December 06, 2012
— Ace Several Republicans were kicked off committees for casting votes against leadership's wishes, rebelling from the right. But many Republicans have rebelled from the left -- voting for Cap and Trade, for god's sake -- and remain untouched on their own committees.
Second look at Sweet Meteor of Death?
Posted by: Ace at
09:22 AM
| Comments (287)
Post contains 70 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Thunderb at December 06, 2012 09:23 AM (Dnbau)
Who in the fuck voted for cap and trade? They should be out of the GOP immediately.
Posted by: Prescient11 at December 06, 2012 09:23 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: georgeofthedesert at December 06, 2012 09:24 AM (Eq2MX)
Posted by: L is screaming, show up damn SMOD! at December 06, 2012 09:24 AM (0PiQ4)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 09:24 AM (XkWWK)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Shipping Sheldon/Penny right to the end. at December 06, 2012 09:24 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: BArack Obamas shriveled testicles at December 06, 2012 09:25 AM (vYB+W)
Posted by: t-bird at December 06, 2012 09:25 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Clemenza at December 06, 2012 09:26 AM (Q8Pu5)
He was always my first choice. Just didn't have enough signature to get on the ballot in Indiana.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, ray of sunshine at December 06, 2012 09:26 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Shipping Sheldon/Penny right to the end. at December 06, 2012 01:24 PM (VtjlW)
*fist raised in solidarity* Word.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 06, 2012 09:26 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 06, 2012 09:26 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 09:27 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Shipping Sheldon/Penny right to the end. at December 06, 2012 09:27 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 09:27 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Walkers! at December 06, 2012 09:28 AM (e/Cti)
Posted by: we are so screwed at December 06, 2012 09:28 AM (HEa5q)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 09:28 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 06, 2012 09:28 AM (Dnbau)
http://tinyurl.com/aydrtqj
(file photo)
Posted by: SMOD 2016 at December 06, 2012 09:28 AM (9eDbm)
If a RINO can make it to a general they know we have no option but to vote for em. But we must make them learn to fear the primary. The Dems have that major advantage, vast swaths of their membership (the Progressive Caucus) come from areas where their only fear is a primary attack for not being crazy enough. We need to learn from their example.
Don't try to elect better Congresscritters, that is impossible. What is possible is to make Republican Congresscritters fear US more than they fear the Progs.
Posted by: John Morris at December 06, 2012 09:28 AM (sCRhB)
Posted by: t-bird at December 06, 2012 09:29 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2012 09:29 AM (BNuW6)
But the fire is so delightful
And since we've no place to run
let it burn, let it burn, let it burn
It doesn't show signs of stopping
And I've brought some corn for popping
The lights are turned way down low
let it burn, let it burn, let it burn
Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 06, 2012 09:29 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: b at December 06, 2012 09:29 AM (HI6wa)
Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at December 06, 2012 09:30 AM (l9Kos)
If we can ever get this right, Let It Burn would work.
Posted by: Iblis at December 06, 2012 09:30 AM (9221z)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at December 06, 2012 09:30 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: SpongeBob Saget at December 06, 2012 09:30 AM (epxV4)
Posted by: Golan Globus at December 06, 2012 09:30 AM (7vSU0)
This ain't forever or inevitable. Somebody tell Boehner before we unconditionally surrender.
>Can Democrats survive after Obama? <
http://tinyurl.com/a9dvyuv
Posted by: marcus at December 06, 2012 09:30 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: we are so screwed at December 06, 2012 01:28 PM (HEa5q)
___ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ ____ ____ ___
Nonsense, everything is going just fine. We got this.
-Zombified Lowell Weicker
Posted by: Meremortal, time to slutdrop the GOPe at December 06, 2012 09:30 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: Eaton Cox at December 06, 2012 09:31 AM (q177U)
Posted by: Trashcan Man at December 06, 2012 09:31 AM (APmL9)
OT: Anyone that would like to email the property managers at the Willows who are denying seniors a Christmas Tree or Menorah can email these grinch asshats at http://www.jbproperty.net/willows.html
Posted by: Cheri at December 06, 2012 09:32 AM (G+Wff)
"The only problem with the "Let It Burn" idea, is how do conservatives avoid the blame?"
They can't because they don't control the means of communication. So fuck it. Don't play the game.
Lit it burn.
Posted by: Jaws at December 06, 2012 09:32 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: t-bird at December 06, 2012 09:32 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: we are so screwed, deliver us oh SMOD at December 06, 2012 09:32 AM (HEa5q)
Posted by: It WILL Burn at December 06, 2012 09:32 AM (CIutZ)
Posted by: 80sBaby at December 06, 2012 09:32 AM (YjDyJ)
Future generations will come to think of them as "liberation trees"
Posted by: @PurpAv at December 06, 2012 09:32 AM (vWHvS)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 09:32 AM (XkWWK)
Nah, that's one thing we shouldn't worry about because we'll always get the blame, time to stop worrying about that and do what needs to be done.
Posted by: booger at December 06, 2012 09:32 AM (HI6wa)
But many Republicans have rebelled from the left -- voting for Cap and Trade, for god's sake -- and remain untouched on their own committees.
They are team players.
Time you woke up to what this team is all about.
Posted by: entropy at December 06, 2012 09:32 AM (TULs6)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at December 06, 2012 09:32 AM (YOZSv)
Posted by: Golan Globus at December 06, 2012 09:33 AM (7vSU0)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 09:33 AM (piMMO)
Thankfully, California will stand as a shining icon of financial strength and prudent management when the maelstrom hits.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at December 06, 2012 09:33 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: The Mega Independent[/i] at December 06, 2012 09:33 AM (bSsXM)
Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2012 09:33 AM (BNuW6)
Posted by: Clemenza at December 06, 2012 09:34 AM (Q8Pu5)
So, have we completed the five stages of grief yet, I'm pretty sure I have, plus a few more.
1. Denial
2. Anger
3. Bargaining
4. Depression
5. Acceptance
6. Apathy
6. LIB
7. Help it Burn
8. Burn it down
9. Drink a lot
Posted by: spypeach at December 06, 2012 09:34 AM (pwTow)
The people have spoken.
give em what they want.
good and hard. as it is said. maybe they will wake up and realize what's actually going on.
or not.
Posted by: really, really pis'd off ette at December 06, 2012 09:34 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 09:35 AM (XkWWK)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 09:35 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 06, 2012 09:35 AM (GoIUi)
Uh, almost every apostate from the left he cites will no longer be in Congress next year. Kind of indicates they were in "swing" districts, doesn't it?
Posted by: buzz at December 06, 2012 09:35 AM (i27M5)
Thank you Ace for not mentioning any of the reps' race. Or were they all white guys?
Ok. I am taking a deep breath and stepping away from my race rant (for now) Sorry you all had to see that.
