January 18, 2011
— Ace Late to this party. Seems to have the chattering classes in a tizzy.
Interesting stuff, I think, particularly to parents, for whom the question of Tough Love or Sympathetic Support is a tangible one, answered (ad hoc) on a daily basis.
There's no dilemma for Amy Chua. She swears by Tough Love, no ice, no water, no chaser.
Don't get me wrong: It's not that Chinese parents don't care about their children. Just the opposite. They would give up anything for their children. It's just an entirely different parenting model.
Here's a story in favor of coercion, Chinese-style. Lulu was about 7, still playing two instruments, and working on a piano piece called "The Little White Donkey" by the French composer Jacques Ibert. The piece is really cute—you can just imagine a little donkey ambling along a country road with its master—but it's also incredibly difficult for young players because the two hands have to keep schizophrenically different rhythms.Lulu couldn't do it. We worked on it nonstop for a week, drilling each of her hands separately, over and over. But whenever we tried putting the hands together, one always morphed into the other, and everything fell apart. Finally, the day before her lesson, Lulu announced in exasperation that she was giving up and stomped off.
"Get back to the piano now," I ordered.
"You can't make me."
"Oh yes, I can."
Back at the piano, Lulu made me pay. She punched, thrashed and kicked. She grabbed the music score and tore it to shreds. I taped the score back together and encased it in a plastic shield so that it could never be destroyed again. Then I hauled Lulu's dollhouse to the car and told her I'd donate it to the Salvation Army piece by piece if she didn't have "The Little White Donkey" perfect by the next day. When Lulu said, "I thought you were going to the Salvation Army, why are you still here?" I threatened her with no lunch, no dinner, no Christmas or Hanukkah presents, no birthday parties for two, three, four years. When she still kept playing it wrong, I told her she was purposely working herself into a frenzy because she was secretly afraid she couldn't do it. I told her to stop being lazy, cowardly, self-indulgent and pathetic.
Jed took me aside. He told me to stop insulting Lulu—which I wasn't even doing, I was just motivating her—and that he didn't think threatening Lulu was helpful. Also, he said, maybe Lulu really just couldn't do the technique—perhaps she didn't have the coordination yet—had I considered that possibility?
"You just don't believe in her," I accused.
"That's ridiculous," Jed said scornfully. "Of course I do."
"Sophia could play the piece when she was this age."
"But Lulu and Sophia are different people," Jed pointed out.
"Oh no, not this," I said, rolling my eyes. "Everyone is special in their special own way," I mimicked sarcastically. "Even losers are special in their own special way. Well don't worry, you don't have to lift a finger. I'm willing to put in as long as it takes, and I'm happy to be the one hated. And you can be the one they adore because you make them pancakes and take them to Yankees games."
...
Western parents worry a lot about their children's self-esteem. But as a parent, one of the worst things you can do for your child's self-esteem is to let them give up. On the flip side, there's nothing better for building confidence than learning you can do something you thought you couldn't.
David Brooks answers her by doing what he does best -- deliberately missing the point in a self-amused half-clever way, fixating on Chua's forbiddances of play-dates and sleepovers as if that's all she's talking about here, and in so doing, flattering his target audience of Yuppie parents and assuring them that they're doing everything right.
I believe she’s coddling her children. She’s protecting them from the most intellectually demanding activities because she doesn’t understand what’s cognitively difficult and what isn’t.Practicing a piece of music for four hours requires focused attention, but it is nowhere near as cognitively demanding as a sleepover with 14-year-old girls. Managing status rivalries, negotiating group dynamics, understanding social norms, navigating the distinction between self and group — these and other social tests impose cognitive demands that blow away any intense tutoring session or a class at Yale.
Yet mastering these arduous skills is at the very essence of achievement. Most people work in groups....
This skill set is not taught formally, but it is imparted through arduous experiences. These are exactly the kinds of difficult experiences Chua shelters her children from by making them rush home to hit the homework table.
Chua would do better to see the classroom as a cognitive break from the truly arduous tests of childhood. Where do they learn how to manage people? Where do they learn to construct and manipulate metaphors? Where do they learn to perceive details of a scene the way a hunter reads a landscape? Where do they learn how to detect their own shortcomings? Where do they learn how to put themselves in othersÂ’ minds and anticipate othersÂ’ reactions?
These and a million other skills are imparted by the informal maturity process and are not developed if formal learning monopolizes a childÂ’s time.
So IÂ’m not against the way Chua pushes her daughters. And I loved her book as a courageous and thought-provoking read. ItÂ’s also more supple than her critics let on. I just wish she wasnÂ’t so soft and indulgent.
This is pretty much the same rote criticism people make of home-schoolers. Well, sure, they do well in spelling bees, the kneejerk response goes, but they aren't learning the most important stuff-- social interaction.
There is probably some truth that by focusing so much on A you unavoidably don't focus so much on B -- that is true of everything, from politics to car engineering -- but probably not as much as David Brooks claims believe. It sort of turns out that people who are good at a bunch of things are also pretty good at all things, really. Parts of the brain are not "used up" for A and therefore unavailable for B. What's learned about A is often sort of applicable to B, too.
But the bigger problem I have with David Brooks' answer is that he is clearly addressing one tiny segment of the population -- the well-off, well-connected urban rich. It is true that for this class (and this class only) social skills are of paramount importance; the real skill of this class (as it was with the artistocrats of Europe, whom they emulate) are networking and glib affability and ready affirmation of class mores, beliefs, and tastes. This is the higher managerial class, or, as it is frequently derided, the Ruling Class.
But what about all other classes? Is social dexterity really more important to a working-class kid than, say, a strong education in math or science or a vocational skill?
No, I'd say. Not to claim that social skills are unimportant (unless you work almost completely alone, and live completely alone, they're important), but actual substantive excellence in one's field is more important than such skills for 90% of the population.
Brooks' piece, while cutesy, is really just a way of informing his cohort of Bourgeois Bohemians (as he terms them) that they're doing everything just right and they needn't fret that maybe this Chinese upstart has something to tell them. That's what he's paid to do, and why the New York Times exists in the first place, after all -- to reassure and flatter and cocoon its Ruling Class readership.
And, I suppose, for that cohort only, his point is well-taken.
But what about the 90% of the population whose kids won't be going to an exclusive east-coast prep school?
Chua's tactics strike me as a little extreme but I'd guess that Western parents can usefully move quite a bit towards her way of thinking.
Posted by: Ace at
08:03 AM
| Comments (201)
Post contains 1363 words, total size 8 kb.
"SHIT OR GET OFF THE POT RIGHT THE FUCK NOW!!!!"
Posted by: EC at January 18, 2011 08:06 AM (mAhn3)
If Brooks says
Chua would do better to see the classroom as a cognitive break from the truly arduous tests of childhood. ...
These and a million other skills are imparted by the informal maturity process and are not developed if formal learning monopolizes a childÂ’s time.
then how would homeschooling keep children from learning social skills?
Most of those skills take place out of the classroom, so homeschooling doesn't keep kids from learning social skills.
And yes, I know everyone knows one homeschooler who doesn't have her kids in social activities enough.
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 18, 2011 08:08 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: EC at January 18, 2011 08:10 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: Roman Polanski at January 18, 2011 08:11 AM (FcR7P)
Everything you ever wanted to know about the difference between Left and everyone else, in three sentences. Well put!
Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at January 18, 2011 08:12 AM (GBXon)
BTW, Chua has said that the WSJ cherry-picked the harshest bits from her book.
...after a few days of her book selling like crazy because of the article...
