March 26, 2011
— rdbrewer

Half a million greedy pigs hit the streets protesting budget cuts.
Between 400,000 and 500,000 teachers, nurses, firefighters, council and NHS workers, other public sector employees, students, pensioners and campaign groups from across the UK marched through central London to a rally where union officials and Labour leader Ed Miliband condemned the "brutal" cuts in jobs and services.
From The Daily Mail:
- Hooded anarchists throw paint and set off flares on Oxford Street
- Police targeted with missiles and light bulbs filled with ammonia
- Windows at The Ritz smashed as masked youths run wild
- Anti-capitalist smash banks and cash points in city centre rampage
- Five police officers injured in clashes, one seriously
- Labour leader Ed Miliband likens protest to anti-apartheid movement
Anarchists today broke away from one of the largest protests Britain has ever seen to bring chaos to the streets of London.The Ritz hotel and Fortnum & Mason were among the buildings targeted in the capital after groups of rampaging youths intent on spreading havoc left the mass anti-cuts demonstration.
Around 500,000 activists and campaigners descended on London this morning to protest at the Government's drastic cuts programme.

Pathetic.
Added: The press seems to be going out of its way to shield the rhetorical value of the protest from the effects of violence. They're calling it peaceful and saying the violence is being perpetrated by "anarchists" who have broken away. Commenter "iknowtheleft" quips:
Anarchists are protesting government spending cuts? Anarchists?LOL.
Posted by: rdbrewer at
10:53 AM
| Comments (308)
Post contains 247 words, total size 2 kb.
Because first they say it, then they do it.
Posted by: brian at March 26, 2011 10:56 AM (y05cf)
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at March 26, 2011 10:58 AM (QBQcg)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at March 26, 2011 10:58 AM (RVdHS)
Posted by: moron at March 26, 2011 10:59 AM (NKSOm)
Posted by: rdbrewer at March 26, 2011 10:59 AM (RVBxX)
Posted by: YRM (Anyone Ever Wonder What Y-R-M Stand For?) at March 26, 2011 11:01 AM (4VSAo)
Posted by: rdbrewer at March 26, 2011 11:01 AM (RVBxX)
Wait 'em out but don't quit. Now that you've started to take Vienna, take Vienna.
Posted by: Kortezzi at March 26, 2011 11:01 AM (/YozM)
Posted by: Jones at March 26, 2011 11:02 AM (cUNcx)
Posted by: Waterhouse at March 26, 2011 11:02 AM (D9etI)
It was a peaceful protest. Except for those anarchists that showed up. But the protesters were peaceful.
So by that logic, when there is a polite Tea Party protest and some racists show up...
Posted by: Mama AJ at March 26, 2011 11:03 AM (XdlcF)
We and the Brits need to make it illegal to conceal your face.
This would also have a beneficial effect vis a vis the Muslims. There is no reason why anyone needs to conceal his face. No legal reason, anyway.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at March 26, 2011 11:03 AM (yLJzo)
Was doing a little online window shopping and looking and ran across this, it sort of brought a tear to my eye since I was really feeling that people were forgetting about Japan.
"The IKEA world is deeply concerned about the situation in Japan with regard to its co-workers there, as well as the country at large. To date, IKEA Japan has offered its co-workers in the Kanto area around Tokyo (and their immediate family) the option to temporarily and voluntarily relocate to Kansai, as well as other regions. IKEA will cover all costs.
IKEA is also temporarily relocating all co-workers who have been transferred to Japan by IKEA to Hong Kong, where they will continue to work for IKEA"
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 11:04 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: izoneguy at March 26, 2011 11:04 AM (83mM1)
Posted by: Kortezzi at March 26, 2011 11:04 AM (/YozM)
It was a peaceful protest. Except for those anarchists that showed up. But the protesters were peaceful.
Every event is peaceful except for the violent parts.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at March 26, 2011 11:05 AM (yLJzo)
Lesson being lefty protesters are moronic scum no matter what country you're in.
Posted by: brak at March 26, 2011 11:06 AM (nIoiW)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 03:04 PM (k1rwm)
yeah i'm suprised there's not a thread on it, the first female VP nominee dying is a pretty big deal no? she was a hyper partisan but always willing to give some credence to the other side's argument, I thought she was in trouble when she appeared on FOX on election night sounding incoherent about how 63 lost seats means nothing
Posted by: YRM (Anyone Ever Wonder What Y-R-M Stand For?) at March 26, 2011 11:07 AM (4VSAo)
I was thinking more of The Ramones:
Beat on the brat,
Beat on the brat,
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 26, 2011 11:08 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Barry O at March 26, 2011 11:08 AM (OXBrh)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 11:09 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Dr Spank at March 26, 2011 11:09 AM (4ZxEW)
Protesters gather in Hyde Park after march through central London sees small number of activists attack shops and clash with police
Violence/destruction? We didn't see any.
Posted by: momma at March 26, 2011 11:10 AM (penCf)
I always liked her. She really loved this country and Americans. And she wasn't a crazy dem, she was reasonable and knowledgeable.
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 11:11 AM (k1rwm)
Beat on the brat,
Beat on the brat,
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 26, 2011 03:08 PM (LH6ir)
Damn, that was exactly what I was thinking.
Posted by: momma at March 26, 2011 11:11 AM (penCf)
Posted by: Barney Frank at March 26, 2011 11:11 AM (tvs2p)
Posted by: Dr Spank at March 26, 2011 03:09 PM (4ZxEW)
but they're not anarchists, they are demanding that there be no budget cuts because damn be the country being broke, I want my gumbit crack
anarchist would support not even being on the budget or having anyone else being on the budget, or anyone doing a budget in the 1st place
Posted by: YRM (Anyone Ever Wonder What Y-R-M Stand For?) at March 26, 2011 11:12 AM (4VSAo)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 26, 2011 11:13 AM (AZGON)
Yeah I'm surprised there's not a thread on it.......Posted by: YRM
There's not much low-hanging fruit on AoS, so to go head-to-head with the liberal brain trust, you must venture forward and spank some fanny. Here's my post on Mediaite to fuck with the liberals.
Ferraro said, “If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color), he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.”
The liberal intelligentsia, blogosphere, pundits, butt boys, and whining mainstream media moonbats went apoplectic after Ferraro made this comment.
So, Ferraro apologized to those who thought it racially insensitive for her to suggest that Obama wouldn’t be the Democratic front-runner if he were not black. But she then declared: ‘It wasn’t a racist comment. It was a statement of fact’.”
Oh Gerry, you truth telling wonder woman! “It wasn’t a racist comment, it was a statement of fact.” As we revisit her statement, liberal heads will explode because their man-child buffoon in the Oval Office has been exposed as the most incompetent boob ever to occupy the office. Thank you Geraldine Ferraro, and may you rest in peace from all the nonsense generated by the likes of Obama, Reid, Pelosi, Streisand, O’Donnell, and a very long list of other socialist/Marxist that are still trying to figure out how to pick up the turd from the clean end?
