September 22, 2011
— Ace Or, at least, it was time to panic.
After noting that the world economy is in truly dire straits, Meade notes that few seem able to understand this.
Trying to follow the US discussion from Tel Aviv, I’m impressed (as is so often the case) with its political and insular focus. Will the worldwide economic crisis help or hurt President Obama’s chances for re-election in 2012? Which political party is gaming the crisis best, and so will gain more or at least lose less voter support in the polls?These questions have to be asked I suppose, but given what is going on in the world right now they are trivial. It is almost as if on December 8, 1941, the press was filled with speculation about whether Franklin Roosevelt’s chances for a fourth term were helped or hurt by the attack — and whether GOP hopes to pick up more seats in the 1942 election would have to be put on hold.
The political speculation is worse than useless at this point. Global economic events are moving so rapidly that we have no way of foreseeing the economic environment for next year. It will probably not be very good, but how bad it will be and how it will look to voters cannot yet be foretold.
More to the point, we need policy discussions more than we need political ones. This is not just about how big the deficit should be; it is about whether the international financial system will survive the next six months in the form we now know it. It is about whether the foundations of the postwar order are cracking in Europe. It is about whether a global financial crash will further destabilize the Middle East and, if so, what we and the Europeans are going to do about it. It is about whether the incipient signs of a bubble burst in China signal the start of an extended economic and perhaps even political crisis there. It is about whether the American middle class is about to be knocked off its feet once again and indeed whether the middle class as weÂ’ve known it will survive. It is about whether sovereign governments can still underwrite economic performance and financial stability in the leading economies of the world.
This is an example of the foolish politicking Mead finds so parochial, but I do remember in 2007 that the media was quite insistent that the housing bubble burst was Very Big News which would portend Very Bad Things. That's not to say they were biased in that reportage. They got that right. And even as the bubble burst, I doubted them on their claims of serious economic fallout.
They were right; I was wrong.
But I would suggest that George W. Bush was the sort of president they didn't mind reporting bad news about. While they are very protective of, and optimistic about, the current resident of the White House.
It could be that we're not getting the true situation from the media because the media has very emotional, very irrational reason to not want to believe it themselves.
And thus what is actually a worldwide catastrophe in progress is demeaned as a mere political hurdle for Obama to overcome, maybe with a really good speech, maybe with a drop-in-the-bucket "stimulus."
And regarding politics: I do not know for certain what the next president would do, usefully, to improve the situation.
I do know that one man is singularly unqualified to occupy the most important office in the world during that 3 a.m. emergency call.
Posted by: Ace at
11:58 AM
| Comments (248)
Post contains 610 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: David "Big Papi" Ortiz at September 22, 2011 12:00 PM (Vy1lZ)
Collapse delayed is always collapse worse.
And the bad thing, we are STILL sending them money even though we don't have any to send.
Posted by: Vic at September 22, 2011 12:00 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Ben at September 22, 2011 12:02 PM (wuv1c)
"It is about whether sovereign governments can still underwrite economic performance and financial stability in the leading economies of the world."
This can only occur if it is deemed to be "fair" by a Kenyan import. Just sayin. We have to have priorities.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at September 22, 2011 12:02 PM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 12:03 PM (AEIYh)
Posted by: Bob Saget at September 22, 2011 12:03 PM (F/4zf)
Posted by: Ben at September 22, 2011 12:03 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: tasker at September 22, 2011 12:03 PM (rJVPU)
Posted by: Azerbaijan, Georgia, Armenia, and Israel at September 22, 2011 12:03 PM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 22, 2011 12:04 PM (136wp)
Posted by: Taiwan at September 22, 2011 12:04 PM (wLl5o)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 22, 2011 12:05 PM (jx2j9)
It matters a hell of a lot who wins next year, and not just for us either.
Posted by: KG at September 22, 2011 12:05 PM (LD21B)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 22, 2011 12:05 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Fat Union Boss at September 22, 2011 12:05 PM (ItDg4)
Posted by: willow at September 22, 2011 12:05 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: Vic at September 22, 2011 12:06 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at September 22, 2011 12:06 PM (0M3AQ)
No. I'd just depress myself with how small the time frame would be.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 22, 2011 12:06 PM (bjRNS)
WRM is an over-beloved slinger of a familiar sort of bullshit: "If only X could be more like Y..." The world is in too much debt, BUT. Cutbacks are needed, BUT. Like reading tea leaves on top of entrails, all you gonna get is a headache...
\\
Posted by: M. Murcek at September 22, 2011 12:07 PM (ToZXn)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 22, 2011 12:07 PM (jx2j9)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 22, 2011 12:07 PM (bjRNS)
>>>No need to panic. America will be best poitioned to thrive in the reset if we get over the Gaia cult. The people in a sling are the central EUtopians.
We are in a decent position. We have a wealth of natural resouces, regions with various climates condusive to growing almost every type of crop imaginable. Tons of arable land. Most of the worlds fresh water in the Great Lakes. A peaceful northern neighbor rich in natural resources like oil and timber.
We've got enough gas, oil, natural gas, and coal to last us several lifetimes. We have warm water ports on both the pacific and atlantic oceans.
We're in a good position as a nation. I am happy we're not in Europe or Asia when the music stops and everyone is grasping for a chair.
Obviously things can, and probably will, get bad. But there are degrees of bad. There is rampant unemployment and soup lines bad. Which will be American bad.
And then there is let's pull straws to decide which kid to eat bad, which will be Asia.
Posted by: Ben at September 22, 2011 12:07 PM (wuv1c)
"What you're starting to see is glimmers of hope across the economy. [...] We've still got a lot of work to do. Still, the signs of progress are unmistakable."
