August 25, 2011
— Ace FoxNews just noted that Mitt Romney has been keeping his focus relentlessly on where he's long kept it -- squarely aimed at Barack H. Obama.
That's all well and good. I sort of like that.
But I don't think he'll be able to maintain that. Perry isn't exactly hammering Romney with attacks, and he's not hitting him with anything new. But he is hitting him.
Romney's strategy made sense as long as he was the front-runner. By ignoring his rivals, and only getting into arguments with his would-be general election opponent Obama, he could propagate the idea that all this primary business was a formality and the real headliner of Romney v. Obama was set in stone.
I have given Romney props on this before. If there is one thing I have liked about him, it was his combination of hammering Obama only, and dismissing his rivals as pretenders to the Alpha Dog throne. (His best Alpha Dog moment came when Pawlenty made that scripted semi-joke about mowing only one acre of Romeny's lawn, and the debate moderator asked if he wanted to respond, Romney just smiled and said "That's just fine." As in, "I need not stoop.")
But that was a different situation. Well ahead of his rivals, and the only candidate the Establishment was even halfway confident in, he could use his front-runner status to further his front-runner status.
But he's not the front-runner now.
I really don't want him beatin' up on my boy Perry, but I don't see how he can avoid doing so.
Of course the trap in that, now, is the media's new headline becomes Desperate Romney forced into campaign re-think of that kind of thing. Still, that's a one day story, and it doesn't say much more than we already know (i.e., Romney is no longer the front-runner).
Posted by: Ace at
03:07 PM
| Comments (252)
Post contains 319 words, total size 2 kb.
I really don't want him beatin' up on my boy Perry, but I don't see how he can avoid doing so.
Well, he's supposed to. This ain't beanbag.
Posted by: Barack Obama is a Stuttering Clusterfuck of a Miserable Failure Ebook at August 25, 2011 03:11 PM (MMC8r)
She ran away crying saying that he ass wasn't that fat
Oh, and also too..foist?
Posted by: beedubya at August 25, 2011 03:11 PM (AnTyA)
Not to worry he is their dog so they will not attack him directly until after the primary.
Posted by: Vic at August 25, 2011 03:13 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Gore88 at August 25, 2011 03:14 PM (S/qP2)
Posted by: DarkLord© sez Obama is a stuttering clusterf--- of a miserable failure
Oh, and F--- Nevada! at August 25, 2011 03:14 PM (GBXon)
Posted by: Duke Lowell at August 25, 2011 03:15 PM (6hsR4)
Perry clearly knows how this game is played. Romney needs to demonstrate that he does, and right quick, or it's over for him.
Posted by: pep at August 25, 2011 03:15 PM (6TB1Z)
I thought that would hurt him in the long run. Rather than work up a strong base of emphatic supporters, he choose to play the defacto winner, and by not engaging strongly he picked up squishy voters who like "civility" and "presidential image" but no one who would actually fight for him because of *strong* feelings that he is the best candidate. Sort of loosely attached non-committals. Now he will be forced to change tactics, and those loosely attached to him will shed off, making his condition worse before it gets any better; if it ever gets better enough for him to win.
I disagree, I think playing the civil center in an emotional race like this one, especially in the primary, where everyone has a bone to pick, was a loser from the beginning, it was just a matter of time before the loose attachment to his supporters was stripped. And he would never build the supporters necessary to man his call centers, and go door to door, by being supremely uninspiring.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at August 25, 2011 03:16 PM (0q2P7)
There's no way I'm re-typing my brilliant comment (lost when the friggin' autoclick took me to some martini-related page).
Short version: it's best for the GOP if Romney and Perry keep their attacks substantive and dignified. I think they are both capable of that. However, if it gets dirty, my money's on Rick.
Posted by: Y-not at August 25, 2011 03:18 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt's Greatest Hits Ebook at August 25, 2011 03:19 PM (MMC8r)
Romney is everyone's "safety school". Everyone's second-best choice. If he wasn't, then his place-holder lead wouldn't have evaporated the moment a real candidate challenged him.
Romney has only one shot at beating Perry, and that's for Perry to implode.
Which means Romney should stick to his strategy, slow and steady, and be ready to pick up the pieces should we not be able to get into the really good school we always wanted to go to.
Posted by: Truman North, TPT at August 25, 2011 03:20 PM (K2wpv)
Yeah, but that's why Chuck Norris can be a nice guy. Everyone knows he can rip your legs off, so he has nothing to prove and nobody challenges him. There are real doubts about Romney, so he has to show that he can be dirty if (when) Obama goes that way.
Posted by: pep at August 25, 2011 03:20 PM (6TB1Z)
Huntsman!
How the heck did he wrangle an invitation to the next debate?
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at August 25, 2011 03:20 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: RJ at August 25, 2011 03:21 PM (QjrRF)
Posted by: Gore88 at August 25, 2011 03:21 PM (S/qP2)
Posted by: DngrMse at August 25, 2011 03:22 PM (H5Aqe)
Posted by: Trimegistus at August 25, 2011 03:22 PM (5/200)
I'd vote for him if he was the nominee, BUT he is a NE GOP machine pol with lots of money and is not stridently pissed off about Washington being out of control.
I think all of the GOP nominees should treat one another with respect and reserve all the attacks on Sir Golfsalot and the Democratic party ruining the country since 2007. They need to be unified on the message that it's time to put the GOP back in control of government to disassemble the freaking trainwreck and push a rest button; ideally to 1912 please.
Posted by: Yip in Texas at August 25, 2011 03:23 PM (SyLEU)
There are real doubts about Romney, so he has to show that he can be dirty if (when) Obama goes that way.
