January 20, 2012
— Ace Interesting that nowhere in this report does Brian Ross make the connection that Marianne herself began an adulterous relationship with Gingrich while he was married to his first wife.
He mentions the first wife, and he mentions the beginning of Marianne's relationship with Gingrich; but aw shucks, he just forgot to mention or ask about that one bit.
She doesn't have any more allegations, if this is what she has. Even the "open marriage" thing sounds like it's her interpretation of something Gingrich said, rather than something he actually said.
Ross quickly dispenses with the little matter of a government informant alleging that Marianne sought $500,000 down, $10,000,000 total for "getting things done" in government. That part does sound a bit unlikely, but I'd sort of like to hear more.
Seems to me that if this is all she has, it's not enough, of itself, to do the job. But it has served her nicely to make it a big topic again Ross' pointed summary of Gingrich as a guy who left one cancer-struck wife and then an MS-struck one isn't going to help his numbers with women much. Or with men.
Posted by: Ace at
07:00 AM
| Comments (291)
Post contains 215 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Country Singer at January 20, 2012 07:05 AM (L8r/r)
To be fair, he was cheating with Callista long before he found out about the MS. It's not like he divorced the woman because she got MS.
Posted by: taylork at January 20, 2012 07:06 AM (5wsU9)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 20, 2012 07:06 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Country Singer at January 20, 2012 07:06 AM (L8r/r)
Posted by: Pooter Hound at January 20, 2012 07:07 AM (ELPgk)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 20, 2012 07:07 AM (Qjh0I)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 20, 2012 07:07 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Dang at January 20, 2012 07:07 AM (BbX1b)
Posted by: Pooter Hound at January 20, 2012 07:07 AM (ELPgk)
Posted by: Pooter Hound at January 20, 2012 07:08 AM (ELPgk)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 20, 2012 07:08 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at January 20, 2012 07:08 AM (qgwNu)
Posted by: Pooter Hound at January 20, 2012 11:05 AM (ELPgk)
Most likely the severed kind.
Posted by: Insomniac at January 20, 2012 07:09 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at January 20, 2012 07:09 AM (6dhH/)
Yup, she tried to divorce him in 1987. She even cleaned their house out and left him only a bed and tv.
That marriage was dead long before the incident in the 1990s. She knew it.
Also, I read somewhere that she was trying to sell a book now that she couldn't sell back in 2000.
Posted by: Ben at January 20, 2012 07:10 AM (wuv1c)
Ed Rollins, a former Newt staffer, mentioned on Hannity that he knew a whole lot about this whole situation. A point he made that I thought was interesting was why would Newt use the term "open marriage" unless there were other things going on that made him think it was okay?
Posted by: taylork at January 20, 2012 07:10 AM (5wsU9)
Posted by: Dang at January 20, 2012 11:07 AM (BbX1b)
You keep your goddamn hands off mah wife!
Posted by: H. I. McDonough at January 20, 2012 07:10 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: texette at January 20, 2012 07:10 AM (beZqk)
Posted by: Pooter Hound at January 20, 2012 07:11 AM (ELPgk)
My wife and I discussed this last night, and my wife thinks Marianne is the "homewrecker" twice over.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at January 20, 2012 07:11 AM (RI0fC)
Posted by: joncelli, too stressed by half at January 20, 2012 07:11 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: The Chicken at January 20, 2012 07:12 AM (oif6Y)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 07:13 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 20, 2012 07:14 AM (i6RpT)
The old allegations wouldn't have generated headlines.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 07:14 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: I am the walrus, goo-goo-ga-joo at January 20, 2012 07:15 AM (ybkwK)
Posted by: jewells45 at January 20, 2012 07:15 AM (l/N7H)
And didn't she leave him for a while? I didn't see any of that brought up.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 20, 2012 07:15 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 20, 2012 07:16 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Truman North at January 20, 2012 07:16 AM (I2LwF)
Okay, that's frickin' awesome! Does this mean we'll be using the maps drawn up by our Legislature, or does it go back to the court to be re-drawn (again)?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 07:17 AM (8y9MW)
why would she have expected him to wait for years for her to make up her mind?
Posted by: willow at January 20, 2012 07:17 AM (h+qn8)
Posted by: giftogab at January 20, 2012 07:17 AM (SPVfc)
Posted by: Mr Pink at January 20, 2012 07:18 AM (FzVXi)
I wonder if he can get wife #1 or any of the kids to go to bat for him? Wife #1 would be a really powerful counter to mistress #1/wife #2.
I would like someone (preferably someone who is not in any of these dudes' camps yet) to do a gory explanation (or maybe exploration) of Newt's scandals as Speaker. Those would be more serious, imho, than fifteen year old sex stuff.
And for the men here who keep telling me how Women vote, all I can tell you guys is that the only one women hate more than cheating men are the women with whom they've cheated.
Posted by: Y-not at January 20, 2012 07:18 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: willow at January 20, 2012 07:18 AM (h+qn8)
But even that doesn't matter, they are all losers. I vote for a convention nomination of the hissing possum from the "D" Train. Hey, he would get the NYC vote.
He'll turn Long Island "red"
Posted by: Vic at January 20, 2012 07:18 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at January 20, 2012 07:19 AM (jucos)
To me the issue isnÂ’t about Newt and poon. Dismissing his actions as normal behavior because lots of people get divorced misses the point. Sure divorce can happen to the best of us, but the dogs that cheat on their wives in a serial fashion donÂ’t get a free pass on the character issue.
Character, folks is the most important issue relative to the ex-wifeÂ’s interview. The pols that lack the character and integrity gene do things like take bribes, fix bids and the like. What a politician is like when no one is looking is extremely pertinent here. NewtÂ’s being accused by his ex as someone whoÂ’s arrogant and full of hubris. This is what we already have in the White House and it sucks.
Posted by: dblwmy at January 20, 2012 07:19 AM (BvTwT)
Posted by: Wall_E at January 20, 2012 07:19 AM (48wze)
Posted by: Dr Spank at January 20, 2012 07:19 AM (Sh42X)
Posted by: Vic at January 20, 2012 07:19 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Truman North at January 20, 2012 07:19 AM (I2LwF)
"Fucking someone new after the wife leaves" is not cheating. If she didn't want him fucking someone else, she should have stayed. Newt's mistake was not telling her to FOAD when she came crawling back to disrupt his life.
(Did she come back for the health insurance or other financial gain? This happened to my cousin...bitch left him to fuck someone else while he was deployed in Saudi Arabia, then when the strange dumped her and she realized my cousin had a good job and a house and a great life (and all she had was debt), she contacted him out of the blue to get back together. Gah. Womyn.)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 20, 2012 07:20 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: mare at January 20, 2012 07:20 AM (A98Xu)
Ross' pointed summary of Gingrich as a guy who left one cancer-struck wife and then an MS-struck one isn't going to help his numbers with women much.
