January 28, 2011
— Ace I don't know... I am trying to resist the blame-it-on-PC thing which is popping into my head but I'm a little skeptical that this guy was sent to Iraq just because they were short on intelligence officers.
Pfc. Bradley Manning's direct supervisor warned that Manning had thrown chairs at colleagues and shouted at higher ranking soldiers in the year he was stationed at Fort Drum, N.Y., and advised that Manning shouldn't be sent to Iraq, where his job would entail accessing classified documents through the Defense Department's computer system.But superior officers decided to ignore the advice because the unit was short of intelligence analysts and needed Manning's skills, two military officials familiar with the investigation told McClatchy.
I can see situations in which a non-head-case throws a chair or shouts in a non-head-case way (everyone gets pissed). But based on the fact that this little prick is a born head-case, I have to think these instances were the head-case hissy-fit/inappropriate rage type of act-ups.
Posted by: Ace at
03:20 PM
| Comments (180)
Post contains 183 words, total size 1 kb.
Usually with a little shit like Manning, it's a case of shine 'em up and ship 'em out. Here the guy's direct supervisor took one for the team and said, "I'll keep him. He does not belong in Iraq."
That goes against all bureaucratic good practice. But I'm impressed by the supervisor. The folks should have listened.
Posted by: Comanche Voter at January 28, 2011 03:24 PM (3ESDJ)
Posted by: pep at January 28, 2011 03:25 PM (P18+/)
All due respect Ace, did they know he was a born head-case. Which begs the second question: Now that the DoD has been a volunteer force, why/how did this born head-case get in?
Just askin'.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at January 28, 2011 03:27 PM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: Damiano at January 28, 2011 03:27 PM (3nrx7)
In Obama's administration such a person is recommended for promotion, or the very least, an advisory position.
Posted by: Unruly at January 28, 2011 03:27 PM (LL4jH)
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2011 03:28 PM (alr7n)
Throwing chairs and shouting in a workplace? In the civvy world that gets you shitcanned right quick with possible law enforcement involved and maybe a lawsuit or two.
Really? Has our military become that pussified? God help us.
Posted by: ErikW at January 28, 2011 03:29 PM (lQVKk)
Posted by: pfc. bradley manning at January 28, 2011 03:30 PM (2rOwc)
Pfc. Bradley Manning's direct supervisor warned that Manning had thrown chairs at colleagues and shouted at higher ranking soldiers in the year he was stationed at Fort Drum, N.Y., and advised that Manning shouldn't be sent to Iraq, where his job would entail accessing classified documents through the Defense Department's computer system.
Ya' don't diss a queen.
Posted by: Soona at January 28, 2011 03:31 PM (Oo2Ip)
Posted by: moki at January 28, 2011 03:31 PM (dZmFh)
Posted by: MīcÞeMūß at January 28, 2011 03:31 PM (0q2P7)
Hell, he was unsuitable for work at IHOP.
Posted by: pep at January 28, 2011 03:33 PM (P18+/)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2011 03:33 PM (/Ibu8)
Posted by: dan in michigan at January 28, 2011 03:33 PM (9jRMu)
You got that right.
He is the poster boy for DADT intel troops!
Where would we be without this kind of expertise?
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2011 03:34 PM (alr7n)
Great decision making going on in Teh Army.
Posted by: sifty at January 28, 2011 03:34 PM (96ttX)
Posted by: moki at January 28, 2011 03:35 PM (dZmFh)
Posted by: Retread at January 28, 2011 03:35 PM (okCHU)
Posted by: dan in michigan at January 28, 2011 07:33 PM (9jRMu)
Yup. The original "attitude adjustment".
Posted by: Soona at January 28, 2011 03:36 PM (Oo2Ip)
Posted by: Barack the Coward at January 28, 2011 03:36 PM (AXHCj)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2011 03:37 PM (/Ibu8)
Great decision making going on in Teh Army.
Posted by: sifty at January 28, 2011 07:34 PM (96ttX)
I was refused by the Navy because I had asthma when I was a kid.
Posted by: ErikW at January 28, 2011 03:37 PM (lQVKk)
Posted by: Dr Spank at January 28, 2011 03:37 PM (45DBC)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff had a procedures for motherfuckers like this when he was a SGT at January 28, 2011 03:38 PM (FePvp)
Posted by: XBradTC at January 28, 2011 03:40 PM (jilZo)
Posted by: dan in michigan at January 28, 2011 07:33 PM (9jRMu)
Yup. The original "attitude adjustment".
Posted by: Soona at January 28, 2011 07:36 PM (Oo2Ip)
No this guy was bad news and it must have been very obvious. He should have spent his hitch shoveling shit in Arkansas.
