January 28, 2012
— Gabriel Malor Glad they did this.
"It's not necessarily overdue, it's just the right thing," said Radford, a 23-year Army veteran who walked in the parade alongside his 8-year-old daughter, Aimee, and 12-year-old son, Warren.Radford was among about 600 hundred veterans, many dressed in camouflage, who walked along downtown streets lined with rows of people clapping and holding signs with messages including "Welcome Home" and "Thanks to our Service Men and Women." Some of the war-tested troops wiped away tears as they acknowledged the support from a crowd that organizers estimated reached 100,000 people.
Fire trucks with aerial ladders hoisted huge American flags in three different places along the route, with politicians, marching bands - even the Budweiser Clydesdales - joining in. But the large crowd was clearly there to salute men and women in the military, and people cheered wildly as groups of veterans walked by.
Nice.
Related enough: The Tenth Circuit ruled yesterday (PDF) that the Stolen Valor Act is constitutional. The Ninth Circuit went the other way last year, holding that lying about military service is speech protected under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court will ultimately decide the issue later this year.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:33 PM
| Comments (185)
Post contains 217 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 02:36 PM (niZvt)
And thank you, military vets from all wars for your sacrifice.
P.S. I am the lady chasing you down in airports to thank you. We are so proud of you all.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky,Romneybot loves Rubio at January 28, 2012 02:41 PM (baL2B)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at January 28, 2012 02:45 PM (jucos)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 02:45 PM (eCnLg)
O/T: Occutards rioting in Oakland. FOX shows thousands of the leftists confronting the PD.
Posted by: Cast Iron at January 28, 2012 02:45 PM (EL+OC)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 02:46 PM (eCnLg)
Posted by: Vic at January 28, 2012 02:50 PM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at January 28, 2012 02:51 PM (jucos)
Posted by: Peaches at January 28, 2012 02:51 PM (cCiY7)
Why should military service be so special? So more 'equal' under the law? What if someone who went to a community college for 2 years said they had a B.S., as from a 4 year college? What if a 40 year old gal said she was 30? Or even 39? Should she be prosecuted too? What if a guy who made $50,000 a year said he made $60,000 a year? Should he be prosecuted? The list is almost endless.
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 02:53 PM (GZmsj)
It's about time we started to acknowledge what our Troops are sacrificing.
We hear a lot more about the useless occutards.
God Bless the Troops and America.
Posted by: seamrog at January 28, 2012 02:54 PM (FEIfF)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 03:02 PM (eCnLg)
Posted by: GergS at January 28, 2012 03:06 PM (dptRY)
Posted by: FeralCat
They are committing fraud against the Federal Governemt, that's why it was decided against them (phony vets) in a Federal Court. If you misrepresent yourself in employment with the government or try to commit fraud against the government, you too can be sued by the Federal Gov. in a Federal Court.
Extra prizes!!
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes.... at January 28, 2012 03:07 PM (sJTmU)
Posted by: uteri at January 28, 2012 03:09 PM (tKWAs)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 03:09 PM (eCnLg)
Posted by: Ann d'Mestik at January 28, 2012 03:12 PM (zvScT)
I thought you had it there for a second. I thought you understood the problem. Claiming military honors you did not earn is somewhat like someone claiming to have a four year degree from a prestigious college. They are claiming something they did not earn to get respect they don't deserve. In some cases, they are using it to get jobs, earn speaker's fees or gain votes. Even if it's just a free beer at the bar, such behavior is despicable.
Now there's no way you'll ever be able to stop it. There will always be someone claiming to be a Navy SEAL or an Army Ranger insisting that you must respect them because of it, even though they don't seem to know the first thing about being in the military. I can live with that. What I can't stand it to see someone lying or mis-characterizing their service history to gain an unfair advantage. It cheapens what it means to be a military veteran and takes away resources from those it was intended.
Posted by: DavidJ at January 28, 2012 03:17 PM (I75AE)
Posted by: steevy at January 28, 2012 03:17 PM (7W3wI)
So... ten years of war, one parade?
What a fucking travesty.
THANK YOU, St. Louis, and THANK YOU, members of the armed services.
