April 20, 2011
— Ace The WSJ confirms what's apparent.
In an interview, Mr. Trump said people are finally realizing he is serious. "Originally they said, 'Oh, Trump is just having a good time,' " he said. "Then they were saying, 'Well, this is getting interesting.' Then, as of today they are really taking it seriously. I'm not playing games. I am totally serious."Mr. Trump called one of Iowa's leading evangelical leaders last week, and has put out lines to tea-party groups in the state. He also is contacting prominent national religious leaders, while checking off other boxes typical for GOP contenders, such as agreeing to sign the Americans for Tax Reform pledge to never raise taxes.
"Donald's as serious as a heart attack" about running, said Tony Fabrizio, a top Republican pollster who has been in frequent contact with Mr. Trump.
Here's are the benefit of Trump, and the likely downfall of Trump: He's a relentless self-promoter, has a hustler's mentality of saying what is needed to close the sale, and has the overconfidence of a billionaire.
All of those things are actually positive -- to an extent -- in a candidate. They all come with high negatives, though.
I'm particularly worried about that "hustler" thing. Closing the deal is the be-all end-all for a certain type of sharp operator, and if it means fudging a few things here and there, so be it.
I'm a little alarmed at the breezy lack of candor in telling the GOP what he believes it wants to hear in order to, as they say in Glengarry Glen Ross, sign on the line that is dotted.
Check out his recent interview with CBN’s David Brody. Discussing his religious beliefs, he volunteered, “I think the Bible is certainly, it is the book. It is the thing.” That sounds more like a Larry King blurb than a declaration of faith. And can you just feel the passion when asked how often he attends church? “As much as I can. Always on Christmas. Always on Easter. Always when there’s a major occasion. And during the Sundays.”Oh well, “during the Sundays.” Never mind then.
I don't believe that answer is really candid. I don't believe that Trump goes to church on "the Sundays." Some Sundays, maybe. "The Sundays?" The whole back half of that answer is Trump realizing that by saying he goes to church on Christmas and Easter he's actually telling religious voters he's not one of them, so he adds in what he thinks will close the deal -- he also goes to church on "the Sundays."
It's not candid. I'm a cynical guy so I can sort of go with this if this is our best shot at ousting Obama. I won't withhold support because of "the Sundays." The way I see it Obama is lying left and right and I'm not going to get squeamish if our guy is lying left and right too.
My problem with these serial fibs is not that I'm morally offended but that I think they won't work. I think they'll be understood, widely, to be less than candid, and thus Trump will get the reputation (if he doesn't have it already) of being a typical New York City sharp-operator/hustler who's willing to say whatever's necessary to con the rubes.
I mean, the abortion thing -- he breezily announced at CPAC "I'm pro-life; I bet you didn't know that." But he hadn't been pro-life until this declaration; he had been avowedly pro-choice.
When you flip-flop on an important gut/values question like that, you're supposed to have a story to explain your conversion (the elder Bush had a story about the "little brown ones" or something, his adopted grandchildren), and Trump is in fact checking that box with a story. But again, it doesn't really sound credible. It sounds like a hustle.
"A friend of mine, his wife was pregnant, in this case married, and she was pregnant, and he was going to—they were going to—he didn't really want the baby. And he was telling me the story, he was crying as he was telling me. They ended up for some reason—amazingly, through luck, because they didn't have the right timing—he ends up having the baby. And the baby is the apple of his eye. He says it's the greatest thing that ever happened to him . . . And I am pro-life."
Trump is like 65 and it's not credible that he has too many friends of any sort of age where they might be considering abortion. Of course the story is constructed such that Trump can always refuse to name his friend ("it's too personal"), but the suspicion rises that this "friend" is less than what we typically call "real" and more of what we call a "hypothetical construct."
Is this going to sell? I don't think so. The GOP base is rabid to punt out Obama (I know I am), but that very rabidness suggests we need to exercise some caution about who is most likely to achieve this task. (Nevermind the secondary goal of actually governing in a manner consistent with our aspirations and values.)
Trump has never had an interest in politics before, either. Not a real intellectual interest. He's flirted with the idea of running, but he's never been much for policy.
Some may call that a plus -- in a way, it is -- but it means his knowledge base is limited. Last week a reporter tried to ask one of those questions they only ask of Republican candidates, the pop-quiz "please get this wrong so we can start The Narrative that you're dumb" question. In this case, they asked Trump how many Representatives were in Congress, and Trump apparently didn't know, because he said something like "I'm not going to answer that, this isn't a history test."
Big deal? Well, not really, but they did an awful lot with lesser stumbles from Palin.
But going back to abortion, it's pretty obvious from this article in in LifeNews that Trump knows almost nothing about the policy question surrounding abortion. LifeNews headlines this as Trump "falters" on the abortion question, and it's hard to argue with that interpretation.
Businessman Donald Trump faltered when responding to a series of questions on abortion that saw NBC reporter Savannah Guthrie attempt to challenge him on the so-called right to privacy the Supreme Court invented to create a “right” to abortion.“Is there a right to privacy in the Constitution?” Guthrie asked Trump.
“I guess there is, I guess there is. And why, just out of curiosity, why do you ask that question?” Trump responded, his tone of voice changing to one of skepticism.
Guthrie asked Trump how his newfound pro-life view “squares” with the so-called privacy right and Trump replied to the question with an answer that made it appear he doesn’t understand the legal arguments underpinning the abortion debate.
He said, “Well, that’s a pretty strange way of getting to pro-life. I mean, it’s a very unique way of asking about pro-life. What does that have to do with privacy? How are you equating pro-life with privacy? ”
NBC’s Guthrie then said, “well, you know about the Roe v. Wade decision” and Trump appeared to finally understand the context of the question. “Yes, right sure,” he said. “Look, I am pro-life. I’ve said it. I’m very strong there.”
Now, Roe v. Wade rests almost entirely on this suggestion of a "right to privacy" that extends to contraceptive choices and, by the next step in the reasoning daisy-chain, to abortion. This is all very basic. You don't have to accept this reasoning in order to know it, of course. Most pro-lifers are fully fluent with this line of argument -- they know the argument; they just reject it.
But Trump appears to not understand the central argument in the most divisive hot-button issue of the last 30 years.
And his conclusion -- "I'm very strong there [on pro-life]" -- is completely undermined by the fact he doesn't seem to get this. How can he be "very strong" on this issue if he's not even interested enough to read a four sentence digest of the holding of Roe v. Wade.
I find this whole answer very Freudian. Let me bold-face the part I think is telling.
NBC’s Guthrie then said, “well, you know about the Roe v. Wade decision” and Trump appeared to finally understand the context of the question. “Yes, right sure,” he said. “Look, I am pro-life. I’ve said it. I’m very strong there.”
That's what concerns me -- the "I've said it." The equating of actually believing in a position with merely saying you believe in that position.
I just find that to be a Freudian slip, unintentionally revealing his thought processes.
"I'm very conservative on ObamaCare. I want to repeal it. Look, I've said it."
"I just signed the promise to never raise taxes. I'm very anti-tax. Look, I've said it."
"I'm very religious. I got to church on the Sundays. Look, I've said it."
Yes, you have said it. The doubt is over whether you mean it.
Honestly, I've got nothing against Trump. I watch his dumb tv shows.
But it sounds and awful lot like he's just checking boxes off a list, and when questions are asked about his commitment to these positions or just his sincerity in expressing them, the answer seems to be "Look, I've said it."
Like: "Look, I said what you wanted me to say."