This is why I hate many female voters. Why should I care if he left someone with MS? Are people with disabilities supposed to be pitied and viewed as some sort of inferior group of people who can't handle being treated like normal adults? That is utterly ridiculous. I'm a 26 year old male with Muscular Dystrophy, I guess every woman I've ever had relationships end with have committed some unspeakable crime and now must start sexing me up once again.
Posted by: hueydiamondpooty at January 20, 2012 07:20 AM (YhZFe)
Posted by: Pooter Hound at January 20, 2012 11:05 AM (ELPgk)
Not that there is anything wrong with that.
Posted by: Mister Money at January 20, 2012 07:21 AM (wN82N)
Posted by: mare at January 20, 2012 07:21 AM (A98Xu)
Posted by: comatus at January 20, 2012 07:21 AM (ySTXt)
That's the part of this that makes me nuts. 6 years of separation, yet he's supposed to remain alone waiting for her to make up her mind?
Jeez, I'm coming across as a Newt guy now, but I think this story is stupid on so many levels.
Also ... "Open Marriage"? Her words and Brian Ross's, Newt never said those words.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at January 20, 2012 07:22 AM (RI0fC)
Posted by: Truman North at January 20, 2012 07:22 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: willow at January 20, 2012 07:23 AM (h+qn8)
Posted by: mpurinTexas, Evil Conservanatrix, is broken hearted at January 20, 2012 07:25 AM (J57C0)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 20, 2012 07:25 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Jean at January 20, 2012 07:25 AM (tvOF2)
Then F* him sideways with a rusty chain-saw.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 07:25 AM (8y9MW)
In some States even if he proved the children were not his and they were still married he would have to support them. The damn laws on child support are totally hosed in most States. And family court truly sucks if you are a guy.
Posted by: Vic at January 20, 2012 07:25 AM (YdQQY)
The ex comes off as bitter and loses some credibility. Newt handled it well, as Newt does.
However, the problem isnÂ’t with Newt or the ex, itÂ’s with Callista. People donÂ’t pick a president according to their VP pick, but they do figure in the subject of what kind of First Lady weÂ’re going to end up with, if only subconsciously.
I’m leery of how people are going to act in the primary voting booth thinking about Callista “being ok” with a semi-open marriage. That and starting her journey to the White House by giving Newt blow jobs in the car.
Posted by: jwest at January 20, 2012 07:26 AM (FdndL)
I'm out.
Yeah, Mr. "I'm scared for the future of this country if Obama's reelected" sure is doing his best to make that happen.
Who the fuck actually takes this assholes advice anyway?
Posted by: taylork at January 20, 2012 07:26 AM (5wsU9)
Posted by: Barney "Privates Are my Friends" Frankly wanting a donkey punch at January 20, 2012 07:26 AM (wN82N)
But seriously.. this is good news that Newt is surging. If he can erode enough of Mitt's support to take this fight to the convention, maybe we can convince Chris Christie to step in.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 20, 2012 07:27 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: willow at January 20, 2012 07:27 AM (h+qn8)
Posted by: real joe at January 20, 2012 07:27 AM (w7Lv+)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 20, 2012 11:27 AM (f9c2L)
Why? He's just a fat Mutt.
Posted by: Vic at January 20, 2012 07:28 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 20, 2012 07:28 AM (hiMsy)
Posted by: mare at January 20, 2012 11:20 AM (A98Xu)
But it makes such salacious reading. Don't let facts get in the way of a good story
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at January 20, 2012 07:28 AM (mFxQX)
Posted by: Tami at January 20, 2012 07:28 AM (X6akg)
The country is in the shitter. Does anyone really care about this?
Posted by: real joe at January 20, 2012 07:28 AM (w7Lv+)
Posted by: supercore23 at January 20, 2012 07:29 AM (bwV72)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 20, 2012 11:27 AM (f9c2L)
Fukkin' A, there ain't enough RINOs in the contest yet. And Christie can't step, he'd have to waddle.
Posted by: maddogg at January 20, 2012 07:29 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at January 20, 2012 07:29 AM (jucos)
Posted by: Vic at January 20, 2012 07:29 AM (YdQQY)
Michelle Obama ... I rest my case
Posted by: Dave in Fla at January 20, 2012 07:29 AM (RI0fC)
Posted by: Mr Pink at January 20, 2012 11:18 AM (FzVXi)
A story made for radio.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at January 20, 2012 07:29 AM (uGKhi)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 20, 2012 07:29 AM (niZvt)
Sorry, I can't nominate someone I know independent voters will be disgusted with, especially since even I as a conservative that hates Obama with a passion would have a hard time pulling the lever for such a pig.
Women will not vote for Newt, even with an 8% unemployment rate. They would much rather "send a message" about what they they think of men like Newt that leave their seriously ill wives high and dry for a younger, better looking mistress.
Posted by: 8 Track at January 20, 2012 07:30 AM (0kf1G)
And now we see the "value" in making divorce something that is difficult to obtain.
I mean, if people knew that they couldn't end a marriage on a whim, it MIGHT make them think a little harder before they take that leap.
(And please don't jump all over me for my statement - I realize there were drawbacks to the "old" system that made it necessary to make it easier to obtain a divorce)
Also, anyone who still believes the "50% of all marriages end in divorce" lie needs to re-read their Thomas Sowell ("Visions of the Anointed" is where I saw it torn apart) - some idiots in the news media don't understand basic math/statistics.
Then again, that's probably why they are "reporters".....
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at January 20, 2012 07:30 AM (0xqzf)
What was your position on Bill Clinton in 1997.
Good for him.
What else does he do when no one is looking?
Don't blame him - have you taken a good look at his wife?
What other character flaws does this guy have?
What *is* the definition of is?
Posted by: dblwmy at January 20, 2012 07:30 AM (BvTwT)
Posted by: Jean at January 20, 2012 07:31 AM (tvOF2)
Posted by: real joe at January 20, 2012 07:31 AM (w7Lv+)
Posted by: supercore23 at January 20, 2012 07:32 AM (bwV72)
Posted by: Vic at January 20, 2012 07:32 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Mister Money at January 20, 2012 07:34 AM (wN82N)
Posted by: Guy What Slept With Marianne Gingrich and had to Chew His Arm Off at January 20, 2012 07:34 AM (jucos)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 20, 2012 07:34 AM (niZvt)
Posted by: Vic at January 20, 2012 07:34 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Will Folks at January 20, 2012 07:34 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: eman at January 20, 2012 07:34 AM (3VSsp)
Apparently she didn't have an issue with helping to make his 1st marriage an open one...Must be different when the foots on the other hand.
I think i'm developing a zero tolerance for bitching by mistresses.
Posted by: BHO at January 20, 2012 07:35 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 20, 2012 07:35 AM (niZvt)
Perjury and Obstruction of Justice are unacceptable in the President of the United States.
Stop it with the "Clinton was impeached over sex" meme- it was a blatant lie even then.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 07:35 AM (8y9MW)
Why? He's just a fat Mutt.
