July 28, 2011
— Ace Supposedly it will still be had later tonight, but that assumes they have a decent shot at passage.
A later update at NRO said that some "long-standing" conservative members, not the Freshmen, have been particularly hard to get on board.
From commenters, I hear that 24 are confirmed "no" which means Boehner can't lose another one.
Updates: From Hot Air, FoxNews' Ed Henry says Boehner doesn't have the votes.
But we sort of knew that, or else he would have called the vote.
Posted by: Ace at
01:54 PM
| Comments (165)
Post contains 93 words, total size 1 kb.
From commenters, I hear that 24 are confirmed "no" which means Boehner can't lose another one.
That sounds a lot like math.
Posted by: garrett at July 28, 2011 01:57 PM (3wVv2)
Not the point. The point is that we have a plan, and the Dems don't. Something beats nothing every time. That's where the '12 PR battle will be fought.
Posted by: pep at July 28, 2011 01:57 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: ace at July 28, 2011 01:59 PM (nj1bB)
This is all designed to create a crisis they can pin on the GOP with the MBM writing the scripts, and Jugears creating a crisis "that won't go to waste"
Huge tax hikes on those earning over 200K and under 2 million is the end game here. Spending hikes AKA "investments in our future" is what Jugears wants, and the only thing he'll settle for.
Posted by: kbdabear at July 28, 2011 01:59 PM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: ace at July 28, 2011 01:59 PM (nj1bB)
What is Obama's grand scheme here? The house will have one plan and th Senate will have another. What then?
Posted by: cherry π at July 28, 2011 01:59 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: 80sBaby at July 28, 2011 01:59 PM (o2lIv)
The point is that we have a plan, and the Dems don't. Something beats nothing every time.
Nothin' beats Rock.
Posted by: Mickey Abbott at July 28, 2011 01:59 PM (3wVv2)
someone suggested a neat idea: Pass it, and then adjuourn, and just say, "We're done."
--------
We could have done this already....oy.
Look, I'm not saying I had to have CCB, but why in the hell didn't we use CCB as our starting point and then let the Dems counter? Why did we counter ourselves with this Boehner plan? That's what I don't understand.
Compromise, I get it, but good lord make them come in with an offer before you start bidding against yourself.
Posted by: Rich at July 28, 2011 02:00 PM (OX4OZ)
Posted by: Jordan at July 28, 2011 02:01 PM (4z6KA)
Posted by: Paper at July 28, 2011 02:01 PM (B5qn7)
What is Obama's grand scheme here? The house will have one plan and th Senate will have another. What then?
RE your last question, we may get reconciliation.
Posted by: 80sBaby at July 28, 2011 02:01 PM (o2lIv)
Posted by: ace at July 28, 2011 02:03 PM (nj1bB)
But even a busted clock ...
A Small Business Dies
There will be no more wafer-thin pancakes served at Furin's restaurant.
Posted by: kbdabear at July 28, 2011 02:03 PM (Y+DPZ)
Boehner wants to pass this because Reid has a bill with the same title in the Senate, and the two parties can just work out a compromise in conference.
Getting the Boehner bill as it exists would be the best case scenario for Republicans at that point. The bill will come back worse with the same pressure and whip counting to pass the next iteration.
Posted by: Paper at July 28, 2011 02:03 PM (B5qn7)
Posted by: Dr Spank at July 28, 2011 02:03 PM (IMglX)
RE your last question, we may get reconciliation
----------
Oh, and I'm sure it will be swell.
I see something like- 1 trillion in cuts 10 years out with an immediate 2 trillion in debt ceiling increase that gets this past 2012. Oh, and the 1 trillion is the ending of the Afghanistan war.
Posted by: Rich at July 28, 2011 02:03 PM (OX4OZ)
Da Bone Man has the votes. He just needs to pick and choose who he lets have some political cover and future favors. The bill passes.
Posted by: Mister Money at July 28, 2011 02:04 PM (wN82N)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at July 28, 2011 02:05 PM (mf8Ua)
Posted by: cherry π at July 28, 2011 02:06 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: CoolCzech at July 28, 2011 02:06 PM (kUaEF)
What is Obama's grand scheme here?
