May 13, 2012

Arlen Specter Would Like Utah to Reelect Orrin Hatch
— rdbrewer

What does that tell you?

For Arlen Specter, it's not about being a good Republican. It's about holding onto power.

But you don't have to worry about Orrin Hatch. He has an 89% lifetime ACU conservative rating. He only crosses the aisle on the really important things.

From Philip Klein at the Washington Examiner:

As President Bush worked with Congressional Republicans to explode government when they were in power, Hatch voted with him every step of the way. He voted to expand the federal role in education with "No Child Left Behind" and for the biggest expansion of entitlements since LBJ's Great Society in the form of the Medicare prescription drug plan.

In 2005, Hatch voted for the $286 billion highway bill, which contained 6,376 earmarks, including the infamous "Bridge to Nowhere." He then voted against an amendment that would have diverted funds earmarked for the bridge to help pay for Hurricane Katrina relief. In the fall of 2008, Hatch went on to vote for the Wall Street bailout.

Video below the fold from The Daily Caller.

Follow me on Twitter.

Posted by: rdbrewer at 10:58 AM | Comments (154)
Post contains 199 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Someone should tell him that Orrin hasn't behaved like a lady lately.

Posted by: RushBabe, co-opted by the Mayor of Realville at May 13, 2012 11:02 AM (tQHzJ)

2 There has to be a way to work in a "down the hatch" pun here...

Posted by: JDTAY at May 13, 2012 11:03 AM (sFP59)

3

O/T - I would've put it in the last thread since it was Mother's Day-related, but can anyone decipher what this guy's research interests are in plain English?  Is Kratos in the house?  My 9th grader is doing a research paper on him and asked me what this first graf translates to.  I'm at a loss...

 

http://bit.ly/KYaHyi

Posted by: RushBabe, co-opted by the Mayor of Realville at May 13, 2012 11:04 AM (tQHzJ)

4 20 years or so ago he was OK..lately, not so much.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at May 13, 2012 11:04 AM (N7c3/)

5 Hey, where did the first three comments go?

Posted by: RushBabe, co-opted by the Mayor of Realville at May 13, 2012 11:06 AM (tQHzJ)

6 What makes these assholes think they are untouchable? 

Posted by: huerfano at May 13, 2012 11:07 AM (bAGA/)

7 Sonuvabitch...I just went back to the state I represent and found out they now have a pro football team there.
When the hell did that happen?

Posted by: Soon to be ex-Senator Dick Lugar at May 13, 2012 11:07 AM (Yhu4q)

8 Spector's endorsement isn't enough.  On the other hand, if Charlie Crist and Jim Jeffords endorse Hatch, I'll support him.

Posted by: Cicero at May 13, 2012 11:09 AM (qhHI4)

9 Piss on Hatch.

Posted by: Vic at May 13, 2012 11:09 AM (YdQQY)

10 What makes these assholes think they are untouchable?


Everything that's happened up to now. This entire "accountability" thing is confusing and frightening to them.  When we say our betters, we're mocking.  When they say it, they really do mean that they are our betters. 

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD 2012 at May 13, 2012 11:10 AM (Gk3SS)

11

"What does that tell you?"

 

It tells me that Orrin & Arlen have a history of that Bammy/Larry Sinclair/Reggie Love/Rahm Emanuel/John Travolta/footsies-beneath-the-airport-mensroom-stall/dare-not-speak-its-name excitement in their lives.

 

 

 

Posted by: Emmanuel Goldstein at May 13, 2012 11:10 AM (JW/aG)

12 What's wrong with a little big government?

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at May 13, 2012 11:10 AM (Iyg03)

13 Oh, hell yeah! Take Arlen Spector's advice. Snort! Sorry. Was that not lady-like?

Posted by: nerdygirl at May 13, 2012 11:10 AM (HJYyV)

14 What does that tell you?


****

It tells me that both of them should go. Then again, it really just reinforces a long-held opinion.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 11:11 AM (piMMO)

15 can anyone decipher what this guy's research interests are in plain English?

They're working on the lowest level chemical/mechanical mechanisms behind DNA replication and modification. 

Posted by: Purple Avenger at May 13, 2012 11:11 AM (N7c3/)

16 "8 Spector's endorsement isn't enough. On the other hand, if Charlie Crist and Jim Jeffords endorse Hatch, I'll support him. Posted by: Cicero" Hold out for the oh so impressive Nanny Bloomberg endorsement.

Posted by: nerdygirl at May 13, 2012 11:12 AM (HJYyV)

17 The people of Indiana decided who they wanted to represent them..

...and that's cannibalizing?

Posted by: Albie Damned at May 13, 2012 11:13 AM (Yhu4q)

18 I feel that Republicans in the Senate should be collegial.  Democrats?  They don't have to.  I mean, can you imagine Harry Reid being collegial?  He's like that bratty kid you knew at six who wouldn't let you try out his pedal-powered Chevy and delighted in your frustration. 

But Republicans?  We have to be collegial.  We're above petty partisanship.  And if that means the country slowly drags toward that left, well, so be it.  Because the important thing is for us to be collegial.

In fact, that's what I want on my gravestone:  "He was collegial.  Even while the country went to hell in a handbasket. He was collegial." 

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at May 13, 2012 11:15 AM (Iyg03)

19 Doggone it now, Arlen...shut the H-E-Double toothpicks up, will ya?

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at May 13, 2012 11:16 AM (Yhu4q)

20 They're working on the lowest level chemical/mechanical mechanisms behind DNA replication and modification.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at May 13, 2012 03:11 PM (N7c3/)

 

Thanks!  We don't speak microbiologese 'round these parts.

Posted by: RushBabe, co-opted. at May 13, 2012 11:16 AM (tQHzJ)

21

"They're working on the lowest level chemical/mechanical mechanisms behind DNA replication and modification."

 

They also have a very large grant which allows them to purchase some incredibly expensive software to make those pretty pictures.

