September 29, 2011
— Gabriel Malor
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
03:01 AM
| Comments (171)
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
I know ace posted on this yesterday but I wanted people to keep this in mind when reading that article:
Democrats (n = 382) ± 5% Republicans (n =
33
± 5.5% Independents
(n = 189) ± 7% GOP Primary Voters (n = 363) ± 5% Dem
Primary Voters (n = 356)
Romney 23%
Perry 19%
Cain 17%
Newt 11%
Paul 6%
Huntsman 4%
Bachman 3%
Santorum 3%
First it is a news poll and second why did they poll more Dems than Repubs for a Repub primary and then count them. Sure, frakin Dems like Romney, so does Fox.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 03:02 AM (M9Ie6)
Perry walks back "heartless" comment
“I was probably a bit over-passionate by using that word and it was inappropriate,” Perry said in a interview with Newsmax. “In Texas in 2001 we had 181 members of the legislature — only four voted against this piece of legislation — because it wasn’t about immigration it was about education.”
But Perry stood by his argument that building a fence along the entire Mexican border was unwise. The Texas governor said that the fence would likely be expensive, ineffective and violate the property rights of those who owned land on the border.
I like this inserted “but” BS. Yes the fence is BS and nothing “The Hill” can say makes it any better. Besides that, when did the damn Hill start supporting the fence? 2000 mile fence = $1.4T dollars, cheap wood ladder = $50
Hey are all you concern trolls that said you switched to Romney over that comment going to switch back now? No, yeah, I didnÂ’t think so.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 03:03 AM (M9Ie6)
No, stupid suspend elections comment was not a joke or a "misspeak
Stupid scrunt was serious. She needs to be impeached.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 03:04 AM (M9Ie6)
The Hill reports on Solyndra!
GOP's Solyndra probe threatens to ensnare Energy Secretary Chu
Gee GOP is hot after Chu!
The controversy over a $535 million loan guarantee to the now-bankrupt California solar firm Solyndra is threatening to dim the star of Energy Secretary Steven Chu, a physicist and Nobel Prize winner who has rarely been thrust into the political spotlight.
Republican lawmakers have set their sites on Chu, who for three years has managed to avoid being dragged into a litany of political battles waged by Republicans and the White House on energy and environmental issues.
I have a better headline for The Hill. Dems and their PR rags throw Chu under the bus trying to save Obama from this case of fraud. Another case of I did not have sex with that woman while jizz shows up on her dress.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 03:05 AM (M9Ie6)
Gee, Greta breaking with the Fox mold and pushing Chris Christie “we need moderate a Republican from a blue State who can work with Democrats”.
Fuck you bitch
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 03:05 AM (M9Ie6)
Obama is a Stuttering Clusterfuck of a Miserable Failure.
Seriously. Typing that NEVER gets old, and it never fails to make me smile.
I'm pleased to see the Germans finally bailing on Obama. Or at least calling him out for his arrogance and condescension. And seriously... when the EUROPEANS are calling you arrogant, you know you've pushed it too far.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at September 29, 2011 03:06 AM (wnbjH)
The primary wars are on again this year
Recall in 2008 the same thing happened and the RNC “punished” States who moved their primaries by removing half their delegates. If SC moves theirs what are they going to do? They have already made the SC primary virtually irrelevant for anything but a PR gambit.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 03:06 AM (M9Ie6)
Obamanites get setback in AL immigration law ruling
Gee what a difference not being in the 9th circuit means.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 03:07 AM (M9Ie6)
Democrat governors from NC are not the only ones calling for a dictatorship
How about Obamanite policy wonks.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 03:08 AM (M9Ie6)
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A county clerk likely violated the law when she failed to report thousands of votes in this spring's tightly contested Wisconsin Supreme Court election, but her conduct wasn't criminal, state investigators said Wednesday.
This is why this shit happens. When elections are subverted people need to go to jail. We complain about election fraud all the time but prosecutions almost never happen and when they do the outcome is always “ho-hum”.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 07:02 AM (M9Ie6)
Vic, this is the clerk from the heavily Republican county that put the conservative Prosser over the top. She made a mistake in totaling the votes on election night, the only thing she did wrong was make the donks think they didn't need to cheat too hard. She only broke a law if it was intentional, and the democrat on the election board said it was an honest mistake.
Posted by: mugiwara at September 29, 2011 03:09 AM (KI/Ch)
Fortunately for what's left of my good mood this morning, NR only shows the full article to subscribers. I ain't one, ain't gonna be one.
Any asshole who works for -- or buys the treasonous rap of -- the stuttering clusterf*** of a miserable failure has nothing worthwhile to say to me. All I want to hear is the sound of a cell door slammin' shut on each and every one of them.
