June 15, 2011
— Gabriel Malor Nothing takes the taste out of peanut butter quite like unrequited love.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
03:12 AM
| Comments (229)
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
We all know how dumb American students are in match, science, and geography.
Well now you can add history to their lack of knowledge.
Fewer than a quarter of American 12th-graders knew China was North Korea's ally during the Korean War, and only 35% of fourth-graders knew the purpose of the Declaration of Independence, according to national history-test scores released Tuesday.
But IÂ’ll bet they are experts at diversity in 18th century colonial America and tell you the exploits and inventions of the oppressed womyn of Boston.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 03:13 AM (M9Ie6)
On this day in 1215 King John was forced to sign and seal the Magna Carter.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 03:13 AM (M9Ie6)
Lindsay Graham RINO 'n chief hasn't been getting enough face time lately
So he does the one thing he knows is guaranteed to get a press microphone in his face, attack another Republican. (Even if it is another RINO).
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 03:14 AM (M9Ie6)
Democrat assholes couldn't get the Dream Act through in that disastrous lame duck session
So why is dingy Harry reintroducing it now when he has even less support? Pandering pure and simple because there is an election in 2012 and their base is not happy now.
So what does he have to say?
During a firefight in 2003, near Umm Qasr, Iraq, Lance Cpl. José Luis Gutierrez became one of the first American casualties of that war. Ironically, Cpl. Gutierrez was not an American citizen when he died. He was a lawful permanent resident, born in Guatemala, who came to the United States illegally a few years before.
So why was he in the Army and not deported Harry? In addition, where in this worthless paper does it tell you that the Armed forces ALREADY have a program for immigrants to earn American citizenship through serving in the Armed forces. The BS dream act is just another attempt by the Democrats to blow amnesty through.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 03:15 AM (M9Ie6)
Agent's testimony provides evidence that DOJ officials lied to congress
Now the question is, did the DOJ official get sworn in? Anytime a Republican testifies they get sworn in while the Dems try to catch them in perjury traps about meaningless crap.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 03:15 AM (M9Ie6)
We need a new internet law on debate
We have Godwin’s law that talks about comparing things to Hitler in a debate. What about comparing things to “slavery”? This has started cropping up more and more lately.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 03:16 AM (M9Ie6)
As I predicted months ago, the SC redistricting plan is headed for court
They havenÂ’t got a prayer of winning but it is all about dragging feet and delaying until after the 2012 election.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 03:16 AM (M9Ie6)
Hey, that was mah ancestah!
Posted by: The second worst President ever at June 15, 2011 03:17 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 03:17 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Nash Rambler at June 15, 2011 03:18 AM (vmcYN)
Posted by: HH at June 15, 2011 03:24 AM (6oDXl)
This State beats all I have ever seen. It is everyone's God given right to own a dog and let it roam.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 03:35 AM (M9Ie6)
Number 2 is my favorite. Not sure why my husband picked number 20 to quote when he sent me the link...just random, right?
Posted by: Mama AJ at June 15, 2011 03:37 AM (XdlcF)
But I've been disappointed before.
Posted by: toby928™ at June 15, 2011 03:38 AM (GTbGH)
But that's the DOJ and Eric "black man's law" Holder. It will never happen.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 03:39 AM (M9Ie6)
You can see proof of this on the teen and student Jeopardy tournaments. These kids are the brightest and the best, and they are consistently weak in American history.
Posted by: real joe at June 15, 2011 03:39 AM (w7Lv+)
Vic..I enjoy your links and comment...but are you an anti-dog-ist??????
Posted by: beedubya at June 15, 2011 03:42 AM (AnTyA)
I am all for a dog as long as you keep it in your own yard.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 03:43 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: toby928™ at June 15, 2011 03:43 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 07:13 AM (M9Ie6)
You fucking bloody stupid bagger of tea. You've obviously never been to the beach; over 60% of beachgoers regularly consume sunscreen for protection inside and out. The establishment knows this since the statistics originate from our sources for proof of global warming. Sop trying to kill women/children/the elderly with your ignorance. My Spice harvester is under attack! BUILD ME A MOTHERFUCKING CARRYALL!! BLESSED BE THE GOD OF GOLD AND SILVER!!!
Posted by: Martin Bashir at June 15, 2011 03:44 AM (gQ374)
If I recall correctly we started with State history in the 4th or 5th grade. Got U.S. history the next year and then world history the year after that,
The repeated the U.S. history again in High School at a deeper level.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 03:45 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at June 15, 2011 03:46 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: kelley in virginia at June 15, 2011 03:46 AM (VIqi1)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at June 15, 2011 03:48 AM (SB0V2)
We got that in Civics class in the 9th grade.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 03:51 AM (M9Ie6)
Are 4th graders really supposed to know any history?
Knowing the purpose of the Declaration of Independence is pretty basic.
Schoolhouse Rock still rules.
Posted by: Mama AJ at June 15, 2011 03:54 AM (XdlcF)
Does A and B, but mostly B count as a paraprosdokian?
I guess. I give you the ruling...this time.
Posted by: Mama AJ, Proper Paraprosdokian Usage Unit (PPUU) at June 15, 2011 03:56 AM (XdlcF)
Yeah, it seems to me that we also did the World history/American history alternating when I was growing up.
And as kids, we really thought the Ancient Romans were way cool...
Posted by: HH at June 15, 2011 03:59 AM (6oDXl)
Don't worry about the sunscreen as you'll have more important things to worry about.
Posted by: harleycowboy at June 15, 2011 03:59 AM (wSTfB)
Posted by: Museisluse at June 15, 2011 03:59 AM (Y3n3D)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at June 15, 2011 04:00 AM (CO/bv)
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 07:13 AM (M9Ie6)
Sadly this is too true. People give me funny looks when I talk about moving to a poor Caribbean country, but at least there the government is too poor to meddle in every aspect of your life. Also, there are way fewer damn do-gooders running around with a lot of time on their hands. That's the problem with the US - too many people trying to "do what's best for you." That, and the horde of leftist pigs who try to steal every dime you make to give to the "poor."
Posted by: Reactionary at June 15, 2011 04:10 AM (xUM1Q)
Vic's link and comment about the FDA chaps my ass as much as any thing else he posted. I expect Lindsay Graham to exhibit dickish behavior.
You ever seen a headline "Govt Program Completes Its Mission, Disbands"?
Posted by: Mr. Dave at June 15, 2011 04:13 AM (CO/bv)
Posted by: Case at June 15, 2011 04:13 AM (0K+Kw)
And as kids, we really thought the Ancient Romans were way cool...
Posted by: HH at June 15, 2011 07:59 AM (6oDXl)
...I got a real kick out of the part where they used to gorge themselves at feasts then use a feather to tickle the back of their throats till they puked, and did it all over again...
