January 27, 2012

2011 GDP Growth Rate: 1.7%
— Ace

The Q4 annualized quarterly rate is supposebly (which is like supposedly, except with the added implication that you'd have to be extra dumb to accept this at face vaule) 2.8%, which isn't good, but the actual rate for the year 1.7%.

By the way, Bush's average growth rate from 2001-2005 was 2.8%. More than a point higher than Obama's "recovery." And if you remember, Bush's recovery was considered horrible, virtually a depression.

Now when Obama hits 2.8% for one quarter -- just one quarter -- it's great. That 1.7% rate for all of 2011? Also pretty great.

That said, I was listening to Adam Carolla, and he and Allison Rosen were discussing the economy and its likely determinative roll in the 2012. Carolla successfully diagnosed the situation -- It's not what the economy's actually doing, but how the media will spin it -- but then added that it was his impression things were in fact getting better.

That worries me. I always like getting the input of less-partisan types, because it's their beliefs, not ours, that swing elections.

And even after noting that of course the media is going to spin this as an improving economy, he said he sort of felt like it was an improving economy.


Posted by: Ace at 09:24 AM | Comments (235)
Post contains 218 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Getting better for who? Him?

Posted by: mike at January 27, 2012 09:26 AM (BpjHA)

2 Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable tyrant.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:26 AM (8y9MW)

3 But just you wait for this years "Recovery Summer" (TM)

That's going to be awesome I'm told.

Posted by: Have Blue at January 27, 2012 09:26 AM (IKTC8)

4 did Carolla actually give reasons He believed the economy is getting better?

Posted by: willow at January 27, 2012 09:27 AM (TomZ9)

5

How long until that's adjusted down?  Sort of like how the unemployment numbers keep getting adjusted up.

 

I wonder if some of the "things are getting better" is actually "things are stabilizing".  My gut impression is that people perceive the economy as no longer shedding jobs as progress.  Stasis fever!  Catch it!

Posted by: alexthechick at January 27, 2012 09:28 AM (VtjlW)

6 which isn't good, but the actual rate for the year 1.7%.

Man. I love me some Obama Recovery.
Wait. Wait, no. My mistake.

It's bacon I love.  The Obama Recovery sucks worse than the Star Wars prequels.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:28 AM (8y9MW)

7 "...not what the economy's actually doing, but how the media will spin it -- but then added that it was his impression things were in fact getting better."

Gotta love those self-fulfilling prophecies....

Posted by: Nighthawk at January 27, 2012 09:29 AM (RSqz2)

8 Hey, Obama kinda left that out of the State of the Union. But, good thing we know about some billionarie's effin' secretary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Adirondack Patriot at January 27, 2012 09:29 AM (iAUf+)

9 Stasis fever! Catch it!

I had that once.  My doctor suggested I "move more."

Pshaw.  What does he know?

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:29 AM (8y9MW)

10 Any second now, my old job will be calling me back to work.

Posted by: YIKES! at January 27, 2012 09:30 AM (L3I4w)

11 Who are you gonna believe, me or your lying eyes?

Posted by: Brian Williams at January 27, 2012 09:30 AM (5Rurq)

12

But....everything that Bush did was bad. Everyone knows that. Cowboys are dumb. And evil. And they talk funny.

.

Oh look! Squirrel!

Posted by: The DNC Media at January 27, 2012 09:30 AM (ALwK/)

13 'roll', eh.  like Rock and Role ??  .   Were there any Italian torpedo boats?

Things are even 'stabilized', IMHO.  There are several downhill slides we're on, with  maybe one level plane amongst It All:    This is Stagnation, with a slow downhill circling motion.

like a slow-flushing toilet

Posted by: SantaRosaStan at January 27, 2012 09:30 AM (UqKQV)

14 He wasn't specific about why he felt this. Just his "feeling."

Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 09:30 AM (nj1bB)

15

SCoaMF/T has spent $4 trillion trying hide the fact that we are already in a depression.

What's happening in Europe now is a warning which we seem determined to ignore.

Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at January 27, 2012 09:31 AM (6BgmB)

16
Here's a short clip in which Pissbrain Matthews says Alinsky was no Lefty.

I shit you not.

http://tinyurl.com/6ozq5gl


Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 09:31 AM (G/zuv)

17 Go to a suburban super market during the peak hours for older folks to shop (usually mid morning in my neck of the woods) and tell me the economy is getting better. 

Or ask your friends the last time they had a raise (if they're even employed). 

Posted by: Y-not at January 27, 2012 09:31 AM (5H6zj)

18 That WSJ 'poll' of how people perceive the future is a Classic of Irony:

More people now think Things will get better--because more people think Hussein will be Gone, Baby, Gone by the end of this year

Posted by: SantaRosaStan at January 27, 2012 09:32 AM (UqKQV)

19 Or ask your friends the last time they had a raise (if they're even employed)

I'm hearing the 2012 version of "Are you better off now...?"

"When was your last raise, and how much was it?"

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (8y9MW)

20 My clients aren't convinced we've seen the bottom, yet.

Posted by: garrett at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (+7fwG)

21 politically speaking, my concern over this is that it will be spun as "when those radical tea-partiers came in, the economy slowed"

Posted by: A.G. at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (myTwx)

22 Growth at 1.7% when 2.4% (IIRC) is what we need just to keep up with population growth? That's good? Real, live unemployment at 11% (if you count everybody who was working when the SCOAMT took orifice) is good? Record numbers of Americans living in poverty and on food stamps is good? And yet, not a single Pubbie candidate has the cojones to even mention this at every opportunity? There literally is no difference between us and the pineapple anymore...

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (d0Tfm)

23 Getting better no.It's called a " plateau".

Posted by: Steevy at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (vd4t0)

24
Gas is back up to $3.44/gal.

But you know what? People are getting used to high gas prices and high unemployment.

Welcome to the New Normal.

Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (G/zuv)

25

"... when Obama hits 2.8% for one quarter -- just one quarter -- it's great."

2.8% is a very high C+, almost a B- ...

"That 1.7% rate for all of 2011? Also pretty great."

1.7%, for just about all of us, is a failing grade ... under 2.0.  However, for a man who graduated from Columbia,  it's ok. It got him into Harvard.

Posted by: Arbalest at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (WfF4T)

26 I believe Mathews lost his mind somewhere around 2003, or  at least that is when i noticed his slip into tortuous lying for the Dems.

Posted by: willow at January 27, 2012 09:33 AM (TomZ9)

27 I think the economy is getting better, but only because people are ignoring what the "0" is doing to prevent it.  They're still out shopping, eating and spending.  The stock market is still over 10k despite all the shit the government has done.

People are just ignoring how bad it is.

Posted by: © Sponge at January 27, 2012 09:34 AM (UK9cE)

28 errrrr, things are NOT even stabilized.  Not me, either:  Not stabilized

Posted by: SantaRosaStan, sedated yet paranoid at January 27, 2012 09:34 AM (UqKQV)

29 But you know what? People are getting used to high gas prices and high unemployment.

Welcome to the New Normal.

Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 01:33 PM (G/zuv)

It's "Mourning in America".

Posted by: Nighthawk at January 27, 2012 09:35 AM (RSqz2)

30 It's bacon I love. The Obama Recovery sucks worse than the Star Wars prequels.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 01:28 PM (8y9MW)



But, 3D!!!!!

Posted by: © Sponge at January 27, 2012 09:35 AM (UK9cE)

31

But, but...we haven't applied the Affirmative Action Curve!

Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at January 27, 2012 09:35 AM (+7fwG)

32 But is it fair?

Posted by: dagny at January 27, 2012 09:35 AM (0BpYu)

33 26 Yep,that's all it is.Peoplecan get used to anything.

Posted by: Steevy at January 27, 2012 09:35 AM (vd4t0)

34 things are going better for Adam, I think that's the extent of his thinking on this. and I'm glad, good for him, he's taking huge risks with Ace Broadcasting

Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 09:35 AM (SB0V2)

35 by the way, carolla is wealth and furthermore is self-employed in a business which probably is fairly insulated from the economy. And he knows mostly show business people. So his primary method of knowing how the economy is performing is... the media he acknowledges will spin it. That to me is a data point, just a minor one, but a reminder that the media does still have a big role here in spinning people's feelings. Even with a lesser reach and influence, they still have some juice there.

Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 09:35 AM (nj1bB)

36
If gas drops to $2.95/gal and unemployment dips below 8% by October, you bet your ass that we'll be in Boom Times!

That's how it will be framed by the Left/media. And it will have been so long since things were that "good" that people will buy the spin.

Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 09:35 AM (G/zuv)

37 It is easier to talk down and economy like the MFM did with Bush than it is to talk up an economy.

People notice high gas prices and friend still out of work and the lack of available jobs locally.

It is my belief that the MFM will only make it worse by talking it up. The pundits and beltway people will be shocked just like they were in the Reagan election when SCOAMF gets his ass handed to him.

Many of my non-political friends are scratching their heads wondering how things are improving with statements like, "I don't see it" and "where are the jobs."

The MFM and democrats are excavating their grave and blindly waltzing into it.

Posted by: Fire with Fire at January 27, 2012 09:36 AM (lcwvr)

38 People are just ignoring how bad it is.

I'm not sure they're "ignoring" it, I think it's more like what sooth said earlier: welcome to the new normal.

