May 25, 2011
— Gabriel Malor
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
03:02 AM
| Comments (159)
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
I am surprised the LAT even published this story. Of course it is evil “big business”.
Posted by: Vic at May 25, 2011 03:05 AM (M9Ie6)
I was 'absolutely terrified' when Sarah Palin was nominated for VP, her former aide says
In "Blind Allegiance to Sarah Palin: A Memoir of our Tumultuous Years," Frank Bailey claims Palin is a self-serving individual who "loved to play the victim."
What a crock of shit.
Posted by: Vic at May 25, 2011 03:11 AM (M9Ie6)
Sez the guy with the book to sell.
Posted by: nickless at May 25, 2011 03:15 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 03:19 AM (AnTyA)
Oh, yeah, they are well known for their fanatical devotion to their hero, and their paranoid sensitivity to criticism, aren't they?
Posted by: Adjoran at May 25, 2011 03:29 AM (VfmLu)
Posted by: Dave C at May 25, 2011 03:30 AM (yzEMj)
The "Morning Jay" shows his Rovian neocon roots
Today, I want to look at things strictly from the competitiveness metric, and here I think the main contenders -- Jon Huntsman, Tim Pawlenty, and Mitt Romney -- all score very, very well. I see four reasons for drawing this conclusion.SO the Weekly Standard is pushing "moderates" as being the "competitive" candidates. Huntsman is competitive???
Shades of 2008 all over again.
This is why I hate The Weekly Neocon.
Posted by: Vic at May 25, 2011 03:34 AM (M9Ie6)
I don't feel like digging up news this morning. But I will say this: The Vancouver Canucks are in the Stanley Cup finals.
Did you know they still had professional hockey in Canada?
Did you know we still had an operational professional hockey league?
Posted by: Truman North at May 25, 2011 03:41 AM (K2wpv)
Paul Ryan is going to be coming up on Morning Joe. Hmmm.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 25, 2011 03:43 AM (UOM48)
A Democrat has won an upset victory in a hotly contested race for a U.S. congressional seat from upstate New York, where proposed cuts to federal health assistance were seen as a pivotal issue.
Anyone wanna argue with me now that pushing Ryan's plan (a plan that had no chance of passing) was the stupidest political move of the century? If our sitting Repub reps and Senators keep pandering to the idiot Tea Party with symbolic votes like this, we'll not only never regain the Senate or the White House, we'll lose the House again in 2012. Fucking doofuses.
And please.. I know that idiot that ran on Tea Party ticket blew it for us.. but 48% for the Dem! What's going to happen in closer races?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at May 25, 2011 03:43 AM (qsodE)
Posted by: Jean Crowden...not a Palin fan at May 25, 2011 03:46 AM (vP488)
The truth of the matter is that the Republican Party of New York sucks and has sucked for a while. It is especially terrible at special elections where the out of touch party leaders pick state legislators who everyone hates and runs them.
I know a lot of the Morons hate EE but he right on the money on this one.
Posted by: Vic at May 25, 2011 03:51 AM (M9Ie6)
Yep get out there with the Dem meme of the day.
Posted by: Vic at May 25, 2011 03:53 AM (M9Ie6)
Why is it that anything associated with the U.N. has some Euroweanie or 3rd world shithead running it but the U.S. always winds up paying for it?
Posted by: Vic at May 25, 2011 07:04 AM (M9Ie6)
I'm pretty sure that's why those things exist - to drain the taxpayer to enrich the scum of humanity. The UN and IMF should be defunded. Today.
I can't think of any "international" organization that is anything other than an enemy of the US. Every one of them should be on the cut list. Indeed, nearly all organized efforts to "aid" poor nations are corrupt and counterproductive. Let each stand on its own, or fall. Most people do a fine job of figuring out solutions for themselves.
It reminds me of what I saw when I visited the D.R. Foreign do-gooders would come in and be horrified by the little palm-wood shacks the locals had. So, the do-gooders would offer to build them nice, solid, concrete houses on the same site, for free. Naturally, many poor fools feel for it. Now, instead of a comfortably ventilated and termite proof palm wood shack, they instead live in a crude concrete hot box with no air flow. Their condition, thus worsened, drew no concern from the do-gooders who did the damage in the first place - they walked away feeling pretty good about how they "helped" the underpriveleged. Oh - and note that those do-gooders (especially the Europeans), always the good natured and helpful sort, liked to stimulate the economy - via sex tourism. The Germans especially - who's tastes were widely accepted to run to the jail-bait side of the spectrum.
Scratch a do-gooder, find a commie pervert.
