September 21, 2011
— Ace Dead Now: Executed at 11:08.
The first thing is that the "Van full of Air Force witnesses" really did not see the shooter's face. They could identify him, they say, based on his clothing.
Clothing's important here. In the parking lot was a White Shirt and a Yellow Shirt. Everyone agrees the White Shirt shot and murdered Officer McPhail.
It also seems established that between one Sylvester Coles and one Troy Davis, one was wearing the Yellow Shirt (and therefore is innocent of the murder) and one was wearing the White Shirt (and therefore is guilty of the murder).
Who's who? Who is White Shirt, and guilty of a capital offense, and who is Yellow Shirt, and not guilty?
There is testimony that Coles was wearing the Yellow Shirt, and so is innocent, and Davis was wearing the White Shirt, and so is guilty. Unfortunately that testimony comes from Coles' sister, and even more unfortunately, she spins an odd tale of the men switching shirts.
She claims that her brother wore a yellow shirt as he ran back to her house, and swapped it for a red shirt she gave him. She claims that Davis, on the other hand, ran back to her house shirtless (implication: he took off the white shirt of the murderer), and, for reasons unclear, put on Coles' nasty sweaty yellow shirt for a few moments, before pulling it back off and throwing it back on the porch.
This testimony is all a bit weird, and one reasonable inference is that the sister is making up a story that turns her guilty brother, Coles -- the actual White Shirt killer -- into the innocent Yellow Shirt bystander, and seems to maybe be covering for inconsistencies in her story (perhaps earlier saying that Davis was wearing the yellow shirt, which would make Davis innocent and her brother guilty) by spinning a tale of shirts briefly worn and then discarded.
On the other hand, the blog dismisses eyewitness identifications of Davis as the killer. Coles and Davis (or at least White Shirt and Yellow Shirt) accosted and pistol-whipped a homeless man while he was drinking beer; it was the shouts of this homeless man that brought Officer MacPhail running over.
The homeless man says he didn't remember anything, but the police intimidated him into identifying Davis as the killer. That's one of the recantations.
But his girlfriend did in fact pick Davis out of a photo array. On the second try:
Ms. Murray was shown a photo array the night of the shooting, but could not identify the gunman. Several days later, the police showed her a second photo array, from which she identified Mr. Davis as the man who hit Mr. Young and shot the officer.
Coulter mentions the man who doesn't fully retract his testimony -- Darrell Collins continues to say it was Troy Davis wearing the White Shirt, which, when added to the other eyewitnesses (who agree White Shirt killed him), would seem to indicate Davis did shoot Officer MacPhail.
Although he says Davis was wearing the White Shirt, he says he was coerced by police into implicating Davis in an earlier shooting, and now says that despite being within ten feet of Davis when the shots were fired, he didn't see anything.
He also alleges that Coles was the one who struck the homeless man (the initial assault that brought MacPhail running to the scene)...
They told me that I would go to jail for a long time and I would be lucky if I ever got out, especially because a police officer got killedÂ… I didnÂ’t want to go to jail because I didnÂ’t do nothing wrong. I was only sixteen and was so scared of going to jail. They kept saying thatÂ…[Troy] had messed with that man up at Burger King and killed that officer. I told them that it was Red and not Troy who was messing with that man, but they didnÂ’t want to hear thatÂ…
That last bit is somewhat interesting, because others say the man who "messed" with the homeless man was also the man who shot the cop.
I don't know. It's a lot more convoluted and messy than I first thought. And in this situation -- a cop murdered sadistically by a gun-wielding member of a two-man wolfpack -- I can imagine cops making a lot of threats to get a conviction.
It's the classic two-man murder, one is guilty, and one is actually innocent (except for things that aren't capital offenses, like palling around with killers).
And which is which?
Coles rushed to the police station the next morning to implicate Davis in the murder.
Does that mean Coles was actually innocent?
Or does that mean Coles was smart enough to realize that someone was going to hang for this, and better to get the police focused on Davis?
If you like CSI, or Law & Order, especially those ambiguous-ending episodes, the whole murky mess is worth a read.
AP: A balanced piece, from AP.
Thanks to robrr.
Posted by: Ace at
07:25 PM
| Comments (203)
Post contains 865 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Tommygun at September 21, 2011 07:30 PM (T2ydq)
Posted by: mghorning at September 21, 2011 07:30 PM (FmCe7)
Posted by: Andy at September 21, 2011 07:32 PM (z6jMn)
Posted by: CitizenOfTheRepublic at September 21, 2011 07:32 PM (uqY5u)
If the White Shirt / Yellow Shirt issue were such a dealbreaker, it would certainly have been reviewed at the evidentiary re-hearing. And so it was. And the hearing upheld his conviction.