Posted by: Vic at January 20, 2012 11:28 AM (YdQQY)
No. Give the fat man his due, he makes even Mitt look conservative.
Posted by: s☺mej☼e at January 20, 2012 07:35 AM (oif6Y)
Posted by: maddogg at January 20, 2012 07:36 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at January 20, 2012 07:36 AM (jucos)
Why? He's just a fat Mutt.
.............
Ok.. so who is left at this point? Who is conservative enough for you Vic, who could actually win?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 20, 2012 07:36 AM (f9c2L)
People donÂ’t pick a president according to their VP pick, but they do figure in the subject of what kind of First Lady weÂ’re going to end up with, if only subconsciously.
Yeah?
Posted by: Michelle Obama at January 20, 2012 07:36 AM (uGKhi)
Posted by: joncelli, too stressed by half at January 20, 2012 07:37 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: willow at January 20, 2012 07:38 AM (h+qn8)
E A
R K
A E
R
Oh and Obama's still a Stuttering Clusterfuck of a Miserable Failure.
Posted by: Iblis at January 20, 2012 07:38 AM (9221z)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at January 20, 2012 11:36 AM (f9c2L)
Obviously you missed the last two threads. Go look at post 9 in the news thread.
Posted by: Vic at January 20, 2012 07:38 AM (YdQQY)
#96 i was thinking the same way. You steal from a crook since they cannot go to the police.
Seems that she never learned the rule.
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at January 20, 2012 07:39 AM (SO2Q8)
The point is that Newt can't survive the kind of all-out onslaught that the MSM would surely launch on his character in a general election. We're talking Abu Ghraib-style daily coverage of every woman who's ever felt like Newt looked at her tits too long. Every day, day after day, from the day he's nominated until Election Day. I don't think Newt can survive that.
Hard to say, but he has handled it very well so far. Not even a stutter, unlike Mitt, who stutters every time somebody askes about Bain.
Posted by: maddogg at January 20, 2012 07:39 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Mr Pink at January 20, 2012 07:39 AM (FzVXi)
Posted by: Noot Gingrich's First Dog, Long Lost and Forgotten at January 20, 2012 07:40 AM (jucos)
And Mitt is a Mormon- with all the disinformation available to the MFM there.
The fact that they're lies won't change anything.
Seriously, it's like you think ONLY a ham sandwich can win against Obama- because anything else would be too controversial (and the ham sandwich only wins because we never get the Jewish or Islamic vote anyway).
Like I said while Perry was still in the race: stop thinking about what you're afraid the media will do, and pick your candidate based on the one you think best represents you and your values.
If that happens to be Mitt, fine: but then talk up Mitt's positives, don't try to say that the other guy "can't win" because of crap like this.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 07:40 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 20, 2012 11:40 AM (piMMO)
I don't either, but he is the lesser of the 4 evils.
Posted by: Vic at January 20, 2012 07:41 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at January 20, 2012 07:41 AM (21lBC)
And to press the metaphor further. The current demo derby between the Jag and the rusty F150 is just to entertain the hicks then I guess.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at January 20, 2012 07:41 AM (tf9Ne)
Or hit my blog, where I promoted his epic rant to its own post (cause it deserved it).
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 07:41 AM (8y9MW)
Brian Ross? Never heard of him.
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at January 20, 2012 07:42 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 20, 2012 07:42 AM (hiMsy)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at January 20, 2012 07:42 AM (roASQ)
Newt still screwed around on two wives.
Oh, and Etta James has passed away. I thought she was long gone.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 20, 2012 07:42 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Vic at January 20, 2012 07:42 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Vic at January 20, 2012 07:43 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Unclefacts Out Of Commenting Retirement Just For This One Thing at January 20, 2012 07:44 AM (6IReR)
Remember that 30% of the voting public canÂ’t even name the current Vice President. They donÂ’t know shit. The MSM is certainly going to continue hammering the story line of Newt dumping his first wife in the hospital as she lay there dying of cancer, and kicking his second wife to the curb the second she was diagnosed with MS. All the while, Callista was sucking him off in the parking lot. Not a pretty sight.
Facts donÂ’t have any place in politics. Obama is going to lose because the economy sucks and gas is going to be over $4 a gallon. It doesnÂ’t matter if itÂ’s his fault or not, thatÂ’s the way the majority of the people see it. As weÂ’ve been drilled to accept here at AoSHQ, once a public image is established, itÂ’s impossible to reverse. I donÂ’t see how Newt gets around this.
Posted by: jwest at January 20, 2012 07:44 AM (FdndL)
His negatives among the general population are already quite high, I wouldn't assume at this point this is "much ado about nothing". This shit isn't new to us but it will be new to people who aren't political junkies. The Republicans already face a tough situation with women voters, this only makes that worse.
As I said before, if he gets the nomination and Callista gets more exposure, the fact she was a lying whore is going to bother people. It fucking bothers me already. Even if we accept that most politicians are lying hypocrites on sexual/marriage issues, which is a helluva thing for us to concede given or supposed stand on morality, people still expect women to be better in that regard.
Callista is not the woman scorned standing by her man, she was an active participant in the years of lying to Newt's ex. I don't want her anywhere near the white house. Michelle Obama looks like an icon of virtue compared to her. You want that?
Posted by: Ken Royall at January 20, 2012 07:44 AM (9zzk+)
Like Ringo said, "they were only foolin' about".
Posted by: Vic at January 20, 2012 07:44 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at January 20, 2012 07:44 AM (jucos)
Posted by: Village Idiot at January 20, 2012 07:44 AM (utXSy)
Actually, if what the 'Rons are saying (re: them being separated before he started seeing Calitsa) then he screwed around on 1 wife- after his marriage was already on the rocks anyway. Well, okay, technically both, but the second one is a lot more understandable.
That doesn't make it good or right, but it makes it a whole lot less bad than the MFM would like it to be.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 07:45 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Jean at January 20, 2012 07:45 AM (tvOF2)
Posted by: blaster at January 20, 2012 07:45 AM (7vSU0)
I thought that must be so but I am heartened to have your confirmation on this matter. Have you a periodical, that you have no association with, distributed generally to the masses perhaps by mail?
Posted by: luaP noR at January 20, 2012 07:45 AM (oif6Y)
Posted by: Village Idiot at January 20, 2012 07:45 AM (utXSy)
And nobody would boo when the F150 smashed the Jag at a demo derby.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at January 20, 2012 07:45 AM (tf9Ne)
A woman who thought she heard something in her husband's words that might not have been there?
Fuckin' News at 11.
Posted by: garrett at January 20, 2012 07:45 AM (JgNE0)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at January 20, 2012 07:45 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 20, 2012 11:35 AM (niZvt)
I think Newt's first divorce shows a lack of character.
Newt's second shows great character.