Posted by: Truman North at January 28, 2012 03:19 PM (I2LwF)
Oh! And
100,000 Attend Nation's First 'Welcome Home' Parade for Iraq War Veterans... MFM Strangely Silent
FIFY
Posted by: Truman North at January 28, 2012 03:19 PM (I2LwF)
Posted by: GergS at January 28, 2012 07:06 PM (dptRY)
How is lying an abridgment of free speech? There are plenty of forms of lying that will get you thrown into prison, fined, or both?
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 07:09 PM (eCnLg)
Well, I suppose it depends on under what circumstances you are lying. Lying for govt benefits? yeah. Lying to impress anti-American commies? It's a little different.
That said, it's not going to keep me up at night either way.
Posted by: GergS at January 28, 2012 03:23 PM (dptRY)
If we start jailing liars, who will be our politicians ?
Posted by: seamrog at January 28, 2012 03:24 PM (FEIfF)
I've mentioned this before but I was priveleged to attend a motorcade carrying a fallen soldier who was the cousin of a friend of mine. He was Army PFC Zachary T. Myers who was part of the 545th Military Police Company out of Ft. Richardson who was killed in Iraq, Sept. 8 2009 when they drove over an IED.
I'd never met him but according to my friend he was the nicest guy you'd ever meet.
The procession was very sad but what was really awesome was that it seemed like everyone in town turned out with flags and lined the streets. The procession was also escorted by state troopers, local police and dozens of bikers. It was very, very moving.
Posted by: ErikW at January 28, 2012 03:24 PM (4jO3k)
Posted by: Truman North at January 28, 2012 03:25 PM (I2LwF)
Lying about being a Cop, Federal Agent, Doctor, EMS Tech, etc. all carry legal penalties. Why shouldn't lying about being in the armed forces?
Posted by: BlueFalcon in Boston *now with accuracy approved by Blue Hen* at January 28, 2012 03:32 PM (ijjAe)
Here's a novel thought :
Swear in all participants of political debates.
See what they say " under oath".
This could be fun, and there would be fewer
politicians AND debates.
Posted by: seamrog at January 28, 2012 03:32 PM (FEIfF)
That said, it's not going to keep me up at night either way.
My problem is the ones lying usually are anti-American commies lying to impress conservatives.
Posted by: DavidJ at January 28, 2012 03:32 PM (I75AE)
"Why should military service be so special?"
I'm just a dumb civvy and even I know the answer to that.
Posted by: ErikW at January 28, 2012 03:32 PM (4jO3k)
"In New York, for example, Mayor Michael Bloomberg recently said there would be no city parade for Iraq War veterans in the foreseeable future because of objections voiced by military officials."
Yeah, right. Nanny Bloomberg is probably quite happy to have been handed an excuse to save the tax dollars a parade would cost so he can spend them on the OWS crowd instead.
Posted by: Retread at January 28, 2012 03:33 PM (joSBv)
Posted by: gebrauchshund at January 28, 2012 03:33 PM (iYwUw)
Swear in all participants of political debates.
See what they say " under oath".
This could be fun, and there would be fewer
politicians AND debates. Only for those politicians who would respect the law, have some honor, or would be held accountable by the press.
Posted by: Truman North at January 28, 2012 03:33 PM (I2LwF)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 07:02 PM (eCnLg)"
Even never minding that the majority lose neither life nor limb, and even never minding that the Iraq occupation saw the ethnic cleansing of 2/3 of it's Christian population and even never minding Iraq becoming an ally of Iran, it still violates the principle of equality before the law.
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 03:40 PM (NmAt0)
Posted by: steevy at January 28, 2012 03:41 PM (7W3wI)
What if someone who went to a community college for 2 years said they had a B.S., as from a 4 year college? What if a 40 year old gal said she was 30? Or even 39? Should she be prosecuted too? What if a guy who made $50,000 a year said he made $60,000 a year?
Can you give me even one instance where any of the examples given were held by a court to be constitutionally protected free speech? If not then I would ask, indeed, why should military service be any different?
Posted by: gebrauchshund at January 28, 2012 03:42 PM (iYwUw)
Oops. Guess I walked into a legal argument while being ignorant. Again.