Posted by: Lou at September 21, 2011 07:32 PM (0F3ej)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 07:33 PM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Gerbil Malodor, the Skin flutist at September 21, 2011 07:33 PM (jn9dd)
Ace,
AP went throught the trial transcripts and the 16 year didn't recant. He said the police intimidated him into testifying on the stand.
According to the AP most of the recants weren't recants and the stuff they said in the new afidavit was stuff the jury had already heard.
I posted the AP article on the other thread.
Posted by: robtr at September 21, 2011 07:35 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 07:37 PM (EPcuy)
Posted by: ace at September 21, 2011 07:38 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 07:41 PM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Sparky at September 21, 2011 07:41 PM (0F6Sg)
Posted by: Occam's Strop at September 21, 2011 07:42 PM (X1d/W)
Posted by: mpfa, TPT at September 21, 2011 07:42 PM (3TjSM)
Posted by: ace at September 21, 2011 07:42 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Joejm65 at September 21, 2011 07:43 PM (UZuc4)
Posted by: Tommygun at September 21, 2011 07:44 PM (T2ydq)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 07:44 PM (EPcuy)
Posted by: Andy at September 21, 2011 07:44 PM (z6jMn)
For every nominal innocent there are many, many more innocents serving life, or 20 years.
Hell, why weren't these same people going nuts when the government blamed Steven Hatfill for the anthrax mailings and tried him in the court of public opinion?
Posted by: 18-1 at September 21, 2011 07:45 PM (FBr/C)
Posted by: Chris R, red in NY-9 at September 21, 2011 07:45 PM (hGTfi)
Posted by: ace at September 21, 2011 11:42 PM (nj1bB)
What was the specific decision where our robed masters opined on this?
Posted by: 18-1 at September 21, 2011 07:46 PM (FBr/C)
Moral of the story under any plausible scenario: don't kill people or hang around with people who do.
The more you know.
Posted by: Ben at September 21, 2011 07:46 PM (tEGzl)
Posted by: D. Hopper Badger at September 21, 2011 07:46 PM (kBWjM)
Posted by: 18-1 at September 21, 2011 11:45 PM (FBr/C)
They are cop killer enthusiasts, they only get excited when the victim was a cop.
Posted by: robtr at September 21, 2011 07:46 PM (MtwBb)
In cases like that, it is often mostly impossible to say with 100% surety whether it was this one or the other one. As a formal matter, that means you're always supposed to acquit in such cases.
As a let's-be-real matter, I think a lot of juries just decide there is enough guilt between them and convict.
Posted by: ace at September 21, 2011 11:38 PM (nj1bB)
Yeah, pretty much. If they got it backwards, Coles should be fried, but being an accessory to the killing spree, fleeing the scene of the crime, etc. makes the moral case against both of them pretty much equal even if the law doesn't say so.
Most of us won't pour through trial transcripts and so we rely on these news reports to lay out the case for us. And every. single. time. with these last-minute appeals, they are swiss cheese lies put out by defense lawyers or anti-death-penalty advocates.
I'd have sympathy for the anti-death-penalty advocates if once -- just once -- they'd be honest about their cases instead of lying, omitting and misrepresenting the facts.
There is a dog that didn't bark here in that all the sympathetic stories leave a lot out of this case. I don't have a lot of sympathy for people who lie to me.
Posted by: AmishDude at September 21, 2011 07:52 PM (73tyQ)
Liberalism really is a mental disorder.
Posted by: Rich C at September 21, 2011 07:53 PM (aXpAb)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 21, 2011 07:55 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Joejm65 at September 21, 2011 07:56 PM (UZuc4)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 21, 2011 08:03 PM (ZDUD4)
One slight problem with this though....
(that may take forever to load -- so here's the relevant part) (foonote 97 or page 99 of the pdf)
The State introduced evidence regarding Mr. Davis's "bloody"
shorts. (See Resp. Ex. 67.) However, even the State conceded
that this evidence lacked any probative value of guilt,
submitting it only to show what the Board of Pardons and Paroles
had before it. (Evidentiary Hearing Transcript at 468-69.)
Indeed, there was insufficient DNA to determine who the blood
belonged to, so the shorts in no way linked Mr. Davis to the
murder of Officer MacPhail. The blood could have belonged to
Mr. Davis, Mr. Larry Young, Officer MacPhail, or even have
gotten onto the shorts entirely apart from the events of that
night. Moreover, it is not even clear that the substance was
blood.
