December 29, 2011
— Gabriel Malor Good morning. To kick off the day, scroll down to the post under this one about Bachmann's Iowa campaign guy defecting to Paul, if you haven't already read it.
Also in the news, Obama's mixed-signals on immigration aren't winning over Latinos.
If, like me, you're just the teensiest sick of Iowa's BS, Jim Geraghty has an idea for a new presidential primary calendar that actually has a rhyme and reason.
If you're into talkshow podcasts, I made an unplanned appearance on Larry O'Connor's Stage Right Show last night to talk about Iowa. Streaming audio or the podcast is on the left. I was on around the 25 minute mark. I even managed to give the right URL for the HQ.
Finally, my gaming pals say I'm not doing enough to demonstrate opposition to SOPA (hence my new Twitter avatar). Here's an interactive map of congressional SOPA supporters.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:44 AM
| Comments (248)
Post contains 155 words, total size 1 kb.
Latest CNN poll has Romney and Ron Paul on top in Iowa.
But then again, I have NEVER trusted CNN polls. In any case we are about to get the “real poll” and besides that, Iowa hasn’t been much of a bell weather lately. In addition, because of Florida Iowa will only get 28 delegates which will be split proportionally. So other than bragging rights, this election will settle very little.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 02:47 AM (YdQQY)
Newt blames VA ballot fiasco on fraud.
One wonders if MuttÂ’s sigs were checked they would find the same thing. Sounds to me like Newt (and the rest) should have just made up sigs until they got to 15K which would assure none got audited.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 02:47 AM (YdQQY)
The Hill parrots stupid claims on Keystone pipeline from the watermelon wing of the commie party.
Republicans who lobbied aggressively for a measure to force President Obama to make a speedy decision on the Keystone XL pipeline have ensured the projectÂ’s demise, environmental groups say.
Note to the Watermelons and The Hill staff. ItÂ’s a little more complicated than that. Obama will have to lie his ass off to kill it. Of course, that has stopped him yet. Every time he opens his mouth he lies his ass off.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 02:48 AM (YdQQY)
Be sure to read the one about TX scrunt, Sheila Jackson Lee. I donÂ’t know how I missed that one.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 02:48 AM (YdQQY)
Gary Johnson will deliver NM to Obama?
I have some news for you folks. NM went for Obama in 2008 w/o Gary Johnson. NM is a blue State now. Too many CA fruits and nuts moved to Albuquerque.Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 02:48 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 02:49 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 02:49 AM (YdQQY)
Jim Geraghty has an idea for a new presidential primary calendar that actually has a rhyme and reason.
His isn't much different than what we have now. The first three ARE small population States. I still say the order should be based on how the State voted in the last presidential election. That is if we can't go to a run-off style election where all States vote at the same time.Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 02:56 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: joncelli at December 29, 2011 03:03 AM (+MbqG)
Posted by: TiminAL at December 29, 2011 03:04 AM (9pzPv)
Posted by: GMB ONT exile at December 29, 2011 03:08 AM (wY55N)
They did not eliminate the "mandates" either. So we are forced to buy E-85 and w/o the subsidy it will be even higher in price than E-0.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 03:11 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Killerdog at December 29, 2011 03:14 AM (CZrbJ)
Be sure to read the one about TX scrunt, Sheila Jackson Lee. I donÂ’t know how I missed that one.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 06:48 AM (YdQQY)
I don't know how you missed it either. That one stuck in my craw.Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at December 29, 2011 03:16 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 29, 2011 03:20 AM (TpXEI)
But who's counting...
Posted by: Nighthawk at December 29, 2011 03:22 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at December 29, 2011 03:32 AM (xbrnB)
THIS is the behavior of a stable, mature adult? No, this is the act of a worthless unbalanced douchebag masquerading as a political leader.
Forget it, Jake. It's Iowa.
Posted by: nickless at December 29, 2011 03:33 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Nighthawk at December 29, 2011 03:33 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 03:35 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: The rotten apple and the rotten tree at December 29, 2011 03:38 AM (xHenH)
One wonders if MuttÂ’s sigs were checked they would find the same thing. Sounds to me like Newt (and the rest) should have just made up sigs until they got to 15K which would assure none got audited.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 06:47 AM (YdQQY)
That's what it sounds like to me, too. Add enough fake names (are there enough different character names in Disney movies to get to 15K?) to get to the 15,000 threshold and they all magically become "valid". Well, no, you can't be on the ballot because you only got 12,000 fake signatures, but if you had made up 3K more fake ones, you'd have been fine. Which means Virginia really had no rules, just an arbitrary made-up bloody mess designed to screw over anyone expecting rational rules. Sorta like being on double-secret probation in Animal House.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at December 29, 2011 03:39 AM (hcJkV)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at December 29, 2011 03:40 AM (mUqtg)
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 07:35 AM (YdQQY)
I think low to mid 20's(F) is about the lower bound of where an un-assisted heat pump will function.
On a similar note- one more "70's flashback" that I've noticed in this great Obama economy is a resurgence in the popularity of kerosene heaters.being used indoors. There's a large hole in the roof and about a dozen burned out apartments in an apartment house in my neighborhood giving testimony to that little Carteresque throwback.
Posted by: Nighthawk at December 29, 2011 03:44 AM (OtQXp)
I like Geraghty's plan...it's not perfect, and I'd sure do some tweaking to it from where he has it, but virtually anything would be better than the current system. More campaign time and money should be spent in states you actually need to win in the general to, you know, win the general. But still give the smaller states - where the less filthy rich, non-Romney types have a chance to catch fire and become contenders - a continued voice, too...just not nearly as much influence as they have now. And no damn caucuses, and no damn open primaries. If your state opts for either of those, then you automatically move to the back of the line.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at December 29, 2011 03:48 AM (hcJkV)
Posted by: alppuccino at December 29, 2011 03:52 AM (r5vER)
The WillardCare Blues at American Thinker...
"The American people, in 2008, were taken in by soaring rhetoric and well-produced theatre resulting in the election of the worst president since before the Civil War."
Posted by: Doctor Fish at December 29, 2011 03:53 AM (TkGkA)
On a similar note- one more "70's
flashback" that I've noticed in this great Obama economy is a resurgence
in the popularity of kerosene heaters.being used indoors. There's a
large hole in the roof and about a dozen burned out apartments in an
apartment house in my neighborhood giving testimony to that little
Carteresque throwback.
Posted by: Nighthawk at December 29, 2011 07:44 AM (OtQXp)
Wouldn't go near those things, much less have one in my house. We have enclosed electric heated oil ones by DeLonghi in various cold spots around the house that we leave on when it gets in heat pump won't work territory...the pump seems to labor a lot less with those things running, and they don't use a lot of power either; just plug into a regular wall socket.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at December 29, 2011 03:54 AM (hcJkV)
South Carolina tried to close their primary, but an Obama-appointed judge decided they were not going to be allowed to do so. Maybe a federal law is needed that specifically gives state parties the right to close or open their primaries as they wish, since the federal govt has aggregated that right.