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at March 26, 2011 11:14 AM (ZHsNw)
Posted by: Damiano at March 26, 2011 11:15 AM (3nrx7)
What we need to do is start beating the living shit out of them, throw them in jail and prosecute them for riot and vandalism. And make them do some hard time on a chain gang.
If they do that this shit will cease.
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2011 11:15 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: catmman at March 26, 2011 11:15 AM (DTzwU)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 26, 2011 11:16 AM (UO6+e)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 11:18 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 26, 2011 11:18 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Idiot in England at March 26, 2011 11:18 AM (RVBxX)
Posted by: AmishDude at March 26, 2011 11:19 AM (BvBKY)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 26, 2011 11:20 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Scott at March 26, 2011 11:20 AM (S3AFi)
Like Madison on steriods, armed with clubs, paintguns, and more.
It would do wonders to turn the vapid independent centrists toward the conservative side, IMHO.
Posted by: High Dollar Moron at March 26, 2011 11:21 AM (4sQwu)
Posted by: DMXRoid at March 26, 2011 11:21 AM (vd872)
But Gerry would have said "I told you so!"
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 11:22 AM (k1rwm)
Coming soon to a city near you!!!
I came here hoping for a DOOM post but figured I wouldn't get one Saturday. This'll fill the void nicely though. Thanks. No other news really matters but the DOOM posts. Everything else is just filler until the inevitable.
Here's my DOOM world scenario relevant to the story above.
As to the zombie apocalypse portion of DOOM WORLD, I expect:
-The breakdown of all the major governments that no longer have the dollars to function. With bankruptcy, they lose the ability and authority to govern as the money has dried up.
-This leads to the rise of the smaller, more regional governments. In here, you'll have your productive groups (small urban areas or cities that actually have industries and make things) and your non-productive groups (areas like Detroit where most people are reliant on the government to take care of them.
-The non-productive areas threaten the productive areas for a while until the productive areas are able to build sufficient defences and cut off remaining goods and services. At this point, non-productive members flee their areas, learn to become productive and self-sufficient or get sent packing.
-The non-productive areas get goods and services cut off, go into riot mode, torch everything, continue to go after the well defended productive people and eventually are eliminated.
It's in steps 3 and 4 that Europe saves itself from the Muslims. Unless all of those Muslim no-go zones contain huge tracts of farmland, angry citizens eventually eliminate the Muslim enclaves one by one, either sending them home or killing them off in self defense. I can live with either and will celebrate like a Palestinian on 9/11.
At least that's how I see things in DOOM World.
Posted by: Canadian Infidel at March 26, 2011 11:22 AM (GKQDR)
Posted by: melvin at March 26, 2011 11:22 AM (3OCZw)
Posted by: Damiano at March 26, 2011 11:23 AM (3nrx7)
This downtown disturbance is just so uncivilized and not in the proud tradition of British society. We must try harder to maintain an equilibrium of peaceful public protest and civility in the great unwashed class.
Posted by: Charles, Prince of Wales & Pussy Boy at March 26, 2011 11:24 AM (ZHsNw)
So by that logic, when there is a polite Tea Party racist protest and some even more racists show up...
Posted by: Mama AJ at March 26, 2011 03:03 PMDid you forget the meme?
Posted by: MBM at March 26, 2011 11:25 AM (2pEj7)
Posted by: DMXRoid at March 26, 2011 11:26 AM (vd872)
I'm still trying to figure out what the hell the expected end result of throwing an ammonia filled light bulb is supposed to be.
How do you get ammonia in the light bulb in the first place?
Posted by: ErikW at March 26, 2011 11:26 AM (DP09E)
Excellent point. Can't be said enough.
Posted by: Johnny at March 26, 2011 11:27 AM (mhmc7)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 11:27 AM (k1rwm)
Yes. Most adults would tend to see it our way.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 26, 2011 11:27 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Damiano at March 26, 2011 03:23 PM (3nrx7)
Dude, if that cameraman tried to stop a mob riot, he'd be beaten to death. I hear what you're saying, but I don't see any Texas Rangers over there.
Posted by: NC Ref at March 26, 2011 11:28 AM (/izg2)
Posted by: Typical Brit at March 26, 2011 11:29 AM (nIoiW)
I love it when a plan comes together.
Posted by: Frances Fox Piven at March 26, 2011 11:29 AM (2pEj7)
Not in England! If you kill an armed intruder in your home the odds are good that you will go to jail for a very long time. Merely protecting property probably gets you the death penalty.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 26, 2011 11:29 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Ace's liver at March 26, 2011 11:29 AM (QgI7g)
Posted by: Wisconsin Democrats at March 26, 2011 11:29 AM (MMC8r)
Young Randy Man?
Better take a good look at that protest...there's our future, but it'll probably be more violent, as it'll be a three way of lefties vs. righties vs. law enforcement/NG...and real splodey things will not be out of the question (hey, say what you will, but I think Americans are the world's best at throwing down when they finally decide to do it...so far they've been pretty sedate, but when the top does blow off look out!).
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2011 11:30 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 11:30 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: CDR M at March 26, 2011 11:30 AM (BuYeH)
yeah that is a perplexing problem isn't it?
Something lost in translation of English to English perhaps.
Posted by: melvin at March 26, 2011 11:30 AM (3OCZw)
Posted by: President Wormburner McMulligan. at March 26, 2011 11:30 AM (DP09E)
The cameraman could have intervened with a strong rendition of Kumbaya and a few Twinkies as a bribe.
Posted by: Don Imus, Asshole of the Day Club at March 26, 2011 11:30 AM (ZHsNw)
If I killed an armed intruder I would bury him in the back yard and not tell anyone. What do you have to lose?
Posted by: Ace's liver at March 26, 2011 11:31 AM (QgI7g)
Posted by: Typical Brit at March 26, 2011 03:29 PM (nIoiW)
This morning one of my friends said "is it just me or does Kate have that "what the heck am I doing marrying into the royal family look on her face". We then discussed that her family has the money, probably more, at this point than his. Then we went on to discuss the godfather scenario where you realize you are marrying the mob and it's too late. Fascinating discussion for a bunch of lib/dems and me....lol
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 11:32 AM (k1rwm)
If I killed an armed intruder I would bury him in the back yard and not tell anyone. What do you have to lose?
Posted by: Ace's liver at March 26, 2011 03:31 PM (QgI7g)
If you killed someone in Detroit, Camden, or Philadelphia, your safe because no one cares and it's one less mouth to feed. You also get the ATTA-BOY award instead of the DUMBSHIT!
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at March 26, 2011 11:33 AM (ZHsNw)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 11:34 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 26, 2011 11:35 AM (EyTr4)
60 Well, either that (which wouldn't be so bad) or the government steps in and enacts the Ukrainian famine on a global scale...have to admit, that would really suck.
Let's hear it for scenario #1!
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2011 11:35 AM (5/yRG)
This.
Posted by: Berserker at March 26, 2011 11:36 AM (gWHrG)
Whiff of grapeshot!