 

[As a general rule of thumb, in any technical endeavor, pretty pictures are just staggeringly expensive...]

Posted by: Emmanuel Goldstein at May 13, 2012 11:18 AM (JW/aG)

22 Arlen, I wish the hell you'd shut the fuck up.

Whoops!  I didn't say that.  That was one of my aids.  I mean, I would never say anything like that. 

I never get pissy, dammit.

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at May 13, 2012 11:18 AM (Iyg03)

23 Quick...someone run out and get me a tri-corn hat and Gadsden flag

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at May 13, 2012 11:19 AM (Yhu4q)

24

Posted by: Emmanuel Goldstein at May 13, 2012 03:18 PM (JW/aG)

 

The daughter and I just looked at some of his purdy pix on line.  Sheesh.

Posted by: RushBabe, co-opted. at May 13, 2012 11:20 AM (tQHzJ)

25 Goddam voters.

Whoa, was that mic on?  I mean, "I love the God-given voters."  Because they're the vote givers.  I'd never say anything like that.

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at May 13, 2012 11:21 AM (Iyg03)

26 It's already 20 minutes in, but if you can catch the replay on FNC, Stossel's 'The Road to Serfdom' episode is pretty good.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 11:21 AM (piMMO)

27

I think

 

"They're working on the lowest level chemical/mechanical mechanisms..."

 

is a good answer to

 

"What makes these assholes think they are untouchable? "

Posted by: Mama AJ, who may be skimming the comments a little too quickly at May 13, 2012 11:23 AM (XdlcF)

28

The problem with these "Conservative" ratings, is that they are based on Republican positions...

 

And Consrevative, and Republican, are NOT the same thing.

 

DHS was a REPPUBLICAN creation... not a Conservative creation. No child left behind? Republican....

 

We can play this game alllll day... but you get my meaning.

Posted by: Romeo13 at May 13, 2012 11:24 AM (lZBBB)

29 Why does Mark Levin have such a hard on for Orrin?  Couple of weeks ago I happen to catch Hatch on Levin's program.  He thinks Orrin is the greatest thing since sliced bread.

Posted by: Tami at May 13, 2012 11:24 AM (X6akg)

30 RushBabe, He's a biophysicist who is trying to figure out the exact mechanism by which DNA is uncoiled in order for it to be copied. There a large assemblies of protein molecules that come together and go through structural changes to accomplish this. The fuel they use comes from a smaller molecule called ATP. The pictures that they have are derived from atomic structures of the protein molecules (that were probably determined via X-ray crystallography) at different chemical states that represent steps in the mechanism that they are studying biochemically... fit together with computational modeling.

Posted by: Y-not at May 13, 2012 11:27 AM (5H6zj)

31 If I get reelected, there is simply no way I'd move back to the left the following week. 

Because I'm honorable.  I'm an honorable man.

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at May 13, 2012 11:27 AM (Iyg03)

32

>>The problem with these "Conservative" ratings, is that they are based on Republican positions...

>>And Consrevative, and Republican, are NOT the same thing.

 

Need Tea Party ratings.

Posted by: Mama AJ at May 13, 2012 11:27 AM (XdlcF)

33 What the hell's this talk about biology when we're trying to have a thread about me? 

(The voters didn't hear me say that, did they?)

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at May 13, 2012 11:28 AM (Iyg03)

34 #3 - Rushbabe - It's all about genetics and RNA transcription. I think.

Beyond that, it's way, but way, over my head.

Posted by: Dianna at May 13, 2012 11:29 AM (mKMj1)

35 I saw a recent poll in which 56% of voters would just prefer to replace all the Congresscritters at once.
 
Sounds low to me.

Posted by: GnuBreed at May 13, 2012 11:31 AM (ccXZP)

36 DHS was a REPPUBLICAN creation... not a Conservative creation. No child left behind? Republican..



If I recall correctly it was a Hillary creation that Bush co-opted.

Posted by: Vic at May 13, 2012 11:32 AM (YdQQY)

37 The work those guys at Berkeley are doing could ultimately take gene therapies, genetic engineering and stuff like that out of the stone knives and bear skins stage its currently at.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at May 13, 2012 11:33 AM (N7c3/)

38 Orrin's main argument for being re-elected is his seniority on the finance committee, but the next guy in line behind him (Crapo, per one of our morons here) is a better conservative than Hatch is. Liljenquist seems like a solid guy, but I think it's an uphill battle. Although my sense is that Hatch is not very popular down here in very red Utah County (he usually draws tepid applause at civic events around here), he is a fixture and I think Mitt endorsed him. I kicked some bucks to Dan anyway. I was at some civic events this weekend (a temple ground breaking and a convention center opening) and Chaffetz, who had been quite popular around here last year seems to have squandered some good will by not challenging Hatch. He would have had a much better chance of beating Orrin, imho. I'm pretty irritated he didn't run. Mia Love is also going to need help to win in the general. Even though she's the Republican nominee, she's running against an incumbent Democrat in a newly formed district. If she wins, it will represent a pick up for us in the House.

Posted by: Y-not at May 13, 2012 11:33 AM (5H6zj)

39 ACU ratings are based on "conservative" positions.  But the problem is people like Hatch have figured out how to game the system.

Posted by: Vic at May 13, 2012 11:34 AM (YdQQY)

40 I thought Arlen was dead. Oh well, one can dream. He's a disgrace.

Posted by: mpfs at May 13, 2012 11:35 AM (Fy6L7)

41 That's right, if I get reelected, I get to run the Senate Finance Committee.  And that means I get to spend shitloads of money in Utah. 

And that's what it's all about.  Spending money.

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at May 13, 2012 11:35 AM (Iyg03)

42 37 The work those guys at Berkeley are doing could ultimately take gene therapies, genetic engineering and stuff like that out of the stone knives and bear skins stage its currently at.
Posted by: Purple Avenger

But Drew M (and a lot of the other Morons) think selling California (of which Berkeley is a liberal part) back to Mexico is just the bestest idea ever!