Posted by: sophistahick at December 06, 2012 09:35 AM (UhXzR)
Posted by: House Repubs at December 06, 2012 09:36 AM (3p/jD)
Who cares? If we want non career politicians we are going to fail sometimes. Accept that as a price of the goal or resign yourself to career politicians who won't open their chow hatch until their focus groups tell em what to say. One or the other.
Also, we have tried this strategy of 'well we have to elect the career RINO again because a more conservative candidate might lose after the sure to be bruising primary challenge' thing for a long time. Isn't it time to step back and reassess the success of the strategy yet? So how is that working out for us?
Would it be better to have forty one solid conservative Rs in the Senate or fifty-one with a dozen RINOs? I'll grant that dipping under forty and losing the fillibuster (while Reid keeps it alive) is important and we don't have unlimited room for error, but when your current plan is losing the war, and losing it hard and fast, you should be open to changing plans.
Posted by: John Morris at December 06, 2012 09:36 AM (sCRhB)
------
Name the legislation after him. The Obama Fair Tax Act. The Obama Economic Stimulus Act. The Obama Budget Reform Deal. The Obama Debt Ceiling Act.
Make speeches on "hearing the will of the American people" and that elections matter. Publicly congratulate the President on signing day on HIS legislation.
You and I know what his policies will do to the economy. Hang the coming recession around his skinny frickin neck.
Posted by: fixerupper at December 06, 2012 09:36 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 06, 2012 09:36 AM (XkWWK)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at December 06, 2012 09:36 AM (79ueO)
Posted by: Hadji the Muslim Comic at December 06, 2012 09:37 AM (RuUvx)
Posted by: Serious Cat at December 06, 2012 09:37 AM (UypUQ)
the govt will just grow and grow until it will need to take everything and hand us back benevolently what is left.
I guess they'll then truly be the deciders.
Posted by: really, really pis'd off ette at December 06, 2012 09:37 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: chocolatepretzel at December 06, 2012 09:37 AM (B7i4w)
It's hilarious that some people think Let It Burn is an option.
It's inevitable, it's not some match we can light or not light. It's burning now, and will continue to burn. It's not a wildfire, it's a slow-death smolder.
And Republicrats have led us to this end.
Conservatives don't even make up a majority of the GOP, let alone a majority of Americans.
Posted by: Meremortal, time to slutdrop the GOPe at December 06, 2012 09:37 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: rickb223 Let. It. Burn. at December 06, 2012 09:38 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: sophistahick at December 06, 2012 09:38 AM (UhXzR)
Posted by: Clemenza at December 06, 2012 09:39 AM (Q8Pu5)
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 06, 2012 09:39 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 01:33 PM (piMMO)
I know the Horde likes to dump on McConnell but I've said all along that he plays a weak hand much more masterfully than Boehner does a strong one. Boehner just doesn't know how to deal with a fucking retard like the JEF, which calls for labeling him as a "fucking retard" to the MFM among other things. Allen West as Speaker would be bitch slapping the Indonesian so fucking hard that we'd be having daily thousand comment threads laughing about it. But the simple cocksuckers in Florida decided to make him a redistricting victim rather than dump one of the numerous Cheeto Crists in training. Fuck those Repuke turds.
Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at December 06, 2012 09:39 AM (l9Kos)
Posted by: The Political Hat at December 06, 2012 09:39 AM (XvHmy)
Whatever course Boehner takes in the fiscal cliff and debt ceiling talks, his response cannot be blamed on the undue influence of Tea Party 'extremists'. His will be the definitive mainstream Republican position. If that position happens to be abject and craven surrender to the Democrats then it's time, I think, for the GOP to go the way of the Whigs. The Whig Party fell apart because its leadership refused to take a strong stand against slavery. The big issue of our day is the stealth Marxist socialist takeover of the United States, which would in turn become a dictatorship in all but name. Either fight or move aside.
I consider myself a Party of Lincoln Republican. This breaks my heart.
Posted by: troyriser at December 06, 2012 09:39 AM (vtiE6)
predict...oh, a sunset. And we would pay him for the privilege of this knowledge.
He was not a nice guy. Nothing has changed.
DangerGirl you can find me at Goodreads. I owe you.
Posted by: DCBourone at December 06, 2012 09:40 AM (7J6t/)
I'm bringing this over from the previous thread since it has direct bearing on the whole fiscal cliff fiasco, to which Boehner's purging of the heretics is but one piece.
Thanks to alexthechick (pbuh), the Chicago Tribune (http://trib.in/YzTEcO 
is calling for Obama to show a little flexibility and meet the Republicans part way on spending cuts. My favorite part of the whole story -- which still manages to be fawning and reverent to the Boy King -- has got to be the very first sentence of the actual piece. After a long quote pulled from a 2009 Tribune interview with Obama in which he talks about the necessity of entitlement reform, and how he intends to "spend political capital" to make it happen, they give us this gem:
Four years later, President Obama has a golden chance to begin keeping that commitment.
Just let that soak in.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 06, 2012 09:40 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: rickb223 Let. It. Burn. at December 06, 2012 09:40 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: Some1 at December 06, 2012 09:40 AM (cSlKk)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at December 06, 2012 09:40 AM (H1M3J)
"Jaws, instead of the lawyers, make sure reporters get it first this time."
I don't discrimate against the enemies of Liberty based on race, sex, religion, *or* profession. First come, first serve.
I'm all EEOC like that.
Posted by: Jaws at December 06, 2012 09:41 AM (4I3Uo)
Simple.
They get the blame no matter what.
Seriously, the economy tanks, it's Republicans' fault. Fiscal cliff? Republicans' fault.
Posted by: AmishDude at December 06, 2012 09:41 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows pragmatism has pwned your asses at December 06, 2012 09:41 AM (Lxw+T)
Posted by: 80sBaby at December 06, 2012 09:41 AM (YjDyJ)
I'm voting West in 2014. Up until that point, I will totally ignore the Republicans, and the polls, and who's getting in the race. Don't. Care.
West is SMOD. The end of the Republican party.
BONUS: we don't have to bother forming a new party. Just everyone Vote West.
I'll send money to DeMint and Palin, because they are effective at helping kick start races in the states. But I'm still voting West.
Posted by: K~Bob at December 06, 2012 09:41 AM (ifbVk)
But but but, I cried when I let them go from their committees, so you know it was difficult and for the best. - Weepingly Boner
Posted by: sophistahick at December 06, 2012 09:41 AM (UhXzR)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 06, 2012 09:41 AM (i0vBR)
Posted by: El Kabong, RINOINO at December 06, 2012 09:42 AM (sGU4F)
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 06, 2012 01:35 PM (GoIUi)
Maybe 2 days ago. And it appeared everywhere
Posted by: Nevergiveup at December 06, 2012 01:36 PM (79ueO)
The first place I saw it was Fox, but that is because they are the first in line for my morning news links. It was in several others at the same time the same morning.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 09:42 AM (YdQQY)
I mean aside from the requisite description as Repub SoH, or resisting taxes, you know, role definition.