Rick Perry has the best chance for a Reagan "there you go again" moment in a debate with Obama. Don't underestimate the power of the laconic personality.
Romney will come across as technocratic as Obama will. Even when Romney tries to go for the jugular (e.g. "Barack Obama's dog food) he comes off as too scripted.
So far, Perry's the one to beat - and Mittens doesn't have it in him.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 25, 2011 03:24 PM (HUZDZ)
Posted by: Gore88 at August 25, 2011 03:24 PM (S/qP2)
Posted by: Peregrine Took, a Hobbit on Janet Napolitano's Watch List at August 25, 2011 03:24 PM (mJznp)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at August 25, 2011 03:25 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 03:25 PM (7utQ2)
Please let's not change the meaning of those words again. For me...Okay?
Conservative = Freedom loving, God fearing, proud American.
Liberal= Government loving, God replacing, proud Citizen of the world.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at August 25, 2011 03:26 PM (0q2P7)
Bradley should be happy that Prosser is willing to let the issue go.
Posted by: Deathknyte at August 25, 2011 03:26 PM (gqvHi)
Posted by: steevy at August 25, 2011 03:26 PM (pV6cO)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 03:26 PM (TMB3S)
To me a substantive attack can still show the nuts-ripping side of a candidate.
I've never gotten the McCain "my friends" hit off of Romney. I think Romney is closer to Perry and Pawlenty was closer to McCain with his pretend nice but some cheap shots routine.
From what I've read, Romney was thought to be behind all sorts of dirty fighting last round. I never followed it and don't much care, but I thought that was well-established. So to me we know he can fight dirty.
I guess I'd like them both to emerge looking Presidential out of this. Partly, because shit happens and I agree with Truman North that Romney is our back up. Also, I want to have the option of Romney as VP. Looking at that Baseball Crank electoral map (I keep linking to his post but everyone ignores it so I won't link again), it really seems as though the Midwest is key. Romney is a better campaigner than Pawlenty, imho -- fundraising wise and stylistically. Also, I chortle with delight at the exploding Progressive heads with an Evangelical-Mormon ticket.
I'd also like Bachmann to emerge unscathed as well, by the way.
The rest, I don't take seriously as candidates and don't have big futures ahead of them that I can see, so I don't care what happens to them.
Posted by: Y-not at August 25, 2011 03:27 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 25, 2011 03:27 PM (eOXTH)
Posted by: steevy at August 25, 2011 03:28 PM (pV6cO)
Posted by: Gore88 at August 25, 2011 03:29 PM (S/qP2)
Somewhere the Vice President of the United States sticks his tongue to the poles of a nine-volt battery.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 03:29 PM (7utQ2)
Democrat's are ineligible for critical scrutiny because they are members of the favored group.
See Biden, Joe and Waters, Maxine
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 25, 2011 03:29 PM (HUZDZ)
I am not changing that. By Oct he will be a second tier candidate.
Posted by: Vic at August 25, 2011 03:30 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 25, 2011 03:30 PM (bAySe)
Posted by: Rick P. at August 25, 2011 03:30 PM (syoaz)
The Ultimate Food: The Beef Jerky, Potato Chip Hybrid
I'll never have to eat anything else again.
Sounds delish, but it's more accurately described as "The Penultimate Food." All other forms of sustenance pale before the power of bacon.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 25, 2011 03:30 PM (3AuGS)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at August 25, 2011 03:31 PM (AZGON)
#23
"It's Romney who's too conservative, not Perry. Romney's the one who would "stay the course" and "reach across the aisle" to keep in place the Democrat policies that are destroying us."
-------------
Eh? That is not 'conservative'...that is spineless.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at August 25, 2011 03:31 PM (vi8F3)
Posted by: phoenixgirl needs a generator for the house at August 25, 2011 03:33 PM (eOXTH)
How is he embarrassing himself?
Herman Cain has embarrassed himself.
Jon Huntsman has embarrassed his family.
Ron Paul has embarrassed the human race.
I'm not seeing what Mitt has done to embarrass himself. He's a very viable candidate at this point, just not the top one.
Posted by: Y-not at August 25, 2011 03:33 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Gore88 at August 25, 2011 07:29 PM (S/qP2)
Does anyone want to diagram the grammatical, logical, and syntax errors in that post? Or should we just leave it?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 25, 2011 03:33 PM (HUZDZ)
I hope they don't beat up on each other too much.
The important thing here is beating Obama in a little over a year. I will dip my balls in pudding if that happens, regardless of whether it is Perry or Romney.
Posted by: dan-O at August 25, 2011 03:33 PM (BAjNF)
Posted by: RJ at August 25, 2011 03:34 PM (QjrRF)
Nah I just think taking oil is cheaper than paying for it.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at August 25, 2011 03:34 PM (0q2P7)
And the people said, "Fuck, yeah!"
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 03:34 PM (7utQ2)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at August 25, 2011 03:34 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: USS Diversity at August 25, 2011 03:34 PM (KbEJl)
Posted by: steevy at August 25, 2011 03:35 PM (pV6cO)
Posted by: Gore88 at August 25, 2011 07:29 PM (S/qP2)
Does anyone want to diagram the grammatical, logical, and syntax errors in that post? Or should we just leave it?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 25, 2011 07:33 PM (HUZDZ)
He's just a troll. Leave it. His are comments just begging to be trollbusted especially since his hash is in constant flux.
Posted by: buzzion at August 25, 2011 03:35 PM (GULKT)
Does anyone want to diagram the grammatical, logical, and syntax errors in that post? Or should we just leave it?