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 18, 2011 08:13 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: an erection lasting longer than four hours at January 18, 2011 08:13 AM (ao9DD)
Not pushing kids will create adults who can't push themselves.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at January 18, 2011 08:13 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: David Brooks at January 18, 2011 08:13 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: AndrewL at January 18, 2011 08:13 AM (VxLxI)
FIFY.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at January 18, 2011 08:13 AM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: Rum, Goddess of Doom at January 18, 2011 08:14 AM (YxBuk)
Posted by: moki at January 18, 2011 08:14 AM (dZmFh)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at January 18, 2011 08:14 AM (8y9MW)
my father made it perfectly clear to me when I was 7, I had done something stupid and made him mad, he said to me "I'll get rid of you and make another one just like you"
that's when I realized I wasn't "special", to a liberal that is a horror story but to regular folks that was just part of growing up.
Posted by: Shoey at January 18, 2011 08:16 AM (ehKDD)
Posted by: Barack Obama at January 18, 2011 08:16 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 18, 2011 08:17 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 18, 2011 08:17 AM (0GFWk)
There is a lot of good to be said for parents putting more pressure on students to perform well, and instilling a greater sense of discipline when it comes to studying. That said, the insanity that is East Asian educational culture is not something that I believe is healthy, and certainly not worth the price of a 10% increase in test scores (the difference between the US and Hong Kong on a lot of the standardized tests). While the socialization arguement is often overstated, I think a better arguement can be made that the beauricratic and conformist society that encourage the "Chinese Mother" are also the opposite of the American experience, and contrary to the spirit that allowed for our prosperity.
Posted by: Alex at January 18, 2011 08:17 AM (J2ejK)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at January 18, 2011 08:17 AM (ujg0T)
The system that punishes achievement and rewards complacency.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at January 18, 2011 08:18 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Drider at January 18, 2011 08:19 AM (HaJD9)
You're educating children the Wong way!
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 18, 2011 08:20 AM (hUf/c)
Posted by: ConservativeintheCity at January 18, 2011 08:21 AM (JourR)
I predict a trip out to Van Nuys and a scorching career in Asian pr0n.
Posted by: EC at January 18, 2011 08:22 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: rgh at January 18, 2011 08:22 AM (MiBr0)
Do they take into account all of the babies Chinese parents drowned to get a son...
or just the survivors?
Posted by: garrett at January 18, 2011 08:22 AM (Q2Rx1)
If she's indicative of "Chinese mothers," we will one day be facing an army of fucked up, angry former kids. It is possible that Little Chua doesn't want to be a pianist, a physicist or anything but a normal, well-adjusted child playing with toys. It happens, you know.
If a child loves -- or learns, through less brutal means than Amy Chua employed here -- to make music, or paint pictures, or do any "creative" thing, he or she will do exactly that. Otherwise, they may do it well, but without the "soul" that distinguishes great from capable.
Projecting your desires on the kidlings is a sure way to breed a race of psychotics.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at January 18, 2011 08:23 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at January 18, 2011 08:23 AM (SB0V2)
There is a transvestite/fetish joke in there somewhere...
Posted by: Alex at January 18, 2011 08:23 AM (J2ejK)
The Chinese have practiced infanticide throughout history, culminating with tens of millions sex ratio difference between boys and girls. So I guess the opposite of "care" in the Chinese language is kill.
Posted by: fbundy at January 18, 2011 08:23 AM (H2fiJ)
FNORD, man, fnord!!!
Posted by: community college student at January 18, 2011 08:24 AM (2rOwc)
Posted by: BumperStickerisrt at January 18, 2011 08:24 AM (h6mPj)
Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at January 18, 2011 08:24 AM (GBXon)
So yeah. Homeschooling's great when it's done right. Otherwise ...
Posted by: Joanna at January 18, 2011 08:24 AM (HaYO4)
1 Just gave my kid(home educated) a big list of long sentences to diagram. Bwahahaha.
Wow, that's savage. Beastly, even. I think you're related to Attila the Nun, who gave me long sentences to diagram.
Oh, and the number of times I've had to diagram a sentance since: 0.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at January 18, 2011 08:25 AM (1hM1d)
I predict a trip out to Van Nuys and a scorching career in Asian pr0n.
While a lot of half/half white/asian kids are striking (think Kristiara Barrington if you remember her), others are not.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at January 18, 2011 08:25 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Alex at January 18, 2011 08:25 AM (J2ejK)
Drider,
THat's the difference btw the poor Chinese and the modestly well-off (or getting there). The Chinese poor are just as dumb as our tailer trash. It's their middle class that exemplifies the hard work=success ethos that made our country great in teh first place, back when America was mostly European.
Now Europeans are lazy, self-indulgent, and unfocused. And their American descendants are more so.
David Brooks' inability to navigate a room full of 14 year old girls notwithstanding, social skills are not "lost" or missing in kinds who are focused on intellectual tasks, provided the social aspects are attended to in turn. Homeschooling has lots LOTS of group activities to get kids to interact with each other. Homeschoolers are just frankly more mature, and socialized by adults, so they act more like adults. Sure there are the weirdos, but those are the kids of weirdos, by and large.
Best thing you can do for your kids is sacrifice an income (if possible) and teach them yourself
Posted by: s'moron at January 18, 2011 08:26 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: pee pee in your coke at January 18, 2011 08:26 AM (eTknn)
Why is it not difficult to imagine Brooks being in his element at a sleepover?
Posted by: ya2daup at January 18, 2011 08:27 AM (0AClR)
Witness the television ads in the NYC area for the Times weekend deal - paraphrasing a bit: "The Times reporters are the best in the business, and no one can dispute that."
Posted by: Z as in Jersey at January 18, 2011 08:27 AM (sXUiz)
Posted by: moki at January 18, 2011 08:27 AM (dZmFh)
This Chua mom sucks ass.
Hard.
Posted by: Dang at January 18, 2011 08:27 AM (TXKVh)
When her daughter is older and reminiscing about her childhood, she's gonna remember the time her fingers bled trying to learn Brahms instead of that fun sleepover before the boy band concert.
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at January 18, 2011 08:28 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 18, 2011 08:28 AM (Q16sd)
Posted by: doubtingJohn at January 18, 2011 08:29 AM (D57dx)
I'm so grateful that my parents didn't exult over every little accomplishment when I was a child. I didn't even know getting an A was all that special until I was in fourth or fifth grade and the other kids were talking about it. It was just how things were supposed to be for my family. Why celebrate the status quo?
I was damn lucky to have parents who didn't buy me video games but who took me to the library and the book store, and a father who watched history programs instead of sports, and a mother who let my sister and I watch Shakespeare on School of the Air and didn't act like it was above our comprehension level. Now my sister's working on a PhD and I'm a semi-regular commenter at AoSHQ. I'd say we've both gone pretty far in the world.
Posted by: MWR at January 18, 2011 08:29 AM (4df7R)
Practicing a piece of music for four hours requires focused attention, but it is nowhere near as cognitively demanding as a sleepover with 14-year-old girls. -- David Brooks
This gets my vote for the creepiest sentence, ever.
While Brooks is a weenie liberal "BoBo" dumbass, having had to chaperone such parties, I can't deny what Brooks is stating. Then again, having to *drive* such screaming girls around is trying too.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at January 18, 2011 08:29 AM (ujg0T)
Shhh... She might hear you.
Posted by: The Invisable Mr. Chua at January 18, 2011 08:29 AM (TXKVh)
Good Lord,that is some weapons grade stupid there.
But the 10 ton elephant on the couch that is inferred in this story, but not mentioned outright is that the "Chinese mother" is at home actively raising the children and not at work and farming the kid out to day care.
We used to do that when I was a kid in the 50s.
Posted by: Vic at January 18, 2011 08:30 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at January 18, 2011 12:24 PM (GBXon)
You're right. I've seen both sides of the aisle on homeschooling. I knew an expat family when I lives overseas (in Asia...ha) who home schooled their 7 or 8 kids. The oldest was scoring off the charts when it came time for college entrance test and the friendlies kids you'd ever meet.
The other family I know is my brother-in-law's. Eight kids all dumber than the next because the mother is box of rocks stupid.