Kinda weird how he's not portrayed as an evil villain 24/7 by the commie press,
.......or maybe not.
Posted by: ontherocks at December 06, 2012 09:42 AM (aZ6ew)
Giving them what they want will not 'Let it Burn'.
Giving Barky an increase in the Debt Limit will enable him to keep the good times rolling through the rest of his term.
Giving him another big batch of Stimulus money, will enable him to bail out the broke states and give payback money to all his cronies.
So I say...No Increase in the Debt Limit.
If you want 'Burn', that will do it.
Posted by: wheatie at December 06, 2012 09:42 AM (CM59X)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 09:42 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows pragmatism has pwned your asses at December 06, 2012 09:43 AM (Lxw+T)
Um...are you fucking kidding? FIFTY-ONE. And wouldn't be a "dozen" RINOs, it would probably be three or four at most. But yes, yes, yes, you have to be tragically naive to think there is literally any conceivable advantage, in the current political world that exists, to having 41 "true cons" versus 51 GOP Senators and control over the calendar, bringing judicial nominees to a vote, all the Senate subcomittees, etc. Anyone who posits otherwise simply has no understanding of the scope and breadth of what a majority in the Senate enables in terms of its legislative functions.
Also, people need to realize that Dave Schweikert wasn't removed from his committee by John Boehner for being "too conservative," he was removed for being a nasty little dishonest rat-faced weasel shit who connived with the liberal media to unjustifiably tar the reputation of Ben Quayle, whom he was running against in a primary. He's a turd who should be kicked to the curb.
Posted by: Jeff B. at December 06, 2012 09:43 AM (TuW+p)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 06, 2012 01:41 PM (i0vBR)
The hell you say
Posted by: Linsay Graham, Olympia Snow, Susan Collins at December 06, 2012 09:43 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: rickb223 Let. It. Burn. at December 06, 2012 09:43 AM (GFM2b)
At a time when party unity is more important than ever, Boehner pulls this stunt. I couldn't take his slurry pronouncements prior to the purge, now I just see him as evil rather than just merely incompetent.
Do ANY of the Beltway types comprehend that the TEA party won them the house in 2010?
Posted by: kallisto at December 06, 2012 09:44 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: alex of school at December 06, 2012 09:44 AM (uFY4s)
Posted by: alex of school at December 06, 2012 01:43 PM (uFY4s)
-----
I do that all the time....
Posted by: Helen Thomas at December 06, 2012 09:44 AM (nELVU)
it's a slow-death smolder.
Remember those snakes from independence day, yoiu lit the little pellet and the snake came forth amid fire and brimstone....a lot like that.
Posted by: Cicero Kid embaces the burning at December 06, 2012 09:44 AM (+v9b3)
Posted by: EC at December 06, 2012 09:44 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows pragmatism has pwned your asses at December 06, 2012 09:45 AM (Lxw+T)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 06, 2012 09:45 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: alex of school and quite insane at December 06, 2012 09:45 AM (uFY4s)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at December 06, 2012 09:46 AM (H1M3J)
I think the more important thing is surviving the fire. If it burns in the right way, there won't be any liberals left on the other side. Not enough to matter, anyway.
Posted by: BS Inc. at December 06, 2012 09:46 AM (FFwP9)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 09:46 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 06, 2012 09:46 AM (i0vBR)
Posted by: alex of school and quite insane at December 06, 2012 09:46 AM (uFY4s)
Posted by: Helen Thomas at December 06, 2012 09:47 AM (XvHmy)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows pragmatism has pwned your asses at December 06, 2012 09:47 AM (Lxw+T)
Posted by: rickb223 Let. It. Burn. at December 06, 2012 09:48 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 06, 2012 09:48 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: DocBallerPHD at December 06, 2012 09:48 AM (KfsHF)
Posted by: alex of school and quite insane at December 06, 2012 09:48 AM (uFY4s)
Posted by: Citizen Anachronda at December 06, 2012 09:48 AM (IrbU4)
Posted by: colonel saito-boner at December 06, 2012 09:48 AM (jPVBi)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 01:46 PM (piMMO)
He is my damn Senator and yes he is. While a low ACU rating is god for evidence of RINO a borderline high is not by itself. In those case where they are hitting around 90% you must also look at how many times he has crossed the aisle to screw the Party on major legislation. Graham does that a lot.
A lot of these RINOs like Graham team up with other Senators and game the ACU votes.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 09:49 AM (YdQQY)
So, It wil burn in some fashion or other.
Nearest Exit Route? Or will I need to stop drop and roll? Choices.
I'll be checking for an exit route and it involves preparedness of all sorts.
Posted by: sophistahick at December 06, 2012 09:49 AM (UhXzR)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 06, 2012 09:49 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: 80sBaby at December 06, 2012 09:49 AM (YjDyJ)
Posted by: alex of school and quite insane at December 06, 2012 09:49 AM (uFY4s)
>>...The only problem with the "Let It Burn" idea, is how do conservatives avoid the blame? You know the media will never let any of this stick to Barry.
I'd like to think we could solve this by decorating a few lampposts with "journalists."
Posted by: LibertarianJim (team #letitburn) at December 06, 2012 09:49 AM (WDCYi)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows pragmatism has pwned your asses at December 06, 2012 09:50 AM (Lxw+T)
Posted by: Clemenza at December 06, 2012 09:50 AM (Q8Pu5)
Oh wait, I don't know better.
LIB.
Posted by: DocJ at December 06, 2012 09:50 AM (A5uiv)
Monday in Roll Call. Apparently they were fed the story before it was even true; they say they couldn't get any quotes, because their calls to the purged were the first they (the purged) heard of it. That may be bullshit. But obviously, the story was originated by Team Orange, and making a show for the media was their top priority.
Notable quote:
The shuffling is the latest sign that Boehner is flexing his muscle with the right flank of his conference as he seeks a united front during tense fiscal cliff negotiations with President Barack Obama.
That's the uncited-press-release/why-the-source-talked part of the story. So...that's the story. And it's in "whip" language, so that's where it came from.
Posted by: oblig. at December 06, 2012 09:50 AM (cePv8)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 09:50 AM (piMMO)
________________
Thanks! I have been trying to find out exactly what Schweikert did because I saw some hints about how he was playing the "conservative victim" and getting everybody up in arms, when he deserved to be booted.