Posted by: Sean BannionIgnore it and it will get bored eventually.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at August 25, 2011 03:35 PM (DEcmU)
I really don't get all the Republican's begging for the GOP primary candidates to duke it out. Calling them "pussies" if they don't, and so forth. I don't want damaged goods heading into the finals.
Posted by: dan-O at August 25, 2011 03:35 PM (BAjNF)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 03:36 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 03:37 PM (7utQ2)
I did a lap dance for Jon Huntsman, and he didn't enjoy it.
Posted by: Jenna Jameson at August 25, 2011 07:20 PM (Lt/Za)
If it was like your dancing from Zombie Strippers (streaming on Netflix), I can see why. That movie was terrible, and you were a large part of why it was so very, very bad. How can you ruin a movie that combines Zombies, Strippers, and Robert Englund? Well you managed to do it. I hate you, Jenna Jameson!
Posted by: wooga at August 25, 2011 03:37 PM (2p0e3)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 07:37 PM (7utQ2)
Yeah, it's easy to spot them because they tend to be illiterate.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 25, 2011 03:37 PM (HUZDZ)
RINO.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 03:38 PM (7utQ2)
Nah I just think taking oil is cheaper than paying for it.
I mean seriously, you would think those little countries would be saying "thank you".
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at August 25, 2011 03:38 PM (0q2P7)
Congrats, Ace.
Posted by: Herr Blücher at August 25, 2011 03:39 PM (5a6TC)
I mean seriously, you would think those little countries would be saying "thank you".
At some point I think you've made enough oil.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 25, 2011 03:39 PM (HUZDZ)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 25, 2011 07:30 PM (3AuGS)
Technically, if it is the "penultimate," that means it is only the second best.
Posted by: wooga at August 25, 2011 03:39 PM (2p0e3)
Posted by: phoenixgirl needs a generator for the house at August 25, 2011 03:39 PM (eOXTH)
Posted by: Gore88 at August 25, 2011 03:40 PM (S/qP2)
Sure, you may hate me, but you would suck my little boat cock.
Well I would be angry when I did it!
Posted by: wooga at August 25, 2011 03:40 PM (2p0e3)
that's really mean because he speaks 27 different languages......./ channeling the gotham princess......
Thanks, I just had a cold chill run down my spine reading that.
I'm sure we'll be getting the scoop from Long Island in three...two...one...
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 25, 2011 03:41 PM (HUZDZ)
304 One of my friends might rent a giant SUV and we might all drive out of the city tomorrow night. When they mentioned closing the bridges at the presser, this freaked him out.
My parents tell me that they have never stopped the trains system wide that they can remember. They also tell me they've never closed all the bridges. Why are they preparing like this. If they close the bridges you can't get off of long Island.
Posted by: Quisling Brewer at August 25, 2011 03:41 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 25, 2011 03:42 PM (bAySe)
Politics is a contact sport, and if Perry can't handle Romney, then how will he do against the Democrat and MBM (but I repeat myself) attacks?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative)) at August 25, 2011 03:42 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Boston12GS at August 25, 2011 03:42 PM (KYtbw)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 25, 2011 03:42 PM (lGFXF)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 07:26 PM (TMB3S)
Hmmmm. Nope. Don't buy it.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at August 25, 2011 03:43 PM (/PFGQ)
>>> 74 O/T: I was doing my daily search on Google for the phrase "stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure".....
WTF??? Holy shit check this out below... a link to Bing:
http://tinyurl.com/3douk27
Search for "stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure" (in quotes) on bing, the FIRST RESULT is barackobama.com... holy shit that is funny
Posted by: dan-O at August 25, 2011 03:43 PM (BAjNF)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 25, 2011 07:42 PM (lGFXF)
Cynic.
You just wait, you'll catch Romney fever soon.
Posted by: Mitt Romney's Mom at August 25, 2011 03:43 PM (HUZDZ)
"I really don't want him beatin' up on my boy Perry, but I don't see how he can avoid doing so."
Our Clubmember Mitt ... resort to someting as ... provincial ... as public argument with a ... a ... Texan?
Posted by: T. Coddington vanVoorhees at August 25, 2011 03:43 PM (J24sL)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 03:45 PM (TMB3S)
I refer you to last year's gubernatorial nomination fete between Coyote Shooter and the sweet southern belle Hutchison.
RP cut her up like a sushi chef doing a blowfish. He is not John McCain.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 03:45 PM (7utQ2)
OT I will admit to being somewhat surprised by the vehemance with which the crowd around here attacks Ron Paul supporters. I only knew him as a libertarian and a little goofy. I now have a slightly deeper understanding for your distain. I was listening to Michael Medved, no fan of Paul, when he said in a previous election cycle Paul, after not winning the Republican nomination endorsed 4 people. The people were Bob Barr, Ralph Nader, Chuck Baldwin and CYNTHIA McKINNEY. How detached from reality is this buttwipe.
Posted by: Ohio Dan at August 25, 2011 03:46 PM (JKNDp)
Posted by: Fritz at August 25, 2011 03:46 PM (2P+pn)
Yep. There's a difference between the vetting we all need to do with the candidates to make our decision and a street brawl.
I can win an argument with my husband nearly every time, but I'm only right about half of the time. I'm just a much better arguer than he is. I'm more aggressive, I think more quickly on my feet, and I fight dirty. But after 27 years of marriage, I've finally started to learn that winning fights is not the most important thing. And, in fact, it's not really that helpful to the cause of having a good marriage.
I'm kind of hoping Romney and Bachmann focus on the purpose of this whole process. Trying to win, but doing so on substance so that we are best-positioned, whoever our candidate is, for the general.
