October 20, 2012
— CAC Long meandering thought from me:
First North Carolina, now Florida. While I've been saying they've been gone for a while, the eighth straight poll giving Romney a lead makes it pretty irrefutable. The President will not publicly concede it, because it would look terrible. But Romney is enjoying a close but consistent lead now.
The next two most Romney-loving states, Virginia and Colorado, may start dropping in line soon. Rasmussen gave us another R+ poll in the Old Dominion, and PPP could only get O+1 in their most recent paid poll released Wednesday. Not to mention the Kimball Poll and Gravis release earlier in the week. (Sorry this post is train-of-thought).
Ohio of course is the big beast. Until pollsters start showing a more realistic D/R/I, we will keep getting results like the new Fox poll giving Obama a 46-43 lead while bleeding independents to Romney by twenty-four points which of course totally jives totally. Romney has quietly picked off other states and closed the gap in a plethora of light-blue ones in the two weeks since the first debate, now rising to 261 electoral votes on RCP's latest chart- 9 short of beating the President (gaining the aforementioned Virginia and New Hampshire today).
Wisconsin and Ohio are trading places with smaller margins for the President back and forth. If it remains a tight race it would not shock me to see both go to the winner with a margin of a half-point or less between them.
I need to repeat something I've said in posts, in the comments, and on twitter: this is not about Romney hitting 270- it is about Obama keeping 270. In the polling averages, he is. In my projection, he isn't. But the difference between RCP and AOSHQDD is now just 18 EVs (Ohio). The President has lost North Carolina, Indiana, Nebraska's 2nd, Florida, and is watching Virginia slip away, Colorado by a slight margin as well, and now New Hampshire. His "firewall" states are now reduced to Nevada, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Ohio- states he still leads in on averages, but wherein Romney has made serious gains. A collapse in the first two, he is an ex-President. Wisconsin? One-termer. Ohio? Hello, President Romney. There are a lot of fires the President must continuously put out now. Some, he's stayed on top of...while he was still making Romney fight for Florida, Virginia, North Carolina and the weak two (CO/NH). Now that the race is going to shift into these new battlegrounds, there is little room for error for the President. If he starts to slip in any of the following routes: Wisconsin Ohio Nevada-Iowa Michigan, he is done. The map has shrunk for him and now things get interesting. Now is the time for boldness, and looks like Romney-Ryan is starting that up, upping ad buys in Boston (targeting New Hampshire perhaps to keep it as a weak pickup/strengthin Romney's new margin there), Michigan, and sending Ryan to Western Pennsylvania.
There could still be a 'game changer' at this point back into the President's favor, but the debates don't look like it, as PPP and even Marist's whack polling have shown no bounce for him (and in the case of Rasmussen's report about tomorrow, a negative one). What I stressed with Drew in that shoddy podcast was this: look at all the polls, look for the trends, check the crosstabs. All three are leaning Romney, it is up to us to keep them going that way.
Update:

Posted by: CAC at
11:21 AM
| Comments (533)
Post contains 607 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Jimmy Buffet at October 19, 2012 02:55 PM (OiC7K)
Posted by: Interested Party at October 19, 2012 02:55 PM (RE+1w)
Posted by: Lindsay Lohan at October 19, 2012 02:55 PM (0Gygk)
Posted by: t-bird at October 19, 2012 02:56 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Whoever this is, it's definitely not Michael at October 19, 2012 02:57 PM (JVCVF)
Posted by: huerfano at October 19, 2012 02:58 PM (bAGA/)
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 19, 2012 02:58 PM (zrpqj)
Posted by: rockmom at October 19, 2012 02:58 PM (qe2/V)
Posted by: dogfish at October 19, 2012 02:58 PM (N2yhW)
Posted by: Dr Spank at October 19, 2012 02:59 PM (0muQ0)
Maybe we get lucky, and Obama confuses Vince Lombardi with Jerry Sandusky, and accuses Green Bay of being a town full of pedophiles.
Posted by: wooga at October 19, 2012 03:00 PM (vjyZP)
Do not think for one second this is in the bag for Romney.
Why not? MASSIVE VOTE FRAUD.
I am a tiny red dot in a deep blue city in a deep blue county in a deep blue state.
Last week, the postal carrier came round with the cards confirming our voter registration. He said, "Man! These things are driving us nuts. You know that there are a lot of houses round here that get like six of them?"
Wait a consarn minute here.
I know this neighborhood well. I've doorwalked it during local political campaigns. The average number of adult registered voters here is not above 1.7,or I'll eat my hat. It may have ticked up slightly from that level due to college-grad kids moving back in with Mom and Dad due to the Obamaconomy.
But six registered voters per address would be highly anomalous round here even at one address. When there are "a lot" of such households? You don't have to have a keen nose to smell a rat.
Multiply this by tens of millions all across America. Get worried. And GOTV. Call, volunteer, drive, do whatever you can.
This obviously isn't a swing state. I will be going to a swing state myself on behalf of R-R as soon as it's clear where I will help make the biggest dent in Barky's chances.
Posted by: torquewrench at October 19, 2012 03:00 PM (ymG7s)
Posted by: Dianne Feinstein at October 19, 2012 03:01 PM (O6q63)
Posted by: Whoever this is, it's definitely not Michael at October 19, 2012 03:01 PM (JVCVF)
Posted by: Some Guy in Wisconsin at October 19, 2012 03:01 PM (Uq5Hs)
"How's Allen West doing? ....Anyone know?"
Saw poll somewhere. I think it was up 52-43ish. Praying that's right. He's my favorite politician.
Posted by: Beagle at October 19, 2012 03:02 PM (sOtz/)
viewing FOX they just said their latest poll has Romney +3 in Florida, and now only down 3 in Ohio - where he is gaining with women and independents
Posted by: This Administration Lies at October 19, 2012 03:03 PM (0upWk)
Posted by: Beagle at October 19, 2012 07:02 PM (sOtz/)
It was a headline at Hot Air earlier, I didn't read the story though so I don't know any of the details.
Posted by: Adam at October 19, 2012 03:03 PM (/YJYi)
I dunno. CAC's post is like, about something. Ace's was about somebody named Tom Hanks.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at October 19, 2012 03:04 PM (4+LTj)
Of course you do!
2008 turnout - Romney +2.38%
2010 turnout - Romney +8.01%
2004 turnout - Romney +10.92%
D+3 turnout - Romney +5.45%
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 19, 2012 03:04 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 19, 2012 03:05 PM (zrpqj)
Over the last few days here in NE PA, the number of R/R yard signs have exploded. They're everywhere....20 to 1 against O/B signs, (based on a driving around, and horribly unscientific count on my part this afternoon). Granted this is a red county anyway, but there was nothing like this when McShitsandwich was running.
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at October 19, 2012 03:05 PM (L7hol)
Posted by: What do you do all day if you don't watch tv, anne? at October 19, 2012 03:05 PM (oZfic)
Posted by: Whoever this is, it's definitely not Michael at October 19, 2012 03:05 PM (JVCVF)
One drawback for Romney is that there are basically 3 union proposals on the ballot, so you can bet unions are going to be push push pushing their members to the polls.
Posted by: longerthoughts at October 19, 2012 03:06 PM (CVVLU)
Posted by: Shep Smith and the other lefties on FNC at October 19, 2012 03:06 PM (hO9ad)
Two things I want when we win:
1. Repeal the Obamacare abomination
2. Shred that regulation on dishwasher soap that makes my glasses look like shit out of the dishwasher. That shit's gotta stop.
Do that and I'm happy.
Posted by: AnabolicState at October 19, 2012 03:06 PM (nGsOy)
Thanks for the update, SomeGuy and Beagle.
Been worried about Allen West...since they did that 'redistricting' that added a shit ton of Dem-voters to his district.
And yeah, he's great isn't he.
I would hate to lose him in the House.
Posted by: wheatie at October 19, 2012 03:06 PM (ipkPX)
Posted by: Meremortal!! at October 19, 2012 03:06 PM (1Y+hH)
If Romney is up 3, 4, 5 points nationally, he's taking Ohio.
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at October 19, 2012 03:06 PM (T+yaH)
Posted by: Whoever this is, it's definitely not Michael at October 19, 2012 03:06 PM (JVCVF)
# 26:
I dunno. CAC's post is like, about something. Ace's was about somebody named Tom Hanks.
That name's familiar. Didn't some guy named Forest Gump play him in a movie a few years back?
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at October 19, 2012 03:07 PM (L7hol)
Posted by: sliderblaze at October 19, 2012 03:07 PM (b1ead)
Posted by: Jim in Virginia at October 19, 2012 03:07 PM (5pMyq)
Posted by: FeneloonSpoke at October 19, 2012 03:08 PM (u1lkY)
# 35:
Pick up some TSP from your local hardware store....add about a tablespoon or two to each dishwasher load, (adjusting as needed). Works great in your clothes washer two.
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at October 19, 2012 03:09 PM (L7hol)
Posted by: What do you do all day if you don't watch tv, anne? at October 19, 2012 03:10 PM (oZfic)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 19, 2012 03:10 PM (j1gX1)
Do that and I'm happy.
Posted by: AnabolicState at October 19, 2012 07:06 PM (nGsOy)
And light bulbs - I want my light bulbs back.
Posted by: someone at October 19, 2012 03:10 PM (bqjJT)
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 19, 2012 03:11 PM (ovpNn)
Yeah, my big worry is not so much an Oct. surprise, but some big anti-Romney story released the day before, or day off, the election. Because you do it then - it doesn't even matter if it's true as long as people believe it. Romney can prove it a complete fabrication on Nov. 7 and that's one day too late.