Posted by: Dianna at May 13, 2012 11:36 AM (mKMj1)

43 He's a biophysicist who is trying to figure out the exact mechanism by which DNA is uncoiled in order for it to be copied.

I got a dollar that says its all due to chemical bond angles and strain on the bonds.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at May 13, 2012 11:36 AM (N7c3/)

44

It drives me nucking futs to hear the libs in my office go on about the "death of the moderates" like it's some sort of march backwards.

Good freaken lord, the only reason these people care is because it was closer to their side of the aisle than mine.  If a bunch of blue dogs went tits up in favor of some far left people they'd be celebrating party purity. (Which they try to tried to preemptively say "I don't like the blue dogs, but they got elected so it it's not my place to talk.")  Really?  You only bitch when the senate moves right?

Is this so called "endzone politics" whereby the only people who get elected are those on the extremes? Eh, maybe, but we have nothing to blame but a bunch of gerrymandering for that, and I don't see anyone up in arms when the gerrymandering saves their favorite politicans.

Posted by: tsrblke at May 13, 2012 11:36 AM (22rSN)

45 Hell, I like power.

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at May 13, 2012 11:36 AM (Iyg03)

46 Why is Arlen Specter getting interviews? He's no longer a senator, is he? Toomey has his seat, doesn't he?

Posted by: Dianna at May 13, 2012 11:37 AM (mKMj1)

47 I saw a recent poll in which 56% of voters would just prefer to replace all the Congresscritters at once.

Sounds low to me.


****

There are a few good ones: Ryan, Gowdy, West, Chavetz, Rand P., Issa...

It would be interesting to see Ace put up a poll each day with a few different critters and two check boxes by each: Stays and Goes and then focus on the 'Goes'.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 11:38 AM (piMMO)

48 think selling California (of which Berkeley is a liberal part) back to Mexico is just the bestest idea ever!

That work is all highly transportable.  I have no problem with a few strategic kidnappings prior to the sale.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at May 13, 2012 11:38 AM (N7c3/)

49 There's only a problem with moderation when the right tries to pull the country back from what the extreme left has done over the last 60 years.

When we're going left, well, moderation just isn't an issue.

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at May 13, 2012 11:38 AM (Iyg03)

50 Why is Arlen Specter getting interviews? He's no longer a senator, is he? Toomey has his seat, doesn't he?


****

Correct. He needs to go away.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 11:40 AM (piMMO)

51 What's up with the picture?


Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 13, 2012 11:40 AM (ebPtk)

52 What's up with the picture?  Don't you know a fine princeling when you see one? 

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at May 13, 2012 11:41 AM (Iyg03)

53 So if Specter endorses Romney, you'll go for Obama, then?  If not, what is the point?  Or are you just stupid?

Hatch wins the primary easily.  Bennett would have won the primary easily in 2010, but took the Party for granted, let the Tea Party activists take over the convention, and he finished 3rd there and didn't make the ballot.  Hatch was prepared.

If you halfwits would concentrate more on unseating borderline Democratic Senators, we might have a working majority in both House and Senate to address the real problems.  Or you can work on your old grudges.

Posted by: Adjoran at May 13, 2012 11:41 AM (VfmLu)

54
It's not really cannibalization. It's more like dunking someone in boiling hot water and watching their essence leach out slowly, then tossing them in the trash.

Posted by: the new, improved arhooley -- now with 10% more cynicism! at May 13, 2012 11:42 AM (oS2lG)

55 50 Why is Arlen Specter getting interviews? He's no longer a senator, is he? Toomey has his seat, doesn't he?


****

Correct. He needs to go away.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 03:40 PM (piMMO)

 

With the way he refused to let go of his senate seat you know damn well that he's not going to turn down any interview request.  And you know liberals will love to give him one so long as he bashes Republicans, despite that even they didn't want him in the Senate for them either.

Posted by: buzzion at May 13, 2012 11:42 AM (GULKT)

56 Hatch wins the primary easily?

What, are you reality challenged?  I did my best, but I only sqeaked by.

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at May 13, 2012 11:43 AM (Iyg03)

57 Hell, I wasn't even able to avoid a primary.

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at May 13, 2012 11:44 AM (Iyg03)

58

"The pictures that they have are derived from atomic structures of the protein molecules (that were probably determined via X-ray crystallography) at different chemical states that represent steps in the mechanism that they are studying biochemically... fit together with computational modeling."

 

Which describes several million dollars' worth of hardware and software, not to mention hundreds of thousands of dollars each year in technicians' salaries.

 

 

 

 

Posted by: Emmanuel Goldstein at May 13, 2012 11:44 AM (JW/aG)

59

If I recall correctly it was a Hillary creation that Bush co-opted.


 

Posted by: Vic at May 13, 2012 03:32 PM (YdQQY)

 

And the Repubs went all in... is the point...

 

Same with TSA... is the TSA considered a 'Conservative' thing by the ACU?

 

Note, that they cherry pick which votes they base their rating on...

Posted by: Romeo13 at May 13, 2012 11:44 AM (lZBBB)

60 If Utah can't get a solid conservative, what's the point? Hatch spends very little time in Utah. He's a dinosaur who places more importance on making friends with Democrats than on representing his constituents. He's an old man who needs to retire. I think it's worth trying to get Dan in for Hatch. There are no other really important primary battles, so it is not going to detract from any other efforts. And if Dan wins, he WILL beat the Democrat. There's no risk of losing that seat... which makes this much different than some of the other races that caused so much contention last time.

Posted by: Y-not at May 13, 2012 11:45 AM (5H6zj)

61 If you halfwits would concentrate more on unseating borderline Democratic Senators, we might have a working majority in both House and Senate to address the real problems. Or you can work on your old grudges.

Posted by: Adjoran at May 13, 2012 03:41 PM (VfmLu)

 

I bet you were bitching about Toomey running against Specter and Rubio running against Crist in the primaries.  Its the primaries where we don't get to focus on the Democrats we want to unseat, but rather focus on who we want to represent us.  And its become very obvious to the people of these states that the likes of Lugar and Hatch no longer represent them so time for them to go.

