November 07, 2011
— Gabriel Malor I stumbled over a column (I hesitate to call the DenBestian-length and -quality piece a mere blog post) by Walter Russell Mead yesterday on the topic of privilege. Specifically, the collapse of expectations of privilege that is fueling the Occupy movement and various other protests.
He starts with police union privilege:
New Yorkers are getting an uncomfortable look at the ugly realities behind what we like to think of as the countryÂ’s bluest, most European and most enlightened city. A series of trials now underway in the Bronx reveal the harsh truth of embedded corruption and contempt for the public at the heart (if that is the right word) of the New York City police union.A palpably shocked New York Times covered the story last week as union-organized cops hurled their venom and hate at the law they are sworn to uphold:
As 16 police officers were arraigned at State Supreme Court in the Bronx, incensed colleagues organized by their union cursed and taunted prosecutors and investigators, chanting “Down with the D.A.” and “Ray Kelly, hypocrite.”[...]
Together with a string of other recent cases, the Bronx case suggests that a culture of corruption and entitlement has spread through the ranks of the thin blue line. Worse, it is clear that police union officials are the mainstay of the illegal ticket fixing enterprise, so much so that prosecutors considered indicting the union as a corrupt organization under racketeering laws. The police demonstration in the Bronx was apparently orchestrated by the union, which sent text messages to officers urging that they show up to support colleagues involved in ticket fixing. “It’s a courtesy, not a crime,” was the slogan.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
03:19 AM
| Comments (72)
Post contains 292 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: mugiwara at November 07, 2011 03:26 AM (KI/Ch)
the Bronx case suggests that a culture of corruption and entitlement has spread through the ranks of the thin blue line.
This is news?
I suppose, I too, in my naivete thought that the police weren't corrupt as hell. I've discovered that they will happily lie to make the state more money. I suppose they are rewarded for this some how.
Posted by: dagny at November 07, 2011 03:33 AM (Ol+5L)
I suppose, I too, in my naivete thought that the police weren't corrupt as hell. I've discovered that they will happily lie to make the state more money. I suppose they are rewarded for this some how.
Posted by: dagny at November 07, 2011 07:33 AMOTOH, I've always though there was a certain level of corruption in the NYPD. My initial take is that the Guy With Three Names was looking for something to fill a blog post and said to himself: "self, let's talk about the horrid corrupt cops in NYC!"
In short, I call drivel on this.
Historically, police forces have been fertile grounds for corrupt practices, just like any other governmental authority. When a group is given more privileges than the citizenry at large, exploitation follows. It's not confined to NYC, either.
So that big gelatinous pile of verbiage may have impressed the hell out of Gabe, but to me it was a time-waster in search of an editor, full of obvious points rendered in multi-syllabic grandiosity. I can just hear the guy hitting the "send" key and saying: "oh, what a good boy am I."
Posted by: MrScribbler at November 07, 2011 03:43 AM (HkOAc)
Posted by: Hrothgar at November 07, 2011 03:44 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: Truman North at November 07, 2011 03:45 AM (I2LwF)
Re special privileges, I think it despicable that the murder of a police officer in the line of duty is considered more heinous than the murder of any citizen going about his daily routine.
Then again, I don't believe in hate crimes as an add-on for actions that are already criminal.
Posted by: Hrothgar at November 07, 2011 03:48 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: phoenixgirl ready to drink the perry flavor-aid..can i get a different flavor? at November 07, 2011 03:56 AM (SH3gZ)
"hate crimes" are thought crimes. A dead lover is just as dead as a dead stranger.
Just remember, a dead white Christian heterosexual man is less valuable in the eyes of the law than any other kind of person.
Posted by: Truman North at November 07, 2011 03:57 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Jose at November 07, 2011 04:03 AM (oMY/5)
Remember all those folks who think only the police should have guns? These thugs would have a monopoly of force under that scenario.
Posted by: butch at November 07, 2011 04:05 AM (UIbD4)
Posted by: Hrothgar at November 07, 2011 04:06 AM (i3+c5)
Posted by: Kobe Bryant at November 07, 2011 04:24 AM (sKEfY)
I think it breeds a certain disdain or contempt for the very laws they are supposed to enforce. Or as Orwell says, some animals are more equal than others.
I like the site Injustice Everywhere as he tracks police misconduct nationwide and does statistical YoY reviews of various categories.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 07, 2011 04:29 AM (ENKCw)
Just remember, a dead white Christian heterosexual man is less valuable in the eyes of the law than any other kind of person.
Posted by: Truman North at November 07, 2011 07:57 AM (I2LwF)
At least we know he wasn't killed because of hate, because its impossible for minorities to hate us lovable white guys...