24 Also, as far as I understand it, he was separated from her for 6 years, during which time he started seeing Callista. So he had an existing relationship with Callista when she came back and said let's get back together.My wife and I discussed this last night, and my wife thinks Marianne is the "homewrecker" twice over.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at January 20, 2012 11:11 AM (RI0fC)
I've read the same and that the separation was in part because she was cheating on him. In fact, my understanding is that she previously claimed that Gingrich did not suggest an open marriage so much as a sham marriage. I guess "open marriage" sounds sexier.
Bottom line: I think Marianne is a pretty awful person. If she thinks he shouldn't be president for political reasons, then she should just say she opposes him for that. If she thinks he shouldn't be president for personal reasons, then she should keep her mouth shut and be the better person.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 20, 2012 07:46 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: blaster at January 20, 2012 07:46 AM (7vSU0)
Posted by: c. up at January 20, 2012 07:47 AM (oZfic)
Separated and married are synonyms in my mind.
You wanna date? Get a fucking divorce
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 20, 2012 07:48 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 20, 2012 07:48 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Ken Royall at January 20, 2012 11:44 AM (9zzk+)
You gotta be kidding. Ms. Proud of my country for the first time Michelle? And Hildebeast, the meanist bitch ever to infest the White House is better and more honest too? Bullshit.
Posted by: maddogg at January 20, 2012 07:48 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: pitbull at January 20, 2012 07:49 AM (i6RpT)
MSNBC is bringing up the Callista “question” right now.
Posted by: jwest at January 20, 2012 07:49 AM (FdndL)
They were separated for six years after she left him. I think for most people there's the assumption that both are probably dating.
For all we know Mitt dresses up like a hamster every night and gets off on Japanese pron.
What we know about Newt now is that as of 2000 he started going to church regularly, has been faithful to his wife, and recommitted to God. He, too, may dress like a hamster. I. Don't. Care.
Posted by: Y-not at January 20, 2012 07:49 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: chas at January 20, 2012 07:50 AM (TKF1Y)
Posted by: Ron Jeremy's fading libido at January 20, 2012 07:51 AM (3niml)
From a moral standpoint, I agree. The fact is that most of America doesn't (whether they say they do, or not), and there's just not any political hay to be made here if the actual facts are known.
You tell the average dude on the street that he was cheating on his wife and "offered" her an open marriage, and they'll think something along the lines of "That ain't right." You tell them, instead, "They were separated and he'd started seeing someone else, but when the wife asked if they could get back together he said, 'Sure, but I'm not leaving my girlfriend'" and they'll think, "Yeah, and?"
It's just not that big an issue- if the facts are known. What made it so explosive as a headline yesterday was that the facts weren't known.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 07:51 AM (8y9MW)
Why do we always get diverted from Romney's problems to the problems of other candidates?
Just when Romney was getting a little scrutiny we decide that Newt's marriage history is the "real issue".
Posted by: Chris at January 20, 2012 07:51 AM (XGZYX)
Posted by: Ken Royall at January 20, 2012 07:51 AM (9zzk+)
They clearly know she is fucking crazy as a loon.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo-intellectual at January 20, 2012 11:49 AM (hXJOG)
newt and marianne didnt have any children.
Posted by: chas at January 20, 2012 07:51 AM (TKF1Y)
Separated and married are synonyms in my mind.
You wanna date? Get a fucking divorce
You want problems to fix? Get a fucking life, and stop worrying about everyone elses.
Posted by: Entropy at January 20, 2012 07:52 AM (mf67L)
What was your position on Bill Clinton in 1997.
----
Bionic Seahorse, Reverse Cowboy, Asian cowgirl, inverted corndog
But mostly it was his position on me...
Posted by: Monica L. at January 20, 2012 07:52 AM (SO2Q8)
Chris at January 20, 2012 11:51 AM (XGZYX)
romney has no problems. but whats your fucking problem dude?? why are you attacking capitalism???!!!
Posted by: chas at January 20, 2012 07:52 AM (TKF1Y)
Which shows slightly better judgement on Newt's part than I would have given him credit for...
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 07:53 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: maddogg at January 20, 2012 07:53 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Serious Cat at January 20, 2012 07:54 AM (2YIVk)
Character, folks is the most important issue relative to the ex-wifeÂ’s interview. The pols that lack the character and integrity gene do things like take bribes, fix bids and the like. What a politician is like when no one is looking is extremely pertinent here. NewtÂ’s being accused by his ex as someone whoÂ’s arrogant and full of hubris. This is what we already have in the White House and it sucks.
Posted by: dblwmy at January 20, 2012 11:19 AM (BvTwT)
I agree, he lacks or at least lacked character in these actioons. But she equally lacked character so doesn't get to be a victim here. Newt didn't lie about it to us, nor is he proud of it. He is not vulnerable to any blackmail about it because he ADMITS IT, so check that off. He had a gazillion ethics charges that didn't stick, other than taking and advance on a book deal. (remember Clinton doing that too?) tells me that his infidelity may not translate across the board to the things of which you worry. If you write him off because of a past that he admits to and don't believe him about his repentence, that is your choice. What we have in the White House is a guy bent on ruining America. Newt has a desire to FIX America.....I'll take that no matter how many women he porked.
Posted by: giftogab at January 20, 2012 07:54 AM (SPVfc)
Why do we always get diverted from Romney's problems to the problems of other candidates?
Just when Romney was getting a little scrutiny we decide that Newt's marriage history is the "real issue".
Because no is going to vote for Romney anyway?
Posted by: luaP noR at January 20, 2012 07:54 AM (oif6Y)
Yeah. I know it's difficult for many to grasp, but the vast majority of Americans do not spend several hours a day on a conservative blog, bitching and debating the minutia of political campaigns.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 20, 2012 07:55 AM (piMMO)
For all we know Mitt dresses up like a hamster every night and gets off on Japanese pron.
What we know about Newt now is that as of 2000 he started going to church regularly, has been faithful to his wife, and recommitted to God. He, too, may dress like a hamster. I. Don't. Care.
First of all, nobody knows they were separated. Newt's ex specifically said he was sleeping with his current wife in her bed and Newt would call her and tell her she loved him while Callista was lying next to him. That is pretty powerful and most women will believe her. Why wouldn't they, we KNOW Newt is a serial adulterer and liar.
Secondly, you have no evidence Mitt has anything like this in his background. When you do, feel free to talk about it then.
YOU might have known all of this about Newt but most people who vote DO NOT. They don't even start paying attention until a month before the fucking election.
Posted by: Ken Royall at January 20, 2012 07:55 AM (9zzk+)
Posted by: c. up at January 20, 2012 07:56 AM (oZfic)
------
*woof, woof* splurrrrrrt
Posted by: Seamus covered in diarrhea at January 20, 2012 07:56 AM (5H6zj)
Huh?
She took all the furniture. She was living elsewhere.