Posted by: buzzion at May 13, 2012 11:45 AM (GULKT)

62 If you halfwits would concentrate more on unseating borderline Democratic Senators, we might have a working majority in both House and Senate to address the real problems.
-----------------

We can walk and chew gum at the same time.

And give us a specific Democrat target that we're overlooking.

Posted by: the new, improved arhooley -- now with 10% more cynicism! at May 13, 2012 11:46 AM (oS2lG)

63 That asshole McCain acted like a John Bircher to get re-elected in 2010, just like Hatch is doing now. An endorsement from Specter is the kiss of death, ba-bye Orrin

Posted by: Doom am I, full-ripe, dealing death to the worlds, engaged in devouring mankind. at May 13, 2012 11:46 AM (7KE2R)

64 Which describes several million dollars' worth of hardware and software, not to mention hundreds of thousands of dollars each year in technicians' salaries. --------- What's your point?

Posted by: Y-not at May 13, 2012 11:46 AM (5H6zj)

65 @62 In the general, we should knock off Jim Matheson. Mia is going to be facing him. I think she can beat him, but it will be difficult. He sells himself as a "moderate" Democrat and I think the new district they'll be running in tilts liberal.

Posted by: Y-not at May 13, 2012 11:48 AM (5H6zj)

66 53. If you halfwits would concentrate more on unseating borderline Democratic Senators, we might have a working majority in both House and Senate to address the real problems. Or you can work on your old grudges. Posted by: Adjoran at May 13, 2012 03:41 PM (VfmLu) We are concentrating on unseating borderline Democratic Senators. Hence, the target on Hatch. Are you sure you're in the right thread?

Posted by: BuddyPC at May 13, 2012 11:48 AM (KCuY9)

67

Posted by: Adjoran at May 13, 2012 03:41 PM (VfmLu)

 

YES! such a Great Plan... lets just continue to re-elect the exact same folks who got us into this mess...

 

Because this time, they will do better!

 

Remember, it was only 12 years ago that the Repubs had control of the House, Senate AND the Presidency.... and did such a bang up the Job that only a few years late, they had given that same control to the Demorats...

 

And you want the SAME F'n people who have been there forever... who failed us before... back in????

 

/facepalm

Posted by: Romeo13 at May 13, 2012 11:49 AM (lZBBB)

68 I'd love to have working majorities in both the House and the Senate.  Hence the need to kick out the fucked up senators on "our side" that stab us in the back while they give the democrats a reach-around.

Posted by: buzzion at May 13, 2012 11:50 AM (GULKT)

69 Courtesy of Stossel, I didn't know this site existed. Note how the coloring is such that it downplays the sites of "existing excess."

http://1.usa.gov/k4MDgu

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 11:52 AM (piMMO)

70 Seriously,

WTF is up with the picture?

Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 13, 2012 11:52 AM (ebPtk)

71 So Snarlin Arlin  likes him some "moderates".  I laugh whenever I hear one of these assholes talking about"moderates". 


A moderate is simply a liberal that is in denial.

Posted by: Vic at May 13, 2012 11:53 AM (YdQQY)

72 What picture? What is everyone WTFing about?

Posted by: the new, improved arhooley -- now with 10% more cynicism! at May 13, 2012 11:53 AM (oS2lG)

73 I got a dollar that says its all due to chemical bond angles and strain on the bonds.
Could that be the hydrogen bonds?

Posted by: Bildo at May 13, 2012 11:53 AM (eToum)

74 29 Why does Mark Levin have such a hard on for Orrin? Couple of weeks ago I happen to catch Hatch on Levin's program. He thinks Orrin is the greatest thing since sliced bread. Posted by: Tami at May 13, 2012 03:24 PM (X6akg) Same here. Considering Levin hates Lugar and is a big Ted Cruz booster, his support for Hatch is confusing. Does he not face a Tea Party challenger? Maybe that's it, but why he has to be a booster is beyond me, considering his tepid support of Mitt.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 13, 2012 11:53 AM (i8AZQ)

75 S. Weasel on the Sphincter: http://sweasel.com/archives/9828

Posted by: Grover's Improved No. 5 at May 13, 2012 11:55 AM (B2VwH)

76 #53 Adjoran -

Hello: Morons! Or didn't you notice what we call ourselves?

Oh, and the Utah primary is June 26th, so Hatch hasn't won anything, yet.

So, who's  the nitwit?

Posted by: Dianna at May 13, 2012 11:56 AM (mKMj1)

77

Squeal like a pig Arleen weeeee weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee !!!!!! hahahahhahahahahahahahahaha I remember his attitude as being a snotty old bastard. May I recommend a better book. The Tea Party Three Principles By: Elizabeth Price Foley

She now chairs for the Institute for Justice constitutional litigation but formerly worked on Capital Hill for Dems.

Posted by: sonnyspats at May 13, 2012 11:56 AM (bo11P)

78

Arlen sounds real creaky in the interview.  He'll never get re-elected sounding like that.

 

He needs to start by taking his clacky teeth out, cleaning Polident-ing them real good (BTW, using a strong mouthwash while the tablets work is a good idea), and then getting them back in, this time with a good adhesive ...

Posted by: Arbalest at May 13, 2012 11:57 AM (uFcKL)

79 Sonny, I've been pushing for a weekly or bi-weekly Who Did Trey Take Down? thread. No success yet.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 11:58 AM (piMMO)

80 OT: Although the New York Times calls unemployment a "national emergency", it treats the Obama depression as some inexplicable Act of Nature:

IT seems clear that neither political party was prepared to deal with the crisis of long-term unemployment. In spite of the severity of the downturn, there was a general expectation that the economy would bounce back, as it had after previous downturns.  http://tinyurl.com/78who77

Solutions?  Oh, just the usual suspects:

A policy package that as a whole should appeal to the left and the right should spend money to help expand public and private training programs with proven track records; expand entrepreneurial opportunities by increasing access to small-business financing [read: more government money dumped on "favored" industries]; reduce government hurdles to the formation of new businesses [also: make pigs fly]; and explore subsidies for private employers who hire the long-term unemployed.