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2011 07:37 PM (/Ibu
My old platoon sergeant said an entrenching tool does wonders in adjusting attitudes.
Ah, the good old days.
Today, he would be up on charges and Manning would get a promotion!
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2011 03:40 PM (alr7n)
ARMY. Because somebody has to make the sammiches.
Posted by: R. Lee Ermey's Sister at January 28, 2011 03:41 PM (o0D5y)
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at January 28, 2011 03:41 PM (QBQcg)
Posted by: Sec. Gates at January 28, 2011 03:41 PM (96ttX)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff had a procedures for motherfuckers like this when he was a SGT at January 28, 2011 03:41 PM (FePvp)
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2011 03:42 PM (alr7n)
Posted by: DavidJ at January 28, 2011 03:43 PM (I75AE)
Having thrown a chair or two in my time in the Army, and having had LOUD discussions with my seniors, those things alone aren't necessarily disqaulifying for further service. People in the Army can be pretty... uh, vehement.
You were in a different army than I was. My seniors would have had my ass for lunch with conduct like that.
Posted by: Soona at January 28, 2011 03:43 PM (Oo2Ip)
He was clearly unsuitable for intelligence work of any kind. Those kinds of emotional outbreaks scream security risk.
Totally.
Posted by: Abu Nidal Hasan at January 28, 2011 03:44 PM (kDTRQ)
a gay evening enjoyed by all i'm sure
Posted by: newrouter at January 28, 2011 03:45 PM (nfC5u)
This guy would have been out of my squadron in a nanosecond with a direct psych referral, good luck with that TS clearance. The supervisor made a very strong effort, in our new PC-centric military, to do the right thing. Now it's time to look at the commander who signed off on the DEPORD for this traitor.
Posted by: Phat at January 28, 2011 03:45 PM (dus0l)
Will DADT improve the performance of high speed trains?
A critical question and why the hell isn't anyone talking about it!!
Posted by: Bill Maher at January 28, 2011 03:45 PM (kDTRQ)
Posted by: Navin R Johnson at January 28, 2011 03:45 PM (HpT9p)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff had a procedures for motherfuckers like this when he was a SGT at January 28, 2011 03:46 PM (FePvp)
Pfc. Bradley Manning's direct supervisor warned that Manning had thrown chairs at colleagues
Eh...sound like a day in my office.
Posted by: dananjcon at January 28, 2011 03:46 PM (62W/G)
Posted by: XBradTC at January 28, 2011 03:47 PM (jilZo)
.......and shouted at higher ranking soldiers.....
This young man would have been before Courts & Boards on my watch, and his time in either the stockade or prison would have been a meaningful experience......for him.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at January 28, 2011 03:47 PM (ZHsNw)
Posted by: Dr Spank at January 28, 2011 03:49 PM (45DBC)
lame, but it is all I can come up with for now.
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2011 03:49 PM (alr7n)
Posted by: Navin R Johnson at January 28, 2011 07:45 PM (HpT9p)
Sorry after 6 beers the best I can do is poddy jokes.
Posted by: dananjcon at January 28, 2011 03:49 PM (62W/G)
Private Bullet Train entering the tunnel at high-speed and reporting for duty!
Posted by: pfc. bradley manning at January 28, 2011 03:49 PM (2rOwc)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff had a procedures for motherfuckers like this when he was a SGT at January 28, 2011 03:50 PM (FePvp)
Posted by: robtr at January 28, 2011 03:50 PM (hVDig)
Posted by: sifty at January 28, 2011 03:50 PM (96ttX)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2011 03:52 PM (/Ibu8)
Will DADT improve the performance of high speed trains?
A critical question and why the hell isn't anyone talking about it!!
Posted by: Bill Maher at January 28, 2011 07:45 PM (kDTRQ)
I'll be glad to be a guest and discuss that topic but my rider demands 30 lbs of White Castle Jalapeno Sliders, 12 gallons of Pepsi and a can of Crisco, just to grease the gullett.
The fuck are you waiting for? Time is money!
Posted by: Michael Moore at January 28, 2011 03:52 PM (lQVKk)
Posted by: CJ at January 28, 2011 03:52 PM (tNWxq)
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2011 03:52 PM (alr7n)
Posted by: dananjcon at January 28, 2011 03:52 PM (62W/G)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2011 03:53 PM (/Ibu8)
Posted by: DavidJ at January 28, 2011 03:54 PM (I75AE)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2011 07:52 PM (/Ibu
We had a navy doc in our CAP, that fuckin guy is still my hero,
Posted by: robtr at January 28, 2011 03:54 PM (hVDig)
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2011 03:54 PM (alr7n)
Posted by: Brian at January 28, 2011 03:55 PM (sYrWB)
Posted by: sifty at January 28, 2011 07:50 PM (96ttX)
Oh...do tell.