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 29, 2011 03:12 AM (YjjrR)
The exposure of the true goals of the leftards, as evidenced by Orszag and Perdue, are merely the extension of a basic psychological flaw that has plagued mankind from the beginning, namely the desire to control others.
We cannot survive as a nation if we can't discover these people and keep them out of office. Power attracts them, like flies to a dung heap, and the Democrat Party is the biggest heap of them all.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, Tea Party SOB at September 29, 2011 03:16 AM (d0Tfm)
Also, Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure.
That is all. We now return you to your regularly scheduled program.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, Tea Party SOB at September 29, 2011 03:18 AM (d0Tfm)
http://bit.ly/o4UEs4
I'm really starting to like Herman Cain. Apparently, the commenters on the CNN blog disagree with me...I denounce myself for being racist, just for them.
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 29, 2011 03:18 AM (YjjrR)
Apparently, the commenters on the CNN blog disagree with me...I denounce myself for being racist, just for them.
Heh, I read that too. Cain's correct. While I'm on the subject of psychology, you'd be surprised to find out just how easy it is to brainwash someone. Endless repetition of a phrase, coupled with emotional arousal (and not the good kind like we Morons get when we see pictures of cute cheerleaders or boobehs) is all it takes.
Lots of concentrated, industrial strength stoopid in those comments.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, Tea Party SOB at September 29, 2011 03:26 AM (d0Tfm)
Fair and balanced and unafraid. We report, you decide.
Posted by: Blacksheep at September 29, 2011 03:27 AM (NQqz7)
Commenters there demonstrate some industrial strength stupid.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 03:28 AM (M9Ie6)
Washington democrats have demonstrated that they will NOT work with ANY Republican president. They threw roadblocks in President Reagan's way and got him to raise taxes by LYING about cutting spending. They attacked GHWB and attempted to block a Supreme Court nomination with baseless character attacks. They conducted an 8-year character assassination of Bush 43 during a damn war!!
Yet Christie is supposedly going to waltz in and magically be able to get them to work with him on solving the nation's problems.
This demonstrates that the east coast elite think they are smarter and more skillful than we hicks in the South and the Midwest. I personally think they are also naive.
Posted by: Miss Marple at September 29, 2011 03:28 AM (Fo83G)
Posted by: Jean at September 29, 2011 03:30 AM (pawS5)
Posted by: Luke@yahoo.com at September 29, 2011 03:31 AM (t4YF+)
Posted by: Luke@yahoo.com at September 29, 2011 03:32 AM (t4YF+)
I repeat, f*k you scrunt.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 03:34 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Miss Marple at September 29, 2011 07:28 AM
Yup.
Maybe Christie and Palin will enter the race simultaneously. That would make Ann "fat dudes are sooo cuddly" Coulter quiver with jealousy. Wonder if that's what Michelle Malkin wants, too?
Skinny wimmins and lard-O dudes. What do they mean?
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 29, 2011 03:35 AM (YjjrR)
@#2 I think you just answered your own question about the poll. Fox News is drifting further left every single day (and I never thought they were conservative in the first place...just barely, kinda sorta neutral).
Posted by: davidinvirginia at September 29, 2011 03:35 AM (ED4oz)
LOL, thinking alike
The Moron Hive-Mind at work.
OK, y'all, I'm off. And I'm leaving, too. This is my Friday at my little part-time, poor paying, no-benefits job.
At least tonight, I get to whomp on my drums for a while in between Guinnii.
Y'all have fun today. I'll be here in spirit, if not electron.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, Tea Party SOB at September 29, 2011 03:35 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Luke@yahoo.com at September 29, 2011 07:32 AM (t4YF+)
Yes thank you lying troll, come back next year when you are shit on and your paymaster is broke.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 03:35 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Luke@yahoo.com at September 29, 2011 03:39 AM (t4YF+)
A woman who translates for the Hispanic population in Foley told FOX10 since the law was brought up, the community has been in fear.
"These families live in fear day by day, every time they leave their house,” she said.
Waaaaaa, I am so touched.Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 03:39 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Luke@yahoo.com at September 29, 2011 03:40 AM (t4YF+)
"We donÂ’t allow faster than light neutrinos in here" said the bartender. A neutrino walks into a bar.
Posted by: Truman North at September 29, 2011 03:42 AM (I2LwF)
Recall in 2008 the same thing happened and the RNC “punished” States who moved their primaries by removing half their delegates. If SC moves theirs what are they going to do? They have already made the SC primary virtually irrelevant for anything but a PR gambit.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 07:06 AM (M9Ie6)
Fuck the RNC. Those bumfuck states of Iowa and New Hampshire have to go to the end of the fucking line. To hell with their state constitutions saying they get to be first; if Reonce Priebus had a hair on his ass, he's wipe it with the Iowa constitution. I'm tired of those worthless cocksuckers getting to set the fucking pace in the primaries so that by the time the rest of the country votes it's a done deal. The pukes in both parties are happy with this garbage while the rest of us say fuck this shit.