Posted by: lu at September 21, 2011 08:04 PM (CjJhm)
Posted by: Jordan at September 21, 2011 08:07 PM (4z6KA)
Posted by: Joffen at September 21, 2011 08:07 PM (EPcuy)
Posted by: nerdygirl at September 21, 2011 08:12 PM (MEtbb)
Mr. Davis, Mr. Larry Young, Officer MacPhail, or even have
gotten onto the shorts entirely apart from the events of that
night. Moreover, it is not even clear that the substance was
blood.
Yeah. It was ketchup. He was opening one of those packets and it just went everywhere.
Yes, yes, I know, can't be used in court and all that, a man's life hangs in the balance, but as Ace said, if the Felony Murder rule hadn't been changed, this wouldn't be an issue.
Posted by: AmishDude at September 21, 2011 08:13 PM (73tyQ)
Posted by: SFGoth at September 21, 2011 08:13 PM (g/WYX)
Fuck you.
I am a barbaric. I don't give a shit what you think. This guy deserved the sentence he got.
Posted by: mpfs, TPT at September 21, 2011 08:14 PM (3TjSM)
It also seems established that between one Sylvester Coles and one Troy Davis, one was wearing the Yellow Shirt (and therefore is innocent of the murder) and one was wearing the White Shirt (and therefore is guilty of the murder).
Who's who? Who is White Shirt, and guilty of a capital offense, and who is Yellow Shirt, and not guilty?
Fuck it, they all look alike.
Posted by: C*ntessa Brewer at September 21, 2011 08:15 PM (QaKuj)
Posted by: Rick Perry at September 21, 2011 08:15 PM (I/MzF)
Posted by: Jordan at September 21, 2011 08:15 PM (4z6KA)
I also think the cops who beat Kelly Thomas in Fullerton CA to death deserve what they are going to get too. I'm an equal opportunity barbarian.
Posted by: mpfs, TPT at September 21, 2011 08:16 PM (3TjSM)
Posted by: Johnny (John E.) at September 21, 2011 08:17 PM (nRTou)
Posted by: fused at September 21, 2011 08:17 PM (P34gz)
Posted by: Captain Hate at September 21, 2011 08:17 PM (7dMdC)
Posted by: mpfs, TPT at September 21, 2011 08:17 PM (3TjSM)
Posted by: nerdygirl at September 21, 2011 08:18 PM (MEtbb)
Posted by: The terrorist Hobbit formerly known as Donna at September 21, 2011 08:18 PM (5Wl/f)
Posted by: mike at September 21, 2011 08:18 PM (IBh7/)
I'm never clear on what "social" justice is.
Of course, I believe the adjective "social" is used to give irony to the noun that follows.
Posted by: AmishDude at September 21, 2011 08:18 PM (73tyQ)
Amishdude,
Your words...they make me swoon
Jordan thinx ima bad with teh grammer. Whats agrahmcrackerariam. I'm so dumb!
Posted by: mpfs, TPT at September 21, 2011 08:20 PM (3TjSM)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 21, 2011 08:21 PM (deaac)
Posted by: garrett at September 21, 2011 08:22 PM (X1d/W)
Posted by: nerdygirl at September 21, 2011 08:22 PM (MEtbb)
Posted by: lu at September 21, 2011 08:22 PM (CjJhm)
Posted by: mike at September 21, 2011 08:25 PM (IBh7/)
Muma did that too. His execution can't come fast enough. Justice has been delayed too long.
Posted by: mpfs, TPT at September 21, 2011 08:25 PM (3TjSM)
Posted by: cherry π at September 21, 2011 08:26 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: nerdygirl at September 21, 2011 08:27 PM (MEtbb)
-- Spencer Lawton (prosecuting attorney)
Posted by: JMS at September 21, 2011 08:27 PM (tNNAe)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 21, 2011 08:27 PM (deaac)
Posted by: DaMav at September 21, 2011 08:27 PM (QNU76)
How do we know it was smoke? How do we know it wasn't fog? It could have been steam. We aren't even sure that it was a gun, even though it was gun-shaped and half-full of bullets.
Posted by: AmishDude at September 21, 2011 08:27 PM (73tyQ)
Posted by: cherry π at September 21, 2011 08:27 PM (OhYCU)
Monroe is about 40 miles south of Dearborn, MI (Dearbornistan.) Lot of people just mad mad mad at each other.
