January 27, 2012
— Ace The Q4 annualized quarterly rate is supposebly (which is like supposedly, except with the added implication that you'd have to be extra dumb to accept this at face vaule) 2.8%, which isn't good, but the actual rate for the year 1.7%.
By the way, Bush's average growth rate from 2001-2005 was 2.8%. More than a point higher than Obama's "recovery." And if you remember, Bush's recovery was considered horrible, virtually a depression.
Now when Obama hits 2.8% for one quarter -- just one quarter -- it's great. That 1.7% rate for all of 2011? Also pretty great.
That said, I was listening to Adam Carolla, and he and Allison Rosen were discussing the economy and its likely determinative roll in the 2012. Carolla successfully diagnosed the situation -- It's not what the economy's actually doing, but how the media will spin it -- but then added that it was his impression things were in fact getting better.
That worries me. I always like getting the input of less-partisan types, because it's their beliefs, not ours, that swing elections.
And even after noting that of course the media is going to spin this as an improving economy, he said he sort of felt like it was an improving economy.
Posted by: Ace at
09:24 AM
| Comments (235)
Post contains 218 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:26 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Have Blue at January 27, 2012 09:26 AM (IKTC8)
Posted by: willow at January 27, 2012 09:27 AM (TomZ9)
How long until that's adjusted down? Sort of like how the unemployment numbers keep getting adjusted up.
I wonder if some of the "things are getting better" is actually "things are stabilizing". My gut impression is that people perceive the economy as no longer shedding jobs as progress. Stasis fever! Catch it!
Posted by: alexthechick at January 27, 2012 09:28 AM (VtjlW)
Man. I love me some Obama Recovery.
Wait. Wait, no. My mistake.
It's bacon I love. The Obama Recovery sucks worse than the Star Wars prequels.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:28 AM (8y9MW)
Gotta love those self-fulfilling prophecies....
Posted by: Nighthawk at January 27, 2012 09:29 AM (RSqz2)
Posted by: Adirondack Patriot at January 27, 2012 09:29 AM (iAUf+)
I had that once. My doctor suggested I "move more."
Pshaw. What does he know?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:29 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: YIKES! at January 27, 2012 09:30 AM (L3I4w)
Posted by: Brian Williams at January 27, 2012 09:30 AM (5Rurq)
But....everything that Bush did was bad. Everyone knows that. Cowboys are dumb. And evil. And they talk funny.
.
Oh look! Squirrel!
Posted by: The DNC Media at January 27, 2012 09:30 AM (ALwK/)
Things are even 'stabilized', IMHO. There are several downhill slides we're on, with maybe one level plane amongst It All: This is Stagnation, with a slow downhill circling motion.
like a slow-flushing toilet
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at January 27, 2012 09:30 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 09:30 AM (nj1bB)
SCoaMF/T has spent $4 trillion trying hide the fact that we are already in a depression.
What's happening in Europe now is a warning which we seem determined to ignore.
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at January 27, 2012 09:31 AM (6BgmB)
Here's a short clip in which Pissbrain Matthews says Alinsky was no Lefty.
I shit you not.
http://tinyurl.com/6ozq5gl
Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 09:31 AM (G/zuv)
Or ask your friends the last time they had a raise (if they're even employed).
Posted by: Y-not at January 27, 2012 09:31 AM (5H6zj)
More people now think Things will get better--because more people think Hussein will be Gone, Baby, Gone by the end of this year
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at January 27, 2012 09:32 AM (UqKQV)
I'm hearing the 2012 version of "Are you better off now...?"
"When was your last raise, and how much was it?"
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: garrett at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (+7fwG)
Posted by: A.G. at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (myTwx)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Steevy at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (vd4t0)
Gas is back up to $3.44/gal.
But you know what? People are getting used to high gas prices and high unemployment.
Welcome to the New Normal.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (G/zuv)
"... when Obama hits 2.8% for one quarter -- just one quarter -- it's great."
2.8% is a very high C+, almost a B- ...
"That 1.7% rate for all of 2011? Also pretty great."
1.7%, for just about all of us, is a failing grade ... under 2.0. However, for a man who graduated from Columbia, it's ok. It got him into Harvard.
Posted by: Arbalest at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (WfF4T)
Posted by: willow at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (TomZ9)
People are just ignoring how bad it is.
Posted by: © Sponge at January 27, 2012 09:34 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, sedated yet paranoid at January 27, 2012 09:34 AM (UqKQV)
Welcome to the New Normal.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 01:33 PM (G/zuv)
It's "Mourning in America".
Posted by: Nighthawk at January 27, 2012 09:35 AM (RSqz2)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 01:28 PM (8y9MW)
But, 3D!!!!!
Posted by: © Sponge at January 27, 2012 09:35 AM (UK9cE)
But, but...we haven't applied the Affirmative Action Curve!
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at January 27, 2012 09:35 AM (+7fwG)
Posted by: Steevy at January 27, 2012 09:35 AM (vd4t0)
Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 09:35 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 09:35 AM (nj1bB)
If gas drops to $2.95/gal and unemployment dips below 8% by October, you bet your ass that we'll be in Boom Times!
That's how it will be framed by the Left/media. And it will have been so long since things were that "good" that people will buy the spin.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 09:35 AM (G/zuv)
People notice high gas prices and friend still out of work and the lack of available jobs locally.
It is my belief that the MFM will only make it worse by talking it up. The pundits and beltway people will be shocked just like they were in the Reagan election when SCOAMF gets his ass handed to him.
Many of my non-political friends are scratching their heads wondering how things are improving with statements like, "I don't see it" and "where are the jobs."
The MFM and democrats are excavating their grave and blindly waltzing into it.
Posted by: Fire with Fire at January 27, 2012 09:36 AM (lcwvr)
I'm not sure they're "ignoring" it, I think it's more like what sooth said earlier: welcome to the new normal.