I have no such illusions about Ron Paul, the selfish little troll, and don't think the others in the race can do much damage.
Posted by: Y-not at August 25, 2011 03:46 PM (5H6zj)
That would have been funny; if he hadn't lost to someone even less inspiring than himself. McCain has all the excitement of flavorless gelatin.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at August 25, 2011 03:46 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: model_1066 at August 25, 2011 03:48 PM (2j/Mv)
I'm not seeing what Mitt has done to embarrass himself. He's a very viable candidate at this point, just not the top one.
Romney from two months ago:
“I believe the world is getting warmer, and I believe that humans have contributed to that.” The Republican candidate for President also said that “It’s important for us to reduce our emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases that may be significant contributors.”
Posted by: DngrMse at August 25, 2011 03:48 PM (H5Aqe)
I bow before you.
Posted by: The penultimate pompous pedantonservative)) at August 25, 2011 07:43 PM (LH6ir)
Thanks to a hashtag check, I now have the image of a half-cocked Charlie Brown's Dildo.
Posted by: wooga at August 25, 2011 03:48 PM (2p0e3)
He is...against conservatives, Christians, and competent scientists.
Posted by: Peregrine Took, a Hobbit on Janet Napolitano's Watch List at August 25, 2011 03:48 PM (mJznp)
Hey, the whole Iranians with nukes and heroin for all platform is beginning to grow on me.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 03:48 PM (7utQ2)
that's just wrong...sick and wrong....
did sentences like this exist before the internet?
Posted by: model_1066 at August 25, 2011 03:49 PM (2j/Mv)
Posted by: Barbarian at August 25, 2011 03:50 PM (EL+OC)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 25, 2011 03:50 PM (lGFXF)
did sentences like this exist before the internet?
No, but then again before the internet "curious" was just a word describing an admirable quality.
Now it's a synonym for "idiocy"
Posted by: Mitt Romney's Mom at August 25, 2011 03:51 PM (HUZDZ)
Posted by: dogfish at August 25, 2011 03:51 PM (N2yhW)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 25, 2011 07:50 PM (lGFXF)
Nobody looks good in a CVC. Some just look less worse than others.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 25, 2011 03:52 PM (HUZDZ)
And Smithers doesn't even know the meaning of the word "gay"...
Posted by: model_1066 at August 25, 2011 03:53 PM (2j/Mv)
Posted by: USS Diversity at August 25, 2011 03:53 PM (KbEJl)
On the one hand, he is a charismatic guy, and that is good.
On the other hand, he is a Texan. That will be used against him, fairly or not.
On the one hand, he leads a state that has been a jobs engine for the country. That is good
On the other hand, he does have some crony capitalism problems. The vaccine, the highway. Sure they didn't come to pass but he still proposed them nonetheless.
And - let's just be honest about it - there is a lot of anti-Southern bigotry out there, where when certain people here a Southern accent they immediately think "dumb". These people are more likely to be in the states of the upper Midwest that are going to be crucial for R's to win. Romney has the anti-Mormon bigotry, Perry has the anti-Southern bigotry. I am not sure which is worse in the places where it is going to matter the most.
Romney is a safe, managerial candidate. Perry is more of a risk-taking, swashbuckling candidate. I don't know which is better when it comes to defeating Obama, which is my #1 goal.
Anyway, just throwing some thoughts out there.
Posted by: chemjeff at August 25, 2011 03:53 PM (s7mIC)
stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure. .com
re-routes to barack obama's campaign website
Posted by: Truman North, TPT at August 25, 2011 03:54 PM (K2wpv)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at August 25, 2011 03:54 PM (4nfy2)
I can win an argument with my husband nearly every time, but I'm only right about half of the time. I'm just a much better arguer than he is. I'm more aggressive, I think more quickly on my feet, and I fight dirty. But after 27 years of marriage, I've finally started to learn that winning fights is not the most important thing. And, in fact, it's not really that helpful to the cause of having a good marriage.
Well, there's that, plus the fact that you can withhold the booty.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at August 25, 2011 03:54 PM (/PFGQ)
Romney is in a tough spot. With what exactly can he hit Perry?
That Texas has created too many net jobs over the past decade? That there's been too much tort reform and too much spending restraint in Texas? That Romneycare has been such a success? That Romney's 4-year tenure governing Massashusetts makes him more qualified than Perry's 11-year tenure governing Texas? That Perry's service in the U.S. Air Force pales in comparison to Romney's service, er, never mind.
Seems to me that Romney only has three options: (1) bash Perry over the vaccine issue (already old news), (2) get low down dirty and personal (not Romney's style and in any event bad form all around), or (3) run a positive campaign, avoid the mud and see what happens.
I suspect Romney will take the high road and will let the chips fall where they may.
Barring a bimbo eruption or similar scandal I expect Perry will be the nominee and that he'll have it wrapped up early in the process.
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at August 25, 2011 03:54 PM (f8XyF)
If Bush had built a 100,000 foot high wall around the country after Katrina like he should have, we wouldn't have to worry.
Note: A variant of this argument WILL appear in the coming 72 hours.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 03:55 PM (7utQ2)
Believe it or not I could care less if people want to put drugs or battery acid in their veins. Now if you are selling or giving it to kids that's a whole different matter. I also could care less if people want to sell sex. No need to rehash those arguements. That's about the two areas of Libertarian thinking may have some merit.
I am with you on the Iran/nukes business.
RP is a goof and a phoney.
Posted by: Ohio Dan at August 25, 2011 03:55 PM (JKNDp)
Texas = where the jobs are, and he can be proud of that being the longest serving governor in TX history (IIRC)
that is enough for me.
