April 07, 2011
— Gabriel Malor All they are is Hate. All they have is Hate. All they need is Hate. All they want is butternut fudge ice chocolate pickles.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
03:08 AM
| Comments (93)
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
we gave afghanistan a chance, they can go fuck themselves now for all i care.
Posted by: skr8 outta at April 07, 2011 03:12 AM (Hznyf)
Posted by: Talibill at April 07, 2011 03:14 AM (WEWGu)
So, I read all of his twitter posts available, and I discovered that he works for a non-profit and has an adopted (and I believe minority) son and that his grandmother died recently at age 94.
AND HIS WIFE IS A DOCTOR.
That little factoid seems to have escaped Obama. How did I find this out? Henderson tweeted that people should follow his wife. So, I went to her account and read the following:
@barackobama just said my husband's name in a press conference (@jthenderson76). Doesn't the Pres know I have surgery rounds at 4am?
Posted by: Miss Marple at April 07, 2011 03:19 AM (Fo83G)
--and theres reports of rampant voter fraud.
fuck em, they beat my steelers...jus sayin.
Posted by: skr8 outta at April 07, 2011 03:20 AM (Hznyf)
John Edwards on facing jail: 'I'd kill myself first'...
Did he ever mind participating in the process that sent people to jail?
He'll argue that Jail is cruel and unusual punishment and unsuitable for attorneys the likes of himself.
Posted by: by any other name at April 07, 2011 03:25 AM (H+LJc)
any time the vote is close enough to "cheat", the dems will win. A couple thousand more votes will turn up in the trunk of a union members car for kloppy
Posted by: wing at April 07, 2011 03:27 AM (p55Wp)
Posted by: Bugler at April 07, 2011 03:27 AM (VXBR1)
Posted by: skr8 outta at April 07, 2011 07:20 AM (Hznyf)
May as well expect to see this in every election from now on. It can be done (by the Left) with zero fear of any legal penalty whatsoever. The limp dick Republicans almost never lift a finger to stop this shit. Wait until the next presidential election - the margin of fraud our side has to cover will be the biggest ever.
People tell me I'm crazy to dream about doing to a 3rd world country where my vote doesn't count. Well, brothers and sisters, it counts a little less here every damn day. Black Panther thugs are allowed to patrol polling places. The dead vote in record numbers. Bums and street urchins are registered in multiple districts and are bussed from one to another to vote in each.
And if the Left gets its way there will be even more abuse. Just wait until they figure out some way to make voting Sharia compliant. It's only a matter of time. Meanwhile we on the right sit here navel gazing, fearfully watching each other lest any of our number engage in "violent rhetoric." Which we do even as our own so-called leaders are threatened with death by the Left and the media says not a word.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 07, 2011 03:30 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 07, 2011 03:31 AM (RWDbd)
I'd rather not go under the knife of a tweeting surgeon dedicated to her tweet account.
Posted by: by any other name at April 07, 2011 03:31 AM (H+LJc)
When people say bad things will happen if we leave, they mean Al Qaeda will set up shop there again and Muslims, being warlike assholes, will believe that Allah granted them victory over the great Satan, so they will step up their terror attacks.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 07, 2011 03:32 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Truman North at April 07, 2011 03:34 AM (8ay4x)
Posted by: Bugler at April 07, 2011 07:27 AM (VXBR1)
Coming to a major US city near you... (probably Dearborn and Detroit first)
Posted by: Reactionary at April 07, 2011 03:35 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 07, 2011 07:32 AM (uhAkr)
That assumption is not unreasonable. That is why we should use weapons of mass destruction (I vote for nerve gas) to sterilize the entire place. Kill every single one of them. THAT, and that alone, will teach those vermin a lesson. Let the various arabs and persians and everyone else look upon our works and tremble. We have the power to bring upon them wrath and suffering like none they have ever known - as the world has never known. It's long past time we did so.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 07, 2011 03:38 AM (xUM1Q)
I'm looking for a downside here and just can't find one.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 07, 2011 03:40 AM (RWDbd)
........and hire Charlie Gibson as Pentagon spokesman.