Posted by: waelse1 at December 29, 2011 03:56 AM (1M81x)
They want America to stop it. bwahaha. Perhaps they don't know we have a SCoaMF in office at the moment.
Thanks for all the links Vic.
Posted by: GnuBreed at December 29, 2011 03:57 AM (ENKCw)
Used kerosene heaters for years ever since I got my first all-electric (non-heat-pump) bill in January! However, since I do not use them stupidly I don't find them threatening. The problem is finding decent K-1 kerosene.
For me, the deLonghi always seemed to noticeably add to my electric bill and didn't really do much more than warm up a very small area.
Posted by: Hrothgar at December 29, 2011 03:58 AM (i3+c5)
Wouldn't go near those things,
much less have one in my house. We have enclosed electric heated oil
ones by DeLonghi in various cold spots around the house that we leave
on when it gets in heat pump won't work territory...the pump seems to
labor a lot less with those things running, and they don't use a lot of
power either; just plug into a regular wall socket.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at December 29, 2011 07:54 AM (hcJkV)
The oil/electric units are very nice- I've used them in several homes over the years and they help a lot. I will never understand the thought process (or more likely lack thereof) which inspires people to put a kerosene tank in their living room. I was a fireman back in the 1970's and we had a LOT of house and apartment fires from kerosene heaters. Seems that we're going "back to the future".
Posted by: Nighthawk at December 29, 2011 03:59 AM (OtQXp)
Say.. what's the head Ewok gonna be wearing?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at December 29, 2011 04:00 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: waelse1 at December 29, 2011 07:56 AM (1M81x)
What was that pesky Tenth Amendment thing about anyway?
Posted by: Hrothgar at December 29, 2011 04:01 AM (i3+c5)
What was that pesky Tenth Amendment thing about anyway?
Posted by: Hrothgar at December 29, 2011 08:01 AM (i3+c5)
Tenth Amendment, what the hell is that? All we see are the words "Commerce Clause."
Posted by: The Supreme Court at December 29, 2011 04:03 AM (TpXEI)
Posted by: billygoat at December 29, 2011 04:05 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: waelse1 at December 29, 2011 07:56 AM (1M81x)
I thought Vic had mentioned that being related to something the SC legislature had passed when the Dems were in charge? And that had to be changed legislatively first?
Posted by: davidinvirginia at December 29, 2011 04:06 AM (hcJkV)
Via Hot Air, ads are up in Iowa for people to caucus for Sarah Palin.
How much you want to bet that she does better than Perry? Ace will need to be physically restrained and heavily medicated.
Posted by: jwest at December 29, 2011 04:06 AM (8moZm)
Posted by: Jean at December 29, 2011 04:07 AM (+oKKW)
Posted by: The Supreme Court at December 29, 2011 08:03 AM (TpXEI)
Sort of a koranic interpretation,eh? Just stop reading at Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. All the later additions weren't meant to actually be a part of the living Constitution.
Posted by: Hrothgar at December 29, 2011 04:08 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: Jean at December 29, 2011 08:07 AM (+oKKW)
Sounds racist to me. Next thing, you will probably want a photo ID to participate.
Note that DoJ doesn't have a problem with PARTY ID cards Comrade!
Posted by: Hrothgar at December 29, 2011 04:12 AM (i3+c5)
If you guessed attention whore Jesse Jackson, give yourself a gold star.
Posted by: GnuBreed at December 29, 2011 04:12 AM (ENKCw)
32°F is where they start to struggle. The heat strips come on when it gets below 32° and your meter then spins like a top. I have a forced draft electric heater in the living room now that I turn on when it goes below 32°.
I used to use my gas logs until the price of propane went above $4/gal. Too bad can't get natural gas. If I had that I would have got a heat pump with the gas packs.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 04:12 AM (YdQQY)
For me, the deLonghi always seemed to noticeably add to my electric bill and didn't really do much more than warm up a very small area.
Posted by: Hrothgar at December 29, 2011 07:58 AM (i3+c5)
Given my lifelong history of being accident prone, I tend to avoid open flames and other things that can end up going catastrophically bad in a short period of time. :-)
The trick with the DeLonghi's seems to be to leave them on, on low at least, and leave an overhead fan going in the room if there's one in it to circulate the warm air. They don't do the "heat a room in a hurry" thing at all. Our electric bills are lower this winter than last, but we've also had a mild season so far.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at December 29, 2011 04:13 AM (hcJkV)
Posted by: jwest at December 29, 2011 08:06 AM (8moZm)
...so will the Dems and trolls if that happens!
Posted by: billygoat at December 29, 2011 04:14 AM (6DDE+)
So the Repubs need to address it in the Legislature, after which the Dems will probably then sue in Federal court. The problem with the legislature right now is a lot of the R's are converted D's that still act like D's.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 04:15 AM (YdQQY)
Sorry don't remember the judge's justification, other than SC being under double secret probation since 1865. The State newspaper didn't mention the judge's link to Obama either. So when people like me rant the state parties should close their primaries, there's the small issue of federal judges taking that right away from them.
Posted by: waelse1 at December 29, 2011 04:17 AM (1M81x)
So a regular Thursday then.
Posted by: DaveA at December 29, 2011 04:20 AM (aHWbA)
Posted by: waelse1 at December 29, 2011 04:20 AM (1M81x)
Posted by: billygoat at December 29, 2011 04:20 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: Hrothgar at December 29, 2011 07:58 AM (i3+c5)
From what I've seen I think the biggest problems with the kerosene units are fuel storage/management and maintenance. Most of the fires we saw were the result of either improperly stored fuel or a unit that had not been kept clean so that the cut-off failed when it was tipped over. There was also problems with incomplete combustion when the wicks were not cleaned.
So if you're scrupulous in keeping a kerosene heater clean and maintained and careful with storing the fuel I guess you can operate it safely, but from what I saw most people don't do that.
Posted by: Nighthawk at December 29, 2011 04:22 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 29, 2011 04:24 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 04:26 AM (YdQQY)
The ceiling fan might have made a lot of difference in the heat distribution--good point. Frankly, right now, I am waiting for it to get cold enough to fire up the wood stove. The wood stove in my house really skews the heat distribution and runs you out of the room on a warm afternoon, even if it just has embers from the night before.
Posted by: Hrothgar at December 29, 2011 04:26 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: billygoat at December 29, 2011 04:27 AM (6DDE+)
So if you're scrupulous in keeping
a kerosene heater clean and maintained and careful with storing the
fuel I guess you can operate it safely, but from what I saw most people
don't do that.
Posted by: Nighthawk at December 29, 2011 08:22 AM (OtQXp)
We use our K-heater in our tent!