In general, Americans are only going "hide" for just so long. Eventually they'll decide the worst is over (even if it isn't) and try to get back to normal. So they're not shopping and spending because they're ignoring reality, but because they can't change the situation, and they like to shop, eat, and spend.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:36 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Dr Spank at January 27, 2012 09:36 AM (lVGED)
Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 09:37 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Frog in the Hot Tub at January 27, 2012 09:37 AM (jucos)
Or as Reuters tells it
"The US economy grew at its fastest pace in 1-1/2 years in the fourth quarter of 2011"
Happy days are here again . . . .
Posted by: imp at January 27, 2012 09:37 AM (UaxA0)
The stock market is still over 10k despite all the shit the government has done.
It's a good thing the Stock Market can't be manipulated by the administration!
Posted by: garrett at January 27, 2012 09:37 AM (+7fwG)
1.7% isn't progress. It's dying slower.
Really, 1.7% "Growth" is functionally a decline.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:38 AM (8y9MW)
I had an old friend tell me he sees improvement, and thinks it's important that our gov't "invests in infrastructure" so he is apparently willing to give Obama another bite at the apple and wants another stimulus. It about gave me a coronary, and it's utterly stupid to believe that, but he's going to vote for Obama unless I or someone else can put him on some facts....but he's not really interested in those. He loves the class warfare red meat too much to think rationally.
Posted by: Dave S. at January 27, 2012 09:39 AM (UvR6d)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 01:36 PM (8y9MW)
Eh.....good point.
Posted by: © Sponge at January 27, 2012 09:39 AM (UK9cE)
Ace did a post more than a couple of years ago on the coming of the new normal and how we're on the way of mirroring the shitty economy of Europe.
I don't why Ace abandoned or forgot about the idea because it proving to be 100% prophetic.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 09:39 AM (G/zuv)
So it has always been; so it will always be. Some people like Newt because they think he can Unspin the MFM, but he can't. Media influence is steadily declining, but still an important factor.
The Good News is that they have more influence over those least likely to vote ( than over those most likely to vote ).
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, sedated yet paranoid at January 27, 2012 09:39 AM (UqKQV)
Except if you are a hedge funder, then you're going to act accordingly.
I hinted at this the other day in a comment I made cause I am hearing this from non political folks also I think I said all you need is the perception of things getting better right before the election. My dad says every president helps the illusion along during the re election year. I think I said the day after the election it could all collapse but as long as it looks good up until then it's tough to fight.
Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 09:39 AM (oZfic)
Balderdash. You can talk a good economy down but you can't talk a bad economy up.
Posted by: toby928© at January 27, 2012 09:40 AM (GTbGH)
where in the hell is the hope ? i see what the change is.
Posted by: willow at January 27, 2012 09:40 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: Ron Paul's Nursing Assistant at January 27, 2012 09:40 AM (r2PLg)
------
I was thinking this very thing while watching an Astaire & Rogers flick the other day. It was Top Hat and feature all of that Depression-era glam and opulence.
Maybe the silver lining in an Obama second term will be the return of the musical.
Posted by: Y-not at January 27, 2012 09:40 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, sedated yet paranoid at January 27, 2012 09:40 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 09:41 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 09:41 AM (nj1bB)
Obama and the Democrats have done a remarkable job at training people to lower their expectations.
Frog, slowly boiling pot, etc.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 09:41 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: garrett at January 27, 2012 01:33 PM (+7fwG)
.
And they would be right. ....Because we are still in the circling-the-drain stage.
.
Personally....I am stocking up on Toilet Paper.
.
What! .....I figure that when it all goes to shit, we will run out of toilet paper. And they will start rationing the stuff. .....So I see it all now....no toilet paper, because my men folk use waaay too much of the stuff for each wipe. ....So, there I'll be, the one who will be having to wash all their shit rags.....in a big iron kettle over an open fire.
.
Start stocking up on toilet paper now!
Posted by: wheatie at January 27, 2012 09:41 AM (ALwK/)
Posted by: garrett at January 27, 2012 01:37 PM (+7fwG)
True, but the average Joe hasn't yanked their money out of it. We all know that QE is a really bad idea, especially when done over and over and over......They're still not putting their money under their mattresses.
Posted by: © Sponge at January 27, 2012 09:41 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 27, 2012 09:42 AM (r1H6z)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 09:43 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: joeindc44 - tebow's new lifting coach at January 27, 2012 09:43 AM (QxSug)
Sometimes people ask me what I wrote today and I say, honestly, "I have no idea, I don't remember.
I say the same thing when asked, "What did Ace write about, today?'.
Posted by: Breitbart at January 27, 2012 09:43 AM (+7fwG)
We had Obama and the Democrats on the run in 2010. On the economy; on the deficit.
I don't understand how we lost all that momentum. But I have to look at (mostly) Boehner and McConnell and how they squandered the momentum and mandate.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 09:44 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: booger at January 27, 2012 09:44 AM (29wvc)
-------
BTW, don't think I didn't notice your not-so-subtle attack on Capitalism, ace. Eleventy!11!!!
Posted by: Y-not at January 27, 2012 09:44 AM (5H6zj)
Well, I'd say you're looking in the right place.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:45 AM (8y9MW)
One little shake and we're over the cliff in a very immediate and very painful manner.
If someone can name an actual green shoot (no, you cannot use North Dakota--it's not a national indicator), I'd be glad to hear it. Seriously.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 27, 2012 09:45 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at January 27, 2012 01:35 PM (phlKA)
With the devaluation of the dollar, inflation, and another million LEGAL immigrants...
We're in negative numbers per capita.
They just keep changing how they count the numbers to make it look better... much like the UnEmployment numbers.