-President Mess-Creator
April, 2009
Posted by: soothie at September 22, 2011 12:07 PM (sqkOB)
Posted by: tasker at September 22, 2011 12:07 PM (rJVPU)
Stock Market: DOOM
Gold and Silver: DOOM
Land and Property: DOOM
Food Prices: DOOM
Good RUM: Helps ease the DOOM.
Yo Ho Ho and A bottle of Bacardi!
Posted by: Pirate Pelf Lucre at September 22, 2011 12:08 PM (wN82N)
We're gonna get to see this depression in color.
Could it get so doggone bad that The One could win a second term just because everyone in the middle would panic about making a change?
We'll see.
Posted by: I'm in a New York state of mind at September 22, 2011 12:08 PM (4sQwu)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 12:08 PM (QxSug)
>>>No need to panic. America will be best poitioned to thrive in the reset if we get over the Gaia cult. The people in a sling are the central EUtopians.
We are in a decent position. We have a wealth of natural resouces, regions with various climates condusive to growing almost every type of crop imaginable. Tons of arable land. Most of the worlds fresh water in the Great Lakes. A peaceful northern neighbor rich in natural resources like oil and timber.
We've got enough gas, oil, natural gas, and coal to last us several lifetimes. We have warm water ports on both the pacific and atlantic oceans.
We're in a good position as a nation. I am happy we're not in Europe or Asia when the music stops and everyone is grasping for a chair.
Obviously things can, and probably will, get bad. But there are degrees of bad. There is rampant unemployment and soup lines bad. Which will be American bad.
And then there is let's pull straws to decide which kid to eat bad, which will be Asia.
Posted by: Ben at September 22, 2011 04:07 PM (wuv1c)
"first thing we do, is we kill all the lawyers"
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:08 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 12:09 PM (AEIYh)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at September 22, 2011 12:09 PM (0M3AQ)
In the end, there will be only chaos.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 22, 2011 12:09 PM (9hSKh)
Obviously things can, and probably will, get bad. But there are degrees of bad. There is rampant unemployment and soup lines bad. Which will be American bad.
Yeah. I'd still rather be here than practically anywhere else.
Posted by: sandy burger at September 22, 2011 12:09 PM (0U+Pz)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 22, 2011 04:07 PM (bjRNS)
yeah you can use that to put me back together if this keeps up.
thanks in advance
Posted by: willow at September 22, 2011 12:09 PM (h+qn8)
Thank you! I'm honored.
Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure.
Ahhhhhh.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 22, 2011 12:09 PM (jx2j9)
Posted by: © Sponge at September 22, 2011 12:09 PM (UK9cE)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 12:10 PM (QxSug)
It'll start in the South China Sea. Go hit the Strategy Page and bone up on the region.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 22, 2011 12:10 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of Lonely Unicorns at September 22, 2011 12:10 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 22, 2011 12:10 PM (w8Nh8)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 22, 2011 04:09 PM (9hSKh)
sometimes that isn't so funny.Posted by: willow at September 22, 2011 12:10 PM (h+qn8)
Hey now, let's not lose focus. The most important thing is that we navigate these crises so that we can pick up a few more seats and maybe the white house. Taking a principled stand for policy reasons could mean an electoral loss. That's much, much worse than economic ruin.
Posted by: John Boehner at September 22, 2011 12:10 PM (FkKjr)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 04:08 PM (QxSug)
Double that number.
Posted by: Fat Union Boss at September 22, 2011 12:11 PM (ItDg4)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at September 22, 2011 04:09 PM (0M3AQ)
the mideast couldn't organize a package of gummy bears. Europe is busy navel gazing and feeling sorry for themselves and eating shitty food. China is focused. The russians are mostly drunk and/or whores.
Worry about China.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:11 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: joncelli at September 22, 2011 12:11 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: © Sponge at September 22, 2011 04:09 PM (UK9cE)
a silver lining. tx
Posted by: willow at September 22, 2011 12:11 PM (h+qn8)
It is almost as if on December 8, 1941, the press was filled with speculation about whether Franklin Roosevelt’s chances for a fourth term were helped or hurt by the attack — and whether GOP hopes to pick up more seats in the 1942 election would have to be put on hold.
That is, in fact, what our current MFM would focus upon.
I'm with Steyn, I believe Europe will revert to form to deal with the problems. The difficult matter is that demographics do not favor the Old Guard.
honestly i picked the wrong decade to be a sober member of society.
Seriously. I told my mother early in the week that I am now actively rooting that Yellowstone blows.
Posted by: alexthechick at September 22, 2011 12:11 PM (VtjlW)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 12:11 PM (QxSug)
b..but Maxine Waters said..........................
Posted by: sonnyspats at September 22, 2011 12:11 PM (I/MzF)
Just a couple thoughts.
Posted by: observer at September 22, 2011 12:12 PM (gkxl1)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 22, 2011 04:09 PM (9hSKh)
sometimes that isn't so funny.I didn't mean it to be funny, it's somber. Alas, Internet text cannot yet transmit tone inflection...
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 22, 2011 12:12 PM (9hSKh)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 12:12 PM (QxSug)
And then there is let's pull straws to decide which kid to eat bad, which will be Asia.
And whatever shall I do with my excess male population of 30 million. Oh, hi, Taiwan!
Posted by: China at September 22, 2011 12:12 PM (136wp)
Winter's coming.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 22, 2011 12:12 PM (bjRNS)
Mike makes a good point.
Tell me again why a govt shutdown would've been awful for us? We gotta stop being pussies. And by 'we', I mean Boner and his pals.
Posted by: soothie at September 22, 2011 12:12 PM (sqkOB)
Posted by: Arms Merchant at September 22, 2011 12:12 PM (hW3KZ)
I completely agree with Mead on this. It's one of the things that turned me off the media from the start, even before they became such blatant, snivelling sycophants to the left (or rather, before I realized QUITE how blatant, snivelling and sycophantic they were).