*clap* *clap* *clap clap clap*
Whiff of grapeshot!
*clap* *clap* *clap clap clap*
Whiff of grapeshot!
*clap* *clap* *clap clap clap*
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at March 26, 2011 11:38 AM (xy9wk)
Yes. My .45 ACP is a fine piece of kinetic crowd control equipment, although my Remington 1100 might be a more sensible choice.
And I don't want to hear any crap about 00 buck. It's #4 for me.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 26, 2011 11:39 AM (LH6ir)
No way. The royal family literally owns half of downtown London. Even if you don't count items like the royal jewels (which they couldn't sell, realistically), the Windsors are by far the wealthiest family in Great Britain.
Posted by: Ace's liver at March 26, 2011 11:39 AM (QgI7g)
Hooded antichrists throw paint and set off flares on Oxford Street
Posted by: Beto at March 26, 2011 11:40 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 26, 2011 11:41 AM (EyTr4)
Posted by: Rocks at March 26, 2011 11:42 AM (th0op)
Posted by: Idiot in England at March 26, 2011 11:43 AM (RVBxX)
Would it kill the media to leverage this "drastic" cuts programme to the inevitability of the bonarific bonage that would occur if nothing was done?
This "third way" pipe dream has got to end.
Posted by: Johnny at March 26, 2011 11:43 AM (mhmc7)
Hooded antichrists throw paint and set off flares on Oxford Street
Posted by: Beto at March 26, 2011 03:40 PM (H+LJc)
HA! That's the way I read it at first, too.
Posted by: ErikW at March 26, 2011 11:43 AM (DP09E)
I heard one English reporterette being interviewed on Fox. She said the protesters are "understandably upset" about the "reasonably Liberal" government being "overtaken" by the "quite Conservative" Tories.
The BLM can't help themselves, no matter what country they're in.
Posted by: Truman North at March 26, 2011 11:44 AM (8ay4x)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 26, 2011 11:44 AM (G8NKv)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 26, 2011 11:44 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Z as in Jersey at March 26, 2011 11:44 AM (sXUiz)
@100: "My .45 ACP is a fine piece of kinetic crowd control equipment, although my Remington 1100 might be a more sensible choice."
.45-70 Government is also a solid crowd control device. Nothing gets people's attention like shooting doorknobs at them. Granted, it's basically a howitzer at ranges over about 150 yards, but hey.....
Also agree on the #4 buck. Good stuff.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at March 26, 2011 11:44 AM (xy9wk)
Posted by: George Orwell
Send in the puppets
There have to be puppets
Don't bother, they're here!
(meat puppets, vanguards of the revolution)
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes... at March 26, 2011 11:46 AM (sJTmU)
Anyone who's had to use one knows the difference.
The old man said "Never bigger than B Buck."
He said During The Battle of the Bulge when you shot an enemy with 00Buck it barely broke the skin after passing through all clothing but B Buck was stuck in the jacket....on the opposite side of the wound.
Posted by: Beto at March 26, 2011 11:46 AM (H+LJc)
It's much worse than that. The "drastic cuts" aren't cuts at all, just minor reductions in the growth of social programs. They don't actually constitute "doing something" beyond the symbolic.
Posted by: Ace's liver at March 26, 2011 11:47 AM (QgI7g)
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 26, 2011 11:47 AM (EyTr4)
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2011 11:48 AM (5/yRG)
We would win . lol
Posted by: Berserker at March 26, 2011 11:49 AM (gWHrG)
Posted by: unknown jane
Well, then it's all brownshirts and fascism. Totally different. Shoot to kill.
Posted by: Guardian reporter, MBM! at March 26, 2011 11:49 AM (sJTmU)
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 26, 2011 11:50 AM (EyTr4)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 26, 2011 11:50 AM (UO6+e)
Posted by: 7 Chinese Spammers at March 26, 2011 11:50 AM (xaCZY)
[4] -The non-productive areas get goods and services cut off, go into riot mode, torch everything, continue to go after the well defended productive people and eventually are eliminated.
I'm thinking that we'll see this in Los Angeles and Las Vegas: the state governments failing, the cities losing cash, and a Left-Latino takeover. If you're Asian in these cities, it might be wise to quietly slip away prior to that.
DOOOOOOM
Posted by: Zimriel at March 26, 2011 11:53 AM (pl1+G)
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2011 11:53 AM (McG46)
Posted by: Dr Spank at March 26, 2011 03:09 PM (4ZxEW)
sorry, couldn't help it.
Posted by: A. Weasel at March 26, 2011 11:53 AM (/94MP)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 26, 2011 11:53 AM (G8NKv)
Socialist-Anarchy
That hurts my brain almost as much as "anti-civilization blog".Posted by: Mama AJ at March 26, 2011 11:54 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Papa Editor at March 26, 2011 11:54 AM (YX6i/)
Well, the media's dilemma is whether to call them communists, anti-government, or anarchists.
They can't label them communists because it makes the Left look bad. They can't call them anti-government because that label is reserved for small-govt conservatives/libertarians.
So they lie and call them anarchists.
(Excellent points above, DRoid.)
Posted by: Alternate Universe Soothsayer at March 26, 2011 11:54 AM (uFokq)
* CONFUCIANISM: Confucius say, "Shit happens".
* ZEN: (What is the sound of shit happening?)
* JESUITISM: If shit happens and when nobody is watching, is it really shit?
* ISLAM: Shit happens if it is the will of Allah.
* COMMUNISM: Equal shit happens to all people.
* CATHOLICISM: Shit happens because you are bad.
* PSYCHOANALYSIS: Shit happens because of your toilet training.
* SCIENTOLOGY: Shit happens if you're on our shit list.
* ZOROASTRIANISM: Bad shit happens, and good shit happens.
* UNITARIANISM: Maybe shit happens. Let's have coffee and donuts.
* RIGHT-WING PROTESTANTISM: Let this shit happen to someone else.
* JUDAISM: Why does shit always happen to US?
* REFORM JUDAISM: Got any Kaopectate?
* MYSTICISM: What weird shit!
* AGNOSTICISM: What is this shit?
* ATHEISM: I don't believe this shit!
* NIHILISM: Who needs this shit?
* AZTEC: Cut out this shit!
* QUAKER: Let's not fight over this shit.
* FORTEANISM: No shit??
* 12-STEP: I am powerless to cut the shit.
* VOODOO: Hey, that shit looks just like you!
* NEWAGE: Visualize shit not happening.
* DEISM: Shit just happens.
* EXISTENTIALISM: Shit doesn't happen; shit is.
* SECULAR HUMANISM: Shit evolves.
* CHRISTIAN SCIENCE: Shit is in your mind.
* BUDDHISM: Shit happens, but pay no mind.
* SHINTOISM: Shit is everywhere.
* HINDUISM: This shit has happened before.
* WICCA: Mix this shit together and make it happen!
* HASIDISM: Shit never happens the same way twice.
* THEOSOPHY: You don't know half of the shit that happens.