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 07, 2011 04:31 AM (Iaxlk)
Where's Giuliani's heir to clean up NYC corruption, to replace crony corruption Occupy Bloomberg?
..."most European, most enlightened" ... a fallacious, stale gimmick. Most European police includes the SS, Stasi, Ceka, Police d'Etat or Etatisée, Sûreté Nationale, Assault Guards and Carabinieri, KGB, Interpol ... Europeans never embraced the most enlightened form of government as their own, given their Old World long standing permeation of authoritarianism where "most enlightened" translates as serve your European lords, those who know what's best for you, better than you. Americans who long for European authoritarianism have no right to impose such national corruption of our Constitutional Republic to usurp balance of powers into a monopoly of powers to abuse.
The value system that actually touts Europe to be a desirable model for America illustrates grand scale vanity.
Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 07, 2011 04:31 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: dagny at November 07, 2011 04:32 AM (Ol+5L)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 07, 2011 04:33 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: Case at November 07, 2011 04:34 AM (DYR2Q)
Imagine it this became a nation wide movement:
Every time you see a cop you tell him that your taxes pay his salary.
Posted by: Deep Beam at November 07, 2011 04:35 AM (pNAwW)
The value system that actually touts Europe to be a desirable model for America illustrates grand scale vanity.
It demonstrates a grand scale of stupidity. It takes an incredibly naive or incredibly stupid wonk to desire things "european". Why would you want a lesser system? How did some americans become convinced that europe was desirable? Hell, most of this country is composed of people who FLED europe. Please tell me one thing that Europe has/is/produces that we cannot or do not supercede. I can only think of "body odor" and we may have over come that deficiency at OWS.
Posted by: dagny at November 07, 2011 04:35 AM (Ol+5L)
Posted by: Deep Beam at November 07, 2011 04:36 AM (pNAwW)
Surprise (or shock, SHOCK!) by the leftist media is as usual the most disingenuous, inappropriate and counter-intuitively staged response.
Posted by: ontherocks at November 07, 2011 04:37 AM (HBqDo)
By either not turning it in or by not being in court when the ticket number is called.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 07, 2011 04:38 AM (ENKCw)
Americans who long for European authoritarianism have no right to impose such national corruption of our Constitutional Republic to usurp balance of powers into a monopoly of powers to abuse.
Nor, in my opinion, do they even have the write to consider themselves "Americans." They really are what Washington would have called "Tories;" pathetic Euroworshippers that deeply disdain their own countrymen as "beneath them."
Today's varient even worships Asian despotism: just witness the love notes Thomas Friedman routinely writes the killer regime in Beijing, that routinely executes human beings like dogs (typically, a gunshot to the back of the head after being forced to kneel) and immediately thereafter has a "doctor" remove their marketable organs for sale on the black market. That idiot - who would have written essays about how Mussolini made the trains run on time back in the 30's - calls these inhuman monsters "enlightened."
If that is an example of what Liberals like to call "enlightened," then by all means, pack them up and ship them off to Beijing (along with the OWS types, while you're at it). Hope none of us get stuck with Friedman's kidney, though...
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 07, 2011 04:38 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: Jean at November 07, 2011 04:39 AM (WnnBz)
Posted by: dagny at November 07, 2011 04:40 AM (Ol+5L)
Then again, I don't believe in hate crimes as an add-on for actions that are already criminal.
Posted by: Hrothgar at November 07, 2011 07:48 AM (i3+c5)
I can understand why killing a cop carries such a heavy potential sentence, since the purpose is to make criminals think twice before adding an even heavier burden to whatever charges they may be facing at the time they're arrested. Otherwise what's to stop a psychotic, or a plain thug, from just killing every cop that comes to find them? So I understand the theory behind the practice, even if I don't fully endorse it.
But, that said, I personally believe that there should be no pre-defined "ceiling" for a maximum sentence on any crime. Every felony should have every possible sentence, up to and including the death penalty, on the table as an option. I don't care about your history or what "made you do it." Rapist? Pedophile? Serial abuser? Repeat drunk driving offender who killed three people after swerving onto the sidewalk? Death penalty.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and Padawan at November 07, 2011 04:40 AM (4df7R)
By either not turning it in or by not being in court when the ticket number is called.
Posted by: GnuBreed at November 07, 2011 08:38 AM (ENKCw)
Not turning it in would produce the problem of the unaccounted for ticket... remember, they are numbered, the same way personal checks are. Someone would notice and ask what happened to it.
If a cop didn't show up for court, I'm not sure that would necessarily invalidate the ticket. And even if it did: wouldn't he get in trouble for now showing up? What about all his other tickets that went before the judge that day?
