May 11, 2011
— Gabriel Malor
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
03:04 AM
| Comments (145)
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
She will sign the bogus “ATV Safety” bill today that pops in a host of new regulations on ATVs “for the children”.More damn intrusive government control to save the children from stupid parents. Also, this bill allows police to enforce these regulations on the vehicles on private property. This is a new precedent for laws on vehicles which to date have always depended on the implied consent rule in operating on public roads. Sanford had vetoed this bill last time it came up.
One more “ironic” thing that comes to mind here is how the Dems yell about the “cost of photo ID” for voting and how it prevents poor blacks from voting. Yet not a damn peep about this and the cost of sending your children to a safety training course before they are allowed to operate an ATV in your own yard. Training that they will remember for about 5 seconds after they leave the course.
This also demonstrates that the regulatory fascists never rest. You can kill their shit but it always comes back. Dracula was a piker compared to the regulation Czars.Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 03:09 AM (M9Ie6)
How about being greedy for approval from the media? How about heading down that global warming path? Is "undisciplined" the new word for adultery?
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 11, 2011 03:10 AM (Fo83G)
Washington Times is center-right?
A number of Morons have said the WT is center-right while I have maintained that it is just another left wing Dem PR rag. Here is their take on ObamaÂ’s host of campaign lies with amnesty round III
The headline:
Obama says border is secure enough to begin legalizationThat alone screams to be refuted by the paper. Do they? Of course not.
Oh, and did you know that “immigration reform” is being blocked by “legislative gridlock”? Hahahahaha. How about the fact that another round of amnesty by the idiots in the commies Party has no support from Republicans or even many Democrats.
Piss on the Washington Times.
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 03:10 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at May 11, 2011 03:15 AM (qIHlG)
Gee, do they calculate their inflation rate different than ours???
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 03:15 AM (M9Ie6)
Listen to this, Newt: STFU & GTFO before you fuck up conservatives chances to beat the biggest jackhole ever to occupy the White House.
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 11, 2011 03:15 AM (wX23+)
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 03:16 AM (M9Ie6)
My concern is that he will use this as a justification for an executive order, and that his hinting at this (and promising it in private talks) is what he is using to get the Hispanic vote.
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 11, 2011 03:19 AM (Fo83G)
Posted by: joncelli at May 11, 2011 03:19 AM (Nvw83)
No one should have to look at that guy this early in the morning.
Thanks a lot, Vic!
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 11, 2011 03:23 AM (Fo83G)
Ill. lawmaker says raising obese kids should cost parents at tax time
Posted by: Zoe Castillo (from Dreamfall) at May 11, 2011 03:23 AM (9hSKh)
My latest trope:
RINO. I do not think it means what you think it means.
"RINO" presumes that the default position of a Repubilcan is the conservative position. This is not so, and has never been so. The default position of a Republican is whatever gets the Republican re-elected.
We're using "RINO" wrong.
Posted by: Truman North at May 11, 2011 03:27 AM (K2wpv)
He has already ordered ICE to cease arrests.
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 03:28 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at May 11, 2011 03:29 AM (qIHlG)
Mitch Daniels is probably drawing up an offer even as we speak.
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 11, 2011 03:29 AM (Fo83G)
Posted by: Truman North at May 11, 2011 03:32 AM (K2wpv)
iknowtheleft/Empire of Jeff 2012: Kicking the JEF back to Indonesia one boot in the ass at a time
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 11, 2011 03:32 AM (wX23+)
I don't think he would be a good candidate, and I am thinking he won't run, anyway. But he has been a good governor.
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 11, 2011 03:34 AM (Fo83G)
I'd say that is an accurate and comprehensive assessment.
Posted by: Beto at May 11, 2011 03:34 AM (j5CHE)
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 11, 2011 07:34 AM (Fo83G)
He's very well placed right now. In the words of Dirty Harry: "A man's always gotta know his limitations."
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 11, 2011 03:37 AM (wX23+)
I'd say that is an accurate and comprehensive assessment.
I'd go with leech where it says mercenary; but other that that, yeah.