Posted by: Reactionary at May 25, 2011 03:53 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Vic at May 25, 2011 07:34 AM (M9Ie6)
Amen, Vic. To stretch Buckley's maxim about pushing the most electable conservative to include these RINO clowns is fucking idiotic.
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 03:54 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: ontherocks at May 25, 2011 03:57 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Jean Crowden...not a Palin fan at May 25, 2011 03:57 AM (vP488)
Note:
With 90 percent of precincts reporting, Hochul had 48 percent of the vote. State Assemblywoman Jane Corwin (R) had 42 percent, with independent candidate Jack Davis running a distant third with 9 percent.
If this election had been in SC they would have to do a "run-off" because no candidate got 50% of the vote. That is how you fix stupid fraud like this.
And note that it was an "independent", not a fake Tea Party candidate.
Posted by: Vic at May 25, 2011 03:57 AM (M9Ie6)
Since I've been out on travel, I didn't get to comment on the Irish Barky, so indulge me...
My Irish ancestors kicked Barry O'Toole's Irish ancestor's ass. That is all.
Posted by: dogfish at May 25, 2011 03:57 AM (N2yhW)
Content? Nil.
Ability for context or debate? Nil.
Snark? Give it a 4.
Plea for attention? 9.
New troll is john Ryan with a shift key.
Posted by: nickless at May 25, 2011 04:00 AM (MMC8r)
Crash n Burn, that;s the responsible policy.
Posted by: Randolph Duke at May 25, 2011 04:00 AM (YGNmh)
Posted by: Vic at May 25, 2011 04:00 AM (M9Ie6)
Democrats lie. Like trolls, it's what they do. Every election, in every year that I can remember, the Democrats has tried to scare seniors into staying on the plantation by saying that Republicans will leave them starving and cold. It makes no difference whether we propose some thing or not. The Democrats will says it, and the MFM, stenographers for the DNC, will spread it around as unexamined gospel.
Posted by: toby928™ at May 25, 2011 04:02 AM (GTbGH)
More brilliant political analysis by Jerry, wasn't it?
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 04:02 AM (AnTyA)
Even the NRO fails to call the "Tea Party" candidate in NY a fake.
Yeah, well he did officially declare his party offilliation as "Tea Party", so that probably causes problems to a reporter - even if they know it's a misnomer.
I suppose - to play the devil's advocate here - his one-man "Tea Party" was perhaps the only official political party by that name in existence to date. Weird, huh? Still doesn't make it right, though - the guy's still a fraud.
I can't blame the loss on him, though. The (R) would have needed 3/4 of his vote to tie the (D), and as his candidacy lost steam most of his votes went to the (D). In a district like this, the (R) should have had more room to spare than any votes the fake might have cost her.
I suspect an incident involving a video may have hurt both the (R) and the fake. Before that, the (R) was ahead by a bit, and the fake had 25% (vs 9% at the end). It reflected negatively on both. And let's not forget that the former holder of the seat was a representative the Republican party, which he thoroughly embarrassed.
It's hard for me to say how much the Medicare issue played into it. I don't subject myself to much of the major media that is said to be painting the Ryan plan as throwing grandma off a cliff. I think even my (D) wife voted for the (R). I know I did, and so did my kid (her 1st federal election).
Posted by: Optimizer at May 25, 2011 04:04 AM (F56VB)
I think the citizens of the US need to soak in $8.00 a gallon gas for a while first.
On third thought... when y'all are ready to be a country again, instead of manacled, uh, "bound," as our greatly jug eared Friend puts it, to whatever foreign country we're begging from this week, let me know.
The funny thing is, I can think of reasons to not vote for (for instance) Palin, but I ain't seen a one of them yet in the "maybe this will get me a piece of liberal ass" five minute hates this blog has bogged down with lately.
Probably because that reason (she supports the Jug Eared Friend on Libya) doesn't resonate with the other people in the five minute hate.
It ain't about policy, it's about proving you're one of the crowd.
Here's a free clue:
The Jean Crowdens aren't laughing with you, they're laughing _at_ you.
Posted by: Abdominal Snowman at May 25, 2011 04:04 AM (ewj2Y)
St. Louis Facebook Group Organizes & Sends 4 Truckloads of Supplies to Joplin, Missouri
Posted by: momma at May 25, 2011 04:05 AM (penCf)
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 04:05 AM (AnTyA)
The pic used on the yahoo page about the NY election shows an oldster protest, prominant signs say 'Hands off MY medicare'
We're doomed
Posted by: Red Shirt at May 25, 2011 04:08 AM (FIDMq)
How does that refute his point?