* DIANETICS: Your mother gave you shit before you were born.
* SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST: No shit on Saturdays.
* JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES: No shit happens until Armageddon.
* MOONIES: Only happy shit really happens.
* HOPI: Corn fertilizer happens.
* BAHA'I: It's all the same shit.
* STOICISM: This shit is good for me.
* OBJECTIVISM: Our shit is good for you.
* EST: If my shit bothers you, that's your fault.
* REAGANISM: Don't move; the shit will trickle down.
* FASCISM: Shit makes the trains run on time.
* CARGO CULT: A barge will come and take all the shit away.
* EMACS: Hold down Control-Meta-Shit.
* DISCORDIANISM: Some funny shit happened to me today.
* RASTAFARIANISM: Let's smoke this shit.
* CHARISMATIC: This is not shit and it doesn't smell bad.
* MASONIC: Shit happens, but we can't discuss it during Lodge.
* RED CROSS: Shit happens - send money.
* EVANGELICAL: Praise God in spite of this shit cause this shit ain't gonna last much longer.
Posted by: stupid stuff at March 26, 2011 11:54 AM (VMcEw)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 26, 2011 11:54 AM (G8NKv)
Z: I bet that 90% of these assholes would stay away from the shit if they felt certain that they were in for a legal beatdown.
The problem comes when the mob is in the hundreds of thousands. There's no soft way to disperse an insurrection.
Posted by: Zimriel at March 26, 2011 11:54 AM (pl1+G)
and then the communes eventually become waring tribes because they will be made up of assholes with a sense of entitlement that won't sit around when the neighboring tribe has 1/2 inch longer loaf of bread.
Posted by: Berserker at March 26, 2011 11:56 AM (gWHrG)
The problem comes when the mob is in the hundreds of thousands. There's no soft way to disperse an insurrection.
Posted by: Zimriel at March 26, 2011 03:54 PM (pl1+G)
Lots of tear gas?
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2011 11:57 AM (McG46)
And I don't want to hear any crap about 00 buck. It's #4 for me.
We carried #4 buckshot in our issue scatterguns. Overall, it's a pretty good load: there's not much difference in the size of the pellets, but there's more of them.
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at March 26, 2011 12:00 PM (S2+uh)
Lots of tear gas?
Posted by: FUBAR at March 26, 2011 03:57 PM (McG46)
Tear gas will not be effective. Have you smelled these people?
I suggest mustard gas.
Posted by: Papa Editor at March 26, 2011 12:00 PM (YX6i/)
Never let it be said the communes of the '60's weren't a success. They were invaluable in teaching corporate America a lesson, that we weren't going to take their products anymore, and would live off the land.
Posted by: Jane Fonda, Capitalist Workout Guru at March 26, 2011 12:01 PM (ZHsNw)
The problem comes when the mob is in the hundreds of thousands. There's no soft way to disperse an insurrection.
Posted by: Zimriel
What happens next time if the mob is bigger? When does it reach a point when drastic measures are necessart?
No critcizing anyone, but things could get much worse.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes.... at March 26, 2011 12:01 PM (sJTmU)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 12:01 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 26, 2011 12:03 PM (G8NKv)
"...hey do you guys know what the prez is going to talk about on Monday night?"
curious
Something about Libya and a rundown of the the Prezident's NCAA bracket picks.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes.... at March 26, 2011 12:04 PM (sJTmU)
The problem comes when the mob is in the hundreds of thousands. There's no soft way to disperse an insurrection.
Posted by: Zimriel at March 26, 2011 03:54 PM (pl1+G)
Free Cash from Obama's Stash! Must be collected in Windsor, ONT.
Posted by: Detroit Reclamation Project at March 26, 2011 12:04 PM (/izg2)
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes.... at March 26, 2011 04:01 PM (sJTmU)
Microwave beam weapons?
Posted by: ErikW at March 26, 2011 12:04 PM (DP09E)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 26, 2011 12:04 PM (G8NKv)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 12:04 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 04:01 PM (k1rwm)
Only if the flags are the UN flag and the Hamas flag
Posted by: buzzion at March 26, 2011 12:05 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Brit Who Cares About Country at March 26, 2011 12:05 PM (RVBxX)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 26, 2011 12:05 PM (G8NKv)
Microwave beam weapons?
Posted by: ErikW
That crowd needed a dose of the microwave pain beam the military has.
Posted by: eman
Well, great minds think alike. Then there's ErikW and eman.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes.... at March 26, 2011 12:05 PM (sJTmU)
Only if the flags are the UN flag and the Hamas flag
And the kind of flag found at Augusta or Pebble Beach.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at March 26, 2011 12:06 PM (m1fCS)
irony
irony is that these are the same leftists pushing for anti-bullying legislation.
These protests in the UK and in WI are bullying. They're intended to intimidate and terrorize others into submission.
There's no difference between these protestors demanding other people's money and a 10yr old bully threatening a kid for his milk money.
Posted by: Alternate Universe Soothsayer at March 26, 2011 12:07 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: Papa Editor at March 26, 2011 12:09 PM (YX6i/)
hey do you guys know what the prez is going to talk about on Monday night?
The Arizona Wildcats are to be Executed by Executive Order for 'Crimes Against the Presidential Brackets'.
Posted by: garrett at March 26, 2011 12:09 PM (vZ0vk)
JWF:
President Obama will address the nation Monday night on the crisis in Libya, the White House said Friday.
Obama will speak at 7:30 p.m. ET at the National Defense University in Washington.
While the U.S. is eager to take a backseat role in the international military campaign in Libya, it is considering stepping up its assistance to rebel forces through humanitarian, political, economic and even military aid, a U.S. official said Friday.
In other words he's not going to say anything.
Posted by: lurker at March 26, 2011 12:10 PM (JNsdN)
Posted by: Papa Editor at March 26, 2011 03:54 PM (YX6i/)
They're not really "anarchists". Nobody is an anarchist anymore. They're mostly kids 16-22 who know that "Communism" isn't cool, but there's been no murderous dictator who wore the anarchist label, so they can't be tied to the immoral actions of others.
There are plenty of places in the world where you can live in a commune without having much contact at all with governments and capitalism, but they like their running water, electricity and fast transportation.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 26, 2011 12:11 PM (BvBKY)
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that severe and violent riots are coming to the U.S. Just look at the behavior of supposedly rational "professionals" going crazy in Wisconsin upon being asked to kick-in for their own pension and health insurance.
Just wait until the lower social orders get whipped up into a frenzy because they won't get their "free" stuff.
I think storing several months worth of food, a means to cook it and having some firearms would be very prudent.
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at March 26, 2011 12:11 PM (S2+uh)
Ever since WWI England has gone downhill. Killing off your upper class leaders leaves you only the scum who didn't fight to run the country.
Depressing.
Posted by: Kemp at March 26, 2011 12:11 PM (JpFM9)
Posted by: toby928™ at March 26, 2011 12:11 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 26, 2011 04:05 PM (G8NKv)
Your typing skills must REALLY suck if you beat me!