Posted by: s☺mej☼e at May 11, 2011 03:37 AM (TrAxp)
FIFYCIJCSTM
Posted by: s☺mej☼e at May 11, 2011 03:41 AM (TrAxp)
Orrin Hatch, Lamar Alexander, Elizabeth Dole, Dan Quayle, Alan Keyes, Steve Forbes, Bob Smith, John McCain, and George W. Bush.
Bush's debut came at the governor's conference in Indianapolis, where he gave a very boring speech.
So, despite not having a bunch of exciting candidates currently, we can still win this and should not despair. One of these people will turn out to be better than we thought (or maybe more than one) so take heart. The media's reporting on our candidates is geared towards making us depressed and unenthusiastic. Don't let them win.
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 11, 2011 03:41 AM (Fo83G)
Thanks a lot, Vic!
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 11, 2011 07:23 AM (Fo83G)
I had to kill the browser to escape!
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 11, 2011 03:43 AM (yrGif)
Posted by: franksalterego at May 11, 2011 03:44 AM (7/sDI)
Obama says border is secure enough to begin legalization.
He is one lying son of a bitch. Nevermind the fact that the deal was secure the border and implement self deportation measures to rid ourselves of the hoards that have no desire to assimilate.
Posted by: dogfish at May 11, 2011 03:44 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at May 11, 2011 03:45 AM (hbKCI)
The law will make it illegal for children younger than 6 to operate ATVs and for children younger than 16 to carry passengers on them.
That is pure nosense. They have governs on them so your child can't go fast. They have REMOTE off switches so a parent can turn the thing off if the kid gets too reckless. Age 5 is the perfect age to start your child on one because he is willing to still listen. By the time they turn 6, they have so many outside influences that it is harder to teach safety. Plus, a fucking class won't help. Ignorant parents will think 'No, my kid is cool. I don't have to keep that close an eye on him. He did pass that safety class.'
My almost 4 year old and my 5 year old both ride them. As with gun safety, you have to start at age three or so because that is the easiest time to 'influence' your child.
* If I'm not making sense, blame my lack of coffee.
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 03:47 AM (penCf)
Man, I hated Bush for the first few months. I thought he was a lying idiot. Then I realized he was actually trying very hard not to insult, not to belittle, and not to preach. Once I realized that, I found myself agreeing with him.
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 03:50 AM (penCf)
Exactly. The best words I could imagine a Repub candidate saying are "I told Karl Rove to go fuck himself".
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 11, 2011 03:52 AM (wX23+)
Don't you realize that everything is potentially dangerous and that only a knowledgeable high school graduate "state-sanctioned" bureaucrat can assist you to live your life, and the lives of your children, dogs, cats, horses, etc., to the fullest (where fullest is redefined from day to day)?
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 11, 2011 03:53 AM (yrGif)
Suddenly it rose to $4.09.
A few hours later, it dropped to $3.99.
It's done this before. What's the deal?
Posted by: nickless at May 11, 2011 03:54 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 03:55 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Newt Desmond at May 11, 2011 03:55 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at May 11, 2011 03:55 AM (hbKCI)
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 11, 2011 07:52 AM (wX23+)
Wait. I thought we LOVED Karl!
/
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 03:57 AM (penCf)
I did too. I figured he would be just like his daddy, another NE liberal Republican who would sell us out at the drop of a hat. But he ran further and further to the right during the primary and he didn't go very far back during the general.
I voted for him in the end, but I had some misgivings. Again, he was the lesser of two evils. When his first act was no child gets an education those misgivings started showing fruit.
Then 9-11 came and it was time to quit worrying about RINO and domestic issues.
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 03:59 AM (M9Ie6)
Don't you realize that everything is potentially dangerous and that only a knowledgeable high school graduate "state-sanctioned" bureaucrat can assist you to live your life, and the lives of your children, dogs, cats, horses, etc., to the fullest (where fullest is redefined from day to day)?
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 11, 2011 07:53 AM (yrGif)
Question Authority!!! Fight the Power!! Wait, what? We're in power now? Do as you are told! We have your best interests at heart!