Posted by: ontherocks at April 07, 2011 03:40 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Bugler at April 07, 2011 03:41 AM (VXBR1)
Posted by: Bobby Tittiecomb at April 07, 2011 03:43 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: Case at April 07, 2011 03:46 AM (0K+Kw)
Obama is lying, as usual.
Now I would still like to know about that Ed guy in the Obama campaign kick-off ad. I am certain he wasn't just some random guy from north Carolina.
Posted by: Miss Marple at April 07, 2011 03:47 AM (Fo83G)
I wouldn't say 'we can't' win, because we definitely could win. They just won't do what it takes TO win.
Posted by: Tami at April 07, 2011 03:50 AM (VuLos)
True, but the terrorists in those camps are fighting and killing people in Afghanistan, rather than coming into the US or other civilized nations and attacking people here.
Regardless of the consequences, it makes no sense to engage in a fight we can't win. This is such a fight. The longer we stay, the weaker and poorer we become.
We could most definitely win this fight. Whether or not we do is an open question, because winning would require us to do things which are no longer politically correct.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 07, 2011 03:53 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at April 07, 2011 03:54 AM (fjoLg)
Posted by: Bugler at April 07, 2011 03:54 AM (VXBR1)
I wear my hawkish outlook on my sleeve so it pains me to say this but we need to get the fuck out of Afganistan. There is nothing, I mean nothing we can or will do to move that country into the 21st century. Better than 80% of the population can not read nor write their own lanquages. Will it become again a haven for crazed religious idiological fools? Without a doubt and when it does we address it head on - warheads on foreheads like. Then we move on. Pack our shit and put the weapons back in the box until it's time to bring the weapons back out.
Posted by: Talibill at April 07, 2011 03:55 AM (WEWGu)
Posted by: Bugler at April 07, 2011 03:58 AM (VXBR1)
-- depends on what "fight" you're talking about.
we can win the ground fighting sure. the real battle was trying to make a 'region' into a 'country', and it just aint happening. afghanistan is a lost cause, let em rot.
the best we could do is stop all migrations from there to our country. stop all help to whatever low-life government may be in place and to the people there. the paki-tribal areas are basically the same, a wasteland.
personally, i think 9/11 was al qaeda's big moment, i doubt anything will happen on that scale again. were more vigilant despite our political bickering these days, although of course some could argue that.
Posted by: skr8 outta at April 07, 2011 04:00 AM (Hznyf)
I have thought this since I heard about the rules of engagement being changed. MY opinion is that we hang on and get a new CIC and then actually wage war to win.
Base your primary vote on who you think will do this.
Posted by: Miss Marple at April 07, 2011 04:01 AM (Fo83G)
Posted by: Bugler at April 07, 2011 04:02 AM (VXBR1)
Posted by: How's the Coffee? at April 07, 2011 04:07 AM (HGMGA)
Posted by: Case at April 07, 2011 04:11 AM (0K+Kw)
Just want to point out for those saying we should leave Afghanistan, that Obama WANTS that.
Thanks Miss Marple for pointing out that I have something in common with president present. I'll go cut my wrist now.
Posted by: Talibill at April 07, 2011 04:15 AM (WEWGu)
If the Senate cannot even pass a resolution supporting their own Constitutionally enshrined duty to declare war, we are boned.
If we cannot discern that multiculturalism is a racist attack on our very civilization, then we are boned.
If we continue to place our troops in harm's way with no intention of letting them "win" (and actually refusing to define "win"), then we are boned.
If we cannot trust even our local government officials to conduct elections without fraud, we are boned.
If our federal officials are busy feathering their own elite group of betters with our tax dollars and NEVER called to account, then we are boned.
When I cannot find a article in my house or on my property that has not been taxed, specified, or regulated by some gevernment entity, then we are boned.
Other than that it looks like a nice day.
