1 Not likely

2 Not a problem. Just another kabuki dance.

3 Frist!

4 Ah fuck it.

5

Reid will stop anything from happening again.

6 This will just kill the GOPs hopes of global domination.

7 Nope, we learned our lesson last time. Let them twist in the wind. All of them.

8 Greg Sargent, masturbating furiously to the results of the 1998 Congressional elections

9 Is it just me or does Greg Sargent look like he just took a load in his mouth?

10 There will be no impeachment of Obama. The left wants to right to think there would be because it will be exactly the kind of drama to detract from culpability of Obama for ineptitude and malfeasance. Does that make sense? And if they try to run with impeachment it will still save Hillary.

11 What kind of post is this? I have no idea who greg sargent is or what reason he has for suggesting impeachment. How about better info in your postings ace, less val-u-rite vodka (or more?)

12 Who's going to initiate impeachment proceedings without House leadership on board? Low level staffers in the Cleveland office?

13 He explains later in the thread that he believes the GOP base will insist on it regardless of the wishes of the leadership - although the reaction of his followers is pretty funny.

14 The Obama Administration has a lot of callow sissies in it who kind of get off on telling stories about CIA missions and SEAL operations. They think talking about men of action sort of makes them manly themselves. They don't seem to care that this behavior might put real men in jeopardy.


Ace, could you clear this up? You seem to be implying that the pantywaists at the White House...have expressive wrists.

15 Fuck you Greggy.

16 Ace, could you clear this up? You seem to be implying that the pantywaists at the White House...have expressive wrists.


They talk like fags and their shits all retarded.

17 Beware all you "low" level staffers everywhere, your heads are all about to roll...

18 Don't be cynical, Ace, Embrace the light....bringer and all will be well. Thus sayeth the MSM

19 NO impeachment. The answer my friends... is twistin' in the wind. The answer is twistin' in the wind.

20

FURTHER ON DOWN THE ROAD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wp4BlGXwSew

21 They talk like fags and their shits all retarded. Posted by: Cicero That's a medical diagnosis, mind you.

22 BAM!

23 John Boehner is a limp dick. As long as he controls the gavel Barack Obama can pretty much do whatever he wants without fear or consequences.

24 Cross-posted from below... I think its time to come on out and say it - Obama's reelection is completely illegitimate. It is now time for honorable Americans, whether they be republicans, independents or those few left democrats with any integrity, to work against this illegitimate fraud, by civil disobedience if necessary, until he is removed from office and a free and democratic election held. Obviously, Slow Joe Biden's claim to office is similarly illegitimate. Add to the attack on the A.P. the following: Still, the Obama administration's misconduct facially includes using the I.R.S. to harass and suppress opposition, hampering the TeaParty and others who would work against him through democratic means (denying their capacity to operate by delaying and denying their tax exemption, interfering with their operation by ridiculous demands for paperwork in transparently political fashion, and by revealing non-disclosable taxpayer information to democrat party aligned groups). That's what this was about - unlawfully constraining legitimate and healthy political opposition. And its absurd that this did not come from the upper echelons of this lawless administration. This is nothing less than an attack on our democracy, Chicago style. Moreover, its clear Obama's gang deliberately concealed information from the electorate concerning Benghazi, colluding in a cover up of his administration's malfeasance, including stand down orders that reportedly can only come from the very top, for transparent political gain. Sure, he knew it would come out eventually, notwithstanding the media functioning as a filter to propel his political interests, country be damned, but he only needed to survive the 8 weeks until the November election. Thereafter, we would be stuck with him for 4 more years, of golf, parties, fellow celeb-u-tards and economic decline. Worse, they blamed an innocent patsy who, right now, languishes in Federal prison. The contention that this did not come from the top levels of his micro-managing, media obsessed, narcissist lead administration is transparently absurd. Regardless, this is simply not a legitimate president, and there is no reason why Americans should treat him as such.

25 Hmmm, 'bout that cynical thing.  Walked past a TV with ABC nightly news on and even they trumpeted the unfairness of government going after particular groups ala IRStapo style.

Can't want for WH the tantrum.

26 This makes obamas"I didn't know about this until it came out Friday" even more ridiculous....

27 It's a trap. They want us to go impeachment because it would prove our racism and unreasonableness. Better to let him stew in his mess.