Posted by: CanaDave at June 15, 2011 04:16 AM (ZpzZz)
Posted by: Toby the Beagle at June 15, 2011 04:18 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 15, 2011 04:18 AM (cft2u)
Anyone have any idea if ace bans a random set of IPs along with the announced ones?
Yep. Well, not random. "Near-by".
Posted by: Mama AJ at June 15, 2011 04:21 AM (XdlcF)
As I recall, back in 2004, John Edwards had one last debate to take down John Kerry. Edwards should have been wearing knee pads because he spent the entire hour blowing John Kerry's horn.
Posted by: Cooter at June 15, 2011 04:21 AM (O924f)
Posted by: Jean at June 15, 2011 08:20 AM (E4Xqk)
...I have to admit, that impressed me as a kid...in a gross out sort of way. Nothing compared to the Obama administration and Nancy Pelosi's congress though...
Posted by: CanaDave at June 15, 2011 04:21 AM (ZpzZz)
We need a new internet law on debate
We have Godwin’s law that talks about comparing things to Hitler in a debate. What about comparing things to “slavery”? This has started cropping up more and more lately.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 07:16 AM (M9Ie6)
Vic's Law!
Actually, there is probably a nice Latin term drawn from the discipline of Logic that would cover all these cases of false equivalence. The internet would be a better place with more formal logic, methinks.
Posted by: Grey Fox at June 15, 2011 04:23 AM (DpNOw)
Posted by: Case at June 15, 2011 04:27 AM (0K+Kw)
Posted by: todler at June 15, 2011 04:30 AM (fPOY0)
Undiplomatic drones aside, this "Obama Doctrine" explains why Obama ordered an invasive act of war against Pakistan. Then, given the state of war between the US and Pakistan that Obama started, from Pakistan's point of view, Pakistani C.I.A. informants have committed treason by siding with the US over Pakistan's sovereignty.
"Weeks after the raid that killed Osama bin Laden at this compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan arrested C.I.A. informants who had assisted in the operation. Senate Intelligence Committee asked Michael J. Morell, the deputy C.I.A. director, to rate Pakistan’s cooperation with the United States on counterterrorism operations, on a scale of 1 to 10. 'Three,' he responded.”
Never fear, because the politician who can't decide which intelligence agency he directs, Leon Panetta, arrived last week in Pakistan to clear the air with Pakistani military and intelligence officers, delivering the latest Obama Doctrine. "You're either with us or against us." Sound familiar?
Bear in mind the statements from Pakistani Bhutto, US hospital witnesses, retired C.I.A. officials from the region, British intelligence, French and Italian intelligence, et al., that Bin Laden died YEARS AGO; and the myth of his survival until Obama had him assassinated was only fodder skeleton in the closet to be exploited when convenient for propaganda purposes.
Pakistan has allies that the US is not prepared to commit warfare against, particularly since we're already bogged down spread from Africa across Asia Minor. In the 1950s when China decided to back N.Korea BY PARTICIPATING THEMSELVES with hordes of warriors, they did not have their industrial development. They do, today. And holding worthless investments in the US Dollar is no incentive for "peace" or tolerance with aggressive US military warfare threatening China's existing presence and/or domination of any region in the world.
We supposedly simply want Pakistani cooperation. Policy? American politicians who willfully and stupidly start "compassionate wars for peace" can't FORCE Pakistan to play the totally subservient dhimmi to the US without inflicting blows upon America that the media will either fail to acknowledge or else play apologists for "good intentions with unintended consequences".
Posted by: maverick muse at June 15, 2011 04:30 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 04:31 AM (M9Ie6)
One of my favorite classes in high school was world history, which actually turned out to be Western Civ. The teacher (also the school's Latin teacher basically told us on the first day that nothing worth noting happened in Asia or Africa so she wasn't going to spend any time on them. She'd probably be fired today.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 15, 2011 04:32 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 15, 2011 04:32 AM (9hSKh)
Don't worry about the sunscreen as you'll have more important things to worry about.
Posted by: harleycowboy
From the article above:
"The temperature change associated with any reduction in sunspot activity would likely be minimal and may not be enough to offset the impact of greenhouse gases on global warming, according to scientists who have published recent papers on the topic."
...said the temple priests, at the temple of Gaia.
The warmists are in no danger of losing their religion, it seems.
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at June 15, 2011 04:33 AM (tk5O7)
Posted by: todler at June 15, 2011 08:30 AM (fPOY0) '
Where you see the really story innovation is in video games. I'd rather watch the cinematic segments from God of War or even Final Fantasy than a Hollyweird movie.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 15, 2011 04:33 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: CanaDave at June 15, 2011 04:35 AM (ZpzZz)
"The temperature change associated with any reduction in sunspot activity would likely be minimal and may not be enough to offset the impact of greenhouse gases on global warming, according to scientists who have published recent papers on the topic."
So people are more now powerful than the sun. Riiiiight.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 15, 2011 04:35 AM (JxMoP)
Our 7th grade son just finished studying the crusades, and had to write about the history and influence of Islam.
For some reason, our son decided to focus his writing on how non-Muslims lived under Islamic rule.
The teachers one response, and there were several, was "I actually had to look up Dhimmi and the tax structure to grade his paper properly"
I believe it was graded as an "A".
So yesterday, they were apparently studying Nazi Germany, and the Jews.
Now the teacher wants to know why our son can discuss "The Final Solution" in such detail.
Military Brats pick up so much knowledge in their formative years.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at June 15, 2011 04:36 AM (4gDCQ)
So people are more now powerful than the sun. Riiiiight.
Seeing as how the sun revolves around the earth, that'd be a fair assessment.
Posted by: Brother Chip, greeter, Temple of Gaia at June 15, 2011 04:37 AM (tk5O7)
So people are more now powerful than the sun. Riiiiight.
What disproves that thesis is that the global temperature was flat from 2000-2008, even as greenhouse gases increased dramatically during this period.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 15, 2011 04:38 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Case at June 15, 2011 04:38 AM (0K+Kw)
Link: http://www.sondrakistan.com/?p=6355
"You need to be shot from one of the planes that shoot th (sic) the very wolves that you ordered. You (f-word) whore ... I want to look into the eyes of a phony (c-word) witha (sic) whore of a daughter and votes to overturn roe vers wade, you worthless piece of flesh...want go hunting for wolves still? let's make you run in your heels, you (f-word) ugly pig!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
I just want to know whether that was written by George Will or Kathleen Parker.
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 15, 2011 04:39 AM (PLvLS)
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 15, 2011 08:35 AM (JxMoP)
Sorry, I know you were being sarcastic, but it brings a smile to my face that while the writers push the "climate change" angle within the story, they disprove their own thesis by the words of the very experts they quote.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 15, 2011 04:39 AM (9hSKh)
What disproves that thesis is that the global temperature was flat from 2000-2008, even as greenhouse gases increased dramatically during this period.
