, 2011 04:36 AM (/v94V)
See you on the other side.
Posted by: BumperStickerist at December 21, 2011 08:31 AM (h6mPj)
Count me in!
Posted by: Mister Money at December 21, 2011 04:36 AM (wN82N)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 21, 2011 07:10 AM (FkKjr)
Exactly right. Quit beefing at the House. McConnell is - as usual - the problem - not the House. He was handed a winning hand and folded it.
Posted by: One-Eyed Cat Peepin' in the Seafood Store at December 21, 2011 04:37 AM (tAwhy)
Really? Wildly popular? With who? On what do you base that assessment?
_____________________
What percentage of the population do you think even knows of the existence of this bill, Senate or House version? 7%? That's wild, but not what I would call "popular" even giving you the assumption that 3000% of people who have heard of the bill support it.
"On the payroll tax deduction, 58 percent of respondents said they want Congress to extend the break, while 35 percent want it to expire.
"Democrats and independents are the strongest supporters of continuing the tax cut, while Republicans were evenly divided. But the difference is more partisan than ideological: Conservatives supported an extension, 54 percent to the 42 percent who prefer to let the reduction expire.
"Those with annual incomes below $50,000 more strongly support the extension compared with higher-income respondents, and seniors were more likely than younger adults to back the extension."
I guarantee you that when the first paychecks in 2012 come out, people are going to notice that they're getting less than they were.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 21, 2011 04:38 AM (IkTb7)
Posted by: blaster at December 21, 2011 04:39 AM (Fw2Gg)
He was handed a winning hand and folded it.
Oh, how typical. Blame Boehner, even though Boehner wasn't the one to throw the brakes on. He gave McConnell the go-ahead on the deal. Then (as usual) the rank-and-file members revolted and derailed the whole thing.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 21, 2011 04:40 AM (IkTb7)
Yeah, I'm impressed.
Posted by: GnuBreed at December 21, 2011 04:41 AM (ENKCw)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 21, 2011 04:42 AM (8y9MW)
for it, without having actually read it, or maybe his aides did read it, but that's how we got what I like to call Sutton/Dillinger, Dodd Frank.
Posted by: randolph Duke at December 21, 2011 04:42 AM (AH8RI)
Posted by: blaster at December 21, 2011 04:42 AM (Fw2Gg)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at December 21, 2011 04:43 AM (dD3tG)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 21, 2011 04:43 AM (l9zgN)
Well the first of the primary candidates has gone 3rd party
Gary Johnson to Drop Out of GOP Race to Run as LibertarianIs there enough time for the Libertarians to run a primary between him and Ron Paul?
Posted by: f2000 at December 21, 2011 04:43 AM (FcMtg)
Boehner can't count.
Posted by: toby928© Perrykrishna with tattooed knuckles at December 21, 2011 04:43 AM (iVgwk)
Fact 1. The Grassroots TEA Party movement DOES NOT endorse or run candidates.. Nor do they endorse Republicans or Democrats.
Fact 2. Any organization calling itself a Tea Party, is not endorsed by the TEA Party movement.
Fact 3. Ron Paul and his supporters are trying to hijack the movement for political gain.
Fact 4. The TEA Party does not have tax-exempt status, as would a political organization or "Party." (bottom of the page)
It's all right HERE, in the mission statement. (.pdf)
Posted by: franksalterego at December 21, 2011 04:44 AM (9XykO)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at December 21, 2011 04:44 AM (h6mPj)
Repubs have already taken car of that.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 04:46 AM (YdQQY)
@118 I guarantee you that when the first paychecks in 2012 come out, people are going to notice that they're getting less than they were.
The tumultous cacaphony of the masses will resound across the land.
Posted by: Mister Money at December 21, 2011 04:47 AM (wN82N)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at December 21, 2011 04:48 AM (h6mPj)
Posted by: Bannor at December 21, 2011 04:48 AM (6AXh/)
Do the respondents want a two month extension?