Assholes.

Posted by: Cicero at May 13, 2012 11:59 AM (qhHI4)

81 By the way, that libtard interviewing him is Melissa Harris-Perry, one of the more recent MSNBC tokens and genius inventor of the term "electoral racism," in which Democrats lose interest in the chocolate jesus.

Tulane students who want an easy "A" will be delighted to know:

In Spring 2012 Professor Harris-Perry is teaching two courses.
POLA6960: America's First Ladies is a seminar that explores American First Ladies as political and social actors.

POLA3010: Introduction to African American Politics provides an introduction to the political experience of African Americans.

Posted by: the new, improved arhooley -- now with 10% more cynicism! at May 13, 2012 11:59 AM (oS2lG)

82 Isn't Arlen's cred as a statesman kind of over on both sides of the aisle now?

Posted by: Truman North at May 13, 2012 11:59 AM (I2LwF)

83 oops

Posted by: Cicero at May 13, 2012 12:00 PM (qhHI4)

84 Raise your hand if you found about 10 grains of pure gold today. (I'm waving furiously). Nice quiet day panning in the backyard, so much better thansquawking about politics on a Sunday.

Posted by: Lincolntf at May 13, 2012 12:00 PM (hiMsy)

85 Woo hoo, 'ettes!


Bull riding on CBS right now.

Real men wearing Wrangler jeans.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 12:03 PM (piMMO)

86 Raise your hand if you found about 10 grains of pure gold today. (I'm waving furiously). Nice quiet day panning in the backyard, so much better thansquawking about politics on a Sunday.
Posted by: Lincolntf
---------------

All right, I'm off to pretty myself up and take my mother to a performance of Carmen, her favorite opera.

Posted by: the new, improved arhooley -- now with 10% more cynicism! at May 13, 2012 12:03 PM (oS2lG)

87 Raise your hand if you found about 10 grains of pure gold today. (I'm waving furiously).

That's $3.61 worth of gold at today's prices.  I hope you didn't spend the whole day on this.

Posted by: Cicero at May 13, 2012 12:03 PM (qhHI4)

88

"What's your point?"

 

The obvious point would be that his lab is being propped up by an un-Godly-expensive technical infrastructure.

 

Which, among other things,  means that the modern "science" lab has a insatiable desire for grant money.

 

PS: There is also a vastly more subtle point, which is that he & his lab might be relying on that technical infrastructure even more than they realize.

 

I once read someone speculating that the reason there is so little variation in automobile designs these days is because all of the design studios are using [essentially] the same CAD/CAM software suites [software suites which can cost in the $100,000's or $1,000,000's of dollars], and those CAD/CAM "templates" were pushing them all in the same direction in their designs ["designs" which were in reality little more than rote instantiations of the pre-packaged templates].

 

 

 

 

Posted by: Emmanuel Goldstein at May 13, 2012 12:03 PM (JW/aG)

89 Real men wearing Wrangler jeans.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 04:03 PM (piMMO)

 

When I take photos of my junk to send them to busty members of the Jets staff I make sure its hanging out of a pair of Wranglers.

Posted by: Brett Favre - Wrangler Spokesman at May 13, 2012 12:04 PM (GULKT)

90 Raise your hand if you found about 10 grains of pure gold today. (I'm waving furiously). Nice quiet day panning in the backyard, so much better thansquawking about politics on a Sunday.


****

Good for you!

Did you see the Penn and Teller show about the guy who digs dirt from between the cracks in the NYC sidewalks? He mines gold, silver, and gems from just little scoops of dirt.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 12:05 PM (piMMO)

91   79 Sonny, I've been pushing for a weekly or bi-weekly Who Did Trey Take Down? thread. No success yet.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 03:58 PM (piMMO

We could classify it under 'entertainment'.

Posted by: sonnyspats at May 13, 2012 12:06 PM (bo11P)

92 First rider down.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 12:06 PM (piMMO)

93 Correction: $36.10.  That's half a tank of gas so that's something. 

Posted by: Cicero at May 13, 2012 12:08 PM (qhHI4)

94 Off on errant-ry.

This actually means I have errands, but sounds much more amusing.

For one thing, imagine a charger, a suit of armor, and a lance at the grocery store. Really, it would be fun.

Posted by: Dianna at May 13, 2012 12:08 PM (mKMj1)

95 We could classify it under 'entertainment'.


****

That it is. I have been a huge fan of Rand Paul for his ability to take down a man in such a way that it almost skips past the intended recipient. No such thing with Gowdy. I cannot overstate how much I like that guy.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 12:08 PM (piMMO)

96

>>I hope you didn't spend the whole day on this.

 

As opposed to spending the whole day here??

Posted by: Mama AJ at May 13, 2012 12:08 PM (XdlcF)

97 I once read someone speculating that the reason there is so little variation in automobile designs these days is because all of the design studios are using [essentially] the same CAD/CAM software suites [software suites which can cost in the $100,000's or $1,000,000's of dollars], and those CAD/CAM "templates" were pushing them all in the same direction in their designs ["designs" which werein realitylittle more than rote instantiations of the pre-packaged templates].



Posted by: Emmanuel Goldstein at May 13, 2012 04:03 PM (JW/aG)

 

I actually think some of that might be more of a result of them trying to get the most aerodynamic design to help with fuel efficiency.  Well there is only so much you can do with tweaks while attempting to keep the aerodynamics there.

Posted by: buzzion at May 13, 2012 12:08 PM (GULKT)

98 Did you see the Penn and Teller show about the guy who digs dirt from between the cracks in the NYC sidewalks?
Hobos?

Posted by: Bildo at May 13, 2012 12:08 PM (eToum)

99 Cicero, that's more than I would've guessed! I look at it like catching a bunch of undersized gamefish. I'm in the right spot, just need that big strike.