Posted by: model_1066 at August 25, 2011 03:56 PM (2j/Mv)
RUDY!!!!!
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 03:56 PM (7utQ2)
For the record I'm not a Perry-bot and will have to say something negative about Perry later for balance, as soon as I think of something.
Posted by: Bob Saget at August 25, 2011 03:56 PM (dBvlk)
This is neglecting one major factor that killed McCain in 2008. That is voter turnout.
All those red States that McCain turned blue will stay blue. Also, a few more red States in the South will turn blue as Republican voters stay at home..
The voters in the South will NOT vote for a liberal leaning Northeastern gun grabber.
If Romney gets the nod it WILL be a landslide, but for Obama. And that doesn't even count the probability that the Tea Party will get together and run a 3rd Party candidate and we lose 18% of the Republican vote to that as Rasmusen said.
Posted by: Vic at August 25, 2011 03:57 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: model_1066 at August 25, 2011 03:58 PM (2j/Mv)
Posted by: Bob Saget at August 25, 2011 03:59 PM (dBvlk)
Posted by: steevy at August 25, 2011 03:59 PM (pV6cO)
Posted by: model_1066 at August 25, 2011 03:59 PM (2j/Mv)
Posted by: Rich at August 25, 2011 04:00 PM (yyLIB)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 04:00 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: steevy at August 25, 2011 04:02 PM (pV6cO)
Posted by: steevy at August 25, 2011 04:03 PM (pV6cO)
Posted by: model_1066 at August 25, 2011 04:03 PM (2j/Mv)
Hmmm. All available evidence says "You are totally wrong."
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 04:03 PM (7utQ2)
Damn you, chemjeff! Now I'm picturing Rick in a pirate costume and it's making me hawt!
Posted by: Y-not at August 25, 2011 04:04 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Devil's Advocate at August 25, 2011 04:04 PM (syoaz)
well, I aim to please
Posted by: chemjeff at August 25, 2011 04:05 PM (s7mIC)
I call that mighty bold talk for one-eyed fat man.
Posted by: Reuben Cogburn at August 25, 2011 04:05 PM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: USS Diversity at August 25, 2011 04:05 PM (KbEJl)
Posted by: Rich at August 25, 2011 08:00 PM (yyLIB)
Yeah, you're right. All those polls showing Perry with just a double-digit lead over Romney is certainly leading me to believe the evangelicals and the others have turned their backs on him.
Posted by: Soona - Tearorrist at August 25, 2011 04:06 PM (/PFGQ)
Posted by: Reuben Cogburn at August 25, 2011 08:05 PM (4Kl5M)
Technically the sock should be Lucky Ned Pepper.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 04:06 PM (7utQ2)
arrr, mateys....fetch the lard and we beginnin' the sodomizing....sans rum....
-Lord Urkel Hussein McPutt-Putt, destroyer of nations, taker of vacations.
Posted by: model_1066 at August 25, 2011 04:06 PM (2j/Mv)
He's not only linking/quoting Ace frequently, he's even got one for a DOOM post by Monty.
Posted by: jwb7605 at August 25, 2011 04:07 PM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: model_1066 at August 25, 2011 04:10 PM (2j/Mv)
Posted by: steevy at August 25, 2011 04:11 PM (pV6cO)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at August 25, 2011 04:12 PM (AZGON)
All hail the unknown moron that bought stutteringclusterfuckofamiserablefailure.com
Posted by: toby928™ at August 25, 2011 04:14 PM (GTbGH)
Did you even ask rum if she'd participate?
Posted by: Doofus at August 25, 2011 04:14 PM (vD09P)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at August 25, 2011 04:15 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God at August 25, 2011 04:15 PM (NHeC0)
If Perry is the nominee, and he only narrowly defeats Obama, then we may not have seen the last of Barry. He could try to pull a Grover Cleveland and run again in 2016.
But If Romney is the nominee and landslides his ass, Obama is done. He'll have been Carter-ized.
----------
Really? This is where we are going in order to favor Romney? If Perry wins, Grover Cleveland returns? I have to admit, this is a new one.
Posted by: Rich at August 25, 2011 04:16 PM (ldOlo)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at August 25, 2011 04:16 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Jenna Jameson at August 25, 2011 07:20 PM (Lt/Za)
Well.....as big a douchebag as he is,...I can't really fault him for that
Posted by: beedubya at August 25, 2011 04:16 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Reuben Cogburn at August 25, 2011 08:05 PM (4Kl5M)
Technically the sock should be Lucky Ned Pepper.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 08:06 PM (7utQ2)
Fill yer hand you sonofa bitch!
Posted by: Rooster at August 25, 2011 04:18 PM (FIDMq)
Posted by: La Raza at August 25, 2011 04:18 PM (CfNN1)
Posted by: steevy at August 25, 2011 04:20 PM (pV6cO)
And those who complain can eat a bucket full of wet shit.
Posted by: model_1066 at August 25, 2011 04:20 PM (2j/Mv)
And oddly, you applauded when he said that the Feds need to get the border secured as well.
Posted by: toby928™ at August 25, 2011 04:21 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Mitt Romney at August 25, 2011 04:21 PM (73tyQ)
Some more than others, I guess ...
Posted by: jwb7605 at August 25, 2011 04:23 PM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at August 25, 2011 04:24 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at August 25, 2011 04:25 PM (AZGON)
I call that pandering, by the way.
It's only acceptable because he clearly promotes the state's rights aspect of it.
Posted by: jwb7605 at August 25, 2011 04:25 PM (Qxe/p)
Not even one.
