September 21, 2011
— Gabriel Malor There are no stupid questions, only stupid people.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:31 AM
| Comments (219)
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 02:38 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: 52% ers at September 21, 2011 02:39 AM (rFdqZ)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 02:40 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 02:42 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: backhoe, Hobbit tea-roar-ist of Doom at September 21, 2011 02:44 AM (rFdqZ)
Fed announces it will print even more money and call it something else again. Zimbabwe here we come.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:46 AM (M9Ie6)
Government shutdown looming? Not to worry crying Boner will make a deal.
The commies know that Boner is scared of a shutdown so they will threaten it at every turn. Also note Sen bill passed with 10 Republicans “crossing the aisle”. Anyone want to bet who these were?
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:46 AM (M9Ie6)
The Hill finally covers Solyndra
House Republicans are making a concerted effort to drum home charges that the White House is guilty of Chicago-style cronyism.
How about this you worthless assholes, the WH made a concerted effort to funnel taxpayer money to a political contributor and “favored crap” in a wash of corruption and got caught red-handed.
This story is reminiscent of the MFM blaming Ken Starr for ClintonÂ’s perjury.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:47 AM (M9Ie6)
Evidently the offshore drilling office for the Gulf of Mexico was called the Gestapo by a LA congressman and now they are “offended”. I say after repeated ignoring court orders they should be called something else, how about a number on their prison uniform?
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:47 AM (M9Ie6)
Evil Rethugs holding up spending bill
Two conservative Republicans are holding up the Health and Human Services spending bill.
My question is why is it only two?
The two lawmakers, Reps. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), say the spending measure costs too much and are demanding spending reductions, sources tell The Hill. Last week they sent a letter to House leaders saying they want spending levels for the bill to be in line with the budget put forward by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and approved by the House instead of the debt ceiling deal.
Not worry, Boner made a deal and they can spend what they want this year and next. They did pinky-swear to reduce spending 10 years down the road.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:48 AM (M9Ie6)
Daily Caller says Tea Party will challenge crying Boner in primary
Not sure how much we are believing DC anymore. For now I will keep linking them. What do the Morons think?
Tea party activist David LewisÂ’s announcement Friday that he plans to mount a primary challenge to House Speaker John Boehner could indicate a larger problem for the GOP leadership, and point to restlessness among an important segment of the tea party faithful.
I really donÂ’t think this will amount to anything at all. In addition, I donÂ’t think we need to primary crying Boner. What we need is to get him out of the SOH job.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:48 AM (M9Ie6)
Another case of "no shit Sherlock".
Energy Dept. weatherization programs rife with waste, fraud, inspector general audits showPosted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:49 AM (M9Ie6)
Bill "serial perjurer" Clinton says watermelon movement needs more money
I say its adherents need more jail time.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:49 AM (M9Ie6)
Sorry, been needing to get to work earlier and earlier. Usual schedule to be resumed tomorrow.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at September 21, 2011 02:50 AM (XVaFd)
Some really hard core arrogance from AG secretary
We will eat our low salt peas and learn to like it, or else. Somebody help me out here. My understanding was that this salt reduction scam was a “recommendation” by Moochell and had no force of law, so what is this shit?
And BTW, there is no evidence that lowering salt intake is heart healthy for most Americans. Only people with congestive heart failure and people who are salt sensitive need to avoid salt intake.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:50 AM (M9Ie6)
GOP governments have been curtailing early voting (in Ohio and Florida) and requiring voters to produce official photo-identification cards (in Wisconsin). In South Carolina, the poll tax lives again: Voters who want an official photo-ID card must present a passport or a birth certificate, neither of which can be obtained for free.
This shit about SC is an outright lie. The new voter ID law was modeled after the GA law which the Supreme Court upheld. The key provision in it that SCOTUS looked for was availability of free ID to poor voters. That is in the SC law.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:51 AM (M9Ie6)
F&F will have the CEO of a firm which was fined $15K by the SEC for “hiring too many people”. He says he was fined plus incurred $500K in legal costs because he hired new people without “SEC permission”. This is something I have been talking about for a long time. Absolutely worthless regulations. This is truly what is killing business in the U.S.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:51 AM (M9Ie6)
Also on F&F discussion whether a child born of a Filipino citizen over international waters in an American carrier is a U.S. citizen. I have some news for them, there is no question about it. Too bad lady, you needed to make it to U.S. airspace before your anchor baby was born. Babies born in international airspace have citizenship of their parents.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:51 AM (M9Ie6)
Goldman-Sachs is gonna downgrade us again....
when you have President Xerxes X in charge and he swears he won't cut and wants to tax 3 bucks for every dollar "saved"....(actually since his budgets is even more a con than it looks it is really 3 bucks tax for every .53 cents "cut") I am thinking the presses get fired up at least two more times before Barry gets thrown out.