I find it interesting that when I pull up articles on the search, the first ones about Boehner "purging conservatives" are all from lefty leaning press sources, like The Hill, Politico, and Reuters. And the source all of these sites use to show how Boehner is "purging" people is Schweikert. Imagine that.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 06, 2012 09:51 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: alex of school and quite insane at December 06, 2012 09:51 AM (uFY4s)
They actually have debt proposals and a budget. How old is Ryan's original plan now?
As much as I like to criticize them- it's not like they have been sitting on their thumbs.
Conversely, Democrats have destroyed the economy and never passed a budget in four years. The President accumulates over $1.2 trillion in additional debt each year. He has tripled our national debt.
But yet if this fails...it's Republican's fault?
No small wonder why this country is fooked. Sheeple can't follow the facts.
Posted by: marcus at December 06, 2012 09:51 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: Hipster that thinks Apple is the greatest ever at December 06, 2012 09:51 AM (UK9cE)
LOLZ!!
I crack myself up!!
Posted by: B. Frank at December 06, 2012 09:52 AM (jvd3N)
We do forget that these are people and people who are on our side are not necessarily honest or of high character and can often take advantage of our allegiance.
Posted by: AmishDude at December 06, 2012 09:53 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: alex of school and quite insane at December 06, 2012 09:53 AM (uFY4s)
Make him lead. Stop pretending our opposition means anything and just openly announce we're voting 100% party line in favor of whatever the President wants. He can't blame us very effectively if we support him more uniformly than his own party. Stop playing our designated powerless scapegoat role in his kabuki theatre and make him take the lead.
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at December 06, 2012 09:53 AM (WLuv5)
Posted by: Cashin at December 06, 2012 09:53 AM (TYEu4)
Is there anybody in this stupid fucking party with any political aptitude whatsoever? Do we ever fight back? Ever? Or do we just let Obuttfuck piss all over us while our elected "leaders" talk about what a nice guy he is? I'm so fucking sick of this stupid motherfucking shit I'm ready to rockout with my Glock out.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 06, 2012 09:53 AM (KSjsb)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 09:53 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: jakeman at December 06, 2012 09:54 AM (96M6e)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 06, 2012 09:54 AM (hjRtO)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 01:50 PM (piMMO)
They had rating well below the DIABLO break point. They were Democrats with an R after their name.
Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 09:54 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: CarolT at December 06, 2012 09:54 AM (z4WKX)
Posted by: Cicero Kid at December 06, 2012 09:54 AM (+v9b3)
Posted by: @PurpAv at December 06, 2012 09:55 AM (vWHvS)
It's Boehner negotiating. Even the Suruwaha People know he will fold and sell-out.
Posted by: marcus at December 06, 2012 09:55 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 09:55 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 06, 2012 09:55 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: we are so screwed, deliver us oh SMOD at December 06, 2012 09:55 AM (HEa5q)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 09:55 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: In Cognito at December 06, 2012 09:55 AM (1MXyW)
Posted by: t-bird at December 06, 2012 09:55 AM (FcR7P)
Not a new epiphany: Those in DC are playing 6 dimensional chess cubed with constantly changing fields of play. Most of their maneuverings are beyond comprehension to normal thinking beings.
That being said, it is likely that the games being played have little to do with representing.
Posted by: sophistahick at December 06, 2012 09:55 AM (UhXzR)
I'm impressed that there's at least one other person (and one not normally tarred as a "RINO") around here who understands this point. We are negotiating from a position of *EXTREME* weakness as it is. The preening and spotlight-grabbing primadonna stuff from backbenchers -- who are more concerned about their own careerist ambitions, i.e. getting media and blog love and raising their profiles, than actually getting the best deal -- doesn't help.
"Let It Burn" is not a fucking answer -- it may make people feel better when repeating the phrase in a blog comment section, but we can all be internet tough guys since we don't have any responsibility. Meanwhile, it's not just an irresponsible position, it's an immoral one for elected officials tasked with governing the country to take. Even if, yes, Obama is a fucking piece of shit.
At some point, should Boehner just be willing to walk away? You bet. If Obama doesn't move off his current "offer" (and I use scare-quotes there) then fuck him, he's not negotiating in any real sense. But Boehner is the only one at the table, as you said, and he needs to be able to negotiate with a free hand, without looking over his shoulder, to see if he can get something better. Otherwise Obama and his team -- who aren't retards, you know -- will simply play the two wings off one another and screw us all even more.
I do worr
Posted by: Jeff B. at December 06, 2012 09:55 AM (TuW+p)
As for Amash, his nickname is "Mr. No" because he is a miniature Ron Paul. Frankly, there are other conservative members who are better suited to Budget than he is.
Heh. Did you read what you wrote there? $16T? $22T? Yeah, the last thing we need is Dr. No dicking with the budget. The budget is too low! That's the problem.
Posted by: entropy at December 06, 2012 09:56 AM (TULs6)
Point of order.
Don't only 16 republicans have to abstain. CAN'T WE GET THAT FUCKING MUCH. I'd say we at least have 3 or 4 off of committees that should be abstaining.
Posted by: Prescient11 at December 06, 2012 09:56 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 06, 2012 01:51 PM (GoIUi)
Tammy Bruce has been criticizing him for this and maybe Rush has also (I don't listen to him regularly).
Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at December 06, 2012 09:56 AM (l9Kos)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 09:57 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: alex of school and quite insane at December 06, 2012 01:53 PM (uFY4s)
Yeah, that was a leftover sock from yesterday that stayed in my cache for some reason.
Apple sucks. It really never pays to be a sheep.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 06, 2012 09:57 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: t-bird at December 06, 2012 01:55 PM (FcR7P)
----
Now why didnt I think of that.
Posted by: Vlad the Impaler at December 06, 2012 09:57 AM (nELVU)
Second look at Sweet Meteor of Death?
I'm on Team SMOD / Barbed Cock of Satan, myself. But I'm a moderate.
LIB/Cthulhu is for the extremists.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at December 06, 2012 09:57 AM (zF6Iw)
"And wouldn't be a "dozen" RINOs, it would probably be three or four at most."
Um, we have more than three or four now. The conventional wisdom method of getting to a majority always involves choking our bile and electing yet more RINOs. So we get nominal control and thus the blame but the the RINOs 'reach across the isle' and we still get Progs passing legislation. Worst of both worlds.
The goal has to be first be unifying our own camp to the point where we could actually accomplish something when we next take control. We have tried the reverse order enough times and failed that we should be ready to write it off as a bad idea.
THEY understand that. The very last of the 'blue dogs' are gone now. They present a solid blue wall of hate and wickedness now. And they are kicking our butts, just in case you have been under a rock the last couple of years.
Posted by: John Morris at December 06, 2012 09:57 AM (sCRhB)
Posted by: dananjcon at December 06, 2012 09:57 AM (jvd3N)
Posted by: rickb223 Let. It. Burn. at December 06, 2012 09:58 AM (GFM2b)
(1) Boehner's camp goes to Roll Call and says he's doing a purge.