You can fit the same tired shit on a 3x5.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 04:26 PM (7utQ2)
Posted by: steevy at August 25, 2011 04:26 PM (pV6cO)
Posted by: steevy at August 25, 2011 07:59 PM (pV6cO)
Yes, he supported the Brady Bill and the banning of "ugly rifles".
Posted by: Vic at August 25, 2011 04:26 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Jon Huntsman at August 25, 2011 04:27 PM (ApIyR)
He's a closet homosexual that sneaks out to look at naked chicks at strip clubs then proposition and bang them?
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at August 25, 2011 04:27 PM (0q2P7)
Some more than others, I guess ...
Posted by: jwb7605 at August 25, 2011 08:23 PM (Qxe/p)
Damn you! That was uncalled for.
I do wish she was still part of the WH press corps son Carney had to look at her every day.
Posted by: Tesla at August 25, 2011 04:27 PM (DPU1J)
Posted by: Serious Cat
Mitt folded his tents on February 07, 2008 last time around, so that's the over/under for this run.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at August 25, 2011 04:27 PM (EeYDk)
Posted by: steevy at August 25, 2011 04:27 PM (pV6cO)
Right, I'll get to the point. I need a really big favor...
Posted by: Mitt Romney at August 25, 2011 08:21 PM (73tyQ)
Maverick Mitt Romney?
Posted by: Peregrine Took, a Hobbit on Janet Napolitano's Watch List at August 25, 2011 04:28 PM (mJznp)
Posted by: La Raza at August 25, 2011 04:28 PM (CfNN1)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 04:28 PM (TMB3S)
I don't disagree, but I understand why Perry would feel that he has to go and talk to them. Personally, I'd prefer that he have those racists crucified and their ashes scattered at the Rio Grand, but I'm not the governor of a state where 1/3 of the voters are of foreign descent.
Posted by: toby928™ at August 25, 2011 04:29 PM (GTbGH)
Yep, he's for wide open borders.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 25, 2011 04:29 PM (18X9Z)
Overwhelming support from La Raza, organized labor, and Ed Schultz.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 04:30 PM (7utQ2)
No but it's not go/no-go either.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at August 25, 2011 04:30 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Jon Huntsman at August 25, 2011 04:31 PM (ApIyR)
You think he should be ashamed? Do you have a specific complaint with the appointee? I really don't know anything about her but perhaps you can bring the knowledge to the morons.
Posted by: toby928™ at August 25, 2011 04:32 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Tonawanda at August 25, 2011 04:32 PM (fgysf)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 04:32 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Paris Paramus at August 25, 2011 04:33 PM (N3MsF)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at August 25, 2011 04:33 PM (AZGON)
Until the economy comes back a bit, it's at least on the other side of the table, behind the butter dish.
It's so bad that "undocumenteds" are going back to Mexico.
Posted by: jwb7605 at August 25, 2011 04:33 PM (Qxe/p)
Or is it just some sand in the Mittgina ?
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 25, 2011 04:34 PM (18X9Z)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at August 25, 2011 04:34 PM (AZGON)
Anything I could provide would lead to LGF, KOS, Media Matters, or the like.
And I already posted a pic of Helen Thomas ...
Posted by: jwb7605 at August 25, 2011 04:35 PM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: JackStraw
Given that Mitt is halfway to an illegal alien anchor baby himself*, got to figure Perry is closer to the mark on this one.
*Mitt's great-grandfather ran to Mexico with his wives in 1885. Mitt's father George was born in Mexico.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at August 25, 2011 04:36 PM (EeYDk)
Posted by: toby928™ at August 25, 2011 04:36 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Beldar at August 25, 2011 04:36 PM (duTu/)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 04:37 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: jwb7605 at August 25, 2011 08:35 PM (Qxe/p)
Roast in hell for that, by the way.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 25, 2011 04:37 PM (7utQ2)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 25, 2011 04:38 PM (18X9Z)
Posted by: Rich at August 25, 2011 08:00 PM (yyLIB)
Still laughing...................
Posted by: dagny at August 25, 2011 04:39 PM (Ke1ws)
Posted by: steevy at August 25, 2011 04:39 PM (pV6cO)
Perry is told us he is so proud to have appointed a Latina to the Supreme Court Posted by: La Raza
Am I a Caucasia? or a Whitette? Waspa? Help me out here.
Posted by: dagny at August 25, 2011 04:42 PM (Ke1ws)
Because he was addressing Hispanics. I'm sure if he was addressing the Ancient Order of Hibernians, he'd have some Irish-American appointment to be extra proud of.
It's politics.
Posted by: toby928™ at August 25, 2011 04:43 PM (GTbGH)
I guess Perry thought it was ok to mention he was proud of appointing a conservative, hard working, apparently self made Hispanic woman to the Court, since the liberal stereotyping of Hispanics has them all as migrant farm workers.
Do you have something against Hispanics? 1/3 of Texans are of Hispanic ancestry. Good politics and a great choice for a justice.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 25, 2011 04:44 PM (18X9Z)
Oh shit. Here come the goddamn birthers. Again.
You rang?
Posted by: WND at August 25, 2011 04:44 PM (mJznp)
Posted by: steevy at August 25, 2011 04:44 PM (pV6cO)
Posted by: toby928™ at August 25, 2011 04:44 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: steevy at August 25, 2011 04:45 PM (pV6cO)
Face it folks, he is the fucking front runner for the GOP. He will win the nomination. And he will beat Obama.
Deal with it.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 25, 2011 04:46 PM (18X9Z)
You and me both, brother.
I stated that some people see the fact that Perry is a career politician as a liability, while I can see a good side to it. The tide is setting conservative for a while, so Perry will stay bought, I think.