Posted by: No need to thank me- I enjoy being helpful at September 21, 2011 08:28 PM (zVHzM)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 22, 2011 12:27 AM (deaac)
Then death row is the best place. You'll notice that life imprisonment doesn't focus the activists. They're happy to have a man waste his life behind bars because it isn't as sexy. Let's face it, they're going to die anyway.
Posted by: AmishDude at September 21, 2011 08:31 PM (73tyQ)
Posted by: Joejm65 at September 21, 2011 08:32 PM (UZuc4)
Posted by: Godzilla at September 21, 2011 08:33 PM (YzFnv)
Posted by: cherry π at September 21, 2011 08:33 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: AmishDude at September 22, 2011 12:31 AM (73tyQ)
It's living a bare subsistence life on the government dime of boring uselessness; it's what they want for everybody.
Posted by: Captain Hate at September 21, 2011 08:33 PM (7dMdC)
I think we probably did o.k. on this one."
How many people get sentences overturned? I'm pretty sure none of the people convicted over the Secret Satanic Child Molestation Daycare Cults did, which means a judge not overturning a sentence isn't indicative of anything.
But, anyway, the guy is at least an accessory to the murder. I don't generally support the death penalty for single murders, but I'm not going to shed any tears for the (former) asshole.
Posted by: Justin at September 21, 2011 08:37 PM (yoAYX)
Posted by: bigmike at September 21, 2011 08:38 PM (VmHc2)
Posted by: navycopjoe aka Palinista Extremo at September 21, 2011 08:39 PM (R7NIt)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at September 21, 2011 08:40 PM (i0App)
Yeah. First of all, this is why "felony murder" exists. You want to hang with criminal assholes and do crime, then pony up to the cashier. Yes, it's a "convenience of the cops" thing, much like "open container" laws, but it's hard to muster much sympathy.
Beyond reasonable doubt, they got this one right. And if they didn't, if it was actually the other guy? At one time, I would have taken that more seriously than I do now. When I first watched that movie, can't remember the title, which featured Glenn Close and a Magic Negro mother-of-criminal nodding her head through the whole thing, and some mope was on trial for something, and the evil prosecutor said, about the possibility of his innocence for the specific crime charged: "So what? He had a rap sheet as long as my dick." At the time, I went along with the narrative of the movie, and thought "Oh, you bad evil man."
Now? I'm not for convicting the innocent, but I have since acquired more of a sense of the stakes of the battle between civilization and those who prey on it, so I say to the evil prosecutor: you're wrong, because it's your job to get this right. But if it weren't, well, good point.
Posted by: Splunge at September 21, 2011 08:40 PM (2IW5Q)
Michelle Malkin is actually getting threats and such vulgar comments on Twitter. It's hard to believe that people have become so consumed with hate that they take pride in their poison being re-tweeted.
Posted by: Carolyn at September 21, 2011 08:41 PM (CQId4)
Posted by: mike at September 21, 2011 08:42 PM (IBh7/)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 21, 2011 08:44 PM (ZDUD4)
A "college jr." RT @intellect13: @michellemalkin my foot is gonna stay on yo neck you noddle slurping hoe. goodnight!
Posted by: Carolyn at September 21, 2011 08:44 PM (CQId4)
Posted by: mike at September 21, 2011 08:45 PM (IBh7/)
Posted by: Joejm65 at September 21, 2011 08:52 PM (UZuc4)
That said, the #$%^ that is being allowed to be spewed at her is draining the last bit of love for my fellow men/women, that I had left.
I have to stop reading it. I've already stopped following numerous people and I didn't have many to begin with.
I wonder if the people that also promote their business under the same screen names, will regret tomorrow, what they are tweeting tonight.
Posted by: Carolyn at September 21, 2011 08:53 PM (CQId4)
Posted by: Malcolm Tent at September 21, 2011 08:57 PM (4+XnQ)
Posted by: mike at September 21, 2011 08:59 PM (IBh7/)
Have you read his Twitter? Baldwin is really, fucking evil. He's open about expressing his total hatred for most Americans. He's a Truther. He wants Bush and Cheney tried for murder. He incites racial threats against Malkin.
It's nuts. And this fucker will host SNL. And be paid millions by NBC.
And yet he daily spews foul-mouthed rage at half the country.
It'd be like if Ann Coulter also starred in a wacky sitcom where she played an uptight women's studies professor.