The right is doomed until its comfort bubble is popped and it stops the passive-aggressive bitching.
Posted by: Anony at May 25, 2011 04:09 AM (7ahtU)
After 34 years of teaching sociology at the University of Illinois at Chicago, I recently retired at age 64 at 80 percent of my pay for life. This calculation was based on a salary spiked by summer teaching, and since I no longer pay into the retirement fund, I now receive significantly more than when I “worked.” But that’s not all: There’s a generous health insurance plan, a guaranteed 3 percent annual cost of living increase, and a few other perquisites.
Good work if you can find it.
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 25, 2011 04:10 AM (ENKCw)
LOL, when is he going to campaign in SC and call for an end to people eating fried chicken, pork, and pecans?
Posted by: Vic at May 25, 2011 04:10 AM (M9Ie6)
Bozell Column: No One May Lecture Obama
Posted by: momma at May 25, 2011 04:10 AM (penCf)
Posted by: Case at May 25, 2011 04:11 AM (0K+Kw)
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 08:02 AM (AnTyA)
New York and Illinois aren't good examples of typical American thinking, just entrenched American corruption.
Jean Palin brings as much to the table as a black fly.
and I denouce it for flyism
Posted by: ontherocks at May 25, 2011 04:11 AM (HBqDo)
The pic used on the yahoo page about the NY election shows an oldster protest, prominant signs say 'Hands off MY medicare'
We're doomed
Posted by: Red Shirt at May 25, 2011 08:08 AM (FIDMq)
I have no problem whatsoever about the older retired folks demanding that the government keep their fuckin hands off their Medicare...because it IS their Medicare. They have had the deductions forcibly taken from their paychecks since 1966 with the promise by the government that it would be there when they retired.
Medicare does need to be changed, but not on the backs of the seniors.
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 04:12 AM (AnTyA)
The American Cornholing Association is not on the chopping block! What are you talking about?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 25, 2011 04:13 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Bugler at May 25, 2011 04:15 AM (VXBR1)
LOL, when is he going to campaign in SC and call for an end to people eating fried chicken, pork, and pecans?
Maybe when eating those becomes a government program, Vic.
Posted by: nickless at May 25, 2011 04:15 AM (MMC8r)
I would think that the right is always doomed as long as the Party of the Free Lunch also has the major media as a subsidiary, at least, until things get so bad that they can't be denied. When your opponent can promise the moon, gratis, and no one calls them on it, painful truth is a hard sell.
Doesn't mean we don't try though.
Posted by: toby928™ at May 25, 2011 04:16 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Optimizer at May 25, 2011 04:16 AM (F56VB)
Posted by: Randolph Duke at May 25, 2011 04:16 AM (YGNmh)
Medicare does need to be changed, but not on the backs of the seniors.
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 08:12 AM (AnTyA)
Can we at least take Viagra off the allowed prescription list?
But seriously, the problem is that new life extending treatments, each more costly than the last, are being developed continually. People will demand that they get them (and any failure to provide it will be seen as a betrayal). There's some limit beyond which we just can't make it happen. Older folks need to come to grips with the fact that Medicare was designed in the days when if you got a serious disease they basically gave you some meds and sent you home to die. No one could have foreseen the costly options available today.
The question is - what is the fairest way to deal with the fact that we have limited health care resourced? Somebody is going to feel that their ox has been gored. Probably lots of somebodies.
Posted by: Reactionary at May 25, 2011 04:17 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 25, 2011 04:18 AM (NtTkA)
Vic, you are a bitter clinger so you don't really understand the nuances of a complex budget. Spending more than we have simply creates a vibrant, growing economy. It's really too much math for you, but trust us; we'll take care of you.
Posted by: Republican leadership at May 25, 2011 04:18 AM (LH6ir)
The Obamacare corruption. pssst- GOP you could run on this.
GOP - you can also run on fixing Medicare to save our grandchildren's future. If the GOP had balls.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at May 25, 2011 04:18 AM (0fzsA)
In a lot of ways, I consider Palin to currently be a less than ideal candidate. I think some of the factors there are however contrived/"not her fault," etc. That still doesn't make those factors non-factors.
I think a lot of what happened to force her resignation was passively-aggressively aided by the national party, which did nothing when she got sued out of office.
Y'all may be too stupid to see this this way... but
THAT'S WHY YOU CAN'T GET DANIELS TO RUN. IT'S WHY RYAN ISN'T RUNNING.
Everyone seems to be happy to see the Less Than Ideal Candidate "made an example of" by the democrats, and can't figure out why their dream candidate isn't running.