And, is the GOP's position they want it to expire, or that they want to go to committee with the Senate with an amended bill?
Then (as usual) the rank-and-file members revolted and derailed the whole thing.
Bullshit. Did they revolt when Boehner reneged on his plan to cut 100 billion from the 2010 budget and instead cut one billion? Or when they passed the 'Grand Bargain' of the Super Committee after Boehner's pleading?
Seems to me the TEA party folk have given Boehner a lot of leeway, and that he has exhausted it stupidly. And agreed to a deal without knowing what the caucus thought of it.
And, as you've proven, the TEA party get no credit for playing 'ball.' The media still excoriates them, and some of us buy it.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 21, 2011 04:48 AM (FkKjr)
Well Gabe, I think a little Boehner finger pointing is acceptable here. One thing you have to give to Pelosi, she knew pretty much how her herd would vote on any issue. Boehner doesn't seem to have gotten that consensus from his caucus before telling McConnell to go ahead with the Senate version.
He should have predicted this outcome as a possibility. And advised his Senate cohort accordingly.
Posted by: GnuBreed at December 21, 2011 04:49 AM (ENKCw)
Whatever technical rationale they come up with it looks horrible, and plays right into "their" hands. Tea partiers proving their super-conservative credentials to Rush?
Easy argument even a democrat can make: So if reducing taxes (tax rates) results in a net increase in tax revenue, why does this not qualify? And we call b.s. on the Social Security trust fund counter argument.
Four more years? Jeezus.
Posted by: Bobby Ahr at December 21, 2011 04:50 AM (bh0Df)
Posted by: Glenn Becque at December 21, 2011 04:50 AM (h6mPj)
The Senate adjourned for the year shortly after 3:30 p.m. Saturday, but GOP leaders insisted on holding ten cursory pro-forma sessions over the next month to stop President Obama from making recess appointments.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 04:51 AM (YdQQY)
Baby and corrupt asshole Senate leader Harry Reid(D) wants 2 months and claims he want more, but not now. That's ploitics and the American people should see through it.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at December 21, 2011 04:52 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 21, 2011 04:53 AM (l9zgN)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at December 21, 2011 04:53 AM (h6mPj)
Gabe, I think you need to get out of the Beltway. Seriously.
Cutting taxes simply to cut taxes is pointless. Conservatives do not believe in cutting taxes as an end, we believe in it as a means to certain ends: specifically increased economic liberty and reduced government. This payroll tax holiday does neither. It is all style and no substance.
The point of getting elected isn't to get elected again (whatever politicians believe), it's to represent your constituents.
Now, I'm all in favor of paying fewer taxes, but let's look at a couple of problems with the payroll tax holiday-
1) It's virtually non-existent. I get paid pretty decently. I take home about $25.00 per paycheck more. My world is not going to be shattered if that stops. In the aggregate, however, that is significant chunk of change for the government's already over-stressed budget.
2) It's temporary. As in "could be gone next week" temporary. The Democrats want a whopping 8 weeks. Yeah, that's huge tax relief right there. The two main problems (there are others) with it being temporary are these: A) It will cost business more to implement it than it saves people on their taxes. Can you say "net drain on the economy?" I knew you could. B) People cannot plan on that money for any sort of long-term spending or investing. $25.00 per paycheck is one extra night out to Pizza Hut every two weeks. This is not going to help the economy. However, you can't say, "But if I save it all year, that'll be $650 at the end of the year, that'll buy me a new gun!" because you don't know it will be there at the end of the year.
So spare me your tears for Boehner and McConnell. They poohed the scrooch on this one. Just like so many before it.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 21, 2011 04:54 AM (8y9MW)
My 11-Dimensional Chess Theory is that the House Republicans, by forcing the Senate to reconvene is doing so to prevent Obama making recess appointments. for the children.