Vote fraud also worries me. Basically, I think we'd win a fair election, and hope we get one.
Posted by: longerthoughts at October 19, 2012 03:11 PM (CVVLU)
Posted by: Palm Beach Pooter Hound at October 19, 2012 03:11 PM (ufLRj)
Wait, what? You don't just troll us?
You're like, a troll for trolling's sake?
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at October 19, 2012 03:11 PM (4+LTj)
Posted by: buzzion at October 19, 2012 03:11 PM (eff0F)
Four dead in O-HI-O..
la da da da dadah...
*plays a little air guitar*
Oh wait, that was Libya... hardy har har
Posted by: Joey Nuk Nyuks Biden at October 19, 2012 03:12 PM (wAQA5)
Posted by: teej says go K-State at October 19, 2012 03:12 PM (RYVE/)
# 43:
I'm still waiting for some devastating October surprise from Team Obama-the SOBs
Gloria Allred apparently has something simmering on the back burner. She's saving it to drop on R/R at the last possible moment which will give it legs, and affect the vote, but not enough time for R/R to debunk it. So...her usual tricks.
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at October 19, 2012 03:12 PM (L7hol)
Pick up some TSP from your local hardware store....add about a tablespoon or two to each dishwasher load, (adjusting as needed). Works great in your clothes washer two.
And "TSP" is Trisodium Phosphate.
Posted by: Al at October 19, 2012 03:12 PM (MzQOZ)
You heard that the one that was supposed to show up on the 'net turned out to be a Rick Roll, right?
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at October 19, 2012 03:12 PM (4+LTj)
Posted by: MidGeorgian at October 19, 2012 03:12 PM (qBGUl)
Posted by: Jim in Virginia at October 19, 2012 07:07 PM (5pMyq)
I was just thinking they might not be willing to carry his water much longer due to the absolutely unorganized MCF the Libya scandal is turning out to be. Nobody in the adminstration is telling the same story. State says one thing, White House another. It's just one contradiction after another. The MFM can't defend the indefensible. They try for a while because they love him so. But even love has its limits.
Posted by: Beagle at October 19, 2012 03:13 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Hello, it's me Donna at October 19, 2012 03:13 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 19, 2012 03:13 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: RomneylosesOhio at October 19, 2012 03:13 PM (l5Jl8)
#44 No shizzle, eh? TSP works teh awesome! Thanks for the tip -- I'm on it.
Posted by: AnabolicState at October 19, 2012 03:13 PM (nGsOy)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at October 19, 2012 03:13 PM (j1gX1)
Posted by: FeneloonSpoke at October 19, 2012 03:15 PM (u1lkY)
"Homeland angers minister over depiction of Beirut"
"A Lebanese minister has threatened to sue the makers of hit US TV series Homeland for misrepresenting Beirut in a recent episode of the show."
...
"This kind of film damages the image of Lebanon - it is not fair to us and it is not true," he told Beirut's Executive magazine.
"We want to take action, we want to write to the filmmakers and producers and demand an apology. And we are planning to raise a lawsuit against the director and the producer."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-20002148
Posted by: wooga at October 19, 2012 03:15 PM (vjyZP)
Posted by: Barack Obama at October 19, 2012 03:15 PM (vWNz8)
You are really going to tie your reputation on that Fox poll?
Oh right, you have no reputation. My bad.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 19, 2012 03:15 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: drawandstrike at October 19, 2012 03:16 PM (uVLJc)
Posted by: andycanuck at October 19, 2012 03:16 PM (vDl/w)
27..Great Post Dave with your breakdown of the last elections in OH and how they play out in 2012 numbers!!....I agree this is mind numbing....and Fox protects itself with that 11 point undecided margin...which is BS!! They know they have a skewed sample....that is what I said earlier....if you have a Plus 3 Dem Romney would still win...if you have 2008 Sample....Romney would win...Fox is deliberately manipulating the poll. First there is no Dem Plus 8 and there is no 11 percent undecided and you will NEVER win OH when you are losing independents by 24 points....it is absurd!
That 11 percent leaves FOX the BS ground to say they broked for Romney...which in theory would by 8 or 9 for Romney and 2 to 3 for Obama....Either way he loses. But when you publish a Poll that POLLSTERS should be required to immediately and publicly announce their sample! And them explain....it would eliminate alot of this bias BS!!
If you were Obama and saw you are losing INDEPENDENTS by 24 points with a PLUS 8 DEM sample you know you would be in trouble!
I will bet anyone cash that on election day OH will not even come close to a Plus 8 Dem Sample....
OH will easily go red!
Posted by: bluerose75 at October 19, 2012 03:16 PM (HDcKc)
Posted by: Waterhouse at October 19, 2012 03:16 PM (DHcG+)
In which case, Romney leads by 5 in the Fox Ohio poll.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 19, 2012 03:17 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, what did huma abedin know at October 19, 2012 03:17 PM (j1z2L)
Posted by: Soona at October 19, 2012 03:18 PM (3zJEz)
Posted by: Dept. of Accuracy Dept. at October 19, 2012 03:18 PM (BAnPT)
Posted by: bluerose75 at October 19, 2012 03:18 PM (HDcKc)
Posted by: GnuBreed at October 19, 2012 03:18 PM (ccXZP)
I never much cared for women, I just find tits boring and that thing between their legs is kinda gross.
And no cock, means no fun.
It's nice playing on the other team..... *sigh*
Posted by: RomneylosesParis at October 19, 2012 03:19 PM (/YJYi)
Posted by: What do you do all day if you don't watch tv, anne? at October 19, 2012 03:19 PM (oZfic)
Posted by: Trimegistus at October 19, 2012 03:19 PM (yWIC7)
That's because he's not a politician. He is a statesman who loves his country. And oh by the way, a truly intelligent man.
Not like....
Posted by: teej says go K-State at October 19, 2012 07:12 PM (RYVE/)
True. I felt a little guilty calling him that. But he is running for office, so...
I recently saw the statement which ended with the quote about the "avenging eagle" or whatever. The entire statement is brilliant and the bit at the end is intended to show the type of people we are dealing with and what works when you are trying to deal with them. But of course the media just lopped off the first eight, or whatever, paragraphs to try to make him sound unhinged.
I liked it even without the arguments at the beginning. I figured he was just speaking their language, and he was.
Posted by: Beagle at October 19, 2012 03:19 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at October 19, 2012 03:19 PM (lddO4)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 19, 2012 03:19 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, what did huma abedin know at October 19, 2012 03:19 PM (j1z2L)
Posted by: RomneylosesOhio at October 19, 2012 07:13 PM (l5Jl
The usual Gerg has a "Kk" in his hash. This is somehow different. I'm sure the autofellatio is the same.
Posted by: Beagle at October 19, 2012 03:21 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, what did huma abedin know at October 19, 2012 03:21 PM (j1z2L)
Romney will get 320+ and Obama about 220 or so.
Even when the dems spring their Oct suprise (looks like it will be an agreement with Iran to stop nuclear producdtion ) it wont help.
What is more important IMO after the election is the UN small arms treaty.
They will vote on it right after the election and it will pass (only needs 6o nations to do so). Obama will sign it. Reid will not let the Senate convene to vote on it. If a President signs a treaty and the Senate doesnt reject it within 30 days it becomes binding per international agreements. They may go for the global warming and or antipoverty treaty as well.
Once Romney is elected and in office he will have to fix this mess.
Posted by: retired military at October 19, 2012 03:21 PM (UbevC)
Posted by: BHO at October 19, 2012 03:22 PM (z6gbu)
Posted by: drawandstrike at October 19, 2012 03:22 PM (uVLJc)
Posted by: Barack Obama at October 19, 2012 03:22 PM (vWNz8)
Posted by: Karusky at October 19, 2012 03:23 PM (dO4L7)
I just heard that if Obama wins reelection, they're going to go ahead with Larry Crowne 2: The Golden Years.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at October 19, 2012 03:23 PM (BuSM8)
Posted by: buzzion at October 19, 2012 03:23 PM (eff0F)
Posted by: Barack Obama at October 19, 2012 03:24 PM (vWNz8)
78..what point? This is decline from his last lead from FOX...he is losing Independents by 24 and he is up three with a plus 8 Dem sample...exactly what point do the trolls have? Would you feel comfortable if this was Romney down 24 with Independents and the poll slanted ridiculously Republican...I sure as heck would not!! The top line is like the Debate....CBS has 37/30 Obama won....but on the INTERNALS....Romney best Obama on the Economy 65/34....same here....the poll shows an Obama lead of three (down from last month) but internally HE IS DOWN WITH WOMEN, LOSING INDEPENDENTS and he is only ahead because FOX interviewed 8 percent more Dems...and that is not a realistic breakdown in anyone's TRUE KNOWLEDGE....and you think that is a point for trolls?
I understand that they hang on the top number but it is a falling numbers with eggshells everywhere!
Posted by: bluerose75 at October 19, 2012 03:25 PM (HDcKc)
How would you know?
btw: 'Internet troll' is hardly a winning strategy to lead with on your resume.
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at October 19, 2012 03:25 PM (feFL6)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at October 19, 2012 03:27 PM (lddO4)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at October 19, 2012 03:28 PM (R8hU8)
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at October 19, 2012 03:28 PM (d6TfZ)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at October 19, 2012 03:29 PM (lddO4)
Posted by: New York Times at October 19, 2012 03:29 PM (AREf/)
Posted by: Redd at October 19, 2012 03:29 PM (RoEtU)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 19, 2012 03:30 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at October 19, 2012 03:30 PM (lddO4)
Posted by: bluerose75 at October 19, 2012 03:30 PM (HDcKc)
They will vote on it right after the election and it will pass (only needs 6o nations to do so). Obama will sign it. Reid will not let the Senate convene to vote on it. If a President signs a treaty and the Senate doesnt reject it within 30 days it becomes binding per international agreements. They maygo for the global warming and or antipoverty treaty as well.
