February 20, 2011
— Open Blogger My daughter and son-in-law live in Madison, WI, so they've had a keen interest in what's going on there. Heather (my daughter) pointed me to this video, which she said was done by a friend of a friend.
What's interesting are the notes that go with the video, which I've posted below the jump.
Hear the whistle blowing in the background through the whole thing? That would be the teachers and union protestors trying to interrupt or interfere with the the Pledge of Allegiance. Not unlike many who do the same when it's recited during school. This is a full description of my experience at the protest and rally on capitol square in Madison, WI, on 2/20/2011.I wandered to the capitol after the Polar Plunge to see what it was like for myself. My husband and I walked the square, listened to the union speakers protesting against the bill, and then went to listen to the supporters. We had never been to a political protest or rally before. It was a beautiful day, with positive people, in a supportive atmosphere. We walked by displays set up by several socialist groups, and doctors giving fraudulent notes to teachers so they can get paid with taxpayer money for protesting. I was very surprised and disturbed by this.
At the rally supporting the bill we agreed with most of what we heard, especially "Joe the Plummer" and the last young woman who spoke: they seemed to say everything we hear around our kitchen table and from friends and family in our everyday lives.
But then there was the mob that everyone had to go through to get to and from the area for the support rally. I wish I had video taped trying to leave. I had no sign, and was not an active participant - but I experienced first-hand the intimidation and hostility of either union mercenaries, or even worse, of the good people who have been getting whipped into an exhausted and desparate state by the union sponsored liberal rhetoric and atmosphere.
They stood blocking the way, leaving only a narrow two-person-wide space for thousands to funnel through. It was scary, claustrophic, and made me feel panicked. They glared, yelled, and one guy pushed me so hard I flew two feet forward. I thought my husband was going to lose it, so we stopped and just stood to the side where we were. I watched a lot of people from the rally pass in front of me experiencing the same thing. I saw middle class, working class people who looked liked my sister, my mother, my son or daughter, my neighbors... being taunted and intimidated by a mob hoping to provoke mayhem or violence. I looked for police help to secure a path or help with our exit, but I only saw them standing in isolated clusters amongst themselves, the nearest over 50 feet away from the crowd.
As a member of the union, I'm ashamed and horrified. As a public school teacher, I'm confused and disheartened to see so many people I admire support this behavior and even worse: join in pimping our children to further their political agenda. As the daughter of a police officer, I'm heartbroken to experience their callous indifference for my safety, that I can only understand as their passive support for protestors, and which makes them complicit in the intimidation.
Well that experience has led to these two independent voters, who have been fiscally conservative but socially divided on many issues, to a new understanding of how politics, unions, and the media work. I'm glad I didn't rely on the descriptions and information from others about this issue. I saw the reality for myself, and we have both decided to stay actively involved. We will not trust or rely on any media to deliver primary information or facts. It really is true: there is biased reporting and organized, liberal oppression and hostility for all other viewpoints. I'm just little nobody wife, mom, and teacher in small town Wisconsin, and I experienced it.
Please don't believe Hitler's description of the Jews, the opponents description of his enemy, or the liberal government / media reports on conservative groups or politics. Go see for yourself.
I can't vouch personally (or even indirectly) for the accuracy of the statements above, but they are certainly consistent with other reports coming out of Madison.
There's an old joke that asks, why are politics so vicious among academics? Because the stakes are so small. Here, the stakes are very big indeed -- if the unions lose in Wisconsin, they will likely suffer similar setbacks in the many states that went Republican in the statehouse and the legislature last November. One can expect the politics -- and the tactics -- by those on the Left to be vicious indeed. ..fritz..
Posted by: Open Blogger at
03:40 PM
| Comments (440)
Post contains 816 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Uncle Jed at February 20, 2011 03:48 PM (vXwmy)
And if I may loosely quote Evan Sayet, "'Academic' is a well known term for being useless, as in, "It's all academic, let's get some real work done."
Posted by: ErikW at February 20, 2011 03:49 PM (wnu+j)
Posted by: Log Cabin at February 20, 2011 03:49 PM (/o4vW)
Well, at least in the fiscal matters.
Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 20, 2011 03:50 PM (S59+B)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 20, 2011 03:51 PM (9Lm5R)
Posted by: Tami at February 20, 2011 03:53 PM (VuLos)
They only understand one thing and that is force. So best thing, take a honey badger 'cause he don't give a shit,
Posted by: Vic at February 20, 2011 03:54 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: eman: United People's Front of Wisconsin at February 20, 2011 03:55 PM (VmVG3)
Unfortunate that this woman's husband couldn't whip the ass of the thug who pushed his wife.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 20, 2011 03:55 PM (c0A3e)
Then they will transition seamlessly and straight-faced to arguing these types of situations make programs like Obamacare even more necessary and "right".
The R leadership better be ready with the retort, because this will happen...it's who the left is.
Posted by: The Hammer at February 20, 2011 03:56 PM (32ubA)
If some asshat had shoved my wife like that there'd be mayhem alright. If I controlled my temper at least he wouldn't get gutted.
While I agree that in general the Marxists and the MBM want violence from conservatives so they can do a "see I told ya so" moment on TV, NO ONE SHOVES MY WIFE WITHOUT A TRIP TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM DIRECTLY AFTERWARDS.
I'd really like to field flying squads to these things armed with cattle prods and kbars. There's be a 100 foot wide open area with stunned bodies all over the landscape along with some cracked heads and broken extremeties. I am SO over and done with putting up with these jerks. Just like the damn towelheads, if you bend over they'll shove it in you. It's time to return the favor, in spades (pardon the pun).
Posted by: chuck in st paul at February 20, 2011 03:57 PM (+rIGi)
Because the evil-human catastrophic global warming research money is going to run out?
Oh. You were talking about K-12...
Because the evil-human catastrophic global warming poster money is going to run out. And because the state wants to stop paying for abortion counseling for 10 year olds and condoms to be forced on 2nd graders.
But, there's still the safe-school czar and fisting lessons for kindergartners (fisting is age-appropriate for kindergartners, since they make fists all the time).
But, as Gov. Walker tries to stop the teachers' union from stealing money straight out of every teacher's check, whether the teacher wants to contribute or not (like taxing ...) then the teachers' union is going to have to start mugging people on the streets to make up for the lost cash. These riots in Madison are practice for beating the crap out of innocent people and then whining about it.
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 20, 2011 03:57 PM (N49h9)
The sad part is that my dad who is a vet firefighter of 26 years has become a libtard overnight because he believes what he reads in the Columbus Dispatch about House Bill 5.
He's convinced Wall Street Republicans are out to steal his pension and I don't even bother arguing anymore because he's a stubborn SOB.
I owe another libtard an ass-beating because of this.
Posted by: ErikW at February 20, 2011 03:58 PM (wnu+j)
Posted by: chemjeff at February 20, 2011 03:58 PM (GaLxs)
Posted by: Vic at February 20, 2011 03:58 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: dogfish at February 20, 2011 03:58 PM (N2yhW)
In that situation, if they so much as touched me, I'd go down on the ground and scream my head off.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 20, 2011 03:59 PM (BvBKY)
Posted by: Stillwater at February 20, 2011 03:59 PM (0GpN4)
Posted by: Vic at February 20, 2011 07:58 PM (M9Ie6)
The teachers were cheering the union thugs on from behind, though, and threatening to sic their animals on anyone who looked at them funny.
At least they haven't bitten any fingers off ... so far. When they get hungry, though ...
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 20, 2011 04:01 PM (N49h9)
He's convinced Wall Street Republicans are out to steal his pension and I don't even bother arguing anymore because he's a stubborn SOB.
What "Wall Street Republicans"? There are no "Wall Street Republicans".
Amazing what people believe. It's bigotry, really.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 20, 2011 04:01 PM (BvBKY)
I'd go more with an inability to do fifth grade math, but maybe it's just me.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 20, 2011 04:04 PM (7utQ2)
Scumbag teacher hiding behind: Yeah! Perswasion of are powers. The children needs my smarts to learn them good.
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 20, 2011 04:05 PM (N49h9)
Posted by: Red Shirt at February 20, 2011 04:06 PM (FIDMq)
I'd go more with an inability to do fifth grade math, but maybe it's just me.
Union organizers depend on this inability, to convince people to join. (There have been several attempts to 'organize' my workplace over the last decade...)
Posted by: Stillwater at February 20, 2011 04:07 PM (0GpN4)
Got that?
Oh, by the way one of our dumb fuck womyn got her tits rubbed in Egypt and had a organism. Front page news!!
Posted by: MSM at February 20, 2011 04:08 PM (JpFM9)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 20, 2011 04:08 PM (9Lm5R)
There are a fair number of useful idiots who believe that somehow this is a case of fat cat Republicans out to steal money from the working man and reward their big business cronies. The foolishness is strong in many. (don't get me wrong: I don't trust Republicans either, but these idiots still believe that Democrats are "for" them...spit).
and I know of some people who have received threats...the unions are being very serious about this; it could end very badly indeed (my biggest fear is that someone will get killed...I hope the Tea Party people are not taking their kids to these events anymore; I wish those school kids were completely out of the picture and it angers me that they were ever bussed into this).
Posted by: unknown jane at February 20, 2011 04:08 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: EC at February 20, 2011 04:09 PM (f4TZ2)
Posted by: unknown jane at February 20, 2011 04:10 PM (5/yRG)
What "Wall Street Republicans"? There are no "Wall Street Republicans".
Amazing what people believe. It's bigotry, really.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 20, 2011 08:01 PM (BvBKY)
It's the fucking IAFF that sends in sympathetic Lt's or Captains to brainwash them.
Goddamn fucking Communist union assholes.
Posted by: ErikW at February 20, 2011 04:10 PM (wnu+j)
Posted by: unknown jane at February 20, 2011 08:10 PM (5/yRG)
Previous Thread
oh and
Honey Badger Dont Give A Shit
Posted by: Red Shirt at February 20, 2011 04:11 PM (FIDMq)
Why hasn't he called? Did he write it down wrong.
God, I love the smell of camel dung in the morning.
Posted by: MSM Womyn Newscaster at February 20, 2011 04:12 PM (JpFM9)
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 08:11 PM (3duwi)
I aint got time to bleed
Posted by: Blain at February 20, 2011 04:13 PM (FIDMq)
Contributing to the delinquency of a minor is a crime governed by state laws, which vary by state. Generally, the crime consists of someone knowingly persuading, inducing, enticing or encouraging such a child or youth to engage in actions that would constitute a violation of federal or state law or a municipal or local ordinance. Local laws should be consulted for applicability in your area.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at February 20, 2011 04:14 PM (4cZ5q)
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 08:11 PM (3duwi)
You got that fuckin' right! I'm am sick and tired of these union jagoffs assaulting people in broad daylight, thinking they can keep pushing people they don't know around. I want to beat these fuckwits down.
Sorry for the rage, but I can't take much more reading about these sisterfuckers.
Posted by: EC at February 20, 2011 04:14 PM (f4TZ2)
Shameless & Unaccountable
When we can figure out a way to shame the Left and make them accountable for their behavior, then we can grind them into the dust.
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at February 20, 2011 04:14 PM (/ebqR)
Can the Wisconson governor declare the missing dems AWOL or derelict in their duty and appoint replacements?
Posted by: Ohio Dan at February 20, 2011 04:15 PM (EH4cc)
If not you're gettin him anyway
Honey Badger don't give a shit
Posted by: vaeriax at February 20, 2011 04:16 PM (oCZ9d)
That account was hard to read. I wonder if we can have something like this in Colorado?
Currently our new governor Hickenlooper has been pretty quiet. That seems to be his M.O.; when there were racial murders in Denver last year (link on my name), Hick stayed quiet then too. I bring this up not to bring up race (not that much of a factor in Colorado, which ain't Louisiana, or western Houston); but to bring up that Hick is a go-along-to-get-along sorta guy, even in the face of evil; even in the face of an evil which he could do something about. Public employees are a good deal harder to deal with than are a few random Denver gangstas.
Someone else brought up here that our unions have got themselves a cushy deal of their own (which I didn't know): PERA, the Public Employee Retirement Association. A little websearching (Bing: I know, I know) pulled up that SEIU is very interested in getting into the PERA board. I think that Coloradan working families - I mean, the families that actually work for a living - could stand to get interested too.
Hickenlooper sure as fuck isn't going to fight for us. But I'm guessing he won't fight against us either. He's a pussy, too busy making nice and shopping around his "bottom up" shpiel.
Posted by: Zimriel at February 20, 2011 04:17 PM (pl1+G)
What "Wall Street Republicans"? There are no "Wall Street Republicans".
Amazing what people believe. It's bigotry, really.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 20, 2011 08:01 PM (BvBKY)
You can thank the ex-governor of Ohio, Twitch Strickland, for making that an all-purpose buzzword within the state. Of course it's ludicrous but the dense cocksucker ran ads with that against Kasich round the clock and, like everything else no matter how inane, if you hear it enough times it will stick with you. Btw, Twitch was up in Madison helping out his union buds since he no longer has any fucking responsibility other than to live in whatever glorified crossroads north of Athens is unfortunate enough to have him as the village idiot.
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 20, 2011 04:17 PM (eh+ki)
I think in this situation I'd recommend rolling on the ground shitting and vomiting.
Cops at a union rally want to murder teacrackaz, not help them, so you have to make them take you away—but not away to beat you to death.
No one punches a shit-and-barf-covered guy twice. Not if he's well-covered.
Posted by: oblig. at February 20, 2011 04:17 PM (xvZW9)
Posted by: Rick at February 20, 2011 04:17 PM (j3pEj)
Can the Wisconson governor declare the missing dems AWOL or derelict in their duty and appoint replacements?
Posted by: Ohio Dan at February 20, 2011 08:15 PM (EH4cc)
I think Kemp was doing some ranting about this earlier, Ive seen so many things, I dont know what the real options are. Except ram everything non budget related thru while there gone...can they work on redistricting too?
Posted by: Blain at February 20, 2011 04:17 PM (FIDMq)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 20, 2011 04:20 PM (9Lm5R)
There are two Wisconsins:
The Democrats are in the Badger State.
The Republicans are in the Honey Badger State.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 20, 2011 04:20 PM (BvBKY)
Posted by: Tami at February 20, 2011 07:53 PM (VuLos)
Nope. I'm Tami.
Posted by: tcn at February 20, 2011 04:21 PM (DjPot)
Posted by: lan sing at February 20, 2011 04:21 PM (YHrQZ)
Posted by: unknown jane at February 20, 2011 04:21 PM (5/yRG)
Not an inability per se but willful ignorance.
If you were to ask most Lefties about a hypothetical situation of personal finances, most would be able to answer, "Yes, you can not spend more than you earn without serious consequences to follow."
There's a mechanism that Lefties engage in the discussion any larger context issue, a +100 'Cloak of Resistance to Reason,' if you will.
So any discussion about government expenditures outside of Law n' order and the military, the Leftie will necessarily regurgitate some invidious comparison (tu quoque) or spurious argument.
Leftism is fundamentally a secular religion; it's a faith that no reason need intrude or suffer.
Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 20, 2011 04:24 PM (S59+B)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 20, 2011 04:24 PM (swuwV)
Well that experience has led to these two independent voters, who have been fiscally conservative but socially divided on many issues, to a new understanding of how politics, unions, and the media work.
Congratulations for finally seeing some of the light. I'd be interested to know if they know that their "social issues" are framed by the same groups for the same reasons. It's all one for the same purpose.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 04:24 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 04:25 PM (3duwi)
Meanwhile, inTrade has the dem Senators in Washington running away to hide in Venezuela trading at 83!
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 20, 2011 04:26 PM (N49h9)
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 04:28 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: unknown jane at February 20, 2011 04:29 PM (5/yRG)
Honey badger not only has more class, he does not care to proffer a segment of human excrement.
Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 20, 2011 04:29 PM (S59+B)
Can the Wisconson governor declare the missing dems AWOL or derelict in their duty and appoint replacements?
Posted by: Ohio Dan at February 20, 2011 08:15 PM (EH4cc)
Didn't the Gov send the Highway Patrol after one of those assholes?
Laws are being toyed with and someone needs to step up. This is a fucking joke.
Posted by: ErikW at February 20, 2011 04:29 PM (wnu+j)
Take union thuggery add some demorat buggery and you got yourself one angry Honey Badger. Honey Badger doesn't give a shat.
Posted by: Turd Ferguson at February 20, 2011 04:29 PM (6yyVB)
Posted by: nerdygirl at February 20, 2011 04:30 PM (73b7y)
The Dems are digging themselves deeper and deeper into a political grave with each passing moment.
Posted by: davidt at February 20, 2011 04:33 PM (9Pzy7)
The WI state senate president said they will start working on non-revenue bills on Tuesday. Non-revenue bills only require a simple-majority quorum.
Posted by: John Edwards at February 20, 2011 04:34 PM (BvBKY)
When we can figure out a way to shame the Left
They sincerely and truly believe that the ends justify the means. Think of the great murderers of the 20th century--same thing. There is nothing to awful to do to ensure their socialist utopia. The fact that they CANNOT grasp is that if you destroy the producers of the wealth that there is no more wealth--for anybody.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 04:35 PM (XW2az)
They could have a lot of fun with this, I bet. No point in letting a perfectly good crisis go to waste.
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 04:36 PM (BebB7)
Fire them all.
When the teachers loose this battle How do you think they will feel about giving their best to educate the taxpayer's children?
The class rooms will be tainted with the discontent of the entire education system leaving them to take it out on the students by way of unpredictable and shoddy work. The students are on the loosing end of this battle. And not to mention the new round of leftist brainwashing they will no doubt endure.
Posted by: melvin at February 20, 2011 04:36 PM (3OCZw)
Posted by: USS Diversity at February 20, 2011 04:37 PM (DLxD/)
Posted by: tcn at February 20, 2011 04:37 PM (DjPot)
I'd love to see Leinenkugles (Wisconsin microbrew) come up with a Honey Badger Lager.
Kind of like Old Rasputin Imperial Russian Stout but with a touch of honey.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 20, 2011 04:39 PM (BvBKY)
All I see conservatives doing is being reactionary to liberals. It took 3 days for a tea party rally to form.
They're permitted free race card passes, free godwin's law waivers, they get away with just about anything.
Is there an Alinsky analogue to promoting conservative principles? We can't afford to be reactionary as we are.
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 04:40 PM (3duwi)
Posted by: tcn at February 20, 2011 08:37 PM (DjPot)
Only if it was a Republican honey badger, would YOU want to vote against one of those?
Posted by: Red Shirt at February 20, 2011 04:40 PM (FIDMq)
Posted by: Dave Bulluim at February 20, 2011 04:40 PM (zVOB7)
Nope. I'm Tami.
Posted by: tcn at February 20, 2011 08:21 PM (DjPot)
Ha!
Great names in Wisconsin.
Posted by: Tami at February 20, 2011 04:40 PM (VuLos)
Still, Walker is doing more than any other elected leader right now.
Posted by: GnuBreed at February 20, 2011 04:40 PM (h0RtZ)
Posted by: CAC at February 20, 2011 04:41 PM (lV4Fs)
To hell with the husband, I wish the wife would have taken this guys balls and tied them in a knot.
Either the cops are complicit or scared. I'm betting on scared.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 04:42 PM (XW2az)
Best defense: have lots of disk aspace, and trake lots of video.
Granted, a thug may try to take your camera, so ideal defesne is to have a camera that uploads to your Youtube account quickly: The thugs can't take it away from Cyberspace.
Posted by: logprof at February 20, 2011 04:42 PM (gWfpg)
Posted by: CAC at February 20, 2011 08:41 PM (lV4Fs)
Hi! We'll be there too!
Posted by: The Dead at February 20, 2011 04:43 PM (FIDMq)
I'd love to see Leinenkugles (Wisconsin microbrew) come up with a Honey Badger Lager. Posted by: AmishDude
Hmm, a mead sounds interesting. Stouts really don't need anything extra. They're pretty stout by themselves.
Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 20, 2011 04:43 PM (S59+B)
Not cool. At all. Leave the little girls the fuck out of it.
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 04:43 PM (BebB7)
76 And then you get the crap beaten out of you (because in a fight, numbers count), and they get nastier with your wife, and then you and your wife will be branded violent reich winging teabaggers with your pictures posted all over the MFM. That's how it would go down.
Sometimes discretion really is the better part of valor....sometimes it really is better to do the unexpected thing.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 20, 2011 04:43 PM (5/yRG)
Unions = Scut Farkus, slushball thrower
Taxpayers = Ralphie Parker, slushball recipient
Posted by: Count de Monet at February 20, 2011 08:43 PM (XBM1t)
O = ralphies brother (he laid there like a slug it was his only defense)
Posted by: Gushka at February 20, 2011 04:44 PM (93zw2)
Hmm, a mead sounds interesting. Stouts really don't need anything extra. They're pretty stout by themselves.
Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 20, 2011 08:43 PM (S59+B)
Yeah, but I think the Honey Badger Stout needs something to go with the theme.
But hey, I don't give a shit.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 20, 2011 04:45 PM (BvBKY)
Posted by: Turd Ferguson at February 20, 2011 04:45 PM (6yyVB)
If the Dems come back the budget repair bill gets passed immediately to the dismay of the Dem's masters.
The longer the Dems stay AWOL the more pissed off the Taxpayers get.
The sooner the Dems come back the more pissed off their masters get.
The Dems cannot win, that's why the teacher's union tried to offer concessions, like islamists calling for a truce when their ass is being kicked.
Posted by: davidt at February 20, 2011 04:45 PM (9Pzy7)
Video tape them on their worst behavior.
Buy some tv advert time
show a clip of it and at the end ask: "do you really identify with vulgarity"?
i think you can tinker with the last line to make it more ominous.
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 04:46 PM (3duwi)
Chaos in the streets all over the U.S. would be their dream come true, don't fall in the trap.
The world seems like its about to take a dump, prepare yourselves the best you can.
Posted by: MarkC at February 20, 2011 04:46 PM (ros+1)
All I see conservatives doing is being reactionary to liberals. It took 3 days for a tea party rally to form.
They're permitted free race card passes, free godwin's law waivers, they get away with just about anything.
Is there an Alinsky analogue to promoting conservative principles? We can't afford to be reactionary as we are.
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 08:40 PM (3duwi)
That's weird but the unions are REACTING to the bill put out by conservatives. The Teaparty or support Walker rally didn't occur until Saturday because that's WHEN THEY HAD OFF WORK-THEY CAME ON THE WEEKEND BECAUSE THEY HAVE JOBS.
The Walker supporters didn't need to come at all. The bill will be passed as long as walker stands firm.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 04:47 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: Arizona Voter at February 20, 2011 04:47 PM (k6Z7V)
We don't need no educators
We don't need no fist control
...all in all, you're just another thug who's AWOL....
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at February 20, 2011 04:47 PM (/zxqz)
Hmm, a mead sounds interesting. Stouts really don't need anything extra. They're pretty stout by themselves.
Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 20, 2011 08:43 PM (S59+B)
Yeah, but I think the Honey Badger Stout needs something to go with the theme.
But hey, I don't give a shit.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 20, 2011 08:45 PM (BvBKY)
im thinkin something unfiltered, maybe a hefeweizen?
Filtered?
Honey badger dont give a shit!
Posted by: Gushka at February 20, 2011 04:47 PM (93zw2)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 20, 2011 04:48 PM (3kefp)
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 08:43 PM (BebB7)
Agreed.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 20, 2011 04:48 PM (BvBKY)
And you mean being reactive not being reactionary.
Reactionary means wanting to return to a previous state or being to the far right. You can't be "reactionary to" liberals.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 04:48 PM (XW2az)
98 Dear, it still wouldn't work. There are plenty of video examples.
Although actual liberals might be shamed and realize for once and for all that they have been duped (so there's that); Leftists however are narcissists and beyond shame.
Remember: these people are not liberal...they are leftists.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 20, 2011 04:49 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Turd Ferguson at February 20, 2011 04:49 PM (6yyVB)
Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 20, 2011 08:47 PM (S59+B)
If I gave a shit, I'd say that mead was just too weak for Honey Badger.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 20, 2011 04:50 PM (BvBKY)
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at February 20, 2011 04:50 PM (QxGmu)
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 08:40 PM (3duwi)
The problem is that conservatives want to protect their lives, and liberals don't have lives, they just want something else (that happens to be impossible).
So they never stop, they never give up, and they never stop screwing everyone and everything around them trying to get to their goals.
I went over that in detail in the COlumbia Students thread and I don't feel like going over it again.
But if I was a liberal I would, because I'd have nothing else more important to do than pushing my agenda.
That's why they keep winning, not because their ideas ever work, but because they never stop, they never shut up, and everyone else is too busy trying to keep their lives going to stop them.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 04:50 PM (bxiXv)
Just met and spoke with Teh Evul Karl Rove tonight. And D'oh sent a pic of the three of us on Facebook. D'oh Boy replied, "Who's the dude in the pic called Turd Blossum?"
His speaking event was awesome. He made us laugh and cry (himself included).
He took loads of time talking to people during his book signing (he stood up at the podium the whole time). When it was our turn, he reached out to me, gave me a hug, and started writing in our book. I told him our Marine kid's name is the same as the Marine's he spoke about and teared up over. He stopped writing, looked me in the eye, and said, "You tell your boy he is my hero." Then he wrote something in the book I didn't see until later.
We told him D'oh is the cousin of ______________ who worked with him in the Bush WH. He laughed and grabbed my husband. A guy got a pic of us together. As we walked away, he said, "You be sure to tell your boy how grateful we all are for his service." I said, "Thank you for your service. And I love W."
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 20, 2011 04:53 PM (UOM48)
Haven't made it over to Teh FB for a long spell--I got pretty sick of retard "friends" constantly stuck on full-on retard and am not a fan of Zuck--but am tempted to go and check to see how my liberal teaching "professionals" are spinning the week's news.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at February 20, 2011 04:53 PM (/zxqz)
Posted by: USS Diversity at February 20, 2011 04:54 PM (DLxD/)
The sad part is that my dad who is a vet firefighter of 26 years has become a libtard overnight because he believes what he reads in the Columbus Dispatch about House Bill 5.
Posted by: ErikW at February 20, 2011 07:58 PM (wnu+j)
I know of at least 10 people that have canceled their subscriptions to either The Columbus Dispatch or one of their 'local papers' just because of their coverage of this bill.
Every time Coleman has been up for re-election I told them not to read the paper, but instead to open their freaking eyes. He has destroyed Columbus, but they never listened. They thought he was great because the Dispatch and 10tv told them he was great.
Finally, they are beginning to see they have been idiots for believing The Dispatch and the local news only reported the truth.
Posted by: momma at February 20, 2011 04:55 PM (penCf)
Posted by: nerdygirl at February 20, 2011 04:55 PM (73b7y)
If I gave a shit, I'd say that mead was just too weak for Honey Badger. Posted by: AmishDude
Mead starts at 10% APV. Stout? Stout? Guinness is 4.2%.
Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 20, 2011 04:56 PM (S59+B)
That ain't no budget bill.
Posted by: nickless at February 20, 2011 04:56 PM (MMC8r)
Get your mind out of the gutter.
Excusing people because 'they had to work" is kinda bullshit imo.
Is our movement a WEEKEND ONLY party? are you fucking kidding?? Well if that's the case, we can close up shop and turn the lights off.
of COURSE the Walker supporters needed to come out. Because anywhere else you look, all you saw was union thugs chanting and marching around downtown Madison. For three days!
ooooOOOOoooooh this bill was passed (and it WILL be passed whether the bill's supporters showed up ANYWAY). That's not the point.
The point is, we're losing the PR battles. We're losing the image battles.
Here's your blank-out response: "waaah waahh waaah liberal media waaah waaah"
So i'll preemptively respond to it: if our entire movement is going to be centered on 1) bitching about liberal media, 2) always REACTING to what the liberals do and 3) and complaining about how "if a liberal did this, then imagine how THAT would look!" .....then again.....lock the doors and turn off the lights.
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 04:56 PM (3duwi)
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 04:57 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: Portnoy at February 20, 2011 04:59 PM (azgo2)
One thing I learned from anti-insurgency literature is the age-old lesson that you try to foment discord within the ranks of the movement. You buy off one guy, spread rumors about another guy, while making the innocent suffer the most. Hence, it may be advantageous to go ahead with the plan to lay off a substantial number of teachers while pushing for increased funding for parental vouchers to send kids to private schools. Or you build a plan to close the offending schools (with high rates of teacher absences) and bus the remaining students to overcrowded schools where the union teachers can manage crowd control for 60 students.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at February 20, 2011 05:01 PM (/zxqz)
Posted by: momma at February 20, 2011 08:48 PM (penCf
Makes sense to me. Good read. Get the wrong guy in office, and poof. There goes America. I love teetering on the brink of a cliff. Wheeeee!
Posted by: Derak at February 20, 2011 05:01 PM (CjpKH)
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 08:54 PM (XW2az)
Thanks. He also took questions for over 1/2 hour. I've come away with a respect I didn't really have before. He's an amazing, open, honest speaker.
One of the things he said during the question/answer period was: Ted Kennedy started the whole "Bush lied over WMDs shit" and then John Effin' Kerry and John Edwards picked it up, along with Jane Harmon. He approached W about nipping that shit in the bud, and W said NO. He said that will forever be his greatest disappointment in himself. He could have pushed W a little more and shut down that crap.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 20, 2011 05:01 PM (UOM48)
Mead starts at 10% APV. Stout? Stout? Guinness is 4.2%.
Meh, a vodka gimlet is 20%.
And I'm talking Imperial stout. That stuff is 9-10% and you savor each and every drop.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 20, 2011 05:02 PM (BvBKY)
Don't know about Wisconsin, but in California, you have the right to not be in the union, but you are still required to pay the Union dues if you want a public school job. They get your money by law no matter what.