If we measured inflation like the 80's? We're over 10%... if the 90's? Over 8%
The idea of of 'don't raise the bridge, lower the water', only works until you run aground.
Posted by: Colosus, The Forbin Project at January 27, 2012 09:45 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Obama at January 27, 2012 09:45 AM (Hx5uv)
1.7% is improving. . . very very slowly. Eh I wouldn't worry to much about that on fire economy ace. You've got at least one more financial crises between now and election day. Can they hold this bitch together till November? IDK, I don't know what is holding it together now. I feel like the economy is a game of Jenga and I ran out of moves I saw last turn.
Everything will have to go perfect for O to maintain a 2% growth over the next year.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 27, 2012 09:46 AM (0q2P7)
Pretty sure that is correct.
But, then, I'm also too lazy to check, so what do I know?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:46 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 09:47 AM (SB0V2)
Start stocking up on toilet paper now!
I've got two full rolls of 1-ply. I'm good for at least a decade.
Posted by: Sheryl Crow's brown stained index finger at January 27, 2012 09:47 AM (+7fwG)
We're like $1trillion to $2trillion in GDP below where we'd be in previous recessions.
(Interestingly, the 2001 recession was merely a correction back to baseline, we didn't drop below the baseline GDP trend. Now, we're way, way below it.)
Posted by: Jimmuy at January 27, 2012 09:47 AM (7jkW7)
Posted by: Y-not at January 27, 2012 09:47 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 27, 2012 09:47 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Genesis P. Orrige at January 27, 2012 09:48 AM (NE0Ln)
Posted by: ejo at January 27, 2012 09:48 AM (QD+0n)
It won't be Obama's fault!
Posted by: Make Believe Media at January 27, 2012 09:48 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Ron Paul's Nursing Assistant at January 27, 2012 09:48 AM (r2PLg)
"That worries me. I always like getting the input of less-partisan types, because it's their beliefs, not ours, that swing elections."
I think the Average Joe swing voter test will be whether he can answer yest to the question: “if I hate my boss, can I tell him to stuff it and find another job in a reasonable amount of time?” I definitely don’t think we’ll be there anytime soon and certainly not before November 2012.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at January 27, 2012 09:49 AM (mg08E)
Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 09:49 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 27, 2012 09:49 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Roy at January 27, 2012 09:49 AM (VndSC)
Texas.
Arizona.
Actually, in terms of % growth, I should probably turn those around, but you get the point.
The fact is that the SCOAMT and the Democrats have figured out that those of us who want prosperity are going to work towards it no matter what they do- and they can ride our coat-tails just enough to convince the sleepy-brained middle that "things" are improving.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:49 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 09:49 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Ron Paul's Nursing Assistant at January 27, 2012 09:49 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: willow at January 27, 2012 01:27 PM (TomZ9)
May have been the Night Train talking.
Posted by: Cast Iron at January 27, 2012 09:50 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 09:50 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 09:50 AM (nj1bB)
I don't think they're getting used to it. Their situation is deteriorating fast and another shock can put people in that situation on the street.
Posted by: runninrebel at January 27, 2012 01:44 PM (N/1Dm
Listening to the idiot CIC today and over the past several months, I'm just wondering when he's just going to sign an executive order forcing companies to hire and colleges to charge less.
"Companies need to hire more people and do their part."
"Colleges need to keep their costs down and charge less."
He really, truly has no clue how the economy works.
Posted by: © Sponge at January 27, 2012 09:50 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 27, 2012 09:51 AM (hOraP)
If I was receiving 1.7% interest from a bank right now, I wouldn't consider that a decline.
If your income were fixed to that yield, and your living expenses were rising faster than your rate of return, you'd be significantly less impressed.
Posted by: Uncle Sam on a fixed budget at January 27, 2012 09:51 AM (+7fwG)
Average SAVINGS rates are at historicly low levels... why?
Because people KNOW they may as well spend it, because if its sitting in a bank, with the low interest rates available, they are loosing money.
When Inflation, is more than interest, for a long period of time... saving in a bank is a Loser..
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 09:52 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 09:52 AM (d0Tfm)
Because GDP isn't your savings account interest.
GDP is more like your pay-check, so start by imagining you got a 1.7% raise. Still better than nothing, right? But now imagine you ALSO added, say, 2% more expenses over the previous year. Now how's that 1.7% looking?
It's still better than an actual negative number, but as long as your increase in income is out-paced by your increase in out-go, you're losing ground.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:52 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: joeindc44 - tebow's new lifting coach at January 27, 2012 09:52 AM (QxSug)
*** *** ***
Neither are mine, but almost every one of them has seen improvement in their own business. There's no question that, generally speaking, the economy has improved from the free-fall conditions of 3Q08 - 2Q09.
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 27, 2012 09:52 AM (+lsX1)
Boner and Bitch had no intention of maintaining the TEA party advantage handed to them in spite of the Republican party's best efforts. They are the kind of pols that were early adopters of the "go along to get along" school of a perpetual minority party.
If they ever find the hill on which to make a stand, I doubt that it will be before 2020.
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 27, 2012 09:53 AM (i3+c5)
Utah is continuing to improve. Our governor has proposed reducing unemployment insurance premiums to further promote growth. Housing is reportedly stabilizing (not down near the Las Vegas market, but up here in Salt Lake and Utah Valleys), unemployment isn't great but I think it's improved and certainly not one of the worst. We're getting some of the companies that are fleeing CA. Just got our first movie studio (that will have a soundstage) this week, but the biggest get was Adobe. They're building a big campus here.
Posted by: Y-not at January 27, 2012 09:53 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: rectal exam at January 27, 2012 09:53 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 09:53 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at January 27, 2012 09:54 AM (3ETnh)
It's not the new normal so much as " economic realization" has not dawned yet. When it does and the average investor concludes that none of this debt will be paid you'll see that panicked run for the exit that always happens when economic bubbles break.