In general, Americans are only going "hide" for just so long.  Eventually they'll decide the worst is over (even if it isn't) and try to get back to normal.  So they're not shopping and spending because they're ignoring reality, but because they can't change the situation, and they like to shop, eat, and spend.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:36 AM (8y9MW)

39 The economy is not getting better Adam, you're just used to the suck.

Posted by: Dr Spank at January 27, 2012 09:36 AM (lVGED)

40 re: people are getting used to it yeah, that's probably a big thing. Once you've internalized the idea that it is "normal" that it should be horrible, minor moves upward feel good, because your frame of reference has now been, um, deleveraged or something downward.

Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 09:37 AM (nj1bB)

41 Is it getting a bit too hot in here? I am starting to think that the bubbles in the water aren't coming from the jets.

Posted by: Frog in the Hot Tub at January 27, 2012 09:37 AM (jucos)

42

Or as Reuters tells it

"The US economy grew at its fastest pace in 1-1/2 years in the fourth quarter of 2011"

Happy days are here again . . . .

Posted by: imp at January 27, 2012 09:37 AM (UaxA0)

43

 The stock market is still over 10k despite all the shit the government has done.



It's a good thing the Stock Market can't be manipulated by the administration!

Posted by: garrett at January 27, 2012 09:37 AM (+7fwG)

44 that despite Obama we're making a little progress.

1.7% isn't progress.  It's dying slower.

Really, 1.7% "Growth" is functionally a decline.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:38 AM (8y9MW)

45

Well, we'll see how the global economy holds up.

 

Posted by: Ben at January 27, 2012 09:38 AM (wuv1c)

46 43 It'how FDR kept getting reflected.

Posted by: Steevy at January 27, 2012 09:38 AM (vd4t0)

47 That worries me. I always like getting the input of less-partisan types, because it's their beliefs, not ours, that swing elections.

I had an old friend tell me he sees improvement, and thinks it's important that our gov't "invests in infrastructure" so he is apparently willing to give Obama another bite at the apple and wants another stimulus.  It about gave me a coronary, and it's utterly stupid to believe that, but he's going to vote for Obama unless I or someone else can put him on some facts....but he's not really interested in those.  He loves the class warfare red meat too much to think rationally.

Posted by: Dave S. at January 27, 2012 09:39 AM (UvR6d)

48 In general, Americans are only going "hide" for just so long. Eventually they'll decide the worst is over (even if it isn't) and try to get back to normal. So they're not shopping and spending because they're ignoring reality, but because they can't change the situation, and they like to shop, eat, and spend.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 01:36 PM (8y9MW)



Eh.....good point.

Posted by: © Sponge at January 27, 2012 09:39 AM (UK9cE)

49
Ace did a post more than a couple of years ago on the coming of the new normal and how we're on the way of mirroring the shitty economy of Europe.

I don't why Ace abandoned or forgot about the idea because it proving to be 100% prophetic.

Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 09:39 AM (G/zuv)

50 {{Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 01:35 PM (nj1bB) ))

So it has always been; so it will always be.  Some people like Newt because they think he can Unspin the MFM, but he can't.  Media influence is steadily declining, but still an important factor.

The Good News is that they have more influence over those least likely to vote ( than over those most likely to vote ). 

Posted by: SantaRosaStan, sedated yet paranoid at January 27, 2012 09:39 AM (UqKQV)

51 Perception always trumps reality in stuff like this.  Since everyone is saying "thigs are getting better" then you aren't going to say "no they aren't." cBecause then that means that you did soemthing in your personal life so that things are getting better in the country and for everyone else but not for you.  Then you look like it's individual and not across the board.  So you are going to hear everything is getting better and you aren't going to say a word.  You have to protect everyone's perception of you after all. 

Except if you are a hedge funder, then you're going to act accordingly.

I hinted at this the other day in a comment I made cause I am hearing this from non political folks also  I think I said all you need is the perception of things getting better right before the election.  My dad says every president helps the illusion along during the re election year.  I think I said the day after the election it could all collapse but as long as it looks good up until then it's tough to fight.

Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 09:39 AM (oZfic)

52 "It's not what the economy's actually doing, but how the media will spin it "

Balderdash.    You can talk a good economy down but you can't talk a bad economy up.

Posted by: toby928© at January 27, 2012 09:40 AM (GTbGH)

53 if my husband making what he used to make 30 years ago is the new normal, stop the world i want to jump off.
where in the hell is the hope ? i see what the change is.

Posted by: willow at January 27, 2012 09:40 AM (TomZ9)

54 And if you remember, Bush's recovery was considered horrible, virtually a depression. Plus it was cheaper than the mirage of obama's Recovery Summer which cost $862 billion. ********** The total estimated cost of President Obama's stimulus bill keeps changing. The Congressional Budget Office now puts the ultimate price tag at $821 billion, $7 billion higher than its previous estimate, and well above the initial projection of $787 billion back when the package was passed in 2009. At one point, the stimulus cost was $862 billion. (USA Today) *****************************

Posted by: Ron Paul's Nursing Assistant at January 27, 2012 09:40 AM (r2PLg)

55 38 by the way, carolla is wealth and furthermore is self-employed in a business which probably is fairly insulated from the economy.
------

I was thinking this very thing while watching an Astaire & Rogers flick the other day.  It was Top Hat and feature all of that Depression-era glam and opulence. 

Maybe the silver lining in an Obama second term will be the return of the musical. 

Posted by: Y-not at January 27, 2012 09:40 AM (5H6zj)

56 the Stock Market makes Ponzi look like Mother Theresa

Posted by: SantaRosaStan, sedated yet paranoid at January 27, 2012 09:40 AM (UqKQV)

57 I can only tell you that I still have many patients losing their Dental Insurance ( of no small concern for me) because they are being laid off.

Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 09:41 AM (i6RpT)

58 >>>I don't why Ace abandoned or forgot about the idea because it proving to be 100% prophetic. I half-remembered that, but couldn't remember if it was real or a dream. When you write ten or fifteen posts a day you tend to forget what you've written. Sometimes people ask me what I wrote today and I say, honestly, "I have no idea, I don't remember."

Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 09:41 AM (nj1bB)

59
Obama and the Democrats have done a remarkable job at training people to lower their expectations.

Frog, slowly boiling pot, etc.

Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 09:41 AM (G/zuv)

60 22  My clients aren't convinced we've seen the bottom, yet.

Posted by: garrett at January 27, 2012 01:33 PM (+7fwG)

.

And they would be right. ....Because we are still in the circling-the-drain stage.

.

Personally....I am stocking up on Toilet Paper.

.

What! .....I figure that when it all goes to shit, we will run out of toilet paper. And they will start rationing the stuff. .....So I see it all now....no toilet paper, because my men folk use waaay too much of the stuff for each wipe. ....So, there I'll be, the one who will be having to wash all their shit rags.....in a big iron kettle over an open fire.

.

Start stocking up on toilet paper now! 

Posted by: wheatie at January 27, 2012 09:41 AM (ALwK/)

61 It's a good thing the Stock Market can't be manipulated by the administration!

Posted by: garrett at January 27, 2012 01:37 PM (+7fwG)



True, but the average Joe hasn't yanked their money out of it.  We all know that QE is a really bad idea, especially when done over and over and over......They're still not putting their money under their mattresses.

Posted by: © Sponge at January 27, 2012 09:41 AM (UK9cE)

62 The only reason it "feels like" it's getting better is because the R's took over the House and stopped the manic legislative lunacy that was going on from 2006-2010, but especially 2008-2010.

Posted by: The Mega Independent at January 27, 2012 09:42 AM (r1H6z)

63 Two words : Moon Shot!

Posted by: Newt Gingrich, American at January 27, 2012 09:42 AM (lVGED)

64 Cuba's growth rate that year was 2.7 percent, per Weasel Zippers. The Cuban Commies considered that a disaster, and vowed to do better.

Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2012 09:43 AM (niZvt)

65 created a new hashtag #PresidentZoolander in response to SCOAMF's message that he wants an economy in which "Where We're Making Stuff And Selling Stuff And Moving It Around" real good. How can this economy be even growing at that rate? Too many people are exiting the workforce. The books, they must be cooked.

Posted by: joeindc44 - tebow's new lifting coach at January 27, 2012 09:43 AM (QxSug)

66

Sometimes people ask me what I wrote today and I say, honestly, "I have no idea, I don't remember.

I say the same thing when asked, "What did Ace write about, today?'.

Posted by: Breitbart at January 27, 2012 09:43 AM (+7fwG)

67 WINNING!

Posted by: Debbie Wasserman-Schultz at January 27, 2012 09:44 AM (niZvt)

68
We had Obama and the Democrats on the run in 2010. On the economy; on the deficit.

I don't understand how we lost all that momentum. But I have to look at (mostly) Boehner and McConnell and how they squandered the momentum and mandate.

Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 09:44 AM (G/zuv)

69 I'm too lazy to check, but aren't most Q4 periods a little better than the rest of the year due to holiday travel and spending?

Posted by: booger at January 27, 2012 09:44 AM (29wvc)

70 38 by the way, carolla is wealth
-------
BTW, don't think I didn't notice your not-so-subtle attack on Capitalism, ace. Eleventy!11!!!

Posted by: Y-not at January 27, 2012 09:44 AM (5H6zj)

71 72 Yep.

Posted by: Steevy at January 27, 2012 09:44 AM (vd4t0)

72 But I have to look at (mostly) Boehner and McConnell and how they squandered the momentum and mandate.

Well, I'd say you're looking in the right place.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:45 AM (8y9MW)

73

One little shake and we're over the cliff in a very immediate and very painful manner.

