September 17, 2012
— Ace A very downbeat article (which begins, in earnest, on page 2; page 1 is just a travelogue).
It should scare people. And wake them up.
But think of what we have lost: I am writing this on Sunday night, September 16, 2012. The Obama administration is still apologizing to the Muslims worldwide, even in Libya even as the President of Libya says the killings there were not spontaneous but were long premeditated and the nutty movie was only a smokescreen. Our government is still saying, "Sorry," to violent mobs because an American citizen exercised his first Amendment rights. Incredibly, Jay Carney, White House spokesman, is spinning a complete fairy tale that the Islamists really like America and Mr. Obama. The murderers are just upset about a movie trailer that came out months ago. How stupid do they think we Americans are? If Mr. Obama really believes, he belongs in a straitjacket. If not, his spokesman is the biggest fantasist of all time.Look, maybe sweet talk and apologies have a place somewhere. Maybe this should be said in private, between diplomats. But to apologize publicly to killers and arsonists over free speech in AmericaÂ… this isn't doneÂ… and of course the first amendment protects people outside the mainstream. Tom Paine, Samuel Adams, John Adams -- these were considered nuts by the British. The whole idea is to protect all speech.
And in Barack Obama's America, the man who made the movie is brought in for law enforcement questioning. This really happened just yesterday.
And Mr. Barack Obama will be President for four more years and then quite possibly Mrs. Clinton, arch apologist for American values, for years afterwards.
When republics fall, it's not always slow. It can be like slamming a door.
It is later than any dare think.
Posted by: Ace at
09:30 AM
| Comments (183)
Post contains 319 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: ejo at September 17, 2012 09:32 AM (kfYyO)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 01:32 PM (j1gX1)
It's on days like today that I wonder why I never started.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/i][/u][/b] at September 17, 2012 09:33 AM (4df7R)
Full constitutional protections afforded to combatants captured on the battlefield.
No constitutional protections afforded to Americans exercising free speech.
Posted by: fixerupper at September 17, 2012 09:34 AM (C8hzL)
Oh, and because it needs to be said, Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable tyrant.
With a small penis.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/i][/u][/b] at September 17, 2012 09:34 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 09:35 AM (j1gX1)
Posted by: Stuff Jefferson Would Have Said, Vol. 3 at September 17, 2012 09:36 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Sockpuppet Czar at September 17, 2012 09:36 AM (HdfHj)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 01:35 PM (j1gX1)
Hell, I like it. Lets just fucking SMOD the world. Start fresh with a new species. One that learns from it's mistakes.
Posted by: maddogg at September 17, 2012 09:36 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: I'm the Honey Badger, BITCH! at September 17, 2012 09:36 AM (+7Usq)
Oh nice for Ben Stein to wake up and act like he never supported Barky Odogeater which I'm pretty sure he did.
Thanks a lot for nothing.
Posted by: Boots at September 17, 2012 09:36 AM (neKzn)
Posted by: Penfold at September 17, 2012 09:37 AM (1PeEC)
Posted by: cajun carrot at September 17, 2012 09:37 AM (UZQM8)
Ben Stein has been sort of liberal, on social issues mostly.
I remember him sounding rather pro-Barky...back in 2008.
I guess he finally is seeing what is at stake here.
Posted by: wheatie at September 17, 2012 09:38 AM (Z7b/q)
Posted by: Jackwagon at September 17, 2012 09:39 AM (PxUBA)
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at September 17, 2012 09:39 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Bsok at September 17, 2012 09:39 AM (n2K+4)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 17, 2012 09:39 AM (+tqYo)
Posted by: soothsayer at September 17, 2012 09:39 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Jean at September 17, 2012 09:40 AM (hrAg/)
Posted by: Captain Hate at September 17, 2012 09:40 AM (xiU27)
Posted by: Xander Crews at September 17, 2012 09:40 AM (QqZzr)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 09:40 AM (j1gX1)
Posted by: Chucky "wheels" Krauthammer at September 17, 2012 09:40 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Lauren at September 17, 2012 09:40 AM (wsGWu)
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at September 17, 2012 09:40 AM (Dll6b)
Guess I better go back and read the rest of it now.