AllahPundit wondered why Trump's obvious insincerity is being given a pass while Mitt Romney is raked over the coals for similar (or less troubling) stuff. All Allah could figure is that Mitt Romney is trying to pull the wool over people's eyes, and they resent that and punish him for that, whereas Trump is so blatant in his hucksterism it's borderline honest.
And so people aren't holding it against him, because no one's actually deceived.
"Look, I've said it. I don't mean it and you know I don't mean it but at least I've said it. If you want me to say it, I've said it."
Is it going to work? No, I don't think so. And don't even get me started on what I think his soon-to-be-leaked divorce records will turn up.
I just don't understand why people who supposedly rank abortion as one of their top issues would rule Romney unacceptable because, in order to win a race in abortion-crazy Massachusetts, he said he was pro-choice, whereas Trump has always said he was pro-choice not to get anything out of the statement but, more likely,just because he really was, and just really thought it was the right common-sense policy.
I think people just want an aggressive posture towards Obama. I get that emotionally, but I think people are not asking themselves if a tough-talker is the best type of candidate to actually do the job that's necessary, of if tough-talk is emotionally pleasing and cathartic but actually not central to the important thing, which isn't talk, but action and victory.
This is why I keep pushing candidates with less-big personalities. Yeah, they're not exciting. But I don't want this election to turn on whether the public finds our candidate acceptable. I want our candidate's acceptability to be sort of the default position, not really the central question at all.
I want the election to turn entirely on Obama. We win that contest 9 out of 10 times.
Posted by: Ace at
08:46 AM
| Comments (246)
Post contains 1929 words, total size 12 kb.
But it sounds and awful lot like he's just checking boxes off a list, and when questions are asked about his commitment to these positions or just his sincerity in expressing them, the answer seems to be "Look, I've said it."
Like: "Look, I said what you wanted me to say."
Reminds me of "Let me be clear".
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 20, 2011 08:51 AM (9hSKh)
Besides, he's a serial bankrupt. Could anyone who's declared bankruptcy 4 times actually win in the middle of a debt crisis?
Posted by: Oschisms at April 20, 2011 08:52 AM (GqM5k)
Is it going to work? No, I don't think so. And don't even get me started on what I think his soon-to-be-leaked divorce records will turn up.
And Obama's team is quite proficient at getting even sealed divorce records into the public's eye, shades of what happened to Jack Ryan, anybody?
History doesn't repeat itself, it stutters.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 20, 2011 08:54 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: ParisParamus at April 20, 2011 08:54 AM (bgSjf)
Posted by: nickless at April 20, 2011 08:54 AM (MMC8r)
He want to run as a Republican because it has an open Primary. Personally outside of NH, I don't think he has a chance in hell. He will only serve as a "spoiler".
Posted by: Vic at April 20, 2011 08:56 AM (M9Ie6)
And as Hugh Hewitt would coyly ask, "You know who this helps?"
It's true in this case; Trump helps Mitt a) stay out of the fray, and b) look presidential.
And Trump helps Newt, too, because compared to Trump, Newt has substance.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 08:56 AM (uFokq)
<puts on thinking cap>
Okay, I'm over that. Next topic?
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 20, 2011 08:56 AM (7dkEj)
Posted by: nickless at April 20, 2011 08:57 AM (MMC8r)
Has Trump announced his undying love for Israel, yet?
That's when we'll know for sure he's serious about stroking the base.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 08:57 AM (uFokq)
1. He's a Manchurian candidate, which is in keeping with several false 'tea party' candidates created by state level Dems. This would be a trojan horse of epic proportions.
2. He's as much of a nutjob as many people suspect he is. (definition of an eccentric: A madman with money.
3. He's a huckster, like Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson, looking to interfere and be paid off (in money, attention, flattery, publicity).
4. He's sincere.
At this point, I don't know, and we may never truly know. What we do know is that people believed very easily that Christine O'Donnell was a huckster. We should compare and contrast what he's doing with that. Occam's razor suggests that #2 or #3 are the most likely possibilities.
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 20, 2011 08:58 AM (6rX0K)
I think people just want an aggressive posture towards Obama. I get that emotionally, but I think people are not asking themselves if a tough-talker is the best type of candidate to actually do the job that's necessary, of if tough-talk is emotionally pleasing and cathartic but actually not central to the important thing, which isn't talk, but action and victory.
This is why I keep pushing candidates with less-big personalities.
Yeah, they're not exciting. But I don't want this election to turn on
whether the public finds our candidate acceptable. I want our
candidate's acceptability to be sort of the default position, not really
the central question at all.
I wish I could tattoo this on the sky so that every time someone said "I like Sarah/Trump/Bachmann because THEY FIGHT" I could just gesture towards it by way of explanation. Any respectable counterargument has to go directly through these two paragraphs and I doubt that any can.
Posted by: Jeff B. at April 20, 2011 08:59 AM (NjYDy)
I couldn't even finish the thread.
With all that is going on, I cannot believe this guy is even in the conversation.
Posted by: Ben at April 20, 2011 08:59 AM (wuv1c)
Yeah, this is the real problem. All the serious candidates are so timid that there's a vacuum to be filled by someone with actual ambition.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 20, 2011 09:01 AM (TpXEI)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 20, 2011 09:01 AM (AZGON)
No, no, no, no.
Are Republicans at that point where they will vote for anyone that will go after Obama, conservative or not? More importantly, are the GOP primary voters in Iowa, New hampshire and South Carolina? Because by then, it will probably be over.
We're doomed.
Posted by: Log Cabin at April 20, 2011 09:01 AM (L9Mr/)
If he has any skeleton's in his closet right now and if the gov't were to come after him, it would be very hard to get people to believe that it wasn't some sort of Obama led vendetta.
Talk about cya. This is the mother of all cya, imo.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 20, 2011 09:01 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 20, 2011 09:02 AM (UOM48)
If you ever questioned your opinion that the Left are scum-sucking, vile, putrid human debris, this might solidify your thoughts. Witness in all their glory, how they make fun of Trig Palin, complete with graphics depicting a hip thrusting pole dancer to commemorate his birthday. Then read the comments. You'll wonder if, at some point, humans split somewhere along the line and these freaks landed in the missing gene pool. I personally think there's an entire frontal lobe missing from a great majority of our American population. It portends a bad future for us. The Left are for the less fortunate! Everybody sing!
(I forgot to check the sidebar, so if it's already there, I apologize.)
Posted by: Lady in Black at April 20, 2011 09:02 AM (usvhr)
It looks like he has the understanding of the "right to privacy" that any American whose idea of "privacy" isn't determined by his position on abortion would have—the what-the-4th-Amendment-says understanding. It's only Roe that lenses that "right" through abortion, so if he's not a Roe-focused guy, he wouldn't think it belongs in the discussion.
I don't believe Trump's pro-life, because believing anything Trump says is stupid, but this isn't necessarily a tell. It only means his understanding of the issue isn't legal, in the precedent-says-this sort of way.
Really, "What the fuck does that have to do with this?" is a good instinctive reaction. It's what pro-lifers used to say about Roe before they bowed to precedent and became anti-"right to privacy," instead of anti-abortion.
Creedal!
Posted by: oblig. at April 20, 2011 09:02 AM (xvZW9)
That's what killed Lynn Swann's attempt at PA governor. He didn't appear to know that repealing Roe would have brought the issue back to the states.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 20, 2011 09:03 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 20, 2011 09:03 AM (AZGON)
btw, anyone remember back in early '09 how many here at AoS consoled themselves with: "Well, it's okay, because Jimmy Carter gave us Ronald Reagan and that'll happen again, you'll see."