Posted by: ErikW at January 28, 2012 03:43 PM (4jO3k)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 03:45 PM (eCnLg)
Posted by: steevy at January 28, 2012 03:46 PM (7W3wI)
I really doubt that anyone would be convicted, or even prosecuted, for saying in a bar in NYC that they were a cop in Spokane,,Washington. Now if they tried to arrest someone, that would be different. Or someone saying he/she was a doctor, but didn't try to prescribe anything or operate on anyone. Military officers take an oath to protect and defend the United States Constitution, The U.S. Constitution does not provide for a class system.
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 03:46 PM (cY9nU)
______________
Similar to any person who claims unearned status as an experienced professional in any line of work. The entire population of educated competent workers in that profession are harmed.
Posted by: Bob Undead Saget at January 28, 2012 03:51 PM (dBvlk)
"I really doubt that anyone would be convicted, or even prosecuted, for saying in a bar in NYC that they were a cop in Spokane,,Washington. Now if they tried to arrest someone, that would be different. Or someone saying he/she was a doctor, but didn't try to prescribe anything or operate on anyone."
Again, that's not the point. Have any of those things ever been held by any court to be constitutionally protected free speech. And if not, why did the Ninth Circuit choose to treat lying about military service differently than lying about other things?
Posted by: gebrauchshund at January 28, 2012 03:54 PM (iYwUw)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 07:45 PM (eCnLg)"
Remaining speechless suits you best.
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 03:54 PM (GZmsj)
Posted by: Duke Lowell at January 28, 2012 03:56 PM (mF58b)
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 03:58 PM (GZmsj)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 03:59 PM (eCnLg)
No law that I know of criminalizes lies as lies. Lies give rise to criminal and/or civil liability when they're used to defraud. That means the lie has to have been spoken with the intention to cause detrimental reliance by someone else. Even perjury has to be a lie about a material fact; it does harm because it is a lie told under oath with an intent to deceive a factfinder (jury, judge, government investigator, etc.) to obtain a better outcome.
Therefore, I don't see lying about one's service in Vietnam as the basis for a fraud prosecution. The liar isn't trying to make any one rely on his false statement to his/her detriment. As offensive as lying about one's service record is, I would argue that it is protected by the First Amendment.
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at January 28, 2012 04:00 PM (yQwq5)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 04:00 PM (eCnLg)
Maybe a bit of Hub's speech from Secondhand Lions will help explain why the Stolen Valor Act is so important for being upheld:
Sometimes the things that may or may not be true are the things a man needs to believe in the most. That people are basically good; that honor, courage, and virtue mean everything; that power and money, money and power mean nothing; that good always triumphs over evil; and I want you to remember this, that love... true love never dies. You remember that, boy. You remember that. Doesn't matter if it's true or not. You see, a man should believe in those things, because those are the things worth believing in.
Honor, Courage, Virtue do mean everything and are worth protecting against those who have none.
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 28, 2012 04:00 PM (4q5tP)
>>
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 07:58 PM (GZmsj) .
.
You missed the one about being a chickenshit.
Posted by: Ronster at January 28, 2012 04:01 PM (JGYCE)
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 04:01 PM (vfiok)
Representing yourself as military implies you have some level of security clearance, going to college (or not) doesn't.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 28, 2012 04:02 PM (cUKDF)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 07:59 PM (eCnLg)"
Well then I must say your sense of direction is very poor ... ... very poor indeed. I was in the military, you idiot.
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 04:04 PM (vfiok)
"I think several people here should be awarded the Keyboard Ranger Metal with extra clusters for extra Keyboard Rangering."
Are you nominating yourself?
Posted by: gebrauchshund at January 28, 2012 04:06 PM (iYwUw)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 04:06 PM (eCnLg)
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 07:54 PM
I would recommend you follow suit.
Posted by: mama winger at January 28, 2012 04:07 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at January 28, 2012 08:00 PM (yQwq5)"
Finally someone here who understands protect and defend the United States Constitution.