Posted by: OWS'ers in Des Moines at December 29, 2011 04:29 AM (6DDE+)
I have the same provision with my employer, but I don't live in Massachusetts. It is just your employer requiring you to be insured.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 04:29 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: OWS'ers in Des Moines at December 29, 2011 04:29 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: waelse1 at December 29, 2011 08:17 AM (1M81x)
Federal judges having their fingers (and other parts of their anatomies) stuck into everything is something that has to be changed, too.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at December 29, 2011 04:31 AM (hcJkV)
Hold their primary in a manner in which the State provides NOTHING in the way of resources. That includes polling places and poll workers which would be the greatest expense.
Or they can go back to the Legislature and pass a law to close them as that would be "reasonable" rules since a lot of other States have closed primaries.
The other avenue is to eliminate primaries all together. There is no law that says they must hold a primary. Tat is essentially what the federal judge said, knowing that nobody wants to go back to the smoke filled rooms.
But they could allow each county to hold mini-meetings to elect delegates to a State convention to choose the candidate. That would be sort of like the caucus system.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 04:31 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Jean at December 29, 2011 04:31 AM (+oKKW)
Yes, its in the sidebar, but such a special honor deserves restating:
The personification of the OWS movement receives another highly coveted award.
Quote:
I am pleased to announce the winner of the First Annual Breitbart “Ambiguous Entity of the Year” award.
Our choice was inspired by the most under-reported story of the year: the dark side of the Occupy Wall Street movement, which the media attempted to hide.
From its origins, the Occupy movement has been riddled by rapes, sexual assaults, and countless other serious crimes–many of which were not reported to police because Occupy organizers understood that public police reports and media dispatches about crimes would hurt the movement’s image.
Congrats to the face of OWS, the 'Tent of the Unknown Rapist'.
Posted by: jimmah at December 29, 2011 04:31 AM (TMeYE)
A kerosene heater is a potentially dangerous primitive device and needs to be maintained for reliable and safe performance. I disassemble mine at last once a season, clean and trim the wick if needed, and replace the wick about every other year. If you are willing to do that, it is a nice heater adjunct (and it still works when you are without power for days).
I also never fill the tank in the house and keep the stored kerosene well away from any open flames.
Posted by: Hrothgar at December 29, 2011 04:32 AM (i3+c5)
Hey! WTF happened to steevy? He usually takes care of this for us.
Posted by: Beefy Meatball at December 29, 2011 04:33 AM (E7yM+)
Have you ever been to Iowa? Driving through on I-80 does not count.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 29, 2011 04:34 AM (hO8IJ)
This week I got a letter from my employer reminding me that even though I'm eligible for company-sponsored health insurance, I should check with Indiana to see if my kids qualify for Medicaid or CHIP because those premiums are "more affordable". Anyone else get this sort of thing? Is this related to Obamacare?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 29, 2011 04:36 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 08:29 AM (s7mIC)
Yeah, that's not something my employer is doing. The letter explicitly mentions the Massachusetts state law.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 29, 2011 04:36 AM (TpXEI)
Withholding
Commerce Clause
VRA
Posted by: Jean at December 29, 2011 08:31 AM (+oKKW)
Posted by: Hrothgar at December 29, 2011 04:37 AM (i3+c5)
http://tinyurl.com/capnkq4
Moral of the story is Shop At Sears, Morons.
Posted by: Retread at December 29, 2011 04:39 AM (joSBv)
Posted by: Jean at December 29, 2011 04:39 AM (wwZVW)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 29, 2011 08:36 AM (hO8IJ)
Can you say "foot in the door" to single payer?
Posted by: Catleen Sebullius at December 29, 2011 04:39 AM (i3+c5)
Vic should grab a drink before reading this, however, because he endorses Gingrich.
Posted by: Y-not at December 29, 2011 04:41 AM (5H6zj)
I also never fill the tank in the house and keep the stored kerosene well away from any open flames.
This! Visited my cousin last week and he has his storage container in the house with a funnel. I said "Cuz', you don't fill that in here do you?"
We have kerosene in the living room and propane for the house with the oil-filled in two bedrooms near draft points. Our heater for the house rarely kicks on. 2 gallons of kerosene lasts us 4 days and the house is toasty during the daytime and cool when we sleep as the stove (and electric heaters) is never on when unattended.The cat loves it! We will try and go to wood next year and cut heating costs further.
Posted by: Cicerokid at December 29, 2011 04:41 AM (Mf7mf)
Posted by: Jean at December 29, 2011 04:42 AM (wwZVW)
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 08:31 AM (YdQQY)
More primary seasons like 2011-12, and those smoke-filled rooms will even start looking good by comparison. :-)
Thanks for the clarification on SC, Vic.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at December 29, 2011 04:42 AM (hcJkV)
The point is, your experience is not much different than what other employers are already doing right now, even in the absence of the mandate.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 04:44 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Y-not at December 29, 2011 08:41 AM (5H6zj)
LOL, I did read that this morning. I may be grabbing a drink later on today since I weaseled out of the chemo this week.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 04:45 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 29, 2011 04:45 AM (niZvt)
Vic should grab a drink before reading this, however, because he endorses Gingrich.
Posted by: Y-not at December 29, 2011 08:41 AM (5H6zj)
Well of course Sowell endorses Gingrich, they are two academics.
Hi Y-not!
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 04:46 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 08:44 AM (s7mIC)
I'm pretty sure the part where if I don't prove it then I face a fine is a big difference.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 29, 2011 04:46 AM (TpXEI)
It struck me as a very intellectually lazy article, to be frank. I'm glad he rejects Romney, but I don't really see that he made the case for it being down to Newt as the only other choice.
I realize Sowell is supposed to be a deep thinker, but where is the evidence of that in that article?
Posted by: Y-not at December 29, 2011 04:47 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 06:49 AM (YdQQY)
11%. Congress has an eleven percent approval rating.
Posted by: Cicerokid at December 29, 2011 04:48 AM (Mf7mf)
He's playing the "electability" game.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 04:48 AM (YdQQY)
Patients may end up paying for 'free' care
We all knew that requiring insurance companies to pay out 100% on whatever tests you want was unsustainable, but apparently this is a surprise to other people.
("Preventative"? A colonoscopy prevents nothing.)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 29, 2011 04:49 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 29, 2011 04:49 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: In Unexpecteed News... at December 29, 2011 04:49 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: Jean at December 29, 2011 08:42 AM (wwZVW)
Agree that this is probably the best (and maybe only) mechanism for reversal of the misinterpretation of the CC, but I expect it would take a generation to do given all the vested establishment interests aligned with keeping it as is.
Posted by: Hrothgar at December 29, 2011 04:50 AM (i3+c5)
Well in my case if I am not insured then I may lose my job.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 04:50 AM (s7mIC)
This caught my eye from Sowell's Random Thoughts page:
Talk show host Dennis Miller said, "I don't dig polo. It's like miniature golf meets the Kentucky Derby."
Miller is wrong. Polo is really very exciting (especially indoor/collegiate polo). It's like hockey with 1000 lb players.