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at February 20, 2011 05:02 PM (QxGmu)
Wonder if she'll quit the union now??? Or can she??
WI isn't a right-to-work state. She could quit, but would still have to pay. Might as well stay in and be able to vote @ the meetings.
Posted by: Stillwater at February 20, 2011 05:03 PM (0GpN4)
O = ralphies brother (he laid there like a slug it was his only defense)
Posted by: Gushka at February 20, 2011 08:44 PM (93zw2)
In actions, yes it fits. For attitude and personality, O is more like Grover Dill, the toady.
Posted by: Count de Monet at February 20, 2011 05:04 PM (XBM1t)
123 Yeah, as far as protesting goes? It is a weekend only party?
You grasp that most protesters on the left are PAID to go to these rallys? The rest are students and other waste cases supported by their parents? No conservative is going to show up on a weekday to protest and they shouldn't.
The fact that these tools are marching around Madison is pissing off more people than it's impressing esp parents who are having to find sitters or stay home.
No one looks fondly on protesters except protesters. No one. I live right outside DC and protesters are despised and reviled. They don't win the PR war, they lose it WHEN they disrupt the schedules of others. People don't really mind saturday protesters.
So if you think that we need to protest 7 days a week then we need to create a subclass of professional protesters. Since that goes against everything that a conservative believes in, then I doubt that's going to happen.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 05:04 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 20, 2011 08:53 PM (UOM4
Honey Badger remains stony-still, but sheds a single tear.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 05:05 PM (bxiXv)
Finally, they are beginning to see they have been idiots for believing The Dispatch and the local news only reported the truth.
Posted by: momma at February 20, 2011 08:55 PM (penCf)
Mom knows better but it's frustrating as hell with Dad.
He's bitter and cynical so he eats up the bad news from the lying cocksuckers at the Dispatch.
Posted by: ErikW at February 20, 2011 05:05 PM (wnu+j)
It's a crying shame that no one had a video cam to document the goons in action. Instapundit recommends them highly at all such gatherings.
But, lacking that, telling everyone to flop on the ground like Bill Laimbeer and screaming at the top of their lungs while other scream for cops sounds like a viable alternative.
Combining the two with a quick posting to YouTube would be the coup-de-gras. A great deal of mileage could be obtained by merely showing the communist unions in their natural habitat.
Of course, the best thing to have would be a personal Honey Badger, for all of the aforementioned reasons.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 20, 2011 05:06 PM (b6qrg)
Might as well stay in and be able to vote @ the meetings.
Forgot to add: as long as she's required to pay, might as well keep up membership to avoid being harassed. Yes, they eat their own.
Posted by: Stillwater at February 20, 2011 05:06 PM (0GpN4)
Last week President Barack Obama described Davis as "our diplomat" and dispatched his chief diplomatic troubleshooter, Senator John Kerry, to Islamabad. Kerry returned home empty-handed.
I wonder if Kerry threw his medals at them.
Posted by: GnuBreed at February 20, 2011 05:07 PM (h0RtZ)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 20, 2011 05:08 PM (3kefp)
So i'll preemptively respond to it: if our entire movement is going to be centered on 1) bitching about liberal media, 2) always REACTING to what the liberals do and 3) and complaining about how "if a liberal did this, then imagine how THAT would look!" .....then again.....lock the doors and turn off the lights.
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 08:56 PM (3duwi)
If you plan begins with "If only people would," you have already failed.
You need to come up with a plan that starts with "because people do" if you want to succeed.
If your plan depends on conservatives not taking care of their jobs and families, you will fail.
You need to find a way where they can do what's needed without abandoning their responsibilities. Just bitching at them because they won't walk out on their jobs and families accomplishes less than nothing.
We know the left has no sense of responsibility except to "win."
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 05:08 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 05:09 PM (XW2az)
It's MR. Honey BADGER. Thank-you.
Re: your idea. I'm open to it. I definitely think it's a start.
@ BondVillain:
If they never stop, never give up, then neither should we. Making excuses is pretty much...er..inexcusable at this late in the game.
Which is funny, because, if conservatives want to protect their lives and rights and future, one would *think* there would be a more energized opposition to the left. If it is WE who have so much to lose....then why are we doing what we're doing? To me, it does not equate. It's disproportionate.
I'll look for your comments in the Columbia student thread (do you have a specific post #?)
They keep winning because they're just working harder than we are.
Otherwise, what you're saying is that this battle is impossible win - and I don't accept that. Not one bit.
I'm quite certain that the band playing in the ballroom on the titanic prided themselves on playing the right notes and rhythms until they went under. Is that really what we're going to do?
Glenn @ Instapundit has been using this whole "doesn't fit the narrative" meme, and I think if they've got a narrative, so should we. And if they say something that doesn't fit it, we should all scream and holler like obama had used the secret word in pee-wee's playhouse.
My FAVORITE picture of all the pictures I've seen at the walker support rally was a guy holding up a "Member of the Taxpayers Union" sign. I hope you've seen it. If you frame this battle as the taxpayers against the union...
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 05:10 PM (3duwi)
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 09:09 PM (XW2az)
Lol. That would do away why most people would even put their kids in private schools. We paid big bucks (and took no vacations) to protect our kid from gubmint schools.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 20, 2011 05:11 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Carrie at February 20, 2011 05:12 PM (hCQG5)
On this one, I don't think the Tea Party is at all. This falls under the "if the enemy is committing suicide, don't get in their way."
Those "optics" the Progressives and the MFM so love and are currently displaying are devastating. The unionized teachers are bailing out on students. They appear distant and greedy to everyone who isn't union-associated. The government is obligated to balance its budget and this is a clear, obvious, and justifiable avenue of economizing. They are responding to the electorate and it is understood to be so. The nasty side of the union protests disgusts most. That won't endear them to the constituency. The Democrats have fled and are being paid not to do their job while abdicating the duties of their office. I could go on and on here.
I love "in-your-face" conservatism, but the Tea Party contingency really just needs to have a presence and, in very controlled, respectful manner, point across the way and say, "Look at all the shenanigans they're pulling and what they stand for."
Tea Party has pimp hand. No need to release the Honey Badger.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 20, 2011 05:15 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 20, 2011 05:15 PM (3kefp)
Posted by: Artruen at February 20, 2011 05:15 PM (L+dBi)
Guys, I just want to point out that they have lost. They won't admit defeat, so it's sometimes hard to tell. The union is telling the teachers to go back to work and the state senate GOP leader has announced they're moving on to non-budget items.
One thing about Leftists, their rage has to be focused. If they get mad at some other piece of legislation, they lose momentum.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 20, 2011 05:16 PM (BvBKY)
Posted by: Dick Cheney at February 20, 2011 05:19 PM (YxGud)
No one looks fondly on protesters except protesters. No one. I live right outside DC and protesters are despised and reviled. They don't win the PR war, they lose it WHEN they disrupt the schedules of others. People don't really mind saturday protesters.
That's true in this country. Protests can work if their goal is intimidation, say of a company. But they actually lose PR, especially if they're disruptive, angry or greedy.
And let us not forget that this is not a surprise. This is what Walker ran on.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 20, 2011 05:19 PM (BvBKY)
I agree. "if only people would" is failing.
I DO need to come up with a plan that starts with "because people do". You're absolutely right. And I've been working on some ideas over the past week (when a lot of this stuff in wisconsin lubricated my gears of inspiration).
If only other people would be thinking about this stuff lol
The left also has jobs and families they need to take care of, too. If we're going to simply say, "well, i'm too busy looking after my kids and work hours to really put some umph into making this a better country" we're going to lose, just the same.
I completely agree that there needs to be a healthy balance. I'm not asking them to walk out on their jobs, but to suggest that no conservative person had the day or the afternoon or the evening off is hard to digest. really.
If the left has no sense of responsibility but to 'win'.....then .....so should we? or do you disagree?
I think there are solutions and resources that have yet to be tapped or thought up. This isn't 1995 anymore.....
I was once on a forum called protestwarrior that had put together some decent ideas almost a decade ago....I wonder if anyone else here was with that group?
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 05:19 PM (3duwi)
If they get mad at some other piece of legislation, they lose momentum.
Which is why no one displays any bright, shiny objects at their protests.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 20, 2011 05:20 PM (b6qrg)
Posted by: davidt at February 20, 2011 05:20 PM (9Pzy7)
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 20, 2011 05:20 PM (3kefp)
I was on ProtestWarrior for a little bit in the early '00s. I remember some git named "Socialist" who used to troll the threads and post nonsense. Oh, and a gun-lover whose sn escapes me at the moment with a Koopa Kid avatar.
Haven't been back there in a while.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 20, 2011 05:22 PM (C2UMM)
Exactly. WI GOP, you have a 100% majority in the state Senate. USE IT.
Posted by: nickless at February 20, 2011 05:22 PM (MMC8r)
One thing about Leftists, their rage has to be focused. If they get mad at some other piece of legislation, they lose momentum.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 20, 2011 09:16 PM (BvBKY)
In general, the Leftists seem to be able to sustain focused rage long enough to win the MBM battle, but the unions get tired of actually having to actually do anything for long periods of time, so if they don't get their way promptly tend to wander off. The MBM doesn't seem to be doing very well with their agenda just now, so this is a good time to let them proceed along their chosen path.
If Walker hangs in there, keeps looking eminently reasonable, and continues to speak articulately sans teleprompter assistance, we might have a win on our hands. The MBM will try to spin this no matter what, so get ready for the next wave of BS.
Posted by: Hrothgar at February 20, 2011 05:24 PM (DCpHZ)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 20, 2011 05:26 PM (TMB3S)
Honey Badger remains stony-still, but sheds a single tear.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 09:05 PM (bxiXv)
LOL! And Jane, that really is awesome. Hope D'oh Boy knows how many people are eternally grateful to him.
Are the teachers at Sidwell Friends unionized?
If they're Quakers, depending on what branch they are, they're fairly radical , so a union might not be necessary. Big on social justice...nice people, delightful people, but there is some very deeply held radical thought in some of the branches.
Exactly. WI GOP, you have a 100% majority in the state Senate. USE IT.They need to act on these things like Honey Badger on cobra.
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 05:26 PM (BebB7)
Posted by: Artruen at February 20, 2011 05:27 PM (L+dBi)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 20, 2011 05:28 PM (9Lm5R)
Union representation is the private sector is approx 7%.
Union representation in the private sector MEDIA is very close to 100%. Even management types who are no longer represented, got their first jobs in the business as union represented newbies.
The media is one of the last bastions of unionism in the private sector. Unions have destroyed most of the businesses that they represented: steel-making, auto-making, manufacturing in general really, those jobs all got shipped offshore.
Posted by: Boots at February 20, 2011 05:30 PM (neKzn)
And a lot of the anti-Walker shit is from Madison's students and hippies and druggies. This is what they do for fun on warm days. (Read comment 2 and comment 20 on this thread). Anything Walker could have proposed to fix the budget--layoffs, cuts in gov't services, closing worthless social departments, anything except chase off more businesses with more taxes--was going to get the same reaction. Half of the smelly folks shuffling around the Capitol Square don't care about "workers rights"[sic], they just want to chant some shit with their friends and go home feeling smug about stickin' it to the man.
It was hard to get out of the rally, I'll confirm that part of her story. And you can hear the disruptions on the YouTube video of Hermain Cain. Unlike Fritzworth's daughter's friend, I was expecting assholes, so I walked back to my bus using the same tactics I used when I worked in a shitty neighborhood in Milwaukee--head up, minimal eye contact, walk purposefully, ignore shouts. The shouts were troll-level, "Stop watching Faux News!", "You're a pawn of the rich!" blah blah blah.
And I think that's the thing--I was expecting assholes because instead of having a house and a family, I have time to hang out on the internet and absorb actual primary news sources, instead of catching ten minutes of carefully selected and edited MFM propaganda here and there. The majority of normal people don't.
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 20, 2011 05:31 PM (nAOMZ)
Sure as hell helping ours, though. I hope they keep it up.
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 05:31 PM (BebB7)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 05:32 PM (zrqN0)
Which is funny, because, if conservatives want to protect their lives and rights and future, one would *think* there would be a more energized opposition to the left. If it is WE who have so much to lose....then why are we doing what we're doing? To me, it does not equate. It's disproportionate.
It's not an excuse, I'm just pointing out why things are the way they are. Conservatives, by their very nature, are not going to put 100% into politics because the very reason they're interested in politics at all is to protect something that isn't politics.
We're not going to abandon our other interests, our families, and our principles like so many liberals do. You put someone in office who will lie, cheat, and steal like they do, he's not going to become like them, he's going to be one of them out of the gate.
You have to find a better solution because "becoming them" loses the whole battle.
I'll look for your comments in the Columbia student thread (do you have a specific post #?)
246, 252, and 283
They keep winning because they're just working harder than we are.
Otherwise, what you're saying is that this battle is impossible win - and I don't accept that. Not one bit.
I didn't say it's impossible to win, I'm saying it's impossible to win by just "trying harder," partly because the bold liar who holds the microphone has a built-in advantage: you have to outnumber or out-shout him, and we let them take over the vast majority of the microphones because of the other reason:
We have other things to do, they don't. You are never going to get as many Conservatives to *live* in the cesspool of politics as liberals do. You have to change the context in some way or you won't be able to overcome their "home field advantage."
Now, if you could overcome the MBM majority, or the academic monopoly, somehow, or if you could just get the public riled up enough about dishonesty (you'd have to fix the MBM first) to stop cold the CONSTANT lies of the left, that might do it. If you could reduce the power of the state to the point where it wasn't the deciding factor in every dispute (oh boy what a world we live in), that might do it as well.
But just demanding what you *know* you're not going to get will not get you anywhere.
I'm quite certain that the band playing in the ballroom on the titanic prided themselves on playing the right notes and rhythms until they went under. Is that really what we're going to do?
So, no offense, but what are you doing? Do you think you're really going to get people who have lives and families and interests and hobbies to just drop all of that, for years or forever, to compete toe-to-toe by sheer brute effort with the "religious fanatics" of the far left, who will in fact throw everything, including your life, to achieve their goal because they think Secular Salvation is waiting for them, and they never get discouraged because they *started* as a failure and are incapable of admitting it?
Glenn @ Instapundit has been using this whole "doesn't fit the narrative" meme, and I think if they've got a narrative, so should we. And if they say something that doesn't fit it, we should all scream and holler like obama had used the secret word in pee-wee's playhouse.
Okay, let me know when you've got the MBM on board with this plan. A lot of people still get their news from them, and that's why the Narrative is a reality.
My FAVORITE picture of all the pictures I've seen at the walker support rally was a guy holding up a "Member of the Taxpayers Union" sign. I hope you've seen it. If you frame this battle as the taxpayers against the union...
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 09:10 PM (3duwi)
There is a Taxpayer's Union. Pretty small group, fragmented, not much real influence, can't bribe anyone, don't have enough resources to do much but issue reports on spending and taxation.One of our problems is we fragment 23 ways from Sunday, everyone has their own interests. I guess one of the reasons the left is (relatively speaking) unified is they subconsciously know they're *all* full of shit, so it hardly matters which faction has the most power as long as they're moving in the right direction.