*crosses fingers*
Posted by: toby928™ at August 25, 2011 04:47 PM (GTbGH)
>> Pretty odd that people here seem to be giving Perry a pass on his Dream Act. A couple years back during the great amnesty kerfuffle he would have been tarred and feathered.
Oh come, he's not getting a pass. It was a stupid law and it's a negative. Perry's been less strident on immigration than I'd like him to be, he's not as awful as he could be. He's been good on immigration crime and drugs. Likely favors a guest worker program (I don't hate that idea).
It's a border state. Over half the cars driving in the valley have uninsured drivers, Dallas County is still 25%.
All of us, you included, favor candidates who have negatives. They're politicians, which is a great reason not to fall in love with them.
From my perspective, for my vote I mean, Perry has far fewer negatives than Mitt. One positive Mitt has (to your earlier point) is Mitt's got more money and more early ground game, and with the exception of Bachmann hasn't had any real challengers. That's changed for now, but it's only been 2 weeks.
For the record, if it's Mitt in the general, then I vote for Mitt. But it'd be a blocking manuever, just like my vote for McLame.
Also the crony capitalist charge is one Mitt should avoid, it won't make him look better in comparison.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at August 25, 2011 04:47 PM (PjVdx)
Posted by: steevy at August 25, 2011 04:47 PM (pV6cO)
Posted by: toby928™ at August 25, 2011 04:49 PM (GTbGH)
Last hint - leave it outside (Duh - CO2) and run extension cords through your window into the house. If needed place something over the top of the generator to keep some of the rain off. Good luck.
Posted by: OkieTea at August 25, 2011 04:59 PM (R7XBI)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 05:07 PM (TMB3S)
Meanwhile, Romney has flipped again on AGW. Only took him two months. Squish of the month and such.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 25, 2011 05:14 PM (18X9Z)
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 25, 2011 05:18 PM (18X9Z)
Posted by: Watership Down AudioBook at August 25, 2011 05:25 PM (z3/Dt)
I never know when we're talking about you and me Jackstraw, vs. everybody else, so I'll confine my remarks to just me. Yes, I know Romney was gonna get rolled on Masscare, he was a somewhat red governor in a deep blue state.
I get it.
All the more reason he should be campaigning on "it was a bad plan, it's created bigger costs, less access, problems". Instead of, you know, defending it.
Romney's major problem is he's boring as fuck (I am now speaking to the general republican electorate). It ain't a crime, but it's true. He hasn't got much of a record to run on in contrast with Perry, even after his "record" becomes known, which incidentally I've been watching for 20 years so it's known to me.
Do I think Perry is more interesting to the general republican electorate? I dunno, I have worried that another Texan isn't exactly a big plus on the national scene. Hell, we're 0-1-1 on Texan presidents.
Still, he couldn't be less interesting than Mitt. Not with a pulse.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at August 25, 2011 05:26 PM (PjVdx)
Romney can come out swinging at Perry, and pile on with Big Media. We don't listen to Big Media anymore.
Either way, Romney loses.
However, Romney can come out swinging against BHO and take the slings and arrows of Big Media. We don't listen to Big Media anymore.
His best option is numero tres. i.e. He needs to double down on his BHO attacks to take the spotlight from Perry.
Posted by: Cooter at August 25, 2011 05:42 PM (4RDlt)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 05:44 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Cooter at August 25, 2011 05:48 PM (4RDlt)
Posted by: Cooter at August 25, 2011 05:53 PM (4RDlt)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 05:57 PM (TMB3S)
Mittens campaign is wearing a red shirt right now.
Warming up in the bullpen, Leonard Mccoy.
"It's dead Jim".
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 25, 2011 05:58 PM (fBpqg)
>> Your view is identical to most here
There's gonna be a fight now.
No, actually I know you do read the blog, and you've seen others (not in this thread) who've pointed to his position on immigration, which is crime-focused, federal responsibility-focused, and weak on general round em up and the tuition thing. Allen what's his name and mpur come to mind. So no, not everyone has an identical view on this.
But yes, in this thread, he's pretty much getting a pass on that. So I take your point. I don't give him a pass on it, but I also don't think it's hugely the "immigration bugaboo" you're making of it, and certainly not the "hey this was the biggest shit EVER 2 years ago man". Because state tuition rates for the children of illegals was not that argument. At all.
>> No, what he should be doing is being even more aggressive in saying "This was a plan that was debated in MA for 2 years. (etc.)
Precisely.
>> Yeah, and yet, that boring fuck is kicking the shit out of Perry in two of the first primary states. How can that be? Why is he racking up endorsement after endorsement? Why has he raised so much money? Could it be that the blogosphere doesn't know everything?
Perhaps. Or it could be he's been at it a hell of a lot longer than two weeks. And as mentioned before, he (was) the most viable in a terribly weak pool of wannabes. Frankly I'm surprised Bachmann is within a hundred miles of him.
>> Texas/Ron Paul
Would you like a match for that strawman? Sheila Jackson Lee is from Texas too and she's also a fucking idiot. If we have to dig down into whose elected representatives are more or less conservative... the next thing you know we'll be buying each other a drink again and I'll be asking you "why the hell do you live there again?" and you'll answer "because it's hot as fuck down there right now".
Also, stay safe from Irene my friend. If you do the gig tomorrow, ask somebody to punch you in the nuts for me. Thanks.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at August 25, 2011 06:01 PM (PjVdx)
Posted by: buzzion at August 25, 2011 06:07 PM (GULKT)
Socialism? So Mitt the Squish is a closet socialist.
Who'd have thunk it?