Posted by: Seamus covered in diarrhea at January 20, 2012 07:57 AM (5H6zj)
This is equally true for Mitt Romney, though. And more people can identify (either through having been there themselves, or having someone close to them who has) with marital troubles than know anything beyond the more absurd and sensational claims about Mormonism.
If you're going to haul out the "The MFM will say..." card, then you've got to apply it to all of our candidates.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 07:57 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Mitt Romney! at January 20, 2012 07:57 AM (r2PLg)
1. Newt Gingrich
2. Mitt Romney
3. Marianne Gingrich
4. Brian Ross
5. None of the above
6. All of the above
Posted by: franksalterego at January 20, 2012 07:57 AM (9XykO)
Posted by: javad at January 20, 2012 07:58 AM (xXhWA)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 11:51 AM (8y9MW)
They won't be. The media (especially, as Ken Royall points out, the soft media that uniformed voters actually consume) works with caricatures. For many middle-of-the-road voters, they'll have heard the joke about some news story before they've actually heard the story. They'll never get the facts before they've formed an opinion.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 20, 2012 07:58 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: izoneguy at January 20, 2012 07:58 AM (2/KD2)
Posted by: Cricket at January 20, 2012 07:59 AM (DrC22)
Maybe if they included a woman with a large bust it would have done better
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 20, 2012 07:59 AM (1Jaio)
Oh, that's right. You've been flying at supersonic speed for days in order to immediately attack anyone who doesn't agree with you. Thus, who gives a shit what you have to say.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 20, 2012 07:59 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: phoenixgirl....a voter without a candidate at January 20, 2012 08:00 AM (mfbqu)
You miss the point.
It isn't relevant.
We have people here arguing that Mitt's work experience is "personal" and off limits, but what happened in Newt's marriages over a decade ago are relevant?
What I know about Newt now is that he is in a stable marriage, he has expressed remorse for what he did, and has recommitted himself to God. I don't give a rat's ass if he was a cheating husband fifteen years ago.
Posted by: Seamus covered in diarrhea at January 20, 2012 08:00 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Jean at January 20, 2012 08:00 AM (tvOF2)
Amazing how while listening to a woman complain about a home wrecking temptress, that they fail to note that she, is in fact, a home wrecking temptress.
Like I said all she is doing in my mind, is explaining for Newt in a way he could never do himself, why he had to dump her for #3.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 20, 2012 08:01 AM (0q2P7)
Ask Romney how many great-great grandmothers he has.....
Well as the politics of personal destruction, ex-wives, and wives geriatric abortionist ex-boyfriends go, how many grandmas did Mittens have, anyway? How far back you got to go down that family tree to find FLDS?
Posted by: Entropy at January 20, 2012 08:01 AM (mf67L)
Posted by: RushBabe at January 20, 2012 08:01 AM (tQHzJ)
If I grant that (and I'm not flat denying it, I'm just more sure of Newts ability to get his message out than most seem to be), you have to grant the same is true of Mitt's Mormonism.
All that will be "known" about it is a caricature of magic underwear, aspiration to god-hood, and polygamy. Given the way he won't even defend Bain Capital (specifically) and Capitalism (more generally), I have no faith in his ability to defend himself against those attacks.
I do have at least a little faith that Newt will be able (or at least willing) to defend himself against this kind of thing.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 08:01 AM (8y9MW)
-----
^This.
But they won't.
Posted by: Y-not at January 20, 2012 08:02 AM (5H6zj)
What I know about Newt now is that he is in a stable marriage, he has expressed remorse for what he did, and has recommitted himself to God. I don't give a rat's ass if he was a cheating husband fifteen years ago.
At adultery, he's a piker compared to the leftard darling Slick Willie. A piker.
Posted by: maddogg at January 20, 2012 08:02 AM (OlN4e)
I suppose that anybody can argue anything, but those aren't the arguments I'm hearing against attacks on Mitt.
It's unseemly for Republican candidates to attack Mitt from the left.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 20, 2012 08:02 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: joncelli, too stressed by half at January 20, 2012 08:02 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Jean at January 20, 2012 08:02 AM (tvOF2)
I do apply it for everybody. It then becomes a question of what negatives can be overcome and which ones will be harder to defend. Newt's angry white man act is not going to carry him through the general unscathed. Are we really going to run a combination of Bill Clinton and Spiro Agnew in this bitch?
Newt's negatives were in the 40's before this shit came out. When Axelrod gets done with him that goes higher. He has no defense, the basic facts of the matter are pretty much undisputed. The fact that he trashes the media constantly will mean they will go after him that much harder.
Posted by: Ken Royall at January 20, 2012 08:03 AM (9zzk+)
One of you political wizards please explain to me what Marianne did wrong and why she deserves to be shit upon?
I'm listening.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 20, 2012 08:03 AM (G/zuv)
Same as everybody else, 8.
It's biologically impossible otherwise.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 20, 2012 08:04 AM (T0NGe)
Did the Brian Ross hit piece work that fast?
Posted by: c. up at January 20, 2012 08:04 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: Truman North at January 20, 2012 11:19 AM (I2LwF)
Guess he doesn't think Obama is that bad after all...
Posted by: Nighthawk at January 20, 2012 08:04 AM (RSqz2)
You can start your research into Mormonism at Utah's Lighthouse Ministry utlm dot org
Or try the Catholic Encylopedia.
Posted by: Entropy at January 20, 2012 08:04 AM (mf67L)
Newt had an affair during his first marriage, with a woman he wound up making wife #2. His first wife had a cancer scare, but did not have cancer. She, the mother of his two children, has a good relationship with Newt, who has a good relationship with his kids. When the apocryphal story appeared saying Newt served her divorce papers while she lay in her hospital bed with cancer, Newt acted like a man and sucked it up without responding, because he realized that a response in the media would inflame the situation and hurt his children. Knowing that the divorce was already painful to them, he swallowed his impulse to fight back for the benefit of the kids.
Let's stop there for a moment. If that was the end of the story, and the truth of it came out clearly, no one but the most sanctimonious asshole (who is going to vote for Santorum in the primary and the Republican in the general anyway) is going to look down on Newt for falling out of love with wife #1 and falling in love with the eventual wife #2. Happens every damn day. Nothing to see here, move along. Santorum's current wife "living in sin" for six years with an abortion doctor decades older than her, and leaving him for Rick only because the old guy didn't want any more kids but Rick wanted an orphanage full, is way more interesting to me.
Now, wife #2, after years of marriage, leaves Newt. On his birthday. Taking everything with her when she goes except for two pieces of furniture. And stays away for six years. During which Newt, remarkably, finds someone else - once again, a woman he would like to spend the rest of his life with - Calista. The two of them become a couple. Wife #2, tired of whatever she's been doing for six years, or maybe looking to get back the benefits she sees in being Newt's wife, asks him to take her back. Some time after that he tells her that he must have Calista in his life. He is willing to remain married to wife #2 if she wants that, but not if she insists that he stop seeing Calista.