(2) The "purged" don't know about it.
(3) The "conservatives" that were purged weren't really all that conservative.
(4) Get rid of Boehner.
What if...just go with me here...what if the GOP is finally getting good about this messaging thing and we're just too knee-jerk to let them?
Posted by: AmishDude at December 06, 2012 09:58 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: sophistahick at December 06, 2012 01:55 PM (UhXzR)
Alexander the Great. Gordian knot. Sword. That's how that game is played.
Posted by: troyriser at December 06, 2012 09:58 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: we are so screwed, deliver us oh SMOD at December 06, 2012 09:58 AM (HEa5q)
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 06, 2012 01:53 PM (KSjsb)
___
Those are all really great questions. I'll forward them on to Reince Preibus, who just sent me a fundraising letter this morning.
I'll add your questions right at the end of my note which directs the RNC to spend my $500.00 on the Zac Moffatt Targeted Victory posse.
Posted by: kallisto at December 06, 2012 09:58 AM (jm/9g)
Posted by: SCoaMF at December 06, 2012 09:58 AM (hNXHo)
Posted by: The Drizzle at December 06, 2012 09:59 AM (ysCLj)
Posted by: polynikes at December 06, 2012 09:59 AM (m2CN7)
It is gone.
May the purifying fire come and go quickly.
Although I suspect we will feel the burning coals upon our feet until at least 2018.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at December 06, 2012 09:59 AM (n/ubI)
Meanwhile, it's not just an irresponsible position, it's an immoral one for elected officials tasked with governing the country to take. Even if, yes, Obama is a fucking piece of shit.
Then maybe they shouldn't have spent the last several decades setting it up and making it inevitable.
You in the camp that just thinks deficits can keep going up and up forever, just like housing prices?
Posted by: entropy at December 06, 2012 10:00 AM (TULs6)
I do worr
-----
see..... SEEE!!!!
I told you guys Big Sis is watching. Jeff B "disappeared" mid post.....
Posted by: fixerupper at December 06, 2012 10:00 AM (nELVU)
Then they're not good at messaging.
The key to Democrats winning the messaging war is that when they say Conservative (or insufficiently Liberal) things, their base knows that, at the end of the day, they can still be counted on to vote Liberal. We have no such faith in the Republicans, because they've proven over and over to be untrustworthy.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 10:01 AM (5DR1j)
The reason I vote for GOP is because of the hope that they would be fiscally responsible. If the party is going to be democrat lite on fiscal matters, I'm out. So it seems like I am a voter without a party that represents my views. That probably was true all along, even if Romney had won, but this move by Boehner seems to seal the deal.
Posted by: California Red at December 06, 2012 10:01 AM (/88Lx)
All you need to know about the modern day GOP is that Mitt Romney was vicious and unrelenting to his fellow GOP primary mates and rolled over for Obama during the general.
Our supposed "leader" in the house has nearly completed a purge of all conservatives on house committees. Why is that?
Because he intends to strong-arm a grand bargain either through his caucus or through committee.
The GOP has left us, it is time to leave the GOP!
Posted by: General Woundwort at December 06, 2012 10:01 AM (RrD4h)
I told you guys Big Sis is watching. Jeff B "disappeared" mid post.....
Posted by: fixerupper at December 06, 2012 02:00 PM (nELVU)
I saw that, too! I had this image of him being picked right out of his seat, possibly right out of his shoes, by a passing CIA drone.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/b][/i][/u] at December 06, 2012 10:01 AM (4df7R)
They've got one more election in 2016, and I swear to all that is holy, if Jeb Bush is the GOP candidate i'm fucking done and switching parties. No bullshit, I can't take this "moderate" shit anymore, let's just nominate a fucking democrat and be done with it.
I live in fucking WY anyway, i'm voting 3rd party.
Posted by: Cashin at December 06, 2012 10:01 AM (TYEu4)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 10:02 AM (piMMO)
Everyone thinks they're clever right up to the point where their head drops into the basket. Then, not so much...
Posted by: Madame Guillotine at December 06, 2012 10:02 AM (vWHvS)
And I cheered.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 10:02 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2012 10:02 AM (bZKG0)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 10:02 AM (piMMO)
Rep leadership = squishy moderates
It will always be more of the same unless this is fixed.
Posted by: slatz at December 06, 2012 10:03 AM (mE0Rl)
No, the problem is that even when they do manage to put forth a budget cut, kneejerk idealists like Ron Paul and Amash vote against it because it didn't go far enough. No matter how far it went.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 06, 2012 10:03 AM (SY2Kh)
And then, maybe.
I am done watching the clown circus running each other over.
Posted by: marcus at December 06, 2012 10:03 AM (GGCsk)
They haven't attacked Reid because THEY DON'T CARE. He broke the LAW by campaigning for Obama on the Senate floor and NOTHING HAPPENED. Voter fraud. Lies. Deception.
They don't care. It stopped being about the citizens of this once great country a LONG time ago and it's going to take a full on revolution to take it back. Vote EM ALL OUT.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 06, 2012 10:04 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 06, 2012 10:04 AM (Dnbau)
If Boehner is getting troops in line for the fight, I have no problem with that and good.
However, true Repubs should not be purged off of committees, etc.
That should happen to lib pubs. I am withholding judgment to see what they are going to do with regard to the budget deal, but I have not been impressed so far.
If Boehner was smart, he would appoint a fresh, new young face to lead the negotiations. Tom Cotton anyone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Seriously though, boehner shouldn't negotiate shit. he strikes me as a pussy. whether it's true or not, I don't know. but we need someone better at the negotiations.
Posted by: Prescient11 at December 06, 2012 10:05 AM (tVTLU)
You're ignoring one big thing...Let It Burn simply means letting the people have their way. There's nothing immoral about that.
People wanted more spending, a bigger federal government and pretend revenue increases. The only way to convince them of the folly of these positions is to let them see them in action.
Posted by: DrewM. at December 06, 2012 10:05 AM (UfvyB)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 10:05 AM (piMMO)
Rep leadership =
It will always be more of the same unless this is fixed.
Posted by: slatz at December 06, 2012 02:03 PM (mE0Rl)
Changed for accuracy.
There are no right leaners left in our government. They're all center left or hard left.
Posted by: © Sponge at December 06, 2012 10:06 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 10:06 AM (piMMO)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 06, 2012 10:07 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 06, 2012 10:08 AM (hjRtO)
No, the problem is that even when they do manage to put forth a budget cut, kneejerk idealists like Ron Paul and Amash vote against it because it didn't go far enough. No matter how far it went.
Hollowpoint, it didn't go far enough. Wasn't going to stop the burn, which will happen now no matter what we do.