Posted by: Scanner Dan at September 17, 2012 09:41 AM (VbeCm)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at September 17, 2012 09:42 AM (e0xKF)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 17, 2012 09:42 AM (+tqYo)
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at September 17, 2012 09:42 AM (P6H+d)
4It's on days like today that I am sorry I gave up drugs
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 01:32 PM (j1gX1)
It's on days like today that I wonder why I never started.
Its on days like this I'm glad that I know how to grow weeds better than vegtables and that I kept my Chemistry books from High School and College.
Thee two most incompetent foreign policy boobs just keep appologising to fanatics that recognise weakness and go for the jugular (or JEF) when they see it.
Posted by: Gmac at September 17, 2012 09:42 AM (IanLz)
Posted by: Mr Pink at September 17, 2012 09:42 AM (ELHKw)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 17, 2012 09:43 AM (+tqYo)
The full court press by the media to protect Obama isn't going to work on something so objectively horrifying to the average American, as apologizing to a ravenous mob who just murdered an American ambassador.
Yes, it will take awhile for the public to fully absorb what's gone on here, but it's over for Obama. We tend to show our true colors in times of crises, and Romney was spot on: Obama's first (and overriding) instinct is to apologize for an American's supposed misdeeds to Islam.
Romney landslide.
Posted by: biff at September 17, 2012 09:43 AM (9qOrR)
I've been saying this for a while now: unless Romney/Ryan is going to actually reverse the decline, and not merely slow its progress, we might be better off sticking with Chairman Sotoero.
Let's just have the collapse and revolution and get it over with.
Posted by: LibertarianJim at September 17, 2012 09:44 AM (CMbMd)
Posted by: soothsayer at September 17, 2012 09:44 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 09:45 AM (j1gX1)
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at September 17, 2012 09:45 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: the AoS Barrel at September 17, 2012 09:45 AM (jUytm)
Posted by: Dave S. at September 17, 2012 09:45 AM (HEWhR)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 17, 2012 09:46 AM (8Hnjw)
Stein mentions Israel and the tide of war rising.
Yesterday Drudge had an article quoting an IRGC official that Israel would not dare attack Iran for lack of US support.
Ignore whether that's true or not. The perception increases the chance of war. At times like this, whatever is going on behind the scenes, Obama should have swallowed his pride (ha, if ever) and made some nice photo ops with Netanyahu and made sure there was no distance in between us. Instead he openly snubbed him after years of obvious, documented, contempt. So here we are on the brink of war.
Posted by: Beagle at September 17, 2012 09:46 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 09:46 AM (j1gX1)
34 Who did Stein vote for in 2008?
Ben Stein endorsed Al Franken in 2008....according to Stein's Wikipedia page.
Called him...."an impressive guy".
Posted by: wheatie at September 17, 2012 09:47 AM (Z7b/q)
Posted by: USA at September 17, 2012 09:47 AM (6Cjut)
Let's just have the collapse and revolution and get it over with.
Posted by: LibertarianJim at September 17, 2012 01:44 PM (CMbMd)
With all Due Respect ( where none is due ) that's maybe the most dangerous sentiment on Earth. ---You can speak for thee, but not for me
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at September 17, 2012 09:47 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 17, 2012 09:48 AM (jUytm)
Saw him last month at Hills. This place is nirvana, and the more people like him expose it, the more the " beautiful people " show up and fuck it up. Then they sic the EPA on the locals until no one can afford to live here but Ben and his beautiful people. And then they gripe about the lack of housekeepers.
Glad you've woken up Ben. But could you just keep your mouth shut about Priest Lake? Thanks.
Posted by: Derak at September 17, 2012 09:48 AM (VEhDR)
Posted by: Matthew Broderick at September 17, 2012 09:48 AM (EJ6V1)
Posted by: LibertarianJim at September 17, 2012 09:48 AM (CMbMd)
A great comment at Ricochet went like this:
Mr. President, what does it say about your foreign policy that it was torpedoed by a single YouTube video?
Posted by: RamonAllones at September 17, 2012 09:48 AM (3lLli)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 17, 2012 09:49 AM (mJMH5)
I used to follow Stein pretty regularly, because when he hits one it is out of the park, but he has been phoning it in for some time and I lost interest. I may have to see if he has finally learned something valuable.
Posted by: Hrothgar (Dagny Aficionado ) at September 17, 2012 09:49 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Lauren at September 17, 2012 01:40 PM (wsGWu)
Which people are surrendering to the islamist? Certainly not me or millions of others like me.