Except Baldwin is much more personally hateful than what I've seen Coulter say.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at September 21, 2011 09:00 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: Warden at September 21, 2011 09:02 PM (KulgD)
Posted by: Fabozz at September 21, 2011 09:05 PM (w+Lhu)
Posted by: Joejm65 at September 21, 2011 09:06 PM (UZuc4)
Posted by: Morbius Wilters at September 21, 2011 09:13 PM (CxBWM)
I dunno; I've got a friend who's a Deputy District Attorney in Los Angeles County. The classic defense is "some other dude did it". Of course here you're got two dudes. Each said the other dude did it. One of them sure as God made little green apples shot a man twice--once in the chest, then, leaning over, once in the face. I would have told those protesting assholes that we should have executed both of the guys--just to make sure we got the right one.
Posted by: Comanche Voter at September 21, 2011 09:13 PM (3ESDJ)
Protesting capital punishment, using death threats.On Twitter, for gawd sake.Twitter accounts linked to their livelihood in some cases.
I can't believe we are members of the same species.
Posted by: Carolyn at September 21, 2011 09:18 PM (CQId4)
Posted by: Jordan at September 22, 2011 12:15 AM (4z6KA)
Fuck off.
HowÂ’s that grammar?
Posted by: Dumb_Blonde at September 21, 2011 09:19 PM (2ZgUA)
Posted by: Sparky at September 21, 2011 09:22 PM (0F6Sg)
Posted by: Max Power is also chillin at September 21, 2011 09:27 PM (+wxCD)
Posted by: Sgt. York at September 21, 2011 09:28 PM (B6nJc)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 21, 2011 09:29 PM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: mike at September 21, 2011 09:31 PM (IBh7/)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 21, 2011 09:31 PM (ZDUD4)
I apologize for my OT ranting re: Twitter.
Nite all.
Posted by: Carolyn at September 21, 2011 09:33 PM (CQId4)
If Yellow shirt and White shirt were running together, what difference does it make? They're equally guilty regardless of who pulled the trigger. Both should have been put down.
Posted by: RokShox at September 21, 2011 09:34 PM (pcly4)
Posted by: Ken Royall at September 21, 2011 09:35 PM (9zzk+)
Posted by: sifty is all for domestic drilling at September 21, 2011 09:36 PM (4CSeG)
Posted by: sauropod at September 21, 2011 09:40 PM (GPm6P)
Lol at the Huff Post article about the racist executed in Texas. They put up a picture where his eyes are red from the reflection during the taking of the photograph. The impression you're supposed to get is, "Jesus, that motherfucker is goddam evil! Look at them demon eyes!" Give me a fucking break.
As for this Troy Davis brouhaha, the real story here is why we're hearing about it. It's all about setting up a foundation to attack Rick Perry later for the Willingham execution as well as the soon to become truth media lie that Perry presided over eleventy million executions during his tenure as governor. Someone got pissed at the reaction of the crowd at the CNN debate when the death penalty came up. I haven't heard a goddamn thing about executions except for a fart in the paper and all of sudden it's a fucking trending topic in the MSM every damn day. You can bet your bottom dollar they're angling for a Perry assassination with this crap. Problem is I don't think it will work since most people don't give a flying fuckall about these scumbags getting the hot shot.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at September 21, 2011 09:41 PM (AF1jB)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at September 21, 2011 09:47 PM (AF1jB)
Posted by: John P. Squibob at September 21, 2011 09:49 PM (lqAhy)
Actually, with appeals and such, it costs 1.2 million dollars to put a person to death, and about $150,000 to house a person in jail for life assuming jailed person is 20 years old and shares a cell. Read that somewhere.
Posted by: Sgt. York at September 21, 2011 09:59 PM (B6nJc)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at September 21, 2011 09:59 PM (AF1jB)
OT: Leggo my BACON!
Police in the St. Louis suburb of University City say a suspect in a string of burglaries was caught after a homeowner reported finding him frying bacon in her kitchen.
Kenya Ealy says she returned home after an errand and found 36-year-old Damon Petty of St. Louis cooking breakfast.
http://tinyurl.com/St-Louis-Bacon
Posted by: Rewrite! at September 21, 2011 10:02 PM (d7Px0)
Posted by: Rewrite! at September 21, 2011 10:04 PM (d7Px0)
Posted by: Clarance Thomas at September 21, 2011 10:18 PM (5PVGE)
It's the classic two-man murder, one is guilty, and one is actually innocent (except for things that aren't capital offenses, like palling around with killers).
Seems like the felony-murder rule should apply - if both assaulted the homeless guy, they're both on the hook for the murder.