If someone can name an actual green shoot (no, you cannot use North Dakota--it's not a national indicator), I'd be glad to hear it.  Seriously.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 27, 2012 09:45 AM (B+qrE)

74

Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at January 27, 2012 01:35 PM (phlKA)

 

With the devaluation of the dollar, inflation, and another million LEGAL immigrants...

 

We're in negative numbers per capita.

 

They just keep changing how they count the numbers to make it look better... much like the UnEmployment numbers.

 

If we measured inflation like the 80's? We're over 10%... if the 90's? Over 8%

 

The idea of of 'don't raise the bridge, lower the water', only works until you run aground.

Posted by: Colosus, The Forbin Project at January 27, 2012 09:45 AM (lZBBB)

75 A recession is when your neighbor loses his job.  A depression is when you lose your job.  And recovery is when I keep my job.

Posted by: Obama at January 27, 2012 09:45 AM (Hx5uv)

76 And even after noting that of course the media is going to spin this as an improving economy, he said he sort of felt like it was an improving economy.

1.7% is improving. . . very very slowly. Eh I wouldn't worry to much about that on fire economy ace. You've got at least one more financial crises between now and election day. Can they hold this bitch together till November? IDK, I don't know what is holding it together now. I feel like the economy is a game of Jenga and I ran out of moves I saw last turn.

Everything will have to go perfect for O to maintain a 2% growth over the next year.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 27, 2012 09:46 AM (0q2P7)

77 I'm too lazy to check, but aren't most Q4 periods a little better than the rest of the year due to holiday travel and spending?

Pretty sure that is correct.
But, then, I'm also too lazy to check, so what do I know?

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:46 AM (8y9MW)

78 Soothie, you're so right I think the mo' was squandered pretty much immediately, I remember my heart sinking as soon as the Boehner started WEEPING up at the dias . . .

Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 09:47 AM (SB0V2)

79

Start stocking up on toilet paper now!

 

I've got two full rolls of 1-ply.   I'm good for at least a decade.

Posted by: Sheryl Crow's brown stained index finger at January 27, 2012 09:47 AM (+7fwG)

80 This is the chart I mentioned in the previous thread. We're now so far behind in GDP growth, it is starting to look like a multi-decade window to get us back to baseline.
We're like $1trillion to $2trillion in GDP below where we'd be in previous recessions.
(Interestingly, the 2001 recession was merely a correction back to baseline, we didn't drop below the baseline GDP trend. Now, we're way, way below it.)

Posted by: Jimmuy at January 27, 2012 09:47 AM (7jkW7)

81 Re the getting used to it: I gotta think that with more men unemployed and picking up some of the household duties while they're out of work, like grocery shopping, there are still plenty of folks who still discovering just how bad it is.  When I shop, the working-aged men and older folks just stand in stunned silence when going to buy staple items. 

Posted by: Y-not at January 27, 2012 09:47 AM (5H6zj)

82 Wait till they revise Q4 GDP down like they have with previous quarters. Q1 was revised from 1.9% to 0.4%. Q2 was revised down from 1.3% to 1.0%. And Q3 was revised from 2.5% to 1.8%. The MFM predictably yells from the mountain tops the original number but buries the revision. Let's see the final annual number after the Q4 revision.

Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 27, 2012 09:47 AM (1Jaio)

83 What you fuckers need is a terrorist attack. Bunch of dead Americans! Happy days, again.

Posted by: Genesis P. Orrige at January 27, 2012 09:48 AM (NE0Ln)

84 Somehow, 3.0% down to 1.7% is headlined in the Chicago Tribune as showing signs of improvements with possible bumps ahead.

Posted by: ejo at January 27, 2012 09:48 AM (QD+0n)

85 The MSM can spin stable as a recovery only until there is another shock.

It won't be Obama's fault!

Posted by: Make Believe Media at January 27, 2012 09:48 AM (Hx5uv)

86 , I'd be glad to hear it. Seriously. Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 27, 2012 01:45 PM (B+qrE) ******** Texas.

Posted by: Ron Paul's Nursing Assistant at January 27, 2012 09:48 AM (r2PLg)

87

"That worries me. I always like getting the input of less-partisan types, because it's their beliefs, not ours, that swing elections."


I think the Average Joe swing voter test will be whether he can answer yest to the question: “if I hate my boss, can I tell him to stuff it and find another job in a reasonable amount of time?”  I definitely donÂ’t think weÂ’ll be there anytime soon and certainly not before November 2012. 

Posted by: Alec Leamas at January 27, 2012 09:49 AM (mg08E)

88 figures lie and liars figure, or so it's said

Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 09:49 AM (SB0V2)

89 Also based on the 3% growth in 2010, I would say the "recovery" portion of our growth is over and we are settling into a long term 2-2.5% growth cycle for the coming decade. Yay. Gimmie more of the Obama guy.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 27, 2012 09:49 AM (0q2P7)

90 But, Obama's 2.8% GDP is a much more luxurious 2.8% than Bush's. It's quality, not quantity.

Posted by: Roy at January 27, 2012 09:49 AM (VndSC)

91 If someone can name an actual green shoot (no, you cannot use North Dakota--it's not a national indicator), I'd be glad to hear it. Seriously.

Texas.
Arizona.

Actually, in terms of % growth, I should probably turn those around, but you get the point.

The fact is that the SCOAMT and the Democrats have figured out that those of us who want prosperity are going to work towards it no matter what they do- and they can ride our coat-tails just enough to convince the sleepy-brained middle that "things" are improving.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:49 AM (8y9MW)

92 by the way I predict six things a month. I'm gonna hit on a few of them!!

Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 09:49 AM (nj1bB)

93 Wait till they revise Q4 GDP down like they have with previous quarters. Q1 was revised from 1.9% to 0.4%. Q2 was revised down from 1.3% to 1.0%. And Q3 was revised from 2.5% to 1.8%. The MFM predictably yells from the mountain tops the original number but buries the revision. Let's see the final annual number after the Q4 revision. ****** Agreed, was thinking exactly this.

Posted by: Ron Paul's Nursing Assistant at January 27, 2012 09:49 AM (r2PLg)

94 5 did Carolla actually give reasons He believed the economy is getting better?

Posted by: willow at January 27, 2012 01:27 PM (TomZ9)


May have been the Night Train talking.


Posted by: Cast Iron at January 27, 2012 09:50 AM (EL+OC)

95 we have green shoots here in PA - the horrifying FRACKING - but seriously I'm pretty happy to see central and northern PA in a boomlet from shale gas

Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 09:50 AM (SB0V2)

96 >>>Wait till they revise Q4 GDP down like they have with previous quarters. I'm sure it will get big coverage.

Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 09:50 AM (nj1bB)

97 We're doing well but I see my friends and neighbors doubling up, out of work, credit destroyed from a lost house or their stuck in an underwater house because they know they'd never get another one, defaulting on their student loans or getting eaten up by them...

I don't think they're getting used to it. Their situation is deteriorating fast and another shock can put people in that situation on the street.
Posted by: runninrebel at January 27, 2012 01:44 PM (N/1Dm


Listening to the idiot CIC today and over the past several months, I'm just wondering when he's just going to sign an executive order forcing companies to hire and colleges to charge less.

"Companies need to hire more people and do their part."

"Colleges need to keep their costs down and charge less."


He really, truly has no clue how the economy works.

Posted by: © Sponge at January 27, 2012 09:50 AM (UK9cE)

98 "Things aren't getting better, things have stabilized."

Fucked is the new "normal"

Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 27, 2012 09:51 AM (hOraP)

99

If I was receiving 1.7% interest from a bank right now, I wouldn't consider that a decline.

 

If your income were fixed to that yield, and your living expenses were rising faster than your rate of return, you'd be significantly less impressed.

Posted by: Uncle Sam on a fixed budget at January 27, 2012 09:51 AM (+7fwG)

100

Average SAVINGS rates are at historicly low levels... why?

 

Because people KNOW they may as well spend it, because if its sitting in a bank, with the low interest rates available, they are loosing money.

 

When Inflation, is more than interest, for a long period of time... saving in a bank is a Loser..

Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 09:52 AM (lZBBB)

101 "When you write ten or fifteen posts a day you tend to forget what you've written." I know the feeling. I looked at the number of posts I had written, only one per day, over the past couple of years, and said to myself, "Shit, that was a lot of posts." Of course, being a noob, I thought I'd done OK. Now I just feel like I've pretty much said everything I wanted to say, and if I keep going, I'd just be repeating myself. You, Ace, have a great fount from which to draw.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 09:52 AM (d0Tfm)

102 and erg's got nuthin

Posted by: situation normal at January 27, 2012 09:52 AM (GTbGH)

103 How so? If I was receiving 1.7% interest from a bank right now, I wouldn't consider that a decline.

Because GDP isn't your savings account interest.

GDP is more like your pay-check, so start by imagining you got a 1.7% raise.  Still better than nothing, right?  But now imagine you ALSO added, say, 2% more expenses over the previous year.  Now how's that 1.7% looking?

It's still better than an actual negative number, but as long as your increase in income is out-paced by your increase in out-go, you're losing ground.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:52 AM (8y9MW)

104 remember, clinton played with his end of term numbers in an attempt to boost Gore's chances at election, hiding the burst of the clinton bubble for as long as possible. Any growth right now seems a little....suspicious, a dead cat bounce for Great Depression 2.0?