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at September 17, 2012 09:49 AM (R8hU8)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 09:50 AM (j1gX1)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC in Johnson County laughing at Cook County at September 17, 2012 09:50 AM (aOzuy)
Posted by: name an amendment day at September 17, 2012 09:50 AM (IPhbB)
Posted by: LibertarianJim at September 17, 2012 01:48 PM (CMbMd)
let me repeat what I wrote, Doomsayer:
You can speak for thee but not for me. ---Get a grip............ ( insert obvious joke here )
Posted by: DOA in Scrambletown, FLA at September 17, 2012 09:50 AM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Gromit at September 17, 2012 09:50 AM (4KOF2)
Be interesting to watch them turn on each other once their mission is accomplished, but I'd really rather explore that through science fiction than reality.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at September 17, 2012 09:50 AM (/kI1Q)
Statues with expensive haircuts, of course.
Posted by: Sgt Hulka at September 17, 2012 09:51 AM (CaPA1)
How does the "Right" bring the country back to a more Constitutional governance without appearing dictatorial in the process?
I ask that because we can deregulate and cut taxes and proclaim freedom throughout the land, but the left still controls the courts,the MFM, and the education system.
Posted by: Soona at September 17, 2012 09:51 AM (cPQjO)
Posted by: Edward Cropper at September 17, 2012 09:51 AM (Lt3vg)
I am a den leader for my son's cub scout pack, I got a letter last week (maybe 10 days ago) from BSA national telling us the records were being released and to expect questions from parents.
Posted by: Penfold at September 17, 2012 09:51 AM (1PeEC)
Posted by: Minuteman at September 17, 2012 09:51 AM (1FOy5)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 09:52 AM (j1gX1)
Posted by: Lady in Black at September 17, 2012 09:52 AM (lTVJy)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC in Johnson County laughing at Cook County at September 17, 2012 09:52 AM (aOzuy)
Posted by: Angry Meatball at September 17, 2012 09:52 AM (mxnUd)
Posted by: Fritz at September 17, 2012 09:52 AM (uRFJj)
28...I don't think he ever supported obama. Show me a link where he did?
Nevergiveup.
Stein has agreed with Warren Buffet...about Barky's "tax the rich" outlook.
I've seen him argue, heatedly, with Neil Cavuto about it...several times.
Stein was also rather supportive of ObamaCare...when it was being debated.
But he's sort of walked that back, after we started seeing all that was in it.
Sorry, don't have any links.
But there may be some youtube vids of the Cavuto show, that show the arguments.
Posted by: wheatie at September 17, 2012 09:52 AM (Z7b/q)
Posted by: Barack Hussain Obama at September 17, 2012 09:52 AM (1FOy5)
Posted by: A. Peasant at September 17, 2012 09:53 AM (c16IJ)
Obama is actually springing to action in response to the attacks on the embassies: the AP reports he is ordering......er........sensitive documents at mideast embassies to be destroyed, to avoid being captured when they are overrun.
Obama's new Mideast policy: shredding from behind.
Posted by: biff at September 17, 2012 09:53 AM (9qOrR)
I do it for the children.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at September 17, 2012 09:54 AM (PHb2k)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 09:54 AM (j1gX1)
All true, but this scandal isn't getting so much as a shrug out of the Honey Boo Boo voters on whom this election seems poised to turn. WTF will it actually take to get the attention of these goons?
Losing their pretties NOW.
Posted by: katya the designated driver at September 17, 2012 09:54 AM (DoZD+)
How did the Left come to control the courts,the MFM, and the education system?
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at September 17, 2012 09:54 AM (3CiXB)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 17, 2012 09:54 AM (+tqYo)
I ask that because we can deregulate and cut taxes and proclaim freedom throughout the land, but the left still controls the courts,the MFM, and the education system.
Soona, I propose we get a national divorce on grounds of irreconcilable differences.
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at September 17, 2012 09:55 AM (R8hU8)
Classify me in that group, mmmmmkay!!! I didn't voluntarily go to war twice just to see my idea of being an American torn down by some ghetto pimp from Chicago I back the Nuge's statement he made awhile back 1000%.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 17, 2012 09:55 AM (8Hnjw)
----------
He's made of wood?
---
And if he's made of wood?