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 04:07 PM (vfiok)
Oh, and Feral Cat, it's not about big sis. It's about the men and women who have earned the right to wear the uniform and also those brave souls who have earned high decoration. Calling oneself a Marine when one is not may be protected speech. Doing it in my presence will result in lost teeth.
Posted by: Duke Lowell at January 28, 2012 04:07 PM (mF58b)
Said it's freezing there.
Anyhow, I'm glad the Iraq vets are getting some token of appreciation of their service and sacrifice. A shame the SCOAMF wouldn't allow the use of the word "victory" for their achievements. Douchebag.
Looking forward to (and praying for) the day my son and his brothers and sisters in arms can march in an Afghanistan victory parade. And hopefully, whoever the CiC is will allow them to declare their service in A-stan a "victory."
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2012 04:08 PM (UOM48)
So is Bradley Manning.
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 08:06 PM (eCnLg)"
Was he an 1193?
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 04:09 PM (vfiok)
Posted by: mama winger at January 28, 2012 08:07 PM (P6QsQ)"
I have given you recommendation a moment of consideration. Alas, a moment was all I could spare.
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 04:12 PM (vfiok)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2012 04:13 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Truman North at January 28, 2012 04:13 PM (I2LwF)
Because, without it, people like you wouldn't get to post your inane ramblings.
Yeah, you're welcome.
Posted by: Tami at January 28, 2012 04:13 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 08:07 PM (vfiok)
By your standards lying to the FBI or under oath would be constitutional then and laws against it should be voided. There is nothing in the constitution that says you cant lie to the FBI or under oath. It doesn't mention lying.
If you throw out one law against lying you have to throw out all of them.
Posted by: robtr at January 28, 2012 04:16 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 04:17 PM (fRSUC)
When lies are outlawed only congressman will have them.
I have 3 years of college. So it's OK for me to lie about graduating with honors at Berzerkley with a PhD in global warming in order to get a 6-figure job at one of O'Barkeys Federal-subsidized green energy plants? Brilliant!
Posted by: Cicero Kid at January 28, 2012 04:17 PM (D0eN0)
Oh Jane...I'm so glad you heard from him!!! Yay!
He's in my prayers.
Posted by: Tami at January 28, 2012 04:18 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 08:17 PM (fRSUC)
The hash is ever changing, careful folks.
Posted by: ErikW at January 28, 2012 04:19 PM (4jO3k)
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 08:17 PM (fRSUC)
Then you, sir, know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 28, 2012 04:19 PM (4q5tP)
Posted by: Tami at January 28, 2012 04:20 PM (X6akg)
But you can lie to Congress as long as you claim you didn't read any of the e-mails.
Posted by: Eric Holder at January 28, 2012 04:22 PM (HtUdo)
Posted by: tangonine at January 28, 2012 04:22 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: buzzion at January 28, 2012 04:22 PM (GULKT)
Posted by: museisluse at January 28, 2012 04:23 PM (+P7KR)
Is there a debate tonight? And if so, who's moderating it?
Posted by: Tami at January 28, 2012 08:20 PM (X6akg)
Yes, on HGTV. Mike Holmes is going to ask those pussies if they know how to hang drywall and whether or not they've wired an outlet.
Posted by: ErikW at January 28, 2012 04:25 PM (4jO3k)
Posted by: buzzion at January 28, 2012 08:22 PM (GULKT)
They should use that format in the primary debates. Except they have to do it in suits. I don't want to see RP or Newt in boxing shorts. Well, any of them actually.
Posted by: Tami at January 28, 2012 04:27 PM (X6akg)
I feel secure in knowing the kid has had the best training on this earth for what he's doing.
And any douchebag who lies about service real or imagined is in my mind the same as some jackass who fled to Canada to avoid the draft.
I'd call the bastard a pussy, but my two house cats would be pissed, and rightfully so.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2012 04:28 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Polliwog at January 28, 2012 04:28 PM (AhUir)
Posted by: chemjeff at January 28, 2012 08:21 PM (7FadD)
And that relates to the first amendment how? It's a law chemjeff. Just like stolen valor is a law. The fact that you may beleive the law against lying to the feds is ok and stolen valor is not has nothing to do with the first amendment.
