May 06, 2011
[Michael Smith]
— Open Blogger
Bumped Again by Ace, with a Short Intro: Last fall, I asked Michael to write an article about how to politically organize, and how to take over your local district. Or at least have a strong say in your local party's decisions, which are usually stupid and you know it, and badly in need of correction from outsiders.The big problem with asking him to write that in, what, September?, was that it was too late to actually do anything about it.
But it's not too late to do something about it now. I encourage you to read his post on
Hijacking Your PartyGrassroots Organization (For Morons), and seriously think about doing it.And I'm bumping this post, of course, because his point is critical: You can choose whatever candidate you like, in 85% of all districts, if you get 5% of the district's voters behind your candidate. Or -- yourself, if you decide the candidate you like best is you yourself.
While teaching me how to pull a stump, Daddy said the most important part was where you stick the crowbar.
That's true anytime you need to move something big. And right now, we have a lot of Congressmen (and state legislators) who don't want to move. They resist bold action, based on the increasingly strange idea that their re-election matters. They appear to be concerned about which of them will have the privilege of sleeping in the Titanic's radio room.
Maybe you are currently represented by one of these passenger Republicans in a "safe" seat. Maybe he nods to the Tea Party but does nothing in office that could actually change the course of government.
What he probably hasn't considered is that if he doesn't get radical on spending, he may get dumped anyway. Not in November 2012; with Congress in the hands of the nominally responsible Republicans, there's no good argument for going with the other party. Change, if it is to happen, will come in a primary.
That's easier than you think, or easier than your rep wants you to think.
As the filing deadline approaches, he'll brag about his war chest to scare off any serious challengers, figuring no one's heard of the Kasten Plan, where he who spends wisest -- not most -- wins.
Even smart primary challengers tend to play the incumbentÂ’s game, wasting money on yard signs, radio spots, and billboards. Many consultants encourage this because they get a cut of the spend. Others know better, targeting the 1 in 10 registered voters who shows up for the primary with personal visits, mail, and calls -- the stuff that can actually defeat a well-financed incumbent.
The incumbent knows that once the primary's over, he's set: His district is so red, he cannot be defeated by any Democrat -- assuming one bothers to file.
I recently summarized the situation in a talk called "The Three Open Secrets of Electoral Politics."
Ace also let me preach here last summer. And right now is the time for primary challengers to start raising funds and planning their 2012 campaign. (E.g., Texas' primary filing closes at the end of December, 2011. Early voting begins less than 60 days later. Raising $2,000 a week starting today, that's only $88,000 for mail, phone banks, and other expenses. A serious primary candidate must start collecting checks right now.)
The short of it is, we are in a dire situation. The 2012 General Election won't save us without a rockin' 2012 primary to set the stage. The primary matters because:
- 85 percent of districts cannot change parties. (They didn't in November 2010.) For those districts, the only way to get a better, bolder rep is in the primary.
- Only 10 percent of voters participate in primaries. Half their votes = win.
- The winner of the right primary wins the general.
In sum, just over five percent of voters choose 85 percent of the House of Representatives and the state legislatures.
That's an excellent place to stick a crowbar.
Would you like to have your own Paul Ryan, or Michele Bachmann, or Eric Cantor?
All one has to do is win the right primary. Five percent +1 of your district's registered voters can make it happen.
Your local Tea Party may already be working on this. If not, get them moving on it now.
Posted by: Open Blogger at
06:25 AM
| Comments (85)
Post contains 731 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Ginormous Goober DeLarge at April 28, 2011 07:00 AM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: curious at April 28, 2011 07:06 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Jay in Ames at April 28, 2011 07:07 AM (UEEex)
Posted by: Michael Smith at April 28, 2011 07:08 AM (2Oas0)
Posted by: Bob Saget with a can of honey badger flavor cheezwiz at April 28, 2011 07:09 AM (F/4zf)
They resist bold action, based on the increasingly strange idea that their re-election matters.
Congress does have access to some sweeeeet underground survival bunkers.