Posted by: Sir Bedevere at September 17, 2012 09:55 AM (e0xKF)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at September 17, 2012 09:56 AM (pmsMR)
Don't you know that Turkey is leading from the front in disestablishing a nominally secular government and returning to a more "sharia friendly" form of thugocracy. No wonder that the Dems DNC would use th Turkish military equipment as part of their propaganda illustrating the kind of military that would not hesitate to bomb its own citizens if they became lacking in respect for government officials.
Posted by: Hrothgar (Dagny Aficionado ) at September 17, 2012 09:56 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at September 17, 2012 01:42 PM
Hmmm...Scumbag Cocksucker Of A Marxist Female?
Posted by: Berserker at September 17, 2012 09:56 AM (FMbng)
Exactly, DOA. "You can speak."
I'm not going to say the idea is a pleasant one, or that it doesn't come from a very dark place of eeyoreism. But the current administration is treating the Constitution like bird cage lining, and it seems no one is willing to say "you have violated the social contract, and consent is withdrawn."
Posted by: LibertarianJim at September 17, 2012 09:57 AM (CMbMd)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 17, 2012 09:57 AM (+tqYo)
Posted by: ejo at September 17, 2012 09:57 AM (kfYyO)
Posted by: Ronster at September 17, 2012 09:57 AM (H5i76)
Posted by: Lauren at September 17, 2012 09:58 AM (wsGWu)
Exactly. I'd like to see the Chi-Coms go face to face against the Muzzies.
Sort of like the Iran-Iraq War. 8 years of popcorn and pudding.
I think we'd need to arm the Muzzies to extend things a bit.
Posted by: Henry Kissinger at September 17, 2012 09:58 AM (e0xKF)
Invest in 5.56 and 9 mm.
Be proficient with your tools.
It's the new gold as far as I am concerned.
Posted by: The Jackhole at September 17, 2012 09:58 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: somebody else, not me at September 17, 2012 09:58 AM (nZvGM)
Posted by: ejo at September 17, 2012 09:59 AM (kfYyO)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 17, 2012 09:59 AM (+tqYo)
Glad he work up, if only temporarily.
Posted by: Cicero at September 17, 2012 09:59 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 09:59 AM (j1gX1)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC in Johnson County laughing at Cook County at September 17, 2012 09:59 AM (aOzuy)
Posted by: the Butcher at September 17, 2012 10:00 AM (8g9qq)
I know what barkies answer would be and that's why he must go.
Posted by: ET at September 17, 2012 10:01 AM (s72/N)
Posted by: katya the designated driver at September 17, 2012 10:01 AM (DoZD+)
Better Zombieized Title (Truthful Impact on the Honeyb's): Ben Stein Recognizes Obama's Hostility to Freedom of Speech of American's everywhere.
Posted by: Minuteman at September 17, 2012 10:01 AM (1FOy5)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at September 17, 2012 10:01 AM (8Hnjw)
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 17, 2012 10:01 AM (NWRs2)
Posted by: A. Peasant at September 17, 2012 10:01 AM (c16IJ)
Havard University Press put out a book on the violence sparked by the Danish cartoon depicting Muhammad...without including the image at the heart of the violence.
Remember that blogger who proposed that all bloggers take one day to stand up for free speech by posting an image of Muhammad...and she quickly backed down and renounced herself?
In both cases, they concluded that the upside of standing up for speech was not as great as the downside. Free people need to change that equation. Normally, we'd have the help of the "creative arts" industry for such things. If the rioting Muslims were not "people of color," Hollywood would have been tripping over itself to crank out dramas and documentaries in defense of free speech. Academia too. Unfortunately, those two make up a huge portion of the Opinion-Shaping Apparatus in the West, and they're not interested in helping.
Posted by: CJ at September 17, 2012 10:02 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: LASue at September 17, 2012 10:02 AM (wAhNv)
We're doing our best, J. J.
Posted by: East Turkestan Islamic Movement at September 17, 2012 10:03 AM (5iuEW)
My question made to indicate the answer. Why should the path to a more felicitous Republic require anything other than the same actions the Left has undertaken in their 80+year march through the institutions?
The correct answers to problems of society are never as satisfying as the easy answers.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at September 17, 2012 10:03 AM (3CiXB)
Posted by: Ken at September 17, 2012 10:03 AM (ayCbQ)
All the threats have already been made over the past 30 years. Now its just down to the devices and logistics.