Posted by: Y-not at December 29, 2011 04:50 AM (5H6zj)
11%. Congress has an eleven percent approval rating.
Posted by: Cicerokid at December 29, 2011 08:48 AM (Mf7mf)
The congressional approval rating, like the 'is the country on the right/wrong track' question, is pretty meaningless. The question is too broad.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 29, 2011 04:51 AM (TpXEI)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 29, 2011 08:49 AM (hO8IJ)
If you do it when you are supposed to do it it CAN prevent cancer by eliminating the colon polyps before they become cancerous.
It is a whole lot cheaper to do one of those every ten years than it is to to do a colon resection and 6 months worth of chemo.
I learned this the hard way.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 04:51 AM (YdQQY)
This log home is heated with K1, (and pellet stove) since heating fuel can't be stored outside in the winter here, it turns to apple jelly.
It was 4 degrees at 6 AM here with a -10 WC.
Posted by: ontherocks at December 29, 2011 04:52 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 29, 2011 04:53 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Y-not at December 29, 2011 04:53 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 08:50 AM (s7mIC)
Do you really not see the difference between a private employer requiring something and the state requiring something?
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 29, 2011 04:54 AM (TpXEI)
It was talked about in the comments yesterday.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 04:56 AM (YdQQY)
Morning, all!
I'm not even going to preface this one with a witty comment. I'm just going to come flat out and say it.
What. The. FUCK. Are we still doing in the UN?
UN Orders flags lowered to half-staff to mark the funeral of Kim Jong Il
(Reuters) - U.N. offices around the world lowered their flags to half-staff to mark the funeral of North Korean leader Kim Jong-il on Wednesday in a move the world body said was routine but which prompted objections from some human rights activists.
In New York, where the flag outside U.N. headquarters was lowered, spokesman Eduardo del Buey said the gesture had been requested by Pyongyang's U.N. mission but was normal for the funeral of any head of state.
"It's a matter of protocol," he said...
Why would I expect anything but this? Seriously, am I insane?
H/T Weasel Zippers.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at December 29, 2011 04:57 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 29, 2011 04:57 AM (niZvt)
I also never fill the tank in the house and keep the stored kerosene well away from any open flames.
Posted by: Hrothgar at December 29, 2011 08:32 AM (i3+c5)
I wish everybody who owned a kerosene heater was as careful as you- I would have gotten a lot more sleep in the 70's and seen a lot less sadness.
Posted by: Nighthawk at December 29, 2011 04:57 AM (OtQXp)
Well in my case my employer is the state.
But the point here is that you are complaining about being forced to prove that you have health insurance, and blaming it on Mitt Romney, when that same scenario already exists for a lot of people who are not subject to a mandate.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 04:58 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 29, 2011 04:59 AM (i6RpT)
In Iowa, Obama toils while GOP roars, then departs
Even the low-information voters know the SCOAMF is in Hawaii on vacation.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 29, 2011 04:59 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 29, 2011 05:00 AM (niZvt)
But it does. They remove the polyps as part of the colonoscopy.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 05:00 AM (YdQQY)
So a regular Thursday then.
Posted by: DaveA at December 29, 2011 08:20 AM (aHWbA)
Belly laughs like this is why I come to this place.
Posted by: Aunt Cranky at December 29, 2011 05:01 AM (JoeF6)
Yup. Getting a colonoscopy does not PREVENT polyps from forming in the future.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 29, 2011 05:01 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 29, 2011 05:02 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at December 29, 2011 05:02 AM (nOFwj)
Ah well see I work for a private company and this is a wide gulf of difference between the two.
But the point here is that you are complaining about being forced to prove that you have health insurance, and blaming it on Mitt Romney, when that same scenario already exists for a lot of people who are not subject to a mandate.
No, the point is that the state is forcing my employer to take arcane measures to protect themselves. I already waived coverage with them, they know that. They want employees who waive coverage to sign a statement to cover their own asses in case I claim to the state I didn't get offered health insurance. They wouldn't give a shit otherwise. It's the result of overreach of the government. The only thing this law has done is hassle the law-abiding.
The fact that other people have this is meaningless. They can choose to work for those employers. My only option is to pack up and leave the state and hope this law doesn't go national.Your rejoinder is, "Oh, it isn't such a big deal." Well, to me it is.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 29, 2011 05:06 AM (TpXEI)
It struck me as a very intellectually lazy article, to be frank. I'm glad he rejects Romney, but I don't really see that he made the case for it being down to Newt as the only other choice.
He couched it in terms of candidates that he considered actually had a chance to win the nomination. From his column:
"Barring some astonishing surprise, the contest for the Republican nomination for president boils down to Mitt Romney versus Newt Gingrich. It is doubtful whether either of them is anyone's idea of an ideal candidate or a model of consistency."
From reading the piece it seems that he isn't particularly enamored with either of them but he's decided to choose the one that he considers has the greater accomplishments.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at December 29, 2011 05:07 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at December 29, 2011 05:07 AM (OBDWE)
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 09:00 AM (YdQQY)
Vic is correct.
Posted by: billygoat at December 29, 2011 05:07 AM (6DDE+)
Aunt Cranky -- did you see the thread which contained the HK, AR-15 clone?
Posted by: billygoat at December 29, 2011 05:09 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at December 29, 2011 09:02 AM (nOFwj)
And, up to 70 for the rest of the year.
Posted by: Beefy Meatball at December 29, 2011 05:10 AM (E7yM+)
How much of Rick Perry's support here comes from the fact that he is a fellow Southerner? And not just physically, but culturally - he has the Southern drawl, he has a typical Southern story (grew up poor, went to a big-name state university, joined the military, devout Christian, good family man), he has that down-home want-to-have-a-beer-with-him feel about him. I suppose Newt and Luap Nor are technically Southerners but they do not exude the same cultural "Southern-ness" that Rick Perry does. And if we are to throw "electability" concerns aside, as we are instructed to do in the case of Mitt Romney, then why not support someone like Bachmann or Santorum, who are definitely "purer" ideologically than Rick Perry is? I think the answer, deep down, is because they aren't Southerners and so they don't share the same cultural affinity with a lot of people here who are from the South.
Now I don't think that explains the entire thing, after all Ace endorsed Perry and Ace is hardly a Southerner, but I do think it is something to think about.
I don't mean to offend, I openly confess I am not a Southerner and, to be honest, I do get a little irritated when certain Southerners try to hoodwink me with their folksy ways. And so that is a bit of the resistance that I feel with Rick Perry.
Anyway, your thoughts.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 05:10 AM (s7mIC)
Actually, I get that. My father was slightly pissed at us when we all turned up to visit him in FL. He actually asked, "You're here because I'm dying, right?"
Posted by: Retread at December 29, 2011 05:11 AM (joSBv)
A colonoscopy procedure involves removal of polyps that appear suspicious and flags your predilection to having more polyps that may appear in the future. As far as I know, it is the only way to assess the presence and extent of colon cancer.