Say we break that treaty; get the fattest Republican we can dig out of the South and get him to wipe his butt on it (symbolically).
What's the UN going to do - declare war on us, the "rogue nation"?
Like hell.
Posted by: boulder hobo at October 19, 2012 03:31 PM (QTHTd)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at October 19, 2012 03:31 PM (GEICT)
Posted by: Dante at October 19, 2012 03:31 PM (NWLVJ)
Posted by: Hello, it's me Donna at October 19, 2012 03:31 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: teej says go K-State at October 19, 2012 03:31 PM (ma+gB)
Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at October 19, 2012 03:31 PM (XvrTA)
Posted by: boulder hobo at October 19, 2012 03:31 PM (QTHTd)
Posted by: Jimmy Buffet at October 19, 2012 06:55 PM (OiC7K)
If it's anything like the song you did for Eric Cartman (link in sig), awesome!
Posted by: wooga at October 19, 2012 03:32 PM (vjyZP)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at October 19, 2012 03:32 PM (lddO4)
Not mathematically possible.
See here? It says so right here in this binder!
*waves binder around*
Hey you, lady, yeah you the fat one. Will you come up here and wear this binder for the audience?
Aw, we love ya, lady. Hardy har har
Posted by: Joey Nuk Nyuks Biden at October 19, 2012 03:32 PM (wAQA5)
Meme generators / photoshoppers, get on it!
Posted by: boulder hobo at October 19, 2012 03:33 PM (QTHTd)
Nine months from now, "Romnesia" is gonna be the #1 name for newborn girls in da 'hood.
Posted by: MrScribbler, banned at TepidAir at October 19, 2012 03:35 PM (ZgX/g)
The UN can't force much of anyone (Iraq, Syria, take your pick among others) to do much of anything. We'd do well to remind it we're bigger than them.
Posted by: Methos at October 19, 2012 03:35 PM (hO9ad)
First thing I want from the future Romney Cabal is free beer. And if anyone complains.... ITS MY BODY!
Posted by: Up, up with people at October 19, 2012 03:35 PM (kzFo5)
Posted by: Evilpens at October 19, 2012 03:35 PM (ck76k)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 19, 2012 03:39 PM (+tqYo)
Posted by: Barack Obama at October 19, 2012 03:40 PM (vWNz8)
Posted by: osu at October 19, 2012 03:40 PM (G4dDt)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 19, 2012 03:41 PM (+tqYo)
Posted by: teej says go K-State at October 19, 2012 03:41 PM (cWpCn)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at October 19, 2012 03:43 PM (lddO4)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 19, 2012 03:43 PM (+tqYo)
Posted by: deusexmachina at October 19, 2012 03:43 PM (6RTwM)
Posted by: RWC at October 19, 2012 03:43 PM (t+Sdx)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 19, 2012 03:43 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at October 19, 2012 03:44 PM (lddO4)
Posted by: Dunce at October 19, 2012 03:45 PM (BVkEs)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at October 19, 2012 03:46 PM (GEICT)
Probably using one of those debunked state polls.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 19, 2012 03:46 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at October 19, 2012 03:47 PM (lddO4)
http://tinyurl.com/9sqg4w2
A judge Friday said yes to the very thing Treyvon Martin's family did not want: Defense attorneys rummaging through their son's school records and background, looking for damaging information.
Posted by: LC LaWedgie at October 19, 2012 03:47 PM (0It32)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at October 19, 2012 03:47 PM (pmsMR)
Posted by: tasker at October 19, 2012 03:48 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Jim in Virginia at October 19, 2012 03:48 PM (5pMyq)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 19, 2012 03:48 PM (kc2b9)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 19, 2012 03:48 PM (XvHmy)
Posted by: teej says go K-State at October 19, 2012 03:49 PM (GX2fm)
Posted by: SurferDoc at October 19, 2012 03:49 PM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: Bones at October 19, 2012 03:50 PM (IoNBC)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 19, 2012 03:50 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: tasker at October 19, 2012 03:51 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: rukiddingme? at October 19, 2012 03:51 PM (MbeEN)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at October 19, 2012 03:51 PM (lddO4)
I think I read about that on some blog
Posted by: Methos at October 19, 2012 03:51 PM (hO9ad)
From Moe Lane over at Redstate:
"Four years ago, Democrats made up about 42% of the early and absentee vote while Republicans made up 22% – a dismal 20-point deficit that contributed to Sen. John McCain’s defeat in Ohio.
Through Wednesday, however, the margin has narrowed: Democrats account for 36% of the early and absentee vote while Republicans make up for 29%."
There is no 20 percent this year DEM advantage in early voting....look again...it is 7 percent...the 20 percent was from 2008 and PPP/Marist tried to say on Sat or Sun about a 20 percent lead in early voting for Dems in OH...remember CAC destroyed that on Sat (the 13th).
However, it is only 7 percent so far this election...which is a drop of 13 percent for the Dems....we are up the Dems are down!
Posted by: bluerose75 at October 19, 2012 03:51 PM (HDcKc)
2. Shred thatregulation on dishwasher soap that makes my glasses look like shit out of the dishwasher.That shit's gotta stop.
Do that and I'm happy.
Short of adding a tsp of TSP (trisodium phosphate) to your dishwasher detergent, you can buy the orig. formula of dishwasher deterg from restaurant-supply businesses. For some reason, it's okay if restaurants don't want greasy glasses and such, but the rest of us proles will have to make do or find other ways. If you opt to go the TSP route, it's in boxes around the deck-cleaning supplies at Home Depot or Lowe's.
Posted by: RushBabe, Kratos Liberation Front at October 19, 2012 03:51 PM (tQHzJ)
Posted by: Jean at October 19, 2012 03:51 PM (ytax8)
That's the worst case scenario. Best case is that it's 2% paint-huffers, mid-40s for Barky and a low-50s romp for Romney.
Posted by: boulder hobo at October 19, 2012 03:52 PM (QTHTd)
Posted by: NWConservative at October 19, 2012 03:52 PM (vWNz8)
Posted by: Tuna at October 19, 2012 03:53 PM (M/TDA)
I'm still waiting for some devastating October surprise from Team Obama-the SOBs
Considering all the early voting going on, they should've done it by now. This leads me to conclude they don't have one.
Posted by: RushBabe, Kratos Liberation Front at October 19, 2012 03:54 PM (tQHzJ)
Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at October 19, 2012 03:54 PM (XvrTA)
Posted by: JT in KC at October 19, 2012 03:54 PM (7cxOe)
First, they fall short on big, risky things......but, then, they start fumbling stuff that had been dirt easy forever......then they can't manage a clean rebound from their latest misstep.....and, finally, as the walls cave in, there's nothing but clusterfuck as far as the eye can see.
I'm starting to get that sort of feeling about the Obama campaign. They lose a state here, they lose a state there.....and the next thing they know, they can't even go on the Daily Show for a tongue bath without coming across as unfeeling sociopaths.
Wish I could find that article again....
Posted by: cthulhu at October 19, 2012 03:54 PM (kaalw)
PPP Poll at WeaselZippers has him up 9 over the Dem.
If that poll is in any shape accurate, not a GD fucking chance he loses.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at October 19, 2012 03:55 PM (qrpxS)
Posted by: Jean at October 19, 2012 03:55 PM (ytax8)
Posted by: Jean at October 19, 2012 03:56 PM (ytax8)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet, Wonders what Dagny thinks at October 19, 2012 03:57 PM (kc2b9)
Posted by: FeneloonSpoke at October 19, 2012 03:57 PM (u1lkY)
Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at October 19, 2012 03:58 PM (XvrTA)
Posted by: boulder hobo at October 19, 2012 03:58 PM (QTHTd)
Posted by: NWConservative at October 19, 2012 04:01 PM (vWNz8)
Posted by: Tuna at October 19, 2012 04:02 PM (M/TDA)
Posted by: Tuna at October 19, 2012 04:04 PM (M/TDA)
Posted by: Jean at October 19, 2012 04:08 PM (u5ozF)
Shepard Smith: http://tinyurl.com/9zjvlf4
Ray Wise: http://tinyurl.com/9vra2jj
Posted by: Slappy at October 19, 2012 04:10 PM (LTbLf)
Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at October 19, 2012 04:10 PM (XvrTA)
162....Ras has Obama up one in Ohio but with those sure to vote Romney is up...
As for Wisconsin and Oh...real simple....in Wisconsin they are not skewing the polls as far to the Dems because everyone wants to focus on OH...henceforth why the effort to skew samples Plus 8 Dem. Notice OH is one of the only states not one pollster has adjusted from 2008...why? Why would OH be the only state to keep the same 2008 turnout or even more DEMS? You have an Rep Gov who is getting more popular...outside of Cleveland, most of the rest of the state is GOP except pockets in Youngstown and Toledo. I find it amazing that no pollster polling OH has adjusted for the change in registration this year....all keep the DEM SAMPLE way too high...and that is why you see OH showing more Democratic....if that was the case the State House and Senate would have more Dems...neither does....both are Republican and so is the Governor....
The fact is OH only looks more DEM because the POLLSTERS have made it look more DEM....pure and simple....if these pollsters...any of them adjusted that sample from down Dem 8 OH would surely show in Romney's camp! But for the drama they keep it at 2008 level plus 1....think about that....IT IS THE STORY THEY WANT!
Look at it this way:
ARG....last week released their OH poll....48/47 for Romney but again with PLUS DEM 8 sample....but only 5 percent undecided!