Casting everything only in political terms is one of the most mindlessly amoral practices the media delights in perpetuating. Hell, I might even call it IMmoral. Obama's approach to Israel isn't solely a political situation. Real lives are in the balance, as is the right of an entire country to exist. Obama's decision to halt permits for new oil drilling isn't just a political maneuver. It puts real people out of work and hurts real people at the gas pump, in the grocery store, and on the heating bill.
It never ceases to amaze me that the left professes to be the ideology that "cares about people, not profits," but they're perfectly happy swinging their political morningstar at every straw man within reach, utterly ignoring the actual PEOPLE who are ruined as a result.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at September 22, 2011 12:13 PM (4df7R)
Posted by: tasker at September 22, 2011 12:13 PM (rJVPU)
Posted by: Arms Merchant at September 22, 2011 04:12 PM (hW3KZ)
Freedom is where you take it.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:14 PM (x3YFz)
I don't see the potential for a world war as we saw in the 20th. The only major players who can project some force all have nukes. So it's doubtful a war will ever be fought on the territory of China, US, Russia, India, etc.
However, wars for resources and proxy wars in nations that have resources are feasable.
China owns a lot of natural resources in Africa. If these African nations ever tried to nationalize them, I could easiy see China, or us for that matter, going in and maintaining them by force.
So in the sense that there would be war all over the globe, that's possible, but it's unlikely it will be as stark a contrast in sides as the second and first world war.
There won't be side a versus side b, but rather us versus everyone and vice versa.
Posted by: Ben at September 22, 2011 12:14 PM (wuv1c)
We are in a decent position. We have a wealth of natural resouces, regions with various climates condusive to growing almost every type of crop imaginable. Tons of arable land. Most of the worlds fresh water in the Great Lakes. A peaceful northern neighbor rich in natural resources like oil and timber.
We've got enough gas, oil, natural gas, and coal to last us several lifetimes. We have warm water ports on both the pacific and atlantic oceans.
We're in a good position as a nation. I am happy we're not in Europe or Asia when the music stops and everyone is grasping for a chair.
Obviously things can, and probably will, get bad. But there are degrees of bad. There is rampant unemployment and soup lines bad. Which will be American bad.
And then there is let's pull straws to decide which kid to eat bad, which will be Asia.
Posted by: Ben at September 22, 2011 04:07 PM (wuv1c
We do???!!!
Posted by: stoopid college kid at September 22, 2011 12:14 PM (I/MzF)
Posted by: Wall Street Bankers at September 22, 2011 12:14 PM (wN82N)
Worry about China.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 04:11 PM (x3YFz)
China, the place with empty cities and fleets of cars nobody buys? The place that long term decided to knee cap itself with a massive gender imbalance?
China's screwed.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 22, 2011 12:14 PM (FkKjr)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 22, 2011 12:14 PM (136wp)
"first thing we do, is we kill all the lawyers"
Sweetie darlin', don't forget that some of us can shoot back.
Posted by: alexthechick at September 22, 2011 12:15 PM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 22, 2011 12:15 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: joncelli at September 22, 2011 12:15 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 12:15 PM (AEIYh)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 22, 2011 12:16 PM (TMB3S)
"first thing we do, is we kill all the lawyers"
Sweetie darlin', don't forget that some of us can shoot back.
Posted by: alexthechick at September 22, 2011 04:15 PM (VtjlW)
"first thing we do, is we kill all the lawyers"
except Alex.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:16 PM (x3YFz)
Sweetie darlin', don't forget that some of us can shoot back.
Posted by: alexthechick at September 22, 2011 04:15 PM (VtjlW)
alright alex, but i'm still getting your boots.
i keed
Posted by: willow at September 22, 2011 12:17 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: Rockhound at September 22, 2011 12:17 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 22, 2011 12:17 PM (136wp)
Posted by: observer at September 22, 2011 04:12 PM (gkxl1)
ARRGH! And right good ones they are, matey.
Posted by: Pirate Pelf Lucre at September 22, 2011 12:17 PM (wN82N)
If you recall, one of the arguments used to intimidate people against a govt shutdown was the closing of parks and the Lincoln Memorial.
Seems rather trite now, doesn't it? It did, then, too, but now it's really silly.
Posted by: soothie at September 22, 2011 12:17 PM (sqkOB)
Posted by: Jean at September 22, 2011 12:17 PM (WkuV6)
Worry about China.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 04:11 PM (x3YFz)
China,
the place with empty cities and fleets of cars nobody buys? The place
that long term decided to knee cap itself with a massive gender
imbalance?
China's screwed.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 22, 2011 04:14 PM (FkKjr)
You're making the mistake of thinking they won't want to be not hungry. You actually made my point for me. In the long term China needs to eat. It's hungry. and your ass is a croissant with a cheesy center.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:18 PM (x3YFz)
Hmmm, cheesy!
Posted by: Homer J. Simpson at September 22, 2011 12:19 PM (136wp)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 12:19 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 04:15 PM (AEIYh)
That's not what John Boehner said in 2009.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 22, 2011 12:19 PM (FkKjr)
Posted by: WalrusRex at September 22, 2011 12:19 PM (Hx5uv)
"first thing we do, is we kill all the lawyers"
Sweetie darlin', don't forget that some of us can shoot back.
Posted by: alexthechick at September 22, 2011 04:15 PM (VtjlW)
crazy woman, you know I love you. How in the metric 7 circles of hell did you get through law school... you being you? There's gotta be more than a few holes in the desert after that episode.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:20 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 22, 2011 12:20 PM (cbyrC)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at September 22, 2011 12:20 PM (5Z/+/)
Posted by: Arms Merchant at September 22, 2011 04:12 PM (hW3KZ)
Freedom is where you take it.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 04:14 PM (x3YFz)
Aye Matey, Freedom's just another word for nothin' left to lose.