28

I'll believe it when Harry Reid Promises 30 Democrat Senate Votes and Nancy Pelosi promises 150 Democrat House Votes. 

 

Until then, go after all his underlings.  Go after the individual departments with funding cuts until they come clean. 

29 What?  Try,... Can't wait for the WH tantrum.

30 Impeachment? Fuck that. Let him keep fucking up with this level of intensity for the next three plus years. Let the fucking proles revel in the taste of tangy c*ck juice running down their chins, day after day. By the mid-terms there won't be anyone left willing to admit voting for 0bama.

31 Better to let him stew in his mess.

I'm starting to board this train as well.

32

This makes obamas"I didn't know about this until it came out Friday" even more ridiculous....

 

I'll tell you what's ridiculous.  The deal I  can get you on  a personal computer.

33

Ace: ..."Greg Sergeant is of course a zealous hack on behalf of Obama."

 

So, he's making a shot across the bow at the Tea Party congressmen?

34 27 It's a trap. They want us to go impeachment because it would prove our racism and unreasonableness. Better to let him stew in his mess. Posted by: Titan at May 13, 2013 06:36 PM (3uVl7) What would be the outcome if a retiring Democrat brought the charges up? There seem to be several of them.

35 The fish rots from the head down

36

ABC News is talking about Gosnell?

Second Story?

 

1st was IRS?

37

There will be no impeachment of Obama. The left wants to right to think there would be because it will be exactly the kind of drama to detract from culpability of Obama for ineptitude and malfeasance. Does that make sense? And if they try to run with impeachment it will still save Hillary.

Posted by: FenelonSpoke at May 13, 2013 06:32 PM....THIS! Unless they find direct evidence of King Barry ordering the IRS to do so , it is stupid to go down this road yet.

38 Watergate happened after I was born, but one thing from a documentary I will never forget was footage of a House Republican saying, "The thing that's most disturbing to me, is when this whole idea was suggested to him, my President immediately didn't rise up and say, 'What are you doing talking about perjury and (something) and keeping witnesses silent? This is the office of the President of the United States! Get out of here!' But he didn't do that.  My president just sat there."

We need honest D's, or at least D's who can recognize a tipping point when it comes. 

Pray, pray, pray, pray.  This week is the anniversary of Our Lady of Fatima's appearances. With our prayers she helped to defeat Russia.  She can defeat him too.   

39 Hey, what about that brave gay basketball player?

40 Impeachment? Fuck that. Let him keep fucking up with this level of intensity for the next three plus years. Let the fucking proles revel in the taste of tangy c*ck juice running down their chins, day after day.

By the mid-terms there won't be anyone left willing to admit voting for 0bama.

Posted by: Name Withheld Upon Request at May 13, 2013 06:36 PM (U2UQk)

 

 

Oddly...I kinda like this approach.

41 None of this will register a lick, unless AP decides to play nasty and run a piece with the headline "SOURCES: Obama not cool" That would cause a lot of pantsshitting in the White House. Nothing else will.

42 Regardless, this is simply not a legitimate president, and there is no reason why Americans should treat him as such. Posted by: Impeach the Bastard! at May 13, 2013 06:35 PM (bT79U) -------------------------------------------------------- Can't touch this! Daaa da da da (da da) da da (da da) da da! Can't touch this....

43 I bet they are frantically trying to find some way to tie GWB to all this...

44 Hey, what about that brave gay basketball player? Posted by: The WH Press Office at May 13, 2013 06:38 PM (8ZskC) ---- If Obama had a son......

45 15 Fuck you Greggy. Posted by: esch at May 13, 2013 06:33 PM (9XVgh) Wait...could it be that Greg Sargent posts here under the name of...it can't be...can it?

46

Why not "let AP jump to the head of the line on scandal investigations"? What do we care?  If that's the straw it takes to break the camel's back, so be it.

47 Yes, cynicism about government is a new thing on the American political scene.  The plot was hatched in Roger Ailes basement last Tuesday.

48

ABC News is talking about Gosnell?
Second Story?

1st was IRS?

 

 

Oh Boy.

