February 18, 2011
— Ace They'll pick one of them up. At least a couple of them are going to have to come back home at some point. Being Democrats, it's easier for them to abandon their families, but they'll still need changes of socks.
Here's something not_steve_in_hb suggested: They're probably all set up for direct deposit payroll payments. The governor can (I'm thinking) stop direct deposit payments and start writing physical checks, which have to be picked up in person.
That won't help for a while, but screw it, it's fun. (I know someone's going to say Hey stop paying them altogether and I guess I'll have to say -- yeah, that's even more fun.)
I really like Walker. I think a lot of the time people don't understand what I mean when I say "moderate in temperament." Like, I like politicians who come off calm and "just doing the people's business" and stuff. That doesn't mean you can't be a hard-core conservative ideologue -- Walker isn't flinching here at all. But he is doing that more-in-sadness-than-anger thing that sells, projecting the idea that he's just workin' for the people and above partisan spats. (Video after the jump.)
Partisans tend to love very partisan-sounding politicians because such politicians give voice to their beliefs and feelings. And not very partisan sounding politicians are often derided as squishy.
But at the end of the day it's the guy who doesn't sound partisan, but is unflinching on principle, who actually gets things done. This is the genius of Christie's act; this is what made Walker seem, well, presidential.
I've been saying this for like four years. Rush Limbaugh is great and maybe you want a Representative or three who talks like him but you don't want a Senator who talks like him and you definitely don't want a presidential candidate who talks like him. Thinks like him, sure. Talks like him? No.
So many times a Republican politician, like Boehner or McConnell will say, "Of course I want to work with the President and hear him out and figure out where we can move forward with shared principle" and people will yell about it, like this is a big sell-out, and what they should say is "I hope he fails." Or whatever.
No. Not for a national leader. A leader's supposed to say stuff like "of course I want to work with the other side" even if he's frankly lying, or even if (most likely) by "work with the other side" he means only I want to work with the other side so long as they concede everything to me and basically fall in line.
Which is what Obama meant when he said it.
Obama, by the way, was denigrated by the left during his run as a "squish." Kos, for example, denigrated him for always "accepting the premise and framework of conservative arguments" when he talked. Like, Kos wanted him always to scream that the conservatives were lying about everything.
I thought Kos was insane. I thought Obama was doing exactly what was needed to get elected, and I was pretty sure he would get elected if he won the primary. (Hence my prayers that Hillary would win it, a more clearly partisan and polarizing figure.)
Anyway, this is my real problem with the idea of Jim DeMint, for example, for president. It's not his ideology -- he's right on it. It's that I fear he's become too associated with a partisan movement to ever be able to credibly say "Oh yeah, of course, I want to be a healer or uniter or whatever the fuck I'm supposed to say to please the ninnies." Honestly, I'd like a stealthier version of Jim DeMint. Maybe Jim DeMint can actually make himself a stealthier version of himself; I don't know.
But a lot of people don't seem to like this "stealth" idea, because it's dishonest, but probably more because if the candidate isn't a firebreathing partisan ideologue in his public declarations, you can't be sure he'll vote that way.
I don't know what to say to that, except that voters need to be flattered some. There is 12% or so of voters who lean right but do not identify as conservatives, because they want to think of themselves as independent, and also because, probably, they think the conservatives are wrong on some issues. I don't know how you pick up that 12% with a candidate who says to them "You're wrong, conservatism is right on everything." I think they'll flee that message because I know they've already been fleeing it all their lives: If they believed that, they'd just self-identify as conservative and always vote to the right. That is, they'd be part of the base already.
Since they're not part of the base, they don't like that message. And I do not for the life of me get the people who say "Just use the message they've already explicitly rejected for 15 years; it'll work this time."
Anyway, this is what I'm usually talking about in these purity wars sorts of arguments. I don't mind politicians who think like Rush Limbaugh. I just don't want them talking like him in public. Unless they're in a super-red district, in which case, fine, we can always use a dozen bomb-throwers. But anything national or statewide? It just doesn't work.
Posted by: Ace at
08:59 AM
| Comments (301)
Post contains 902 words, total size 6 kb.
I would do just about anything to get rid of Sen. Erpenbach. Well, maybe not anything moron-style, but anything else.
Posted by: tcn at February 18, 2011 09:03 AM (DjPot)
Posted by: t-bird at February 18, 2011 09:04 AM (FcR7P)
I wonder if the police will physically drag them into the chambers and how that might play out on tv.
So far, PR wise, i think this is hurting the public unions
Posted by: Ben at February 18, 2011 09:05 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: runningrn at February 18, 2011 09:05 AM (ihSHD)
Posted by: Waterhouse at February 18, 2011 09:06 AM (lTcL2)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at February 18, 2011 09:07 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: dagny at February 18, 2011 09:07 AM (l3g1A)
Posted by: Tom at February 18, 2011 09:08 AM (MWXXs)
Posted by: Wade1970 at February 18, 2011 09:09 AM (MQOrx)
Posted by: Dr Spank at February 18, 2011 09:09 AM (1fB+3)
Posted by: Tom at February 18, 2011 09:09 AM (MWXXs)
Posted by: Ben at February 18, 2011 09:09 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Yip at February 18, 2011 09:10 AM (SyLEU)
Let the GOP take this quote to heart.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at February 18, 2011 09:10 AM (LdYLm)
Rush on Wisconsin teacher's salaries and compensation is: "If they were really low and making so little, the media would be plastering that information all over the place. In fact, they are way out of line with what everyone else makes, that's why it's not being revealed. Per Fox89,500K avg. salary and benefits, average non-public American worker makes 61,000 in salary and benefits/year."
Posted by: runningrn at February 18, 2011 09:10 AM (ihSHD)
Posted by: pep at February 18, 2011 09:11 AM (GMG6W)
Posted by: Ben at February 18, 2011 09:12 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: runningrn at February 18, 2011 09:12 AM (ihSHD)
Really? He's been on Fox quite a bit lately. I really, really like him.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 18, 2011 09:12 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 09:13 AM (nj1bB)
If only we had that fence on the southern border...
The rally in Madison tomorrow to support Walker has confirmed Andrew Breitbart and Herman Cain as speakers. There will be buses from Milwaukee, Rhinelander, Eau Claire, Green Bay/Appleton (details still TBA; follow WI_Majority on Twitter or the event on Facebook).
I've never been to a rally in WI, I hope there's beer vendors.
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 18, 2011 09:13 AM (nAOMZ)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 18, 2011 09:13 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: Rocks at February 18, 2011 09:13 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 18, 2011 09:13 AM (TMB3S)
You hit the nail on the head about the importance of moderate in appearance, but unyielding in principle. Reagan had it in spades-- while he could be a fiery speaker, over time he worked the affable, amiable guy-who-was-just-there-to-do-his-duty schtick much more often.
It was one of Obama's strongest cards in 2008-- though he had his willing tools in the press to push the illusion of non-partisan (ha!) amiability-- to reach the mass of swing voters who like to vote for the personality (or appearance thereof).
We really need a new Reagan, someone trustworthy on principles and issues yet affable and amiable to keep from frightening the swing voters. The appearance of moderation-- what you called "moderate in temperament"-- wins the Presidency.
Posted by: westcoast at February 18, 2011 09:14 AM (cMllr)
Rush on Wisconsin teacher's salaries and compensation is: "If they were really low and making so little, the media would be plastering that information all over the place. In fact, they are way out of line with what everyone else makes, that's why it's not being revealed. Per Fox89,500K avg. salary and benefits, average non-public American worker makes 61,000 in salary and benefits/year."
Posted by: runningrn at February 18, 2011 01:10 PM (ihSHD)
It's $56,000 in Madison, WI. But that's becuase of the high concentration of Gov't workers. Nearby Fitchburg, WI is $50,000
Posted by: The Robot Devil at February 18, 2011 09:14 AM (LdYLm)
Heather, check out the WI short bus at Moonbattery. It's full of win. (I haz no linky skilz.)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 18, 2011 09:15 AM (UOM48)
I could quote Sun Tzu, but a better parallel is Marlon Brando's Godfather character. Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.
This is the most overused and retarded quote of the past 30 years. I fucking hate hearing it at this point.
Kill your enemies. Insincerity is unbecoming.
At least, according to my mom.