Posted by: Beagle at April 28, 2011 07:26 AM (sOtz/)
I'm in Ames, too, Jay. Latham is an appropriator (and not the most Tea Party-friendly guy as such) so I don't see the usual attacks on him being successful. He was an 80 ACU in 2009 and a 90 ACU in 2010. Boswell, IIRC, had some trouble last time and I don't see him doing well in a more conservative district that doesn't know him as well and some of them are used to Peter King.
As far as Christy Vilsack, I just don't see that. King is a good conservative rep and even though he gets the same hits as Bachmann, they don't seem to land (there's probably a little sexism there). He's an experienced campaigner and a good debater. I get the feeling that Christy Vilsack is just being indulged by her husband in the way that the wife of a rich or powerful man often is. It's either this or owning a flower-arranging store.
She does have the advantage that Vilsack was reasonably competent for a Dem, unlike his successor.
Ames is more liberal than Iowa in general, but not that much to overcome the NW part of the state. But maybe I don't know the demographics of Iowa well enough.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 28, 2011 07:27 AM (T0NGe)
Ugghh. I got a Durbin and a squish.
OT: Anyone see this? Carrie Underwood @ the Girls Night Out: Superstar Women of Country. Not a dry eye in the house.
Posted by: CUS at April 28, 2011 07:29 AM (wOGfT)
Can you tell me how do you vote out a chuckie shoo mer?
Posted by: curious at April 28, 2011 11:06 AM (k1rwm)
Reset your phaser to "2016". And pay attention to what is taking place in your state as the new lines for the U. S. House of Representatives (you're losing at least 2 districts, IIRC) and state legislature districts are being drawn up. It's going to take a while ...
Posted by: ya2daup at April 28, 2011 07:33 AM (HmCnI)
660,000 people in a district.
50% registered = 330,000 people
10% vote = 33,000 voters
Winning = 17,501 votes
Posted by: Truman North at April 28, 2011 07:33 AM (8ay4x)
Garrett's the name, and cutting spending's his game.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 28, 2011 07:36 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Jay in Ames at April 28, 2011 07:39 AM (UEEex)
Interesting. Anybody in IN going to primary Lugar? He's a Senator, of course, and the lesson we all learned in 2010 is that putting up a hardcore, perhaps untested, conservative in a statewide race is very risky. E.g., Angle, O'Donnell, Miller.
Thanks for reminding us of that. The first thing that came to mind after reading your post was "oh, great- we're going to lose seats in the name of purity".
But yeah- House elections are different in that there are a lot of "safe" districts out there; the primary has more to do with deciding the winner than the general election.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 28, 2011 07:39 AM (SY2Kh)
I'd think that if we learned anything from the 1994 and 2010 elections, it's that we need to run moderate responsible bipartisan Republican candidates who can go along to get along in order to forge a responsible moderate consensus. I say this as a life long Republican who felt he had to vote for Obama, Kerry, Gore, Clinton, and whoever ran again that extreme GHW Bush in whatever year it was.
snicker snort guffaw...
Posted by: mallfly at April 28, 2011 07:39 AM (bJm7W)
Can you tell me how do you vote out a chuckie shoo mer?
You don't.
One day, however, a TV camera will be taping a live aligator and he'll be unable to resist getting in front of it.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 28, 2011 07:43 AM (SY2Kh)
Same as it's ever been.......
I'm beginning to believe that the Liberal Moment has passed--for a decade or so.
They're as Crazy as ever but they've mostly lost their ability to dupe 'independent' voters and the conservative base is engaged and increasingly organized
Lee in Utah is the paradigm, not awful mistakes like Angle or Witch O'Donnell. Find a conservative, not a goofball woman pseudo-populist.
and yes, Ryan should be forced to run for Prez.
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at April 28, 2011 07:46 AM (UqKQV)
Completely off topic, but I came across a website that gives evidence of Obama's COLB having been manufactured. I am not a graphic artist or photoshop wizard, so I don't know if this means anything, but it was rather compelling
I've NEVER been a "birther", so I wasn't prepared to see the White House release a fraudulent document. Now I don't know what the hell to think.