Posted by: Tami at January 18, 2011 08:30 AM (VuLos)
1 Just gave my kid(home educated) a big list of long sentences to diagram. Bwahahaha.
What a coincidence! I just taught some 12 year old girls how to put in thair diaphragms!
Posted by: Public School Teacher at January 18, 2011 08:30 AM (Q2Rx1)
Or he is in tact agreement with Amy's parenting methods, for the maintenance of family honor and such.
I asked the Chinese lab tech other day if she raised her daughter in the same manner as Amy did. The lab tech wasn't that extreme in her parenting methods - she let her daughter quit piano lessons in 9th grade,
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at January 18, 2011 08:31 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Farmer Joe at January 18, 2011 08:31 AM (z4es9)
Posted by: BumperStickerisrt at January 18, 2011 08:31 AM (h6mPj)
Posted by: Alex at January 18, 2011 08:31 AM (J2ejK)
Posted by: MostlyRight at January 18, 2011 08:32 AM (LaqL2)
The core truth distilled into two sentences.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 18, 2011 08:32 AM (MC19w)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at January 18, 2011 12:25 PM
I'm a writer -- and, by some metrics, a "good" writer (my editors love my text because they don't have to correct it, and readers seem to dig my stuff) -- and I couldn't diagram a sentence if you held a Portable Man-Caused Disaster Device to my head.
My grandmother taught me to read and write when I was three, and I loved reading. Still do. No one punished me or laid guilt on me if I decided to go out and play with the other kids in between reading sessions.
What I learned about the language came from well-educated authors and teachers who, thank God, didn't waste much time on worthless shit like diagramming sentences.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at January 18, 2011 08:33 AM (Ulu3i)
Others like....Olivia Munn and Maggie Q?
Posted by: EC at January 18, 2011 08:33 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: BumperStickerisrt at January 18, 2011 08:33 AM (h6mPj)
Posted by: ConservativeintheCity at January 18, 2011 08:35 AM (JourR)
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 18, 2011 08:37 AM (Q16sd)
Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at January 18, 2011 08:37 AM (GBXon)
Among my friends most don't have children and they are basing their discussion of this on "what my mother did". It's funny the uber successful ones had moms that were balanced in their approach. I've heard a lot of "how come she wasn't arrested and her kids given to child protective services cause that is definitely child abuse" and that inevitably leads to a discussion of cultural norms and our country's laws.
Posted by: curious at January 18, 2011 08:38 AM (p302b)
Posted by: toby928™ at January 18, 2011 08:38 AM (S5YRY)
All great change in America begins at the dinner table
Posted by: Stuff Zombie Reagan may have said at January 18, 2011 08:38 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at January 18, 2011 08:38 AM (GBXon)
Recently? As the pathetic rejoinder goes, lots was invented in the Arab/Muslim world. But not for centuries.
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 18, 2011 08:38 AM (Q16sd)
I believe it is a balancing act in education, but there is no doubt this country has strayed far from the correct path. There's nothing particularly magical about the so-called 'Chinese approach'--it is found throughout Asia and used to be part of the educational process in this country.
Rote learning and regimentation can be taken too far, but it definitely has its place.
To get a feel of how things have changed for the worse, pick up a typical high school textbook from the '60's or early 70's. That material is now typically covered in upper level college courses.
The touchy-feely approach of four decades of liberal-dominated education has produced a generation of ignorant morons that vote Democrat.
Pretty much exactly what they intended, in other words.
Posted by: phineas gage at January 18, 2011 08:40 AM (MeFp8)
Posted by: CAC at January 18, 2011 08:40 AM (osnUn)
Posted by: ConservativeintheCity at January 18, 2011 08:40 AM (JourR)
Actually glad to see this discussed here at the HQ. When Savage covered it I had to listen to him give Trump a tongue bath.
Posted by: Follower of Cthulhu at January 18, 2011 08:40 AM (F/4zf)
3) If you're reading a book on parenting paradigms used by Chinese mothers, and you're not Chinese - and you don't have a track record of successful New Years Resolutions being completed you're going to screw your kid up more than you can imagine.
Yep, that was my first thought when she talked about telling her kid she was "garbage". How many people are capable of doing that AND helping to build up a kid's self-esteem?
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 18, 2011 08:41 AM (XdlcF)
Well, the coolies did build the Transcontinental Railroad, and carve the Grand Canyon.
Posted by: toby928™ at January 18, 2011 08:41 AM (S5YRY)
The core truth distilled into two sentences.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 18, 2011 12:32 PM
I call BS on this, Purp.
When learning is made fun -- and I know this from experience -- you can be happy before you're "good at" whatever you're learning.
I know a lot of people who have spent their lives learning music and have never gotten "good" at it. Listening to them play their chosen instruments sets your teeth on edge. But they love it. Even those who know they don't have what it takes can please themselves by simply performing.
Do we have to make them miserable by insisting they must be "good?"
BTW -- have you ever listened to some of these Asian instrumental prodigies? Yeah, a lot of them can crank out the notes like nobody's business. But, aside from absurd body English and agonized facial expressions, some deliver performances that are cold as ice, and less than satisfying.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at January 18, 2011 08:42 AM (Ulu3i)
I believe the children are our future.
Posted by: Whitney Houston at January 18, 2011 08:42 AM (Q2Rx1)
I think that Western parenting mores used to be closer to that model - notably back when Western children actually learned things of value.
Children are little barbarians, and a parents job is to instill civilization in them along with the ability to learn for themselves.
Interestingly the ruling Bobos do still work on the latter for their children, while actively trying to sabotage middle/lower class people from doing the same.
However, part of the rise of liberalism is the retreat from civilizing children. If you can have anything you want by throwing a big enough tantrum, why would you ever work hard for things yourself? Just scream that you will hold your breath until mommy, or mommy government, gives you the toy you want and who gives a crap if it is taken from someone else?
Posted by: 18-1 at January 18, 2011 08:42 AM (bgcml)
@Vic, it's not that she says she punishes her girls...the incident that made another woman cry was when Chua said she called her daughter a piece of garbage. And, dude, that's just wrong, to me.
I punish my kids, but I don't insult them. I do tell them that if I thought they were stupid or bad or whatever might come close to calling them "garbage" I wouldn't bother with punishing them.
Posted by: Jenny Tries Too Hard at January 18, 2011 08:42 AM (mMs/n)
Posted by: CAC at January 18, 2011 08:42 AM (osnUn)
Posted by: Dr. Evil at January 18, 2011 08:43 AM (RxECq)
Posted by: Rugby Mom at January 18, 2011 08:43 AM (z8O2k)
Do you believe that critical thinking can really be directly taught?
I don't think critical thinking can be taught. I think it has to be learned, as you say. Teachers/educators, whatever the hell they're called these days, can introduce concepts and questions that start their students thinking in critical ways, but actual critical thinking is something that's learned over time through experience. I like your correlation between algebra and logic puzzles and critical thinking, Ace. For me, it was literature; puzzling out what words meant by examining their context, and placing works in their historical periods for greater understanding. I mean, it's one thing to read, "To be or not to be, that is the question," and another thing entirely to read it and ask yourself, "What the heck is he talking about?"
I think that's one of the reasons the recent furor about Huckleberry Finn being censored to remove the N-word and the term "injun" really angered me. There is no reason to remove those words if they're placed in context and children are taught to understand WHY they're there, and made to think about how language and race relations have changed in the century and more since its publication. But no. Better to just take away the sensational aspects and turn it into a book about a boy, a slave, and a river.
Whatever. I'm grateful to God that I'm out of public education, and that I got out when I did. They still had some SENSE when I was there.
Posted by: MWR at January 18, 2011 08:44 AM (4df7R)
48 Witness the television ads in the NYC area for the Times weekend deal - paraphrasing a bit: "The Times reporters are the best in the business, and no one can dispute that."