Fox...today....released their OH poll....46/43 for Obama but again with PLUS DEM 8 Sample....but with 11 percent undecideds!
Okay lets use the normal formula....undecideds break 3/4 to 1 for Challenger...okay base that on 11 percent undecideds...which here would be 8 to 2 or 9 to 2 or 8 to 3...which would be 51/49 Romney.... or 52/48 Romney...remember that is with a Plus 8 Dem sample....
If you weight the ARG poll which has 6 percent less undecideds than Fox....that would be 4/2 or 5/1 to Romney....
Okay add ARG's breakdown of undecideds and give them back to Fox:
ARG....48/47
FOX...48/47 (with the reduction of undecideds to reflect same number in ARG Poll)
They would be identical...and BOTH use a Plus 8 Dem Sample!
That is how and why you see the difference....essentially Fox and ARG are the same...it is just that ARG most likely has leaners from the undecideds while Fox left them off....either way Romney would be up and that is with a Dem Plus 8 sample!
Posted by: bluerose75 at October 19, 2012 04:14 PM (HDcKc)
I wonder about that. We have October unemployment numbers being released on Nov 2nd.
It would be amazing if last months 873,000 jobs were sustained; that number was such an outlier, several standard deviations off any rational estimate of growth or what an economy growing at 1.5% could produce as Okun's Law indicates.
Unless there is a ridiculous amount of manipulation going on, if we're to assume it was just a statistical sampling outlier, the unemployment numbers should pop back up to around 8% and cover that anomaly.
Which would be very bad news for Obama, 6 days before we start voting.
Posted by: Uriah Heep at October 19, 2012 04:14 PM (jhI6f)
Posted by: FeneloonSpoke at October 19, 2012 04:17 PM (u1lkY)
Posted by: FeneloonSpoke at October 19, 2012 04:18 PM (u1lkY)
That's nonsense, and I blame Dick Morris for people believing this stupidity. No amount of international agreements can override the US Constitution, period. Per 'international agreement' (i.e. the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties) a signature without a ratification represents an agreement to not work against the goal of the treaty; that's it. And any future president who wants to work against it can "unsign it," like Bush did with that Kyoto Protocol abortion.
Posted by: dawnfire at October 19, 2012 04:18 PM (eEeH7)
Posted by: Methos at October 19, 2012 04:19 PM (hO9ad)
Posted by: FeneloonSpoke at October 19, 2012 04:21 PM (u1lkY)
Now the closest Paul Ryan will be from here is more than 100 miles away. I know they pulled their resources out of PA but they should chip in a little bit. It'd be a big surprise-a PA gone red.
Posted by: expatinpa at October 19, 2012 04:24 PM (uW+NQ)
Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 19, 2012 04:27 PM (aHR5E)
First of all, we are expecting it, so it won't be a surprise.
I myself expecting a manufactured sex or abortion scandal. Pffft. It will be a lie and everyone will know it.
Romney is the only one who gives us a modicum of hope for getting out of this financial and foreign policy disaster in which we are currently trapped.
After Big Bird, binders, and Romnesia, all you have to do is tell your friends that this is the last desperate gasp of a loser.
Posted by: Miss Marple at October 19, 2012 04:28 PM (GoIUi)
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at October 19, 2012 04:28 PM (WCzJ6)
Posted by: natasha at October 19, 2012 04:31 PM (pyYXJ)
Posted by: stillers at October 19, 2012 04:31 PM (15w2J)
Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 19, 2012 04:32 PM (aHR5E)
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 19, 2012 04:32 PM (ovpNn)
Posted by: JewishOdysseus at October 19, 2012 04:35 PM (WCzJ6)
Posted by: Mr Wonderful at October 19, 2012 04:41 PM (6/bOE)
Posted by: What do you do all day if you don't watch tv, anne? at October 19, 2012 04:41 PM (oZfic)
Look the game is simple.
We can assume that in general these polls are reliable in how they sample -- so, they make randomized phone calls and within a reasonable tolerance they don't have too much intrinsic bias to the questions and ordering, etc.
This is good, it means that polls in general can provide us with information about the actual voter landscape, it's just covered in noise that we need to filter out.
1) We filter out stochastic (random) noise by averaging. So that's simple.
2) We're left with data that is biased toward that firm's partisan/party breakdown.
Dave in Florida is doing tremendous work in unwinding each poll, reweighting it to the historical partisan/party turn-out percentages and then averaging them.
This preserves the information embedded in each poll - which way it's moving, the relative levels of the candidates, etc - while compensating for the fact that these firms are still thinking it's 2008. A totally ridiculous proposition when you realize Obama's D+7 turnout advantage was predicated on a Republican -5% from 2004 -- that isn't happening again.
Just follow his numbers, the D+3 one is money.
Posted by: Uriah Heep at October 19, 2012 04:42 PM (jhI6f)
Posted by: Mr Wonderful at October 19, 2012 04:45 PM (6/bOE)
Posted by: bluerose75 at October 19, 2012 04:47 PM (HDcKc)
Posted by: JT in KC at October 19, 2012 04:56 PM (7cxOe)
Posted by: MT at October 19, 2012 05:02 PM (A6Bqs)
Posted by: JT in KC at October 19, 2012 05:04 PM (7cxOe)
Posted by: TheThinMan at October 19, 2012 05:10 PM (v2S39)
The polls top-line, headline numbers are, at this time, primarily a function of who that polling firm or news organization paying them is predicting will vote.
So, when you run a poll you call a thousand people, 100 pick up and those 100 are biased toward picking-up by the very fact they did -- they have characteristics which correlate to certain voting habits. More democrats, who resent their families, respond on weekends when republicans are out with theirs. More women pick-up during the day, the old are more likely to stay on the line, etc. So, you need to adjust these numbers so they fit the population average.
For a reason that escapes me, most polling firms are using a demographic and partisan turn out model that approximates 2008 or is more favorable to Obama in some cases.
This produces the topline numbers they send to print.
But what the campaigns and us crazies look at are the internals.
If you're a campaign you have had voter contact so you know where they're leaning, total registration numbers, even down to an individual's religious, shopping and internet browsing habits. Several hundred bytes of unique information per voter. They can then correlate these patterns into probabilities of voting, which can then be mapped to registration and completion data. They have a good idea where they need to be based on predicted benchmarks and where the polling internals are telling them they are. This difference can be cost/benefited and they make a decision of what course of action to take.
For us, we have way less data. But, each poll* gives us a few pieces of information, namely what percentage of each demographic are voting for Obama or Romney. We can double check the media/pollster assumptions and if necessary reweigh it to make it more predictive.
This is what Dave's done and we're seeing a picture much different than the headline numbers on the polls. It also correlates with where the campaigns are spending their money and time.
* Gallup doesn't give the breakdown
Posted by: Uriah Heep at October 19, 2012 05:37 PM (jhI6f)
Gallup doesn't let us see their internals, but something to keep in mind is that their numbers are approximating those of what Dave found when he reweighed the outstanding polls using Rasmussen's monthly party affiliation polling showing a R+2.6 spread that's been sustained over several months. (http://tinyurl.com/9xupqlm)
This polling is the average of a month of asking people what party they're with, so ~30,000 people asked. I believe they've never been off more than a percent and a half since they started asking in 2004.
So, it's not like it's totally out of nowhere.... just nowhere the media would ever look.
Posted by: Uriah Heep at October 19, 2012 05:53 PM (jhI6f)
Posted by: HenryVlosesAgincourt at October 19, 2012 06:05 PM (0Q7gz)
Posted by: MrX at October 19, 2012 06:06 PM (PxmNZ)
Posted by: Spike at October 19, 2012 06:41 PM (UZDaa)
Posted by: DriveBy at October 19, 2012 06:44 PM (C9Vc8)
This had better be more than sweet nothings you are whispering in my ear!!!!!
I want this election for keeps!!!!!
Is Ohio in our side or not?
Is Ohio going to stick it to the rest of us?
Posted by: petunia at October 19, 2012 07:04 PM (DAcBA)
A resident from Daytona said that they were expecting 3,000 people. You will read in the news that "several thousand" showed up.
TSA informed us as we were leaving that 14,000 came, between the bandstand and the overflow crowd near the beach. They know as our tickets were bar coded with our names (which I have never seen before, and have attended GOP rallies in 2004 and 200
This was in Biker Week. There were a few bikers there, from their clothes. The crowd was excited and happy to be there and wait to see these two men.
Morons, be very proud of the people voting for Romney/Ryan. Many people there were veterans. Young kids, high school and junior high. Nice, nice and polite people.
Maybe 20-30 people were protesting on a balcony to the rear of the bandstand. As approximately 6000 left from the bandstand people just sang "Na, na, na, hey-hey-hey good-bye and waved to them." I am very glad I went, and it was a couple hours drive for us. People were there from all over the state and one family drove down from Georgia. This is how excited we are to get this done.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, unbanned, ready to get this done at October 19, 2012 09:11 PM (baL2B)
I would not be surprised if these protesters follow the campaign and are paid by SEIU. Again, they were not many and we made fun of them instead of flinging them into the Atlantic Ocean.
While they probably ruined it for some, who came to hear Romney/Ryan, they did not even cause a ripple in the crowd in the bandshell.
Another thing, other than bar codes and ID on the free tickets that I noticed was different from the rallies I attended in 2004 and 2008 (or maybe I just forgot): This rally started with prayer. Imagine the quiet of 14,000 people (as said by TSA agent at the end), with a lone Obama freak shouting his name through the prayer. He was ignored by the crowd. The scripture he quoted was one I have prayed every night for two weeks, and will continue:
If my people, which are called in my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, will heal their land.