Ace, either you or one of the COBS need to see this for yourselves, see if there's anything to it.
Posted by: OneEyedJack at April 28, 2011 07:46 AM (ORvjs)
I think untested is the key. You do need somebody, unfortunately, who knows how the game is played. Also, you need somebody who has some friends in power who can will go to bat for you and GOTV for you.
Let's look at your examples: O'Donnell was a candidate with a lot of baggage who was unknown to the electorate in a blue state -- not going to win. Angle will likely be a great House candidate (she did better toward the end than I expected) but she ran up against the mob, a successful campaign against her and a lack of sense of political correctness, also a purple state. Miller was on his way to winning but was kneecapped by Coke Bear. He also failed to appreciate certain realities of his state's view on entitlements. I think they would have been very happy with his votes, but if you're new, people fear what you might do. Rubio might be a better model.
In the case of Lugar, it's a red state and Lugar doesn't have a reputation of bringing home the bacon. He's a foreign policy guy and nobody in Indiana really cares. However, you do need somebody who is known and well-liked in the state to go against him.
And Mitch Daniels has already endorsed Lugar.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 28, 2011 07:49 AM (T0NGe)
Daniels is not getting involved, although he says he will vote for Lugar (he started his career working for Lugar).
Mourdock is not getting much traction, because the only paper in the state (Indy Star) has pretty much disappeared him.
I happened to work with Moudock years ago. He is a true fiscal conservative and a pretty straight shooter.
Posted by: Miss Marple at April 28, 2011 07:51 AM (Fo83G)
"25 #2 Primary challenger to Lugar has already declered. He is Dick Mourdock, the state treasurer under Daniels. "
Thanks. My thought was, at Lugar's age, having to fight hard in a primary may just make him think retirement is perferable. The man has truly become a Senator from outer space. Maybe he is are own Byrd? Does he babble about Rome and such?
Posted by: Ginormous Goober DeLarge at April 28, 2011 07:56 AM (Q5+Og)
Over the last few years, I have begun to think someone is blackmailing him in order to force such ridiculous votes.
He really needs to go, if for no other reason than age. (And I am not a young whippersnapper; I am 62.) You just know he isn't as quick as he used to be.
Posted by: Miss Marple at April 28, 2011 08:00 AM (Fo83G)
Funny, my dad showed me the technique, too. I learned about the fulcrum and feet on my own.
Posted by: SCRednek at April 28, 2011 08:02 AM (x8U/s)
Posted by: runningrn at April 28, 2011 08:06 AM (ihSHD)
Posted by: Teacher's Unions at April 28, 2011 08:08 AM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Teacher's Unions at April 28, 2011 12:08 PM (zgZzy)
Our skills with crowbars and other melee weapons are legendary.
/Along with the girth of our members.
Posted by: SEIU at April 28, 2011 08:12 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: runningrn at April 28, 2011 08:14 AM (ihSHD)
Milton Friedman said:
"It's not about electing the right people. It's about making the wrong people do the right thing." (Ace posted the video once, but I can't find it on YouTube. I know it's there...)
The constant threat of a primary challenge can make even the wrong politician do the right thing.
It is much more effective than waiting, year after year, for a White Knight.
In the PA State Senate, I watched the Senate Majority Leader be knocked off in the Republican primary by a tire salesman. Had he understood the threat beforehand, he would have led differently while in power.
And while money is imporant, votes are what counts. On Election Day, two middle class votes count more than one millionaire's.
Posted by: CJ at April 28, 2011 08:17 AM (9KqcB)
To all of you Mitch Daniels fans:
Indiana GOP Gov. Mitch Daniels Says He “Hasn’t Decided Yet” if He Will Sign Bill Defunding Planned Parenthood
Posted by: Ed Anger at April 28, 2011 08:22 AM (7+pP9)
"It's not about electing the right people. It's about making the wrong people do the right thing." (Ace posted the video once, but I can't find it on YouTube. I know it's there...)