Posted by: Captain Hate at September 29, 2011 03:43 AM (OGZqf)
Posted by: toby928© at September 29, 2011 03:47 AM (GTbGH)
And they are snotty about it, too.
Posted by: Miss Marple at September 29, 2011 03:48 AM (Fo83G)
Did you read the comments? Most of the lefties at TNR think suspending Democracy is a swell idea.
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at September 29, 2011 03:53 AM (PLvLS)
This is what I don't understand. All the dems and all the media AND the RNC seem to be anointing Romney. It doesn't make sense that supposedly opposing factors should all be on the same side.
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at September 29, 2011 03:55 AM (6IV8T)
“To halt the worldwide epidemic of non-communicable diseases, governments at all levels must make healthy solutions the default social option. That is ultimately government’s highest duty.”
“Collaboration across borders among national and local governments and agencies is also critical. The challenges before us are too vast and complex for individual governments to overcome alone,” Bloomberg later added.
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at September 29, 2011 03:56 AM (PLvLS)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 29, 2011 03:56 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at September 29, 2011 07:53 AM (PLvLS)
What do you expect from a publication that hired Henry Wallace as an editor after he was too commie even for FDR?
Posted by: Captain Hate at September 29, 2011 03:57 AM (OGZqf)
Recall 2005/2006, ox was all for amnesty and McCain-Kennedy. They haven't changed.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 03:58 AM (M9Ie6)
1. The Dems and the MFM want Romney to be nominated so they can destroy him by running "Crazy Mormon" crap non-stop in the general election; thus help re-elect the SCOAMF and getting revenge on the LDS Church for supporting Prop 8.
2. The Republican Establishment likes Romney because polls say a generic Republican can beat the SCOAMF, and there's no Republican more generic than Romney.
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at September 29, 2011 03:58 AM (PLvLS)
The only thing good coming out of NH is The Old Farmer's Almanac.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 04:01 AM (M9Ie6)
Vic, immigration reform is not the same as amnesty. Immigration is really fucking fucked up in this country, even the legal kind. If it wasn't so hard to get a visa to get into this country legally, we wouldn't have such a problem with illegals.
Posted by: chemjeff at September 29, 2011 04:04 AM (s7mIC)
Well they like him because he's not a conservative too. Unlike the quislings that spout the nonsense that Reagan would be considered a RINO, Reagan was opposed by the same party operatives who are shilling for Romney and shackled him with that asshole Poppy Bush to appeal to the squishes.
Posted by: Captain Hate at September 29, 2011 04:04 AM (OGZqf)
Stuff Comrade Obama might have said!
Posted by: Hroth'ar at September 29, 2011 04:06 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: chemjeff at September 29, 2011 08:04 AM (s7mIC)
This is correct but thanks to maximum assholes Rove, McCain and Graham, all talk of reform translates into amnesty.
Posted by: Captain Hate at September 29, 2011 04:08 AM (OGZqf)
Obama's top 'fat cat' strays
JP Morgan honcho Jamie Dimon, once a “fat cat” ally of President Obama, seems to have strayed to Republican contender Mitt Romney.
Dimon, a lifelong Democrat who was rumored to be on Obama’s short list for treasury secretary before he settled on Tim Geitner, met privately with Romney on Tuesday morning before a fund-raiser at Brasserie 8¹/2 hosted by Highbridge Capital, a JPMorgan-owned hedge fund.
Dimon, who was spotted “in a discreet one-on-one”
discussion with Romney, cannot publicly endorse a candidate because he
sits on the board of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. But he
donated to Democratic candidates in 2008 and privately supported Obama.
Well isn't that special.
Posted by: Blacksheep at September 29, 2011 04:08 AM (NQqz7)
I can't speak for all of the moronettes (or, evidently, figure out italics), but I prefer my men to be larger. Makes them more fun to cuddle!
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at September 29, 2011 04:08 AM (6IV8T)
Posted by: Blacksheep at September 29, 2011 04:10 AM (NQqz7)
"We report and (help) you decide!" would be a more realistic motto for them.
Posted by: Hroth'ar at September 29, 2011 04:10 AM (i3+c5)
A generic Republican is sort of conservative, but not so conservative that he when Democrats push back he won't fold faster than Superman on laundry day. That's pretty much Mittens in a nutshell. Also any given politician with the last name 'Bush.'
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at September 29, 2011 04:11 AM (PLvLS)
Looks like Romney can reach across the aisle to "Dem campaign contributors" (read that as potential next administration crony socialist) as well as across the legislative aisle to screw us with O'Romneycare!
Posted by: Hroth'ar at September 29, 2011 04:13 AM (i3+c5)
I may have made that last part up. Then again, maybe not.