Posted by: garrett at February 18, 2011 09:15 AM (sHj00)
Your basic point is right. That 's why Reagan was an icon. He embodied and embraced all 3 legs of the conservative stool, but communicate them in a way that "flatter" people. I am impressed with Walker and like his style. On the other hand, I don't like the people on our side to use this as an excuse to attack your own base as a means to "reach out". I can be excited by people like Walker. Middle of the pack candidate like Tpaw doesn't excite me. He stayed low to avoid the direct fire in the last 2 years. Other people went on the front line to prepare the battlefield and soften the hostile fires for him. Then he can't even handle a hostile interview accusing his side of inciting violence (ie ceding the term of the debate). People like Walker didn't have the visibility in the last 2 years to join the fight for our nation. Other people did that. Now he got the opportunity to do that and I am really impressed with him so far.
Posted by: LAI at February 18, 2011 09:15 AM (R4ub4)
THEY are the oppressive regime. WE are the victims.
Posted by: nickless at February 18, 2011 09:16 AM (MMC8r)
Anyone who's ever been there...
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 18, 2011 09:17 AM (nAOMZ)
Posted by: Dave C at February 18, 2011 09:17 AM (NDoGJ)
Posted by: The Voice of Reason at February 18, 2011 09:17 AM (UpqKo)
I agree, Obama won because he was a blank slate, yet he could wink and nod to left wingers as they knew where he really stood.
I wouldn't mind that for us in 2012
Posted by: Ben at February 18, 2011 09:17 AM (wuv1c)
Ann Althouse pulling in 158K a year as a professor at madison, so take her comments on the situation with a metric ton of salt.
...and bring some Feminine Moisturizer.
Posted by: Labia Greaser's Local #7 at February 18, 2011 09:18 AM (sHj00)
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at February 18, 2011 09:18 AM (tvs2p)
I could quote Sun Tzu, but a better parallel is Marlon Brando's Godfather character. Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.
This is the most overused and retarded quote of the past 30 years. I fucking hate hearing it at this point.
Kill your enemies. Insincerity is unbecoming. At least, according to my mom.
Posted by: garrett at February 18, 2011 01:15 PM (sHj00)
“The greatest happiness is to scatter your enemy, to drive him before you, to see his cities reduced to ashes, to see those who love him shrouded in tears, and to gather into your bosom his wives and daughters.”Yet another overused quote but more appropriate.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at February 18, 2011 09:18 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 18, 2011 09:19 AM (SJ6/3)
I agree, Obama won because he was a blank slate, yet he could wink and nod to left wingers as they knew where he really stood.
I wouldn't mind that for us in 2012
The problem for us is that we don't have the media machine on our side. We usually ended up with people like Souter, McCain, Graham etc... We usually ended up wiping our nose to vote for a Rep candidate. For me, looks like it is the same for 2012 unless sth changes.Posted by: LAI at February 18, 2011 09:20 AM (R4ub4)
Wisconsin Class I FELONY
946.12(1)
(1) Intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the officer's or employee's office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law;Posted by: Cherry π at February 18, 2011 09:21 AM (+sBB4)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 18, 2011 09:22 AM (SJ6/3)
Yeah, Ace, except you can't really tell when these asshole RINOs really mean they will work with the Marxists. They've made these comments in the past and they've really meant them.
So just how can we tell when the pricks are lying: Now ro history?
Huuuuuuuuuuuu?
Posted by: Sukie Tawdry at February 18, 2011 09:22 AM (MPtFW)
946.12 Misconduct in public office. Any public officer or public employee who does any of the following is guilty of a Class I felony:
Posted by: Cherry π at February 18, 2011 09:22 AM (+sBB4)
Posted by: timwi at February 18, 2011 09:22 AM (Sxt4Z)
I think there are a lot of unemployed teachers around the nation that would take these jobs in a heartbeat. Striking in Wisconsin is illegal. How cool would it be if all those who abandoned their classrooms got the boot? They are failing to perform the job they were hired to do. Wouldn't that qualify as grounds for termination?
We had a recent incident here in Seattle where a young cop shot and killed a deaf, Native American woodcarver who was carrying a pen-knife. He was told to drop the knife, but when he didn't comply, 4 seconds later, the cop pumped 5 bullets into his chest. (The woodcarver also had a blood alohol of 0.18.) The cop resigned yesterday (this incident occurred about 3 weeks ago). It's looking like the review board is going to find him at fault. Liberal idiot I run with was bemoaning that this cop got the option of "stepping down and retaining his certification. What's it gonna take to be able to get rid of bad cops" he bemoaned, "How come he hasn't been fired already?"
I said, "Unions. They protect people who shouldn't be kept in place." I mentioned numerous incidents where nurses were caught stealing drugs at work, using those drugs, being alcoholics, etc., and how the hospital I work at had to send them all to rehab. We couldn't fire them. I also mentioned the 60 Minutes piece (hardly a right wing entity) on the "Rubber Rooms" for teachers in NYC.
Posted by: runningrn at February 18, 2011 09:23 AM (ihSHD)
I didn't say to be insincere. Lying is insincere. Not telling people what you think until it is to your advantage is something else entirely. Eisenhower understood that. He let others lead the charge and remained inscrutable until it was to late for his opposition to do anything about it. Everyone can't do this, of course, but the big bosses can use it to good effect. Don't hand advantages to your opponents.
Remind me not to cross your Mom.
Posted by: pep at February 18, 2011 09:23 AM (GMG6W)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at February 18, 2011 01:07 PM (LdYLm)
I think its all in the timing. If Christie would have been elected last november and pulled the stuff he did when he first came in it would be the case. But now he's already pulled his stuff out and most people like it. But now its presidential election time and you need to get your base on board and ready to do stuff and that's what's happening here. This is part of the re-elect Obama campaign.
Posted by: buzzion at February 18, 2011 09:23 AM (oVQFe)
What is completely outrageous and beyond the pale is that Obama's political committee is getting involved in this mess in Madison Wisconsin. Organizing For America (an Obama organization) is driving people to Madison to participate in this riot.
Again, it is made perfectly clear that Obama is an agent of destruction, he WANTS chaos, he thinks it is a good thing to throw gasoline on an already smoldering fire.
Posted by: Boots at February 18, 2011 09:24 AM (neKzn)
The unions are running around working their butts raw with a 6 foot dildo in front of God and all creation and they're too damn stoopid to understand that. The workforce is overwhelmingly non union and most of the non union people are not appreciative of the unions. They are performing a self gang rape and I'm loving it. Pump on teachers!
Posted by: maddogg at February 18, 2011 09:25 AM (OlN4e)
A couple of week's ago, I was coaching a young employee I've been mentoring on how to navigate the political minefield in the owrkplace.
I told him that any time he needed to counter some back-stabber who was trying to fuck him over, his approach should always be calm and sober.
You make the other guy look bad by letting him get emotional. You? You are the professional who is just presenting the facts and trying to do right by the company.
It' s never about you, it's about the company.
You don't say,"Hey! This lazy fuckface is making my life impossible because he's such an incompetent jerkoff!"
It doesn't matter if it's true. You don't say it.
You make it about the company. You say, "Our product is suffering because of these issues. I'm very concerned about X,Y, Z." Then you present your proof. You let the management make the connection between the problems and the lazy jerk-off creating them."
It's fun rip some idiot coworker to your workplace buddies. Hey, they're on your team (just like how in politics, the partisans on the right are on your team).
But the people making the decisions? They don't want to hear all that mean-spirited personal stuff. They want everyone to work together as a team.
Divisive people don't make it far in the workplace, even if they're good at what they do. The same goes for national politics.
Do I like it? No. Do I want to punch the "let's all work together and get something done with all this incivility" types right in the throat? Of course I do. Things get uncivil for a reason--usually it's because some worthless retard is trying to foist the consequences of his own failings of on you.
But it is what it is.
Posted by: Warden at February 18, 2011 09:25 AM (V6HDd)
Posted by: Wade1970 at February 18, 2011 09:25 AM (MQOrx)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 18, 2011 01:16 PM (SJ6/3)
So, how many clowns do fit in a short bus?
Posted by: runningrn at February 18, 2011 09:25 AM (ihSHD)
I'm going to try to be on a real bus to Madison tomorrow 'cause I can't deal with their anti-car setup downtown.
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 18, 2011 09:25 AM (nAOMZ)
" . . . or whatever the fuck I'm supposed to say to please the ninnies . . . "
Independent voters. The middle. The center. All summed up perfectly as "ninnies."