"Please give me a decent moderate candidate, and I PROMISE this time I won't be a party full of fuckups this time?!?!"
Posted by: Abdominal Snowman at May 25, 2011 04:19 AM (ewj2Y)
Michelle's actually nice (but I don't think proper) outfit for state dinner.
Posted by: momma at May 25, 2011 04:20 AM (penCf)
Posted by: toby928™ at May 25, 2011 08:16 AM (GTbGH)
Well said. The scum on the Left have been actively destroying American culture for the better part of a century. It's not leaving us a lot to work with.
Posted by: Reactionary at May 25, 2011 04:20 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 25, 2011 04:20 AM (ENKCw)
Say whaaat? The GOP didn't blast this far and wide to tell Mr. and Mrs. Senior that their Medicare would not be touched? I'm shocked, I tell you. Shocked.
Posted by: Lady in Black at May 25, 2011 04:20 AM (XK4nA)
Posted by: Randolph Duke at May 25, 2011 08:16 AM (YGNmh)
Absolutely correct. Also, those who cannot afford extra coverage will be given a subsidy.
It's the Democratic inaction that has caused and will continue to cause reductions in payments and benefits, not to mention that PeteyCare® robs medicare of over half a trillion dollars.
Those who have had the Medicare forcibly taken from them for the past 45 years deserve every goddamned bit of their healthcare covered.
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 04:21 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Pension Fund of America at May 25, 2011 04:21 AM (fWYBy)
Republicans have refused to approve new debt authority without dollar-for-dollar spending reductions. Budget experts said an agreement on $1 trillion in spending cuts is feasible, but reaching $2 trillion would be politically difficult.
...
There is wide agreement in Washington that deficits must be reduced by $4 trillion over the next decade, and President Obama has made such a proposal. Biden said an agreement for $1 trillion in cuts would be a "down payment."
So everyone knows we need to cut it now, but hell, that would be 'politically difficult' so screw it.
Posted by: momma at May 25, 2011 04:25 AM (penCf)
Disagree. The people who have had Medicare payments forcibly taken from their paychecks for the 45 years were never given a schedule of what would be paid for and what wouldn't.
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 04:26 AM (AnTyA)
I thought I had remembered seeing a picture of Jackie Kennedy with Queen Elizabeth where she was wearing gloves. Not sure of the actual protocol of dress around the Queen at certain times like state dinners, however.
Posted by: Lady in Black at May 25, 2011 04:26 AM (XK4nA)
That won't even offset Obama's addition to the national debt in under four years.
Posted by: nickless at May 25, 2011 04:28 AM (MMC8r)
''Princess Boy'' Author: Courageous Of Toronto Couple Not To Share Kids Gender.
Posted by: momma at May 25, 2011 04:28 AM (penCf)
...or maybe at least have an upcharge for the magic boner pills
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 04:28 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Randolph Duke at May 25, 2011 04:29 AM (YGNmh)
Funny how the carry on about Obama's white mother, but still refer to him as "the first black president". I imagine if you want to make a liberal's head go supernova, you could say he's "half-white". These are the guys who get all self-righteous about how the color of somebody's skin shouldn't matter, but they can't even call it like it is, that he's biracial. They gotta have their "first black president" as if it's some sort of moral imperative.
Posted by: Optimizer at May 25, 2011 04:29 AM (F56VB)
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 04:30 AM (AnTyA)
On this day in 1793 Steven Badin became the first Roman Catholic priest ordained in the U.S.
Also on the Catholic liturgical calendar today is Bede's Feast DayFor those who study English history he is responsible for almost all of our knowledge of Anglo-Saxon history.
Bede's page
Posted by: Vic at May 25, 2011 04:30 AM (M9Ie6)
60 re the NY-26 election, there was some semi-encouraging news there. The fake TPer spent $1.7 million of mostly his own money to garner 8-9% of the vote.
Yeah, but the (R) spent a similar amount in a Republican district - twice as much as the (D) - and lost.
Oh, and the fake TPer is said to have been 100% self-funded, by choice. Which is maybe the only good thing I could say about him.
Posted by: Optimizer at May 25, 2011 04:33 AM (F56VB)
Behar says Palin isn't following Word of God while talking with her weasly ex-aide):
No, Behar, Sarah Palin canÂ’t be Christian if her ex-aide (whoÂ’s going around bashing her as a disaster) says he didnÂ’t see her read the Bible or the Constitution.
Or, if you think she’s ‘vindictive.’
JOY BEHAR: She says sheÂ’s Christian, does she read the Bible? Has she read the Constitution?