49 Between this post and the last post, I am suddenly thinking of this -

http://youtu.be/gKw5mBh4rYs


(NSFW)

50 Well there's that

51
COCK![s/] I mean BAM!

52 Impeachment? Fuck that. Let him keep fucking up with this level of intensity for the next three plus years. Let the fucking proles revel in the taste of tangy c*ck juice running down their chins, day after day.

By the mid-terms there won't be anyone left willing to admit voting for 0bama.

Posted by: Name Withheld Upon Request at May 13, 2013 06:36 PM ........Yep. Exactly.

53 Let be be the first to cry "RACISM!!!"

54 Regardless, this is simply not a legitimate president, and there is no reason why Americans should treat him as such. Posted by: Impeach the Bastard! That way lies a lot of death and destruction. Lives shattered, children orphaned, fortunes destroyed. Taking the step you suggest pits you against the man who commands most law enforcement (even if they are nominally controlled by states and localities) and virtually all military assets in the nation. I'm not saying you're wrong, but there are indeed several good reasons not to take that step. It may be that there is a balance that favors it, but that is the question of our times.

55 38 "We need honest D's, or at least D's who can recognize a tipping point when it comes."

They all got whacked out of Congress. Kucinich was redistricted out for a more loyal Dem, for example.

56

ABC back to normal

 

Story 3 is SARS

Story 4 is ice from Mille Lacs Blown on shore

5 is OJ!!!

 

No Benghazi

57 Of course... There's no there there....

58 Wait...could it be that Greg Sargent posts here under the name of...it can't be...can it? Posted by: AmishDude

Looking plausible, ain't it.

59 Let me say that I am firmly against any talk of impeachment. I would rather a steady drip drip drip of embarrassing stories, scandals, and fuckups that render him completely ineffectual in the 2nd term. Remember, most of his 2nd term will be about creating his legacy, his lasting impression on history. Let that impression be one of abject failure. Don't give him an enemy (impeachment proceedings) against which he can wage a heroic struggle. Let the fucker twist in the wind like a torn sail on a doomed ship.

60 >> I'll believe it when Harry Reid Promises 30 Democrat Senate Votes...
 
rd, there are 34 Democrap Senators that wouldn't vote for his conviction if he personally lined up their families against a wall and shot them all.
 
See Clinton, Bill for further details.

61

BREAKING NEWS FROM THE AP: Obama has not actually stopped the oceans from rising, nor has he healed the planet.  It's mostly republicans fault.

62 They want another impeachment fiasco so badly, I think Democrats will actually push it. The beauty of our system is that every 2 years, there are about 460 federal politicians and God knows how many state-level politicians eager to distance themselves from a loser.

63 Wait...could it be that Greg Sargent posts here under the name of...it can't be...can it?

What does it matter!

64 Only thing to help out Teh Null's legacy is if he were found out in the WH garden humping Bo the dog.  At least it'd show he's an animal lover.

65

Oddly...I kinda like this approach.

 

Hmm, I think I do too. A few years of hearing   about how TFG's is nothing but   a hack Chicago Machine pol could do wonders for conservatism.

66 57 Of course... There's no there there.... Posted by: hello, it's me Donna at May 13, 2013 06:41 PM (9+ccr) Exactly

67 On some level the Dems probably WANT Zero impeached.  They'd get to play the martyr and defend their boyfriend against all the raaaacist evil mean Rethuglikkkans who are jealous because their hero got OBL where Booosh failed. 

Meanwhile, that circus protects Hillary for 2016.  I think the left is so disappointed in Barky they'll throw him under the bus, as long as they can loudly proclaim the exact opposite.

68 Greg Sargent is just administering some inoculation.  An irritant now that strengthens the system and prevents a real incursion.

69 Don't give him an enemy (impeachment proceedings) against which he can wage a heroic struggle. Let the fucker twist in the wind like a torn sail on a doomed ship. Posted by: Jones in CO at May 13, 2013 06:42 PM (8sCoq) I'm with ya.

70 43 "I bet they are frantically trying to find some way to tie GWB to all this..."

They try it with everything, but any hint of scandal during GWB's years pale in comparison.