Posted by: I-wuz-too-hip-now-I'm-just-cynical at February 18, 2011 09:25 AM (4sQwu)
I said, "Unions. They protect people who shouldn't be kept in place." I mentioned numerous incidents where nurses were caught stealing drugs at work, using those drugs, being alcoholics, etc., and how the hospital I work at had to send them all to rehab. We couldn't fire them. I also mentioned the 60 Minutes piece (hardly a right wing entity) on the "Rubber Rooms" for teachers in NYC.
Posted by: runningrn at February 18, 2011 01:23 PM (ihSHD)
I'm dying to know what your lib runner pal's response was!
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 18, 2011 09:26 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: SurferDoc at February 18, 2011 09:27 AM (o3bYL)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 09:27 AM (nj1bB)
I'm going to try to be on a real bus to Madison tomorrow 'cause I can't deal with their anti-car setup downtown.
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 18, 2011 01:25 PM (nAOMZ)
Heather, that short bus pic would make an excellent t-shirt for a Tea Party rally. It would piss off all the "right" people.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 18, 2011 09:28 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: tcn at February 18, 2011 09:28 AM (DjPot)
So say these Unions get their way, and the budget cuts aren't made. What's going to happen when a bunch of their "valued" members end up losing their jobs? Rioting? Murder? Mayhem? Chaos?
If I was a working class parent in WI, I would be pissed. This is what, day 3 of kids having no school? I'm sure there are thousands of parents out there scrambling to find daycare for their children.
Like Rush said, the Dems always use kids as human shields.
Posted by: runningrn at February 18, 2011 09:29 AM (ihSHD)
Except that there hasn't been a "message"—in the sense of political-philosophical principle—election in those fifteen years. Rand Paul's is the only arguable exception, and he had to run—and won—against both parties. On principle.
Here's why you find yourself never convincing anyone with your line on "purity" and shit (aside from the fact that you change the line every time you run it): When "purity"/"message"/any semblance of same comes from someone you don't like, you say their appeal to principle is partisan/simpleminded/exclusionary/etc., but when mere partisanship comes from an unprincipled pol you do like, like Christie or Ryan, you approvingly call it principled/intelligent/appealing/etc.
You dissemble about dissembling. That's one too many.
Only those who already share your judgment of whose behavior is principled/partisan/etc. are going take what you're saying in the way you want it taken. Because they're already there—in a purely partisan sense—and don't have to actually follow what you're saying. Which is unfollowable in any other way. Like a Party platform.
Posted by: oblig. at February 18, 2011 09:30 AM (xvZW9)
Oh, goody! Get Heather likkered up and turn her loose! Promise you'll post the vid on YouTube.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 18, 2011 09:30 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: maddogg at February 18, 2011 09:31 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Moi at February 18, 2011 09:32 AM (Ez4Ql)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 18, 2011 01:30 PM (UOM4
Can't go myself--my four year old son comes first and I"m not dragging him out among the heathens, but I will send hubby and he does have the video. I'm sure he will get some shots of Heather as she scales the Capitol building or something....
Posted by: tcn at February 18, 2011 09:32 AM (DjPot)
Posted by: Zombie-dananjcon at February 18, 2011 09:33 AM (pr+up)
I'm dying to know what your lib runner pal's response was!
Jane, he was sputtering, then speechless. It was bee-yoo-ti-ful! He and I have gotten into it numerous times (I really don't like him much, but for some reason, my husband really does!) It was so awesome, because he knew I'm right, and he even said "Oh, yeah, I saw that 60 Minutes segment." It was great. He had nothing! Never bring a butterknife to a gunfight. Liberals do it all the time. When they can't win, they change the subject.
Posted by: runningrn at February 18, 2011 09:33 AM (ihSHD)
So say these Unions get their way, and the budget cuts aren't made. What's going to happen when a bunch of their "valued" members end up losing their jobs? Rioting? Murder? Mayhem? Chaos?
If I was a working class parent in WI, I would be pissed. This is what, day 3 of kids having no school? I'm sure there are thousands of parents out there scrambling to find daycare for their children.
Like Rush said, the Dems always use kids as human shields.
Posted by: runningrn at February 18, 2011 01:29 PM (ihSHD)
And if you boil them just right, they make a delicious stew!
Posted by: The DNC at February 18, 2011 09:33 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: joncelli at February 18, 2011 09:33 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: tcn at February 18, 2011 09:33 AM (DjPot)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 09:33 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 09:34 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: runningrn at February 18, 2011 01:33 PM (ihSHD)
Or never bring a frontal lobe dessicated by years of disuse.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at February 18, 2011 09:34 AM (LdYLm)
Radish, be sure to bring your camera, Purell and lots of Fabreeze when you go to that counter-protest. The stench of the Hippy Libtards will be overwhelming.
You'll also need a long, hot shower when you get home. Be safe, and be careful! I wouldn't put anything past those Union Thugs.
Posted by: runningrn at February 18, 2011 09:35 AM (ihSHD)
Geez, guys. You can't even to this in your own lives. Do you go 24-7 TRUTH with your spouse? Your friends? Your employees? Your boss?
You know what we call people who do that? Friendless, single and unemployed.
I like to think of myself as a pretty truth-y guy and even have a few rants here about how we don't have the balls to acknowledge the elephant in the room on a slew of touchy social, racial and cultural issues.
But, damn, you do have to be pragmatic. Life requires that you finesse the truth every now and then. It's the only way to get what you want without spending every minute of every day at war with someone else.
Back to the workplace thing--you know why you never TELL your manager what should be done? Because it's an attack on his stupid, fragile little manager ego. That's why.
So you lead him right up to the conclusion that you wanted him to come to and allow him to believe he got there all by himself, like the smart, dynamic leader he believes himself to be.
And now he gets to be a problem solver instead of a guy taking orders from his subordinate.
It's no different in politics. You have to play to the stupid, fragile little egos of the "moderates" and "independents" who have decided that being unprincipled, low-information voters makes them nuanced, outside-the-box thinkers.
Posted by: Warden at February 18, 2011 09:35 AM (V6HDd)
Posted by: runningrn at February 18, 2011 01:33 PM (ihSHD)
Love it.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 18, 2011 09:35 AM (UOM48)
Walker is a man of resolve. definitely. it shows in that tidbit in your post.
makes me wonder how many times he really wanted to say 'get you dead asses back, NOW, you puss.
Posted by: pitchforksandpowder at February 18, 2011 09:35 AM (GStPL)
Posted by: Daffy Duck Classic at February 18, 2011 09:35 AM (sHj00)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 18, 2011 09:36 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: Daffy Duck Classic at February 18, 2011 01:35 PM (sHj00)
Sorry, this is Duck Season no self immolation allowed!
Posted by: Bugs Bunny at February 18, 2011 09:36 AM (LdYLm)
That totally would. I should make a sign.
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 18, 2011 09:37 AM (nAOMZ)
Like Rush said, the Dems always use kids as human shields.
I think he stole that from iknotheleft.
Posted by: garrett at February 18, 2011 09:37 AM (sHj00)
Posted by: runningrn at February 18, 2011 09:37 AM (ihSHD)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 09:38 AM (nj1bB)
Sort of on-topic: Those of you getting the vapors about Jim Demint more than likely have nothing to worry about. I was told over a year ago by someone who knows him that he's not going to run. Granted, things can always change but I don't think he's interested.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at February 18, 2011 09:38 AM (JxMoP)
In good news, 3 ObamaCare defunding bills will be voted upon later today. Steve King is discussing his amendment now.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 18, 2011 09:38 AM (yfJ6g)
Communism. Islamism. Many there were grabbing up her tabloid propaganda.
Get the children away from these people as fast as you can.
Posted by: Derak at February 18, 2011 09:38 AM (CjpKH)
Geez, guys. You can't even to this in your own lives. Do you go 24-7 TRUTH with your spouse? Your friends? Your employees? Your boss?
Why, yes. Yes I do. Thats why I'm known as "that asshole who is too damn skilled to run off" around the work place. I gotta be me
Posted by: maddogg at February 18, 2011 09:39 AM (OlN4e)
"A leader's supposed to say stuff like "of course I want to work with the other side" even if he's frankly lying"
More likely, he's not lying, he just knows damn well that the left will NEVER work with him. Conservatives have tried for decades to truly find common ground, and have oftentimes gone way over the lefty line to show how willing they are to find common ground, at the expense of what's right for our Country. Reality is, the left thinks common ground is wayyyyy over on their side, kind of like how Fox News is seen as right wing.