Thanks 52%
Posted by: sven10077 at September 21, 2011 02:51 AM (AEIYh)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljvyaqa5Mfo&feature=related,
Posted by: Matt at September 21, 2011 02:51 AM (FrvhH)
John "Moderate" Fund stoking the Chris Christie fires again
I keep saying this and pundits keep stoking the fires, it is TOO late for new candidates in the Republican Primary. That includes Christie, Palin, and any others. What we need now is to get rid of some of the fringe candidates (< 5% support) and those who haven’t announced at all (Palin should be removed from all polls). Note that Palin said last night there was still time to get in and she was still “considering”. One wonders WTF she is actually shooting for??? She used to be on my short list, but no more. She is now doing more harm than good.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:52 AM (M9Ie6)
Bama's bill long on taxes and short on actual cuts
During his Rose Garden speech Monday, the President claimed that his new “debt reduction” plan would provide $2 of spending cuts for every $1 of tax increases. A closer look at the administration’s own numbers, however, suggests the President, well, exaggerated.
IOW he is a CF of a liar.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:53 AM (M9Ie6)
The card is free, and all you have to do is get your cheating ass down to the DMV to pick one up. The requirement is waived for people in long-term care facilities, so SEIU can still fill out ballots using the names of the comatose and senile...
Posted by: HeatherRadish at September 21, 2011 02:55 AM (0vDuM)
Who will indict them, Holder? Hahahahaha
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:56 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 02:57 AM (EPcuy)
I wasn't familiar with the WI law, but that makes it 100% Everything in that piece was a damnable lie.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:58 AM (M9Ie6)
What was the purpose of the beef? Has she gone full retard?
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 02:59 AM (M9Ie6)
Too bad nobody's going to see it except us internet politcs nerds.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at September 21, 2011 03:00 AM (0vDuM)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 03:00 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 03:02 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 03:03 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 03:04 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 03:05 AM (UlUS4)
Yes he can, there are no limitations on Presidential pardon power. So says the Supremes.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 03:08 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 03:09 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 03:09 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 03:11 AM (UlUS4)
Nothing like a good class war. Most people want the rich to pay their fair share. Most people get rich by exploitation and taking advantage of others. This comes back to haunt their families.
Posted by: voter222 at September 21, 2011 03:11 AM (t4YF+)
None of this is ever really about health, it is about control of the masses. "You will have no salt and LIKE it!"
I think Ruckelshaus (original head of EPA) said something like "if we can control this (think it was DDT), we can control anything!". The theme lives on.
Posted by: Hrothgar at September 21, 2011 03:13 AM (i3+c5)
Protestors contunire to gather on Wall Street. This very symbolic. It is an indication of the future USA.
Posted by: socialistt at September 21, 2011 03:13 AM (t4YF+)
Sure he can. The only restriction on pardons is he can't pardon himself or any others in the cases of impeachment.
Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution.
"The President ... shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment."
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 03:13 AM (M9Ie6)
That is a super ad, and indicates a real level of competence in his campaign. The ad progresses from dark to light, with the break in mood heralded by the galloping horse.
Just an excellent piece of work. I am quite impressed.
Posted by: Miss Marple at September 21, 2011 03:14 AM (Fo83G)
The founders never envisioned a douche like the Zero making to the Presidency. Too bad for us.
Posted by: Hrothgar at September 21, 2011 03:16 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: voter222 at September 21, 2011 07:11 AM (t4YF+)
Well, that's how lefties get rich. Good people get rich because they have good ideas.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 21, 2011 03:16 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 03:18 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 03:19 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 03:21 AM (UlUS4)
Harry Reid still demonizing the Tea Party with every inane utterance......................
cuz it worked so well for Democrats in the 2010 elections.
Posted by: Spiker at September 21, 2011 03:24 AM (5aWTl)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 07:21 AM (UlUS4)
In the eyes of a true liberal, this is a feature, not a bug!
Posted by: Hrothgar at September 21, 2011 03:25 AM (i3+c5)
The tax the rich thing is getting confusing. The definition of rich keeps changing on both the left and right and the tax code continues to get more complicated.
The repubs and dems dont have a clue about the details of the tax code. I knew a person who had a 4 million dollar income but after expenses only took home 85K. The politicians and businessmen do not understand tax code.
Flat tax makes sense but wont happen in USA. Too many enrich themselves over a more complicated tax code.
Posted by: voter222 at September 21, 2011 03:27 AM (t4YF+)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 03:28 AM (UlUS4)
Mornin', 'rons and 'ettes.
Ima lovin' me some Solyndra, especially early in the morning.
This just may be what we've been waiting for, a scandal that goes all the way to the White House. What I didn't know was that the DOJ renegotiated the bankruptcy details to put the investors of Solyndra at the head of the line to receive their money back when it went tits-up, and screwed us out of any chance to get our tax dollars back in a blatant violation of federal law.