*shrug*
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at September 21, 2011 10:23 PM (2xfbm)
Posted by: John P. Squibob at September 22, 2011 01:49 AM (lqAhy)
Had some hippie FB "friends" from the UK all bundled up in knots over it. As if they don't have enough shit being flung at them in their own country they have to "take up the cause" of some dipshit murderer they've never met. Fuck I hate hippies.
Posted by: tangonine at September 21, 2011 10:28 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: DANEgerus at September 21, 2011 10:29 PM (NhcG5)
Posted by: di butler, bitches at September 21, 2011 10:29 PM (bO3kG)
"Dead. 11:08 local. That's what happens when you kill cops."
heh.
Posted by: tangonine at September 21, 2011 10:30 PM (x3YFz)
Seems like the felony-murder rule should apply - if both assaulted the homeless guy, they're both on the hook for the murder.
*shrug*
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at September 22, 2011 02:23 AM (2xfbm)
As Ace said, the SCOTUS declared that off-limits for death penalty cases.
That's the hilarious thing. He's guilty, guilty, guilty. It's only the technicalities of the law that would -- if the anti-DP crowd's claims were true -- keep him from the needle. They acknowledge his guilt.
Posted by: AmishDude at September 21, 2011 10:31 PM (73tyQ)
Yes. And therein lieth the bullshit.
Posted by: tangonine at September 21, 2011 10:33 PM (x3YFz)
Alec Baldwin is reveling in Davis' death. When I saw the attention whore shore up his self esteem by sicing his minions on Malkin I was reminded of Baron Harkonen pulling the heart plug from one of his slaves and bathing in the dying man's blood.
Baldwin is using another man's death to score some cheap lib self-righteous cred'. He's mentally masterbating over the fact that so many mindless followers of his jump at his command and attack. He'll sleep well tonight, his fragile, fan-nourished ego has fed well tonight.
Malkin may have supported Davis' death, but Baldwin is profiting from it, he's reveling in it.
Posted by: 29Victor at September 21, 2011 10:37 PM (ES9R7)
Yeah, that's the real hypocrisy here. They only oppose the death penalty so they can feel self-righteous.
They love to use dead bodies.
Posted by: AmishDude at September 21, 2011 10:52 PM (73tyQ)
Actually, with appeals and such, it costs 1.2 million dollars to put a person to death, and about $150,000 to house a person in jail for life assuming jailed person is 20 years old and shares a cell. Read that somewhere.
---
Justice* is worth the cost.
*and the price of admission to see so many lefty idiots pissing themselves live on the internet, because they were played by some opportunistic ambulance chaser. The real criminal here is the defense attorney who manufactured this non-crisis and stirred up all this racial hatred and civil discontent.
Posted by: Flounder at September 21, 2011 10:57 PM (Kkt/i)
Good riddance to the scumbag. Too bad that his partner in crime couldn't take a needle as well. And throw in that Mumia Abu-Jamal piece of shit the left is always crying about for the perfect trifecta. I 'd pay to be part of the counter protest outside the prison on the day that Pennsylvania flushes that dude.
Posted by: Kansas Gman at September 21, 2011 10:57 PM (u4a/I)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at September 21, 2011 11:16 PM (dIHHd)
Posted by: hobbes at September 21, 2011 11:29 PM (+CcmI)
Guilty as hell, no doubt at all.
http://tinyurl.com/3ho6ycs
Posted by: Adjoran at September 21, 2011 11:47 PM (VfmLu)
Posted by: Adjoran at September 21, 2011 11:49 PM (VfmLu)
Posted by: Case at September 21, 2011 11:54 PM (FD6YW)
Giving these murderers a chance to re-live their greatest hits over-and-over again is not justice in my book.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at September 21, 2011 11:58 PM (dIHHd)
Posted by: Tookie Williams welcoming fellow wrongly executed powerful black man to his first pikes and pentagra at September 22, 2011 12:47 AM (2xclE)
Posted by: Tookie, ashamed of his lack of knowledge of comment character limits at September 22, 2011 12:48 AM (2xclE)
Posted by: Wonkish Rogue at September 22, 2011 12:55 AM (2xclE)
Posted by: Ellipsis Lacuna at September 22, 2011 12:56 AM (vPtaA)
"Lets kill him to see whether he is innocent", Nancy Pelosi on the event.
Everyone in prison is actually innocent, NYTimes.
Posted by: NortonPete at September 22, 2011 12:59 AM (8zxoH)
Here's what we know for certain.