Posted by: Uncle Jefe at February 18, 2011 09:40 AM (+3fAP)
(a) The qualified electors of the state, of any county, city, village, or town, of any congressional, legislative, judicial, town sanitary, or school district, or of any prosecutorial unit may petition for the recall of any incumbent elective official by filing a petition with the same official or agency with whom nomination papers or declarations of candidacy for the office are filed demanding the recall of the officeholder."
Posted by: misterdregs at February 18, 2011 09:40 AM (XR47G)
I love the fleeing chicken graphic on the short bus. That should be on signs and T-shirts everywhere with the label "Wisconsin Democratic Party mascot" or some such.
That was me. I thought all of them were chasing me, but they passed me and kept going toward the state line.
Whew.
Posted by: The Chicken at February 18, 2011 09:40 AM (XdlcF)
Who is closer then to a real squish (an independent) and can better guess at what will appeal to them?
I used to get squishy.
Posted by: Anne Althouse at February 18, 2011 09:40 AM (sHj00)
Posted by: tcn at February 18, 2011 09:40 AM (DjPot)
*lol*
I'm meek and law-abiding. I'll be listening respectfully to Cain and Breitbart, carrying a little "Dear Gov Walker, I'll be happy to pay a small fraction of my own health insurance costs if you hire me" sign.
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 18, 2011 09:42 AM (nAOMZ)
Posted by: Ryan Frank at February 18, 2011 09:42 AM (CECAj)
You know, this whole thing is going to be really interesting. Even some of my lefty Democrat friends are anti-union. One of them sends her kids to private school because of them and another one who used to be a consultant for Deloitte and Touche saw how destructive they were when she traveled the country to assess various big business manufacturing processes.
Ooh, Rush bringing up a good point: The same media that made fun of GWB and Dick Cheney for "flying around the country" and "hunkering down in a bunker" hiding from the terror threat on 9/11 are lauding the "bravery" of the WI state Senate Democrats for "taking a stand" and leaving the state.
Posted by: runningrn at February 18, 2011 09:42 AM (ihSHD)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 09:44 AM (nj1bB)
You know what? Congratulations. I mean that sincerely.
But know that you're the exception to the rule. It's the rare individual who is considered irreplaceable.
And in politics, everyone is replaceable.
Posted by: Warden at February 18, 2011 09:44 AM (V6HDd)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 18, 2011 09:44 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Daffy Duck Classic at February 18, 2011 01:35 PM (sHj00)
Nuthin like a goodly amount of gun powder.
Posted by: Zombie-dananjcon at February 18, 2011 09:44 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 18, 2011 01:42 PM (nAOMZ)
C'mon Heather, your a moronette. I think the moron nation should be loud and proud supporting Gov. Walker. Yes?
Posted by: tcn at February 18, 2011 09:45 AM (DjPot)
I used to stop at the quilt shop there, back before I ran out of room to store fabric.
Oh, and Radish, make sure you're all up to date on your Tetanus shots and Hepatits Vacines before tomorrow!
And pinning my name and address to my underpants, so they can ID my body (was told to write my SS# on my arm in Sharpie, but I don't want anyone to steal it).
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 18, 2011 09:45 AM (nAOMZ)
What an idiot. The other day I said Christie was lying about his reasons for not joining the ObamaCare suit. I said it was a clever lie, but a lie the same, and I didn't say it was principled. How can a lie be principled?
Whatever dude. You're an extremist, frankly, on EVERYTHING, and yet you think you know what appeals to people so far from your way of thinking it's not funny.
You deride me as a squish. Fine, I'm a squish. Who is closer then to a real squish (an independent) and can better guess at what will appeal to them? You, the extremist waiting for the world to end so you can bugger off to the woods, or me, the squish?
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 01:38 PM (nj1bB)
Hey uh ace, perhaps you should try and take a bit of your own advice on how you like politicians to act. I know you get sick of being bashed as a RINO/squish/McCain lover etc. everytime you give your criticism. But this going on continuously gets tiring.
Posted by: buzzion at February 18, 2011 09:46 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 09:46 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: tcn at February 18, 2011 09:46 AM (DjPot)
Ace, I agree with your points. I was only saying clarity is the common strength. Now, Obama was stealthy mainly in the way his press coverage ommitted whatever they could to make him look mainstream. His campaign had plenty of leftist markers all over it, but the MSM shaped him and carried him to the election.
You can't ignore the media machine that, once in his pocket, did everything they could to minimize his errors and maximize his made-up image. Too, they went into full tear-down mode on Hillary and then the GOP.
There is a distinction between running for office and governing once in place.
Ideally, trainglulate, immulate Reagan, stay above the frey. But they crucified Reagan at the time and there was A LOT of read meat conservative issues that were left for dead because Reagan was on the defense ( from the RINO's, the press, and the dems ) his entire Presidency.
Posted by: yip at February 18, 2011 09:46 AM (SyLEU)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 09:47 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 09:48 AM (nj1bB)
Barack's gotta love a riotous mob of Union Thugs-
That is what Community Organizing is all about!
Posted by: Gerry Owen at February 18, 2011 09:49 AM (4ABat)
Hahaha!
I had a female employee who hated my guts. I didn't care that much, but it's always better to have a drama-free workplace.
I found out through the grapevine that she thought I was rude and uncaring.
So you know what I did? I made sure I asked her about her personal life and listened to her babble about a bunch of stupid shit I didn't care about for a minute or two before getting down to the business at hand.
Worked like a charm. She thought I cared about her personal life, so she became a fan. I got better work out of her.
I supposed i could have instead dug in and told her, "You're here to work, you fucking imbecile! I don't have time for your stupid personal shit. You're on the goddamned clock now let's get to it!"
But that wouldn't have been as effective. So I went for the small lie--pretending I gave a shit about her stupid life--because it cost me very little.
Posted by: Warden at February 18, 2011 09:50 AM (V6HDd)
Posted by: lowfibass at February 18, 2011 09:50 AM (T1ZAZ)
Posted by: The Q at February 18, 2011 09:51 AM (AXHCj)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 09:51 AM (nj1bB)
BTW, remember all the crying over the fact that Bush's "election people" were the one protesting in Florida in 2000?
And how there's no noise being made about Obama's actual election people organizing and leading these protests and the media response.
Democrats and the media. BIRM.
Posted by: The Q at February 18, 2011 09:53 AM (AXHCj)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 09:54 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: The Q at February 18, 2011 01:51 PM (AXHCj)
My son's Catholic school is certainly open. The problem is that the bus service is provided by the public school system, and that shuts down when the public schools are not in session. That is only supposed to happen for snow days and the like, but this crap is causing all sorts of headaches for parents who aren't even involved with the public schools.
And yes, I expect good teachers will jump ranks, too. It can only help the Catholic school system in the end.
Posted by: tcn at February 18, 2011 09:54 AM (DjPot)
Posted by: Warden at February 18, 2011 01:50 PM (V6HDd)
Seriously, that has got to work better than turning the TV volume up while your wife is telling you what a terrible day she had........
Posted by: maddogg at February 18, 2011 09:55 AM (OlN4e)
You're tired of me pouncing on oblig.?
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 01:47 PM (nj1bB)
130 Or are you taking my pouncing on oblig to be a pouncing on you?
Oblig. is aptly named. He is obligatory. Everything he says is predictable. Everyone sucks but him, and there's no point in fighting, because the world is ending.
That's not an attack on you.
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 01:48 PM (nj1bB)
Niether really. I don't consider it attack on me because I'm tired of both sides. I'm sick of the Purge all the RINOs! I'm sick of the Purge the social cons! But you are saying that you like a candidate taking a more "diplomatic" approach if you will, and you're not doing that. And this always degenerates from the point you and oblig. have started. Its not always you and its not always him, but this stuff just keeps popping up and going down the same road. You feel attacked and so attack back and it will go on and on, and then someone will mention the P name, either negatively or positively, and then eventually we get to the person who has decided that they are the Martyr for their anti-fandom of her.
So if you're going to be of the mind that oblig. or whoever else is going to be unflinching in their way of doing things, shouldn't you be the one to try and act the way you prefer to see politicians act? More like Walker, and less of a firebrand like Rush.
Posted by: buzzion at February 18, 2011 09:55 AM (oVQFe)
I agree 100%.
I know people are worried about his gun control stance, amnesty and Cap and Trade, but I'm willing to give him room to nuance his way out of it if he takes a run at the presidency or VP slot.