Posted by: ErikW at March 26, 2011 12:11 PM (DP09E)
Posted by: robtr at March 26, 2011 12:11 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: AmishDude at March 26, 2011 12:12 PM (BvBKY)
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at March 26, 2011 12:12 PM (vZ0vk)
Posted by: toby928™ at March 26, 2011 12:13 PM (GTbGH)
Does it look to anyone else like these "anarchists" are wearing uniforms?
- black shirt
- black watch cap
- black balaclava
- backpack
It's like that South Park episode where Kyle wants to join the Goth Kids and they go get some coffee. Kyle tells them he doesn't like coffee and they tell him, "You can't be a non-conformist if you don't drink coffee."
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 26, 2011 12:14 PM (lGFXF)
Your typing skills must REALLY suck if you beat me!
Posted by: ErikW at March 26, 2011 04:11 PM (DP09E)
Or if I beat you, I mean.
I think I just went retarded.
Posted by: ErikW at March 26, 2011 12:14 PM (DP09E)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 26, 2011 12:14 PM (G8NKv)
Obama won't speak to the American people about important issues of the day. He will speak to defend against Sir Edmund Hillary Rodham Clinton's ball-banging effort in Egypt and Libya. He can't let Hillary have the upper hand, or she may decide to challenge, and that's not acceptable to TheWon!
Today Hillary looks like a cock sporting SecState with low hangers, and he looks like a wussie pussy with a gaping taco.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at March 26, 2011 12:15 PM (ZHsNw)
Look at it this way. There's Anarcho-capitalism where there's little to no gov nosing into business, so that's effectively the Right wing version [and the more traditionally correct, IMO] except without gov there's no stable readily available currency for trade.
This is the Left wing version, so it naturally sidles up to Communism. They view it, like the Right wing Capitalists do, as the Natural Order of Things.
Posted by: 7 Chinese Spammers at March 26, 2011 12:15 PM (xaCZY)
...
Posted by: lurker at March 26, 2011 04:10 PM (JNsdN)
Interesting that he's not going to speak from the Oval Office (but will speak in a military setting). So he doesn't think it's up to the level of other Oval Office addresses and he likes the military audience who won't boo him or get Code Pink protesters infiltrating.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 26, 2011 12:16 PM (BvBKY)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 26, 2011 12:17 PM (lGFXF)
Posted by: 7 Chinese Spammers at March 26, 2011 04:15 PM (xaCZY)
Yeah - we have term for it: Libertarianism.
Posted by: Papa Editor at March 26, 2011 12:18 PM (YX6i/)
Look at it this way. There's Anarcho-capitalism where there's little to no gov nosing into business, so that's effectively the Right wing version [and the more traditionally correct, IMO] except without gov there's no stable readily available currency for trade.
This is the Left wing version, so it naturally sidles up to Communism. They view it, like the Right wing Capitalists do, as the Natural Order of Things.
Posted by: 7 Chinese Spammers at March 26, 2011 04:15 PM (xaCZY)
Except the part where Capitalism is centered on individual freedom and this bullshit is centered on being a fucking retard hippie.
Posted by: tangonine at March 26, 2011 12:19 PM (x3YFz)
The British police seem so hamstrung and ineffectual.
They need the LAPD to come by and show them how it's done.
Posted by: Who Knows at March 26, 2011 12:20 PM (1cx/R)
Posted by: DickRoid at March 26, 2011 12:20 PM (lGFXF)
It would be highly satisfying to see him in the fetal position, curled up around a snootful of law-enforcement concentration pepper spray while angry cops rain blows on his kidneys.
Don't be awful to your Offal!
Kidney's shouldn't need tenderizing.
Though brining or soaking in milk is essential to remove impurities
Posted by: Zombie Chef Dahmer at March 26, 2011 12:20 PM (vZ0vk)
166 As a member of the "lower social order" I kinda get ticky when people make gross generalizations as to my behavior and this supposed "free shit" that I'm supposedly sucking out of people because I supposedly don't work.
It's never a good idea to alienate people by tarring them with a broad brush based on arbitrary assumptions of the groups you think they should be pigeonholed into
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2011 12:20 PM (5/yRG)
I think that it probably would be deemed permissible for the police to fire on someone who threw a molotov cocktail at them, assuming that they had reason to believe that more might be coming. That is why I think it is important not just that the law be clarified to make the cops' legal position known, but that literal "rules of engagement" be drafted and announced. Let these suckers of cock know what is coming; let the citizenry (and future juries) know what is coming; and then shut down the lawsuits against the cops quickly. I do think that the fear of losing one's job, pension and (possibly) freedom keeps the police from cracking down in situations in which it seems obvious to us that they ought to do so. These Brit hooligans cannot be mistaken for peaceful protesters. They wanted to create havoc, destruction, fear and personal injury. And they wanted immunity from punishment for their actions (thus the face coverings). Combine those two things and "there oughta be a law" so that society can protect itself.
Posted by: Z as in Jersey at March 26, 2011 12:21 PM (sXUiz)
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 26, 2011 12:21 PM (EyTr4)
What? I'll lose half my rants.
Posted by: toby928™ at March 26, 2011 12:21 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: tangonine at March 26, 2011 12:23 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 26, 2011 12:23 PM (EyTr4)
And no way to guarantee contracts.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 26, 2011 12:24 PM (BvBKY)
I wish the good people of the country good luck, because their government took them for a fool's ride, and they trusted it. As for the demonstrators, they're a bunch of Socialists who won't get a drop of pity from me.
Parasites.
Posted by: Lee at March 26, 2011 12:24 PM (BD1aO)
Posted by: BMXFreud at March 26, 2011 12:24 PM (D9etI)
Posted by: tangonine at March 26, 2011 12:24 PM (x3YFz)
Americans have just bastardized the word. In Europe and the rest of the world, Libertarian = Socialist. The real Adam Smith and the real Thomas Jefferson were anti-capitalists.
Posted by: stupid shit Noam Chomsky actually says at March 26, 2011 12:25 PM (Klxrr)
It looks, even with face masks designed to intimidate as much as obsfucate features, like a bunch of skinny 20 something punks....who really, really need a healthy ass kicking that they will not get today.
Posted by: Who Knows at March 26, 2011 12:27 PM (1cx/R)
It looks, even with face masks designed to intimidate as much as obsfucate features, like a bunch of skinny 20 something punks....who really, really need a healthy ass kicking that they will not get today.
Posted by: Who Knows at March 26, 2011 04:27 PM (1cx/R)
police brutality does have a place in the world.
Posted by: tangonine at March 26, 2011 12:28 PM (x3YFz)
These protests are for in part, our dearly departed friend Rachel Corrie, her life taken by an American manufactured Caterpillar tractor and driven by a Zionist pig. Power to the people. Fuck IBM and Walmart....and IHP, the dirty bastards that named a pancake breakfast after Rachel Corrie.