Well, no, it won't. We're gonna get who we're gonna get.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 09:03 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Penfold at April 20, 2011 09:04 AM (1PeEC)
This is why I keep pushing candidates with less-big personalities. Yeah, they're not exciting. But I don't want this election to turn on whether the public finds our candidate acceptable. I want our candidate's acceptability to be sort of the default position, not really the central question at all.
I wish I could tattoo this on the sky so that every time someone said "I like Sarah/Trump/Bachmann because THEY FIGHT" I could just gesture towards it by way of explanation. Any respectable counterargument has to go directly through these two paragraphs and I doubt that any can.
Posted by: Jeff B
This makes a great deal of sense, and there is much to commend it. I would note that the status of one's acceptability being a given is not achieved in a vacuum. It is, for most of the front runners, the product of being part of the ruling class that has effectively dodged our problems (everyone regarding debt and SS reform) and those have have made the situation worse (McCain and immigration, Romney and healthcare).
We return once again to how that default position is achieved, and the MFM is an integral part of this.
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 20, 2011 09:04 AM (6rX0K)
If you ever questioned your opinion that the Left are scum-sucking, vile, putrid human debris, this might solidify your thoughts. Witness in all their glory, how they make fun of Trig Palin, complete with graphics depicting a hip thrusting pole dancer to commemorate his birthday. Then read the comments. You'll wonder if, at some point, humans split somewhere along the line and these freaks landed in the missing gene pool. I personally think there's an entire frontal lobe missing from a great majority of our American population. It portends a bad future for us. The Left are for the less fortunate! Everybody sing!
(I forgot to check the sidebar, so if it's already there, I apologize.)
Posted by: Lady in Black at April 20, 2011 01:02 PM (usvhr)
I made the dreadful mistake of reading the comments. I've lost all faith in humanity. I really, really want to send the link to all the libs I know, just to see them explain-away this crap, or apologize for it.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 20, 2011 09:05 AM (UOM48)
I would vote for Donald Duck before I voted for Donald Trump.
Posted by: Thinking Lots, Saying Little at April 20, 2011 09:05 AM (SQvIY)
And Trump helps Newt, too, because compared to Trump, Newt has substance.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 12:56 PM (uFokq)
It helps all the "serious" candidates, including Pawlenty and Daniels.
Again, Trump is Bad Cop. If he gets too much of the oxygen, a good candidate can triangulate against him. On the birther thing, for example, you can use him to say, "Well I think that Obama was born in Hawaii, but his lack of transparency on this is fueling what Trump is doing."
Posted by: AmishDude at April 20, 2011 09:06 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 20, 2011 09:07 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Buffalobob at April 20, 2011 09:07 AM (QPgXF)
This also struck me. Barry wasn't the "poor boy". Any of you all grow up with FOUR live in servants?? Guess that's why he loves the WH, reminds him of his childhood? From the NYT:
Like the households of other Indonesians who could afford it, it had a sizable domestic staff. Two female servants shared a bedÂroom; two men — a cook and a houseboy — slept mostly on the floor of the house or in the garden. The staff freed Ann from domestic obligations to a degree that would have been almost impossible in the United States.
Posted by: Kemp at April 20, 2011 09:07 AM (JpFM9)
They will turn on him in a heartbeat the minute he gets the nomination.
If he doesn't get the nomination they want to keep him pumped-up for a Perot style vote siphoning 3rd party run.
Donald Trump is nothing but another useful idiot for the media and the Democrats (BIRM).
Posted by: Nighthawk at April 20, 2011 09:08 AM (OtQXp)
AmishD: heh, it's only a matter of time until the media declares...
Trump is the face of the Republican party!
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 09:09 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 20, 2011 09:09 AM (AZGON)
Loony Larry O'Donnell over at the Mess that is MesSNBC said that Trump was the biggest embarrassment in the history of NBC.
Goes to show their employees aren't even watching the network that employs them!
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 20, 2011 09:09 AM (7dkEj)
Posted by: ace at April 20, 2011 09:09 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: t-bird at April 20, 2011 09:09 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Kemp at April 20, 2011 01:07 PM (JpFM9)
I had a sister-in-law who lived in Indonesia, hiring full time help is very cheap over there. Makes you wonder who payed for it.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at April 20, 2011 09:10 AM (136wp)
Posted by: t-bird at April 20, 2011 09:10 AM (FcR7P)
That horse is already out of the barn, mated with the late Mr. Ed, and foaled three or four times.
Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at April 20, 2011 09:10 AM (KktlX)
No, that is George Soros.
26 As someone else pointed out yesterday, Trump is a guy who lost money... running a casino.
The gov't lost money running a brothel, so gov't is a perfect fit for Trump.
Levity and humor aside, I don't think Trump is serious about a run (wasn't he doing similar "interviews" in 2000?), but God help us if by some cruel whim of fate he does get the Republican nomination.
/I'd still vote for him in that case, begrudgingly though. 2012 should be ABO - Anybody But Obama. If Satan Himself ran for the Presidency, I'd at least be inclined to give Hell a favorable reference in all my inane scribblings.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 20, 2011 09:11 AM (9hSKh)
If this were a headline over at HotAir, it would merit a giant honkinÂ’ DUDE.
Maybe with a ?, even.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 20, 2011 09:11 AM (jx2j9)
Holy Crap that's a lot of words.
Are ALL of them about Trump? If so, I'm not gonna read all of that.
Posted by: garrett at April 20, 2011 09:11 AM (0oUd+)
Posted by: Ncj the non-terrorist cabbie at April 20, 2011 09:11 AM (J8/NN)
Seriously, WTF is Rush thinking?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 20, 2011 09:12 AM (UOM48)
I never knew this about Obama and I knew quite a bit. I've always emphasized that he was raised by a bank vice president and sent to private schools.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 20, 2011 09:12 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Dan at April 20, 2011 09:12 AM (mXBxH)
Is there a bigger self-righteous prick than Larry O'Donnell?
Someday that man will be caught with child prOn or with skeletons buried in his backyard because NO person is that self-righteous who isn't guilty as sin.
It's true.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 09:12 AM (uFokq)
He's doing well in the polls because he's attacking Obama, which makes the rest of them look even more milquetoast than they already are. He's also doing well because of the overall weakness of the competition.
Even with those two things, I expect his numbers to drop once serious issues are being discussed.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at April 20, 2011 09:13 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 20, 2011 09:13 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 20, 2011 09:13 AM (AZGON)
Yeah, man, that's fucked up.
Posted by: president o'bumbles at April 20, 2011 09:14 AM (Y1DZt)
They will turn on him in a heartbeat the minute he gets the nomination.
This. But it will be the case for anyone they trumpet and start to promote. Romney is being propped up as well. The MBM couldn't be any more predictable. Their intentions are on full display and they will promote the biggest squish or the biggest loser to win the nomination....then tie them to the stake and set the embers afire at their feet once the general starts.
Posted by: Lady in Black at April 20, 2011 09:14 AM (usvhr)
They were flirting. Or something. It was downright w-r-o-n-g.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 20, 2011 09:14 AM (7dkEj)
Posted by: ya2daup, an iPhone iMpeded iPosting at April 20, 2011 09:14 AM (oqhrS)
okay, here's what's coming next: an investigation into how many of Trump's deals went sour and ended up costing the taxpayers or costing people their jobs.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 09:15 AM (uFokq)
For Trump to survive anything close to a Republican primary, he would need the MSM to vet him in a way that can only be described as Obama -esque.