Because the ONLY issue that matters RIGHT NOW is getting our fiscal house in order. And that means razing the public employee unions and salting the earth behind us when we're finished.
He's one of the people most likely to do that. He's also AWESOME at being a hard ass on this issue without coming off as the bad guy, so I'm on board.
Posted by: Warden at February 18, 2011 09:56 AM (V6HDd)
My favorite was his slogan on AA: mend it, don't end it. Can anyone tell me one thing he mended? Yet he got away with it, and progress on this was stopped dead.
Posted by: pep at February 18, 2011 09:57 AM (GMG6W)
You can be forceful like Christie or Walker (or Kasich, soon, I guess) but still throw in the silly-shit "I am looking foward to hearing the good ideas of the Democrats" and the absurd "I want to unite all people of good faith" horseshit.
Posted by: ace
Kasich I know a lot about. When he was in Congress, he used to walk in the 4th of July parade in Westerville with a '67 Chevy carrying his banner (symbol of thrify). He also called himself a "cheap hawk",in that he wanted to control DoD spending, too. He said last fall that "The parties are just vehicles, the problems have to be solved by the center, by consensus from the right and left."
Again, sounds good, but I don't know if he really believes that or not, or whether it is just so much boilerplate. He was in Congress for 20 years, chairman of the Budget Committee after the '94 election. He knows where the bodies are buried. My ultra-lib sister hates him (she is a state employee).
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes... at February 18, 2011 09:57 AM (usS2T)
Posted by: Holger at February 18, 2011 09:59 AM (YxGud)
And in those rare instances when the actually have a good idea steal the credit for it.
Posted by: Dave at February 18, 2011 10:00 AM (FbRAx)
There's no way in hell that Obama's going to roll over teachers with his betrayal bus now. They are his biggest fans with the most pervasive hold on the nation's population. Obama could not politically survive without his teacher unions to brainwash the public at school.
Posted by: maverick muse at February 18, 2011 10:01 AM (H+LJc)
Obama is very good at this. I'll give him credit for that.
Posted by: Cherry π at February 18, 2011 10:01 AM (+sBB4)
/No, I'm not going to watch it all.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 18, 2011 10:02 AM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 10:02 AM (nj1bB)
Yeah -- unflinching on the principle that guns R bad, m'kay, and granting citizenship to 20M illegals is a great idea with no adverse financial, legal, or political consequences at all. Sure he seems to be doing the Lord's Work on NJ spending, but I'm thinking Christie is almost the EXACT OPPOSITE of what you're praising, ace. He sounds extremely partisan -- his YouTube fights with the teacher's union are legendary -- but, on apparently everything except spending, his principles are those of a squishy RINO. "Thinks like Rush Limbaugh"? No, I don't think so...
Posted by: BobInFL at February 18, 2011 10:04 AM (edlRB)
Posted by: snort! at February 18, 2011 10:04 AM (K/USr)
I think the State Senate can compel the police forces to do just that.
Posted by: Holger at February 18, 2011 10:05 AM (YxGud)
You know Buzzion, honestly, I feel in my heart like I am doing God's work in trying to find a candidate who can beat Obama and I think, I hate to say this but I think this, a lot of people are working for Barack Obama's reelection and do not realize that they are
You realize that they feel the exact same way you know.
Posted by: buzzion at February 18, 2011 10:06 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Vyceroy at February 18, 2011 10:06 AM (+3um5)
Obama gives the dog whistles to the hard left, but he leaves it to DailyKos cockroaches to scream, "Fuck you, you white teabagger scum!"
But you need bombthrowers. You need people like DailyKos and the union nazis and the eco-jihadis out there screaming and hurling invective and applying pressure. It lets Imam Obama look reasonable and middle of the road compared to the DailyKos fucktards.
Obviously Obama is just as much of a soulless, leftist traitor as Kos, but he does a very good job papering over his anit-American marxism with a pleasing veneer of moderation.
Posted by: BuckOfama at February 18, 2011 10:06 AM (BXqkH)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 10:07 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: snort! at February 18, 2011 10:07 AM (K/USr)
I'm part of the 12% and am really disgusted with being called "unprincipled" by both the sanctimonious left and even more sanctimonious right. I'm inclined to vote Republican (did in 200
and will in the future if the Party keeps aggressively pushing fiscal responsibility.
But conservatives act like people who don't check all their boxes on the social issues are morally bankrupt. Can I say this is not exactly the best approach for sweet talkin' voters over to your side?
Posted by: "Unprincipled" and proud of it at February 18, 2011 10:07 AM (Ufo2V)
We are looking for Ronald Reagan. A politician who can look you in the eye, smile warmly and tell you that you are full of shit with a humorous quote or quip, then make you like him in spite of yourself. There ain't that many...
Posted by: maddogg at February 18, 2011 10:07 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 18, 2011 10:08 AM (TMB3S)
It's not enough just to gain control and do nothing.
This is the debate that needs to happen.
If we had elected just "electable" candidates in Wis, nothing would be happening there.
Convince us otherwise, but don't call us "extremists".
Posted by: Cherry π at February 18, 2011 10:08 AM (+sBB4)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 10:09 AM (nj1bB)
Fucking killer. One of the bands I played in used to do this song. Throwing slayer out to a rowdy crowd was like fresh meat in a lions den. lol
Posted by: Berserker at February 18, 2011 10:10 AM (gWHrG)
that's why I come here--that and the frisson of sparkling commentary
Walks like Limbaugh but talks like the uber-moderate so many folks love & admire
Chris Christie, only slimmer and Better
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at February 18, 2011 10:10 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: SurferDoc at February 18, 2011 10:11 AM (o3bYL)
Posted by: MJ at February 18, 2011 10:12 AM (BKOsZ)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 18, 2011 10:13 AM (SJ6/3)
I thing Obama has jumped the shark with this Wis mess. This is the beginning of his political demise.
Posted by: Cherry π at February 18, 2011 10:13 AM (+sBB4)
Ok. You and Warden have convinced me. I have been resisting this message. Politics is the art of persuasion and nuance. I get that. It is also part of the reason people hate politics and politicians, they have to lie to advance the agenda. I hate liars. I want a flame thrower, a truth teller. Scorched earth.
However. This country will not survive 4 more years of Obama. It will not.
I am open to whoever can convince me they will do this one thing.
Fix the financial situation before we go the way of Rome.
I personally think it is too late- entirely because of the nature of politics.
Posted by: Derak at February 18, 2011 10:13 AM (CjpKH)
then we 'roll back' what Hussein has done
without the power to Roll--with Reid and Hussein and the media and all the Usual Suspects in unison against any roll back--it ain't Time yet
soon, my weary brothers. Soon
( if that strategy don't work.........
I CAN SEE HARPER'S FERRY FROM MY HOUSE !!!!!11111!!!! )
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at February 18, 2011 10:14 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: maddogg at February 18, 2011 10:15 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 18, 2011 10:15 AM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 18, 2011 10:16 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: maverick muse at February 18, 2011 10:17 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 10:17 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 10:19 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Mayan Calendars for Sale! at February 18, 2011 10:19 AM (sHj00)
if any of you are listening to Rush
dem senator says he did his job, by not voting on legislation...that they didnt' have time to reveiw/read omg healthcare, anyone??
Posted by: pitchforksandpowder at February 18, 2011 10:19 AM (GStPL)
176 I'm waiting for the O-Care defunding amendments right now, but I was definitely glad to see that. The House debated it for 3hrs last night and few Dems expressed concern for the recent recorded actions of Planned Parenthood. It was disgusting.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 18, 2011 10:21 AM (yfJ6g)
Won't ever forgive the R primary voters of Nevada for nominating her over State Senator Sue and Tarkanian's kid
( either of whom would have beat Reid like a big loud drum )
she and they have caused me to be forced to listen to that whiny old lying POS granny-boy scum-sucking politTurd
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at February 18, 2011 10:23 AM (UqKQV)
165 "Was Kos right or wrong when he said Obama wasn't a good lefty candidate because he 'talked too much like a republican'?"
Kookoo. Kos was wrong. I saw what Obama was doing and said "That fucker's going to win and he's going to be the most leftist president in history."
To be fair, Kos and a lot of the moonbats actually think Obama's a Republican who's going to shatter their liberal dreams.
I don't think Kos was posturing or playing a part when he said that.
Posted by: The Q at February 18, 2011 10:23 AM (AXHCj)
Posted by: Log Cabin at February 18, 2011 10:24 AM (ULUfY)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 18, 2011 02:21 PM (SJ6/3)
What the hell, it makes a more interesting read than anything erg ever posts.