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 07, 2011 04:16 AM (DCpHZ)
Posted by: Case at April 07, 2011 08:11 AM (0K+Kw)
Amen. If an enemy in war is willing to live with a set of rules that make the event less inhumane, I'm all for that. There were some things even the Nazis and the Japanese wouldn't do, and we reciprocated. But these muz vermin will do absolutely anything. There is no line of depravity they have not crossed. Kill them with whatever tool gets the job done, and the more horribly they die the better.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 07, 2011 04:18 AM (xUM1Q)
Regards H
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 07, 2011 04:19 AM (DCpHZ)
Posted by: Talibill at April 07, 2011 04:19 AM (WEWGu)
Looks like Rev. Al has friends in high places.
President Obama, embroiled in a furious battle over the federal budget, swept into New York last night for a star-studded celebration of the Rev. Al Sharpton's National Action Network and gave the beaming civil-rights leader a rousing slap on the back.
"Some things have changed a lot since 1991. I told Rev. Al backstage he's getting skinnier than me," the president joked about his formerly portly pal during a keynote address celebrating the 20th anniversary of Sharpton's organization.
"But he hasn't lost his style," Obama said.
The president heartily embraced the once-embattled reverend with a handshake and a hug at the Sheraton Hotel & Towers in Midtown before addressing a crowd of about 600, including such luminaries as Bill Cosby, Magic Johnson, Stevie Wonder, David Dinkins, Spike Lee and Martin Luther King III.
Administration officials such as Attorney General Eric Holder, Education Secretary Arne Duncan and Housing and Urban Development head Shaun Donovan were also on hand.
"The other thing that hasn't changed is the National Action Network's commitment to fight injustice and inequality here in New York City and across America," Obama gushed.
"That's not only a testament to Reverend Sharpton. It's a testament to all of you who are here tonight. I want to commend you for the work that you've done over the last two decades."
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at April 07, 2011 04:22 AM (4dY5n)
And another thing: Where in the hell is our front runner to put against the one? Will someone please suit up and step to the plate. I find it almost unbearable that Mitt and the Donald is the best we can field.
Posted by: Talibill at April 07, 2011 04:26 AM (WEWGu)
So I can expect to see UN troops here in the US guarding the Mexican border?
Posted by: Snorting the NPR butt hash so you won't have to at April 07, 2011 04:28 AM (F/4zf)
Regards H
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 07, 2011 08:19 AM (DCpHZ)
LOL. I've skated the edge of banning a few times, I'm sure, but I do what I can to make certain ideas OK to talk about. You'd be surprised (I was) at how many folks out there are ready to unleash biblical-style apocalypse on those people - but are afraid to say anything in "polite" company. I think the politically correct scolds in this country have cowed most people into making only the approved statements, for fear of losing their jobs or property or domestic tranquility. Thus we don't talk about what is really on everyone's mind.
So, that said, the right solution for the muslim problem is the final solution.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 07, 2011 04:28 AM (xUM1Q)
just an idea to toss out there. i have to delve into the politics of the region more for a more well rounded opinion. what do you guys think? am i on a decent track here?
Posted by: skr8 outta at April 07, 2011 04:29 AM (Hznyf)
Interpretation: “get used to it, and stop whining”
Obama: “We’ve got to have a sustained energy policy that is consistent”
Interpretation: “I’m working to shut down all US energy”
Obama: “There is no magic formula to driving gas prices down.”
Interpretation: “I’m clueless”
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at April 07, 2011 04:30 AM (tvs2p)
Donald Trump, tied for 2nd among republican candidates and within the margin of error with Romney.
Deutch just said that the American public doesn't care about the brither stuff. Trump is saying "the issue is very serious and you know it's very serious". "I've dealt successfully with politicians and people from other countries". "I always start off by saying I went to a great college etc etc cause frankly anybody who gets labeled a birther, the way the president uses it, is not a very nice term" "the grandmother in Kenya is on record that he was born in Kenya" "There's not one record in any hospital in hawaii that Barack Hussein Obama was born there" China and OPEC are his main issues. "What China, OPEC are doing to this country is disgraceful" "And I'm telling you there is a major chance that this guy has violated the United States Constitution" "Why has obama spent over two million dollars trying to get away from this issue"
Donney Deutsch brought up that he is arguing with trump's people about a security deposit from an apartment he moved out of. Trump knew all about it and basically said that Deutsch's dog chewed up the molding. Right on the air they made a deal about deutsch fixing the molding. Deutsch then said that everyone should see that he made a deal right on the air and imagine if it was a world leader, the deal would be done.
the last thing said was someone suggested that trump look in the ship registries.