II Chronicles 7:14
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, unbanned, ready to get this done at October 20, 2012 07:25 AM (baL2B)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at October 20, 2012 11:25 AM (CufTr)
Reverse Midas Touch.
Posted by: red sweater at October 20, 2012 11:25 AM (CUi62)
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2012 11:28 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: red sweater at October 20, 2012 11:28 AM (CUi62)
I of course will be happy to remind them. Repeatedly.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at October 20, 2012 11:28 AM (qrpxS)
Posted by: eman at October 20, 2012 11:30 AM (+XD7n)
(But pay for my contraception.)
Posted by: Sundra Flake at October 20, 2012 11:31 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: Barry S at October 20, 2012 11:31 AM (X4XFN)
Posted by: Dante at October 20, 2012 11:32 AM (NWLVJ)
Posted by: Hobo Cookbook Final Chapter. Desert. Gonna Get Ugly Folks at October 20, 2012 11:34 AM (k/Mc/)
Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 20, 2012 11:34 AM (aHR5E)
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2012 11:35 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: phoenixgirl, team dagny, ROMNEY/RYAN 2012 at October 20, 2012 11:36 AM (Ho2rs)
Posted by: eman at October 20, 2012 11:36 AM (+XD7n)
Posted by: Truman North at October 20, 2012 11:38 AM (2BAAO)
Posted by: Jay walking with Leno at October 20, 2012 11:38 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: someone at October 19, 2012 07:10 PM (bqjJT)
and toilets that flush like the Norway Maelstrom
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 20, 2012 11:38 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: teej says go K-State at October 20, 2012 11:38 AM (GX2fm)
Good for you. Congratulations.
At the same time it saddens me that people now have to live their lives on the edge like this. I remember a time when people would 'sign on the dotted line' and commit to spending the next 15, 20, maybe 25 years in the same place, either continuing employment with the same employer or moving on to a better position.
I hope Romney/Ryan is the beginning of the return to those days.
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at October 20, 2012 11:38 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: eman at October 20, 2012 11:38 AM (+XD7n)
Posted by: Truman North at October 20, 2012 11:39 AM (2BAAO)
Posted by: rickl at October 20, 2012 11:39 AM (sdi6R)
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, unbanned, ready to get this done at October 20, 2012 11:25 AM (baL2B)
Thanks for the report, Christy.
That's heartening to hear first hand reports like that.
Here in OK...we don't even get Romney Ads.
Which is okay, because it would be preaching to the choir...and that money is best spent elsewhere.
Posted by: wheatie at October 20, 2012 11:39 AM (ipkPX)
Posted by: Truman North at October 20, 2012 11:40 AM (2BAAO)
Posted by: eman at October 20, 2012 11:40 AM (+XD7n)
I hope they insert a laugh track over the footage when they play it on the news.
Oh, who am I kidding? We'll do that later when the clips get put up on youtube.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at October 20, 2012 11:41 AM (BuSM8)
I've posted a few cheerleader pics this morning, with zero reaction.
I don't think these guys like cheerleaders.
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 20, 2012 11:42 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: eman at October 20, 2012 11:42 AM (+XD7n)
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at October 20, 2012 11:42 AM (MmH0Z)
Posted by: Hobo Cookbook Final Chapter. Desert. Gonna Get Ugly Folks at October 20, 2012 11:43 AM (pUAXu)
Mitt Romney has successfully presented himself as a viable alternative in the debates, and by doing so has won it. People were just waiting for someone to replace Obama with. What's the Obama team going to do to change that? What can they possibly come up with that will make people say "well Obama sucks but this guy is worse?" I can't imagine.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 20, 2012 11:43 AM (r4wIV)
This CYA spying is not working out to well. So now Barry can say see, the video was the problem. The lies that keep showing up in DC are simply amazing.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 20, 2012 11:44 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at October 20, 2012 11:44 AM (BuSM8)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at October 20, 2012 11:44 AM (CufTr)
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 11:44 AM (kpCLl)
Posted by: ChampionCapua at October 20, 2012 11:44 AM (KZi9D)
But guys like Nate Silver ought to be laughed out of the business. 75%, what a jackass.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 20, 2012 11:45 AM (r4wIV)
Posted by: Truman North at October 20, 2012 11:46 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 11:46 AM (kpCLl)
Posted by: The Man from Athens at October 20, 2012 11:47 AM (RXQ2T)
http://tinyurl.com/9c3cko5
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 20, 2012 11:48 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Truman North at October 20, 2012 11:48 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Hobo Cookbook Final Chapter. Desert. Gonna Get Ugly Folks at October 20, 2012 11:48 AM (B2fm1)
Posted by: Barky O'Genius at October 20, 2012 11:49 AM (CufTr)
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at October 20, 2012 11:49 AM (YjDyJ)
(from glenn reynolds instapundit link)
http://tinyurl.com/d8kttms
Project Censored: The expanding police state tops the annual list of stories underreported by the mainstream media
...the furor sparked by ObamaÂ’s continuation of his predecessorÂ’s overreaching approach to national security, such as signing the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act, which allows the indefinite detention of those accused of supporting terrorism, even U.S. citizens.
And ultimately, it’s the public — not the president and not the corporations—that will determine the future. There may be hope after all.
Signs of an emerging police state
FBI agents responsible for terrorist plots: FBI Terrorism Task Force
Federal Reserve loaned trillions to major banks
Of 43,060 transnational companies, 147 control 40 percent of total global wealth. The connections between companies = “super entity" works.
NATO war crimes in Libya
H.R. 347 criminalizes protest
U.S. deaths from Fukushima
Prison Slavery in the US
By Yael Chanoff, Boulder Weekly
Posted by: panzernashorn at October 20, 2012 11:49 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: hannitys_hybrid at October 20, 2012 11:50 AM (MmH0Z)
Posted by: Truman North at October 20, 2012 11:50 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Truman North at October 20, 2012 11:54 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: TD, one of the proud 53% at October 20, 2012 11:54 AM (+uFux)
Posted by: too little too late at October 20, 2012 11:56 AM (BAnPT)
Posted by: eman at October 20, 2012 11:56 AM (+XD7n)
263 Have you guys seen that thing on Drudge about how the UN is going to be monitoring our election? Words fail me . . .
It's outrageous, Peaches.
[Link to Hill article, which Drudge links...in my sig, for those who want to see it.]
The UN will be..." looking for voter suppression activities by conservative groups".
And working with the NAACP, too!
So I guess they will be turning a blind eye to the Black Panthers with clubs.
Posted by: wheatie at October 20, 2012 11:57 AM (ipkPX)
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 11:58 AM (mY2VW)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 20, 2012 12:00 PM (r4wIV)
well, they're gonna miss all the dead voters in Reno, Chicago, Fargo, Minnesota, Buffalo, Toronto, Winslow, Sarasota, Wichita, Tulsa, Ottawa, Oklahoma, Tampa, Panama, Mattawa, La Paloma, Bangor, Baltimore, Salvador, Amarillo, Tocopilla, Barranquilla and Padilla.
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 20, 2012 12:02 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 20, 2012 04:00 PM (r4wIV)
----------------------------------------------
The dems, and most certainly the SCOAMT, has made the USA the laughing stock of the world. Mission accomplished, assholes.
(I hate these people with the heat of a million suns)
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 12:03 PM (mY2VW)
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 20, 2012 12:04 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 12:04 PM (kpCLl)
And Sioux City, Cedar City, Dodge City.
What a pity.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, Crankypants Extraordinaire at October 20, 2012 12:04 PM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 20, 2012 12:05 PM (8sCoq)
Hell, not even Florida is that f*cking stupid.
Posted by: Fritz at October 20, 2012 12:06 PM (vm7ot)
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 20, 2012 12:06 PM (8sCoq)
What is more important IMO after the election is the UN small arms treaty.
They will vote on it right after the election and it will pass (only needs 6o nations to do so). Obama will sign it. Reid will not let the Senate convene to vote on it. If a President signs a treaty and the Senate doesnt reject it within 30 days it becomes binding per international agreements. They maygo for the global warming and or antipoverty treaty as well.
Once Romney is elected and in office he will have to fix this mess.
Posted by: retired military at October 19, 2012 07:21 PM (UbevC)</blockquote>
Wait, what?
Treaties don't become law until they get a 2/3 vote in the Senate. President Obama can sign all the treaties he likes. The U.N. or some other international body can claim we're bound by it. The U.S. Constitution explicitly states otherwise.
Unless I'm missing something. Is there a Supreme Court case on point? Or an example of a treaty that's been enforced by the U.S. courts without Senate approval??
Posted by: Clint at October 20, 2012 12:08 PM (IJDTs)
Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 20, 2012 12:09 PM (aHR5E)
Posted by: Redd at October 20, 2012 12:09 PM (RoEtU)
doesnt reject it within 30 days it becomes binding per international
agreements.
I dont know where you got your copy of the Constitution but mine says the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and NO statute or treaty can supercede that
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 20, 2012 12:10 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Redd at October 20, 2012 12:11 PM (RoEtU)
Posted by: Redd at October 20, 2012 12:13 PM (RoEtU)
Posted by: Adam at October 20, 2012 12:13 PM (1//Wu)
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2012 12:13 PM (YdQQY)
that's gonna leave a mark here in Colorado, because there are many guys from Ft Carson who deployed to the Middle East and never came back
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 20, 2012 12:13 PM (8sCoq)
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living.... at October 20, 2012 12:13 PM (BF5Y9)
Posted by: Uncle Milty at October 20, 2012 12:14 PM (gvWL9)
And yes Olbermand, Hayes, Stephanopolis, Smith, Maher, et al made the list.
Our pleas, prayers and complaints have been heard and granted.