Soon all you landlubbers will have Freedom. Join the Pirate Revolution, sharpen your cutlass, and take no prisoners.
Posted by: Pirate Pelf Lucre at September 22, 2011 12:21 PM (wN82N)
Eh, Jesus is still Lord. I'mma not freak out that we still can't build Towers of Babel, even with iPads.
Posted by: William at September 22, 2011 12:22 PM (dE2JB)
All right, pop quiz. USA, SCOAMF with one hostage. He's using her for cover; he's almost to a plane. You're a hundred feet away... FRONT?
Posted by: Hairy Temple at September 22, 2011 12:22 PM (136wp)
Posted by: Jean at September 22, 2011 12:22 PM (WkuV6)
Worry about China.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 04:11 PM (x3YFz)
China,
the place with empty cities and fleets of cars nobody buys? The place
that long term decided to knee cap itself with a massive gender
imbalance?
China's screwed.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 22, 2011 04:14 PM (FkKjr)
You're
making the mistake of thinking they won't want to be not hungry. You
actually made my point for me. In the long term China needs to eat.
It's hungry. and your ass is a croissant with a cheesy center.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 04:18 PM (x3YFz)
I always get into trouble when I use 2 or more negatives... I foncuse myself. need moar beer.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:22 PM (x3YFz)
I don't think there will be a "World War" anytime soon. But wars? Yeah, good chance.
Posted by: sandy burger at September 22, 2011 12:22 PM (0U+Pz)
We are in a decent position. We have a wealth of natural resouces, regions with various climates condusive to growing almost every type of crop imaginable. Tons of arable land. Most of the worlds fresh water in the Great Lakes. A peaceful northern neighbor rich in natural resources like oil and timber.
We've got enough gas, oil, natural gas, and coal to last us several lifetimes. We have warm water ports on both the pacific and atlantic oceans.
Now what we need is someone to step up to the podium, unplug the teleprompter, and lay out the plan for The Great American Renewal. We'd begin immediately to drill for oil and natural gas, mine precious metals, construct refineries and nuclear plants, unleash farmers, and start a national initiative to manufacture our own products.
We'd be back on our feet in no time. Screw the rest of the world. If they want prosperity, take our lead, free your people, and the rest will come naturally, on its own.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at September 22, 2011 12:22 PM (d0Tfm)
When you're a professional pi-rate ...
... you don't have to wear a suit.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 22, 2011 12:22 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at September 22, 2011 12:23 PM (5Z/+/)
People can't get their heads around this impending crisis because of recency bias.
Humans look at their current environment and extrapolate from it. Most of us have known nothing but prosperity here in America (at least on a macro scale). The idea of America not being America anymore is unthinkable.
My wife suffers from this bias. She shakes her head at my food stores, my water filters, my gold and silver and keeps repeating, "Just WHAT do you think will happen? Social unrest? How? Why? What would cause it? Why wouldn't we have food or water."
We've agreed that she will let me do my job as head of the household in preparing the family for disaster with the understanding that she is free to mock me as a kook and a crank 30 yrs from now if nothing happens.
I hope that's the outcome.
But it's not just my wife. The financial adviser she works for scolded me for pulling all our money out of equities. He sees "turbulence" coming, but ultimately thinks we'll pull through in a couple of years.
I said to him, when my upside is 10-15% and my potential downside is 25-80%, I'm sitting it out.
Right now he's looking like the dumbass, but it isn't about that. The guy knows far more about investing and finance than me, but that doesn't give him a better perspective on it. As a matter of fact, he's probably too close to the whole thing to have good judgement on the matter.
Posted by: Warden at September 22, 2011 12:24 PM (HzhBE)
90
If you recall, one of the arguments used to intimidate people against a govt shutdown was the closing of parks and the Lincoln Memorial.
Seems rather trite now, doesn't it? It did, then, too, but now it's really silly.
Maybe Sparky will close bridges because their unsafe and there is no government employee on the clock to tell you they are unsafe? Scary.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at September 22, 2011 12:24 PM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: tasker at September 22, 2011 12:24 PM (rJVPU)
Posted by: Jean at September 22, 2011 04:22 PM (WkuV6)
you say that as if you believe it. I, however, do not. I'm not talking a Red China Red Dawn remake here... they have warehouses full of hackers earning pennies/day to take down our infrastructure.
Cybersecurity has become an oxymoron in the US.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:25 PM (x3YFz)
You're making the mistake of
thinking they won't want to be not hungry. You actually made my point
for me. In the long term China needs to eat. It's hungry. and your
ass is a croissant with a cheesy center.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 04:18 PM (x3YFz)
Nope. Historically China eats itself when it all goes to shit, going back thousands of years.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 22, 2011 12:25 PM (FkKjr)
Posted by: OJ from jail at September 22, 2011 12:25 PM (Rb259)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 12:25 PM (AEIYh)
There never was any option to "do something and improve the situation." Not TARP. Not the Stimulus. Not QE, QE2, QE 666. Not the debt limit increase. Not the bailouts DC will be screaming for in the coming weeks and months.
There was only ever "hold the government back (balancing the budget) from intervening and let the market work out the distortions that have been imposed on it." You (anyone) is not smarter than math. The government cannot be bigger than the market, ever, because the market is its food source.
Posted by: Methos at September 22, 2011 12:26 PM (sOXQX)
We are in a decent position. We have a wealth of natural
resouces, regions with various climates condusive to growing almost
every type of crop imaginable.