Not a doctor, but have far less colon that I once had.
Posted by: Hrothgar at December 29, 2011 05:14 AM (i3+c5)
Thank you for that.
Who would know, if you din't read this blog?
Posted by: franksalterego at December 29, 2011 05:15 AM (9XykO)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at December 29, 2011 05:15 AM (nOFwj)
Polo is really very exciting (especially indoor/collegiate polo). It's like hockey with 1000 lb players.
Posted by: Y-not at December 29, 2011 08:50 AM (5H6zj)
Polo is a rough game. I didnÂ’t think the wife would like it, but now we try to get to a few matches every year.
Posted by: jwest at December 29, 2011 05:16 AM (8moZm)
My support is based on the fact that he will definitely go after Obama instead of playing nice, he is a military veteran (which I think important in a CIC when we are at war), his track record on job creation (actually not destroying jobs is a better way of putting it) and the fact that he will push for drilling in the Gulf and other places so that we will have a reliable domestic source of oil. Also he will support Israel and not insult the UK.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 29, 2011 05:17 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at December 29, 2011 05:18 AM (zxrQh)
Seeing this info graphic (from Business Insider) about what happens on the Net every 60 seconds, is eye opening. SOPA will inhibit some of this activity greatly, and without ever touching a bad actor, an intentional thief pirate. It will impact site operators greatly, which will trickle down to box all of us. Additionally, just think if you could monetize that email count! Here is the graphic: http://tinyurl.com/br886eu
Posted by: Errol at December 29, 2011 05:18 AM (vewos)
I think it's a lot more simple than that. Perry's the governor of a very conservative state and his state's done very well economically. If the roles were reversed I believe many more people would be on the Bachmann/Santorum bandwagon. In short I don't think culture has as much to do with this as you believe; if it did, Perry would be polling a lot better in the southern primary states.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at December 29, 2011 05:18 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 29, 2011 05:22 AM (i6RpT)
Aunt Cranky -- did you see the thread which contained the HK, AR-15 clone?
Our roommate posted a pic of it on my Facebook wall. People know me too well....lol.
Posted by: Aunt Cranky at December 29, 2011 05:23 AM (JoeF6)
Not at all for me. I started out supporting Bachmann until she went off the koo-koo-for-garicil-puffs train.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 05:24 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at December 29, 2011 05:24 AM (nOFwj)
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 05:26 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Aunt Cranky at December 29, 2011 05:26 AM (JoeF6)
Nearly all of the Republican primary voters I know want Perry to win (youngest college age brother is a Nor Luap cultist, oh well, at least he's not a liberal) and I'm in NY. Granted, I've been shilling for Perry hard since he got in so I've probably had an undue influence on those I know. The Southern thing is true to an extent though, but not the way you mean. I usually find Republicans around here genuinely like Perry, but are afraid that the media will use his accent to make him out to be a Bush clone.
Posted by: mugiwara at December 29, 2011 05:26 AM (hGb5f)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at December 29, 2011 05:29 AM (nOFwj)
Anyway, your thoughts.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 09:10 AM (s7mIC)
I doubt it has as much to do with it as you seem to think it does. I'm from the Deep South and have lived there my whole life except 6 years in New Hampshire and now a year and a half in Virginia (I'm in my early 50s), and it's got virtually zero to do with why I'm supporting him. He's been a successful and mostly conservative governor of a huge state for a lot of years. He can do the job. Period. I could care less what state he's from. As for "being a Southerner" is concerned, I expect a lot of people from the Deep South wouldn't consider someone from Texas a "Southerner" anyway...they'd first think of him as a Texan or westerner or some such. (shrug) Short answer...it's got nothing to do with me supporting him; others would have to speak for themselves.
Posted by: davidinvirginia at December 29, 2011 05:29 AM (hcJkV)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at December 29, 2011 05:30 AM (nOFwj)
Posted by: Jones at December 29, 2011 05:31 AM (8sCoq)
How much of Rick Perry's support here comes from the fact that he is a fellow Southerner?
Tough question for me. I'm not from the south, but lived in Texas for 4 years and Louisiana for 2 years now.
There are characteristics about Southerners that I like and respect.
For instance, it's not just that Perry was in the military, it's how he's reached out to injured vets (will try to find a link).
I have nothing against candidates from other places. Was never convinced about Bachmann and she said the Guardisil thing and that was that. I don't have anything against Santorum specifically. I lived in New Jersey went he was in PA and he's just never been very interesting.
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 29, 2011 05:32 AM (XdlcF)
Two unrelated stories that made me chuckle.
1) Chavez: America Might Be Spreading Cancer as a Weapon (Bloomberg)
Chavez, speaking a day after Argentine President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner was diagnosed with thyroid cancer, said the Central Intelligence Agency was behind chemical experiments in Guatemala in the 1940s and that itÂ’s possible that in years to come a plot will be uncovered that shows the U.S. spread cancer as a political weapon against its critics.
“It’s very difficult to explain, even with the law of probabilities, what has been happening to some of us in Latin America,” Chavez said in a nationally televised speech to the military. “Would it be so strange that they’ve invented technology to spread cancer and we won’t know about it for 50 years?”
Wow. Someone should send him a spray bottle of vinegar to break up the evil chemtrails America is using to afflict world leaders with cancer.
2) Time to unoccupy? Occupy Santa Fe leaders ready to pack up Railyard camp, citing drunks and conflicts (The Santa Fe New Mexican)
"I wouldn't say it's reached the end of its usefulness because obviously the physical occupation and the willingness of activists to put their bodies out there 24/7 continues to be a really strong statement," he said.
"It's mostly that the Occupy movement is picking up and having to deal with problems our society does not deal with — specifically in this case homelessness and drug and alcohol addiction — and that's made the camp have to spend so much energy on those issues. ... It's made the political encampment very difficult."
Oh really? Oh you poor dears. Excuse me while I drip lemon juice in my eyes to try and conjure some tears to shed on your behalf.
(H/T WZ for both stories)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at December 29, 2011 05:33 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Polliwog, Teahada hobbit at December 29, 2011 05:33 AM (AhUir)
But you repeat yourself.
Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at December 29, 2011 05:35 AM (VdvP/)
-----
Born in PA of MA parents, grew up in MD, schooled in VT, got married to a New Englander and lived in IL, MA, TX, IN, CA, and UT.
Why this fixation on regionalism? Looking for a(nother) reason to dismiss him or us?
Posted by: Y-not at December 29, 2011 05:36 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Jones at December 29, 2011 05:36 AM (8sCoq)
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - New claims for unemployment benefits rose more than expected last week, a government report showed on Thursday, but the underlying trend continued to point to improving labor market conditions.
Initial claims for state unemployment benefits increased 15,000 to a seasonally adjusted 381,000, the Labor Department said. The prior week's claims data was revised up to 366,000 from the previously reported 364,000.
Of course it is, and your chocolate ration is increasing, comrades!