Posted by: joeindc44 - tebow's new lifting coach at January 27, 2012 09:52 AM (QxSug)

105 My clients aren't convinced we've seen the bottom, yet.
*** *** ***
Neither are mine, but almost every one of them has seen improvement in their own business. There's no question that, generally speaking, the economy has improved from the free-fall conditions of 3Q08 - 2Q09.

Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 27, 2012 09:52 AM (+lsX1)

106 Posted by: BlackOrchidHeartlessAgain at January 27, 2012 01:47 PM (SB0V2)
Boner and Bitch had no intention of maintaining the TEA party advantage handed to them in spite of the Republican party's best efforts.  They are the kind of pols that were early adopters of the "go along to get along" school of a perpetual minority party.
If they ever find the hill on which to make a stand, I doubt that it will be before 2020.

Posted by: Hrothgar at January 27, 2012 09:53 AM (i3+c5)

107 @97
Utah is continuing to improve.  Our governor has proposed reducing unemployment insurance premiums to further promote growth.  Housing is reportedly stabilizing (not down near the Las Vegas market, but up here in Salt Lake and Utah Valleys), unemployment isn't great but I think it's improved and certainly not one of the worst.  We're getting some of the companies that are fleeing CA.  Just got our first movie studio (that will have a soundstage) this week, but the biggest get was Adobe.  They're building a big campus here.

Posted by: Y-not at January 27, 2012 09:53 AM (5H6zj)

108 ABC "news" just informed me that we had 3% growth. Right after they re-played a fawning clip from the Diane Sawyer interview.

Posted by: rectal exam at January 27, 2012 09:53 AM (O7ksG)

109 erg's here? ergie stars in... I NEVER FELT SO TALL AS STANDING IN MY MOMMY'S SHOES

Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 09:53 AM (nj1bB)

110 I feel 1.7% better than I did before I read this.

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at January 27, 2012 09:54 AM (3ETnh)

111

It's not the new normal so much as " economic realization" has not dawned yet. When it does and the average investor concludes that none of this debt will be paid you'll see that panicked run for the exit that always happens when economic bubbles break.

Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at January 27, 2012 09:54 AM (6BgmB)

112 "U.S. GDP growth quickens, but speed bumps ahead", sayeth the Trib.  Also an article by Eric Zorn noting the dog whistle anti-semitism theory of using Saul Alinsky's name. 

Posted by: ejo at January 27, 2012 09:54 AM (QD+0n)

113 I had an old friend tell me he sees improvement, and thinks it's important that our gov't "invests in infrastructure" so he is apparently willing to give Obama another bite at the apple and wants another stimulus.
Posted by: Dave S.


5 Myths Behind Obama's Infrastructure Spending Push
http://tinyurl.com/88m4cp5

Debunking ObamaÂ’s Latest Jobs Myth
http://tinyurl.com/7twddg6

Posted by: weft cut-loop at January 27, 2012 09:54 AM (+Jr2Z)

114 CONS...!!!! List your ten favorite movies, cons...!!!

Posted by: Ergie The Gender-Confused Drunk at January 27, 2012 09:54 AM (nj1bB)

115 http://tinyurl.com/6rqzd9h

Chart.

Posted by: Jimmuy at January 27, 2012 09:54 AM (7jkW7)

116 Average SAVINGS rates are at historicly low levels... why?

Because people KNOW they may as well spend it, because if its sitting in a bank, with the low interest rates available, they are loosing money.

When Inflation, is more than interest, for a long period of time... saving in a bank is a Loser..

Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 01:52 PM (lZBBB)

 

When I was a kid my mom had us start up a savings account to get us used to the concept of long terms saving.

 

When I was in college the bank sent me a letter saying that because the account wasn't worth their time, they would start stealing money from it until it was all gone.

 


Posted by: Oldcat at January 27, 2012 09:54 AM (z1N6a)

117 How so? If I was receiving 1.7% interest from a bank right now, I wouldn't consider that a decline.

What percentage of that 1.7% is due to massive govt deficit spending?  If the answer is 100%, then we're effectively at zero growth, if more than 100%, then we're in defacto decline.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 27, 2012 09:55 AM (hOraP)

118

Posted by: ace at January 27, 2012 01:53 PM (nj1bB)

 

Oh, now we're doing re-runs?  or did you forget that you used that one smacking around gaylord the other night?

Posted by: garrett at January 27, 2012 09:55 AM (+7fwG)

119 my question now would be do any of the candidates have the savvy to hire the best minds to turn this around? do they have the will or guts?
is it possible to turn it around?

Posted by: willow at January 27, 2012 09:56 AM (TomZ9)

120

How so? If I was receiving 1.7% interest from a bank right now, I wouldn't consider that a decline. Sure I'd love to see 2.5% GDP or so, which is a nice balance, but I've survived too many recessions (when I had to make a payroll every week) not to appreciate a positive number.



It's Obama, so I guess I'm lowering the standard. 'Don't raise the bridge, lower the water' or 'the soft-bigotry of low expectations' both come to mind.

 

Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at January 27, 2012 01:48 PM (phlKA)

 

Simple, REAL inflation is higher than your rate of return.  Key is that banks can get all the capital they need from the Fed for no interest, so why should they pay you anything for the use of YOUR money?

 

 

Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 09:56 AM (lZBBB)

121 I'm not seeing anything about Q4 on Kos, TPM or Huffpo, apparently they don't think it's very good news, pretty sure they'd have it splashed all over their banners if they thought it was beneficial.

Posted by: booger at January 27, 2012 09:56 AM (29wvc)

122 How so? If I was receiving 1.7% interest from a bank right now, I wouldn't consider that a decline.

What percentage of that 1.7% is due to massive govt deficit spending? If the answer is 100%, then we're effectively at zero growth, if more than 100%, then we're in defacto decline.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 27, 2012 01:55 PM (hOraP) 

 

If the government's idea of a big lie to sell a recovery is 1.7 percent, then things must really be bad.

Posted by: Oldcat at January 27, 2012 09:57 AM (z1N6a)

123 "the average investor concludes that none of this debt will be paid"

Oh it'll be paid back.  We're doing it the old fashioned way - devalue the currency...a lot.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 27, 2012 09:57 AM (hOraP)

124 Even my hardcore lib friends & family mock the media's constant breathless reporting of the recovery and unexpected drops in unemployment. They believe their eyes - empty storefronts as far as the eye can see, friends still out of work and layoffs still happening, department stores deserted, prices through the roof, etc.

Sometimes I think we underestimate the cynicism that most people have for the MSM.

Posted by: jeannebodine, Team Meteor-Bot at January 27, 2012 09:57 AM (byR8d)

125 Now that the economy is booming again, it is time to step out with that "someone special".

Posted by: Lowered Expectations Dating Service at January 27, 2012 09:57 AM (jucos)

126 Get gas prices up to $4.00+ a gallon.  Keep them there for a while.  Then back them off to $3.00 and we are freakin thrilled.  Aren't the same basic tactics used to train animals?

Posted by: Havedash at January 27, 2012 09:57 AM (sFD5n)

127

Key is that banks can get all the capital they need from the Fed for no interest

 

ONLY if they do what they are told! 

I won't have them lending to succesful white businesspeople.  There's been too much of that in this country.

Posted by: Barack Obama at January 27, 2012 09:58 AM (+7fwG)

128 I thought it was Raykon that used the Connns shtick?

Posted by: willow at January 27, 2012 09:58 AM (TomZ9)

129 Aren't the same basic tactics used to train animals?

Yes.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 09:58 AM (8y9MW)

130

When I was a kid my mom had us start up a savings account to get us used to the concept of long terms saving.
When I was in college the bank sent me a letter saying that because the account wasn't worth their time, they would start stealing money from it until it was all gone.


 

Posted by: Oldcat at January 27, 2012 01:54 PM (z1N6a)

 

When I retired from the Navy, 15 years ago, I left a bit over $100 in a Navy Federal Credit Union Savings account... they just closed it because 'fees' ate that all up.

 

Hear ya.

Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 09:58 AM (lZBBB)

131

Every time I start to feel the least bit optimistic, I remember that historical interest rates on Federal borrowing is closer to 5% that to 1.  When interest returns to something close to reality, all the taxes in the country won't pay the carrying charges for the debt the democrats have run up.


You're welcome.

Posted by: toby928© at January 27, 2012 09:59 AM (GTbGH)

132 I was out walking last weekend and ran into a guy I know, mid 50's seemingly intelligent, as he was going by on his snowmobile. He mentioned while he had been unemployed for over a year and every married couple that he knew had at least one partner in the same boat, he's heard that the economy was picking up.

As I not too gently chided him about media manipulation and that nothing would change for the better until Obama was defeated, he proudly stated that he didn't have the problem with O that I did.

And I paused for several seconds and asked Oh, ........ you don't? while shaking my head.

This is the level of self deception going on among a lot of the enlightened NE types.

I don't think he likes me now, joining a lifelong list of liberal contacts that I have encountered. No way to change their thinking, so fuck 'em.

Posted by: ontherocks at January 27, 2012 09:59 AM (ZJCDy)

133

OT:  Just had to sit down with a client and review documents for two hours.  His breath was so horrible that I think he'd just arrived after felching a Russian fishmonger's wife.

 

Blech.  I think I'll drop a steamer in the corner of my office just to make it smell better.

Posted by: Sharkman at January 27, 2012 09:59 AM (RtpCp)

134 btw, since the price of ordinary goods have nearly doubled in the last 3 years, the idiot who thinks that a GDP growth of 1.7% equals his savings account interest rate should know that because of inflation (due to QE1 and QE2 and flooding the market with trillions of borrowed stimulus dollars), you're still sinking.