Posted by: London Anarchists at March 26, 2011 12:28 PM (ZHsNw)
Obviously they aren't anarchist-anarchists. Just spoiled college kids wearing black face masks.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at March 26, 2011 12:28 PM (ATsDF)
And in other "good news", we're fighting on the same side as Al Qaeda now.
My peeps find this, 'Islamophobia', offensive.
Posted by: Barack HUSSEIN Obama at March 26, 2011 12:29 PM (vZ0vk)
It's never a good idea to alienate people by tarring them with a broad brush based on arbitrary assumptions of the groups you think they should be pigeonholed into
I agree wholeheartedly. Especially when you're talking to women - they automatically get defensive. It's as natural to them as shopping and crying.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 26, 2011 12:29 PM (lGFXF)
who know who else is still alive?
Roger Corman. And he's still making shitty movies.
Until today I had no idea he made a version of The Fantastic Four in 1994.
Posted by: Alternate Universe Soothsayer at March 26, 2011 12:29 PM (uFokq)
McCain? How can he pin this on McCain?
or, it it more likely that he's trying to say "see hillary is the same as McCain so if she decides to challenge BO for the candidacy, let me remind you, she mccain in drag"
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 12:29 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: AmishDude at March 26, 2011 03:19 PM (BvBKY)
Posted by: James Madison says, "Yes." at March 26, 2011 12:29 PM (KI/Ch)
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 26, 2011 12:30 PM (EyTr4)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 26, 2011 12:30 PM (G8NKv)
Posted by: Footballer Hooligans Ltd. at March 26, 2011 12:30 PM (MWXXs)
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at March 26, 2011 04:27 PM (QxGmu)
The US State Department Motto: "Undermining Freedom and Liberty with a Touch of Treason For 100 Years!"
Posted by: tangonine at March 26, 2011 12:30 PM (x3YFz)
oh, if he's speaking in a "military setting" where is he going to speak?
(oh geez the conspiracy nuts will have a field day with this one)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 12:32 PM (k1rwm)
can't believe the Republicans are giving Obama a pass on this Libyan fiasco
really getting tired of this wait and see attitude
Posted by: Alternate Universe Soothsayer at March 26, 2011 12:32 PM (uFokq)
Ooh, using the military for a photo op to make himself look like he isn't some pussy who's scared shitless by soldiers and generals and such. Clever, clever.
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 26, 2011 04:30 PM (EyTr4)
No one's going to watch it anyway. Monday night is House Marathon Night.
Posted by: tangonine at March 26, 2011 12:33 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 26, 2011 12:33 PM (lGFXF)
oh I daresay these libs are all in a tizzy these days.
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 12:34 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: tangonine at March 26, 2011 12:35 PM (x3YFz)
It would be amusing if British intelligence sent Charles and Camilla straight into the heart of a riot again, to be poked through the window and get paint thrown on the car by peaceful anarchists.
Posted by: Who Knows at March 26, 2011 12:37 PM (1cx/R)
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2011 12:38 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 26, 2011 12:39 PM (G8NKv)
.......in favor of stabbing things
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2011 04:38 PM (5/yRG)
Dangerous, it could lead to Bobbitization!
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at March 26, 2011 12:39 PM (ZHsNw)
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 04:34 PM (k1rwm)
Imagine it is Election Day next year, Obama faces Palin; do you think any folks on the Left are going to vote for Palin or in any other way not vote for Obama?
Their present anger at Obama means nothing. Obama knows that.
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 26, 2011 04:39 PM (G8NKv)
In "independents" (read: pussies who can't pick a side) might.
Posted by: tangonine at March 26, 2011 12:40 PM (x3YFz)
A note about these "anarchists"
These are not the kind of anarchists we think of with the coherent political philosophy of "leave me alone" but rather anarcho-syndicalists. How can you tell? The flags-- they are divided diagonally between red and black, and some of them have the names of their worker's organizations on them.
Anarcho-syndicalists want
1) the means of production under the control of the proletariat
2) each particular industry under it's own direction by a board of directors of that proletariat made up of the workers in that specific industry and
3) the fundamental national political unit to be comprised of these boards of directorships.
Posted by: Truman North, student of the Spanish Civil War at March 26, 2011 12:42 PM (8ay4x)
Posted by: tangonine at March 26, 2011 12:44 PM (x3YFz)
232 Well, that would be foolish -- if you're going to go to that extreme and trouble then you might as well just off them and be done with it.
Stabbing the butcher block is effective and not as wasteful of valuable china/various sundries that cost money as throwing shit...plus it gets the same message across.
Seriously, back to my original comment: I've noticed an all too disturbing tendency coming from all quarters to lump people into groups...usually with some dehumanizing characterizations. That's not good; not good at all. You could say it concerns me.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2011 12:45 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at March 26, 2011 12:46 PM (G8NKv)
Posted by: Truman North at March 26, 2011 12:47 PM (8ay4x)
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 26, 2011 12:47 PM (EyTr4)
Posted by: Truman North at March 26, 2011 04:47 PM (8ay4x)
the 95% comes from the last election. 95% of black voters cast for Obama.
And if you dig deeper into races where there was an under qualified/INDICTED candidate, e.g. William "refrigerator" Jefferson (86% of the vote), you note that the african american electorate votes for the black man without regard for anything but color.
Posted by: tangonine at March 26, 2011 12:52 PM (x3YFz)
No, those numbers come from exit polls from elections.
Which are... whatever people think the interviewer wants to hear
Posted by: Truman North at March 26, 2011 12:54 PM (8ay4x)
Well in fairness, we can hardly blame this on the racist, sexist, homophobic, islamaphobic, tea baggers now, can we?
Don't worry. We'll find a way.
Posted by: The BLM at March 26, 2011 12:55 PM (8ay4x)
Posted by: Truman North at March 26, 2011 04:47 PM (8ay4x)
the 95% comes from the last election. 95% of black voters cast for Obama.
And
if you dig deeper into races where there was an under
qualified/INDICTED candidate, e.g. William "refrigerator" Jefferson (86%
of the vote), you note that the african american electorate votes for
the black man without regard for anything but color.
Posted by: tangonine at March 26, 2011 04:52 PM (x3YFz)
I'll add to that and say that you have to have a (D) after your name. You could be a serial killer... but if you're black and democrat, the african american vote is a lock, no matter how many bodies are buried in your back yard or how much bribe $$ is wrapped in foil in your freezer.
Posted by: tangonine at March 26, 2011 12:55 PM (x3YFz)
No, those numbers come from exit polls from elections.
Which are... whatever people think the interviewer wants to hear
Posted by: Truman North at March 26, 2011 04:54 PM (8ay4x)
Well, since those are the only source of data, what else is there?
Posted by: tangonine at March 26, 2011 12:58 PM (x3YFz)
I was going to go shopping in the UK next week for a spiffy new black bandana.
By the looks of it, the stores are all sold out.