No, the Senate wasn't in recess. It was still technicaly in session to keep Obama from making recess appointments. McConnell made sure of that. http://is.gd/8hW0m9
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 21, 2011 04:55 AM (IkTb7)
Posted by: Andy at December 21, 2011 04:55 AM (XG+Mn)
A third of the American people think the U.S. government planned 9/11.
A third of the American people give a shit who the Kardashians are fucking.
A third of the American people think rap music is poetry.
Need I go on?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 21, 2011 04:55 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: randolph Duke at December 21, 2011 04:55 AM (AH8RI)
Posted by: blaster at December 21, 2011 04:55 AM (Fw2Gg)
The left live to lie, vilify, cheat, tax, destory and feather their nests.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at December 21, 2011 04:55 AM (O7ksG)
"Anyway, Potato Bandit (!) is right. This only matters to the wonks in the room-- namely, us."
I'm not so sure about that. The non-wonks out there are mad as hell and looking for someone to blame. Congress just had its lowest approval poll ever. Pravda will seek every opportunity over the next year to hammer R's and build up D's.
I heard a conservative leaning analyst say last night that the next year's Presidential election (one the R's ought to be sailing toward with the wind at their backs) will likely be more up in the air than any election in his lifetime. Stupid mistakes like this and handing Democrats and the MFM clubs to pound them with may cost the Republicans - and us - a Presidency.
Posted by: RM at December 21, 2011 04:56 AM (TRsME)
Oh yes, of course.
Tying the Money Supply to a Gold miner makes all the sense in the world.
*sigh*
Posted by: franksalterego at December 21, 2011 04:58 AM (9XykO)
Posted by: blaster at December 21, 2011 04:58 AM (Fw2Gg)
It's not so important to paint one more scoamfy failure in the harshest possible terms as to justify writing off the entire war as a defeat. Yes, call him out for throwing away the chance to better secure our gains and improve the chance of a healthy, free Iraqi society just to score some political points but don't let it define the whole operation. Because guess what: no matter when we got out of there, there was sure to be violence as the terrorists and various power-seekers test the governments ability to stand on its own. And no matter how long we drug it out, they were eventually going to have to stand or fall on their own. There was always a chance they would fail and there's still a chance they won't.
So chill the fuck out on the "surrender" shit.
Posted by: original signed at December 21, 2011 04:58 AM (YCuex)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 21, 2011 04:59 AM (XE2Oo)
Cutting taxes simply to cut taxes is pointless. Conservatives do not believe in cutting taxes as an end, we believe in it as a means to certain ends: specifically increased economic liberty and reduced government. This payroll tax holiday does neither. It is all style and no substance.
I can't believe what I'm hearing. You are so desperate to contort your way into seeing that opposing tax cuts is a good thing that you've just chucked a cornerstone conservative position.
You are out of your ever-loving mind. Absolutely conservatives believe that cutting taxes is an end in itself. It's my money, not the government's. (And, by the way, that is "increased economic liberty.") You've totally bought into the liberal's belief that government redistribution of wealth is to be used for socio-economic engineering.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 21, 2011 05:00 AM (IkTb7)
Posted by: jjshaka at December 21, 2011 05:01 AM (31o9C)
Both versions of this bill impose a permanent new tax on every mortgage backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Posted by: jwb7605 at December 21, 2011 05:02 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: blaster at December 21, 2011 05:02 AM (Fw2Gg)
So let me understand - the GOP should go along with everything the Dems say so they don't look bad, then run on "elect us to stop this Obama crap!"
How does that work again?
Posted by: blaster at December 21, 2011 08:58 AM (Fw2Gg)
House GOP already said they'd give the President what he wants: a full year extension on the tax cut. In fact, they did more than just say it; they actually passed one. I repeat: they already went along with what the President asked for.
So let's not pretend that they're making a bold stand against the payroll tax holiday. They're for it (now). They just didn't want to sign on to the Senate version because it didn't make the issue go away for the rest of the year and they're tired of getting punched in the nuts about it on national television.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 21, 2011 05:03 AM (IkTb7)
Posted by: Potato Bandit at December 21, 2011 05:03 AM (H15Ok)
Posted by: blaster at December 21, 2011 05:04 AM (Fw2Gg)
Wildly popular, Gabe?