Yeah, I'm not really seeing it, either.
He's pretty much in complete control. We can't pass anything unless he agrees to it. And yet, he's stalling.
I'm not sure if it's incompetence or strategy.
Posted by: sandy burger at July 28, 2011 02:06 PM (XyoGP)
Posted by: brown gargantua at July 28, 2011 02:07 PM (B60j2)
Jesus, people, Dow futures are tanking since the first reports came out that Boehner didn't have the votes. It's gonna be a fucking disaster tomorrow if this thing goes down tonight. We're looking at a gargantuan selloff. And guess who will get the blame for that? And guess who will then panic as a result?
I don't know about y'all, but I would really like to keep at least few dollars of what is left in my retirement funds.
Posted by: rockmom at July 28, 2011 02:07 PM (lSyyU)
Posted by: WalrusRex at July 28, 2011 02:07 PM (jUZRg)
But at least until I find an opener I'm gonna be vigilant.
Posted by: ontherocks at July 28, 2011 02:07 PM (HBqDo)
Da Bone Man has the votes. He just needs to pick and choose who he lets have some political cover and future favors. The bill passes.
--------
Yea, I'm thinking he has the votes. He'll get a dem or three.
I mean, if you're a D and you voted for CCB, why exactly would you back away from voting for this. Are you seriously going to take the DeMint stance and say this doesn't cut enough? Is anyone going to buy that bullshit from a D?
Posted by: Rich at July 28, 2011 02:07 PM (OX4OZ)
Good point, but the difference is that CCB was passed while there were still other options. I'm not saying Boehner is the perfect negotiator, and you won't get everything you want, but Boehner is a hell of a lot better than anything the Dems have put on the table, and the vector is finally pointing in the right direction. This is an existential moment for the Dems and they know it. If they can't promise government goodies to buy votes, they have nothing, since their economic approach is ludicrous. They can't come out and say that, so instead they will delay as long as they can.
Posted by: pep at July 28, 2011 02:07 PM (6TB1Z)
But it does sound big balls.
Posted by: ace at July 28, 2011 05:59 PM (nj1bB)
What are these "balls" you speak of?
Posted by: The GOP at July 28, 2011 02:07 PM (KI/Ch)
Posted by: Sonny Tzu at July 28, 2011 02:07 PM (ZgvjV)
Posted by: Paper at July 28, 2011 02:07 PM (B5qn7)
Posted by: The Regular Guy at July 28, 2011 02:08 PM (qHCyt)
Posted by: exceller at July 28, 2011 02:08 PM (Z7Znk)
Posted by: osoloco at July 28, 2011 02:09 PM (D7W2L)
Posted by: Paper at July 28, 2011 02:09 PM (B5qn7)
Jesus, people, Dow futures are tanking since the first reports came out that Boehner didn't have the votes. It's gonna be a fucking disaster tomorrow if this thing goes down tonight. We're looking at a gargantuan selloff. And guess who will get the blame for that? And guess who will then panic as a result?
I don't know about y'all, but I would really like to keep at least few dollars of what is left in my retirement funds.
-----------
And I'd like a country to live in for the next 50 years of my life that actually can function.
Posted by: Rich at July 28, 2011 02:09 PM (OX4OZ)
Look, I'm not saying I had to have CCB, but why in the hell didn't we use CCB as our starting point and then let the Dems counter? Why did we counter ourselves with this Boehner plan? That's what I don't understand.
Compromise, I get it, but good lord make them come in with an offer before you start bidding against yourself.
Posted by: Rich at July 28, 2011 06:00 PM (OX4OZ)
You forgot about me, bitches! I aint goin down easy!!
Posted by: The Status Quo at July 28, 2011 02:09 PM (FIDMq)
I'm not sure if it's incompetence or strategy.
Never attribute to malevolence that which can be explained by stupidity. Especially in the case of this fool.
Posted by: pep at July 28, 2011 02:10 PM (6TB1Z)
We're looking at a
gargantuan selloff.
What the hell's that mean? I'm not green like my brother, you know. I'm the nice one. Bigot.