Fuck me for picking the week after all the 'individualist' decide on wearing the same fucking thing
Posted by: momma at March 26, 2011 12:59 PM (penCf)
Posted by: rdbrewer at March 26, 2011 01:01 PM (RVBxX)
These aren't anarchists, they're stupid young people with sticks and cans of spray paint. Can't create or produce anything, but they demand to be able to control the society and it's resources.
If a natural disaster hit, they'd be the first to die from a complete inability to care for themselves.
Posted by: JR at March 26, 2011 01:02 PM (u/+WC)
These aren't anarchists, they're stupid young people with sticks and cans of spray paint. Can't create or produce anything, but they demand to be able to control the society and it's resources.
If a natural disaster hit, they'd be the first to die from a complete inability to care for themselves.
Posted by: JR at March 26, 2011 05:02 PM (u/+WC)
We can only hope that natural selection turns its awesome gaze their way.
Posted by: tangonine at March 26, 2011 01:04 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Cicero at March 26, 2011 01:05 PM (0pBLV)
These aren't anarchists, they're stupid young people with sticks and cans of spray paint
This. I think we make a mistake when we attribute much in the way of a philosophy to most of these misfits and losers. They are just at the extreme end of what lefty college punks do for fun. Protest and get high that is.
Oh and the conservative kids are at the football game.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at March 26, 2011 01:05 PM (m1fCS)
Posted by: Damiano at March 26, 2011 01:05 PM (3nrx7)
Why do we let the least capabile destroy the means of advantage of capitol ?
Almost like they were islamist already.
Posted by: meleager at March 26, 2011 01:08 PM (uJU/g)
Also, it's he due for his bi-annual press conference where he answers 8, prescreened, softball questions and one tough sounding question from Fox or Tapper that was written by the White House staff?
If you could be any golf club Mr. President, which one would it be? Seven iron or pitching wedge?
Posted by: Delta Smelt at March 26, 2011 01:09 PM (m1fCS)
Happy Holidays!
Posted by: tangonine at March 26, 2011 01:09 PM (x3YFz)
"Anarcho-Syndicalism" is a highly-regimented form of Communism with a misleading name. The "street anarchists" are just malcontents, nihilists, and unpopular communists.
The MBM uses the term out of ignorance or a desire to protect the left from the consequences of their actions.
Why these wreckers aren't arrested by the hundreds and sentenced to hard labor I'll never know, I can only assume the sympathies of public employees play a part (and, of course, the ACLWLU).
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at March 26, 2011 01:10 PM (bxiXv)
I think that it probably would be deemed permissible for the police to fire on someone who threw a molotov cocktail at them, assuming that they had reason to believe that more might be coming. That is why I think it is important not just that the law be clarified to make the cops' legal position known, but that literal "rules of engagement" be drafted and announced.
There was a claim made, after Katrina, that Gov. Blanco had given orders to the Nat'l Guard to "shoot to kill" the looters. I can't say I actually believe it, nor am I sure that the Guard would listen. But if you google "katrina blanco 'shoot to kill'", you will see the stories. At the very least, it was a crazy, out of control situation and might be instructive.
Posted by: Mama AJ at March 26, 2011 01:10 PM (XdlcF)
Posted by: coniston at March 26, 2011 01:13 PM (s2uRp)
Posted by: Donna at March 26, 2011 01:14 PM (DhK9/)
Posted by: MFM at March 26, 2011 01:15 PM (3nrx7)
"Je$$$$ How much more of this cheap-jack bullshit can we be expected to take from that stupid little gunsel? Who gives a fuck if he's lonely and depressed down there in DC? If there were any such thing as true justice in this world, his rancid carcass would be somewhere down around Easter Island right now, in the belly of a hammerhead shark. "
Posted by: NuclearJim at March 26, 2011 01:16 PM (9M9xc)
Posted by: coniston at March 26, 2011 01:16 PM (s2uRp)
Posted by: momma at March 26, 2011 01:16 PM (penCf)
LOL.
The new anarchists are opposed to government in any form, except for those parts that send them their checks.
Posted by: Sacco and Vanzetti at March 26, 2011 01:16 PM (mQMnK)
Posted by: SEIU Goons at March 26, 2011 01:17 PM (FZAKH)
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at March 26, 2011 01:17 PM (edTzD)
Posted by: 7 Chinese Spammers at March 26, 2011 03:50 PM (xaCZY)
This is why Frances Fox-Piven is an evil bitch. This is what she wants for all of us here.
Posted by: Polliwog at March 26, 2011 01:17 PM (GKm+o)
Posted by: NuclearJim at March 26, 2011 01:19 PM (9M9xc)
Posted by: MFM at March 26, 2011 01:20 PM (3nrx7)
It's never a
good idea to alienate people by tarring them with a broad brush based on
arbitrary assumptions of the groups you think they should be
pigeonholed into
I agree wholeheartedly. Especially when you're talking to women -
they automatically get defensive. It's as natural to them as shopping
and crying.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 26, 2011 04:29 PM (lGFXF)
EoJ, you always make me laugh. I like that in a man.
Posted by: Museisluse at March 26, 2011 01:20 PM (xrmna)
As the political turmoil deepened, there were signs that Islamic militants in the remote reaches of the country were seeking to make gains on the situation. Residents and witnesses in the small town of Jaar in the south said suspected al-Qaida militants moved down from an expanse of mountains on Saturday to seize control there a few weeks after police fled, setting up checkpoints and occupying vacant government buildings.
Posted by: momma at March 26, 2011 01:21 PM (penCf)
Posted by: Texan Economist at March 26, 2011 01:24 PM (TC/9F)
That used to be the standard prescription, but sadly as a society we've allowed the Oprahs to circumscribe our options. I don't blame you for not believing it - I don't think anyone believes it any more.
On the other hand, if somebody does get shot there's some legal protection for the guardsmen involved.
Posted by: Ace's liver at March 26, 2011 01:27 PM (QgI7g)
Posted by: Libtard at March 26, 2011 01:27 PM (3nrx7)
If a natural disaster hit, they'd be the first to die from a complete inability to care for themselves.
Posted by: JR at March 26, 2011 05:02 PM (u/+WC)
No, they'd do ok -- because they know how to be jackals, and jackals aren't the first to go. In fact, jackals do pretty well for themselves.
Old people, little kids, the disabled, the truly good...they're always the first to go when society completely breaks down because they are the defenseless and rely on the kindness of strangers to defend them (and we are already seeing how much kindness strangers are willing to give each other!). Jackals (no matter what their particular stripe) do well -- better than sheepdogs, better even than the wolves sometimes.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2011 01:28 PM (5/yRG)
Jackals (no matter what their particular stripe) do well -- better than sheepdogs, better even than the wolves sometimes.
I can't help but hope you're wrong. Then again, I keep hoping I'll wake up one day and life will be shiny and happy for all (I almost said fair, but thank God it isn't).