Posted by: Blacksheep at September 29, 2011 04:13 AM (NQqz7)
Posted by: Luke@yahoo.com at September 29, 2011 07:39 AM (t4YF+)
Let me guess: back pain, high blood pressure or COPD. Any of those correct?
Posted by: museisluse at September 29, 2011 04:14 AM (4Lj43)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 29, 2011 04:17 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at September 29, 2011 04:20 AM (6IV8T)
Posted by: Blacksheep at September 29, 2011 04:20 AM (NQqz7)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 29, 2011 04:21 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Jean at September 29, 2011 04:21 AM (qjHIb)
Posted by: Tami at September 29, 2011 04:23 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 29, 2011 04:23 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: chemjeff at September 29, 2011 04:23 AM (s7mIC)
Having a liberal government in total administrative and regulatory control of the very license(s) that permit you to operate at all, does tends to shift your views to the center/left.
Posted by: Hroth'ar at September 29, 2011 04:24 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: Jean at September 29, 2011 04:24 AM (qjHIb)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 29, 2011 04:24 AM (ZDUD4)
- The Marx Factor
- CSI: Obama admin
- Law and Order: Fast and Furious
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at September 29, 2011 04:25 AM (OhYCU)
The RNC won't allow any states other than South Carolina, Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada to hold a primary earlier than March 6.
I've never understood why this is.
What happens is, the votes in these states influence the votes in the states yet to come.
By the time it got to Washington State, the nomination was already in the bag for McCain.
My choice was, vote with the winner, or throw away a vote.
Posted by: franksalterego at September 29, 2011 04:26 AM (7/sDI)
Posted by: Jean at September 29, 2011 04:26 AM (qjHIb)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 29, 2011 04:27 AM (ZDUD4)
I've never understood why this is.
Those four states want to go first, and they'll do anything to make sure they go first. It's to prevent primaries from beginning three years before the election.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 29, 2011 04:28 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at September 29, 2011 04:28 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at September 29, 2011 04:29 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at September 29, 2011 04:29 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 29, 2011 08:28 AM (FkKjr)
FIFY
Posted by: Hroth'ar at September 29, 2011 04:30 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 29, 2011 08:24 AM (ZDUD4)
You'd think he'd be able to tell how old the Cheetos stains are.
Posted by: Tami at September 29, 2011 04:30 AM (X6akg)
Anyone catch Cain's interview on Michael Savage? I only heard a bit.
Background: Cain earned his degrees in math/physics, with a master's from Purdue in computer science. Cain is a great communicator with a solid and efficient intellect who produces success for a real living.
There's likely concern regarding the Federal Reserve cloning the dollar. But the mannered approach to solve the problem in order to terminate the corruption would obviously vary based upon background and ideologies. Cain isn't talking about the Federal Reserve on his website. I doubt that Cain would address the Fed's corruption; he knows the Fed would never allow itself to be clipped from power. That he has experience within the Fed is a given. Cain's business approach to the economy would be based on his own experience of what feasibly can be accomplished to improve economic matters ASAP using current institutions at play. Until Ron Paul himself is arguing with Herman Cain about the Federal Reserve, I wouldn't put much stock in the "stupid" molehill tiff being hyped since every candidate has bitter clingers. Repeating a question no matter how many times the answer remains the same is at best an exercise in futility, and at worst, torture. And so far as the Republican big tent is concerned given the media hyping antagonism, I'd think he's well grounded. Cain didn't dismiss out-of-hand the concerns of Libertarian/Republicans aka Goldwater Republicans since guest hosting regularly for Neil Boortz, "a confirmed Libertarian." Cain's kept in step with the grassroots public concerns hosting talk radio, and his business success includes multi-perspectives from each segment of the population as to what is needed for top performance synthesized with what the establishment mechanisms will do.
/relish on the side: Moochelle's bomb removed by Cain.
Posted by: think twice at September 29, 2011 04:30 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 29, 2011 04:30 AM (ZDUD4)
You'd think he'd be able to tell how old the Cheetos stains are
Not necessarily.
For most of them you'd have to use carbon dating techniques.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at September 29, 2011 04:31 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at September 29, 2011 04:33 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Blacksheep at September 29, 2011 04:33 AM (NQqz7)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 29, 2011 04:34 AM (ZDUD4)
@27. Cheap labor.
If an American business has to hire illegal border jumpers to turn a profit then they don't need to be in business. If a business hires jumpers because they don't want to pay a decent wage then the boss needs to spend some time in jail and pay a hefty fine. It's that simple.
Posted by: Case at September 29, 2011 04:34 AM (FD6YW)
lol2 given Fred's dissuading "late entry"
Posted by: think twice at September 29, 2011 04:35 AM (lpWVn)
45....Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 07:02 AM (M9Ie6)
This is what I don't understand. All the dems and all the media AND the RNC seem to be anointing Romney. It doesn't make sense that supposedly opposing factors should all be on the same side.