Whatever they did to "fix" the ticket, it must have been more involved than that.
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 07, 2011 04:44 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: Jean at November 07, 2011 04:45 AM (WnnBz)
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 07, 2011 04:45 AM (Iaxlk)
ALL PUBLIC SECTOR UNIONS SHOULD BE ILLEGAL. They create a corrupt petry dish. Even FDR, the left's lefty mircale man, knew it.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 07, 2011 04:45 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 07, 2011 04:47 AM (i6RpT)
@31: I eat "European" because I was raised that way.
I hate to side with the Europeans on anything, mind you, but in this case I do agree with them. To anyone used to using their utensils European style, the American method of taking a beautiful steak and first chopping it up into a beef goulash, and then putting down their knife and holding their knife in their right hand, looks pretty crude. Almost as though the person wasn't coordinated enough to use their fork with their left hand. Sort of the thing a peasant would do... which is how, I suspect, the practice started in America to begin with.
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 07, 2011 04:48 AM (Iaxlk)
I despise corruption at all levels. That said, I have less of a problem with the corruption -- the low level corruption at least, such as ticket fixing -- than I do with the brainless union sycophants who are happy to stand out there in their police blues and actively endorse criminal behavior. The union SHOULD be brought up on racketering charges, among many other things. And like I mentioned in my last comment, every single penalty should be on the table when handing down a sentence, up to and including the death penalty. How many people have been negatively affected, even killed, as a result -- however tangential -- of police corruption? The total is greater than the sum of its parts. It's an endemic, systemic cancer.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and Padawan at November 07, 2011 04:49 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Jean at November 07, 2011 04:49 AM (WnnBz)
Posted by: Jean at November 07, 2011 04:52 AM (WnnBz)
And their brethren in corruption, the LIRR union, scammed millions in collecting "medical injury: benefits. Because, let's face it, $85K/yr is just not enough for walking up and down an aisle.
Posted by: john b at November 07, 2011 04:53 AM (FrVk7)
Posted by: Beefy Meatball at November 07, 2011 04:54 AM (sKEfY)
I hate to side with the Europeans on anything, mind you, but in this case I do agree with them. To anyone used to using their utensils European style, the American method of taking a beautiful steak and first chopping it up into a beef goulash, and then putting down their knife and holding their knife in their right hand, looks pretty crude. Almost as though the person wasn't coordinated enough to use their fork with their left hand. Sort of the thing a peasant would do... which is how, I suspect, the practice started in America to begin with.
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 07, 2011 08:48 AM (Iaxlk)
I eat "european" style, though I've never really considered it like that. It wasn't a conscious choice, and no one else in my family eats that way. They're all a little puzzled where I picked it up. I am, too, for that matter. I have no idea why I eat like that. I think it's because I can't see the point in wasting energy by constantly having to pick up and put down the knife when it's just easier to hold the knife and fork throughout. I didn't even know there was anything odd about it until my mother pointed it out to me.
Then again I'm borderline OCD about keeping my plate neat, so that might have something to do with it, too. Hacking up a big ole chunk of meat is detrimental to a tidy plate.
Yeah, I'm weird.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and Padawan at November 07, 2011 04:59 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Chuckit at November 07, 2011 04:59 AM (/hAyA)
It's amazing how in just 3 short years Obama has ruined our once great nation. He has promied to bring us together and has done nothing but divide and vilify. He is an evil dangerous man.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at November 07, 2011 05:03 AM (O7ksG)
As far as corrupt or abusive police go a friend of my daughter was beat up badly by a sheriff a couple of weeks ago. He was on an ATV and according to witnesses the sheriff used his vehicle to stop him. WTH! The sheriff told the hospital he was in an accident then charged him with resisting arrest. So conflicting stories from the start. I think the sheriff thought he could get away with saying it was an accident then realized the injuries and witnesses would say otherwise so he charged him.
He has a Broken eye socket and jaw. Had surgery for the jaw last week. Originally not able to see out of one eye but says he can see light through the lid now. Bruised all over.
He was unconscious for 2hrs and they would not take him to the hospital till bail of a $100,000 was posted.
And of course this sheriff is already under investigation for brutality. Court date this week so we shall see.
Posted by: California Witch at November 07, 2011 05:05 AM (Xcvk0)
the American method of taking a beautiful steak and first chopping it up into a beef goulash,
Properly, you would only cut one bite at a time. More than one is improper. You should only butter one bite of bread at a time as well.