Posted by: joeindc44 - tebow's new lifting coach at January 27, 2012 09:59 AM (QxSug)

135


Now that the economy is booming again, it is time to step out with that "someone special".

Posted by: Lowered Expectations Dating Service

LOFL

Exactly

Posted by: imp at January 27, 2012 09:59 AM (UaxA0)

136 How so? If I was receiving 1.7% interest from a bank right now, I wouldn't consider that a decline. Posted by: Schrödinger's cat

You would if CPI was up, say 2.0% YoY.

Gee, I wonder what the CPI really is...

" The all items index has risen 3.0 percent over the last 12 months, ..."
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm

Well, ain't that sompin'!

Posted by: weft cut-loop at January 27, 2012 10:01 AM (+Jr2Z)

137 Well, just got back from early voting here in central FL...I was pleased to vote for my man, Newt.  I know the clerk, heheh, so I was able to vote **17 times,** heheh. 


[JUST KIDDING, PEOPLE.]

But I did vote for the man whom the New Republic's Sidney Blumenthal wrote in 1984 represented "Reaganism on fast forward."  [more on that next week]

Posted by: JewishOdysseus at January 27, 2012 10:01 AM (rrxFx)

138 What you fuckers need is a terrorist attack. Bunch of dead Americans! Happy days, again.

Oh I think plenty of Americans are going to die over O's insane dream of utopia that threatens to obliterate the US economy. I've done my level best to slow, and stop it. Funny thing is most of those folks are going to be people like you in the end. The least you can do is thank me.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 27, 2012 10:01 AM (0q2P7)

139

Things are really fragile for me and B'Gal right now. We have no money left over at all, but we can eat. Her health isn't all that great and I'm no spring chicken either. If anything happened to me, she'd be OK, if anything happens to her, I'm homeless.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 10:01 AM (d0Tfm)

140 No friends reference?

Stick w/ it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5z0Gitlj9bM

Posted by: Jahiliyya at January 27, 2012 10:01 AM (D3MNp)

141 I was out walking last weekend and ran into a guy I know,

Then you should be more careful.

And I paused for several seconds and asked Oh, ........ you don't? while shaking my head. 

My response, as someone currently employed, would probably have been, "No.  You have exactly the same problem with O that I do: you, specifically, are unemployed.  I'd rather get rid of him so you have a chance to find remunerative employment."

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 10:01 AM (8y9MW)

142

Alison Rosen is a twit.

 

I would do things to her. 

 Things that would stain the sheets and leave us sticky.

Posted by: garrett at January 27, 2012 10:01 AM (+7fwG)

143 O just got applauded for the good economic news. Wow.

Posted by: TomH at January 27, 2012 10:02 AM (q1Ebc)

144 In our most candid interview ever. Not only has President Obama sigle handedly killed Osama and now the Somali kidnappers and rescued a girl. He has revived the economy to a roaring pace. Our viewers asked why President Obama hasn't mentioned any of his success.

Posted by: Diane Sawyer at January 27, 2012 10:02 AM (lCXr2)

145

Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at January 27, 2012 01:48 PM (phlKA)

 

1.7% GDP growth is a decline because it takes 3% to keep up with population growth. It isn't like comparing it to your savings account getting 1.7% interest, it's like increasing the size of your family expenses 3% while getting a 1.7% raise. 

Posted by: robtr at January 27, 2012 10:02 AM (MtwBb)

146 Abc news saying that NASA is taking applications for it's next astronaut class.

Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 10:03 AM (oZfic)

147 Neither are mine, but almost every one of them has seen improvement in their own business. There's no question that, generally speaking, the economy has improved from the free-fall conditions of 3Q08 - 2Q09.

Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 27, 2012 01:52 PM (+lsX1)

 

The overall economy still is poor, of course, due mainly to housing being in the dumps.  But some sectors are OK.

I can only speak from the narrow field of auto manufacture, but we have too much work.  So much that it's driving down quality and delivery performance.  The Japan earth quake f-ed up the whole supply chain.  Also, the upcoming model change overs have every tool shop in the world building molds/dies at break neck pace.  Tool and die was a dying industry 5 years ago.  Now they can't find enough people to do all the work.  The school I went to offers a tooling engineer degree, and their 27 or so grads had 200+ employers chasing them.

Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 10:03 AM (xUM1Q)

148

Conditions in the fuherbunker are improving.  I feel it.

A. Hilter, March 12, 1945, Excerpt from private diary

Posted by: Count de Monet at January 27, 2012 10:03 AM (4q5tP)

149 147 Things are really fragile for me and B'Gal right now. We have no money left over at all, but we can eat. Her health isn't all that great and I'm no spring chicken either. If anything happened to me, she'd be OK, if anything happens to her, I'm homeless.  

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 02:01 PM (d0Tfm)

 

Hear ya... sold the house to get out of debt... working for 1/4 of what I used to make... and had to start my own business to do so....

 

But then again, I'm in Central California with an Public unemployment rate of 18%, and real probaly in the high 20's.

Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 10:04 AM (lZBBB)

150 But I did vote for the man whom the New Republic's Sidney Blumenthal wrote in 1984 represented "Reaganism on fast forward." [more on that next week] ******* Alan Keyes is still on the ballot!?

Posted by: Ron Paul's Nursing Assistant at January 27, 2012 10:04 AM (r2PLg)

151 Schrödinger's cat hmm, not many i suppose, look at who we have running, I guess they don't want to jump into the snake pit , only to be sliced and diced, by the media, the dems , hell even by our own.

Posted by: willow at January 27, 2012 10:05 AM (TomZ9)

152 67   Two words : Moon Shot!

.....Posted by: Newt Gingrich, American at January 27, 2012 01:42 PM (lVGED)

.

Yeah. Make fun of the idea all you want.

.

But a balls-to-the-wall Space Program would create the kind of jobs that people are whining and bitching about *not* having.

.

Most people don't realize that the US being the leader in Aviation and Aerospace is what lead to us being the leader in technology. .....But it is circling the drain now. .....And China and Russia are the ones with a surge in all those high tech jobs.

.

It wouldn't require a huge outlay of government money to stimulate a renaisance in space exploration.......just some big tax incentives. .....That idea of Newt's about offering some 'Prizes' is a good one too.

Posted by: wheatie at January 27, 2012 10:06 AM (ALwK/)

153 A better question is how many patriotic and qualified Americans would move to the DC area, most likely take a huge cut in pay (if they were coming from a business background) while enduring a huge increase in costs?

Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at January 27, 2012 01:59 PM (phlKA)

 

Indeed.  And even if we could bring in the brainiacs, the fact is that the entire federal bureaucracy is a huge pile of incompetents, communists, and sundry traitors.  They will resist change to the bitter end.  Remember Condi Rice?  Couldn't even reform the State Department.  Don't tell me those people get paid small salaries and are irreplaceable. 

The beast is just too big.

Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 10:07 AM (xUM1Q)

154 ABC "news" also informed me that Obama said the stimulus worked and that without it, we'd really be hurting.

Posted by: rectal exam at January 27, 2012 10:07 AM (O7ksG)

155 Reactionary, where are you? I'm a Certified Tool and Diemaker. Do you do any business in FL?

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 10:07 AM (d0Tfm)

156

Carolla has a job ... of course he may feel like its getting better because his only measure is the media spin, he has no personal measure  ...  but for the 16 million Americans out of work and the millions working part time jobs all know its not better no matter what the MSM spin is ...

don't forget that nearly every one of those 16 million out of work folks as a father and mother who are retired or nearly retired and they know how bad it is for thier kids ...  thats almost 50 million voting Americans who will ignore the media spin ...

 

Posted by: JeffC at January 27, 2012 10:07 AM (A3tpD)

157

 Obama said the stimulus worked and that without it, we'd really be hurting.

 

Bless that man.

Posted by: Tim the Signmaker at January 27, 2012 10:08 AM (+7fwG)

158

Posted by: wheatie at January 27, 2012 02:06 PM (ALwK/)

 

Hmmm... interesting idea... Declare that US Tax law stops at 100,000 Feet... so anything Space Based in Untaxed by business law?

Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 10:08 AM (lZBBB)

159 1.7% GDP growth is a decline because it takes 3% to keep up with population growth. It isn't like comparing it to your savings account getting 1.7% interest, it's like increasing the size of your family expenses 3% while getting a 1.7% raise.
*** *** *** ***
Nobody is saying that 1.7% is a good number. They are saying that it is better than 0%. Or -1.7%. Or the -9% number we saw in 3Q08. Is it good? No. Is it better? Yes.

Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 27, 2012 10:09 AM (+lsX1)

160 1.7% is about the raise I am giving 3 of the 5 on my staff, and I can assure you they won't be super optimistic about it. 

Posted by: Dave S. at January 27, 2012 10:11 AM (UvR6d)

161 >>My response, as someone currently employed, would probably have been, "No. You have exactly the same problem with O that I do: you, specifically, are unemployed. I'd rather get rid of him so you have a chance to find remunerative employment."

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 02:01 PM (8y9MW)



I know, that's logical AllenG, so you can forget using that tactic with these mentally defective fools.

You could hit this guy in the kisser with a baseball bat emblazoned with the stamp "Obama did this to your teeth" and it would make him prouder to go out and vote for him.


It really is a mental disorder.