Posted by: maddogg at February 18, 2011 10:24 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 10:25 AM (AZGON)
"But anything national or statewide? It just doesn't work."
Works fine for the Dems - their firebreathers get re-elected again and again, and no one ever calls for them to tone it down.
I would agree that not every GOP'er can be an aggressive bastard, but having a few national/statewide ones wouldn't hurt. Hell, look to Winston Chuchill - he wasn't adverse to getting nasty. Yes, sometimes it hurt him, but if often helped, too.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at February 18, 2011 10:25 AM (xy9wk)
Passed.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 18, 2011 10:25 AM (yfJ6g)
Can we just keep the rope loose?
Posted by: Cherry π at February 18, 2011 10:25 AM (+sBB4)
The difference is, leftist politicians who fly a moderate flag of convenience ARE really leftists. They do not "go native" and become moderate. Occasionally they will ACT moderate...but they always keep the goal in view. Move Left.
"Right leaning" politicians who act/speak as moderates (e.g. using the left's vocabulary) AREN'T. They either ARE stealth lefties or ARE actually squishy middle of the roaders. They believe the crap they spew. They do NOT keep the (presumably right-side) goal in view. Or, if they started with their heart on the right, continued exposure to D.C. makes them go native, AT HEART.
The left makes tactical feints to the center, as part of maneuver towards their left wing goal. The right ACTUALLY moves to the center.
Hence, our country races to the left when the D's are in control, and ambles to the left when the R's are in charge.
That's why conservatives are PISSED when they hear this crap from politicians: it's not tactical; it's not deceptive -- it's WHO THEY ARE. It's never just a feint.
Posted by: BobInFL at February 18, 2011 10:27 AM (edlRB)
Unfortunately, in politics, it sometimes happens that the lunatics get the keys to the asylum. Kos and other loonies got a Leninist self-absorbed dipshit elected POTUS
Hard times ahead, brothers. Hard times.......
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at February 18, 2011 10:28 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 18, 2011 10:29 AM (yfJ6g)
193 their firebreathers get re-elected again
Which national firebreathers were successes?
Presidency: Clinton, Obama, & Carter portrayed themselves as moderates
Senate: Teddy Kennedy, Barbara Boxer, & Schumer are probably the three biggest firebrands in recent memory. What states do they represent?
Ace is right - at the national level, in a contest involving states that aren't hyperpartisan in one way, firebreathing doesn't work.
Posted by: The Q at February 18, 2011 10:29 AM (AXHCj)
A lot of what you've said is why I get so pissed off at the purity folks. Take Boehner, for instance. I am quite sure he is prepared to shut down the government. But, he just can't say it. And when the time comes, he has to keep saying he's willing to work with the other side, and even make it look like it was totally the Dems fault for shutting down the government.
This in-your-face shit might sound good for the rabble (who seem to believe they are a much bigger percentage than they really are), but winning with a smile and finesse gets those independents/centrists/whatever to come along for the ride. It is the only way we are ever going to win the presidency back (at least without a charismatic actor like Reagan - and notice I said "actor" - he knew say one thing and do another.).
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 18, 2011 10:30 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 10:30 AM (AZGON)
Well said. That's why we want change - a real conservative that can speak "moderate".
Posted by: Cherry π at February 18, 2011 10:30 AM (+sBB4)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 18, 2011 02:13 PM (SJ6/3)
Okay, if you are controlling a city you are no longer a protester. You are either a rebel or a revolutionary and you shouldn't be surprised your life is on the line.
Posted by: Rocks at February 18, 2011 10:31 AM (Q1lie)
He was not a hard core Rightist in domestic matters, but a Cold Warrior and strongly anti-Hitler back when that was unusual
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at February 18, 2011 10:31 AM (UqKQV)
Ok. You and Warden have convinced me.
Well, there you go guys. The arguments can be tiresome, but they also serve a purpose.
I mean, mostly i just come here to sockpuppet and make thoughtlessly snarky comments, but occasionally I try to influence other people.
For every commenter, there are dozens of lurkers. They're reading and weighing the arguments. And people sometimes do reverse their positions.
I know I've changed my mind on things based on other people's arguments--ace and JackStraw to name two, but there have been others who have influenced me as well.
Posted by: Warden at February 18, 2011 10:31 AM (V6HDd)
@19: "Bipartisanship is nice, but it cannot be a substitute for action, not having it cannot prevent us from going forward. - Nancy Pelosi
Let the GOP take this quote to heart."
Are you kidding? We LOVE that quote - so much so that we built our entire world around it. It gets a little muddled after the first three words, but man, that opening is beautiful. "Bipartisanship is nice" might, might - mind you, only be trumped by "In the beginning" as the greatest three-word phrase ever. The greatest two-word phrase? "I surrender," or, in plural, "We surrender."
Posted by: The GOP at February 18, 2011 10:31 AM (xy9wk)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 10:31 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 10:32 AM (nj1bB)
Isn't it like Congress in that bills have to be scheduled? The Dims see the schedule and just head for the bus again.
Posted by: Rocks at February 18, 2011 10:33 AM (Q1lie)
Emerson Amendment barring IRS from using funds for the individual mandate passed.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 18, 2011 10:34 AM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: tcn at February 18, 2011 10:34 AM (DjPot)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 10:34 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 10:35 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 10:35 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 18, 2011 10:36 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 10:36 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 10:36 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: tcn at February 18, 2011 10:37 AM (DjPot)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 10:38 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 02:36 PM (nj1bB)
Yes but they aren't derelict in their duty till the bill comes up in session. They aren't in session when the schedule comes out.
Posted by: Rocks at February 18, 2011 10:38 AM (Q1lie)
Rush didn't "explode" or "blast" anyone. He never raised his voice. He showed more patience than I would have. I've been listening to Rush now for over a year and I'm amazed at how even tempered he is. He is not ANYTHING like I expected him to be.
But you call him a bomb thrower. That's what wrong with conservatives. You'd rather spend countless hours dissecting every fart from Dave Weigel and David Frum but you have no problem advancing every rotten thing a liberal has ever said about Rush or Mark Levin. Now HE's a bomb thrower and I love him for it! I bet you cringe over Sean Hannity, too, don't you. Of course you do. You're well trained.
Posted by: Jaynie59 at February 18, 2011 10:41 AM (/f9MS)
It is disgusting. I also have a feeling that effort was led by the Appropriators-- who were still whining about further cuts today, BTW-- and by those who have AMTRAK in their districts. However, the Rs have held together strongly on a majority of other amendments save 5 (somewhere near), so I'm not ready to toss them out on their ears just yet.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 18, 2011 10:43 AM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 18, 2011 10:44 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 10:45 AM (AZGON)
The bill only prevents "home health care workers" and "family child care workers" from collectively bargaining with the state.
I think that's a reaction to the drive in Michigan to force babysitters to join SEIU.
But you know the left, never let the facts get in the way of a good hate.
Posted by: HeatherRadish stands with Scott Walker at February 18, 2011 10:45 AM (nAOMZ)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 10:46 AM (nj1bB)
Can't they just call one of the dems' cell phones and trace them?
Call google. They know where everyone is ... even before they go there.
Posted by: Henry Harold Humphries - you can call me 'H' at February 18, 2011 10:47 AM (Ikk5M)
Posted by: Henry Harold Humphries - you can call me 'H' at February 18, 2011 10:49 AM (Ikk5M)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 10:49 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 10:50 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: joeindc44 at February 18, 2011 10:51 AM (QxSug)
"Bomb-thrower" is not a wholly negative term -- bomb-throwers have their usefulness.
I agree, however, Bomb Wearers are more effective.
Have you seen any of the Madrassa Baseball Teams qualify at the Little League World Series? Neither have I.
My people throw like girls. It's sad, but true.
Best to just strap the explosives to them and be done with it.
Posted by: Mohammed at February 18, 2011 10:52 AM (sHj00)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 18, 2011 10:52 AM (yfJ6g)
Ace, Rush is only a provocatuer ( bomb thrower ) in the sense that he ashews politically correct speech and has had the NERVE to question the MSM and their framing of any given storyline.
You can't control the way wacko lefties react, and they react so wildly because they cannot stand to have the meme questioned and their control of the storyline exposed.
I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired. I'll argue or disguss with a leftard if they can keep it on facts instead of feelings and emotion... and of course, you can count the number able to do that on one hand. They are passionate and emotional and you can't talk to them ... at least in my family.