It's was fascinating to watch how these three responded to Trump. He answered their questions directly, no avoidance. At one point, deutsch who is trying to minimize "the birther issue" chided trump about not answering the question. Trump instead was getting his credentials in first and as you can see from above, didn't avoid the question.
I'm told that meredith vieira had an interview with him and that she got more out of him on this issue and Hawaii.
With Trump gone, the next guest Jeremy Scahill from the nation immediately responded saying "can we have someone on to discuss how rumsfeld is a lizard, Donald Trump must have the biggest tin foil hat in the world". You guys have explained tin foil hats to me but I didn't understand the comment about Rumsfeld. However, the fact that the guy was on to talk about the Pentagon and he felt compelled to go back to the birther issue when he was the next segment and wasn't asked about this seems to speak volumes.
Posted by: . at April 07, 2011 04:30 AM (k1rwm)
Dear Mr. Malor,
Our research staff has determined that there is no way with our current technology to produce chocolate pickles of any type with a stable shelf life. We are discussing further research efforts with Nestle.
Posted by: The Vlasic Pickle Stork at April 07, 2011 04:31 AM (canrt)
Posted by: maddogg at April 07, 2011 04:34 AM (OlN4e)
It seems to me that the rationale for point of war is either conquest (land, treasure, or slaves), or it is retribution (righting a grievous wrong). It is never humanitarian.
If it is retribution (as all our games in the ME should be), then the choice is either total annihilation or a level of devastation that makes the survivors think I don't want this again in several lifetimes. Hiroshima and Nagasaki come to mind!
If goat f*ckers want to screw each other over in their own countries based on subtle malleable definitions of a 7th century barbaric religion, I say go to it. If they exhale over their borders, I say bring on the nukes.
A gentleman's war will not suffice for this existential effort.
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 07, 2011 04:37 AM (DCpHZ)
This means that we can expect nothing to happen to those involved.
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at April 07, 2011 04:42 AM (tvs2p)
Posted by: maddogg at April 07, 2011 04:43 AM (OlN4e)
A gentleman's war will not suffice for this existential effort.
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 07, 2011 08:37 AM (DCpHZ)
Well said. Especially in noting that this is an existential conflict. It's them or us. They will never stop trying to destroy us. We will be on the defensive forever, unless we finish it once and for all. Sitting around, waiting for them to figure out how to finally get at us, is a losing proposition.
And, frankly, the war against the Muz should start at home. How can we ever be safe when we let the enemy roam free within our borders? Round 'em up, and get rid of them - one way or another. The constitution should be amended to exempt Islam and all its variants from any form of legal protection. Every mosque and koran in the US and all its possessions should be burned. Every practitioner of that belief system should be removed from our soil.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 07, 2011 04:44 AM (xUM1Q)
I think that you're right.
Someone told me long ago... have you ever seen the rain comin' down on a sunny day? Still I wonder, who'll stop the rain?
When Bush propagandized to take it to them rather than let them bring it here, it sounded reasonable, as did "nation building". How easy was that to get us to swallow, as if fighting a never ending war abroad would prevent Jihadists from terrorizing America from within -- Maj. Hassan @ Ft. Hood, TX. It was whole cloth that America frantically bought from the neoconservatives selling "compassionate conservatism" that effectively exterminated the indigenous ancient Christian populations throughout the ancient world from the Balkans through the Middle East and Africa, and set all peoples at odds in warfare to inaugurate the "promises" from the New World Order globalists. I reluctantly supported Bush's agenda after he ordered invasion, knowing that our military deserve and require America's support when called to war. It's been ten years, and the original promises from Bush have come to naught.
Posted by: by any other name at April 07, 2011 04:50 AM (H+LJc)
You'd be surprised how ineffective nukes can be in mountainous areas without any civil resources. You'd kill a lot of people, but the result would be nothing like "salting the earth." There'd be a lot of survivors, and the whole area would not remain uninhabitable for long -- given very small values of "inhabit," which they have there.