Posted by: Z as in Jersey at January 18, 2011 12:27 PM (sXUiz)
That line is a perfect howler for me. But it is unquestionably true for true believers of the NYT and they will never, ever look at evidence to the contrary.
Posted by: ya2daup at January 18, 2011 08:44 AM (0AClR)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at January 18, 2011 08:45 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: ConservativeintheCity at January 18, 2011 08:45 AM (JourR)
Recently? As the pathetic rejoinder goes, lots was invented in the Arab/Muslim world. But not for centuries.
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 18, 2011 12:38 PM (Q16sd)
Well, but it is actually *true* that the Chinese were once a fount of science and technology.
The Arabs merely conquered the Greeks and Indians and took credit for what they stole.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 18, 2011 08:45 AM (bgcml)
My orientation into critical thinking was tearing apart advertisements throughout my entire youth. I still do it. My latest peeve is the one that says, "We throw away 1.7 billion toilet paper tubes in America every day. That enough to fill the Empire State Building twice."
Really? Because that averages out to every person in America going through about 5 rolls of toilet paper a day. I don't want to get into my personal bathroom habits, but 5 rolls of toilet paper a day seems like a lot to me. I know, people use toilet paper to blow their noses and wipe their dry-erase boards, but it still seems high.
Anyway, I still do this because (1) there are so many exercises available and (2) so many things that aren't advertisements really are.
Posted by: FireHorse at January 18, 2011 08:46 AM (sWynj)
Posted by: Bobby at January 18, 2011 08:46 AM (inzhm)
Example: If my dog doesn't lie down when told, he's not in trouble (I may speak more harshly to get him to sit, but he's not in trouble). If my son doesn't do what he's told when he's told to do it, he's in trouble. There's even a (semi-conscious) pseudo-formula I use to decide how much trouble: how dangerous is what he's doing, how many times (previously) have I told him not to do it, how well or badly behaved has he been recently (last few hours) etc.
The kids I see who misbehave the most are the ones whose parents are constantly saying "no no" or making empty threats ("Do that again and I'll spank you." [Kid does it again] "This is your last warning, do that again and I'll spank you." [Kid does it again] "This is your... (etc. etc.)) instead of actually forcing their children to obey.
Coddling your kids and preventing them failing isn't really helping them. I'm just not sure that threatening to give your kid's stuff away because they can't (won't) learn a piece of music is helping them either.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at January 18, 2011 08:47 AM (8y9MW)
As for the assertion that Chinese mothers are superior,lets point out that if a Chinese mother has a girl in China, odds are very good it will be abandoned or killed in favor of a son, thanks to China's one-child policy.
Such wonderful parents.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 18, 2011 08:48 AM (TpXEI)
This +1. At my house, we eat the main meal of the day together. Have to prompt the 4 kids (A11 - 19) at every step to get the table set. Final reminder is, "we are not barbarians, put out napkins and use them!" Seems to crack them up. Ex-wife lets them free range graze/forage for food at her home until she brings home a meal in a drive-thru window bag.
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 18, 2011 08:51 AM (XBM1t)
Posted by: ConservativeintheCity at January 18, 2011 08:53 AM (JourR)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at January 18, 2011 08:55 AM (HaYO4)
As for the assertion that Chinese mothers are superior,lets point out that if a Chinese mother has a girl in China, odds are very good it will be abandoned or killed in favor of a son, thanks to China's one-child policy.
For the record, let us remember that Mrs. Chua (maiden name) is 2nd generation Chinese American, married to a Jewish American, living in NYC. She probably runs with the BoBo crowd, even though she definitely does not parent like them.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at January 18, 2011 08:55 AM (ujg0T)
I'll take Umbrage for $400, Ace. I had a Psych course in college, "Research Methods of Cognitive Psychology". The professor taught us about design of experiments, in a way that to this day informs my critical thinking - what are the variables, what can be controlled, what can't, what IS being controlled, what are the limits, what are the assumptions, etc. While it wasn't direct, in terms of being called, "Critical Thinking", it's as close as I can think it could be so taught directly.
More to topic, I'm married to a Chinese wife, who is nothing of the described Chinese mother. Everything with her 7 year old daughter is a negotiation, and you know who wins every single one of those negotiations? Yes, the seven year old. I'm developing my own sense of chinese motherhood, or what I'd call simply good ole' fashioned hold-you-to-real-standards American parenthood, to care for our own 2 year old daughter.
Posted by: Jeeebuz at January 18, 2011 08:57 AM (ZsBGd)
Posted by: ConservativeintheCity at January 18, 2011 12:45 PM (JourR)
I agree with you completely. My ex-wife however, would call you mean and abusive.
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 18, 2011 08:59 AM (XBM1t)
That is very true.
But she didn't say Chinese American moms married to Jewish men were the best though. She said Chinese moms were. At which point it's fair to make her answer for the barbaric practice that Chinese moms in the aggregate do.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 18, 2011 09:00 AM (TpXEI)
My next door neighbors have five kids all homeschooled. The youngest is 15.
The oldest -a boy-is now in med school...the next..a girl is now going for her PhD in physics at MIT..the next -a boy started law school...the fourth is playing minor league baseball..and the youngest at 15 will graduate this year and start college in the fall..
Today the youngest, along with a group of about 20 other homeschooled kids, is skiing...
Over the weekend she had a mixed party with about 30 kids there..
I think most people don't understand homeschooling because they pay too much attention to the media
Posted by: beedubya at January 18, 2011 09:01 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: ConservativeintheCity at January 18, 2011 09:02 AM (JourR)
ConservativeintheCity,
She mentions that her daughter finally was able to play the piece of music and was thrilled. The problem isn't that she pushes her daughter to keep practicing, it's that she treats her children like shit, her husband as well, and appears to allow them no room for error or for a life. Note that she doesn't allow any instrument but piano or violin. I was expected to put in an hour of trumpet practice a night when I was in the band, but I chose to be in the band and play trumpet, so I had no one to blame but myself.
Posted by: Alex at January 18, 2011 09:02 AM (J2ejK)
I've always believed that a parent's main responsibility was to watch their child and note what they were naturally interested in, then nurture that inquisitiveness. Curiosity will take care of the rest.
That's not how I was raised, not by a long shot. But I still tried to do that, while the Daughter of Satan (the ex-) stood in my way at every opportunity.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 18, 2011 09:03 AM (b6qrg)
Most parents drag out the "but, they're not learning socialization" retort as a shield. For many reasons, but mainly because "socialization" is not easily measured.
Grades, musicianship, etc. can be measured. And Asians seem to be kicking ass, based on their proportional representation. Same with home-schoolers and spelling bees. Don't grade them on their ability to spell, grade them on their...socialization, which is vague enough to avoid grading, which is the point.
I do not parent as Chua does. I could give a host of reasons, of varying importance. Part of the reason, honestly, is that I am not willing to put in the time.
Posted by: CJ at January 18, 2011 09:03 AM (9KqcB)
Another thing that irritates me is when an ad cites a number but preceds it with up to and follows it with or more. "Save up to fifty dollars or more!" "Earn up to four thousand dollars a month or more!"
All they're doing is manipulating people with meaningless claims designed to have effect because it uses a certain number. "Earn up to $4,000 or more" is exactly the same as "earn up to $5,000 or more" and "earn up to $3,000 or more" -- but the $5k figure seems too high to be credible and the $3k figure is too low to be interesting.
I'm always on the lookout for tricks like this. I'm glad I'm not alone.
Posted by: FireHorse at January 18, 2011 09:05 AM (sWynj)
She mentions that her daughter finally was able to play the piece of music and was thrilled. The problem isn't that she pushes her daughter to keep practicing, it's that she treats her children like shit, her husband as well, and appears to allow them no room for error or for a life.