Posted by: SEIU at April 28, 2011 08:23 AM (9hSKh)
All one has to do is win the right primary. Five percent +1 of your district's registered voters can make it happen.
Even before targeting a Congressional primary, RUN FOR COUNTY COMMITTEE.
They are the ones who endorse those RINOs your complaining about. And you only have to win the majority of votes in a handful of neighborhoods.
Each county committee is usually broken down by townships/local municipalities. A few conservatives winning votes in a few neighborhoods can change a local GOP committee's endorsement. Which can change the county endorsement, which can change who gets endorsed and wins in a Congressional District.
It's more doable than people think.
Posted by: CJ at April 28, 2011 08:23 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 28, 2011 08:24 AM (9hSKh)
You (and by extension Ace) were preaching that conservatives could win in solid Phlegm 'n Crap districts.
You were wrong.
Ace admitted that his dreams didn't come true.
When will you?
Posted by: Chuckit at April 28, 2011 08:26 AM (NAaLp)
Posted by: runningrn at April 28, 2011 08:27 AM (ihSHD)
USD Index just hit its lowest point since March 08. My bet is it is going to crash through that floor pretty soon too.
Posted by: Marcus at April 28, 2011 08:28 AM (CHrmZ)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 28, 2011 08:29 AM (OW0nw)
Posted by: SEIU at April 28, 2011 12:23 PM (9hSKh)
Bless you! This can't be repeated enough:
"The way you solve things is to make it politically profitable for the wrong people to do the right things."
Friedman applies the market concept to governance. 'You want politicians to do the right thing? Create a market for it.' Stop waiting for Rep. Camelot Hercules, who's willing to lose a seat that he devoted millions of dollars and years of groveling to gain just to Do the Right Thing.
Posted by: CJ at April 28, 2011 08:31 AM (9KqcB)
Ha! Ha! Mark Steyn addressing integrative complexity--heh!
All kinds of closet pudding dippers out there, huh?
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 28, 2011 08:31 AM (cniXs)
Posted by: cherry π at April 28, 2011 08:33 AM (+sBB4)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 28, 2011 08:33 AM (170sK)
When will you?
Posted by: Chuckit at April 28, 2011 12:26 PM (NAaLp)
I don't see where he's advocating running conservatives in districts that won't elect them.
Posted by: CJ at April 28, 2011 08:33 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: maddogg at April 28, 2011 08:34 AM (OlN4e)
Well I guess we've had 6 months off. (In amidst budget battles and the Wisconsin debacle) I will take this as the first official call to arms for the 2012 season.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 28, 2011 08:36 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at April 28, 2011 08:38 AM (SzK71)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 28, 2011 08:41 AM (mHQ7T)
How many Republicans voted against the Ryan budget in the House? Anyone? Buehler? Buehler?
4 Republicans voted Nay.. 235 voted Yea.
This has you guys all upset and ready to primary GOP candidates????
Spend your time looking for another O'Donnel maybe? Huh?
Jesus H. Christ on a stick.. let's concentrate on the Senate and the White House and quit getting distracted by this nonsense. We don't get anything done even if we fill 100% of the seats in the House with control of the White House and the Senate.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at April 28, 2011 08:49 AM (f9c2L)
A serious primary candidate must start collecting checks right now
i agree, ready my money bomb!!!
27 oooooh, a snuck in HL reference, outstanding
Posted by: navycopjoe aka peroni beer czar at April 28, 2011 08:50 AM (EOu3d)
Redistricting should help the Republicans here. Koster barely lost last time around. I think he wins in 2012 if he runs.
Posted by: Sounder at April 28, 2011 08:59 AM (kLZ/9)
Posted by: sarah archimedes at April 28, 2011 09:00 AM (Y1DZt)
Steyn posits, "If the guy is as smart as we are told he can't be inept..."