It's easy to understand why the Dems want Romney......they know they can beat him.
The Obama media.....same thing. ....Fox must want Obama to win because he's been so good for their ratings.
The RNC......either they are too dense to realize that Romney can't win, or they want to throw this cycle so that they can run Jeb or someone else that they can control, in 2016.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at September 29, 2011 04:35 AM (6n8mm)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 29, 2011 08:34 AM (ZDUD4)
Now that makes sense.
400ml = 1 day.
Very scientific!
Posted by: Sean Bannion at September 29, 2011 04:35 AM (sbV1u)
Sure, no clocks in mom's basement. And yet every PC I've owned has a leetle clock in the lower right corner. Unless his is set to brother Bluto's time.
Posted by: Count de Monet at September 29, 2011 04:36 AM (4q5tP)
You can bet your paycheck on someone pushing amnesty if they are on TV calling for "immigration reform". You would win 99 out of 100 times. The federal Dream Act was amnesty, this guy was pushing the federal dream act. IOW he was pushing amnesty.
So 99 out of 100 "immigration reform" calls are in fact amnesty unless they call for my version of reform below.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 04:39 AM (M9Ie6)
Have to post this every time the left calls for “reform”.
Yes we need immigration reform, but NOT what has been rolled out the last half dozen times. Every bill that has come out since the first major rewrite in 1965 has basically been amnesty and open invitation for illegals to flood across the border.
We are no longer the country of the 19th century with vast
open areas in the West. Our cities are overcrowded shit holes run by corrupt
communist hacks AND there is no longer a vast area open for the inhabitants to
flee to and take up farming.
This is not to mention that we have entire towns in CA with a population >
20,000 in which none of the citizens speak English. The current crew of
"immigrants" do not appear to desire to assimilate and the current crowd
of liberals do not think they should. The schools have gone from teaching
America as a mixing pot to America as a salad bowl where "diversity"
is celebrated and heritage counts for all, unless you have a European heritage
then you are a racist.
Yes, there are a lot of things that need to be done to "fix" our
immigration laws. The first one of these should be to repeal that POS of
Amnesty Round I that got us where we are today.
We need immigration law that does the following AND that is enforced:
1. Eliminate the BS anchor baby interpretation by providing a definition of
what the term “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means, which is not
dashing across the border to deliver a baby.
Personally, I would require that at least one of the parents of any
child born in the U.S. be a citizen before that child was eligible for
“birthright” citizenship. If not, then the child would have to undergo
naturalization.
2. Provide a reliable means for employers to check the status of employees.
3. Provide severe punishments for knowingly hiring illegals (or reckless
disregard). That punishment should include jail time for repeat violations.
4. Eliminate ALL benefits for illegals including schools for children.
5. Rewrite legal immigration to allow in immigrants with a desirable education
and/or skill set and arrange the waiting list to have the most skilled/educated
at the top of the list. (Australian system) Also include a check for
communicable diseases (as we did in the past) and provide for immunization.
Immigrants from countries on the list of terror support need not apply.
6. For groups that already have large populations in the U.S. who have not
assimilated, reduce the allowable numbers until they do (eliminate whole towns
that do not speak English)
7. Provide severe penalties for mules.
8. Provide the death penalty for people involved in sex slavery.
9. Eliminate all forms of asylum. That system has been abused to the point of
making it a joke. Any true case that needs to be let in should be a case by
case special act passed by congress. Get them on record.
10. Immigrants who become involved in any serious crime prior to becoming a
citizen should be deported back to their home country.
11. Absolutely no dual citizenship allowed.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 04:40 AM (M9Ie6)
Just for you CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative)
A guy from NJ wises up.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 07:07 AM (M9Ie6)
Excellent article. My NYC in-laws are ignorant in that area as well. Gee, I'll just get all my information from Hollywood and other bigots. One told me last year that in NY she could get her film developed in an hour. Well, well, here in the DC suburbs we don't even use film anymore.
Posted by: Henry II at September 29, 2011 04:41 AM (QF52E)
How stupid. "Good food" is less expensive. In fact some of it is free after a little expenditure in miracle grow and manure.
Posted by: Henry II at September 29, 2011 04:43 AM (QF52E)
But, remember, crony capitalism and payouts to connected politicians are crucial to competing with China.
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at September 29, 2011 04:43 AM (PLvLS)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at September 29, 2011 04:43 AM (JNqU9)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 29, 2011 04:44 AM (ZDUD4)
I'm shocked! Shocked I tells ya!
Posted by: Tami at September 29, 2011 04:45 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at September 29, 2011 04:46 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 29, 2011 08:28 AM
It seems to me, that if you can hold the general election on the same day in every state, you should be able to hold the nomination elections and caucuses on the same day in every state, also.