Posted by: Lincolntf at May 13, 2012 12:08 PM (hiMsy)

100 As opposed to spending the whole day here??

Posted by: Mama AJ at May 13, 2012 04:08 PM (XdlcF)


Point well taken.

Posted by: Cicero at May 13, 2012 12:11 PM (qhHI4)

101 gold-mining NYC sidewalks:

http://bit.ly/sFpQBY

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 12:12 PM (piMMO)

102 Spector is very very Old News ---- he was an attorney for the Warren Commission --- (  which is how he Made his Bones )


I'm trying to watch "Ace Ventura" but am distracted by Courtney Campbell's bosoms

Posted by: SantaRosaStan at May 13, 2012 12:12 PM (Dll6b)

103

Posted by: Adjoran at May 13, 2012 03:41 PM (VfmLu)

Thank you Colonel Korn

Posted by: Junior Stool Samples at May 13, 2012 12:12 PM (bo11P)

104 The "all cars look the same" whine is a bunch of horseshit anyway.

Posted by: Waterhouse at May 13, 2012 12:13 PM (Z3Bhm)

105 I'm trying to watch "Ace Ventura" but am distracted by Courtney Campbell's bosoms Posted by: SantaRosaStan at May 13, 2012 04:12 PM (Dll6b) That is the only reason to watch the movie...

Posted by: The Robot Devil at May 13, 2012 12:14 PM (OKNQi)

106 Courtney Cox --- somehow the causeway got into my head

Posted by: SantaRosaStan at May 13, 2012 12:14 PM (Dll6b)

107 I'm trying to watch "Ace Ventura" but am distracted by Courtney Campbell's bosoms


Her bosoms must be the ONLY reason to watch that movie.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 12:14 PM (piMMO)

108 That was an awesome ride!

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 13, 2012 12:14 PM (piMMO)

109 Auto designs are largely dictated by govt CAFE standards, which in turn cause designers to seek very low coefficients of drag.  If you need aerodynamically slick designs, that fit within the physical constraints of existing roadway and parking facilities, and incorporate sufficient internal structure to withstand crash test mandates...

...you're gonna have a lot of shit that looks pretty similar.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at May 13, 2012 12:14 PM (N7c3/)

110 105 The "all cars look the same" whine is a bunch of horseshit anyway.

Posted by: Waterhouse at May 13, 2012 04:13 PM (Z3Bhm)

 

Yeah, the ones that don't are really fucking ugly.  *Looks over at the Chevy Sonic*

Posted by: buzzion at May 13, 2012 12:14 PM (GULKT)

111
84 Raise your hand if you found about 10 grains of pure gold today. (I'm waving furiously). Nice quiet day panning in the backyard, so much better thansquawking about politics on a Sunday.

Posted by: Lincolntf at May 13, 2012 04:00 PM (hiMsy)


I thought you were prospecting for mercury.

Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at May 13, 2012 12:16 PM (7+pP9)

112 Yeah, I saw something about the NYC guy. Good thinking on his part. I'm basically doing the same thing in the middle of streams. Looking downstream from where miners worked years and years ago. No equipment bigger than an e-tool.

Posted by: Lincolntf at May 13, 2012 12:18 PM (hiMsy)

113 Nice way to spend your afternoon.

Posted by: Bildo at May 13, 2012 12:20 PM (eToum)

114 OT Oh Noooo's wow this is hillarious. He who shall not be mentioned wrote this weeks cover story for Newsweek!!! This is some funny shite!! Somebody brush the leaves and grass clippings off Ace to wake him up.

Posted by: Junior Stool Samples at May 13, 2012 12:21 PM (bo11P)

115 Dang!! Off sock

Posted by: Sonnyspats at May 13, 2012 12:22 PM (bo11P)

116
110 Auto designs are largely dictated by govt CAFE standards, which in turn cause designers to seek very low coefficients of drag.
...
Posted by: Purple Avenger at May 13, 2012 04:14 PM (N7c3/)


And lots of accidents where the wedge shaped cars put the rear wheels of the car in front of them into their windshields. I really miss the old rain gutters on cars. The doors on every car I've owned since they got rid of them freeze shut in the winter.

Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at May 13, 2012 12:23 PM (7+pP9)

117 Yo, drama queen, you got fired for being a traitor. No one "cannibalized" you. And remove the dick from your mouth, no one can understand what you're saying half the time. 

Posted by: Jimmah at May 13, 2012 12:24 PM (UpwlP)

118 I tried to watch the video, got past the 5 minute long question by the MSNBC gal, then listened to the mush mouth ex-Senator for the 5 seconds or so before he held up his book and started his infomercial. That was enough.

Posted by: BurtTC at May 13, 2012 12:24 PM (Gc/Qi)

119 First Gay President!

Posted by: Bildo at May 13, 2012 12:25 PM (eToum)

120 Judge a man by his enemies and you get a true view of the man.

Posted by: jukin at May 13, 2012 12:25 PM (5oKRH)

121 The doors on every car I've owned since they got rid of them freeze shut in the winter.

This is very dangerous counter-revolutionary talk comrade.  I'm just saying...

Posted by: Purple Avenger at May 13, 2012 12:28 PM (N7c3/)

122 Jefferson was not gay.

Posted by: Vic at May 13, 2012 12:31 PM (YdQQY)

123 And lots of accidents where the wedge shaped cars put the rear wheels of the car in front of them into their windshields. I really miss the old rain gutters on cars. The doors on every car I've owned since they got rid of them freeze shut in the winter.

Posted by: Ed Anger - Certified Kos Kid at May 13, 2012 04:23 PM (7+pP9)

 

And don't you just love it when its so frozen shut and you try to open it that you break the door mechanism inside making it unable to open.  I did that with a Cutlass Supreme.  Broke the door on the outside.  So I had to open the back door to get at the handle inside the front door.  THEN it happend on the passeger side door.  And I had locked the car and the geniuses don't have external locks on the back seat doors.  And the unlock button on my keychain was shit and wouldn't unlock any door except the driver door.  So it sat in my work parking lot for the weekend until we could get out there to fish through a piece of metal to hit the unlock button inside the car.