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at January 27, 2012 09:54 AM (6BgmB)
Posted by: ejo at January 27, 2012 09:54 AM (QD+0n)
Posted by: Dave S.
5 Myths Behind Obama's Infrastructure Spending Push
http://tinyurl.com/88m4cp5
Debunking ObamaÂ’s Latest Jobs Myth
http://tinyurl.com/7twddg6
Posted by: weft cut-loop at January 27, 2012 09:54 AM (+Jr2Z)
Posted by: Ergie The Gender-Confused Drunk at January 27, 2012 09:54 AM (nj1bB)
Because people KNOW they may as well spend it, because if its sitting in a bank, with the low interest rates available, they are loosing money.
When Inflation, is more than interest, for a long period of time... saving in a bank is a Loser..
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 01:52 PM (lZBBB)
When I was a kid my mom had us start up a savings account to get us used to the concept of long terms saving.
When I was in college the bank sent me a letter saying that because the account wasn't worth their time, they would start stealing money from it until it was all gone.
Posted by: Oldcat at January 27, 2012 09:54 AM (z1N6a)
What percentage of that 1.7% is due to massive govt deficit spending? If the answer is 100%, then we're effectively at zero growth, if more than 100%, then we're in defacto decline.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 27, 2012 09:55 AM (hOraP)
Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 01:53 PM (nj1bB)
Oh, now we're doing re-runs? or did you forget that you used that one smacking around gaylord the other night?
Posted by: garrett at January 27, 2012 09:55 AM (+7fwG)
is it possible to turn it around?
Posted by: willow at January 27, 2012 09:56 AM (TomZ9)
How so? If I was receiving 1.7% interest from a bank right now, I wouldn't consider that a decline. Sure I'd love to see 2.5% GDP or so, which is a nice balance, but I've survived too many recessions (when I had to make a payroll every week) not to appreciate a positive number.
It's Obama, so I guess I'm lowering the standard. 'Don't raise the bridge, lower the water' or 'the soft-bigotry of low expectations' both come to mind.
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at January 27, 2012 01:48 PM (phlKA)
Simple, REAL inflation is higher than your rate of return. Key is that banks can get all the capital they need from the Fed for no interest, so why should they pay you anything for the use of YOUR money?
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 09:56 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: booger at January 27, 2012 09:56 AM (29wvc)
What percentage of that 1.7% is due to massive govt deficit spending? If the answer is 100%, then we're effectively at zero growth, if more than 100%, then we're in defacto decline.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 27, 2012 01:55 PM (hOraP)
If the government's idea of a big lie to sell a recovery is 1.7 percent, then things must really be bad.
Posted by: Oldcat at January 27, 2012 09:57 AM (z1N6a)
Oh it'll be paid back. We're doing it the old fashioned way - devalue the currency...a lot.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 27, 2012 09:57 AM (hOraP)
Sometimes I think we underestimate the cynicism that most people have for the MSM.
Posted by: jeannebodine, Team Meteor-Bot at January 27, 2012 09:57 AM (byR8d)
Posted by: Lowered Expectations Dating Service at January 27, 2012 09:57 AM (jucos)
Posted by: Havedash at January 27, 2012 09:57 AM (sFD5n)
Key is that banks can get all the capital they need from the Fed for no interest
ONLY if they do what they are told!
I won't have them lending to succesful white businesspeople. There's been too much of that in this country.
Posted by: Barack Obama at January 27, 2012 09:58 AM (+7fwG)
Posted by: willow at January 27, 2012 09:58 AM (TomZ9)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:58 AM (8y9MW)
When I was a kid my mom had us start up a savings account to get us used to the concept of long terms saving.
When I was in college the bank sent me a letter saying that because the account wasn't worth their time, they would start stealing money from it until it was all gone.
Posted by: Oldcat at January 27, 2012 01:54 PM (z1N6a)
When I retired from the Navy, 15 years ago, I left a bit over $100 in a Navy Federal Credit Union Savings account... they just closed it because 'fees' ate that all up.
Hear ya.
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 09:58 AM (lZBBB)
Every time I start to feel the least bit optimistic, I remember that historical interest rates on Federal borrowing is closer to 5% that to 1. When interest returns to something close to reality, all the taxes in the country won't pay the carrying charges for the debt the democrats have run up.
You're welcome.
Posted by: toby928© at January 27, 2012 09:59 AM (GTbGH)
As I not too gently chided him about media manipulation and that nothing would change for the better until Obama was defeated, he proudly stated that he didn't have the problem with O that I did.
And I paused for several seconds and asked Oh, ........ you don't? while shaking my head.
This is the level of self deception going on among a lot of the enlightened NE types.
I don't think he likes me now, joining a lifelong list of liberal contacts that I have encountered. No way to change their thinking, so fuck 'em.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 27, 2012 09:59 AM (ZJCDy)
OT: Just had to sit down with a client and review documents for two hours. His breath was so horrible that I think he'd just arrived after felching a Russian fishmonger's wife.
Blech. I think I'll drop a steamer in the corner of my office just to make it smell better.
Posted by: Sharkman at January 27, 2012 09:59 AM (RtpCp)
Posted by: joeindc44 - tebow's new lifting coach at January 27, 2012 09:59 AM (QxSug)
Now that the economy is booming again, it is time to step out with that "someone special".
Posted by: Lowered Expectations Dating Service
LOFL
Exactly
Posted by: imp at January 27, 2012 09:59 AM (UaxA0)
You would if CPI was up, say 2.0% YoY.
Gee, I wonder what the CPI really is...
" The all items index has risen 3.0 percent over the last 12 months, ..."
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
Well, ain't that sompin'!