And that aint gonna happen.
Posted by: AndrewsDad at April 20, 2011 09:15 AM (C2//T)
/i blame this on the GOProud that invitied him to CPAC.
If he isn't invited, this shit isn't happening.
Posted by: Ben at April 20, 2011 09:15 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: John at April 20, 2011 09:16 AM (4ZzqT)
Posted by: glowing blue meat at April 20, 2011 09:16 AM (K/USr)
Best analysis yet on Trump. I like the guy basically, respect his accomplishments, and I have to admit that his willingness to take on Obama is very, very appealing.
But I agree with the points made in the post, and also think that although he is no doubt a very tough businessman, I suspect he may have a thinner skin than even he thinks. I think he revels in being the "kind of bad guy you love to hate but then you watch his shows and find out a little more about him and you realize there's a lot more to him and he's really not a bad guy..." Kind of the likable curmudgeon thing.
I think he may be like Obama and will get riled when he really gets his feet held to the fire. Also, how tough will he be when he realizes the media and the left really HATE him because of taking conservative positions? Palin, yes, she can hack that. Trump, maybe, I dunno.
Posted by: RM at April 20, 2011 09:16 AM (TRsME)
Posted by: MacGruber at April 20, 2011 09:16 AM (9cJF9)
Trump is kicking Obama in the ballls everyday, and for good measure he is kicking the liberal media is the nuts as well....that alone makes him better than another other GOP candidate except Palin at this point.
We ALL would take Trump over Obama and you know it.
Posted by: lead vocals at April 20, 2011 09:16 AM (amSe4)
They were flirting. Or something. It was downright w-r-o-n-g.
What the hell is up with her and libtard douchebags? She dated Bill Maher, for crying out loud. I'd have had my vagina surgically removed. {{shudder, gag}}
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 20, 2011 09:17 AM (UOM48)
I never knew this about Obama and I knew quite a bit. I've always emphasized that he was raised by a bank vice president and sent to private schools.
Posted by: AmishDude
Does anyone think it's coincidence that this is coming out now? Almost three years after he was elected President, and over a year before 2012, and the NYT is putting out details of his childhood so that they will be 'old news' long before primary season.
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 20, 2011 09:17 AM (6rX0K)
And I have no idea if Romney and Trump have any sort of a relationship, but it almost seems like Trump is doing all this as a favor to Romney.
Romney will come out of this looking presidential, and people will stop asking questions about his flip flops, etc. Plus - Trump has put the question of legitimacy of Obama's citizenship into the minds of a lot off voters. Romney doesn't have to dirty his hands with that one.
I know Romney is disliked pretty universally around here. But, I think we oughtta get used to the idea that Romney may well end up being the guy, and decide who his best running mate would be. I still think Rubio.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at April 20, 2011 09:19 AM (f9c2L)
heheh, Trump's nomination will drive George Will and Charles Krauthammer right over to Obama's camp.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 09:19 AM (uFokq)
They were flirting. Or something. It was downright w-r-o-n-g.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 20, 2011 01:14 PM (7dkEj)
If that's wrong, I don't want to be right.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 20, 2011 09:19 AM (T0NGe)
My attitude was to abort the fucking thing, and kill this motherfuckers chance of spreading his fucking DNA any farther on this plamet. Well it didn't happen, and the baby was born, its a girl. I don't have kids, and babies never excited me at all, but this little girl is absolutely a living doll, just beautiful, always happy with a smile that melts you. I don't look at the abortion issue the same way anymore. I couldn't imagine this little girl not being here. If trump had a moment like that, I would understand his changing his position. I can't say if he had a moment like that or not, but I did, and it changes you forever.
Posted by: Berserker at April 20, 2011 09:19 AM (FMbng)
Less-big personalities? Come on Ace.
That mentality got us Bob Dole and the smarmy, mealy mouthed version of John McCain. We all know that McCain can be a sharp tongued asshole. Too bad we didn't see any of that during the campaign.
The presidency is first and foremost an image. I like that Trump is in there stirring shit up. Maybe some other viable candidate will grow a pair and take that Hill like a warrior.
Posted by: kevlarchick at April 20, 2011 09:20 AM (TNuqz)
Posted by: Francisco "Triple Nipple" Scaramanga at April 20, 2011 09:21 AM (VLlWA)
Trust me on this. I'm a Southerner.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 20, 2011 09:21 AM (UOM48)
Dana Vachon to Imogen Lloyd Webber:
"You discussed 'Brand Britain'. How do bleeding gums, institutionalized pedophilia and intergenerational unemployment play into that?"
Hahahaha.
Posted by: Waterhouse at April 20, 2011 09:21 AM (Q95Dr)
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 01:19 PM (uFokq)
I hope there's handicapped parking.
Posted by: Tami at April 20, 2011 09:21 AM (VuLos)
I am not worried about the business BK's that Trump has but I am in the same business, it's risky and both Trump and his investors knew it.
Trump had a series of non-recouse loans which means that the creditor can't go after the borrower personally. It also means that Trump didn't think enough of the deals to expose himself personally and the creditors knew that going in. They rolled the dice with eyes wide open on the possibilities of failure.
Not everybody is familiar with this though so it will hurt him with the public who knows (until recently) that if they get a loan on their house they have to pay back the money regardless of how their house performs as an investment.
He has the media in full attack mode now though because he is hurting Obama on the birther issue. Obama is falling like a stone in heavily skewed polls and the media doesn't like it.
Whether you believe Obama was born in Hawaii or on Mars people don't like their president hiding shit from them.
Posted by: robtr at April 20, 2011 09:22 AM (MtwBb)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at April 20, 2011 09:23 AM (Cm66w)
For Trump to survive anything close to a Republican primary, he would need the MSM to vet him in a way that can only be described as Obama -esque.
And that aint gonna happen.
Posted by: AndrewsDad at April 20, 2011 01:15 PM (C2//T)
Don't be so sure about that. If they know they can dish more dirt on Trump than any of the other potential candidates they will fawn all over him from now until he is nominated.
The day after the convention, however, they will tout every gaffe, broken promise, position reversal, shady business deal/partner, off color comment and parking ticket he has ever had.
If he isn't nominated they will keep stoking his ego so he runs a 3rd party campaign to dilute the anti-O vote.
Posted by: Nighthawk at April 20, 2011 09:23 AM (OtQXp)
Seriously, WTF is Rush thinking?
Rush hasn't endorsed him, and he was questioning his core beliefs pretty heavily the other day.
I think like all of us, Rush is merely hungry for a candidate, anyone, that will directly call out Jug-Ears for the evil fraud that he is.
Posted by: Log Cabin at April 20, 2011 09:23 AM (osx1V)
Great. Another f-ing Ross Perot. A damn vote stealer who will do nothing but undermine a real candidate (if we ever find one). I sure hope this guy drops dead before election season. We don't need this. The man's a loon - an attention whore. He brings nothing real or substantive to the table.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 20, 2011 09:23 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Dan at April 20, 2011 09:23 AM (mXBxH)
He's a relentless self-promoter, has a hustler's mentality of saying what is needed to close the sale, and has the overconfidence of a billionaire.
Don't we already have a guy like that as president?