1. Benghazi - "But attacks on embassies BOOSH!" Except not on 9/11, in an active warzone, with a stand-down order, and not blaming an unrelated YouTube video.

2. IRS - "But churches targeted by BOOSH!" Yes, pastors getting in the pulpit and specifically telling their constituents to vote for John Kerry were targeted, since a church advocating for a candidate would be illegal. Not the IRS targeting people just based on phrases or political views.

The same is true of Fast & Furious, Solyndra, and all the other bullshit.

The only thing they do have a leg to stand on is this wiretapping of journalists, which the Bush people did do. But then I thought Our Lord and Savior had come to "change" Washington and bring "hope" to America?

71 NO IMPEACHMENT.

Do not give these commies something to rally around.

72 Follow everything to the end and ignore the creature... If its evident that impeachment is necessary then it'll become obvious soon enough. I think far more likely is that they (the WH) operates on a form of plausible deniability. He may know that, intrinsicially, stuff like this is going on and likely doesn't care as he knows his team (or rather jarret's team) is playing according to agreed rules. If these guys are as slimy as we think and given the other things I have to think they don't ever mention any of these things. Thus he can't get in trouble as he is made continuously ignorant and therefore not to blame. People get into trouble when they do specific things and not intrinsic things. Go after his circle, he can't operate without them. A normal person would know everybody has a role but we know he isn't an administrator... A true internal shake up will leave him lost

73

Posted by: GnuBreed at May 13, 2013 06:43 PM (ccXZP)

 

That's wht Impeachment should not be attempted.  #59  Jones has the right idea. 

 

Let this administration become a sick joke and miserable failure. 

74 Thing is, if the IRS scandal can be proved to reach Obama whether to impeach or not won't even be a question, it will happen. Using a government agency to harass and attack a political opponent is pretty much a guaranteed ticket to the big show.

75 We may well be seeing impeachment proceedings soon, whether House GOP leadership wants it or not.


So huh?

lol,  so are they saying we peons could try to do it by ourselves?

76 Don't give him an enemy (impeachment proceedings) against which he can wage a heroic struggle.

Let the fucker twist in the wind like a torn sail on a doomed ship.
Posted by: Jones in CO at May 13, 2013 06:42 PM (8sCoq)


Doing nothing is a plan we can execute perfectly.  Just look at our track record!

77 Greg Sergeant is of course a zealous hack on behalf of Obama. This is one way to derail impeachment. Right now, there's cause to investigate, and move towards impeachment, but not enough to clearly force the Senate Ds to vote to remove. Therefore, starting the process now makes removal highly unlikely, and precludes a second chance (excluding the question of double-jeopardy) for Benghazi, F&F, IRSgate, ... OTOH, keeping all these things alive and simmering keeps them fresh and active ... Do not let the MSM drive these investigations.

78 IRS makes me cynical about government....and DOJ...and DMV...and..

79

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at May 13, 2013 06:44 PM (+z4pE)

 

 

Some say it took Carter to Deliver us Regan.  Frankly although Obama's worse than Carter Overall I suspect, he's better at the thug politician thing.  So it might just take 2 terms of Barky to deliver us Zombie Regan.

80 tea party , or middleclass  america impeaches the President!

not likely

81 The other unbelievable thing? Cmdr Hadfield IS married - to his high school sweetheart, Helene. They have three adult children.

82

62 They want another impeachment fiasco so badly, I think Democrats will actually push it.

 

Yeah they do, AmishDude.

 

They know that an impeachment fiasco would be a gift.

They know that it's their last hope at picking up seats in 2014.

 

 

83 I think the better attack is that of The Incredible Shrinking Obama. You can't blame him for Benghazi, nobody bothered to bother him on it. You can't blame him on the IRS, he doesn't pay attention to low-level staffers, like the chief counsel of the IRS. You can't blame him on phone-monitoring of the AP, he's too busy at fundraisers and golf outings.

84 How many insider tell-all books were their at this point in the Bush presidency? 6, 8?

We've had two or three so far. Plenty of time for three more.

I would give anything just to be able to follow Pres. Air Ball around for a few days.

85 OT -- Dr. Joyce Brothers dead at 85.

86 They may have had no choice to tap AP's phones. Don't worry, there's still plenty to go after Obama, if that's what you like to do, but lets stop making stuff up.