I can't work up an Imperial disdain for the Afghans. They remind me of certain peoples we used to admit having in my country. Don't expect guys who don't watch the Nightly News and tweet snark to share your weltenschau-du-jour. Their estimation of our motivations and prospects are based only on what they see, and might not be far off.
These are some hard old boys who live by their wits alone, such as they are, and backslud on the Prophet quite a few times before that invasion took. Waiting out invaders is what they do, and have been doing since 'time immoral.' Literate, schmiterate; we had plenty illiterates on our side of the Revolution, and my last (I reckon) illiterate relative hasn't been dead all that long. He got along pretty well in the world, too. Got proselytized now and again by Democrats, but carried no abiding commitment to their agenda.
We could learn from the Afghans. And one way or the other, we will.
Posted by: Wrong Side of The Line at April 07, 2011 04:50 AM (W5ilH)
--- but neither will pummeling them into near-extinction. i'd prefer a different solution.
afghanistan is more or less a dumping ground rather than a unified state. everyone there is loyal to this tribe or that tribe, making it near impossible for any type of coalesced govt to take hold. try as they might, they just dont have the foundations for a working nation anymore. so i say fuck the 'nation-building' route and focus primarily right now on the taliban.
the tribal areas of pakistan is the taliban's de facto HQ. its their hide out, the safe house, the place they can run to mommy. well i say we hit mommy real hard, right in the nose to be honest. i think taliban tribalists would loathe pakistani upheaval even more so than afghan strife and thats where our efforts should lie right now.
draining the afghan swamp of the taliban would let the other various groups of afghan warlords bicker, shoot and maim each other to near irrelevancy again, while we should just keep 'watch' to make sure nothing gets TOO out of hand there. the disputes of a burgeoning and developing india towards their neighbors need to be pin pointed. i think we could help out more there politically, while afghanistan is left to die on it's own.
just an idea.
Posted by: skr8 outta at April 07, 2011 04:50 AM (Hznyf)
Outside of Western Civilization, it never helped that America's strictly malleable "policy" which shifts politically at least every election cycle does not correlate within the static Islamic minded world.
It's a tangled web we've woven poetically illustrated in "The Wind and the Lion": To Theodore Roosevelt - you are like the Wind and I like the Lion. You form the Tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the Ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours. - Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates.
Reagan was for the Afghan Tribalism before America decided to be against them.
GW Bush "conquered" al-Qaida in Afghanistan before moving on to flatter lands in Iraq to bring Muslims "democracy", may the majority Sharia rule.
The Pakistani Musharraf Government dealt with the Islamist Jihad by keeping a healthy distance leaving al-Qaida and/or the Taliban the mountains into Afghanistan so long as the terrorists keep out of the cities.
There has never been a reasonable plan by any modern power to conquer that mountainous border tribal territory. Containment has been forfeited as well by native populations who prefer to defer rather than confront terrorism.
Americans who actually imagine that extermination of "the enemy" is a final solution only condemn themselves to hell on earth. Beyond the utter amorality that condemns an entire civilization that would contemplate such a thing, there is no practical way at all to "exterminate" Islamists throughout the world, or from any specific region of the world. Inevitably, the two results would be that the exterminating authoritarians would re-target any undesirables regardless of initial target for elimination; and furthermore, that those targets who manage to survive would most assuredly bring utter destruction to mass populations, specifically killing citizens in the interior of the USA. Poison + Water Supply = Death.
We have no more right to make anyone outside of America into us than anyone has the right to make an American forfeit our sovereign Constitutional Republic.
America is at war with itself. Those running our government are against the US Constitution. Aside from the new Tea Party movement, Americans are also ruining every aspect of what Americans hold dear, Liberty, home, family, food, and the pursuit of happiness with all held equal under Constitutional Law. Americans have the constitutional obligation to uphold the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the only "thing" holding America together, E Pluribus Unum.
We do have the sovereign right to defend our nation, the emphasis beginning within from our BORDERS. Yesterday's news from Mexico is their popular uprising organized against the USA, crying that they've been protecting America's back while the US does nothing for them.