Posted by: Jcw46 at October 20, 2012 12:15 PM (Vh0f5)
290....Treaties don't become law until they get a 2/3 vote in the Senate.
Posted by: Clint at October 20, 2012 04:08 PM (IJDTs)
Correct.
I'm not aware of anything that has happened to change this.
But if Barky is reelected...he can do anything he wants, because Who will stop him?
Posted by: wheatie at October 20, 2012 12:15 PM (ipkPX)
Posted by: Redd at October 20, 2012 12:15 PM (RoEtU)
The Migratory Bird Case not withstanding a treaty can not supersede the Constitution
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2012 12:15 PM (YdQQY)
Posted by: JamesGOP at October 20, 2012 12:15 PM (4A5EK)
Posted by: Adam at October 20, 2012 04:13 PM (1//Wu)
They gave away half of Korea. Gave away the Suez Canal. Let the freedom fighters in Hungray (1954) die in the streets.
Oh, and started Israel, which has worked out real well for 64 years.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 20, 2012 12:15 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: ChampionCapua at October 20, 2012 12:15 PM (KZi9D)
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 12:16 PM (kpCLl)
f a President signs a treaty and the Senate
doesnt reject it within 30 days it becomes binding per international
agreements.
-------------------------------------------------
That duck don't fly here in the US. Thank God for the Constitution.
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 12:16 PM (mY2VW)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 12:16 PM (sZTYJ)
sure the constitution is all well and good until the massive blue helmet army shows up on our shores to enforce the treaty
Posted by: kj at October 20, 2012 12:17 PM (AW9md)
Posted by: Johnny C. at October 20, 2012 12:17 PM (RoEtU)
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 20, 2012 12:18 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 04:16 PM (mY2VW)
The constitution? One more liberal Supreme court justice is ALL that they need to ignore it.
Don't EVER forget that.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 20, 2012 12:18 PM (wR+pz)
Those women and young girls in Haiti, Sierra Leone, Bosnia, Cambodia , East Timor and Congo couldn't rape themselves.
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/mar/25/unitednations)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, Crankypants Extraordinaire at October 20, 2012 12:18 PM (hO8IJ)
306 And of course, the 2nd Amend protects our gun rights. Seriously, if this rumor going around were true, wouldn't the NRA be on top of it? Nevertheless, if it scares people into voting against the knucklehead in the WH - good!
-------------
Actually, Wayne LaPierre has been warning about it.
Posted by: wheatie at October 20, 2012 12:19 PM (ipkPX)
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 20, 2012 12:20 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 12:21 PM (kpCLl)
I think you are forgetting the unemployment numbers AND the large Mormon population.
Wynn has said he wants Mitt. Adelson as said he wants Mitt. Both of them control a lot of shit in NV and they are going to work it hard.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 20, 2012 12:21 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Evilpens at October 20, 2012 12:22 PM (ck76k)
Posted by: Redd at October 20, 2012 12:22 PM (RoEtU)
Posted by: kj at October 20, 2012 04:17 PM (AW9md)
-----------------------------------------------
Oh,man. Please, please, please. Make most of them ME types too.
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 12:22 PM (mY2VW)
Posted by: kj at October 20, 2012 12:22 PM (AW9md)
Posted by: Soothsayer at October 20, 2012 12:23 PM (jUytm)
Posted by: Zombie Flanders at October 20, 2012 12:24 PM (YGxEA)
Posted by: Redd at October 20, 2012 12:24 PM (RoEtU)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 12:25 PM (sZTYJ)
Posted by: Zombie Flanders at October 20, 2012 12:25 PM (YGxEA)
Posted by: The Political Ass Hat at October 20, 2012 12:26 PM (8sCoq)
313 Nevada is lost to Romney.
Maybe....maybe not.
Luntz's group on Tuesday night after the debate...were Dems who voted for Barky last time.
All but 3 or 4, have switched to Romney this time.
And they were very vocal about 'why'.
Just because someone is still registered as a Dem, doesn't mean they will be casting their vote that way.
Here in OK, Dem registrations still outnumber Republican, 2 to 1.
But OK has been deep red for quite a while.
Posted by: wheatie at October 20, 2012 12:27 PM (ipkPX)
Who the fuck is an "undecided" with two weeks to go?
Liars that don't want to admit they are going to vote for Mitt.
The challenger always gets the majority of the "undecided" at the end.
I think we should......
http://tinyurl.com/dkozn5
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 20, 2012 12:28 PM (wR+pz)
The Dems are doing better in absentee voting than in '08.
https://secure.deanheller.com/donate/
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 04:25 PM (sZTYJ)
------------------------------------------------
You need to check your dipstick. I believe you're running a couple of quarts low on shit.
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 12:28 PM (mY2VW)
Who the fuck is an "undecided" with two weeks to go?
Liars that don't want to admit they are going to vote for Mitt.
Ding, ding, ding, we have a winner!!!
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 12:29 PM (kpCLl)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 12:32 PM (sZTYJ)
Ohio was never going to go to Romney. He never got any traction there, even in his post first debate bounce.
And with no Ohio, there is no victory.
It's nice being right. Posted by: RomneylosesOhio at October 19, 2012 07:13 PM
Geez gerg, you've posted this exact same thing in other threads yesterday and today.
Just phoning it in now?
Posted by: kbdabear at October 20, 2012 12:33 PM (wwsoB)
Who in NV IS going to vote for Barry?
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 20, 2012 12:34 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Undecided Voter at October 20, 2012 12:35 PM (NWLVJ)
robotroll
Posted by: kj at October 20, 2012 04:34 PM (AW9md)
Hey, we're broke. That's the best I can get now.
Posted by: Axe at October 20, 2012 12:35 PM (wR+pz)
Who the fuck is an "undecided" with two weeks to go?
Liars that don't want to admit they are going to vote for Mitt.
People are afraid of this Thug in the White House.
Look at what happened to that girl who wore an R/R t-shirt to school.
Yeah...she got vindicated.
But she had to leave that school, and go to another one, because of all the bullying.
So I don't really blame people for being careful...and lying to pollsters.
Posted by: wheatie at October 20, 2012 12:35 PM (ipkPX)
Posted by: kbdabear at October 20, 2012 12:36 PM (wwsoB)
sure the constitution is all well and good until the massive blue helmet army shows up on our shores to enforce the treaty
Now that would be interesting, as in fish+ barrel, some assembly required
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at October 20, 2012 12:36 PM (R8hU8)
Posted by: mediumheadboy at October 20, 2012 12:36 PM (aHR5E)
Just phoning it in now?
Posted by: kbdabear at October 20, 2012 04:33 PM (wwsoB)
---------------------------------------------------
We're going to be seeing a lot of delusional people walking around after Nov 6th. I'm sure many of them will be mentally locked into Nov 5th.
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 12:36 PM (mY2VW)
When is that little shit going to start carpet bombing?
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 20, 2012 12:37 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Dante at October 20, 2012 12:38 PM (NWLVJ)
Damn Episcopalians.
Posted by: MSM Spin doctors at October 20, 2012 12:39 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 12:40 PM (kpCLl)
Posted by: kbdabear
The copy pasta should earn him a perma-ban.
On the other hand, I want him front and center when Romney beats Obama like a rug.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at October 20, 2012 12:40 PM (qrpxS)
Posted by: PJ at October 20, 2012 12:40 PM (DQHjw)
That 9/91 response thing is hiding a LOT.
Posted by: @PurpAv at October 20, 2012 12:40 PM (LbeyC)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 12:41 PM (sZTYJ)
Do you REALLY think Dems are going to outnumber the GOP by 9 points? Because that is the only way Obama gets to +3 in the recent NV polls. Panicking over those early vote totals is silly. Obama can't crack 48 in any of these over sampled polls.
And Heller? He's hitting 50% with a 7 point lead.
Quit trolling.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 12:41 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: wheatie at October 20, 2012 04:35 PM (ipkPX)
Plus, it's just plain ol' fun! I remember last time telling some nice young lady on the phone four years ago that I would absolutely vote for Barry and, laying it on thick, thanked her for doing what she was doing. I didn't even bust out laughing until after I had hung up.
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 12:42 PM (kpCLl)
Posted by: and irresolute at October 20, 2012 12:42 PM (DBH1h)
Posted by: Justamom in Achin' Akin's district at October 20, 2012 12:43 PM (Sptt8)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 20, 2012 12:44 PM (r4wIV)
Something does not pass the smell test.
If that is all they have, they are truly going to get the barb cock of Satan up the ass.
I figure Mitt has over a $100 mill, and Karl has at least twice that and then don't forget the evil Koch brothers weighing in with a least $50 mill, plus the NRA.
We are taking $300 mill to SPEND in 16 days. About $20 mill a DAY and it ALL has to be spent by November 6th.
Wish I owned a TV station.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 20, 2012 12:45 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: too little too late at October 20, 2012 12:45 PM (BAnPT)
Posted by: Whoever this is, it's definitely not Michael at October 20, 2012 12:45 PM (JVCVF)
I haven't seen him today. I expect the PPP poll in Ohio isn't exactly supporting his position.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 12:46 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: Undecided Voter at October 20, 2012 12:46 PM (NWLVJ)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 12:48 PM (sZTYJ)
Its just the 9% responders who are fucking with the pollsters. The other 91% are too livid to speak.
Any Obama supporter would be more than willing to say so in a poll. There's no downside to professing Obama support.
I'm starting to think, as outside longshot, that even CA might flip, but only on election day, when your opinion is anonymous.