Posted by: entropy at December 06, 2012 10:08 AM (TULs6)
I will ask again....
WHYYYYYY are people making such a huge-ass deal out of three backbench rookies getting their hands rapped? Jesus, people are acting like this is some massive Stalinist purge or something.
Posted by: rockmom at December 06, 2012 10:08 AM (qE3AR)
The GOP must compromise on revenue. They said they would.
That much is smart. Now you force the dems to come up with budget cuts.
This I have yet to see. It shouldn't be that hard. If dems refuse to do something, pass simpson-bowles. that was it just is not a repub proposal.
Now is time to take a hard line on the budget. Period.
Posted by: Prescient11 at December 06, 2012 10:08 AM (tVTLU)
Seems true now, but as I recall the preferred candidate in 2012 was "Anyone but Romney." So yea, i'm already prepared to be vastly disappointed. I haven't been conservative my entire life, but the time I have been can be surmised as a long string of disappointments after the other.
Posted by: Cashin at December 06, 2012 10:08 AM (TYEu4)
No matter how far it went. Hah! How far did it go?
A severe decrease to the rate of increase? Severely conservative.
Posted by: entropy at December 06, 2012 10:09 AM (TULs6)
Posted by: General Woundwort at December 06, 2012 02:01 PM (RrD4h)
======
Done already. Changed my affiliation to Independent this year.
Posted by: Captain Whitebread, The Least Interesting Man In The World at December 06, 2012 10:09 AM (cVfX0)
210...Let It Burn simply means letting the people have their way. There's nothing immoral about that.
Barky wants to have the unlimited ability to raise the Debt Limit.
So you're saying we should let him have that?
Posted by: wheatie at December 06, 2012 10:09 AM (CM59X)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 06, 2012 02:08 PM (hjRtO)
Yeah, he's such a shitty general that he kept control of the House while Barack Obama was winning 338 electoral votes.
Posted by: rockmom at December 06, 2012 10:10 AM (qE3AR)
The best, most conservative option on the table is to go over the fiscal cliff. Do you see any scenario where we really get spending cuts? Do you see any scenario where we see the tax rates stay the same, or go lower? No, those things aren't going to happen.
The only "bargain" we'll be able to get is either a) no cuts in spending, and tax rates go up (complete loss), or... b) promised future cuts (the same as no cuts), and only the "top" tax rate goes up- which is also a complete loss.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 10:10 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 06, 2012 02:07 PM (Dnbau)
------
Well.... to be fair to TFG, all he ever did was "community organizing".... which means "give us what we want or we'll fuck yer shit up."
He and his merry band of fascists dont know any better.
Posted by: fixerupper at December 06, 2012 10:10 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: El Kabong, RINOINO at December 06, 2012 10:11 AM (sGU4F)
This is wholly dependent on the MFM burning too, which is assumed with the LiB concept. Anything bad that happens short of a true reset will be blamed on the GOP. Obama can do nothing wrong until such time as there is a reset and actual pain felt by His children.
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at December 06, 2012 10:11 AM (zpqa2)
Posted by: rockmom at December 06, 2012 02:08 PM (qE3AR)
Can't see the forest through the trees, eh?
Posted by: © Sponge at December 06, 2012 10:11 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: wheatie at December 06, 2012 02:09 PM (CM59X)
---
yes.
Posted by: fixerupper at December 06, 2012 10:11 AM (nELVU)
rockmom:
Indeed, the headlines seem a bit hyped up. I will withhold judgment until I see what they do with the stupid fiscal cliff.
If they fuck this up though, I am going to start to lose hope.
Posted by: Prescient11 at December 06, 2012 10:11 AM (tVTLU)
So you're saying we should let him have that?
The debt limit is already too high by a factor of 10, in the absence of the political will to make those kind of debt reductions, sure, let him spend it till there is nothing left to borrow and spend.
Posted by: SpongeBob Saget at December 06, 2012 10:11 AM (epxV4)
Because people are looking to be betrayed. They want it to happen to say "I told you so."
Posted by: AmishDude at December 06, 2012 10:12 AM (T0NGe)
Maybe, but he wasn't.
Whether you dissent from the left or right, if you're not going to play ball don't expect to get rewarded with the choice committee assignments.
You might be the best widget maker in the factory, but if you regularly spit in your bosses coffee, you can probably forget about promotion. That your boss is douche is irrelevant.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 06, 2012 10:13 AM (SY2Kh)
Who's talking about avoiding the blame. Embrace the blame. We'll get blamed no matter what happens.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at December 06, 2012 10:13 AM (5DR1j)
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at December 06, 2012 10:13 AM (zpqa2)
Posted by: Madame Guillotine at December 06, 2012 10:13 AM (vWHvS)
Posted by: In Cognito at December 06, 2012 10:13 AM (Gr8tW)
Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2012 10:13 AM (ytax8)
No we aren't. We are in a crap position only if we accept the Prog Media's frame. If we reject that we are in a position to win. Yes, win.
I have written this before, one more time.
We are spending vastly more than we take in. We are spending vastly more than any sane person believes the government can take in. The problem is spending. The problem is that since O came to power the Progs have decided to just skip the whole budget process.
If we can't go forth (with a base of paid advertising to bypass the Prog Media) and make the simple bumper sticker argument that "We have a budget problem. We are taking the no-brainer position that if we are to get a grip on the budget the first step is to actually, ya know, pass a budget. We have actually passed a budget. We do not expect our opponents in the Senate to like our proposal, we do however expect them to to what every Congress has done from the Founding to the election of Obama and propose a budget of their own and meet us in a House Senate Conference. Until then there shall be no more continuing resolutions and no increase in the debt limit."
Reid is in mortal terror of a budget and if it looked like he was being forced into debating one would give us damned near anything. They have the weak hand. They have convinced us that they are the ones winning so we refuse to attack our enemy in his weak spot.
Posted by: John Morris at December 06, 2012 10:14 AM (sCRhB)
At some point, should Boehner just be willing to walk away? You bet. If Obama doesn't move off his current "offer" (and I use scare-quotes there) then fuck him, he's not negotiating in any real sense. But Boehner is the only one at the table, as you said, and he needs to be able to negotiate with a free hand, without looking over his shoulder, to see if he can get something better. Otherwise Obama and his team -- who aren't retards, you know -- will simply play the two wings off one another and screw us all even more.
I do worr
Posted by: Jeff B. at December 06, 2012 01:55 PM (TuW+p)
Jeff, while I agree with som of your comment , mainly the last paragrph.
I would like to know why you added we aren't responsible?
WE collectively from rich to poor will have to pay off/ cough up forThe decisions made by these deciders, We don't HAVE a voice unless we send people to State what we desire. So seeing those thrown out for a better 'working environment' for Boehner doesn't really appeal to many .