Well, well- looks like someone's check from the Big Oil propaganda ministry just arrived.
Gaia is weeping, unbeliever.
Posted by: Brother Chip, greeter, Temple of Gaia at June 15, 2011 04:41 AM (tk5O7)
He needed to buy some small items to take with him.
And the conversation went this way.
Lil' VIA: Dad, can you buy me this stuff.
VIA: Son, you have been cutting grass, and earning money. Why don't you spend your own money for things you want?
Lil' VIA: But dad, you have lot more money than I have.
VIA: So, even though it's something you want, and you have the money to buy it, you want me to pay for it because I have more money than you do? What group of people always want someone else to pay for things that they want?
Lil' VIA: Liberals
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at June 15, 2011 04:43 AM (4gDCQ)
Well, well- looks like someone's check from the Big Oil propaganda ministry just arrived.
That just cracked me up...
Posted by: HH at June 15, 2011 04:45 AM (6oDXl)
Well, well- looks like someone's check from the Big Oil propaganda ministry just arrived.
I can get an extra pudding cup at lunch today, hooray!
Gaia is weeping, unbeliever.
Gaia is dead, and rightfully so - she was a treacherous bitch! I stabbed that tyrant through the heart with the Blade of Olympus.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 15, 2011 04:47 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at June 15, 2011 08:43 AM (4gDCQ)
That brought a tear to my eye....
Posted by: Tami at June 15, 2011 04:52 AM (X6akg)
Me? I don't stay out in the sun for too long. Problem solved.
But for people that use the stuff, I see no problem is knowing what is effective or not. Turns out the current labeling is all bullshit. Who knew?
Just like I like the labeling of food products showing all the crap they put in there... not a bad thing.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at June 15, 2011 04:52 AM (qsodE)
Sorry, I know you were being sarcastic, but it brings a smile to my face that while the writers push the "climate change" angle within the story, they disprove their own thesis by the words of the very experts they quote.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 15, 2011 08:39 AM (9hSKh)
I am always fascinated by the ability of the liberal mind to accept that two mutually contradictory statements can both be true. For example, GWB = retarded genius. "Reality" based community, indeed.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 15, 2011 04:52 AM (JxMoP)
NYSE to take the big Purple Veined Boner on the opening!
Liberals rejoice at the misfortune of silly capitalists.
Liberals demand additional transfer payments.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at June 15, 2011 04:57 AM (cwFVA)
Posted by: Large McBighuge at June 15, 2011 04:57 AM (XYK5z)
Much like wanting to create 10,000 engineers a month and decrying automation. Or supporting late-term abortion but thinking waterboarding is barbarism.
It's like liberals have different glasses, and when they put those glasses on they have tunnel vision so they can't take into account everything.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at June 15, 2011 04:58 AM (FkKjr)
I guess ewoks don't have good manual dexterity, what with the the whole paw thing.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 15, 2011 05:04 AM (0Z5GH)
I have neighbors who are packing up as we speak for a move to Costa Rica. He made out pretty well off some patents, and is living off residuals and investments. He'll be taking all that potential tax revenue with them.
...and he said they are buying a place in Puerto Limon just so I have a place to go diving
For some reason, I don't think that's the whole reason though
Posted by: beedubya at June 15, 2011 05:08 AM (AnTyA)
The administration probably wants those engineers to figure out a way to automate abortion without having to deal with odious state laws.
And as far as encouraging scientific/engineering exploits, at least Stalin pushed for heavy industry and power production. And he had better artists and slogans working for him.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at June 15, 2011 05:09 AM (n2Voo)
Same in Maryland and the Western States during the '60s. Each grade level had music song books that we could read (treble clef). We sang an entire repertoire of American folk, patriotic and popular songs from the Revolution through the early 20th Century from every region's former frontier. In 4th grade we felt like we'd finally become "big kids" singing the anthems of our Military and the most memorable marching songs from previous American wars. During recess, it was normal for the boys to re-enact "battles" our dads, grandfathers and frontiersmen had fought.
In Civics class (NOT social studies) it didn't take forever for students to learn our American history, to know our Founding Fathers by name and reputation, of our Constitution and our Rights, and our form of government. We drew the three branches of government diagram in 5th and 6th grade when we learned to spell and use those big words like executive, judicial, legislative. /flashback, since the Nuremburg Trials/executions were still recent history and our American political assassinations had just occurred, losing the Kennedy brothers and MLKjr, I really did not like the subliminal associations between "execute" and "executive".
Posted by: maverick muse at June 15, 2011 05:09 AM (lpWVn)
Gaia is dead, and rightfully so - she was a treacherous bitch! I stabbed that tyrant through the heart with the Blade of Olympus.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 15, 2011 08:47 AM (9hSKh)
Nah, that's just hubris. In reality, Gaia is like Honey Badger; Gaia don't give a shit (about us at least).
That may be the worst thing to realize as a tree-hugging idiot; that the earth (ignoring the stupidity of anthropomorphizing a planet) doesn't give a rat's ass about us, and doesn't even know we exist. Sort of like the mouse humping the elephant's leg and whispering, "I'll be gentle."
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 15, 2011 05:09 AM (0Z5GH)
It is so misleading that Jake Trapper calls them out on it:
the video, which Messina calls a “highlight reel” and the DNC titled “What in the world are they talking about?” selectively uses clips from the 2-hour forum suggesting that the candidates were focused on idiotic issues, or battles from the past, when all of the topics the video hammers the Republicans for talking about were ones they were asked about at the forum.
Posted by: momma at June 15, 2011 05:11 AM (nWikJ)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at June 15, 2011 05:13 AM (UciSl)
Others like it, too, which is why a bill floating through Congress, the New Alternative Transportation to Give Americans Solutions Act of 2011 (HR 1380), or Nat Gas Act, has seen a number of Republicans joining central-planning Democrats in supporting it.
But HR 1380, sponsored at last count by 105 Democrats and 83 Republicans, is another government intervention in the free market. Instead of getting government out of the way of innovators, it would give a tax credit for up to 80% of the purchase cost of a natural gas vehicle — with a cap dependent on the car's weight, $8,000 for passenger cars and up to $64,000 for heavy trucks — to get more gas-powered vehicles on the road.
The title of the article is A Bill to Make Soros Richer. Take it with a grain or lump of salt.
Posted by: GnuBreed at June 15, 2011 05:13 AM (ENKCw)
The U.K. continues its decline into failure
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 07:17 AM (M9Ie6)
This. is. bullshit.
Completely flabbergasted. Britain's done for.