Posted by: weft cut-loop at January 27, 2012 10:01 AM (+Jr2Z)
[JUST KIDDING, PEOPLE.]
But I did vote for the man whom the New Republic's Sidney Blumenthal wrote in 1984 represented "Reaganism on fast forward." [more on that next week]
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at January 27, 2012 10:01 AM (rrxFx)
Oh I think plenty of Americans are going to die over O's insane dream of utopia that threatens to obliterate the US economy. I've done my level best to slow, and stop it. Funny thing is most of those folks are going to be people like you in the end. The least you can do is thank me.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 27, 2012 10:01 AM (0q2P7)
Things are really fragile for me and B'Gal right now. We have no money left over at all, but we can eat. Her health isn't all that great and I'm no spring chicken either. If anything happened to me, she'd be OK, if anything happens to her, I'm homeless.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 10:01 AM (d0Tfm)
Then you should be more careful.
And I paused for several seconds and asked Oh, ........ you don't? while shaking my head.
My response, as someone currently employed, would probably have been, "No. You have exactly the same problem with O that I do: you, specifically, are unemployed. I'd rather get rid of him so you have a chance to find remunerative employment."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 10:01 AM (8y9MW)
Alison Rosen is a twit.
I would do things to her.
Things that would stain the sheets and leave us sticky.
Posted by: garrett at January 27, 2012 10:01 AM (+7fwG)
Posted by: TomH at January 27, 2012 10:02 AM (q1Ebc)
Posted by: Diane Sawyer at January 27, 2012 10:02 AM (lCXr2)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at January 27, 2012 01:48 PM (phlKA)
1.7% GDP growth is a decline because it takes 3% to keep up with population growth. It isn't like comparing it to your savings account getting 1.7% interest, it's like increasing the size of your family expenses 3% while getting a 1.7% raise.
Posted by: robtr at January 27, 2012 10:02 AM (MtwBb)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 10:03 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 27, 2012 01:52 PM (+lsX1)
The overall economy still is poor, of course, due mainly to housing being in the dumps. But some sectors are OK.
I can only speak from the narrow field of auto manufacture, but we have too much work. So much that it's driving down quality and delivery performance. The Japan earth quake f-ed up the whole supply chain. Also, the upcoming model change overs have every tool shop in the world building molds/dies at break neck pace. Tool and die was a dying industry 5 years ago. Now they can't find enough people to do all the work. The school I went to offers a tooling engineer degree, and their 27 or so grads had 200+ employers chasing them.
Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 10:03 AM (xUM1Q)
Conditions in the fuherbunker are improving. I feel it.
A. Hilter, March 12, 1945, Excerpt from private diary
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 27, 2012 10:03 AM (4q5tP)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 02:01 PM (d0Tfm)
Hear ya... sold the house to get out of debt... working for 1/4 of what I used to make... and had to start my own business to do so....
But then again, I'm in Central California with an Public unemployment rate of 18%, and real probaly in the high 20's.
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 10:04 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Ron Paul's Nursing Assistant at January 27, 2012 10:04 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: willow at January 27, 2012 10:05 AM (TomZ9)
.....Posted by: Newt Gingrich, American at January 27, 2012 01:42 PM (lVGED)
.
Yeah. Make fun of the idea all you want.
.
But a balls-to-the-wall Space Program would create the kind of jobs that people are whining and bitching about *not* having.
.
Most people don't realize that the US being the leader in Aviation and Aerospace is what lead to us being the leader in technology. .....But it is circling the drain now. .....And China and Russia are the ones with a surge in all those high tech jobs.
.
It wouldn't require a huge outlay of government money to stimulate a renaisance in space exploration.......just some big tax incentives. .....That idea of Newt's about offering some 'Prizes' is a good one too.
Posted by: wheatie at January 27, 2012 10:06 AM (ALwK/)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at January 27, 2012 01:59 PM (phlKA)
Indeed. And even if we could bring in the brainiacs, the fact is that the entire federal bureaucracy is a huge pile of incompetents, communists, and sundry traitors. They will resist change to the bitter end. Remember Condi Rice? Couldn't even reform the State Department. Don't tell me those people get paid small salaries and are irreplaceable.
The beast is just too big.
Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 10:07 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: rectal exam at January 27, 2012 10:07 AM (O7ksG)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 10:07 AM (d0Tfm)
Carolla has a job ... of course he may feel like its getting better because his only measure is the media spin, he has no personal measure ... but for the 16 million Americans out of work and the millions working part time jobs all know its not better no matter what the MSM spin is ...
don't forget that nearly every one of those 16 million out of work folks as a father and mother who are retired or nearly retired and they know how bad it is for thier kids ... thats almost 50 million voting Americans who will ignore the media spin ...
Posted by: JeffC at January 27, 2012 10:07 AM (A3tpD)
Posted by: wheatie at January 27, 2012 02:06 PM (ALwK/)
Hmmm... interesting idea... Declare that US Tax law stops at 100,000 Feet... so anything Space Based in Untaxed by business law?
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 10:08 AM (lZBBB)
*** *** *** ***
Nobody is saying that 1.7% is a good number. They are saying that it is better than 0%. Or -1.7%. Or the -9% number we saw in 3Q08. Is it good? No. Is it better? Yes.
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 27, 2012 10:09 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Dave S. at January 27, 2012 10:11 AM (UvR6d)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 02:01 PM (8y9MW)
I know, that's logical AllenG, so you can forget using that tactic with these mentally defective fools.
You could hit this guy in the kisser with a baseball bat emblazoned with the stamp "Obama did this to your teeth" and it would make him prouder to go out and vote for him.
It really is a mental disorder.
Posted by: ontherocks at January 27, 2012 10:11 AM (ZJCDy)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 02:07 PM (d0Tfm)
Sorry - southern Michigan. But if you can take the cold, you might consider looking at what might be available up this way. This is anecdotal, of course, but FWIW my plant does injection molding, and all the tool shops we use are slammed and can barely manage to help us even with urgent repairs.
Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 10:11 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: ejo at January 27, 2012 10:12 AM (QD+0n)
Posted by: Dave S. at January 27, 2012 10:12 AM (UvR6d)
Then they glare at me when I walk by going, "Holy shit. Holy SHIT." Dried beans are going for what I used to pay for bratwurst. Good God.
Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 27, 2012 10:12 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God at January 27, 2012 10:13 AM (vahvH)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 27, 2012 02:09 PM (+lsX1)
What you have to remember is that 1.7 isn't the real number. Its the number that they got from adding a made up 4th Q number with the slightly less made up 1st 3Q numbers, all of which were moved way way down once nobody was looking.
It's like Pravda in the old Soviet Union. You can't believe the actual words, but savvy observers could get a lot of info by looking at who was standing closest to the middle in the propaganda pictures.
Posted by: Oldcat at January 27, 2012 10:13 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: joeindc44 - tebow's new lifting coach at January 27, 2012 10:13 AM (QxSug)
No. It was and is a stupid fucking idea in the form of a shameless pander to the Florida aerospace industry.
Tax incentives aren't going to lead private industry to engage in building a moon base that would have zero chance of turning a profit.
Know why the US is a leader in aviation? Because there's a commercial market for it. Manned Mars expeditions? Not so much.
Yeah, it's "cool". I know. But fulfilling Battlestar Galactica fantasies isn't what we should be spending hundreds of billions of dollars on. It's not even in the top ten things we should be focusing on.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 27, 2012 10:13 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at January 27, 2012 02:11 PM (phlKA)
Why does he need an excuse?
Posted by: Oldcat at January 27, 2012 10:13 AM (z1N6a)
I've given my “drive by reports on what I see locally” in “letters to Miss Emily”- in my name link, but that are scattered about. I'll sum it up.
Emptying malls, shopping centers, & businesses. Houses for sale forever. Block long lines waiting for the thrift stores to open. Half of my black friends who want to work can't find anything, no matter how awful it is.
Inflation? Being a widower I don't use much detergent. Went to the store a few weeks ago to buy some- what had sold for $4-$5 last time were now $8-$10 a bottle. Luckily a new Dollar Store ( “where everything's a dollar...” ) just opened- boy, are they busy- and I got the house brand for a dollar.
Unprecedented!
Posted by: backhoe at January 27, 2012 10:14 AM (QROim)
.
Hmmm... interesting idea... Declare that US Tax law stops at 100,000 Feet... so anything Space Based in Untaxed by business law?
.....Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 02:08 PM (lZBBB)
.
Not a bad idea. ....Now you're thinking.
.
I didn't even mention Helium3. .....Turns out those worthless space rocks we brought back from those Apollo missions....are rich in Helium3. .....Scientists are telling us that He3 could finally enable us to master cold fusion. .....This is why Russia and China are in a race to get to the Moon. ....To mine for He3.
.
It is being said that one shipment of Helium3 from the Moon, could power our cities for a year.
Posted by: wheatie at January 27, 2012 10:15 AM (ALwK/)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 10:15 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: William Shatner at January 27, 2012 10:15 AM (e8kgV)
I don't want to do the math but our population went up 50 million or so in last two decades...and there hasn't been a new baby boom. has there? It seems that population growth is huge, 20% so does that equal the GDP growth?
Posted by: joeindc44 - tebow's new lifting coach at January 27, 2012 02:13 PM (QxSug)
Have to add in the 1 million a year in LEGAL immigration.
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 10:16 AM (lZBBB)
...the Obama growth rate is both artificially deflated & durable.
Before I send you back under the stairs, I'm going to remind you how Obama is trying to borrow and spend at a break-neck speed our way into prosperity. Bush drove us into a ditch. Obama is driving us off a cliff.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 10:16 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 02:11 PM (xUM1Q)
Have you thought about outsourcing to India?
Posted by: Joe biden at January 27, 2012 10:17 AM (+7fwG)
Obamanomics is based on "investing" in the non-producers.
Only a fucking idiot college faculty member would think of such a foolish idea.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 10:18 AM (G/zuv)
Ace did a post more than a couple of years ago on the coming of the new normal and how we're on the way of mirroring the shitty economy of Europe.
I don't why Ace abandoned or forgot about the idea because it proving to be 100% prophetic.
This is ace. If he remembers where he left his pants, it's a good day.
Posted by: reason at January 27, 2012 10:18 AM (sPO/s)
The same could be said about most other high growth periods.
For example, the Dot Com boom was artificially fueled by a bubble created with reckless investment in anything remotely connected to the Internet and datacom. This was followed by the bubble bursting in 2000.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 27, 2012 10:19 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 27, 2012 02:09 PM (+lsX1)
That wasn't my point. I was saying that even though it is a positive number it is still a decline because it is below the 3% growth rate needed to balance between population growth and growth in the economy so we continue to decline in terms of overall performance.
Is a larger number better than a smaller number, yes. Are we growing enough to increase the size of the workforce, no. That is my point.
Posted by: robtr at January 27, 2012 10:19 AM (MtwBb)
Posted by: Kim Jong Un at January 27, 2012 10:19 AM (sPO/s)
Posted by: Hollowpoint (circa 1500) at January 27, 2012 10:20 AM (ggRof)
Posted by: Dave S. at January 27, 2012 10:20 AM (UvR6d)
Sadly, you're almost certainly right.
Sometimes I despair for humanity.
Was in the industry for over thirty years and can't find anything down here.
Have you looked in TX? I know that Raytheon, Lockheed, and Bell Heli are almost always looking for good machinist types. That doesn't include other manufacturing also in my area- or anything at all outside of DFW (I have no idea what metro areas like San Antonio, Houston, or Austin would have available).