He was convicted by a jury of twelve people who heard 34 prosecution witnesses and 5 defense witnesses after deliberating for two hours. Their decision has been reviewed at least a dozen times over twenty years by the Georgia Supreme Court, the United States Court for the Southern District of Georgia, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and the United States Supreme Courts.
The Supreme Court, for the first time in 50 years, even ordered the Circuit Court to conduct a full evidentially hearing. At that hearing, the defense refused to call the man it accused of the shooting and two of the so-called "re canters" to the stand, even though the court stated it would not consider their affidavits if they did not testify.
But all those jurors and judges were apparently retards who couldn't see what is obvious to the supergenius Hollywood libs who read one or two blogs and the wikipedia page on the topic and now know everything is there is to know about it.
Posted by: Jingo at September 22, 2011 01:50 AM (mdwWR)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 22, 2011 01:57 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: hobbes at September 22, 2011 02:24 AM (+CcmI)
Posted by: Malcolm Tent at September 22, 2011 02:52 AM (y1EAd)
Posted by: Internet tough guy at September 22, 2011 03:01 AM (STTZD)
Posted by: Yerton at September 22, 2011 03:32 AM (tKWAs)
The other actively aided & abetted and was present at the time of the murder.
The sister actively aided & abetted after the fact. At a minimum she is guilty of harboring fugitives.
Why aren't all 3 of them guilty?
Posted by: Mark E at September 22, 2011 03:37 AM (w5RwR)
Posted by: Mr Fever Head at September 22, 2011 03:37 AM (ZgvjV)
Posted by: Just explain it already at September 22, 2011 04:08 AM (UIEJa)
Posted by: Billy Jack at September 22, 2011 04:15 AM (tIilm)
Posted by: Frank G at September 22, 2011 04:24 AM (1rPxL)
Posted by: Frank and Joe Hardy at September 22, 2011 04:39 AM (XVZqw)
Posted by: Jennifer Harris at September 22, 2011 04:42 AM (N7xJb)
It also seems established that between one Sylvester Coles and one Troy Davis, one was wearing the Yellow Shirt (and therefore is innocent of the murder)
Horseshit.
Coles and Davis (or at least White Shirt and Yellow Shirt) accosted and pistol-whipped a homeless man while he was drinking beer
So, neither of them were exactly innocent.
Lesson: Don't think you can pistol whip some innocent person and might not get killed over it.
Posted by: ThomasD at September 22, 2011 04:44 AM (UK5R1)
For every nominal innocent there are many, many more innocents serving life, or 20 years.
Hell, why weren't these same people going nuts when the government blamed Steven Hatfill for the anthrax mailings and tried him in the court of public opinion?
Posted by: 18-1 at September 21, 2011 11:45 PM (FBr/C)
Yeah, or that poor sap security guard at the Atlanta Olympics, whom the Atlanta Urinal and Constipation practically crucified for the pipe bomb incident, and to this day refuses to recant any of the trash they printed about him.
Posted by: DaveinNC at September 22, 2011 04:55 AM (boNGU)
Posted by: Chuckit at September 22, 2011 05:28 AM (Hc9Yd)
Posted by: Irving Schatz at September 22, 2011 05:28 AM (lB/5N)
Posted by: Jordan at September 22, 2011 05:29 AM (4z6KA)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at September 22, 2011 06:02 AM (Z6fyp)
You are a profoundly silly person.
Posted by: toby928™ at September 22, 2011 06:03 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at September 22, 2011 06:13 AM (Z6fyp)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 22, 2011 06:18 AM (1Jaio)
If OJ hadn't been incarcerated, he would have persuaded the real killer to step forward.
So it's OJ's fault.
And if you're going to commit a murder, wear inconspicuous clothing. That's why I don't understand people who have vanity license plates--why make your vehicle easier to spot?
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at September 22, 2011 06:23 AM (Br3eE)
I have to say the Gacy execution had more of a festive feel to it...I celebrated with "Lethal Injection" shots at Cody Coyote's.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at September 22, 2011 06:26 AM (Br3eE)
Hee.
Parody posters--Your best entertainment value.
Posted by: LeBron Steinman at September 22, 2011 06:52 AM (TQy0T)
I think a good idea rally the conservative base would be for Rick Perry to personally perform each and every Texas execution using a garrotte. On TV.
In Texas, it might be more culturally sensitive to just shoot 'em though.
Posted by: West at September 22, 2011 07:02 AM (1Rgee)
He's feeling cold and stiff this morning.
Posted by: Dick Nixon
A little extra-strength Tylenol and he will be fine. Still dead but fine.