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 17, 2012 10:04 AM (NWRs2)
Could not agree with you more.
If Romney wins, it will take one or two decades to even partially reverse much of the evil put in place by the anti-Constitutionalist liberals.
If Obama wins, it will take one or two generations to reconstruct a Constitutional Republic, if it can be reconstructed at all.
Posted by: Hrothgar (Dagny Aficionado ) at September 17, 2012 10:05 AM (Cnqmv)
Re: my comment #14 above -
In looking for a linky for Ben Stein actually endorsing Obama in 2008, I can't find one, what I have found in abundance are links to Ben Stein saying that the pick of Sarah Palin as the VP nominee "scares" him.
Ben Stein got lots of press in 2008 on his dissing of Sarah Palin. Compared picking her as VP to a card game of 52-pickup, where McCain had just thrown all the cards in the deck up in the air, and would have to pick them all up to get voters to vote for Sarah Palin.
So that's why my memory banks had him endorsing Obama in 2008, he didn't come right out and say "Vote for TFG" but he trash talked Palin incessantly.
La meme chose.
Posted by: Boots at September 17, 2012 10:05 AM (neKzn)
Hasn't Stein been one of those famous fiscal conservatives/social liberals?
He is a anti-evolution.
Posted by: katya the designated driver at September 17, 2012 10:05 AM (DoZD+)
He worked for Nixon and Ford, which might tell you something.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at September 17, 2012 10:06 AM (4+LTj)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 17, 2012 10:06 AM (+tqYo)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 17, 2012 10:06 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: A. Peasant at September 17, 2012 10:06 AM (c16IJ)
119 115
92 And if he's made of wood?
------
He floats?
---
And if he floats?
------------------------
Yah, burn the witch!!!!
Posted by: Boots at September 17, 2012 10:07 AM (neKzn)
Posted by: toby928© for TB at September 17, 2012 10:07 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: A. Nother Peasant at September 17, 2012 10:08 AM (136wp)
(*)The easiest, least detectable delivery system is by ordinary cargo container ship.
Posted by: @PurpAv at September 17, 2012 10:08 AM (NWRs2)
Posted by: Barack Witchy Obama at September 17, 2012 10:08 AM (136wp)
(Overheard in the Warsaw Ghetto, c 1942)
Posted by: mallfly at September 17, 2012 10:10 AM (bJm7W)
128 120 The correct answers to problems of society are never as satisfying as the easy answers.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at September 17, 2012 02:03 PM (3CiXB)
Oh, wouldst that would be the case. It will be a tough slog. Forget government - we have to win back the schools from kindergarten to post-graduate.
Everything after that should fall into place, but it will take at least a generation.
If that fails, then all bets are off.
--------------------------------------------------
How long did it take Bill Ayers and his minions to take over the public schools? Um, at least since the 1960's, so that's 50 years, which is two generations. And they were united in their hatred of the rest of us, and focused on the goal of destruction.
The people on the other side kept ceding ground, giving in, thinking, oh just this one little thing, and before you know it everything has changed. Yeah, change.
Posted by: Boots at September 17, 2012 10:11 AM (neKzn)
Man, now that's a real shame when folks be throwing away perfectly good targets like that.
Posted by: Better Off At The Range On The K-12, On One Ski at September 17, 2012 10:11 AM (z1Zdt)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 17, 2012 10:12 AM (X3lox)
I hate the left for many reasons, but mostly because I see that there will be no alternative except the use of force to restore the republic. I abhor violence, and I hope they rot in Hell for putting us in this position.Posted by: J.J. Sefton
No.
My question made to indicate the answer. Why should the path to a more felicitous Republic require anything other than the same actions the Left has undertaken in their 80+year march through the institutions?
This.
The Left did this legally. The worked harder.
It makes sense. If you're "progressive," always seeking to change America, you're work is clear and you are alwasy on the offensive. If you are conservative, you, by nature, play defense, to conserve American traditions.
It's time to work as hard as the Left did, and stop playing defense.