Posted by: ontherocks at January 27, 2012 10:11 AM (ZJCDy)

162 Reactionary, where are you? I'm a Certified Tool and Diemaker. Do you do any business in FL?

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 02:07 PM (d0Tfm)

 

Sorry - southern Michigan.  But if you can take the cold, you might consider looking at what might be available up this way.  This is anecdotal, of course, but FWIW my plant does injection molding, and all the tool shops we use are slammed and can barely manage to help us even with urgent repairs.

Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 10:11 AM (xUM1Q)

163 But it's worse growth than last year, you moron. That is kind of a signal that things aren't getting better, isn't it, pea brain? 

Posted by: ejo at January 27, 2012 10:12 AM (QD+0n)

164 They are not getting used to that part of the "new normal", even though we were unable to give anything in 2009.

Posted by: Dave S. at January 27, 2012 10:12 AM (UvR6d)

165 When I shop, the working-aged men and older folks just stand in stunned silence when going to buy staple items.

Then they glare at me when I walk by going, "Holy shit. Holy SHIT."  Dried beans are going for what I used to pay for bratwurst.  Good God.

Posted by: HeatherRadish needs italics. And a beer. at January 27, 2012 10:12 AM (ZKzrr)

166 Here's the problem with the Bush growth rate: it was fueled by two related bubbles, in credit & in housing: that is, the Bush growth rate was both artificially inflated & unsustainable. Here's the problem with the Obama growth rate: it's being held down by two related bubble bursters, in the continuing deleveraging of the two Bush bubbles & in the Fed's ongoing obsessing over inflation vigilantes: that is, the Obama growth rate is both artificially deflated & durable. Look, I hate an awful lot of what Obama is doing, but it does absolutely no one any good at all, including the country, to promote head-in-the-sand attitudes of what happened during the Bush era. We went more than a little nuts, partied like it was 1929, & just about completely trashed the joint, & now we're paying for it in hangover pain. Promoting Bush this way, not facing up to all that went wrong, is absolutely the wrong way to go about contributing to reconstructing conservatism.

Posted by: Rex the Wonder God at January 27, 2012 10:13 AM (vahvH)

167 Nobody is saying that 1.7% is a good number. They are saying that it is better than 0%. Or -1.7%. Or the -9% number we saw in 3Q08. Is it good? No. Is it better? Yes.

Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 27, 2012 02:09 PM (+lsX1)

What you have to remember is that 1.7 isn't the real number.  Its the number that they  got from adding a made up 4th Q number with the slightly less made up 1st 3Q numbers, all of which were moved way way down once nobody was looking.

 

It's like Pravda in the old Soviet Union. You can't believe the actual words, but savvy observers could get a lot of info by looking at who was standing closest to the middle in the propaganda pictures.

Posted by: Oldcat at January 27, 2012 10:13 AM (z1N6a)

168 **1.7% GDP growth is a decline because it takes 3% to keep up with population growth. It isn't like comparingit to your savings account getting 1.7% interest, it's like increasing the size of your family expenses 3% while getting a 1.7% raise.** I don't want to do the math but our population went up 50 million or so in last two decades...and there hasn't been a new baby boom. has there? It seems that population growth is huge, 20% so does that equal the GDP growth?

Posted by: joeindc44 - tebow's new lifting coach at January 27, 2012 10:13 AM (QxSug)

169 It wouldn't require a huge outlay of government money to stimulate a renaisance in space exploration.......just some big tax incentives. .....That idea of Newt's about offering some 'Prizes' is a good one too.

No.  It was and is a stupid fucking idea in the form of a shameless pander to the Florida aerospace industry.

Tax incentives aren't going to lead private industry to engage in building a moon base that would have zero chance of turning a profit.

Know why the US is a leader in aviation?  Because there's a commercial market for it.  Manned Mars expeditions?  Not so much.

Yeah, it's "cool".  I know.  But fulfilling Battlestar Galactica fantasies isn't what we should be spending hundreds of billions of dollars on.  It's not even in the top ten things we should be focusing on.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 27, 2012 10:13 AM (SY2Kh)

170 I'm looking at the 1.7%, pathetic (or even nonexistent) as it may be as taking away the excuse for Obama to take another trillion in 'stimulus money' and crap it away on another round of hand outs to his friends.

Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at January 27, 2012 02:11 PM (phlKA)


Why does he need an excuse?

Posted by: Oldcat at January 27, 2012 10:13 AM (z1N6a)

171

I've given my “drive by reports on what I see locally” in “letters to Miss Emily”- in my name link, but that are scattered about. I'll sum it up.


Emptying malls, shopping centers, & businesses. Houses for sale forever. Block long lines waiting for the thrift stores to open. Half of my black friends who want to work can't find anything, no matter how awful it is.


Inflation? Being a widower I don't use much detergent. Went to the store a few weeks ago to buy some- what had sold for $4-$5 last time were now $8-$10 a bottle. Luckily a new Dollar Store ( “where everything's a dollar...” ) just opened- boy, are they busy- and I got the house brand for a dollar.

Unprecedented!

Posted by: backhoe at January 27, 2012 10:14 AM (QROim)

172 167 Posted by: wheatie at January 27, 2012 02:06 PM (ALwK/)
.
Hmmm... interesting idea... Declare that US Tax law stops at 100,000 Feet... so anything Space Based in Untaxed by business law?

.....Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 02:08 PM (lZBBB)

.

Not a bad idea. ....Now you're thinking.

.

I didn't even mention Helium3. .....Turns out those worthless space rocks we brought back from those Apollo missions....are rich in Helium3.  .....Scientists are telling us that He3 could finally enable us to master cold fusion. .....This is why Russia and China are in a race to get to the Moon. ....To mine for He3.

.

It is being said that one shipment of Helium3 from the Moon, could power our cities for a year.  

Posted by: wheatie at January 27, 2012 10:15 AM (ALwK/)

173 "Sorry - southern Michigan." Damn. I have Reynaud's Syndrome and really need to live where it's warm. I've done mold work, too. I know G-codes and can program with a pencil, paper and a calculator if I need to. Was in the industry for over thirty years and can't find anything down here.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 10:15 AM (d0Tfm)

174 What's that ... Recovery Winter ??

Posted by: William Shatner at January 27, 2012 10:15 AM (e8kgV)

175 Biden: Pelosi, House Dems 'saved this country'
http://tinyurl.com/6lu2njf

Posted by: M80B at January 27, 2012 10:16 AM (d6QMz)

176

I don't want to do the math but our population went up 50 million or so in last two decades...and there hasn't been a new baby boom. has there? It seems that population growth is huge, 20% so does that equal the GDP growth?


 

Posted by: joeindc44 - tebow's new lifting coach at January 27, 2012 02:13 PM (QxSug)

 

Have to add in the 1 million a year in LEGAL immigration.

Posted by: Romeo13 at January 27, 2012 10:16 AM (lZBBB)

177
...the Obama growth rate is both artificially deflated & durable.

Before I send you back under the stairs, I'm going to remind you how Obama is trying to borrow and spend at a break-neck speed our way into prosperity. Bush drove us into a ditch. Obama is driving us off a cliff.

Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 10:16 AM (G/zuv)

178

Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 02:11 PM (xUM1Q)

 

Have you thought about outsourcing to India?

Posted by: Joe biden at January 27, 2012 10:17 AM (+7fwG)

179
Obamanomics is based on "investing" in the non-producers.

Only a fucking idiot college faculty member would think of such a foolish idea.

Posted by: soothsayer at January 27, 2012 10:18 AM (G/zuv)

180

Ace did a post more than a couple of years ago on the coming of the new normal and how we're on the way of mirroring the shitty economy of Europe.

I don't why Ace abandoned or forgot about the idea because it proving to be 100% prophetic.

This is ace.  If he remembers where he left his pants, it's a good day.

Posted by: reason at January 27, 2012 10:18 AM (sPO/s)

181 Ewok don't need pants, silly.

Posted by: garrett at January 27, 2012 10:19 AM (+7fwG)

182 Here's the problem with the Bush growth rate: it was fueled by two related bubbles, in credit & in housing: that is, the Bush growth rate was both artificially inflated & unsustainable.

The same could be said about most other high growth periods.

For example, the Dot Com boom was artificially fueled by a bubble created with reckless investment in anything remotely connected to the Internet and datacom.  This was followed by the bubble bursting in 2000.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 27, 2012 10:19 AM (SY2Kh)

183

Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 27, 2012 02:09 PM (+lsX1)

 

That wasn't my point. I was saying that even though it is a positive number it is still a decline because it is below the 3% growth rate needed to balance between population growth and growth in the economy so we continue to decline in terms of overall performance.

 

Is a larger number better than a smaller number, yes. Are we growing enough to increase the size of the workforce, no. That is my point.

Posted by: robtr at January 27, 2012 10:19 AM (MtwBb)

184 Despite the passing of my father, the economy is improving!  Why, just yesterday, I heard that there have been several new delicious recipes for dirt cookies currently being passed around!

Posted by: Kim Jong Un at January 27, 2012 10:19 AM (sPO/s)

185 What we really need to focus our money on is killing those dragons that keep us from exploring beyond our shores. Also, on accurately mapping the edge of the world so more ships don't keep falling over the edge into space. My friend was killed that way!

Posted by: Hollowpoint (circa 1500) at January 27, 2012 10:20 AM (ggRof)

186 #179 - Yeah, but Gingrich was also given a hero's welcome when he was gladhanding at the Star Trek convention this morning. 