EX-PALIN AIDE, FRANK BAILEY: I never saw her read the Constitution. I never saw her read the Bible.
JOY BEHAR: You say sheÂ’s vindictive, thatÂ’s not a Christian value, personality trait, to be vindictive. I donÂ’t think Jesus meant for people to be vindictive.
Posted by: momma at May 25, 2011 04:33 AM (penCf)
Posted by: Jean Crowden...not a Palin fan at May 25, 2011 04:34 AM (vP488)
Medicare should be means tested in the same manner that Veteran's benefits are tested based upon annual income and net worth filings. Failure to accurately divulge net worth and current cash assets will result in loss of privilege, and it's rigorously enforced. The annual VA filing is compared to the personal 1040, and it should be the same.
Based upon my disclosures, I pay $50/visit, and from $9 - $37 per prescription. Prescriptions are actually cheaper at Wally Mart, but the VA doesn't write prescriptions for the civil market.
I gladly recompense the VA for services which allows some of the older men with diminishing assets to receive services.
The wait times can be lengthy, and the services are on occasion less than desirable, but access is guaranteed, and that's important to the aging military population.
Of note: X-rays, electrocardiogram's, and endoscope treatments, MRI's, etc., are not chargeable services because the VA considers the equipment purchased and staff personnel mandatory to complete the mission.
Something on this order might work well for Medicare, but the aging population will bitch about the payment schedule.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at May 25, 2011 04:36 AM (cwFVA)
Posted by: real joe at May 25, 2011 04:37 AM (w7Lv+)
Posted by: Case at May 25, 2011 04:37 AM (0K+Kw)
Posted by: Jerry from Chicago at May 25, 2011 04:37 AM (fWYBy)
He was a Democrat who had run for Congress as a Democrat a few times before, now he ran as a self-styled Tea Partier.
Posted by: real joe at May 25, 2011 04:39 AM (w7Lv+)
And although unsaid, I am certain that he didn't want to have his family sacrificed in order to provide fodder for the leftist media.
It amazes me how quickly people throw GOP candidates under the bus. If we were serious people, we would be defending all of them who step forward, because it is not something I would want to do. I am continually amazed that Palin hasn't been destroyed. The attacks her family have suffered would have destroyed me.
I come on a site like this and look at the amount of viciousness towards her, or Romney,. or Pawlenty, or Cain (just depends on who is in the news) and I wonder why anyone at all would want to be a Republican candidate. You end up as a target of the media and the vicious left, and your so-called allies turn on you as well.
I think I will go work in the garden for a while.
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 25, 2011 04:40 AM (Fo83G)
How is Rand Paul getting the blame, instead of Reid who refuses to vote up/down on Rand Paul's amendments?
Patriot Act powers may lapse at end of week
Posted by: momma at May 25, 2011 04:40 AM (penCf)
Those who have had the Medicare forcibly taken from them for the past 45 years deserve every goddamned bit of their healthcare covered.
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 08:21 AM (AnTyA)
Anybody 55 and older are exempt from any changes, the people at the protest were far older than that, they drank the kool aid, or are protesting for their kids rights to medicare....hahahahah
Posted by: Red Shirt at May 25, 2011 04:41 AM (FIDMq)
Oh, and the fake TPer is said to have been 100% self-funded, by choice. Which is maybe the only good thing I could say about him.
Posted by: Optimizer at May 25, 2011 08:33 AM (F56VB)
Thanks for the correction.
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 25, 2011 04:41 AM (ENKCw)
It's called "Reckless Endangerment"
...of course that fucking pandering idiot Scarborough tried to interject and claim it was Republicans too...she just gave him a look like Queen Lizzie the Deuce gave President Petey yesterday when he completely fucked up the toast at the state dinner
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 04:44 AM (AnTyA)
Anybody 55 and older are exempt from any changes, the people at the protest were far older than that, they drank the kool aid, or are protesting for their kids rights to medicare....hahahahah
Posted by: Red Shirt at May 25, 2011 08:41 AM (FIDMq)
They're probably relatives of Chi-Town Jerry
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 04:47 AM (AnTyA)
He was a Democrat who had run for Congress as a Democrat a few times before, now he ran as a self-styled Tea Partier.
Posted by: real joe at May 25, 2011 08:39 AM (w7Lv+)
Chris Lee (R) stepped down after a scandal involving him running dating ads on Craigslist. This special election was held to fill his spot.
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 25, 2011 04:48 AM (ENKCw)
I think I will go work in the garden for a while.
Don't sweat it, Miss M. Most of the most vicious (and infinitely redundant) attacks are by people far more concerned with their own egos, an imagined philosophical pecking order or some mix of other completely non-political factors. They don't represent any significant number of Republicans. Cranks will be cranks.