Click on my handle for the highlights...
Posted by: Emerson, Lake, and Palmer at September 21, 2011 03:30 AM (d0Tfm)
Yes, even Gretchen said that. But in this case unless this adm flouts the law she will not make it.
In the case of voter fraud there have been cases were the cheating was so flagrant and widespread it was possible to know. Examples are the widespread phony registration by ACORN and cases where there were more voters in a precinct than there was "population".
And what is funny is that these are ALWAYS in Democrat districts.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 03:31 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at September 21, 2011 03:32 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 03:33 AM (UlUS4)
If that is true then it wasn't income, it was gross receipts. Gross receipts minus expenses is profit. Profit that is taken from the company (not reinvested) becomes income and is taxable.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 03:34 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: dogfish at September 21, 2011 03:34 AM (N2yhW)
...But you know, the problem with Madoff is Madoff actually happened because, I think, of the regulators. If we didn't have security regulation, I don't think Bernie Madoff ever could have gotten as big as he was. People would have ferreted him out. There would have been more due diligence. But because he had the blessing of the regulators, nobody questioned him...
Posted by: franksalterego at September 21, 2011 03:36 AM (7/sDI)
Obama "The Won" has yet to accomplish anything beyond destruction of life.
Posted by: maverick muse at September 21, 2011 03:36 AM (lpWVn)
You just have to rank them in order of "badness".
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 03:37 AM (M9Ie6)
They did this with Chrysler and GM to protect UAW pensions over the investors.
Oh yeah. Last time, there was the Pelosi- and Reid-led congress to ignore it.
This time, um, not so much. I'd personally like to see some real results from this, like impeachment and prison time for all involved.
It's the Chicago Way!
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at September 21, 2011 03:37 AM (d0Tfm)
"Continue to poke the middle class in the eye with a sharp stick, this will bring them around to embrace our message."
"We will attack the earners and drivers of prosperity by calling them rich without distinction of the massively wealthy who pay practically no taxes and recieve the lion's share of the public purse."
"Foment crisis after crisis to confuse and exhaust the resistance to our malfeasance."
Posted by: Beto Ochoa at September 21, 2011 03:39 AM (j5CHE)
Posted by: franksalterego at September 21, 2011 07:36 AM (7/sDI)
Let's not forget that there were several people who actually reported this Ponzi scheme to the SEC warning them. The SEC ignored them.
This, more than anything else, shows the true worthlessness of federal regulation. It only punishes the honest businesses.
Crooks like Madoff just falsify the paper and the SEC is happy, they have a piece of paper with all the "I's" dotted and the "T's" crossed.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 03:40 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 03:41 AM (EPcuy)
-"Nice Perry ad. Now let's hear something about how he can change that." - The Flamethrower
=====================
True Dat. Otherwise we are filling in the blanks with our own "hopes and dreams" and doing exactly what the mindless minions did in 2008.
Did Perry ever attend Bilderberg meetings? It's entirely possible we're getting fooled.
Posted by: Dadof3 at September 21, 2011 03:42 AM (umKhw)
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 07:40 AM
Nevermind, they were all sittin' around, pulling their puds.
NTTAWWT, 'cept during working hours.
Posted by: franksalterego at September 21, 2011 03:45 AM (7/sDI)
@55. Yes, it was DDT. The EPA said if they could control it (stop its use), they would be able to control anything. Even though the myths about the use of DDT have been debunked its still baned for old times sake. They will never admit they were wrong. And it goes to show the government does not care about real science. They want the control over us. The EPA fu*ks us and we even pay them to do it. This is the kind of sh*t that government does, and why I will never trust it.
Posted by: Case at September 21, 2011 03:45 AM (DYR2Q)
Did Perry ever attend Bilderberg meetings? It's entirely possible we're getting fooled.
Posted by: Dadof3 at September 21, 2011 07:42 AM (umKhw)
Yes, we should be sure he's not a Reptilian either. You can never be too sure. [Facepalm]
Posted by: joncelli at September 21, 2011 03:46 AM (YL3wr)
Posted by: Bilder-burger at September 21, 2011 03:47 AM (JZBti)
I guess these kind of interviews will show the country what a commie douche this scrunt is but it will not materially effect her reelection chances. Her district would reelect her if the saw a video of her having unnatural sex with a donkey on main street.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 03:48 AM (M9Ie6)
President Zero.. gotta love that and hope it catches on.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 21, 2011 03:48 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 03:48 AM (UlUS4)
It's the Chicago Way!