Posted by: Barny's frank at January 28, 2011 03:55 PM (62W/G)
Posted by: Frank G at January 28, 2011 03:55 PM (4X0aT)
Hands off! He's mine, douche!
Posted by: anderson pooper, er, cooper at January 28, 2011 03:56 PM (2rOwc)
FIFY!
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2011 03:56 PM (alr7n)
Posted by: Frank G at January 28, 2011 03:56 PM (4X0aT)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2011 03:57 PM (/Ibu8)
Posted by: XBradTC at January 28, 2011 03:58 PM (jilZo)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 28, 2011 03:59 PM (FePvp)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2011 07:53 PM (/Ibu
That doesn't explain why we've seen almost nothing reported about his vast pre-muzzled life.
Posted by: CJ at January 28, 2011 03:59 PM (tNWxq)
Posted by: Bradley Manning's Mom at January 28, 2011 04:01 PM (45DBC)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2011 07:53 PM (/Ibu
That doesn't explain why we've seen almost nothing reported about his vast pre-muzzled life.
Or Hasan's either. Guess they think we'll eventually forget about the whole thing.
Posted by: trace at January 28, 2011 04:01 PM (kDTRQ)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2011 07:53 PM (/Ibu
That doesn't explain why we've seen almost nothing reported about his vast pre-muzzled life.
Or Hasan's either. Guess they think we'll eventually forget about the whole thing.
"That sort of thing is out of bounds, not like battle plans or state secrets." NYT Editorial Staff Guidance
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2011 04:03 PM (alr7n)
Posted by: Wonkish Rogue at January 28, 2011 04:04 PM (IzPTF)
Sounds like bullshit to me. I have a nephew in Army intelligence who got sent home from Iraq for wrestling around with a coworker while technically on duty..but not engaged in anything to do with intelligence.
shortage my ass
Posted by: beedubya at January 28, 2011 04:08 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Uncle Jed at January 28, 2011 04:11 PM (vXwmy)
Posted by: Barky at January 28, 2011 04:18 PM (62W/G)
Posted by: robtr at January 28, 2011 04:19 PM (hVDig)
What the fuck is going on at the Pentagon?
I've been through FBI background checks to work with our youth group and a variety of other checks just to get a gig at a fucking Dollar General store and assholes like these are getting through?
I have the utmost, deep respect for you folks that serve but our military is fucked in a really bad way.
Not that you don't know that.
Posted by: ErikW at January 28, 2011 04:19 PM (lQVKk)
Posted by: kawfytawk at January 28, 2011 04:19 PM (lFt0D)
Sounds like bullshit to me. I have a nephew in Army intelligence who got sent home from Iraq for wrestling around with a coworker while technically on duty..but not engaged in anything to do with intelligence.
shortage my ass
Posted by: beedubya at January 28, 2011 08:08 PM (AnTyA)
My guess is nobody wanted to be the one to sign that he was unfit due to possible political fallout.
Posted by: Oldcat at January 28, 2011 04:21 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: robtr at January 28, 2011 08:19 PM (hVDig)
RAND PAUL!
Posted by: Oldcat at January 28, 2011 04:21 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: kawfytawk at January 28, 2011 04:25 PM (lFt0D)
Posted by: The Q at January 28, 2011 04:26 PM (AXHCj)
Posted by: PFC Manning at January 28, 2011 04:28 PM (4fdrO)
Posted by: Sekhmet at January 28, 2011 04:30 PM (gnEPW)
He had to have been facilitated by some other anti-American puke who was in the service under false pretenses. To have had the time to download that much data, he had to have had someone watching the door, or someone who gave him the go ahead.
We're not used to out and out traitors in the American military; but if there is this one guy, then there are probably a couple of others who enabled him to do his traitorous deeds. I just can't believe he acted alone, was all by himself, and just decided on his own to send top secret stuff out over the ether.
The bloke who told his commanding officer to ship him out anyway may have been looking for just this type. Someone who, if he were caught or killed, wouldn't be sorely missed. But who could be convinced to act out his pathetic little feelings of confusion or unrequited love or whatever.
Posted by: adair at January 28, 2011 04:34 PM (DRIc3)
I have the utmost, deep respect for you folks that serve but our military is fucked in a really bad way.
Not that you don't know that.
Posted by: ErikW at January 28, 2011 08:19 PM (lQVKk)
Yeah..I don't know what your tryrin to get at.