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 10:21 AM (8y9MW)
179....Tax incentives aren't going to lead private industry to engage in building a moon base that would have zero chance of turning a profit.
.
Hollowpoint.....the profit motive for salvaging space junk alone, is a pretty good one. ....We just need the technology to do it.
.
And as for the Moon. ....What we know so far about the abundance of Helium3 on the Moon's surface....and the potential for He3 being the clean, abundant source of energy that we have been searching for....is enough to motivate the Russians and the Chinese to go for it.
.
We still don't know what other mineral riches are lying on the Moon. .....Looks like Russia and China will find that out before we do.
Posted by: wheatie at January 27, 2012 10:23 AM (ALwK/)
And by "scientists", you mean "frauds". You can't power a city with a reactor that doesn't exist.
Helium-3 can be (and is) produced on Earth at a fraction of the cost of mining it on the moon. China is trying to get to the Moon for the same reason the US did in 1969- national pride. We did it over 40 years ago, we don't have anything to prove. They do.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 27, 2012 10:24 AM (SY2Kh)
Let's not get our hopes up that anything is going to change soon - economy or otherwise.
Posted by: Not an Artist at January 27, 2012 10:24 AM (YUwuZ)
Posted by: jewells45 at January 27, 2012 10:25 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: Barack Obama, MomJeanius at January 27, 2012 10:25 AM (+7fwG)
I thought the whole point of this country is that everyone is equal, rich or poor. He must think the Supremes are going to find in his favor with obamacare cause he is getting bolder and bolder. The 30% capital gains tax will effectively kill a lot of the money the planners have set aside for their kids to go to college. So I guess then it has to come out of regular income.
Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 10:25 AM (oZfic)
*** *** *** ***
The price of natural gas is falling to all time lows, but we need to build a moon-city to get clean energy?
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 27, 2012 10:25 AM (+lsX1)
OT
Drudge poll of Florida Readers
Romney, Santorum, Paul, then Gingrich.
Ironically this is my predicted order of finish.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 10:26 AM (kaOJx)
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God
Wow, I thought Obama was pushing loans to indigents when he was a senator while Bush was trying to reign in the irresponsible lending as president. I mean, weren't the Dems resisting every move to tighten-up lending by Fannie and Freddie?
I think it's best to "reconstruct conservatism" with the facts, not with shit you think happened.
Posted by: Dr Spank at January 27, 2012 10:26 AM (lVGED)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 01:41 PM (i6RpT)
My company had a 38% increase in medical premiums and in order to afford it, dropped dental. Strap yourself in and get ready.
Posted by: Derak at January 27, 2012 10:27 AM (VEhDR)
You spelled 'Son' and 'Kenya' wrong.
lol
Maybe. But "sun" was because I pasted it from the google search and wasn't paying attention.
My search was for "son of york"
Anyway, I'm thinking indonesia is more in line with his actual governing style. He's not an anarchic/kleptocrat/nepotist, he's a crypto-muslim dictator. Suharto in mom-jeans, as it were.
Posted by: imp at January 27, 2012 10:28 AM (UaxA0)
Know why it's called "space junk"?
Hint: It's in the second word of that phrase.
We've had the technology to recover it for decades. That we haven't is because there's no profit in spending $20 million to recover $2 million worth of obsolete dead satellites and used rocket boosters.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 27, 2012 10:28 AM (SY2Kh)
We still don't know what other mineral riches are lying on the Moon.
UNOBTANIUM AS FAR AS THE EYE CAN SEE!
Posted by: some guy, selling cheese at January 27, 2012 10:29 AM (sPO/s)
and it's on the CNBC site on the top of the far right column.
Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 10:31 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: some guy, selling cheese at January 27, 2012 02:29 PM (sPO/s)
Really, can't Newt just build a colony in Wisconsin instead.
Posted by: robtr at January 27, 2012 10:31 AM (MtwBb)
Zero Hedge picked it up too...
Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 10:32 AM (oZfic)
Tomorrow is my birthday. Am I really 56? Where has the time gone? Boy does time fly when one pursues building a Master Race and a society to last 1,000 years that will ensure Global World Domination for our perfect way of life. Seig Heil me! <g>
Anyway, I think I'll go to the surface and pass around some medals (got a few boxes of Iron Crosses left) to those glorious Hitler Youth boys. Whatta bunch of fine Ayran lads.
The prospect of birthday cake, a birthday BJ from Eva, and gladhanding those dear applecheeked boys fills me with renewed optimism. Steiner's counterattack will succeed, I just know it.
Things are on the up, on the rebound. Zippity Doo Dah!!
A. Hitler, April 19, 1945, excerpt from personal diary
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 27, 2012 10:33 AM (4q5tP)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 10:35 AM (oZfic)
---
That's ok. I hear Barack is going to give us all magic beans in November!
Posted by: Y-not at January 27, 2012 10:36 AM (5H6zj)
And according to a new analysis of viewing patterns during the speech, interest was on the decline from the beginning. More than a quarter of the people who started watching on network television at 9 p.m. Eastern tuned out within the first five minutes — before the president even began speaking.
Kantar Media conducted a survey of 100,000 households and examined their behavior in the moments leading up to, during, and after the speech. It found that after 27 percent of network television viewers stopped watching in the first five minutes, many of them flipped the channel to TBS, USA and ESPN, which benefited the most from the drop off in the State of the Union audience.
Posted by: William Shatner at January 27, 2012 10:37 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Joe biden at January 27, 2012 02:17 PM (+7fwG)
Thank heaven, no. But perhaps just as bad, we do outsource some of the simpler mold builds to Korea. They do a good job, overall, but the costs are going up. US mold makers are getting pretty competitive with the better overseas makers. More and more US companies are starting to wake up, after being raped by China's "cheap" mold builders.