Let's stop here for a minute. Newt has acted reasonably, and has cut wife #2 a fuck of a lot more slack than most of us ever would have given her. It is not enough for her, and a divorce follows. After which, childless and therefore with no continued relationship with Newt, she spends her days plotting and exacting "revenge" on him for whatever wrongs she perceives him to have inflicted on her.
And now to the present. ABC, CNN and the rest of the Obama blowhards look for a way to make a scandalous story out of this nothing burger. I think that Newt is already planning to let them run with this for a good long while. (Hell, if you correct them, they just move on to the next attack. Why not let them chew on this bone instead?) When the time is right, he will (himself or through an appropriate proxy) set the record straight in a definitive manner. These assholes will go down the Dan Rather hole of history, and Newt's appeal to women will trend up from its current level, as sensible women will see that on some levels he has acted with honor and concern for family members. No, they will not ignore the serial marriages, but they will understand them better and recognize that Newt exercised restraint for the benefit of his kids and, sometimes at least, for his exes.
That is all.
Posted by: Z as in Jersey at January 20, 2012 08:04 AM (jF5A4)
People can jump up and down shouting the truth from the rooftops, but itÂ’s not going to change the picture in the minds of the voters.
Newt dumped his suffering wife while she lay on her death bed in the hospital, probably with his girlfriend waiting in the car outside. Then, after fooling around with a staffer for years getting blown in the parking lot, he tosses out his second wife after she is diagnosed with MS. Not only that, but the ex finds out that Callista was doing Newt in her bed. If you donÂ’t think that humping a girlfriend in the wifeÂ’s bed is big deal, go ask a woman.
This is the narrative. ItÂ’s not going to change.
Posted by: jwest at January 20, 2012 08:04 AM (FdndL)
That or you can call the nearest Mormon Temple and they'll be happy to send out a couple of guys to explain it to you.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at January 20, 2012 08:04 AM (tf9Ne)
I'm told that actual facts don't matter. That the American people won't do research.
So which is it: will people actually pay attention and do some research (in which case this is a nothing burger with weak sauce) or will they not, in which case the only thing they'll "know" about Mormonism is that they they believe blacks can't go to heaven, they all wear magic underwear, they think they're gods, and the guys all have multiple wives?
Why do you think they'll spare Mitt?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 08:05 AM (8y9MW)
Really? Where?
Posted by: weft cut-loop at January 20, 2012 08:05 AM (xbjUC)
Underneath the public image, Reagan could be a nasty SOB.
I know which one I'd rather have as Prez.
Posted by: The Q at January 20, 2012 08:05 AM (LnQhT)
Posted by: maddogg at January 20, 2012 08:05 AM (OlN4e)
One of you political wizards please explain to me what Marianne did wrong and why she deserves to be shit upon?
I'm listening.
Posted by: soothsayer at January 20, 2012 12:03 PM (G/zuv)
Petty vindictive bullshit. Also, I have no sympathy for someone who sleeps with Newt.
Posted by: javad at January 20, 2012 08:05 AM (xXhWA)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 20, 2012 08:06 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: joncelli, too stressed by half at January 20, 2012 12:02 PM (RD7QR)
Amen! But, but, but... even though the house is on fire, wouldn't you rather argue about whether the fireman on the scene are wholesome, good and perfectly in line with your views? No? Where is your sense decency man?!!
Posted by: Sgt. Fury at January 20, 2012 08:06 AM (r2dnH)
And the "wronged wife" is the woman who was screwing him while he was married to wife 1. If she was surprised by his actions, she is the stupidest second wife alive.
Posted by: huerfano at January 20, 2012 08:06 AM (lXi+d)
So why should we believe that Newt's personal image will kill him in an election while Romney's "Richie Rich" plutocrat squared image won't?
Posted by: Chris at January 20, 2012 08:06 AM (XGZYX)
Yep, Mitt's a Mormon. So is Harry Reid. Barack Obama is into Black Liberation Theology. I hope religion is a big issue in the campaign.
Posted by: Ken Royall at January 20, 2012 08:07 AM (9zzk+)
Meh. I can't get too upset with the Mormons for their bout with Polygamy. They kind of wrote themselves into a theological corner when they for reasons of promoting family insisted that a woman marry in order to achieve the highest favor with God, without thinking, "Men die, a lot more often then women, we are going to have leftovers, what do we do then?"
eventually they worked that out.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 20, 2012 08:08 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 20, 2012 08:08 AM (i6RpT)
After the wife took the furniture and left? Really?
And for fuck's sake, stop telling women what they think.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 20, 2012 08:08 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Will Folks at January 20, 2012 08:09 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Chris Christie at January 20, 2012 08:10 AM (i6RpT)
"We have people here arguing that Mitt's work experience is "personal" and off limits, "
We do? Where is that?
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 20, 2012 08:10 AM (Qjh0I)
"Mitt's attack- unfair though they may have been- were in response to something very provocative that Perry said as a candidate. He opened himself up for a response. Newt's attacks on Mitt were part of his experience in the private sector. One is an attack on a policy statement, the other is more personal. "
Posted by: Y-not at January 20, 2012 08:10 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at January 20, 2012 08:10 AM (21lBC)
So decency has absolutely no place in politics any longer then?
Count me in!
Posted by: Bill Clinton at January 20, 2012 08:10 AM (piMMO)
You don't hear about any woman problems with Obama because:
1. Look at the guy, he is a whinely little knat
2. Because MOOOOOOOOOOOOOCHELE would beat the shit out of his pencil neck
3. He is not really a ladies type of guy
4. He could fuck up a wet dream so how do you think he would perform in real life
Posted by: Wall_E at January 20, 2012 08:11 AM (48wze)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Has Joined Team Meteor at January 20, 2012 08:11 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Will Folks at January 20, 2012 12:09 PM (I2LwF)
Rumblings? Then they need to go to lunch. There hasn't been a brokered convention in a century and I can't even think of a mechanism for forcing one.
Posted by: joncelli, too stressed by half at January 20, 2012 08:12 AM (RD7QR)
I dunno. Did you hear him singing an Al Green song yesterday? (immediately after Al Green himself sang!)
Posted by: Bill Clinton at January 20, 2012 08:13 AM (piMMO)
She consented to sexual intercourse with a man she knew was married. That immediately destroys all of her credibility when she complains about being cheated on by the exact same guy. Face it, it not like his tendency to wander was an unknown quantity when she married him. Now she wants to come back a decade later and be bitter? What part of "Newt was a cheating bastard" was unclear when he divorced his wife and married you?
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 20, 2012 08:13 AM (0q2P7)
After the wife took the furniture and left? Really?