Posted by: CJ at September 17, 2012 10:12 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: steevy at September 17, 2012 10:12 AM (6o4Fb)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC in Johnson County laughing at Cook County at September 17, 2012 10:13 AM (aOzuy)
Sort of like the Iran-Iraq War. 8 years of popcorn and pudding.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 17, 2012 01:54 PM (+tqYo)
I'm sure the uyghurs would have a thing or two to tell their muzzie brethren about fucking with the Chinese. One thing you can say about a brutal totalitarian dictatorship - they don't like sharing loyalties.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/i][/u][/b] at September 17, 2012 10:13 AM (4df7R)
"Why is he practically calling the race for TFG already?"
Not just that, but he assumes that after another four years of TFG there will actually be an America left, but it will be one in which a woman is allowed to hold public office, which he practically calls for Hillary.
Sorry. I was giving credit to Ben's writing until that sentence. Then I stopped.
Posted by: reason at September 17, 2012 10:14 AM (sPO/s)
Posted by: Economics Teacher at September 17, 2012 10:14 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 17, 2012 10:16 AM (X3lox)
*facepalm*
Leave it to you morons to be fed a line from Ferris Bueller's Day Off, and confuse it with Monty Python...
Posted by: reason at September 17, 2012 10:16 AM (sPO/s)
I was not a huge fan of Boosh the Elder, but if not for the white jug-eared Fuck, we wouldn't be in this situation. Fuck Ross Perot.
I think it's a mistake to see it that way. The elections reflect changes in America as much as they cause the changes. Bush 41 being re-elected would not have changed a thing, since the underlying changes in the electorate remain.
Posted by: CJ at September 17, 2012 10:16 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Thelmadatter at September 17, 2012 10:17 AM (jR2x5)
Posted by: Minuteman at September 17, 2012 02:01 PM (1FOy5)
You have to keep it short and sharp. Something like, "Ben Stein: Obama Will Make Freedom of Speech Illegal."
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit and ABO Supporter [/i][/u][/b] at September 17, 2012 10:18 AM (4df7R)
Another question I've been thinking about over the weekend.
Knowing that absolutely no harsh words towards the muzzies or the governments where these deadly demonstrations were executed and that keeping this rhetoric in the forefront will eventually hurt his chances for re-election, why is the SCOAMT doing this?
Could it be that he has knowledge of a muzzie nuclear device already in the US? I know he doesn't give a crap about this country, but couldn't this be just a temporary appeasement to hold off on a detonation until he's out of office?
Posted by: Soona at September 17, 2012 10:20 AM (cPQjO)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 17, 2012 10:20 AM (X3lox)
No, they didn't. Having judges pervert the meaning of laws is not "legal" in any sense.
If you think that's the reason for the Left's success over the last century, you're kidding yourself. And if enough conservatives think that, we are finished, because it means we won't up our game and beat them on the playing field, we'll just cry that they cheated.
Posted by: CJ at September 17, 2012 10:20 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Ken at September 17, 2012 10:24 AM (ayCbQ)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 17, 2012 10:25 AM (X3lox)
What you wrote in no way refutes CJ's statement and he is still correct.
To use your example, judges don't spontaneously errupt from the ground. They come from the schools, steeped in decades of leftism. They work with graduates and become renown one way or another and then become judges and politicians.
That takes a lot of work by a lot of people. That work by and large wasn't counted by the Right because we either didn't want to fight a cultural war or we didn't think what they were doing would fundamentally change the country.
Just because you recognize this as a great problem doesn't mean you get to handwave away correct assessments of the 'why.'
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at September 17, 2012 10:26 AM (3CiXB)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 17, 2012 10:28 AM (X3lox)
Again, that in no shape or form refutes what CJ wrote. You're barking the wrong tree for little reason
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at September 17, 2012 10:30 AM (3CiXB)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 17, 2012 10:31 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 17, 2012 10:32 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: TheGarbone at September 17, 2012 10:32 AM (R0JuT)
Posted by: teej at September 17, 2012 10:34 AM (z+Xap)
It's now 'when', folks:
http://tinyurl.com/8asnjp8
I give it 3 to 5 years for collecting for the 'Roman Polanski School for Educating Young Children and Dorking Them Up The Squeakhole' to come to your office or shop. It's the new normal! Don't be a hater!
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at September 17, 2012 10:36 AM (DLu2s)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at September 17, 2012 10:37 AM (UU0OF)
The left does cheat. If we won't enforce the laws on them then we have a very serious problem,
Answer me this: If we enforced every law that you say we didn't enforce, how different would the cultural/political landscape be?