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at September 21, 2011 07:37 AM (d0Tfm)
We have front row seats to watch how the Chicago Way collides with the Washington (Establishment) Way. Even with a republican House, Boner can't bring himself to actually lead and go on the attack against the blatant corruption, lies, criminality, and fraud present in this administration. God forbid that RINOs jeopardize their choice of tee times or risk not getting to the very best dinner parties or can't access the most profligate lobbyists! "Go along to get along" works far better than standing on principles, because principles might change, but compromise is always in favor with an establishment politician.
I'm betting on the Chicago Way, myself, not that I like it, but I can spot a winner. The Zero may not get a second term, but no important Dem will do jail time, the important people will have lots of taxpayer money (transferred to off shore banks and conveniently overlooked by the IRS), and the ranks of the feral bureaucracy will have been salted with liberals that will take decades to weed out.
Not bad for a community organizer without a paper trail!
Posted by: Hrothgar at September 21, 2011 03:49 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 03:50 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 03:50 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: Beto Ochoa at September 21, 2011 03:51 AM (j5CHE)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 03:51 AM (UlUS4)
THANK RICHARD NIXON!
Posted by: The Flamethrower
............
Actually, I DO thank Nixon. The Clean Air Act and other stuff he did really cleaned up this country.
Air quality, water quality of not only the Great Lakes but a lot of other waterways has improved immensely. Anyone who doesn't think so wasn't alive in the 70's or was clueless.
The problem with a bureaucracy, however, is it never thinks it's job is done.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 21, 2011 03:52 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 03:52 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 03:52 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: Case at September 21, 2011 07:45 AM (DYR2Q)
Doesn't the EPA also fund environmental groups on how to file cases against the EPA for not being strict enough in their regulations?
Not only are we being f*cked, we are paying them to do us with barbed wire dildos.
Posted by: Hrothgar at September 21, 2011 03:53 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: Beto Ochoa at September 21, 2011 03:53 AM (j5CHE)
The secret to keeping government corruption low is to keep government small. Government corruption has been around since John Adams and the crooked American System.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 03:53 AM (M9Ie6)
Vic I meant total Gross Revenues/Gross receipts.It does not seem clear what they want to tax (receipts profit). But it looks like they (conservatives and libs) are raising taxes on everything (except "Special Companies" The R's and the D's both seem to want to tax the rich more. It seems like some companies will always get special tax treatment.
Posted by: voter222 at September 21, 2011 03:54 AM (t4YF+)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 03:54 AM (UlUS4)
And they take financial and personal risks and work their asses off to get their ideas/products out into the market, with no guarantee of "getting rich."
Posted by: HeatherRadish at September 21, 2011 03:55 AM (0vDuM)
Posted by: dogfish at September 21, 2011 03:55 AM (N2yhW)
Just before the break, and after a long list of ObamaFail!, you hear SCOAMF's voice say, "I'm just getting started!" That is a bit of brilliance as it made me think 'not four more years of this' as it was meant to, I'm sure.
Posted by: Retread at September 21, 2011 03:55 AM (BO5ap)
Posted by: Beto Ochoa at September 21, 2011 03:56 AM (j5CHE)
The EPA instantly became worthless and should be disbanded.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 03:57 AM (M9Ie6)
The only antidote is transparency in government and the high probability of serious jail time for transgressors.
Individual honor used to count for something and tended to limit corruption, but modern politicians have moved far far beyond that.
Posted by: Hrothgar at September 21, 2011 03:57 AM (i3+c5)
How many billions did Bush's buddies make on the Iraq and Afghan wars? Influence peddling has no ideological bent.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 21, 2011 03:58 AM (UTq/I)
Income tax hits received income. Business taxes hit "profits". Where the real rubber hits the road is how they determine what is an allowable buisness expense.
If the Dems had their way there would be almost no allowable expenses and gross receipts would be taxable and all businesses would intermediately go bankrupt.
I haven't seen any evidence that "conservative Republicans" are trying to raise taxes.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 04:00 AM (M9Ie6)
Some just do it on a grander scale than others.
I ain't a'skeered of no build-a-burger. IF it wasn't them, it'd be someone else. Don't live your life in fear, friend.
Posted by: Bilder-burger at September 21, 2011 04:00 AM (JZBti)
Posted by: Beto Ochoa at September 21, 2011 04:01 AM (j5CHE)
I would really like to read some investigative reports into the lawyers hired by the groups with EPA money and their political/social/family affiliations.
Her district would reelect her if the saw a video of her having unnatural sex with a donkey on main street.
The videographer would be charged with a hate crime. (...and how dare you imply that it's inappropriate for two consenting animals to have sexual relations in a public setting? Why do you hate free speech? Speciesist prudery!)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at September 21, 2011 04:01 AM (0vDuM)
Posted by: voter222 at September 21, 2011 07:54 AM (t4YF+)
How else will the pols get kickbacks? It's the Washington Way! Ever wonder why there are no poor congresscritters? It is not because God has singled them out as being especially deserving of his grace on Earth!