You know what else is wildly popular? Social Security, Medicare, and all the rest of the entitlements that are bankrupting us, that's what.
The House GOP decided they were tired of being pissed on and told it was raining. Good for them and let the chips fall where they may.
Doesn't fly, Andy. House GOP is in favor of the payroll tax holiday. They just "paid for" it differently. Gosh, I remember the days when Republicans used to call Democrats out for considering tax cuts to be a form of government spending...
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 21, 2011 05:04 AM (IkTb7)
Posted by: Juji Fruit at December 21, 2011 05:05 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: blaster at December 21, 2011 05:07 AM (Fw2Gg)
I heard reports yesterday that Obama wants a one year extension. It looks like whiny asshole baby Harry Reid is going against him own king.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at December 21, 2011 05:07 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: blaster at December 21, 2011 05:08 AM (Fw2Gg)
Gabe the payroll tax holiday is not a "tax cut" - and accepting that premise is playing the Democrat game.
First of all, go read my post. Note the "holiday" language and get off my nuts.
Second, explain to me why we refer to them as the "Bush Tax Cuts" and not the "Bush Tax Holiday" since, after all, they were and are set to expire after a certain term.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 21, 2011 05:09 AM (IkTb7)
A tax on money borrowed from the government? WTF?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 21, 2011 05:10 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Fritz at December 21, 2011 05:10 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 21, 2011 05:13 AM (hiMsy)
Yeah, that's why people keep promising to stay home or vote for Obama if Newt or Mitt are the nominee.
This IS a doom thread.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 21, 2011 05:13 AM (/kI1Q)
No. Really not. No. Really haven't.
Cutting taxes just to cut taxes (for its own sake) does nothing. If it did, we should be advocating for complete repeal of taxes. We don't do that because we know that's an insane position- not just politically, but practically.
As a corollary, if cutting taxes for its own sake were "a cornerstone of the Conservative position" then we should vote for every miniscule tax-cut the Democrats send our way, regardless of what they attach to it: we would still have achieved our desired end: cutting taxes.
That's bullshit and you know it. 6.5% of my pay is not "increased economic liberty" in any sense worth discussing. 6.5% of my pay, at the cost of (probably) twice that to my employer is worth less than nothing.
We don't look at every individual and say, "If only Joe the Plumber made more money, the economy would be better!" Joe the Plumber gets more money from a better economy, not (necessarily) the other way around. What Conservatives do is look at the aggregate and say, "What can we do to increase economic liberty as a whole? We know that some people are going to be harmed or left behind no matter what we do, but what do we do to minimize that negative impact and maximize the positive?"
Newsflash: A miniscule "tax cut" (which will inevitably lead to higher taxes later) which costs more for business to implement (oh: and they won't do it right in the time-frame provided, so they'll be liable for that, too) than it will save the Tax Payers decreases net economic liberty. It is a net drain on the economy.
Say that phrase with me, there, Gabe: "Net drain on the Economy." Once more: "Net drain on the Economy." There. Now you understand why Conservatives do not agree to a 2 month extension to the payroll tax holiday.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 21, 2011 05:14 AM (8y9MW)
How would you like to be a businessman trying to operate with that uncertainty?
I don't blame Boehner, one damned bit.. It's the Senate Democrats holding up the parade.
Posted by: franksalterego at December 21, 2011 05:15 AM (9XykO)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 21, 2011 05:15 AM (l9zgN)
Posted by: toby928© Perrykrishna with tattooed knuckles at December 21, 2011 05:17 AM (iVgwk)
Do you practice hard headed? The Bush Tax Cuts were across the board tax cuts, designed (from the outset) to be permanent. They were reduced to "temporary" 10 year measures by the political process.