Posted by: Pvt Manning's at January 28, 2011 04:34 PM (62W/G)
Posted by: rabidfox at January 28, 2011 04:40 PM (475AP)
Besides, it isn't like we're fighting to win or anything! In fact the CinC doesn't know where combat operations ended.
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2011 04:41 PM (alr7n)
PFC. Private First Class. If your rank has "Private" anywhere in it, you're not so fucking indispensible that you can't easily be replaced. I don't care what his MOS is.
The Unbelievable Bullshit warning is going strobe here.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at January 28, 2011 04:43 PM (A/oSU)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 28, 2011 04:44 PM (eOXTH)
But, but, but ... WE NEED prissy drama queens to stay in the Army. THat's why we repealed DADT!!!!!!
Posted by: s'moron at January 28, 2011 04:45 PM (UaxA0)
Or is that just another lie used by the left to impose their will on the last vestige of government that still works.
Posted by: beanervt at January 28, 2011 04:45 PM (NqeOq)
This was pre-repeal-DADT / gay affirmative action days.
If true, he would have ended up Chapter 15.
Posted by: Druid at January 28, 2011 04:46 PM (RnujI)
Bullshit like this - tolerating drama queens and other loons, while at the same time forcing PC bullshit down the throats of the real men, has cost the army many good soldiers.
Time to get the social engineering out of the army, and return to a more reality-oriented way of doing things. It won't fix every problem (my friends who served in the army had a hundred stories of horrific and systemic wrongness) but it would go a long way toward keeping the useful folks, and dumping the worthless/dangerous pukes.
Posted by: Reactionary at January 28, 2011 04:52 PM (4nbyM)
No, they kept promoting him and passing him along! Those protected classes make life in a mission oriented organization tough.
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2011 04:54 PM (alr7n)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 28, 2011 04:55 PM (ofEJm)
Police actions and AUF just don't seem serious enough.
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 28, 2011 04:59 PM (alr7n)
Check out the first two word of the headline and the pic neath it
Posted by: beedubya at January 28, 2011 08:44 PM (AnTyA)
Eh. don't get me started. You think the chicken is warn out? You have no idea.!
Posted by: maddow's middle finger at January 28, 2011 05:00 PM (62W/G)
49 Can someone make up a Bradley Manning/ High Speed Rail joke? I'm feeling kinda lazy.
I call the big one "Bitey"
Posted by: Minuteman at January 28, 2011 05:02 PM (/3GFM)
Can someone make up a Bradley Manning/ High Speed Rail joke? I'm feeling kinda lazy.
Is there a Rail Line to Fire Island?
Posted by: PFC Manning at January 28, 2011 05:05 PM (4fdrO)
Posted by: Manning's Cellmate at January 28, 2011 09:00 PM (ZgvjV)
At least your crack don't smell like a side car.
Yeah...she mixes drinks with me.
Posted by: maddow's middle finger at January 28, 2011 05:07 PM (62W/G)
Posted by: Brian at January 28, 2011 07:55 PM (sYrWB)
Rule of thumb: Anything above O-5 is purely political among line officers. LtCol Allen West would never make O-6 in that system because he's a warrior. I'd like to see him as CINC one day.
Posted by: Minuteman at January 28, 2011 05:08 PM (/3GFM)
Posted by: steevy at January 28, 2011 05:09 PM (T4ZvL)
This is the same organization that tolerated Nidal Hasan.
I was listening to NPR earlier and they had someone on explaining the Army policy (specifically relating to gays, but in general). Apparently you can't "disrespect" people.
Now, I'm all for treating people with respect. But if you create a bureaucracy that empowers the disrespectee to decide what constitutes disrespect, you're inverting the command structure. It's bad enough that it happens in business, where companies that can't function under these kinds of constraints are put out of business by those that can.
But the army has no competitors to keep it honest in peacetime, or even in the kind of wars in which we find ourselves. Is this a force that's going to be able to fight a real war, against an adversary like China?
Posted by: Ace's liver at January 28, 2011 05:09 PM (XIXhw)
Posted by: steevy at January 28, 2011 05:11 PM (T4ZvL)
Posted by: Frank G at January 28, 2011 07:55 PM (4X0aT)
We all did. After Manning the way you were able to use DOD computers changed
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2011 07:57 PM (/Ibu
Here's one aspect of the fallout:
GENERAL ORDER 267:
NO MORE LADY GA GA.
Posted by: Minuteman at January 28, 2011 05:13 PM (/3GFM)
Posted by: momma at January 28, 2011 05:14 PM (penCf)
Posted by: PFC Manning at January 28, 2011 05:18 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: steevy at January 28, 2011 09:10 PM (T4ZvL)
Sorry but I believe that would be a direct violation of Moron Code, Section Who Gives a Shit?