Posted by: KinleyArdal at June 15, 2011 05:14 AM (BAZ1j)
Much like wanting to create 10,000 engineers a month and decrying automation.
Oh geez- completely missed that one. Very, very good catch.
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at June 15, 2011 05:15 AM (tk5O7)
Anyone got a nice, polite way to tell a co-worker that I don't appreciate his global warming doom emails?
This guy sends them to the entire office everytime he finds some online piece about how we're all going to melt. To me, that's unprofessional in the extreme.
I've refrained from sending pieces outlining the case against AGW, because frankly, this is a reliogion with these people and there's no point arguing it.
Any ideas?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at June 15, 2011 05:15 AM (sbV1u)
I take it you've never played God of War.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at June 15, 2011 05:16 AM (FkKjr)
Nothing takes the taste out of peanut butter quite like unrequited love.
Is that a quote from Peanuts? It sounds like something Charlie Brown would say.
Posted by: Insomniac at June 15, 2011 05:17 AM (DrWcr)
That article about the sex crimes registry in England is interesting, but the idea of a registry, complete with visits from law enforcement, is troubling.
People should be punished for their crimes, but an open-ended sentence, which is what a sex crimes registry is, smacks of totalitarianism.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 15, 2011 05:17 AM (0Z5GH)
Well now you can add history to their lack of knowledge.
But IÂ’ll bet they are experts at diversity in 18th century colonial America and tell you the exploits and inventions of the oppressed womyn of Boston.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 07:13 AM (M9Ie6)
This is nothing new. About 10 years ago I was working for a large bank and talking with co-workers (who were all college graduates and all voted for Al Gore) some didn't know who we won our independence from, the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, when the moon landing was etc. After a while one of the geniuses told me, well if we don't know then it must not be that important. And thus you see the deeply ingrained stupidity of Democrat voters
Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 15, 2011 05:17 AM (kfqBA)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at June 15, 2011 05:17 AM (n2Voo)
Nah, that's just hubris. In reality, Gaia is like Honey Badger; Gaia don't give a shit (about us at least).
That comment was with GoW canon in mind, but you are right, as usual.
George Carlin had a great rant about human conceit that we're a threat to the Earth.
/NSFW - Carlin had some good comedic bits before he got old and bitter.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 15, 2011 05:18 AM (9hSKh)
"I just want to know whether that was written by George Will or Kathleen Parker."
Rove.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 15, 2011 05:18 AM (lpWVn)
Bombard him with 'Lose your belly fat' ad e-mails.
Posted by: Tami at June 15, 2011 05:19 AM (X6akg)
Anyone got a nice, polite way to tell a co-worker that I don't appreciate his global warming doom emails?
Oh, maybe invite him to a combination monster truck rally/tractor pull/giant earth dug barbeque/fluorescent lighting tube smashing party?
Won't change his mind, but he might take you off his distribution list.
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at June 15, 2011 05:19 AM (tk5O7)
Anyone got a nice, polite way to tell a co-worker that I don't appreciate his global warming doom emails?
This guy sends them to the entire office everytime he finds some online piece about how we're all going to melt. To me, that's unprofessional in the extreme.
I've refrained from sending pieces outlining the case against AGW, because frankly, this is a reliogion with these people and there's no point arguing it.
Any ideas?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at June 15, 2011 09:15 AM (sbV1u)
I don't think there is a polite way to ask them to stop, sir. In my experience, AGW devotees are more rabid than any evangelist (myself included!) They will become angry at your disinterest.
You'll need to brace for the holy fury, or grin and bear it. I'd recommend just deleting them and smiling politely, to avoid workplace drama.
Posted by: KinleyArdal at June 15, 2011 05:20 AM (BAZ1j)
Bombard him with 'Lose your belly fat' ad e-mails.
Thanks, I just spewed this morning's coffee all over the carpet. I'm sure the cleaning crew will be pleased.
Hilarious, Tami.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at June 15, 2011 05:20 AM (sbV1u)
Sure. Complain to HR about his politicizing the workplace. Point out that you feel threatened, and then mention that it isn't really part of what most would consider productive work to proselytize for the tree-huggers.
Or just punch him in the teeth. Either one will work.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 15, 2011 05:20 AM (0Z5GH)
ChicagoÂ’s Big Brother network of over 10,000 public and private surveillance cameras is already the most extensive and integrated in the nation. But, itÂ’s about to get even bigger.
Mayor Rahm Emanuel chaired his first Public Building Commission meeting on Tuesday and joined his fellow members in adding three potential terrorist targets to the cityÂ’s surveillance network: the Board of Trade, the Federal Reserve and the AT&T switching center.
All three are located in ChicagoÂ’s financial nerve center. But, they apparently constituted gaping holes in ChicagoÂ’s camera network.
Posted by: momma at June 15, 2011 05:21 AM (nWikJ)
Or just punch him in the teeth. Either one will work.
Well, that's not "polite" but I've been leaning that way for a while.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at June 15, 2011 05:21 AM (sbV1u)
That was great! That belongs in the sidebar.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 15, 2011 05:23 AM (0Z5GH)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at June 15, 2011 05:23 AM (agD4m)
Anyone got a nice, polite way to tell a co-worker that I don't appreciate his global warming doom emails?
Have lots of children, feed them all beans and broccoli, and bring them to work on Take Our Daughter to Work Day.
During one particularly costly Girl Scout season, one of the sergeants sent her daughter to my office--naturally, I obliged and purchased a year's supply of Thin Mints. She returned the favor by emitting the silent mother of all wallhangers. I'm sure her Mom put her up to it.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at June 15, 2011 05:24 AM (n2Voo)
Not really since they get their "day in court". Sex crimes have an almost 100% record of recidivism (sp?). They should be tracked, especially if their crimes involved minors.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 05:25 AM (M9Ie6)
Any ideas?
Posted by: Sean BannionEither leave an anonymous note by the water fountain, whistle blow an anonymous complaint with Personnel, or reply in kind with links to Lord Monkton's well researched public awareness efforts. At some point, someone else will get the hint that unwanted to forward non-business matter email at work is unnecessary or "inappropriate".
Posted by: maverick muse at June 15, 2011 05:26 AM (lpWVn)
That article about the sex crimes registry in England is interesting, but the idea of a registry, complete with visits from law enforcement, is troubling.
People should be punished for their crimes, but an open-ended sentence, which is what a sex crimes registry is, smacks of totalitarianism.
The concept has certainly been abused. For example, the 19 year old guy who has sex with the underage GF, the parents get mad, and the guy ends up as a registered sex offender. That's dumb and people should not be placed on registries for that. I might be convinced that a person with a single charge could be allowed to be removed from a registry after a certain number of years. But child molesters and those with multiple rapes need to be monitored because they will do it again.