Even then, the point was that they would be so popular that Congress would make them permanent before they expired (which didn't work out so well, but it was the plan). So, yes, Bush's cuts were ACTUAL Tax Cuts (well, cuts to the Tax Rate, to be technical) whereas the Payroll Tax Holiday is designed only to be a temporary gimmick to lead to higher taxes down the line.
Even if they'd been designed to be "temporary," and never meant to be made permanent, do you not see a little difference in a 2 month gimmick and a 10 year rate cut?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 21, 2011 05:18 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: toby928© Perrykrishna with tattooed knuckles at December 21, 2011 05:20 AM (iVgwk)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 21, 2011 05:21 AM (XE2Oo)
Those ARE you personal self-interests,
That term, personal self-interest, I do not think it means what you think it means. You appear to be conflating self-interest with prinicples and, to me, those are two very different things.
Here, I'll give an example. It would be in my personal self-interest to have all student loan debt forgiven. I am against that on principle due to concerns about such things as the stability of contract law. Hell, the entire point of that idiotic what's the matter with Kansas book is that the author could not get his wee mind around the idea that the mouth breathers would be voting against their best interests.
Now, it is possible to argue that placing primacy on living in accordance to expressed principles over more blatant actions in self-interest is, in actuality, self-interest as one is acting to maximize one's highest order desire. But still, I would draw a distinction between acting in accordance with principle and acting in accordance with personal self-interest.
Posted by: alexthechick at December 21, 2011 05:22 AM (VtjlW)
I think she's right, EoJ. I think you're looking for "Enlightened Self-Interest." If you substitute that phrase into your post, y'all are arguing the same side (IMO).
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 21, 2011 05:23 AM (8y9MW)
Tax increases, on the other hand....
Posted by: Hrothgar at December 21, 2011 05:24 AM (i3+c5)
Gosh, did the Tea Party just send Boehner out to die? With friends like these...
“This is a ‘Braveheart’ moment. You, Mr. Speaker, are our William Wallace,” Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-Ga.), a member of the Tea Party Caucus, said on the Fox News Channel.
http://is.gd/Lzpq9f
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 21, 2011 05:24 AM (IkTb7)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 21, 2011 05:28 AM (l9zgN)
Posted by: Pipe Holder at December 21, 2011 05:29 AM (VTeUD)
" explain to me why we refer to them as the "Bush Tax Cuts" and not the "Bush Tax Holiday"
Most people who use that language are leftists, Democrats, and the supposedly "moderates" who elected Obama. Who is this "we" you are referring to?
Posted by: Dick Nixon at December 21, 2011 05:30 AM (kaOJx)
Posted by: The Leperous Guy in the Tower at December 21, 2011 05:31 AM (h6mPj)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 21, 2011 05:31 AM (vzFJV)
Posted by: Robert the Bruce (R) at December 21, 2011 05:35 AM (h6mPj)
Actually, the "Deal" on the Keystone Pipeline is just that they'll Instruct the President to approve or reject it in 30 days (or 60, something like that). At which point, when he doesn't, they'll... do nothing, because we know Senate Democrats won't do anything to him.
So, for a Net Economic Loss, we would be getting- nothing.
So, yes, I oppose a 2 month extension.
I'm open to discussion of a 1 year extension, as that should not be a net drain on the economy. But the Senate Dems seem intent on taking that off the table.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 21, 2011 05:37 AM (8y9MW)
I think she's right, EoJ.
Ahhh, such sweet music to my ears.
I think you're looking for "Enlightened Self-Interest." If you substitute that phrase into your post, y'all are arguing the same side (IMO).
Ding, ding, ding, we have a winner!
I still want the boots.
Posted by: alexthechick at December 21, 2011 05:40 AM (VtjlW)
I think you're looking for "Enlightened Self-Interest."
Is that code for cold beer and hot, easy women?
I believe there is a persuasive case for making that a high order level principle, yes.
Posted by: alexthechick at December 21, 2011 05:41 AM (VtjlW)
I think he has 60 days to approve it or prove it hazardous. If he does nothing in 60 days, it's considered approved.