Posted by: yip at February 18, 2011 10:53 AM (SyLEU)
If you're for killing babies, expect to be called out for it. Don't like that? Go to hell.
Posted by: Adjoran at February 18, 2011 10:54 AM (VfmLu)
Posted by: Rocks at February 18, 2011 10:55 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 18, 2011 10:55 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 10:56 AM (AZGON)
It most definitely *is* about killing the unions.
I posted this on another thread, but there are these gems:
12% of health insurance premiums, and 5.8% of salary into pension.
For this, Walker has stated:
A) No layoffs
B) No furloughs
C) No union dues unless you want to be in the union
D) No automatic deduction of union dues for anyone...you must write out the check once per month if you want to pay them.
E) Oh, and the union has to hold a vote to re-certify every year.
F) The unions cannot collectively bargain for anything other than salary increases, and those are capped at CPI unless a statewide referendum is held.
Posted by: GMan at February 18, 2011 10:57 AM (sxq57)
It's just common sense to cut spending and
Common sense
bust public employee unions.
ideological
I'd actually like to hear ways we could get unions to be non-corrupt and responsive to market forces.
Posted by: Dave at February 18, 2011 10:57 AM (FbRAx)
It's not enough just to gain control and do nothing.
This is the debate that needs to happen.
If we had elected just "electable" candidates in Wis, nothing would be happening there.
Convince us otherwise, but don't call us "extremists".
Posted by: Cherry π
I agree with that. Given where we are and what has happened, we can't keep going downstream singing, "don't rock the boat".
The so-called "electability" factor is completely unpredictable, mere hype spewed by the candidate owned by globalists, wittingly or not. McCain was "the most electable" '08 potus candidate.
Also, the "extremist" label is misused purposely and too frequently. as with the DHS Napolitano early memo targeting veterans, conservatives as radicals to be eschewed by officials and by the general public.
When activism became apparent from conservative quarters via the Tea Party movement, "extremism" became a smear tactic performed by everyone so proud to have read Alinsky's rules for radicals and practicing the tactics out for themselves, inappropriately targeting good competition in order to contain the political platform within the same ol' same old. Let me specify "centrist" purists who extinguish critical historical points by smearing the messenger as radical, extremist, or radical extremist.
Posted by: maverick muse at February 18, 2011 11:00 AM (H+LJc)
Which national firebreathers were successes?
Presidency: Clinton, Obama, & Carter portrayed themselves as moderates
Ace is right - at the national level, in a contest involving states that aren't hyperpartisan in one way, firebreathing doesn't work.
Posted by: The Q
This is ridiculous. The three national examples all claimed to be moderates, and WERE GIVEN COVER BY THE MFM. You left that little detail out. All three showed their colors before, during and after their campaigns.
Try this for a premise: It is far more difficult for a Conservative to be a fire- breather and be successful than for a Leftist to be one.
That premise can withstand a falsibility test. the first cannot.
Posted by: Blue Hen at February 18, 2011 11:01 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: stuiec at February 18, 2011 11:03 AM (Di3Im)
Right, cell phones too I bet I bet.
Don't cancel the cell phones. Use them to track down the little bastards.
Posted by: Dumb_Blonde at February 18, 2011 11:03 AM (9sEhu)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 11:04 AM (AZGON)
OK, I'll start. Even down this far.
Of course I want to work with the other side, even if;
1- He's a lying, socialist, liberal sockpuppet, constitutional scofflaw, Marlboro puffing, spendthrift, anti-democracy thug who takes it up the squeakhole from every penny ante dictator in the world.
Posted by: Marcus at February 18, 2011 11:04 AM (CHrmZ)
Posted by: Dave at February 18, 2011 02:57 PM (FbRAx)
By not allowing closed shops (or anything of the like, as Walker is stopping them from stealing money from every employee's paycheck as if the union were the government taxing them at will). Without this sort of coercion and force allowed to the unions, they become nothing more than a bunch of people tying their jobs together and bargaining together.
Of course, by the same notion, management must also be allowed to decide if it wants to bargain with collectives of workers, or not.
Of course, if you do these things, then unions disappear. Unions have no reason for existence other than force and extortion (of both the business and employees).
Posted by: Henry Harold Humphries - you can call me 'H' at February 18, 2011 11:04 AM (Ikk5M)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 11:04 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Vyceroy at February 18, 2011 11:04 AM (2UDUL)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 11:06 AM (AZGON)
You *really* think people will write checks to the union every month? I doubt it. The non-negotiating on anything but salary, and then only to a small cap, removes any real incentive people have for keeping the unions around...
I'd be willing to bet that they'd be gone in a few years.
Posted by: GMan at February 18, 2011 11:08 AM (sxq57)
Now is the time for the Wisconsin Republicans to pass all the non budget stuff that the Democrats hate, even the stuff that barely gets a majority of the Republicans.
The Dems will come a running.
Posted by: toby928™ at February 18, 2011 11:09 AM (GTbGH)
As if they haven't been all along?
Look who is gullible. Ex.: GWBush/Paulson ultimatum that unless Congress passed TARP immediately, martial law would result. Then again, if you believe that, who's extremist?
Posted by: maverick muse at February 18, 2011 11:09 AM (H+LJc)
This constitutional scholar right here (who has lived in Madison over the past several years, no less) will be happy to tell you that you're wrong. The collective bargaining agreement was passed via state legislation around 50 years ago, and it can easily be undone by legislation now. Moreover it's not a Federal issue in any way. We might have to worry about the WI state Supreme Court, but that's got a reliable conservative majority right now. And even if it didn't, it's hard-to-impossible to imagine the legal pretext for a suit.
Posted by: Jeff B. at February 18, 2011 11:10 AM (NjYDy)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 11:11 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Mr. Sar Kastik at February 18, 2011 11:12 AM (qC8/Q)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 11:12 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 11:14 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: maverick muse at February 18, 2011 03:09 PM (H+LJc)
You can bet your ass they believed that was a possibility. It was.
The problem was that the solution (to move private liabilities onto the public books) was worse and just kicked the can down the road - along with moving a mainly economic problem (though there were some very serious monetary issues) into a real monetary problem.
Congress had responsibility to take care of the monetary issues, only, but it acted on the economic issues, while they were at it. But, you are kidding yourself if you don't think the credit crisis was very, very serious. As to waht would have resulted from it, that is not known, but it would not have been a ride in the park. And it won't be when we hit the eyewall coming at us - especially after the big mistakes I outlined above.
Posted by: Henry Harold Humphries - you can call me 'H' at February 18, 2011 11:14 AM (Ikk5M)
247 The three national examples all claimed to be moderates, and WERE GIVEN COVER BY THE MFM. You left that little detail out. All three showed their colors before, during and after their campaigns.
If you're saying that those three showed some far left positions before being elected, that's true, but it's also true of Bush 43. Bush 43 was talking about a hypothetical war with Iraq back in 1999.
That does not contradict the point - that those four presidents (and Reagan) presented themselves as moderates, at the very least in tone.
Howard Dean, Jesse Jackson, Pat Buchanan, Bob Dole (in 198
- they were firebreathers. They were bombthrowers. They were people who did not pretend to be moderate.
Carter, Clinton, Bush 43, and Obama all claimed to be moderates, and they won. Reagan may have showed his cards a little clearer, but he was not even close to the firebreathers mentioned above.
Posted by: The Q at February 18, 2011 11:15 AM (AXHCj)
Boehner or McConnell will say, "Of course I want to work with the President and hear him out and figure out where we can move forward with shared principle"
Huh. And how many times did Tip O'Neill declare Reagan's budget DOA? Why is it that the President Present gets to say I won and Boehner doesn't?
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at February 18, 2011 11:15 AM (1hM1d)
I'd be surprised if the unions didn't create an "independent" organization that automatically withdraws membership dues, like a gym or health club to which members are automatically enrolled as a union perk.
Posted by: maverick muse at February 18, 2011 11:15 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Vyceroy at February 18, 2011 11:15 AM (tXSkq)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 11:20 AM (nj1bB)
Ace, FWIW I've spoken to some people who work on the GOP State Sen side of the legislature -- and the good news is that according to my friends (one of whom is a chief-of-staff) these protests have had the absolute opposite effect intended. In fact, there was real danger in not getting the plan through EARLY ON, because (admittedly) this is some really bold radical stuff from Walker. But the school shutdowns, the endless death threats (you wouldn't believe some of the stuff their FAMILIES are getting), the busing in of out-of-state protesters, and finally the comical flight of the Senate Dems have stiffened their resolution immensely. Before this all went down smart money would have bet on a few defections from the GOP side in the Senate (2 in particular, making it a razor-thin 17-16 victory). Now? Now I'm pretty sure they're all going to be on board.