I mean, there's a reason, election returns, during the general election, aren't announced until the voting has ended.
Why should the nomination process be any different?
Posted by: franksalterego at September 29, 2011 04:47 AM (7/sDI)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 29, 2011 04:47 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 29, 2011 04:49 AM (ZDUD4)
But on your 11-point list: can someone be in favor of, say, 7 or 8 of those items and still be considered "anti-amnesty"?
Posted by: chemjeff at September 29, 2011 04:49 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Spiker at September 29, 2011 04:50 AM (4t9J5)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 29, 2011 04:52 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 29, 2011 04:54 AM (cbyrC)
Which ones would you throw out and why?
BTW, that list wasn't intended to be so much anti-amnesty as it was general reform of immigration. To be "anti-amnesty" all it takes is "no path to citizenship for illegals" or as Perry actually said "there already is a path to citizenship, get in line".
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 04:57 AM (M9Ie6)
I think the SocSec Ponzi Scheme is the reason why so many politicians on both sides are squishy on illegal immigration.
They want more warm bodies paying into the system. ....Employers are still matching the SocSec/Med they withhold from an illegal's paycheck, just like a citizen's paycheck.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at September 29, 2011 04:58 AM (6n8mm)
Posted by: Spiker at September 29, 2011 04:58 AM (4t9J5)
Christie seriously considering presidential bid after GOP prodding
Posted by: franksalterego at September 29, 2011 05:02 AM (7/sDI)
A lot haven't in the past, sometimes based on how politics became "personal" either when the victor "stole" the loser's ideas, or else the loser's ideas simply lost.
What Cain refuses to endorse Federally is using tax funds to benefit illegal aliens.
It's a matter of consistent law, good business and a clear policy battle line. It's not a personal vendetta.
LOL, drawing the legendary Alamo line and Perry finding himself straddling the fence...knee-jerk can-can cabaret barkers make it personal, 3-2-1!
Posted by: think twice at September 29, 2011 05:04 AM (lpWVn)
I don't favor not educating the kids. If they're here, we should educate them. How that is paid for is a different matter. I don't think it should come out of local property tax budgets, the feds should pick up the tab for educating the illegals.
I also don't agree with the "eliminate towns that haven't assimilated" bit. If they want to bask in their Spanish or Italian or Vulcan heritage, that's fine with me. I would require, however, that all official business be conducted in English.
Those are the biggies in my mind anyway.
Posted by: chemjeff at September 29, 2011 05:09 AM (s7mIC)
As often as not, employers pocket what they withhold from illegal alien employee FICA pay, never submitted to the IRS. Banks aren't the only ones with two sets of books.
Imagine your frustration when those who stole your SS# file for your SSbenefits and you're triple screwed.
Posted by: think twice at September 29, 2011 05:10 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 29, 2011 05:12 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 29, 2011 05:18 AM (f9c2L)
The idea is not to "eliminate the town". It is to reduce the allowable number of immigrants until those towns are assimilated into our culture. When you have cities of 20,000 residents in which everyone speaks a foreign language it is indicative of failure to assimilate and immigration run wild.
Sure we had "foreign ghettos" in NYC in the early part of the 20th century in which Italian or German was a main language but within a few short years they were dispersed and assimilated.
That is not happening in CA and people are actively calling for it NOT to happen. As I said, "salad bowl" has replaced "melting pot".
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 05:19 AM (M9Ie6)
There is a difference between Immigration and Colonization.
My Cherokee ancestors would have been happy to explain the difference.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at September 29, 2011 05:24 AM (6n8mm)
Perhaps Vic and Perry aren't aware of the fence and DMZ between north and south Korea or the Berlin wall for that matter?
Posted by: Barbarian at September 29, 2011 05:26 AM (EL+OC)
Coincidentally (?), a Lefty (but kind of a squish Lefty - almost more a cultural Lefty than an Axelrod troll) friend of mine posted this Isaac Asimov quote on his FB yesterday: “Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”
Posted by: Y-not at September 29, 2011 05:30 AM (5H6zj)
There are towns like that in Michigan, too, but they speak Arabic. And they get more and more demanding as years go by. Now they don't even want to be able to hear church bells from surrounding cities, and they expect non-muslim women who visit their cities to dress appropriately.
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at September 29, 2011 05:31 AM (6IV8T)
I don't think so.
I am for legal immigration. I think it makes, and has made, our country robust and vibrant. And I certainly am aware of the visa issues in trying to hire skilled workers (having done so myself when I had a lab). Those could certainly be stream-lined and improved.
But I don't think that has anything to do with folks crossing the border in white cargo vans or climbing fences or fording rivers at night.
And, not to put too fine a point on it, just how many visas would you want to grant to a population of folks with no prospects in their home country, one that is royally effed up and causing problems for us here, and who do not speak English or have educations or any prospects for a job here?