Carry on as you were, please.
Posted by: ErikW at January 28, 2011 05:18 PM (lQVKk)
Posted by: momma at January 28, 2011 09:14 PM (penCf)
Sarah Palin? Yeah, we would soooo hit it!
Posted by: maddow's middle finger at January 28, 2011 05:25 PM (62W/G)
Posted by: momma at January 28, 2011 09:14 PM (penCf)
Not like they really give a shit about what's happening ni Egypt considering they seem to have had a hand in it. The telgraph links to a document that shows that the US was secretly backing it.
The American government secretly backed leading figures behind the Egyptian uprising who have been planning “regime change” for the past three years, The Daily Telegraph has learned.
We are so boned.
Posted by: Steph at January 28, 2011 05:26 PM (AkdC5)
The American government secretly backed leading figures behind the Egyptian uprising who have been planning “regime change” for the past three years, The Daily Telegraph has learned.
We are so boned.
Posted by: Steph at January 28, 2011 09:26 PM (AkdC5)
But...but...Mubarak's regime is the stable ally.
Is this more war for oil??
But Egypt has no oil. WTF?
Is Obama pushing a leftist regime?
Pewshaw!!
Posted by: dananjcon at January 28, 2011 05:31 PM (62W/G)
Posted by: LAG at January 28, 2011 05:31 PM (GHgDm)
Posted by: Anonymoose at January 28, 2011 09:29 PM (ZgvjV)
So, this part of the document is just nothing then, right?
(C) Comment: xxxxxxxxxxxx
offered no roadmap of concrete steps toward April 6's highly
unrealistic goal of replacing the current regime with a parliamentary
democracy prior to the 2011 presidential elections.
It sure looks like someone planned concrete steps after that meeting.
Posted by: Steph at January 28, 2011 05:35 PM (AkdC5)
Sure. Fabulous timing for Rand to say we should cut off aid to Israel. Absolutely brilliant.
He lasted, what?, a week before revealing himself to be the same sort of foreign policy kook as his dad. Mighty impressive.
Posted by: Y-not at January 28, 2011 05:37 PM (pW2o8)
I am really starting to like Rand Paul, I know his dad's nuts but this guy makes a lot of sense.
Sure. Fabulous timing for Rand to say we should cut off aid to Israel. Absolutely brilliant.
I caught half of that during the break. Rand, huh?
The crazy asshole doesn't fall far from the tree.
Posted by: ErikW at January 28, 2011 05:41 PM (lQVKk)
Posted by: tom_06060 at January 28, 2011 08:59 PM (y5tGs)
from previous thread...
It takes an Obama to get a Christie.
Posted by: dananjcon at January 28, 2011 05:42 PM (62W/G)
Hey y'all 20% unemployment!! Whoot, Whoot!!!
Really hope this won't affect your UNemployment rate.
What? wrong thread??
Posted by: Senor at January 28, 2011 05:44 PM (kDTRQ)
Sure. Fabulous timing for Rand to say we should cut off aid to Israel. Absolutely brilliant.
Yup. You would think, for the sake of strategy/credibility, he would have held off with the chip off the old block stuff. Disappointing.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at January 28, 2011 05:45 PM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: runningrn who lives in the land of Microsoft at January 28, 2011 05:46 PM (ihSHD)
Posted by: Richard Aubrey at January 28, 2011 05:46 PM (yt878)
I am really starting to like Rand Paul, I know his dad's nuts but this guy makes a lot of sense.
Sure. Fabulous timing for Rand to say we should cut off aid to Israel. Absolutely brilliant.
I caught half of that during the break. Rand, huh?
The crazy asshole doesn't fall far from the tree.
To be fair he said we needed to cut off all foreign aid. Blitzer then pushed him to say specifically Israeli aid. Obviously ALL aid includes aid to israel.
I'm not entirely unsympathetic. I love Israel, but baby we broke. I would prefer we cut aid to every other country first before cutting aid to Israel, but if we have to cut all aid then we need to cut all aid.
Whatever Israel loses in US money will be offset by their enemies also being cut off from US money, keep in mind we bankroll everyone
Posted by: Ben at January 28, 2011 05:49 PM (DKV43)
Patty Murray has been named the chair of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee?
When I think battle hardened warrior, defender of our Nation's freedoms, I think Patty Murray! I mean think of the long hard slog she faced, walking in those sneakers. Courage.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at January 28, 2011 05:50 PM (A0VTZ)
This is why I don't like people who've never held elected office to jump right out of the gate into big political offices.