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 25, 2011 04:49 AM (Z05lF)
He was a Democrat who had run for Congress as a Democrat a few times before, now he ran as a self-styled Tea Partier.
Posted by: real joe at May 25, 2011 08:39 AM (w7Lv+)
Wait. Wasn't it actually the GOP married douchebag who was fucking stupid enough to text shitless pictures of himself to other women??
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 04:50 AM (AnTyA)
80 Was the Republican who stepped down a tea party guy or a typical New York rhino? Why did we lose this seat in the first place? Was it because of the Ryan plan? The Tea Party? Or because some Rhino couldn't keep his pants on?
You mean the guy who vacated the seat, right? He left because of a scandal that was all over the national media (he was the guy not wearing his shirt - not pant-less, just out looking; it was THAT lame). He was a real Republican, not a RINO. A small business owner, and we could use more of them in Washington. It was a major screw-up.
An opponent to the Republican trying to replace him registered himself as being on the "Tea Party", but he wasn't a real Tea Partier. Some people blame that tactic for (R) losing the seat, but I don't feel the numbers add up to come to that conclusion. Most media blame the Ryan plan for the loss, but the (R) candidate had a number of problems that could be pointed to. It's an embarrassment anyway, though.
Posted by: Optimizer at May 25, 2011 04:51 AM (F56VB)
What happened to McConnell's "deal" that we traded away Senate blocks on federal judges for? Republicans were supposed to get "amendments".
Posted by: Vic at May 25, 2011 04:51 AM (M9Ie6)
82 He was a Democrat who had run for Congress as a Democrat a few times before, now he ran as a self-styled Tea Partier.
They were asking about the guy who resigned, not the fake TPer who was vying for his seat. He had been a Republican before running as the Democrat candidate 3x, though.
Posted by: Optimizer at May 25, 2011 04:54 AM (F56VB)
Posted by: Randolph Duke at May 25, 2011 04:56 AM (YGNmh)
I wanna be on your health plan, Jean- you are obviously on some very effective hallucinogenics, because I've yet to see your shit make even the slightest bit of sense.
And, uh...lolz n' shit.
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at May 25, 2011 04:58 AM (XyjRQ)
Yup, my bad. Reading comp not so good at the moment.
Posted by: real joe at May 25, 2011 04:58 AM (w7Lv+)
So this Princess Boy book- that's not a sequel to the Audacity of Hope, is it?
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at May 25, 2011 04:59 AM (XyjRQ)
Posted by: momma at May 25, 2011 05:00 AM (penCf)
Geez, you're living in the past- whaddya think it's 2008 or something?
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at May 25, 2011 05:00 AM (XyjRQ)
Posted by: Bugler at May 25, 2011 05:00 AM (VXBR1)
Nice concern trolling, Jerry...
Posted by: beedubya at May 25, 2011 07:50 AM (AnTyA)
Nice concern concern concern trolling, beedubya. ;^)Posted by: andycanuck at May 25, 2011 05:00 AM (wPxqH)
You morons need to stop your dogs from shitting in the yard. It attracts jean cockholsters and other vermin.
Posted by: maddogg at May 25, 2011 05:01 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Dave C at May 25, 2011 05:02 AM (YPLGQ)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at May 25, 2011 05:02 AM (1Jaio)
I wouldn't know; I'm in Toronto.
Posted by: andycanuck
Winnipeg is gettign the Thrashers next year.
Posted by: todler at May 25, 2011 05:03 AM (fPOY0)
Yeah, that's probably a pretty good way to put it. Realistically, though, this state is infested with cities, which are invariably infested with parasitic Democrats. The GOP in this state are usually sacrificial lambs, and it's amazing to me that they ever get anybody elected in this state. The governors they get in are often RINO-ish, but that's what they have to be here.
Before 2010, BTW, there were only two (R) congressional seats in NY, and this was one of them (the other is on Long Island - Peter King).
Posted by: Optimizer at May 25, 2011 05:05 AM (F56VB)
As an American, I'd say we fought for our independence so we wouldn't have to unnecessarily kow tow to purported "Royalty".
As someone who loathes all things to do with the clown show in the White House right now, I say that Michelle the Wookie's latest gaffe is a stunning example of ugly Americanism- and the term "ugly" should be applied in all possible contexts.
And no, the above is neither consistent nor fair- but I got a waiver, so it's all good.
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at May 25, 2011 05:05 AM (XyjRQ)
Who knew that indoctrinated diversity was more worthy of taxpayer dollars than an actual education?