Posted by: brown gargantua at July 28, 2011 02:10 PM (B60j2)
Posted by: cherry π at July 28, 2011 02:10 PM (OhYCU)
Congress always cuts against the baseline. Always. Can Cato find an example since the creation of CBO in which they didn't? I also don't see how cutting spending as compared to last year or even five years somehow doesn't count as a real cut. Why even talk about returning to '06 levels if that means absolutely nothing?
Posted by: 80sBaby at July 28, 2011 02:10 PM (o2lIv)
Posted by: Dr Spank at July 28, 2011 02:10 PM (IMglX)
it is better to attack your own forces in circle jerking formation than to suffer a smaller victory than desire
Republicans and conservatives are not co-extensive.
Remember, some men just want to watch the world burn. Care to compromise and just let them burn half of it?
Posted by: imp at July 28, 2011 02:11 PM (UaxA0)
The only deal I've even heard about that sounded, in the balance, attractive was the CCB bill. If we really hit the debt limit and the G has to stop sending out some checks, that is the point that the Dems will start getting serious about a deal where they have to give something up. Like sending a balanced budget amendment to the states.
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at July 28, 2011 02:11 PM (k34Gz)
Posted by: osoloco at July 28, 2011 06:09 PM (D7W2L)
I like it. Good plan, just double the cuts every time.
Posted by: Mister Money at July 28, 2011 02:11 PM (wN82N)
Posted by: robtr at July 28, 2011 02:11 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: runningrn at July 28, 2011 02:11 PM (ihSHD)
You did know he's queer, right? Him and Rodan...mid-air boofoo. Oh yeah. Queer.
Posted by: brown gargantua at July 28, 2011 02:12 PM (B60j2)
Posted by: The Donkey Show (Will never use HTML under penalty of DOOM) at July 28, 2011 02:12 PM (ijjAe)
Noted theologian, Nacy Pelosi actually said that "What were trying to do, is save life on this planet as we know it today."
Unbelievable.
I mean, the stupidity, you'd think that it would just burn or at least itch mightily, or something...
Posted by: Deety at July 28, 2011 02:12 PM (R1GFN)
Posted by: Rich at July 28, 2011 02:12 PM (OX4OZ)
I would be thrilled if you are right and I am proven wrong. But it won't happen.
Posted by: pep at July 28, 2011 02:13 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: filbert at July 28, 2011 02:13 PM (smvTK)
Posted by: ontherocks at July 28, 2011 02:13 PM (HBqDo)
Posted by: 80sBaby at July 28, 2011 02:13 PM (o2lIv)
Please, never again mention Pelosi and itch in the same sentence. I must go wash now.
Posted by: pep at July 28, 2011 02:14 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: ontherocks at July 28, 2011 06:13 PM (HBqDo)
Can't. Would increase the debt.
Posted by: filbert at July 28, 2011 02:14 PM (smvTK)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at July 28, 2011 02:15 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Survivor at July 28, 2011 02:15 PM (jEEpE)
U.S. stock futures are up across the board, as of about five seconds ago on Fox Business Channel . . .
---------
GIGANTIC, ENORMO, MASSIVE EFFIN SELL-OFF
Posted by: Rich at July 28, 2011 02:15 PM (OX4OZ)
Yep. If Boehner loses this vote, I'm sure the plan will be to use Dem votes to pass a Senate compromise rather than to stand firm on CCB or a conservative bill.
Posted by: Paper at July 28, 2011 02:15 PM (B5qn7)
Posted by: Y-not at July 28, 2011 02:15 PM (5H6zj)
Ya know, I have a long-standing member . . .
Posted by: Anthony Wiener at July 28, 2011 02:16 PM (zgZzy)
He needs 216 and can only have 24 no votes cast. Also, it looks like the Senate might try to force a bad deal on the House.
Posted by: 80sBaby at July 28, 2011 02:16 PM (o2lIv)
Posted by: Drider at July 28, 2011 02:17 PM (uJSfP)
Jesus, people, Dow futures are tanking since the first reports came out that Boehner didn't have the votes. It's gonna be a fucking disaster tomorrow if this thing goes down tonight. We're looking at a gargantuan selloff. And guess who will get the blame for that? And guess who will then panic as a result?