I just don't see those folks every having the wherewithall to get visas legally anyway, no matter how well-run that system was.
Posted by: Y-not at September 29, 2011 05:35 AM (5H6zj)
Governments, if they endure, always tend increasingly toward
aristocratic forms. No government in history has been known to evade
this pattern. And as the aristocracy develops, government tends more
and more to act exclusively in the interests of the ruling class --
whether that class be hereditary royalty, oligarchs of financial
empires, or entrenched bureaucracy.”
Frank Herbert
I think Ms. Perdue proved this yesterday with her comment about eliminating elections.
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at September 29, 2011 05:37 AM (6IV8T)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 29, 2011 05:37 AM (UlUS4)
Romney is McCain 2.0, less the military record. He's starting to scare the shit out of me.
Posted by: Y-not at September 29, 2011 09:36 AM (5H6zj)
Yeah, but he's "electable". Right JeffB?
Posted by: Fringe Element at September 29, 2011 05:38 AM (OlN4e)
Yeah they are the same thing aren't they?? How many armed guards were posted on the Berlin wall. How many troops are still posted at the DMZ to guard that concertina wrapped and mined no man's land. (which is 160 miles long compared to 2000 miles at the U.S. border.)
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 05:38 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 29, 2011 05:42 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 29, 2011 05:46 AM (cbyrC)
Posted by: Barbarian at September 29, 2011 09:26 AM (EL+OC)
Perhaps you've never visited Big Bend country?
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry, bitch at September 29, 2011 05:52 AM (pY3GI)
Good morning morons.
Posted by: Y-not at September 29, 2011 09:26 AM (5H6zj)
Damn straight!
Mornin'
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry, bitch at September 29, 2011 05:53 AM (pY3GI)
@Men like Rick; women like Mitt????
----
Hawt women like Rick!
139 Y-not,
The snooty-ness is strong in that poll. ....It also says that Perry polls high with non-college-educated people as a whole.
Isn't that the PC term for 'rednecks'? ...."Non-college-educated"?
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at September 29, 2011 05:54 AM (6n8mm)
Are non-college educated people subhuman or something? I kind of missed that memo.
I hate those pricks and the divide they're helping to create between people who happen to go to universities and people who don't.
Posted by: Y-not at September 29, 2011 05:56 AM (5H6zj)
147... Perhaps Vic and Perry aren't aware of the fence and DMZ between north and south Korea or the Berlin wall for that matter?
Yeah they are the same thing aren't they?? How many armed guards were posted on the Berlin wall. How many troops are still posted at the DMZ to guard that concertina wrapped and mined no man's land. (which is 160 miles long compared to 2000 miles at the U.S. border.)
--------
Exactly, Vic.
In addition to being tiny compared to the US-Mexico border.....the DMZ and Berlin wall don't/didn't have miles and miles of a major River serving as the borderline.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at September 29, 2011 05:58 AM (6n8mm)
I hate those pricks and the divide they're helping to create between people who happen to go to universities and people who don't.
Some of the most clueless people I've ever met were PhD's. and, not surprisingly, they were rabid liberals to boot.
Just saying.
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry, bitch at September 29, 2011 06:02 AM (pY3GI)
153.....I hate those pricks and the divide they're helping to create between people who happen to go to universities and people who don't.
It's clear that Romney has the elistist vote.
It's also interesting that the people who have a problem with Perry's 'accent'.....are strangely silent about Herman Cain's accent.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at September 29, 2011 06:03 AM (6n8mm)
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at September 29, 2011 06:04 AM (6n8mm)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 29, 2011 06:05 AM (cbyrC)
Yeah, I still prefer football and hockey, but baseball has its own appeal, especially as a game to watch live.
Posted by: Y-not at September 29, 2011 06:09 AM (5H6zj)
Stole this quote right off of Fox News. A muslim jihadi wanting to fly planes into the Pentagon is not reflective of a particular culture?
There is a certain amount of slowburn that lives in me.
Posted by: Artruen at September 29, 2011 06:12 AM (fDGF1)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at September 29, 2011 06:19 AM (Cs6bg)
But Romney did
BTW, I wrote that "reform" post in 2005 when the amnesty bill was being floated. it took a mass of conservatives phoning in to congress to block that POS after it was passed in the Senate.
It was also the start of the massive fall in Bush poll numbers as his base started deserting him.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 06:29 AM (M9Ie6)
Should be a sidebar item, IMO
http://tinyurl.com/3zrfr85
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, supports Rick Perry, bitch at September 29, 2011 06:32 AM (pY3GI)
162.....Pandering for the Hispanic vote is now an unfortunate political necessity that you can't fault someone for. Sad.
Sad? ....Yeah sad....and disgusting.
I don't like it one bit.