(Which you cannot do in many places as it's against homeowners associationsand EPA)
Tons of arable land. Most of the worlds fresh water in the Great Lakes. A peaceful northern neighbor rich in natural resources like oil and timber.
(who has the money to buy ?)
We've got enough gas, oil, natural gas, and coal to last us several lifetimes. We have warm water ports on both the pacific and atlantic oceans.
(EPA)
Posted by: willow at September 22, 2011 12:26 PM (h+qn8)
China owns a lot of natural resources in Africa. If these African nations ever tried to nationalize them, I could easiy see China, or us for that matter, going in and maintaining them by force.
Posted by: Ben at September 22, 2011 04:14 PM (wuv1c)
Aye, right ye be, Laddy, and the Pirate Crew be a-waitin' for that one, the riches of Africa bekon. Soon we sail.
Posted by: Pirate Pelf Lucre at September 22, 2011 12:26 PM (wN82N)
Posted by: steevy at September 22, 2011 12:26 PM (fyOgS)
110 Soon all you landlubbers will have Freedom. Join the Pirate Revolution, sharpen your cutlass, and take no prisoners.
When you're a professional pi-rate ...
... you don't have to wear a suit.
Yeah. Going all Piratey might be a fun way to roll through the apocalypse. Beats listening to Ivy Leaguers masterbate on TeeVee.
Posted by: Sub-Tard at September 22, 2011 12:26 PM (0M3AQ)
You're making the mistake of
thinking they won't want to be not hungry. You actually made my point
for me. In the long term China needs to eat. It's hungry. and your
ass is a croissant with a cheesy center.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 04:18 PM (x3YFz)
Nope. Historically China eats itself when it all goes to shit, going back thousands of years.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 22, 2011 04:25 PM (FkKjr)
True, but until now there wasn't an all-you-can-eat buffet in europe.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:27 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 04:25 PM (AEIYh)
So you are saying John Boehner in 2009 needed help.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 22, 2011 12:27 PM (FkKjr)
you say that as if you believe it. I, however, do not. I'm not talking a Red China Red Dawn remake here... they have warehouses full of hackers earning pennies/day to take down our infrastructure.
Cybersecurity has become an oxymoron in the US.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 04:25 PM (x3YFz)
Wolveri-WTF? Blue screen?
Posted by: Ima Wurdibitsch at September 22, 2011 12:27 PM (fk/lm)
Posted by: Ima Wurdibitsch at September 22, 2011 12:28 PM (fk/lm)
There never was any option to "do something and improve the situation." Not TARP. Not the Stimulus. Not QE, QE2, QE 666. Not the debt limit increase. Not the bailouts DC will be screaming for in the coming weeks and months.
There was only ever "hold the government back (balancing the budget) from intervening and let the market work out the distortions that have been imposed on it." You (anyone) is not smarter than math. The government cannot be bigger than the market, ever, because the market is its food source.
Posted by: Methos at September 22, 2011 04:26 PM (sOXQX)
The next president, if we're to fix this shit, would go down in history as "The Hammer."
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:28 PM (x3YFz)
True, but until now there wasn't an all-you-can-eat buffet in europe.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 04:27 PM (x3YFz)
When the Chinese government goes caput, the warlords are gonna fight over China, like they always have. That will keep them occupied for a long time. By then Europe will either have un-fucked itself or be Muslim.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 22, 2011 12:28 PM (FkKjr)
Wolveri-WTF? No cell signal?
Rut-roh.
Posted by: Ima Wurdibitsch at September 22, 2011 04:28 PM (fk/lm)
exactly.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:29 PM (x3YFz)
I think so, too, although the definition of "China" probably includes Taiwan.
Russian minerals might be a tempting target for them, though.
Posted by: sandy burger at September 22, 2011 12:29 PM (0U+Pz)
Posted by: tasker at September 22, 2011 12:30 PM (rJVPU)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 22, 2011 12:30 PM (tKFT6)
True, but until now there wasn't an all-you-can-eat buffet in europe.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 04:27 PM (x3YFz)
When
the Chinese government goes caput, the warlords are gonna fight over
China, like they always have. That will keep them occupied for a long
time. By then Europe will either have un-fucked itself or be Muslim.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 22, 2011 04:28 PM (FkKjr)
first: when was the last time Europe un-fucked itself?
second: those warlords and going to pick the path of least resistance and most profit. That's not in China.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:30 PM (x3YFz)
Given their hold on the government, business, media, and education worlds, and their successes to date, that's a might big "if".
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at September 22, 2011 12:31 PM (xy9wk)
"first thing we do, is we kill all the lawyers"
The cliche joke is that 99% of lawyers give all the rest a bad reputation.
I prefer to look at it another way: Somewhere around 1% of lawyers leave us with unrealistic expectations that the other 99% won't predictably act like slime.
The title of that new book: "Lawyer jokes"..... is redundant.
If you assemble all the best political jokes and put them together, you'd have...Congress.
Thank you, I'll be here all week...try the veal!
Posted by: Uknown Comic at September 22, 2011 12:31 PM (2uovW)
Posted by: Jean at September 22, 2011 12:31 PM (WkuV6)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 12:32 PM (QxSug)
In a couple of years, this is all going to seem so obvious.
People will look back and wonder what the hell they were doing still fucking around in the stock market in 2011.
Kinda like I did after the internet bubble crashed. That's when I decided I better educate myself about financial markets if I didn't want to get raped again by Wall St.
Posted by: Warden at September 22, 2011 12:32 PM (HzhBE)
Posted by: steevy at September 22, 2011 04:29 PM (fyOgS)
Ever seen a guy across the street get attacked by a wasp? It's useful in that it's hilarious to watch.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:32 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Barack Obama at September 22, 2011 12:32 PM (rJVPU)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 22, 2011 12:32 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 12:32 PM (AEIYh)
Posted by: steevy at September 22, 2011 04:26 PM (fyOgS)
Drink!