Here are his committee assignments:
The U.S. Senate Republicans announced committee assignments for the 112th Congress today. Sen. Rand Paul received placement on four committees: Energy and Natural Resources; Health, Education, Labor and Pensions; Homeland Security and Government Affairs; and Small Business.
Well, at least he's not on the Intelligence Cmte.
Fortunately, here are Rubio's committee assignments:
Commerce, Science and Transportation; Foreign Relations; Small Business and Entrepreneurship; and the Select Committee on Intelligence.
God, I wish Rubio was ready to run now.
Posted by: Y-not at January 28, 2011 05:50 PM (pW2o8)
He lasted, what?, a week before revealing himself to be the same sort of foreign policy kook as his dad. Mighty impressive.
Posted by: Y-not at January 28, 2011 09:37 PM (pW2o
Look, I am as pro israel as anyone else. Do you want to tell me where we are going to come up with the money to give to Israel or anyone else? Our deficit is $1.5 Trillion, that's with a T.
List the things you want to cut so we can give money to other countries without borrowing it. Even with Pauls cuts we still have a $1 Trillion deficit. In less than 10 years if we don't fix it all of our budget will go to interest and entitlements. We can either make cuts now or wait a few years and they will be made for us.
Everyone saying we have to cut but not here get's pretty tiring .
Posted by: robtr at January 28, 2011 05:51 PM (hVDig)
When I think battle hardened warrior, defender of our Nation's freedoms, I think Patty Murray! I mean think of the long hard slog she faced, walking in those sneakers. Courage.
Heh! That's funneh.
When I think of my Senior Senator Patty Murray, I think mental midget in tennis shoes. I remember her idiotic words post 9/11--"People loooove Osama Bin Laden because he built roads, daycares and hospitals." The only thing he was missing was an high speed train.
Posted by: runningrn who lives in the land of Microsoft at January 28, 2011 05:53 PM (ihSHD)
It's unforgivable to say something so destabilizing about that region right now.
Even if the goal is to reduce foreign aid, you don't pick a time like this to say it when you're a U.S Senator and you certainly don't allow yourself to be maneuvered into saying it about Israel.
Frankly, he was adept at interviews during the campaign, so I assume it's the anti-Joo Paulian streak emerging and not a misstep.
Posted by: Y-not at January 28, 2011 05:53 PM (pW2o8)
Posted by: unknown jane at January 28, 2011 05:54 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 28, 2011 05:55 PM (aFBR5)
Everyone saying we have to cut but not here get's pretty tiring .
Yeah, I say no cuts, or minimal cuts to our number 1 ally and friend in the region.
Get back to me when the worthless Department of Education is abolished.
I'm all for cutting foreign aid by the way, priorities would be nice though.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at January 28, 2011 05:56 PM (A0VTZ)
I love Israel, but baby we broke.
Posted by: Ben at January 28, 2011 09:49 PM (DKV43)
That's about the most ignorant and apathetic fucking attitude I've ever seen towards our Israeli friends. Are you high or just a jerk-off?
Posted by: ErikW at January 28, 2011 05:56 PM (lQVKk)
Patty Murray has been named the chair of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee?
Hey! You wingers needed me.
**sniff**sniff**
Posted by: The wrong Murray? at January 28, 2011 05:57 PM (62W/G)
Get back to me when the worthless Department of Education is abolished.
I'm all for cutting foreign aid by the way, priorities would be nice though.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at January 28, 2011 09:56 PM (A0VTZ)
Then watch the fuckin interview, getting rid of the dept of education was part of his plan.
Posted by: robtr at January 28, 2011 05:58 PM (hVDig)
No, I don't think you are.
Do you want to tell me where we are going to come up with the money to give to Israel or anyone else? Our deficit is $1.5 Trillion, that's with a T.
HuffPo (this is the company Rand and you are keeping) had a "cut aid to Israel" piece recently citing $3B in military aid to Israel. Is $3B going to make a dent in that $1.5T?
How will our economy be if that region further destabilizes? Or do you want to pull out of the Middle East altogether?
Setting aside the moral issues of emboldening Israel's enemies at this time in history, Israel is of strategic military importance to us. It should enjoy a "special relationship" with us, like a few other close allies.
Posted by: Y-not at January 28, 2011 05:59 PM (pW2o8)
@Ben
It's unforgivable to say something so destabilizing about that region right now.
Even if the goal is to reduce foreign aid, you don't pick a time like this to say it when you're a U.S Senator and you certainly don't allow yourself to be maneuvered into saying it about Israel.
Frankly, he was adept at interviews during the campaign, so I assume it's the anti-Joo Paulian streak emerging and not a misstep.
they were talking about spending. Not foreign politics. The media always does this to us.