That was what bothered me as well. Perhaps Amy Chua was embellishing it for good book sales, but the tone just sickened me.
Note that she doesn't allow any instrument but piano or violin. I was expected to put in an hour of trumpet practice a night when I was in the band, but I chose to be in the band and play trumpet, so I had no one to blame but myself.
Exactly. Suppose her daughter wanted to be in the marching band, or play guitar/bass/drums in a garage band with friends who also played. Even if she kept her grades up, didn't do drugs, and stayed out of trouble, Amy Chua would no doubt have a shit-fit. I shudder to think what will become of her daughters.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at January 18, 2011 09:09 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: MWR at January 18, 2011 09:11 AM (4df7R)
Oddly enough, that very same mom is also unemployed in whatever town I happen to be in when I am online, so she really gets around.
I also like the "scam exposed" one for acai berries using a head shot of that hot French television newsreader. I am quite sure they are not paying her royalties.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at January 18, 2011 09:12 AM (o2QOm)
OT, the local hate-filled vitriolic talk radio station that carries Rush said on the break that the Texas inauguration is today, Rick Perry sworn in, and then speculation on future national aspirations for Perry and Lt Gov. Dewhurst.
Dewhurst may seek KBH's Senate seat in 2012. Perry mentioned as possible VP candidate, but not pursuing the top spot.
Imagine an Alaska/Texas ticket and what could be made of that.
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 18, 2011 09:12 AM (XBM1t)
Posted by: BumperStickerisrt at January 18, 2011 09:13 AM (h6mPj)
Has anyone noticed the older kids in stores with pacifiers in their wittle mouths? I mean, ages 4 and 5 years old and talking around the paci--they are poster children for their generation (one son who had a binkie knew his crib was the only place for it). This is parenting today for some: give in and/or stick the little darlin' in front of a DVR--a smallish DVR player for restaurants and plane trips, and a DVR in the minivan. The DVR generation. The Chinese mom may go overboard as a drill sgt, but she is better than those raised with no rules at all.
I can only remember one son's tantrum in public: a spread-eagle screaming fit face-plant in a grocery store as a two-year-old. My hands were full and his four year old brother and I left him there, after telling him "no" to some candy and then telling him to come on. We walked around the corner of the grocery aisle. The second he noticed we were gone (and waiting for him 10 feet away) the screeching stopped and he never did it again. We took long car trips and plane rides with both boys and never had a problem. I don't know if I threatened to call Santa at times, but I never had to beat them to get them to behave. Taking away TV or computer seemed to work well for them, as well as time out. One was smart enough to put himself into time out before I even knew something was wrong (we always went easy on that kid, as he is pretty funny). I have a feeling that "Super Nanny" show is not an outlier today.
My sons managed to be conservative college grads (with jobs! They are not still on our insurance or living at home like the Democrats!) called me "the strictest Mom on the block" when the elder hit 7th grade. My response? I thanked him. Hell nearly froze over on the day he thanked me for "having boundaries" as he now teaches high school and sees the results of the opposite to strict.
Posted by: ChristieBlinky at January 18, 2011 09:13 AM (zFyaZ)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 18, 2011 09:15 AM (xmuv/)
Posted by: BumperStickerisrt at January 18, 2011 09:17 AM (h6mPj)
Man, reading this just breaks my heart.
My wife worked with a 54yr old man whose father overrode all of his preferences and forced him into the family business.
The problem was that his father's strengths weren't his strengths--they were his weaknesses. So he was stuck in a job he wasn't cut out for with his dad for a boss. He fucked up constantly and his old man was forever displaying disappointment in him.
The guy tried hard, but his heart wasn't in it. He wasn't cut out for business; he was more the artistic type--singing in choirs, participating in theater groups, hand doing photography.
I'm convinced he could have made a living doing one of these things if his dad had allowed it. He truly had acting talent and could do some of the funniest impersonations you'd ever seen.
But he was stuck in an office doing work he hated, trapped forever under his father's thumb.
I never want to do that to my kid. I believe my role is to guide him and help him use his God-given talents and strengths to his best advantage. It isn't my job to run his life for him.
Does that mean I'm soft on him? No. He's only four and I'm already all over him for giving up on things as soon as he gets frustrated. I always make him go back for another try when he wants to quit. But I don't call him names or insult him over it. I just don't allow quitting at the first sign of resistance to be an option.
But hell, he's four. Some days his attention span isn't very long, so I've learned to pick my spots. Some days I push. Other days I let him self-direct his activities (so long as it isn't him sitting in front of the TV all day) and do his own thing. I try to mix structure with free time because I believe that kids naturally learn through play.
I try to never forget that kids are complicated, just like adults are. Their emotions, fears, concerns and wants should be respected even as you set behavioral boundaries.
I'm firm. I spank when needed and generally don't put up with a lot of bullshit. But just pushing, pushing, pushing on your kids doesn't make for happy, well-adjusted individuals in my opinion.
Posted by: Warden at January 18, 2011 09:20 AM (V6HDd)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 18, 2011 09:21 AM (xmuv/)
"Daughter of Satan"
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 18, 2011 01:03 PM (b6qrg)
Heh! Fits perfectly. Gonna use that without attribution.
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 18, 2011 09:21 AM (XBM1t)
Well said.
For all the talk about how much American parents suck, we've done pretty well compared to the rest of the world. For the past thirty years my generation heard how we were going to be sucking Japanese cock because of how well they were scoring on tests. Didn't materialize that way.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 18, 2011 09:22 AM (TpXEI)
And yeah, while giving kids an overdeveloped sense of accomplishment isn't good, I think setting them up to fail is worse. I'm not going to force my son to perfect a complex piece of music just so I can feel better about my parenting skills. That's ridiculous.
Instead, I've taught my son something more important: critical thinking (see next post) For example, he wants to build a model of the solar system. He quizzed me about the solar systems and then, on his next trip to the school library, checked out a book on the subject so he could research it. He is currently preparing a list of the items he will need to build his model. He will be 6 in April. His classmates are still picking their noses and eating paste. Just saying.
Posted by: mpur in Texas (kicking Mexico's ass since 1836) at January 18, 2011 09:23 AM (QV82F)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 18, 2011 01:15 PM (xmuv/)
What he said. This is what I was trying to say, when I kept talking about old episodes of Punky Brewster and boy bands.
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at January 18, 2011 09:24 AM (HaYO4)
"Western parents worry a lot about their children's self-esteem. But as a parent, one of the worst things you can do for your child's self-esteem is to let them give up."
We quit all the time. Hasn't negatively impacted us.
Posted by: Houston Texans at January 18, 2011 09:25 AM (jmf9+)
Posted by: Todd Marinovich's Dad at January 18, 2011 09:25 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: nickless at January 18, 2011 12:53 PM
Probably a side of rice, egg rolls and soy sauce.
Think of them as veal....
Posted by: MrScribbler© at January 18, 2011 09:25 AM (Ulu3i)
Not nearly enough you heartless bitch.
Boy howdy do I remember that day when I announced that I was done with piano (It was in the middle of an "exercise" designed to frustrate me on a physical coordination level.)
Piano is a percussion instrument, after all.
Why the hell do we have "Piano Books" that don't include a lick of music BTW?
So weird.
My Mom was adamantly against it and insisted that I keep working for the remainder of my scheduled (and paid for) classes, recitals and lessons.
She never fucking manhandled me though.
I served my time, resentfully and won some trophies.
BFD.
I later came to enjoy playing music (poorly) on a piano and other instruments.
I even sing sometimes!
But the piano has always been and always will be a psychic lodestone for me.
I've sought and received some amazing tutelage on some basic technique from members of the CSO and the Santa Fe Opera.
Expert consensus seems to be that I am terrible and clunky with my rhythms and dynamics, except when I'm not.