Posted by: Hrothgar at September 21, 2011 04:01 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: voter222 at September 21, 2011 04:01 AM (t4YF+)
Evidently they eat live babies and pet Persian cats in their laps.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 04:02 AM (M9Ie6)
Solutions? Posted by: J.J. Sefton
..........
The solutions is to make every law and every agency be forced to have a sunset provision.
And also, of course, to make the federal government smaller and responsible for less and less. FEMA, EPA etc. etc.. those should be state's responsibilities. Federal Government should have a role in co-ordination, setting standards (but NOT enforcing them), etc.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 21, 2011 04:02 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: AE at September 21, 2011 04:03 AM (YYjeh)
Posted by: Beto Ochoa at September 21, 2011 04:04 AM (j5CHE)
And leftists keep attempting to legislate health equality, and it's going to work about as well as legislating equality of intelligence and finance.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at September 21, 2011 04:05 AM (0vDuM)
Too bad that boat has already been sunk.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 04:05 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 04:05 AM (EPcuy)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at September 21, 2011 04:05 AM (0vDuM)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at September 21, 2011 04:06 AM (0vDuM)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 21, 2011 04:06 AM (UTq/I)
THANK RICHARD NIXON!
The EPA did not start out with the power it has today. But as with government it has grown more powerful. We all want clean air, water and earth. But these things should go along with common sense, balance, a give and take. The world should not stop over an endangered "weed", "bird" or "rodent". The EPA has grown fangs that harms more than helps. It's past time to tame them.
Posted by: Case at September 21, 2011 04:06 AM (DYR2Q)
Posted by: blaster at September 21, 2011 04:07 AM (Fw2Gg)
Even the R's only care about enriching themselves. They favor certain businesses when it benefits themselves. They really dont care unless it benefits them.
I do not understand why Romney is ok with the rich paying more taxes. It is not patriotic for the rich to pay more taxes for the majoriry of americans except the big business owners.
Posted by: voter222 at September 21, 2011 04:08 AM (t4YF+)
Posted by: voter222 at September 21, 2011 04:09 AM (t4YF+)
Posted by: blaster at September 21, 2011 04:09 AM (Fw2Gg)
Posted by: Fritz at September 21, 2011 04:09 AM (/ZZCn)
Fed announces it will print even more money and call it something else again. Zimbabwe here we come.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 06:46 AM (M9Ie6)
Meh. I doubt much of that money will make it into the economy. And even with the latest "bad" numbers, the core CPI only shows inflation of about 3%. We had double that in the 80's. With so much slack capacity I don't think inflation is going to set in for some time yet, and with rates this low there's plenty of room to fight inflation with rate hikes and still be in low-mid single digits.
We're still a long way from Zimbabwe/Weimar.
Posted by: Reactionary at September 21, 2011 04:10 AM (xUM1Q)
This explains it all
As Democratic and Republican leaders in Washington struggled to find agreement on spending cuts and extending the debt limit, Mitt Romney struck a conciliatory note in New Hampshire on Monday by lamenting partisan feuding while touting his record of working with Democrats -- even the Senate's onetime liberal lion Edward M. Kennedy.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 04:10 AM (M9Ie6)
And people called me "naive". Do you actually believe those numbers from this adm?
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 04:11 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at September 21, 2011 04:11 AM (LnUPt)
And also, of course, to make the federal government smaller and responsible for less and less. FEMA, EPA etc. etc.. those should be state's responsibilities. Federal Government should have a role in co-ordination, setting recommending standards (but NOT enforcing them), etc.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 21, 2011 08:02 AM (UTq/I)
Yes on the sunset provision on everything (legislation and regulations).
I need to look this up as the percentages below might be wrong, but IIRC Heinlein (Moon is a harsh mistress) proposed a bicameral legislature of sorts. One house needed 75% to enact any new law and the other house only needed 51% to repeal any law. Sounds like a plan, given the scope and reach of the ferals these days.
Posted by: Hrothgar at September 21, 2011 04:12 AM (i3+c5)
I do not understand why Romney is ok with the rich paying more taxes.
where do you get such things?! you Perrywinkles are out of control!
Posted by: Romneybot at September 21, 2011 04:13 AM (yAor6)
That is just an excellent ad, fine work. And it's already got Rick Klein snarking about it on Twitter. ("In Perry world there are galloping horses and fully-stocked Hallmark stores.") That's how you know it hit the mark.
Posted by: Miss Marple at September 21, 2011 04:13 AM (Fo83G)
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 04:15 AM (M9Ie6)
Are they still leaving out food and the "necessarily skyrocketing" price of energy as the feds shut down oil rigs, coal mines, and power plants?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at September 21, 2011 04:16 AM (0vDuM)
Posted by: AE at September 21, 2011 08:03 AM (YYjeh)
Congrats to ye!