Posted by: Polliwog at March 26, 2011 01:35 PM (GKm+o)
Posted by: dananjcon at March 26, 2011 01:38 PM (q1Tbv)
Posted by: Barack H. Obama at March 26, 2011 01:41 PM (BjQSh)
Posted by: dananjcon at March 26, 2011 01:48 PM (zPfoL)
It would be great if there were actually cuts for them to be protesting, but hardly. It's mostly the sort of cut that reduces the rate of increased spending.
Posted by: S. Weasel at March 26, 2011 01:51 PM (xlCGT)
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at March 26, 2011 01:53 PM (vA9ld)
Hey. "Anarchists."
Posted by: rdbrewer at March 26, 2011 01:55 PM (RVBxX)
My roommate, a large, well-armed cop, once had the opportunity to have a
conversation with a self-proclaimed anarchist across the police barricade. My
roommate said "If you achieve anarchy I'll kill you. Law is the only thing
keeping you alive." The Reed College educated 'anarchist' thought for a moment, turned and left the riot peacefully.
Lone, outlaw bikers are anarchists. These punk are communists.
Posted by: Dennis at March 26, 2011 02:10 PM (opBLV)
________
So... using the impeccable logic of Sir Bedevere, that means anarchists are hobos, right?
Posted by: Anachronda at March 26, 2011 02:36 PM (6fER6)
Don't forget the morbidly obese Internet dumbfucks like DMXRoid. Apparently they're "anarchists" too. And they'll get around to constructing their self-sufficient organized anarchy just as soon as one of them figures out how to mass-produce a reasonable substitute for Cheetos.
Posted by: Waterhouse at March 26, 2011 02:36 PM (D9etI)
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 26, 2011 04:47 PM (EyTr4)
now you did it....they are going to toss this at the speech writing intern who is the only one who knows how to work the teleprompter and say..."hey can you do something about blaming it on these guys for us?"
Posted by: curious at March 26, 2011 02:49 PM (k1rwm)
So was there some kind of Lefty dogwhistle that went off telling them all to riot at the same time? I count the ME riots as part of them mostly because the Leftards see them as fellow travellers and the initial rioting over there was caused by ME versions of Leftards.
So, tell me. It can't just be economics. Why now? What conditions are set? Was the rioting in WI supposed to be larger, and will it be come summer?
This might just be It. The Big Takeover that Jello Biafra used to talk about. Global Action, as they say
Posted by: 7 Chinese Spammers at March 26, 2011 02:50 PM (SMqnS)
100 Posted by: CDR M at March 26, 2011 03:30 PM (BuYeH)
Yes. My .45 ACP is a fine piece of kinetic crowd control equipment, although my Remington 1100 might be a more sensible choice.
And I don't want to hear any crap about 00 buck. It's #4 for me
Load 3 rounds of 00 followed by 2 rounds of #4. If the first two don't do it, you will want the next three!
Posted by: Winchester Model 12 at March 26, 2011 03:11 PM (2oxND)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at March 26, 2011 03:13 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Jimbo at March 26, 2011 03:30 PM (O3R/2)
Indeed. Real anarchists would applaud govt spending getting slashed to zero, because that would be the end of government. Supposed Euro "anarchists" have been a stalking horse for the commies for about 90 years now.
John Muir (the guy who wrote the VW repair books) also wrote a book with a quasi-blueprint for a social structure that was pretty close to anarchy. It's called the Velvet Monkey Wrench. It was a good read and I agreed with a lot of what he had to say. Some of his social idead were decidedly outside the box.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 26, 2011 03:48 PM (Y8hWz)
Posted by: Alan Simpson at March 26, 2011 03:57 PM (OmVtv)
That will come at some point, if the regressives get their way.
Interesting, isn't it, that they call themselves "progressive," when they're actually the most reactionary idiots around?
Personal liberty in a nation of free citizens is the Most Radical Idea on the Planet. All this other authoritarian stuff is Old School: tyranny with very bad clothes.
Posted by: Beverly at March 26, 2011 04:01 PM (NtqzB)
FUCKIN PUSSIES
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at March 26, 2011 04:01 PM (54F2e)
Posted by: Alan Simpson at March 26, 2011 04:12 PM (OmVtv)
Posted by: Andy at March 26, 2011 04:25 PM (DPM1U)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at March 26, 2011 04:27 PM (DPM1U)
Posted by: Erik Larsen at March 26, 2011 04:35 PM (u04e2)
In a lot of countries it really is economics. Governments all over the world have been buying off the proles for years with bubble inflated tax revenue. When the bubble popped, they borrowed. Now they're just about out of credit headroom. If the world economy doesn't start booming you're going to see a lot more of this. In the US, too.
Posted by: Ace's liver at March 26, 2011 04:54 PM (QgI7g)
Posted by: Agmike at March 26, 2011 05:02 PM (PRpiv)
Glow in the dark SuperBall ones at night.
One can only hope...that would be fucking awesome.
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at March 26, 2011 05:09 PM (54F2e)
Why now? What conditions are set?
American weakness.
Posted by: Zimriel at March 26, 2011 09:15 PM (pl1+G)
This ^
People totally underestimate the influence the US has on the world, simply by its very existence. Our current weakness, thanks to President Toonces Hussein O'Mulligan, is encouraging all manner of miscreants to push the envelope in a way they would not have dreamed of with a Reagan or W in the oval office.
Things are going to spiral out of control. American servicemen and women are going to die for no good reason, and whole countries will suffer chaos and violence and destruction, simply because the President of the US is such a feckless swine.
Posted by: Big Sis at March 26, 2011 05:25 PM (7+pP9)
So, it's the same in Britain as in Wisconsin? The people rioting are the ones who have jobs and benefits, but those benefits are being lowered?
Meanwhile the people with no jobs are not rioting.
Hmmmm...
Posted by: Meremortal at March 26, 2011 05:29 PM (DffuX)
Posted by: Gem at March 26, 2011 05:31 PM (zw+pb)
And I just finishing reading "A Long Way Gone" about child soldiers in Sierra Leone in the '90s. Thinking that kind of crap could never happen in a civilized place. So wrong.
I've already got some provisions stocked in the basement...I need to get a gun.
Posted by: Gem at March 26, 2011 05:35 PM (zw+pb)
As far as a gun goes, start with a small (concealable) revolver. I think confiscation of semi-automatic weapons is a real possibility, so I'm thinking the base of any arsenal should be a revolver, bolt action rifle and a double-barreled or pump action shotgun.
Posted by: Josef K. wants to fly under the radar at March 26, 2011 05:44 PM (7+pP9)
277 It depresses you, because you know I'm right...and that it is probably coming.
There is one way to avoid the worst of it though: don't look for happy and shiney to be something you wake up to...that sort of thing only comes out from within; it only takes a few people to change the course of the world, but they have to be willing to drop their fear and do it
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2011 06:44 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: wholesale lingerie at March 27, 2011 03:53 AM (uA1wY)
Posted by: Decaf at March 27, 2011 04:29 AM (3+xlM)
Posted by: Case at March 28, 2011 12:01 AM (0K+Kw)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2858 seconds, 436 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: brian at March 26, 2011 10:55 AM (y05cf)