June 19, 2012
— Ace The "undervote" is the count of people who vote in an election, but choose, for whatever reason, to not vote for a candidate in an uncontested primary, or some no-name.
If Democratic voters come out to vote in Democratic primaries, and dutifully vote for Congressman, AG, and so forth, but elect not to bother voting for Obama, what does that mean?
Mike Flynn says it means trouble for Obama.
[T]hese numbers are based solely on Democrat primary voters. There are no Republican or Independent voters in this. This is Obama's base. That said, look at the map above, in only about three counties is he winning the support of more than 90% of Democrat voters in an uncontested primary. In over 27 counties, he is winning less than 70%. In a few counties, he is winning 55%.Our old rule of thumb was that any undervote more than 20% was a reason to go to DefCon 1. It signaled a serious problem with the base and would necessitate our adapting campaign strategy and tactics to shore up our support. I have never seen a situation where a candidate had an undervote of 30-40% and went on to win the general election. In fact, in such situations, we would often pull out of the race entirely.
One caveat here is that Obama's lowest undervote percentages are in the Philadelphia area, and those infamous Bucks County suburbs that put the Democratic candidate on top in every recent presidential election. Those are the most populous counties (well, those and Pittsburgh), so a county-by-county analysis is worse for Obama than the actual statewide undervote. In the Philly area, the undervote is, it is said (this disagrees with Flynn) "well within historical norms," and is only 15% or thereabouts.
But that means that statewide it's higher, around 20% or so, or more.
Over at the liberal New Republic, analyst William Galston puts Pennsylvania in the swing column, and that was before this data was published.
The latest Quinnipiac survey gives the president a 6-point edge (46-40), but his support remains well below 50 percent, as it has in most previous surveys for the past six months. Obama’s job approval among Pennsylvanians stands at only 46, versus 49 percent who disapprove of his performance as president. Forty-eight percent think he deserves to be reelected, while 47 percent do not. And 56 percent are dissatisfied with the way things are going in their state, versus 43 percent who are satisfied.At this point, the odds still favor an Obama victory in Pennsylvania this November. But the evidence suggests that Romney has a shot in the state—and Romney himself seems to think so.
Southwestern Pennsylvania shares some commonalities with bordering West Virginia, including coal, and voters who are socially conservative but economically in favor of big government's allegedly helping hand.
It also now features a significant undervote for President Obama, and perhaps a growing desire on the part of Democrats to skip the presidential race entirely.
Three Democrats from West Virginia, including first-term Sen. Joe Manchin, are skipping the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C. this September, where President Obama will formally receive the party's presidential nomination.The West Virginia Democratic Party told reporters Monday that in addition to Manchin, Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin and Rep. Nick Rahall do not plan to join West Virginia's delegation. State Party Chair Larry Puccio said Sen. Jay Rockefeller will attend and will serve as the group's honorary chair.
Mr. Obama is unpopular in the state and lost 41 percent of the West Virginia primary vote to a convicted felon. Manchin -- who faces his own re-election battle this year -- has said he's not sure he'll vote for Mr. Obama.
He says he'll just stay home and keep working for West Virginia, or something.
Posted by: Ace at
09:45 AM
| Comments (138)
Post contains 653 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Vic at June 19, 2012 09:07 AM (YdQQY)
when flipping a state from blue to red, you have to win bigger than the margin of cheating from the blue side
Posted by: Jones in CO at June 19, 2012 09:08 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Captain FAPtastical at June 19, 2012 09:46 AM (/pd0C)
Posted by: Crazy guy in a lab coat at June 19, 2012 09:48 AM (Ky1+e)
Posted by: Undervote at June 19, 2012 09:49 AM (vfaO9)
Posted by: rd at June 19, 2012 09:49 AM (9sUlj)
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at June 19, 2012 09:51 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: Dang - peering over the top of his spectacles at June 19, 2012 09:51 AM (Ky1+e)
When 40% of your party votes for a Felon, in Jail, in another State, instead of you on the Primary?
You've got problems.
I actualy think Obama was vulnerable to a Primary Challenge, if someone had bothered to step up...