I'm not trivializing the problem, it's huge and we have to solve it. But solving a problem requires actually *solving* it, which means working with the tools you have.
And millions of conservatives with ACORN budgets and unlimited free time and free press from the MBM and free allies in academia are just not something we have.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 05:35 PM (bxiXv)
Fucking awesome.
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 20, 2011 05:35 PM (nAOMZ)
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 20, 2011 05:38 PM (nAOMZ)
If we had no Tea Party....then what? What if the Tea Party didn't exist right here and now....where would we be?
Perhaps the solution is to dream up a new independent-but-conservative faction too? I dig the Tea Party, I go to meetings, you know the drill...
The enemy isn't committing suicide, not if what BondVillain says is true - they're only goal is total annihilation of opposition. And, imo, we should take on the same ideal.
How the hell does our civilization survive some of the most gruesome and violent left-wing wars and assaults on humanity.....to only see it sinking back that way at full force. How is it that collectivist notions run rampant among all different economic classes....despite the clear history of what it has caused? I think we turned off the spigot that was fighting such hellish fires.
Devastating? Maybe to people like us. But not to people who see a bunch of angry teachers (they're saints! don'tchaknow!) and the discussion is centered around 'taking their rights away'. The discussion isn't on 'balancing the budget'. That's not what people here. You and I....we know what's actually at stake here.
Imagine, for a moment, if there was no exclusion for police officers and fire fighters and state troopers!
So strange....that the people on the left who love their government so much...are willing to have it go insolvent.....
I don't see the protests 'disgusting most'. at all. it disgusts me. it disgusts people on conservative forums. but 'most? nah. After the election of Obama, I don't have much trust that this 'disgusts' people. I think the only reason people are really ticked off is because the Democrats have fled the state. That's probably one thing that will hurt them the most here.
I love the in-your-face conservatism.....mostly because it's 1) rare, and 2) when you do see it it's actually AMAZING. Breitbart got the ball rolling. But he can't be the sole proprietor on such endeavors.
Being "present" in the manner in which Obama had often voted as a senator is not good enough. We all need to vote, and vote YES for The United States. You can sit back and "point out the shennanigans they're trying to pull" but that doesn't convey our ideas. I agree the Tea Party should remain respectful and controlled....despite the fact that it really has no other options, I think it's the right tone for their group. (how do you contrast that with your comment that the Tea Party has the pimp hand??) (if you want to see a real pimp hand, watch Niall Ferguson slap Mika silly on the Morning Joe show on MSNBC the other day)
Honestly, I love the imagery of a conservative honey badger roll out campaign.
Pro-Active. Not Reactive.
Conservative Honey Badger doesn't give a shit.
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 05:41 PM (3duwi)
Posted by: nickless at February 20, 2011 05:43 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 05:44 PM (zrqN0)
They never see the disgusting stuff. Milwaukee paper photo gallery hasn't shown a single violent, vulgar, or offensive sign, even though pictures of them are all over the internet.
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 20, 2011 05:44 PM (nAOMZ)
Posted by: Kenneth Gladney at February 20, 2011 05:44 PM (MMC8r)
I'm going to take a really wild guess that Randall / zrqN0, by sneering at the Tea Party as an "element" - read, fringe - was in attendence for the SEIU "element".
Randall, welcome to AoSHQ! You're not one of this site's regular trolls. What brought you by? One of the local unions noticed?
Posted by: Zimriel at February 20, 2011 05:45 PM (pl1+G)
Posted by: davidt at February 20, 2011 05:46 PM (9Pzy7)
I see also that Randall doesn't give shit one about the jobs lost when the "corporations" got hit by the EPA.
Solidarity to the worker!
Posted by: Zimriel at February 20, 2011 05:47 PM (pl1+G)
I'd say complicit. And I think this matter will escalate to the point where the Wisconsin National Guard is called up and deployed. Consider the federal response if that happens.
The American Spectator recently posted an article describing the events and aftermath during Calvin Coolidge's problem with the Boston police union in 1920. LINK
Excerpt:
Governor Calvin Coolidge was furious. The police were fired by the Commissioner of Police, and Coolidge backed him up, calling out the National Guard. The Governor refused to re-instate the union policemen. Said Coolidge: "There is no right to strike against the public safety by anybody, any time, anywhere."
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 05:47 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: nickless at February 20, 2011 05:47 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 05:48 PM (zrqN0)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 20, 2011 05:50 PM (TMB3S)
So they can just get it back when they get enough union-owned Democrats back into the gummint via vote fraud.
Posted by: nickless at February 20, 2011 05:53 PM (MMC8r)
Our new troll "Randall" has so conveniently named himself after the U of Wisconsin's football stadium, Camp Randall.
Making excuses for thugs who assault unarmed women walking through a crowd is pathetic. Girlie Man!!
Posted by: Boots at February 20, 2011 05:55 PM (neKzn)
I DO need to come up with a plan that starts with "because people do". You're absolutely right. And I've been working on some ideas over the past week (when a lot of this stuff in wisconsin lubricated my gears of inspiration).
If only other people would be thinking about this stuff lol
We are. I've spent hundreds of hours discussing ideas about what to do that might actually work with others. A few of them have been done, some worked in a small way, some failed. I've made a few converts and failed to convince many because they're committed to a destructive path and don't care what the facts are.
I've been involved in petitions, recalls, lawsuits, clubs, and casual conversations. We're not all just sitting on our asses out here. You're not the only one that gives a damn.
The left also has jobs and families they need to take care of, too. If we're going to simply say, "well, i'm too busy looking after my kids and work hours to really put some umph into making this a better country" we're going to lose, just the same.
I completely agree that there needs to be a healthy balance. I'm not asking them to walk out on their jobs, but to suggest that no conservative person had the day or the afternoon or the evening off is hard to digest. really.
You have to convince them to do so. Like I said about 9 times, most conservative people have a lot of other things to do with their time, whether it's their family or their job or business or whatever. You have a Hell of a lot more small business owners in our camp, and I don't know many of them that have "time off" very often. There are also a ton of people who aren't committed and we have a hard time reaching and retaining them because they're surrounded by things like MBM coverage and its dishonest message.
They have welfare populations to organize, union members with protected jobs who can run around whenever they want and not get fired, doctors to fraudulently sign their sick notes, etc. We don't have that.
A lot of us are not doing so well job- and money-wise these days. We're scrambling to take care of ourselves and our families by working harder, innovating, finding new business opportunities, doing interviews, etc.
This whole financial mess, the bankrupting of state governments, the protesting and lobbying for expansion of the state - THAT IS THEIR JOB! That's how they make a living and improve the quality of their lives.
Automatic advantage. You need to work smarter, not harder, to overcome that. You can't out-protest them and I know *I* haven't been able to convince many people that it's big enough to be their whole life like the left, because honestly it *isn't* their whole life. The people I have convinced can see far enough ahead to see that it *will* be their whole life if they don't do something about it.
If the left has no sense of responsibility but to 'win'.....then .....so should we? or do you disagree?
Of course I disagree. Are you saying we abandon our honesty, our principles, to "win?" What have we won? It's not about having the "right people" in charge, if it was, leftist governments wouldn't be such a constant disaster.
It's about a system that *works* based on *reality* - the right ideas. If the system is well designed it matters *less* (but obviously it does matter) if the "wrong" people are in charge because the damage they can do is limited.
Our big problem is that damage is cumulative, and the left has been doing that damage for a long time, and undoing it is a problem.
I think there are solutions and resources that have yet to be tapped or thought up. This isn't 1995 anymore.....
I was once on a forum called protestwarrior that had put together some decent ideas almost a decade ago....I wonder if anyone else here was with that group?
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 09:19 PM (3duwi)
It turned out to be sort of a one-trick pony, it got minimal coverage (You *have* to get past the gatekeepers!) and while I think they're still out there they didn't accomplish much. One of those things we tried that didn't work.Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 05:55 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: nickless at February 20, 2011 05:57 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 05:57 PM (zrqN0)
Tell me again why I should pay for any one else's health care and pension? I already pay your salary, at what, 3 times more than the average non-unionized private-sector worker? Why aren't you offering to pay for all your own health care and pension?
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 05:59 PM (BebB7)
The Mob gravitates to easy money it can take by force. With private sector unions just about played out, public sector unions are the only prey available to The Mob thugs.
Those nice little old lady teachers are just the window dressing for the goons in purple standing behind them.
Posted by: Boots at February 20, 2011 06:00 PM (neKzn)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:00 PM (zrqN0)
It's not an excuse, I'm just pointing out why things are the way they are. Conservatives, by their very nature, are not going to put 100% into politics because the very reason they're interested in politics at all is to protect something that isn't politics.
Then I guess it comes down to valuation and priorities.
We're not going to abandon our other interests, our families, and our principles like so many liberals do. You put someone in office who will lie, cheat, and steal like they do, he's not going to become like them, he's going to be one of them out of the gate.
I saw quite a few pics with families and people with strollers. Hell, if one really thinks about it, get the whole family involved in this.
You have to find a better solution because "becoming them" loses the whole battle.
I"m not saying we should become them....but that we should match them. And bring the fight to their doors before they bring it to ours. Again, always being on the defensive end doesn't (and hasn't) helped.
I didn't say it's impossible to win, I'm saying it's impossible to win by just "trying harder," partly because the bold liar who holds the microphone has a built-in advantage: you have to outnumber or out-shout him, and we let them take over the vast majority of the microphones because of the other reason:
Well, since we ARE right....why should the truth have a quaint voice?
We have other things to do, they don't. You are never going to get as many Conservatives to *live* in the cesspool of politics as liberals do. You have to change the context in some way or you won't be able to overcome their "home field advantage."
I disagree. Other things to do? Sure. Just like anyone else. Perhaps you're right about not getting as many conservatives to *live* in the 'cesspool' of politics....but we aren't even taking a vacation there. I completely agree on changing the context and the proper narrative. It's a necessity.
Now, if you could overcome the MBM majority, or the academic monopoly, somehow, or if you could just get the public riled up enough about dishonesty (you'd have to fix the MBM first) to stop cold the CONSTANT lies of the left, that might do it. If you could reduce the power of the state to the point where it wasn't the deciding factor in every dispute (oh boy what a world we live in), that might do it as well.
You can't get the people riled up about dishonesty. It'll never work. Maybe in small communities and local elections. Unless they're caught with a hand down a child's pants, it's just not gonna happen.
Academic Monopoly? You can't really overcome that. But you can insulate students from the cloying effect of sweet stupidity being taught on campuses.
I must revisit the Alinsky book, but I do recall that one of the pointers was that you can lie your face off ...because the message that gets out there first almost always wins because it stays in peoples minds. people STILL think palin is responsible for the tuscon shootings. even normal people i know....insane. I know.
We seriously need to reverse engineer alinsky's commentary. no joke.
[So, no offense, but what are you doing? Do you think you're really going to get people who have lives and families and interests and hobbies to just drop all of that, for years or forever, to compete toe-to-toe by sheer brute effort with the "religious fanatics" of the far left, who will in fact throw everything, including your life, to achieve their goal because they think Secular Salvation is waiting for them, and they never get discouraged because they *started* as a failure and are incapable of admitting it?
I've spent time at the TEA party meetings. Volunteer. Been doing a lot of writing on how to change this narrative....aggregating ideas....i dig Ryan's Roadmap for the economy. Why not a new one for conservative discourse?
If we can't inspire people to be passionate about their country and the future of their country......well...actually maybe that's where we should start? It's not like the direction of this country has gone unnoticed by anyone.
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 06:00 PM (3duwi)
At issue is legislation put forth by the Republican Wisconsin Governor and Legislators. Negotiations over that legislation are between the Republican
Wisconsin Governor and Legislators and the Democrat Wisconsin
Legislators, not with outside the legislative process special
interest union leaders. Unfortunately for the unions, The Democrat Wisconsin Legislators have gone AWOL depriving the unions of representation within the Wisconsin Legislature.
Posted by: davidt at February 20, 2011 06:01 PM (9Pzy7)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 09:48 PM (zrqN0)
Hey guys! Check out the new astroturf in Randall's mom's back yard!
Hey, jackwagon, $200 M is missing from patient compensation funds, stolen by your hero Diamond Jim Doyle (D-ouche). I highly doubt that is going to be replaced by revoking corporate tax reductions, which, by the way, are not back where they were when WI HAD a surplus, because when corporations make money, they pay taxes and hire people and more business comes and on and on.
But then, you learned economics from a public school teacher, didn't you?
Posted by: tcn at February 20, 2011 06:02 PM (DjPot)
You addressed the meta argument and I agree with it. I'm pointing out that in this particular case - the WI teacher union sickout - that the Tea Party need do much less than normal. The visuals speak for themselves. The Tea Party's presence is enough to bring attention to the alternate POV, a POV that resonates with infinitely more people.
I would never argue that the Tea Party can settle down now and coast. It's an imperative to empower it and grow it in order to preserve the nation. Frankly, I don't think it, the nation, can be saved; however, it doesn't mean that you don't fight for it whenever and however you can. The thing is that this is a battle that will take, literally, generations if we've not already gone beyond the socialist tipping point already. The reality is that societies are built to fail and there may not be a damned thing we can do about it. The gene pool will get its cyclic purging and something else will form... and we won't be part of it.
Sorry 'bout the gloom and doom but it's inevitable. However, right here, right now, in the battle for WI, the Tea Party is winning and will score. Let's be as smart as possible, understanding the limits to which we are restrained, and move outwardly from that epicenter. Build outwardly from the window of real reform and begin appealing not just for economic remedies but also for labor/union ones and academic liberation. The hidden kernel to come from this won't be labor reform (as economics have guaranteed that path) but the change in the way academia should be viewed. That's the slow-boiling narrative that needs cultivation and the real power of socialist/Marxist thought.
On that, bring out Honey Badger and his dad.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 20, 2011 06:03 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:03 PM (zrqN0)
Just don't let that be an excuse to avoid cutting the shit out of the EPA.
If you don't want to do these jobs, you are free to work in the private sector
You should go drop that bon mot on your illegally striking "educator" friends.
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 20, 2011 06:03 PM (nAOMZ)
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 06:04 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 06:05 PM (AkdC5)
Oh yeah, and a lot of these people do jobs that most Americans wouldn't touch, like working in a sewer or picking up trash
Um, that's a loser argument. Democrats and Republicans have told me for decades now that THOSE jobs are for illegal aliens.
Posted by: Boots at February 20, 2011 06:05 PM (neKzn)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 10:03 PM (zrqN0)
Wait, isn't that the excuse given for having illegals stay in the country? I'm confused on the Commie talking points. Are you saying that union workers are like illegals?
Posted by: tcn at February 20, 2011 06:05 PM (DjPot)
Yes, that's exactly what we mean. So what's your gripe, you just agreed that unions are the problem.
by all means, disband the Unions and the EPA.
BUNK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 06:06 PM (BebB7)
Posted by: tcn at February 20, 2011 06:07 PM (DjPot)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 10:03 PM (zrqN0)
Bull fucking shit. In every right to work state those jobs get done just like they do in union shitholes.