A major customer of our transferred several molds to us made in China. What total, absolute, unmitigated garbage. The Chinese can't even put in a bolt hole straight - and I say that litterally - not figuratively. They use the cheapest garbage steel available. Poor venting, everything is set up for manual (rather than robotic) extraction, etc. Thank heaven my company doesn't use any Chinese suppliers.
Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 10:37 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Y-not at January 27, 2012 10:38 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Chicago Tribune at January 27, 2012 10:41 AM (xGZ+b)
When I shop, the working-aged men and older folks just stand in stunned silence when going to buy staple items.
I've shared in the grocery-gathering duties for several years, so I know all too well how much more expensive stuff is still.
Mrs. Reason and I still marvel at how four sacks of "get by for the week" groceries will run us close to $100.
The only thing that surpises me anymore is that we're still surpised.
And then I think to myself, "oh well, in another year, we'll have President Mittens to start fixing some of this!" And then I weep into my big frosty mug of tap water.
Posted by: reason at January 27, 2012 10:42 AM (sPO/s)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 02:15 PM (d0Tfm)
Well, right now we don't have any contacts down in the nice parts of the country, but if I come across info that might be useful I'll post it. And if you can do G-codes you can learn the new languages pretty fast. The new conversational software is way, way, better than those old G-codes. I've done G-code myself, and am glad it's going the way of the Dodo. Of course, these days everything is getting to be contoured with crazy math data - a human couldn't program the tool paths himself if he wanted to and had a thousand years to get it done.
Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 10:42 AM (xUM1Q)
Speaking of prices, those Jiffy Corn Muffin mix boxes are one of my barometers for c-o-l.
Good call. Even ramen is over a quarter a package. That shit used to be a dime.
My barometer of choice is a gallon of orange juice, and the comparison of it to the gallon of gasoline it took to go get it. A gallon of milk is still cheaper than a gallon of gas, but a gallon of OJ is easily 2x.
Posted by: reason at January 27, 2012 10:44 AM (sPO/s)
Posted by: Mike at January 27, 2012 10:45 AM (NH9Y5)
Posted by: reason at January 27, 2012 02:42 PM (sPO/s)
I dunno where you guys live, but I'm always puzzled when I read this. For me, the price of fruit, meat, milk, and a few sundry other things I buy have barely moved in years. I buy boneless/skinless chicken breasts for $2 a pound in the bi-weekly sale. Pork loin for $1.90. The less costly fruit I can get for about $1 - $1.30 a pound. For me these prices have been the same for some time.
Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 10:46 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 10:55 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 10:55 AM (d0Tfm)
--> G-codes
Take three courses in MasterCam. There are even on-line courses (12 weeks/$250.00). Much of the work is drawing a part (SolidWorks, Creo/ProE, ..) then specifying toolpaths. Trying to do a 3D contour is virtually impossible by hand, but drawing one, then specifying the proper tool path, tool path type and tool is very easy.
SurfCam and competing products are ok, but MasterCam has a larger /the largest market share.
Posted by: Arbalest at January 27, 2012 10:58 AM (WfF4T)
Posted by: reason at January 27, 2012 11:00 AM (sPO/s)
Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable tyrant.
I like this, but somebody the other day referred to him as the OJ Simpson of American politics. At first I thought it was stupid, but it dawned on me that they are very similar. Both did awful things, both knew that we all knew, and both were sure that they could get away with it. When people called them on it, racism was always the answer.
Any thoughts?
Posted by: gulfkraken at January 27, 2012 11:12 AM (WBfjO)
...and now this thread has been killed by ketamines, bear mace, and Internet creeps.
Where's CSI: Blogland when you need it?
Posted by: reason at January 27, 2012 11:12 AM (sPO/s)
Barry as OJ. Complicated, but potentially awesome.
Barry's OJ.
The economy is the dead wife? That he killed in a hot rage of jealousy over...
Capitalism, the dead wife's dead friend? Hmm. Potential.
And Joe Biden is Kato, the dim-bulb witness who saw everything, but can't put any of what he saw together cohesively.
And we're all along for the ride in a crappy Bronco, doin' 30mph with every cop in the state following us as we make our mad getaway...to mom's house... Hm. I got nothin' for that one.
Posted by: reason at January 27, 2012 11:16 AM (sPO/s)
Posted by: gulfkraken at January 27, 2012 11:42 AM (WBfjO)
Posted by: gulfkraken at January 27, 2012 11:42 AM (WBfjO)
"Posted by: Arbalest at January 27, 2012 02:58 PM (WfF4T)" Glad that there are online refreshers, that $250 is awfully tough to come by right now. But thanks for the heads-up. I've also found some SolidWorks videos on YT, if I ever get a nibble, I'll look over at the Khan Academy site too.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 12:22 PM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 12:28 PM (d0Tfm)
@218
Hey! WTF. Why do you want Newt to mess around in my state? We got enough problems up in here with all the union wackjobs. You bastard!
Posted by: Some guy you don't know in Wisconsin at January 27, 2012 01:17 PM (dx77n)
@218
Um, sorry, it seems you were responding to someone else's comment. To that someone else- You tell your buddy Newt to stay the hell away from my great state! Wisconsin can't afford anymore nuts.
Posted by: Some guy you don't know in Wisconsin at January 27, 2012 01:20 PM (dx77n)
Posted by: Mitt Still Sux at January 27, 2012 02:20 PM (KYRHA)
Posted by: Ministry of Truth at January 27, 2012 04:24 PM (0GucZ)
Posted by: Harvard Admission Committee changing the standards to fit the facts and the outcomes we want at January 27, 2012 06:22 PM (u3N3z)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3051 seconds, 363 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: mike at January 27, 2012 09:26 AM (BpjHA)