Posted by: ErikW at September 22, 2011 12:33 PM (KinxY)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 12:33 PM (QxSug)
"first thing we do, is we kill all the lawyers"
Reporters first this time
Posted by: Jean at September 22, 2011 04:31 PM (WkuV6)
I have to agree. But you can't fault Shakespeare, he didn't know about cable news. Having said that, I insist Megyn Kelly be brought to my castle, bound, and wearing nothing but heels and a hat of my choosing.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:34 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 04:30 PM (x3YFz)
The path of least resistance isn't halfway around the world through Russian winters.
The Chinese historically build walls to keep other people out, because they think other lands suck compared to theirs. Any Chinese Warlord will want China first and foremost.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 22, 2011 12:34 PM (FkKjr)
Posted by: steevy at September 22, 2011 12:34 PM (fyOgS)
I was seeing around me the lives of family and friends being turned upside down by losing jobs...and especially losing their own businesses. But more importantly, I was seeing and trying to make the point that these types of business concerns were bedrock to the to the economy...and that whole industries were just disappearing. ...whole economic sectors were irreparably crumbling.
...and this was at the time when people would not shut up about the cultural impact of that stupid fucking movie about alien Smurfs. There was post after post about it here.
Monty is right. It's DOOM time
Posted by: beedubya at September 22, 2011 12:34 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 12:35 PM (AEIYh)
@35: "Good RUM: Helps ease the DOOM."
Couple more days like today, and she's gonna have to be one busy 'ette.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at September 22, 2011 12:35 PM (xy9wk)
China can partially "outsource" that problem by importing women, not necessarily voluntarily, from places like North Korea and Vietnam.
Posted by: sandy burger at September 22, 2011 12:36 PM (L07Yb)
Posted by: Steve C. at September 22, 2011 12:37 PM (V3oL8)
People can't get their heads around this impending crisis because of recency bias.
Humans look at their current environment and extrapolate from it. Most of us have known nothing but prosperity here in America (at least on a macro scale). The idea of America not being America anymore is unthinkable.
That's the worst part about it. Everyone's used to the way things have been when the way things have been for 30-40 years have been a lie supported by government borrowing and consumption debt (credit cards, mortgages, auto loans, student loans etc.). Total systemic debt has grown faster than GDP in every quarter since 1980 save one in 2009 when it crashed faster (see market-ticker.org any day of the week for that chart).
If all that leverage works its way out of the system, we're going back to 1980, or worse, because the shortfall has to be accounted for somewhere.
Posted by: Methos at September 22, 2011 12:37 PM (sOXQX)
Posted by: steevy at September 22, 2011 12:37 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 04:30 PM (x3YFz)
The path of least resistance isn't halfway around the world through Russian winters.
The
Chinese historically build walls to keep other people out, because they
think other lands suck compared to theirs. Any Chinese Warlord will
want China first and foremost.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 22, 2011 04:34 PM (FkKjr)
I hope your right. I really do.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:37 PM (x3YFz)
Aye Laddies, it surely be the time of DOOM!
Hackers broke SSL encryption.Paypal and other Online payment systems at risk! http://zapit.nu/DOOM
There be no safe harbor now online. matey, keep your counsel close, your wallet closer, these be times of danger across the internet
Posted by: Pirate Pelf Lucre at September 22, 2011 12:38 PM (wN82N)
Sooo, how's that whole "global economy" thingy working out?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, Tea Party SOB at September 22, 2011 12:38 PM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: steevy at September 22, 2011 04:37 PM (fyOgS)
or get a job at the PX
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:38 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: MrCaniac at September 22, 2011 12:38 PM (eKuOw)
I do know that one man is singularly unqualified to occupy the most important office in the world during that 3 a.m. emergency call. - Ace
Would that person happen to be a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure?
Posted by: joejm65 at September 22, 2011 12:39 PM (UZuc4)
C'mon, how about all those enablers who supported the policies that cuased this disaster. Obama may be a classic screwup but what about all the senators and congressmen, and presidents going back to Carter who haven't balanced the budget. Drunken sailors look like Scots compared to our political class and the parsites that live off the government.
We need a balanced budget amendment and term limits so we do[t have a professional political class.
Posted by: Molon Labe at September 22, 2011 12:39 PM (S7K8x)
You know the simplest way to curtail the Chinese hackers? Me.
It ain't elegant but it stops them cold.
Posted by: Guy with Ax Poised Over International Cable at September 22, 2011 04:34 PM (IhHdM)
If it's stupid but it works, it ain't stupid.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:39 PM (x3YFz)
I guess we need a good definition of riot. Do our various flash mobs and Wisconsin attack-whitey-mini-riots count? Does the Great Madison Freakout count? I think storming a state capitol probably should. So maybe Wisconsin has already won.
But to be more specific -- which American city will have the first London-style multi-day riot? Where it takes the police 24+ hours to regain control?
Baltimore and Detroit probably aren't bad guesses. Though the crazy pacific northwest leftist anarchists might surprise us with their violent tendencies. And LA always has the kindling ready to go.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at September 22, 2011 12:39 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: China at September 22, 2011 04:12 PM (136wp)
-------------------------
Hello, yourself. By the way, *we're* gonna get reincarnated, so kill all you like, we'll be back.
Posted by: India at September 22, 2011 12:41 PM (xy9wk)
That's just crazy talk.
Posted by: Trent Lott at September 22, 2011 12:41 PM (L07Yb)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 12:42 PM (AEIYh)
Must be a multi-day affair requiring massive police mobilization (and the requisite media "order" montage) and a press conference where Obama blames someone else for the situation.
My money's on Chicago as Rahm Emanuel is no Mayor Daley.