You really are a dumb shit.
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 06:07 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 20, 2011 06:08 PM (nAOMZ)
Ah, the sophistry.
If you don't earn enough, you're not linked in with the proper band of thugs.
'Randall' is a union lawyer.
Posted by: nickless at February 20, 2011 06:09 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 06:09 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:10 PM (zrqN0)
And we were apparently India and Mexico before 1970.
Posted by: nickless at February 20, 2011 06:11 PM (MMC8r)
If Union salaries and benefits are so much better than yours
Dream on, buddy. I have 100% medical and dental, and I make 10% more than community, all without having to waste money on union dues every month.
a lot of these people do jobs that most Americans wouldn't touch, like working in a sewer or picking up trash
The trash in my hometown is picked up regularly by NON-UNION workers. There are hundreds and thousands of cities all over the freaking country that can manage to have trash service without unionizing. Ditto sewer work.
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 06:11 PM (BebB7)
Free low-deductible health insurance != health.
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 20, 2011 06:13 PM (nAOMZ)
Posted by: tmi3rd at February 20, 2011 06:14 PM (WRtsc)
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 10:11 PM (BebB7)
Yeah, and they don't piss off and not go to work when they are needed most like in *cough* NY *cough*.
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 06:14 PM (AkdC5)
Does it even pentrate your pea brain that this is probably why these two thirds are IN Wisconsin to begin with?
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 06:14 PM (BebB7)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:15 PM (zrqN0)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:17 PM (zrqN0)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 20, 2011 06:17 PM (TMB3S)
The Public Sector is receiving higher wages and better benefits at lower costs (and completely unsustainable pension plans that no one else gets) AT THE EXPENSE OF the taxpayers, who are broke. We can't afford it anymore.
So the answer is no, you cannot have any more of our money, in fact you can have less, and you had better damned well be grateful or you won't get any at all.
How do you like them apples?
Unions are by no means perfect, and it should be a wake up call to them that they need to reform or they face extinction.
I think I'll just go with option 2, because option 1 has been refused over and over and over again. They're out of second chances.
But even the private sector has benefitted from organized labor, and we should not need to be wage-slaves to have access to health care and a comfortable life.
Public servants have insanely liberal protection LAWS as well as unions who cooperate with politicians, bribe them, and receive protection in addition to those laws. We can't afford the money, and we can't afford the corruption. It has to stop.
Yes, many of the people at this protest are ridiculous, Madison is a kind of ridiculous place. But it is also the home of organized labor, and nobody should be surprised that normal working people do not want to see fifty years of labor history erased in a week with almost no public debate. That is not freedom.
It sure as Hell isn't freedom to have a bunch of self-entitled, shirking, greedy, so-called "public servants" trying to protect their Champagne and Caviar while the rest of us are scrabbling to pay the damned rent. The Public Sector union members are first-class citizens and the rest of us second-class, we don't have the special legal protections, high pay and obscenely cheap benefits they do.
This is unacceptable. This is not freedom.
Union people pick up your trash, allow you to sh*t in a flushing toilet, educate your children AND the children who do not have money or parents who care.
Oh, don't even get me started on calling what these people do "education." And my dumpster is always full and my water stops at random, so don't ask me for sympathy on that basis either. And I know how much these people bank, it's a Hell of a lot more than I do.
If you don't want to do these jobs, you are free to work in the private sector, where your health benefits and wages are decided by corporate boards not by you and your fellow workers.
I decide where I work, if I'm not happy with conditions I can negotiate for more or go somewhere else. I don't get to bribe politicians or get automatic raises and Cadillac benefits at the taxpayer's expense.
Also, as far as people "not wanting to do those jobs," most public sector positions have an application list a mile long. Because the pay is obscenely good, they get more vacation and sick time, better benefits, and defined-benefit pensions no one else does.
If your benefits and wages are unacceptable, it may be because your employer is not particularly concerned with your well being.
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 09:57 PM (zrqN0)
In the private sector, people are paid what it costs o replace them. If you want more, make it harder to replace you by doing better.
Of course, in the public sector, people are paid as much as they can get away with, which is why either public sector unions or civil service protections need to go.
In short, you're wrong about everything, and either your side is going to lose or it won't matter because we're going to go bankrupt and you're going to lose it all anyway.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 06:17 PM (bxiXv)
Jeeze, it almost makes me wish I lived in country where if I thought my employers weren't treating me fairly or paying me enough I could fucking quit and go get another fucking job!!!
Oh Wait!!!
Posted by: Portnoy at February 20, 2011 06:18 PM (azgo2)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:19 PM (zrqN0)
No, you should be asking your self why the fuck you think it is ANY employer's job to keep their employees healthy. If I don't like the wage I am being paid, I am free to find another job. My employer owes me nothing. I'm not some lazy, free loading shit who thinks anyone owes me anything.
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 06:19 PM (BebB7)
Peeing inside is bad for Gaia. It wastes a lot of water, and is completely unnecessary. If you really cared about the environment, you'd do that shit outside, and not use paper to wipe with.
Do you use paper to wipe with, Randall? Your Masters will be very disappointed to hear that, if it's true.
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 06:22 PM (BebB7)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:25 PM (zrqN0)
"a lot of these people do jobs that most Americans wouldn't touch, like working in a sewer or picking up trash"
Randall,
Then why can't they pick up their own trash from the protests!
Oh, and Honey Badger don't like that shit.
Posted by: redwhiteandblue at February 20, 2011 06:26 PM (W3UHW)
Or at least go Sheryl Crow. One square to rule them all.
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 06:26 PM (HjPtV)
Ooo, more of that sophistry.
'You should care' licenses the mob to demand it.
The troll equates two different things.
And then the flip, judgmental QED from the false premise.
That's why he's a lawyer.
Posted by: nickless at February 20, 2011 06:27 PM (MMC8r)
Randall,
the point it is no longer sustainble , no matter how much we like our childs teacher , every state , our country itself is broke, we have educators either not understanding that (which itself is rather bizzare)
bennies, wages, living the high dreams etc. are not viable any longer, millions are unemployed and can no longer pay taxes, where is the sympathy for those? or those that took substantial cuts in their lifestyles wages and other perks in life are to keep funding state? where they get to chose their payscale , ? and take it from us? and we have no say? we are called names because we say we can no longer handle the burden of their lifestule?
see yes Doyle lost the funds. shame on him. many of our pensions were hit hard during the crisis .
they state already have things in place already for workers protection, cut out the middle guy, save us some money, (although that part is only my own thought not walkers)
Posted by: willow at February 20, 2011 06:28 PM (h+qn8)
We're on the defensive because they're trying to steal from us. We don't want to steal from them, we just want to stop them from doing whatever theyw ant to us.
We are, by nature, defensive.
Well, since we ARE right....why should the truth have a quaint voice?
It doesn't have a quaint voice, the lie just has a megaphone.
You can't get the people riled up about dishonesty. It'll never work. Maybe in small communities and local elections. Unless they're caught with a hand down a child's pants, it's just not gonna happen.
Then we've already lost.
Academic Monopoly? You can't really overcome that. But you can insulate students from the cloying effect of sweet stupidity being taught on campuses.
Then we've already lost, demographic destiny. Even if they don't convince everyone, they set the "background noise" that sets the context.
I must revisit the Alinsky book, but I do recall that one of the pointers was that you can lie your face off ...because the message that gets out there first almost always wins because it stays in peoples minds. people STILL think palin is responsible for the tuscon shootings. even normal people i know....insane. I know.
We seriously need to reverse engineer alinsky's commentary. no joke.
Posted by: hoittytoitty at February 20, 2011 10:00 PM (3duwi)
Alinsky's model is based on dishonesty. You want to take that road? Think it goes to a different place?
And do you think your lies can outrun the MBM and academia? No. Communication is everything, and trust is everything, if you want a stable system.
If all you want is to "beat democrats" and you don't care about the consequences or what philosophy you actually live under, then sure, you can follow their "rules." But I don't think you'll like the outcome.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 06:28 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:28 PM (zrqN0)
Until the mob comes and tells us we joins or dey breaks our legs.
Posted by: nickless at February 20, 2011 06:30 PM (MMC8r)
So what? You have to have net income to pay tax. If you have that many businesses not being profitable, then maybe other business expenses - say labor costs - are too high. I guess I'm missing your point. Are you saying corporations don't need to be profitable to be successful and that the greater virtue is just existing to pay higher salaries (union included) because profits ultimately don't matter? That a corporation that grows by running in place WRT not contributing income tax or franchise tax to the state is better? Worse? What? I'm not following.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 20, 2011 06:31 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 20, 2011 06:31 PM (TMB3S)
Honey, you truly seem like a nice enough guy, and I don't like fussing with folks. But honestly, we see things differently.
My take on it is that I make money in the first place because I get a paycheck from this company. That's enough incentive for me, and they pay me well and give me great benefits, without me being in a union that does nothing but agitate and foment distrust, unrest, and encourage feelings of entitlement.
I think this is the main difference between Leftists Socialist like yourself. You have this attitude that everyone owes you something, or that someone should ve taking care of you. And I hope that didn't sound snotty, I didn't mean it to.
I just can't understand the whole mindset.
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 06:32 PM (BebB7)
Posted by: nickless at February 20, 2011 06:33 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:33 PM (zrqN0)
Well that's mighty big of you.
Posted by: Portnoy at February 20, 2011 06:33 PM (azgo2)
You know, you need to hang around here. I believe there is hope for you yet!
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 06:35 PM (BebB7)
What? Randall Flagg shows up to say, The Tea Party element was allowed to have its rally and was not assaulted.
Are you fucking kidding me? Allowed? ALLOWED?Who the hell are you to ALLOW the "tea party element" to have their rally? The unions are the ones who should be arrested for fraud the minute they present fake doctor's notes. Allowed my ass.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 06:37 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 20, 2011 06:39 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:39 PM (zrqN0)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 10:03 PM (zrqN0)
Yeah, companies that make 3% profit should double their employees' salary and provide free health care.
And go out of business and lay off all their employees.
You are really dumber than a bag of wet hair, aren't you?
Do you know where all this money comes from? Here's a hint, it's not "the money fairy." It's also not "The Money Tree," unless you want to pay really high interest.
Where did you learn about economics, the Vladimir Lenin Memorial School for Upping the Proletariat? It doesn't work, dude, I've known a lot of business owners, and with a couple of jerk exceptions they all cared a great deal for their employees (well, most of them, everyone has a problem child).
You just can't double your expenses without increasing your revenue, unless you're in the public sector and can bribe a politician to run up huge debts or raise taxes for you.
It will stop. Either we will stop it or the whole thing will collapse because of the greed and ignorance of everyone with their lips sewn to the public tit.
Do you seriously think, for real, that nobody in the REAL 19% unemployed will pick up trash for $40k + std bennies instead of $80k, and you can't find anyone to teach school for $50k instead of $90k?
The Unions' JOB is to restrict employment in a sector to keep wages artificially high. Distorting the market ALWAYS has consequences, you can only ignore them for so long.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 06:40 PM (bxiXv)
1) Mandatory annual union re-certification by a majority vote of ALL of the union's members, not just a majority of the members that bothered to vote.
2) No more automatic deduction of union dues from each member's government paycheck. For Wisconsin teachers, that's $700 to $1,000 a year.
(h/t John Fund WSJ LINK "What's at Stake in Wisconsin")
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 06:42 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: davidt at February 20, 2011 06:42 PM (9Pzy7)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:43 PM (zrqN0)
That's Obama Math. Set a currently unsustainable level and then cap that while acting like a sacrifice was made by not meeting some future, made-up number. Return future raises? Are you kidding me? That's not a return. And it's not nearly good enough for the "shared sacrifice" the Progressives so demand.
The union still wants guaranteed raises without taxpaying voter approval, i.e. the ones who actually must pay the bill.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 20, 2011 06:44 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:45 PM (zrqN0)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 10:33 PM (zrqN0)
So if they have no economic impact, then you don't have a problem removing the Unions' authority to negotiate (with the state) salaries and benefits, but only working conditions. And "dignity."
Because there's no economic impact means that those negotiations don't affect the budget.
Or, alternatively, you're just making things up.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 06:45 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: willow at February 20, 2011 06:45 PM (h+qn8)
Who pays the Corporate Income Tax?
Think carefully before you answer.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 06:46 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Honey Badger at February 20, 2011 06:47 PM (tl/+H)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:48 PM (zrqN0)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:48 PM (zrqN0)
Randall,
You hadn't pulled out the Christian card before, however to be authentic you need to add concerned. Christians are more than capable of taking care of themselves and others without the government involved.
The unions you espouse are taking us down the indoor and outdoor toilet.
Posted by: redwhiteandblue at February 20, 2011 06:49 PM (W3UHW)
You can bet it won't be me. I just won't give a shit.
Posted by: Honey Badger at February 20, 2011 06:49 PM (swuwV)
Public-sector employees are free to seek employment elsewhere if they don't like their employers' wage and benefit packages.
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 06:50 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:52 PM (zrqN0)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:53 PM (zrqN0)
Well gee...I can't imagine why that would have them worried. The unions are so beloved and wonderful...this is a gimmie....
Posted by: Portnoy at February 20, 2011 06:53 PM (azgo2)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 10:39 PM (zrqN0)
But that's not what actually happens. What actually happens is people are forced to pay for political lobbying they don't want, forced into unemployment if they won't pay for that and representation which as often or not serves to harm employment in general by raising prices, restricting employment in a sector, disincentivising productivity in favor of seniority, and in my experience doing as much harm to employees with strikes and corrupt negotiations as good.
Add to that the corruption of NLRB and labor laws giving unions a hand up, even excusing violence in the case of MANY conflicts (and demanding employees who vandalized company property and threatened or injured company personnel not be punished), and you have the reason why the private sector unions are dying.
As far as the public sector, unions + civil service law has led to a "labor market" without the "market" part. Management's hands are completely tied, the negotiators on the government side are as often as not sympathetic to or even members of a union, and the taxpayers are treated as an unlimited source of money.
Unsustainable doesn't even begin to cover it, but corrupt and evil are a good start.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 06:55 PM (bxiXv)
Yeah, but the people that replace them aren't free from the union. Funny how that works.
Posted by: Portnoy at February 20, 2011 06:55 PM (azgo2)
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 06:56 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 06:56 PM (zrqN0)
another thing, the unions call for a strike, public unions against the popultions, shutting down schools. police service, sanitation, , I mean really, the CAN quit their job if they feel stifled or unfairly treated, move onto something more lucrative. but they coerce the population instead, why is this justifible at all, the leaders from state to state that have mismanaged funds, to the unions themselves that have mismanaged the Peoples funds. butthe tax payer through no fault of their own has to Make certain these BETTERS do not suffer at all, the rest of us must, for the greater good and all.
to much power, and they've proved unworthy.
Posted by: willow at February 20, 2011 06:57 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 10:52 PM (zrqN0)
That's the first thing you've said that makes real solid sense, the problem is that you've got your polarity reversed.
So, who pays corporate income tax?