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 29, 2011 05:37 AM (1Jaio)
Many similarities to Palin, including the willingness to shoot a gun. At an animal!!1!
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 29, 2011 05:37 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Rochelle, Rochelle at December 29, 2011 05:39 AM (WI2om)
How much of Rick Perry's support here comes from the fact that he is a fellow Southerner?
I don't care where a candidate comes from, what their religion is, what color they are or if they have a hoohah instead of a peepee. As long as their political beliefs are aligned with mine.
Posted by: Jones at December 29, 2011 05:39 AM (8sCoq)
If you go too far west in your hunt for a viable R candidate, you hit the Left Coast. The midwest and upper midwest has been largely Dem for quite a while, though change is in the air.
So that takes the search for viable conservative Rs to below the Mason-Dixon line, or the emptier Western states.
I'm just speaking in generalities. There's plenty of possible exceptions like Scott Walker.
Posted by: GnuBreed at December 29, 2011 05:40 AM (ENKCw)
Posted by: Y-not at December 29, 2011 09:36 AM (5H6zj)
Why do you think I am dismissing you? that hurt.
I think that culture plays a stronger influence than we are likely to give it credit for. That is why I think many mushy-headed moderates are turned off by conservatives: not because they disagree with conservatives on the issues per se, but because they perceive conservatives as being "icky" on some cultural barometer (redneck Bible-thumping hayseeds, or something).
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 05:40 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Rochelle, Rochelle at December 29, 2011 05:42 AM (WI2om)
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - New claims for unemployment benefits rose more than expected last week, a government report showed on Thursday, but the underlying trend continued to point to improving labor market conditions.
I guess "more than expected" is the new "unexpectedly."
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at December 29, 2011 05:42 AM (4df7R)
I really contest that Texas is "very conservative." I moved there from Massachusetts in the early 90s and lived there about 6.5 years. It felt quite balanced to me.
Utah (where I live now) is a very conservative state. Texas is a red state with a strong Democrat party.
Posted by: Y-not at December 29, 2011 05:42 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Jones at December 29, 2011 05:42 AM (8sCoq)
However, another portion of the blame comes from those of us (myself being one) who tend to avoid confrontation and so keep silent when the stupidity is being pushed in family and social gatherings. I am trying to speak up a bit, but it is very hard to do in my family, since the democrat portion is very loud and wants to bully you into submission.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 29, 2011 05:44 AM (GoIUi)
Your are who your friends are
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 29, 2011 09:22 AM (i6RpT)
I'm sure that the MFM will be all over no where near that story
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 29, 2011 05:45 AM (1Jaio)
Oh really? Oh you poor dears. Excuse me while I drip lemon juice in my eyes to try and conjure some tears to shed on your behalf.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at December 29, 2011 09:33 AM (4df7R)Okay that made me snort. That's a big deal around here.
Posted by: Aunt Cranky at December 29, 2011 05:45 AM (JoeF6)
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 09:40 AM (s7mIC)
This is very true. The Left in this country OWNS cultural bias. They perceive a southern accent as evidence of mental retardation. Recall that famous cartoon in the New Yorker that showed no signs of civilization west of the Hudson River.
Posted by: Jones at December 29, 2011 05:45 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Aunt Cranky at December 29, 2011 09:23 AM (JoeF6)
HEH!
Posted by: billygoat at December 29, 2011 05:47 AM (6DDE+)
Gee, you acknowledged in your post that it was an offensive question.
You appear to be casting about - without any data as a foundation - for a reason to explain why people could possibly support a candidate you dismiss.
If you had come with some polls (even with their flaws) showing that Perry's support is primarily from southerners and then asked us Perry supporters if that was the factor in our support, that might be one thing. But without any data to suggest that his support was regionalism you assumed that it was his regional ties that drew his support.
If you want to admit you have problems with Texans or Southerners, that's one thing.
If you want to know why we support Perry, that's another.
But that's not what you asked. You asked us to confess to our irrational reasons for supporting him.
Posted by: Y-not at December 29, 2011 05:48 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Rochelle, Rochelle at December 29, 2011 05:49 AM (WI2om)
The Left in this country OWNS cultural bias. They perceive a southern accent as evidence of mental retardation.
When we moved to Louisiana it was fall--hunting season, that is. I was used to seeing people out and about in hunting gear, but there were also some men walking around stores and malls wearing overalls.
I'd never seen people just wearing them around. While fixing machinery, okay, but other than that, it was on TV and it was a visual cue for someone dumb and Southern, right?
Now I'm used to it. Almost.
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 29, 2011 05:50 AM (XdlcF)
Thankfully, my family is almost entirely conservative. That said, I'm frequently in social positions where I'm outnumbered by Libs. I've been around too long to be nice...I usually just go for their throats in any argument...not trying to convert and / or win friends.
Posted by: billygoat at December 29, 2011 05:50 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 09:40 AM (s7mIC)
Pure brainwash. Rinse and repeat.
You are projecting your own reservations on others since you are either not really conservative or are in the midst of a conversion.
I'm from the NE (over 50yrs) and my only concerns about Perry are
1 is he a real conservative?
2 can he articulate it in such a way so as to move the squishy middle regardless of the MFM's constant attacks, since so far he makes W sound like a Rhodes Scholar?
Posted by: ontherocks at December 29, 2011 05:54 AM (HBqDo)
Empty? Colorado is chock full of awesome
Posted by: Jones at December 29, 2011 09:42 AM (8sCoq)
I said I was speaking in generalities, and by emptier I meant population wise. I knew I cast my net too big.
Tell me the name a good conservative Colorado GOPer I need to keep my eye on for future national office? Honestly I can't think of one.
Posted by: GnuBreed at December 29, 2011 05:55 AM (ENKCw)
Mugiwara's friend: "So you're voting for Romney, right?"
Mugiwara: "Meh, he's far better than Obama, but the bar is set pretty low. I guess I'll vote for him in the unlikely scenario that NY comes into play, but I'll probably just vote third party and hope Obama gets defeated in the states that matter."
Another scenario, Mugiwara's friend: "So you're voting for Perry, right?"
Mugiwara: "Hells yes! It's about damn time the GOP nominated a candidate I can feel good about voting for!"
I have these friends. Substitute Romney with McCain and you have the conversations I had with them in 2008. Give the base a candidate they can get fired up about, and you win the squishes. Give us another McCain, and 2012 becomes a hell of a lot harder to win over the moderates.
Posted by: mugiwara at December 29, 2011 05:56 AM (hGb5f)
Posted by: real joe at December 29, 2011 05:58 AM (w7Lv+)
Anyway, your thoughts.
Folksy ways are not something we use to hoodwink people with. It is how we are. I lived ,many years 'up north' and realize the perceptions. I think a lessened amount of rudeness is a positive. Now, we will still knife you in the back, but with a little honey-drip.
Ask the Texas Trial Lawyers about Perry.