Posted by: Methos at September 22, 2011 12:43 PM (sOXQX)
Baltimore and Detroit probably aren't bad guesses. Though the crazy pacific northwest leftist anarchists might surprise us with their violent tendencies. And LA always has the kindling ready to go.
How would anyone notice if Detroit rioted?
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at September 22, 2011 12:43 PM (JxMoP)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 22, 2011 12:43 PM (w8Nh8)
Posted by: I'm Your Man for 2012, then. at September 22, 2011 12:44 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: Middle class at September 22, 2011 04:41 PM (ZDUD4)
We can't grow dirt out here (eastern CO). But, I've been putting off buying my own reloading gear. Guess that's going to change. Water is covered.
Posted by: tangonine at September 22, 2011 12:44 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 22, 2011 12:44 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 12:44 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 12:46 PM (QxSug)
Probably the best thing we can do is suggest to the Chinese the "Saddam Gambit." You know, take over a ME country. Two birds with one stone--no moslum terrorists and a happy China.
Posted by: Jimmuy at September 22, 2011 12:46 PM (ibeMV)
Posted by: Methos at September 22, 2011 12:46 PM (sOXQX)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 12:46 PM (AEIYh)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at September 22, 2011 12:47 PM (tKFT6)
Posted by: Jean at September 22, 2011 12:47 PM (WkuV6)
The "next" president hopefully won't say "I inherited this mess."
If he has a brain in his head.
Posted by: kevlarchick at September 22, 2011 12:48 PM (+dlqq)
Where are they going to go? It's not like city people have any idea what lies beyond the end of their block.
Posted by: Methos at September 22, 2011 12:48 PM (sOXQX)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 12:50 PM (AEIYh)
Posted by: The Robot Devil
Michael Stipe solo albums?! It's the end times!
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at September 22, 2011 12:50 PM (h1p5V)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 12:51 PM (QxSug)
The "next" president hopefully won't say "I inherited this mess."
If he has a brain in his head.
As President, sure.
But I'd love to see a debate where Obama makes that excuse and his opponent points out that Obama is handing him the worst mess in our history (and then gives The Plan).
Posted by: Methos at September 22, 2011 12:51 PM (sOXQX)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 12:51 PM (AEIYh)
At the end of Atlas Shrugs the cities starve as the country is no longer capable of delivering food or energy to them. You can imagine what that'll be like. The Exodus from the cities will be interesting.
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 04:46 PM (QxSug)
I'd planned for years to sell my house (in a rural area) and move into the city. Then, the housing market tanked. Then, I started paying attention. I am not moving into the city and wish my place were more isolated. As it is, if/when things get bad, I'm going to have to make sure my neighbors the strangers in my neighborhood don't know that I was prepared. If the bad looks like it's going to last a while, my brother is also planning and he has 80 acres with a water source not too terribly far from me.
Posted by: Ima Wurdibitsch at September 22, 2011 12:51 PM (fk/lm)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 12:52 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 22, 2011 12:52 PM (w8Nh8)
Posted by: Jean at September 22, 2011 12:53 PM (WkuV6)
Posted by: TheGarbone at September 22, 2011 12:53 PM (O3f8/)
I can see Chicago on a clear day, but not much of anyone is going to walk this far. So, unless the trains are still running, I should have an adequate head start (to family further out and better positioned).
Posted by: Methos at September 22, 2011 12:54 PM (sOXQX)
Absolutely stupid. But the government kept pushing it because they want to take control of the internet.
Posted by: Vic at September 22, 2011 12:54 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 12:55 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: Jean at September 22, 2011 12:56 PM (WkuV6)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 12:56 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 12:58 PM (AEIYh)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 22, 2011 12:58 PM (w8Nh8)
Baltimore and Detroit probably aren't bad
guesses. Though the crazy pacific northwest leftist anarchists might
surprise us with their violent tendencies. And LA always has the
kindling ready to go.
How would anyone notice if Detroit rioted?
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at September 22, 2011 04:43 PM (JxMoP)
The crime rate would drop.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at September 22, 2011 12:58 PM (6BvaE)
170 Anybody want to take bets on which American city has the first crisis riots?
Guaranteed Safe Bet: East or West Coast first with those pesky flyover Red States going last. Start with the entitlement mentality/illegal immigrants and maybe throw in a little of your minority/welfare culture and we'll be having some good old fashioned "Flash Mob" activity. OUTSIDE possibility of Detroit or New Orleans going first but I'll still put my money on those Blue Coasts.
Posted by: MrObvious at September 22, 2011 01:00 PM (2uovW)
That's the rub, for me. I know where there's water nearby, but so does everybody else.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 22, 2011 01:02 PM (bjRNS)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 01:04 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 01:07 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 22, 2011 04:05 PM (TMB3S)
It only makes sense for us to slash defense spending.
Posted by: long toss at September 22, 2011 01:09 PM (2G9cy)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 01:09 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: Jimmuy at September 22, 2011 04:46 PM (ibeMV)
I agree, but I'm afraid whoever the President is will feel pressured to "do something".
Posted by: KG at September 22, 2011 01:10 PM (LD21B)
Then the zombies will start rioting and burning, after which they will begin eating each other. The smart ones will make it to the suburbs and in States like MA they will be able to steal cars there because the occupants will be unarmed. Those will then have a 300 mile range.
This is why I have been saying anyone within a 35 mile distance from an urban area over 30K people needs to think about either moving now or having a quick getaway plan in place at the first sign of collapse. .
Posted by: Vic at September 22, 2011 01:11 PM (M9Ie6)
Their murder rate is through the roof. Venezuelan slums are some of the most dangerous places in the world.
Posted by: sandy burger at September 22, 2011 01:14 PM (HfydS)
You said it, brother.