87

We may well be seeing impeachment proceedings soon, whether House GOP leadership wants it or not.

 

I wonder about that statement too. What does the House GOP have to do with it? I thought impeachment had to start in the Senate.

 

And with Little Hairy  Reed in charge of that body, we know about how that'll go:  Nofuckingwhere.

88 I suck, no really I do.

89

Do not impeach. 

 

It has NEVER Worked.

Jackson and Clinton beat the rap.

Nixon Quit.

Grant, Buchanan and other failures finished their terms. 

 

Make the Democrats force him out. 

90 NO IMPEACHMENT.

Do not give these commies something to rally around.
--

I'm on board this train too.  Just tie every last Democrat to Obama for the next 4 years.  Preferably with handcuffs.

91 OTOH, I just watched obama hem and haw through his non-explanation of his non-cover up of Benghazi.  When he gets to far from VarJar's mind control ray, his diction suffers and his eyes begin to roll up into his head.

92 I smell a trap....

93 To number 59 . Is this a waterboarding , waterboarding everywhere , not a drop to drink kind of thing ? I'll tell you the reason for the AP wire taps . " If it saves one child." And for the record , don't count out Joe Biden . He will have no problems taking an Ogre sized (press) leak in order to become the Ford to Obama's Nixon . See Revenge of the the Nerds Part 2 for visual reference .

94

It's a traaaaaaaap.

1) Throw out impeachment chum.

2) Get a few prominent conservatives to comment on it

3) Call all conservatives raaaaacist for talking about impeachment

4) Obama becomes sympathetic victim (see:Clinton)

5) Drink

95 All depends on if Obama's handlers are tired of him.  When Uncle Joey suddenly retires for "health" reasons, and Hillary becomes VP, then Obama will suddenly find out what the underside of the bus looks like and impeachment will start rolling.

96 Count on the repukes to shoot themselves in the feet over this. They are probably stupid enough to draw up the articles of impeachment and pass it through the house. The Purple Lipped Jesus will rise like a Phoenix out of his own self created ashes and become a hero to the LIV. Bill Clinton on steroids. The repukes will make him look like a hero.

97 if the left is opening the door to it, then its a funking trap.

bill maher did the same thing last week.

98

87...I wonder about that statement too. What does the House GOP have to do with it? I thought impeachment had to start in the Senate.

 

I don't think so, BackwardsBoy.

 

The House impeached Clinton...then, the Senate failed to prosecute that impeachment.

 

99 The Constitution, Article I, Section 3: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. and with the Senate currently in the hands of the enemy, this seems unlikely and it is unwise Twist. In. The. Wind.

100 I'm wondering if this isn't a squirrel. AP indignant but complicit?

101

So it might just take 2 terms of Barky to deliver us Zombie Regan.

 

And at this  point, I'd rather have Zombie Regan.  He'd be a vast   improvement  over TFG.

102 The ewok is on uppers.  New thread about 10 minutes ago.  Thought I let the stragglers know.

103 I suck, no really I do.

Posted by: Megs McCain, junior goddess in training at May 13, 2013 06:51 PM (GVZO/)

Yes, Meggie, dear, we know, you should start tweeting your price list, not your IQ.

104  impeachment would mean Joe Biden.

 think about That.

105

>>>I smell a trap....

 

 

**Crosses Legs**

 

Sorry.  That  was   me. 

106 impeachment would mean Joe Biden. think about That. *** He doesn't hate America. That would be an improvement.

107

Posted by: Mayday at May 13, 2013 06:52 PM (F3s39)

 

Make the democrats disown him. 

Ried and Pelosi need to lead the impeachment. 

 

(In other words it will never happen)

108 We're gonna need a bigger bus.

109 Gird your Loins . Joe Biden is not getting pushed out . He's too dumb to blackmail and the shock treatments are wearing off . And there must be a few Biden loyalists that can smell a castle coup .

110
Is today still Monday?

Shit......

111 >> I thought impeachment had to start in the Senate.
 
Backwards Boy, this issue comes up so often I created a Notepad file just to copy/paste whenever it arises...but I haven't uploaded it yet to this new computer.
 