Posted by: CJ at September 17, 2012 10:37 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 17, 2012 10:40 AM (X3lox)
That takes a lot of work by a lot of people. That work by and large wasn't counted by the Right because we either didn't want to fight a cultural war or we didn't think what they were doing would fundamentally change the country.
Unfortunately, the Right only gets motivitated at election time. The Left is working year-round. Everything is political to them. I really do think the Internet has allowed the Right more of a year-round platform. It's just that we're in a race to catch up, and we may have passed the point of no return.
Posted by: CJ at September 17, 2012 10:41 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Bart who lurks with SMOD 2012, master of his domain at September 17, 2012 10:43 AM (he2LC)
Posted by: BuddyPC at September 17, 2012 10:44 AM (nXICX)
Very.
That's it? You can't even point to a change in the political landscape. Screw the Roberts vote. I want major policy decisions being decided by the court. How did a politician get elected promising government health care? How did it pass a representative body? How is it the guy behind it is on his way to re-election? Because...they cheated? In every case?
No. Because the other side got more people to support their ideas.
Posted by: CJ at September 17, 2012 10:46 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: CJ at September 17, 2012 10:46 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 17, 2012 10:49 AM (X3lox)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 17, 2012 10:51 AM (X3lox)
Unfortunately, the Right only gets motivitated at election time.The Left is working year-round. Everything is political to them.
The Left has a small cadre of hard-core Communists who eat, drink, sleep, and dream subversion. It's all they do. They're highly organized, highly disciplined, and utterly determined. Read Whitaker Chambers's Witness to see how that's been true for at least half a century.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 17, 2012 11:04 AM (oX7vY)
And yet I know that moral people are in the minority in this country now. My hope is that Romney is successful in convincing the taxpaying voters to show up in great numbers because it is in their economic self-interest to do so.
Like Abraham, people of faith in the good ole USA have become strangers in a strange land.
And yep, this little church lady has become a modest prepper.
Posted by: 56 and loving RR at September 17, 2012 11:12 AM (SCWZQ)
Sure ... only the most serious un-Constitutional expansion of the feral government made possible because feral judges don't worry about stomping all over the Constitution (which Congress is charged with protecting, too). Not a big change there ...
My friend, no one agrees with you. I mean, not enough people agree with you. The guy who said he would do it was elected. Then it was passed by elected Congress. Then upheld by the court. Then the guy who said he would do it was re-elected (perhaps.)
Your entire theory rests on one man in one court ruling, while the rest remains untouched. We got Obamacare because we lost politically. Period.
Posted by: CJ at September 17, 2012 11:28 AM (9KqcB)
For another simple example, if the NY Slimes and WaPo had been prosecuted for revealing national security secrets to the enemy then that would have put a bit of a lid on the MFM and their treasonous behavior. Even if the they were acquitted.
The reason they were not prosecuted is because no elected politician thinks the public will support him if he tries - because conservatives have not made the case. Nothing happens in politics if politicians don't think they have enough support.
This stuff is not won or lost in a courtroom. It's fought in the court of public opinion. And we haven't been winning there.
Posted by: CJ at September 17, 2012 11:32 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at September 17, 2012 11:47 AM (X3lox)
It goes even further. We supposed to believe that the ambassador's death was a "spontaneous" mob.
But since the perps were armed with RPGs, machine guns, and mortars, we also asked to believe that these are typical things that one brings to a demonstration in Libya.
But, MOST OF ALL, we are asked to ignore the obvious question as to how a "Spontaneous" mob was able to assassinate a US ambassasor!
And, FURTHER, we are asked to believe that the kind of security most people have in their homes (locks on doors), plus a handful of local rent-a-cops and a few cameras was a perfectly REASONABLE level of security for a US ambassador in war zone - one where the locals - in their fantasy world - bring RPGs to a demonstration. That it was perfectly reasonable to forego any serious security, in order to "keep a low profile."
Posted by: Optimizer at September 17, 2012 12:57 PM (As94z)
Posted by: twoslaps at September 17, 2012 01:58 PM (rAV7y)
Posted by: G. at September 17, 2012 05:46 PM (567uf)
Posted by: unironic at September 17, 2012 10:07 PM (+Xtgz)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3266 seconds, 311 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 17, 2012 09:32 AM (j1gX1)