I don't know about y'all, but I would really like to keep at least few dollars of what is left in my retirement funds.
Posted by: rockmom at July 28, 2011 06:07 PM (lSyyU)
RINO.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at July 28, 2011 02:17 PM (IhrXZ)
Posted by: Macky O'Velli at July 28, 2011 02:17 PM (ZgvjV)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at July 28, 2011 02:18 PM (mf8Ua)
Posted by: Dow Jones at July 28, 2011 02:18 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Y-not at July 28, 2011 02:18 PM (5H6zj)
No matter what Boner sends to the Senate, Dingy Harry will vote no on it, and Jugears would veto it anyway.
How about this for everybody: they do that, then we can all agree to stand firm on Cut, Cap and Balance. We can always say "hey, we tried to be reasonable, but the Commiecrats would have none of it. They just want to spend spend spend."
I know the MFM won't report us honestly, but Ace and the rest of the good guys will?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 28, 2011 02:18 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: green gargantua at July 28, 2011 02:20 PM (B60j2)
Posted by: !RON PAUL!, Rightful Winner of All Online Polls at July 28, 2011 02:20 PM (IhrXZ)
This whole exercise has been for nothing because ultimately the Republicans weren't willing to shut the government down.
But on the bright side we finally have a quantifiable difference between the parties that can be measured with absolute scientific precision --- and it is --- $20 billion.
Posted by: Voluble at July 28, 2011 02:20 PM (JKX4x)
Posted by: cherry π at July 28, 2011 02:21 PM (OhYCU)
Say a husband and wife comes to your yardsale and wants to buy an old TV.
The price tag on the TV says $20.
The Husband tells you he'd really love to buy it but he only brought $15 cash in his wallet.
The Wife immediately looks at the Husband and loudly says, "Honey, I know you have $50 in your wallet and I have another $250 in my purse because I put it in there myself this morning!"
Who are you going to try to deal with?
Posted by: sifty at July 28, 2011 02:21 PM (ECjvn)
>>Can't. Would increase the debt.
Posted by: filbert at July 28, 2011 06:14 PM (smvTK)
Yeah, but since we're already sticking the Chinese for several hundred billion that they'll never see, how could a few more eggrolls hurt anybody, and Harry will never be able to get takeout in DC again.
Win/win with wonton on the side.
Posted by: ontherocks at July 28, 2011 02:21 PM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Lady Gaga at July 28, 2011 02:21 PM (zgZzy)
Despite all the Left's talk they know that a vote for Boehner is a vote for Reid.
Yep! Isn't it a great day to be a Republican.
Posted by: GhostShip at July 28, 2011 02:22 PM (sbaXF)
I honestly want to see this thing passed at this point just so I can see it voted down in the Senate. Then everyone who told the wingerz to get behind the bill because it was the only legit option can then begin to tell us about a brand new and even better legit option that we need to get behind.
Posted by: Rich at July 28, 2011 02:22 PM (OX4OZ)
Posted by: Wimpy Obama at July 28, 2011 02:22 PM (zgZzy)
The comments from the later risers read like fan letters from Teen Beat.
I'm a life-long subscriber!
Posted by: Anthony Weiner at July 28, 2011 02:23 PM (zgZzy)
babe ...
I got you babe ...
Posted by: Sonny & Cher at July 28, 2011 02:23 PM (SQP5L)
It's going to be Jonestown 2.0 for some of those folks when she doesn't toss her hat in the ring.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at July 28, 2011 02:24 PM (pLTLS)
Stand pat on what they passed.
Let the Dems put out something on paper that we can point and jeer at.
There is no deadline other than Obama's Fuck that.
Posted by: SOYLENT GREEN at July 28, 2011 02:25 PM (IVEhB)
"Jesus, people, Dow futures are tanking since the first reports came out that Boehner didn't have the votes. It's gonna be a fucking disaster tomorrow if this thing goes down tonight. We're looking at a gargantuan selloff. And guess who will get the blame for that? And guess who will then panic as a result?
I don't know about y'all, but I would really like to keep at least few dollars of what is left in my retirement funds."
What the fuck are you talking about. Futures are up one measly point. I'm in the business; I watch this shit all the time. Where the hell are you coming from?