Posted by: Tami at December 21, 2011 05:42 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at December 21, 2011 05:44 AM (4svun)
@ 189 I am against that on principle due to concerns about such things as the stability of contract law........
The Obama administration has already destroyed this stability. Just ask anyone who held "GM FullySecured Bonds" before Obama Nationalized GM. The conversion of these secured bonds to stock warrents of far less value was outright theft, and contravened all previous contract law of the past few hundred years.
Do a bit of research, and find out just how bad this really was.
Posted by: Mister Money at December 21, 2011 05:45 AM (wN82N)
Boehner had agreed to the Senate deal because the White House would have to decide on the pipeline, which we all thought would pretty much force Obama to placate the unions and go ahead with it.
HOWEVER, Ed Henry put a bunch of tweets up on Twitter 2 days ago which said that the people at the White House had pretty much decided that Obama had already taken the political hit on the pipeline and would not be hurt further by stopping it.
If you ask me, that was seen by House members as a sign that going with the 2-month thing was NOT going to get the pipeline started, and that is why they voted against the 2-month extension.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 21, 2011 05:46 AM (GoIUi)
Okay, so he accepts the first argument Green Peace or the Sierra Club can give him not to OK the pipeline, and he rejects it. Then the MFM still slobbers all over his knob while downplaying what the Pipeline would have done. Still not anything to rejoice over- and certainly not worth accepting a Net Drain on the Economy.
You force Obama's hand.
No, you don't. Okies, in general, and a few other "Fly-over-Country" types know about the Keystone Pipeline. Most of the rest of the country doesn't. So it's not some Political Excalibur, here. All he has to do is seize on some excuse (this one would play really well with the media: "There are still serious questions about the environmental impact of the pipeline. If we had more time to review them, we might be able to settle them, but based on the timeline insisted upon by Republicans, we do not have time for the proper investigation. Therefore, I cannot, in good conscience, approve this project.") and then reject it.
So you've forced him to, what? Make a nothing decision that won't get any play?
And if you accept a 2 month extension and THEN another one as that runs out, you're just increasing the costs of compliance, perhaps to the point that even the 1 year extension is a Net Drain on the Economy.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 21, 2011 05:50 AM (8y9MW)
To quote myself from the previous thread: He will just invoke the Precautionary Principle. Something bad might happen and it would be bad, real bad, as bad as the EPA bureau-slugs can imagine. The bill does not require that the reason be, er, reasonable.
Posted by: toby928© at December 21, 2011 05:52 AM (iVgwk)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at December 21, 2011 05:57 AM (4svun)
Re: 2-month payroll tax cut
It must be nice to be a lawyer and not have to be someone who has to implement the crazy ideas of other lawyers and politicians. If passed, every payroll provider would have one week to modify, test, and deploy changes to the way paychecks are calculated. Brilliant.
Posted by: OCBill at December 21, 2011 06:00 AM (MiSre)
I swear it seems as though there's a perverse enjoyment floating around here in reference to the latest developments--as if they afford a kind of martyrdom. Constant drumbeat of defeat and despair.
It's Christmas, people--there is a reason for hope and celebration that transcends politics, you understand. Maybe a bit of perspective needs emphasizing?
Now let the shredding commence.
Posted by: irongrampa at December 21, 2011 06:03 AM (SAMxH)
Posted by: Wall_E at December 21, 2011 06:03 AM (48wze)
Extending the payroll tax holiday is fast becoming yet another Ways & Means Committee hot potato, not unlike the AMT fix and the Medicare Doc fix.
Keep kicking that can, boys.
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 21, 2011 06:04 AM (4q5tP)
Posted by: toby928© at December 21, 2011 09:52 AM (iVgwk)
I haz a bad feeling about this.
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 21, 2011 06:05 AM (4q5tP)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 21, 2011 06:06 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 08:35 AM (YdQQY)
You can consider "Watermelon Commies" stolen.