Also, my chief-of-staff friend tells me that the internal polling is absolutely toxic for the unions right now. And you have to understand that WI is a pretty heavily unionized state.
I'm very confident this is all going to go down as a major victory for us. I predict Walker may allow the Dems to attach some meaningless amendment to the bill to let them save a bit of face (remember what Ace said about 'moderate in tone?" Wisconsin ain't a red state yet), but it's all going through.
Posted by: Jeff B. at February 18, 2011 11:20 AM (NjYDy)
Hey Vyceroy, are you the same poster as "Vyce" from HotAir? If so, way to go on fighting the good fight over there. My god, I read those comments and I sometimes want to smash my laptop.
Posted by: Jeff B. at February 18, 2011 11:22 AM (NjYDy)
No, I did not say that the credit crisis was not real. The TARP example proved that Republicans lie, since it was propagandized as a quick fix on our national economy. Getting any accounting for all our TARP tax funds lost to globalist banks will never happen. And threatening Americans with martial law if they don't fork out globalist bank bail-outs was my point in reflecting upon who is extremist and what is radical, specifically when Republicans are at the helm.
Posted by: maverick muse at February 18, 2011 11:22 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Guvnah at February 18, 2011 11:22 AM (Rg8DN)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 11:24 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 11:25 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at February 18, 2011 11:27 AM (nj1bB)
Because our side isn't nuts.
Posted by: pep at February 18, 2011 11:28 AM (GMG6W)
B-schools are usually the bastions of good sense at big universities. From what I hear, it was the B-school that blocked U Chicago from getting an HDr slapped onto him.
Posted by: Y-not at February 18, 2011 11:30 AM (pW2o8)
But go the way of the lie, be the deceiver, and explain again why voters should think they can rely on your validity this time.
Ex: McCain.
Posted by: maverick muse at February 18, 2011 11:33 AM (H+LJc)
Don't have his e-mail on me. I'll call him later tonight and see if I can convince him, though. He's a pretty no-drama/no-press sort of guy, though, so I'm doubtful.
Posted by: Jeff B. at February 18, 2011 11:33 AM (NjYDy)
Here's something not_steve_in_hb suggested: They're probably all set up for direct deposit payroll payments. The governor can (I'm thinking) stop direct deposit payments and start writing physical checks, which have to be picked up in person.
Cutting off their state-issued travel cards would surely get them back home as they are not about to foot the bill for their vacation from responsibility on their own dime. Further, unless they are on official state business, those cards are being misused.
Posted by: whatever at February 18, 2011 11:35 AM (LyOUH)
Nah, we usually skip the usual drinking spots, they're usually undergrad hellholes and besides money is always an issue. We practically lived at Dottie's for a period of time, however. Had a nasty effect on my waistline until I gave it up.
We live right on Lake Mendota, about 3 minutes away from the Union, to give you a sense of our personal geography. The Capitol is about a 10 minute walk down State Street from us. (I say "us" but I'm not there right now, sadly...I'd give anything to be back in Mad City right now. Just to troll the hippies if nothing else...all those cliches about "The People's Republic of Madison" are absolutely 100% accurate.)
Posted by: Jeff B. at February 18, 2011 11:44 AM (NjYDy)
Posted by: Vyceroy at February 18, 2011 11:48 AM (tXSkq)
Just to walk this back a little bit, "absolutely toxic" is not the phrasing my guy used, that was me editorializing and honestly going to far in a fit of enthusiasm. What he said, rather, is that we're definitely winning the PR war.
And as a note of caution, the situation is fluid, as always. Things could change, and I don't want to be the guy sitting here holding the bag if it somehow all goes pear-shaped. But as things stand? This is backfiring. Madison is not the state as a whole.
Posted by: Jeff B. at February 18, 2011 11:49 AM (NjYDy)
Posted by: maverick muse at February 18, 2011 03:22 PM (H+LJc)
Don't forget, TARP was a product of the dem Congress. The only real opposition to TARP was from the House GOP, and they were getting destroyed over their opposition. They forced the first TARP to go down in flames, which at least allowed a few safeguards put into the second version, but that was still total shit, too. But America was scared shitless -and for good reason - though the TARP solution was done totally incorrectly. But the blame for that goes 50-50 between the dem Congress and Bush.
Most of us commenting on bomb-throwing right wing sites were saying that TARP was a scam and that it would never be used for what they claimed (since the $750 billion figure was just pulled out of Paulson's ass, obviously, and based on nothing). We were correct. TARP has been used to buy everything BUT toxic assets.
But, again, don't forget, it was the House GOP and conserevatives who pushed back hard against TARP.
Posted by: Henry Harold Humphries - you can call me 'H' at February 18, 2011 11:56 AM (Ikk5M)
Posted by: Jeffrey Quick at February 18, 2011 12:04 PM (bijvq)
Posted by: Ken at February 18, 2011 12:04 PM (3ar4L)
Winning elections also requires keeping your base in the game and not giving them a reasons to stay home.
My problem with politicians frequently called RINOs, Graham for example, is that they think its a winning strategy to grab the indies by calling your base "racists".
You don't win by pissing off or scaring off or repulsing those who might vote for you. I want to win.
My view is this: we shouldn't ask nor expect rightish politicians to throw the bombs even though its fun for us. Its us, the morons and general rabble that needs to get out there and roll out a few verbal grenades.
One on one, small group: I present my argument "reasonably."
In a larger group with one loud mouth leftie: I up it a notch. I know I won't change the lefty, but he's not the mind I am trying to change. Sometimes showing how a douche's argument is stoopid changes the mind of the quiet observing audience or at least makes them receptive to the more moderate pitch of a conservative politico.
Posted by: Mr.Barky at February 18, 2011 12:20 PM (qwK3S)
Posted by: Kathleen McKinley at February 18, 2011 01:03 PM (A6fyh)
Say hello to my little mine cave in.
Officer BallBreaker has the most arrests so we'll pay him the most even though the lawsuits are killing us.
There's lots of fields where safety, public interest, weakest link, pass/fail only metrics or just plain convenience make unions work. Teaching isn't one but they got going when they weren't paid spit and now they're a double plus good PITA.
I was referring to ways to make them adversarial but not hostile earlier. The list in the WI bill looks like a bare minimum to be non-coercive. Something that would've balanced the UAW out anytime in the past 40 years & saved GM. Now it's their turd. I probably won't buy another fresh one to polish.
Posted by: Dave at February 18, 2011 01:18 PM (FbRAx)
@200: The media portrayed Obama as a moderate, he portrayed himself as a god. Checking his record revealed that he was a firebreather, or at least a true believer (biggest Leftist in Senate at the time). He gave plenty of statements (e.g. chat with Joe the Plumber) that also showed it. Clinton and Carter were little-known governors.
Reagan was regarded as an uber-Reichwing extremist: voting for him was basically voting for war with Russia. In no sense was he presented as a moderate.
For the Senate, there's also Dick Durbin, Bernie Sanders (an open Socialist, no less), Reid, etc.
Pelosi didn't run at a national level, but the Dems chose her, an obvious firebreather, for a national position.
Posted by: The GOP at February 18, 2011 01:50 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 18, 2011 01:55 PM (mHQ7T)
BULL FUCKING SHIT, ACE, AND YOU CAN'T HONESTLY BELIEVE THAT. WHY WOULD SOMEONE WHO LOOKS LIKE DANIELS EVEN TRY FOR INDEPENDENT VOTERS? WHAT ABOUT OVERTURNING ONLY PARTS OF OBAMACARE AND TINKERING WITH IT? OR HOW ABOUT RATIONING CARE FOR THE ELDERLY?
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 18, 2011 02:57 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: General Schadenfreude at February 18, 2011 03:52 PM (bAySe)
Posted by: Arms Merchant at February 18, 2011 09:01 PM (VdT9+)
Posted by: wang dang doodle at February 18, 2011 10:44 PM (tXbf1)
Posted by: soccer cleats at June 26, 2011 10:07 PM (ESwwK)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2902 seconds, 429 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Rush at February 18, 2011 09:02 AM (LdYLm)