Posted by: @PurpAv at October 20, 2012 12:48 PM (LbeyC)
Posted by: Sandra Slut at October 20, 2012 12:48 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Another Undecided Voter at October 20, 2012 12:48 PM (I2LwF)
Posted by: and irresolute at October 20, 2012 12:48 PM (DBH1h)
There are so many polling outfits now, with no skill and an obvious agenda, that you should either ignore them or carefully check their internals
The MFM are trying desperately to prevent a 'preference cascase' a la 1980, and increase viewership by painting their boyfriend as 'neck and neck'
Posted by: Major _________ de Coverly at October 20, 2012 12:49 PM (Dll6b)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 04:48 PM (sZTYJ)
6 electoral votes. You're hanging your political asshat on 6 electoral votes?
Posted by: Undecided at October 20, 2012 12:49 PM (8sCoq)
There was a Democrat union conference nearby where Debbie Whatzhershitz spoke. These pathetic people were paid protestors last night. Not one was suicidal enough to be in the crowd. And, as I reported earlier, one male loser yelled "Obama" during the prayer, giving me instant memories of the DNC voting three times against God.
Brietbart was in Daytona Beach last night. Heavy and loud singing and mocking of the protestors vs being beaten to a pulp by bikers. Everyone treated them like gnats and laughed and waved at them. When you have former aging supermodels (me) pointing and laughing and singing, well, their ship has sailed.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, unbanned, ready to get this done at October 20, 2012 12:50 PM (baL2B)
Posted by: Undecided at October 20, 2012 12:50 PM (8sCoq)
But I'm a little skeptical that the highest unemployment in the nation is going to vote to reelect TFG.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 12:50 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: Sandra Slut at October 20, 2012 04:48 PM (wR+pz)
I want one of those! Or the one that doesn't have me face-down across my desk all day!!
Posted by: and irresolute at October 20, 2012 12:51 PM (DBH1h)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 04:48 PM (sZTYJ)
Real numbers not percentages here. 250% of WHAT? What are the total registration numbers D vs R vs I? I had 100% more sex last month than the month before. I flapped it twice.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 20, 2012 12:51 PM (wR+pz)
Welcome to the Republic of Texas...
Leave your liberalism behind, but do please keep Austin weird...
Posted by: Bill from Chappaqua at October 20, 2012 12:52 PM (MAhUT)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 12:52 PM (sZTYJ)
it's a checkerboard: Large tracts of third world sh*t-holes checkered with mostly-White / Asian prosperity.
Posted by: Major _________ de Coverly at October 20, 2012 12:53 PM (Dll6b)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 12:54 PM (sZTYJ)
so you're saying a state that depends on people keeping enough money in their pockets to blow is going to vote for a guy who wants to take more money out of peoples pockets?
Posted by: kj at October 20, 2012 12:54 PM (AW9md)
Easily done.
Comcast
CMCSA 36.95
News Corp.
NWSA 24.91
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at October 20, 2012 12:54 PM (qrpxS)
What's that? Yes, I did call NEW JERSEY for Romney on Thursday.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at October 20, 2012 12:55 PM (uluoH)
Posted by: and irresolute at October 20, 2012 12:56 PM (DBH1h)
Posted by: ACOrlando at October 20, 2012 12:56 PM (/fPyr)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 20, 2012 12:57 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Honey Badger at October 20, 2012 12:57 PM (vzfrq)
I don't think that goes both ways. Unlike the merry pranksters of Team Racist Hater, those other guys have NO sense of humor.
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 12:57 PM (kpCLl)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at October 20, 2012 04:55 PM (BuSM
One of the Cobs mentioned this morning that they were all getting drunk and planning the election night coverage.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 20, 2012 12:58 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: teej says go K-State at October 20, 2012 12:58 PM (QbKVX)
Posted by: Mr Wonderful at October 20, 2012 12:58 PM (lD8ju)
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 12:59 PM (kpCLl)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 12:59 PM (sZTYJ)
Posted by: Mr Wonderful at October 20, 2012 04:58 PM (lD8ju)
Big Tex was a Jew? Shit you learn something everyday.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 20, 2012 01:00 PM (wR+pz)
9/91
No pollster knows what's going on with 91% of the public this time. Not a single one.
Posted by: @PurpAv at October 20, 2012 01:00 PM (LbeyC)
Posted by: Undecided Voter at October 20, 2012 01:00 PM (NWLVJ)
What part of "Heller is at 50%" did you not understand?
Nevada exits in 2008 D/R/I was 38/30/32. Nevada Independents (32% of the 2008 vote!!) have swung from Obama to Romney by 31 points.
But you want us to believe that Democrat registration is up so high that it will overcome that high a swing?
Oh, and in 2008? 11% of Nevada GOP voted for Obama. Think that is happening this year?
The good news is that you made me look at the internals. I had been considering Nevada leaning toward Obama, but now I think Romney is going to win it.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:02 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: The littl shyning man at October 20, 2012 01:02 PM (PH+2B)
Posted by: Dept. of Accuracy Dept. at October 20, 2012 01:02 PM (BAnPT)
phat
i lived in Vegas for ten years and still have many freinds there that i talk to on a regular basis,i can say what you speak of is a crock of shit.
Posted by: kj at October 20, 2012 01:02 PM (AW9md)
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at October 20, 2012 01:02 PM (qrpxS)
Posted by: Undecided Voter at October 20, 2012 01:03 PM (1//Wu)
Then you are fucked. What do you want us to do about it?
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:04 PM (dX4hn)
But I'm a little skeptical that the highest unemployment in the nation is going to vote to reelect TFG.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 04:50 PM (dX4hn)
---------------------------------------------------
Plus the ever-present ghostliness of large unfinished hotels that have remained abandoned for three years is always there to remind everyone who caused that.
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 01:04 PM (mY2VW)
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 01:05 PM (kpCLl)
Alabama Cheerleader
http://tinyurl.com/8zbvgna
Tennessee Cheerleader
http://tinyurl.com/8tbawut
Posted by: kbdabear at October 20, 2012 01:05 PM (wwsoB)
That's disastrous for Obama. Absentee has favored Dems in the past. They pushed that as a way to generate the vaunted "paper trail" and wanted all the Dems to get absentee ballots when we were still using the electronic stuff.
Posted by: @PurpAv at October 20, 2012 01:05 PM (LbeyC)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 01:07 PM (sZTYJ)
Posted by: Joe at October 20, 2012 01:08 PM (Duv7q)
Alabama Cheerleader
Tennessee Cheerleader
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Link sandwich, my friend.
Posted by: Torch-Wielding Villager at October 20, 2012 01:08 PM (sTS/8)
Posted by: Redman Bluestate at October 20, 2012 01:08 PM (sRIFP)
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 01:08 PM (kpCLl)
BREAKING!
BREAKING!
BREAKING!
THEY JUST DROPPED THE OCTOBER SURPRISE!
http://tinyurl.com/8lzc3xn
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 01:09 PM (ovpNn)
Posted by: kbdabear at October 20, 2012 05:05 PM (wwsoB)
No contest.
The Alabama wheat-headed cheerleader is a doll.
Better uniform, too.
Posted by: wheatie at October 20, 2012 01:10 PM (ipkPX)
Posted by: Redman Bluestate at October 20, 2012 05:08 PM (sRIFP)
P E D A R A S T Y
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 01:10 PM (ovpNn)
Posted by: Mr Wonderful at October 20, 2012 01:10 PM (lD8ju)
Posted by: Torch-Wielding Villager at October 20, 2012 01:11 PM (sTS/8)
Posted by: Jean at October 20, 2012 01:12 PM (hrAg/)
Alabama Cheerleader
http://tinyurl.com/8zbvgna
Tennessee Cheerleader
http://tinyurl.com/8tbawut
Posted by: kbdabear at October 20, 2012 05:05 PM (wwsoB)
---------------------------------------------
I thought they were going to be nekkid. Can't judge 'em with clothes on.
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 01:12 PM (mY2VW)
Posted by: Joe at October 20, 2012 05:08 PM (Duv7q)
Ha Ha!
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at October 20, 2012 01:13 PM (wR+pz)
Let's do a poll;
Alabama Cheerleader
http://tinyurl.com/8zbvgna
Tennessee Cheerleader
Do these shorts make my clit look fat?
Posted by: eleven at October 20, 2012 01:13 PM (fsLdt)
BREAKING!
BREAKING!
BREAKING!
THEY JUST DROPPED THE OCTOBER SURPRISE!
http://tinyurl.com/8lzc3xn
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 05:09 PM (ovpNn)
---------------------------------------------------
It's over. We've lost.
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 01:14 PM (mY2VW)
Let's see, wasn't there another statewide election in 2008 in Nevada? Oh right, it was the Governor, which he WON BY 12 POINTS. Hell of a turnout operation the Dems mounted there. The Independents liked Sandoval and didn't like Angle. Dem turnout had no effect.
Your concern is noted.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:14 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:15 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: LASue at October 20, 2012 01:17 PM (32Scy)
Posted by: LASue at October 20, 2012 05:17 PM (32Scy)
-----------------------------------------------
They aren't holding hands, are they?
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 01:18 PM (mY2VW)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:19 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: eleven at October 20, 2012 01:19 PM (fsLdt)
Posted by: Dante at October 20, 2012 01:19 PM (NWLVJ)
Sort of Not Safe for Your Peace of Mind.
http://tinyurl.com/9kdwext
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 01:19 PM (ovpNn)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 01:20 PM (sZTYJ)
Sort of Not Safe for Your Peace of Mind.
http://tinyurl.com/9kdwext
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 05:19 PM (ovpNn)
-----------------------------------------
Why do I keep clicking on the fucking links here. *GAG*
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 01:22 PM (mY2VW)
OCTOBER SURPRISE!
http://tinyurl.com/8lzc3xn
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 05:09 PM (ovpNn)
----------
Big Bird didn't see him coming.