This whole Dem Racial Groups who vote in lock step thing? leaves out the White Male voter.... which is still, along with White Women, one of the two biggest Demographics.... and one in which Metro Obama is NOT doing well.
Posted by: Romeo13 at June 19, 2012 09:54 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Walter Freeman at June 19, 2012 09:54 AM (kqGWM)
Posted by: Jones in CO at June 19, 2012 01:08 PM (8sCoq)
I hear ya and don't mean to underestimate the seriousness of fraud, but then how did Toomey and Corbett win?
Posted by: Uncledave at June 19, 2012 09:55 AM (nJ32z)
Posted by: Andreas mick Jaggeresque vaginal lips. at June 19, 2012 09:55 AM (9TTOe)
Posted by: Tommy Christopher at June 19, 2012 09:56 AM (jm/9g)
The WV democratic party is just being carbon concious and environmentally aware. They do not believe that burning all that gasoline driving 270 miles from Charleston WV to Charlotte is environmentally friendly.
Being seen with Obama is not environmentally friendly and is especially hostile to their re-election environment,
Posted by: rd at June 19, 2012 09:56 AM (9sUlj)
Manchin has a set o' balls on him, too.
What a slick fuck he is. Talks like Jim DeMint, votes like Dick Durbin.
Posted by: soothsayer at June 19, 2012 09:56 AM (9Q7Nu)
Posted by: Dr Spank at June 19, 2012 09:56 AM (I/Xad)
Posted by: Andrea Bitchell at June 19, 2012 09:57 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Linus at June 19, 2012 09:57 AM (ZzzNj)
Posted by: jeannebodine at June 19, 2012 09:57 AM (xI+jL)
1. ) Stupid.
2. ) America haters
3. ) Deaf, Dumb AND blind (looking for a pinball machine).
Posted by: © Sponge at June 19, 2012 09:58 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Madison, Milwaukee and Kenosha on June 5th. at June 19, 2012 09:59 AM (lQszg)
How many posts can an Ewok post if he posts his posts one handed?
Posted by: garrett at June 19, 2012 01:57 PM (X49XP)
An ewok could post as many posts as an ewok could post if an ewok could post posts.
And if that's not enough he can double post
Posted by: The Jackhole at June 19, 2012 10:00 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Ken at June 19, 2012 10:01 AM (ayCbQ)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Team Dagny at June 19, 2012 10:01 AM (9TTOe)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Lite! 98% Anger Free! at June 19, 2012 10:01 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Walter Freeman at June 19, 2012 10:02 AM (kqGWM)
Posted by: kallisto at June 19, 2012 10:02 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: Cricket at June 19, 2012 10:02 AM (DrC22)
I would venture a guess their traffic is down to about half of what it was a few years ago. They just don't have the fire in backing that miserable JEF.
I predict this will be a landslide for Romney. The left just doesn't have it in them this time because Barry is such a fuck up.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at June 19, 2012 10:02 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: CAC at June 19, 2012 10:02 AM (lQszg)
Oh, and PA has 67 counties.
Posted by: Jay at June 19, 2012 10:03 AM (3LaGb)
Barack Obama is Steamy Coleslaw on a Mayonnaise Falafel !
Posted by: Mitt Romney's WaWa Sammich at June 19, 2012 10:03 AM (A3zgF)
Posted by: Uncledave at June 19, 2012 01:55 PM (nJ32z)
I give: how?
all seriousness aside, I suspect voter fraud in the Nov election will be widespread
Posted by: Jones in CO at June 19, 2012 10:04 AM (8sCoq)
Maybe if you posted a picture of the state of Pennsylvania to remind us what it looks like.
Posted by: EC at June 19, 2012 10:04 AM (GQ8sn)
You do realize that we are called Morons for a reason?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at June 19, 2012 10:04 AM (nEUpB)
Who cares about PA.
We need to win OH.
And we need that senate seat in MO if we want to take the Senate.