Posted by: really, really pis'd off ette at December 06, 2012 10:14 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: ejo at December 06, 2012 10:14 AM (GXvSO)
Posted by: Thunderb at December 06, 2012 10:14 AM (Dnbau)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 06, 2012 02:03 PM (SY2Kh)
We would have a better chance of moderating Libertarians than pulling RINO's to the right.
The Libertarians are far more conservative than you give them credit for. Returning to constitutional government is the ultimate conservative ideal, yet most here would rather shit on Ron Paul over Iran. The drug issue is about freedom too.
I've voted R since my first vote (Reagan), my wife too. But I primaried for Ron Paul. (Texas), vote Romney in general.
We want it to burn, and are preparing for that.
Without conservatives finding common ground with Libertarians, and then taking voters from the Democrats, we will not win IN TIME to stop this.
Posted by: Jack Wagon at December 06, 2012 10:15 AM (KUPae)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 02:06 PM (piMMO)
That's the most positive thing I've read in this thread. Jeb's probably a decent person and I don't dislike him but I was maxed out on Bushes in the Oval Office when Poppy told Eastern Europe to proceed more cautiously after Reagan gave them the green light they'd been waiting for ever since that gimp cocksucker FDR gave them to Stalin on a silver platter. Enough with the Bush family forever.
Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at December 06, 2012 10:15 AM (l9Kos)
#231 Bilbray was also in a district full of enviro-nuts and was allowed to vote for Cap and Trade to help him back home. And it did, he was reelected easily in 2010, he just got hosed by redistricting this time and by the tidal wave for Obama in California.
One reason Democrats lost so many seats in 2010 was that Pelosi forced too many Democrats from purple and red districts to vote for Obamacare and especially Cap and Trade. These were the Blue Dogs that gave her the majority in 2006, but she screwed them.
Too many conservatives really have no idea how the House works.
Posted by: rockmom at December 06, 2012 10:15 AM (NYnoe)
Posted by: J. Boehner at December 06, 2012 10:16 AM (jvd3N)
Posted by: really, really pis'd off ette at December 06, 2012 10:16 AM (nqBYe)
Barky wants to have the unlimited ability to raise the Debt Limit.
So you're saying we should let him have that?
What is the alternative? Have Republicans raise the debt limit just as high, piece by piece, with a tiny betrayal of everything they claim to stand for every couple months????
If they were going to hold the line and put their feet down, it might be different. But you're completely fucking delusional and in total denial of reality if you think they're going to do that.
Posted by: entropy at December 06, 2012 10:17 AM (TULs6)
This "fiscal cliff" was his creation sweety because he wasn't willing to go to the matresses over the debt ceiling hike, so now he's not willing to go to the matresses over the fiscal cliff which will lead to him having to compromise and craft a grand-bargain so that he can avoid going to the mattresses which will lead to him having to compromise and craft a grand-bargain so that he can avoid going to the mattresses which will lead to him having to compromise and craft a grand-bargain so that he can avoid going to the mattresses which will lead to him having to compromise and craft a grand-bargain so that he can avoid going to the mattresses which will lead to him having to compromise and craft a grand-bargain so that he can avoid going to the mattresses....
...which will lead to FULL ON SOCIALISM
Posted by: General Woundwort at December 06, 2012 10:17 AM (RrD4h)
Posted by: really, really pis'd off ette at December 06, 2012 10:19 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at December 06, 2012 10:19 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Jean at December 06, 2012 02:13 PM (ytax
Oh, OK, I get it. All those votes Boehner held to repeal Obamacare, and pass a budget, and extend the tax cuts - none of that had anything to do with people deciding to vote for their Republican Congressman, it was just demographics. Funny, my Congressman ran on all that stuff and won in a district that Obama carried.
Posted by: rockmom at December 06, 2012 10:19 AM (qE3AR)
If we go over the cliff? Republican obstructionism
If we go over the cliff and negotiate a deal afterwards? Democratic Saviors
If we get a shitty deal and then there's a recession? Republicans kept the recession preventing parts out of it
We get a pretty decent deal but there's a recession? See above
I really believe we are currently in a recession right now, it's coming regardless. It's time for some short term pain for a long term goal. I'm not ready to deal with a democrat's recession and be blamed for it and lose elections the next 20 years if not longer. Let it burn and we'll rebuild from the ashes in 2016, at least a Democrat and progressive policies will be toxic for at least a decade or so after this depression.
Posted by: Cashin at December 06, 2012 10:20 AM (TYEu4)
It would be more likely that George P. Bush, Jeb's son, might run for something.
Apparently GPB has filed paperwork to run in Texas.
Posted by: Boots at December 06, 2012 10:21 AM (neKzn)
Boehner, aka Weepy the Dwarf, will completely cave to Obama anyway, he is a spineless Northeastern establishment Republican, not quite Olympia Snowe, but on that side of the spectrum.
The sooner he just surrenders without a fight and gives Obama everything he wants, the less bad press from the MSM.
Obama stole the election, he has assumed the Article I powers Boehner should have to pass laws or cancel laws he doesn't like by Executive Order, and Weepy says nothing. We no longer really live in a Constitutional Republic anymore, we are closer to Venezuela than most people think.
The Fed already buys almost 90% of the debt, we will go Zimbabwe/Weimar hyperinflation soon, Social Security which "invested" its surplus in long term Treasuries will pay pennies on the dollar, and the elderly will soon be dumpster diving, and it probably no longer matters what kind of deal is reached, its is past the tipping point of debt to GDP, and all the arguing is about where to hang pictures on the Titanic after the iceberg.
Posted by: Ed Mahmoud, minor internet royalty at December 06, 2012 10:26 AM (NVdGX)
Posted by: 80sBaby at December 06, 2012 10:27 AM (YjDyJ)
I can see what he's doing - After the emergence of the TEA party we've had at least 2 mutually-exclusive factions in the GOP and we can't seem to get anything done since. He does need unity to get what HE wants done, its just that what he wants done is BS and craven BS at that.
Anyway I suspect the party's done and suggest you just tally up what's most important to you then accordingly.
I've always been more on the civil libertarian wing of the GOP so its Libertarians for me. Those who want top just win small-e elections without troubling themselves with principles can stay GOP [and no bones about it they're done with the big elections]. I dunno where socons and fiscons should go. Follow your conscience.
Posted by: uterus cannon at December 06, 2012 10:27 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Ed Mahmoud, minor internet royalty at December 06, 2012 10:29 AM (NVdGX)
Make him lead. Stop pretending our opposition means anything and just openly announce we're voting 100% party line in favor of whatever the President wants. He can't blame us very effectively if we support him more uniformly than his own party. Stop playing our designated powerless scapegoat role in his kabuki theatre and make him take the lead.