Posted by: dagny at November 07, 2011 05:05 AM (Ol+5L)
According to legend, the practice started during the Revolutionary War. Many reasons are attributed - what I always heard was that it was keeping your knife out of your hand during heated arguments about Independence over dinner.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at November 07, 2011 05:07 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: willow at November 07, 2011 05:14 AM (h+qn8)
Properly, you would only cut one bite at a time. More than one is improper. You should only butter one bite of bread at a time as well.
Posted by: dagny at November 07, 2011 09:05 AM (Ol+5L)
So if I butter the whole thing, I get to jam the whole thing in at once? and still be 'proper'? AWESOME
Posted by: Red Shirt at November 07, 2011 05:18 AM (FIDMq)
napkins also a waste of resources , use your shirt sleev for goodness sake.
Posted by: willow at November 07, 2011 05:22 AM (h+qn8)
Posted by: willow at November 07, 2011 09:22 AM (h+qn
I am sorry that was so unthinking of me, Use the bottom of your shirt that can be tucked and hidden away in your skirt or pants for aestetics sake.
Posted by: willow at November 07, 2011 05:24 AM (h+qn8)
The "wanting to be European" thing is not new. ....It dates back to when the Euro countries were creating as many colonies as they could around the globe.
It was just 'understood' that Europe was the wellspring of all that was enlightened, educated and cultured. ....So the low-class plebian colonists were conditioned to value all things European above anything else in life.
Back to topic: Union Privilege.
Unions are anti-consumer. ....The product does not improve with unionization. If anything, it decreases in value....while the cost of it increases.
This is why there should be no government unions. Government unions are sheltered from the competition of the free market....because they have a monopoly on the funding source for their employment.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at November 07, 2011 05:32 AM (FaACh)
Posted by: polynikes - Texan for Romney at November 07, 2011 05:41 AM (o/UM0)
Courtsey cards are a license to speed. very dangerous. I know a lot of folks related to police officers who have courtesy cards. One women said that she was pulled over for going 50mph in a 30mph road. Her husband is a cop, so she was not ticketed, but received a lecture, because she was driving that fast with her baby in the back seat! She said that she often feels comfortable speeding, because she has the courtesy card.. Very dangerous. I'm surprised this hasn't been brought to light sooner.
Posted by: JoeNYC at November 07, 2011 05:42 AM (J5JOi)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at November 07, 2011 06:10 AM (9IFxO)
My IronyMeter is still broke and a little blue on blue is not my problem.
Posted by: DaveA at November 07, 2011 06:15 AM (fTMsl)
Yep. And that's when it becomes a crime that needs to be dealt with.
"How do you 'fix' a ticket?"
Easy. The person pleads not guilty, and shows up (or has a lawyer show up) for the trial date. The cop doesn't show up, and the ticket is dismissed.
Posted by: Greg Q at November 07, 2011 07:02 AM (/0a60)
Yes, it actually is that simple. It's rare that a cop will have more than one ticket to deal with at any given hearing, and it's not like his boss is going to bitch, when next time it might be one of his family members who's catching a break.
Posted by: Greg Q at November 07, 2011 07:08 AM (/0a60)
Actually from what I have seen all you have to do is show up anyway and the ticket will be reduced.
Posted by: Vic at November 07, 2011 07:24 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: SamIam at November 07, 2011 08:19 AM (0QYwx)
No witness.
And even if it did: wouldn't he get in trouble for now showing up?
Would depend on the jurisdiction.
What about all his other tickets that went before the judge that day?
All thrown out.
It is not that unusual, at least in the state of Texas, for contested traffic tickets be thrown out. The exceptions tend to be for the most egregious moving violations and for those jurisdictions where traffic fines make up a relied-upon portion of the annual budget.
Who pays tickets? Those who have a job from which they cannot make time to appear in court on multiple days - suckers. And non-local recipients who find it inconvenient to return for multiple court appearances.
Posted by: RioBravo at November 07, 2011 09:29 AM (eEfYn)
Posted by: steevy at November 07, 2011 01:01 PM (7WJOC)
Posted by: Stephen King 11/22/63 ePub at November 07, 2011 04:40 PM (uKJ4e)
Posted by: Christopher Paolini Inheritance epub at November 07, 2011 04:55 PM (Vrw1B)
Posted by: Lie with Me AudioBook at November 07, 2011 05:05 PM (inbL8)
Posted by: SEAL Target Geronimo ePub at November 07, 2011 06:34 PM (de3em)
avi to flash swf to avi converter flv to dvd converter
swf video converter video to flash converter flash video creator
Posted by: doumaduo at November 08, 2011 03:21 AM (9gc9r)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3882 seconds, 200 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: The Pirates Your Mom Feared at November 07, 2011 03:22 AM (lpWVn)