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 25, 2011 06:11 PM (fBpqg)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 06:22 PM (TMB3S)
Ah yes, more anti religious bigotry.
Didn't think a Mittens fan would want to talk religion.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 25, 2011 06:26 PM (fBpqg)
The same social con Praise Jeebus state that Huck pulled his bullshit last time. Romney has not only not campaigned in Iowa it has been reported widely that he is "snubbing" Iowa and he is still in striking distance of the two social con candidates? Yea, I'll take that as a plus.
Sucking Ethanol Subsidy cock has probably helped him there.
Posted by: buzzion at August 25, 2011 06:27 PM (GULKT)
>> Ok. Let's pretend I'm the NY Jets and you're the Dallas Cowboys. I'm gonna whip you like you're gonna get whipped in a couple weeks.
That's the stupidest goddamn thing I've ever heard you say, and I've heard you say a lot. We have a new kicker in camp, and everything. Plus, Tony Romo played hide and seek in the woods, so we're ready.
...
Ok, how many points will you give me?
>> So the trumpeting here and far and wide that Perry is the new front runner means, what?
That Romney is a multi-million dollar funded fart in the wind.
>> There won't be any stimulus to pay the bills next year, what then?
The only viable answer is keep (my) taxes low, and bring more of those sissy corporations from CA and NY. More jobs. And congressional seats. Somebody has to fix congress, we're willing to help out. Even with Sheila and RP.
>> Dumbass little breeze isn't going to stop me from cocktails by the ocean but I'm pretty sure Wiser will pussy out.
Sorry I couldn't make it this time, next time pal. And bring Jackstraw. I'll bet he misses the hell outta me. Have fun, and cook your hobo to an internal body temp of 145 before eatin.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at August 25, 2011 06:31 PM (PjVdx)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 06:42 PM (TMB3S)
Your little "Jeebus" comment shows a little bit of bigotry on your part.
As far as religious bigotry, are you referring to your boy Mittens? Mormonism has some pretty weird tenants and beliefs. However, his being a Mormon isn't what makes him a squish and soon to be out of the contention for the nomination.
He flip flops. His AGW stunt today shows it. Only took him 2 months to flip. Probably he saw Perry proclaim AGW a scam and reacted to it. He isn't proactive, he is reactive.
3rd place in Iowa won't kill his candidacy. But it will put it on life support.
Little Dope. Sort of describes your bullshit statements and fluff you spew.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 25, 2011 07:10 PM (fBpqg)
>> Low taxes and a metric fuckload of oil.
And a 12 year governor who isn't so stupid as to try to punish the production of the same in the interest of AGW-worshipping communists who merely switched badges to push the same friggin "punish America" agenda, but rather understands that energy production is one of the keys to growing our economy instead of killing it.
Unlike a dozen or more other states, who have access to supplies, but refuse to encourage their production. And the jug-eared fuck who shut down gulf exploration. And gave Brazil a brazillion dollars for offshore exploration.
He may be "yee-haw", but yee-haw when it comes to oil and natural gas production, earns my vote.
That stupid Texan.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at August 25, 2011 07:25 PM (PjVdx)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 07:40 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 08:12 PM (TMB3S)
No, what he should be doing is being even more aggressive in saying "This was a plan that was debated in MA for 2 years. I put my plan out there. Unfortunately, the legislature made many changes which I was unable to override because of their veto proof majority and Deval Patrick has changed it even further. However, the fact is the vast majority of MA citizens supported the basic idea of this plan as right for MA and now 97% of MA citizens have health insurance. Of course, I could have done nothing as Rick Perry did where over 26% of the population, most in the nation, have no healthcare but that was not responsible and not what the people of MA wanted."
========
Just a quick question, but it would appear you are making the claim that somehow it is the government's job to make sure that people have health insurance? And when exactly did this line of thinking become common-place in the conservative movement?
Posted by: Rich at August 25, 2011 08:33 PM (ldOlo)
Posted by: dscott at August 25, 2011 08:35 PM (NGe7F)
Posted by: Rich at August 25, 2011 08:37 PM (ldOlo)
Posted by: Rich at August 25, 2011 08:40 PM (ldOlo)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 08:47 PM (TMB3S)
Jackstraw, if oil is the only thing that keeps our economy producing the only goddam job growth any state with natural resources has, then why is California drying up?
Any supposition?
If Perry and the rest of our legislature, let's spread the credit around, wasn't stupid enough to go along with the EPA, then why is that a negative for Perry?
He didn't call them "fuckheads"? You require evidence that Perry encouraged the positive job and economic growth that actually happened here?
You know what? The electorate will not need your "required evidence". The evidence itself, even if he didn't have fuck all to do with it, it will still resonate.
Bet me.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at August 25, 2011 09:06 PM (PjVdx)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 09:14 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 09:25 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 09:32 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 25, 2011 09:39 PM (TMB3S)
Sorry, I didn't know you were waiting on me and I decided to sleep. Good call by me.
Here. Most new jobs in healthcare, then professional services. Plus all the other common criticisms of Perry, enjoy.
To answer your question, I suppose then we'd have cut (or will) $27BB from the budget instead of the $21BB we did. Perry never said he wouldn't accept federal money, he did refuse to accept $555MM in stimulus funding because of all the Obama-strings attached, mostly payoffs to unions.
This is a net benefit to Romney, why again? Did he ever take a dollar from DC while he was governor?
...
Yeah, I thought so.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at August 26, 2011 12:11 PM (WvXvd)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2342 seconds, 380 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








You mean Mitt is going to have to grow a set?
He's going to need a lot of fertilizer for that.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 25, 2011 03:10 PM (HUZDZ)