Or we could rightly consider them to be dangers to society and just lock them up forever (my preference). Then there would be no need for a permanent registry because they'd never get out of custody.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 15, 2011 05:27 AM (JxMoP)
Sean Bannion
I'd suggest sending him a link to WUWT. one click and he'll figure it out. THEN you've got him for harrasment. and a nice payoff if he doesn't stop.
Posted by: todler at June 15, 2011 05:29 AM (fPOY0)
Then keep them in jail until they die. But a sex crimes registry, administered by bureaucrats makes our court system a mockery.
Well, the judges help. And the legislature too.
Never mind.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 15, 2011 05:29 AM (0Z5GH)
Obama Creates Slew of Jobs ... For His Top Donors More than two years after Obama took office vowing to banish “special interests” from his administration, nearly 200 of his biggest donors have landed plum government jobs and advisory posts, won federal contracts worth millions of dollars for their business interests or attended numerous elite White House meetings and social events, an investigation by iWatch News has found.
These “bundlers” raised at least $50,000 — and sometimes more than $500,000 — in campaign donations for Obama’s campaign. Many of those in the “Class of 2008” are now being asked to bundle contributions for Obama’s reelection, an effort that could cost $1 billion.
As a candidate, Obama spoke passionately about diminishing the clout of moneyed interests. Kicking off his presidential run on Feb. 10, 2007, he blasted “the cynics, the lobbyists, the special interests,” who had “turned our government into a game only they can afford to play.”
“We’re here today to take it back,” he said.
...
Overall, 184 of 556, or about one-third of Obama bundlers or their spouses joined the administration in some role. But the percentages are much higher for the big-dollar bundlers. Nearly 80 percent of those who collected more than $500,000 for Obama took “key administration posts,” as defined by the White House. More than half the 24 ambassador nominees who were bundlers raised $500,000.
Posted by: momma at June 15, 2011 05:29 AM (nWikJ)
You might try what I did with a co-worker who kept forwarding those damn chain e-mails, which was to politely point out I had to concentrate on e-mails related to my work and found I didn't have time to spend on non-work related messages. And in case that was too subtle I asked for her help on a project I knew she didn't want to work on.
Posted by: Retread at June 15, 2011 05:30 AM (G+7cD)
"The temperature change associated with any reduction in sunspot activity would likely be minimal and may not be enough to offset the impact of greenhouse gases on global warming, according to scientists who have published recent papers on the topic."
So people are more now powerful than the sun. Riiiiight.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 15, 2011 08:35 AMSure, the "EXPERTS" know that they can't tax, regulate, and micromanage the sun.
That's why solar activity has no effect while leaving the bathroom light on will melt the glaciers and flood Algore's beach mansion in Santa Barbara
Posted by: kbdabear at June 15, 2011 05:31 AM (so1xa)
Posted by: momma at June 15, 2011 05:32 AM (nWikJ)
Not really since they get their "day in court". Sex crimes have an almost 100% record of recidivism (sp?). They should be tracked, especially if their crimes involved minors.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 09:25 AM (M9Ie6)
I concur.
Since I was small, I have liked the same thing in the opposite sex: red hair, curvy figure, blue or green eyes. That has not changed throughout my life.
I have only ever known one person who abruptly changed their sexuality, a homosexual who decided, firmly, that he would be one no longer, and even that is not simply a cut-and-dried matter for the guy. He works hard at it, consciously, daily.
When it comes to rapists, especially child rapists, there is no trust. Unless their will surpasses the rest of us - and we know that it does not, seeing as how they're violent offenders in the first place - they will attack again. Their sexuality does not change, their preferences do not change. There can be no trust, and they must be watched carefully.
Or shot.
One of the two.
Posted by: KinleyArdal at June 15, 2011 05:32 AM (BAZ1j)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at June 15, 2011 05:33 AM (NtTkA)
Posted by: momma at June 15, 2011 09:32 AM (nWikJ)
I endorse this option.
Or, alternatively, the aforementioned firing squad.
Posted by: KinleyArdal at June 15, 2011 05:34 AM (BAZ1j)
"Enough with the bullshit."
That should do it.
Posted by: Dang at June 15, 2011 05:34 AM (TXKVh)
The concept has certainly been abused.
---
I agree.
Posted by: Y-not at June 15, 2011 05:34 AM (TFxd0)
Tell him your religion is the exact opposite of Climate Change. Tell them your faith requires you to believe God/not man controls the weather.
He can't even mention climate change to you again without 'disrespecting your religion' which is grounds for firing.
Posted by: momma at June 15, 2011 05:35 AM (nWikJ)
ChicagoÂ’s Big Brother network of over 10,000 public and private surveillance cameras is already the most extensive and integrated in the nation. But, itÂ’s about to get even bigger.
Mayor Rahm Emanuel chaired his first Public Building Commission meeting on Tuesday and joined his fellow members in adding three potential terrorist targets to the cityÂ’s surveillance network: the Board of Trade, the Federal Reserve and the AT&T switching center.
Posted by: momma at June 15, 2011 09:21 AMFunny how Chicago's spycam network can't seem to spot teenage thugs attacking and robbing downtown shoppers
Posted by: kbdabear at June 15, 2011 05:35 AM (so1xa)
What about the example cited above? The 18-year-old boyfriend having sex with the 17-year-old girlfriend. Daddy gets mad, calls the cops, and boyfriend goes to jail for life?
Registries are administered capriciously. The concept is anathema to a free society.
Set the penalties so that the public is protected from sexual predators.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 15, 2011 05:36 AM (0Z5GH)
What Chicago really needs is cameras watching ever fucking move their corrupt politicians make. That would cut the crime rate down.
Posted by: momma at June 15, 2011 05:37 AM (nWikJ)
From the "NO SHIT SHERLOCK" file:
The Consumer Price Index, the government's key inflation measure, rose 3.6% over the past 12 months. That compares to a 3.2% rise in April when gas prices were still climbing rapidly.
Gas prices fell 2% in May but are still up 36% over the past year. Food prices jumped 3.5% compared to a year ago.
But the so-called core CPI, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, rose just 1.5% over the past 12 months. Still, that's the biggest increase for core CPI since January 2010. Core CPI rose 1.3% year-over-year in April.
who would have guessed that inflation is taking off? none of us morons. the public certainly doesn't notice things like that.
Fucking morons.
oh, and the DOW is off 96 pts.
Posted by: todler at June 15, 2011 05:37 AM (fPOY0)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at June 15, 2011 09:33 AM (NtTkA)
That's not really sporting. Funny as hell, but perhaps a bit over the top.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 15, 2011 05:39 AM (0Z5GH)
Got my blood work done today. Couldn't do it yesterday 'cause they couldn't find me in the system (I've been there before) and the only person who could add records into the database was out sick. This shit happens to me all of the time.