Posted by: Artruen at December 29, 2011 06:00 AM (fDGF1)
>>Why do you think I am dismissing you? that hurt.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 09:40 AM (s7mIC)
And do yourself a favor, don't get "hurt". That's a weakness that leftists exploit while they encourage you to emote about injustice and other failures of capitalism, even as they are organizing a permanent strangling "hurt" to western culture and advanced living standards.
Posted by: ontherocks at December 29, 2011 06:03 AM (HBqDo)
If you want a fun book written by doctors for doctors try the "Placebo Chronicles". The anecdotes are hilarious. Lots of xrays with really strange things stuck up people's butts.
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at December 29, 2011 09:29 AM (nOFwj)
Years ago, I read a book by Howard Stern I know, I know ...
Anyway, he related a story a Doctor friend told him. A man presented at the ER with extreme pain in his lower colon. The reason? In an attempt to create a custom sex toy, he had performed a headstand against a wall, while his boyfriend poured Sakrete into his bunghole. It dried, and because your colon is not a smooth thub, it didn't come out they way they had anticipated. Hours later, with the aid of a local, muscle relaxants, an enema tube, etc., the Sakrete was removed. In it were embedded 3 ping pong balls the couple had forgotten were up there.
Truth is stranger than fiction. Every time.
Posted by: Josef K. at December 29, 2011 06:03 AM (7+pP9)
Thankfully, my family is almost entirely conservative. That said, I'm frequently in social positions where I'm outnumbered by Libs. I've been around too long to be nice...I usually just go for their throats in any argument...not trying to convert and / or win friends.
Posted by: billygoat at December 29, 2011 09:50 AM (6DDE+)
In my experience, this is the best way to turn moderates into conservatives. It sucks for me, because my more liberal friends now avoid political arguments around me knowing I will mercilessly mock their retarded positions, but I have managed to pull a few fence sitters over to our side. There's nothing the fence sitters enjoy more than watching someone get skewered, that's why the liberals love to employ mock and ridicule, the only real trump to win the non-ideological fence sitters is stirring in a little reason alongside the mock and ridicule, of which the liberals have none of, they rely on you keeping silent.
Posted by: mugiwara at December 29, 2011 06:05 AM (hGb5f)
I knew my question had the potential to be perceived as offensive, that is why I posted the disclaimer, but when viewed analytically, I did not think it was an offensive question though.
But without any data to suggest that his support was regionalism you assumed that it was his regional ties that drew his support.
Now you are stretching too far what I actually wrote. I inquired about how much cultural influences had on his support. I didn't assume it was due SOLELY to him being from Texas. I even admitted Ace isn't a Southerner and yet he endorsed Perry. I agree he has an impressive record and that Texas has done quite well economically. I know you are a strong supporter of him even though you are not a Southerner. I know there is support for him that doesn't involve regional ties. I was asking a question, in the spirit of openness I thought, among people here on this blog (not some national poll), how much cultural influences had to play.
Now I will confess that my question was a little bit passive-aggressive, yes. I am irritated that there are quite a few people in the tank for Perry who say "don't fall for the 'electability' myth" when it comes to Romney, but who simultaneously say "I can't support Santorum, he couldn't even win his own state!!!" (i.e., not electable). There does seem to be a double standard.
And I will also say that there are some things about the South that I just don't get. I don't understand the worship of firearms, for instance. I am a Yankee, and a city-slicker to boot. Do I bear some prejudice against the South? Maybe a little, sure.
But it was not at all my intention to demand that you or anyone else "confess" to "irrational reasons" for supporting him. Please don't get defensive about it. Even for someone to support him for the sole reason that he is from Texas isn't really irrational, anyway - it is rational tribalism, the idea that someone from one's own tribe can be trusted more than someone from another tribe.
So it appears I offended you Y-not, and I am sorry about that.
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 06:06 AM (s7mIC)
Under Mayor Bloomberg, New York’s nothing like the Bible Belt, of course — it’s much less civilized and much more repressive.. And just like black people visiting the South in the 1930s, gun owners today need to realize that irrational prejudice and legal persecution are a risk when visiting these benighted places. This is why we need national civil rights laws to protect gun owners wherever they go.
Assuming y'all can find his blog without me linking it...scroll below the chart...
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 29, 2011 06:06 AM (XdlcF)
Yeah, but you live in Utah County. I know you come up to Salt Lake a lot, but I suspect if you lived in, oh, Park City or Sugarhouse you'd say Utah was merely a very conservative state (no underscore.
Posted by: J. Random Dude at December 29, 2011 06:09 AM (72afg)
ontherocks: please, personal emotions are not a partisan thing
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 06:13 AM (s7mIC)
I grew up in the SF Bay Area, so I grew up around people who hated them. There was one family friend who had them (he wasn't from there, of course) and let me try one out. I was happy to have a little knowledge of them instead of not having a clue which way to point it.
How can I put this? It seems more genuine to me to acknowledge that they are useful tools than to be totally afraid of them and want to ban them.
They are useful tools and sporting, too, so people collect them, use them, want more, etc.
My mom still thinks they are yucky and rolls her eyes about her Texas neighbors who love them. I finally flat out told her she should have one when she goes on walks miles from other humans but with lots of wild animals. Deadly wild animals. Lots of deadly wild animals.
I've never hunted and probably never will. I eat meat though, so I can't think that I'm better in any way than those who actually kill their own.
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 29, 2011 06:16 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at December 29, 2011 06:16 AM (EV5/9)
>>ontherocks: please, personal emotions are not a partisan thing
Posted by: chemjeff at December 29, 2011 10:13 AM (s7mIC)
I do have several cutting responses for the concerns that you express, but I wouldn't want to "hurt" you.
And good luck at the gynecologist.
Posted by: ontherocks at December 29, 2011 06:20 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 29, 2011 06:30 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: BurtTC at December 29, 2011 06:32 AM (Gc/Qi)
Posted by: toby928© at December 29, 2011 06:35 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: chemjeff on the phone at December 29, 2011 06:35 AM (RJzmI)
Posted by: toby928© at December 29, 2011 06:36 AM (GTbGH)
Think Switzerland.
Posted by: real joe at December 29, 2011 06:39 AM (w7Lv+)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 29, 2011 10:30 AM(p7SSh)
Funny how that never gets mentioned on "the city slicker" 11 o'clock news that is usually filled with stories of bad people shooting off those bad guns that hurt people.
Bad bad guns
I know this because I saw it on TV News.
Posted by: ontherocks at December 29, 2011 06:39 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: DarkLord© expects the Spanish Inquisition... at December 29, 2011 06:40 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Maureen Dowd at December 29, 2011 06:41 AM (qE3AR)
When you've got a bunch of people wanting to ban them and constantly lying about "statistics" (see another InstaPundit story today re Denver Post article), then the people who are pro-guns feel the need to be loud about it.
Or shut up about it in real life around people who hate them and then come here and be free to be loud about it!