Honestly, Heather, every guy has had a girlfriend who would do this. Remember, the wife never ever sleeps on the couch. It is unlikely that the man is wrong 100% of the time.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 20, 2012 08:14 AM (T0NGe)
It's like listening to some well to doer, who needs that oddball pet so they buy a badger, complain about being bit.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 20, 2012 08:14 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: chas at January 20, 2012 08:15 AM (TKF1Y)
AmishDude at January 20, 2012 12:14 PM (T0NGe)
your right that there are many many woman who if they were cheating would be happy to screw in the wife's bed, but when the tables are turned they would still be incensed and rant how that crosses the line.
Posted by: chas at January 20, 2012 08:17 AM (TKF1Y)
Posted by: c. up at January 20, 2012 08:17 AM (oZfic)
Umm.. I don't care. It's still non-substantive. I'm still going to support newt.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at January 20, 2012 08:17 AM (0q2P7)
Adultery, yes. But "understandable" (still wrong in my book) and not nearly as awful as it's being made out to be.
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at January 20, 2012 12:10 PM (21lBC)
We don't know if Newt hadn't asked for a divorce. Now he may have or he may have figured that it was politically better for him to stay married. I don't know. I'd read that the separation happened because she cheated on him, but this whole thing is muddy and I follow it.
I'm pretty sure that Calista did not cause the separation. First divorce, I can pin on Newt and I would hold that against his character. The second one, I think is a positive.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 20, 2012 08:18 AM (T0NGe)
Mitt is trying to create a narrative in the event the economy continues to improve, meaning it should be better. If unemployment continues to drop, even if we know it is bullshit, that works against us. Mitt is saying Obama should be gone either way which I agree with.
Posted by: Ken Royall at January 20, 2012 08:19 AM (9zzk+)
Posted by: phoenixgirl....a voter without a candidate at January 20, 2012 08:19 AM (mfbqu)
Posted by: phoenixgirl....a voter without a candidate at January 20, 2012 08:20 AM (mfbqu)
Posted by: lowfibass at January 20, 2012 08:20 AM (BrqlK)
Posted by: Ken Royall at January 20, 2012 08:22 AM (9zzk+)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at January 20, 2012 12:10 PM (21lBC)
So, in your mind its not the vow to God or your own honor which makes the marriage, but a piece of Paper from the State? A piece of Paper which has a long legal process to get rid of... and which ONE person involved in said contract can drag the process out for YEARS?
So, you believe the STATE should control your Sex Life? By locking you into celibacy while some Lawyers get rich off delaying the process?
Seperated? You're done.... Game on...
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 20, 2012 08:22 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Ken Royall at January 20, 2012 08:24 AM (9zzk+)
Posted by: Z as in Jersey at January 20, 2012 12:04 PM (jF5A4)
THIS!
One thing I saw that you did not point out that shows through in your Chronology: This EXPLOSIVE, LOOSE CANNON....held back and showed restraint for the good of his family. I think Newt is NOT a loose cannon, but that he picks his battles. As President, I do not think he would POP as Santorum puts it. (I think Santorum would fizzle under pressure.) I think he could beat Ochuckles. I also think he could put some rear into our less than allies and bolster Israel's confidence. A strong front is what we need. Bush disappointed me when his Shock and Aw was less than aw inspiring. We need someone who can put the wood to it when needed and won't just cave for the sake of them likening us, really liking us.
Posted by: giftogab at January 20, 2012 08:24 AM (SPVfc)
Posted by: lowfibass at January 20, 2012 12:20 PM (BrqlK)
One problem with the current GOP meme, that Mitt is good for independents.. is that many independents are LIBERTARIANS... who left the GOP when it became Overtly Statist.
Mitt has no appeal that those voters... IMO, as one...
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 20, 2012 08:25 AM (lZBBB)
I have had enough of soap operas in the White House, which usually are brought to us by the democrats.
Newt is not dependable and should not be CIC, where his habit of shooting his mouth off might get us in a war or in some hare-brained alliance we don't want.
I repeat my observations of Newt vs. Bush and Katrina on Fox:
Newt right after Katrina: President Bush should start a Marshall Plan for the Gulf Coast. (This means spend tons of federal money.)
Newt 10 months later, after graft, corruption, thievery and waste are revealed in the Katrina Fund: This is what happens when the federal government gets involved in disaster aid. It should have been done by the private sector.
In both cases, the common theme was that "Bush had screwed up" and therefor, Newt was going to take the popular opinion of the day.
This is not a serious person. This is an opportunist. As far as his marital history, I don't want ANY of them in the White House, and that includes Newt, Callista, Marianne, first wife, 2 daughters who are dutifully repeating what their father tells them, and anyone else remotely associated with him.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 20, 2012 08:25 AM (GoIUi)
Miss Marple at January 20, 2012 12:25 PM (GoIUi)
nuts and sluts also surfaced when cain was being accused. the "support anyone with an R by his name" attitude has been taking hold and i really dont like it. it doesnt help and just makes it easier for the dems to win. sure its a double standard but it aint gonna change anytime soon and to act in defiance of it just hurts us.
Posted by: chas at January 20, 2012 08:30 AM (TKF1Y)
Posted by: c. up at January 20, 2012 08:30 AM (oZfic)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at January 20, 2012 08:32 AM (21lBC)
Forget DOMA, forget gay marriage, we lose the argument because our standard bearer is an immoral piece of shit. If you folks think seeing Newt throw out some one-liners at Obama during the debate is worth that only to lose the election anyway, then go ahead and support him.
How can Newt Gingrich ever say "marriage is between one man and one women" ever again? He won't because he knows what some lib reporter is going to say next.
Posted by: Ken Royall at January 20, 2012 08:32 AM (9zzk+)
The marriage is a contract and part of the contract is the piece of Paper from the State. Supposed to be forever and all that. A Christian is not supposed to get divorced at all if you want to go down that road.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 20, 2012 08:34 AM (T0NGe)
*For the record, this is the moment I was transformed from bleeding heart liberal to right wing nut job. Not since Ananias laid hands on the Apostle Paul has a conversion been as sudden and absolute.
Posted by: Dumb_Blonde at January 20, 2012 08:36 AM (Q0z3n)
This, I agree with.
As far as his marital history, I don't want ANY of them in the White House, and that includes Newt, Callista, Marianne, first wife, 2 daughters who are dutifully repeating what their father tells them, and anyone else remotely associated with him.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 20, 2012 12:25 PM (GoIUi)
We all have faults, I don't blame the others, but especially his daughters. They are not touting a party line but pushing back against the caricature.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 20, 2012 08:38 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Z as in Jersey at January 20, 2012 08:40 AM (jF5A4)
I don't necessarily hold others to this, but if I ever get married, I'll hold myself to this standard, Lord willing.
I'm probably offending some commenters by this post, but this is my belief. I've never been married, so I don't know what it's like. And I don't judge people for doing what they feel they have to do in a difficult or unbearable situation.