Posted by: soothsayer at June 19, 2012 10:05 AM (9Q7Nu)
Posted by: red sweater at June 19, 2012 10:05 AM (Xwgt3)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Team Dagny at June 19, 2012 10:05 AM (9TTOe)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Lite! 98% Anger Free! at June 19, 2012 10:05 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: pause at June 19, 2012 10:05 AM (HOOye)
Posted by: CAC at June 19, 2012 10:05 AM (lQszg)
Barack Obama isSteamy Coleslaw on a Mayonnaise Falafel !
Posted by: Mitt Romney's WaWa Sammich at June 19, 2012 02:03 PM (A3zgF)
Garnished with Andrea Mitchell's crotch crickets!
Posted by: model_1066 at June 19, 2012 10:06 AM (YbQJm)
Oh, and PA has 67 counties.
Posted by: Jay at June 19, 2012 02:03 PM (3LaGb)
yes, but those 4 counties only have to 'find' enough votes or 'register' enough 'voters' to defeat the other 63
Posted by: Jones in CO at June 19, 2012 10:07 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 19, 2012 10:07 AM (8y9MW)
We've been seeing some good signs that this could happen, but chickens only count when they've hatched.
I'll say this - I know players in the upper echelon of both parties in Bucks, and the consensus is that the down ballot candidates will be running away from Obama, not with him in 2012.
N.B. Bucks also turned out Patrick Murphy in favor of Mike Fitzpatrick in 2010 (Murphy beat Fitz in 2006 by 1200 votes, then Fitz took it back in 2010 by 18,000 votes or so). Hopefully MontCo can get it's act together.
All good signs, together with a Republican Controller in Philadelphia (Alan Butkovitz), the office charged with ensuring free and fair elections, which should cut down on the built-in fraud advantage in favor of Obumbles.
Posted by: Alec Leamas at June 19, 2012 10:07 AM (mg08E)
...how did Toomey and Corbett win?
Balls-to-the-wall GOP turnout in an off-year election cycle combined with a strong anti-incumbent mood.
2012 is gonna be a lot different. Much bigger challenge for the GOP.
Posted by: soothsayer at June 19, 2012 10:07 AM (9Q7Nu)
So, you know. Don't listen to me.
Posted by: CAC at June 19, 2012 02:05 PM (lQszg)
It's like when you walk down the street and ignore the guy yelling on the corner about the end of days......
You look the other way and pretend he's not there. No offense.
Posted by: © Sponge at June 19, 2012 10:07 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at June 19, 2012 02:02 PM (f9c2L)
WHAT???!?!!! YOU DARE INSULT ME OR MY PEOPLE!!!!!
Posted by: A fuck up at June 19, 2012 10:07 AM (ZzzNj)
Posted by: Jones in CO at June 19, 2012 02:04 PM (8sCoq)
Why wouldn't the dems have had set their fraud machine on ludicrous speed for the most recent governor and senate elections? With redistricting on the line a lot was at stake.
Posted by: Uncledave at June 19, 2012 10:07 AM (nJ32z)
THIS
Posted by: kelley in virginia at June 19, 2012 10:07 AM (p3a8+)
Posted by: Dr Spank at June 19, 2012 10:07 AM (I/Xad)
Posted by: CAC at June 19, 2012 10:08 AM (lQszg)
Posted by: Cricket at June 19, 2012 10:08 AM (DrC22)
Posted by: goddessoftheclassroom at June 19, 2012 10:08 AM (eJ0Ce)
Posted by: CAC at June 19, 2012 10:09 AM (lQszg)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Team Dagny at June 19, 2012 02:05 PM (9TTOe)
In other news: water found to be wet; dog bites man; Chris Matthews to fellate President
Posted by: Jones in CO at June 19, 2012 10:09 AM (8sCoq)
I don't think you can generalize since conditions are much different in the primaries than in the general. First, unlike in the primary, the New Black Panthers will be out in force in front of the polling stations (if not the polling booths) on November 6. Second, a lot of dependable democrat voters sit out the primaries but show up in November. Speaking of which, anybody else looking forward ot the next season of The Walking Dead?
Posted by: Dirks Strewn at June 19, 2012 10:09 AM (VLifP)
Posted by: Vic at June 19, 2012 10:09 AM (YdQQY)
-----
I prefer him in
Posted by: Cricket at June 19, 2012 02:08 PM (DrC22)
Fixed.