I just welcomed my latest (7 lbs 14 oz) grandson a few weeks ago so I can appreciate the joy in your heart.
Posted by: Hrothgar at September 21, 2011 04:16 AM (i3+c5)
Incorporated
"America, the last great hope of the world..."
Yes, but the interpretation of what that great hope means!
Given Slick Rick over Mitt Nitwit, both are in the pocket of globalist interests. Circumstances are not visa versa. Neither candidate has the power to manipulate globalist interests in favor of abiding by the US Constitution around the world. Talk is cheap: "making Washington inconsequential" means Perry will do exactly what, and how? Leave us pawns of the UN even while no longer holding diplomatic favor within the UN? Leave us taxpayers funding the UN and NATO majority of expenses, making Washington (the middle man) seem inconsequential.
Stylistic contrast, but essentially how would they actually differ on international policy (both will defer to the military industrial complex which is not to say providing national security through national defense), domestic both defer to DHS on domestic policy, both defer to the Federal Reserve and Keynsian economic policy (after appointing their own Fed Chairman and Treasury Secretary from Goldman Sachs' talent pool), and both concur in decommissioning Constitutional Governance in favor of the permeating authoritarian "efficiency" of bigger, better, too big to fail federally empowered policy.
Perry's record shows that his character resorts to over-extension of his official authority, disregarding the constitutional rights of American citizens, enabling grotesque profits for globalist corporations that do not trickle down at any rate sufficient to compensate for all the costs paid (beyond taxation, permanent negative results of poor policy, including "ironic" loss of liberty, property, life) by the typical working American.
Posted by: maverick muse at September 21, 2011 04:16 AM (lpWVn)
Yes, but even that is deceptive. Economic experts that I have read put actual inflation above 10% right now and increasing. The more money they print the more it goes up.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 04:17 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 08:15 AM (M9Ie6)
dangerous territory to comment back to you but idk how i'd feel, I was actually defending DC but Treacher came on here insulting ace and other commenters while claiming he wasn't defending his boss to keep his paycheck. surrrre....
he was a dick yesterday so i'm just in a w/e mood w/ that story
Posted by: AuthorLMendez (Perry Guy) at September 21, 2011 04:17 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: voter222 at September 21, 2011 04:17 AM (t4YF+)
Posted by: Zakn at September 21, 2011 04:17 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: Case at September 21, 2011 04:18 AM (DYR2Q)
Posted by: voter222 at September 21, 2011 08:17 AM (t4YF+)
could be afraid of those poll numbers against the prez, from tied to -6 in the RCP average this past week. He still leads the primary race +8
Posted by: AuthorLMendez (Perry Guy) at September 21, 2011 04:19 AM (yAor6)
Perry needs to kick some ass on Thursday, tell the dwarf candidates to stuff it, and then move on to the campaign trail and lay the wood to Romney. And more TV money for optics like that, please.
Posted by: Blacksheep at September 21, 2011 04:20 AM (kLrdC)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 04:23 AM (EPcuy)
Unfortunately Mittens the Beach Sandal leads the scoamf however that's mostly name recognition.
Mittens is down to Obama -3 in Ras and losing in the Real Clear poll of polls. Mitt is pratically tied w/ Obama while perry is losing a close one. Good thing for Perry is he still lacks name recognition as gallup pointed out and Mitt has recognition. Both also keep Obama under 50%, bad for an incumbent this far out.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez (Perry Guy) at September 21, 2011 04:24 AM (yAor6)
Screw. The rich pay enough tax,.
Posted by: brianm35 at September 21, 2011 08:22 AM (t4YF+)
Not if they have any money left!
Posted by: Hrothgar's evil twin at September 21, 2011 04:25 AM (i3+c5)
Perry needs to kick some ass on Thursday, tell the dwarf candidates to stuff it, and then move on to the campaign trail and lay the wood to Romney. And more TV money for optics like that, please.
agreed, +1
Posted by: AuthorLMendez (Perry Guy) at September 21, 2011 04:25 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: maverick muse at September 21, 2011 08:16 AM (lpWVn)
whos your candidate?
Posted by: AuthorLMendez (Perry Guy) at September 21, 2011 08:18 AM (yAor6)
maverick muse is a Ronulan.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 21, 2011 04:29 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 21, 2011 08:29 AM (FkKjr)
oh God! *ignores maverick from now on*
Posted by: AuthorLMendez (Perry Guy) at September 21, 2011 04:29 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Downscaled Upscale at September 21, 2011 08:29 AM (IhHdM)
+1000
before I commented on here I battled w/ YouTube lefties
one told me Reagan raped a woman, one said Monsters Inc was a film about Enron, and another told me a five year old could be aborted. low iq doesn't begin to describe them
Posted by: AuthorLMendez (Perry Guy) at September 21, 2011 04:30 AM (yAor6)
The aisles of cards looked weird. WTF, pro-USPS? Distinguishing himself from Palin's facebook fan club?