Posted by: Rocket Scientist Lib at May 11, 2011 04:00 AM (O/onO)
Chris Matthews: ‘I’m Not A Bush Hater’ But Bush’s Attitude Towards Bin Laden Was ‘Wise-Ass’
“I’m not a Bush hater, but that was wise-ass behavior there. Just wise-ass. I mean this is the rich kid acting like I don’t care about that old girlfriend that dumped me. That was behavioral weirdness right there.”
Walsh agreed, suggesting she found it especially difficult to hear BushÂ’s chuckle from the clip. Yet Walsh theorized there actually was a plan behind BushÂ’s eagerness to steer the conversation away from Bin Laden:
“They were making the case – they decided it was bigger than Bin Laden – they were going to blame the whole thing on Iraq and lie about it. . . . He was laying the groundwork to shift the focus from Bin Laden as the mastermind and the bad guy to Saddam Hussein and Iraq.”
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 04:03 AM (penCf)
Discouraging to be sure. Still, if next fall Obama loses two out of three amongst Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania (and if the election were held today he would probably lose all three), our guy will likely win the election. Ah, the good old Electoral College, a natural counterweight to biased media reporting and inflated poll numbers.
Posted by: Blacksheep at May 11, 2011 04:05 AM (5cGDj)
I hope the hell Republicans have learned from 2007/2008 and know better this time.
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 04:06 AM (M9Ie6)
I'm not usually big on psychiatry but this is a clear description of the mentality of both the recently fooled and the true believers, while also explaining the apparent raving insanity in the current MBM.
But most people on the left choose denial, if not outright delusion. Why? Because, unlike conservatives, progressives don't just carry beliefs; they are their beliefs. Their ideology is their identity.
And stripped of this, what would they have left? Nothing, emptiness, being lost in an unfathomable universe. This is precisely why people create alternative realities...because the real one is too unbearable.
So the left attacks and intimidates the messengers, and they do this not just for political expediency. They do this to quell the doubts inside of them, the ones that threaten to break through their stealth defenses.
Posted by: ontherocks at May 11, 2011 04:06 AM (HBqDo)
All I did for the first two debates is yell, 'Liar!' It took me a long time to realize he was trying really hard not to lie. He chose his words very carefully, which actually made him sound like a liar.
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 04:07 AM (penCf)
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 08:06 AM (M9Ie6)
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
*gasp*cough*
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Posted by: Tami at May 11, 2011 04:07 AM (gFSHO)
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 08:06 AM (M9Ie6)
I always enjoy a good laugh first thing in the morning.
Posted by: Darth Randall at May 11, 2011 04:08 AM (O/onO)
Posted by: ontherocks at May 11, 2011 04:09 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Case at May 11, 2011 04:11 AM (0K+Kw)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at May 11, 2011 04:14 AM (hbKCI)
I expect Sears/Kmart to fold permanently soon.
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 04:14 AM (M9Ie6)
GE's asking leeway on content in exports risks backlash on jobsGeneral Electric Co. and Boeing Co. want leeway to use more foreign-made parts in exports financed by the U.S. government, a move unions say would subsidize sending jobs abroad.
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 04:16 AM (penCf)
Posted by: Blacksheep at May 11, 2011 04:18 AM (5cGDj)
League of Women Voters - Scott Brown Wants Kids To Choke To Death
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 04:19 AM (penCf)
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 08:16 AM (penCf)
Usually if something pisses off the unions, I'm all for it but this also benefits GE, which I'm not for.
I'm all conflicted.
Posted by: Tami at May 11, 2011 04:19 AM (gFSHO)
GE's asking leeway on content in exports risks backlash on jobs
General Electric Co. and Boeing Co. want leeway to use more foreign-made parts in exports financed by the U.S. government, a move unions say would subsidize sending jobs abroad.
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 04:20 AM (penCf)
The U.S. Export-Import Bank is another worthless agency created by executive fiat by FDR. What we should do is elliminate the agency totally and every regulation associated with it.
I would surmise that its only function is helping politically connected outfits like GE. It is part of "The American System" and needs to be abolished.
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 04:21 AM (M9Ie6)
I'm all conflicted.
Posted by: Tami at May 11, 2011 08:19 AM (gFSHO)
See, that is where I am. I figured one of the more intelligent morons can put me some knowledge.