Posted by: harleycowboy at April 20, 2011 09:24 AM (wSTfB)
Posted by: Ginormous at April 20, 2011 09:24 AM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: blaster at April 20, 2011 09:24 AM (Fw2Gg)
Posted by: Marcus at April 20, 2011 09:24 AM (CHrmZ)
But I am like you others, you have a birth certificate?, then show it Prez Ohole.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 20, 2011 09:25 AM (IXLvN)
The mouth breathers think Trump is cool ( he's ugly, has money, loves power, loves fame).
He is everything the Left knows about Obama but refuses to admit to knowing.
of course, I don't think Trump is evil . . .
Posted by: momma at April 20, 2011 09:25 AM (penCf)
Two years ago I was in Atlantic City. We walked through the Taj Mahal and while at first glance it was impressive, you began to notice the un-vacuumed carpets, the garish and cheap furnishings, the dust, etc.
This is the Trump card so to speak. All show - no blow.
Posted by: Cheri at April 20, 2011 09:25 AM (oiNtH)
Sure you are (can)!
You're no longer posting under 'zach what'shisface bobble head' anymore. Change.
Posted by: laceyunderalls digs a male makeover at April 20, 2011 09:26 AM (7dkEj)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at April 20, 2011 09:26 AM (Cm66w)
He's fucking goofy, they say.
It's a little-known fact that Donald is allowed to go pantsless because duck genitals aren't very prominent.
Posted by: cliff clavin, usps (retired) at April 20, 2011 09:26 AM (Y1DZt)
For the morons from the last thread worried about bugs on plants:
Ohh, that reminds me. Instead of picking them off, buy yourself a bug vacuum (sold at toys r us for kids, but other planes for spiders, etc are stronger). (video) They work like a charm.
Posted by: momma at April 20, 2011 09:27 AM (penCf)
The Dems are losing. They are going down hard. Narrative #1,302 ain't working, so they'll trot out Narrative #1,303 ... The peasants are fed up, they've had enough of the sh_t sandwiches and 2012 can't come fast enough.
Posted by: mrp at April 20, 2011 09:27 AM (HjPtV)
Let's find out if Moochelle is his beard, and prove he's not as brilliant as the MFM made him out to be.
Posted by: Jane D'oh, proud to be a "slug" at April 20, 2011 09:28 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Dan at April 20, 2011 09:28 AM (mXBxH)
Posted by: Randolph Duke at April 20, 2011 09:28 AM (AYwIq)
The only reason I like Trump in the mix now is he is shaking things up. Maybe the other clueless dildoes who are running (I'm not including Bachman) will get a clue that the people want to hear them take on Prez Douchebag head on. Don't just sit back and play it safe for once. Go for the jugular.
Posted by: mpfs at April 20, 2011 09:29 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Waterhouse at April 20, 2011 01:21 PM (Q95Dr)
Vaschon's schtick is hystyerical.
Having Joyce on opposite him, though, is gold!
Posted by: garrett at April 20, 2011 09:29 AM (0oUd+)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 20, 2011 09:29 AM (uVLrI)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 09:30 AM (OW0nw)
Anyways I ran across this at CBSnews.com. Look at his picks in the 2000 race he wanted to help him run the country. Holy fuck what an idiot.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at April 20, 2011 09:30 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 09:32 AM (OW0nw)
Posted by: phoenixgirl
That's already been answered repeatedly. We need someone who will actually win in 2012 and will be effective. We currently have no reason to believe that he can win in 2012. And we also have no reason to believe that he will be effective.
We have great reason to believe that he is either stupid, transparent, or both. But he is saying stuff that seems to discomfit Obama.
We are possibly re-living the Delaware Senate race. Fuck my life.
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 20, 2011 09:32 AM (6rX0K)
""Vaschon's schtick is hystyerical.
Having Joyce on opposite him, though, is gold!""
Did you see those 2 together a few weeks ago on redeye? I laughed my ass off with those 2, it was hysterical.
Posted by: Berserker at April 20, 2011 09:32 AM (FMbng)
/lightbulb
you know, that's not half bad...
Obama/GE 2012
We tie Obama to GE and center our attack on corporate favoritism and corruption.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 09:32 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: JackStraw at April 20, 2011 09:33 AM (TMB3S)
I can't say if he had a moment like that or not, but I did, and it changes you forever. posted by Beserker
A young innocent life will do that to you. I have changed my mind over the years on these issues. Congratulations to you and your friend for celebrating a new, sweet life.
Posted by: Cheri at April 20, 2011 09:34 AM (oiNtH)
Posted by: Ginormous at April 20, 2011 09:34 AM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: Rocks at April 20, 2011 09:34 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: lions at April 20, 2011 09:34 AM (31qfl)
Posted by: Jean at April 20, 2011 09:34 AM (CQ+DR)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at April 20, 2011 09:35 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: Jane D'oh, proud to be a at April 20, 2011 09:35 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: maddogg at April 20, 2011 09:35 AM (OlN4e)
...who cannot take criticism from Weird Al Yankovic.
The story (new since I posted this in the previous thread). The song.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 20, 2011 09:36 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Berserker at April 20, 2011 01:32 PM (FMbng)
I think they've done that three times now...it's almost as good as when Dave Brockie shows up as Oderus!
Love seeing him and SE Cupp on the same set...just knowing that the 'Cuttlefish of Cthulu' is that close to SE makes me proud to be an American.
Posted by: garrett at April 20, 2011 09:36 AM (0oUd+)
Posted by: maddogg at April 20, 2011 09:37 AM (OlN4e)
He'll lose the nomination, run as an Independent - get 5% of the vote, and Obama wins in 2012.
This will end badly.
Posted by: KG at April 20, 2011 09:37 AM (Hu5B6)
Weird Al is not a huge star but he's been around for, what, 30 years?
Lady Gag will be a wrinkly old forgotten headcase with the hivs in thirty years.
Posted by: Soothsayer 6 of 8 at April 20, 2011 09:38 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: dfbaskwill
Yup. It tells me that the Dear Leader is an idiot. That's it. But you shouldn't be asking just me. You need to ask 51% of the registered voters who will decide to vote on that day. Unless you think that this Hairy Hedonist ® can get that 51%, then he is at best an agent provacateur and at worst a diversion of Perot-like dimensions.
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 20, 2011 09:39 AM (6rX0K)
I'm convinced Obama's ratings are way down partly because Trump is making America second guess Obama and his ability to lead....or prove he is even an American citizen.
I will forever thank Trump for showing the GOP how to kick ass and destroy the opponent.
Posted by: lead vocals at April 20, 2011 09:39 AM (amSe4)
Posted by: Barbarian at April 20, 2011 09:39 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: Dan at April 20, 2011 09:40 AM (mXBxH)
Posted by: The Chap in the Deerstalker Cap at April 20, 2011 09:40 AM (qndXR)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 09:40 AM (mHQ7T)
"I wear supermodels."
While googling images of Melania the other day, I discovered she's already 40. What's the expiry date on Pneumatic Eastern European Pleasure Models anyway?
Posted by: Waterhouse at April 20, 2011 09:41 AM (Q95Dr)
Wait a minute. Trump is doing exactly what Mitt did in 2008 and lines up on all the issues just like Mitt and for some reason the gop establishment is attacking him. amazing.
Posted by: unseen at April 20, 2011 09:41 AM (aVGmX)
Posted by: Berserker at April 20, 2011 09:42 AM (FMbng)
Posted by: Ginormous at April 20, 2011 09:42 AM (Q5+Og)
I'm convinced Obama's ratings are way down partly because Trump is making America second guess Obama and his ability to lead....or prove he is even an American citizen.