Posted by: Sukie Tawdry at July 28, 2011 02:25 PM (MPtFW)
It's going to be Jonestown 2.0 for some of those folks when she doesn't toss her hat in the ring.
Lacey, why do you hate women? //
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at July 28, 2011 02:25 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: steevy at July 28, 2011 02:26 PM (fq7xf)
Hey, you try to keep coming up with new stuff when you have to coordinate the mass spamming of conservative sites for the old lady.
Posted by: Bristol Palin (TM) at July 28, 2011 02:26 PM (IhrXZ)
Posted by: John F. Kerry at July 28, 2011 02:26 PM (zgZzy)
I dunno. Perhaps not Kool-Aid, but a helluva lot of tinfoil hats. I'm pretty sure there will be a lot of blame tossed around, none of it directed to the right person.
Posted by: Bestest Fan Evah at July 28, 2011 02:26 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff, EXXXTREMIST at July 28, 2011 02:28 PM (lGFXF)
Posted by: Y-not at July 28, 2011 02:28 PM (5H6zj)
Then why the hell give them the opportunity now by not voting for Boehner's plan? It's much easier to throw the ball back in their court than to let this die and be forced into a position to hand Obama the keys by way of McConnell/Reid. No, no thanks.
Posted by: 80sBaby at July 28, 2011 02:28 PM (o2lIv)
There will be a vote tonight it has been announced.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at July 28, 2011 02:29 PM (mf8Ua)
Posted by: Ripley at July 28, 2011 02:29 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: laceyunderalls
It's going to be the Great Auto-da-fé of Lisbon around here if she does....
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at July 28, 2011 02:29 PM (EeYDk)
Neither? Obama's natural inclination for bitchy passivity works. He doesn't have to do things. Never has.
This time, he's allowing the Republicans to cave as many times as they want to, and in the manner of their own choosing. They picked "about four times" and "by publicly gang-raping the crackaz who brung us."
Tonight they'll pass Orangina's shitty no-cuts pile of debt-bloating shit, and the Ds will reject it, even though it's pretty much what they want. In a couple days, they'll pass Reid's shitty shit, or something worse if they can come up with it before the 2nd.
Then Obama will bitch about it, and they'll try harder to please him next time.
Posted by: oblig. at July 28, 2011 02:30 PM (xvZW9)
It's going to be the Great Auto-da-fé of Lisbon around here if she does
Sarah Palin is a lesbian? That's hot!
Posted by: Rachel Maddow at July 28, 2011 02:31 PM (zgZzy)
"I vote to store all Baby Boomers in the Yucca Mountain facility."
Here...Here! They are a bunch of spoiled brats!
(Except those who fought in Vietnam....You guys Rock!)
Posted by: Jimi at July 28, 2011 02:33 PM (JMsOK)
Tonight they'll pass Orangina's shitty no-cuts pile of debt-bloating shit, and the Ds will reject it, even though it's pretty much what they want.
If the Commiecrats do that, then hang it around their necks.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 28, 2011 02:33 PM (ujg0T)
Yeah, Rick Perry commanded a majority of the results while the thread was active this morning. Checked it now and looky-loo, Palin™'s acolytes have been busy.
There's no significant difference between Palinistas and Paultards.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at July 28, 2011 02:33 PM (IhrXZ)
Yeah, Rick Perry commanded a majority of the results while the thread was active this morning. Checked it now and looky-loo, Palin™'s acolytes have been busy.
There's no significant difference between Palinistas and Paultards.
Oh puhleeze. Foreign policy?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 28, 2011 02:34 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Anonymoose at July 28, 2011 02:34 PM (ZgvjV)
Posted by: ontherocks at July 28, 2011 02:35 PM (HBqDo)
There's no significant difference between Palinistas and Paultards
Not true! Our tinfoil hats are biodegradable!
Posted by: The Paultards at July 28, 2011 02:35 PM (zgZzy)
See what we need to do here is shut the government down so we can lose the presidency, the house, and senate in 2012. While at first it may appear that this would be a total catastrophic loss, we can bask in righteous indignation as our nation goes down in flames. Sweet. Count me in. Winning is for pussies.