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 06:58 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 10:56 PM (zrqN0)
No it isn't. We've been laying a dozen arguments down here, and that isn't one of them. You're making things up again, because your made-up version of reality makes you feel better than the real reality.
Yeah, Liberal.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 07:00 PM (bxiXv)
How does dignity and a living wage translate into free benefits far above and beyond the usual private sector benefits? How is it just to force people who pay at least some of their own insurance and retirement to pay for a better package for these teachers and University of Wisconsin staff?
It's not just, it's not "Christian" and it shouldn't be legal unless a state is FLUSH with money and can give away those kind of perks.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 07:00 PM (XW2az)
Nobody is losing collective bargaining in Wisconsin. People just aren't getting the bargain they want.
^THIS
Public-sector employees are free to seek employment elsewhere if they don't like their employers' wage and benefit packages.
and ^THIS
I think the union (corporate, not the actual employees) are mostly scared of being voted out at the end of a year.
Posted by: Stillwater at February 20, 2011 07:00 PM (0GpN4)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 07:01 PM (zrqN0)
What? I do declare that's what the unions are saying to taxpayers.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 20, 2011 07:02 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: SDN at February 20, 2011 07:02 PM (UN7r3)
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 07:03 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 07:03 PM (zrqN0)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 10:28 PM (zrqN0)
Where's the freedom for the employee that doesn't want to be in a union, but has no choice if they take a job with a company that is union controlled?
Unions aren't about fucking freedom. They are about control. Control of the minion's money to influence government and politicians, and to line the union boss's pockets.
Don't give me that shit about freedom. That's nothing but a leftist meme to gain control.
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 07:03 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: Honey Badger at February 20, 2011 07:03 PM (tl/+H)
I'm sure that's true, but the main argument against Unions seems to be "I got mine, if you aren't so lucky then forget you." I simply disagree with that.
Try again.It's "I don't have mine in this shitty economy and I don't think you should be robbing me of what little I do have to provide you with a better life than I can afford myself."
You've spent too much time absorbing the left's propaganda that everyone is rich besides the unions and other protected groups.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 07:03 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: Stillwater at February 20, 2011 07:05 PM (0GpN4)
Can't wait for an answer on this one....
Posted by: Portnoy at February 20, 2011 07:07 PM (azgo2)
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 07:08 PM (AkdC5)
Union members are simply the individual units that get the money that gets creamed off to the union and the politicians it seeks to buy. The real beneficiaries to all this are politicians and union leadership. The union proles only get buttered enough for the lamprey eelite (see what I did there?) to feed on.
Posted by: nickless at February 20, 2011 07:09 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Portnoy at February 20, 2011 11:07 PM (azgo2)
Not holding my breath.
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 07:09 PM (AkdC5)
Wait. I know. You're free not to work for that unionized company. Freedom is in the eye of the beholder.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 20, 2011 07:09 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 07:09 PM (zrqN0)
Posted by: Stillwater at February 20, 2011 07:10 PM (0GpN4)
The bill allows them to collectively bargain for wages.
Double their contributions to pension and health care? What is the going rate now? What would doubling it consist of ? How long would they agree to that and not simply strike again, or call in sick, or use whatever other intimidation and thuggery they enjoy tomorrow?
SEIU has taken to storming people's private residences. Is that next?
The goal is to overwhelm the system so that it can no longer function and provoke a crisis. They are well on their way to doing so.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 07:11 PM (XW2az)
I'm still waiting for the admission that folks in right-to-work states don't have to crap in a shoebox.
Posted by: nickless at February 20, 2011 07:11 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 07:11 PM (zrqN0)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 07:14 PM (zrqN0)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at February 20, 2011 07:14 PM (cq+pQ)
So why the need for doctor's notes?
Posted by: nickless at February 20, 2011 07:15 PM (MMC8r)
Union members are simply the individual units that get the money that gets creamed off to the union and the politicians it seeks to buy.
Yes. My point is actually that in WI, the real issue is not being discussed--the union leadership is not liking the possibility that they face potential decertification once a year, coupled with employees actually having to send in checks (vs. payroll deduction) for their dues. They'll have to 'part with the money in person' and that'll make them think, and then they'll get to vote in private without having to (horrors, maybe get seen doing it...) gather signatures for a decert. election.....
Posted by: Stillwater at February 20, 2011 07:15 PM (0GpN4)
"Foreign corporations which are not subject to the franchise tax and which own property in Wisconsin or whose business in Wisconsin is exclusively in foreign or interstate commerce. The tax rate is 7.9%. Income from obligations of the United States government and its instrumentalities isn't included in income under the income tax law."
Why are you talking about foreign corporations?
They asked you who paid corporate income tax? Not who paid foreign corporation taxes. Even so, who pays the taxes? Do you think taxes decrease the profit of the corporations?
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 07:16 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 07:16 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 11:11 PM (zrqN0)
See, that's always the answer, but it's bullshit. A teacher may actually want to be a teacher and give a shit more about her/his students that they do about being in a union. But, in WI, do they have a choice if they want to work in a public school? What if they're working in a company that a union bullies their way into? Does that employee have a choice to opt out, or will their union dues be stolen from them without giving them a choice?
Freedom. Do you know what that means?
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 07:16 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 11:01 PM (zrqN0)
Remember that huge screed I wrote about how leftists will push the same ideals forever, no matter what the real-world consequences are? Because the *IDEAD* matters to them and the *consequences* are just grubby details for other people to deal with.
We can't afford the consequences of your bad ideas anymore.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 07:16 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at February 20, 2011 07:17 PM (cq+pQ)
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 07:18 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: Portnoy at February 20, 2011 07:19 PM (azgo2)
Posted by: Stillwater at February 20, 2011 07:19 PM (0GpN4)
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 07:20 PM (XW2az)
i really don't care to snag my teeth about unions with exception of public unions.
where the users of state items usually demanded by law, also have to support the union and actually help them pay for cronies and misdeeds-corruption and buying politicians and their stifling ideas with my dollar.
Posted by: willow at February 20, 2011 07:21 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 07:22 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 11:09 PM (zrqN0)
I *knew* you would get the answer COMPLETELY wrong. I had *zero* doubt of that. You didn't even understand the question.
I *knew* you'd get it wrong because you live (mentally) on the left/libertarian "fear the corporation" axis of the political spectrum, and certain things are simply outside your comprehension as a result.
From the other things you've said you might even be in the "communitarian" pocket, which is a bit of a weird place.
Oh, what the hell. Honey Badger don't care.
Here's a hint - you named who *collects* the tax, not who *pays* it.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 07:22 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 07:22 PM (zrqN0)
I think in Minnesota, a teacher can choose not to join the union but the are still required to cough up 80% of the dues. There's some freedom for ya.
Posted by: Portnoy at February 20, 2011 07:23 PM (azgo2)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 07:24 PM (zrqN0)
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 07:24 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 07:25 PM (HjPtV)
I was there yesterday. It was as described. My husband and I had to walk through the union crowds to enter and leave the TEA party-Support Walker area. It was pure intimidation. I am union and I support Walker. I can't believe anyone would choose the other side.
Union goons intimidating and shouting down free speech.
Union thug unplugging the speakers to the TEA party event- against free speech. As Andrew Breitbart said, the worse thing we did was be filmed cleaning up after ourselves.
Walker and the Senate Republicans need to vote the dems in contempt and vote. In the mean time they should be voting in all non-fiscal legislation they can, e.g. voter ID, and stupid but important legislation like allowing us to use regular light bulbs and phosphate based dish soap. I like my house bright and clean.
Just start voting and ignore them. The teachers union has asked the teachers to stop abandoning their children and return to work. They know they are losing the PR war.
Posted by: Barbara at February 20, 2011 07:25 PM (zBDIC)
@Dagney, #125 - I'm unable to quit the union, and they take 2-3% of my income forcibly for their PAC. That is the main reason for the union reaction, since this bill will make union dues voluntary and require a yearly election to renew union certification. Us teachers will be able to off-set paying an increased share for our benefits by declining to donate our income to the unions.
And in response to the honorable men who can't fathom restraining themselves if their wives were pushed (or my favorite, a lefty POS put his hands on his wife), I thought I'd share that my husband is over 6'3, 300 lbs, and nicknamed "One Punch" in the Navy since he never had to hit someone twice. It was an extreme show of restraint to make it through the mob and not succumb to their provocation. I wish I'd had the wherewithall to think like CAC, and practiced some good Scout knot-tying. Next time.
I feel very naive, even ignorant, reading these comments and this blog. But I will quickly wise up.
And your daughter, Heather, is a wonderful friend with fabulous political links =)
Posted by: WIse cracker at February 20, 2011 07:26 PM (MYHqA)
Some of the "poorest" people have stereos, 60" television, and cable. Meaningless statistic.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 20, 2011 07:26 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 07:28 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 07:28 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: Barbara at February 20, 2011 07:29 PM (zBDIC)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 07:32 PM (zrqN0)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 11:22 PM (zrqN0)
Yeah, those states are really rich. What's happening in NJ? Is it a rich state or asshole deep in debt? 6th most debt ridden.
How about CA? Rich? Asshole deep in debt? What's Brown thinking about doing there with unions?
NH? 7th most debt ridden state.
DE. 5th
CT. 4th
AK 2nd
MA 1st
Want to try, again?
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 07:33 PM (AkdC5)
The tables are being turned in Wisconsin, through the electoral process, and the unions don't like it. The employers, ie, the voters electing a GOP Governor and Legislature who campaigned on this issue, have decided to take away that threat of striking without being replaced.
If the budget repair bill passes as is in Wisconsin the unions will still be free to request whatever they want, they just won't have the threat of being able to strike without being replaced. They'll have to earn what they want by becoming irreplaceable on their own merits within the employment marketplace.
Posted by: davidt at February 20, 2011 07:35 PM (9Pzy7)
I'm sure that whatever your answer is, its very clever. Please, do share.
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 11:24 PM (zrqN0)
Why? You wouldn't understand it anyway.
I'll bet everyone else here knows the answer to "who pays corporate income tax?"
I'm giggling over the fact that you need someone to tell you, you really can't puzzle it out. I even gave you a hint. Heck, it wasn't a hint, it was a brick.
Dude, you are great, you know, I haven't actually laughed out loud today until now?
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 07:35 PM (bxiXv)
I don't think it should surprise anyone that when a group of people who were bussed in from out of state to disagree with people who had already been there for three days are picked on a little
We all know unions were being BUSED in. Unless you mean kissing?
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 07:35 PM (XW2az)
Again, funny how that works. You don't have a right to not collectively bargain.
Posted by: Portnoy at February 20, 2011 07:36 PM (azgo2)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 07:38 PM (zrqN0)
322-- They prefer to be able to dictate rather than negotiate, through the threat of striking without being replaced.
Ding! Ding! *handing you the 64K and a cigar*
Posted by: Stillwater at February 20, 2011 07:38 PM (0GpN4)
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 07:39 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 07:39 PM (zrqN0)
Oh, here I'm gonna call hypocrite on you, with your Obama/DNC backing and Unions bussing-in "troops" out marching to keep more of the taxpayers hard-earned money versus you accusing ANYONE else of staging an event.
A lot of you here on this board are just as unwelcoming, and I totally expected that.
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 11:32 PM (zrqN0)
Dude, we practically rolled out the red carpet for you, stop whining, it's pathetic.
Just because you're wrong about everything is no reason to get petulant.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 07:39 PM (bxiXv)
Randall, you're losing it. Take my advice and get that fake doctor excuse. Take a few days off.
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 07:40 PM (HjPtV)
I'll meet you halfway, and say that I think there was a case to be made for unions in the WV coal mines in the early 20th century.
I agree that they have been seriously corrupted and I understand that pensions and benefits eat up huge amounts of state budgets.
God bless ya, sweet pea, you're almost there.
But the right to collectively bargain
Got no argument about the right to bargain, though right is not the word I'd choose
for the right to dignity and a living wage are for me inherently American virtues.
Here's the rub for me.......dignity is earned. And you don't get it from your boss.
My parents and grandparents are the most humble, dignified people you'd ever want to meet, despite the lack of both electricity and indoor plumbing most of their lives (and peeing inside was something I did only at school til I was 10) Are you saying you can only be dignified if you have a union job???
Do you have ANY idea of what would happen if everyone in America was making 20 dollars an hour, or whatever amount you consider to be a living wage?? How much money would a newspaper subscription cost of the paper boy was making 20 dollars an hour?? If Wal-Mart had to start paying everyone that much? Or the part time clerk at the McDonald's??
And if you're paying the french fry guy 20 bucks an hour, don't you think the more skilled laborers might think they need a huge raise, so they make just a tad more than the crew at McDonald's, or the bagger at Wal-Mart? Let alone because they won't be able to afford buying anything at either place, given that the prices just sky-rocketed.
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 07:40 PM (BebB7)
Pardon me, I should have been clearer. Those are the states with the highest and lowest personal income.
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 11:38 PM (zrqN0)
And those with the highest income are union controlled and asshole deep in debt. FU. The states that are right to work are not going to bail them out.
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 07:40 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: Stillwater at February 20, 2011 07:41 PM (0GpN4)
We all know unions were being BUSED in. Unless you mean kissing?
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 11:35 PM (XW2az)
Damn, bad spelling is contagious. People on the internet spell so badly it makes me question my own spelling.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 07:41 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 07:41 PM (zrqN0)
Randall , as for the name calling I wouldn't know. But you were hanging out with bused in union goons. it's not exactly like we don't know what seiu and freinds have been up to the last 3 years .
as for teachers, police, firemen, i'm glad they are there, although Their first job is to the public That Pays them ..and whom they represent as a state worker. (not the union)
the union and the demands for more when we cannot give more is the issue here.
Posted by: willow at February 20, 2011 07:42 PM (h+qn8)
NH? 7th most debt ridden state.
DE. 5th
CT. 4th
AK 2nd
MA 1st
And CA is broke because it continued to borrow against the future believing that growth would be endless, which it turned out not to be when the American financial system nearly destroyed the economy by doing roughly the same thing.
Duh.
But the unions should be able to continue to push the state governments into the hole? Can you not connect that the financing of debt in order to pay entitlements union or otherwise has to stop or there will be NO entitlements? You can't raise taxes any higher, it isn't there.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 07:42 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 11:39 PM (zrqN0)
No, I think a fraudulent sick day goes for more than $50 for those folks.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 07:43 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 11:39 PM (zrqN0)
You went there? You really went there? Do you think we all have been living under a rock for the last week?
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 07:43 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: Stillwater at February 20, 2011 07:44 PM (0GpN4)
And it certainly can't have anything to do with funding state employee payrolls and pension funds, can it? Why, Governor Walker would be derelict in his duty if he were to follow California's brilliant public worker employment policies, wouldn't he?
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 07:45 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 07:45 PM (zrqN0)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 11:38 PM (zrqN0)
And why did they do that?
...
You still don't get the corporate tax thing?
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 07:46 PM (bxiXv)
I dunno. Could be more. Is that the daily salary for walking away from their jobs?