A republican will say we need to make cuts in social security, then the reporter will say, " but sally smith is a quadrolpegic who is blind, deaf, dumb and works in a zinc factory at the age of 88 and will die if you cut social security, surely you don't support cutting her social security check" to which the republican always says, "no of course not".
Paul didn't capitualte, we should applaud that. Blitzer was talking about spending cuts, Paul said foreign aid needs to go, then Blitzer furthered the point to include israel, which we all knew was included in the first questions, Blitzer did this because he wanted paul to say, "no of course not Israel" and that way he could call him a hypocrit on spending cuts.
Disagree with paul but he stuck to his guns which is more than any other republican does when the media pulls this s*it
and I say this as someone who is a zionist.
we need to cut spending, sure we can make israeli aid the last foreign aid cut, but we have to cut spending.
Posted by: Ben at January 28, 2011 06:00 PM (DKV43)
27 As for "what kind of pussy branch is Intelligence"...like every other MOS you have great soldiers, good soldiers, average ones, ok ones, and poor ones...and then you have the ones who are such bad news that they get people killed.
I know of one who was up for a Bronze Star in Iraq (it went to an infantryman, but for an intel person, a fobbit, a pussy if you will Jeff, to even get considered for one is pretty noteworthy)...so they can't all be pussy ass mofos...right?
Posted by: unknown jane at January 28, 2011 06:00 PM (5/yRG)
Then watch the fuckin interview, getting rid of the dept of education was part of his plan
I know.
I said get back to me when it happens, not when it is proposed.
I'm not for cutting off aid to Israel. You?
Posted by: Delta Smelt at January 28, 2011 06:00 PM (A0VTZ)
If true, he would have ended up Chapter 15.
Bankrupt?
Posted by: Ronster at January 28, 2011 09:04 PM (1F/m
HEH!, I was off a bit, Chapter 15 is "Separation for Homosexuality"
I meant Chapter 14, "Misconduct"
provides that you may be separated involuntarily for-- Civilian court conviction as a juvenile offender or for having committed certain types of offenses after entering the Army. Commission of a serious offense. Abuse of illegal drugs. Acts or patterns of misconduct, such as repeated failure to pay valid debts, repeated failure to support dependents, or frequent incidents of misconduct with civil or military authorities. Minor military disciplinary infractions, such as disobedience of lawful orders, disrespect, failure to repair, or absence without leave. If you are separated under these provisions, you may receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions.Posted by: Druid at January 28, 2011 06:02 PM (RnujI)
Posted by: Y-not at January 28, 2011 09:59 PM (pW2o
You can think whatever you want, I really don't care. Israels income tax is far lower than ours. There 10% rate goes up to $57,000 ours ends at $8,000 if you are single and $16,000 if you are married. The balance of their tax rates have the same disparity to ours.I think they could come up with the $3 Billion and we would still support them if they were attacked.
So you can come up the the $3 Billion if its so easy to come by and send it to them.
Posted by: robtr at January 28, 2011 06:07 PM (hVDig)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 28, 2011 06:14 PM (FePvp)
Posted by: Anonymoose at January 28, 2011 09:54 PM (ZgvjV)
Did you read the whole thing? All I'm saying is that at one time the US seemed to be backing the potential, otherwise why would they have had opposition leaders come to DC to dicuss it?
And, the timeline seems to fit. Does it not? I'm just saying that it was discussed & it certainly doesn't look like it was forgotten, at least by some, because um WTF is happening today?
Posted by: Steph at January 28, 2011 06:18 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC at January 28, 2011 06:56 PM (tCW2d)
The diversity group has run amok, and no, I don't mean just from race. Women soldiers (not all, of course) cry foul when their feelings get hurt. And, sadly, claims of racism fly when someone is counseled for fill in the blank. It really is a mess and makes those soldiers of all races who are busting their tails frustrated as heck. The MEDDAC, which is its own island of crazy, has caused my career, live and breath the Army husband to put in his retirement right before he was to go to the Sergeant Major's Academy. My heart breaks for him that he achieved this at the age of 38 and feels he has to walk away because he can't stand what the Army has become. Again, my husband is no slouch, he has deployed over 6 times and his ribbon rack is something to behold. This guy is one the Army needed to keep, but their PC above all else mentality has made it unbearable for him and many like him.
Posted by: ArmyWife at January 28, 2011 07:04 PM (5y2N2)
Posted by: The Drizzle at January 28, 2011 07:25 PM (ysCLj)
Posted by: ThePaganTemple at January 28, 2011 07:59 PM (kY3oi)
Posted by: gushka at January 28, 2011 08:18 PM (93zw2)
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at January 28, 2011 08:24 PM (vA9ld)
Posted by: Topsecretk9 at January 28, 2011 08:45 PM (8x3SC)
http://shoqvalue.com/regarding-team-bradley-manning
Serious blue on blue and Shoq takes Hamsher and Greenwald to school.