I'm applying for a legal name change -- to Joe Btfsplk.
Posted by: Ed Anger at June 15, 2011 05:41 AM (7+pP9)
Anyone got a nice, polite way to tell a co-worker that I don't appreciate his global warming doom emails?
This guy sends them to the entire office everytime he finds some online piece about how we're all going to melt. To me, that's unprofessional in the extreme.
I've refrained from sending pieces outlining the case against AGW, because frankly, this is a reliogion with these people and there's no point arguing it.
Any ideas?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at June 15, 2011 09:15 AM1st time, simply request that the emails cease simply due to non business nature. Do not enter into the politics of it
2nd time, request that the emails cease, CC to your manager, his/her manager, and IT director.
3rd time, CC to all the above and HR
Posted by: kbdabear at June 15, 2011 05:42 AM (so1xa)
Send a "reply to all" email saying something like "Slow day?" or "Having a stay-cation right here in the office?". Later you can say "oops" about the reply to all thing.
Posted by: Dang at June 15, 2011 05:42 AM (TXKVh)
No. But, I don't see that as rape either. You can be a senior in high school and be 19.
If a emotional relationship can be establish (proved) and the minor is 16 +, and the 'offender' is 19 or younger, and both parties say it wasn't force-able sex, then there shouldn't even be a case.
I'm talking under 15, force-able sex, lives ruined, etc.
Posted by: momma at June 15, 2011 05:43 AM (nWikJ)
One of my favorite classes in high school was world history, which actually turned out to be Western Civ. The teacher (also the school's Latin teacher basically told us on the first day that nothing worth noting happened in Asia or Africa so she wasn't going to spend any time on them. She'd probably be fired today.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee AtwaterNothing wrong with teaching her own specialty, Western Civilization, a major impact on global civilizations given colonialism. She didn't prohibit independent study.
That a teacher honestly expressed her own bias put it out front so students could see it and go figure on their own. It isn't as if students always agree with their teacher's biases.
"Nothing worth noting" in Asia and Africa, by ignoring what Western Civilization did upon introduction to Asia and Africa, is its own confession. No sense beating a dead horse, whether the feudal class system of castes or slavery, so long as the horse is dead. And applying the guilt trip on Western Civilization is historically inaccurate given that racism, tribalism, slavery and castes in Asia and Africa pre-date European colonialism. The West did not "teach" Africans slavery. The West did not "teach" Asia castes and racism. The West did not invent vice and human exploitation, though the West certainly marketed it best. At least the West banned overtly marketing slavery. Can either Africa or Asia claim that they no longer trade in slavery, that they no longer base warfare on tribalism?
Posted by: maverick muse at June 15, 2011 05:44 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at June 15, 2011 05:44 AM (NtTkA)
Are they sending them to everyone in the office? the Owner/Managers?
I had a problem like that for years and finally told the person "do not send me anymore of your "lectures" and all hell broke lose. I wound up looking like the bad guy. They were so offended you would have thought I had poured hot coffer over their head. Most in the office, being like minded, sided with her.
Posted by: lan sing at June 15, 2011 05:44 AM (YHrQZ)
Posted by: Ed Anger at June 15, 2011 05:44 AM (7+pP9)
Try to look on the bright side. The DOOM won't seem so bad while you're on those meds.
Take care, Ed.
Posted by: Y-not at June 15, 2011 05:44 AM (TFxd0)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at June 15, 2011 09:33 AM (NtTkA)
That's not really sporting. Funny as hell, but perhaps a bit over the top.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative)
Could always have a subscription to various gay porn magazines and videos for the person and make sure they deliver it to his work addy.
Posted by: todler at June 15, 2011 05:45 AM (fPOY0)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at June 15, 2011 05:46 AM (lbo6/)
Posted by: momma at June 15, 2011 05:47 AM (nWikJ)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff
ONLY as long as you post your emails here at the HQ. I want to see th eepic beat down you administer.
Posted by: todler at June 15, 2011 05:47 AM (fPOY0)
Posted by: CAC at June 15, 2011 05:47 AM (7TwHV)
The Dragon and the Persian Leopard continue to plot against the status quo. Perhaps they are seizing their "chance"?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 15, 2011 05:47 AM (9hSKh)
It seems to me a standard background check would be able to pull up skeletons of that sort so that employers or organizations would not hire someone with that background to work with children. What is the purpose of me knowing where a sex offender lives?
Posted by: Y-not at June 15, 2011 05:48 AM (TFxd0)
Registries are administered capriciously. The concept is anathema to a free society.
Set the penalties so that the public is protected from sexual predators.
This all stems from the concept of criminal rehabilitation. The registry concept is a reaction to a faulty premise, that being that rapists and child molesters can be rehabilitated. It's just not possible because there's something wrong inside their heads. The proper policy would be to accept that some people are just broken, they can't be fixed, and therefore they need to be removed from society so that they can't harm others.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 15, 2011 05:49 AM (JxMoP)
But the so-called core CPI, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, rose just 1.5% over the past 12 months. Still, that's the biggest increase for core CPI since January 2010. Core CPI rose 1.3% year-over-year in April.
who would have guessed that inflation is taking off? none of us morons. the public certainly doesn't notice things like that.
Posted by: todler at June 15, 2011 09:37 AM (fPOY0)
The question remains in why the fuel and food price increases took place. The word "inflation" always implies that monetary policy is causative. That is not the case here, or at least not entirely. Oil demand is up, and supply is down. Food demand is up world wide, and we had the Russian and Australian wheat crops largely destroyed last year. Some portion may of the food price increases may also be related to the diversion of resources to ethanol.
We have prices going up - but we must be careful in finding the real causes so that our policy prescriptions are correct. Drive up the supply of energy and food, and suddenly what we're calling inflation will be nearly zero.
Posted by: Reactionary at June 15, 2011 05:49 AM (xUM1Q)
That is a problem with the way the laws in some States are written. The laws here were revised a few years ago to eliminate those kinds of abuses and tighten up on other issues.
But the bottom line is this. True sex offenders are always repeat offenders. And those that prey on children are the most heinous of the heinous.
Personally I apply the 100 year rule (which may need extending now to 150 years now). What did they do back in days of yore? If someone raped a child and was caught by the townspeople he never made it to court. If he did make it to court he would never see the light of day again.
There was no "registry" because there was no need for one.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 05:50 AM (M9Ie6)
I'm sorry about your meds. that truly must be a horrible feeling, especially for someone who likes to be in control. I'm sure you've done all the stuff to bring your blood pressure down naturally. Like forcing yourself to think before you start to get upset and telling yourself to calm down. And I'm assuming you are taking a nice walk with your significant other everyday and drinking 8 glasses of water.