Yeah, Obama is in favor of high gas prices. Funny how progressives are all about the poor while their economic policies cause what amounts to brutal regressive taxation through inflation. Inflation is the ultimate regressive tax on the poor and middle class especially. If your billion drops to eight hundred million in value, it really sucks but you'll still take the G6 for vacation this Summer.
Posted by: Beagle at April 28, 2011 09:12 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Beagle at April 28, 2011 09:24 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: JoeInMD at April 28, 2011 10:07 AM (PIahf)
Posted by: Cold Warrior at April 28, 2011 11:28 AM (SuIOP)
Getting on the County Central Committee gets you the most bang for your buck
Here in Linn County Iowa the Tea Party is an effective voting block in the County Committee. That did not happen by accident or overnight
For a record of that journey just Google "Hot Issues Linn County"
I get the first hit LOL You might enjoy the first post "Don't Feed the Pig"
Posted by: Dan Kauffman at April 28, 2011 03:18 PM (K6mgj)
Posted by: StopShouting at April 28, 2011 03:35 PM (OLKDg)
Posted by: wholesale lingerie at April 28, 2011 03:40 PM (Yczb7)
Even in "non-partisan" offices there are things you can do. Look at the candidates' political donation at opensecrets. Have they made their political donations over the years to radical Democrats? If so, that is where their sympathies lie.
Make sure no Democrat runs unopposed if there is any way to avoid it. Many state legislative districts have seats that run unopposed. That shouldn't happen.
Also, pressure elected executives at all levels (including county or municipal) to replace appointed positions with new faces that reflect their agenda. We have seen too many liberal appointees serve decades under both Democrat and Republican administrations. It is the prerogative of the executive to fire them and replace them with individuals that share the same agenda. That is the *reason* those positions are appointed.
Posted by: crosspatch at April 28, 2011 03:42 PM (ZbLJZ)
Posted by: Funemployment at May 06, 2011 06:28 AM (0bk6W)
Posted by: Hedgehog at May 06, 2011 06:40 AM (Rn2kl)
Posted by: Beagle at May 06, 2011 06:45 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Earn free money while U vote at May 06, 2011 06:59 AM (weExl)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at May 06, 2011 07:18 AM (TaOum)
Derail a train to mark the 10th anniversary of 9/11?
Not that I'd like to see that of course, but...that's a little weak, isn't it?
Posted by: Meremortal at May 06, 2011 07:49 AM (mNpD/)
this website is very good, you can go and see it
http://www.shoes4world.com/
Posted by: shoes4world at May 07, 2011 06:15 AM (ELbvE)
When Reichert supported crap & tax this WA-08 GOP group picked a few people (statewide and from the district, a total of about 8 or 9, including a woman who was a huge supported of his), and met with him privately so he could 'address their concerns'. Nice elitism there. Then the group leader, Mark, emailed us all that Reichert had satisfied them, he explained there was some bait and switch, etc etc, all a bunch of hooey. When I refused to swallow it and argued, I got a bit of an email lecture. I have not gone to one of their meetings since then, and my husband and I were the two youngest members. When someone does something wrong, they are wrong, even if they call themselves a Republican. Really put me off getting involved locally, I'm sad to say, esp. since no one will run against him.
Sorry, had to get that off my chest, it's been bothering me for a while.
Posted by: Linlithgow at May 07, 2011 10:18 AM (Gim9y)
What brings this up is that in the recent Denver mayoral elections, MOST of the candidates were Democrats. (It was a little difficult to find this out. Apparently city/ county elections are considered not to be party-affiliated; and nothing on the mail-in ballots hinted who was a member of which party. I had to go to the Democrat website, and was amazed to find that for one position, ALL FIVE of the candidates were Dems!)
How do we find and encourage good Righties to take on the Lefties???
Posted by: A_Nonny_Mouse at May 07, 2011 05:56 PM (FVGBe)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2116 seconds, 213 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: maddogg at April 28, 2011 06:59 AM (OlN4e)