Posted by: Topsecretk9 at January 28, 2011 08:48 PM (8x3SC)
Posted by: Decaf at January 28, 2011 08:55 PM (oXMaW)
OK, question for someone who has some knowledge...
Everyone is talking about how if Bradley manning had thrown a chair at a high ranking NCO or Officer in their old unit, he would have been UCMJ'ed, court martialed, or given wall to wall counseling.
But are we all getting punked by the news media report?
Pfc. Bradley Manning's direct supervisor warned that Manning had thrown chairs at colleagues and shouted at higher ranking soldiers in the year he was stationed at Fort Drum
OK, when he was stationed at Fort Drum, he was just a private. So since collegues *usually* implies co-equals, couldn't this mean he was just throwing a chair at other privates? And technically, even a E-4/Specialist is a higher ranking soldier than Private Manning.
I mean, throwing a chair at another private could just be barracks shenanigans. And yelling at an E-4 as a private isn't really going to cause a whole lot of official notice, all else being equal.
The guy is a shit head, no question about it. I just want to know if anyone has any further info about who he yelled at and threw chairs at, more specifically than just "collegues" and "higher ranking soldiers".
Private Throwing Chair at Private = Shit happens.
Private Thowing Chair at SFC = Some shit is going to come down on said Private. Type and intensity to be decided by CPT or LTC if UCMJ.
Private Throwing Chair at Captain = Whoa. That's some wild, crazy shit. Get out of the impact area of expected counter battery fire ASAP.
Posted by: ed at January 28, 2011 10:53 PM (emG8W)
Throwing chairs and shouting in a workplace? In the civvy world that gets you shitcanned right quick with possible law enforcement involved and maybe a lawsuit or two.
Posted by: Douglas at January 28, 2011 11:06 PM (YKOnu)
As for yelling? Well, the military is a far more volatile environment than civvy life, but it's generally kept quiet. I would NEVER have done what manning is said to have done, but I did destroy a few things when out of the site of authority figures, and when caught, I took my lecture, and then there was "Private Counseling" also some "physical counseling." I remember one specific, I was FURIOUS! and I throw a door open, so hard that the effing thing when it bounced back sounded louder than a gunshot.
I immediately turned around walked in, and stood by my section head a master sergeant with 20 odd years in, not saying a word as he read me the riot act.
What Manning got away with doesn't sound like the service I was in, and I was/am quite confident I served during the most puzzified era of the Marines.
Posted by: Douglas at January 28, 2011 11:12 PM (YKOnu)
It is almost incoceivable, especially in that MOS and that division, this traitors hissy fits go unnoticed. Anybody else would have bought the shittiest duty imaginable while waiting for a psych evaluation and general discharge. The latter of which they should give to every ass-covering, empathetic retard in his CoC that ignored the direct supervisors concerns.
Posted by: Marcus at January 29, 2011 03:44 AM (mtflb)
Posted by: we are fucked at January 29, 2011 03:51 AM (y0VOX)
Posted by: moi at January 29, 2011 04:15 AM (Ez4Ql)
Posted by: moi at January 29, 2011 04:24 AM (Ez4Ql)
I didn't throw any chairs. It turned out to be far better than anything I could have imagined, but that's another sea story.
Posted by: MarkD at January 29, 2011 05:09 AM (6CLxP)
Posted by: moi at January 29, 2011 06:46 AM (Ez4Ql)
Posted by: Congwessman Bawney Fwank at January 29, 2011 08:25 AM (mQMnK)
Posted by: Spook at January 29, 2011 11:35 AM (KETCq)
Posted by: E at January 29, 2011 07:35 PM (/1D/c)
Time to get the social engineering out of the army, and return to a more reality-oriented way of doing things. It won't fix every problem (my friends who served in the army had a hundred stories of horrific and systemic wrongness) but it would go a long way toward keeping the useful folks, and dumping the worthless/dangerous pukes.
Correction:
Time to get the social engineering out of the United States and return to a more reality-oriented way of doing things. It won't fix every problem (my friends who served in various industries had a hundred stories of horrific and systemic wrongness) but it would go a long way toward keeping the useful folks, and dumping the worthless/dangerous pukes.
Posted by: Anon at January 30, 2011 04:52 PM (kuWdX)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.219 seconds, 308 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: sifty at January 28, 2011 03:23 PM (96ttX)