Posted by: Friedrich Hayek at September 22, 2011 01:16 PM (0U+Pz)
@83: "I'm not sure where it will start"
Turkey vs. Greece & Israel; Iran jumps in, other Arab states jump in on side of Turkey/Iran (and maybe even one or two against Iran), Europe sends harshly worded e-mails, but eventually has to get invovled; we get drawn in; China and Russia take advantage of chaos and get into their own shooting matches (China over Spratleys/Taiwan, Russia vs. whomever they decide to start shit with). Russia could also get drawn in simply because a lot of stuff would be happening very close to its borders/sphere of influence.
Mexico could collapse and/or Venezuela gets froggy - stuff spirals out of control in the Americas.
Might be a lot like WWII - two major wars that are largely unconnected, even though a number of the same combatants are involved in both of them.
Not guaranteed, of course, but possible.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at September 22, 2011 01:17 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: The Jackhole at September 22, 2011 01:17 PM (+qHxi)
Posted by: The Jackhole at September 22, 2011 05:17 PM (+qHxi)
And tonight I think I will order more 9MM
Posted by: The Jackhole at September 22, 2011 01:18 PM (+qHxi)
Posted by: KG at September 22, 2011 01:19 PM (LD21B)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 22, 2011 01:24 PM (cbyrC)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 01:25 PM (AEIYh)
@92: "You're making the mistake of thinking they won't want to be not hungry. You actually made my point for me. In the long term China needs to eat. It's hungry. and your ass is a croissant with a cheesy center."
If China wants to eat, Russia is a far easier target than the US. It's in full-on demographic collapse. Transural Russia is resource rich, but almost unpopulated - ripe for a quick land grab. The Russian military is not particularly effective (Chechnya and Georgia as examples), either.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at September 22, 2011 01:26 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 01:29 PM (AEIYh)
Yeah, they're a bunch of drunks. They'd be no match for the "People's" "Liberation" Army.
Posted by: Democrats at September 22, 2011 01:29 PM (HfydS)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 01:30 PM (AEIYh)
Did we ever get a definitive answer on the Madrid train bombing the weekend before the socialist was elected? I recall that the election seemed to shift on allegations that the then government tried to push attention to local actors when it was more likely al qaeda (I think it was AQ, I just don't recall how much media follow up there ever was).
I wouldn't be surprised if someone among the Iran axis took a lesson from that and applied it to the wrong party in an attempt to wave them off involvement.
Posted by: Methos at September 22, 2011 01:31 PM (sOXQX)
Posted by: sven10077 at September 22, 2011 01:34 PM (AEIYh)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 22, 2011 01:47 PM (QxSug)
I largely agree with Meade and find him one of the more realistic liberal pundits, but I didn't care for his swipe about the economy being more important than a Republican debate months before the election.
This only serves to shore up the shabby front put forward by Obama on his speech-date grandstanding. Republicans didn't refuse to let Barry speak during their debate because they thought the debate was more important than the economy. They did so because they knew Obama's speech was of no significance to the economy and that he was the one playing politics.
The speech was so "important," in fact, that Obama has yet to produce his new plan and the Senate is taking its regular recess while it's pending.
Meade's a deep enough thinker to know better, but he still advances the "Roadblock Republicans" and "electorally opportunistic Republicans hoping America fails" memes.
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at September 22, 2011 01:53 PM (MH77M)
There is only one person who can even begin to solve the financial crisis.
That is Mitt Romney.
Rick Perry only kept Texas going by doubling his spending and taking stimulus dollars. He doesn't have a clue about the economy.
Mitt Romney's specialty was bring back companies on the brink of bankrupcy.
It is time to get past Romneycare.
Every candidate has much worse problems than Mitt, Rick Perry most of all.
Stop pretending. And get behind the only answer, maybe the markets would respond to Romney being the clear front runner. Maybe we could get a Romney recovery even before the election.
Posted by: petunia at September 22, 2011 02:00 PM (hgrmi)
Romney is totally unacceptable.
And FYNQ.
Posted by: Methos at September 22, 2011 02:10 PM (sOXQX)
Someone whack me on the head if I'm missing something that's obvious to everyone else, but....I don't understand why no one will so much as look in Rick Santorum's direction.
He was a tea-party fiscal conservative before it was cool, is well versed in foreign affairs (particularly the ME), has been active in entitlement reform efforts, and seems to me to be one of the most decent and principled men to throw his hat in the ring in years.
Okay, so he's not flashy or gimmicky. Is there something else that makes him a dud?
Posted by: EyeTest at September 22, 2011 02:38 PM (ReC4P)
Posted by: Cornfused Yet Again at September 22, 2011 02:44 PM (AyzfE)
Posted by: evil Libertarian at September 22, 2011 04:28 PM (5lowB)
Posted by: Mr. Maelstrom at September 22, 2011 04:04 PM (+ZX4J)
More like Maxwell Smart. A much dimmer version of Maxwell Smart
Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 22, 2011 04:41 PM (2DwHd)
EyeTest at September 22, 2011 06:38 PM (ReC4P)
Because he isn't "cool". All the cool kids know that you make fun of Santorum.
That's how you know that you're cool.
Posted by: ed at September 22, 2011 04:48 PM (Y2WVW)
Didn't read everything above so excuse me if this is a repeat...
If they they told the truth, as it were, they may then be guilty of inciting riots.
Just sayn'
Posted by: Dadof3 at September 22, 2011 06:00 PM (umKhw)
Posted by: The Detachment AudioBook at September 22, 2011 06:02 PM (+uroR)
Posted by: sierra at September 23, 2011 02:40 AM (ZJYcC)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2454 seconds, 376 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Sub-Tard at September 22, 2011 11:59 AM (0M3AQ)