Posted by: Deety Jersey (Guernsey, whatever) at January 18, 2011 09:28 AM (Jb3+B)
For all the talk about how much American parents suck, we've done pretty well compared to the rest of the world. For the past thirty years my generation heard how we were going to be sucking Japanese cock because of how well they were scoring on tests. Didn't materialize that way.
That is because of the American environment of enterprise and creativity. For all their smarts, innovation is damn near not allowed in Asia. But don't worry, the Commeicrats are working to snuff that out too. :-(
Posted by: Curmudgeon at January 18, 2011 09:29 AM (ujg0T)
Meh, Chinese Tiger Moms have nothing on Italian-American former DI Dads/Grandpas.
Unknown Jane's rules for raising yer kids: expose them to as much knowledge as possible (from algebra to Shakespeare to Bach to gardening); give them actual work to do so they learn responsibility, give them opportunities to learn to master themselves, and don't speak down to them unless they warrant it (and then explain to them why they warrant it).
Oh, and when in doubt, hurting their feelings (or their butts) is a parental duty; use it in all seriousness, but don't be afraid to do it -- your job is to be parent, not "friend".
Posted by: unknown jane at January 18, 2011 09:30 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at January 18, 2011 09:30 AM (xmuv/)
Someone brought up a good point elsewhere: have these girls ever actually failed anything? Drama and sports and the like aren't necessarily important for socialization skills, but simply because you can lose a soccer match even if you are the best player on the team. You can audition for a part and not get it, even if you recited Shakespear flawlessly. I wonder if Ms. Chua isn't doing her children a disservice by controlling their every movement and activity, because while they may excel in certain areas, at some level they are 'playing it safe'.
Posted by: Alex at January 18, 2011 09:31 AM (J2ejK)
Posted by: Big meanie mom at January 18, 2011 09:32 AM (JZBti)
You are a horrible parent. The joy children get in accomplishment pales beside the relief they will feel when you are ready to beat them and burn their toys for their failures.
Fear will keep your children in line. Fear of this belt.
Your sad devotion to that ancient method of parenting hasn't helped him master calculus, or given you the foresight to demand he sail around the world solo at age nine.
(cuts off Empire of Jeff's airway)
I find your lack of faith disturbing....
Posted by: Darth Chua at January 18, 2011 09:37 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Brian at January 18, 2011 09:37 AM (sYrWB)
Posted by: Armando at January 18, 2011 09:37 AM (nd0uY)
Posted by: Grand Moff Jeff at January 18, 2011 09:42 AM (xmuv/)
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at January 18, 2011 09:42 AM (pKiK/)
The business of not letting the kid go to the toilet until she mastered a musical piece strikes me as being a little over the top.
And as other people have pointed out, while being able to work hard and stick to a task is extremely important in life, even a bigger part is being able to make sound, informed decisions - and stick by them. By making every decision for her daughters, Chua is denying them a key skill that they'll need in adult life.
Posted by: Brown Line at January 18, 2011 09:43 AM (VrNoa)
Posted by: Tori Amos at January 18, 2011 09:44 AM (ujg0T)
On one hand, I'm always suspicious of people that are this certain they are right about something - and everyone else is wrong.
On the other hand ... I think maybe there's a kernel of truth to what she's saying.
Either way, I'm sending the link to my wife. My first child is arriving in a few months, and I'm already terrified of the 436 ways I can screw the kid up.
This gives me some new ammunition for self-doubt. I'll bet if my parents had made me master the violin, I'd have better self-esteem about being a Dad.
Posted by: PB at January 18, 2011 09:47 AM (83bUN)
I'm guessing no.
As shitty as our education system is, America still produces a hell of a lot of innovative products.
I'm guessing our rebelliousness has something to do with it.
Posted by: Warden at January 18, 2011 09:52 AM (V6HDd)
My first child is arriving in a few months, and I'm already terrified of the 436 ways I can screw the kid up.
You will screw up. Accept that fact. But remember that kids have a (mostly) short memory for your screw ups and love can cover an immense amount of screw-ups. All parents make stupid mistakes but most kids turn okay or even awesome, in spite of it.
The best thing I ever did for myself as a parent, was to ignore everybody else's advice.
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at January 18, 2011 09:52 AM (pKiK/)
I learned reading and writing phonetically -- "I'll wield my shield in the field till you yield," that sort of thing -- but God forbid any teacher should try to teach that way today. We WANT to. We're not allowed.
Posted by: Stephen Tilson at January 18, 2011 09:54 AM (grJK8)
This gives me some new ammunition for self-doubt. I'll bet if my parents had made me master the violin, I'd have better self-esteem about being a Dad.
If you have a little bit of time and money, then what's stopping you from learning at least the basics? Forcing your kids to practice for hours on end on something is a lot less effective than if they see that Mom or Dad is willing to learn something new, and work at it, IMHO.
Posted by: Alex at January 18, 2011 09:54 AM (J2ejK)
Amen.
Just admit it when you do, forgive yourself and vow to do better.
Posted by: Warden at January 18, 2011 09:59 AM (V6HDd)
Heh...
If the words "You can't make me." ever escaped my lips while addressing an ordered task from my parents, I would have worried about living to see the next Christmas, not how many presents I received. My parents usual model was, "If you want to quit fine, but you will do task x first. " Where x is some task that had stubbornly rebuffed me.
1. I knew they could and would make me, and didn't even consider the Lulu approach.
2. I actually did accomplish task x, eventually, *every*single*time*.
3. Task x was never the reason I gave up a hobby or interest. If I ultimately gave something up, it was for much better reasons than personal failure.
Lessons learned about "perseverance" as my step father would put it rank on the short list of the most valuable in my life. *flashback* "You see boy, you can do it" *teary eyes*
Posted by: MikeTheMoose© at January 18, 2011 10:01 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: EmilyM. at January 18, 2011 10:02 AM (YMfT5)
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 18, 2011 10:07 AM (Q16sd)
Late to the party, or evisceration of American parents, whichever. Does this crazy woman who is frankly bordering on what in other cases we’d term as child abuse (tell me, if you re-cast her as a tea party member, would the press still be lapping up her methods?) really have something in her way of parenting? I’d say a big resounding no. She’s creating great “worker bees” who can do tasks flawlessly but have no ability to think in ways that lead to innovation.
I work with kids being raised by this type of parent when I volunteer in the classroom. Yes, great they can spit out their math facts, but they are absolutely lost when they have to create something. Oh, they can reproduce a famous artistÂ’s work, no problem, but ask them to think up something themselves and they flounder.
Balance, really, in all things. Push kids, but let them have fun too. ItÂ’s in fun that creativity is sparked and from that creativity comes great things, great inventions.
Posted by: ParanoidNewYearInSeattle at January 18, 2011 10:11 AM (RZ8pf)
^^ This ^^
If Amy can't get off her butt and join in -- ever heard of duets? -- then she's just another whiner who expects her kids to do something she couldn't be bothered to do.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at January 18, 2011 10:12 AM (Ulu3i)
Those could be the two whiniest sentences ever written in English. Worry about self-esteem later, your first priority should be to order a paternity test. Estrogen levels that high put your ability to father a child in serious doubt.
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at January 18, 2011 10:20 AM (+lsX1)
165 My parents and grandparents (and instructors) worked the "you can't make me" out very well -- and I used them as a model for my own kids.
Me as a kid (or my own kids now):"I don't want to check the horses/dogs' water and food right now; I want to go play with my friends/read a book/whatever...(and you can't make me; do it yourself)"
Them (me now): "true, we can't force you -- but then the animals might go without, and that is irresponsible and even perhaps cruel; you wanted them around and like riding them/hunting with them; if you want those things then you have to take care of them as they could die without care -- then you will not only have lost those things but have to bear the burden of being responsible for their loss and the suffering it entailed." (and while this is not verbatim, it's pretty damn close)
You go out and feed/water the critters...usually with a deep sense of guilt over even considering not to do so.