Posted by: © Sponge at June 19, 2012 10:09 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at June 19, 2012 10:09 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Sarah Jessica Parker at June 19, 2012 10:10 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: nickless at June 19, 2012 10:10 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: CAC at June 19, 2012 02:09 PM (lQszg)
Well, that's different. Tits and bacon make the world go round, so you'd HAVE to acknowledge at that point.
Posted by: © Sponge at June 19, 2012 10:10 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Sarah Jessica Parker at June 19, 2012 10:12 AM (r2PLg)
I'm one of those Philly-area undervotes. I'm registered Dem only for pragmatic reasons. If you're registered R and try to get any kind of city service, good luck. I haven't voted D in a general election since Clinton in '96 when I was young and dumb...not that it matters much around here.
Anyways, I'm wondering if the undervote numbers in my area are just a reflection of the lack of choices on the D side. Obama ran unopposed, as did virtually every candidate on the ballot. I think I only cast one vote, for some judge (I could never vote for SCMOAF even in this situation). There simply wasn't much reason for a Dem voter to show up on primary day, not even to cast a love vote for Zero.
Anecdotally, I'm not sure if Zero can get the 500,000 vote city margin he needs without the feared massive fraud. Those white trade union guys who voted for him last time aren't gonna do so again (or at least most of them won't).
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at June 19, 2012 10:12 AM (YmPwQ)
If the guy was screaming this in between painting tits and eating bacon, you'd still ignore him?
CAC, a plaid map is all we ask. It's instant credibility with us.
But, tits and bacon wouldn't hurt. Just sayin'...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at June 19, 2012 10:12 AM (d0Tfm)
Eh. He probably thinks it's solid blue and we shouldn't bother.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at June 19, 2012 10:12 AM (ZzzNj)
Posted by: Detective John Kimble at June 19, 2012 10:13 AM (136wp)
Posted by: CAC at June 19, 2012 02:08 PM (lQszg)
I would think WI is a better pick-up opportunity than either PA or MI, no?
Posted by: Uncledave at June 19, 2012 10:13 AM (nJ32z)
Posted by: Sarah Jessica Parker at June 19, 2012 10:14 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 19, 2012 10:14 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: Wedge Antilles at June 19, 2012 10:14 AM (XvHmy)
Posted by: Namor at June 19, 2012 10:15 AM (136wp)
Well it is an essential Democrat campaigning skill. So I can see why they want it factored in.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Lite! 98% Anger Free! at June 19, 2012 10:15 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: BlackOrchid-TeamDagny at June 19, 2012 10:15 AM (SB0V2)
But, tits and bacon wouldn't hurt. Just sayin'...
If not plaid, then paisleys. Possibly painted on the tits with a brush made with bacon.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at June 19, 2012 10:16 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Sarah Jessica Parker at June 19, 2012 10:16 AM (r2PLg)
This undervote article makes me hot. (Just the antidote to that horrid Greenspan/Mitchell sex tape image that came from the last thread.)
Posted by: kallisto at June 19, 2012 10:16 AM (jm/9g)
2012 is gonna be a lot different. Much bigger challenge for the GOP.
Posted by: soothsayer at June 19, 2012 02:07 PM (9Q7Nu)
-----------------------------------------------
It's my thinking, considering what happened in WI, that the GOP and the voters are pretty jacked up about the election.
One or more whoppers like Baraka's immigration edict will really fire everyone up. And we know the SCOAMT has more of his little surprises in store for this nation.
Posted by: Soona at June 19, 2012 10:18 AM (58frh)
Posted by: tasker at June 19, 2012 10:18 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Mr Ed at June 19, 2012 10:19 AM (136wp)
Posted by: CAC at June 19, 2012 10:20 AM (lQszg)
It's called a wedge.
Posted by: garrett at June 19, 2012 01:57 PM (X49XP)
I prefer "Hero"
Posted by: Wedge Antilles at June 19, 2012 02:14 PM (XvHmy
I prefer "Sub"
Posted by: Namor at June 19, 2012 02:15 PM (136wp)
----------------------------------------------
I prefer "sammich".