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 04:21 AM (penCf)
An interesting article concerning inflation vs. deflation. I contend that food and energy prices are going up due primarily to supply & demand issues, rather than monetary policy, so this may be cherry picking on my part - but the numbers should speak for themselves.
Posted by: Reactionary at May 11, 2011 04:24 AM (xUM1Q)
Politifact notes that ObamaÂ’s proposed 2011 budget requested a reduction of 181 Border Patrol agents.
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 04:24 AM (penCf)
The government should neither provide funding to assist exports, nor set rules regarding percentages of parts' origination.
If the exporters have a sound business model they will need no assistance from the government, and any sound business model includes the acquisition of parts necessary for that enterprise.
Posted by: Blacksheep at May 11, 2011 04:27 AM (5cGDj)
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 04:27 AM (penCf)
'An impermissible act of public expression' - CA Dept. of Trans. They are trying to say no one can fly a flag in public right of ways.
California Agency Rejects Veterans Memorial Over American Flag
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 04:31 AM (penCf)
Just fucking brilliant.
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 11, 2011 04:33 AM (wX23+)
Issa: No Subpoena for Obama's Budget Director Over Contracting Dispute
The House Oversight Committee has decided not to move ahead with a subpoena for President ObamaÂ’s budget director, Fox News learned Tuesday night. The chief government investigator in Congress was initially planning to subpoena budget director Jack Lew to probe why the White House is considering tying government contracts to political contributions.
This isn't a GD contracting dispute you idiots. It is outright blatant corruption. if a Republican did this it would not have been a "no subpoena" issue after the fact. The initial report would have 50 point headline news for a month.
And on top of this Issa has folded like a cheap dime store suit.
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 04:37 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Reactionary at May 11, 2011 08:24 AM (xUM1Q)
Think you are right on there--economics is a multi-dimensional problem. In the two D model it seems there is a supply and demand component AND there is a intrinsic/perceived value assigned to the exchange currency (which has a speculative element as dollars received today may not be spent until next week).
If more people need energy, the price goes up due to finite capacity. If I perceive the fiat dollars will be worth less next week, the price goes up. The former problem "might" be solved by an increase in production (if possible or allowed). The latter one might never be solved (within our lifetimes).
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 11, 2011 04:38 AM (yrGif)
Suddenly it rose to $4.09.
A few hours later, it dropped to $3.99.
It's done this before. What's the deal?
Posted by: nickless at May 11, 2011 07:54 AM (MMC8r)
The same thing happened here in Baltimore. I got gas for $3.91 yesterday and today I was driving my kids to school and the same station had it at $4.17. WTF?
Posted by: Hedgehog at May 11, 2011 04:39 AM (Rn2kl)
At long last. His handicap revealed. Since he always lies, it must be at least a 27. With a 17 (or 27) handicap, it means they stop counting strokes over par after 2-3 over per hole.
Please join in with me in laughing at the 'Golfer in Chief'. He's a hacker. hahahaha
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 11, 2011 04:39 AM (ENKCw)
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 11, 2011 08:39 AM (ENKCw)
In ooooh so many ways.
Posted by: Tami at May 11, 2011 04:40 AM (gFSHO)
An Amerikkkan flag visible from the highway might incite the driver of a van-load of illegal aliens, peacefully commuting to their lawn care jobs, into an act of road rage. Voila!
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 11, 2011 04:41 AM (yrGif)
Posted by: dagny at May 11, 2011 04:42 AM (23y25)
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 11, 2011 08:39 AM (ENKCw)
You'd think that playing so much would make him better than a 17. Oh yeah, if he is really a 17 I'll eat my fucking shoe.
Same magazine has Sheriff Joe as a 7. Riiighttt!
Posted by: Hedgehog at May 11, 2011 04:42 AM (Rn2kl)
>>I'm all conflicted.
Posted by: Tami at May 11, 2011 08:19 AM (gFSHO)
See, that is where I am. I figured one of the more intelligent morons can put me some knowledge.
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 08:21 AM (penCf)
I'm not one to get conflicted, but I'm sure a couple of shooters would help bring some resolution.