In other words you can't say I like that law so it doesn't fall under the first amendment but I don't like this other law so I will claim first amendment when they are both about your right to tell the truth or not. I just don't see the difference.
Posted by: robtr at January 28, 2012 04:29 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: CMU VET at January 28, 2012 04:29 PM (ARTjI)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 04:30 PM (eCnLg)
Anyone catch the Occupy 'tards in Oakland tonight? They're really ramping shit up.
Barky's peeps. Awesome.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2012 04:30 PM (UOM48)
Congratulations, you understand the Constitution better than Barack Obama. You're now qualified to lecture at Harvard Law.
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at January 28, 2012 04:31 PM (yQwq5)
Only for the Live Blog. Funniest sh*t on the interwebs.
Posted by: Tami at January 28, 2012 04:32 PM (X6akg)
Prayers, Jane. I hope your warrior comes home safe.
Posted by: ErikW at January 28, 2012 04:32 PM (4jO3k)
Can we please have some long lost boobie talk?
Got my haircut this afternoon and got an earful of boob. Thrill of the week!
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 28, 2012 04:33 PM (4q5tP)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 04:33 PM (eCnLg)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 04:34 PM (niZvt)
"Cain is endorsing Newt.
Posted by: Jumbo Jogging Shrimp at January 28, 2012 08:29 PM (qjUnn)"
Does that mean he doesn't endorse the American People anymore?
Posted by: ErikW at January 28, 2012 04:34 PM (4jO3k)
Posted by: CMU VET at January 28, 2012 04:34 PM (ARTjI)
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 28, 2012 04:35 PM (GoIUi)
I wore the uniform with PRIDE, yet when I see these young men and women serving today, I feel humbled.
To see them honored like this brings that pride swelling back.
And I'd add a HUGE thank you to those who wait behind--your sacrifice is all too often ignored or downplayed.
So from this vet--thank you, past and present.
Posted by: irongrampa at January 28, 2012 04:36 PM (SAMxH)
Posted by: Truman North at January 28, 2012 04:37 PM (I2LwF)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 04:38 PM (niZvt)
I heard someone on Fox say it would be insensitive to the troops still fighting in Shitcanistan.
I can't imagine the troops would have a problem with the men and women who have been through hell and back in Iraq to have a victory lap. Even if SCOAMF won't let them use the word "victory."
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2012 04:38 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 04:39 PM (eCnLg)
I've read all of them except the most recent one. The books are way better than the movie.
My recommendation is to save your money.
Posted by: Tami at January 28, 2012 04:40 PM (X6akg)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 04:41 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 28, 2012 08:35 PM (GoIUi)
Indeed.
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 28, 2012 04:41 PM (4q5tP)
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 08:17 PM (fRSUC)
Then you, sir, know the price of everything and the value of nothing."
Thomas Jefferson said that. The subject was different, but the point is the same.
Posted by: FeralCat at January 28, 2012 04:43 PM (parIF)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 04:43 PM (eCnLg)
There's a funny vid on YouTube of Motor T Marines in Afghanistan singing the Barbie song. The (very cute) male Marine in the vid was one of our son's Motor T instructors at Fort "Lost in the Woods" MO.
Makes me feel good to see an occasional video of troops living in a hell hole having a few minutes of fun.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2012 04:44 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 04:45 PM (niZvt)
FWIW, what CoolCzech says here is 100% true. And I found out the fun way in college.
Posted by: Jeff B. at January 28, 2012 04:46 PM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 28, 2012 04:49 PM (4q5tP)
137 >>>A fact little known to non-Asian boobie aficionados is that Asian girls'
nips are often so prominent, the girls can only dim their highbeams
with bandaids...
People like non-Asian boobs? Do they know non-Asian boobs are attached to non-Asians?
Posted by: Truman North at January 28, 2012 04:49 PM (I2LwF)
Yikes.
Funny, but sometimes I feel like I'm turning Japanese.
I really think so.