People like to hold up Ronald Reagan as some sort of 'gold standard' for a conservative president. ....But the truth is, he granted Amnesty for over 3 million illegals.
The thing that people don't like to admit that they loved about Reagan, was the fact that he won by landslides.....twice.
Which is what I think that Rick Perry could deliver.
Jim Inhoffe was the single biggest opponent of the McCain/Bush Amnesty Bill. ....He filibustered it and poison pilled it to death. ........And yet Jim Inhoffe has endorsed Rick Perry without hesitation.
People like to claim that Perry is another 'compassionate conservative' like Bush. .....No, not really. ....Perry is more of a 'tough love' conservative. While he may love his fellow man, he believes in doing the tough things that benefit the country as a whole in the long run, not just what would be the 'compassionate' thing for a few.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at September 29, 2011 06:37 AM (6n8mm)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at September 29, 2011 06:49 AM (Cs6bg)
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at September 29, 2011 06:58 AM (6n8mm)
An interested lurker for quite some time on this remarkable site, the now "leftist" Fox News and Establishment (radical marxist Dems, statist, possibly fascistic, Repubs) support firming for Romney leads me to comment. Please be kind.
The main issues I see for election 2012 are: 1. Encourage all "responsible" private development of natural energy resources first -- no government help in any way -- we cannot return to affluence without vigorous energy development; 2. Return healthcare to decisions between the individual and his/her doctor -- medical insurance competitive across the U.S. and carried from job to job -- everyone has an opportunity for basic healthcare; 3. Return CO2 to its life-giving and life-enhancing status -- real, not fraudulent, science -- real, not "fraudulent" education; 4. Completely secure the U.S. borders first, immigration reform to follow; 5. Limit all government (city, state, federal) spending to 18% of GDP, no double taxation; 6. Keep a graduated income tax (people must notice when they are working for the government), e.g., 5% $40,000 or less; 10% <$70,000; 15% <$100,000; 20% < $250,000; 25% <$1,000,000; 30% >$1,000,000 -- everyone pays and everyone works when receiving any government assistance; 6. Reduce the size of government on all levles to fit 18% GDP; 7. No government support for "business" endeavors -- tricky, how do states compete for corporations?; 8. No government interferrence in the private sector, and transparency and accountability for all according to the law -- this just about takes care of the financial mess, banking scandal, the Federal Reserve, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; 9. Strong foreign policy, but absolutely directed by national interest, not moral policing of the globe - support our allies, eliminate the UN on our soil and from our budget.
I view these as "liberal" positions (none of today's Dems are liberal, they befoul the definition) because they encourage "liberty and justice for all" and "life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness" for every individual. They are "conservative" because they have been agreed to and practiced over a long period of American history. One example -- Cain's 9-9-9 taxation plan -- is a radical revision of our system. A federal "sales" taxes and a "flat tax" completely change the nature of our social compact. Beware.
All those Republican primary candidates who support the majority of these positions should be cherished and encouraged to discuss and debate as long as possible. The electorate must be informed. The debates are doing that (positive) at the same time they have a leftist purpose of sinking the candidacy of Gov Perry (negative). I wish they were not run by the marxist (socialist, statist-fascist) media, but how else do the candidates reach the largest audience?
Posted by: pyromancer76 at September 29, 2011 07:11 AM (i0aYq)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at September 29, 2011 07:14 AM (Cs6bg)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 29, 2011 08:24 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 29, 2011 08:36 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: steevy at September 29, 2011 10:55 AM (fyOgS)
The Snobby Clusterfuck of a First Lady goes shopping at Target! Just like a real people! She even carrys her own bags! Lookie, she's pushing a shopping cart! Where do I donate?
The story is typical MF media slobbering, the comments are brutal. Morons should feel right at home.
Posted by: Max Entropy at September 29, 2011 01:57 PM (lH6z9)
Posted by: theCork at September 30, 2011 12:30 AM (iSyWd)
Posted by: abercrombie and fitch canada at October 05, 2011 07:40 PM (s+Uph)
Posted by: sara at October 10, 2011 01:22 AM (1aJuZ)
desktop
Notebooks
Posted by: sara at October 10, 2011 01:29 AM (1aJuZ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1966 seconds, 299 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








From the ONT because it just pissed me off
this just in "Lying skank gets away with trying to hide 14 thousand votes in the WI recallelections'.http://tinyurl.com/4yaru5q
Posted by: sonnyspats at September 29, 2011 04:40 AM (I/MzF)
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A county clerk likely violated the law when she failed to report thousands of votes in this spring's tightly contested Wisconsin Supreme Court election, but her conduct wasn't criminal, state investigators said Wednesday.
This is why this shit happens. When elections are subverted people need to go to jail. We complain about election fraud all the time but prosecutions almost never happen and when they do the outcome is always “ho-hum”.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2011 03:02 AM (M9Ie6)