That Jihadists have planted dirty bombs throughout the US is a given. That our own government is absolutely corrupted is a given; it functions "legally" as an elitist authoritarian entity that disregards the Supreme Law of the Land. That it would be foolish to "trust" the intelligence community is a given.
Clean our own house first. Support Michele Bachmann's and Rand Paul's initiatives. Establish security for the Dollar. THAT is the survival of the fittest at hand.
Posted by: by any other name at April 07, 2011 04:53 AM (H+LJc)
--- fuck their 'rights', we can do whatever we want while at war. its not like we're setting up concentration camps over there or anything, i mean come on.
what else should we do? the point is to decrease the threat to our country first and if that means "making" them into something then im all for it. so long as it's not rounding them all up and wasting them ala what the nazis did.
there are other solutions to the problem and other facets of warfare i dont think we've explored fully yet.
Posted by: skr8 outta at April 07, 2011 04:57 AM (Hznyf)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at April 07, 2011 05:02 AM (SB0V2)
--- my liberal friends have sunken into the odd, paranoid-nightmare world the hard left has imagined.
clandestine CIA ops, evil bloodthirsty corporations taking over the world, the rise of the "koch brothers", bilderbergers, aliens, FEMA coffins...its like one big hollywood-str8 to video movie with a shit load of bad actors.
.....its not depressing, its actually hilarious to me.
Posted by: skr8 outta at April 07, 2011 05:07 AM (Hznyf)
“If you’re complaining about the price of gas and you’re only getting 8 miles a gallon, you know,” Obama said laughingly. “You might want to think about a trade-in.”
What an arrogant son of a bitch. Don't like the gas prices get a new car.
Can you imagine the MFM letting Bush get away with an answer like that?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 07, 2011 05:08 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at April 07, 2011 05:09 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at April 07, 2011 05:10 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: by any other name at April 07, 2011 08:53 AM (H+LJc)
Absurd. First, that is effectively how the problem with American Indians was handled - they were diminished until too few were left to effectively resist. They didn't all simply integrate and adopt our way of life.
While it is probably not practical, at this time, to clean the earth, we can certainly clean out the US. We have tools at our disposal that would make the effort much easier than it ever was before. Further, past exterminations, done by those with much baser motives, were not universal affairs. They were targetted, just as ours would be. The idea that suddenly all sorts of people would be rounded up and eliminated is without basis, because the ideology behind the action does not support it.
Finally, it's only a matter of time before the muz hit our water supply. If they could do it at will, they would already have done it. Saying that it's a possibility now, but that somehow they're being nice and holding back, has no basis in reality. Tolerating their presence only gives them more time. A vigorous containment action, done now rather than later, might avert that which is otherwise inevitable.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 07, 2011 05:11 AM (xUM1Q)
America's participation in globalist wars are NOT in America's best interest IF you uphold the Constitution as America's Supreme Law of the Land. Only if you prefer being ruled by the so-called "international community" of global elitists do you feign that wars produce humanitarian ends. I dare say that WWI produced WWII that produced statist nations that have produced the UN and the EU. It isn't as if WWII ended Marxist socialism at all.
Update, there was no such Tunisian PhD whose government denied the right to fish who burnt his life into flames. That was a fabricated story, now an urban myth that successfully enraged "righteous" indignation.
Tunisia, Lebanon, Egypt, Libya, ... exploited by globalists meaning to overwhelm the world into domination.
Don't fool yourself into denying that Western Intelligence and Sharian Jihadists aren't in bed with each other.
Clean our own house. Otherwise, accept being sabotaged from within while our best patriotic youth are exploited abroad, repeatedly re-deployed until broken, and our borders encourage the terrorism and ruin that the wars abroad promised to prevent.
Posted by: by any other name at April 07, 2011 05:13 AM (H+LJc)
There is no way to exterminate an entire population without being more evil than the entity targeted for destruction.
That you'd fool yourself into visions of self-righteous vindication is problematic.
Posted by: by any other name at April 07, 2011 05:16 AM (H+LJc)
Agreed.
Posted by: by any other name at April 07, 2011 05:18 AM (H+LJc)
--- this is the isolationist route, of which i am very sympathetic to. unfortunately for you and me both, the world out there exists, warts and all.