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at January 28, 2012 04:50 PM (yQwq5)
They're probing limits and heading towards overt violence at some point. Pretty typical communist game plan.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 28, 2012 04:51 PM (cUKDF)
Posted by: Average Joe at January 28, 2012 04:52 PM (gshdd)
Posted by: Ammo Dump at January 28, 2012 04:53 PM (WUWb9)
And also to the 'ettes who lent us those who were once their children but are now our sentinels, I am also grateful.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 28, 2012 04:53 PM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 28, 2012 04:54 PM (4q5tP)
Posted by: Old at January 28, 2012 04:55 PM (sJA0d)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 28, 2012 04:55 PM (cUKDF)
But if lies weren't protected speech, then anytime some guy lied about how many women he slept with, that would be a crime. I don't think that's appropriate either.
Posted by: chemjeff at January 28, 2012 08:45 PM (7FadD)
You are putting different weight on different acts of lying. The constitution doesn't do that, it says we have freedom of expression. Not that we have freedom of expression unless we are being interrogated by the federal government. There are several instances where we as a society decided you have freedom of expression unless you are doing one of these things. Stolen Valor is one of those instances.
Posted by: robtr at January 28, 2012 04:55 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 04:56 PM (eCnLg)
Am I going down there? No.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 28, 2012 04:57 PM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Old at January 28, 2012 04:58 PM (sJA0d)
Posted by: Average Joe at January 28, 2012 04:59 PM (gshdd)
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 28, 2012 04:59 PM (GoIUi)
Ha. Oakland PD has surrounded a group of OWSer and tear gassed them. They are yelling "let us out" and "this is a war crime"
Ha. pussies.
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 28, 2012 04:59 PM (4q5tP)
Posted by: Juicy Girl at January 28, 2012 05:01 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: Truman North at January 28, 2012 05:01 PM (I2LwF)
As a practical matter, that's when it would be enforced. If some jackass is shooting of his mouth in a bar and someone realized he's full of shit, a beatdown is what he's gonna get, not a prosecution.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 28, 2012 05:02 PM (cUKDF)
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 28, 2012 08:59 PM (4q5tP)
Waste of perfectly good tear gas. They should have just been soaked with soap-saturated water.
Posted by: Pinhead at January 28, 2012 05:03 PM (DrrnD)
Posted by: the dude in the jag at January 28, 2012 05:03 PM (RmlCF)
Posted by: Average Joe at January 28, 2012 08:59 PM (gshdd)
Yeah, like the deference and respect and regard and esteem of fellow citizens is not a "real benefit."
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 28, 2012 05:03 PM (4q5tP)
Triple stupid fuck ...
Posted by: Old at January 28, 2012 05:05 PM (sJA0d)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 05:05 PM (niZvt)
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 28, 2012 05:06 PM (4q5tP)
Posted by: Old at January 28, 2012 05:06 PM (sJA0d)
Posted by: the dude in the jag at January 28, 2012 05:07 PM (RmlCF)
As a practical matter, that's when it would be enforced. If some jackass is shooting of his mouth in a bar and someone realized he's full of shit, a beatdown is what he's gonna get, not a prosecution.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 28, 2012 09:02 PM (cUKDF)
There are already laws against that. It's called fraud. Stolen valor is a vanity law, I served and I am not sure how I feel about it. I am usually a less laws the better type person and there are probably better uses for the resources it takes to procecute these dirtbags. Claiming first amendment protection is a farce though. We have consistantly passed laws against lying.
Posted by: robtr at January 28, 2012 05:08 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 28, 2012 08:59 PM (GoIUi)
Thanks. I was an Air Force daughter, and granddaughter of a recipient of the Croix de Guerre. Our family's service in this country goes back to the Revolution.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2012 05:08 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Truman North at January 28, 2012 09:01 PM (I2L
Fox has been showing live feed of the hippy douchetards this evening.
Here's hoping the damned format doesn't totally fair on this site.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 28, 2012 05:11 PM (UOM48)
The rich, do not need you to help them. Stupido.
Posted by: Old at January 28, 2012 05:14 PM (sJA0d)
The Oakland cops fucked up - if they put this on PPV they'd cover their whole budget for the year in one night.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 28, 2012 05:14 PM (cUKDF)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 28, 2012 05:16 PM (eCnLg)
Posted by: the dude in the jag at January 28, 2012 05:17 PM (RmlCF)
Posted by: the dude in the jag at January 28, 2012 05:21 PM (RmlCF)
It's a bad law with good intentions. Everyone agrees that claiming medals or service you didn't earn is despicable . . . but unfortunately being despicable isn't -- and shouldn't -- be against the law.