Posted by: Dave S. at January 27, 2012 10:20 AM (UvR6d)

187 You could hit this guy in the kisser with a baseball bat emblazoned with the stamp "Obama did this to your teeth" and it would make him prouder to go out and vote for him.

Sadly, you're almost certainly right.

Sometimes I despair for humanity.

Was in the industry for over thirty years and can't find anything down here.

Have you looked in TX?  I know that Raytheon, Lockheed, and Bell Heli are almost always looking for good machinist types.  That doesn't include other manufacturing also in my area- or anything at all outside of DFW (I have no idea what metro areas like San Antonio, Houston, or Austin would have available).

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Team Meteor. Now with Cheesecake at January 27, 2012 10:21 AM (8y9MW)

188

Ewok don't need pants

 

YES!  YES THEY DO!

Posted by: short people in the elevator with ace at January 27, 2012 10:22 AM (sPO/s)

189

179....Tax incentives aren't going to lead private industry to engage in building a moon base that would have zero chance of turning a profit.

.

Hollowpoint.....the profit motive for salvaging space junk alone, is a pretty good one. ....We just need the technology to do it.

.

And as for the Moon. ....What we know so far about the abundance of Helium3 on the Moon's surface....and the potential for He3 being the clean, abundant source of energy that we have been searching for....is enough to motivate the Russians and the Chinese to go for it.

.

We still don't know what other mineral riches are lying on the Moon. .....Looks like Russia and China will find that out before we do.

Posted by: wheatie at January 27, 2012 10:23 AM (ALwK/)

190

Now is the winter of our discontent
made glorious summer by this sun of Indonesia

Posted by: imp at January 27, 2012 10:23 AM (UaxA0)

191 I didn't even mention Helium3. .....Turns out those worthless space rocks we brought back from those Apollo missions....are rich in Helium3. .....Scientists are telling us that He3 couldfinally enable us to master cold fusion. .....This is whyRussia and China are in a race to get to the Moon. ....To mine for He3.

And by "scientists", you mean "frauds".  You can't power a city with a reactor that doesn't exist.

Helium-3 can be (and is) produced on Earth at a fraction of the cost of mining it on the moon.   China is trying to get to the Moon for the same reason the US did in 1969- national pride.  We did it over 40 years ago, we don't have anything to prove.  They do.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 27, 2012 10:24 AM (SY2Kh)

192 All of this discussion is why I've said and will continue to say that no matter who our nominee is, we have at best about a 25% chance of unseating an incumbent president.  Under similar circumstances, (Not Ford) we've only done it once or twice in the last century.  With the MFM so much in the tank for Barky, it's going to be especially difficult.  (and I'm being generous with the 25% number).

Let's not get our hopes up that anything is going to change soon - economy or otherwise.

Posted by: Not an Artist at January 27, 2012 10:24 AM (YUwuZ)

193 So the dems will line up, with a compliant media and tout the recovering economy and most of the mind numbed citizens will buy into it.  Great.

Posted by: jewells45 at January 27, 2012 10:25 AM (l/N7H)

194 You spelled 'Son' and 'Kenya' wrong.

Posted by: Barack Obama, MomJeanius at January 27, 2012 10:25 AM (+7fwG)

195 I guess the colleges and universities got mad at him for wanting to lower their costs so now he's saying, per the daily caller, that if you are rich you should pay more for your college education.

I thought the whole point of this country is that everyone is equal, rich or poor.  He must think the Supremes are going to find in his favor with obamacare cause he is getting bolder and bolder.  The 30% capital gains tax will effectively kill a lot of the money the planners have set aside for their kids to go to college.  So I guess then it has to come out of regular income.

Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 10:25 AM (oZfic)

196 And as for the Moon. ....What we know so far about the abundance of Helium3 on the Moon's surface....and the potential for He3 being the clean, abundant source of energy that we have been searching for....is enough to motivate the Russians and the Chinese to go for it.
*** *** *** ***
The price of natural gas is falling to all time lows, but we need to build a moon-city to get clean energy?

Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 27, 2012 10:25 AM (+lsX1)

197

OT

 

Drudge poll of Florida Readers

 

Romney, Santorum, Paul, then Gingrich.

 

Ironically this is my predicted order of finish.

Posted by: Dick Nixon at January 27, 2012 10:26 AM (kaOJx)

198 >>Look, I hate an awful lot of what Obama is doing, but it does absolutely no one any good at all, including the country, to promote head-in-the-sand attitudes of what happened during the Bush era. We went more than a little nuts, partied like it was 1929, & just about completely trashed the joint, & now we're paying for it in hangover pain. Promoting Bush this way, not facing up to all that went wrong, is absolutely the wrong way to go about contributing to reconstructing conservatism.
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God



Wow, I thought Obama was pushing loans to indigents when he was a senator while Bush was trying to reign in the irresponsible lending as president. I mean, weren't the Dems resisting every move to tighten-up lending by Fannie and Freddie?
I think it's best to "reconstruct conservatism" with the facts, not with shit you think happened.






Posted by: Dr Spank at January 27, 2012 10:26 AM (lVGED)

199 61 I can only tell you that I still have many patients losing their Dental Insurance ( of no small concern for me) because they are being laid off.

Posted by: nevergiveup at January 27, 2012 01:41 PM (i6RpT) 


My company had a 38% increase in medical premiums and in order to afford it, dropped dental.  Strap yourself in and get ready.

Posted by: Derak at January 27, 2012 10:27 AM (VEhDR)

200
You spelled 'Son' and 'Kenya' wrong.

lol

Maybe.  But "sun" was because I pasted it from the google search and wasn't paying attention.

My search was for "son of york"

Anyway, I'm thinking indonesia  is more in line with his actual governing style.   He's not an anarchic/kleptocrat/nepotist, he's a crypto-muslim dictator.  Suharto in mom-jeans, as it were.

Posted by: imp at January 27, 2012 10:28 AM (UaxA0)

201 Hollowpoint.....the profit motive for salvaging space junk alone, is a pretty good one. ....We just need the technology to do it.

Know why it's called "space junk"?

Hint:  It's in the second word of that phrase. 

We've had the technology to recover it for decades.  That we haven't is because there's no profit in spending $20 million to recover $2 million worth of obsolete dead satellites and used rocket boosters.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 27, 2012 10:28 AM (SY2Kh)

202

We still don't know what other mineral riches are lying on the Moon.

 

UNOBTANIUM AS FAR AS THE EYE CAN SEE!

Posted by: some guy, selling cheese at January 27, 2012 10:29 AM (sPO/s)

203 "Here's some numbers and they really aren't pretty".....Rick Santelli goes to the white board.  (It's entitled:  "Rick's 'Ugly' Math: Your Debt Ceiling Hike Share"
and it's on the CNBC site on the top of the far right column.

Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 10:31 AM (oZfic)

204 UNOBTANIUM AS FAR AS THE EYE CAN SEE!

Posted by: some guy, selling cheese at January 27, 2012 02:29 PM (sPO/s)

 

Really, can't Newt just build a colony in Wisconsin instead.

Posted by: robtr at January 27, 2012 10:31 AM (MtwBb)

205 "Debt Ceiling 101, Santelli Sounds Off"

Zero Hedge picked it up too...

Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 10:32 AM (oZfic)

206

We still don't know what other mineral riches are lying on the Moon.

Spice!

Posted by: closet Dune fan at January 27, 2012 10:32 AM (sPO/s)

207

Tomorrow is my birthday.  Am I really 56?  Where has the time gone?  Boy does time fly when one pursues building a Master Race and a society to last 1,000 years that will ensure Global World Domination for our perfect way of life.  Seig Heil me! <g>

 

Anyway, I think I'll go to the surface and pass around some medals (got a few boxes of Iron Crosses left) to those glorious Hitler Youth boys.  Whatta bunch of fine Ayran lads.

 

The prospect of birthday cake, a birthday BJ from Eva, and gladhanding those dear applecheeked boys fills me with renewed optimism.  Steiner's counterattack will succeed, I just know it.

 

Things are on the up, on the rebound.  Zippity Doo Dah!!

 

A. Hitler, April 19, 1945, excerpt from personal diary

Posted by: Count de Monet at January 27, 2012 10:33 AM (4q5tP)

208

Really, can't Newt just build a colony in Wisconsin instead.

 

A Newtist Colony?

Posted by: reason at January 27, 2012 10:34 AM (sPO/s)

209 Romney wants to build houses that no one can buy.  Oh wait they've done that in China with cities that are empty.

Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 10:35 AM (oZfic)

210 Then they glare at me when I walk by going, "Holy shit. Holy SHIT." Dried beans are going for what I used to pay for bratwurst. Good God.

---

That's ok.  I hear Barack is going to give us all magic beans in November!

Posted by: Y-not at January 27, 2012 10:36 AM (5H6zj)

211 President ObamaÂ’s State of the Union address on Tuesday underwhelmed by one significant measure: with 37.8 million television viewers, it was the least watched of the three he has delivered since 2010.

And according to a new analysis of viewing patterns during the speech, interest was on the decline from the beginning. More than a quarter of the people who started watching on network television at 9 p.m. Eastern tuned out within the first five minutes — before the president even began speaking.

Kantar Media conducted a survey of 100,000 households and examined their behavior in the moments leading up to, during, and after the speech. It found that after 27 percent of network television viewers stopped watching in the first five minutes, many of them flipped the channel to TBS, USA and ESPN, which benefited the most from the drop off in the State of the Union audience.