Impeachment is merely a set of charges, like an indictment. It is produced in the House, with a 50% + 1 vote needed to proceed to trial in the Senate.
 
In the Senate, a 2/3 vote is needed to convict on any given charge. Thus 67 votes are needed. Incidentally, none of the votes in the Senate to convict Clinton were even close.
 
Not even close.

112

MN Senate Approves Gay Marriage! 

KSTP reporterette almost orgasmed on camera?

Goes in effect 8/1/2013, after Marky Dayton Signs It.

 

All the fabulous types will be partying tonight. 

113

"As @drewmtips is pointing out (and as I mentioned in my article, obliquely), there may actual be justification here for finding a leaker, depending on what information the leaker actually compromised."

 

Okay, so riddle me this.  Why did the J.D. notify the AP on their snooping activities if they had actual justification?  If the subpoenas were indeed acquired without notification to the AP, the (only) justifiable reason being that notification would jeopardize the investigation makes sense.  So why tell the AP now?  Is the J.D. required to notify them after the investigation is over?  If that's the case then why do the AP peeps have their panties in a wad?  Just mad that they've sucked every dick in the administration and got fucked in the ass?

114

They are callow sissies who get a stiffy talking about boy stuff.

They're also big projecters.  They're the ones bringing up impeachment because this is what THEY would do.  In fact, they would have done it, like, back in October if this was a Republican administration.  Investigations would be well under way by now with multiple leaks and talk of frog-marching and heads-a-rolling all over Capitol Hill.  Also, it allows them to control the narrative.  (Impeachment talk is for weirdo right wingnuts.  Let's talk about weirdo right wingnuts.)

115 Pleeeeeease Impeach me, let me go -

116 27 It's a trap. They want us to go impeachment because it would prove our racism and unreasonableness. Better to let him stew in his mess. Posted by: Titan at May 13, 2013 06:36 PM (3uVl7) This. It seems too good to be true that all this crap is coming out now just by chance. They're airing some of their dirty laundry in order to goad us into overreaching. They know they probably won't win the House in 2014 as things are now. The economy is still pretty sucktacular, job growth is anemic, confiscatory, draconian gun control is still a loser at the polls, and gay marriage only goes so far. The only way they can win the House, and assure they keep the Senate, is if they can get the Republicans to screw up big. No matter how crappy his policies and performance are, as things stand Obama is still pretty popular personally, especially with the Low Information crowd. This same MSM that is now highlighting these stories and sounding temptingly even-handed will go right back into Palace Guard mode the moment their messiah is placed in any real danger. Hell, knowing our crappy MSM for what it is, they're probably coordinating this with the White House and the Congressional Democrats..... It's better to hold back the temptation to go after Barry, and instead put all this to better use: Use these scandals to bludgeon the Democrats and hammer them in hearings. Point out consistently and repeatedly that these scandals are the result of Democrat incompetence or outright thuggishness of Obama appointees and aides. And of course, as bad as Barry is, Slow Joe wouldn't be any better

117 I'm not sure why people don't think we can have our cake and eat it too here. Let the impeachment talk circulate while his continuing fuckups, and perhaps the midterms become about putting an end to the Obama regime in the most humiliating manner remaining.

Two years is a long time for any of these scandals to be investigated, and given the character Obama's shown, it's unlikely they are all completely unconnected to him. Plus Biden wouldn't exactly be an effective banner carrier for the commies for the duration of his stay in office. And Hillary 2016 gets scorched in the process.

Even if there's no actual impeachment vote, just the idea of it poisons the well for the rest of his time occupying the White House, and nothing more gets done. Which at this point is our optimal outcome.

118 118 "Plus Biden wouldn't exactly be an effective banner carrier for the commies for the duration of his stay in office. " Never underestimate the power of the Free Shit Army, the shallowness of the Low Information Voter group, or the ability of the MSM to carry a Democrat to victory. And never underestimate the power of Republicans to screw things up......

119 At the risk of sounding like I'm just making s**t up, my ultra libtard brother was once ( a long time ago) a supply officer for SEAL Team 6. The only thing he ever said about those guys is that he loved to jerk those big, burly macho men around regarding their expense reports, getting off on their abject obedience.  In reality, he was fit to be in the same room with those guys.