Now if people misrepresent themselves as veterans, or wear unearned medals, in order to defraud, I'd be perfectly happy with stiffer penalties than other kinds of fraud.
But just being a douchebag who claims to be a Marine Green Beret who won the Blue Max for his service in Iran -- mock him, kick his ass, but don't put him in jail.
Posted by: Trimegistus at January 28, 2012 05:21 PM (gKy6k)
Absolutely. If there were less than a half dozen prosecutions over the next 50 years I wouldn't be surprised at all.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 28, 2012 05:21 PM (cUKDF)
jagoff, this site is fkd up and running on fumes.
Posted by: Old at January 28, 2012 05:22 PM (sJA0d)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 28, 2012 05:24 PM (cUKDF)
Stupid fk:
Irony (from the Ancient Greek εἰρωνεία eirōneÃa, meaning dissimulation or feigned ignorance) is a rhetorical device, literary technique, or situation in which ...
Feigned ignorance as compared to true ignorance.
Posted by: Old at January 28, 2012 05:25 PM (sJA0d)
Posted by: the dude in the jag at January 28, 2012 05:27 PM (RmlCF)
Maybe a better solution would be public shaming. Done in the most humiliating manner possible.
Right after they let me have five minutes with the asshole.
Posted by: irongrampa at January 28, 2012 05:28 PM (SAMxH)
Posted by: the dude in the jag at January 28, 2012 05:28 PM (RmlCF)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 28, 2012 08:38 PM (niZvt)
I'm still fairly fascinated...
As far as the Stolen Valor act, I think I would rather live in a country where it is legal to be a douche. That way we can always pick them out of a crowd.
Posted by: GGE, Exclusive Member of the ONT at January 28, 2012 05:35 PM (yh0zB)
Posted by: Old at January 28, 2012 05:40 PM (sJA0d)
Posted by: Old at January 28, 2012 05:42 PM (sJA0d)
Posted by: Spad13 at January 28, 2012 05:49 PM (ctvKN)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 28, 2012 06:05 PM (oZfic)
THAT can be overcome, so that the 90% can understand, and would only take about only three years of one's undivided attention, 24-7.
Most judges understand their three years to a JD, but head fully up ass until they can see the light out their own ears when it comes to this.
Posted by: Rmoney at January 28, 2012 07:30 PM (7MFxV)
Posted by: PalinFan at January 28, 2012 07:30 PM (otN9L)
Glad they did this. Cool.
.
Bless them all, wherever they are. They're heroes in my opinion. All of them, but especially the ones who've seen the heavy action. Hope they all stay safe and come home to the people who love them.
Posted by: wheatie at January 28, 2012 07:47 PM (ALwK/)
Put me on the list of vets that don't really give a shit about Stolen Valor. We've got enough laws already. If fraud is committed there's already laws against that. My only beef are all the douchebags claiming to be vets just so they can do crap to make vets look bad. God knows the media will run with it until they find out otherwise, then it goes straight down the memory hole. I bet there's still dickweeds out there that think the Giffords shooter was a vet since they were claiming it in the first few hours after it happened.
On the other hand I'm getting old and starting to care less and less about stupid shit. My son in Afghanistan might feel differently about it. He's still got that young man rage going. I feel sorry for the first dumbass that tries impressing him in a bar with a bs story.
Posted by: digitalbrownshirt at January 28, 2012 09:36 PM (uUtvO)
Posted by: VADM (Red) Cuthbert Lord Collingwood (Mentioned in Dispatches) at January 29, 2012 02:10 AM (kkQ6Q)
Posted by: Duke Lowell at January 28, 2012 07:56 PM (mF58b)
May we start with "Vietnam Veteran" Senator Tom Harkin? Please?
Posted by: MarkD at January 29, 2012 06:35 AM (iYBP2)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2133 seconds, 313 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Vic at January 28, 2012 02:35 PM (YdQQY)