Posted by: buzzion at May 13, 2012 12:34 PM (GULKT)

124 Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.

Posted by: steevy at May 13, 2012 12:38 PM (7W3wI)

125 Well Arlen, may you fornicate with a camel and get a thousand fleas in your crotch.  That's what I wish.

Posted by: Comanche Voter at May 13, 2012 12:39 PM (6USwK)

126 Hatch's BFF in the Senate was Ted Kennedy

That says a lot

Posted by: kbdabear at May 13, 2012 12:47 PM (Y+DPZ)

127 O/T --- So Obama is slated to be at the Fox Theater in Redwood City, CA Wed at 6 pm. Any other Bay Area moron/ettes want to fight the slobbering supplicants? I need an ANTI statement sign? Any good ideas? I thought about burning him in effigy, but don't feel like being in FBI/SS hands...

Posted by: Calyx the Unanswered at May 13, 2012 12:47 PM (PS32A)

128 #129, got rear ended by a speeding Honda CRX once at a red light during a snowstorm. It stopped a 1/4" away from my gas tank. Had to have my car towed off his.

Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston at May 13, 2012 12:52 PM (KCvsd)

129 Spectre, Hatch, Lugar, Graham.

Courtly gentlemen all. 

What part of "NEVER EVER vote to confirm the likes of Eric Holder, Elena Kagan, or Sonia Sotomayer don't you understand?"

Posted by: Jimbo at May 13, 2012 12:56 PM (O3R/2)

130 Those who claim cars are all samey-looking forget that every decade had a similar look among its cars. Pick a decade and choose any ten models from the same category (four door sedan or pickup truck, for instance) and you'll see they have plenty of style in common. New materials and molding techniques have their influence as the designers get more options to choose from. And much of it is simply fashion.

It's easy for set designers on movies to cue the audience on what era the story is set just by the cars lining the streets. In 'Jacob's Ladder' one of the big hints to the ending was that all of the cars were almost a decade older than when the main story was supposedly happening.

Posted by: epobirs at May 13, 2012 12:57 PM (kcfmt)

131 Bi-partisan means working together without principles to screw over America.

Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston at May 13, 2012 12:58 PM (KCvsd)

132 #3

Imagine it was your goal to build all sorts of motorized vehicles to do all kinds of terrific stuff. Something very much like those items already exists in nature, so rather than ignore those you choose to study them and figure out how every aspect of them works so you can apply those mechanism to your own goals.

Other guys will continue to do it the other way. Both will learn important stuff along the way.

Posted by: epobirs at May 13, 2012 01:01 PM (kcfmt)

133 Arlen Specter cares only about Arlen Specter. In this instance, he's pushing his stupid book. (Remember a couple of months ago when he went off on some radio host because the guy didn't let him plug his book enough?)

I don't think he cares how much his "endorsement" hurts Hatch.

And I say this as someone who wants to see Hatch lose, thanks to his "punch them in the mouth" comment, if nothing else.

Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at May 13, 2012 01:12 PM (UCR1O)

134 What kind of name is 'Orrin,' anyway? Other than a signal to bullies, I mean.

Posted by: nickless at May 13, 2012 01:18 PM (MMC8r)

135 >>>> Courtney Campbell's bosoms

Courtney Campbell does not appear in that movie. And Courteney Cox's bosoms do not appear in any movie.

Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at May 13, 2012 01:20 PM (UCR1O)

136 Kronos, I wanted legislation to make the BCS take my crappy favorite college football team seriously.  After all, government belongs everywhere.  What makes you think I won't propose legislation to make you write nicey nice things about me?

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at May 13, 2012 01:28 PM (Iyg03)

137 Lighten up, Kronos.  You can see MOST of them.  And they move around now  and then.   --- Not bad.......


the Courtney Campbell Causeway connects Clearwater with Tampa

Posted by: SantaRosaStan at May 13, 2012 01:28 PM (Dll6b)

138 Hatch was tasty!

Posted by: The cannibal that ate Hatch at May 13, 2012 01:32 PM (mQMnK)

139 #138

You need to look a up a movie by the title 'Commandments' starring Aiden Quinn.

Posted by: epobirs at May 13, 2012 01:38 PM (kcfmt)

140 SantaRosaStan: "Most" of them? Isn't that kind of like seeing "most" of Mishu (formerly of the Ringling Brothers Circus).

As Todd DiLaMuca would say, put some Band-aids on those mosquito bites and they'll quit moving around.

Senator Booby Hatch: I fear your legislation about as much as your punch in the mouth.

Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at May 13, 2012 01:38 PM (UCR1O)

141 most of a good thing ( or matched pair of good things ) is a lot better than all of a bad thing

Posted by: SantaRosaStan at May 13, 2012 01:48 PM (Dll6b)

142 Thanks, Arlen, but I'll be out pounding the pavement in my precinct for Dan Liljenquist, a REAL conservative.

Posted by: Zoltan at May 13, 2012 02:03 PM (sX1gH)

143 #130 - I fear I am doomed, as I ride CalTrain. I may join you just because it's easier than sitting on the train!

Posted by: Dianna at May 13, 2012 02:18 PM (mKMj1)

144 I can't believe people here saying Arlen's not relevant. No one is more relevant that Arlen Specter.

Posted by: Dick Lugar at May 13, 2012 03:04 PM (IoNBC)

145 "I once read someone speculating that the reason there is so little variation in automobile designs these days is because all of the design studios are using [essentially] the same CAD/CAM software suites [software suites which can cost in the $100,000's or $1,000,000's of dollars], and those CAD/CAM "templates" were pushing them all in the same direction in their designs ["designs" which werein realitylittle more than rote instantiations of the pre-packaged templates].
Posted by: Emmanuel Goldstein at May 13, 2012 04:03 PM (JW/aG) "

Welcome to the wonderful world of contemporary architecture thanks to AutoDesk's Autocad and Revit

Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston at May 13, 2012 03:45 PM (KCvsd)

146 Emmanuel Goldstein: "The obvious point would be that his lab is being propped up by an un-Godly-expensive technical infrastructure."