Heh.
The only 'bad thing' about that pic...is that it makes Mitt look like he used to have a Unibrow.
And if they try to bring that up, then there are school pics out there that show Moochelle with a Unibrow...and a mustache.
Posted by: wheatie at October 20, 2012 01:22 PM (ipkPX)
I'm now done with this. I have no idea why you decided to start concern trolling, but I'm tired of it.
Piss off.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:23 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: wheatie at October 20, 2012 05:22 PM (ipkPX)
Nothing has changed.
She still has a mustache.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 01:23 PM (ovpNn)
I'm now done with this. I have no idea why you decided to start concern trolling, but I'm tired of it.
Piss off.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 05:23 PM (dX4hn)
I love you dave. In a bromance sort of way ofcourse.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 01:24 PM (ovpNn)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:24 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 01:25 PM (kpCLl)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 05:24 PM (dX4hn)
You clicked the link didnt you.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 01:25 PM (ovpNn)
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 01:26 PM (ovpNn)
Although I told you to piss off once too *laugh*
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:26 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 01:26 PM (sZTYJ)
Although I told you to piss off once too *laugh*
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 05:26 PM (dX4hn)
DId you? I dont recall...i was probably too busy fapping to your poll analysis to notice
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 01:27 PM (ovpNn)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:27 PM (dX4hn)
http://tinyurl.com/9f4dzfb
^^^
Chart of all the results.
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 20, 2012 01:28 PM (zrpqj)
I live here.
Harry read and his cronies are as dirty as the ass crack of a fat man with chronic diareah.
No matter what the actual vote count they will adjust it with found votes before the counting is finished.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 01:29 PM (ovpNn)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 20, 2012 01:29 PM (Af6GM)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:29 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: Scobface at October 20, 2012 01:30 PM (IoNBC)
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 01:30 PM (kpCLl)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 20, 2012 01:30 PM (i5gpY)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 05:20 PM (sZTYJ)
----------------------------------------
Why don't you go back over to Tepid Air or Politico. I'm sure they'll welcome your comments there.
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 01:30 PM (mY2VW)
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 20, 2012 01:31 PM (zrpqj)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 01:31 PM (sZTYJ)
Now I am. Although it looks like the Texas Tech-TCU game might be more of a barn-burner. Just at first glance.
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 01:31 PM (kpCLl)
As if we needed proof of the tag-team collusion between Barky and Candy Crowley....
New pic shows them together, right before the debate.
Link in my nic.
Posted by: wheatie at October 20, 2012 01:32 PM (ipkPX)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 01:33 PM (sZTYJ)
Posted by: Mr Wonderful at October 20, 2012 01:34 PM (lD8ju)
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 20, 2012 01:34 PM (zrpqj)
Heller on the other hand is looking good. My concern is Scott Brown, Warren has hit 50% on a poll there. Bad for an incumbent.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:34 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: Mr Wonderful at October 20, 2012 01:35 PM (lD8ju)
Posted by: Mr. Dave on island time at October 20, 2012 01:35 PM (S6qGD)
169 - I agree completely with your description of the phenomenon, but in this case I'd call it being punch-drunk. They've taken two heavy hits - Benghazi (the shit about the youtube film-maker being parole-busted for trivialities and Obama whining about the future not belonging to those who insult Islam caused centre-right bloggers in Australia to explode in outrage about his bullshit, even before the truth came out) and the first debate. Everything they've done since has been fumble-fingered, and the more they try to recover, the more they miss their return swings and get pounded some more.
Posted by: perturbed at October 20, 2012 01:35 PM (HvCLl)
New pic shows them together, right before the debate.
Link in my nic.
Posted by: wheatie at October 20, 2012 05:32 PM (ipkPX)
-------------------------------------------------
Another click, another ten years off my life.
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 01:35 PM (mY2VW)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:36 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 01:36 PM (kpCLl)
Posted by: Adam at October 20, 2012 01:38 PM (1//Wu)
Posted by: blb at October 20, 2012 01:38 PM (hwg80)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 01:38 PM (sZTYJ)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 05:36 PM (dX4hn)
But, they don't actually seem to save everything. For example, they drop off previous days of Gallup % Rasmussen tracking.
Plus, they don't seem to have data going back to the 1980's.
...and they don't allow you to download their database of polls.
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 20, 2012 01:39 PM (zrpqj)
None, the Gary Johnson vote is already factored into those polls. The Ind swing in NV is from Obama to Romney, with any movement to Johnson factored in.
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:40 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: Mr Wonderful at October 20, 2012 01:40 PM (lD8ju)
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 01:41 PM (ovpNn)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:42 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 01:42 PM (sZTYJ)
Posted by: Mr Wonderful at October 20, 2012 01:42 PM (lD8ju)
Is this image technically Safe for Work?
http://tinyurl.com/95uwt93
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 05:41 PM (ovpNn)
--------------------------------------------------
Not going to click. No sir, not going to click. Not going to cl...........
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 01:43 PM (mY2VW)
Not even Capt. America's No.1 fan, Palin Steele, came close.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at October 20, 2012 01:43 PM (qrpxS)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:43 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 05:42 PM (dX4hn)
Congress should pass a law requiring all polling companies to register their results in national polling database. That's what I would do, if I were president.
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 20, 2012 01:43 PM (zrpqj)
Posted by: Mr Wonderful at October 20, 2012 05:42 PM (lD8ju)
It wont matter. Nevada is as dirty as chicago when it comes to union backed vote finding right when you need it.
We shoudl win Nevada. Harry Reid and his ilk will steal it though. Luckily we dont need Nevada, its just gravey.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 01:44 PM (ovpNn)
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 05:43 PM (mY2VW)
--------------------------------------------
AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 01:44 PM (mY2VW)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:45 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 05:43 PM (dX4hn)
Nah, i am trying to find a profile picture to use when i register for daily kos (so that they think i am a true liberal) in preperation for the trolling i intend to do there starting election night.
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 01:45 PM (ovpNn)
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 20, 2012 01:46 PM (zrpqj)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 20, 2012 01:47 PM (sZTYJ)
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 20, 2012 01:48 PM (zrpqj)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:48 PM (dX4hn)
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 01:49 PM (ovpNn)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 01:50 PM (dX4hn)
The chart...
http://tinyurl.com/9f4dzfb
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 20, 2012 01:50 PM (zrpqj)
Posted by: LeBron Steinman at October 20, 2012 01:51 PM (jfWE9)
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 05:49 PM (ovpNn)
------------------------------------------------
45 States.
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 01:51 PM (mY2VW)
If their internal polls weren't giving the Democrats really bad news about Ohio The President wouldn't have been campaigning in blue regions (college campuses and Cleveland) of the state; he is scrounging desperately for votes. Remember watch where the candidates are campaigning to see what their internal polls tell them.
Posted by: An Observation at October 20, 2012 01:51 PM (ylhEn)
I would offer to beat you senseless, but apparently that ship has sailed . . .
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 01:51 PM (kpCLl)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 05:50 PM (dX4hn)
Go to bed? are you kidding?
Ima go hop in my truck which has a newley installed PS system and slowley drive through the neighborhoods screaming at the top of my lungs in a high pitched whiney effete voice...OBAMA LOST....ITS OVER...DEMOCRACY DIED TONIGHT...WE ARE DOOMED!
Posted by: jeremiah Gosh Darn Amerikkka Ali Muhammad Surpra-izi Amin U'rbu T'hol wright at October 20, 2012 01:51 PM (ovpNn)
Posted by: Serious Cat at October 20, 2012 01:52 PM (zrpqj)
Posted by: Dave in Fla at October 20, 2012 05:50 PM (dX4hn)
---------------------------------------------------
Not me. I'll be calling all the liberals that I know and laughing hysterically. Nothing else. Just non-sensical cackling.
Posted by: Soona at October 20, 2012 01:54 PM (mY2VW)
Posted by: Peaches is caustically optimistic at October 20, 2012 01:56 PM (kpCLl)
No way, dude. If that's the case I absolutely won't go to bed early. I might not go to bed at all. I want to be up to see every shiny tear rolling down the faces of the Barrybots. EVERY. SINGLE. TEAR.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at October 20, 2012 02:00 PM (BuSM8)
Shouldn't you be spending your time in Nevada Blogs and Comment sections of newspapers IN - N E V A D A ?
We're just a Moron Horde thats peppered throughout this great country...
Posted by: AmericanDawg at October 20, 2012 02:00 PM (XIsD/)
Posted by: Serious Cat
That econ.#s model has never, ever been wrong
Posted by: Dept. of Accuracy Dept. at October 20, 2012 02:03 PM (BAnPT)
Posted by: JEM at October 20, 2012 02:20 PM (o+SC1)
Hope it works.
Posted by: PJ at October 20, 2012 02:38 PM (DQHjw)
What will, realistically, be our first indication?
In an unbiased world I'd guess NC and NH. The midnight vote tally's up in Dixville Notch NH will be symbolic, but I'd say if there's a general swing we'll see it in NH.
That said, realistically, no network will call a large eastern state early against Obama, regardless of the trends so long as there is still voting in OH or CO or IA or WI, so VA will be dragged out as long as possible, NC could be as well.
NH is small enough that it come in quick, but it's likely to be close. NC is larger, but will hopefully will have a significant gap -- so, it's a trade off. If states like NJ are too close to call for a while, we're in good shape.
Posted by: Uriah Heep at October 20, 2012 04:37 PM (jhI6f)
Posted by: Frank S at October 21, 2012 07:35 AM (B9edC)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3661 seconds, 661 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: steevy at October 19, 2012 02:52 PM (Ts9tU)