Posted by: curious at June 15, 2011 05:51 AM (k1rwm)
Ick.
I thought Facebook Twitter was for that.
Posted by: Y-not at June 15, 2011 05:52 AM (TFxd0)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at June 15, 2011 05:54 AM (NtTkA)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at June 15, 2011 05:55 AM (lbo6/)
We have prices going up - but we must be careful in finding the real causes so that our policy prescriptions are correct. Drive up the supply of energy and food, and suddenly what we're calling inflation will be nearly zero.
Posted by: Reactionary
True. and it's responses like that why I like this smart military blog. I lean new things every day. Sometimes useful things too.
IF the govt fixed it's rectal-cranial inversion and got out of the way, we'd reduce inflation, lower unemployment, and make people happier.
but then that's a feature, not a bug, of the current administration.
Posted by: todler at June 15, 2011 05:56 AM (fPOY0)
Posted by: curious at June 15, 2011 09:51 AM (k1rwm)
Now I know why all the morons love you so much.
I'm going fishing, catch y'all later.
Posted by: Ed Anger at June 15, 2011 05:57 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: curious at June 15, 2011 05:59 AM (k1rwm)
I'm sorry about your meds. that truly must be a horrible feeling, especially for someone who likes to be in control. I'm sure you've done all the stuff to bring your blood pressure down naturally. Like forcing yourself to think before you start to get upset and telling yourself to calm down. And I'm assuming you are taking a nice walk with your significant other everyday and drinking 8 glasses of water.
Posted by: curious at June 15, 2011 09:51 AM (k1rwm)
And be very careful about what links you click on.
Posted by: lan sing at June 15, 2011 06:00 AM (YHrQZ)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at June 15, 2011 06:00 AM (eOXTH)
The Rx meds seriously f*cked over my high pressured better half, taking him to emergency heart hospital care. Along with the dietary care, a tablespoon of Lecithin granules before lunch brought his blood pressure down to normal without pharmaceutical drugs. He got that tip from his diabetic, high blood pressured dad.
Best wishes for your good health.
Posted by: maverick muse at June 15, 2011 06:00 AM (lpWVn)
I'm not sure this is the same as the e-mail thing at work, but something similar.
We just get brow-beaten to give to the United Way at work. I don't. But what they really get on you is to fill out a card saying that you are not giving. I have refused for years to fill out that card. My explanation to them is that if I don't want to give to a Charity, then it's my business and I don't have any obligation to fill out paperwork to state that.
But man, they really, really come down on me about this. And I'm talking about the real high ups.
At this point, to me, it's become a matter of principle, and I'm not giving in. But I know I'm about to get a lot of heat in the next week or so.
Posted by: HH at June 15, 2011 06:01 AM (6oDXl)
I have worked at places where if you don't contribute, you are going to get fired eventually. When the company decides that be a Fair Share giving company is good PR, anyone who doesn't help isn't considered a company man, and your days are numbered.
Posted by: toby928™ at June 15, 2011 06:05 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: maverick muse at June 15, 2011 09:51 AM (lpWVn)
I'm not talking about putting them in a hospital or trying to find out what makes them tick. Send them to prison for the rest of their lives.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 15, 2011 06:05 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: CAC at June 15, 2011 06:07 AM (6gk77)
Posted by: torabora at June 15, 2011 06:09 AM (w4ZJu)
Posted by: PaleRider at June 15, 2011 06:09 AM (cQZV0)
---
Thanks for answering.
To me, the best way to protect your family is to know your neighbors and your kids' friends. Having the home addresses of people in the registry, which I think we all agree lumps very dissimilar people together, doesn't really protect kids from people they encounter day to day.
I freely admit, I think it's very 19th Century (and wrong) to label people in perpetuity after they've completed their incarceration and probation (aside from government records that can be accessed by background checks). The appropriate thing to do is to construct their sentences so that they include treatment, for the handful of people who are able to be fixed, and continued incarceration for the ones who are not. I'd also consider voluntary castration if there's enough evidence out there to suggest that that would actually be effective. (I don't know if folks who go that route wind up getting their jollies by other sick methods.)
Posted by: Y-not at June 15, 2011 06:10 AM (TFxd0)
Posted by: lan sing at June 15, 2011 06:10 AM (YHrQZ)
My hubby and I have both worked in higher ed philanthropy. We hate the United Way and their strong arm tactics.
I'd keep doing what you're doing and "forget" to fill out those cards.
Posted by: Y-not at June 15, 2011 06:12 AM (TFxd0)
Posted by: todler at June 15, 2011 06:13 AM (fPOY0)
Posted by: Y-not at June 15, 2011 06:14 AM (TFxd0)
Posted by: PaleRider at June 15, 2011 06:14 AM (cQZV0)
Yeah, I believe Huntsman is solidly pro-life.
But the other factor is that he's a weasel. Everyone I've spoken to here in Utah, including people who worked on his gubernatorial campaigns, say he is an untrustworthy opportunist. I'd consider voting for Huckabee (yeah, yeah, he's not in) before I'd vote for Huntsman.
Posted by: Y-not at June 15, 2011 06:16 AM (TFxd0)
I think they can, it's just that you lose that state's electoral votes.
Posted by: Y-not at June 15, 2011 06:17 AM (TFxd0)
--*COUGH* Muslims with arranged child brides *COUGH*
Posted by: logprof at June 15, 2011 06:17 AM (ylQKN)
Posted by: lan sing at June 15, 2011 10:10 AM (YHrQZ)
I understand that. But the point is I won't contribute (I don't care for United Way as a charity), and I'll be damned if I have to fill out a card stating that I'm not going to donate.
Posted by: HH at June 15, 2011 06:17 AM (6oDXl)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at June 15, 2011 06:18 AM (lbo6/)
Do you know anything about this Utah healthcare reform law?
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 06:18 AM (M9Ie6)
Well, I am trying to be fair. I know he has at least one supporter here at AOS.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 06:20 AM (M9Ie6)
hey, anyone notice the side-bar about the mini-ice age? the magical words Maunder Minimum are appearently mentioned. Hope everyone has enough wood on hand.
All we need now is a plague and "The Last Centurion" will be a predictive book, not fiction.
Posted by: todler at June 15, 2011 06:21 AM (fPOY0)
Too bad employees have to put up "crap" that has nothing to do with the getting their job done.
Posted by: lan sing at June 15, 2011 06:22 AM (YHrQZ)
Posted by: Case at June 15, 2011 08:27 AM (0K+Kw)
I make zee incision here, attach you together here...Using zee surgical staples, I attach zee feet to zee pedals, und mit der surgical screws I attach zee wheels... A human velocipede!!!!!