Yes, the horses caught my eye. (Aside from sick bastards, who would want a world without horses? Better to have a world without sick bastards.) Horses instead of a dog for public appeal? The Cavalry is coming? Horses have played an important role developing America. But were they inserted to prevent the mind from thinking about the oil industry, or to make people long for the good old "green" back to nature days of horse and buggies? (That won't attract liberals who would rather kill a horse than appreciate it, as if the decomposing body won't emit more gas into the "green" environment --inevitably-- than the living creature. How would a Palin ad top the horses; with moose, grizzlies or Sarah running a marathon?)
Posted by: maverick muse at September 21, 2011 04:31 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: voter222 at September 21, 2011 04:31 AM (t4YF+)
Posted by: blaster at September 21, 2011 04:32 AM (Fw2Gg)
The list of celebrities who haven't made a joke about Palin (or her daughters) being raped, beaten, or killed might be shorter than the list of those who have.
I'm kind of fascinated by when it's OK to employ a vile racist stereotype and when it's not. Sandra Bernhardt used one straight out of the original 19th-century KKK literature, and it's cool! But noting that Tyson is an actual convicted rapist is somehow utilizing that stereotype for evil. WTF.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at September 21, 2011 04:33 AM (0vDuM)
Posted by: Zakn at September 21, 2011 04:33 AM (zyaZ1)
$535 million wasted on Solyndra?
I can find that much U.S. currency hidden in the walls of an Afghan warlord's house!
Posted by: maverick ruse at September 21, 2011 04:34 AM (5aWTl)
Posted by: blaster at September 21, 2011 04:35 AM (Fw2Gg)
Posted by: Mandy P., Teahadi from Hobbitton at September 21, 2011 04:36 AM (qFpRI)
BEAST MODE!!
OK. I should go to work while I still have a job. Millions of Obama voters are counting on me for their EBT. Good to see you morning people again.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at September 21, 2011 04:36 AM (0vDuM)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry
Prove it or Fuck You
Posted by: DaveA at September 21, 2011 04:36 AM (9c1gI)
Posted by: Jean at September 21, 2011 04:36 AM (WkuV6)
Perhaps you meant into your pocket with that Meh. But flooding more paper fiat funny money into the global bank fraud industry devalues the Dollar, and devalues your standard of living. That standard of living is "the economy" to working Americans. Perhaps you haven't noticed the effects of inflation.
Posted by: maverick muse at September 21, 2011 04:37 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Mandy P., Teahadi from Hobbitton at September 21, 2011 04:39 AM (qFpRI)
Posted by: Jean at September 21, 2011 04:41 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Jean at September 21, 2011 04:46 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 21, 2011 04:47 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: blaster at September 21, 2011 04:48 AM (Fw2Gg)
Posted by: Mandy P., Teahadi from Hobbitton at September 21, 2011 04:49 AM (qFpRI)
Ex-Solyndra Employees Now Applying For Trade Adjustment Assistance
All on our dime.. After sucking up the bulk of the $527 million.
It just never ends,
does it.
Posted by: franksalterego at September 21, 2011 04:49 AM (7/sDI)
Former Flint state Leg swithes to GOP saying SCoaMF has failed Michigan.
http://t.co/OoPERd5c
The Rats they are a fleeing!
Posted by: Zakn at September 21, 2011 04:50 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: Jean at September 21, 2011 04:51 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 21, 2011 05:04 AM (ZDUD4)
Yes, but the interpretation of what that great hope means!
We differ there. And were I to respond in a typically moronic fashion, I'd ridicule the HOA misconception pulled out of thin air. Let's not improperly drag out the ungrounded tinfoil isolationist slam that lacks logic. I assert that we differ on attributing significance to other nations' and regions' populations' expectations. How do American involvement and policy play in other civilizations' where we are not welcome, where we align with former colonial powers funding al-Qaeda's Arab Spring? Considering history either aids in determining how best to manage conflicts; or by refusing history's consideration, requires history's repetition. Neither a refusal to respond to conflict nor a blind kneejerk response to conflict will provide a solution. Nor will "winning hearts and minds of enemies" or COIN, given 10 years of evidence proving those as suicidal. Nor will spreading upheavals to destabilize the region in favor of radical Islamofascist Jihad. Nor will issuing assassination orders to kill a head of state. Nor will propagating "democracy" that places every minority in front of the firing squad. Yet there we are still. Though the US Constitution may be the last hope of the world, American PC is NOT the last hope of the world. And though their stylistic use of PC is starkly different, both Mitt and Rick adhere to PC policy. Yes, even Rick pays homage to PC every time he apologizes for his insensitivity that smears the Tea Party. He isn't the first politician to promise what the voter wants to hear in order to win his own election or gain more power for himself and his own interests at the expense of the US Constitution and American citizens.