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 20, 2011 07:46 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: timwi at February 20, 2011 07:47 PM (Sxt4Z)
Posted by: Stillwater at February 20, 2011 07:47 PM (0GpN4)
Thanks for looking that up, I was gonna check that but I'm lazy.
Maybe I should join a union.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 07:47 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 07:48 PM (zrqN0)
Randall, you actually got something right. They feel more passionately about the union than they do their students. That is what they have shown this week. It's not about the students. It's about thier own damn selves.
Oh, and some of your doctors in that state are real pieces of work, too. Nothing like a little fraud when it comes to keeping that union going.
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 07:48 PM (AkdC5)
And CA is broke because it continued to borrow against the future believing that growth would be endless, which it turned out not to be when the American financial system nearly destroyed the economy by doing roughly the same thing.
I suppose being the largest welfare state in the union, having the one of the largest amount of illegal alien populations in the country, being in the top three of largest amount of unfunded public sector pension debt has nothing to do with CA's problems?
Not to mention being populated by complete idiots who thought their 900 sq ft house in an average-at-best neighborhood was really going to stay valued at 750,000? Or the that regulations have shut down manufacturing jobs, oil production, and hundreds of square miles of what was once the most productive farm land in the world???
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 07:49 PM (BebB7)
Because you know, ripping students out of school is ultimately....
Say it with me, Gang!
FOR THE CHILDREN!!!!1!11!
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 20, 2011 07:49 PM (pGB/L)
All the unions that came to Ed Shultz's little crazy-thon on the mall were bused in and were paid. Why would it be any different there when there was an actual threat?
Oh yeah, passion.
Snort
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 07:51 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 07:52 PM (AkdC5)
This.
The MFM has been having a lot of fun with the new 'school bullies are EVERYWHERE' meme. When in fact, the biggest school bully is the NEA and other local unions. It has been for years. You know it. I know it. They know it. And at the end of the day, the just don't care.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 20, 2011 07:53 PM (pGB/L)
Oh, and some of your doctors in that state are real pieces of work, too.
Turns out that the bill includes University of Wisconsin faculty (and med center/school). Surprise surprise surprise.
That may be what we have here. For a troll.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 07:53 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 07:54 PM (zrqN0)
Randall was edumicated by those lovely union teachers, weren't he? You know, the ones that can't spell negotiation?
Well, he can't spell "bussed" (bused). But that is a common error.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 07:54 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: willow at February 20, 2011 07:54 PM (h+qn8)
I don't think you'll get an argument there.
What we are saying is that organized labor is bad for business, breeds the kind of belief system that makes decent people somehow come to think it's okay to screw everyone else as long as they get theirs, festers huge entitlement mentalities, and suppresses critical thinking skills, as well as the ability to do basic math.
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 07:55 PM (BebB7)
Some where in an earlier post some one said 'Union Lawyer'...I'm going with that. What ever it is...there's a financial stake it it.
Posted by: Portnoy at February 20, 2011 07:55 PM (azgo2)
Turns out that the bill includes University of Wisconsin faculty (and med center/school). Surprise surprise surprise.
That may be what we have here. For a troll.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 11:53 PM (XW2az)
I just happened to send a little video evidence along with the names & pics of those teachers to the dean at UW. And, to the head of the family practice where they practice. Then, I sent the same to the medical board.
Probably won't do any good, but if that's the kind of professors/doctors that teach at UW what kind of doctors are they producing? And who the hell wants to go to that family practice where the doctors have no problem committing fraud?
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 07:57 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 07:57 PM (zrqN0)
Meanwhile, 14 Democrat state senators are on the lam outside the Wisconsin state lines because the passionate people of Wisconsin elected Walker to the governorship and, at the same time, sent so many Republicans to the legislature that the GOP took control of both the state house and senate chambers. Your side lost and you can't deal with it.
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 07:58 PM (HjPtV)
Not sure I agree.....I choose to believe that Randall is one of us, and just doesn't know it yet. These things take time. He's a far better breed of visitor than we normally get here.
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 07:58 PM (BebB7)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 11:54 PM (zrqN0)
So, why are they so frightened of having to do that once a year?
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 07:59 PM (AkdC5)
ok, one more...
some one said 'Union Lawyer'
I would've guessed someone a bit lower: shop steward or someone with basic 'organizing' training, like a recruiter. Full of the refined versions of their slogans.
Posted by: Stillwater at February 20, 2011 07:59 PM (0GpN4)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 11:57 PM (zrqN0)
Yep, all of them just happened to have the same red shirts, and professional signage. Yep. Did those teachers have them all waiting in a closet for just such a time?
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 08:01 PM (AkdC5)
You can say that, but I know you are wrong, because I was actually there. Ed Schultz is a grand-standing blowhard who came to score some points off of this, which makes me mad too. But you might as well stop trying to convince me that any significant number of these people are not legitimate protesters, because I know that's not true, and you are surmising.
Liar.
There were scads of local interviews of the attendees. They didn't even stay for the whole thing. I saw their pre-boxed union provided lunches littered all over the bridges and bike paths leading to the mall. It was a filthy disgusting mess. I watched them get off the buses and walk to the memorial in their matching shirts. I am not surmising and they were anything but legitimate. They are paid, they are tools of their unions and their bosses are only out to get what they can get by corruption, coersion, and the threat of violence.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 08:03 PM (XW2az)
Thanks for waiting! Sure, it seems suspicious that Unions have secret-ballot recertification. Anything "secret" is suspicious. The reason these certification votes are secret is to protect Union workers from pressure, both from Unions and from employers, into voting a certain way. Put another way, its very similar to the secret-ballot system by which we choose all of our elected officials.
No, the secret-ballot itself is not 'suspicious' to me (nice try in twisting that, though!) Why does the union oppose the proposed annual secret balloting?
Posted by: Stillwater at February 20, 2011 08:03 PM (0GpN4)
Posted by: Portnoy at February 21, 2011 12:01 AM (azgo2)
Maybe for you and me, but I bet Randall has a good explanation.
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 08:03 PM (AkdC5)
Bus
Pre-made professional signage (left on the ground)
Boxed lunch (remains left on the ground, river, bridges, memorial etc)
Leaders with bull horns
Name tags (I guess if they got lost)
Predetermined places to congregate
Passion Lol
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 08:06 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 10:48 PM (zrqN0)
Bullshit. With bennies it's over $100K. That's the issue.
Posted by: tcn at February 20, 2011 08:06 PM (DjPot)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 08:07 PM (zrqN0)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 11:57 PM (zrqN0)
You do know we had people from this site there and reporting back to us, didn't you?
Or is that another surprise?
Still no idea about the corporate income tax, huh?
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 08:07 PM (bxiXv)
Better question yet...Why have the Democrats been trying to do away with the secret ballot altogether with that Card Check horse shit???
Posted by: Portnoy at February 20, 2011 08:08 PM (azgo2)
They actually want "card check" because it's EASIER to get people to sign a card (which the union bosses can see) than to vote in secret).
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 08:09 PM (XW2az)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 11:57 PM (zrqN0)
Uh, Randy, darlin'. These folks were bused in from out of town, and many of them congregated at the Alliant Energy Center. And gosh, I know this because, gee, I was there. K? Quit lying to make your points and maybe we will tolerate you a bit better.
Posted by: tcn at February 20, 2011 08:10 PM (DjPot)
Once again, I am against corruption, greed and a class-based society. I am not against Unions, and I am not against conservatives or corporations.
But you went to the Special Ed Shultz rally? He loves conservatives too, right? That's a long trip from Wisconsin for someone who doesn't hate conservatives.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 08:11 PM (XW2az)
So you support the legislation's requirement for the annual majority-vote re-certificatione that gives more power to the union's membership (and lessens the power of the union bosses), and the legislation's requirement that mandatory union dues deductions be eliminated? Because more power and money to the people (membership) and less power for the bosses seems to be your constant trope.
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 08:15 PM (HjPtV)
Gov Walker holds all the cards. He can't lose, and he knows it.
No amount of hysterics by those opposed to him will change the reality of the situation, namely that the Dems are outnumbered in the WI Legislature by the duly elected GOP.
The longer those AWOL Dems put off their inevitable defeat on this issue by refusing to return to their paid constitutional duties and face that reality the more devastating that defeat will be.
Posted by: davidt at February 20, 2011 08:16 PM (9Pzy7)
But you can't tell me that free-market economics doesn't encourage the exact same, "I got mine, screw you" mindset.
Holy shit, how many times do we have to explain to you that it's the unions who are "I got mine, screw you" mindset. The people want some equity. Stop asking people to pay for benefits that they don't have themselves.
Stop with the evil rich meme too. That won't convince a single person here.
Just who do you think composes the free market? The little monopoly guy? Most of the things you site are codified into law. The unions are out now just for money and power.
Posted by: dagny at February 20, 2011 08:16 PM (XW2az)
Let me tell you a little sumpin, sumpin 'bout conservatives, sparky. We actually give more to charity to help the poor than your lefty buddies. We actually care more about that personal responsibility thing because it helps to build people up and get them away from that victim mentality that lefties label them with.
In short, conservatives actually care more about the individual.
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 08:17 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 08:19 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 08:20 PM (HjPtV)
If you meant me and my last point about math, what I mean is, they can't figure out that the pensions and wages they have been used to are not sustainable any more. And the answer is always to raise taxes, and my argument is that we already pay their salaries, and have been paying their benefits for years, and that it is no longer feasible.
I am against corruption, greed and a class-based society
I think a certain amount of greed, corruption and class is an inherent part of being human, and I am happy to take the bad that comes with the overwhelmingly good of being free of a nanny-state government, that, however well-intentioned it is, eventually destroys individual freedom and crumbles under its own bloat.
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 08:20 PM (BebB7)
Posted by: Randall at February 21, 2011 12:07 AM (zrqN0)
Businesses don't have a conscience but governments and unions do.
History is looking at you like you just walked into the room with two heads and a pet monkey with three heads.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 08:21 PM (bxiXv)
In addition, the Madison Police, who are exempt from the measures of this "budget repair bill" would (in this official statement: http://www.cityofmadison.com/news/view.cfm?news_id=2512) disagree with the contention that "I saw middle class, working class people who looked liked my sister, my mother, my son or daughter, my neighbors... being taunted and intimidated by a mob hoping to provoke mayhem or violence."
Or are the police also part of this insidious conspiracy?
Posted by: WIFactCheck at February 20, 2011 08:22 PM (Jh4pk)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 08:28 PM (zrqN0)
What I have seen on video proves that doctors on the unions' side were passing out notes, that some young man vandalized the speakers at the Tea Party event, that thousands of teachers who should have been at work were protesting instead, and that 14 Democratic legislators are cowards in great dereliction of their duty.
Randall, goodnight. Thanks for keeping it decent. I hold out great hopes on your coming over to the dark side....
Posted by: MissTammy at February 20, 2011 08:30 PM (BebB7)
Randall, you say you live in WI, and know what is actually going on there. Well, maybe you should become better informed, and quit listening to the lies. Walker did not threaten to call out the National Guard on the protesters. He spoke to the National Guard about the possibility that they may be needed to guard prisoners if the guards walked out in protest about the bill.
It's kind of a shame that someone halfway across the US knows more about what's going on in your state than you do.
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 08:32 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: pighunter47 at February 20, 2011 08:33 PM (V8n45)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 08:34 PM (zrqN0)
Bullshit.
The debate over legislation belongs between the legislators, not between the Governor and the mob, and the Dem legislators fled the debate leaving the mob to take stage.
Posted by: Honey Badgerette at February 20, 2011 08:38 PM (9Pzy7)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at February 20, 2011 08:38 PM (cq+pQ)
And the Soviet Union was a worker's paradise.
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 08:39 PM (HjPtV)
Christ hated organized labor. Read the parable of the laborer. Be grateful you can get a job. If the man has to pay more than your worth he goes broke. Then who is gonna pay that wage. Unions didnt secure the rights to better wages. Good laws did.
Posted by: pighunter47 at February 20, 2011 08:39 PM (V8n45)
Posted by: timwi at February 20, 2011 08:41 PM (Sxt4Z)
What the Hell have we been doing for the last week, cooking asparagus?
Oh, and who shut down the political discussion in Wisconsin by walking out on their jobs again?
Walker has invited outrage by publicly threatening to sic the National Guard on peaceful protesters, and I find it difficult to believe that this isn't intended in large part to weaken organized labor in the place where it was basically born.
Maybe because they have too much political influence, far more than any other group including taxpayers, given the fact that we can't stop them from constantly taking more and more and more from us without changing the law. And they use that power to enrich themselves at our expense, which, you know, makes us kind of mad.
He's doing this because the Right eats that macho mandate shit up, and I am sure its been a lot of fun to ridicule my fellow citizens for standing up in what they believe.
Ah, more hypocritical insults form "Mr. Polite." Yeah, the Left never mandates anything, or ridicules people. Yeah, you've got nothing against conservatives, all right.
Trying to make someone angry so that they say something ridiculous is the oldest lawyer trick in the book,
We didn't have to do anything to get you to say something ridiculous.
and I appreciate those on this board who have tried to have a respectful debate, and I encourage you to continue because I am listening and it is enlightening.
Oh, how I wish that were true.
We who disagree with you are not all crazy socialist maniacs, and its clear some of you are at least polite. I appreciate that.
Politesse has its place, but unfortunately the philosophical conflict we find ourselves in is approaching existential, so, you know, we have to do things you might not like. Sucks.
By the way, I don't think you're a maniac, but you've got some epic blinders on and I'm just not sure, despite all the words exchanged, you're really prepared to be part of a conversation. The whole assertions-contrary-to-fact thing is tiresome, as well as the staggering half-knowledge of economics and law, which requires constant correction, which is not even examined not to mention accepted.
Oh, and polite people don't imbue their opponents with motives falsely and then whine about people being impolite. Nothing is more aggravating that passive-aggressive victim-mongering.
You essentially opened your message here by calling the others here who had reported their experiences liars, which is a pretty piss-poor start for someone who claims to value politeness. You know, that old hypocrisy thing.
"Be excellent to each other, and party on dude."
We now understand you much better.
I'm out.
That's been clear for some time.
Posted by: Randall at February 21, 2011 12:28 AM (zrqN0)
Honey Badger waves.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 08:43 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 08:43 PM (zrqN0)
Get selfemployed. Stop being anyones stooge. When you give your name to someone then you give away your right to think freely. What you see is the result. When the BIG BOSS demands you have to put your honor out to be trampled.Always some brainless pig who hates Honey Badgers
Posted by: pighunter47 at February 20, 2011 08:44 PM (V8n45)
Randall, while the unions may have been thought necessary a long time ago, their time has come and is soon to be gone. There are enough state and federal regulations, now, that workers have all the protection they need from unfair practices by employers.
When unions are doing more harm than good, and bankrupting states it's time for them to go unless on a voluntary basis only.
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 08:46 PM (AkdC5)
When all you`all are freezing and hungry, Please dont move south!
Posted by: pighunter47 at February 20, 2011 08:47 PM (V8n45)
Huh? It's not "passing" because 14 Runnin' Dem state senators are hiding out in neighboring states while they collect taxpayer-funded paychecks.