I will forever thank Trump for showing the GOP how to kick ass and destroy the opponent.
Posted by: lead vocals
Assertions like this drive me insane(er). Can you prove correlation? Or is this an informed supposition? Or is this a wild ass guess? Wishful thinking? Betting the farm on this guy should be based upon something more.
Please bear in mind the Rasmussen poll from last week.
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 20, 2011 09:42 AM (6rX0K)
UPI:
Gas Prices Reach Five Dollars a Gallon in the Nation's Capital Gas prices reach five dollars per gallon at a gas station in Washington, DC on April 19, 2011. Unrest in the Middle East and price speculation have steadily led to higher oil prices and consequently higher gas prices throughout the year so far.
Posted by: Jane D'oh, proud to be a at April 20, 2011 09:43 AM (UOM48)
We did see it during the campaign! That was the McCain who chastised conservatives for fearing an Obama victory.
Posted by: Kensington at April 20, 2011 09:43 AM (mEyVv)
I would like to see Rick Perry jump into the race. He has the usual amount of bullshit that I don't like but over all I think he would be pretty good.
Thoughts on Perry?
Posted by: Roadking at April 20, 2011 09:43 AM (exyM+)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 09:43 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: maddogg at April 20, 2011 09:43 AM (OlN4e)
FIFY, sugar. Now come over here and help me with these people hiding under my porch.
Posted by: Christine O'Donnell at April 20, 2011 09:43 AM (FYCiJ)
I'm convinced Obama's ratings are way down partly because Trump is making America second guess Obama and his ability to lead....or prove he is even an American citizen.
Of course, can't blame me!
Posted by: Mismanaged Military Whatever in Libya
Well don't look at me.
Posted by: $4 gasoline at April 20, 2011 09:43 AM (6rX0K)
Anyone that would stay home and let Obama get a second term deserves to be mocked forever. I hate Ron Paul...but even that kook is better than Obama...
Trump is a capitalist....Obama a socialist....wow..really tough choice. And the last time I checked Trump isn't banktrupt today, is he?
Posted by: lead vocals at April 20, 2011 09:44 AM (amSe4)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 09:44 AM (h8pRl)
I'm convinced Obama's ratings are way down partly because Trump is making America second guess Obama and his ability to lead....or prove he is even an American citizen.
What am I, chopped liver?
Posted by: National Debt
In part, yes.
Posted by: rising food costs at April 20, 2011 09:45 AM (6rX0K)
Posted by: lead vocals at April 20, 2011 09:46 AM (amSe4)
Posted by: Dan at April 20, 2011 09:46 AM (mXBxH)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff
You do NOT want to see the webcam shots of that.
Posted by: rising food costs at April 20, 2011 09:46 AM (6rX0K)
FIFY
Posted by: Buzzsaw at April 20, 2011 09:46 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 09:47 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Jane D'oh, proud to be a at April 20, 2011 09:47 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: maddogg at April 20, 2011 09:47 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Dan at April 20, 2011 09:48 AM (mXBxH)
Posted by: Trump in 2012! at April 20, 2011 09:50 AM (xs5wK)
/IDEA!
We fill a swimming pool up with tomato paste and dunk an Oldsmobile in it and then parade a herd of donkeys past the whole she-bang.
The Democrat link to the late extremist senator Edward Kennedy is made and we then make our attack against Obama from the center.
Result: Obama loses 16 precincts in the Detroit suburbs by .034%.
Posted by: Seethsewer at April 20, 2011 09:50 AM (FYCiJ)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 20, 2011 01:30 PM (OW0nw)
First, the day they can successfully compare a Republican prez to the lying, muslim loving, chubby-chasing Bill Clinton is the day I throw in the towel for good. It's hard enough as it is to hold my nose and vote for those limp-wristed Republican pukes. Second, I like to see first ladies who are sexless and frumpy - that way you know the prez is paying attention to work and not wasting time in the bedroom. I want a prez who is full of vengeful energy - frustrated and angry. "Nixonian" if you will.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 20, 2011 09:50 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Dan at April 20, 2011 09:51 AM (mXBxH)
In all seriousness, we need an Alan West type. We are so boned we need somebody who is just short of superhero.
Alan West....my dream candidate. He had me completely when he was asked during the article 32 hearing for his conduct in Iraq....
Asked if he would have act differently if under similar circumstances again, West testified, "If it's about the lives of my soldiers at stake, I'd go through hell with a gasoline can.
That's a man and a patriot. Trump is a Circus ring-leader.
Posted by: Cheri at April 20, 2011 09:52 AM (oiNtH)
Well I said last week I would act out khan's last little speech in star trek II when it came time to vote. I don"t care WHO ends up running as the R. For hate's sake I will spit my last breath at that marxist scumbag and drag my dying body to the the voting booth and pull the lever to send that kenyan cocksucker straight to hell.
Posted by: Berserker at April 20, 2011 09:53 AM (FMbng)
Funny that we have been screaming for someone to take it to Obama ever since McLame refused to even say Obama's name.....now we have the most famous capitalist in the world flaming Obama and our team rips into Trump because he is not Reagan.
Unreal.....how are those Romney, Pawlenty and Huckster attacks on Obama going? Oh...what attacks?
Folks, this is why we lose and the communist Democrats win....we have no idea how to get into the trenches and destroy our opponent so that opponent has zero chance of ever winning anything more than the local dog catcher position.
Trump knows how to win and has already shifted the playing field so the GOP now understands that attacking Obama is OK.
Posted by: lead vocals at April 20, 2011 09:54 AM (amSe4)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 09:55 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 01:47 PM (mHQ7T)
I disagree. Campaigns go negative for a reason - it works. No politician can hope to make himself loved, unless he's Reaganesque (few are). However, you can make your enemy hated. We'll never win over the Libtards, but turning the leaners to our side will work best if we show them all what a worthless PoS Obastard is. Basically we need to make sure they know which candidate is the lesser evil. That's all any of us ever get to vote for.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 20, 2011 09:55 AM (xUM1Q)
He then brought up CHINA and OPEC.
Trump might get some play with politically-confused people like my Father. Being a retired UAW worker, my father loves Obama and loathes all Republicans. However, he HATES China and Illegal immigration with a red-hot passion; believing them to be Republican-caused problems. He's also very religious, so if Trump claims to be pro-life...bonus!
Posted by: Pyrocles at April 20, 2011 09:56 AM (cv5Iw)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 09:56 AM (mHQ7T)
""Alan West....my dream candidate. He had me completely when he was asked during the article 32 hearing for his conduct in Iraq....
Asked if he would have act differently if under similar circumstances again, West testified, "If it's about the lives of my soldiers at stake, I'd go through hell with a gasoline can.""
When that incident first happened there was an email set up to send messages of support to his wife and family. I sent an email of support and used the above quote. I told the family that men like him are never alone, and he would have a line of men fighting over who would carry that can of gas for him.
Posted by: Berserker at April 20, 2011 09:57 AM (FMbng)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 09:58 AM (mHQ7T)
I wouldn't bet on it. He and his cohorts are systematically taking this country apart brick by brick and he is still polling in the 40s.
Posted by: QueQueeg the Harpooner at April 20, 2011 09:59 AM (onxiv)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 10:00 AM (mHQ7T)
Hello big guys at blog. Think this deserves a sidebar post?
Flashback: Obama tells weirdo that he should be proud to work at a job that doesn't pay well. Plus, Obama's tax 'breaks' will help him, plus he says ObamaCare will give this McDonald's worker healthcare. Also says he wants to give him a refundable tax credit for his college tuition.