Posted by: mpfs, TPT, Barbarian and Bad Grammarian at September 22, 2011 07:07 AM (iYbLN)
At the very least we could have gotten him his Social Security benefits.
Posted by: Binder & Binder at September 22, 2011 07:19 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: The Drizzle at September 22, 2011 07:29 AM (ysCLj)
Both Davis and Coles deserve to be executed. They were out 'wilding' or whatever you want to call it, the situation became lethal, and a cop died. It doesn't matter who pulled the trigger or who ran away after the initial assault because both are equally guilty. They were together, intent on criminal behavior, f*ck 'em both and any namby-pamby whiner that wants to claim either one is innocent. Innocent of what?
When I was was little (probably in elementary school) there was a lesson taught that went something like this: If you are part of a gang that robs a bank, even if you are the unarmed get-away car driver that never goes inside the building, and one of your accomplices shoots and kills a bank guard, then you are just as guilty of murder as if you had pulled the trigger yourself.
No innocent man was executed last night. The only travesty is that another, equally guilty man did not go to his great reward alongside Davis.
Posted by: hughie at September 22, 2011 07:32 AM (+56Bh)
Posted by: S. Weasel at September 22, 2011 07:41 AM (zGphV)
The felony murder doctrine -- if you are committing a felony, such as pistol whipping somebody -- and somebody gets killed, you are a murderer even if you aren't the one who pulled the trigger.
Nail 'em both, whatever shirts they wore.
Posted by: Walt at September 22, 2011 07:45 AM (M3qfr)
Posted by: S. Weasel
That's what I thought. In my city, a guy got convicted for murder just because a cop fell into a ditch and drowned while pursuing him. In TX, if you commit a felony and a police officer dies in the course of trying to stop you, you get charged with murder.
I don't know if that guy got the death penalty though. Maybe that's where they draw the line.
Posted by: stace at September 22, 2011 07:47 AM (lYlx9)
Posted by: stace at September 22, 2011 07:50 AM (lYlx9)
Which is why the Founders thought it beter that a guilty man go free than to punish an innocent man.
Between jury nullification and politicizing the prosecution and judiciary, we can't honestly claim to have a just and honest judicial system.
Killing a man is not a thing to be taken lightly. Allowing prosecutors to build a capital murder case on supposition, sophistry and innuendo so that they can use those cases merely as justification to be re-elected or to run a successful campaign for higher office?
...we've gotten lost somewhere along the way since we shook off King George and England.
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at September 22, 2011 07:55 AM (E7Z1r)
Posted by: JeffC at September 22, 2011 07:56 AM (A3tpD)
Life in prison with no parole is a MUCH harsher penalty than a needle.~Sgt. York
Looks like Davis agreed with you, which is why he kept filing to get his execution date moved up./sarc
Posted by: Speller at September 22, 2011 08:27 AM (J74Py)
Posted by: h0mi at September 22, 2011 08:43 AM (0f5+I)
recantations or even "different" versions that come out 5, 10, 15 or more years down the road are completely unreliable. eyewitness testimony is iffy even early on but as time goes on memory fades, you hear other people's version and you start to "remember" things you didnt recall early on due to those stories suggestive effect on your memory. you incorporate other people's story into your version of events. also some people start to feel guilty that they helped send someone to death row and regret it.
for the anti-DP to try and capitalize on this is just opportunism in its rawest form. they cant convince people that the death penalty is wrong so they instead try to make it look like innocent people are dying. they are so sure in the righteousness of their cause they feel any means is justified.
Posted by: chas at September 22, 2011 09:00 AM (TKF1Y)
Coles rushed to the police station the next morning to implicate Davis in the murder.
Does that mean Coles was actually innocent?
Or does that mean Coles was smart enough to realize that someone was going to hang for this, and better to get the police focused on Davis? Posted by: Ace at 11:25 PM
Quick question...why didn't Davis do this?
Posted by: Deanna at September 22, 2011 09:02 AM (BmLEJ)
Posted by: Skeptical Juror at September 22, 2011 10:02 AM (CagCl)
Posted by: Molon Labe at September 22, 2011 11:50 AM (S7K8x)
Posted by: Molon Labe at September 22, 2011 11:54 AM (S7K8x)
Posted by: steevy at September 22, 2011 12:17 PM (fyOgS)
There are so much to learn from your post here, Uma, well done.
Posted by: The Detachment AudioBook at September 22, 2011 05:55 PM (+uroR)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3517 seconds, 331 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Arbalest at September 21, 2011 07:29 PM (ox1Nr)