Posted by: mrp at February 20, 2011 08:48 PM (HjPtV)
"Actually he asked the National Guard to be on call in case of "labor unrest."
Which is it, Randall?
Posted by: Honey Badgerette at February 20, 2011 08:51 PM (9Pzy7)
Posted by: Randall at February 21, 2011 12:43 AM (zrqN0)
Sorry, I don't read Drudge. And, Democratic legislatures in your own state said that Walker said he was going to do this the entire time he was campaigning, but they didn't want to believe it. The voters in your state put him in office because he said he was going to do this. Sorry, your dem buddies didn't believe him, but maybe they're just used to their own lying about everything.
And, you're still wrong about the National Guard. He never said he was going to use them against the protesters. It was for use if the guards walked out in protest. That was the labor unrest he was talking about.
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 08:53 PM (AkdC5)
I`d just be a really pissed off Badger if the teachers in my school thought thier shyt was more important than my kids education. Want unions?Stop public education and contract it out to private companies and base contract payments on educational performance. Competition always makes for better results.
Parents ought to go up there and beat the damn teachers and put them back to teaching. Guess you people dont give shit about your kids.HUH?
Posted by: pighunter47 at February 20, 2011 08:55 PM (V8n45)
TNT was invented for construction. Whole lotta dead bodies followed.
<em>Money has not conscience. </em>
Neither does tupperware. A *person* has a conscience, and *people* run companies, unions, and governments. Your assertion that one is morally better than the other is *highly* offensive, especially when your assertion is based on coercive power of law that the other lacks.
<em>The point of a Union is to insure that people who do not individually have the means to demand justice in the workplace have a means to do so. </em>
Public employees have civil service laws, we've been over this like five times. Also that Unions do not achieve what you purport they achieve but something distinctly different.
<em>They are not perfect, but they are necessary. </em>
They were one method to achieve a goal, I think they have turned out to be a bad method.
<em>I do not believe that corporations, out of the goodness of their hearts, would ever provide fair conditions for their workers. </em>
Because, unlike unions and governments, corporations are run by evil demons instead of humans. And therefore it's not in their interest to ensure that productive employees are retained, but rather that they are driven away through poor working conditions to be replaced by people with low self-esteem.
<em>If you want to claim that modern private industry is capable of this, I would argue that Union victories like the weekend, the paid holiday, and the eight hour day, are the reason. They would not have done that on their own. </em>
The funny thing is, I just let myself get sidetracked by this. My bad. You have no argument, because I'm not talking about banning unions, I'm talking about stopping PUBLIC SECTOR unions from ass-raping the public through outrageous influence , pensions, and benefits that no one else (you know, the people paying for all of this) can afford.
<em>People get extremely rich because all they want in the world is to be extremely rich. Its not hard to get very wealthy if you don't give a shit about anything else.</em>
It's also not hard to get very powerful if you don't give a shit about anything else, and Union leaders have become both powerful and rich by monopolizing public service. So powerful and rich that they can get away with enormous transfers of wealth from taxpayers to themselves.
It Will Stop, one way or the other.
<em>History has shown this to be true, if you bother to take a look at all of it. </em>
Seriously, you're killing me now. You can't even get the present straight. Don't stress yourself.
<em>And my pet monkey has four heads, and is a proud member of Local Deformed Circus Animals 410.
Posted by: Randall at February 21, 2011 12:34 AM (zrqN0)</em>
You never did figure out who pays corporate income tax, did you?
I find your claims of being a business owner suspicious, the answer should have been the first thing you thought of.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 08:57 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: starboardhelm at February 20, 2011 08:58 PM (ctMcG)
Posted by: Randall at February 21, 2011 12:43 AM (zrqN0)
I'll bet a day without telling other people what they *really* mean without consulting them must be like a day without sunshine.
I mean, you opened on that theme, and now you close on it.
Symmetry.
...
Honey Badgers are symmetrical, BTW. Not that they care.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 09:00 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 09:02 PM (bxiXv)
That almost sounds like you believe that all poor people are unhappy about being poor and that they need someone to stick-up for them.
I'd rather be a bit lazy and a tad stupid, sometimes a whole lot immoral plus be 100% happy with my have-not lot in life, than be bitter and envious and in need of someone to champion their cause for me.
Posted by: Carolyn at February 20, 2011 09:02 PM (NYjsM)
You discuss unions in a purely theoretical and historical context. That they protect the working man and prevent child labor. Here is my experience with a public sector union. I actually was a member of one for a while. It isn't a theoretical concept to them. It isn't about child labor or paid holidays. It really isn't all that much about working conditions, really, because even the union bosses know that there is very little left to negotiate on that front, regulations have pre-empted any legitimate concern requiring negotiation. The negotiations that I witnessed were really all about two things: (1) money and (2) power. That's really it. Money - wages and benefits. About 90% of all negotiations centered on pay scales and insurance benefits. Power - the ability to extract information from management, the ability to extract dues money from unwilling nonmember objectors, and the ability to lobby the state legislature to put the "correct" people in charge of negotiations for management (this was a public sector union, after all). So please quit it with your theoretical nonsense about unions. That really is only relevant in textbooks anymore. The practical, on-the-ground reality about public sector unions is that they exist mainly to extract money from the taxpayers and to accumulate more power unto themselves so as to make them untouchable.
Posted by: chemjeff at February 20, 2011 09:05 PM (GaLxs)
Posted by: Randall at February 20, 2011 09:17 PM (zrqN0)
Oh that's BULL FUCKING SHIT and you know it. The Dem Senators walked off the job because that was the only power they had to stop Walker from actually reforming the corrupt Democrat-Union complex. Once the complex is destroyed, it destroys a major source of cash for Democrats. It had nothing to do with timing over the bill's introduction.
Posted by: chemjeff at February 20, 2011 09:33 PM (GaLxs)
How will anyone know the difference? Isn't the graduation rate like 46% in Milwaukee?
Posted by: ExExZonie at February 20, 2011 09:35 PM (DRR4t)
Wow, you really do live on a different planet than I do.
What are the gas prices like there?
Of course they do, but I am not THE LEFT. I have not insulted anyone. I do have nothing against conservatives. I just don't like assholes.
You opened by calling posters here liars. That's an insult where I come from.
Also, for someone who's not on the left, you seem to hold every single mistaken perception of the "right" that the left does.
Very clever. You must be proud of being so clever.
You wouldn't know, you don't even know who pays corporate income tax.
It is, stop flattering yourself that I am from some secret group that's trying to infiltrate you. Just genuinely curious what you have to say.
You didn't understand that either? Sad. I meant you weren't listening because you just keep repeating the same assertions over and over. You're not really participating in a discussion, just making statements which vary slightly.
This is not a new philosophical conflict, its been existential from the get go. There are very fundamental differences in how people in this country perceive the world, one that I don't believe we can ever overcome, nor should we. But if you can't express yourself or do what you need to do without being a dick about it, that's a shame.
You started out by calling people here liars, don't dare call me a dick, you hypocrite.
Somebody say something about passive-aggressive insults? I assert what you disagree with, therefore I assert without fact. I would love to see a serious, fact-based argument that Unions have not improved the conditions for working people since they were implemented, and that incorporated wealth, left unchecked, does not exploit the powerless. Show me that.
We're talking about public sector unions abusing power. You keep trying to go elsewhere. And also, you opened here calling people here liars, you don't get to accuse others of being insulting after that.
I read the motives of others as best I can, and so do you. Neither one of us can truly know what motivates the other, we can only make the best judgement based on what that person presents to us. You think I am wrong, I think you are wrong.
When people tell you you're wrong about them, you keep insisting that you're right about what THEY believe, without evidence. And then you call them dicks. You're kind of a downer.
Close. I didn't call her a liar. I merely said that as someone who has been at these protests for several days I did not see anything close to what this woman is describing. I also suggested that occasionally, in a crowd of 70,000 people, shoving occurs. You get shoved at football games and rock concerts, too. I am sorry she had a negative experience, but if you can't take the heat then stay at the Polar Plunge.
You repeatedly stated that people here weren't there, which was wrong. You made positive assertions about no reports of violence or arrests, which is wrong. You mischaracterized Heather's friends' description of events, even in this statement, and then after denying that it happened you make excuses for it, along with another implied insult.
You really *think* you have class, but you don't. You don't need to use profanity to be a jerk, but it's more honest.
You understand nothing about me. You don't know me, you know only what I posted on the internet in a four hour span. You've been conditioned to believe certain things are true about anyone who disagrees with you, which is apparent in your arrogant confidence. You also apparently don't have a sense of humor, which is disappointing.
Wow, your true colors are finally showing. I knew if we played with you long enough they would. You apparently don't know how starkly self-referential that paragraph appears to be.
You continue to declare with absolute certainty what the world *is* and who everyone in it *is* without any direct knowledge, and you go so far as to accuse others of it as well.
The funny thing is, while this paragraph is nonsense, your prior assertion that people guess about each other is quite true. I only know of you what you've done here in the last few hours, and it's nice to see that the ugly undercurrent I was suspecting has risen to the surface.
I also think it's hilarious that someone who quotes a simplistic crappy escapist teenage angst comedy as a joke doesn't get it at all when someone jokes back on that reference, and then accuses the person who joked back of not having a sense of humor. Kind of sad, but humorous as well.
Weak, dude. I'm sure you can do better than that.
Honey Badger don't care.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 09:39 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: mrp at February 21, 2011 01:32 AM (HjPtV)
Oh, please, That's, what, the third time he said goodbye? Do you really think he's gone?
Only the Shadow knows!
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 09:40 PM (bxiXv)
Randall, Randall, Randall...what don't you get about what happened in your state? Your governor campaigned on doing just what he is doing. He has, for the entirety of his political life, even in local governemnt, espoused those beliefs.
The Dems in your state were not really surprised about what he is doing. They just don't want him to do it, so they are having hissy fits like petulant children. The union bosses, being the thugs that they are, thought they could bully him into not doing it.
Guess what? To paraphrase the president...Walker won.
Posted by: Steph at February 20, 2011 10:01 PM (AkdC5)
First of all, there is a current year deficit when tax breaks aren't even in effect, so these future "costs" have no impact on the immediate crisis.
Second, most of the "cuts" are actually incentives to create jobs or to relocate companies to WI. So no company gets a "cut" without adding to the economy - static analysis again misleads the gullible.
The rest of the cuts are the repeal of the personal income tax on Health Savings Account contributions, bringing WI in line with federal law and most other states in a sane health care reform.
A good rule of thumb is that leftists are ALWAYS lying.
Posted by: Adjoran at February 20, 2011 10:10 PM (VfmLu)
Posted by: Adjoran at February 21, 2011 02:10 AM (VfmLu)
Come on, Adjoran, Randall is *not* a leftist. He said so.
He just, you know, believes about them and us what the left says. Unions good, corporations and the all-powerful right-wing think tanks (like Media Matters... oops, sorry) bad.
So, remember, *not* a leftist.
In name.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 20, 2011 10:26 PM (bxiXv)
Your daughter experienced the same type of thing I did. Whether it was Gathering of Eagles in support of the troops in 2007, or my first tea party in February 2009, the feelings she describes when coming up against the bias in the media or the opponents of something includes some not so nice behaviors.
For the friends I have who are liberal, they have no clue that as "proud Liberals" these hateful people are the ones in the streets getting the recognition and the ones conducting peaceful rallies or free speech are the ones constantly getting the bad rap. They have no clue on issues and if they would believe my first hand accounts, should feel some shame. Sadly, I am vilified as well. Just another example of the head-in -the-sand mentality and that I, one so passionate about this country, the Republic, couldn't possibly be telling the truth.
My son and husband went to the second Tax day tea party in Chicago and were an arms length away from the CNN reporter Susan Roesgen who went apeshit on a Dad and his child and how he should be grateful that Obama gave TARP money to IL! Our backs are against the wall. It's going to get bigger and bigger. Get ready.
Posted by: DefendUSA at February 21, 2011 03:18 AM (yIwYC)
You are fighting against evil, and evil can't be beaten - it can only be beaten back.
Light prevails over darkness - if you choose to be the light you prevail - but darkness is always there because darkness is the absence of light. It is a constant fight to hold back darkness; we never get to rest on our laurels - the darkness is always there. That is the price that you have to pay if you choose to be good.
If you expect there to be some Victory Over Darkness day with parades and such you are sadly mistaken, and you are fighting in the wrong war. If you let your light fade you have joined the darkness.
What makes our task even more difficult is that in the modern world darkness masquerades as light, and light is cursed as darkness.
If you work for good and someone opposes you - they are not working for good. People will tell you that these are differences in opinion - mostly they lie. It takes experience; but you can tell the difference between differences in opinion and evil; however, you have to look to see them.
The shock is not how many people have sold their souls - and that is a huge number - but rather how cheaply they have sold them. At least Obama got to be president; the average person sells his soul for a bottle of whiskey.
Posted by: An Observation at February 21, 2011 05:44 AM (ylhEn)
Randall is typical of so many on the left. His self esteem is dependent on his need to be "right"; or make that "correct". He'll never be "right" because he can't think for himself. If he hears something that does not jive with his preconceived leftist notions he says "liar, not true!" To actually think might make his head explode.
And Mr. HoneyBadger don't care.
Posted by: Mrs.HoneyBadger at February 21, 2011 07:56 AM (FjF3P)
Posted by: Jerry at February 21, 2011 08:33 AM (4SKYj)
1. Okay I'm Posting Knowing Not Many Will See This. But I just had to put my 2 cents in.
2. Randall is not a leftist, he's the definition of independent squishes. My gf's sister dates one and he looks down on anybody who doesn't buy the whole evil people bringing the poor down while they claim to be all about responsibility and american virtues; thus how Palin who is really not much different from a typical conservative Republican, who's disagreed w/ Jim Demint at times even has been seen as some right wing radical by these folks
3. I'm REALLY dissapointed how many of you drop the ball w/ this clown, you allowed your anger at his bs to overshadow the facts, stats, and history that makes conservatism win in every debate it's used in. Some of you did engage him and even destroyed pratically every argument he used and he's ignoring of who pays the tax was speaking volumes.
4. Randall is why I have decided to stop claiming American Exceptolism bs talk; sorry but the fact is a bunch of people who claim to be concerned and want to be more responsible also want their piece of the gumbit crack pie. They hang on to ideas and damn be consequences; he showed this in every post hypocritically claiming he was being painted as something we were raught to see him as whole he did the same. He basically started churning out fake numbers and weird stats that were taken down as soon as they were posted; and he ignored most that he was replied to. He only left room to keep talking about the great "idea" of the unions, not the consequences.
Posted by: YRM (Just Read Through All 438 Comments) at February 21, 2011 01:48 PM (UzBwz)
Posted by: Sailor Suits at April 03, 2011 10:27 PM (iONAR)
Posted by: webdesigner at June 28, 2011 09:29 PM (UxPRW)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2501 seconds, 568 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: eman: United People's Front of Wisconsin at February 20, 2011 03:47 PM (VmVG3)