Posted by: William Shatner at January 27, 2012 10:37 AM (e8kgV)

212 Have you thought about outsourcing to India?

Posted by: Joe biden at January 27, 2012 02:17 PM (+7fwG)

 

Thank heaven, no.  But perhaps just as bad, we do outsource some of the simpler mold builds to Korea.  They do a good job, overall, but the costs are going up.  US mold makers are getting pretty competitive with the better overseas makers.  More and more US companies are starting to wake up, after being raped by China's "cheap" mold builders.

A major customer of our transferred several molds to us made in China.  What total, absolute, unmitigated garbage.  The Chinese can't even put in a bolt hole straight - and I say that litterally - not figuratively.  They use the cheapest garbage steel available.  Poor venting, everything is set up for manual (rather than robotic) extraction, etc.  Thank heaven my company doesn't use any Chinese suppliers. 

Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 10:37 AM (xUM1Q)

213 Speaking of prices, those Jiffy Corn Muffin mix boxes are one of my barometers for c-o-l.  I used to be able to get them for 33 cents each (sometimes a quarter on a really good sale).  I paid 79 cents last week.   

Posted by: Y-not at January 27, 2012 10:38 AM (5H6zj)

214 89 Somehow, 3.0% down to 1.7% is headlined in the Chicago Tribune as showing signs of improvements with possible bumps ahead.   ---------   Have you heard the rumor? Choco ration's GDP's going up!  

Posted by: Chicago Tribune at January 27, 2012 10:41 AM (xGZ+b)

215

When I shop, the working-aged men and older folks just stand in stunned silence when going to buy staple items.

I've shared in the grocery-gathering duties for several years, so I know all too well how much more expensive stuff is still.

Mrs. Reason and I still marvel at how four sacks of "get by for the week" groceries will run us close to $100.

The only thing that surpises me anymore is that we're still surpised.

And then I think to myself, "oh well, in another year, we'll have President Mittens to start fixing some of this!"  And then I weep into my big frosty mug of tap water.

Posted by: reason at January 27, 2012 10:42 AM (sPO/s)

216 I've done mold work, too. I know G-codes and can program with a pencil, paper and a calculator if I need to. Was in the industry for over thirty years and can't find anything down here.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 02:15 PM (d0Tfm)

 

Well, right now we don't have any contacts down in the nice parts of the country, but if I come across info that might be useful I'll post it.  And if you can do G-codes you can learn the new languages pretty fast.  The new conversational software is way, way, better than those old G-codes.  I've done G-code myself, and am glad it's going the way of the Dodo.  Of course, these days everything is getting to be contoured with crazy math data - a human couldn't program the tool paths himself if he wanted to and had a thousand years to get it done.

Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 10:42 AM (xUM1Q)

217

Speaking of prices, those Jiffy Corn Muffin mix boxes are one of my barometers for c-o-l.

Good call.  Even ramen is over a quarter a package.  That shit used to be a dime.

My barometer of choice is a gallon of orange juice, and the comparison of it to the gallon of gasoline it took to go get it.  A gallon of milk is still cheaper than a gallon of gas, but a gallon of OJ is easily 2x.

Posted by: reason at January 27, 2012 10:44 AM (sPO/s)

218 The media has been boosting up economic news since January 20, 2009, and Obama's numbers are still in the crapper.  People aren't buying it, and, barring a real recovery before Nov of this year, I don't think they ever will.

Posted by: Mike at January 27, 2012 10:45 AM (NH9Y5)

219 I've shared in the grocery-gathering duties for several years, so I know all too well how much more expensive stuff is still.

Posted by: reason at January 27, 2012 02:42 PM (sPO/s)

 

I dunno where you guys live, but I'm always puzzled when I read this.  For me, the price of fruit, meat, milk, and a few sundry other things I buy have barely moved in years.  I buy boneless/skinless chicken breasts for $2 a pound in the bi-weekly sale.  Pork loin for $1.90.  The less costly fruit I can get for about $1 - $1.30 a pound.  For me these prices have been the same for some time.

 

Posted by: Reactionary at January 27, 2012 10:46 AM (xUM1Q)

220 Someone just told me that if Newt loses Florida he's still not going away.  He's going to be in it for the duration so says this person who would know  Apparently he feels this is too important an election to just give up and walk away.

Posted by: ambrosia at January 27, 2012 10:55 AM (oZfic)

221 "The new conversational software is way, way, better than those old G-codes. I've done G-code myself, and am glad it's going the way of the Dodo." Yeah, I knew the Mazatrol "language" where basically, all you did was describe the part to the computer. Know MasterCam, but am a little rusty. Most of  the software packages are pretty much the same, or were. Way easier. That was the second Quick Turn 8 in the country at the time. Little sucker had a chip-to-chip time of around one second. Very, very cool little lathe. *sigh* I miss the old days...

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 10:55 AM (d0Tfm)

222

 --> G-codes

Take three courses in MasterCam. There are even on-line courses (12 weeks/$250.00). Much of the work is drawing a part (SolidWorks, Creo/ProE, ..) then specifying toolpaths. Trying to do a 3D contour is virtually impossible by hand, but drawing one, then specifying the proper tool path, tool path type and tool is very easy.

SurfCam and competing products are ok, but MasterCam has a larger /the largest market share.

Posted by: Arbalest at January 27, 2012 10:58 AM (WfF4T)

223 Reac - DFW.  The stuff we usually get week-to-week are things for kid breakfasts and lunches, so bread, jelly, cereal, milk, prepackaged yogurt, you get the idea.  That stuff, plus the off-need of laundry detergent, or toilet paper, or some allergy pills...

Posted by: reason at January 27, 2012 11:00 AM (sPO/s)

224 I am sorry, somebody said this the other day and it really stuck with me.  I am sure I will be called awful things but here it is. 

Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable tyrant.

I like this, but somebody the other day referred to him as the OJ Simpson of American politics.  At first I thought it was stupid, but it dawned on me that they are very similar.  Both did awful things, both knew that we all knew, and both were sure that they could get away with it.  When people called them on it, racism was always the answer. 

Any thoughts?


Posted by: gulfkraken at January 27, 2012 11:12 AM (WBfjO)

225

...and now this thread has been killed by ketamines, bear mace, and Internet creeps.

Where's CSI:  Blogland when you need it?

Posted by: reason at January 27, 2012 11:12 AM (sPO/s)

226

Barry as OJ.  Complicated, but potentially awesome.

Barry's OJ. 

The economy is the dead wife?  That he killed in a hot rage of jealousy over... 

Capitalism, the dead wife's dead friend?  Hmm.  Potential. 

And Joe Biden is Kato, the dim-bulb witness who saw everything, but can't put any of what he saw together cohesively. 

And we're all along for the ride in a crappy Bronco, doin' 30mph with every cop in the state following us as we make our mad getaway...to mom's house...  Hm.  I got nothin' for that one.

Posted by: reason at January 27, 2012 11:16 AM (sPO/s)

227 I was just thinking the angle where we all know what a scum bag he is, but nobody in the media has the stones to say anything. 

Posted by: gulfkraken at January 27, 2012 11:42 AM (WBfjO)

228 And he knows nobody will say anything about it. 

Posted by: gulfkraken at January 27, 2012 11:42 AM (WBfjO)

229

"Posted by: Arbalest at January 27, 2012 02:58 PM (WfF4T)" Glad that there are online refreshers, that $250 is awfully tough to come by right now. But thanks for the heads-up. I've also found some SolidWorks videos on YT, if I ever get a nibble, I'll look over at the Khan Academy site too.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 12:22 PM (d0Tfm)

230 In case I wasn't clear about, I do know how to program and even have a bit of experience with Pro-E WildFire and Solidworks, not enough to get a gig, tho'. I could teach AutoCAD, did that for years. I've had so many shit jobs in manufacturing down here, I essentially gave up about the time everything left: lots of assholes who couldn't work for anyone else start up their own shop where they're now the CAIC, with the high turnover rates to match their stupid decisions. I'd like to do something with rapid prototyping (like a small shop), but my credit is awful, thanks to being funemployed for three plus years. Oh, well...

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, feeling all extra curmudgeony today at January 27, 2012 12:28 PM (d0Tfm)

231

@218

Hey!  WTF.  Why do you want Newt to mess around in my state?  We got enough problems up in here with all the union wackjobs.  You bastard!  

Posted by: Some guy you don't know in Wisconsin at January 27, 2012 01:17 PM (dx77n)

232

@218

Um, sorry, it seems you were responding to someone else's comment.  To that someone else- You tell your buddy Newt to stay the hell away from my great state!  Wisconsin can't afford anymore nuts.  

Posted by: Some guy you don't know in Wisconsin at January 27, 2012 01:20 PM (dx77n)

233 !.7% growth rate! Looks like fish sticks and chicken nuggets are back on the menu boyz!

Posted by: Mitt Still Sux at January 27, 2012 02:20 PM (KYRHA)

234 8.5% unemployment. CHECK. Hey, America: You're Welcome.

Posted by: Ministry of Truth at January 27, 2012 04:24 PM (0GucZ)

235 We see no reason whatsoever why a black man with a 2.9 GPA and an LSAT score in the 75th percentile should not be admitted to Harvard Law.  We also see no obstacle to an unpublished member being elected President of the Law Review  an annual GPA growth of 1.7% should not be considered a stunning economic turnaround.

Posted by: Harvard Admission Committee changing the standards to fit the facts and the outcomes we want at January 27, 2012 06:22 PM (u3N3z)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
206kb generated in CPU 0.1172, elapsed 0.3423 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.3051 seconds, 363 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.