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 29, 2011 06:42 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at December 29, 2011 06:46 AM (BsXKJ)
Posted by: chemjeff on the phone at December 29, 2011 06:47 AM (RJzmI)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 29, 2011 06:49 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at December 29, 2011 06:51 AM (BsXKJ)
All Proggers are murderous tyrants at heart. They just lack the power to execute it.
Posted by: the banality of evil at December 29, 2011 06:51 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: chemjeff on the phone at December 29, 2011 06:52 AM (RJzmI)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 29, 2011 06:56 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: DarkLord©says Ia! C'thulu ftaghn! at December 29, 2011 06:57 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 29, 2011 07:04 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: chemjeff on the phone at December 29, 2011 10:52 AM (RJzmI)
Don't count me as one of the us that you're talking about dearie.
Lightweights like yourself, that get "hurt" and don't want anyone to get the "wrong idea" about your perceptions of icky conservatives or southerners, are just enabling the totalitarian left with your ridicule of people that understand rights and freedoms, and your failure to recognize those that would take them away more quickly and forcefully without the 2nd amendment.
US?
I'm hurt.
Posted by: ontherocks at December 29, 2011 07:07 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: chemjeff on the phone at December 29, 2011 07:22 AM (RJzmI)
214 “ Hey look you assholes…”
Posted by: chemjeff on the phone at December 29, 2011 11:22 AM (RJzmI)
WasnÂ’t that the title of Dale CarnegieÂ’s first book?
Posted by: jwest at December 29, 2011 07:32 AM (8moZm)
>>Because normal people will be rightly turned off by the stupid.
Posted by: chemjeff on the phone at December 29, 2011 11:22 AM (RJzmI)
I think you meant leftly turned off.
When you get a minute define normal people. I can wait.
That opus will be a real eye opener.
Posted by: ontherocks at December 29, 2011 07:34 AM (HBqDo)
Sorry, I don't buy it.
You, as do many Romney supporters (even the less enthusiastic ones like yourself), assume that the basis for other non-viable candidates' support must be irrational. You guys have done the cold, hard "electability" calculation. Your guy is the "rational" choice. Our guys (or gals) are not.
You may not have called us stupid or cultists the way many of the Romney supporters do (we know who those are) because you're a nice guy, but that is the core of your question. And that's why you apologized in advance for asking it.
If you want to examine the emotional factors going into each of the candidates' bases of support, let's do it. Why not start with dissecting the ones underlying Romney's support, since he's the candidate you favor?
I'm not offended, but I've watched you talk yourself into compromising your principles far too early in this process and I'm calling you on it.
Posted by: Y-not at December 29, 2011 07:41 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: chemjeff on the phone at December 29, 2011 07:50 AM (RJzmI)
Wait, Obama isn't Pol Pot? Gotta tear off that bumper sticker.....
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at December 29, 2011 07:50 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: naturalfake at December 29, 2011 07:52 AM (XBdI0)
Maybe Obama's not Pol Pot, but, given the record number of firearms that have been sold since he took office, many people don't think he's just benign, misguided lib either.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at December 29, 2011 07:55 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 29, 2011 08:00 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: brak at December 29, 2011 08:09 AM (p5Ncj)
and, again in my opinion only, it's not unthinkable for sane people to fear that Obama and Holder's constant drumbeat of race and class warfare is not only encouraging violence, it is condoning it.
So, murder, mass or otherwise, is not out of the realm of possibility.
It might be a good time to put down the shovel and step away from the hole.
Posted by: Carolyn at December 29, 2011 08:11 AM (CQId4)
Posted by: chemjeff on the phone at December 29, 2011 08:12 AM (RJzmI)
And you are a very funny chick.
>>"normal people" = people who can make reasonable historical comparisons,
reasonable is pretty vague for a definition, and whose version of history are you referring to? The History Channel, Pubic Education?
You must be an idealistic and naive youngster.
Posted by: ontherocks at December 29, 2011 08:13 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: the 99% at December 29, 2011 08:18 AM (a4lmz)
Posted by: chemjeff on the phone at December 29, 2011 08:21 AM (RJzmI)
Posted by: chemjeff on the phone at December 29, 2011 08:25 AM (RJzmI)
Posted by: Advo at December 29, 2011 08:29 AM (7vbG1)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 29, 2011 08:31 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: andycanuck at December 29, 2011 08:35 AM (sHY5w)
They've got four legs so they can wear twice as many water wings. Duh!
Posted by: andycanuck at December 29, 2011 08:38 AM (sHY5w)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 29, 2011 08:43 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: chemjeff on the phone at December 29, 2011 12:25 PM (RJzmI)
That was your formulation, I didn't say anything remotely like that, but then you couldn't even get my name right so accuracy apparently is unimportant to you......just feelings, and being one of "us" and how "we" do it and how "we" look.
At some point the important stuff may occur to you if you grow up in time, maybe not.
Whatever
Posted by: ontherocks at December 29, 2011 08:55 AM (HBqDo)
This may sound grade-schoolish, but why not have the state that had the highest percentage voter turnout the previous national election cycle go first? Reward the people who gave a rats-ass with a say in the next election and leave the the people who couldn't be bothered to vote with the limited options?
It's no less meaningful than having the All-Star game determine which league is "Home" for the World Series.
Posted by: dougherty at December 29, 2011 08:59 AM (Gi9d4)
Posted by: chemjeff on the phone at December 29, 2011 09:03 AM (RJzmI)
For sanity's sake, substitute "President X " for "Obama". and "Genocidal Dictator X" for "Pol Pot".
Posted by: Tinfoil Wholesale at December 29, 2011 09:11 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 29, 2011 09:17 AM (p7SSh)
Posted by: NJRob at December 29, 2011 09:29 AM (CJZx5)
Now go back to your survivalist bunker and play with your gold and your guns and STFU for 11 months while the non-crazy among us attempt to persuade the mushy middle that they shouldn't vote for Obama.
Jeff, YOU asked the question. Nobody mentioned Pol Pot before then. Why don't you just call us "bitterclingers" and be done with it? Sheesh.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at December 29, 2011 09:37 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: Mindfulness for Beginners ePub at December 29, 2011 04:39 PM (lpwuJ)
Posted by: Spirit Wars iBooks at December 29, 2011 05:09 PM (YMJ+1)
Posted by: A Brief History of Thought ePub at December 29, 2011 05:19 PM (5VWTg)
Posted by: 18 Minutes AudioBook at December 29, 2011 05:34 PM (he4Ek)
Posted by: Kelley Armstrong Hidden ePub at December 30, 2011 04:34 AM (lr6sw)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.241 seconds, 376 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Good Morning Morons. Its December 29th, 2011. Yes, the year is winding down quickly now. On this day in 1170 Richard Burton Thomas a Becket was murdered in order to rid Henry II of “this troublesome priest”. App 400 years later another version of Henry had his shrine destroyed and looted. Such is history when you mix church and state as was done in the middle ages.
Posted by: Vic at December 29, 2011 02:46 AM (YdQQY)