This appears to be yet another nexus of government regulation and union lifelines, and the sooner we are rid of both, the better for all of us and our GDP.
Posted by: ontherocks at May 11, 2011 04:45 AM (HBqDo)
Usually if something pisses off the unions, I'm all for it but this also benefits GE, which I'm not for.
I'm all conflicted.
Posted by: Tami at May 11, 2011 08:19 AM (gFSHO)
Fuck GE. They manufacture very little here any longer outside their aircraft engines and turbines...and they pay no taxes. All of their applinances and other consumer goods are imported.
Fuck 'em ...let 'em fold. Pratt and Whitney makes great engines.
Boeing on the other hand is being forced to kowtow to the unions by President Petey and his thugs. We have no one to replace them if they leave or go under.
...but guess which one will the breaks
Posted by: beedubya at May 11, 2011 04:45 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Kevin in ABQ at May 11, 2011 04:45 AM (U69e0)
The same thing happened here in Baltimore. I got gas for $3.91 yesterday and today I was driving my kids to school and the same station had it at $4.17. WTF?
Fluctuations in the commodity market.
Posted by: dagny at May 11, 2011 04:46 AM (23y25)
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 11, 2011 04:49 AM (wX23+)
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 04:49 AM (penCf)
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 04:49 AM (penCf)
Posted by: Blacksheep at May 11, 2011 04:50 AM (5cGDj)
The new look, complete with Palin losing 5 pounds, was unveiled April 30 at the White House Correspondents' Association dinner in Washington, D.C.
...
The Palin family's lawyer declined to comment to The Associated Press on Tuesday.
Posted by: momma at May 11, 2011 04:53 AM (penCf)
Government, picking winners and losers once again. Gee, I bet there won't be any large campaign contributions involved either. I'm so glad I got out of the tax hellhole that is IL decades ago.
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 11, 2011 04:53 AM (ENKCw)
I'd like to know when self-absorbed rappers started to be identified as "poets" in the first place.
Morning, all!
Posted by: MWR at May 11, 2011 04:55 AM (4df7R)
+100
I also suspect he is a big fan of the 'foot wedge'.
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 11, 2011 04:58 AM (ENKCw)
Sorry, but... LMAO!
Son says bin Laden sea burial demeans family
1) Good, because your family deserves to be demeaned, son.
2) I agree that bin Laden shouldn't have received a sea burial. He should have been strung up by his ankles in the middle of Islamabad, surrounded by pressure sensitive landmines to prevent anyone from reaching his body, and left to rot and fester, and then his bleached bones crushed and churned into meal and fed to pigs. I think that would have been much more appropriate and fitting to a man of his standing.
3) You want to sue for proof? Really? Oh, kiddo, bring it ON. Our President is so messed up in the head you won't get anything of value. Though he may give you an iPod fully stocked with all of his speeches, including the one announcing your asshole father's double-tap death. Enjoy.
Posted by: MWR at May 11, 2011 05:02 AM (4df7R)
High pay and benefits for lifeguards in Newport Beach is the latest example of frustrating levels of compensation for public employees. More than half the cityÂ’s full-time lifeguards are paid a salary of over $100,000 and all but one of them collect more than $100,000 in total compensation including benefits. When thinking about career options with high salaries, lifeguarding is probably not one of the first jobs to come to mind. But it apparently should.
WTF
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 11, 2011 05:03 AM (ENKCw)
Morning, all!
Posted by: MWR at May 11, 2011 08:55 AM (4df7R)
"Poet" sounds so much better than "thug", but then I am into nuance.
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 11, 2011 05:03 AM (yrGif)
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 11, 2011 05:04 AM (ENKCw)
Posted by: curious at May 11, 2011 05:05 AM (k1rwm)
In order to balance out the Beoing deal; EXIM has to do hundreds of small business loan guarentees for political risk and currency risk (balance of payments issues). They are also the US Berne Union - balance of trade/payments bank.
I think they are entirely fee supported or mostly as well. So EXIM would be one of the last agencies I would cut; OPIC should go before EXIM. You could probably merge EXIM with the USTR (US Trade Representative); for a minor savings in rent/support staff - last time I dealt with them they were both in old government buildings in DC so that wouldn't be much.