You're painting too broad a brush here. 3-D visualization is exceedingly useful for modelling and understanding fit/form/function. I don't know what software they're using, but there's open source software and free proprietary software that enables recreation and visualization of defined structures. I've not played with any in some years, but RASMOL and its variants come to mind. Once you get the atomic structure and angles measured out, modelling is a trivial exercise particularly if it's just for show so that humans can understand it. So, their graphics costs could well be trivial in an industry where a single microfuge tube of enzyme could run in the many thousands of dollars (or maybe not be purchasable at all).

One really cannot grasp the interaction of enzymes fully without seeing a 3D-representation. 2D works at a chemical level, but to visualize the manipulation of an enzyme complex, nothing beats a 3D model. A picture is worth a thousand words, so it's actually a fantastic shorthand to communicate with peers and those aiming to be. Of grant monies wasted, and it's legion, a lab studying enzyme complexes, gene replication, and the intervention of drug therapy at the genetic level could waste money in quite a few worse ways.

IOW, the graphics are very helpful (perhaps integral and irreplaceably efficient) and quite probably not the exorbitant money sink one would imagine. As to the costs of acquiring a timely, measurable bound state complex and getting the crystallographic dimensions down, that's a different story.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at May 13, 2012 04:10 PM (eHIJJ)

147 Uhhhhh...Arlen Specter became a Democrat 3 years ago! Why the f@ck shd any sincere Repub take advice from a squisy, washed-up turncoat Democrat?! This shd truly be the kiss of death for Hatch!

Posted by: JewishOdysseus at May 13, 2012 05:08 PM (1X/a4)

148 Arlen Specter Would Like Utah to Reelect Orrin Hatch

All the more reason to kick Hatch to the curb.

Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at May 13, 2012 05:19 PM (4s7w4)

149 The DNA stuff is about ways to unwind a DNA helix and the reconstruct it via a process known as transcription.  A phase of replication. That's a segment where the DNA molecule, the information, a long strand double helix of proteins,  is unwound and separated into strands of RNA and then uses what they refer as "motors" to recombine into new DNA strands. They are talking about the use of "molecular motor proteins" which ease difficulties which arise during the unbinding and rebinding process. Things can knot, bundle, misalign, etc.

In addition the issue arises of the use by some protein sections of ATP (Adenosine Triphosphate) to facilitate some changes such as shepherding a segment of  DNA duplex through a break in another segment of DNA so that it can be re-segmented or de-segmented somewhere else along the DNA strand.

The paired proteins within the inner part of the DNA are unwound, melted in another way iof saying, and rewound in another configuration. Then the paired proteins, always pairing with their partnered proteins reattach and the DNA strand is completed, at least that segment, and rewound.

They are referring to specific eukaryotic, bacterial and archaeal motors. The Archaea and bacteria are prokaryotes and eukaryotes are, well, eukaryotes. The archaeas have 3 RNA polymerases, bacteria have one, and eukaryotes also have three. Archaeas have only be recognized as distinct in the last 20 or so years and are related to the extremophiles like the bacteria and such that live in hot water vents, volcanoes and any of the Kardashian sisters.

They're kind of looking at how these different mechanisms de-construct and re-construct RNA and DNA, using ATP and ADP. Adenosine Diphosphate.

None of this applies to Sphincter or Orrin DOWN tha Hatch, as they are made of fossilized dog crap and there is no recoverable DNA left in them.

Posted by: enter sandman, sometime commenter, fulltime troublemaker at May 13, 2012 06:45 PM (zxaA2)

150 One really cannot grasp the interaction of enzymes fully without seeing a 3D-representation. 2D works at a chemical level, but to visualize the manipulation of an enzyme complex, nothing beats a 3D model. A picture is worth a thousand words, so it's actually a fantastic shorthand to communicate with peers and those aiming to be. Of grant monies wasted, and it's legion, a lab studying enzyme complexes, gene replication, and the intervention of drug therapy at the genetic level could waste money in quite a few worse ways.

And here, AnonymousDrivel is absolutely right. The actions of enzymatic knives to resegment and desegment RNA and DNA is best seen visually. You can describe it all day long but these illustrations are useful. A helluva sight better use than another boondoggle California high speed train or Dog eater Vacay.

here, at least, if that's gubmint money spent, it actually served a viable purpose.

Posted by: enter sandman, sometime commenter, fulltime troublemaker at May 13, 2012 06:50 PM (zxaA2)

151 Anyone other RINOs need an endorsement?

Posted by: Arlen Specter at May 13, 2012 08:10 PM (+XVQe)

152

Like Richard Lugar he is 20 years too old and too long out of state.

 

Posted by: burt at May 14, 2012 08:16 AM (OzqQM)

153 I'm fine with Orrin Hatch getting the boot because it's Utah, but conservatives are wasting money and resources on a dumb fight, imo. 
The voting record of his replacement will likely be 99% the same as Hatch's. 

This seems to me to be more about political groups seeking more clout and money by putting a prominent  head on their mantle, not about real ideological progress.


Posted by: Brigadier at May 14, 2012 09:34 AM (0kf1G)

154 "Why does Mark Levin have such a hard on for Orrin?"

Why did Levin have such a panty twist against Mitt - who he supported in '08?  Mitt has never even served in Washington.  Maybe Levin loves Washington insiders.

Orrin is not horrible, but he is well past his time and very much "old school".  Time for more change.

Posted by: Evan at May 14, 2012 10:07 AM (zmvcV)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
153kb generated in CPU 0.1594, elapsed 0.3581 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2949 seconds, 282 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.