That'll be good for a few lib aneurysms Vic, you magnificent bastard.
Posted by: ontherocks at December 21, 2011 06:11 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: twoslaps at December 21, 2011 06:15 AM (lZZpV)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at December 21, 2011 06:16 AM (i0App)
Clean house!!! Cry Boy Baynor to Sneaky Reed..
We need a complete douche of these Assholes
3 Card Monte anyone?
Posted by: flintstone at December 21, 2011 06:19 AM (b+IFj)
More proof the Tea Party is jumping the shark.
Too many amateurs in the kitchen.
I've give Boehner credit for deling with all these novices and yahoos.
Posted by: Winning at December 21, 2011 06:20 AM (+H3LV)
I give Baynor an Award for Simulated Competence It is Rampant mental disorder in Washington.....
Posted by: flintstone at December 21, 2011 06:26 AM (b+IFj)
Posted by: Bobbil at December 21, 2011 06:32 AM (SjHuo)
Posted by: flintstone at December 21, 2011 06:33 AM (b+IFj)
Not the hill to die on
Overton window
Ignore the issue and focus on the politics
Blah, blah de blah blah
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 21, 2011 06:38 AM (3wBRE)
Posted by: Arterial Johnson at December 21, 2011 06:41 AM (ucERL)
Posted by: Arterial Johnson at December 21, 2011 06:45 AM (ucERL)
Posted by: Arterial Johnson at December 21, 2011 07:15 AM (ucERL)
Posted by: ejo at December 21, 2011 07:20 AM (+GBuV)
Well, yeah, and they're right. The whole argument that dems are winning on this is based on the fact that the media won't report the R's side of things, when will the Washington R's ever take a stand and start pointing out simple facts like that instead of caving because the media won't report their side of things? Apparently never, so cave it is, again.
Posted by: booger at December 21, 2011 07:22 AM (EjNp5)
Yep, and i don't even like Gingrich.
Posted by: booger at December 21, 2011 07:25 AM (EjNp5)
Personally I think it is refreshing that we have a Speaker who sometimes fails to get his troops in line. As opposed to Jackboot Nancy who corralled every vote for Obamacare and cost 63 of her members their seats. Boehner is not that kind of person, he is making sure that all of his members have a voice even if it gets messy from time to time.
All this jibber-jabber about who is winning the tactical battle this week is stupid.
Posted by: rockmom at December 21, 2011 07:29 AM (aBlZ1)
Posted by: rockmom at December 21, 2011 07:32 AM (aBlZ1)
*Many House Democrats did/do not like the two-month extension, despite their current displays of indignation.
Posted by: M80B at December 21, 2011 07:35 AM (d6QMz)
A two-month payroll tax extension is indefensible. No payroll system in the country can handle it without massive manual effort, which will in turn be rife with error, which in turn will cost money. It took years (and countless programming hours) to get the FICA cap split in place back in the 90's; there's no way we can get a two-month payroll tax fix in place in a couple of weeks.
And please don't tell me a full-year extension is "inevitable". It's not. Nobody knows what will happen in two months. That uncertainty is one of the primary negative pressures on the economy. If you're going to have a year-long tax holiday, then vote the year-long holiday, and only the year-long holiday. Anything less is asking to be taken advantage of. People who count on the largesse of the Democrats or the common sense of Congress in general have been consistently disappointed.
That's just the argument against the two-month extension itself. As far as I can tell, it's purely anti-Conservative and that's even before you include all the horrible baggage included in the bill. As usual, what has happened is a perfectly good House bill goes to the Senate and the Senate crams it with crap. The only difference this time is that instead of eating the lovely crap cannoli, the House (for the most part in the person of TEA Party Republicans) told the Senate to shove it.
Conservatives should be happy. Conservatives should be emailing their representatives and patting the backs of those who held firm and excoriating those who didn't. As to this being a strange hill to defend, I don't really care which is the first, as long as there is a first, and up until this point there hasn't been one.