Posted by: Jean at May 11, 2011 05:06 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 11, 2011 05:07 AM (OW0nw)
They say he's crazy, but it just might be a lunatic we're looking for!
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 11, 2011 05:07 AM (yrGif)
Posted by: Jean at May 11, 2011 05:10 AM (WkuV6)
A group of Pakistani politicians including a former minister hijacked proceedings in parliament to offer prayers for the death of Osama bin Laden, little more than a week after he was killed in a US Navy Seal raid. Their actions will heighten suspicions that parts of the Islamabad government or the powerful military establishment sympathised with the al-Qaeda leader, and may have sheltered him from justice. "Bin Laden was an international figure and above all a Muslim ... I took it as my religious duty to offer prayers for him," said Maulvi Asmatullah, an independent Member of the National Assembly
Yeah, forget all about that inconvenient mass murdering stuff.
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 11, 2011 05:10 AM (ENKCw)
Posted by: Dave C at May 11, 2011 05:12 AM (Kggtu)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 11, 2011 09:07 AM (OW0nw)
I agree wholeheartedly. If this turd is a 17 I'll eat my shoe. If he has ever broken 90 legitimately I'll throw in the other shoe.
Posted by: Hedgehog at May 11, 2011 05:24 AM (Rn2kl)
In all fairness, a big chunk of their problem is Congress itself, which won't allow them to make needed changes to adjust to a world with less snail mail being used.
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 11, 2011 05:26 AM (ENKCw)
Yeah, forget all about that inconvenient mass murdering stuff.
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 11, 2011 09:10 AM (ENKCw)
The part that you boldfaced implies that infidels died, and that it was a feature and not a bug, and this is inconvenient for the MBM to report, to say the least.
Posted by: ontherocks at May 11, 2011 05:28 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: tsj017 at May 11, 2011 06:45 AM (4YUWF)
Don't know if you guys follow this.
<quote>
He is the most prominent figure convicted in the governmentÂ’s crackdown on insider trading on Wall Street.
Mr. Rajaratnam, who was convicted on all 14 counts, faces up to 25 years in prison when he is sentenced.
Mr. Rajaratnam is expected to appeal.</quote>
Posted by: Flounder at May 11, 2011 07:23 AM (Kkt/i)
He is the one who contributed least to Barky's campaign. I have zero confidence in the integrity of these prosecutions. I also think "insider trading" is one of the phoniest laws on the books there is.
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 07:29 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Flounder at May 11, 2011 07:34 AM (Kkt/i)
After almost two weeks of jury deliberations, he was charged and found guilty of 14 counts of securities fraud and conspiracy: 9 of those counts pertained to insider trading, and the remaining 5 counts were on conspiracy to commit fraud."
Posted by: curious at May 11, 2011 07:40 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Flounder at May 11, 2011 11:41 AM (Kkt/i)
I don't know why the link didn't work, here it is again.
I thought it was fascinating that they asked for that recording yesterday.
Posted by: curious at May 11, 2011 07:43 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: curious at May 11, 2011 07:45 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: curious at May 11, 2011 07:49 AM (k1rwm)
What good does it do? Inconsistent enforcement doesn't go far enough in describing the BS that goes on with that law.
If it was up to me I would eliminate the SEC and all its regulations. The laws against fraud and breech of contract are enough.
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 07:51 AM (M9Ie6)
yes, big victory but, how big a list could be made of folks that haven't been charged? and maybe should have been?
Posted by: curious at May 11, 2011 07:54 AM (k1rwm)
"What good does it do?"
It helps create the facade that the market for publicly traded securities is a level playing field (falsely or not), thereby encouraging public investment. But as you point out, it takes enforcement for this to result in a good, or as we say around here, a good-good.
"If it were up to me . . ."
I, for one, welcome our beneficent overlord Vic at May 11, 2011 11:51 AM (M9Ie6, the wise.
I kid, but I think we are of the same ideological mindset.
Thanks again.
Posted by: Flounder at May 11, 2011 08:07 AM (Kkt/i)
A hand full of cases in how many years?