120 One senses the tide is turning in this scandal-a-day horse and pony show.

Of course, they will no "nothing," as no one in the WH appears to know anything of what their departments are doing, much less read emails or cables, or have meetings to discuss the government. But I can bet The Won knows where he is playing golf this weekend as well as how many fundraisers he will be swaggin' at.

He sure had his evil eye thing going today with the British PM. He be mad.

121

Somehow I don't think it's just because the Republicans are hot on this sumbitches trail that people are "cynical about government".  When you've got the Obamaturd raining scorn on bitter clingers and such--and talking out of two sides of his mouth whilst simulataneously blowing a  whole bunch of smoke out of h is backside---well you'd have to be pretty danged dumb not to be cynical about Obama.  Heckfire even the readers over at Reader's Digest just made Da Bamstuh the 65th most trustworthy man in America.  I understand he came  in way behind Rin Tin Tin and Lassy.

 

Fact of the matter is, if I was a girl--and I'm not--I'd trust Obama just about as much as I would trust the guy who tells me he'll "pull out in time".  Ain't gonna happen.

122 The TSHTF on the DoJ spying on AP as they where not spying on the tea party. First they came for the tea party and the media was all for it
Then they can for the media and they want him gone but it is still 1300 days away and they will just vote for a clone of him once that is done.

123

Who the hell is Greg Sargent, anyway?

 

 

 

As to any illusions of impeachment, I can't believe anybody in here would be against it, if it were a viable possibility. If the last week has reminded us of anything, it is how profoundly corrupt Obama's administration is. Hell, maybe we can take heart that Nixon is being eclipsed. Sure, Clinton had a boatload of scandals, and was indisputably the most embarrassing President in history, but I don't think he had this level of corruption.  He didn't have a sitting AG found in contempt of Congress, he didn't have a DHS (or equivalent) being sued by her employees for her asking them not to follow the law, or have recess appointment for a recess that didn't happen, or have a war without consent of Congress, ..., it just seems to go on and on.

 

 

To make impeachment a realistic possibility TFG's approval rating would have to plummet severely. That would take a lot of weeks like this one, where his former propaganda machine has suddenly decided to do their jobs for some reason. Who knows? Maybe this will snowball.

 

 

We're heading into more uncharted territory. How does a President function when the people KNOW he has lied to, and basically betrayed us (abandoning our people in a asinine attempt to cover-up a terrorist attack). He's still lying about it to our faces, just as he literally took out an ad to lie to our faces about "you didn't build that". People are finally noticing this one, though.

 

124 Is there something actually wrong with President useless as tits on a bull? Stupid question I know but he seems to be missing something normal people have in terms of common decency or empathy. There seems an utter lack of humanity--kind of like what C.S. Lewis called men without chests. I know I'm late to this party.

125 Libs salivating uncontrollably over the prospect of impeachment so they can scram it's due to Rethuglikkkan racism. Better to let the SCOAMF dangle in the wind, hoisted by his own skinny petard, an impotent POTUS for the rest of his lame duck term.

126 Impeachment is folly. Not just because we don't have the votes, but also because it would be missing an opportunity.

Remember, Zero is going to be around post-Preznitcy, running his mouth and generally being the low-level agitator he is. Three years of scandal, corruption and failure will destroy his rock star vibe and make him the butt of every joke. Think Carter and Nixon rolled into one.

Also, the game here is not to destroy the man, but the twisted ideology that spawned him. The only way you do that is to let events so thoroughly discredit his mal-Administration and belief system that it becomes abhorrent. Let these shitbags stew in that as they live on the ill gotten pensions we will be providing them.

127 127- very good points.

128

Greg Sargent goes snowballing with Obama every chance he gets.

Don't get me started on that little twink Toure Neblett.

129 What about the Muslim cleric mocking Christians in Arabic  at the SEALs funeral? I here nothing in press about that, except one time this week?

130 Aw, hell. By the time a year goes by and we are in the 2014 minor election cycle the Thugocracy will have spun this as Republican over-reach and grand-standing to make political hay. IOW, this whole thing is a set-up. The chances that Obunghole gets impeached much less feels ANY discomfort is between slim and none. Slim just left the country.