"Update, there was no such Tunisian PhD whose government denied the right to fish who burnt his life into flames. That was a fabricated story, now an urban myth that successfully enraged "righteous" indignation.
Tunisia, Lebanon, Egypt, Libya, ... exploited by globalists meaning to overwhelm the world into domination."
---- huh? you totally lost me there. its early to me and im on my third cup of coffee....
"Don't fool yourself into denying that Western Intelligence and Sharian Jihadists aren't in bed with each other. "
--- i'm not. but that isnt the point i was trying to get across. maybe i havent been making myself clear enough.
"Clean our own house. ......."
--- agreed. we have our own problems also. but this shouldnt stop us from partaking in events that could benefit us overseas. again, im very sympathetic to walling ourselves up and laughing at the rest of the planet, but it's just not gonna happen that way.
Posted by: skr8 outta at April 07, 2011 05:24 AM (Hznyf)
Okay, this one has been steaming me all day and it has gotten very little coverage. Here's the lead in bite:
Two mainstream news organizations are receiving hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars from Obamacare’s Early Retiree Reinsurance Program (ERRP) — a $5 billion grant program that’s doling out cash to companies, states and labor unions in what the Obama administration considers an effort to pay for health insurance for early retirees. The Washington Post Company raked in $573,217 in taxpayer subsidies and CBS Corporation secured $722,388 worth of Americans’ money.
The article is at The Daily Caller, and they are directly calling this ERRP a slush fund. Anyone ever hear of it? Fuckity fuckity fuck. But wait, there's more. It gets a LOT worse:
In addition to CBS Corporation and the Washington Post Company, recipients of ERRP funding include the United Auto Workers union, which secured $206,798,086 in taxpayer money, AT&T, which took in $140,022,949, and General Electric (GE), which raked in $36,607,818. GE has made headlines recently for not paying any U.S. taxes last year. IBM got $12,989,690 in taxpayer money.
Verizon pulled $91,702,538 in taxpayer cash, too, and General Motors received $19,002,669. More than $6 million went to different Teamsters groups nationwide, and millions more went to the United Mine Workers, United Food and Commercial Workers, the AFL-CIO and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME).
The fucking UAW got over $200 million of our fucking tax dollars??? Damn those cocksuckers in DC to hell. And I don't even believe in hell.
Really, I'm not bitter or anything.
Posted by: GnuBreed at April 07, 2011 05:28 AM (ENKCw)
So, that said, the right solution for the muslim problem is the final solution.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 07, 2011 08:28 AM (xUM1Q)
Go fuck yourself, you psychopath.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 07, 2011 05:49 AM (LH6ir)
Go fuck yourself, you psychopath.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 07, 2011 09:49 AM (LH6ir)
You'll be singing a different tune if/when they hit that critical mass needed to start doing in the US what they do everywhere else on earth. Unless, of course, you're willing to bow down to them. Then I guess you won't mind being a slave.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 07, 2011 06:14 AM (xUM1Q)
A full-sized, 90K miles Cadillac V8 gets mid-20's mileage, over 17 in all-town driving. 3/4-ton SUV's get better than 16. Yo,Bama must be driving on E85.
Posted by: Wrong Side of The Line at April 07, 2011 06:20 AM (W5ilH)
People 'love' MO'chelle, which in turn, will be the reason they vote for her dickless, spineless, rotten-pussied, airhead, lazy, money whoring, lying slimeball of a husband.
I was hoping, with all of 'The First Ladies'' attention to our soldiers, you'd see better pay, better base schools, more attention to the USO,etc., etc.
If you ask a soldier (and I've asked the 4 in my family) they will tell you life is worse now then it was a few years ago. The morale, the ROEs, the deployments, etc.
Multifaceted Michelle!Our First Lady has had quite a busy week with her mentoring initiatives while concurrently heading Lets Move. In addition to all of this, The White House says Michelle Obama and the Vice President's wife, Jill Biden, will kick off a national effort on April 12 to increase public support for U.S. service members and their families. The new campaign will focus on four areas: employment, education, wellness and public awareness. Thanks to this administration we have a refined image of military families.