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at January 20, 2012 12:32 PM (21lBC)
I agree totally. But being a vow to God means something between your God and you and the one included in the vow....he has broken that vow and claims he has sought forgiveness for that.....that same God tells us he is a forgiver....are we, therefore, held to never forgive because he could not live up to something he clearly did not hold in high enough regard when he made it? Furthermore, it is #2 that left the marriage....deserted it. Bible says, it is not good for man to be alone. Says to remarry after death of spouse. Also says desertion grounds for divorce. Additionally, if married to a non believer, divorce is sanctioned.
Posted by: giftogab at January 20, 2012 08:40 AM (SPVfc)
I think there is a difference between "nuts and sluts" and dealing with individual accusers based on their merits and conflicts of interest.
"Nuts and sluts" was a deliberate Carvillian strategy to tar EVERY accuser of Clinton with the same brush.
An accuser's credibility has to be taken into account because otherwise, anyone can accuse anyone of anything.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 20, 2012 08:40 AM (T0NGe)
He holds "seminars."
He's too fat for hiking to be a reasonable alibi.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 20, 2012 08:41 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Z as in Jersey at January 20, 2012 08:45 AM (jF5A4)
Remember that three legged stool Reagan talked about? If we nominate Newt we can snap the family values leg off and throw it away. It means nothing if we are willing to accept this charlatan.
Legs are getting snappned no matter who you nominate.
Posted by: Entropy at January 20, 2012 08:46 AM (mf67L)
Marianne I do not want to hear from again, nor Callista.
The two daughters are old enough to know that they are being used (How could they POSSIBLY know what conversations took place between Newt and Marianne?) and cannot help but think they were looking forward to being presidential daughters. However, I will ease up on that portion.
I was always grateful to the two younger Reagan children that they pretty much stayed away from the White House and didn't drag all of their oddball Hollywood friends into public view. Obviously part of this was due to their estrangement from their father based on political views, but at least everyone stayed off my television. After the White House years was, of course, a different story.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 20, 2012 08:47 AM (GoIUi)
One problem with the current GOP meme, that Mitt is good for independents.. is that many independents are LIBERTARIANS... who left the GOP when it became Overtly Statist.
It's OK, they don't want the racists to come back anyway. Good riddance!
Posted by: Entropy at January 20, 2012 08:48 AM (mf67L)
Posted by: twolaneflash at January 20, 2012 08:48 AM (vWPhU)
Posted by: giftogab at January 20, 2012 08:51 AM (SPVfc)
His favorite president is Franklin Roosevelt. Until very recently he believed in global warming, a la the Pelosi couch moment. He undercut Paul Ryan's budget plan as "conservative social engineering" which, by the way, he is NOT adverse to when it is HIS idea, such as having poor children learn to work in schools.
Winston Churchill was not thrice-married. He drank and smoked cigars and sometimes cussed. Big whoop./ And let me tell you this, I am old enough to remember Winston Churchill's retirement years and interviews, and Newt is NO Winston Churchill!
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 20, 2012 08:52 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: giftogab at January 20, 2012 08:55 AM (SPVfc)
NEWT was the one who did that.
And whatever issues I do have are immaterial. I don't think being used is one, but I suppose there could be something buried in my deep subconscious.
Posted by: Miss Marple at January 20, 2012 09:00 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at January 20, 2012 09:02 AM (21lBC)
Hmmm. Nope, still alive apparently.
Kinda puts a crimp in those "divorced her on her deathbed" rumors eh?
Posted by: Entropy at January 20, 2012 09:09 AM (mf67L)
Posted by: Entropy at January 20, 2012 09:09 AM (mf67L)
LOL. Add another failure to the Carter list. He did admit to 'lusting in his heart', I remember. So he got the guilt but without getting the nookie first.
Posted by: Retread at January 20, 2012 09:10 AM (joSBv)
And I would agree, also - except for the clause in most separation agreements (including mine) that says "...living apart as if unmarried". That means, in the eyes of the law at least, what you do after you're separated is your business and only your business. Biblically, a totally different set of standards apply, but for purposes of proving/disproving behavior during a separation, there it is.
Posted by: antisocialist at January 20, 2012 09:13 AM (j/nZn)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at January 20, 2012 01:02 PM (21lBC)
And she's also older than Methuselah and doesn't remember much about the whole thing. Kidding, I'm kidding.
Seriously, if Marianne had been Newt's first wife, she might have a tad more credibility with me. But, apparently, Newt's lack of a "moral compass" didn't bother her in the least when she was the one doing the freak nasty with a married man. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned, especially a woman who's being traded in for a newer model, after once actually being the newer model being traded in for.
Future reference, Marianne...if a man will cheat with you, he'll damn sure cheat on you.
Posted by: antisocialist at January 20, 2012 09:20 AM (j/nZn)
The only way this doesn't end in disaster is if it is used to block a Luap Nop nomination.
IIRC, the last smoke-filled room nomination for Republicans was of Warren G. Harding in the 20s.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 20, 2012 09:21 AM (e0xKF)
Posted by: Entropy at January 20, 2012 01:09 PM (mf67L)
She had a BENIGN TUMOR. that is a SCARE not actual cancer. She was Never dying.
Posted by: giftogab at January 20, 2012 09:23 AM (SPVfc)
No, giftogab, I will not listen to your atrociously racist talking points.
She died of a broken heart because Gingrich dumped her in her moment of need. She is dead now. I don't care if that's her, right over there, talking and doing shit. She is dead.
Actually though, I really had assumed she was dead. I would not have figgured the smears would be that outrageously fictional.
Posted by: Entropy at January 20, 2012 09:39 AM (mf67L)
Posted by: twolaneflash at January 20, 2012 09:43 AM (vWPhU)
No, giftogab, I will not listen to your atrociously racist talking points.
She died of a broken heart because Gingrich dumped her in her moment of need. She is dead now. I don't care if that's her, right over there, talking and doing shit. She is dead.
Actually though, I really had assumed she was dead. I would not have figgured the smears would be that outrageously fictional.
Posted by: Entropy at January 20, 2012 01:39 PM (mf67L)
Aint THAT the truth!
Posted by: giftogab at January 20, 2012 09:46 AM (SPVfc)
Great, let's put them in the White House!
Posted by: Jeff B. at January 20, 2012 09:48 AM (23Ios)
Posted by: Burke at January 20, 2012 09:57 AM (9N3G1)
Posted by: twolaneflash at January 20, 2012 10:14 AM (vWPhU)
Posted by: Burke at January 20, 2012 10:16 AM (9N3G1)
We must have a candidate who is willing to go to the mattresses or we lose and we cannot afford to lose this election.
Posted by: BJM at January 20, 2012 12:54 PM (yiBiw)
I'd like to add that Marianne married Newt in 1981 when his political star was rising. The divorce was in 2000 when he was at his nadir. If Callista is a gold digger she married him in 2000 when the claim looked like it was totally played out. Could it be she is actually in love with the fool?
Posted by: NC Mountain Girl at January 21, 2012 07:27 PM (d1WtL)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3167 seconds, 419 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Pooter Hound at January 20, 2012 07:01 AM (ELPgk)