This can work for everything from picking up your toys to doing your homework once the groundwork is laid
Posted by: unknown jane at January 18, 2011 10:21 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Social Savant at January 18, 2011 10:23 AM (G60Nl)
One thing no one is commenting on is the inherent racism of the Chinese mom philosophy. She won't "let" her kids be "less than number one" at everything.
The assumption is that compared to all those weak Westerners, of course her kids should be the best. If they're not, they're not working hard enough. Never mind that some of those Western kids are working their butts off too. It's a foregone conclusion that the Chinese kid is superior so it's just a matter of working harder to be number one. But we're the racist ones, that's right, I forgot.
I know Chinese and Korean moms with exactly that attitude. One of my Korean mom friends got upset at her 3-year-old son's swim teacher because her son wasn't the best in the class. If he's not the best, clearly he needs a better teacher who will push him harder.
Posted by: Average Jen at January 18, 2011 10:27 AM (DBr05)
Posted by: Mel Gibson at January 18, 2011 10:29 AM (DQjJA)
Having your kids make friends at school is great -- if it's a good school with kids from good families. If it's a bad school then you don't want your kids to make friends there. The "skill" of friend-making is a bad thing if your kid is making friends with future criminals, bums, drop-outs, and losers.
The same thing for casual sex and recreational drug use. These mistakes are much easier to overcome if your family has money and connections. Rehab is very expensive.
Family money and connections function as a huge safety net for a kid. Many more mistakes can be made and recovered from.
Posted by: bobbo at January 18, 2011 10:33 AM (QcFbt)
It's an equal and opposite mistake to ascribe excess virtues to the generic Chinese Mom.
Cranking out maladjusted performers is a recipe for a future social meltdown. What's the kid going to do when the world doesn't want/need any more 10 year-old prodigies?
I prefer little rat-bastard kids who are learning and enjoying the process. Going all prison-guard on them doesn't help. Encouraging independent thinking and exposing the kid to all the good things in the world is the way to go.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at January 18, 2011 10:40 AM (Ulu3i)
On the homeschool/social skills thing. My pet peeve is the "proof in the pudding" homeschooling parent who attributes their kids' maturity to learning at home. That sets the bar high for some of us who have chosen to homeschool because our kids' social skills were very poor and not being helped by immersion in a public school (asperger's). Some kids are weird because they're homeschooled, some are homeschooled because they're weird and the social dynamics of the average public school would chew them up and spit them out.
Posted by: michele at January 18, 2011 10:40 AM (q7Waf)
If I ever have grandchildren, some advice I will give my sons: turn off the TV, limit viewing of the TV and other electronics, let them play and use their imaginations, read books daily before bed and naptime---yes, naps!, set limits, give them chores,and try to keep them sort of on a schedule. I sound Chinese, but it worked.
A friend of mine, a type-A perfectionist, who married into an Asian family, had a son the same age as my boys. She had him in computer classes, etc and a regimented schedule before he started kindergarten. The child had no free time just to be a boy and ride his bike, skin his knee and make forts. I don't know if his schedule and expectations had anything to do with it or not, but he killed himself a few years ago. Very sad.
Posted by: ChristieBlinky at January 18, 2011 10:42 AM (zFyaZ)
Posted by: unknown jane at January 18, 2011 10:45 AM (5/yRG)
Having your kids make friends at school is great -- if it's a good school with kids from good families. If it's a bad school then you don't want your kids to make friends there. The "skill" of friend-making is a bad thing if your kid is making friends with future criminals, bums, drop-outs, and losers.
Umm, yes and no. I went to a good prep school and had peers who were future (white collar) criminals. The other day I checked out the old San Jose "Jerk-The-Knee News" hometown news and chuckled when one of them was busted for misappropriating investment funds and sentenced to prison and a fine.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at January 18, 2011 10:49 AM (ujg0T)
I've only read a few dozen posts and my own reaction will really seem against the flow here but DAMN, that woman is harsh! I wouldn't trade my own ma (who didn't spare the rod but again, DAMN, she didn't force us to do things we were physically incapable of) in for anyone in the world, especially this woman. Uff.
OK, back to work.
mac :]
Posted by: macbrooks at January 18, 2011 10:51 AM (J+MD4)
There were also a few Chinese families in the neighborhood growing up. The one family's kids seem well adjusted, but the other's kids all burned out shortly after getting into college and went completely off the rails out of the direct constant influence of their parents. The second family's kids were also good at solving linear problems, but couldn't dynamically think their way out of a paper bag if their lives depended upon it.
So I guess it all boils down to just HOW Chinese Mom the Chinese mom goes on the kid.
Posted by: Ranba Ral at January 18, 2011 10:57 AM (KSjrh)
In other words, they become leftists.
Posted by: someone at January 18, 2011 11:07 AM (DfAwB)
I love the anecdotal 'I work with kids raised by this parenting method I disagree with and they are all screwed up' which applies causality that isn't there.
I think the far bigger problem with our youth is they give up too easily on difficult or long and arduous tasks, not that they aren't having enough fun.
Well first I think you fail to subdivide the event. It actually has two parts. 1 the child initially fails and wishes to give up. 2. The child becomes violently insubordinate. Responses to both situations is well within acceptable parenting.
Like I said in my family, it simply was not acceptable to quit due to failure. You say this is borderline abuse? The child wanted to quit a task. Accepting failure on difficult tasks makes failing anything hard the standard. The parent didn't want the child to quit in failure. The child was given the task to continue to attempt and the child responded by
1. Refusing
When that didn't work the child escalated to.
2. Violently protesting.
When that didn't work the child escalated to.
3. Destroying objects.
This is an attempt by the child to gain control, using a temper tantrum, to avoid doing something they don't want to do. Allowing children to control situations using tantrums sets tantrums as the acceptable standard. The response to the temper tantrum was more than measured and involved only loss of privileges and impounding and threatened loss of toys. Like I said in my family I would have gotten paddled at step 1, and personally I still think it's justified.
So what we have here is a parent who would not allow a child to quit in failure. A child who protested and escalated to violence. A parent who used moderate discipline to correct the insubordination.
The child then complies; overcomes the difficulty, then gains both confidence in their own ability to overcome, and the enjoyment of having accomplished something difficult. You want to call ALL children raised using this method drones. Am I a drone?
For my own introspection, also anecdotal, I observe a number of things about who I was when I was young.
1. I was lazy
2. I became quickly discouraged if I didn't see immediate results from my efforts.
After I was forced to do some things against my own will and succeeded, my outlook changed. I become more interested in more things because I knew I could accomplish if I kept trying. And I was able to be more successful at the endeavors of my life.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose© at January 18, 2011 11:13 AM (0q2P7)
You didn't read the full article. Shortly after Lulu complied, she did learn to play the piece correctly and goes on to perform it in a recital. That is a far cry from physically incapable.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose© at January 18, 2011 11:15 AM (0q2P7)
Not everyone would be a great artist, actor, photographer, if only Mom or Dad had eased off a little. Some people just aren't creative.
I homeschool/homeschooled my three sons. Oldest is brilliant in math. Calculus as an 8th grader brilliant in math. He can solve any puzzle, see any pattern, but he can not make up a puzzle or a pattern of his own. That's just him, and no amount of tough, or permissive, or perfect parenting would have made him less mathematical or more creative.
Some kids need drill sergeants, and some kids need kumbaya-singers, and pretending that all kids respond identically to identical parenting styles is stupid.
Posted by: VKI at January 18, 2011 11:20 AM (LZK9H)
Posted by: Canadian Infidel at January 18, 2011 11:21 AM (GKQDR)
Posted by: Knemon at January 18, 2011 11:24 AM (ucCVi)
A number of commenters have said that Tiger Moms keep their children from being creative artist-types.