..
A three pronged initiative, while still being a supportive wife and mother. Dare I say, the bar is being raised for First Ladies everywhere!
Posted by: momma at April 07, 2011 06:39 AM (penCf)
Every word you type is just more proof that you are stupid, and a chicken-hawk to boot.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 07, 2011 06:49 AM (LH6ir)
Should have recognized the Taliban as the chosen leaders of the Afghan people, because they were, recognzed that 9-11 was due to the choice of the Afghan people, then killed as many of them fuckers as is needed to get the survivors to forever change their religion...
...but when your primary mission is to deliver care packages to every last fucking one them (and it always has been, ref: Petraeis sp?) and hit the occasional talib, you already lost.
Posted by: Druid at April 07, 2011 06:53 AM (RnujI)
Posted by: elspeth at April 07, 2011 06:55 AM (0AkWH)
Posted by: naturalfake at April 07, 2011 08:00 AM (jkSbV)
A): Come home from everywhere. Let "them" fight it out for themselves.
B): Establish a basic policy that REQUIRES swift, randomly targeted and mindlessly violent punishment raids in the event of any type of attacks upon our citizens or their property.
C): Loop until done.
Posted by: Errol at April 07, 2011 09:15 AM (uAzAD)
It's possible to buy Asics Running Shoes at low price with best price at online sale store. Today, our store supply Cheap Asics Shoes for youth who are like to do any sport/running. So, you can shop your favorite Asics from us. Recommend you Asics Tiger Sale for running or any sport exercise.
Posted by: asics running shoes at April 13, 2011 04:46 PM (K2Fky)
Posted by: bill at April 16, 2011 12:45 AM (yhLBA)
I get some more fresh information from your articles.Great web site Pandora uk ! Let me pay much more awareness in your weblog and bring in the item Pandora Charms sale to be able to my close friends afterwards gucci shoes for women Pandora store. I get some more fresh information from your articles cheap Pandora Charms.
Posted by: pandorauk at April 18, 2011 12:08 AM (56++m)
Cleats are sports shoes that help you maintain balance. They also improve your Soccer Cleats On Salemotion. Their designs are made according to the cleat covers or caps. An important consideration in the design of a soccer cleat is that it is made to keep the player's center of gravity low. This ensures stability. It is also built to keep the players feet as low to the ground as possible. made for the sport you intend. Please, do not buy get them inSoccer Cleats On Sale general merchandise stores or specialized shoe outbaseball game. It is, therefore, very important cleats soccer cleats discount storefor another sport no matter how the salesman tries to convince you they will do the job If you are needs of the sport. Discount Soccer shoesThis means that those that are great for soccer will be inadequate for a not have outsoles. They also do not have mid soles. They are made of various materials like leather and polyurethane and may sometimes have aluminuma soccer player, yobuy are those made for the sport you intend to use them for.Several options are open tosoccer cleats discount store you if you are looking to buy new cleats. You canDiscount Soccer shoes that you ensure the cleats you intend to a good point to bear in mind is that they must be the right size and specifically, they won't. Soccer cleats are different from other cleats in that they do lets. You can also get them online. However,u'll agree that this helps your speed and in certain types of shots. Lastly, soccer cleats have stitches in place of toe cleats as these make for better control over the ball.
Posted by: mrhuang0707mrhuang at May 25, 2011 07:53 PM (rA/SY)
Posted by: thomas sabo at June 09, 2011 12:53 AM (YQSKd)
Posted by: co-cochanel at June 19, 2011 07:39 PM (rWnij)
Posted by: hermes at June 21, 2011 06:34 PM (0Al0x)
Posted by: sac at June 22, 2011 01:19 AM (Q2Fa0)
Posted by: bracelet pandora at June 22, 2011 11:08 PM (baBWZ)
Posted by: Sabo Online at June 30, 2011 01:21 AM (rDuNS)
Posted by: v at July 09, 2011 12:47 AM (neAGm)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2861 seconds, 221 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








First, suckers.
Posted by: Buck Ofama at April 07, 2011 03:10 AM (c5Nwx)