Posted by: maverick muse at September 21, 2011 05:06 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: I'm in a New York state of mind at September 21, 2011 05:07 AM (4sQwu)
Any other fix will simply encourage the communists in congress to increase spending.
So since they will not do that we need to just leave it alone and let it collapse in its own weight. It will "fix" itself.
Posted by: Vic at September 21, 2011 05:11 AM (M9Ie6)
I just welcomed my latest (7 lbs 14 oz) grandson a few weeks ago so I can appreciate the joy in your heart.
Posted by: Hrothgar at September 21, 2011 08:16 AM (i3+c5)
Wow, there must be a mini-moron population boom because I became a grandfather for the first time just over a month ago.
Posted by: Captain Hate at September 21, 2011 05:12 AM (7dMdC)
Unlike Ace, it seems Darrell Issa does indeed think Operation Gunwalker was all about gun control laws.
He elaborated a bit when he noted that while he wouldn’t presume to know the precise goals of Operation Fast and Furious, it certainly did seem to tie in with the narrative the Obama administration was trying to push — that U.S. guns were turning up at Mexican crime scenes. That allowed, the suggestion hanging in the air was that a goal of the Administration was indeed a “Reichstag fire” designed to support a narrative that has been publicly woven by Attorney General Holder, Secretary of State Clinton, Secretary of Homeland Security Napolitano, and President Obama himself on multiple occasions.
Posted by: The Relentless Chicken Of No Return at September 21, 2011 05:12 AM (OlN4e)
__________
They just don't make shredders like they used. Cheap Chinese junk craps out on you when you need it most.
Posted by: Anachronda at September 21, 2011 05:37 AM (6fER6)
Posted by: voter222 at September 21, 2011 08:17 AM (t4YF+)
Posted by: brianm35 at September 21, 2011 08:22 AM (t4YF+)
Those are quite a few socks for this early in the day.
Posted by: museisluse at September 21, 2011 05:45 AM (4Lj43)
Posted by: Jean at September 21, 2011 05:49 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Jean at September 21, 2011 05:57 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Adjoran at September 21, 2011 06:06 AM (VfmLu)
Posted by: John P. Squibob at September 21, 2011 06:36 AM (Jxhdd)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 06:35 AM (EPcuy)
Watched THOR last night. That ad was almost more fun and exciting. I heard Perry takes no prisoners and labeling the SCoaMF a "Zero" and shoving his hopey changey pap up his arse with facts is brilliant, IMHO.
Posted by: observer at September 21, 2011 06:38 AM (56x/u)
Two conservative Republicans are holding up the Health and Human Services spending bill.
My question is why is it only two?
They are on Appropriations and the bill has not yet been voted out of committee,
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 21, 2011 07:08 AM (o2lIv)
Do you care about Windows 8 or what is being called Metro style apps for this new operating system? If yes, then here is a VERY long presentation that may be of interest to you. Although this is a presentation to an audience of application developers, it really is non-technical in the main and nicely spoon feeds the topic and it may serve to demystify this new interface, and the philosophy behind it's creation, for even the most casual system user. I am placing this here because, in my opinion, there periodically come upon us changes that one might wish to adopt sooner rather than later. Frequently, the fear of "another new thing to learn" can cause us to avoid using the best hammer to drive our nails. I hope that this video will help to remove any anxiety that you might feel on the day that you decide to make this change.
http://tinyurl.com/3bbf9bv
Posted by: Errol at September 21, 2011 07:28 AM (vewos)
Posted by: Lying MFM Assholes at September 21, 2011 07:36 AM (56x/u)
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at September 21, 2011 07:42 AM (4rQH4)
Such an effective, er, attacking ad will alienate a lot of moderates.
But you forgot. It worked.
Unexpectedly...
Posted by: HH at September 21, 2011 07:44 AM (HFnqj)
Posted by: AmandaJane at September 21, 2011 08:13 AM (x7+T/)
Posted by: steevy at September 21, 2011 08:32 AM (fyOgS)
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at September 21, 2011 08:58 AM (mAm+G)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 21, 2011 09:10 AM (lNGfM)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 21, 2011 09:12 AM (lNGfM)
Posted by: North Face Jackets at September 21, 2011 11:55 AM (RKbAd)
Discount <A href="http://pumps4uk.com/">Christian Louboutin Pumps</A> sale are holding the promotion activity, 70%-80% off, free shipping,cheap <A href="http://pumps4uk.com/">christian shoes</A>, cheap <A href="http://www.cl4heels.com/">christian louboutin heels</A>, 100% quality guarantee, 7 workdays to your door!
Posted by: shanenan at September 22, 2011 05:02 PM (NuL5h)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
61 queries taking 0.1055 seconds, 344 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 02:31 AM (EPcuy)