On to 2012, folks. Limit the damage until we get there. No more crapwiches. Obama will not get re-elected because of a two-month tax gift in January, unless we continue to harp about it amongst ourselves.
Posted by: AJsDaddie at December 21, 2011 08:07 AM (dyjs6)
Posted by: karenm at December 21, 2011 08:50 AM (Xnxty)
karenm> Haven't read all the comments but I wonder if the WSJ writer understands that the payroll cut applies only to the employee--the employer match is remains at 6.2%. There is NO incentive to hire any further employees in this equation.
Yeah, I wondered that myself. Seems I've seen more than one comment referring to employers, and this doesn't affect them at all.
Not only that, but in Illinois they used this as an excuse to raise the income tax 2%, saying they would offset each other. Except that when the payroll tax goes back to normal, we'll still have the higher income tax. So typical of the Democrat mindset.
Posted by: AJsDaddie at December 21, 2011 09:00 AM (dyjs6)
Posted by: booger at December 21, 2011 09:09 AM (EjNp5)
Posted by: Chris at December 21, 2011 09:10 AM (3GtyG)
Notice that it's the ever popular "anonymous aide" saying that, booger? What else do you expect from CNN? But we should all be flooding our reps with that message: the Republican House passed a year-long holiday, the Democrat Senate cut it by nearly 85%. Just tweet that over and over.
Posted by: AJsDaddie at December 21, 2011 09:30 AM (dyjs6)
May we always eat well and live comfortably indoors.
Posted by: Huggy at December 21, 2011 02:16 PM (EVwH9)
I get the impression the GOP representatives honestly thought they were doing the best thing when they voted to reject the Senate's two-month extension. Problem was, the relatively inexperienced tea-party reps lacked the experience to recognize how much the MFM was gonna spin this to make the GOP look bad.
Specifically, my local radio news reported that "House republicans voted to kill a two-month extension of unemployment insurance [sic]." No mention that they had offered a one-year plan in its place.
Second: Does anyone really believe Boehner "gave McConnell the okay on the two-month deal"? I seriously doubt that, because given the Dem majority in the senate there was nothing McConnell could have done to block the senate version.
Third: I agree with whoever noted that a third of all Americans think socialism is great and would vote for Satan himself if he promised more "free shit." And another third of the electorate, though smart enough to know socialism sucks, is too disinterested in the inside-baseball details of all this political maneuvering to be involved. So--as the MFM knows--whoever lies first and loudest wins the majority of public support.
All GOP congress-dips should be telling the truth about the competing offers at every news conference and gathering. I believe a majority of voters would like for congress to do the right thing for a change, but they have no idea what the choices are at any moment, thanks to our lying, socialist-loving media.
That is all.
Posted by: sf at December 21, 2011 03:30 PM (bJsQe)
Posted by: The Sense of an Ending iBooks at December 21, 2011 04:44 PM (W3W7Z)
Posted by: The Sisters Brothers ePub at December 21, 2011 05:13 PM (l4O1T)
include comfortable. The color and the layout of the amazing for countless
young people meet, and will provide you using the above feel
confident. New brand design and cross shoes to the recently, it also has
the same oyher shoes. The highest level of quality and resin
awesome design, fashion design and special characters. An ideal to
give you more as well as an ideal to give you more people like hyperfuses, buy it online. For innumerable view of this society, even the most
critical feasible for the possible between individuals across the
shoes, just think what they really beneficial justice in almost every
and each detail. The red and white cross skytop rapid growth of can find to
be considered as a kind of trademark method and skateboarding
Posted by: supra tk society red at January 09, 2012 11:25 PM (pVVTc)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2333 seconds, 369 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Good Morning Morons its Dec 21st/ On this day in 1620 the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock. This wasnÂ’t their original destination but they stopped there because they were out of beer and needed to look for a 7-11. Unfortunately they were 300 years too early. And besides they didnÂ’t have a picture ID.
Posted by: Vic at December 21, 2011 03:04 AM (YdQQY)