Posted by: Psycho German Surgeon and Cycling Enthusiast at June 15, 2011 06:22 AM (DrWcr)
My understanding is that this is not necessarily true. I don't think it's been litigated, but the interpretation I've seen of the part of the 12th Amendment this falls under is that they CAN be from the same state, but are not eligible for the electoral votes from that state.
Since no GOP candidate, even Pawlenty, was expected to win MN, the issue becomes moot....and I don't find that ticket altogether distasteful. I'm not a Pawlenty fan, but others are so there are those votes, and he'd be pretty impotent as VP anyway.
Posted by: beedubya at June 15, 2011 06:23 AM (AnTyA)
Both were organizations I'd had personal experiences with. One, amusingly, I now actually work for. Funny how that rolls.
Posted by: AoSHQ's *second* worst commenter, DarkLord© at June 15, 2011 06:27 AM (GBXon)
But United Way is not for a good cause. They bundle all sorts of things together, including planned parenthood type stuff iirc. Look at the list in your area and see what they say they support.
In the past when I was forced to participate I always made it a point to designate my contribution to a group that I knew about. Usually this was the Boy Scouts, though I am not sure if United Way supports them any more because of BSA's continued prohibition of gay Scoutmasters.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 15, 2011 06:29 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: todler at June 15, 2011 10:21 AM (fPOY0)
Yeah, I've just read about that. Interesting that increased CO2 levels haven't warmed us. So if the Sun starts sort of cooling, hmmm....
Posted by: HH at June 15, 2011 06:30 AM (6oDXl)
They changed the way they did United Way so that you could designate local organizations that your contribution went to so then that one wasn't so bad.
The others continued to be the suckittude though.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 06:30 AM (M9Ie6)
Both were organizations I'd had personal experiences with. One, amusingly, I now actually work for. Funny how that rolls.
Posted by: AoSHQ's *second* worst commenter, DarkLord© at June 15, 2011 10:27 AM (GBXon)
I had an employer like that once. They'd have high-pressure office meetings to try to convince you to donate to United Way and stuff a pledge form in your hands before you could leave. I was barely making enough at the time to cover my living expenses (which were pretty modest, believe me), so the form promptly went in the trash.
Posted by: Insomniac at June 15, 2011 06:32 AM (v+QvA)
Posted by: CAC at June 15, 2011 06:32 AM (5UcDQ)
The boy studied Texas history in Kindergarden. Granted, it was superficial, but it was still history. (He also learned about Venn diagrams - WTF?)
Posted by: mpurinTexas supports Rick Perry, bitch at June 15, 2011 06:33 AM (5d6vv)
LOL, I do try to avoid starting flame wars. But I seem to recall him/her(?) posting in multiple threads. (Tatoo DePlane)
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 06:34 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at June 15, 2011 06:34 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at June 15, 2011 06:36 AM (eOXTH)
Yeah, I've just read about that. Interesting that increased CO2 levels haven't warmed us. So if the Sun starts sort of cooling, hmmm....
Posted by: HH
I'm preparing to scout locations south of me that will allow me to survive, and protect myself if it does what I'm expecting. I don't believe it will be good for much of the "West" simply because all the idiots in charge refuse to believe what they are seeing. And in the process they will manage to destroy much of what we've built.
Although 3rd world countries won't be much better off. Maybe I'll find a quiet island somewhere.
Posted by: todler at June 15, 2011 06:36 AM (fPOY0)
Posted by: Cherry π at June 15, 2011 06:39 AM (+sBB4)
I'm not against Charity at all. What I just don't get is the pressure from United Way on companies.
What's with that, and how come it happens?
Posted by: HH at June 15, 2011 06:40 AM (6oDXl)
Same here. Would you believe I have NEVER seen a polar bear in South Carolina!
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 06:40 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: CAC at June 15, 2011 06:46 AM (6gk77)
batchelor did a segment on this last night. It was very informative and totally made the global warmies look like fools.
Posted by: curious at June 15, 2011 06:47 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: curious at June 15, 2011 06:49 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 06:51 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 06:57 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: CAC at June 15, 2011 07:00 AM (C3KwS)
Unfortunately that is true, but I think it applies to Democrats more than Republicans.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 07:15 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 10:51 AM (M9Ie6)
Immediately after the debate I came on and said "bachmann wooo hoooo" cause that was my thought too. She basically ran the table.
Posted by: curious at June 15, 2011 09:58 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: canada goose at June 15, 2011 07:45 PM (+Yddc)
Posted by: uk men at June 17, 2011 02:18 AM (QIF3/)
Posted by: co-cochanel at June 19, 2011 07:23 PM (rWnij)
Posted by: hermes at June 21, 2011 06:25 PM (0Al0x)
Posted by: bracelet pandora at June 22, 2011 10:45 PM (baBWZ)
Posted by: Thomas And Sabo at June 30, 2011 01:03 AM (rDuNS)
Posted by: tina at June 30, 2011 11:36 PM (7rE4R)
Posted by: qingxiang at July 01, 2011 09:52 PM (pLi3W)
Posted by: v at July 09, 2011 12:46 AM (neAGm)
Posted by: Hogan Sito Ufficiale at July 11, 2011 09:51 PM (vehtj)
To not be inside the understand more often than not, I am inclined to dont like posts regarding this subject progressively additional consider you are writing it in fashion furthermore your personal means, we gotta say really is really 1 of those nice publish to remember.
Posted by: cheapchinawholesales at July 11, 2011 10:58 PM (wB66k)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2732 seconds, 357 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Fox did a report on this BS yesterday
It is another fine example of a government bureaucracy expanding its reach far beyond what congress allocated to it when it was constructed. Now the FDA have decided that there is an overwhelming need to regulate the labels on sunscreen. Whole new books of regulations about how the PF is done, what can be posted, and what you even call sunscreen on the label.
The FDA (as we know it today) was born out of the Food and Drug Act of 1906. Our own “progressive” Teddy Roosevelt was one of the driving forces. Since then they have grown to gargantuan size and authority over all kinds of food and drugs. But now sunscreen??? This is neither a food not a drug. Anyone with an IQ above that of a Fig Newton either knows how to pick out sunscreen or can figure out how to learn to pick it out. Has there been some kind of study that showed massive public problems caused by bad labeling? - NO Has congress held hearings? - NO In fact, congress has done nothing to authorize this expansion of government power into private business. The FDA, like a bunch of other Obama agencies simply took it upon themselves to relegate this power to themselves.
As we saw with the cases of the rabbits, unchecked bureaucratic meddling has become the biggest source of loss of freedom in the U.S. Forget no knock drug raids. There are really few of those. But damn near every minute of your life is now regulated in once form or another.
Posted by: Vic at June 15, 2011 03:13 AM (M9Ie6)