Since when is caving in--yet again--"winning"?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 28, 2011 02:37 PM (ujg0T)
#70 And while she's saving life on the planet; the oceans will rise.
Are we sure she's not Zero's 'real' mommy?
Posted by: NY Betsy Rose at July 28, 2011 02:38 PM (QUUOj)
I always had that feeling that she wasn't getting by on her looks alone.
Posted by: ontherocks at July 28, 2011 02:39 PM (HBqDo)
McConnell/Reid has to pass the house or am I missing something? As far as Boehner's plan, it's a joke.
Posted by: Dr Spank at July 28, 2011 02:39 PM (IMglX)
Yes, but there's a simple way to fix that. Reid negotiates with and pressures Boehner into taking part of what they have because Boehner wants a deal. The panic created by the tensing markets could potentially cause some menbers to pass a bill out of the House (send to the Senate) that they would have otherwise rejected. Remember the circus that was TARP?
Posted by: 80sBaby at July 28, 2011 02:40 PM (o2lIv)
~Guy Benson
Posted by: 80sBaby at July 28, 2011 02:43 PM (o2lIv)
I guess the Palin folks just got off work.
Posted by: cherry π at July 28, 2011 02:43 PM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Jimi at July 28, 2011 02:43 PM (JMsOK)
Posted by: Dave Wu at July 28, 2011 02:46 PM (ZgvjV)
That's why I say just pass Boehner's plan tonight. Better to do that than kick the situation entirely to the Dems and legislate in pure crisis mode. No more last-minute fixes.
Posted by: 80sBaby at July 28, 2011 02:46 PM (o2lIv)
Oh, c'mon. The thread launched at 7:28 AM (Eastern). It was showing a consistent sampling of supporters until some time after the Instalanche.
Posted by: Y-not at July 28, 2011 02:47 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: WalrusRex
FIFY
Posted by: FORGER - Racist Czar at July 28, 2011 02:49 PM (YGzTa)
While almost true - this is actually complete BS in the way things are actually done.
The Senate regularly does crap like amending "House Bill on Unicorns and Fairies" to read "Amnesty Bill, take 427" and sends it back to the House.
There are -always- extra bills lying around for the Senate to pick up and completely gut and turn into something completely different. So "The Bill originated in the House!!!" but ... the Senate essentially completely rewrites it and sends it back.
It's one of 'the powers of the House' that the Senate regularly games. And the House can't restrain themselves from passing extraneous bills.
So in our case, there's at least three bills I can think of that the Senate "has" that they could amend and send back to the House. "Hey, everything in this here 'Ryan plan bill' is crap. Let's add an amendment: a) strike every word, b) change title to 'Fuck the House Bill', c) add whatever Reid wants."
The bill "originated in the House". And yet the Senate could use it to articulate whatever fairies and unicorns plan they think will fly in smurfland.
Posted by: Al at July 28, 2011 02:50 PM (MzQOZ)
Jim GeraghtyÂ’s comment on PalinÂ’s FB post is epic:
“If she were any clearer, they would have woken up with horse’s heads in their beds this morning.”
Posted by: cherry π at July 28, 2011 02:51 PM (OhYCU)
He's in the right line of work to be taken seriously by unserious people.
Posted by: ontherocks at July 28, 2011 02:53 PM (HBqDo)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at July 28, 2011 03:01 PM (IhrXZ)
Posted by: kurtilator at July 28, 2011 03:04 PM (juh4Z)
So is yours, so it's cool.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at July 28, 2011 03:11 PM (IhrXZ)
Posted by: Congressman Leaning Toward a 'No' Vote at July 28, 2011 04:32 PM (gDbpf)
Posted by: The Snowman on AudioBook at July 28, 2011 05:34 PM (mHQqy)
Posted by: GHD Straighteners at July 30, 2011 10:59 PM (aLmvz)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2339 seconds, 293 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Again, is this a big deal? If Boehner can't get one freaking Dem to vote for it, how in the hell is he going to get them to vote for it the Senate? Even if it makes it out of the House, it's going not going to become law.
Posted by: Rich at July 28, 2011 01:56 PM (OX4OZ)