Posted by: Soona at June 19, 2012 10:21 AM (58frh)
I kept re-reading them for some meta equine stuff and it wasn't happening.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at June 19, 2012 10:21 AM (ZzzNj)
Posted by: CAC at June 19, 2012 10:22 AM (lQszg)
Posted by: Uncledave at June 19, 2012 01:55 PM (nJ32z)
***
As I understand it, the "T"-zone doesn't release its returns until very late in the evening so as not to give a heads up to the Philly fraudsters. That's why the returns showed an even race between Sestak-Toomey until very late in the night when the T-zone numbers came rolling in.
Posted by: kallisto at June 19, 2012 10:22 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: CAC at June 19, 2012 10:22 AM (lQszg)
Isn't Pelosi planning on retiring after one more term? I suspect she will, unless the Democrats win the House.
Posted by: soothsayer at June 19, 2012 10:22 AM (9Q7Nu)
Really? I thought maybe they were protesting the vote against gay marriage NC
Posted by: Cheetohs Jhonsno at June 19, 2012 10:24 AM (Y+DPZ)
No precedent for not holding the election. He would risk the entire progressive agenda doing that. The progs wouldn't let him.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Lite! 98% Anger Free! at June 19, 2012 10:25 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: CAC at June 19, 2012 02:22 PM (lQszg)
***
I was listening to an election returns radio show that featured commentary by Rick Santorum. Maybe at the time I tuned in the race had already evened out. Or it could be that I totally misremembered because my brain does turn to mush from time to time.
Posted by: kallisto at June 19, 2012 10:25 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: soothsayer at June 19, 2012 02:22 PM (9Q7Nu)
------------------------------------------------
I would almost consider that a pudding dipping event. Whether she gets voted out or she retires, it'll be nice to get rid of that scrunt.
Posted by: Soona at June 19, 2012 10:26 AM (58frh)
Don't forget that Obama's EPA has been devastating the coal industry and is trying to clamp down on the fracking. If the union guys out there still vote Dem then they deserve what they get. Unfortunately the rest of us will get it too.
BTW...the New Black Panthers thing...I've never seen them in my neighborhood, nor can I say that even in this heavily Democratic ward that I've seen an attempt at voter intimidation by anyone. Usually there are a bunch of bored-looking union guys who try to hand you a leaflet on the way in. And even if there were a bat-brandishing Panther standing in front of the polling -place, I'm gonna walk right around him and vote for Romney.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at June 19, 2012 10:27 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 19, 2012 10:27 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: tasker at June 19, 2012 10:28 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Jim Scrummy at June 19, 2012 10:30 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at June 19, 2012 10:31 AM (C8mVl)
Posted by: Jones in CO at June 19, 2012 10:31 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: tasker at June 19, 2012 10:33 AM (r2PLg)
We're talking about PA being the girl who won't go home with us after buying her drinks. Meanwhile, Wisconsin just fucked us dry and is begging for more.
And WI is kind of sexy, whereas PA is just a lumpy rectangle.
Posted by: Uncledave at June 19, 2012 10:37 AM (nJ32z)
Posted by: Mr Ed at June 19, 2012 10:37 AM (136wp)
Posted by: SamIam at June 19, 2012 10:47 AM (VDpzM)
Posted by: Thunderb at June 19, 2012 11:07 AM (Dnbau)
I still think they should split up the electoral votes by congressional district, the GOP would have a lock on the White House for probably a generation.
Posted by: Fitzgerald at June 19, 2012 11:13 AM (0kf1G)
They will bring in the experts from MN who can find votes in car trunks in just the right amount to turn a close loss into a win.
Posted by: Vic at June 19, 2012 11:16 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: NewBrunswicker at June 19, 2012 11:22 AM (pwoSP)
Posted by: rockmom at June 19, 2012 11:42 AM (NYnoe)
Voter ID laws won't "fix" all fraudulent voting, but it SIGNIFICANTLY curtails it. Coming up with thousands of fake ids that match real voters names and addresses is an enormous criminal conspiracy that most people will not get near.
But if all you have to do is show up at a polling location without any ID, it's a much different story, and the "risk" goes down significantly.