And when it all crashes the Democrats disown the president, blame the Republicans and go on to win big in 2016. Inevitable whichever way you turn.
Posted by: Decaf at December 06, 2012 10:29 AM (TnBUi)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 06, 2012 10:30 AM (UjSt7)
The United States Government has become a fucking joke. These bastards are only interested in their own power and wealth and give a flying fuck about you or your life.
They haven't attacked Reid because THEY DON'T CARE. He broke the LAW by campaigning for Obama on the Senate floor and NOTHING HAPPENED. Voter fraud. Lies. Deception.
They don't care. It stopped being about the citizens of this once great country a LONG time ago and it's going to take a full on revolution to take it back. Vote EM ALL OUT.
Miss me yet?
Posted by: Preston Brooks at December 06, 2012 10:30 AM (zF6Iw)
Why aren't there ads running in every state with a Senate race in 2014 painting Reid as a creepy, vile human being who couldn't pass a budget when he had a filibuster-proof supermajority and tying the Dem Senate candidates in those states to him?
With Democrats in a permanent campaign you would think RNC would get a clue. To Dems politics is their whole life, to Repubs it's not even a part-time job. That has to change.
Posted by: Decaf at December 06, 2012 10:34 AM (TnBUi)
Posted by: rickl at December 06, 2012 10:35 AM (zoehZ)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at December 06, 2012 10:36 AM (piMMO)
After Jan 1, if all is lost, I'm going to spend all my money on whiskey and gambling, go on welfare, and stop caring.
Posted by: PJ at December 06, 2012 10:39 AM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: Iblis at December 06, 2012 10:42 AM (9221z)
Let it burn and we'll rebuild from the ashes in 2016, at least a Democrat and progressive policies will be toxic for at least a decade or so after this depression.
Posted by: Cashin at December 06, 2012 02:20 PM (TYEu4)
Rebuild from the ashes how? And why will progressive policies be toxic? The bad guys control the media.
So enough with 'Let it burn', please. Everything that follows the burning part sounds to me like the pitch for a happy, hopeful post-apocalyptic musical doomed for straight-to-video distribution. Me, I say fight these guys. Fight them, forestall them, balk them, hinder their efforts, call them out for what they are. Letting the bad guys win so the audience can see how bad they are is not a winning strategy.
Posted by: troyriser at December 06, 2012 10:44 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: 80sBaby at December 06, 2012 10:44 AM (YjDyJ)
Bunch of crybaby whiners.
Posted by: Adjoran at December 06, 2012 10:46 AM (ZHQvg)
Posted by: Ed Mahmoud, minor internet royalty at December 06, 2012 02:29 PM (NVdGX)
What is up with the governor of the state? He was purportedly a Tea Party guy, no? If so he's the biggest fucking disappointment since Scottie Centerfold. He was the guy who caved on George Zimmerman and let shit for brain Angela Corey prosecute it like a crazed harpie on meth. Has he done anything intelligent?
Posted by: Captain Hate (more dagny and less curious) at December 06, 2012 10:50 AM (l9Kos)
Posted by: 80sBaby at December 06, 2012 10:57 AM (YjDyJ)
Please consider a position more suited to your talent and experience, sweeping barroom floors in Cincinnati.
Best regards.
Posted by: ToursLepantoVienna at December 06, 2012 11:19 AM (6NIyO)
@31: "Never did understand what people saw in Boner, guy just oozes Washington used car salesman sleaze."
And scotch.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at December 06, 2012 11:24 AM (FsqHK)
Is it possible Boehner is simply reading the writing on the wall?
He can see that his options are 'Cliff' or 'Taxmageddeon'. In an effort to avoid shouldering the responsibility for either of those shitass options, maybe he's simply putting the people in place who will bow to the Dems; let their measures pass, and then the Dems own the entire flaming pile of shit.
He's washing his hands. Let it burn.
Posted by: shank at December 06, 2012 11:34 AM (+H1yK)
I used to be a Palinista, but now her PAC raises $800,000 in a quarter and spends $750,000 of that on office expenses and fund raising. She gave $55,000 to candidates one quarter, and only contributed to Romney a day or two before the election. Really, her operation has like 93% overhead. If you want the money to get to your candidates, give directly.
Posted by: Agnes Day at December 06, 2012 01:09 PM (D1eJg)
No, they're just mind-bogglingly stupid.
Posted by: Agnes Day at December 06, 2012 01:40 PM (D1eJg)
The center is so far left of where it used to be that in practical terms we're all Leftists now.
LiB
Posted by: Agnes Day at December 06, 2012 02:34 PM (D1eJg)
Posted by: troyriser at December 06, 2012 02:44 PM (vtiE6)
So we're supposed to call these people out for what they are? How? You just said yourself that the Lib's (not to be confused with the LiB [let it burn] community) control the media. You're right about the media, we can't forget that you and I are playing for the same team here.
But it's going to be very difficult to explain how Republicans are at fault for the policies that Dear Leader was pushing for himself, especially after the media is going to be declaring Obama the "great uniter" and proclaim his bi-partisan powers to bring a deal together that has saved the nation, from certain disaster no less. You, I, Ace, and every commenter here knows we're going to be hearing about that for weeks from the Media as trolls show up to take part in some more schadenfreude.
But then Unemployment jumps up, the next Quarter shows a rapid decline in GDP, and the following shows a contraction.
I'm living in a post-election world now, we tried all of the last election cycle to convince voters that Obama was terrible with reason and logic, they responded as children do, now it's time for them to take their medicine. Because the only way we return to the a senate majority, let alone the white house, is by making a big fucking picture of what liberal and progressive policies do. There's simply no better picture than a full blown depression.
Or, we can follow your plan, stand against him and be viciously blamed for it, Obama gets his tax increases anyway, gets to blame Republicans for a huge increase on middle class tax cuts as well as the recession that's coming, we're forever labeled as the party of the rich who destroys the middle class, and then lose huge in 2014.
But hey, at least we stood by our principles.
Let it burn. It's time to stop treating the electorate like adults, and treat them like the children they are.
Posted by: Cashin at December 06, 2012 03:00 PM (TYEu4)
Posted by: Romney Defeats Obama at December 06, 2012 06:10 PM (KdyqO)
Is it more delicious than troll tears? I hope so, cuz that's all you're getting these days.
oh, and go fuck your communal horse cum loving selves.
Posted by: Romney Defeats Obama at December 06, 2012 06:11 PM (KdyqO)
Posted by: Romney Defeats Obama at December 06, 2012 10:11 PM (KdyqO)
What's the matter ergi?
Got stood up again at the public bathroom?
Posted by: Ergi's a dumbfuck at December 06, 2012 06:46 PM (mETGQ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3076 seconds, 415 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Vic at December 06, 2012 09:23 AM (YdQQY)