Posted by: ontherocks at May 25, 2011 05:05 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Dave C at May 25, 2011 05:07 AM (YPLGQ)
Posted by: curious at May 25, 2011 05:11 AM (k1rwm)
Barry Rubin over at YidWithLid, synthesizes the stupid BarryÂ’s problem with the Â’67 lines.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at May 25, 2011 05:14 AM (jx2j9)
Great, encouraging people to wholly never work again in their chosen field for a couple of bucks.
Posted by: curious at May 25, 2011 05:15 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: glowing blue meat at May 25, 2011 05:23 AM (K/USr)
Posted by: naturalfake at May 25, 2011 05:33 AM (I49Jm)
Posted by: Bob Saget talking shit about total at May 25, 2011 05:41 AM (F/4zf)
Never mind T-Paw's take on chicken and pecans - I want to know where he stands on barbecue sauce.
Posted by: mrp at May 25, 2011 05:59 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Sassy at May 25, 2011 06:05 AM (MRPcL)
It might be nice to have an analysis of the NJ Supreme Court ruling requiring Christie to spend $500 million additional on NJ schools. Does he have any recourse at this point?
Posted by: Y-not at May 25, 2011 06:06 AM (pW2o8)
__________
...which looks just like the outfit Barack wore when he was visiting his relatives in Kenya.
Posted by: Anachronda at May 25, 2011 06:10 AM (6fER6)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at May 25, 2011 06:18 AM (YmPwQ)
__________
CAROUSEL! RENEW! RENEW!
Posted by: Anachronda at May 25, 2011 06:20 AM (6fER6)
Yeah, that's what I thought.
Posted by: Bugler
..........
Ok.. here ya go.. had to get to work in between posts...
First off.. You ask the question like Ryan's privatizing plan is the only alternative. That's silly.
The problem with Medicare is not that it is a government run plan. It is run very efficiently, with less than 5% overhead. Most private insurers have 15% to 35% overhead (including profit).
The problem is Medicare pays for too much. Caps per year are too high. Benefits that should not even exist cost billions per year. One fourth of all Medicare payments are made in the final year of the recipient's life. End-of-life care needs to be addressed - some will call it death panels - but that is exactly what private insurers will do to ensure they make a profit.
Add in Medicare fraud and disability fraud (or unnecessary disability payments) and Medicare is a money pit.
I do not argue that it needs reforming.. it's just that privatizing does nothing except put about 20% of Medicare dollars into the coffers of private insurers whose main job will be denying care to the elderly to increase profits.
Giving a healthy 65 yr old $15,000 for "insurance" when they might only use $2,000-$3,000 in care that year is stupid. Stupid. That is $12k or so profit for an insurer.
One can privatize Medicare much more efficiently with fixed costs. Here's how:
Set aside whatever Congress wants to allocate into a major medical fund. Let's call this a catastrophic illness fund - it's a big risk pool fund. These funds would kick after the recipient has $10k or more (some number that makes Medicare work) in costs for the year.
This fund is administered by private insurers who agree to take on all applicants (administration fee of 2-3% can be paid to them for the trouble). Those private insurers are then able to sell gap insurance (from $0 to $10k) to Medicare recipients - this is where they will make their profits. This will be cheap because there is no large risk to the insurer - anything over $10k is paid from the common risk pool fund.
So - everyone on Medicare can purchase whatever level of gap insurance they feel comfortable with. Very poor people will get assistance on this gap insurance.
Fraud will be nearly eliminated because private insurers will police the funds much better than a government that doesn't give a shit about fraud.
Put disability patients in this plan as well and start a bounty reward program for reporting fraudulent recipients.
Jerry's plan.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at May 25, 2011 06:22 AM (f9c2L)
__________
...which looks just like the outfit Barack wore when he was visiting his relatives in Kenya.
Posted by: Anachronda at May 25, 2011 10:10 AM (6fER6)
SHE LOOKS BEAUTIFUL!!!...and she (like her husband), NEVER MAKES MISTAKES!!!...WILL YOU REICH-WINGERS PLEASE GET WITH THE PROGRAM!!!
Posted by: JUDY!!! at May 25, 2011 06:24 AM (xEXzN)
Could you please update us on the nuclear reactor situation in Japan? I keep reading stories about possible melt downs at 2 of them and would appreciate your opinion. Thanks
Posted by: chillin the most at May 25, 2011 06:34 AM (6IV8T)
Posted by: Sassy at May 25, 2011 10:05 AM (MRPcL)
That would be bad news except for 2 pertinent facts.