Posted by: Fitzgerald at June 19, 2012 11:48 AM (0kf1G)
Posted by: rockmom at June 19, 2012 11:50 AM (NYnoe)
Exactly, and Voter ID is also a HUGE psychological game changer. To get large scale voter fraud, you need large amounts of willing participants. People get VERY nervous when drivers' licenses are involved.
If Republicans take back Congress and the White House, they should tie highway funding to mandatory Voter ID. If the blue states want to keep up this game, fine, no highway funding.
Around 70% of Americans supports Voter ID. It's a no brainer for the GOP to force it in all 50 states.
Posted by: Fitzgerald at June 19, 2012 11:57 AM (0kf1G)
Posted by: Vic at June 19, 2012 11:59 AM (YdQQY)
I disagree, I'm not saying it never happens, but there's usually a lot of transparency in that process.
Most vote fraud is people voting that legally should not be for a variety of reasons (didn't register, are inelgible because of a felony, non citizens, are a college student registered in their parents state, etc.) or they just show up saying they're somebody else. All of this is almost exclusively from Democrats, usually in urban areas.
What I get tired of though is conservative Eeyores that constantly harp that the game is hopelessly rigged. I think that curtails turnout because it looks like a lost cause.
If voter fraud was that potent, no way could there be a Republican Governor and legislature in Pennsylvania.
Posted by: Fitzgerald at June 19, 2012 12:07 PM (0kf1G)
Vic, not in Philly. Believe me, they have it down to a science, but it all depends on there being no voter ID required. They really do send the buses around all day, I know people who have seen them. The Democrats also pay what they call "walking-around money" to the ward captains, which is used to pay the people on the buses, and to pay the black preachers for delivering their congregations. They also get all the college students to vote in Philly, and there are a lot of them.
#131 I also really want the next Congress to repeal the motor-voter law, and do something to strongly incent states against same-day registration in federal elections. Those have led to inestimable amounts of mischief.
Posted by: rockmom at June 19, 2012 12:07 PM (qE3AR)
Posted by: rockmom at June 19, 2012 12:12 PM (NYnoe)
Posted by: Uncle Jefe at June 19, 2012 01:10 PM (25KoS)
Anyways, I'm wondering if the undervote numbers in my area are just a reflection of the lack of choices on the D side. Obama ran unopposed, as did virtually every candidate on the ballot. I think I only cast one vote, for some judge (I could never vote for SCMOAF even in this situation). There simply wasn't much reason for a Dem voter to show up on primary day, not even to cast a love vote for Zero.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at June 19, 2012 02:12 PM (YmPwQ)
Not showing up is not an undervote by the definition given. It is those who show up, but do not vote for a guy anyway.
So if 90000 voters show up, buy only 70000 vote for you while 90000 vote for the dogcatcher, that shows serious discontent. Much more than if you didn't show up at all and vote for anyone.
Posted by: Oldcat at June 19, 2012 01:28 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Fitzgerald at June 19, 2012 04:07 PM (0kf1G)
Voter fraud requires work, so it has a harder time when everyone on that side knows it is futile.
Posted by: Oldcat at June 19, 2012 01:29 PM (z1N6a)
The point I'm trying to make is, voter fraud is usually something at the margins that makes a difference in a close election. Some conservatives have this idea that millions upon millions of votes are fraudulent (you're talking about the entire populations of several states)
The reality is at most you're talking about a couple percentage points statewide where there's a Tammany Hall type operation in an urban area (think Philadelphia, Detroit, etc.)
The fact that Republicans can win handily in states like Michigan and PA even WITHOUT voter ID laws tells me we can overcome this handicap even more so now that we have these laws.
Posted by: Fitzgerald at June 19, 2012 01:52 PM (0kf1G)
Posted by: steevy at June 19, 2012 04:18 PM (Xb3hu)
It won't be easy, but it can be done.
MoronWorld needs to get behind Tom Smith so's we can get rid of Little Bobby Casey in the Senate.
Posted by: bob at June 19, 2012 04:18 PM (yN6xf)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2686 seconds, 266 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Dave Bowman at June 19, 2012 09:05 AM (GnKed)