Memories, more memories
Posted by: curious at May 11, 2011 08:13 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: curious at May 11, 2011 08:14 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 08:20 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: soulpile is...expendable, s.a. at May 11, 2011 08:34 AM (afWhQ)
Posted by: Bob Saget at May 11, 2011 10:25 AM (F/4zf)
White House senior adviser David Plouffe was years ago quoted saying the notion of a Huntsman candidacy made him "queasy."
Hey, David Plouffe and I agree on something! Go figure.
Posted by: sherlock at May 11, 2011 12:00 PM (TQbuA)
Posted by: learn a language at May 16, 2011 04:54 PM (8crfW)
Posted by: hulin011 at May 18, 2011 07:06 PM (Aj5R5)
Posted by: km at May 19, 2011 07:56 PM (zzXIh)
Cleats are sports shoes that help you maintain balance. They also improve your Soccer Cleats On Salemotion. Their designs are made according to the cleat covers or caps. An important consideration in the design of a soccer cleat is that it is made to keep the player's center of gravity low. This ensures stability. It is also built to keep the players feet as low to the ground as possible. made for the sport you intend. Please, do not buy get them inSoccer Cleats On Sale general merchandise stores or specialized shoe outbaseball game. It is, therefore, very important cleats soccer cleats discount storefor another sport no matter how the salesman tries to convince you they will do the job If you are needs of the sport. Discount Soccer shoesThis means that those that are great for soccer will be inadequate for a not have outsoles. They also do not have mid soles. They are made of various materials like leather and polyurethane and may sometimes have aluminuma soccer player, yobuy are those made for the sport you intend to use them for.Several options are open tosoccer cleats discount store you if you are looking to buy new cleats. You canDiscount Soccer shoes that you ensure the cleats you intend to a good point to bear in mind is that they must be the right size and specifically, they won't. Soccer cleats are different from other cleats in that they do lets. You can also get them online. However,u'll agree that this helps your speed and in certain types of shots. Lastly, soccer cleats have stitches in place of toe cleats as these make for better control over the ball.
Posted by: mrhuang0707mrhuang at May 25, 2011 08:07 PM (rA/SY)
Posted by: pandora at June 19, 2011 10:58 PM (bficH)
Posted by: hermes at June 21, 2011 06:41 PM (0Al0x)
Posted by: Charm Thomas Sabo at June 30, 2011 01:15 AM (rDuNS)
Posted by: lili at July 06, 2011 04:40 PM (OIqem)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2469 seconds, 273 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








On this day in history one of the worst episodes of judicial misconduct in history was concluded. The charges against Daniel Ellsberg were dismissed based on illegal “evidence gathering” by federal authorities under uber-liberal Nixon. This as a follow-up to the BS ruling by SCOTUS that the government could not prevent publication of classified documents by a newspaper.
Both of those rulings really have zero basis in the Constitution contrary to what the liberal courts have to say. Dismissal of charges due to police misconduct is an artificial construct that should have never been allowed and should be eliminated. What should happen is that if police are guilty of misconduct then they should be charged with crimes. Instead what we get is two sets of criminals going free, the original criminal who committed the crime and the police who violated laws to hunt them down.
The infamous case of NYT vs United States is one of the most misunderstood cases in history. Most people think that as a result of the case a newspaper can print anything it wants with virtual immunity. This is not the case. The ruling was that the government can not “pre-censure” publication of information unless they first show in court clear and imminent danger would result from such publication. The problem with that is that such a trial would only release more of the classified information. All that being said, the ruling did allow the newspaper to be prosecuted AFTER the fact if it was shown that publication did harm the national security. Ironically, publication of the Pentagon Papers did reveal sources and methods that directly resulted in the death of U.S. agents and informants.
However, by the time those events unfolded the government was already so embroiled in the mess stemming from this series of events that they decided no further action would be taken. The final fallout has been that despite the actual ruling the NYT continues to publish classified information (when Republicans are in office) that harms the U.S. and no government official will take any action.
Posted by: Vic at May 11, 2011 03:06 AM (M9Ie6)