1. There is no shortage of whores in the world.
2. That particular whore will be on the market again within 2 years.
Posted by: maddogg at May 25, 2011 06:37 AM (OlN4e)
_______
What I've been seeing is reports of meltdowns in two reactors in addition to the one they had expected to be a meltdown.
http://tinyurl.com/4yjc8xa
Posted by: Anachronda at May 25, 2011 06:40 AM (6fER6)
I haven't checked lately. I understand though that they have actually visually inspected and one does show a partial melt.
Posted by: Vic at May 25, 2011 06:41 AM (M9Ie6)
OK, before I start in, let me just say that you at least brought something to the table. That puts you up on the Dems, not that they set a high bar these days.
Unfortunately, you typed what I quoted. Unless you have some way to control what Congress can allocate, I can guarantee you this doesn't fix the problem. Congress will just keep allocating like it has been for it, and all you've done is tie some insurance providers in to take the ride down the rapids.
Unless you have a plan to keep that under wraps, this doesn't make a very viable solution, at least not from where I'm sitting.
Posted by: AoSHQ's *second* worst commenter, DarkLord© at May 25, 2011 06:48 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: chillin the most at May 25, 2011 06:53 AM (6IV8T)
Posted by: AoSHQ's *second* worst commenter, DarkLord
How is that different from Ryan's plan? He has to have a fixed amount for the premium support per person.
He has set his number at $15k (or whatever). Why wouldn't the same logic apply? The next Congress would allocate a $20k premium support. ??
Any scheme requires a disciplined Congress and President.
I think a risk pool to cover catastrophic expenses, however, ends up spending less total dollars than Ryan's plan - assuming you have the same disciplined Congress in place.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at May 25, 2011 06:59 AM (f9c2L)
Also Vic, I appreciate you posting various articles everyday of interest
Yeah, Vic is a good bridge between the ONT (OOT?) and the day crew.
Posted by: HH at May 25, 2011 07:00 AM (6oDXl)
I think a risk pool to cover catastrophic expenses, however, ends up spending less total dollars than Ryan's plan - assuming you have the same disciplined Congress in place.
If you know where to find such, let me know, as that would be a monumental improvement over what we have.
Sadly, it's also the only way any plan is going to work. I've never been a fan of devising clever plans to be executed by thieves and dunderheads, thus guaranteeing their failure...
Posted by: AoSHQ's *second* worst commenter, DarkLord© at May 25, 2011 07:03 AM (GBXon)
And no matter how many people lied to them about it at the time, it's the rest of us who have a duty to make those lies good?
Posted by: Abdominal Snowman at May 25, 2011 07:13 AM (rVfMa)
Only if you want their votes.
Posted by: toby928™ at May 25, 2011 07:20 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: HH at May 25, 2011 08:22 AM (6oDXl)
Yes, sir I may be drunk. But in the morning IÂ’ll be sober; and youÂ’ll still be a dumbass with big ears, and married to Chewbacca.
– Winston Churchill, from his grave
Posted by: medulla oblongata at May 25, 2011 09:22 AM (bs/PE)
Disney has been working for more than a year on a Navy Seal movie and video game. They jumped on the copyright ahead of the competitors.
It's not exploitative, it's preemptive.
Posted by: Max Entropy at May 25, 2011 09:39 AM (lH6z9)
Posted by: jeff at May 25, 2011 01:57 PM (dUznx)
Posted by: jr at May 25, 2011 05:17 PM (uzbYw)
Boobies used to distract jury. Tragically, there are no pictures.
Well shit, that pretty well eliminates the old "or your lyin' eyes" line doesn't it?
Posted by: sherlock at May 25, 2011 05:31 PM (thr9V)
Posted by: discount nike max women at May 25, 2011 10:56 PM (xu/ZL)
Posted by: chanel bags outlet at June 08, 2011 12:04 AM (PEaA3)
Posted by: thomas sabo uk at June 09, 2011 12:46 AM (YQSKd)
Posted by: pandora at June 19, 2011 11:00 PM (bficH)
Posted by: bracelet pandora at June 22, 2011 11:33 PM (baBWZ)
Posted by: Thomas Sabo at June 30, 2011 01:22 AM (rDuNS)
Posted by: lili at July 06, 2011 04:38 PM (OIqem)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2794 seconds, 287 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








IMF rapist to get 250K from the U.S. as a golden parachute
Why is it that anything associated with the U.N. has some Euroweanie or 3rd world shithead running it but the U.S. always winds up paying for it?
Posted by: Vic at May 25, 2011 03:04 AM (M9Ie6)