Obama Town Hall Julio's McDonalds Question from 2009
Posted by: momma at April 20, 2011 10:01 AM (penCf)
When that incident first happened there was an email set up to send messages of support to his wife and family. I sent an email of support and used the above quote. I told the family that men like him are never alone, and he would have a line of men fighting over who would carry that can of gas for him.
Awesome....thank you for doing that ~
Posted by: Cheri at April 20, 2011 10:02 AM (oiNtH)
Yeah, they're not winners.
T-PAW 2012! He'll do what not even Mondale could do!
Posted by: Rob Crawford at April 20, 2011 10:02 AM (IuKAf)
Posted by: Chuck Z, dissatisfied customer at April 20, 2011 10:03 AM (qXWUM)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 10:03 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: unseen at April 20, 2011 10:04 AM (aVGmX)
Posted by: That's Life at April 20, 2011 10:05 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 10:08 AM (mHQ7T)
"I wouldn't bet on it. He and his cohorts are systematically taking this country apart brick by brick and he is still polling in the 40s."
Polling in the 40s mean 50+% ain't buying. BTW these polls are taken in non-election year. Wait till next year with $5/gallon gas, unemployment officially at 10% , the dollar in free fall and inflation cutting the groceries in half. How do you think those independents will vote? "Are you better off now than you were four years ago" ring any bells? Do it with a smile and you will have them eating out of your hands.
Posted by: Ginormous at April 20, 2011 10:08 AM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: Michelle Obama's Landing Strip at April 20, 2011 10:08 AM (YE84l)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 10:12 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at April 20, 2011 10:12 AM (YE84l)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 10:14 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 02:08 PM (mHQ7T)
sorry that same poll showed that Trump has taken no support from Palin's base. Trump is a total different tpye of candidate than Palin supporters would ever support. Trump is the RINO's core voters dream candidate and they are flocking to him in record numbers.
Posted by: unseen at April 20, 2011 10:17 AM (aVGmX)
My worry is that Trump is such an arrogant bastard that if he doesn't get the GOP nod (And I doubt he will) he will pull a Perot and fuck us for another 4 years. Giving us Barry V 2.0
Posted by: BruceTheRobert at April 20, 2011 10:17 AM (re6ik)
If you wanted to destroy Republican chances in 2012 I can't think of a better way than to keep hammering Birtherism. It's like 9/11 'Truth'er but the other side.
Trump's novelty wore off a lot quicker than I thought it would.
Posted by: Beagle at April 20, 2011 10:19 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 10:20 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 10:24 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: TexasJew at April 20, 2011 10:24 AM (gdGPK)
Given the stakes, Conservative need a broader strategy than live or die with the presidential race. We have got to hedge out bets. Plus the left wants us to be emotionally devastated if we can't win the presidential race.
The goal should be to retain and increase seats in the House, take the Senate and oust Obama with whoever we can. But that is a tall order, e.g., Nev, Del.
If ousting Obama is in doubt [probably always is given fraud], we have to retain the House and take the Senate [with Rand Paul sorts] to at least hold Obama at bay, a complicated task given his penchant for extra-constitutional activity and GOP passivity in challenging czars and the like and aided by MFM duplicity.
State governments are our final lifeboat, ill-maintained and creaky and unreliable. Assuming we can't win the Senate and can't beat Obama, we need to have strong state legislatures and governors. That will be the final institutional/structural stand before, well, you know. . .
Having Trump in the race as an independent, while potentially devastating to the task of removing Obama, could have a benefit: increased turn-out which the GOP appears to suck at.
The question is how those voters would break on US Rep and US Sen and state offices because Trumpers won't be fielding a significant number of persons for those offices. Based on what we know today, I'd think Trump brings out more conservative voters. I can't remember how that worked with Perot. So a Trump independent run could aid in keeping the House, in making progress in the Senate and in securing enough States to take a stand.
Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at April 20, 2011 10:27 AM (qwK3S)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 10:28 AM (mHQ7T)
And now we go live to Trump Huntsman in the eye of the storm...
Posted by: Beagle at April 20, 2011 10:29 AM (sOtz/)
Trump is like 65 and it's not credible that he has too many friends of any sort of age where they might be considering abortion.
Trump and his friends might be 65, but I guarantee you, most of them (including Trump himself) have wives of just such a young age.
Just sayin'.
Posted by: Average Jen at April 20, 2011 10:30 AM (DBr05)
In any case, what do Krauthammer and Rove have to say?
Posted by: Fritz Gibson at April 20, 2011 10:31 AM (AN8d5)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 02:20 PM (mHQ7T)
Yes I see that too but then most of the hillary voters would also vote for Mitt. I see Trump as the John anderson of 1980 not the Perot of 1992
Posted by: unseen at April 20, 2011 10:34 AM (aVGmX)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 10:35 AM (mHQ7T)
Has the opening salvo of the purity wars been fired yet?
In any case, what do Krauthammer and Rove have to say?
Posted by: Fritz Gibson at April 20, 2011 02:31 PM (AN8d5)
Saw Krauthammer on O'Reilly and Rove on Greta. Both think the Birther thing benifits Obama and hurts the party. Krauthammer considers Trump "not serious" and made fun of his answer saying he is richer than Romney. Rove less negative, but not much.
It's not purity when there is a real problem with glib and shallow answers to policy questions. Especially in 2012 where I think a just-the-facts candidate will have the best chance against Obama's platitudes and sweet-sounding personal stabs.
Posted by: Beagle at April 20, 2011 10:36 AM (sOtz/)
Polite, sincere, and gentlemanly ain't gonna get it done.
Time to stock up on popcorn.
Posted by: Fritz at April 20, 2011 10:43 AM (AN8d5)
I think most of the comments about Trump have already been said. I can only add that I believe he's a RINO but is trying to change his appearance so he can either feed his horrendus ego or he's trying to screw up the GOP's run at 2012.
He's already said that if he doesn't win the GOP nomination that he will run as an independent. Unfortunatly that could be just enough to "Perot" the GOP candidate and hand the WhiteHouse to Obama for another 4 years (and who knows what effect it would have on the sentate and house races if Trump encourages other independents to run).
This guy keeps trying to bill himself as this omniscient business man in spite of all the bankrupcies he's had, the partners and friends that have lost huge amounts of money with him (people soon learned that you don't depend on a handshake with "The Donald" on a deal, you get a real contract and you still line the lawyers up just to be ready) and the self serving running at the mouth that he constantley does. This is a guy that called Obama the worst President in history, wait now, didn't he call Bush the worst (and evil as well) and then added in Carter as the second worst. But only now is he having his "come to Jesus" moment?
On top of all that, his TV success protects him from real questioning of his abilities and motives or maybe it's just the left that realizes that this loud mouthed, self-promoting, ego-maniacal, lying failure of a business man is the best chance to keep Obama in office.
Posted by: scr_north at April 20, 2011 10:57 AM (6HBsT)
Yeah. I so hate to see Trump pull a Romney on the abortion issue. But wait a minute... didn't Romney go the other way and say to hell with them babies??? What was Romney's story for his flip-flop again?
Oh, and all Hillary voters would NOT go for Romney. Believe me, I was one of them.
Posted by: Nunya Bizness at April 20, 2011 10:58 AM (rvTuL)
That's all they care about, and I'm shocked that anyone is "wondering" about their motivation, it's not like their motives have changed in the last 30 years.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at April 20, 2011 11:06 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at April 20, 2011 01:35 PM (71LDo)
Yea, that we need someone else.