It isn't so much that, as it is that the children get no praise and support whatsoever. I am really surprised they aren't drinking the Drano and cutting their wrists yet. Or maybe they are....
Posted by: Curmudgeon at January 18, 2011 11:25 AM (ujg0T)
That particular item is not explained. Whether Lulu decided she wanted to learn piano initially or Chua decided she would. But I think the lesson is more appropriate either way.
Again I don't think you bothered to click through. The point of this example was. Most rewarding interests are not enjoyable until you get good at them. Getting good at them takes effort. Children are adverse at expending effort when they do not immediately see results. Without a parent to make them soldier on; This leads them to try and quit rewarding endeavor after rewarding endeavor when initial efforts don't pan out.
The serial quitters of western society; Whose parents never forced them to stick with something they started and see it through. Who go through life looking for immediate rewards for minimal effort. Who never develop any interest beyond gossip, gadgets, an simple entertainment.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose© at January 18, 2011 11:26 AM (0q2P7)
I become more interested in more things because I knew I could accomplish if I kept trying.
I think this is key--the parent showing you that you could accomplish the task. As opposed to just berating the child until s/he is reduced to tears. I fear that Amy Chua is more of the latter than the former.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at January 18, 2011 11:30 AM (ujg0T)
Well Lulu does go on to perform the piece in a recital, and receives many accolades. Ultimately success was had and possible, where failure would have been accepted, detrimentally so in my opinion, by many here. Somtimes the path to success, the path to true rewards, is extremely unpleasant and contains real hardships. Also a lesson not lost here.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose© at January 18, 2011 11:36 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: unknown jane at January 18, 2011 11:37 AM (5/yRG)
It's all bullshit. You've got a quadrillion freaking neurons adjusting to every little assumption, thought, experience, sight, smell, sound and sensation, and you're expected to react the same as everyone else? Parents and children learn each other, sometimes well, sometimes not well.
You need to learn the child as much as teach them, because you can't teach them without learning how they react to their teaching. Some kids react well to discipline, some don't. Some overcome that, some don't. If you don't adapt to them, they end up neurotic or bitter or running away.
The "you have to do it my way" crowd pisses me off, at least in this area of life.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at January 18, 2011 11:45 AM (bxiXv)
It is unclear if the initial decision to pursue the piano is Lulu or Amy.
Part of the point here, is that to get the absolute best effort from a child, you will have to, at least on occasion, have to push them beyond where they want to quit.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose© at January 18, 2011 11:47 AM (0q2P7)
Ah, Mike the Moose(c) sets me straight about the physical incapabilities of the child. Many thanks. Still, harsh training methods. My own mom learned quickly on that I get bored of things very quickly, whether I'm good at them or not (still do - only three things have kept my interest for longer than a year: Jesus, Mr. macbrooks and writing), and I shudder to think of how my life would've been like under this "perfect" mother.
mac :]
Posted by: macbrooks at January 18, 2011 12:08 PM (J+MD4)
Posted by: hair extensions suppliers at January 18, 2011 01:32 PM (tpvde)
Sorry long, but since you asked
I can only speak from personal experience here, but I had a desire to draw from the time I could pick up a pencil and I drew on any kind of paper I could get a hand on my mom would take me to art galleries etc, but I never took a class. When I got some babysitting money at 13 was the first time I bought an actual sketchbook. I also did the same with guitar, purchased on my own with babysitting money. I am accomplished in both of these areas, because I had the inner desire and curiosity. I can't help but think it's inborn.
Fast forward to my children. I have no interest in bugs or birds or dragons, but my daughter developed an obsessive interest early. By the time she was three she could name every bird or bug (or flower) she came in contact with. Now she draws dragons. I'm so sick of dragons I could scream, but I can't deny her talent. The drawings are beautiful and dynamic...she even creates stories for them and has taught herself computer animation in order to watch them move in three dimensions. My son bores me to tears talking about electronics and light sabers, and is scoring post high school in science on his achievement tests. I think he's doing pretty well for being 11. She's 13.
I think children should have the door open to be the people they were created to be, that we need to dispense with the elitism of pushing the arts over other accomplishments, and they need to know early that who they are does not come from a metaphorical bull whip wielded by an overbearing mother who has a competitive desire to prove her worth by living vicariously through her kids. That mother doesn't even have to be interested in what her kids are as long as she encourages them to never give up on what they love.
Posted by: michele at January 18, 2011 01:44 PM (q7Waf)
can only speak from personal experience here,
Well it looks like a sort of single case type experience. Some children are motivated to zealously pursue interests. Others are not. Many in my various stretches of family fall or fell into category 2. Some will naturally achieve in many areas, some will achieve modestly in only a few, some will fail to achieve in all. I think that how you simply stay out of the way of a born overachiever, which is what you are describing, is a much different task than motivating a mediocre or under achiever to become what they could be. In some personal cases, some true dreads of my youthful years, to include writing, have become not only strengths, but rewarding enjoyable activities thanks to some "overbearing" parents. Parents that did not wait for me to magically blossom, and wouldn't let my own malaise (Jimmeh!) of youth to negatively impact who I could be in adult life. I owe much of my happiness today to those overbearing parents, who proved unequivocally, that I really could do anything I set my mind to, anything I was willing to expend the effort to do, not just that which came easy. The bottom line of MY personal experience is.
1. I was a no account loser who couldn't care less about school or anything else other than video games, TV, and playing around with friends.
2. My parents used various forms of coercion to correct my attitude. Including coming down on me like a brick delivery for new cathedral construction.
3. I eventually developed real interests, real talents, got decent grades, went on to graduate from the USNA served as a Naval Officer, and later became an engineer in private employment.
Thanks to step 2 I have.
1. An engaging job that pays good money.
2. Talents and life skills that are rewarding as they are useful.
3. More hobbies, including that dreaded writing, than I have time.
I look at others who never did get that "overbearing" intervention, some of my childhood friends, and I reflect on how full my life is today, and how empty it could have been; That 10 or so years of "overbearing" parents is just a drop in the bucket to how much fun, and how many of life's rewards I am able to reap today. I say THANK GOD! for my "overbearing" parents.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose© at January 18, 2011 03:37 PM (0q2P7)
This thread is dead and no one's going to read this, but I'm going to say this anyway. My mother's methods of raising us was similar to Chua's and as I said above, my mother is Chinese. I can't remember her ever praising or supporting anything I ever did since I was maybe 5 or 6 years old. Yet, despite that, I'm not suicidal or a cutter. I like to think I'm pretty well adjusted. Mostly.
Posted by: Rum, Goddess of Doom at January 18, 2011 03:53 PM (YxBuk)
Posted by: Clyde Shelton at January 18, 2011 05:21 PM (NITzp)
I think your opinions are sound. I just think parents should find something that interests their kid, something that they gravitate towards and help them there.
Posted by: michele at January 18, 2011 05:23 PM (q7Waf)
How can Professor Tiger-Mom teach Yale Law, and be Super-Helicopter Mom at the same time? I'm guessing that she got tenure, then went on permanent paid sabbatical. Helicopter Parenting her daughters on Yale's dime, then writing a book about it to make even more money. America! What a country!
Now if she could teach her daughters to drive competently, that would be an achievement for Chinese Tiger Mom.
Little Known Fact: Rocky Balboa Defeated Clubber Lang because he recovered the Eye Of The Tiger Mom that he had once lost.
Posted by: Live Free Or Die at January 19, 2011 03:32 AM (vugg/)
Posted by: Personal Growth at January 21, 2011 09:01 AM (UhGhS)
WhatÂ’s this theme you use? Is it customized?
If customized can you please facilitate me the website of the company who designed it for you?
I would apreciate to have him/her do one for me also!
Posted by: gucci 2010 at February 28, 2011 04:39 PM (sWuzb)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2742 seconds, 329 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Big meanie mom at January 18, 2011 08:06 AM (JZBti)