Posted by: KG at April 20, 2011 11:06 AM (4L0zr)
Fritz,
Who knows? SOOOoooooo much crap is going to happen between now and election day. Trump is not the guy.
Posted by: CHRC, EU, and UN at April 20, 2011 11:30 AM (sOtz/)
While I would vote for The Donald over Barky (I would vote for a one-celled-mutant-pondscum-protozoa named Polly over Barky), I do hope he is not in the primary and/or takes votes from the GOP.
That said, I am loving every second he torpedoes The Won, and forces discussion on politically correct issues. Race card be damned. Full speed ahead.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky at April 20, 2011 11:40 AM (FnRYN)
Posted by: Southern RIer at April 20, 2011 12:03 PM (/W+YH)
If BachmannÂ’s stupid enough to take Obama at his word than she has no business serving in higher office. She just lost my support should she run for the presidency. The public stance regarding the Birther issue for any Republican politician is so simple to state and defend that itÂ’s now become my new litmus test- if a GOP pol canÂ’t manage to take the correct line on this then they wonÂ’t get my support.
Obama has not yet established his eligibility for the Presidency. If it turns out he is not eligible then a massive fraud has been perpetrated for which the GOP is complicit and they should die as a part.
I donated and bugged friends and family to get to the polls and vote the correct way in 2011, but if the GOP does not get right on the eligibility issue then they will not get my vote in 2012.
Threat? FACT!
Posted by: sartana at April 20, 2011 12:05 PM (7Xm5b)
Absolutely false. It's folly to think Soetoro will be brought down by facts. For the GOP to think they can dislodge him by running a traditional campaign shows that as a party they have learned nothing. Obama's election to the Presidency was an act of supreme irrationality on the part of the American electorate and anyone hoping to unseat him must take that into account. You cannot use reason on a person who is not in his right mind. A spell has been cast on the American people and that spell will need to be broken. I believe the correct military term would be "assymetrical warfare". The kind of campaign Trump has been running- that's why we love him.
The GOP, instead of soiling their pants at the thought of The Donald, should follow his lead.
Posted by: sartana at April 20, 2011 12:15 PM (7Xm5b)
Jon Huntsman was John McCain's campaign co-chair.
RINO alert. Kind of a junior maverick, huh? No thanks.
Posted by: Mortimer Snerd at April 20, 2011 12:20 PM (mQMnK)
I'll take Donald Trump for the GOP over what we've been offered so far. I DO NOT want the same old shitty choices we had last time.
I know Trump's trying to say what he thinks will win the republican vote and I know he's an asshole. But we need someone who will stand up to and play chicken successfully with the arab assholes.
And I think Trump gets the whole capitalism is a win/win situation deal.
I'll take Trump over McCain. McCain, the old lost in space guy who needs to retire YESTERDAY! but keeps going and going, just like Biden, seemingly stuck in a neck and neck contest to see who can fuck everything up faster.
Posted by: Dianne at April 20, 2011 12:20 PM (RPC8g)
Yes, exactly. Who is anyone in the GOP to attack Trump or any of his supporters when John McCain was the last nominee? But then again, who am I to talk- I voted for the backstabbing fuck. I'll never live that down.
Posted by: sartana at April 20, 2011 12:33 PM (7Xm5b)
Can Trump be worse than Obama?
How?
Unlike Obama, Trump really has made deals. Not scummy, union goon, race card deals - but real deals.
Do we want Trump negotiating trade deals? Or an inner city race hustler who hasn't a clue?
Come on folks - we are fucked now. What can go wrong?
Posted by: George at April 20, 2011 12:34 PM (y0VOX)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 12:37 PM (mHQ7T)
WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT TRUMP????
You heard it here first: HE IS NOT GOING TO RUN!!!!
Trump is in the middle of contract renegotiations for the Apprentice to be extended.
Add the fact that he's announcing his run on the show's finale... and what do you got? ... A great marketeer. But not a GOP (or whatever party) candidate!
Posted by: GabeS at April 20, 2011 12:39 PM (ZaNql)
Posted by: GabeS at April 20, 2011 12:43 PM (ZaNql)
Posted by: The Donald at April 20, 2011 12:45 PM (VXBR1)
Explain how Obama is defeated with only rock-ribbed conservatives on board. You couldn't even win the Senate in a wave year. My point was, Huntsman is a fresh face who knows how to win a national primary.
Step 1 is you nominate a rock-ribbed conservative. Maverick McCain's campaign chairman need not apply. I think he would be wise to lose that page of his resume.
Plus, for me, Huntsman's Mormonism is a deal-breaker. Call me a bigot if you like.
Posted by: Mortimer Snerd at April 20, 2011 12:52 PM (mQMnK)
Extortion.
That's Trump's game here. He makes some heat on Obama, peripheral heat but still noisy and catchy - just to show that he can. Then he waits for the agent from Obama who offers him a deal to back out.
Posted by: Whitehall at April 20, 2011 01:22 PM (FmPSC)
Posted by: Mandy P. at April 20, 2011 02:13 PM (vGmv/)
#85
Trump is clearly worried about America. That is what he is running on and he is serious and honest about that. I am in agreement with most everything he's said on that account (not everything, but most). Trump is not a conservative, though. He has probably no concept of what the Constitution states and no idea of federalism, but that is why it should be easy for any Republican with to cathc up to Trump on that issue and pass him on the rest of conservativism.
All the speculation about Trump's motives ignores the most obvious one right there. He certainly likes his life, being rich and keeping his money. He looked around and suddenly noticed that the present occupant of the White House is in the process of endangering everything that makes his life rich and comfortable. So he decides he must do something about it. And where do you think he can go? Certainly not to Democrats who are all in the process of following the leader over the cliff therefore he is left with conservatives.
Trump has a lot of momentum at present and GOP should make use of it instead of abusing him even if at the end of the day you have to offer him the VP option which he may decline having proven his point. The other good thing about his run is that it may wake up other 'madmen with money' and peel them away from Democrats.
Posted by: Decaf at April 20, 2011 02:27 PM (3+xlM)
However, what I do object to is the idea that your right to privacy trumps someone else's right to live. I realize that requires acknowledging that an unborn baby is an alive human being and that a lot of leftards aren't going to do that. But that is how I see it and it's how everyone I know who is pro life sees it also.
Posted by: Mandy P. at April 20, 2011 06:13 PM (vGmv/)
I'm liking that new bumpersticker:
If it's not a baby you aren't pregnant.
Posted by: Meremortal at April 20, 2011 02:39 PM (Usk3+)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 02:46 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 20, 2011 02:56 PM (mHQ7T)
Ace, I'm coming to the same point, too. Lately I've been warming to Pawlenty & Daniels, because if for nothing else, the guys have extensive executive records as governors (good records at that), and I think competence is all that we need in contrast with The Won™. At heart, I'd prefer a proverbial bomb-thrower like Palin (but not Trump), but rationally, I think Pawlenty, Daniels, or maybe Haley Barbour are the best options. Goodbye Romney & Fuckabee, and give Newt a job in the cabinet, nothing more. That said, I think even Palin could win, if she's gotten herself ready enough for the onslaught.
That is, unless we can get Fred Thompson to run for real this time...
Posted by: 5th Level Fighter at April 20, 2011 07:14 PM (hfWKa)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2433 seconds, 374 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Trump at April 20, 2011 08:51 AM (McG46)